2
INVESTOR DAY 2015 JUNE 10, 2015
DAVID COOPER, PRESIDENT, BUILDGINS AND CCO, U.S.
(David): Good morning. So I'm going to talk about our buildings
practice. And we’ve come a long way in the last two
years since we’ve been talking to you.
Today, we are 1,035 people across 17 offices. When
I first talked to you back in 2012, we were 650
people across seven offices. So we’ve made some
good progress.
Our buildings business is about 14 percent of the
total U.S. revenue stream, net revenue stream and
growing. We base -- and I’ll come in -- we’re here
in 2012. We’ve talked about our core services and
special services. But our core services still represent
the majority of our business; structures and systems
engineering -- (handful) of electrical plumbing and
structures.
And then we have a numbers of specialty services
where (inaudible) excellence. So you can't have that
expertise everywhere, but the national practices
(going) together with expert resources shared across
certain offices.
(Market central) lighting, commissioning, (filter
colleges) are high performance design practice to
really the leading edge thought leadership in
sustainable buildings and high performance
3
buildings.
Our buildings technology is audiovisual, security
and AV.
Commissioning is about testing buildings and
making sure they actually perform and deliver. And
on their performance and comfort and energy.
And then we have a number of services on green
consulting and sustainability, lead consulting.
But those specialty services help us round out our
offering and be part of wholly integrated approach
for a building, you know, engineer service. And that
has been our strategic plan back in 2012, was to
expand our offering from providing just MEP or
providing just structures and have a fully integrated
design. And that’s how we maximize our income
stream for any one particular project.
And you could see with only 13 percent of our
revenue from our specialty services, and I’ll talk
about that later, that’s really an opportunity for us to
grow the business.
We are very diversified practice. We are heavily
weighted in commercial real estate; office buildings,
hotels, residential towers. But we are well
diversified across many market sectors which is a
very strong place to be as market sectors -- strength
of different market sectors shift.
We do have a strategic focus going forward on four
4
specific market sectors to grow our business. That’s
aviation, sports and entertainment, healthcare, and
science and technology. And I’ll talk more about
that later.
But clearly, aviation and sports are areas where our
integration with the transportation and infrastructure
business is going to have a lot of synergies and
drive.
On the left side, you can see what our footprint looks
like in terms of market sectors in 2014. Pretty
diversified, but big chunks in commercial real estate.
We did an acquisition, our first acquisition, in 2014,
of a business specializing in healthcare and
laboratory work, but mostly healthcare, which was a
great strategic bid for us. And I’d talked about over
the last few years of strategic ambition to grow the
business to organic growth and acquisition.
This was -- we looked a lot across many companies
and we’ve found the perfect first acquisition for us.
They added about 200 people to the business,
brought us into new geographies, new urban centers,
and it greatly expanded our healthcare (for clients),
which we think is a growing -- an important market
for us to be in.
And you could see on the right side how that
changed our footprint, our market share of our
business in healthcare and helped diversify our
practice -- improved the diversity of our practice.
5
(ENR) ranking just came out, and the (WC process)
(inaudible) offering in the U.S. in the pure play
design firms with number four. If you look in a
building sector and you strip out people into
architecture and construction, we’re actually number
two. And we don’t actually -- I mean, we never
talked about scale and size being our premier mark
in the world as opposed to be in the (inaudible). But
we are the best, and we also think we’re right now
number two in scale in our space.
We have a great roster of plans. The buildings
business has about a thousand active clients across
our U.S. business and about 3,000 active projects.
We have a group of clients in the U.S. that are
national and global. And we have global clients that
also work -- that are also coming into the U.S. and
working in the U.S.
So we have a series of global clients that are global
practice is very connected together. And we track
our work activities for these clients and we service
these clients on a national and global basis. And
they're very important to us.
7 out of those 10 firms you see listed there are U.S.-
based firms and key to our success.
Our revenue growth -- net revenue growth has been
exceptional. It’s mostly organic in this part. There’s
a little bit of acquisition or acquisition activities in
2014. It didn’t happen until November, so there’s
6
only two months of acquisitive growth in a
significant way in the 2014 figures. So most of our
growth has been organic, 2015. They’ll full impact
to that acquisition will be in play.
