Date post: | 14-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | emery-mathews |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Invited Paper, Demography and Labour Economics Section
Second Russian Economic CongressSuzdal, 18 February 2013
Dr Judith ShapiroDepartment of Economics
1
The Disciplines of Demography and Economics: Can We and Should We Narrow the Gap?
Outline of key points• Meade, Brass, Glass (1960) goal not yet achieved:
Closer co-operation of demography and economics• Connected origins of demography and economics: • Graunt, Petty: London, science and Baconian empiricism
• Separate Disciplines as 19th Century Development • Economics, theory first; Demography, highly empirical
• 20th Century: Demography finds Sociology• Sociology and Economics: values first of incentives?
• 21st Century: As in 1960, need closer co-operation• New as key policy challenges: Migration, labour force• Little room for luxury of separate intellectual worlds
2
Economics has been different, is evolving:Colander 2005 [US data]
Very important Moderately UnimportantDon’t know
Other parallel problems:Demogaphers’ Period versus Cohort
• Analogy in Economics: Time Series and Cross Section• Time series and cross section may yield different results. • Good recent example: Womens’ status and the birth rate
• Time-series : direct relationship• Cross-section: inverse! [Ahn and Mira, 2002 + others]
• May have to use cross-section to estimate cohort. • Many demographic magnitudes not popularly understood
as cross-section estimates of cohort values: e.g: Total Fertility Rate, Life Expectancy
United for policy needs?
• Russia, 2013: Past crisis of mortality and fertility• Migration and the labour force move to centre stage• Neither discipline has priority here• Theory and empirical evidence both needed • Co-operation requires understanding each others’
traditions, borrowing fruitfully• Does not require or benefit from union • Partnership, joint publication: a giant step • Both disciplines, and policy, have much to gain