+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Investigating thermodynamic properties of the ternary systems of MCl (M=K, Rb, Cs) with aqueous...

Investigating thermodynamic properties of the ternary systems of MCl (M=K, Rb, Cs) with aqueous...

Date post: 30-Dec-2016
Category:
Upload: mancheng
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
5
Investigating thermodynamic properties of the ternary systems of MCl (M = K, Rb, Cs) with aqueous mixed solvent: N,N-dimethylacetamide Jia Lu, Shu'ni Li , Quanguo Zhai, Yucheng Jiang, Mancheng Hu Key Laboratory of Macromolecular Science of Shaanxi Province, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710062, PR China abstract article info Article history: Received 8 October 2012 Received in revised form 16 November 2012 Accepted 18 November 2012 Available online 30 November 2012 Keywords: KCl RbCl CsCl Activity coefcients N,N-dimethylacetamide Potentiometric In this work, thermodynamic properties measurement for KCl/RbCl/CsCl in N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) (w)+H 2 O (1 -w) systems (where the w= 0.10, 0.20, 0.30) was carried out by potentiometric method using ion-selective electrodes at 298.15 K. Modeling of the activity coefcients of these ternary systems was based on the Pitzer, the modied Pitzer and the extended DebyeHückel equations. Meanwhile, the osmotic coefcients, the standard free energy of transference from the water to the mixture have also been reported. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction There is a consensus that studying the thermodynamic properties of electrolyte in mixed organic + water solvents is very important which get a widely application in industrial and environmental, especially desalination and purication. Up to now, a lot of studies on the electrolyte in mixed water solvents have been reported by isopiestic method, potentiometric method and other measurements [1,2]. Potentiometric method has an advantage in the study of thermodynamic properties, such as rapidity, stability, simplicity and good selectivity. Many researches on thermodynamic properties of alkali metal halides in organic solvent have been determined using potentiometric method. For example, Lopes et al. investigated the activity coefcients of NaCl in ethanol + water mixtures [3]. Uspenskaya et al. determined the thermodynamic properties in the sodium chloridewater1-butanol (iso-butanol) ternary systems [4]. The activity coefcients of NaBr in ethylene carbonate + water mixed solvents have been obtained by Hernández-Luis group [5]. Moreover, the thermodynamic property inves- tigations of alkaline metal salts in some model compounds of proteins like amino acids, peptides as well as amide are of interest for researchers [6]. For instance, the activity coefcients determination of KCl in the KCl + formamide + water system by potentiometric measurement was studied by Ghalami-Choobar group [7]. Hernández-Luis et al. reported the activity coefcients of NaF/NaCl/NaBr + formamide + water [810] and NaCl + N-methylformamide + water systems [11]. Activity coef- cients for NaCl in N,N-dimethylformamide + water mixed solvent have been investigated by the group of Alfredo Maestre [12]. As one of the amides, DMA is a highly polar solvent and also versatile solvent in various industrial processes [13]. However, the thermodynamic properties of electrolyte in DMA are not reported. As an extension of our work on the thermodynamic properties of alkaline metal salts + organic solvent + water systems [1417], this paper aims to investigate the ternary systems of MCl (M = K, Rb, Cs) + N,N-dimethylacetamide + water at 298.15 K. The experimental data were well tted to the Pitzer, the modied Pitzer and the extended DebyeHückel equations. The mean activity coefcients, os- motic coefcients, and the standard free energy of transference were also calculated herein. 2. Experimental Potassium chloride (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, A.R. purity>99.5%), rubidium chloride and cesium chloride (A.R. purity>99.5%, Sichuan State Lithium Materials Co., Ltd.) were dried in vacuum at 393 K for the constant weight and then stockpiled in desiccators. DMA (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, A.R. purity >99.5%), were used without pretreatment which contents very few water in original product could be ignored. Double distilled water was used in all experiments. The ion-selective electrode (model 401) was obtained from Jiangsu Electroanalytic Instrument Factory. The K ion-selective electrode (ISE), Rb-ISE and Cs-ISE were lled with 0.1 mol·L -1 KCl solution, RbCl solu- tion and CsCl solution relatively. Both the electrodes were of the type of PVC membrane and activated about 2 h before use. The membrane has no chemical reaction with DMA but dissolves in tetrahydrofuran. Journal of Molecular Liquids 178 (2013) 1519 Corresponding authors. Tel.: +86 29 81530767; fax: +86 29 81530727. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (S. Li), [email protected] (M. Hu). 0167-7322/$ see front matter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2012.11.014 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Molecular Liquids journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/molliq
Transcript

Journal of Molecular Liquids 178 (2013) 15–19

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Journal of Molecular Liquids

j ourna l homepage: www.e lsev ie r .com/ locate /mol l iq

Investigating thermodynamic properties of the ternary systems of MCl(M=K, Rb, Cs) with aqueous mixed solvent: N,N-dimethylacetamide