Most of our work is private sector as the buildings
business. It varies over the years depending on the
nature of public sector work, where public sector
investment has fallen. Public sector doesn’t have to
pick up. So a couple of years ago, that probably
would’ve been 85-15, maybe 90-10, but today it’s
more closer to 95-5 or 94-6.
And most of our work in buildings (inaudible)
transportation is lump sum. We bid on projects as
fixed fee. And there’s art and science to that
because the projects are not defined more than how
tall the building might be or how many square feet it
might be. But we have fixed fee contracts. We
defined the scope of work. And our variations are
usually the time and material across plus work, that
you see that (inaudible) that 22 percent of our
business.
Our backlog has also grown. So we don’t have
business in net revenue. We’ve also (freed) our
backlog and our pipeline is very strong today going
forward. We’ve got (big growth) between 2013 and
2014. It’s a combination again of our organic
pipeline growth, as well as the acquisitive pipeline
growth.
So the market sector is strong. The market sector is
7
outperforming GDP in the U.S. It’s anticipated --
this is really not a good indicator of the future health
of a design business, but the construction market is
expected to grow next year. Of course all of the
major sectors we work in.
But in fact, that’s a lagging indicator for us because
obviously this year, creates construction business
next year.
The architecture building index is something we
track. And again, that’s not necessarily -- it’s a
better indicator for the future of construction and the
future of design because it’s (inaudible) the
architects are today and all (inaudible). We’re not
going to be busy. It’s takes an architect to design a
building with us.
But you can see in the heyday before the crash, you
know, it was very robust design activity. Anything
above 50 is growth on the scale. Anything below 50
is (contraction). Anything above 50 is growth.
In the heyday before the recession who’s up around
57-58. We are recovered from the recession and
we’re in positive territory. But it’s still from an
architectural perspective, it’s modest, modest
strength overall in the industry. And this is a 9 to 12
month lean indicator on construction.
That’s April -- this is a table for March. April, the
numbers just came out. And the actual billing index
shrunk below 50 for the first time in many months --
8
just below 50. But it’s still (inaudible) the architects
community, so it’s a very positive (inaudible)
industry.
And more importantly to me than the billing index is
something called the inquiry index. Inquiries, the
line of opportunities we see which is our future
pipeline, is still very strong. Not as strong as it was
in the middle of last year, but still very strong and
we’re seeing that ourselves and the architectural
community is seeing that which is important to us.
Our competition is very varied. Most of our
competition buildings are small private firms,
regional firms. They're very few regional national
players, and even fewer multi-disciplinary players as
we are tend to be in the marketplace. So we’re
creating a niche for ourselves and it’s a bit special.
And it should give us some strategic advantage in
the market in how we approach projects.
But the (inaudible) you see up here are major players
in our industry. And (Mene Comic Clearly) is a big
(inaudible) firm. But firms like (Thomas Eddie and
Lera) (inaudible) of the structural firms or the MEP
firms. They're very few multi-disciplinary structures
MEP specialist services in the market in the U.S.,
especially not with their full national footprint and
with the full global footprint as we do.
So it gives us some strategic advantage in the market
as we leverage our national and global skillsets and
resources, and with local delivery.
9
The market is changing -- the market is driving
forward along the lines of what we’ve seen in the
past couple of years. Urbanization is driving a
tremendous amount of development; residential
development, commercial development, the need for
more educational facilities and infrastructure,
healthcare infrastructure. The urban environment is
changing and (justifying). The population is getting
older. And that again, that’s going to drive
healthcare.
Healthcare spending was actually down a bit in 2014
between Obamacare, the health American -- the
Affordable Care Act and healthcare. The market in
this country is in a bit of turmoil. But the population
is ageing. There’s still a tremendous amount of
healthcare work to be done and increased amount of
healthcare work to be done as the market stabilizes.
And that’s been expected growth area for us.
Technology is driving a different marketplace,
whether it be mobile workforce, smart buildings,
how people access information and use facilities is
changing dynamically. And we have our great
technology practice to leverage that.
Sustainability -- it’s projected that about 50 percent
of all non-single family residential construction is
going to have a sustainable orientation to it going
forward.
So having a strong footprint in the sustainability
10
marketplace is a key importance to us and we do it
with our (build the college) practice, as well as our
core business.
And alternative delivery is greatly increasing.
