+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Introduction

Introduction

Date post: 10-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: kaili
View: 25 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Evaluation of the Effect of Global Positioning System (GPS) Simplistic Spoofing Attacks on GPS Performance. Introduction. Increasing use for PNT applications: Positioning Navigation Timing. GNSS Vulnerabilities. Ionospheric delay Tropospheric delay Satellite clock error Ephemeris error - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
28
Transcript
Page 1: Introduction
Page 2: Introduction

STRIDEIntroductionIntroduction

Increasing use for PNT applications:

PositioningNavigationTiming

Page 3: Introduction

STRIDEGNSS Vulnerabilities GNSS Vulnerabilities

Ionospheric delayTropospheric delaySatellite clock errorEphemeris errorSignal error

LOS blockageReceiver noiseDilution of precisionJammingSpoofing

Page 4: Introduction

STRIDEGNSS SpoofingGNSS Spoofing

Forging and transmission of navigation messages in order to manipulate the navigation solutions of GNSS receivers

Even if a spoofer is not fully successful, he/she can still create significant errors and jam GNSS signals over large areas

Page 5: Introduction

STRIDEGNSS SpoofingGNSS Spoofing

GPS spoofing used to trick a British vessel into Chinese waters

Page 6: Introduction

STRIDEGNSS SpoofingGNSS Spoofing

Page 7: Introduction

STRIDEGNSS SpoofingGNSS Spoofing

Page 8: Introduction

STRIDEGNSS SpoofingGNSS Spoofing

Page 9: Introduction

STRIDEGNSS SpoofingGNSS Spoofing

A number of GNSS simulators have been designed for legal purposes

In the wrong hands, can be used for spoofing

Page 10: Introduction

STRIDEGNSS SpoofingGNSS Spoofing

GNSS simulators can be built with relatively low cost equipment

Page 11: Introduction

STRIDEGNSS SpoofingGNSS Spoofing

The spoofing threat continuum

Page 12: Introduction

STRIDEGNSS SpoofingGNSS Spoofing

Meaconing

GNSS record and playback systems record real GNSS signals and retransmit the signals to evaluated GNSS receivers.

While spoofing using this method cannot be used to impose user-defined scenarios on a receiver, it can still cause the receiver to compute false location fixes using the transmitted real GNSS signals.

Furthermore, this form of attack can be used for spoofing military GNSS signals

Page 13: Introduction

STRIDEGNSS SpoofingGNSS Spoofing

Page 14: Introduction

STRIDEGNSS SpoofingGNSS Spoofing

Page 15: Introduction

STRIDEObjectivesObjectives

This study is aimed at evaluating GPS performance during simplistic GPS spoofing attacks.

Spoofing is conducted using a standalone GPS simulator, which at present poses the greatest near-term threat.

In this type of spoofing attack, the spoofing signal is not synchronised (in terms of power level, phase, Doppler shift and data content) with the genuine signals received by the target GPS receiver.

This could cause the target GPS receiver to temporarily lose position fix lock first, before being taken over by the spoofing signal.

Page 16: Introduction

STRIDEMethodologyMethodology

Test Setup

Test area located at N 2º 58.056’ E 101º 48.586’ 70m

Page 17: Introduction

STRIDEMethodologyMethodologyTest Scenario

• Test area located at N 2º 58.056’ E 101º 48.586’ 70m• The spoofing signal is set for position of N 2º 58’ E 101º 48’ 80m,

while the time is set at the simulator’s GPS receiver’s time.

Page 18: Introduction

STRIDEResults & DiscussionResults & Discussion

The effect of GPS spoofing attacks

Evaluated GPS receiver

Reference GPS receiver

Page 19: Introduction

STRIDEResults & DiscussionResults & Discussion

Reading 1 Reading 2 Reading 3

Evaluated GPS receiver

The effect of spoofing on GPS accuracy

Reading 4 Reading 5 Reading 6

Page 20: Introduction

STRIDEResults & DiscussionResults & Discussion

Reading 1 Reading 2 Reading 3

Reference GPS receiver

The effect of spoofing on GPS accuracy

Reading 4 Reading 5 Reading 6

Page 21: Introduction

STRIDEGPS SpoofingGPS Spoofing

The effect of spoofing on GPS accuracy

Evaluated GPS receiver Reference GPS receiver

Page 22: Introduction

STRIDEConclusionConclusion

Varying minimum spoofing signal power levels, times between position fix lost and spoofing, and probable error patterns are observed for different dates and times.

This is due to the GPS satellite constellation being dynamic, causing varying GPS satellite geometry over time, resulting in GPS performance being time dependent.

Variation in other GNSS error parameters, including ionospheric and tropospheric delays, satellite clock, ephemeris and multipath errors, and unintentional signal interferences and obstructions, could have also resulted in the variation of GPS performance.

As the spoofing signal power level is increased, probable error values increase due to decreasing C/N0levels for GPS satellites tracked by the receiver.

For all the readings, the highest probable errors occur at the minimum spoofing power levels. After spoofing takes place, the probable errors reduce to levels that are lower as compared to prior to transmission of the spoofing signal.

This occurs as at this point, the spoofing signal power level is relatively large, resulting in high C/N0 level and hence, improved accuracy.

Page 23: Introduction

STRIDEScope for Future WorkScope for Future Work

On the whole, this study has demonstrated the disadvantages of field GNSS evaluations.

Without the ability to control the various GNSS error parameters, it is difficult to effectively study the effect of any particular error parameter, in the case of this study, spoofing, on GNSS accuracy.

This highlights the importance of conducting such tests in a controlled environment, using a GNSS simulator as the source of genuine GNSS signals as opposed to live GNSS signals.

This would allow the tests to be conducted under repeatable user-controlled conditions.

Page 24: Introduction

STRIDEGNSS Receiver EvaluationGNSS Receiver Evaluation

Employs live GNSS signals. Should be conducted in open area with

clear view of the sky. Tests scenarios are uncontrollable by

users and not repeatable.

Field Evaluation

Employs simulated GNSS signals. Should be conducted in a RF enclosure

(e.g. anechoic chamber). Test scenarios are user controllable

and repeatable.

GNSS Simulation

Page 25: Introduction

STRIDEGPS JammingGPS Jamming

Field Evaluation GPS Simulation

Page 26: Introduction

STRIDEGPS Functional TestsGPS Functional Tests

Pendulum Instruments GPS-12R

Topcon Hiper GA

Magellan Z-Max

Trimble R8

Trimble Geoexplorer 6000 GeoXH, Nomad

900G and Juno SB

ProMark 200

Page 27: Introduction

STRIDEResearch CollaborationsResearch Collaborations

Effect of Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) on Global Positioning System (GPS) Static Observations

Collaboration with Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying (FSPU), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM)

Project Co-Leaders: Assoc. Prof. Sr. Dr. Azman

Mohd Suldi Mr. Ahmad Norhisyam Idris

Page 28: Introduction

Recommended