Date post: | 11-Apr-2017 |
Category: |
Data & Analytics |
Upload: | robert-grimm-phd |
View: | 43 times |
Download: | 3 times |
1 ©Ipsos.11
Global @dvisor: Power to the People?Part 2
January 2017
©Ipsos. All rights reserved. Contains Ipsos' Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be disclosed or reproduced without the prior written consent of Ipsos.
©Ipsos.
2 ©Ipsos.
Contents
1
2
3
Society is broken and Confidence in institutions
Nativism
‘Populist’ measures
4
5
6
Voting behaviour
Country in decline
Is the system broken?
7 Exclusionism
Part 1: Is the system broken? (previously released)
SOCIETY IS BROKEN AND CONFIDENCE IN INSTITUTIONS
©Ipsos. 3
4 ©Ipsos.
Most feel society is broken (especially Poland, Spain, Brazil and Mexico)…GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalPoland
SpainBrazil
MexicoSouth Africa
HungarySerbia
South KoreaArgentina
United StatesGermany
Great BritainPeru
TurkeyItaly
FranceSweden
AustraliaBelgiumCanada
IndiaIsraelJapan
58%79%
78%77%
76%74%
73%72%72%
70%66%
61%56%
55%53%53%
52%51%
47%38%
37%32%32%
31%
Strongly Agree/Tend to Agree
Q5 To what extent, if at all, do you agree or disagree with the following statements – “Society is broken”
5 ©Ipsos.
How much confidence, if any, do you have in the each of the following…GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
COMPLETE CONFIDENCE
FAIR AMOUNT OF CONFIDENT
NOT VERY MUCH CONFIDENCE
NO CONFIDENCE AT ALL
The Justice System, including the courts
Banks
International Institutions
Political parties
4%
20%
5%
33%
38%
The Media
6%
30%
6%
33%
25%
6%
30%
5%
35%
24%
5%
32%
10%
35%
18%
4%
23%
5%
39%
28%
4%
28%
7%
39%
22%
Big Companies
The Government
2%
12%
6%
37%
43%
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
6 ©Ipsos.
Spain has the least confidence in International Institutions, as do many other Europeans – and Israel
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalSpainIsrael
FranceItaly
SerbiaBelgium
GermanyGreat Britain
AustraliaUnited States
South KoreaArgentina
BrazilPolandTurkeyCanada
HungaryMexico
JapanPeru
SwedenIndia
South Africa
52%77%
66%65%
64%63%63%
59%59%
54%54%
53%52%52%
51%51%51%
49%46%
43%41%
39%29%
28%
No confidence/not very much confidence
Q11 How much confidence, if any, do you have in the each of the following? International Institutions
7 ©Ipsos.
Spain and Italy have the least confidence in their banksGLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalSpainItaly
GermanyBelgiumHungary
IsraelFrance
Great BritainSweden
ArgentinaPolandBrazil
TurkeySerbia
MexicoAustralia
South KoreaUnited States
PeruCanada
JapanSouth Africa
India
59%92%
80%75%
74%72%72%
69%67%
63%60%60%60%
58%57%
56%53%
52%51%
50%45%
35%34%
18%
No confidence/not very much confidence
Q11 How much confidence, if any, do you have in the each of the following? Banks
8 ©Ipsos.
Confidence is marginally higher for the justice system, but very low in LATAMGLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalArgentina
PeruMexicoSerbia
South KoreaSpain
HungaryItaly
PolandBelgium
South AfricaTurkey
IsraelBrazil
AustraliaFrance
CanadaGermany
United StatesGreat Britain
SwedenIndia
Japan
59%84%84%
83%75%
74%74%
67%64%
60%59%59%
58%57%
56%52%52%
49%48%48%
44%37%
34%32%
No confidence/not very much confidence
Q11 How much confidence, if any, do you have in the each of the following? The justice system including the courts
9 ©Ipsos.
Most lack confidence in big companiesGLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalSpain
South KoreaIsrael
GermanySerbia
ArgentinaGreat Britain
BelgiumFrancePoland
HungaryCanada
AustraliaMexico
SwedenItalyPeru
United StatesTurkey
BrazilJapan
South AfricaIndia
61%82%
77%73%
72%70%
69%68%
66%66%
65%64%64%
61%60%60%60%
59%57%
53%51%
46%32%
31%
No confidence/not very much confidence
Q11 How much confidence, if any, do you have in the each of the following? Big Companies
10 ©Ipsos.
