+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Intoxilyzer 8000

Intoxilyzer 8000

Date post: 12-Feb-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 5 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
Intoxilyzer 8000 (OH-5) What You Need to Know
Transcript
Page 1: Intoxilyzer 8000

Intoxilyzer 8000 (OH-5)

What You

Need to Know

Page 2: Intoxilyzer 8000

Theory of Operation:

1. The Intoxilyzer 8000 uses the method of INFRARED ABSORPTION to

analyze the breath sample.

2. The IR light source is a PULSED INFRARED light.

3. The wavelength frequency is 3.4 and 9.4 MICRONS for alcohol and

other interfering substances.

4. The decrease in intensity of the JR light due to absorption by alcohol in

the breath sample is proportional to the amount of alcohol in the breath.

5. The sample chamber holds 29.4 cc=s of deep lung air for the analysis.

Source: Bureau of Alcohol and drug Testing Ohio Department of Health Revised

6-2009 Page 12

Difference from previous machines:

Previous machines, BAC DataMaster, BAC DataMaster CDM, BAC

DataMaster DMT, Intoxilyzer 5000, Intoxilyzer 5000 EN, all used infrared

absorption as the analytical method.

The sample chamber in previous machines contained

DataMaster 50 cc. in the BAC DataMaster and 38 cc. in the BAC

DataMaster CDM 38cc

Intoxilyzer 5000 EN 84 cc.

Intoxilyzer 8000 29.4cc

Page 3: Intoxilyzer 8000

Of more significance is the light path length in the sample chamber.

Machine Sample chamber size light path length

Intoxilyzer 5000 EN 81.4 cc 11.4 inches

Intoxilyzer 8000 OH-5 29.4 cc not specified

DataMaster 50 cc 43.3 inches

DataMaster CDM 38 cc 33 inches

The length of the light path is significant in that the farther the energy

travels through the breath sample, the more time the energy has to react to

the sample. This translates into a greater sensitivity of the machines with the

longer light paths. Source DataMaster Supervisor Guide p. 2.

Both the DataMaster and the Intoxilyzer 5000 EN utilized a spinning

wheel containing multiple filters to test specific frequencies for infrared light

absorption. The Intoxilyzer 8000 does not use a wheel, but rather pulses the

light. The elimination of the wheel eliminates moving parts, hypothetically

decreasing the possibility of maintenance, but also requires a slower

processor, which results in a reduced number of samples of the breath,

which reduces the sensitivity of the machine to errors.

Page 4: Intoxilyzer 8000

In particular, the short light path and slow operating speed, due to the

pulsed infrared lamp, makes the Intoxilyzer less able to reliably detect

mouth alcohol and flag invalid samples compared to existing older

technology.

Page 5: Intoxilyzer 8000

The processor in the DataMaster series of machines runs at 525

megahertz which results in 125 samples per sec of the breath sample. The

Intoxilyzer 8000 only takes 4 samples per second of the breath sample. The

result is that the Intoxilyzer is not able to detect the negative slope with the

same accuracy or reliability as other machines on the market, including the

older Intoxilyzer 5000 EN and the DataMaster family of machines.

The result is that the Intoxilyzer 8000 is less able to detect mouth

alcohol in subjects. This has been verified by testing conducted by the

Alaska Department of Highway Safety, which after the testing, has not

Page 6: Intoxilyzer 8000

approved the machine for use in Alaska. Similar testing in Minnesota has

caused that state to not approve the Intoxilyzer 8000 for use in Minnesota.

The Intoxilyzer does leap ahead in that the test sequence provides for

two breath sample and two external calibration checks. This is the “dual

testing” that has been recommended for forensic testing since at least the

1970s and utilized in many other states. This same capability has been

available in the existing breath testing machines, but has never been utilized

by the Department of Health, although it’s implementation would not have

increased the cost of breath testing and could have been enabled by the

pushing of a few buttons without even having to take the machines out of

service.

National standards for forensic testing utilizing other testing methods

used to test bodily fluids and substances, such as the gas chromatograph,

have been required to utilize multiple point calibration checks and quality

control samples to be run with at least two samples of the unknown sample

for years. Many states has used dual testing for years as a basic check of the

accuracy of their breath tests.

Another feature of the Intoxilyzer 8000 is that it will automatically

report the results of all breath tests and calibration checks to a database

maintained by the Ohio Department of Health, which is available on line to

Page 7: Intoxilyzer 8000

the public. http://publicapps.odh.ohio.gov/BreathInstrument/ Anyone can

access the database and review information on all the machines and tests.

