1
Investigating the potential of mobile phones for e-governance in Indonesia
By Sri Ranjini Mei Hua and Ezmieralda Melissa
Abstract
This paper brings to the fore various issues that inhibit the adoption of e-governance in developing
countries, particularly in Indonesia. It articulates the importance for understanding and taking into
account citizens’ needs and priorities in the application of e-governance. While the existing literature
has examined e-governance mostly in isolation, this paper argues that it needs to be considered in
tandem with citizen engagement through an analysis of the relationship between citizens and the
state institutions. We define citizen engagement as a process of participation in state affairs that goes
beyond being able to voice an opinion, but also to participate in decision-making processes. Active
engagement means being able to seek greater accountability and information through increased
discussion and consultation.
As mobile platforms provide the same functionality as internet kiosks and household computers, at a
lower investment and operating cost (Samarajiva, 2010), this study investigates the role and potential
of mobile phones in e-governance, and more specifically e-engagement. In order to determine the
level of connectivity and method of engagement that Indonesian citizens have with their government,
we will assess the reach and communication effectiveness of e-government initiatives through an
analysis of web metrics of government websites. While the target of e-government measures involves
four main groups: citizens, businesses, governments and employees (Ndou, 2004), this paper will
focus on the relationship of e-government with citizens.
The paper begins with a review of several definitions of e-governance and assesses what they mean
in the developing country context. Then, it goes on to evaluate the primary conditions of access and
good governance for successful e-governance implementation in developing countries. Next, it
examines the merits and challenges of e-government implementation in Indonesia and evaluates the
current state of its development. In an evaluation of the data gathered through web analytics of
government sites, it was found that mobile social media usage was an important channel through
which information were accessed. Therefore, this paper proposes the need to examine the role of the
mobile phone in e-governance especially with the rapid diffusion of mobile technologies in Asia and
the increasing trend toward using smartphones as the main access point to the Internet in Southeast
Asia (Nielsen, 2011).
Keywords: governance, mobile phones, access, citizen, applications, information, markets
2
Introduction
The concept of e-governance has gained currency in recent years throughout much of the developed
world and increasingly in the developing countries in Asia and Africa. Since the mid-1990s,
governments have introduced a slew of initiatives taking advantage of information and communication
technologies (ICTs) to support stakeholder relationships and policy goals (Andersen, Belardo, and
Dawes, 1994) as well as to improve efficiency, maintain cost effectiveness, and promote transparency
and responsiveness in governance.
While the benefits of e-governance have been observed in many high-income developed economiesi,
there is still much skepticism about its applicability in the global South. In the 2012 United Nations e-
government survey rankings of its 193 member states, the Republic of Korea emerged as the world
leader, scoring 0.9283 on the index, followed by the Netherlands (0.9125), the United Kingdom
(0.8960), Denmark (0.8889), and the United States (0.8687). The composite index measures the
capacity of governments to develop and implement e-government services, and ranges from 0 to 1
(an index closer to 1 indicates a higher level of readiness). The three sub-indices that make up the
index are national website assessment, telecommunication infrastructure, and human capital (adult
literacy and gross school enrolment ratio).
Of the top 20 countries in the e-government development index, the majority are from Northern
America and Europe, while three are from East Asia (Republic of Korea, Singapore and Japan).
Overall, at the regional level, Northern America (0.8559) and Europe (0.7188) lead, with East Asia
(0.6344), South Asia (0.3464), and Africa (0.2762) following behind. The reasons for the gap in e-
governance development between the developed and developing countries are manifold.
As each society’s needs and priorities vary, the model of how e-governance is executed in the
developed countries cannot be applied to the developing countries. The readiness of each society
and its government for embracing e-governance is contingent on its needs and priorities, as well as
the human, financial and physical resources available. Unlike the comprehensive planning, political
and technical support that e-governance projects in developed countries have, many of the e-
governance projects implemented in developing countries do not have such an advantage.
Furthermore, they depend to a large extent on existing budgets and external funding.
It would be impractical to expect that one standard solution for e-governance execution can be
suitably transferred from developed to developing countries. While the concept of e-governance
originated in the public administration systems of industrialized countries, how it functions outside of
that domain, such as in a developing country in Asia or Africa, is influenced in part by the different
administrative environment and process of that country. Beyond the level of technological
infrastructure available, it is important to consider the cultural, political, economic and administrative
contexts in developing countries (Riggs, 1970; Adamolekun, 1976).
3
A low-quality and inefficient public administration system with limited resources is typical of
developing countries in Asia i.e. Indonesia, India, Burma, and North Korea, and Africa i.e. Nigeria,
Congo, Sudan. These countries are usually characterized by poor and/or rigid leadership, high levels
of corruption, and unmotivated and ill-qualified civil servants (Wescott, 1999). With all of these factors
combined, it is difficult to imagine the possibilities for e-governance to take root in the global south.
Moving away from these assertions, the objective of this paper is to identify and analyze the role of
the mobile phone in engaging Indonesia’s citizenry. The paper is structured as follows: first, several
definitions of e-government will be discussed with key elements highlighted, particularly in regard to
developing country contexts. This will be followed by a discussion about the conditions for successful
e-government implementation. Next, the paper will evaluate the current state of e-governance in
Indonesia i.e. the primary issues, opportunities and challenges that e-government initiatives face.
Finally, the paper aims to shed light on the significance and role of the mobile phone in e-governance.
Research purpose:
1. Examine the conditions for successful e-governance implementation in developing countries.
2. Evaluate the role of the mobile phone in the development of e-governance in developing
countries such as Indonesia.