Two in three lack confidence in their mediaGLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalHungary
SerbiaSpain
MexicoGreat Britain
IsraelItaly
AustraliaPoland
GermanySweden
FranceSouth Korea
United StatesBelgium
TurkeyJapanBrazil
ArgentinaCanada
PeruSouth Africa
India
68%87%
85%78%
76%75%75%
73%71%
70%70%
69%68%
67%67%
65%65%
64%63%
61%57%57%
51%39%
No confidence/not very much confidence
Q11 How much confidence, if any, do you have in the each of the following? The media
11 ©Ipsos.
Most countries are not confident about their government – especially negative in Mexico and Spain
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalMexico
SpainSouth Korea
PolandHungary
South AfricaBrazil
ItalyIsrael
FranceBelgium
GermanySerbia
AustraliaGreat Britain
PeruSweden
United StatesCanada
JapanArgentina
TurkeyIndia
71%90%
89%84%
82%82%
81%81%
80%78%
77%75%
70%69%
66%66%66%
64%64%
60%60%
58%50%
35%
No confidence/not very much confidence
Q11 How much confidence, if any, do you have in the each of the following? The Government
12 ©Ipsos.
Of all institutions, countries have the least confidence in their political partiesGLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalSpain
MexicoHungary
SerbiaIsraelPeru
PolandSouth Korea
ItalyBelgium
FranceBrazil
ArgentinaGermanyAustralia
Great BritainSouth Africa
United StatesSwedenCanada
JapanTurkey
India
81%94%
92%90%
89%88%88%
87%86%86%
85%83%
82%81%
80%79%79%
75%74%
72%71%
68%65%
59%
No confidence/not very much confidence
Q11 How much confidence, if any, do you have in the each of the following? Political parties
Click icon to add picture
NATIVISM
©Ipsos. 13
14 ©Ipsos.
Attitudes are divided on immigration – but most countries are against uncontrolled immigration
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
[Country] would be stronger if we stopped immigration
Immigrants take jobs away from real [nationality]
Immigrants take important social services away from real [nationality]
[Country] would be better off if we let in all immigrants who wanted to come here
34%
22%
6%
18%
9%
11%
When jobs are scarce, employers should prioritise hiring people of this country over immigrants
17%
17%
7%
22%
16%
20%
16%
19%
22%
6%
16%
21%
19%
19%
21%
7%
15%
18%
5%
8%
7%
21%
21%
37%
STRONGLY AGREE
SOMEWHAT AGREE
SOMEWHAT DISAGREE
STRONGLY DISAGREE
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
These days I feel like a stranger in my own country17%
21%
22%
6%
15%
19%
15 ©Ipsos.
Just over half think employers should prioritize hiring locals over immigrants – especially in Serbia, Hungary, Turkey and Israel
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalSerbia
HungaryTurkey
IsraelPeru
ArgentinaIndia
South AfricaItaly
United StatesPolandBrazil
MexicoSouth Korea
AustraliaFrance
SpainGreat Britain
BelgiumCanada
GermanyJapan
Sweden
56%81%
76%74%
73%64%
63%62%
60%60%
58%57%
56%55%
54%51%51%
50%48%
46%45%45%
38%17%
Strongly Agree/Tend to Agree
Q9 When jobs are scarce, employers should prioritize hiring people of this country over immigrants
16 ©Ipsos.
Europeans tend to be more worried about immigration’s impact on social/public services (Turkey most worried again overall)
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalTurkey
BelgiumHungary
IsraelArgentina
FranceItalyIndia
SpainUnited States
South AfricaGreat Britain
AustraliaSerbia
GermanyCanada
South KoreaBrazil
PeruSwedenMexicoPolandJapan
39%63%
50%50%50%
49%49%
47%46%46%46%
44%40%
39%37%37%
35%29%
27%27%
21%19%19%
17%
Strongly Agree/Tend to Agree
Q9 Immigrants take important social services away from real [nationality]
17 ©Ipsos.
Concern about immigration’s impact on jobs highest in Turkey, India and Argentina
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalTurkey
IndiaArgentina
South AfricaUnited States
IsraelPeruItaly
BelgiumAustraliaHungary
SpainSouth Korea
FranceBrazil
CanadaGreat Britain
MexicoSerbiaPoland
GermanyJapan
Sweden
35%62%
51%48%
47%43%
42%41%
40%37%37%
36%35%
34%33%
32%32%32%
26%24%
23%22%
12%9%
Strongly Agree/Tend to Agree
Q9 Immigrants take jobs away from real [nationality]
18 ©Ipsos.
