-
Christmas is upon us once again and I can’t help but think about
how different it will be this year.
Growing up I had fond memories of carol singing door-to-door
with a small group of pals. If we were lucky a performance could
usually earn us a few coppers though every now and again somebody
would tip us a couple of bob (2/- or 10p) and we’d have been over
the moon with such a windfall. I should add that their generosity
was perhaps more out of pity than our ability to sing. None of
us could really sing and we’d often forget our words but we’d
make a concerted effort to reach a crescendo in joyful unison
during the final chorus. Nothing really mattered other than having
some fun and keeping the tradition alive. It was the spirit of
Christmas which bonded both singer and listener together and it was
always exciting if not a little embarrassing at times.
The world has bet the farm on vaccines as the solution to the
pandemic, but the trials are not focused on answering the questions
many might assume they are.
As phase III trials of covid-19 vaccines reach their target
enrolments, officials have been trying to project calm. The US
coronavirus czar Anthony Fauci and the Food and Drug Administration
leadership have offered public assurances that established
procedures will be followed. Only a “safe and effective” vaccine
will be approved, they say, and nine vaccine manufacturers issued a
rare joint statement pledging not to prematurely seek regulatory
review.
But what will it mean exactly when a vaccine is declared
‘effective?’ To the public this seems fairly obvious.
“The primary goal of a covid-19 vaccine is to keep people from
getting very sick and dying,” a National Public Radio broadcast
said bluntly.
Peter Hotez, Dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at
Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said, “ideally, you want an
antiviral vaccine to do two things;
firstly, reduce the likelihood you will get severely ill and go
to the hospital, and secondly, prevent infection
and therefore interrupt disease transmission.”
Yet the current phase III trials are not actually set up to
prove either. None of the trials currently under way are designed
to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital
admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines
being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission
of the virus.
In a September interview Medscape editor-in-chief Eric Topol
pondered what counts as a recorded “event” in the vaccine
trials.
“We’re not talking about just a PCR [polymerase chain reaction
test]–positive mild infection. It has to be moderate to severe
illness to qualify as an event, correct?” he asked.
“That’s right,” concurred his guest, Paul Offit, a vaccinologist
who sits on the FDA Advisory Committee that may ultimately
recommend the vaccines for licence or emergency use
authorisation.But that’s not right. In all the
ongoing phase III trials for which details have been released,
laboratory confirmed infections even with only
mild symptoms qualify as meeting the primary endpoint
definition.
In Pfizer and Moderna’s trials, for example, people with only a
cough and positive laboratory test would bring those trials one
event closer to their completion. (If AstraZeneca’s ongoing UK
trial is designed similarly to its “paused” US trial for which the
company has released details, a cough and fever with positive PCR
test would suffice.)
Part of the reason may be numbers. Severe illness requiring
hospital admission, which happens in only a small fraction of
symptomatic covid-19 cases, would be unlikely to occur in
significant numbers in trials. Data published by the US Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention in late April reported a symptomatic
case hospitalisation ratio of 3.4% overall, varying from 1.7% in
0-49 year olds and 4.5% in 50-64 year olds to 7.4% in those 65
UK NEWS
Censoring The Vaccine Debate Will Backfire
INTERNATIONAL
Life In Sweden Is ‘The Old Normal’
UK NEWS
Santa Claus Facing Travel RestrictionsThis Xmas
UK NEWS
There’s Nothing Great About This Reset
ECONOMY
Central Banks Start Move Into Digital Currencies
Vaccine Trials Answer Few Questions: BMJ‘The Most Important
Battle Any Of Us Has Ever Fought’ PAGE 8
Interview With Dr. Vernon Coleman
HEALTH
Pasteur’s Germ Theory vs Béchamp’s Terrain Theory PAGE 16PAGE
14PAGE 12PAGE 4 PAGE 5PAGE 3
The 12 (Not 5!)Days of Christmas
by PETER DOSHI_______________________________________
Photo credit: DANIEL SCHLUDI
December 2020
THE LIGHTA Truthpaper thelightpaper.co.uk Free
Continued on page 2 >>
and over. Because most people with symptomatic covid-19
experience only mild symptoms, even trials involving 30,000 or more
patients would turn up relatively few cases of severe disease.
In the trials, final efficacy analyses are planned after just
150 to 160 “events,”—that is, a positive indication of symptomatic
covid-19, regardless of severity of the illness.
Yet until vaccine manufacturers began to release their study
protocols in mid-September, trial registries and other publicly
released information did little to dispel the notion that it was
severe covid-19 that the trials were assessing.
Moderna, for example, called hospital admissions a “key
secondary endpoint” in statements to the media. And a press release
from the US National Institute of Health reinforced this
impression, stating that Moderna’s trial “aims to study whether the
vaccine can prevent severe covid-19” and
“seeks to answer if the vaccine can
prevent death caused by covid-19.”But Tal Zaks, chief medical
officer
at Moderna, told The BMJ that the company’s trial lacks adequate
statistical power to assess those outcomes. “The trial is precluded
from judging [hospital admissions], based on what is a reasonable
size and duration to serve the public good here,” he said.
Hospital admissions and deaths from covid-19 are simply too
uncommon in the population being studied for an effective vaccine
to demonstrate statistically significant differences in a trial of
30,000 people. The same is true of its ability to save lives or
prevent transmission: the trials are not designed to find out.
“Our trial will not demonstrate prevention of transmission,”
Zaks said, “because in order to do that you have to swab people
twice a week for very long periods, and that becomes operationally
untenable.”
https://bit.ly/bmj-vax-trials
by RHISIART AP ROY__________________________________
-
UK NEWS
PAGE 2
THE LIGHT TruthpaperDistributed independently to remain fi
ercely free from the
establishment we seek to hold to account.Original content is ©
2020 thelightpaper.co.uk
For all distributi on enquiries,please email: lightdistributi
[email protected]
For submissions, adverti sing, careers,donati ons, etc., please
visit our website at
htt ps://thelightpaper.co.ukTo subscribe for postal copies:
htt ps://thelightpaper.co.uk/subscribeSound off in our forum:
htt ps://thelightpaper.co.uk/forum
Editor: Darren SmithLayout: Ian Smith
Administrati on: Cath Smith & Matt SmithAdverti sing: Nicola
SmithSubscripti ons: Roz Smith
Proof-Reading: Karen, Gill , Romilly, Tracy & Nicola
SmithLighthouse logo: Arti st Samantha Smith
and Adrian Smith PhotographicSpecial thanks to our warehouse
hubs, and all those giving their
valuable ti me to distribute The Light around the country.Thank
you also to all those who have generously donated to make this
truthpaper a reality. Although the paper is FREE, it costs us
to
produce, print and distribute it.If you believe in what we
do,
please help the truth be told by supporti ng us.Donate at
thelightpaper.co.uk – Thank You.
Plans for Major Satanic Temple in Scotland
Let us list the ways in which this once free country of ours has
descended into some kind of Orwellian totalitarian state with even
worse on the horizon, under the watch of those who are supposed to
uphold freedom and democracy for the people they purportedly
represent:
Police violence – a man in Liverpool already on the ground and
in custody had his head repeatedly punched by what appeared to be a
police offi cer; a 72 year old lady was handcuffed and then bundled
spread-eagled into the back of a police van outside Parliament; and
many peaceful protests up and down the country have been violently
broken up by police determined to carry out the orders of those who
wish to see the removal of the rights of free speech and free
association in this country.
Illegal arrests – a 19-year old dancer, a visiting German
doctor, scientist Piers Corbyn, and many hundreds of others have
been arrested whilst either speaking, walking or otherwise going
about their business as free human beings over the last 6 months,
whilst many more have been violently beaten.
Unlawful and unconstitutional measures, including those in the
Coronavirus Act 2020 which allow all kinds of outrageous breaches
of natural, ancient, common and even modern human rights, and the
Covert Human Intelligence Sources Bill which
will give many government agents the licence to commit many
crimes, have been all but rubber-stamped by this toothless and
useless Parliament, sleepily acquiescent in the destruction of the
civil liberties our ancestors spilled blood for, and for which
those MPs’ predecessors asked them to.
Allowing big business and retail giants to stay open while
forcing small independent businesses to shut is another in a long
line of attacks on the middle class, i.e.- ordinary working people,
which will result in more and more Britons becoming dependent on
government welfare, while also raising the tax burden on the rest
that might be lucky enough to survive the great ‘covid culling,’
and those public servants who have been on furlough and actually
enjoying a rather pleasant 2020.
Dictating socialising rules is something Roman emperors might
even have hesitated at, but Boris probably can’t believe his luck
that people have become so docile through psychological operations
that they are actually willing to not hug their own children, or
gather in large groups, for fear of transmitting a disease that has
a 99.5% recovery rate (not ‘conspiracy theory’ – SAGE documents and
the Behavioural Insights Team prove this is fact.)