Jia Lu, Shu'ni Li ⁎, Quanguo Zhai, Yucheng Jiang, Mancheng Hu ⁎Key Laboratory of Macromolecular Science of Shaanxi Province, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710062, PR China

⁎ Corresponding authors. Tel.: +86 29 81530767; faxE-mail addresses: [email protected] (S. Li), hmch

0167-7322/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. Allhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2012.11.014

a b s t r a c t

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:Received 8 October 2012Received in revised form 16 November 2012Accepted 18 November 2012Available online 30 November 2012

Keywords:KClRbClCsClActivity coefficientsN,N-dimethylacetamidePotentiometric

In this work, thermodynamic properties measurement for KCl/RbCl/CsCl in N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA)(w)+H2O (1−w) systems (where the w=0.10, 0.20, 0.30) was carried out by potentiometric methodusing ion-selective electrodes at 298.15 K. Modeling of the activity coefficients of these ternary systemswas based on the Pitzer, the modified Pitzer and the extended Debye–Hückel equations. Meanwhile, theosmotic coefficients, the standard free energy of transference from the water to the mixture have also beenreported.

© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

There is a consensus that studying the thermodynamic properties ofelectrolyte in mixed organic+water solvents is very important whichget a widely application in industrial and environmental, especiallydesalination and purification. Up to now, a lot of studies on the electrolytein mixed water solvents have been reported by isopiestic method,potentiometric method and other measurements [1,2]. Potentiometricmethod has an advantage in the study of thermodynamic properties,such as rapidity, stability, simplicity and good selectivity. Manyresearches on thermodynamic properties of alkali metal halidesin organic solvent have been determined using potentiometricmethod. For example, Lopes et al. investigated the activity coefficientsof NaCl in ethanol+water mixtures [3]. Uspenskaya et al. determinedthe thermodynamic properties in the sodium chloride–water–1-butanol(iso-butanol) ternary systems [4]. The activity coefficients of NaBr inethylene carbonate+water mixed solvents have been obtained byHernández-Luis group [5].Moreover, the thermodynamic property inves-tigations of alkalinemetal salts in somemodel compounds of proteins likeamino acids, peptides as well as amide are of interest for researchers [6].For instance, the activity coefficients determination of KCl in theKCl+formamide+water system by potentiometric measurement wasstudied by Ghalami-Choobar group [7]. Hernández-Luis et al. reportedthe activity coefficients of NaF/NaCl/NaBr+formamide+water [8–10]and NaCl+N-methylformamide+water systems [11]. Activity coeffi-cients for NaCl in N,N-dimethylformamide+water mixed solvent have

: +86 29 [email protected] (M. Hu).

rights reserved.

been investigated by the group of Alfredo Maestre [12]. As one of theamides, DMA is a highly polar solvent and also versatile solvent in variousindustrial processes [13]. However, the thermodynamic properties ofelectrolyte in DMA are not reported.

As an extension of our work on the thermodynamic properties ofalkaline metal salts+organic solvent+water systems [14–17], thispaper aims to investigate the ternary systems of MCl (M=K, Rb,Cs)+N,N-dimethylacetamide+water at 298.15 K. The experimentaldata were well fitted to the Pitzer, the modified Pitzer and theextended Debye–Hückel equations. The mean activity coefficients, os-motic coefficients, and the standard free energy of transference werealso calculated herein.

2. Experimental

Potassium chloride (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd,A.R. purity>99.5%), rubidium chloride and cesium chloride (A.R.purity>99.5%, Sichuan State Lithium Materials Co., Ltd.) were driedin vacuum at 393 K for the constant weight and then stockpiledin desiccators. DMA (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, A.R.purity >99.5%), were used without pretreatment which contentsvery few water in original product could be ignored. Double distilledwater was used in all experiments.

The ion-selective electrode (model 401) was obtained from JiangsuElectroanalytic Instrument Factory. The K ion-selective electrode (ISE),Rb-ISE and Cs-ISE were filled with 0.1 mol·L−1 KCl solution, RbCl solu-tion and CsCl solution relatively. Both the electrodes were of the type ofPVC membrane and activated about 2 h before use. The membranehas no chemical reaction with DMA but dissolves in tetrahydrofuran.