Literature Review
1. Evaluating the definition of e-governance
Several definitions of e-governance exist in the scholarly literature. One simple definition of e-
governance or ‘electronic governance’ is the application of information and communications
technology to government functions and processes so as to bring about ‘simple, moral, accountable,
responsive and transparent’ (SMART) governance (Budhiraja, 2003; Heeks, 2001; Harris, 2004).
Another term for e-governance is “digital government,” adopted by the National Science Foundation
(1999) which focuses on the use of information and technology to support and improve public policies
and government processes as well as to engage citizens and provide timely and comprehensive
services. This is consistent with the World Bank’s definition of e-governance, which also highlights the
elements of i) public administration i.e. delivery of government services and policymaking, and ii)
politics, i.e., how decisions are made at the local, national, regional and global levels (Held, 1995;
World Bank, 2005).
According to Keohane and Nye (2000), “Governance implies the processes and institutions, both
formal and informal, that guide and restrain the collective activities of a group. Government is the
subset that acts with authority and creates formal obligations. Governance need not necessarily be
conducted exclusively by governments. Private firms, associations of firms, nongovernmental
4
organizations (NGOs), and associations of NGOs all engage in it, often in association with
governmental bodies, to create governance; sometimes without governmental authority.” This
definition implies that the domain of e-governance does not have to be limited to the public sector.
The private sector has a role to play as well in terms of managing and administering policies and
measures. Therefore, it is important to note that the success of e-governance is not solely dependent
on the public sector. However, for the purposes of this paper and its focus on the element of e-
government within the larger concept of governance, we will discuss the role of the public sector in e-
governance. The terms e-government and e-governance will be used interchangeably.
An important aspect to consider about e-governance is that it is about choice. On the one hand, it is
about providing citizens with the ability to choose the way in which they want to interact with their
governments. On the other, it is also about the choices governments make about how ICTs will be
deployed to support the choices of its citizens (Drucker, 2001). This paper takes into account various
definitions of e-governance and argues for a shift in focus from e-governance as a one-way, top-down
approach of government operations to one that involves constant negotiation and engagement with
the citizenry.
There are two objectives of e-government strategies: one is targeted toward internally-oriented
processes and the other toward externally-oriented services. The external objective of e-government
is to meet public requirements and expectations through the use of various online interfaces and
services. Its internal objective is to develop an efficient, accountable and transparent process for the
execution of government operations. It is thus important for e-governance to be first implemented
internally across the various ministries, organizations and departments before it can be effectively
used as a tool to provide online services for the public or to engage the citizenry.
According to Gartner (2000), the maturity of e-governance goes through four stages (see diagram 1).
These phases have been developed based on e-commerce and e-governance experiences in Europe
and other Western regions. They are: Web presence – the initial stage where government websites
are set up to provide basic information to citizens; Interaction – government websites offer various
tools that enable interaction i.e. emails, search engines, document downloads; Transaction – citizens
can make online transactions; and Transformation – the final phase, where all government operations
are integrated and customized (see diagram 2). In all of these phases, websites are the main focus
and the primary barometer for the measurement of e-governance success.
5
Diagram 1: E-Governance Maturity Model (Gartner, 2000)
Information Presence
Interaction Intake process
Transaction Complete transaction
Transformation Integration and organisational changes
Diagram 2: E-Governance Maturity Model (Gartner, 2000)
It is important to note, however, that the experience in developing countries would be vastly different
as the e-government communications and information infrastructure is still at a very nascent stage.
With the rising adoption of mobile phone technologies especially among the developing countries in
Asia, more attention needs to be paid to the changing ways in which people access, share and apply
information. Furthermore, the proliferation of social media has enabled citizen interaction with the
ruling party, thus altering traditional power structures and rules on connecting with formal institutions.
An analysis of existing models of e-government development generally shows a similar pattern; the
movement from an embryonic (one-way communication) to a mature (two-way democratic) stage.
One of the advantages of analyzing the development of e-governance in stages is that it enables
governments to measure the development process and also to maintain continued progress.
However, the model fails to indicate the cyclical and iterative nature of e-governance development.
For instance, the processes in the interaction, transaction and transformation phases may feedback
into and shape the development of prior stages. Moreover, the model does not indicate the influence
of exogenous factors i.e. social and political changes, on the maturity track of e-governance.
According to the E-ASEAN task forceii model developed by IBM (see diagram 3), sufficient tele-
density and computer penetration are considered to be important requirements for e-government
projects to work in developing countries. Telecommunication density, tele-density for short, is an
indicator that refers to the number of subscribers (in hundreds) who are served by one telephone
connection unit. In 2009, the tele-density of fixed telephony in Indonesia was 3.82 per cent, meaning
about four telephony connection units served 100 people. This is a low tele-density compared with
Phase
Information
Increasing value to
Citizen / Business
Increasing complexity
Phase
Interaction
Phase
Transaction
Phase
Transformation
6
other developed countries. However, looking at the use of all telephony services including mobile
wireless telephony and fixed wireless telephony, Indonesia’s tele-density reached 76.48 per cent in
2009, a high tele-density number. In fact, from 2004 to March 2009, the number of mobile telephony
subscribers increased by as much as 371.5 per cent with an average increment of 37.9 per cent per
year. Hence, the model fails to include other important indicators such as the reach of mobile wireless
telephony. Furthermore, while it takes into account the level of computer penetration, it overlooks the
internet penetration rate.
