+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Introduction Results - University of Queensland · the same time the system captured the volumetric...

Introduction Results - University of Queensland · the same time the system captured the volumetric...

Date post: 12-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Jidong Zhang, Zhongwei Chen* UQ School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, * [email protected] Sorption and swelling of coal under unconstrainted conditions CRICOS Provider Number 00025B The helium injection results show that volumetric strain increases linearly with pore pressure, which gives a coal buck modulus of 9.8 GPa (Figure 3). The nitrogen injection results show that (a) coal swelling follows approximately a linear relationship with excess adsorption volume (Figure 4): every cubic meter increase in gas adsorption causes 0.0324% strain increase, and (b) for each step, coal clearly experiences three stages: instant compaction, rapid rebound due to cleat pressure increase, and slow rebound due to gas diffusion (Figure 3). Introduction Experimental apparatus Results Figure 1: Experimental apparatus Figure 2: Pressure and volumetric strain evolution Figure 4: Langmuir isothermal and swelling measurement during nitrogen adsorption References 1. Quantachrome Instruments, “high pressure gas sorption system operating manual”, 2012. 2. Clarkson C R, Bustin R M. The effect of pore structure and gas pressure upon the transport properties of coal: a laboratory and modeling study. 2. Adsorption rate modeling[J]. Fuel, 1999, 78(11):1345-1362. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0.90 0.93 0.96 0.99 Nitrogen pressure(MPa) 2.95 3.00 3.05 3.10 4.92 4.98 5.04 5.10 6.86 6.93 7.00 7.07 Volumetric strain() Time(h) Axial strain Circumferential strain Volumetric strain The adsorption capability of coal to different gasses and the induced swelling are fundamental input parameters for coal seam gas reservoir simulation. The sorption capacity of coal is usually measured by the volume method, pressure method or gravity method, where coal is normally crushed into powders. Parameters such as the Langmuir pressure constant and volume are obtained by fitting the adsorption curves. The measurement of corresponding deformation of coal is not very common. In this work, a specially designed sample cell was fitted to the Quantachrome’s high pressure gas adsorption system (20MPa maximum pressure) to measure the adsorption capacity of a bituminous coal under different pressures. At the same time the system captured the volumetric strain of coal during the adsorption process using three strain gauge TDS-150 (Figure 1). Four pressure values were tested, rising from 1 MPa to 7 MPa with an increment of 2 MPa. Nitrogen and helium gasses were used to conduct the work, and the injection sequence was explained in Figure 2. The facility offers a reliable experimental capability for direct measurements of both isothermal curves and sorption- induced strain - important inputs for reservoir modelling. Figure 3: Volumetric response to helium (left) and nitrogen injection UQ Centre for Natural Gas Annual Research Review 2019
Transcript
Page 1: Introduction Results - University of Queensland · the same time the system captured the volumetric strain of coal during the adsorption process using three strain gauge TDS-150 (Figure

Jidong Zhang, Zhongwei Chen*

UQ School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, * [email protected]

Sorption and swelling of coal under unconstrainted conditions

CRICOS Provider Number 00025B

The helium injection results show that volumetric strainincreases linearly with pore pressure, which gives a coalbuck modulus of 9.8 GPa (Figure 3).

The nitrogen injection results show that (a) coal swellingfollows approximately a linear relationship with excessadsorption volume (Figure 4): every cubic meter increasein gas adsorption causes 0.0324% strain increase, and (b)for each step, coal clearly experiences three stages:instant compaction, rapid rebound due to cleat pressureincrease, and slow rebound due to gas diffusion (Figure 3).

Introduction

Experimental apparatus

Results

Figure 1: Experimental apparatus

Figure 2: Pressure and volumetric strain evolution

Figure 4: Langmuir isothermal and swelling measurement

during nitrogen adsorption

References1. Quantachrome Instruments, “high pressure gas sorption system

operating manual”, 2012.

2. Clarkson C R, Bustin R M. The effect of pore structure and gas

pressure upon the transport properties of coal: a laboratory and

modeling study. 2. Adsorption rate modeling[J]. Fuel, 1999,

78(11):1345-1362.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-500

0

500

1000

1500

2000

0.90

0.93

0.96

0.99

Nit

rogen

pre

ssu

re(M

Pa)

2.95

3.00

3.05

3.10

4.92

4.98

5.04

5.10

6.86

6.93

7.00

7.07

Volu

met

ric s

train

()

Time(h)

Axial strain

Circumferential strain

Volumetric strain

The adsorption capability of coal to different gasses and theinduced swelling are fundamental input parameters for coalseam gas reservoir simulation.

The sorption capacity of coal is usually measured by thevolume method, pressure method or gravity method, wherecoal is normally crushed into powders. Parameters such asthe Langmuir pressure constant and volume are obtained byfitting the adsorption curves. The measurement ofcorresponding deformation of coal is not very common.

In this work, a specially designed sample cell was fitted to theQuantachrome’s high pressure gas adsorption system(20MPa maximum pressure) to measure the adsorptioncapacity of a bituminous coal under different pressures. Atthe same time the system captured the volumetric strain ofcoal during the adsorption process using three strain gaugeTDS-150 (Figure 1). Four pressure values were tested, risingfrom 1 MPa to 7 MPa with an increment of 2 MPa. Nitrogenand helium gasses were used to conduct the work, and theinjection sequence was explained in Figure 2.

The facility offers a reliable experimental capability for directmeasurements of both isothermal curves and sorption-induced strain - important inputs for reservoir modelling.

Figure 3: Volumetric response to helium (left) and nitrogen injection

UQ Centre for Natural Gas

Annual Research Review

2019

Recommended