Table 4Values of E0 and the Debye–Hückel parameters for KCl/RbCl/CsCl in the DMA+watermixtures at 298.15 K.

w a/Å c/kg·mol−1 d/kg2·mol−2 E0/mV SD

KCl+DMA+water0.10 3.61 0.0510 −0.02216 259.1 0.240.20 5.18 −0.0389 0.01235 275.1 0.130.30 2.00 0.1296 −0.07364 300.9 0.34

RbCl+DMA+water0.10 5.53 −0.0927 0.02773 146.0 0.270.20 6.08 −0.0972 0.00972 168.1 0.140.30 6.92 −0.1922 0.04996 183.0 0.32

CsCl+DMA+water0.10 5.48 −0.1143 0.04992 147.2 0.270.20 1.61 0.1396 −0.04543 166.9 0.210.30 1.55 0.1331 −0.03543 185.9 0.29

Table 1Values of the molality m, potential E, mean activity coefficients γ± and osmotic coeffi-cients Ф for KCl/RbCl/CsCl in pure water at 298.15 K.

m/mol·kg−1 E/mV γ± Ф m/mol·kg−1 E/mV γ± Ф

KCl+pure water0.0020 −79.9 0.9520 0.9840 0.2471 152.2 0.6999 0.90920.0033 −53.8 0.9385 0.9796 0.2978 160.5 0.6859 0.90620.0078 −11.0 0.9105 0.9704 0.3818 171.8 0.6675 0.90280.0146 19.2 0.8840 0.9618 0.4606 180.4 0.6539 0.90060.0300 54.2 0.8460 0.9497 0.5507 188.6 0.6412 0.89890.0517 79.9 0.8125 0.9394 0.6657 197.0 0.6282 0.89780.0836 102.2 0.7799 0.9298 0.7735 203.7 0.6184 0.89740.1165 117.6 0.7561 0.9232 0.9975 214.7 0.6029 0.89800.1737 135.9 0.7264 0.9154

RbCl+pure water0.0025 −169.6 0.9454 0.9818 0.1596 28.4 0.7240 0.91180.0060 −126.6 0.9195 0.9732 0.2107 40.9 0.7016 0.90570.0079 −113.3 0.9092 0.9698 0.2887 55.0 0.6759 0.89920.0152 −81.9 0.8805 0.9603 0.3705 65.9 0.6557 0.89450.0296 −49.8 0.8442 0.9485 0.4470 74.0 0.6407 0.89150.0495 −25.5 0.8114 0.9380 0.5488 82.9 0.6246 0.88860.0774 −4.6 0.7799 0.9282 0.6626 90.6 0.6103 0.88660.1066 9.9 0.7558 0.9209 0.7758 97.5 0.5987 0.8855

CsCl+pure water0.0015 −199.9 0.9568 0.9855 0.3889 62.7 0.6279 0.87810.0046 −144.5 0.9278 0.9758 0.4627 70.0 0.6118 0.87370.0076 −119.6 0.9095 0.9696 0.5500 77.7 0.5960 0.86970.0128 −94.4 0.8865 0.9619 0.6194 82.8 0.5853 0.86720.0223 −67.6 0.8573 0.9520 0.6855 87.2 0.5762 0.86520.0359 −45.1 0.8275 0.9419 0.7625 91.9 0.5669 0.86330.0539 −26.1 0.7989 0.9323 0.8236 95.3 0.5602 0.86210.1045 4.1 0.7465 0.9149 0.8832 98.3 0.5543 0.86110.1556 22.0 0.7120 0.9036 0.9400 101.1 0.5491 0.86040.2043 34.2 0.6874 0.8959 0.9930 103.3 0.5446 0.85980.3096 52.7 0.6491 0.8842

16 J. Lu et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 178 (2013) 15–19

Ag/AgCl electrode was conditioned overnight in 0.1 mol·L−1 HCl solu-tion. Prior to the experiment, the electrodes were calibrated andpresented a good Nernstian response. The potential readings wereachieved on a pH/mV meter (Orion-868, America) and taken as the

Table 2Values of average molecular mass M, dielectric constant D, density ρ, Debye–Hückel consta

w M/g·mol−1 D ρ/g·cm−3

DMA+water0.00 18.02 78.3 0.99700.10 19.57 74.0 0.99570.20 21.41 71.7 0.99620.30 23.64 69.3 0.9973

Table 3Values of E0, the Pitzer parameters and modified Pitzer parameters of KCl/RbCl/CsCl in DM

w Pitzer

β(0)/kg·mol−1 β(1)/kg·mol−1 Cφ/kg2·mol−2 E0/mV SD

KCl+DMA+water0.10 0.0820 0.2213 −0.03573 259.1 0.240.20 −0.0238 0.4966 0.02386 275.2 0.140.30 0.1477 −0.0801 −0.11809 300.9 0.35

RbCl+DMA+water0.10 −0.0859 0.5034 0.04727 146.1 0.280.20 −0.1010 0.6321 0.02507 168.3 0.150.30 −0.2368 0.8269 0.10327 183.2 0.35

CsCl+DMA+water0.10 −0.1065 0.4913 0.07790 147.3 0.290.20 0.1354 −0.1498 −0.06959 166.9 0.210.30 0.1226 −0.1608 −0.05337 185.9 0.29

final readings when they became constant for at least 5 min. The uncer-tainty of the experimental of potential is ±0.1 mV.