Diagram 3: E-ASEAN task force model
• Emerging (<5% teledensity and <1% PC penetration)
• Evolving (5-10% teledensity and 2-5% PC penetration)
• Embedding (20-40% teledensity and 5-10% PC penetration)
• Extending (>40% teledensity and >20% PC penetration)
2. Conditions for e-governance to thrive in developing countries
2.1 Access to infrastructure and information
Former President of India, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam, spoke about the main challenge of implementing e-
government and this also applies to other developing countries such as Indonesia:
“e-Governance, has to be citizen-friendly. Delivery of services to citizens is considered a
primary function of the government. In a democratic nation of over one billion people like India,
e-Governance should enable seamless access to information and seamless flow of information
across the state and central government in the federal set up. No country has so far
implemented an e-Governance system for one billion people. It is a big challenge before
us.”
The population of Indonesia is less than a quarter of India’s and already it is a challenge to implement
e-governance. Indonesia is a large archipelagic country with 17,508 islands and 75,666 villages in 33
provinces; 24 per cent of the villages are located in Java Island. About 60 per cent of Indonesian
people live in the rural areas, characterized by low productivity, high poverty, and low standards of
living. With the development of rural areas, the telecommunication industry and infrastructure
becomes increasingly developed as well but the distribution of infrastructure and services remain
unequal. Thus, many rural areas still do not have telecommunication services. For instance, 31,824
villages did not have access to telecommunication services in 2009.
According to Heeks (2002; 2003a; 2003b), a key reason for the failure of e-governance in developing
countries is that there is often a mismatch between the present situation and the plans for future e-
government systems. More specifically, where there is a gap between the current political situation
7
and that which is required for successful e-government roll-out, the development of e-governance will
naturally be stifled (Ciborra, 2005).
Particularly among developing countries, while resource allocation factors such as the availability of
technological infrastructure, financial resources and skilled personnel are important, organizational
changes may be more important as the lack of these resources are largely attributed to the lack of
coordination among stakeholders (Gichoya, 2005). Therefore, the conditions for the successful
implementation of e-governance may vary among developing countries with different socioeconomic
and political contexts.
Developing countries often have poor IT infrastructure, which constitutes a further obstacle for the
implementation of e-governance (Tapscott, 1996). Without consistent and reliable electricity supply,
telecommunications service and internet access, it is difficult for e-governance to succeed in the
developing context. Even with the right infrastructure in place, many people in developing countries
still do not have access to ICTs due to the digital divide. Thus, the gap persists between the urban
educated segments of the population and the low-educated poor who are unable to afford technology
(Basu, 2004). Therefore, it may be more appropriate to consider low-tech solutions that fit the existing
infrastructure (Cecchini & Raina, 2004) in these situations.
Although Indonesia has the lowest overall internet penetration rate in Southeast Asia (21 per cent –
see diagram 4), mobile internet use is high, making the Indonesian market a viable one. According to
Nielsen’s 2011 Southeast Asia Digital Consumer Report, 48 per cent of regular internet users in
Indonesia access the internet on their mobile phones (see diagram 5). Hence, there is clear potential
for the development of e-governance platforms on mobile phones as more Indonesians access the
internet via their mobile phones.
In contrast to developing countries, most developed countries have better platforms and frameworks
for the development and implementation of e-governance. For instance, the characteristics that define
countries with more frequent and regular usage of online government services tend to be the
following: high income per capita, better access to the internet, greater expenditure on ICT
infrastructure, development and services, and tools.
One study found that access to IT infrastructure accounted for a significant increase (81 per cent) in
the use of e-government services, indicating that public access to the internet is the most crucial
factor influencing the use of e-government services (Prattipati, 2003). However, the same study
indicated that only a small percentage of those who use the internet use it to access government
information and services. For instance, only 23 per cent of Hungarian citizens and 27 per cent of
Polish citizens who use the internet used it for government services. Therefore, it appears that access
alone will not determine the extent of e-government usage.
8
As Heeks (2000) explains, in order for information (made available to the public domain through ICTs)
to have a real impact on people’s lives, it is necessary to have the social and economic resources to
guide people in accessing, assessing and applying the information. Thus one of the primary
objectives of e-governance is ensuring universal access to data and information for citizens (Coleman
& Gøtze, 2001).
Diagram 4: Internet penetration in Southeast Asia
Diagram 5: Mobile internet use
2.2 Good governance
With the effects of globalization and the information revolution, citizen-state relations are changing as
well as the roles and relations of various orders of government with institutions and agencies beyond
government, thus bringing about a greater focus on local governance (Shah & Shah, 2006). However,
there has been no evidence to suggest that the incorporation of ICTs in public administration has led
to improved governance procedures and practices. To be effective, e-government needs to be
integrated within a holistic approach that includes a supportive and qualified leadership, good
communication infrastructure, as well as reliable and affordable internet connectivity. Thus, this paper
brings forth the notion that for e-governance to be effective, good governance is an important pre-
9
requisite. A stronger political desire, as well as more research and investment in skills training are
needed in the implementation of e-governance solutions in developing countries.
E-governance needs to be viewed within a systems theory perspective, i.e., it is an input is influenced
by the context that is made up of a number of moderating variables that interact to produce the
desired output, viz, good governance. Only with the right conditions will e-governance translate into
good governance, e-government is not a necessary precondition for the outcome of good
governance, but good governance does help to facilitate the success of e-governance.
The Asian Development Bank defines good governance in four elements: accountability, participation,
predictability and transparency (Coffey, 2007). Access to information and communication plays a
significant role in promoting good governance (ibid). Therefore, information delivery to the public is a
key responsibility of the government in keeping citizens informed of what is happening around them.