How many more steps will our elected so-called representatives
allow the executive, supranational
bodies and billionaire businesspeople to take before we fi nd
ourselves in irreversible tyranny? Elsewhere here you can read
about their transparent and open plans to completely tear up the
normal fabric of society in order to impose a ‘4th Industrial
Revolution,’ marketed to sound like a utopian natural progression
but which will actually mean the automation and
smart-contract-isation of most jobs that are currently done by
human beings, leading to widespread poverty.
All this might be understandable if the evidence did actually
point to a pandemic. But outside of the telescreen and radio’s
omni-message of incessant, repetitive fear propaganda, the truth is
that no hospitals are over-run with covid patients, hardly anyone
even shows symptoms, and the only reason they are able to promote
panic and keep the charade going is because they encouraged, and in
many cases bribed, tens of thousands of people to go and get tested
using a PCR test which is known to give over 90% false positives,
and even up to 100% if you raise the number of doubling cycles up
past 45.
Most of us don’t fi gure in the rulers’ future plans, and the
buck stops with our MPs, who we pay to represent our interests.
Many are currently hiding, but now is the time to ask them to do
their jobs for those they supposedly protect and work for, and if
they refuse then they should rightly step down and we’ll fi nd
people who will, to replace them.
Please share the Light with someone when you’re done,
thanks.
MPs In Serious Dereliction Of Duty
Aleister Crowley was the UK’s leading satanist, whose teachings
still heavily infl uence modern satanists across the world today.
He spent many years living at Boleskine House (Scottish gaelic
name: Baile Os Ceann) in the Highlands of Scotland.
The OTO or Ordo Templi Orientis was the secret society that
Aleister Crowley had taken over and led. The OTO Society now own
the site (approx. 10 acres) through a front organisation, the
Boleskine House Foundation, and have a fund of about £1.4 million
to restore it according to their vision – the plan is to turn it
into the leading satanic temple in the UK.
At page 97 of his book, ‘Children for the Devil’ (Published in
1991 by Methuen London), the British journalist and author, Tim
Tate, wrote: “...the OTO is today the most widely spread of all
international satanic organisations.”
If OTO is permitted to fulfi l their development plans for Baile
Os Ceann (Boleskine House) the location will become a major satanic
temple and a very active hub for satanist abusers from
across the world to visit that location and perform Satanic
Ritual Abuse (SRA) there and in its surrounding areas, posing a
huge threat to both children and vulnerable adults.
Crowley publicly boasted in his book: ‘Magick In Theory and
Practice’, that he had himself carried out ritual killings of
children. In that book Crowley also wrote: “...the bloody sacrifi
ce has from time immemorial been the most considered part of
Magick.”
“For the highest spiritual working, one must accordingly choose
that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male
child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most
satisfactory and suitable victim.”
Crowley promoted the idea that the strong should dominate the
weak and that people should do whatever they wish, regardless of
whom such actions may hurt or even kill.
Crowley’s teachings amount to a “moral” imperative to do as one
pleases – regardless of the harm that one’s actions may have on
others – and to kill
anybody who attempts to stop one from doing this. This also
comes across as a convenient and self-serving justifi cation for
Satanist Ritual Abuse.
The OTO is currently mounting an international letter
writing/email campaign targeted at the Highland Council to pressure
them to approve their plans for developing Baile Os Ceann
(Boleskine House).
There is a counter campaign to such international pressure with
a campaign against the development of Baile Os Ceann (Boleskine
House) because of the very dire threat that it will pose to
children and vulnerable adults if the development plans are
approved. If that happens it will become a major centre for devil
worship and SRA in the UK.
Alas those days seem to have faded into obscurity. Our way of
life today looks completely different to the carefree world of
yesteryear.
As I dwell on what was, I can imagine carol singers today
wouldn’t be out of place applying these lyrics to ‘The Twelve Days
of Christmas’ as those who rule the nations, (whatever you want to
call them), attempt to usher in their dystopian agenda, (whatever
you want to call it), under the guise of a fake pandemic.
So let us sing together while we still can:
“On the fi rst day of Christmas the rulers gave to us, a fake
test for covid-19.
On the second day of Christmas the rulers gave to us, two metre
rules and a fake test for covid-19.
On the third day of Christmas the rulers gave to us, three
layered masks, two metre rules and a fake test for covid-19.
On the fourth day of Christmas the rulers gave to us, four in a
bubble...
On the fi fth day of Christmas the rulers gave to us, fi ve
brand new rules...
On the sixth day of Christmas the rulers gave to us, mad rules
of six...
On the seventh day of Christmas the rulers gave to us, seven
drones a spying...
On the eighth day of Christmas the rulers gave to us, eight
bumping elbows...
On the ninth day of Christmas the rulers gave to us, nine toxic
vaccines...
On the tenth day of Christmas the rulers gave to us, ten
thousand pound fi nes...
On the eleventh day of Christmas the rulers gave to us, eleven
covid marshals...
On the twelfth day of Christmas the rulers gave to us, twelve
months of chaos...”
The Twelve Days of Christmas (2020)
Merry Christmas to you all - Nadolig Llawen i chi i gyd.
by DARREN SMITH_______________________________________
>> Conti nued from page 1
To write to The Highland Council about the Planning Applicati
on
re: Baile Os Ceann,correspondence should be sent to: The CEO of
the Highland Council,
Donna Manson. Email [email protected]
-
UK NEWS
PAGE 3
There’s Nothing Great About This ‘Reset’As most remain stupefi
ed by rising infection rates, fi xate on the daily ‘R number’ or
argue the virtues of mask wearing, those who seek to impose their
technocratic will, and tighten their vice grip upon the Earth,
aren’t hiding anything.
Catalysed by a multi-billion dollar campaign of virus fear and
disinformation, infecting minds from Wuhan to Washington, the World
Economic Forum’s (WEF’s) ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism is a
sophisticated plot to transfer all the remaining wealth and power
from the people up to the fi nancial classes. The WEF has been
gaining power and infl uence on the international stage in recent
years and seems to have been chosen as the driving force behind the
agenda. It presents a future of increased globalisation, the
imposition of a totalitarian framework of bio-secure control and
hints at a transhumanist future that challenges the very essence of
what it means to be human.
But what is this Great Reset? Well, if you took the fl owery
descriptions on the forum’s website at face value and mindlessly
absorb the slick messages peppering advertising billboards all over
the country, you’d be forgiven for thinking this is a heroically
ambitious rescue plan designed to overcome the mammoth covid (and
climate) disruptions to our social, political and economic systems.
An entirely necessary response, demanding the cooperation of
international ‘stakeholders’ to combat the unprecedented challenges
we face.
Or as the big budget promo video–which blends depressing themes
of covid-19, ‘climate change’, social justice and pollution
destruction, loudly declares:
Our World has changed,Our challenges are greater,Our fragilities
exposed,Our systems need a reset,Everyone has a role to play,The
Great Reset,Join us.
Marketing spin aside, dig below the surface and you’ll soon
unearth some bright red fl ags. To begin with, the whole premise of
this internationally transformative push being an unexpected–but
necessary–reaction to an unforeseen threat is disingenuous at
best.
On the WEF’s website is a complicated ‘transformation map,’
depicting and connecting a myriad of sectors, services and
behaviours, interlinked with how they will fuse with the response
to the covid-19 ‘crisis.’ Yet this sophisticated diagram had in
fact already been published in 2017. Now updated to include
covid-19–the catalyst that created a
smokescreen of panic to drive home and fast-track multiple
long-held strategies to fulfi l this agenda.
The WEF and billionaire elitist cronies have set out an
ambitious and open conspiracy to transform permanently every aspect
of what we do–from food to fi nance and from travel to taxes. It
wants to dictate to us how we will live, work and interact
in the future. And under the guise of the connected, 5G-driven
‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’ (4IR) they even plan to transform
the very essence of what it means to be human.
While the word ‘reset’ is typically used to describe a return to
an earlier way of doing things, it would actually be more honest if
its proponents had coined their plans ‘The Great
Transformation.’
In an introductory speech in June of this year, Klaus Schwab,
founder and Executive Chairman of the WEF states that the ‘global
pandemic’ has created challenges not faced since WWII, which he
claims have demonstrated that our ‘old and outdated’ systems are
unfi t for the 21st century.
In his amusingly thick German accent he calls upon the world to
seize this opportunity. Not only in fi ghting covid, but also in
‘reshaping the entire international system, and building a new
social contract, for the post corona era.’ Throwing in a raft of
buzzwords, including ‘sustainability, resilience, equality and
inclusivity,’ the billionaire manages to say a whole lot of
nothing, while assuring us that his ‘Great Reset’ will enable the
world to ‘Build Back Better.’ By radically altering our behaviours,
harmonising with nature and integrating 4IR technologies, it is his
promise that ‘better lives’ will be created.
The 4IR component is perhaps the most alarming aspect of the
plan for its sheer science-fi ction audacity.
Once again, it’s through the words of Schwab himself that we
gain the best insight. His previous book of the same name is
littered from cover to cover with his transhumanist ideals. He
salivates over the potential of the emerging tech to blend man with
machine, marvelling at ‘the staggering confl uence of emerging
technology breakthroughs, covering wide-ranging fi elds such as
artifi cial intelligence, robotics, the internet of things,
autonomous vehicles, 3D printing, nanotechnology, biotechnology,
materials science, energy storage and quantum computing.”