BI-870 Dielectric Constant Meter (Brookhaven Instruments Corpo-ration) was used to determine the relative permittivity of the mixedsolvents at 298.15±0.2 K. Calibration was performed under atmo-spheric pressure using double-distilled water (D=78.4, 298.15 K).The density of the mixture has been measured by density meter(Anton Paar DMA 4500). The uncertainty of the experimental of rela-tive permittivity and density is ±0.1 and ±0.00003 g·cm−3.

3. Results

The cells used in this work belong to the type of cell without liquidjunction with only one fluid, which as follows:

M� ISEjMClðmÞ;waterjAg=AgCl ð1Þ

M� ISEjMClðmÞ;DMAðwÞ;waterð1−wÞjAg=AgCl ð2Þwhere m stands for the molality of MCl (M=K, Rb, Cs) solution (be-tween 0.0020 and 0.9975, 0.0025 and 0.7758, and 0.0015 and 0.9930,

nts A, B and Aφ for DMA+water mixtures at 298.15 K.

A/kg1/2·mol−1/2 B/kg1/2·mol−1/2 Å−1 Aφ/kg1/2·mol−1/2

0.5108 0.3286 0.39210.5556 0.3378 0.42650.5827 0.3433 0.44720.6136 0.3494 0.4710

A+water mixtures at 298.15 K.

Modified Pitzer

b/kg1/2·mol−1/2 BMX/kg·mol−1 CMX/kg2·mol−2 E0/mV SD

1.8023 0.0787 −0.0217 259.1 0.252.7988 −0.0252 0.0035 275.0 0.130.9646 0.1658 −0.0607 300.9 0.34

2.9766 −0.0884 0.0158 145.9 0.273.3740 −0.0939 0.0018 168.0 0.143.9334 −0.2005 0.0303 182.9 0.31

2.8790 −0.1087 0.0314 147.2 0.250.7725 0.1676 −0.0365 166.9 0.210.7619 0.1580 −0.0286 185.9 0.29

Table 5Values of the molality m, potential E, mean activity coefficients γ± and osmotic coeffi-cients Ф for KCl/RbCl/CsCl in the different mass fraction of DMA+water mixtures at298.15 K.

m/mol·kg−1 E/mV γ± Ф m/mol·kg−1 E/mV γ± Ф

KCl+DMA (w)+water (1−w)w=0.100.0017 −71.6 0.9512 0.9838 0.4495 195.2 0.6400 0.89720.0062 −7.3 0.9127 0.9710 0.5406 203.6 0.6263 0.89480.0125 26.7 0.8826 0.9612 0.6328 210.7 0.6146 0.89250.0202 50.0 0.8577 0.9532 0.7261 216.6 0.6041 0.89020.0324 72.7 0.8301 0.9445 0.8238 222.1 0.5941 0.88770.0484 91.8 0.8041 0.9365 0.9042 226.4 0.5865 0.88540.0675 107.3 0.7811 0.9298 0.9871 229.9 0.5791 0.88280.0904 121.0 0.7601 0.9239 1.0629 233.3 0.5725 0.88020.1141 131.7 0.7429 0.9192 1.1297 236.1 0.5669 0.87760.1712 150.6 0.7124 0.9116 1.2032 239 0.5608 0.87460.2374 165.8 0.6877 0.9061 1.2688 241.1 0.5554 0.87170.3079 177.7 0.6682 0.9023 1.3335 243.4 0.5502 0.86870.3729 186.6 0.6539 0.8996

w=0.200.0121 41.0 0.8813 0.9611 0.4350 208.7 0.6306 0.88730.0196 64.5 0.8566 0.9533 0.5161 215.9 0.6153 0.88240.0296 84.3 0.8329 0.9460 0.5887 222.1 0.6034 0.87860.0431 102.4 0.8092 0.9388 0.6594 226.6 0.5931 0.87530.0622 119.9 0.7844 0.9315 0.7269 231.0 0.5841 0.87240.0812 132.2 0.7655 0.9261 0.7964 235.0 0.5758 0.86980.0998 141.7 0.7503 0.9217 0.8614 238.5 0.5687 0.86760.1511 160.7 0.7186 0.9129 0.9257 241.7 0.5622 0.86580.2000 173.4 0.6964 0.9066 0.9820 244.2 0.5569 0.86440.2417 182.3 0.6809 0.9022 1.0341 246.4 0.5524 0.86320.3066 193.0 0.6609 0.8965 1.0814 248.3 0.5485 0.86230.3631 200.5 0.6464 0.8921 1.1264 249.9 0.5451 0.8616