Good governance is not simply about efficiently delivering an array of public services but also about
allowing the freedom and space for democratic engagement and civic dialogue. Public awareness of
societal issues is thus an important prerequisite for meaningful citizen participation on the internet. It
is understood to be a solution to the lack of citizen involvement in liberal democracies (Becker &
Slaton, 2000). In this circumstance, the access to and use of information becomes an important factor
that determines the extent of citizen participation and engagement online. Therefore, we need to
acknowledge the relationship between access to information and political involvement.
In some developing countries where government transparency and accountability is low, it is
important to recognize that governance is not just about effective delivery of public services but also
about “who gets what, when and how” (March and Olsen, 1995). Specifically in Indonesia, known to
be one of the most corrupt countries in the world (ranking 100 out of 182 nations in Transparency
International’s 2011 corruption index), e-governance policy should be developed as it has the
potential to alter the way in which the public sector operates, both internally and with its customers
(Timonen, O’Donnell, and Humphreys, 2003).
Although there is little literature on e-governance implementation in Indonesia, there is increasing
research that tries to identify the reasons or causes for the success or failure of various e-government
projects in developing countries around the world. According to Gartner (2004), over 60 per cent of all
e-governance initiatives either fail or do not meet expected outcomes. Reflecting a similar finding,
Heeks (2003a) has studied more than 40 e-government-for-development projects in
developing/transitional countries and estimates that 35 per cent of these completely failed and 50 per
cent partially failed, while only 15 per cent succeeded.
Some of the reasons that contribute to the failure of e-governance projects in Indonesia are the lack
human capital, infrastructural constraints, low computer and internet penetration, the poor regulatory
environment, lack of organizational culture and design, insufficient e-leadership (Harijadi, 2004) as
10
well as the mismanagement of public funds. Furthermore, developing countries often do not have a
well-planned e-government strategy. An e-government strategy is a ‘plan for e-government systems
and their supporting infrastructure which maximizes the ability of management to achieve
organizational objectives’ (Heeks, 2006).
Without an effective e-government strategy in place, public awareness of e-governance will continue
to remain low. In a study of the Bangladesh government e-Citizens Service Application
(www.forms.gov.bd) portal where most of the government forms are downloadable, it was found that
an overall lack of awareness among the citizenry was a contributing factor toward its low level of use.
This was attributed to the lack of political will, insufficient technological infrastructure and the lack of a
general strategy for e-government implementation (Hossan, Habib, and Kushchu, 2006). Similarly, a
set of case studies conducted on e-government projects in Kerala, India, revealed that several factors
that influence access to e-government services in developing countries are often not taken into
consideration. These factors are dependent on the resources, competencies, beliefs, values, and
motivations of those who are part of the e-government project (Madon, 2004).
The Indonesian government established the Ministry of Communication and Information (2001) and
gave it the responsibility to coordinate, formulate, and disseminate national strategies for ICT
development, so as to increase the adoption and use of ICTs among the people, as well as to
supervise the implementation of the National ICTs policy and development in Indonesia. However, as
Indonesia is a large country with 497 local governments, inconsistencies and conflict sometimes arise
between regional autonomy and central authority thus making the uniform implementation of e-
governance difficult.
Out of the 497 districts in Indonesia, only 214 local governments have websites. Of these 214 sites,
186 were found to be accessible, and the remaining 28 were either under construction or not found
(Donny, 2004). Moreover, the lack of authority held by the State Ministry of Communication and
Information – the institution responsible for the implementation of e-government in Indonesia further
compounds the problems of e-government implementation.
While it has been argued that those of developing countries are relatively less experienced in
democratic systems and processes and thus less actively participate in governmental policy-making
decisions (Yining, Chen, Russell and Wayne, 2007), recent events surrounding the use of ICTs in the
mobilization of citizens in developing countries suggest otherwise e.g. frequent updates on the flood
situation in Thailand between July and December 2011 were posted on social media sites like
Facebook and Twitter; mobile communications and social media applications such as YouTube and
Twitter were used to highlight the public demonstrations of the 2010/2011 revolutions in Tunisia and
Egypt.
11
It has been found that citizens develop a greater interest in using the various e-democracy tools when
governments are ready to provide more services online and in a transparent and efficient manner that
can easily engage the citizenry (Clift, 2002). This process of e-engagement works more effectively
when the government is open to citizen feedback about the information that is disseminated and in
the public domain. However, in a society where the political leadership is dictatorial, inefficient or very
corrupt, it would be difficult for such a system to flourish. In these instances, it would not serve the
interest of the ruling party for citizens to have access to government information.
Access to information can boost people's capability to benefit from the information society (Mann,
2003). It is also a precondition for people to participate in 'digital democracies' (Catinat & Vedel,
2001), and is necessary for the protection of people's right to communicate (Hamelink, 2003). This
development of new approaches toward governance moves toward more lateral and interactive
relationships between governments and its citizens. Hence, ICT introduces communicative tools for
the rearrangement of the party and administration dominated civic participation (Macintosh et al.,
2002).
Research Method
An online web analytics tool, Alexa (www.alexa.com) was used to analyze the web traffic of the top
three government websites in Indonesia. The following web metrics were used to analyze the
websites: i) top pages visited - to determine what information was most sought after by the public, ii)
sources of upstream sites - to find out what sources of information online led them to the main
government webpages, and iii) audience profile – to identify the target group(s) that existing e-
government efforts are reaching. In addition, secondary data were retrieved from both government
and personal sources to understand e-government and ICT trends in Indonesia.