Alternative delivery doesn’t necessarily mean (PPP),
Public Private Partnership, but it’s design build. It’s
integrated project delivery which is a single contract
for owner, contractor design firm, so you have a one
contract shared risk and shared responsibility in
some fashion and shared desired outcomes.
But the landscape is changing from traditional
design build, (bid) build to a design build and
alternative delivery model we’re seeing in Seattle, in
where the entire commercial real estate market is
design build. It’s moving into San Francisco.
We’ve done some of the work here in New York on
design build model. So our relationship with
contractors are becoming more important than our
traditional (declining phase) of architecture and
developers.
And the industry does continue to consolidate. And
as we said before, we’re being smart about it,
making sure we have cultural (bid), strategic (bid).
But we are absolutely looking to continue growing
through acquisition and having firms (doing this)
that we have to bring leverage to our business.
There are a tremendous number of revenue
synergies. We are realizing both -- coming together
with Parsons Brinckerhoff and the transportation
11
infrastructure, as well as the acquisition we’ve made
with CCRD, and in national global footprint that we
have as a buildings business.
Aviation, transit sports, all of those types of projects
have a very strong infrastructure component to them.
And very often, the planning work type gets in front
the environment planning, the infrastructure
planning that the transportation infrastructure
business brings is a great entrée to us from the
building side to get into those projects to leverage
them.
And we’re actually working our projects together as
it happens (and stands) as independent firms before
we came together. And that is going to continue
going and growing for us into the future.
The Parsons Brinckerhoff business is a very, very
strong buildings practice in Asia. And there’s a
tremendous amount of Asia capital now coming into
the U.S. and in Europe as investment. As the China
market has slowed down, the Chinese developers are
being actively promoted to develop elsewhere
internationally.
So we’re starting to see some of our clients, some of
our financial clients, developer clients in Asia for the
Parsons Brinckerhoff relationships coming into the
U.S. and we’re going to be able to access those
clients and we already are accessing those clients in
terms of project opportunities for us.
12
There are great talks about intersection of urban
infrastructure; horizontal urban infrastructure and
vertical infrastructure. And again, we’re starting to
see those synergies develop. And we have a number
of opportunities working on today with that and
previous awards we’ve had in that realm.
And we do have a great global collaboration
amongst our buildings practice. I'm going to be in
Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia at the end of
this month with our global buildings leadership
team, both talking about our strategic move forward
-- how we’re moving forward strategically in the
business, as well as meeting key clients.
And so we are very well connected practice. I
showed you some of the architects that are U.S.-
based architects that work globally. But we also
have global architects, international architects have
come to the U.S. at this international money coming
into the U.S. And our relationship globally are
working for us.
In the ultimate delivery space, again, the revenue
synergies we’ve talked about with the airport. But
that’s where our integrated model of one stop
shopping, our fully integrated offering and the
synergies that that generates is really advantageous
as opposed to our contracts or our (PPP) ventures,
special project, (inaudible) vehicle (mentioned)
going out (behind) individual consultants for the
different elements of the project. So we’ll have a
great -- better footprint and better strategic
13
advantage in chasing those types of projects.
But this as an example, (Thomas Ben and
Waterfront) is a residential development in San
Francisco. The money comes out of Singapore. The
relationship is brought to us. We have the
opportunity to win that project (inaudible)
relationship in Asia.
West Palm Springs Training Facility was a client of
our acquisition, what was (helped) our acquisition.
They're our biggest architectural client as well as
sports work, and that got us into that project. So that
was a leverage there.
We work, as I’ll talk about that a little bit later, Doha
Airport, we’re doing the phase two expansion of the
Doha Airport. That’s a 75-gate expansion in Doha.
That work is being done in collaboration in the U.K.,
the Middle East, and ourselves here in New York to
deliver that airport project on the building side.
(Back Day Overbuild), that is an opportunity. When
we developed a joint presentation in Boston between
our transportation business and our buildings
business, went to a local developer in Boston about
how we could help them look at developing over
existing highway and (rail) infrastructure of Boston.
And we’ve been commissioned to start doing a study
for them and how that might work.
And (Prop 39), this is a small little project, but it’s a
great opportunity against the infrastructure business,
14
had a relationship with a campus in California. And
they brought us in to do a lighting study on all the
campus lighting to prove its energy efficiency.
So there’s just a tremendous amount of synergies
that we’re seeing, that we have the potential to see as
we move forward.