He describes an ‘Internet of Things’ connected world with
education delivered through augmented and virtual reality. Plans
for intrusive sensors to be installed across homes, clothes,
transport and energy networks and smart cities with their
‘all-important data platforms.’ He predicts that many professional
roles–including lawyers, fi nancial analysts, doctors, journalists,
accountants, insurance underwriters or librarians–may soon be
partly, or
completely, automated.Schwab even goes as far as
to suggest that mind-boggling innovations triggered by the
fourth industrial revolution, from biotechnology to AI, will redefi
ne the human experience–from both a biological and a social
standpoint. One particularly chilling section of the book details
with some relish how these technologies “can intrude into the
hitherto private space of our minds, reading our thoughts and infl
uencing our behaviour”.
You will no doubt hear a lot more about The Great Reset over the
coming months. Prince Charles can’t stop banging on about it.
Sesame Street’s Grover fl ogs its benefi ts to the youth. You can
learn all about this multi-billion/trillion dollar plan through the
WEF’s own website, books and podcasts. And if you have a couple of
billion dollars to your name you can even take part in ongoing
online group discussions with other movers and shakers.
While we can, and amazingly still do, argue about the threat
from a ‘virus’ with a 99.5+% survival
rate until we are blue-in-the-face, it is important to recognise
that the trajectory we are now on was planned and coordinated in
advance over many years, and that the earth-shattering changes
certainly do not represent the logical reaction to a typical ‘fl u
season, as much as they attempt to convince us otherwise.
We must also not forget that the ‘we are all in this together’
mantra is a barefaced lie. So far 2020 has been highly profi table
for the billionaire classes: a recent report by Swiss bank UBS
found that this group increased its wealth by more than a quarter
(27.5%) at the height of the crisis from April to July. This was as
millions of people around the world lost their jobs or were
struggling to get by on government schemes.
Granted, it is somewhat depressing to observe our self-appointed
overlords speak so confi dently and boldly about their plans for
us. While it may even appear to be a done deal–and perhaps it
is–without acceptance and compliance from the masses, Schwab’s
manifesto is merely the ramblings of an unhinged megalomaniac.
by JAMES LIGGETT_______________________________________
-
PAGE 4
UK NEWS
The covid-19 pandemic has thrown into sharp relief the concerns
that a number of people have about vaccination. However, such is
the eagerness to develop a vaccine, and get everyone to take it,
that authorities are now looking to ban anyone who raises doubts.
For example, the Labour Party in the UK is now calling for
emergency ‘anti-vaccine’ laws:
‘Emergency laws to “stamp out dangerous anti-vaccine content
online should be introduced,” Labour has said. The party is calling
for financial and criminal penalties for social media firms that do
not remove false scare stories about vaccines.
It follows news of progress on the first effective coronavirus
vaccine. The government said it took the issue “extremely
seriously” with “a major commitment” from Facebook, Twitter and
Google to tackle anti-vaccine content.’ 1
There are so many things that could be said about this, that it
is difficult to know where to start. If the intention of such laws
is to ensure more people are keen to be vaccinated then I have news
for the Labour party.
It will almost certainly backfire. This is because state
censorship does not change minds, never has. Whilst debate, at
least superficially, has been silenced, the concerns do not
disappear. Instead, the doubts are often redoubled. Once you start
banning and censoring and fining and arresting,
people start to wonder if you are just afraid to make your
case.
As Wendell Phillips said, and many people think: ‘He who stifles
free discussion, secretly doubts whether what he professes to
believe is really true.’
Once censorship starts, people are also reminded of the worst,
most
dreadful periods in history the world has ever seen. It has
always been one of the primary tools of totalitarian regimes–Nazi
Germany, Soviet Russia, North Korea, China and Iran today.
One of the greatest books of the twentieth century is George
Orwell’s ‘1984.’ It is a book mainly concerned with how facts, and
truth, are tightly controlled by the Party.
‘And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed — if
all records told the same tale — then the lie passed into history
and became truth.’
Of course, Orwell was not the first to notice the critical
importance of freedom of speech:
“Liberty is meaningless where the right to utter one’s thoughts
and opinions has ceased to exist. That, of all rights, is the dread
of tyrants. It is the right which they first of all strike down.
They know its power. Thrones, dominions, principalities, and
powers, founded in injustice and wrong, are sure to tremble, if men
are allowed to reason of righteousness, temperance,
and of a judgment to come in their presence” Frederick
Douglass.
“Freedom of speech is a principal pillar of a free government;
when this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society
is dissolved, and tyranny is erected on its ruins. Republics and
limited monarchies derive their strength and vigour from a popular
examination into the action of the magistrates.” Benjamin
Franklin.
Deep down we all know this. We know that this essential freedom
– to say what you really believe to be true – is the essential
pillar of any free society. It carries a cost, of course it carries
a cost. People say stupid things, people say wrong and misguided
things. They can be damaging things, but the alternative will
always be much worse in the end.
I say this because people also say things that, whilst angrily
dismissed at the time as dangerous foolishness, are later found to
have been correct all along. I have spent many years looking at the
history of medical science (if that is not, at times, an oxymoron).
I have seen many activities considered to be of inarguable benefit,
turn out to be indefensible malpractice.
Bernard Lown is, I think, my number one medical hero. His motto
‘do as much as possible for the patient, and as little as possible
to the patient.’
As he also said: “From my earliest days in medicine, I have
struggled against the prevailing model of health care. My
opposition in part was provoked by the growing prevalence of
over-treatment. Resorting to excessive interventions seemed to be
the illegitimate child of technology in the age of market
medicine.” 2
He tells a tale from the 1950s where the orthodoxy of the time
was to ensure strict bed rest following a heart attack. In the face
of considerable hostility, he and his mentor, Dr Samuel Levine
allowed patients to sit up in a comfortable chair at the end of the
bed. Shock horror.
In his own words: “The idea of moving critically-ill patients
into a chair was regarded as off-the-wall. Initially the house
staff refused to cooperate and strenuously resisted getting
patients out of bed. They accused me of planning to commit crimes
not unlike those of the heinous Nazi experimentations in
concentration camps. Arriving on the medical ward one morning I was
greeted by interns and residents lined up with hands stretched out
in a Nazi salute and a ‘Heil Hitler!’ shouted in unison.” 3
Heil Hitler indeed. An almost perfect irony, I suppose.
It turns out that strict bed rest
was absolutely and completely and totally the worst possible
single thing you could do. I estimated, some years ago, that this
action resulted in the premature death of around one hundred
million people, worldwide. It could well have been more.
I imagine the ‘Heil Hitler’ shouting interns and residents would
have happily endorsed censorship of any criticism of strict bed
rest… for the good of society, no doubt.
Of course, had this happened, we would probably still be
enforcing strict bed rest to this very day. Once a treatment
becomes ‘standard practice’, there is no longer anything else
against which to compare it, so you have no idea if it is
beneficial, or harmful. That is what happens when you ban freedom
of thought, and speech.
Leaving aside the principle that freedom of speech is our single
most important freedom and must be handled with exquisite care. If
we crush dissent, we also crush progress. Stupid ideas will, in the
end, be shown to be stupid. Nonsense will be exposed as nonsense.
However, if no criticism is allowed, stupid ideas that are widely
believed to be true, cannot be challenged and we will be stuck –
forever.
I think most people recognise this
truth. I also think most people, when they see things being
banned and censored… wonder why.
You immediately raise doubts. Why are they doing this, are they
attempting to hide something? You will not convince anyone, ever,
by censoring them, or shutting them up. You will, instead, make
them more certain that you are hiding something, and that they are
right.
Censorship always hardens attitudes; it does not change minds.
Anti-vaxxers (whatever that stupid, deliberately demeaning term
means) will become more anti-vaxx. Discussion will be driven
underground. Heroes and martyrs will be created. You will have done
the exact oppositive of what you hoped to achieve.
You don’t win arguments by clubbing people into submission. All
you do is silence them and redouble their determination.
Censoring The Vaccine Debate Will Backfire
by Dr. MALCOLM
KENDRICK_______________________________________
Photo credit: DIMITRI HOUTTEMAN
Sources: 1: https://bit.ly/anti-vax-fake-news
2: https://bit.ly/heart-sisters3:
https://bit.ly/bernard-lown
Dr Malcolm Kendrick’s Website: https://drmalcolmkendrick.org
-
PAGE 5
UK NEWS
Admittedly, this is not your standard-issue industrialised,
globalised takeover of society. Why would it be? Fascism has come a
long way since Hitler.
Nowadays the general population is too smart, we would recognise
the face of tyranny and not this garden variety imposter, or so we
think. Besides,‘without the Allies landing on the beaches of
Normandy, how could we be under siege?’ We reassure ourselves
before crawling back into captivity in a comforting lockstep with
less fortunate nations. Adaptation is a wonderful thing, but maybe
not for us.
