Date post: | 13-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | barrie-may |
View: | 232 times |
Download: | 6 times |
Introduction to Risk
The pricing of Risky Assets
Required return depends on the risk of the investment
The Greater the risk the greater the return
Do all risks result in higher return?
Look at the history of Capital Market returns
Returns from non-financial investments have to be comparable with returns from financial investments of similar risk
What determines the required rate of return of an investment?
Market Indexes
Summarize the performance of different classes of securities
Most well known: Dow Jones Industrial Average Standard & Poor’s Composite Index
Indexes are portfolios of various stocks DJIA: 30 stocks SP500: 500 stocks
Different types of Indexes
Equally Weighted portfolios (DJIA) Each asset is represented in the portfolio by 1
share, no matter what the price of the share and the total value of the firm
If you are using 30 firms in your index, you will include a stock of each in it
Value weighted portfolios(SP500) Stocks in the portfolio are weighted by their
relative weight on the market. The bigger the company, the higher it’s weight
Market Capitalization
Total number of stocks * price of stock This is the measure of size that is used when
building value weighted portfolios.
The Value of an Investment of $1 in 1926
Source: Ibbotson Associates
0.1
10
1000
1925 1940 1955 1970 1985 2000
S&PSmall CapCorp BondsLong BondT Bill
Inde
x
Year End
1
6402
2587
64.1
48.9
16.6
0.1
10
1000
1925 1940 1955 1970 1985 2000
S&PSmall CapCorp BondsLong BondT Bill
Source: Ibbotson Associates
Inde
x
Year End
1
660
267
6.6
5.0
1.7
Real returns
The Value of an Investment of $1 in 1926
Value in 1994 of $1 invested in 1926
$7 in 1994 had the same purchasing power as $1 in 1926.
NOMINAL REAL
1994 2000 1994 2000
SMALL CAP $2,843 $6402 $340 $660
S&P500 $811 $2587 $97 $267
CORPORATE BONDS
$38 $64.1 $4.5 $6.6
TREASURY BONDS
$26 $48.9 $3.1 $5
T-BILLS $12 $16.6 $1.5 $1.7
INFLATION $7
Risk of different Asset Classes
Security Risk
Treasury Bills Inflation Risk
Treasury Bonds + Interest Risk
Corporate Bonds + Default Risk
Common Stocks + Market Risk
+ Unsystematic Risk
Average Return 1926-1994
Average Nominal Return
Average Real Return
Average Risk Premium
Treasury bills 3.7% 0.6% 0 %
Government bonds
5.2 2.1 1.4
Corporate bonds
5.7 2.7 2.0
Common stocks
12.2 8.9 8.4
Small-firm stocks
17.4 13.9 13.7
Rates of Return 1926-2000
Source: Ibbotson Associates
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
26 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 9520
00
Common Stocks
Long T-Bonds
T-Bills
Year
Per
cent
age
Ret
urn
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
19
26
19
29
19
32
19
35
19
38
19
41
19
44
19
47
19
50
19
53
19
56
19
59
19
62
19
65
19
68
19
71
19
74
19
77
19
80
19
83
19
86
Year
Return %
US Stock Market
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Number of
years
-50% -30% -10% 10% 30% 50%
Return, percent
Annual Market Returns in the US 1926-1994
Measuring Risk
Variance (σ2) and Standard Deviation (σ)
Average value of squared deviations from mean. A measure of volatility.
N
ii
N
ii
N
ii
RRN
RRN
RN
R
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
Deviation from mean Squared Month Return return deviation
1 5.4% 2.6% 6.8 2 1.7 - 1.1 1.2 3 - 3.6 - 6.4 41.0 4 13.6 10.8 116.6 5 - 3.5 - 6.3 39.7 6 3.2 0.4 0.2
Total 16.8 205.4
Mean: 16.8/6 = 2.8% Variance: 205.4/6 = 34.2 Standard deviation: 34.2 = 5.9% per month Annualized standard deviation 5.9 x (12) = 20.3%
Merck’s historical Mean and Standard Deviation
Average Return 1926-1994
Average Nominal Return
Average Risk Premium
Standard Deviation
Treasury bills 3.7% 0 % 3.3 %
Government bonds
5.2 1.4 8.7
Corporate bonds
5.7 2.0 8.3
Common stocks
12.2 8.4 20.2
Small-firm stocks
17.4 13.7 34.3
Brief periods of extremely high volatility
October 19, 1987, market fell 23% in one day
VARIABILITY IN STOCK MARKET RETURNS
Source: © Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation 2003 Yearbook™, Ibbotson Associates, Inc., Chicago (annually updates work by Roger G. Ibbotson and Rex A. Sinquefield). All rights reserved.
– 90% + 90%0%
Average Standard Series Annual Return Deviation Distribution
Large Company Stocks 12.2% 20.5%
Small Company Stocks 16.9 33.2
Long-Term Corporate Bonds 6.2 8.7
Long-Term Government Bonds 5.8 9.4
U.S. Treasury Bills 3.8 3.2
Inflation 3.1 4.4
Historical returns 1926 to Today
Normal Distribution
A large enough sample drawn from a normal distribution looks like a bell-shaped curve.
Return onlarge company commonstocks
The probability that a yearly return will fall within 20.1 percent of the mean of 13.3 percent will be approximately 2/3.