w=0.300.0075 43.8 0.8929 0.9637 0.4483 230.6 0.5679 0.85820.0120 66.0 0.8689 0.9554 0.5147 236.3 0.5540 0.85340.0198 89.6 0.8386 0.9449 0.5786 241.1 0.5418 0.84850.0312 110.7 0.8072 0.9341 0.6373 244.9 0.5313 0.84380.0498 132.3 0.7708 0.9216 0.6929 248.2 0.5218 0.83900.0766 152.2 0.7340 0.9092 0.7426 251.0 0.5136 0.83440.1210 172.9 0.6926 0.8957 0.7960 253.8 0.5049 0.82910.1626 186.2 0.6650 0.8871 0.8432 256.1 0.4974 0.82410.2144 198.6 0.6388 0.8793 0.8857 257.5 0.4907 0.81920.2699 208.7 0.6169 0.8729 0.9235 259.2 0.4847 0.81470.3173 215.8 0.6015 0.8684 0.9613 261.2 0.4788 0.80990.3783 223.5 0.5845 0.8635 0.9966 262.6 0.4732 0.8052

RbCl+DMA (w)+water (1−w)w=0.100.0172 −66.0 0.8682 0.9582 0.3523 70.8 0.6415 0.88130.0308 −37.9 0.8355 0.9481 0.4559 82.1 0.6147 0.87060.0515 −14.4 0.8024 0.9378 0.5428 89.5 0.5959 0.86290.0773 4.1 0.7734 0.9285 0.6555 97.3 0.5750 0.85440.1094 20.0 0.7466 0.9196 0.7922 104.4 0.5539 0.84580.1474 33.4 0.7221 0.9112 0.9138 110.2 0.5382 0.83960.2127 49.8 0.6900 0.8997 1.0304 115.3 0.5254 0.83480.2827 61.2 0.6632 0.8897 1.1544 119.8 0.5139 0.8309

w=0.200.0079 −82.6 0.9009 0.9675 0.4143 99.5 0.6204 0.87230.0114 −64.8 0.8850 0.9624 0.5033 107.3 0.5978 0.86110.0163 −47.2 0.8673 0.9568 0.6030 114.9 0.5754 0.84910.0253 −26.4 0.8433 0.9494 0.6965 120.4 0.5565 0.83830.0369 −8.6 0.8205 0.9424 0.8021 125.5 0.5372 0.82660.0536 8.6 0.7960 0.9349 0.9037 130.2 0.5203 0.81590.0713 21.8 0.7760 0.9289 1.0035 133.7 0.5051 0.80600.0979 36.3 0.7524 0.9217 1.0962 137.0 0.4920 0.79730.1474 54.8 0.7197 0.9113 1.1826 139.8 0.4806 0.78960.2001 68.0 0.6932 0.9023 1.2667 142.2 0.4702 0.78250.2694 81.1 0.6654 0.8919 1.3469 144.0 0.4610 0.77610.3477 92.2 0.6395 0.8811

w=0.300.0029 −115.5 0.9327 0.9777 0.3350 102.6 0.6090 0.85840.0066 −75.2 0.9037 0.9683 0.3985 109.7 0.5863 0.84610.0098 −56.2 0.8865 0.9627 0.4807 116.8 0.5604 0.8311

Table 5 (continued)

m/mol·kg−1 E/mV γ± Ф m/mol·kg−1 E/mV γ± Ф

0.0150 −35.6 0.8653 0.9559 0.5697 123.4 0.5358 0.81620.0231 −15.1 0.8410 0.9482 0.6570 129.1 0.5146 0.80290.0352 4.2 0.8145 0.9397 0.7373 133.3 0.4972 0.79190.0520 22.3 0.7873 0.9309 0.8187 136.2 0.4814 0.78190.0829 43.6 0.7511 0.9188 0.8976 139.5 0.4677 0.77350.1106 56.4 0.7265 0.9102 0.9755 142.3 0.4555 0.76630.1630 73.7 0.6900 0.8962 1.0477 144.7 0.4454 0.76080.2143 85.3 0.6616 0.8841 1.1136 146.9 0.4371 0.75670.2628 92.5 0.6386 0.8734

CsCl+DMA (w)+water (1−w)w=0.100.0017 −182.9 0.9518 0.9840 0.2277 51.4 0.6772 0.89350.0089 −100.4 0.8989 0.9666 0.3078 64.5 0.6475 0.88240.0123 −84.3 0.8842 0.9618 0.3957 75.3 0.6217 0.87240.0196 −61.5 0.8605 0.9541 0.4672 82.5 0.6041 0.86560.0312 −39.0 0.8332 0.9453 0.5761 91.5 0.5819 0.85710.0472 −19.5 0.8062 0.9367 0.6863 98.9 0.5636 0.85070.0695 −1.5 0.7783 0.9277 0.8106 106.0 0.5470 0.84610.0969 13.6 0.7524 0.9193 0.9382 112.1 0.5336 0.84400.1383 29.5 0.7227 0.9094 1.0761 117.6 0.5228 0.84490.1735 39.5 0.7025 0.9025