Findings and Discussion
The introduction of ICTs alone will not lead to development unless other entitlements are provided
(Alampay, 2006). An integrated approach is needed in order for ICTs to facilitate development
(Alampay, et. al., 2003; Mann, 2003); one that not only looks at the existing ICT infrastructure, but
also the capabilities of people and the value creation in ICT applications.
Since the year 2006, there have been significant improvements with regards to internet access in
Indonesia. The number of government websites has increased significantly and the national budget
allocation toward improving ICT infrastructure has also increased (Anggono 2012, pers. comm., 18
April). At the same time, there has been a significant improvement in public access to internet
services. Research conducted by MarkPlus Insight, an Indonesian research company, revealed that
the penetration of internet users in Indonesia’s urban areas has increased from 30 - 35 per cent in
2010 to 40 - 45 per cent in 2011 (see diagram 6), which means that there are approximately 55 million
12
people who use the internet in Indonesia. From this number, most of the internet users are
concentrated in Java island (70.05 per cent), followed by Sumatra (16.77 per cent), while other
islands only contribute a small percentage of internet users (see diagram 7).
Diagram 6 – The Penetration of Internet Users in Indonesian Urban Areas
Source: MarkPlus Insight 2011
Diagram 7 – The Penetration of Internet Users in Indonesia divided by Island
Source: The Ministry of Communication and Information White Paper 2010
With greater and more affordable access to the internet in Indonesia, this presents an opportunity for
the government to use ICTs to implement initiatives in improving its services to the public. However,
the Indonesian government has been slow in adapting ICTs to their practice. There are many reasons
for this reluctance such as the lack of innovation from the government departments, regulations that
do not support the initiatives, lack of skilled human resources, and so on. In addition, as Indonesia is
known as one of the most corrupt countries in the world, ICTs can also introduce and further
complicate bureaucratic procedures thus providing government officials with an opportunity to abuse
the system for their own benefit (Rahardjo, 2001).
Nonetheless, there have been some increments in e-government applications initiated by the
ministries and other government institutions. However, the lack of e-government policy,
institutionalization, and planning has prevented the citizens from reaping the full advantage of this
infrastructure implementation. As shown in diagram 8 (see Appendix p. 17, for the full list), the top
13
three government websites reflect the main interests of the Indonesian people, thus these are some
of the websites that e-governance initiatives have to focus on in order to reach out to the citizens.
Diagram 8: Top government websites in Indonesia
1. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources: www.esdm.go.id
2. Ministry of Agriculture: www.deptan.go.id
3. Ministry of Education and Culture: www.kemdiknas.go.id
Despite the fact that many ministries and goverment institutions have attempted to incorporate e-
government applications into their websites, the traffic toward these applications are still considered
small (Anggono 2012, pers. comm., 18 April). There are many reasons behind this slow adaptation of
e-government applications in Indonesia such as the low education of Indonesian citizens that make
them unaware or unconfident of their capability in influencing goverment policies or practice, the
relatively high cost of internet connection (although many cell phone providers provide mobile internet
connection, the connection is usually slow or only provides access to the most popular sites, mainly
social media sites), the low level of trust towards the government, and the lack of socialization of
these applications among the public.
Nevertheless, e-goverment initiatives are promoted as first priority by the Soesilo Bambang
Yudhoyono Goverment. This is demonstrated through the formation of Dewan TIK Nasional (The
National Committee of ICT) that involves elements of all ministries and is led by the President himself.
The Committee was founded by The Presidential Decree No. 20, year 2006, with the objective to
speed up ICT development in Indonesia and implement ICT policies nationally that synchronize all
ICT programs across all the ministries or goverment institutions (The Ministry of Communication and
Information White Paper, 2010).
While e-government initiatives continue to be promoted and developed in Indonesia, the potential to
develop online government services and interactive functions on mobile platforms remains to be
explored. Mobile government or m-government can be simply defined as public service delivery that
involves transactions on mobile devices such as mobile phones, smartphones, and personal digital
assistants. Kushchu and Kuscu (2004:3) define it as “the strategy and its implementation involving the
utilization of all kinds of wireless and mobile technology, services, applications and devices for
improving benefits to the parties involved in e-government including citizens, businesses and all
government units.”
The popularity of mobile phones has increased significantly, especially since 2006. The Ministry of
Communication and Information White Paper 2010 states that the the penetration of mobile phones in
Indonesia increased from 24.6 per cent in 2006 to 52.6 per cent in 2008 (see diagram 9). There are
many reasons contributing to this increase, i.e. the cost of mobile phones has been significantly
reduced, particularly since the arrival of Chinese and local products; the cost of mobile phone
providers has also decreased quite significantly; the various applications that can be easily accessed
14
through mobile phones; and the changing lifestyle of Indonesian citizens that see mobile phones as a
trend and providing a form of entertainment.
Diagram 9 – The Distribution of Cellular Phones in Indonesian Households (2006-2008)
Source: National Census Results 2006 -2008
Role of the mobile phone in e-governance
The relative affordability, portability and ease of use of a mobile phone compared with the PC means
that it holds the potential of bridging the digital divide, especially in developing countries where
computer infrastructure is still underdeveloped. In a 2006 study conducted by LIRNEasia with 8,660
respondents from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, the Philippines, and Thailand, Rohan Samarajiva,
executive director of LIRNEasia referred to the mobile phone as an emerging "primary transactional
device" of people in developing countries (Olivia, 2007).