Probability
99.74%
– 3 – 49.3%
– 2 – 28.8%
– 1 – 8.3%
012.2%
+ 1 32.7%
+ 2 53.2%
+ 3 73.7%
68.26%
95.44%
Normal Distribution
The 20.1-percent standard deviation we found for stock returns from 1926 through 1999 can now be interpreted in the following way: if stock returns are approximately normally distributed, the probability that a yearly return will fall within 20.1 percent of the mean of 13.3 percent will be approximately 2/3.
S&P 500 Return Frequencies
0
2
5
11
16
9
1212
1
2
110
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
62%52%42%32%22%12%2%-8%-18%-28%-38%-48%-58%
Annual returns
Ret
urn
fre
qu
ency
Normal approximationMean = 12.8%Std. Dev. = 20.4%
Source: © Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation 2002 Yearbook™, Ibbotson Associates, Inc., Chicago (annually updates work by Roger G. Ibbotson and Rex A. Sinquefield). All rights reserved.
Normal Distribution
Calculated over recent five-year period Firm faces changing business risks over 70-year
period Calculate monthly variance and multiply by twelve,
assuming successive monthly returns are independent Standard deviation increases with the square root of
the length of time over which it is being measured Most stocks more variable than market Diversification reduces variability
Changes in the price of different stocks are not perfectly correlated
Tend to offset each other
Variability In Returns Of Individual Stocks
PortfolioStandardDeviation
UNIQUE RISK
MARKET RISK
Number of securities5 10
Diversification Eliminates Unique Risk
MARKET RISK
Or Systematic Risk Or Undiversifiable Risk
Affects All Stocks UNIQUE RISK
Or Unsystematic Risk Or Diversifiable Risk Or Specific Risk Or Residual Risk
Affects Individual Stocks Or Small Groups Of Stocks
Unique Risk Of Different Firms Unrelated
Eliminated By Diversification
Individual Stocks Have Two Kinds Of Risk
A drug trial showing that beta blockers increase risk of cancer in older people will affect Pfizer’s stock But has no effect on shares of GM or IBM
A strike at a single GM plant will affect only GM and perhaps its suppliers and competitors
A hot summer will increase demand for air conditioners But won’t affect the demand for computers
Unique Or Unsystematic Risk
All firms affected by economy and exposed to market risk Example: surprise in rate of growth in GNP
Market risk cannot be diversified away
Market Or Systematic Risk
Risk of a well-diversified portfolio depends only
on the market or systematic risk of the securities
in the portfolio
Risk of a non- diversified portfolio depends on
the market risk and the unique risk of the
securities in the portfolio
Portfolio Risk
The market or an average stock has =1
A stock with =2 has twice as much systematic risk as the market
An investor in a high beta stock will expect to earn a higher return than an investor in a low beta stock
Systematic Risk Of A Stock Measured By Its Beta
The return on a portfolio, diversified or not, depends only on the market risk of the portfolio
The market doesn’t reward us for taking unique risks we can avoid at very little cost by diversification otherwise mutual funds would always sell at a
premium to the value of their underlying shares
Major Investors Hold Diversified Portfolios, With Little Or No Diversifiable Or Unique Risk
Market risk (beta) for common stocks1989 - 1994
Stock Beta Stock Beta
AT&T .92 Exxon .51
Biogen 2.2 Ford Motor 1.12
Bristol Myers .97 General Electric 1.22
Coca Cola 1.12 McDonald’s 1.32
Compaq 1.18 Microsoft 1.23
= 2.2
Biogen has 2.2 times as much market risk as the
market
relation between and actual returns not precise
because of biogen’s unique risk actual returns scattered about fitted line
BIOGEN
1. TOTAL RISK = DIVERSIFIABLE RISK + MARKET RISK2. MARKET RISK IS MEASURED BY BETA, THE SENSITIVITY TO MARKET CHANGES
beta
EXPECTED
RETURN
EXPECTEDMARKETRETURN
STOCK
Risk Of Individual Stocks
Diversification makes sense for investors Does it also make sense for a firm?
If diversification makes sense for the firm, each new project has to be analyzed in the context of the firm’s portfolio of existing projects
Value of the diversified portfolio of projects would be greater than the sum of the projects considered separately
No. Investors can easily diversify by holding different securities; they will not pay more for firms that diversify In countries with efficient capital markets, diversification
does not increase or decrease a firm’s value Total value of a firm is the sum of its parts
Diversification And Value Additivity
r = rf + (rm - rf)
EXPECTEDRETURN
Expectedmark
etreturn
Riskfreerate
0 .5 1.0 BETA
MARKET PORTFOLIO
Security market line
rm - rf
Rate of return on market - t-bill rate
Has averaged 8.4% over 69 years
Market risk premium
f
m Xr
r
EXPECTED RETURN
BETA1.0
X
SML and investments
Investments lying below the security market line are dominated by a mixture of the market portfolio and the riskless asset
Investments lying below the security market line are dominated by a mixture of the market portfolio and the riskless asset
= 0.92 Interest rate on t-bills rf = 6% Market risk premium rm - rf = 8.4% Expected return on AT&T
r = rf + (rm - rf)
= 6 + .92 X 8.4 = 13.7%
Expected Return On AT&T Stock At Beginning Of 1995