A similar online data collection has been utilized by several states for

several years, with the additional benefit of being able to compare the data

by the downloading of the data in spreadsheet format. This feature is not

available with the existing Ohio format. The online data collection feature

was also available on previous machines approved in Ohio, but ordered

either removed or deactivated. This is somewhat paradoxical in that the

whole concept of the DataMaster family of machines was the ability to

collect test data and report it to a central data base, as is now being done

with the Intoxilyzer 8000 (OH-5), but not the (OH-2) version utilized by the

Watercraft Division.

The Intoxilyzer 8000 also has some bells and whistles not available on

the older machines. It has a scanner that can read the magnetic strip on

driver’s licenses and automatically enter the data on various forms generated

by the machine. The machine can also read the operator’s access card,

which is used to automatically enter the operator’s information. The number

of forms that the Intoxilyzer prints out is dependent on what the operator

requests. Several standard OVI forms, including a BMV 2255 form can be

generated.

Page 8: Intoxilyzer 8000

The test record printout also contains a significant amount of

information not available on the older machines approved by the Department

of Health. The specific information will be presented during the seminar

presentation.

A wealth of information on the Intoxilyzer 8000 (OH-5) and the tests

are available on line. In perusing test results a number of “impossible” test

results have been noted, together with a significant number of incomplete

tests with “ambient fail” results. Some of these tests will be displayed

during the presentation.

Page 9: Intoxilyzer 8000

Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Testing Revised 01-2009 Ohio Department of Health PAGE 37

Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Testing Revised 9-2009 Ohio Department of Health PAGE 37

Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Testing Revised 9-2009 Ohio Department of Health PAGE 37

OPERATION INTOXILYZER 8000

TESTING SEQUENCE / SUBJECT TEST

The AIR BLANK result must be 0.005 or less; If AIR BLANK results are higher than 0.005; AMBIENT FAIL is displayed and the testing sequence ABORTS; Restart testing sequence; If 2nd AIR BLANK FAILS; Discontinue use and notify BADT at (614) 644-4609.

The instrument automatically performs a DIAGNOSTIC TEST;

The instrument will display PASS and continue with testing sequence; If DIAGNOSTIC TEST FAILS; Restart testing sequence; If 2nd DIAGNOSTIC TEST FAILS; Discontinue use and notify BADT at (614) 644-4609.

The instrument automatically performs an AIR BLANK; The AIR BLANK purges the sample cell; The AIR BLANK checks the surrounding air.

Diagnostic . . . . . . . . . . .

Air Blank

Air Blank Rslt: 0.000

Diagnostic Pass

Page 10: Intoxilyzer 8000

ODH Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Testing: Subject Test Report http://publicapps.odh.ohio.gov/BreathInstrument/Testreport.aspx?id=52G3

1 of 1 11/24/2010 4:58 PM

Ohio Department of Health Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Testing

Subject Test Report: Prepared on 11/24/2010 4:47:27 PM

Subject Information

TEST DATE

8/26/2010

CITY

MOUNT GILEAD STATE

OH

NAME

WALTERS, A

ZIP CODE

43338 AGE / SEX

45 / M

Arrest Information

ARRESTING OFFICER

BURKHART, JAMES

TESTING OFFICER

BURKHART, JAMES

TIME OF VIOLATION

AGENCY

MOUNT GILEAD HIGHWAY PATROL

AGENCY

MOUNT GILEAD HIGHWAY PATROL

TIME FIRST OBSERVED

IMPLIED CONSENT WARNING Yes 8/26/2010 19:29

ODH CERTIFICATION #

10846-O-2

TIME OF TEST

19:00 19:00 19:28:19

Test Information

INSTRUMENT SERIAL # 80-004501

CERTIFICATION BOTTLE # 0629

Test BrAC (g/210L) Time

Data Entry 19:32

Air Blank 0.000 19:33

Diagnostic VAC/OK 19:33

Air Blank 0.000 19:33

Dry Gas Control 0.099 19:34

Atmos. Pressure 978 19:34

Tank Pressure 924 19:34

Air Blank 0.000 19:34

Subject Test 0.139 19:35

Breath Volume 3.796 19:35

Sample Duration 9900 19:35

Sample Attempts 1 19:35

Air Blank 0.000 19:35

Data Entry 19:38

Air Blank 0.000 19:38

Subject Test 0.079 19:39

Breath Volume 3.945 19:39

Sample Duration 9610 19:39

Sample Attempts 1 19:39

Air Blank 0.000 19:39

End of Test 19:39

TEST SITE # 5900

TARGET VALUE

0.100 g/210L

DATE OF LAST CERTIFICATION 6/14/2010

CERTIFICATION AVERAGE 0.0988

CERTIFICATION SOLUTION # ODH-001 6

CERTIFICATION STANDARD DEVIATION 0.0004

DRY GAS STANDARD

LOT # 634007

TANK # 09251

TARGET: 0.100 g/210L

No .020 agreement

This test result is a classic example of mouth alcohol. The first test is well over the legal

limit and the second test is just under the legal limit. A single test would only have reported

the higher test result. Note that the machine did not report an invalid sample error.