w=0.200.0014 −171.4 0.9518 0.9838 0.5218 104.2 0.5623 0.86020.0035 −126.6 0.9271 0.9753 0.5942 109.8 0.5507 0.85770.0058 −100.9 0.9079 0.9687 0.6586 114.1 0.5415 0.85560.0094 −77.7 0.8861 0.9612 0.7371 118.8 0.5313 0.85300.0166 −50.9 0.8550 0.9504 0.7925 121.9 0.5247 0.85110.0266 −28.6 0.8243 0.9397 0.8527 124.9 0.5177 0.84880.0407 −8.8 0.7928 0.9287 0.9179 128.0 0.5106 0.84610.0976 30.5 0.7181 0.9031 0.9721 130.4 0.5048 0.84360.1488 49.4 0.6789 0.8904 1.0239 132.5 0.4994 0.84100.1998 62.4 0.6509 0.8819 1.0804 134.6 0.4936 0.83790.2910 78.9 0.6155 0.8722 1.1306 136.5 0.4885 0.83500.3667 88.8 0.5941 0.8671 1.1759 138.1 0.4839 0.83210.4403 96.9 0.5775 0.8634

w=0.300.0035 −108.3 0.9234 0.9740 0.4274 112.5 0.5567 0.85150.0062 −79.6 0.9003 0.9660 0.5010 119.3 0.5418 0.84820.0104 −54.7 0.8749 0.9571 0.5707 124.8 0.5297 0.84570.0177 −29.4 0.8432 0.9459 0.6393 129.6 0.5194 0.84360.0281 −7.6 0.8108 0.9344 0.7039 133.4 0.5106 0.84180.0412 10.0 0.7807 0.9236 0.7649 136.9 0.5031 0.84020.0875 44.3 0.7133 0.8997 0.8252 140.2 0.4962 0.83850.1410 65.6 0.6666 0.8836 0.8936 143.5 0.4889 0.83660.1953 78.1 0.6339 0.8729 0.9495 145.9 0.4833 0.83500.2703 92.5 0.6013 0.8631 1.0043 148.4 0.4779 0.83320.3510 104.0 0.5756 0.8561

RbCl+DMA (w)+water (1−w)w=0.30

17J. Lu et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 178 (2013) 15–19

respectively). w is the mass fraction of DMA in the mixtures. Cell (1)is used to calibrate the electrode pairs and Cell (2) to measure.

The experimental mean activity coefficients can be calculated bythe Nernstian equation:

E ¼ E0 þ 2klnðmγÆÞ ð3Þ

where E0 means the standard potential of cell (1) and cell (2). k=RT/F shows the Nernst slope, in which R, T and F refer to the universal gasconstant, absolute temperature and Faraday constant, respectively.γ± indicates the mean activity coefficient of the electrolyte.

For calibrating the electrode pair of K/Rb/Cs-ISE and Ag/AgCl, theexperimental potentials E of cell (1) were plotted against ln (mγ±).The values of E for KCl, RbCl, and CsCl in pure water are shown inTable 1. The mean activity coefficients of KCl/RbCl/CsCl in purewater were calculated according to the Pitzer equation adopting thePitzer parameters from reference [18]. The values of k and E0 obtainedfrom the linear regression analysis of the experimental data were25.56±0.04 and 241.6±0.1 mV, 25.42±0.06 and 137.6±0.2 mV,

Fig. 1. Plot of γ± versusm for CsCl in various mass fraction of DMA+water mixtures at298.15 K, ■, w=0.00; , w=0.10; , w=0.20; , w=0.30.

Table 6Values of the standard potential E0 in modified Pitzer equations, the standard freeenergy of transference ΔGt

0 of KCl/RbCl/CsCl from water to DMA+water mixtures at298.15 K.

w E0/mV ΔGt0/kJ·mol−1 E0/mV ΔGt

0/kJ·mol−1 E0/mV ΔGt0/kJ·mol−1

KCl+DMA+water RbCl+DMA+water CsCl+DMA+water0.00 241.6 0.00 137.6 0.00 134.8 0.000.10 259.1 1.69 145.9 0.83 147.2 1.220.20 275.0 3.24 168.0 2.97 166.9 3.100.30 300.9 5.71 182.9 4.41 185.9 4.93

18 J. Lu et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 178 (2013) 15–19

and 25.59±0.05 and 134.8±0.1 mV for the systems of KCl/RbCl/CsCl+water, respectively. The theoretical value k is 25.69 mV atT=298.15 K. The average linear correlation coefficients were all larg-er than 0.9998 with a standard deviation about 0.20 mV.