In keeping with the opaque nature of this political confidence
trick, this is not your typical dictatorship either. Instead it’s
Middle England’s answer to a military junta, carrying the letters
of marque from Her Majesty’s Government to legitimise its piracy,
courted by the ivory towers of science and medicine, and extolled
as a force for good by a population sleepwalking towards the edge
of disaster. Meanwhile society burns ritualistically to the ground.
But that’s ok, we can build back better from the ashes. Or so we
are told repeatedly.
The controlled demolition of society, made possible by the
covid-19 agenda, places us at the gates to hell, somewhere between
freedom and slavery, fighting a battle for humanity against a
government who have become the occupational hazard of being
human.
In little under eight months, those who go under the sobriquet
of protector of individual freedom from tyranny have taken on the
mantle of oppressor. Turning on the people of
this nation, taking legal control over our lives, removing our
personal agency, dictating where we can go and who we can meet.
Irrespective of these historic infractions on our freedom, we
obediently roll over rather than disturb the hornet’s nest and
industriously heed the call of showman politicians who have
enlisted us, unaware the culpability has been passed from the
overlords to the victims of their tyranny.
“We are all in this together” is another blandishment from this
Prime Minister, despite his inner circle ruling this country by
ministerial decree since March. Rolling out the most injurious
legislation in history, without recourse to scrutiny, debates or
votes in Parliament, engagement with civil society, or indeed risk
assessment of the impact of these laws, and which the lawmakers
themselves do not obey, in the time-honoured tradition of one rule
for those making the rules but another rule for everyone else.
Following a handful of idle sessions at the House of Commons,
liberties older than Parliament itself have been nullified on the
basis of a disease with an average mortality age of 82. What has
been achieved on this basis by the architects of this apocalypse is
not only reprehensible, it is ingenious. Uniting millions behind
the cult of covid. Transcending decades of the usual propaganda,
behavioural engineering, the manufacturing of consent. Mitigating
the expense of war, terrorism, or whatever chicanery has been at
the disposal of those
in power, grooming us towards a controlled destination. In this
particular watershed, a permanent checkpoint of our democracy to
issue the terms of our servitude, called the biosecurity state.
This journey towards the wrong side of history is made possible
by subtle nuances of control, confusion and fear that most fail to
perceive. Engineering the wholesale abandonment of logic and reason
to a seemingly benevolent cult who alone offer protection against
our seemingly immediate day of reckoning.
The threat of death strikes an uncomfortable chord and our
ability to adapt makes us low-hanging fruit. But who could have
predicted fascism would look so ordinary from inside the
panopticon? Once we’re plugged into a shared digital matrix, a
state of emergency can rapidly contaminate consensus, until forced
collectivism flourishes like wildfire.
Meanwhile, measured perspective becomes an act of war. Who wants
to be on the wrong side of the cult, when those failing to bend a
knee to covid, are, by disassociation, guilty, with blood on their
hands?
This entire process works because the fertile ground for any
dictatorship to prosper is fear. A state of emergency unites us
with common purpose. And what could be more compelling than a
pandemic?
Death, like communism, levels the playing field of all
distinctions. Regardless of class, age, gender, or race, death is
indiscriminate. Reaffirming the normalcy of our departure from one
place of relative safety to another is straightforward enough.
Safety is, after all, relative
to the setting of the emergency. The higher the alert level, the
safer we feel in the herd, regardless of small matters such as the
number of prison bars holding us captive. In a strong-enough
current people are like driftwood trying to dock in the reeds.
Remember the motto of this thing from the outset: ‘The New
Normal’?
The pandemic hunkers down on the ‘Blitz Spirit’ of the British
people: Boris plays Churchill and the propagandists ensnare a
nation under mass-hypnosis, who muzzle their senses and clap for
their captors. As important matters of front-line battle are the
prerogative of the Johnson regime, who work round the clock to
dampen, depress and demoralise the public spirit, criminalising
just about every form of human expression conceivable. In this
Kafkaesque rendition of reality, an arsenic cough, the assassin’s
handshake are the crimes against humanity, while our personal
hygiene and voluntary associations stand before the Nuremberg
Trials.
Covid is the greatest operation to divide and rule in human
history. Factionalising family members, separating each from their
powers of reason, and weaponising society as a Black Death, whose
panacea is an unrelenting assault on the basic joys of life and
other misguided freedoms, that we are told, are the agents of our
suffering.
The cautionary tale from history should teach us that the
surrendering of our rights out of fear of some existential threat
is never a good idea. Typically it’s a threat hatched by a
government looking to cross the Rubicon from
protector of individual liberty to regulator of the
psycho-socio-sexual. Dictating who we may and may not procreate
with is yet another compulsion of cult ideology, which should be
enough to convince most we are already living under tyranny.
On the contrary, those with front row tickets, prostrated in
self-imposed exile, bribed with government kickbacks, and
disguising their own fear of death as compassion for others, would
disagree. Claiming (amongst other platitudes), “It’s only for
another six months… Even if it means saving just one life… 2020 is
the year that was cancelled… You wear a seatbelt but not a face
covering…”
This is despite the overwhelming body of evidence that we are
not the victims of indiscriminate, extemporaneous encroachments on
our liberties, but rather our rights are being permanently
dismantled through a carefully planned sequence of events, where
the previous imposition makes way for the next tightening of the
screw.
The volitional guidelines for the hospitality industry to track
and trace our movements has predictably been ramped up to
mandatory. Anticipating the next iteration in this sequence:
gun-to-your-head contact tracing across all interfaces of the
economy, our workspaces, public transport, international flights
and supermarkets.
Or, for those refusing to comply, then it’s ‘no ticket, no
laundry.’ And the emergence of covid-apartheid.
You have been warned.
Fear – The Trojan Horse For Tyranny
Please pass the Light on to someone when you’ve read it.
by DUSTIN BROADBERY_______________________________________
Photo credit: ALEXANDRA GORN
-
PAGE 6
UK NEWS
Can comparisons be made between life under Nazi rule and the
world we find ourselves in today? On closer inspection some
similarities are just too close for comfort.
When the Germans crossed the Polish border in 1939, Polish state
radio Warsaw One announced; ‘We are strong, united and ready’.
When ‘covid-19’ began to spread from China we were told by Boris
Johnson in March to stay at home for three weeks to ‘flatten the
curve’ and everything would go back to normal.
Historian Emmanuel Ringelblum wrote; ‘There are long queues in
front of every food store and everything is being bought out. Food
shortages for potatoes tripled and there was a spike in the cost of
basic foodstuffs due to food lines being cut and diverted.’
During lockdown we’ve experienced long, socially distanced
(contradiction of terms, we just mean physically distanced) queues
outside shops, imposed purchase limits, shortages and panic buying
frenzies for things like flour, rice, pasta and toilet rolls.
Many people throughout Nazi society struggled to find work.
Employment tended to revolve around servicing the requirements of
the military regime. Many businesses were destroyed or confiscated
from their owners.
Governments are crashing the economy and destroying businesses
under the guise of a global pandemic leaving the workforce jobless,
destitute and bankrupt.
As life became more difficult and food became scarce, profiteers
would lurk in the shadows to exploit the
vulnerable to make a handsome profit.We seem to have our own
profiteers who are doing extremely well off the backs of those
who are struggling. One company that springs to mind is Amazon, and
Big Pharma also stand to make a killing when their covid vaccines
are rolled out.
In 1940 Dr. Kurt Schrempf the chief Nazi physician announced
that Jews in Warsaw, “...needed to be walled inside their district
for their own protection...that they were spreaders of disease and
for sanitary reasons had to be cut off from the rest of the
city.”
For health reasons many of us have been told we are at risk and
should quarantine within our own walls at home for our own
protection as the virus could spread. How many people have died due
to lack of care and isolation?
Initially the movement of people in and out of the Warsaw ghetto
was manned by the Polish Police. Later the German military took
over.
Since March 2020, we have experienced national and local
lockdowns. We have been told not to leave designated areas. Local
police have controlled access points with road blocks. There are
now signs of the military on the streets assisting the authorities
in offering door-to-
door covid tests.Berlin passed a decree on 1st
April 1934 whereby public assembly of more than five people was
strictly forbidden and violators faced prosecution.
The nonsensical rule of six applies today with sanctions in
place for transgressors, though by the time you read this that
number could well already have changed six times over.
Arbitrariness is also the destabilising tactic of the tyrant.
Under the Third Reich woe betide anybody who developed a mind
of
their own. A ruthless programme of state indoctrination existed
to develop a hive-mind mentality. Adults and children were
encouraged to inform on those who opposed state ideology.
Last September a visiting German physician, Dr. Heiko Schoening,
was arrested by riot police for airing his views on covid-19 at
Speaker’s Corner in Hyde Park. ‘Neighbours are being urged to call
police on covid self-isolation cheats and spot checks are being
carried out by police.’ Watch your back if Priti Patel
is your neighbour.Breaking lockdown or curfew
regulations meant you risked being shot on sight.
We’re not quite there yet but can anybody justify a £10,000 fine
for breaking the rules?
As a mark of identification and humiliation, jews were forced to
wear a Star of David armband on their outer garments in public, and
other groups such as homosexuals and gypsies also had their own
group identifying badges.