The mobile phone also shapes and influences the way we interact with our social networks, even
changing traditional norms about whom we can interact with. Furthermore, with the ability to access
the web via smartphones, governments in developing countries need to take into account the
increasing importance of the mobile phone in providing information and services as well as garnering
feedback online. However, issues of access to mobile telephony services still remain because there
will not be enough investment from telecommunications companies in areas that will not make a
profit. Therefore, mobile phones are not the only option for improving e-government communication in
developing countries (Hellström, 2009).The capability of mobile phones must be integrated with
existing e-government infrastructure to enable efficient use of ICTs for governance purposes.
Mobile phone applications exploit the potential of mobile technology to make government agencies
“even more accessible and citizen-centric by extending the benefits of remote delivery of government
services and information to those who are unable or unwilling to access public services through the
Internet or who simply prefer to use mobile devices” (World Bank, 2007). Thus, mobile phones enable
a bottom up style of participation through citizen empowerment. A proposed framework for developing
countries to start implementing mGovernment applications is divided into three different stages:
15
simple applications stage, interactive applications stage, and high interactive applications stage
(Ghyasi & Kushchu, 2004).
Increasing engagement with social media
With the rise of the Indonesian middle class as per capita incomes increase, internet usage has
surged by 1500 per cent since 2000 (Internet World Stats, 2010). Indonesia is estimated to have 37
million Facebook users, second only to the United States, according to web statisticians Socialbakers.
The availability of low-cost handsets on the market has helped propel the adoption of smartphones
and it is expected that the smartphone uptake will rise by 68 per cent in 2012 (International Data
Corporation, 2011).
While internet penetration through computers is low; below 10 per cent, mobile internet penetration
has reached 57 per cent, according to Nielson’s Southeast Asia Digital Consumer Report. Hence, the
trend of Indonesians’ frequent engagement with social network sites demonstrates that this is an area
that should be given due consideration in e-governance policy formulation and implementation.
Diagram 10 shows the percentage increase from 2009 to 2010 in the number of Facebook users
among the top five countries on Facebook.
Diagram 10: Facebook Growth from 2009 – 2010 (top five countries)
Using Alexa, it was found that Facebook was a popular upstream site that online users visited prior to
their visit to the government website. Over 70 per cent of Facebook users in Indonesia access the
social media site through their mobile phones (Facebook, 2011). Thus, these social media sites
constitute an important channel through which updates and announcements can be made by the
government. In fact, Facebook was the third most popular site that online users visited preceding their
visit to the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources and the Ministry of Agriculture portals, the two
most visited government websites. The two upstream websites that were ranked before Facebook
were search engines google.co.id and google.com. For the website of the Ministry of Education and
16
Culture, Facebook was the second most popular upstream site after the localized google search
engine, google.co.id.
It is important to note that the adoption of new technologies may not necessarily bridge the divide that
exists within many societies, i.e. the differences in the level of access between males and females
(Richardson, Ramirez & Haq, 2000), rich and poor (Gomez & Hunt, 1999; Richardson, 2000;
O'Farrell, 2001), urban and rural areas (Campbell, 2001), and among people with different education
levels (O'Farrell, 2001; Madhusudan, 2002) as well as people of different ages and social
backgrounds. For instance, in Indonesia, it was found that males who have children visited
government websites most frequently. This could be due to the fact that males in Indonesia generally
have better and more regular access to ICTs compared with females, because of the possession of
higher incomes or the enrolment into specific employment sectors. Another possibility is that with the
increasing migration of women for work, males who remain in the country with their children have a
greater vested interest in national issues affecting their families such as i) oil and gas markets/prices
(fuel subsidies), ii) methods to improve farming productivity, climate information, agricultural
commodity prices, and iii) educational resources and employment opportunities.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this paper has demonstrated that existing e-governance models that are based mostly
on developed country experiences should not be transposed to developing country contexts as each
country situation is unique and thus would respond to e-governance implementation differently. Good
governance and access to infrastructure and information remain important considerations in rolling
out e- and/or m-government initiatives. Moreover, if governments strive to make e-government
services available via the mobile phone, this will encourage greater public participation.
Education is another key factor in promoting the use of e-governance initiatives to achieve better
accountability, increased transparency and improved governance. Thus, it would be useful to
introduce ICTs into the school curriculum. In addition, the government of Indonesia needs to socialize
its e-governance initiatives into various mass media channels so as to encourage greater e-
engagement with citizens. Furthermore, as the availability of mobile internet connection becomes
more widespread in the country, the government will need to consider various strategies toward using
mobile phone applications to accelerate the development of e-governance initiatives. Finally, with the
increasing popularity of social networking sites among Indonesian citizens, further research would
benefit from understanding how social media are used among people of developing countries in
transactions and interactions with governments and fellow citizens online.
17
Appendix
Ranking of Internet Traffic towards Ministries and Government Institution Sites
18
1. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources
esdm.go.id - Homepage of the Ministry of Energy
and Mineral Resources
bgl.esdm.go.id: Geology Agency
prokum.esdm.go.id - Index page of the Ministry sites
migas.esdm.go.id - Directorate General of Oil and
Gas
eproc.esdm.go.id - e-procurement site for the
Ministry
19
2. Ministry of Agriculture
Litbang.deptan.go.id - Indonesian Agency for
Agricultural Research and Development
Deptan.go.id - Homepage of the Ministry of
Agriculture
Epetani.deptan.go.id - e-farming site (where farmers
can find information on how to improve their farming
productivity)
Ditjenbun.deptan.go.id - Directorate General of
Plantation (enforces regulations on plantation in
Indonesia)
Cybex.deptan.go.id - Agricultural Human Resources
Counselling and Development Commission
3. Ministry of Education and Culture
20
jardiknas.kemdiknas.go.id - Indonesian Education ICT
Network (where teachers and students can share and
get teaching and learning materials)
bahasa.kemdiknas.go.id - Indonesian Language
Development and Supervision Agency (this agency
does regular research on the Indonesian language,
makes Indonesian dictionaries, and determines rules
for formal Bahasa Indonesia)
pusatbahasa.kemdiknas.go.id - as above (this address
brings you to the same site as above)
sergur.kemdiknas.go.id - teacher certification site
(provides information on how to become a certified
teacher in Indonesia)
kemdiknas.go.id - homepage of the Ministry of National
Education
References
21
Alampay, E., Heeks, R. & Soliva, P. (2003) Bridging the Information Divide in the Philippines
Asian Media Information Centre, IDRC and UNDP.