So what does that mean for us? We’re still
continuing to push the growth of the business
organically and acquisitively. We have with our
acquisition of CCRD healthcare business, we entered
the Miami market, the Denver market, the Phoenix
market, the Dallas market. And we have a great
opportunity there. They have a healthcare footprint,
and they don’t have -- and we have the commercial
real estate and other sector strength. And we have a
great opportunity to grow those markets now in
those major urban centers.
So we expect to grow those cities organically from
an small -- increase our presence to capturing those
markets.
We have the opportunity to grow our special
services. We have some very substantial special
services like commissioning where we have about a
60 or 70 people around the country. But we have
some specialty services that are only five or seven
people. And so we have a huge market and a huge
opportunity grow our specialty services organically.
And as I mentioned, we have a market (inaudible).
15
Acquisitively, we have the same strategic outlook
we had a couple of years ago. We made a good star
with our first acquisition in last year. But there’s
still geographies we’re not in. We don’t have a
buildings presence in Chicago, or in LA, or in
Philadelphia which are very major urban centers in
the U.S.
We have the opportunity to grow acquisitively in
some of our specialty services. And we absolutely
need to expand our structural footprint. We have a
great structural business, but it has a very limited
footprint in the U.S. So that would be a combination
of organic and acquisitive activity as well.
So some of our key projects, talk about the
intersection of horizontal and vertical infrastructure.
(Sunny Side Yards) is a big rail facility in Queens.
The New York City Economic Development
Corporation hired a combination of our skillsets in
transportation and buildings to study (decking) over
the rail yard to promote future commercial
development. And so it’s a great commission to
bring all of our expertise that we had with structures,
systems, future -- energy, and rail to bear. And
that’s about a $2 million key assignment.
(Trend Space), the tallest business the west side of
the country. It’s -- and I’ll go with another image
later on, but this is part of a large multi-modal
(transport) facility. This is a high rise commercial
tower. It’s the tallest building west of the
Mississippi I guess. And it should be the home of
16
Sales Force. And we’re doing all the systems
engineering from the tower and build (ecology). It’s
a high performance building and as well as
technology services.
This is another example of global collaboration.
This is the Atlantis -- phase two of Atlantis
development in Dubai. (Kersner International) is the
developer. That relationship resides in our London
office. But the architect is KPS out of New York
and London. And we’re doing this work in New
York, with the New York architects in concert with
the Middle East and in concert with the U.K.
(inaudible) with the client relationship work.
So again, our global connectivity, our global skillset,
our global architects is delivering a great project in
the Middle East with significant (fees) for structures
and MEP as an integrated service offering.
We work as a new commission. We work is looking
to develop office space nationally and globally to
support startups and small space office needs.
Because of our national footprint and our global
footprint, we won this assignment. And our ability
to deliver that kind of leading edge design of
thinking and technology and sustainability to our
future looking office space, office requirement, and
our national and global relationships and footprint is
-- got us out of work.
Our CCRD acquisition has incredible expertise in
healthcare and science and technology, specifically
17
high containment laboratories. They're probably the
top two engineers in the world in high containment
laboratories.
And this is a Proton V therapy unit in the U.K. And
it’s a design-build project with (Wig), because of our
relationship with (Wig) from prior work and our
technical expertise around this type of facility. We
were brought on -- we brought in as engineers, even
though the project is in the U.K. and the architect is
in the U.K. They brought our expertise to their -- on
their project. Great facility. And there will be many
more of these coming, the leading cancer therapy.
432 Park Avenue is a phenomenal project. You can
see it in a distance. It’s that tall skinny building, off
to the right. This is setting all kinds of records at the
moment which will be broken as all records are. But
it should be the tallest building in the western
hemisphere in term of the highest occupied floor.
It’s actually the highest occupied floor in the
Freedom Tower, which is the tallest building in the
western hemisphere. But that’s all structures at the
top.
The view from the top of the building is incredible.
I was there yesterday late afternoon and actually
looking down on everybody else. It’s quite a
penthouse department.
But the slenderness ratio of that tower which is a
train that’s coming is what’s really incredible about
it. It’s you know, 15:1 if you think about a pencil
18
versus something that’s very big. Its tendency to
move in the wind is incredible. And our structural
engineering ability to overcome that and make it
comfortable on top of that building is what we’ve
got a set of work. And again, that’s an integrated
offering, systems and structures. Because that
building needed a very integrated design approach to
make it work and be financially viable.