This is a good example why single tests should not be admitted in OVI cases.

Page 11: Intoxilyzer 8000

Ohio Department of HealthBureau of Alcohol and Drug Testing

Subject Test Report: Prepared on 4/22/2011 11:53:45 AM

Subject InformationTEST DATE5/23/2010

NAMEREIDA, CATHERINE

CITYPOWELL

STATEOH

ZIP CODE43065

AGE / SEX53 / F

Arrest InformationARRESTING OFFICERTHEM, MATTHEW

AGENCYOSHP

IMPLIED CONSENT WARNINGYes 5/23/2010 20:49

TESTING OFFICERTHEM, MATTHEW

AGENCYOSHP

ODH CERTIFICATION #11002-O-2

TIME OF VIOLATION19:41

TIME FIRST OBSERVED19:51

TIME OF TEST20:47:43

Test InformationINSTRUMENT SERIAL #80-004647

TEST SITE #5900

DATE OF LAST CERTIFICATION3/19/2010

CERTIFICATION SOLUTION #ODH-0015

CERTIFICATION BOTTLE #0069

TARGET VALUE0.101 g/210L

CERTIFICATION AVERAGE0.1006

CERTIFICATION STANDARD DEVIATION0.0005DRY GAS STANDARD

LOT # 620082

TANK # 09159

TARGET: 0.100 g/210L

Diagnostic Fail

ODH Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Testing: Subject Test Report http://publicapps.odh.ohio.gov/BreathInstrument/Testreport.aspx?id=3025

1 of 1 4/22/2011 11:55 AM

Page 12: Intoxilyzer 8000

Ohio Department of HealthBureau of Alcohol and Drug Testing

Subject Test Report: Prepared on 4/22/2011 11:54:45 AM

Subject InformationTEST DATE5/23/2010

NAMEREIDA, CATHERINE

CITYPOWELL

STATEOH

ZIP CODE43065

AGE / SEX53 / F

Arrest InformationARRESTING OFFICERTHEM, MATTHEW

AGENCYOSHP

IMPLIED CONSENT WARNINGYes 5/23/2010 20:53

TESTING OFFICERTHEM, MATTHEW

AGENCYOSHP

ODH CERTIFICATION #11002-O-2

TIME OF VIOLATION19:41

TIME FIRST OBSERVED19:51

TIME OF TEST20:52:59

Test InformationINSTRUMENT SERIAL #80-004647

TEST SITE #5900

DATE OF LAST CERTIFICATION3/19/2010

CERTIFICATION SOLUTION #ODH-0015

CERTIFICATION BOTTLE #0069

TARGET VALUE0.101 g/210L

CERTIFICATION AVERAGE0.1006

CERTIFICATION STANDARD DEVIATION0.0005DRY GAS STANDARD

LOT # 620082

TANK # 09159

TARGET: 0.100 g/210L

Diagnostic Fail

ODH Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Testing: Subject Test Report http://publicapps.odh.ohio.gov/BreathInstrument/Testreport.aspx?id=3036

1 of 1 4/22/2011 11:54 AM

Terry Rudes
TextBox
Here are two back to back diagnostic fail results. The following pages show that the next day the machine was being used and that the machine was not taken out of service and no repairs were made to the machine.
Page 13: Intoxilyzer 8000

Contact UsHelp

Last Name

First Name

Date From

Date To

Age

Sex

Race

Refusal?

