1
Introduction to the Introduction to the Presentations to the Presentations to the
National Research Council National Research Council Delta IssuesDelta IssuesDELSDELS--WSTBWSTB--0909--0909
1/26/101/26/10
Jerry Johns Jerry Johns Deputy DirectorDeputy Director
California Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Department of Water Resources
22
OverviewOverview
Water in CaliforniaWater in CaliforniaWater Supply Impacts of the Biological Water Supply Impacts of the Biological Opinion Opinion RPARPA’’ssFour Basic Facts About the DeltaFour Basic Facts About the DeltaAlternatives to the Fish Agency Alternatives to the Fish Agency RPARPA’’ss
Better Tools Better Tools –– Smelt PEISmelt PEIBetter Protective Actions Better Protective Actions –– Salmon BarrierSalmon BarrierBetter Approach Better Approach –– Food Food –– tidal habitat / Ntidal habitat / N
2
33
Water Variabilityand Use
2/3 of precipitation in north
2/3 of use in south
2
44
CaliforniaCaliforniaWaterWaterSystemsSystems
3
3
55Bay-Delta detail image from CALFED
SanFrancisco
San Diego
Redding
Los Angeles
Sacramento
Stockton
San Francisco
SacramentoRiver
San JoaquinRiver
Source:
Delta Vision 2008
4
77
Importance of the Delta to CaliforniaImportance of the Delta to California
•• Water SupplyWater Supply25 million Californians and 3 million acres of agriculture rely 25 million Californians and 3 million acres of agriculture rely on on the Delta for waterthe Delta for waterWater supply for $400 billion of annual economic activityWater supply for $400 billion of annual economic activity
•• InIn--Delta Land UseDelta Land Use558,000 acres in agricultural production558,000 acres in agricultural production64,000 acres of urban and commercial development64,000 acres of urban and commercial development
•• EnvironmentEnvironmentConfluence of CaliforniaConfluence of California’’s two largest watersheds (Sacramento s two largest watersheds (Sacramento River and San Joaquin River)River and San Joaquin River)More than 750 plant and animal speciesMore than 750 plant and animal speciesMore than 40 threatened or endangered speciesMore than 40 threatened or endangered species
15
DRAFT 2009 Delivery Reliability ReportEstimated Delivery Reduction under Average Conditions
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Pre-BO/Pre-Wanger (D1641) FWS & NMFS BO(Most Likely)
Average Conditions
Del
iver
y (T
AF)
0.86maf(24%)
Water Supply Impacts to the State Water Project (SWP)
5
DRAFT 2009 Delivery Reliability ReportEstimated Delivery Reduction under Dry Conditions
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Pre-BO/Pre-Wanger (D1641) FWS & NMFS BO(Most Likely)
Dry Conditions
Del
iver
y (M
AF)
0.65maf(34%)
Water Supply Impacts to the State Water Projects (SWP)
Forecasted 2010 SWP Water Supply Allocation4.2
3.8
3.4
2.9
2.5
2.1
1.7
1.3
0.8
0.4
0.00%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Allo
catio
n (%
)
Volu
me
(maf
)
2010 Final Allocation 0 Allocation w/o USFWS & NMFS BiOp RPAs 0 Series5
Dry Average Wet
2009 Final Allocation
6
1111
Four Basic Bay/Delta FactsFour Basic Bay/Delta Facts
(1) The fishery food web recently altered(1) The fishery food web recently altered(2) The Delta is a Tidal Estuary(2) The Delta is a Tidal Estuary(3) Some good relationship exist between Delta (3) Some good relationship exist between Delta flows and flows and ““taketake”” (salvage) at SWP/CVP pumps (salvage) at SWP/CVP pumps in South Deltain South Delta(4) Relationship between fish take and fish (4) Relationship between fish take and fish abundance abundance –– ““small to negligiblesmall to negligible””
Need comprehensive solution to the many fish Need comprehensive solution to the many fish stressors and stressors and ““reasonablereasonable”” controls on SWP/CVP controls on SWP/CVP exportsexports
0 . 1
1
1 0 2
1 0 3
0 . 1
1
1 0
1 0 0
1 0 2
1 0 3
1 0 4
1 0 5
1 9 7 0 1 9 8 0 1 9 9 0 2 0 0 00 . 1
1
1 0
1 0 2
1 0 3
1 0 4
1 9 7 0 1 9 8 0 1 9 9 0 2 0 0 0
1
1 0
1 0 3
1 0 4
Abu
ndan
ce In
dex
Cat
ch p
er T
raw
l
Y e a r
D e l t a S m e l t L o n g f i n S m e l t
S t r i p e d b a s s T h r e a d f i n s h a d
Source: Kimmerer and Nobriga (2005); Sommer et al. (In Press, Fisheries 32(6))
Exhibit DExhibit DThe Pelagic Organism DeclineThe Pelagic Organism Decline
1970 1980 1990 2000 1970 1980 1990 2000
Abun
danc
e In
dex
Striped bass (YOY)
Delta Smelt
Threadfin Shad
Longfin Smelt
7
1313