Lots of innovations in that building. But it’s a great
project. And as -- and it will be surpassed in the
next two years with other buildings which we’re
doing as well.
We are key player in the high rise market. This slide
is mostly U.S. projects, and most of them are still
under construction. The only non-U.S. project is the
(Shard), which were instrumental in working on and
helping U.K. win. All these other projects are ours
in one capacity or another. One will face the tallest
building. These two are under construction. This is
the one I just talked about, 432 Park, and you can see
out the window.
This one, (Moment Towers) is under construction --
I'm sorry, (Moment Towers) is here, is under
construction. (3 World Trade Centers) under
construction. But we’re the engineers for all of these
buildings, and these are -- except for the (Sears
Tower), the tallest building in the U.S.
So this is the full (Trans Day) picture. Besides being
impressive tower, at the bottom, this whole -- this
19
greenery is the top of the (Trans Day) multi-modal
facility. And we’re the engineers for that as well as
the tower. And that is the northern end of the high
speed rail -- that’s the high speed rail terminus in
San Francisco.
And so we are doing the whole of the engineer for
the multi-modal transportation facility which is
combination of bus, commuter rail and high speed
rail, as well as the tower. It’s a great project.
111 West 57th Street is this building that’s coming.
You wouldn’t probably be (hitting) by some of the
World Trade Center when it does get built. But
that’s in construction. And the other tall building,
our CCRD acquisition, our healthcare acquisition.
So we have some phenomenal healthcare products
including the first (Lead Platinum) hospitals in the
world, the most sustainable hospitals in the world.
And it’s a great, great synergistic pick with us and a
great expertise we brought to bear in our business.
And we also, I mentioned the sports. (Elantra
Dockington) is an example of a job where the
transportation infrastructure business is working on
that project independently from buildings, because
the job started many years ago before we came
together. But we are providing transportation
infrastructure services and we’re doing all the
buildings systems engineering for -- I mean, it’s
under construction. It’s a great project with a very
unique (comfortable) roof.
20
So that sums up our buildings business, where we
are, where we’re heading. And the floor is open for
questions.
Male: Hey (David), out of the core services, what would be the
predominant, you know, service that you're known
for? Is it structure? Like, how would that break out
between the 87 percent?
(David): So our structures business is about a third of our total
business, and it’s about the right ratio. But just it
needs to be expanded.
Right now, our structure’s footprint is really in New
York City. We have a small structures operating in
San Francisco now which is new this year, part of
our organic growth. And we are actively looking at
growing it and expanding our structures footprint.
So our post -- there is no optimal (mixed piece).
We’ll take, we’ll work, we’ll pursue buildings either
from structures perspective, the systems perspective,
the specialty service perspective. Everything we do,
we want to compete in the market to be best in class
individually. So we can then bring it together and
have a value proposition, that is not having all to
worry about of getting (subsequent) service from one
thing by this integrated offering.
So we compete separately and we compete together.
But there’s no necessarily right balance. But on a
project, structures is about -- on a typical
commercial project, structures might be 80 percent
21
of (NEPP). And I (hold) that project last on a
commercial -- on a residential building more
(inaudible).
Male: What in the specialty services category do you think are
things that potentially move to core services through
acquisitions?
(David): I'm sorry?
Male: What in the specialty services category through acquisition
become a core service over time you think, if that’s
kind of how you're thinking about it or …
(David): Commissioning would probably be the closest one.
Commissioning is the national practice we have a
large footprint across the country. But most of our
specialty services, we’re viewing as centers of
excellence, are not going to have the scale and the
robustness of expertise everywhere in those kinds of
practice. And the practice is much more modal
(inaudible) deliver services.
So what we’re looking at is having hubs of
excellence in those specialty areas that support
national practice.
So I would our specialty services, they can certainly
grow. We want to get it to vertical transportation.
We don’t have that offering today. Our fire and
code practice is nascent. It’s very small and that can
become substantial.
So critical -- I mean, our specialty services could
22
become (half the practice) over time.
Male: OK. I just wanted to -- last question. Just in terms of project
lifecycle and I think one of the things that peers
talked about in the past is kind of being there early
stage with the customer kind of at the inception
stage, more control of the process and I guess higher
margins ultimately to that.
