Investigating the Second Language Reader with Low Native Language Literacy
Dr. Elaine C. Klein and Dr. Gita Martohardjono
Research Institute for the Study of Language in Urban Society (RISLUS)
The CUNY Graduate CenterEmail: [email protected]
AAAL, Washington, D.C, March 29, 2008
2
The QuestionsIn young readers, native language (L1) pre-literacy and word level reading skills transfer to the second language (L2).
How does reading develop among older at-risk L2 learners (SIFE)?
Higher level reading skills? Transfer of skills?
3
Who are SIFE?
‘SIFE’ (‘Newcomers’), a subgroup of ELLs:
Recently arrived adolescent students Little or no English Assumed to have:
- Low literacy and academic preparation- Gaps in prior schooling (+2 yrs)
4
Research on adolescent L2 readers
Overlooked and underserved Very high drop-out rates Few appropriate assessment tools
for identification and tracking Need for more systematic research
(e.g. Velasco & Fix 2000; Short, Boyston & Coltrane 2003; Freeman, Freeman & Mercuri 2003; Morse 2005; August & Shanahan 2006; Short & Fitzsimmons 2007)
5
Some Facts about SIFE in NYC Schools*
About 15,000 SIFE comprise 11% of ELLs
Most enter 8th-10th grades 59% have Spanish native language Graduation rates far lower than other
ELLs*Bilingual Education Student Information Survey (BESIS) 2006-2007: NYC DOE Office of English Language Learners, 2007.
6
SIFE Profile and Progress
What academic skills do SIFE bring to school in the US?
How do SIFE compare to their peer groups?
What academic skills do SIFE gain over one year (T1 T2)?
7
The SIFE ProjectIn Progress
18 month Longitudinal StudyParticipants:
98 students identified as SIFE 9th and 10th grade Native language: Spanish
Schools: 5 inner-city high schools in NYC Various program types Native language support
8
Data CollectionMeasures of typical language development:
Versant (Oral Spanish and English) Syntactic development (Spanish and
English)Academic literacy diagnostics:
Reading and content areas (Spanish and English)
Benchmark assessments (State and city-mandated tests)
9
Results: Typical L1 Development
Versant: oral vocabulary, sentence mastery, fluencyOverall Mean % Correct = 79, SD = 16
Syntactic comprehension:Overall Mean % Correct = 89, SD = 12
10
Academic Literacy Diagnostics
Pre- and Basic Literacy Higher-Level Literacy
- Vocabulary and Reading Comprehension Content Areas
- Math- Science- Social Science
11
Results: Pre- and Basic Literacy
Phonological & Orthographic Awareness
Word Reading Simple Sentence Comprehension
Mean % Correct = 96, SD = 4.5
12
Results: L1 Reading Vocabulary
13
Results: L1 Reading Comprehension
14
Difference Between L1 Vocabulary and Reading Comprehension (at T1)
Vocabulary Reading Comprehension
Mean % Correct 66% 56%
Mean Grade Level
5 3.7
(sig; t(97) = 5.5, p < .001)
15
Results: Academic Content Areas
Math: Majority at/below grade 3
Science: Majority at/below grade 4
Social Science: Majority at/below grade 4
16
What skills do SIFE bring? Show typical language development:
- Oral language, syntactic comprehension Have basic reading skills Show delay in:
- Higher level reading skills: (4+ grade levels below expected grade) - Content Area Knowledge: (5+ grade levels below expected grade)
17
Comparison GroupsNative English Speaker Groups:
9th and 10th Graders Community College West Indian English
speakersRegular ELL Group:
9th-12th GradersSpanish-English Community College Group:
Did not meet minimum English language requirements
Currently taking ESL classes
18
Comparison Between Native English Speakers and SIFE
Mean Grade Level Scores on Vocabulary and Reading Comprehension
19
Progress in One Year(N=23)
Academic gains in L1 skills
L2 English development
20
Academic Gains: L1 Vocabulary
Percent Correct at each Grade Level Time 1 and Time 2
N=23
21
Academic Gains: L1 Reading Comprehension
Percent Correct at each Grade Level Time 1 and Time 2
N=23
22
Difference Between L1 Vocabulary and Reading
Comprehension (at T2)
t(22) = 2.9; p < .01
Vocabulary Reading Comprehension
Mean Grade Level
6.8 5.4 3.7 5
23
A Closer Look at Reading Comprehension
Basic Understanding (24%): Recall factual information Identify relevance
Text Level Skills (76%): Inferencing Interpretation Critical Analysis
24
L1 Grade 5 Text Level Skills
Text Level Skills
Mean % Correct Time 1 49%
Mean % Correct Time 2 57%
25
L2 English DevelopmentAfter 1 year: Oral Language: Overall: Very limited speaking and listening skills Vocabulary: Basic; slow, simple speechSyntactic Comprehension: Mean percent correct = 58%Benchmark ESL Reading Test: Approximate Grade Level Score = 3rd to 4th
Grade
26
Summary of SIFE ProgressIn one year:
Significant gains in L1 reading skills Modest gains in L2 English skills Gap between L1 vocabulary and
reading comprehension persists Lowest performance still on L1 text
level reading skills
27
Transfer of SkillsNative Language (T1) Vocabulary = 4.7 Reading Comprehension = 3.6English L2 (T2) Vocabulary and Reading Comprehension approximate grade level = 3-4
Higher level reading skills transfer from L1 to L2.
28
Summary and ConclusionsSIFE Do not have L1 developmental delays in oral language or word-level reading Lag in knowledge base in L1 Lag in higher-level reading
Most severely in text level readingTransfer reading skills from L1 to L2
Accelerate development of these skills in L1.
THANK YOU!
30
Acknowledgements
NYC Department of Education Participating schools and SIFE liaisons Participating community colleges All participants and teachers RISLUS Research Team