Most countries are against uncontrolled immigration , but people are split on whether immigration should be stopped – highest in Turkey, Israel, Hungary, Belgium and Italy
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
TotalIsrael
BelgiumHungary
SerbiaFrance
CanadaGreat Britain
ItalyTurkey
South AfricaPoland
United StatesSweden
GermanyAustralia
South KoreaSpain
ArgentinaMexico
BrazilPeru
JapanIndia
58%77%
72%72%72%
69%69%
67%65%
64%61%61%
57%56%56%56%
54%53%
51%48%
47%46%
36%29%
Strongly/Somewhat disagree
TotalTurkey
IsraelHungaryBelgium
ItalyIndia
FranceUS
SerbiaGermany
South AfricaArgentina
Great BritainPoland
AustraliaSpain
SwedenCanada
PeruMexico
BrazilJapan
South Korea
34%61%
52%49%
47%46%
45%40%
38%38%
37%37%
34%31%31%30%
28%27%
24%19%19%
17%14%
12%
Strongly/Somewhat agree
Q9 [Country] would be better off if we let in all immigrants who wanted to come here
Q9 [Country] would be stronger if we stopped immigration
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
19 ©Ipsos.
Overall people are split on whether or not they feel a stranger in their own country. High in Turkey, South Africa and Brazil, and amongst Western countries most prevalent in Italy, Belgium and the US
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
TotalTurkey
South AfricaItaly
BrazilUnited States
BelgiumSerbia
HungaryFrance
IndiaGermany
MexicoGreat Britain
AustraliaSpainPeru
ArgentinaPoland
South KoreaCanadaSweden
IsraelJapan
38%57%
54%49%
46%45%
44%43%
42%40%39%
38%37%
36%36%
36%35%35%
35%34%34%
22%20%
14%
Strongly/ Somewhat agree
Q14_1. Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? - These days I feel like a stranger in my own country
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
20 ©Ipsos.
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
ArgentinaAustraliaBelgiumBrazil
Canada
France
Germany
Hungary
India
Italy
Japan
Mexico
Poland
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Sweden
Turkey
Great BritainUS
Israel
Peru
Nativism
Syst
em is
Bro
ken
Nativism vs. System is Broken: Categorizing Countries
Feel the system is broken and HIGHER nativist sentiment
Feel system is broken but LOWER nativist sentiment
SUPPORT FOR ‘POPULIST’ MEASURES
©Ipsos. 21
22 ©Ipsos.
Generally the balance of opinion is in favour of ‘populist’ measures – though more so for controlling the price of foodstuffs than nationalizing natural resources
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
The government should nationalize natural resources even if this means slower job growth
The government should control the price of the Basic Foodstuffs (Staples)
[Country] should stop terrorism at all costs even if that means ignoring people’s civil rights
20%
23%
24%
9%
14%
11%
[Country] should prioritize hiring [nationalities] over foreigners even if that means slower job growth
15%
21%
27%
13%
13%
11%
32%
26%
18%
7%
9%
8%
23%
22%
20%
7%
14%
13%
STRONGLY AGREE
TEND TO AGREE
TEND TO DISAGREE
STRONGLY DISAGREE
23 ©Ipsos.
Majority in favour of controlling price of foodstuffs – support tends to be higher in emerging economies, but is also high in France, Israel, Italy and Spain
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
TotalArgentina
IsraelIndia
SerbiaTurkey
HungarySpain
ItalyFrance
PeruBelgium
South AfricaMexico
BrazilSouth Korea
AustraliaCanada
Great BritainPoland
GermanyUS
SwedenJapan
58%80%
78%76%
73%70%70%
69%69%
66%66%
65%62%
60%56%
54%53%
51%49%
45%41%
31%25%
19%
Strongly/ Somewhat agree
Q14_2. Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? - The government should control the price of the Basic Foodstuffs (Staples)
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
24 ©Ipsos.