Can you just give a sense of where the buildings sit,
or do you have those relationships, are you at the
front with a lot of your clients at the inception stage
on the projects?
(David): So the answer is yes and no. Yes, because this is very much a
relationship business. The private sector market
place is relationship-based. So we are open to our
relationships, advice about projects early, and we
sometimes help conceptualize and help owners
develop our (piece) even for projects.
But for the most part, we like to do the upfront
advisory services as well. But there are examples
we just walk into a project because of relationship,
and the World Trade Center -- rebuilding the World
Trade Center is a prime example of that. Our
relationship with (Substeam) properties, we walk
into the job and we negotiated a fee. That’s our
middle and out for bid.
So there are plenty of examples like that. There are
plenty of examples to our relationship is -- where it’s
fine to an architect, fine to an owner, because they
23
want to use us, and our architect recommends us to
an owner because they want to use us. So it’s not
just necessarily competitive at situation, but it’s our
relationships and our upfront work that helps us get
the work.
Yup?
Male: Going to the competition page you mentioned, could you
maybe reiterate what makes your company different
versus the competition? And of course I think
(Acom) like the players, they (grill it here), what’s
their specialty or what do they do that makes them
bigger relative to the market share that they have? Is
that the type of company you want to be, or is it
something within a mix of these competitors?
(David): (Acom) is large and multidimensional. I think their strike is
more on large government (IDI 2-type) contracts and
things of that nature. They have some specialist
skillsets in buildings.
We don’t compete with them all that often in
building engineering services and the actual projects
that we work on. Most of our competition are the
smaller regional firms. There are some national
players that are multi-disciplinary like (Arup) and
(Birohalfhold), both British firms in our origin. But
they don’t have the footprint and they don’t have the
recognition of having the (ship), the equal expertise
across all of the things that they do.
And I would say our reputation in work and develop
24
and to deliver complex, large projects is much
stronger.
But most of our competitors are the single discipline
structures or MEP or specialists, and they are
regional, local players. They don’t have a national
footprint.
So that’s what our strategic plan is to give us that
national footprint, multi-disciplinary phase so we
can leverage on national and global clients whether
they’d be architects, corporate, institutions,
developers, and be able to provide and integrated
holistic design that is truly the best value for that
client versus individual consultants, pursuing
individual with best designs.
Male: (David), your practice is just over a thousand employees. Five
years down the road, how big do you think this
business can become?
(David): It’s a huge market. So it’s -- I would think our strategic plan
for 2017 was to be about 1,700 employees. Five
years down the road, 3,000, I don’t know. I don’t
have -- I think we’re going to keep growing and be
as big as the market will let us be, as we can still
deliver our expertise and operate our business in a
way that delivers best value for our clients.
Right now, we’re not in Chicago, we’re not in LA,
we’re not in Philadelphia, we’re very small in
Miami, we’re very small in Dallas for the size of that
city, we’re still small in Houston for the size of that
25
city. We have plenty of opportunity for growth, and
there’s a lot of firms that (inaudible) -- small firms
that are in this consolidated market. We’ll look for a
home with a bigger footprint.
So I don’t know if 3,000 people is the right number,
4,000, 5,000. So the world is always there so to
speak.
Male: Obviously a business like yours is quite retention -- (ample),
your retention rather is essential. How did you do
the CCRD?
(David): So far out of 200 people, we’ve lost three.
Male: OK. And normal attrition would be?
(David): Sorry?
Male: Normal attrition would be about?
(David): 10 percent. So we’re doing a very -- that integration, that
acquisition/integration is going exceptionally well.
We have full engagement with the leadership.
We’ve seen revenue synergies from them in the U.S.
We have -- we want to (lay) project in Asia with our
Asia business, the (leads) business out of our
(inaudible) headquarters that they have.
We’re pursuing hospital work in the Middle East.
One of their big clients, healthcare clients is doing
our hospital in the U.K. and we’re in the leading
role, leading opportunity for that.
26
This has a tremendous amount of opportunity with
that acquisition nationally and globally, and it also is
getting us into cities that we’re not even before to
bring our commercial real estate expertise, our tall
building high rise expertise with areas that are even
more low rise, you know, more hospital, more
healthcare expertise. So you know, we see a lot of
good things coming from that and people are really
engaged.
Male: Thank you.