The Pitzer [18], the modified Pitzer [19] and extended Debye–Hückel [20,21] equations were used to describe the thermodynamicbehavior of the electrolyte in the mixed solvents.

For 1:1 type electrolyte, the Pitzer equations for activity coefficientcan be written as:

lnγ� ¼ f γ þmBγ þm2Cγ ð4Þwhere

f γ ¼ −Aφ I1=2= 1þ bI1=2� �

þ 2=bð Þln 1þ bI1=2� �h i

ð4aÞ

Bγ ¼ 2β 0ð Þ þ 2β 1ð Þ 1–exp −αI1=2� �

1þ αI1=2–1=2α2I� �h i

= α2I� �n o

ð4bÞ

Cγ ¼ 1:5Cφ: ð4cÞ

α and b are the empirical parameters with the values of 2.0 and1.2 kg1/2·mol−1/2 [18]. β(0), β(1) and Cφ are the parameters of Pitzerequation.

Fig. 2. Variation of mean activity coefficient γ± with molality of KCl/RbCl/CsCl in theDMA+water (w=0.2) systems at 298.15 K, ■, KCl; , RbCl; , CsCl.

For 1:1 type electrolyte, the modified Pitzer equations are simpleand convenient which only have three characteristic parametersand expressed as following:

lnγ� ¼ −Aφ I1=2= 1þ bI1=2� �

þ 2=bð Þln 1þ bI1=2� �h i

þ 2mBMX þ 3m2CMX:

ð5Þ

In Eq. (5) b, BMX, and CMX are the fitting parameters.Aφ is the Debye–Hückel coefficient for the osmotic coefficient. The

definition of Aφ is

Aφ ¼ 1:4006 � 106ρ1=2 DTð Þ3=2: ð6Þ

The density (ρ/g·cm−3) and relative permittivity (D) of the mixedsolvents were measured and given in Table 2.

The extended Debye–Hückel equations may be written as follows:

logγ� ¼ −Am1=2= 1þ Bam1=2� �

þ cmþ dm2–log 1þ 0:002 mMð Þ þ Ext

ð7Þ

where a is the ion size parameter, c and d are ion-interaction param-eters,M represents the averagemolecular mass of mixed solvents andExt contributes to the extended terms. A and B indicate the Debye–Hückel constants which can be written as

A ¼ 1:8247 � 106ρ1=2= DTð Þ3=2kg1=2 �mol−1=2 ð7aÞ

B ¼ 50:2901ρ1=2= DTð Þ1=2kg1=2 �mol−1=2 � Å−1

: ð7bÞ

All the parameters in Eq. (7) have their usual meaning.To combine Eqs. (3) and (4), (3) and (5) or (3) and (7), the E0

obtained fromPitzer, modified Pitzer and extendedDebye–Hückel equa-tions gets a good agreement with each other. Tables 3 and 4 showed thevalues of E0 with the fitting standard deviation and the correspondingparameters.

4. Discussion

The mean activity coefficients and the osmotic coefficientsobtained from the fitting of the experimental data E by the Pitzermodel are shown in Table 5. The mean activity coefficient versusthe molality of CsCl in different mass fraction of DMA+watermixtures was shown in Fig. 1. It can be observed that γ± decreaseswith the increase of the concentration of the electrolyte, and in-creases with the decrease of the DMA mass percentages in themixed solvents. This may be caused by the structural interactionsand electrostatic interaction models. The values of the mean activitycoefficients of KCl/RbCl have the same trend as those of the meanactivity coefficients of CsCl in mixtures.

For the different electrolyte, Fig. 2 indicates that γ± decreaseswith the increase of the cationic radius [22]. It may be interpretedthat the smaller cationic radius is, the smaller the hydration number[23]. So the mean activity coefficients decrease with orderKCl>RbCl>CsCl. Meanwhile, the corresponding osmotic coefficients

Fig. 3. Plot of the standard free energy of transference, ΔGt0 vs the weight percentage of

DMA for KCl/RbCl/CsCl at 298.15 K, ■, KCl; , RbCl; , CsCl.

19J. Lu et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 178 (2013) 15–19

were calculated using the equation of Pitzer in Eq. (5) and listed inTable 5.

The standard free energy of transference, ΔGt0, one of the most

useful thermodynamic properties of solution can be calculated fromthe expression [24]:

ΔGt0 ¼ F Em

0–Ew

0� �

þ 2RTln ρw=ρmð Þ ð8Þ

The subscripts m and w stand for the mixtures and pure water,respectively. Other symbols have their usual meaning. The values ofΔGt

0 were presented in Table 6 and plotted versus the mass fractionof DMA in Fig. 3.

It can be seen that ΔGt0 are all positive, which means that the

transfer of the electrolyte from water to DMA+water mixtures isnot spontaneous. On the other hand, the ΔGt

0 goes to more positivealong with the increasing percentage of the DMA, indicating thatthe solvation power of K+, Rb+ or Cs+ decreases when the mass frac-tion of DMA in the mixed solvents increased [25].