Countries with recent experience of terrorism are likely to prioritise stopping terrorism over protecting civil rights (such as Turkey, France, India, Israel and Belgium), also high in Serbia
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
TotalSerbia
TurkeyIndia
FranceIsrael
BelgiumPeru
HungarySwedenPoland
Great BritainSouth Africa
AustraliaGermany
South KoreaUS
BrazilItaly
MexicoCanada
SpainArgentina
Japan
45%74%
69%63%
59%57%
55%50%50%
48%47%
43%42%
41%40%
38%37%37%
35%34%
31%31%
30%25%
Strongly/ Somewhat agree
Q14_4. Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? - ... should stop terrorism at all costs even if that means ignoring people's civil rights
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
25 ©Ipsos.
Support for prioritising jobs for national citizens is especially high in Turkey, Israel, Serbia, LATAM, and India
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
TotalTurkey
IsraelSerbia
ArgentinaPeruIndia
South KoreaMexicoFrance
SpainItaly
BrazilPoland
USHungary
South AfricaAustralia
CanadaGermany
Great BritainJapan
BelgiumSweden
44%70%
63%62%
61%57%
56%54%54%
50%49%
48%43%
42%39%
39%37%
36%33%
32%30%
22%21%
10%
Strongly/ Somewhat agree
Q14_3. Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? - ... should prioritize hiring [nationalities] over foreigners even if that means slower job growth
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
26 ©Ipsos.
Highest support for nationalising natural resources in emerging economiesGLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
TotalSerbia
IndiaArgentina
PeruMexicoTurkey
ItalySpain
FranceGreat Britain
AustraliaHungary
IsraelBrazil
CanadaSouth Korea
PolandBelgium
South AfricaSweden
USGermany
Japan
36%63%
58%58%
48%44%
42%41%
39%36%
34%34%
32%32%
31%30%
29%28%28%
27%27%
27%22%
14%
Strongly/ Somewhat agree
Q14_5. Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? - The government should nationalize natural resources even if this means slower job growth
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
VOTING BEHAVIOUR
©Ipsos. 27
28 ©Ipsos.
So-called “populist” positions more attractive than unattractive – especially ‘standing up for the common people against the elite’, but also a party that prioritises nationals over immigrants – and radical change more popular than status quo. But a number of ‘pluralist’ positions are just as popular, like listening to alternative points of view/experts, or being prepared to make compromise.
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
A political party or leader that prioritises people born in [country] over immigrants
A political party or leader that stands up for common people against the elite
A political party or leader that wants to radically change the status quo
A political party with a leader who says what he/she thinks, even if it offends others
A political party or leader that has been in power before
22%
22%
12%
27%
8%
9%
36%
27%
12%
18%
4%
3%
20%
24%
24%
17%
9%
6%
20%
25%
13%
23%
10%
8%
A political party or leader that listens to what experts say is best for the country
A political party or leader that listens to alternative points of view
11%
18%
14%
31%
14%
11%
A political party or leader that wants to attract more foreign companies and workers to [country]
25%
27%
12%
25%
6%
5%
24%
32%
13%
21%
7%
4%
27%
29%
13%
22%
6%
3%
34%
33%
11%
16%
3%
2%
A political party or leader that is prepared to make compromises
A political party or leader that stands up for the rights of minorities MUCH MORE LIKELY
SOMEWHAT MORE LIKELY
SOMEWHAT LESS LIKELY
MUCH LESS LIKELY
Q. Would each of the following make you more or less likely to vote for a political party or leader, or would it make no difference?
6%
12%
14%
43%
11%
14%
29 ©Ipsos.
On average a high proportion of people is more likely to vote for a political party or leader that stands up for common people against the elite
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
S o u t h K o re aJ a p a n
G er ma n yFra n c ePo la n d
S we d enB ra z il
T u r k e yI t a ly
B elg iu mI n d ia
G re a t B r it a inS o u t h Afr ic a
Arg e n tin aAu s t ra lia
Mexic oUS
S p a inCa n a d a
Pe ruS er b iaI s ra el
H u n g a ryT o t a l
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
13%17%
21%26%
28%27%
42%35%
34%31%
39%34%
40%42%
37%44%
40%43%
37%44%
49%36%
59%36%
25%26%
26%27%
26%31%
17%24%
25%31%
24%31%
26%25%
31%26%
30%28%
35%28%
24%38%
20%27%
30%20%
25%21%
21%23%
15%18%17%
17%18%
20%22%
18%19%
17%15%
13%16%
16%14%12%
6%18%
13%30%
16%22%
19%12%
17%9%
16%14%
8%11%
4%9%
10%6%8%
10%10%
4%9%
6%12%
12%
12%5%
8%3%
5%4%
4%9%
4%3%
7%3%
6%3%
2%3%
4%4%
2%4%
3%3%
2%4%
7%2%
3%2%2%
3%5%
6%3%
4%4%
1%2%3%2%
4%3%2%2%
4%1%
4%2%
3%
Much more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly less likely to vote for that party or leader Much less likely to vote for that party or leader
Q19_1. I'd now like you to think about what is important and what is not important to you when deciding what party to vote for. Would each of the following make you more or less likely to vote for a political party or leader, or would it make no difference? - A political party or leader that stands up for common people against the elite?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
30 ©Ipsos.