Alampay, E. (2006). "Beyond Access to ICTs: Measuring Capabilities in the Information
Society." International Journal of Education and Development using Information and
Communication Technology 2(3): 4-22. URL
<http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=196>
Andersen , David F. , Salvatore Belardo , and Sharon S. Dawes . 1994 . Conceptual Frameworks for
Strategic Information Management in the Public Sector. Public Productivity and Management
Review 17 (4): 335 – 53.
Adamolekun, L. (1976). Towards development-oriented bureaucracies in Africa. International
Review of Administrative Sciences, 42(3), 257−265.
Basu, S. (2004), “E-Government and Developing Countries: An Overview”, International Review of
Law Computers & Technology, Vol 18, No. 1, pp. 109–132.
Becker, T. & Slaton, C. D. (2000) The Future of Teledemocracy. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
Budhiraja, R. (2003). ”Electronic Governance – A Key Issue in the 21st Century”,
Additional Director, Electronic Governance Division, Ministry of Information Technology,
Government of India. URL<http://www.mit.gov.in /eg/article2.htm>
Campbell, D. (2001) ‘“Can the digital divide be contained?” The Digital Divide: Employment and
Development Implications’, International Labour Review, Vol. 140 No.2
Catinat, M. & Vedel, T. (2001) ‘Public Policies for Digital Democracy’ in Digital Democracy. Issues of
Theory and Practice, Hacker, K.L. & Van Dijk, J. (Eds.) pp. 184208, Sage Publications.
Cecchini, S. & Raina, M. (2004), “Electronic Government and the Rural Poor: The Case of Gyandoot”,
Information Technologies and International Development, Vol 2, No 2, pp. 65–75.
Ciborra, C. (2005). “Interpreting e-government and Development Efficiency, transparency or
governance at a distance?” Information Technology & People Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 260-279.
Clift, S. 2002. ‘E-governance to e-democracy: Progress in Australia and New Zealand toward
information-age democracy’, Publicus.Net: Public Strategies for the Online World, March.
URL <www.publicus.net/articles/aunzedem.html>
22
Coffey (2007). International Development.The Role of Communication in Governance: Detailed
Analysis. URL <http://www.icdev.info/portal/documents/GovernanceSummaryPaper_003.pdf>
Coleman S & Gøtze J 2001, Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation,
Hansard Society, London.
Data Centre of the Ministry of Communication and Information (2010). Indonesia ICT White Paper,
Data Centre of the Ministry of Communication and Information, Jakarta.
Donny, B.U., (2004) Fakta & Kondisi e-Government di Indonesia, makalah pada Seminar Teknologi
Informasi “"Solusi Permasalahan Social Engineering dalam penerapan E-Government" –
Bandung.
Drucker, P F (2001), Electronic Governance on Context. In Commonwealth Centre for
Electronic Governance 2001, Living and working in the connected world.
URL<www.electronicgov.net/pubs/research_papers/eged/summary.shtml>
Gartner. A Majority of E-Government Initiatives Fail or Fall Short of Expectations, Gartner, Inc.'s
Executive Programs, San Diego, April 2002.
Ghyasi, A. F., & Kushchu, I. (2004). m-Government: Cases of Developing Countries. mGovLab,
international University of Japan. URL
<www.mgovernment.org/resurces/mgovlab_afgik.pdf>
Gichoya, D. (2005). “Factors Affecting the Successful Implementation of ICT Projects in Government”
The Electronic Journal of e-Government Volume 3 Issue 4, pp 175-184, URL
<www.ejeg.com>
Gomez, R. & P. Hunt (1999). Telecentre Evaluation. A Global Perspective, International
Development Research Centre. URL
<http://www/idrc.ca/telecentre/evalutation/nn/00_Cov.htm>
Hamelink, C. (2003). ‘Human Rights for the Information Society’, in Communicating in the Information
Society, O’ Siochru, S. & Girard. B. (eds) UNRISD. URL
<http://www.crisinfo.org/content/view/full/231/>
Harijadi (2004). APEC Telecommunications and Information Working Group. 29th Meeting, 21-26
March 2004, Hong Kong, China.
Harris, R. (2004). “The Internet Could Help Reduce Poverty:” WSI: Internet Business.
23
URL <http://rogharris.org/JakartaPost-htm>
Heeks, R. (2000). “Information Systems for Public Sector Management. Government Data:
Understanding Barriers to Citizen Access and Use”. I-government Working Paper Series
No. 10. Institute for Development Policy and Management. University of Manchester.
Heeks, R. (2001). Building e-Governance for Development: A Framework for National and Donor
Action. i-Government Working Paper Series, No. 12. Manchester: Institute for Development
Policy and Management, University of Manchester.
Heeks, R. (2002). “Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local
Improvisations”, The Information Society Vol. 18, pp.101–112.
