Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG Conclusion
UMMC Critical Care TowerBaltimore, MD
Nicholas LeonardStructural OptionThe Pennsylvania State UniversityBAE/MAE of Architectural EngineeringAdvisor: Kevin Parfitt
Predictions
Index
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Leonard TaylorKevin ParfittEddie O’hareAnand Kumar SinghAbdul AzizRyan Solnosky
And a many thanks to
BALLINGER
for supplying a full set of drawings,and permission to use renderings.
Index
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Location: 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201
Function: Renovation including an additional five operating rooms and 60 patient rooms.
Total Floor Area: 140,000 sq. ft.
Height: 7 Stories + Penthouse (~116 ft.)
Anticipated Completion: 2013
Cost: $89,225,671 (structure only)
Contract Type: Guaranteed Max Price
Delivery Method: Design-Bid-Build
Architecture:
-Modular Units-Beige and Red Terra Cotta
-Cantilever Section-Additional Helipad
Index
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Why should we consider blast?
Terrorism
How do we design for blast?
TM 5-1300Structures to Resist the Effects
of Accidental Explosions
Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building
Index
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Foundations:
Gravity and Lateral Systems: The Cantilever System:Index
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
• Largest to likely occur• Similar charge weight as
Oklahoma City Bombing• Challenging design
12 ft
22.5 ft
2 ftGround Surface
Index
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
The Blast Curve & Dynamic Behavior:
Impulse load followed by a period of free vibration.
Structure dissipates energy through plastic yielding of reinforcement, and resists impulse from concrete’s mass.
Positive and negative phase.
Large Peak Overpressure.
Short Duration.
Explosion Types and Reflectance:Free-Air Bursts vs. Ground Surface Bursts
Material Properties:
Material Design Strength
Strength Increase Factor
Dynamic Increase Factor
Actual Strength
Concrete 6000 psi 1.26 1.19 8996 psi
Steel Reinforcem
ent
60 ksi 1.1 1.1 72.6 ksi
Index
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Type of Program:Extreme event, non-linear dynamic, finite element analysis (LSTG).
LS-PrePost is user friendly interface
Compatibility:Had to reduce file size to compute.
Final file size ~ 550 MB, and required 60 GB of memory to perform analysis
High Performance Computing:Set up Hammer Account with Penn State
Completed one iteration in a 24 hr time span
Keyword Format
Cards
My Model:3” Meshing Cubes
Concrete Mesh (solid element)
Reinforcement (beam element)
Index
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Index
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Time Step Snapshots
Index
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Element Ductility Joint Rotation Response Limit
Column 103 4.02 deg 4.0 deg (N.G.)
1ft Strip of Slab
Not Valid Not Valid 6.0 deg (N.G.)
Hand Calculations:
Recommended Redesign:
Increasing Standoff Distance
OR
Hardening of the Structure
Element Ductility Joint Rotation Response Limit
Column 13.8 2.72 deg 4.0 deg (Good)
1ft Strip of Slab
9.28 5.31 deg 6.0 deg (Good)
½” steel jacket surrounding all five column along column line B.
½” plate steel, increase thickness to 8”, and add additional #7 reinforcement for above slab.
Material Quantity Unit Price SubtotalConcrete 312 CY $124/CY $38688
Rebar 118 Tons $1050/Ton $123900Steel Plate 29265 sq ft $25.50/sq ft $746257
Total $908845
Index
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
Major BIM Goals:
• Use FEM to more accurately design for blast.• Shift from using 2D paper based drawings onsite to
a 3D model on a tablet.• Better communication between the design team
and contractor.• Minimize the amount of change orders.• No items on punch list by project turnover.• More precise modeling of existing conditions.• Have the system perform during operations as
designed.• Increase efficiency of equipment maintenance.
Purpose for a BIM Execution Plan ultimately is to save money through efficiency during design and construction by better means of communication.
1. Defining goals and BIM Uses2. Organize processes3. Develop Information
Exchanges/Deliverables4. Set up infrastructure
STARTPROCESS
DEFINE WHAT CONSTITUTES AS A
DISASTER AND MAGNITUDE
DETERMINE WHAT AVAILABLE
RESOURCES ARE ACCESSIBLE AND
NEARBY
DEVELOP EVACUATION
PLANS FOR EACH LEVEL OF DISASTER
DEVELOP AN IMMEDIATE
ASSESSMENT AND REPAIR PLAN
MODEL THE DIFFERENT
SCENARIOS USING APPROPRIATE
SOFTWARE
DOES IT MEET REQUIREMENT
S?
STARTPROCESS
YES
NO
Disaster Plann
in Level 2: Disaster Planning
Index
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
• ASTM E1300 and F2248
Disaster Plann
in
Why consider glass in blast design?
Method: SHG Calculation & Comparison:Type U-Factor SHGC Shade IAC
1/4” annealed 0.58 0.69 0.85/8” fully
temp. w/ PVB Interlayer
2.3 0.8 0.92
Existing Redesign
Index
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG Conclusion
Introduction
Predictions
Thank you for listening!
I will now take any questions or comments.
Project InformationDepth: Blast AnalysisExisting StructureScenarioBlast PhenomenonLs-DynaPredictionsAnalysis and ResultsBreadth: BIMBreadth: Glass Redesign
Index
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
AppendixIndex
Introduction Project Information Depth: Blast Analysis ScenarioExisting Structure Blast Phenomenon LS-Dyna Analysis & Results Breadth: BIM Breadth: SHG ConclusionPredictions
AppendixIndex