(1)(1) The fishery food webThe fishery food webrecently alteredrecently altered
Invasive SpeciesInvasive SpeciesCorbula clams in Suisun Bay Corbula clams in Suisun Bay ––Phytoplankton crashPhytoplankton crashLimnoithonaLimnoithona –– now most dominant zooplankton and now most dominant zooplankton and not a good food source for fishnot a good food source for fishAquatic weeds Aquatic weeds –– Egeria Egeria –– reduce turbidity and reduce turbidity and provide cover to predators in the Central and provide cover to predators in the Central and Southern DeltaSouthern Delta
Increased ammonia dischargesIncreased ammonia dischargesChange in Nitrogen to Phosphorus ratiosChange in Nitrogen to Phosphorus ratiosRelated to more green and blue green algae Related to more green and blue green algae ((microcystismicrocystis) fewer Diatoms) fewer Diatoms
1414
… CRASHED in Suisun Bay right after the 1987 Corbula invasion
0
10
20
30
40
50
Chl
a (m
g/m
3 )
0
2000
4000
6000
Cor
bula
(#/m
2 )ce1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
0
100
200
300
400
GP
P (m
g C
/m2 -
d)
Primary Production in Suisun Bay
Corbula amurensis
Phytoplankton Primary Production
Source: J. Cloern (USGS): Oral presentation at the 2007 Annual IEP Workshop, Asilomar, CA
8
1515
Phytoplankton Primary Production
… in Estuaries is typically very HIGH Narragansett:
~310 g m-2 yr-1
Lower Hudson: ~800
Chesapeake: ~550
80
170
350
Source: S. Nixon, Limnology and Oceanography 1988
1616
Phytoplankton Primary Production
… CRASHED in Suisun Bay right after the Corbula invasion
Suisun Bay 1988:~20 g m-2 yr-1
Suisun Bay 1980: ~100 g m-2 yr-1
Sources: J. Cloern (USGS) & A. Jassby (UCD): Oral presentations at the 2007 Annual IEP Workshop, Asilomar, CA
9
1717
1970s
1990s
2000s:~70 g m-2 yr-1
Phytoplankton Primary Production
… during the POD years is slightly UP in the Delta & Suisun Bay.
Quality???Diatom
Sources: A. Jassby (UCD), J. Cloern (USGS), IEP data
54321
54321
2.0 2.5 3.0Log Delta outflow
Log
abun
danc
e longfin smelt
striped bass
POD Has Further Shifted POD Has Further Shifted AbundanceAbundance--Outflow RelationshipsOutflow Relationships
POD
Post-Corbula
Pre-Corbula
Source: Kimmerer (2002); Sommer et al. (In Press, Fisheries 32(6))
10
1919
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
1972 1980 1988 1996 2004
0
6000
12000
18000
2400018??:Eurytemora
affinis
1978:Sinocalanus
doerri 1988:Pseudodiaptomus
forbesi
1993/1994:Acartiella sinensis
Limnoithona tetraspina
Cala
noid
Cop
epod
s(C
B ne
t co
unt/
m3 )
Lim
noith
ona
tetr
aspi
na(P
ump
coun
t/m
3 )
Adult copepods at Chipps Island, yearly average densities with 5-year moving average lines
Zooplankton Species Invade in “Waves”
Source: A. Mueller-Solger, DWR; IEP data
2 5 10 15 205
10
50
100
500
72
7375
76
77
78
80
81
8283
8485
86
8788 8990
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
9900
01
02
03
0401
02
0304
Sur
viva
l Ind
ex
Biomass, mgC m-3
Del
ta S
mel
t
Zooplankton (Jul-Oct)
Source: Kimmerer (2008)
There is Evidence That Zooplankton Biomass Affects Delta Smelt Survival in Summer
11
Spring Food Abundance also Important to Delta Smelt
Source: BJ Miller
2222
largemouth bass average beach seine relative density
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
19
76
19
77
19
78
19
79
19
80
19
81
19
82
19
83
19
84
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
avera
ge a
nn
ual
larg
em
ou
th b
ass
rela
tive d
en
sity
12
Ammonia Ammonia ContaminantsContaminants
FlowFlow““HarvestHarvest””
PhosphorusPhosphorusTemperatureTemperature
TurbidityTurbidityClamsClamsJellyfishJellyfishEdge & benthic fishEdge & benthic fishMicrocystisMicrocystisAquatic WeedsAquatic Weeds
Lots
High
Low and Constant
High
Limited
Warm
Low
Little
Low
Highly variable
Low
Lots
Cool
HighDiatomsPelagic fish
Natives thriveResists invasions
Alternative Stable StatesSource: Anke Mueller-Solger CALFED
Regime Shift
2424
(2) The Delta is a Tidal Estuary(2) The Delta is a Tidal Estuary
The The DetaDeta Not a river Not a river -- Need to understand Need to understand Tidal effectsTidal effects
2 high tides and 2 low tides per day2 high tides and 2 low tides per day
Delta Outflow Delta Outflow -- +6,000 cfs net daily flow+6,000 cfs net daily flow300,000 cfs tidal flow300,000 cfs tidal flow
Old and Middle River flowsOld and Middle River flows--3,000 cfs net daily flow3,000 cfs net daily flow30,000 cfs tidal flow30,000 cfs tidal flow