Last Name

First Name

Last Name

First Name

Instr. Serial #

Agency Name

Agency Court Code

Agency NCIC #

Subject Info

From To

Officer InfoArresting Officer:

Operator:

Breath Instrument Data Center

Breath Alcohol Test Search Results

ReportLink

Date Subject Arresting Agency Arresting Officer Breath Test Operator(click for access card info)

Report 8/1/2010 KIMES, SCOTT OSHP HOLLOWAY, COBY HOLLOWAY, COBY

Report 7/31/2010 WEAVER, JASON MOUNT GILEAD HIGHWAY PATRO JOHNSON, MORRIS JOHNSON, MORRIS

Report 7/31/2010 WEAVER, JASON MOUNT GILEAD HIGHWAY PATRO JOHNSON, MORRIS JOHNSON, MORRIS

Report 7/30/2010 ZIMMERMAN, JAMES MOUNT GILEAD HIGHWAY PATRO HURLBERT, JUSTIN CRISWELL, SAMUEL

Report 7/27/2010 SISLER, BRET MOUNT GILEAD POLICE DEPART UNDERWOOD, KENNETH UNDERWOOD, KENNETH

Report 7/27/2010 SISLER, BRET MOUNT GILEAD POLICE DEPART UNDERWOOD, KENNETH UNDERWOOD, KENNETH

Report 7/19/2010 WHITE, RAYMOND MORROW COUNTY SHERIFFS OF FOX, STEVEN FOX, STEVEN

Report 7/4/2010 OSWALD, JEFFREY MOUNT GILEAD HIGHWAY PATRO THEM, MATTHEW THEM, MATTHEW

Report 7/3/2010 MELTON, MELVIN MOUNT GILEAD HIGHWAY PATRO MCCRUTER, CORTRELL MCCRUTER, CORTRELL

Report 5/29/2010 HESNESS, KRISTINA OSHP JOHNSON, MORRIS JOHNSON, MORRIS

Report 5/26/2010 RAMIREZ, JESSICA OSHP JOHNSON, MORRIS JOHNSON, MORRIS

Report 5/25/2010 RIPA, ANGELA OSHP JOHNSON, MORRIS JOHNSON, MORRIS

Report 5/24/2010 RIPA, ANGELA OSHP JOHNSON, MORRIS JOHNSON, MORRIS

Report 5/24/2010 PETTY, KEICIANGO OSHP JOHNSON, MORRIS JOHNSON, MORRIS

Report 5/24/2010 PETTY, KEICIANGO OSHP JOHNSON, MORRIS JOHNSON, MORRIS

Report 5/23/2010 REIDA, CATHERINE OSHP THEM, MATTHEW THEM, MATTHEW

Report 5/23/2010 REIDA, CATHERINE OSHP THEM, MATTHEW THEM, MATTHEW

Page of 1 Displaying 1 to 32 of 32 tests

Breath Instrument Data Center http://publicapps.odh.ohio.gov/BreathInstrument/

1 of 1 4/22/2011 11:56 AM

Terry Rudes
Highlight
Page 14: Intoxilyzer 8000

Ohio Department of HealthBureau of Alcohol and Drug Testing

Documents for Breath Instrument, Serial # 80-004647: Prepared on 4/22/2011 11:58 AM

03-19-2010 Certification

04-26-2010 Placed in Service

09-15-2009 Factory Calibration

ODH Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Testing: Breath Instrument Information http://publicapps.odh.ohio.gov/BreathInstrument/InstrumentDocuments.asp...

1 of 1 4/22/2011 11:57 AM

Page 15: Intoxilyzer 8000

Ohio Department of HealthBureau of Alcohol and Drug Testing

Subject Test Report: Prepared on 11/18/2010 11:36:23 AM

Subject InformationTEST DATE11/17/2010

NAMEHAYNES, KATHY

CITYKINGSTON

STATEOH

ZIP CODE45644

AGE / SEX48 / F

Arrest InformationARRESTING OFFICERLAME, MATT

AGENCYPICKAWAY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFIC

IMPLIED CONSENT WARNINGYes 11/17/2010 02:43

TESTING OFFICERPHILLIPS, JAMES

AGENCYPICKAWAY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFIC

ODH CERTIFICATION #12358-O-2

TIME OF VIOLATION01:03

TIME FIRST OBSERVED02:20

TIME OF TEST02:41:21

Test InformationINSTRUMENT SERIAL #80-003989

TEST SITE #6500

DATE OF LAST CERTIFICATION10/28/2010

CERTIFICATION SOLUTION #ODH-0017

CERTIFICATION BOTTLE #1124

TARGET VALUE0.099 g/210L

CERTIFICATION AVERAGE0.0996

CERTIFICATION STANDARD DEVIATION0.0005

Test BrAC (g/210L) Time

DRY GAS STANDARD

LOT # 642845

TANK # 09355

TARGET: 0.100 g/210L

BrAC = 10 g/210L

ODH Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Testing: Subject Test Report http://publicapps.odh.ohio.gov/BreathInstrument/Testreport.aspx?id=6SP8

1 of 1 11/18/2010 11:38 AM

Terry Rudes
TextBox
This test result print out is very different from other test results. What is the official Department of Health form? The above or the report that is on line?

Recommended