Quite obviously the face mask identifies our compliance to
authority despite H.M. Government guidance of the 24th June 2020
stating:
‘the evidence suggests that wearing a face covering does not
protect you...evidence of the benefit of using a face covering
is weak.’Many unfortunate souls were
forcibly transported to the infamous Auschwitz concentration
camp where they were tattooed and some were subjected to Dr.
Mengele’s horrendous medical experiments against their will.
Interestingly, modern day lawyer Robert Barnes raises, and answers,
his own question
‘know how the Nazi’s first sold concentration camps? They called
it quarantine.’
‘Quebec City says it will isolate
and forcibly intern in a secret quarantine facility
‘uncooperative’ citizens.’ The UK Coronavirus Act 2020 allows the
Government to remove you from your home and test and treat you
against your will. Authorities have repeatedly talked about plans
for a digital covid passport (ID 2020) which will allow the
government and corporations to track which vaccines you’ve had (or
have not had). It is thought that these will be required for future
travel amongst other things and are currently being trialled by
United Airlines and Cathay Pacific. Health Secretary Matt Hancock
says he is
“looking very seriously at compulsory vaccinations”, and
according to statements made by Bill Gates, “...normality may never
return to those that refuse the vaccine.”
Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels controlled the mainstream
media of the day by brainwashing the public with repeated lies and
distorted truths.
Much of today’s mainstream media follows the template of
Goebbels. Ask yourself why Melanie Dawes, CEO of Ofcom, is
threatening UK broadcasters with sanctions if they allow anyone to
make a connection between ‘covid 19’ and 5G.
What Next? Do you feel history is repeating itself? Many more
people are waking up to the dire truth of our situation, connecting
the dots, asking questions and are beginning to speak out. But will
those who do know history be doomed to watch those who don’t repeat
it, to everyone’s loss?
‘Just Like The Nazis’ – Is Godwin’s Law Redundant?
Please don’t bin this paper, pass it on and share some
truth.
In the 1970s a US military document listed 2000 research papers
covering many illnesses caused by continuous low level
radiation.
In 1973 the WHO Warsaw Conference document highlighted the
biological effects of non-thermal radiation. Over 350 pages, it
documents harms including cancer.
This document was stamped top-secret. In Jan 2018 studies of
Navy veterans concluded that (1), the International Commission on
Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines don’t protect
people and need to be replaced with biologically based
(non-thermal) exposure limits and (2) that Radio Frequency
Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) is and should be classified as a
group 1 carcinogen.
Microwaves were being used as
stealth weapons before they were used as cell phone technology.
Under the existing safety levels at that time cell phones would not
have been allowed. By 1962 all of the dangers and hazards of
microwave radiation had been highlighted and published.
In 1965 they adopted an old 1953 thermal safety level which is
still in use today, the 6 minute thermal level used by ICNIRP. No
consideration is given here to the published ‘below thermal’
cellular interactions and electromagnetic effects which interfere
with the normal resonant frequency of the body.
Barrie Trower has worked for the Royal Navy and intelligences as
a microwave weapons expert. He is also a physicist. Mr Trower
highlights the devastating effects of Wi-Fi on the
developing foetus. A baby girl in her mother’s womb
develops the ovarian follicles that will produce her own child
in the first 100 days of development. Developing ovarian follicles
have no protection from irradiation from Wi-Fi which can then cause
irreversible DNA damage. The DNA damage done for each successive
baby girl is cumulative. The first generation has only half of its
babies born healthy, the second only a quarter and the third only
an eighth. In another 3 generations only 1 in 8 children will be
born healthy.
This problem will reveal itself in third generations and will
not likely present until 2040 in humans. We are already seeing the
effects in animal populations such as horses. Many animals have
much shorter reproductive cycles than humans. The
implications for farm animals and food production are also very
serious. Microwaves react very differently in our water-based
bodies than radio waves. This makes pregnant women especially
vulnerable.
For children, the main risks are the effects on the integrity of
the blood/brain barrier (protection against toxins), neural and
muscle functions and the depletion of the immune system including
bone marrow and bone effects because of the soft and less dense
bones of children whose absorption of microwave radiation can be 10
times higher than adults. This chronic stress causes mitochondrial
DNA damage which is transmitted to all successive generations
through the maternal line. This is irreversible.
Replacement of Wi-Fi with cable would remove these problems
especially in nurseries, schools and universities. The
dangerously high ICNIRP ‘safe exposure’ limits enable the utilities
to legally build their power lines, substations and towers
dangerously close to schools, residential areas and hospitals.
We should be acutely aware of serious health concerns caused by
microwave radiation in general and 5G.
WI-FI Radiation – A Generational Tragedy?by KATHERINE
HOOPER_______________________________________
by RHISIART AP ROY_______________________________________
Electrosensitivity UK Website: http://www.es-uk.info
5G Awareness Website: https://www.5gawareness.com/
Wi-Fi - A Thalidomide In The Making. Who Cares?
by Barrie Trower (PDF Version):
https://bit.ly/wi-fi-barrie-trower
Hidden Dangers 5G by Jerry Flynn (ePub Version):
https://bit.ly/hidden-dangers-5g
-
PAGE 7
Santa Facing Travel Restrictions
UK NEWS
The government has been pre-ordering copious amounts of the
various covid-19 vaccines being made by a collection of similar
companies. Moderna and BioNTech being the front-runners amongst
them.
Moderna focuses on biotechnology, and interestingly their name
is an acronym for Modified RNA (Ribonucleic Acid – responsible for
gene coding). It was founded by Derrick Rossi, from Harvard
University in September 2010, making it relatively new in
comparison to most other vaccine manufacturers.
In January 2016, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation entered
into a ‘Global Health Project Agreement’ with Moderna, to start the
first in-human Phase 1 clinical trial of a potential mRNA medicine
to help prevent various infectious diseases, with initial grant
funding of $20 million.
If you were wondering how this covid-19 vaccine was made so
fast, there is your answer - they have been working on this type of
vaccine for years. In 2022 the company is set to gain a further
potential $80 million in funding, as follow-on projects could be
granted upon the 6th year
anniversary of the agreement, but here is the catch: Moderna is
obliged to grant the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation certain
non-exclusive licenses, giving them the right to use the
intellectual property gained from the agreement in the same
capacity as Moderna. However, the company has still yet to create
or distribute an approved medicine or vaccine in its entire10 year
existence.
BioNTech, co-founded in 2008 by a man of Turkish descent Uğur
Şahin, and his wife Özlem Türeci, have signed contracts, working
alongside Pfizer, to supply 30 million doses of the RNA covid-19
vaccine to the UK.
Intriguingly, in September 2019 they also signed an agreement
with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to create preclinical
vaccine and immunotherapy programmes for the prevention of HIV,
tuberculosis and other serious diseases, receiving 50 million euros
from the European Investment Bank for its inception.
Not only did they receive 50 million from the EIB, but they also
received investments of €250 million from Temasek Holdings
(Singapore), in June 2020, making them their
largest investor yet.The eventuality of these covid-19
vaccines is said not to be injected intravenously, but to be
able to use a Hydrogel Sticker (like a transdermal patch) courtesy
of DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), the
military’s technological arm of the Pentagon. This will give people
the ability to administer the vaccine themselves, eliminating
complications that trypanophobia (fear of needles) causes and the
mega-logistical issues of mass vaccination programmes, as this will
not be one vaccine but will require multiple vaccinations over a
period of time just like many others.
The Hydrogel and microneedles on the patch will contain enzymes
called Luciferase, named this because of its bioluminescent
qualities. It is difficult to see with the naked eye, but can be
seen when scanned. This scannable feature will be left under the
skin, in the dermis (tough tissue directly underneath the layers of
skin,) by the microneedles on the patch which will contain the
luciferase enzyme and the vaccine itself.
The idea was first proposed to track soldiers and their health
out on the frontline, but it has been modified over the past few
years to be used for vaccination. A video from
DARPA’s YouTube channel called ‘DARPA SBIR: Profusa Implantable
Biosensors – COL Matt Hepburn’ explains the original idea.
The intention for the vaccine is to insert a modified part of
RNA from the virus into a stem-cell in your body, your body will
then start to transcribe that part of the virus and make more of
it. This will kickstart the memory cells in the immune system, then
create antibodies and an improved T-Cell response if you come into
contact with it in the future.
The problem with this is that we may become genetically modified
too, by using a process called Transfection. If the modified RNA
enters our genome, which it more than likely will, and it begins to
replicate when the genome does, it could become a permanent part of
our genetics.
Companies making this vaccine are stating that it will only be a
temporary change, but this is highly doubtful. If it can
permanently modify ferret genetics when trials were done on them,
then why can it not do the same to a human?
We know that genetically modified organisms in foods can make
them carcinogenic, therefore we are running the risk of serious
health problems by accepting this vaccine.
Dr Carrie Madej explains the process for the vaccine in a video
on Bitchute called ‘HUMAN 2.0? A WAKE UP CALL TO THE WORLD’. This
particular vaccine from BioNTech, is called BNT162b2, and also uses
Solid Lipid Nanoparticles which help to deliver the mRNA.