13
2525
How Water Gets to the California Economy
How Water Gets How Water Gets to the California Economyto the California Economy
Sac River– Delta Cross Channel– Mokelumne River– Old & Middle Rivers
Sac River– Delta Cross Channel– Mokelumne River– Old & Middle Rivers
111
San Joaquin
River
San Joaquin
River
222
Sac River /West DeltaSac River /West Delta
333
SWP PumpsSWP PumpsSWP PumpsCVP PumpsCVP PumpsCVP Pumps
Tidal Flow300,000 cfs 30,000 cfs
2626
(3) Some good relationship exist between Delta (3) Some good relationship exist between Delta flows and flows and ““taketake”” (salvage) at SWP/CVP pumps (salvage) at SWP/CVP pumps in South Deltain South Delta
NonNon--linear relationship between January and linear relationship between January and February OMR flows and Salvage of many fish February OMR flows and Salvage of many fish species species -- --6,000 cfs 6,000 cfs Particle tracking and young smelt salvage Particle tracking and young smelt salvage
(4) No substantial relationship between (4) No substantial relationship between ““taketake””and fish abundanceand fish abundance
Reducing Reducing ““taketake”” will not restore fish populationswill not restore fish populationsLook at last four yearsLook at last four yearsTake should be Take should be ““reasonablyreasonably”” limited to avoid rare high limited to avoid rare high take eventstake events
14
Project Effects and Delta Smelt ResponseProject Effects and Delta Smelt Response
D/DD/DW/ANW/AN W/ANW/AN D/DD/D D/DD/D AN/ANAN/AN BN/DBN/D BN/WBN/W W/WW/W D/CD/C C/CC/CYear TypesYear TypesSac/SJRSac/SJR
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Avg
. Neg
. OM
R in
CFS
(Jan
-Feb
)
J-F Exports
Project Effects and Delta Smelt ResponseProject Effects and Delta Smelt Response
D/DD/DW/ANW/AN W/ANW/AN D/DD/D D/DD/D AN/ANAN/AN BN/DBN/D BN/WBN/W W/WW/W D/CD/C C/CC/CYear TypesYear TypesSac/SJRSac/SJR
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Avg
. Neg
. OM
R in
CFS
(Jan
-Feb
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Perc
ent P
EI
J-F Exports
PEI %
15
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Avg
. Neg
. OM
R in
CFS
(Jan
-Feb
)an
d FM
WT
times
10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Perc
ent P
EI
J-F ExportsFMWT X 10PEI %
Project Effects and Delta Smelt ResponseProject Effects and Delta Smelt Response
Water Supply Costs (TAF) 502 731 570 Water Supply Costs (TAF) 502 731 570
Last 4 years reduced project effects,Last 4 years reduced project effects,no delta smelt responseno delta smelt response
W/ANW/AN W/ANW/AN D/DD/D D/DD/D AN/ANAN/AN BN/DBN/D BN/WBN/W W/WW/W D/CD/C C/CC/C D/DD/DYear TypesYear TypesSac/SJRSac/SJR
SWP Water Costs (TAF) 510 250
3030
Frustrations with ESA Frustrations with ESA Section 7 ProcessSection 7 Process
One Stressor / One Fish at a timeOne Stressor / One Fish at a time
Need more Holistic / Systems approachNeed more Holistic / Systems approach
Delta is one of the most studied systemsDelta is one of the most studied systemsWe need to be looking at all this dataWe need to be looking at all this data
Hammer / Nail syndrome Hammer / Nail syndrome
““TakeTake”” focus instead of population effectsfocus instead of population effects
““Critical HabitatCritical Habitat”” has become has become ““Any HabitatAny Habitat””
16
3131
ConclusionConclusionExports Exports -- the only source of fish mortality evaluatedthe only source of fish mortality evaluatedMany factors affecting Many factors affecting ““atat--riskrisk”” fish species in the Deltafish species in the Delta
Controlling exports only has not improved delta smelt abundanceControlling exports only has not improved delta smelt abundanceReasonable export constraints are prudent to prevent Reasonable export constraints are prudent to prevent peak entrainment eventspeak entrainment eventsA comprehensive effort is needed to better protect A comprehensive effort is needed to better protect ““atat--riskrisk”” fish species fish species ––
Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP)Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP)RPAsRPAs should be adjusted to useshould be adjusted to use
Better Tools Better Tools -- Delta Smelt PEIDelta Smelt PEIBetter Actions Better Actions –– Salmon NonSalmon Non--Physical Barrier Physical Barrier –– SJRSJRBetter Approach Better Approach -- Food Food -- Tidal Habitat / N loading Tidal Habitat / N loading
3232
EndEnd