Heeks, R. (2003a). “Most eGovernment-for-Development Projects Fail: How Can Risks be Reduced?”
iGovernment Working Paper Series, Institute for Development Policy and Management,
University of Manchester, UK.
Heeks R. (2003b). “eGovernment for Development: Causes of eGovernment Success and Failure:
Factor Model”, IDPM, University of Manchester, UK, URL
<http://www.egov4dev.org/causefactor.htm>
Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the Global Order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
International Data Corporation (2011). Indonesia Mobile Phone Shipments Surpassed 12
million in Q3; Dual-SIM Mobile Phones Driving the Growth, says IDC. URL
<http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prID23194811>
Hellström, J. (2009), “Mobile phones for good governance – challenges and way forward”, Draft
discussion paper, Stockholm University/ UPGRAID, March. URL
<http://www.w3.org/2008/10/MW4D_WS/papers/hellstrom_gov.pdf>
Hossan, C.G., Habib, M.W. and Kushchu, I. (2006) "Success and failure factors for egovernment
projects implementation in developing countries: A study on the perception of government
officials of Bangladesh", Proceedings of EURa mGaV 2006: Second European Conference
on Mobile Government, Brighton, UK, 30-31 August and 1 September. URL
<http://www.mgovernment.org/resurces/euromgvo2006/PDF/9_Chowdhury.pdf>
Internet World Stats (2010). URL <http://www.internetworldstats.com/asia/id.htm>
Kushchu, Ibrahim and M. Halid Kuscu (2004): From E-government to M-government: Facing the
Inevitable. URL <http://www.mgovernment.org/resurces/mgovlab_ikhk.pdf>
24
Macintosh, A. & Davenport, E. & Malina, A. & Whyte, A. (2002). Technology to support democracy. In
Å. Grönlund (ed.) Electronic Government: Design, Applications & Management. London &
Hershey: Idea Group Publishing, 226–248.
Mann, C.L. (2003). ‘Information Technologies and International Development: Conceptual Clarity
in the Search for Commonality and Diversity,’ Information Technologies and International
Development, Vol. 1, No. 2, 67-79.
March, J.G. & Olsen, J.P. (1995). Democratic Governance. New York: Free Press.
National Science Foundation. (1999). Digital Government Program Announcement NSF 99-103. URL
<http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1999/nsf99103/nsf99103.txt>
Ndou, V. D. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges, The
Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18, 1, 1-24.
Nielsen. (2011). Indonesia The Most Reliant On Mobile Internet Access Across Southeast Asia:
Nielsen. URL <http://www.acnielsen.co.id/news/Release110711.shtml>
O'Farrell, C. (2001). Information Flows in Rural and Urban Communities: Access, Processes and
People. UDRSA Conference 2001.
Oliva, E. RP's poorest spend $2 a month on mobile phones--study" 20 January, 2007 URL
<http://technology.inquirer.net/infotech/infotech/view_article.php?article_id=44458>
Prattipati, S. (2003). Adoption of e-Governance: Differences between countries in the use of online
government services, Journal of American Academy of Business. 3:1.
Rahardjo, B. (2001). Membangun e-Government, in Proceeding of National Seminar on Computer
Network II, Technic Study Club, STMIK Dipanegara, Makassar.
Richardson, D., Ramirez, R. & Haq, M. (2000). Grameen Telecom's Village Phone Program in Rural
Bangladesh: A Multimedia Case Study (Final Report, March 17 2000). CIDA
Riggs, F. (1970). The context of development administration. In F. Riggs (Ed.), Frontiers of Development Administration (pp. 72–108) Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Safitri, D. (2011). BBC Indonesian Service. Why is Indonesia so in love with the Blackberry?
URL<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/direct/indonesia/9508138.stm>
25
Samarajiva, R. (2010). (on behalf of Prof. Subhash Bhatnagar) – eGovernance using mobile
platform [Policy Brief]. Mobile 2.0 Applications and Conditions for Emerging Telecom
Markets. State of Telecom Industry in Pakistan.
Shah, A. & Shah, S. (2006). ‘The new visions of local governance and the evolving role of local
government’, in Local Governance in Developing Countries, ed. A. Shah, The World Bank,
Washington, DC URL
<http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWBIGOVANTCOR/Resources/NewVision.pdf>
Tapscott, D. (1996), “The Digital Economy”, McGraw Hill, New York.
Timonen, V., O. O’Donnell, and P.C. Humphreys. (2003). E-government and The
Decentralisation of Service Delivery. Institute of Public Administration.
UN-DESA (2012). United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. E-Government Survey
2012: E-Government for the People. URL
<http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan048065.pdf>
Wescott, C. (1999). Guiding principles on civil service reform in Africa: an empirical review.
International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(2), 145−170.
World Bank (2005). A Definition of E-Government. URL <http://go.worldbank.org/M1JHE0Z280>
World Bank (2007). World Bank e-Development Thematic Group M-Government Conference –
November 29, 2007 – Background Note.
World Bank (2011). Changes in country classification. URL <http://data.worldbank.org/news/2010-
GNI-income-classifications>
Yining Chen, H.M. Chen, Russell K.H. Ching, and Wayne W. Huang (2007): Electronic Government
Implementation: A Comparison between Developed and Developing Countries, International
Journal of Electronic Government Research, 3, 2, 45-61.
i The World Bank classified a country with a gross national income per capita of greater than USD 12,276 as high income (World Bank; July 2011).
26
ii The e-ASEAN Task Force was established in 1999. The Task Force is responsible for developing a “broad and
comprehensive action plan” to create an “ASEAN e-space”.