There is a plethora of scientific research papers on Pub.Med and
Google Scholar, that can be accessed for free, for further
research.
Gates Funds Vaccines Which Could Change DNAby KYLE
DAVENPORT_______________________________________
Due to current covid restrictions in the UK, Santa is unable to
deliver any presents this year.
On November 24, 2020, the UK government issued a press release
stating that, whilst they give UK citizens permission to have
Christmas celebrations this year, families must follow strict
guidelines because: “This cannot be a ‘normal’ Christmas.”
The government stated that: “Even where it is within the rules,
meeting with friends and family over Christmas will be a personal
judgement for individuals to take, mindful of the risks to
themselves and others, particularly those who are vulnerable. We
need everyone to think carefully about what they do during this
period, balancing some increased social contact with the need to
keep the risk of increased transmission of the virus as low as
possible. This is particularly important when considering those who
are vulnerable, and before deciding to come together over the
festive period we urge the consideration of alternative approaches
such as the use of technology or meeting outside.”
They continued that:• Travel restrictions across the four
administrations and between tiers will be lifted to provide a
window for households to come together between the 23rd and 27th of
December.
• Up to three households can form an exclusive ‘bubble’ to meet
at home during this period. When a bubble is formed it is fixed,
and must not be changed or extended further at any point.
• Each Christmas bubble can meet at home, at a place of worship
or an outdoor public place, but existing, more restrictive rules on
hospitality and meeting in other venues will be maintained
throughout this period.
In other words, Santa has been excluded from visiting the UK’s
children this year, because he can only visit a total of three
families.
Sadly, these cast iron rules, established by the UK government,
cannot be broken and, therefore, will leave millions of children
devastated this Christmas when they wake up to find an empty
stocking.
On a More Serious Note. Whilst Boris Johnson, guided by the
wonderful Matt Hancock, has been busy deciding exactly how the UK
will be allowed to celebrate Christmas this year, it appears
that
he has forgotten that, due to his previous restrictions and
chaotic four tier system, tens of thousands of UK businesses have
either gone into liquidation or have had to furlough their staff
for months on end. These actions have left the UK not only in
crisis, but with approximately 1.6 million people unemployed.
Therefore, it really does not matter whether the Prime Minister
allows us to have a Christmas or not, because as a direct result of
his actions this year, tens of thousands of families are now facing
homelessness and poverty at this time, leaving many of them unable
to AFFORD Christmas anyway.
by CHRISTINA ENGLAND_______________________________________
BioNTech’s Funding By European Investment Bank:
https://bit.ly/biontech-funding
BioNTech’s Connections To The Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation:
https://bit.ly/biontech-gates
Microneedle Platform For Biomedical Applications:
https://bit.ly/microneedle-platform
MHRA–COVID-19 Artificial Intelligence Software Tool:
https://bit.ly/CV19-AI
Moderna, Bill & Melinda Gates Funding:
https://bit.ly/moderna-gates
Pub.Med–Lipid Nanoparticles Research:
https://bit.ly/lipid-research
-
PAGE 8
INTERVIEW
Dr. Vernon Coleman: Medic’s Most WantedIn this issue we have the
privilege of delving into a range of subjects with Dr Vernon
Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA, covering the areas mainstream media won’t
touch.
In March, the best selling international author and highly
esteemed doctor posted a video to YouTube entitled “Coronavirus
Hoax”.
His decades of experience proved popular as he posted
informative and well researched videos questioning the narrative
and providing his audience with facts and further avenues for
research. With his wit, charm and down to earth manner, the “Old
Man in a Chair” (as Dr Coleman became known) helps many to find out
the truth and ditch the fear. But media outlets had another agenda
which led to his work falling victim to extreme censorship. We
believe that as an adult you are capable of reading a range of
information and deciding for yourself from the evidence – a course
of action Dr Vernon would definitely prescribe.
Many people will by this point in 2020 have questions about the
covid-19 situation. Dr Vernon gives us an overview of the situation
from day one.
“The coronavirus was officially downgraded to flu level in
March, the ordinary flu can affect 100 million people and kill
650,000 of them in a single flu season (which runs from autumn to
spring) and the mortality rate with covid-19 is now widely accepted
by doctors to be the same as the mortality rate with the flu.
My first video was in March entitled “Coronavirus Hoax” and my
book ‘Covid-19: the Greatest Hoax in History’ contains the scripts
of the videos I made for YouTube between the end of April 2020 and
the beginning of September. It contains a mass of information about
the dangers of lockdowns, the history of the companies making
vaccines, the problems with social distancing and masks and the
problems with censorship.
I’ve also explained how the figures for covid-19 have been
widely exaggerated. Deaths are listed as covid-19 related if the
patient who died had tested positive for the disease in the
previous 28 days. This means that if a patient is run over by a bus
but tested positive for the coronavirus three weeks earlier then
they officially died of the coronavirus. And the majority of
covid-19 deaths occur in patients over 80 who had other serious
health problems.
Another of my books `Proof that Masks Do More Harm than Good’ is
exactly what it says. It’s merely a summary of dozens of items of
research which prove that
mask wearers are doing themselves enormous harm. In my view,
forcing people to wear masks is criminal and will lead to brain
damage and deaths. I doubt if there are many independent doctors
who disagree with that. As well as physical
problems, masks will cause massive psychological damage. When
people are wearing masks smiles can’t be seen but frowns can.
Children are going to be damaged for life.”
We may be in the middle of a medical scam that could have deeper
consequences in many areas. Yet the Government is determined to
keep publishing figures that suggest to the public there is a high
incidence of covid-19. Where are these figures coming from? “The
PCR tests were never intended to be used to test for covid-19 and
they are worse than
useless. The main problem is that they produce more false
positives than real positives. The test picks up old evidence of
individuals having had the common cold. The test is useful for
governments which want more lockdowns and if testing continues then
there will be more lockdowns – indefinitely.
It is interesting to note that an appeals court in Portugal has
ruled that the PCR process is not a reliable test for Sars-Cov-2
and that, as a result, any enforced quarantines based on those
tests are unlawful. The Portuguese judges ruled that when running
PCR tests with more than 35 temperature changes (or cycles) the
accuracy drops to 3%, meaning that up to 97% of positive results
could be false positives. The number of cycles used when running
the test may be as high as 45. Mainstream media appears to have
ignored this
important judgement.”It appears data is being misused
to enable things like lockdowns, and these responses have had an
impact on us all. Dr Vernon has no doubt that lockdowns serve a
more sinister purpose than protecting the public.
“The lockdowns were always going to kill far more people than
covid-19 – and such has been proven to be the case. Interestingly,
the government in the UK accepts the WHO’s faulty advice on mask
wearing (for which there is no supporting scientific evidence) but
ignores the WHO’s view that lockdowns should be avoided.
The testing programme seems designed to give the government an
excuse for more lockdowns – though these are useless and harmful.
It would be much wiser to allow the very old and sickly to
self-isolate if they wanted to.
Forcing millions of people to stay under house arrest (and
destroying businesses and jobs) is politically motivated. Neil
Ferguson, often thought of as the architect of the lockdown
policies around the world, has made so many mistakes in his career
that it is impossible to understand how he is still hired by the
Government – unless they chose someone to give them the advice they
wanted.
It is appalling that protests have been widely banned. It is
similarly astonishing that a senior police officer encouraged mask
wearers to `shame’ the physically and mentally disabled who are
unable to wear masks. There is no democracy or freedom of speech in
the UK. The fines being handed out are punitive and out of
proportion.”
What does the doctor himself believe is the driving factor for
this? “It is clear that there is something huge behind the covid-19
hoax. Two facts made this clear. First, the fact that the same
`mistakes’ were made globally. (They weren’t mistakes, of course).
So, for example, the elderly were taken from hospitals and dumped
in care homes in a number of countries. I have described this as
manslaughter though I suppose it’s bordering on genocide.
The second factor is the way that debate has been silenced. I
think the BBC has been particularly unscrupulous in protecting the
government’s lies and demonising the truth-tellers. Threats have
been made to doctors to keep them quiet.
The coronavirus hoax was designed to oppress and terrorise the
general population so that those planning a world government could
achieve their aims. I have been called a conspiracy theorist (and
much worse) but the conspiracy is the one created by the United
Nations, the World Economic Forum and a bunch of billionaires.
Some folk ask why governments would deliberately destroy their
economies but the answer is simple: they want to re-create the
world to suit their own purposes.
The climate change scam was deliberately chosen by the Club of
Rome, as a way of terrorising the population. It’s interesting that
while most people have lost a big chunk of their income and savings
this year the world’s billionaires have massively increased their
wealth. The plan is to destroy small companies and to banish
private property holdings. Curiously, billionaires such as Bill
Gates (who through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has shares
in, and links to, drug companies making vaccines) are promoting a
form of communism. Gates is keen on reducing the size of the
world’s population but also keen on vaccination, allegedly to keep
people alive. It is difficult to reconcile these two obviously
opposing viewpoints.”
