+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Introduction Survey 1: Tenure and Promotion Survey 2 ... · the usage trends of online social media...

Introduction Survey 1: Tenure and Promotion Survey 2 ... · the usage trends of online social media...

Date post: 27-Sep-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 7 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Introduction Survey 1: Tenure and Promotion Survey 2: GRAND Communication Networks For Further Information This poster presents our ongoing work to determine the usage trends of online social media (OSM) for academic purposes. Method Survey 1: Online Social Media Usage 315 responses (Oct. 2010 Jan. 2011) American Society for Information Science and Technology Association of Internet Researchers International Network for Social Network Analysis Survey 2: Network Assessment and Validation for Effective Leadership 101 responses (Summer 2010) Graphics, Animation and New Media research network (GRAND) Researchers within the GRAND network primarily rely on emails to communicate with colleagues OSM tools are still underutilized Survey 1: OSM Usage by Age Groups Most respondents stated that OSM activity is not currently considered as a component of the merit or tenure review process If OSM activity is considered, it is listed as activity or service within the community Most respondents believe an OSM activity should be considered if it has been peer reviewed More information on this and related projects can be found at www.SocialMediaLab.ca Acknowledgements We would like to thank the many volunteers who participated in our surveys and for the input from the other members of the Social Media Lab including Philip Mai, Kathleen Staves, and Amanda Wilk as well as the Netlab members including Dr.Barry Wellman, Dima Dimitrova, Guang Ying Mo and Zack Hayat. Funding for this project was provided by the NCE GRAND and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC). * Based on the top two primary OSM tools for professional use Rates of usage across age groups are fairly consistent except when dealing with blogs In the age group 30-34, blogs were the most popular form of OSM 1% 23% 30% 17% 16% 7% 2% 12% 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 % Users Age Group Twitter Blogs Listserv Academic Social Networks Non-Academic Social Networks Online Document Management Video/tele Conferencing Wikis Survey 1: OSM Usage by Tools Survey 1: Dis/Advantages of OSM Use Anatoliy Gruzd ([email protected]) & Melissa Goertzen ([email protected]) School of Information Management, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada Listserv groups are still the primary means of communication Blogging and microblogging are becoming more popular Virtual worlds, social bookmarking and presentation sharing sites are used the least Advantages Disadvantages Keep up to date with topics Time consuming Discover new ideas or publications Distracting from other duties Follow other researchers’ work Threat of negative exposure Make new research contacts Technological challenges Promote current work/research Copyright concerns Collaborate with other researchers Too accessible by the public Solicit advice from peers Maintain professional image Publish findings Discover new funding opportunities Garner mass media attention Survey 1: Some Future Trends Files & Documents Sharing OSM meets References Management Academic Social Networking
Transcript
Page 1: Introduction Survey 1: Tenure and Promotion Survey 2 ... · the usage trends of online social media (OSM) for academic purposes. Method Online Document Management Survey 1: Online

TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2008

www.PosterPresentations.com

Introduction Survey 1: Tenure and Promotion Survey 2: GRAND Communication Networks

For Further Information

This poster presents our ongoing work to determine

the usage trends of online social media (OSM) for

academic purposes.

Method

Survey 1: Online Social Media Usage

315 responses (Oct. 2010 – Jan. 2011)

American Society for Information Science and

Technology

Association of Internet Researchers

International Network for Social Network Analysis

Survey 2: Network Assessment and Validation

for Effective Leadership

101 responses (Summer 2010)

Graphics, Animation and New Media research

network (GRAND)

Researchers within the GRAND network primarily

rely on emails to communicate with colleagues

OSM tools are still underutilized

Survey 1: OSM Usage by Age Groups

Most respondents stated that OSM activity is not

currently considered as a component of the merit or

tenure review process

If OSM activity is considered, it is listed as

activity or service within the community

Most respondents believe an OSM activity

should be considered if it has been peer reviewed

More information on this and related projects can be

found at www.SocialMediaLab.ca

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the many volunteers who participated in

our surveys and for the input from the other members of the

Social Media Lab including Philip Mai, Kathleen Staves, and

Amanda Wilk as well as the Netlab members including Dr.Barry

Wellman, Dima Dimitrova, Guang Ying Mo and Zack Hayat.

Funding for this project was provided by the NCE GRAND and

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC).

* Based on the top two primary OSM

tools for professional use

Rates of usage across age groups are fairly

consistent except when dealing with blogs

In the age group 30-34, blogs were the most

popular form of OSM

1%

23%

30%

17% 16%

7%

2%

12%

25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64

% U

sers

Age Group

Twitter

Blogs

Listserv

Academic Social Networks

Non-Academic Social Networks

Online Document Management

Video/tele Conferencing

Wikis

Survey 1: OSM Usage by Tools Survey 1: Dis/Advantages of OSM Use

Anatoliy Gruzd ([email protected]) & Melissa Goertzen ([email protected])

School of Information Management, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

Listserv groups are still the primary means of

communication

Blogging and microblogging are becoming more

popular

Virtual worlds, social bookmarking and

presentation sharing sites are used the least

Advantages Disadvantages

Keep up to date with topics Time consuming

Discover new ideas or

publications

Distracting from other duties

Follow other researchers’

work

Threat of negative exposure

Make new research contacts Technological challenges

Promote current

work/research

Copyright concerns

Collaborate with other

researchers

Too accessible by the public

Solicit advice from peers

Maintain professional image

Publish findings

Discover new funding

opportunities

Garner mass media attention

Survey 1: Some Future Trends

File

s &

Do

cum

ents

Sh

arin

g

OS

M m

eets

Ref

eren

ces

Man

agem

ent

Aca

dem

ic S

oci

al

Net

wo

rkin

g

Recommended