5. Conclusion

The results in this study present that the thermodynamic proper-ties of KCl/RbCl/CsCl in DMA+H2O mixed solvents were researchedby potentiometric measurement at 298.15 K. The Pitzer, the modifiedPitzer and the extended Debye–Hückel model were used to describethe thermodynamic behavior of the electrolyte in the mixed solvent.The activity coefficients, osmotic coefficients and the standard freeenergy of transference, and the parameters for the Pitzer (β(0), β(1)

and Cφ), the modified Pitzer (b, BMX and CMX), and the extended

Debye–Hückel (a, c and d) were also obtained. This work providedthe basic thermodynamic reference data for deep research.

Acknowledgment

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foun-dation of China (No: 21171111) and the Fundamental Research Fundsfor the Central Universities (Program No: GK201001006).

References

[1] E. Amado-Gonzalez, L.H. Blanco, Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data 57 (4)(2012) 1044–1049.

[2] S.P. Verevkin, J. Safarov, E. Bich, E. Hassel, A. Heintz, Fluid Phase Equilibria 236(2005) 222–228.

[3] A. Lopes, F. Farelo, M.I.A. Ferral, Journal of Solution Chemistry 30 (9) (2001)757–770.

[4] N.M. Konstantinova, M.S. Motornova, M.N. Mamontov, D.I. Shishin, I.A.Uspenskaya, Fluid Phase Equilibria 309 (2011) 20–29.

[5] F. Hernández-Luis, R. Rodríguez-Raposo, H.R. Galleguillos, J.W. Morales, Journal ofChemical and Engineering Data 55 (2010) 3786–3792.

[6] Y.C. Jiang, M.C. Hu, P. Fan, J.J. Wang, K.L. Zhuo, Biophysical Chemistry 118 (2005)25–30.

[7] B. Ghalami-Choobar, V. Mahdavi, S. Pourpanah, Journal of Solution Chemistry 41(2012) 89–99.

[8] F. Hernández-Luis, H. Galleguillos-Castrol, M.A. Esteso, Fluid Phase Equilibria 227(2005) 245–253.

[9] F. Hernández-Luis, H.R. Galleguillos, L. Fernández-Mérida, O. González-Díaz, FluidPhase Equilibria 275 (2009) 116–126.

[10] F. Hernández-Luis, R. Rodríguez-Raposo, D. Grandoso, Journal of Chemical andEngineering Data 56 (2011) 3940–3948.

[11] F. Hernández-Luis, R. Rodríguez-Raposo, G. Ruiz-Cabrera, Fluid Phase Equilibria310 (2011) 182–191.

[12] E. García-Pañeda, A. Maestre, C. Yanes, Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data44 (1999) 1055–1057.

[13] P. Scharlin, K. Steinby, The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics 35 (2003)279–300.

[14] L. Wang, S.N. Li, Q.G. Zhai, H.Y. Zhang, Y.C. Jiang, W.J. Zhang, M.C. Hu, Journal ofChemical and Engineering Data 55 (2010) 4699–4703.

[15] Y.Y. Ma, S.N. Li, Q.G. Zhai, Y.C. Jiang, M.C. Hu, Journal of Chemical and EngineeringData 55 (2010) 1573–1579.

[16] J. Tang, Y.Y. Ma, S.N. Li, Q.G. Zhai, Y.C. Jiang, M.C. Hu, Journal of Chemical and En-gineering Data 56 (2011) 2356–2361.

[17] S. Feng, J. Tang, S.N. Li, Q.G. Zhai, Y.C. Jiang, M.C. Hu, Journal of Chemical and En-gineering Data 56 (2011) 2482–2488.

[18] K.S. Pitzer, G. Mayorga, The Journal of Physical Chemistry 77 (19) (1973)2300–2308.

[19] F. Pérez-Villaseñor, G.A. Iglesias-Silva, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Re-search 41 (2002) 1031–1037.

[20] K.S. Pitzer, J.M. Simonsont, The Journal of Physical Chemistry 90 (13) (1986)3005–3009.

[21] F. Hernández-Luis, H.R. Galleguillos, T.A. Graber, M.E. Taboada, Industrial and En-gineering Chemistry Research 47 (2008) 2056–2062.

[22] R.D. Shannon, Acta Crystallographica 32 (1976) 751–767.[23] L. Ben Gaïda, J.-B. Gros, C.G. Dussap, Fluid Phase Equilibria 289 (2010) 40–48.[24] D. Feakins, P.J. Voice, Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 168

(1972) 1390–1405.[25] C. Kalidas, G. Hefter, Y. Marcus, Chemical Reviews 100 (2000) 820–852.


Recommended