Although the claims Dr Coleman makes are large in scope, any
reader can use the internet to check these statements out for
themselves. However, it may be harder than it should be to find Dr
Vernon’s videos and books due to censorship.
“I put two books `Proof That Masks Do More Harm than Good’ and
`Covid-19: The Greatest Hoax in History’ on Smashwords – making
them both free as eBooks. Unfortunately, they didn’t last long
before Smashwords closed my account – claiming that I had broken
their terms of service. I couldn’t see what I was supposed to have
done wrong – but I can understand that the establishment wouldn’t
want the books available. (They were only on the site for a few
days but many thousands of copies of the books had been
downloaded).
None of the videos which they banned contained anything
inaccurate. I believe they were banned because they contained facts
and research material which proved the official message to be
wrong. I’ve worked in the media for over half a century and
although people have (unsuccessfully) attempted to ban or suppress
my work I never imagined that I would find the level of censorship
that exists today. Although I have previously sold millions of
books in the UK and had books published in 25 languages, I have not
even bothered to offer my recent books to traditional publishers
because I doubt if I would find one with the courage to print
them.”
It is understandable that the public does not want to see itself
as ‘naive enough’ to have fallen for lies and
by VICTORIA AEYN_______________________________________
-
PAGE 9
UK NEWS
suggesting the medical profession is implicated in the hoax is a
radical idea to many who have come to rely on and trust medical
staff. How exactly does the establishment in all forms manage to
convince people?
“The authorities have relied on cognitive dissonance – most
people simply find the awful things that are happening quite
unbelievable. But Hitler and Goebbels recognised that the `big
lies’ are ignored because they are too enormous for people to
comprehend. Most citizens cannot imagine that people could do truly
awful things – even though the evidence shows that the awful things
are happening. What has saddened me is the way that the medical
profession has gone along with this hoax. Some, of course, have
links with the drug companies. The UK Government’s chief scientific
officer (Patrick Vallance) was an employee of vaccine maker GSK –
and he still has shares in the company. The chief medical officer
(Chris Whitty) was previously associated with a Bill Gates
project.
Around the world doctors and nurses have been threatened with
professional ruin if they spoke out. A few have been brave but most
have been shamefully acquiescent. Dr Mohammad Adil lost his licence
to practice because he questioned the official line on the
coronavirus. To ban debate on a medical issue is unprecedented in
the West and is something previously only seen in
dictatorships.”
The newest aspect of the coronavirus saga is the coming vaccine.
The biggest question is what are the potential issues in
mass vaccination with a brand new vaccine? “ I have no idea
precisely what mRNA or DNA vaccines might do in the medium or long
term.” says Dr Coleman, “ I don’t believe anyone else knows either.
Giving one of these vaccines will be an experiment. Why would
anyone want to take an experimental drug to protect against a
disease which is widely acknowledged to be no more deadly than the
flu?”
A fantastic point of common sense, though if you were to search
social media for answers on this you would find very pervasive
discouragement of anyone daring to question the new vaccine. “The
psy-op specialists are cleverly attacking all vaccine criticism as
‘anti-vaxx nonsense.’ There is no attempt to differentiate between
professional criticism and rumour.
This is nothing new, it has been impossible to publish material
questioning vaccination for decades. Nearly a decade ago, I wrote a
book about vaccines but had to publish it myself. I have been
viciously attacked, libelled and lied about because I have
questioned the value of vaccination. It is not widely known that
the government is employing thousands of military psy-op
specialists to manipulate and brainwash the public – and government
employees are busy working as trolls and putting scurrilous
comments on videos about the coronavirus. Wikipedia has been taken
over and its sites used to demonise those questioning the official
Agenda. All we can do is use every avenue we can to share the
truth and to question the government. For the first time in
history we are at war with our own government. They are the
enemy.”
It is highly likely now that vaccines may be made compulsory, or
that a health passport will be launched. A state of play that this
doctor is determined to challenge.
“We all need to fight for the right to decide whether or not we
are vaccinated. Ministers talk about `informed choice’ but there is
no discussion or debate about vaccination in the mainstream media.
Doctors who question these vaccines are threatened, silenced,
ignored or demonised. We all have to question the politicians and
the mainstream media and to demand that proper debate takes place.
Giving a new, untried vaccine to billions of people is the biggest
gamble in history. And why? People need to stand up for themselves.
The people of Denmark recently forced their government to abandon a
plan for mandatory vaccination. Protests outside their Parliament
lasted more than a week.”
It’s fighting talk; informative but determined. How can the
public, as a David to the Government’s Goliath, move forward under
these conditions? “We have to share information” recommends Dr
Vernon. “On my website I have printed material to be used in
leaflets. And I encourage people to send leaflets or letters to
politicians and journalists.
It’s also a good idea to ring up radio presenters and ask them
for their views on vaccine dangers, lockdowns and so on. Use the
information on my website to
confound them. We all have a vital role to play in what is now
clearly a resistance movement. Sadly, our enemy, our oppressors,
are our own government and, indeed, the whole of Parliament. And
find a way not to pay the BBC licence fee (but do it legally). The
BBC has repeatedly proved itself to be the enemy of the
people.”
Dr Vernon Coleman has much to say and a lifetime’s worth of
research and insight to back it up. It is essential that we also
become informed as so much is at stake now, more than ever before.
If we do not ask the questions and become more empowered, life as
we once cherished will be gone forever under the guise of ‘our own
protection’.
“In the past I have fought on many contentious issues (including
benzodiazepine addiction, dementia, vivisection and more,) but this
is, without a doubt, the most important battle any of us has ever
fought. If we lose this war then we will lose our freedom, our
democracy and our very humanity. The technocrats and
trans-humanists have terrible plans for the human race. The mask
wearing and social distancing are being used to force people into
blind obedience. The medical evidence shows that the hypoxia and
hypercapnia caused by the masks will, in due course, cause brain
damage and make people even less likely to stand up to defend
themselves.”
Listen to the doctor, remove your mask and become informed on
the truth behind the headlines and spin from the Government.
Please don’t bin this paper, pass it on and share the Light.
A new paper authored by Adam Smith Institute’s legal fellow and
technology lawyer Preston J. Byrne explores the state of freedom of
speech in the UK and suggests that many of the current problems the
country is facing in this area could be solved by adopting rules
protecting free speech modelled after the First Amendment of the US
Constitution.
As things stand, UK citizens can accuse others and even send
them to prison for ‘crimes’ like feeling offended by their speech,
or finding that speech distressing or uncomfortable. But proper
free speech protections should extend all the way to things that
may be understood as ‘loathsome and hateful,’ Byrne notes.
The reason to look for a new way of ensuring freedom of
expression, which is a vital element in any true democracy, is the
fact the UK has several laws that contravene
it, such as the Public Order, Communications, Terrorism, and
Malicious Communications acts, respectively. The way these are at
times implemented goes against their original purpose and amounts
to overreach, the paper’s author argues.
The newest batch of legislation that is a cause for concern in
this space are the proposed Online Harms Bill and Scotland’s Hate
Crime Bill, Byrne warns, adding that all these create a legal
environment that protects the hearer rather than the speaker, and
relies on social attitudes to introduce ever more restrictive
policies.
On the other hand, the legislation that at this point guarantees
free speech in the UK is based on Article 10 of the European
Convention, that Byrne says is ‘woefully inadequate.’ He believes
that the article deals more with restricting than expanding free
speech, while at the same time
being quasi-constitutional and poorly implemented in
practice.
According to the paper, what Article 10 does is let subjective
social and cultural trends shrink the boundaries of free speech,
instead of providing an objective firm guarantee for them.
For all these reasons, Byrne thinks the UK should look for
inspiration to the First Amendment to ensure protection of free
speech and eliminate interference from the state, naming this
potential new legislation the UK Free Speech Act. One would think
such a proposal by any serious and capable group of MPs is capable
of garnering serious public support and momentum.
UK Think Tank Proposes Free Speech Actby SCOTT
JOYCE_______________________________________
The Light truthpaper hopes you will read our content and go on
to research further for yourselves, then spread the word to your
nearest and dearest.
Follow these links to find more on the work of Dr Vernon
Coleman.
https://brandnewtube.com/@DrVernonColeman
Informative and often humorous video content
http://www.vernoncoleman.com
Much of Doctor Coleman’s work over the years and plenty of
information for further research.
If you enjoyed this feature, look out for more content from Dr
Vernon Coleman as we are delighted to announce he will be joining
the Light truthpaper for a new regular column.
Photo credit: EHIMETALOR AKHERE UNUABONA
‘Sense and Sensitivity: Restoring free speech in the United
Kingdom’ By Preston J. Byrne is available to read at the Adam Smith
Institute:
https://www.adamsmith.org
Original report from:https://reclaimthenet.org
-
Italy
Guatemala
Spain GermanyUK & Ireland Canada
USA
Colombia
Ecuador
Brazil
Argentina Malawi
Date: May 2020 - Dec 2020Trigger: Lockdown Measures
Numbers: >10,000
Date: April 2020 - Dec 2020Trigger: Lockdown Measures
Numbers: >30,000
Date: April 2020 Trigger:Lockdown Measures/Business
Closures Numbers: >1,000
Date: March-December 2020Trigger: Lockdown Measures
Numbers: Unknown
Date: August 2020 Trigger:Lockdown Measures/Judicial Reform Bill
Numbers: >5,000
Date: May 2020 - Jun 2020Trigger: President’s Response to
CV19 Numbers: >1,000
Date: May 2020 Trigger: State-owned Company Closures &
Salary Cuts Numbers: 4,000
Date: March 2020 - Dec 2020Trigger: President’s Policies
Numbers: >1,000
Date: Nov 2020 - Dec 2020Trigger: Govt Spending Cuts
Numbers: >5,000
Date: April 2020 - December 2020Trigger: Business Closures
&
Restrictions Numbers: >10,000
Date: April 2020 - December 2020Trigger: Lockdown Measures
Numbers: >1,000
Date: May 2020 Trigger: Govt Lockdown Policies &
Citizens’
Rights Numbers: >1,000
Sources:https://bit.ly/carnegie-protest-trackerhttps://bit.ly/poland-protestshttps://bit.ly/italy-protestshttps://bit.ly/australia-protestshttps://bit.ly/new-zealand-protests
-
Russia
Serbia
Poland Slovakia Germany
Lebanon
Croatia
New Zealand
AustraliaMalawi
India
Israel
Bulgaria
Date: April 2020 - Dec 2020Trigger: Lockdown Measures
Numbers: >30,000
Date: April 2020 Trigger: Economic Implications & Lockdown
Measures
Numbers: 2,000
Date: November 2020 Trigger:Pandemic-related Restrictions
Numbers: >1,000
Date: May 2020Trigger: Lockdown Measures
Numbers: >1,000
Date: September 2020 Trigger:CV19 Skepticism & Human
Rights
Numbers: >1,000
Date: July 2020 - Aug 2020Trigger: Lockdown Measures, Govt
Corruption Numbers: >10,000
Date: Apr 2020 Trigger: Migrant workers wage
demands/lockdown
extension Numbers: >1,000
Date: March 2020 Trigger:Overcrowding during CV outbreak
Numbers: Unknown
Date: May 2020 - Nov 2020Trigger: Lockdown Measures
Numbers: > Unknown
Date: March 2020 - Dec 2020Trigger: Lockdown Measures
Numbers: >10,000
Date: April 2020 Trigger:Lockdown Measures/Business
Closures Numbers: >1,000
Date: September 2020Trigger: Lockdown Measures
Numbers: > Unknown
Date: October 2020Trigger: Lockdown Measures
Numbers: > Unknown
Sources:https://bit.ly/carnegie-protest-trackerhttps://bit.ly/poland-protestshttps://bit.ly/italy-protestshttps://bit.ly/australia-protestshttps://bit.ly/new-zealand-protests
IS 12/20
-
PAGE 12
INTERNATIONAL
Please pass the Light on to someone when you’ve read it.
Wish You Were Here? Life In Sweden Is Old NormalGordana is 46
and originally from Serbia but moved to Gothenburg 6 years ago. She
lives here with her husband and 3 children, works in a school and
has a degree in Graphic Design.
We asked her about life in Sweden during 2020.
When were you first aware of covid-19?
At the end of January was the first time that we start to speak
about covid, my baby boy is going in daycare next to my work on the
island, so... When I come to work I just leave my baby and start my
work. The kindergarten staff told me one of their colleagues comes
from vacation in China and she have to take two more weeks free
days because she has to be tested for corona covid 19 virus.
Everything has changed since that day.
What was the reaction of the government?
The government’s reaction was: don’t panic, keep your distance,
wash your hands, if you’re sick stay home, and we’ll create
immunity herd, no panic and no stress.
What was the reaction of the media?
The media reported the same as the government. After March the
media started reporting some data that we were all shocked about,
because we didn’t notice it. Many sick people, many dead
people.
What was the reaction of the people?
At first we were all afraid that the virus would kill us or we
would become zombies. As time passed and we were able to read,
hear, explore a lot... many people calmed down, while some remained
in fear until today. High schools were closed in May.
My daughter’s comment was the best, she now enjoys going to
school and she doesn’t have to move out of bed. It was a little
complicated to go to the dentist or doctor – before they let you
in, they interrogate you in front of the door, when you go inside,
everything is calm, there are no people, none of the doctors have a
mask, no one is nervous.
Would the people have locked down if the government had
asked?
I have lived here for 6 years and as far as I understand, people
here respect their government and listen. I guess people would
accept everything but since they love their freedom and right to
choose, I don’t know how long they would suffer being locked up
against their will.
Why didn’t the government ask? What was their stated reason?
Honestly, I’m not familiar with the political parties here, I
have to learn about that, but as far as I
understand when I talk to people who live here (were born here),
it is important for the government not to be economically weak,
some people even wanted and asked to be closed because they were
scared from the number of infected and dead people that media was
reporting, during the lunch break at school many teachers and
kitchen staff joked that it would be good to lock us up to get some
rest from everything. But the government did not want to pay people
for doing nothing and weakening the country’s economy.
What did the government/media/ people say about the response in
the rest of the world?
Media reported poorly on other countries, everything we heard
was through social networks. If media talked about other countries,
they were brief, maybe how many were infected in other countries or
some measures other countries took to protect themselves from the
virus.
I have not heard the Swedish government comment on other
countries. People were shocked
at first because of the number of infected and dead people, and
for the measures that were taken, some people were indignant and
some said that Sweden should be closed that way as well.
Figures show deaths from covid in Sweden the same or lower than
the rest of Europe–do you know of anyone who got it/died from
it?
I don’t know anyone who died of covid, many of my friends saying
the same thing. Everyone who was sick at school went to get tested
and everyone was negative, they were
disappointed because if they were positive, they could stay home
for 6 weeks.
What is life like now in general?In late August, early
September,
signs and tapes were removed all over the city, which they put
up in June to show people that we have to make a distance between
us.
“It all disappeared overnight, all signs, stickers, ribbons.
Everything was removed. Everything was as before.”
Information appears on the
screens to say keep your distance and if you are sick, stay
home.
Very few people talk about the covid, everyone is sick of it,
some people believe that it is dangerous but many people are aware
that it is just a common virus and that all this is a huge
scam.
In the company where my friend works, It is strictly forbidden
to mention covid.
Why do you think Sweden has escaped the madness?
I really don’t know the answer to that question, for me
everything was a bit difficult even with these small measures.
There is nothing
here in Sweden that you HAVE to do, everything is left to the
people to make their own decision how they want.
And it’s not 80% cashless with thousands of people chipped?
It is true that many stores have withdrawn the use of cash, you
can pay with applications, phone or card. But in many places you
can pay with cash, some people like to have cash in hand because
they are so used to it, especially foreigners and older people who
can hardly master modern technology.
I didn’t hear anything about chipping people, no one offered us,
no one told us about it. At one technical college, they studied
chip and putting a chip in people’s hands. Maybe they did it with a
few people solely to test how it affects people’s lives. People in
Sweden love nature very much and do not appreciate anything
artificial. They choose food only if it is organic and as healthy
as possible. Someone made a story out of it and someone else
twisted that story and lied about a lot of things.
Radoslaw also recently reported back from Scandinavia and
confirmed what Gordana told us:
“Sweden didn’t give in to hysteria and didn’t impose the
lockdown. For that it was criticised, chastised and laughed at.
Although they didn’t lock down, their numbers do not differ much to
those countries who imposed the most draconian measures.
What did they do differently? Everything is kept open,
businesses are not being told to close. You have a choice as from
before the lockdown to visit. Except for a few additional
plexiglass screens and a handful of stickers, everything looks
normal.
I saw only one sign saying to keep your distance on the motorway
and I spent three days there and travelled quite a distance. All
businesses are essential: barbers, nail shops and beauticians are
not being slammed with £27,000 fine for staying open. Tattooist’s
shop doors are not being forced in by a police squad with council
staff and locksmiths.
Is everything so good out there? Society in Sweden is much more
obedient and Sweden is a nanny state. That means people will be
more likely to adhere to the guidelines of social distancing. Fear
there is a big tension that I could feel when talking to random
pedestrians, because of information from the media. A young lad on
a scooter told me with broken English, that he cannot lead a normal
life, due to restrictions.
So far there are no plans to roll out mandatory vaccines, nor
are tests mandatory. There is also no bribe from the government –
if you feel like you want to self-isolate, you do it out of your
own pocket – this of course is a game-changer.
Surgeries and doctor appointments are available. On public
transport, only the front line of seats is blocked on the bus and
except for the first three weeks in March, no toilet paper crisis
or buying frenzy happened. Masks are not mandatory.”
by DARREN SMITH & RADOSLAW
KALISZUK_________________________________________________________________________________
-
PAGE 13
INTERNATIONAL
It’s unlikely that Dr Anthony Fauci, Chief Medical Advisor to
the US president, shed a tear when Donald Trump failed to win the
election (although the co