Just under half attracted by radically changing the status quo, especially high in SpainGLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Ge r m anyPoland
Sout h Kor e aA ust r al ia
Isr ae lJapan
CanadaHungar ySw e de n
Fr anceGr e at Br it ain
A r ge nti naUS
Be lgiumBr azi l
It alySe r biaTur ke y
Pe r uIndia
Me xicoSout h A fr ica
SpainTot al
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
11%11%
9%11%13%12%
14%19%
12%18%
16%21%
19%18%
30%27%
24%29%
25%27%
31%31%
36%20%
16%17%
25%25%24%25%
25%19%
28%22%27%
24%26%28%
19%24%
26%23%
28%28%
24%26%
26%24%
26%30%
36%34%
17%20%
31%20%
23%22%
31%27%
24%26%
15%22%
29%20%
23%23%22%
21%15%
24%
17%26%
12%15%
12%32%
17%24%
20%32%
16%18%
14%19%
20%18%
12%12%
10%11%
9%5%
11%17%
15%10%
11%11%
17%8%
11%10%11%
4%8%
5%11%
7%9%
5%5%
7%10%
6%6%
11%7%
9%
14%5%
7%4%
16%3%
4%7%6%
2%2%
6%6%
3%7%
4%4%
10%4%
5%7%
6%4%
6%
Much more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly less likely to vote for that party or leader Much less likely to vote for that party or leader
Q19_2. I'd now like you to think about what is important and what is not important to you when deciding what party to vote for. Would each of the following make you more or less likely to vote for a political party or leader, or would it make no difference? - A political party or leader that wants to radically change the status quo?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
31 ©Ipsos.
People are likely to say that the fact that a party or leader has been in power before has less influence on their voting behavior – but more of a turn-off in LATAM
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
J a p a nFra n c e
B elg iu mS er b ia
Arg e n tin aI t a ly
S o u t h K o re aPo la n d
S p a inH u n g a ry
Au s t ra liaB ra z il
Mexic oG re a t B r it a in
Ca n a d aPe ru
S we d enG er ma n y
T u r k e yI s ra el
USS o u t h Afr ic a
I n d iaT o t a l
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
2%4%
2%4%
6%3%
4%4%5%
6%3%
8%6%
4%4%
7%3%3%
15%7%
10%15%
16%6%
8%7%
9%8%
6%9%
8%11%10%
9%14%
9%11%
13%14%
11%15%15%
9%18%
17%17%
23%12%
34%38%
50%37%
39%39%
35%36%
46%38%
58%35%
31%59%59%
33%54%
51%38%
48%40%
44%37%
43%
36%23%
17%11%
13%17%
14%22%
13%16%
11%19%
10%12%12%
7%18%
17%9%
8%10%
5%9%
14%
14%11%
9%14%
12%13%
22%16%
12%11%
9%11%
13%7%
7%18%
6%9%
10%10%
13%9%
9%11%
6%17%
13%26%
24%19%
17%11%
14%19%
5%17%
30%5%4%
24%3%
5%19%
9%10%
11%6%
14%
Much more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly less likely to vote for that party or leader Much less likely to vote for that party or leader
Q19_3. I'd now like you to think about what is important and what is not important to you when deciding what party to vote for. Would each of the following make you more or less likely to vote for a political party or leader, or would it make no difference? - A political party or leader that has been in power before
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
32 ©Ipsos.
On average close to half of people is more likely to vote for a political leader who says what he/she thinks, even if it offends others – especially Hungary and Turkey
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
JapanPoland
Br az i lIt aly
Me xicoSout h Kor e a
Ge r m anyUS
Sout h A fr icaGr e at Br it ain
Se r biaCanada
A ust r al iaBe lgium
IndiaPe r u
Fr anceSpain
A r ge nti naSw e de n
Isr ae lTur ke y
Hungar yTot al
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
2%14%
19%16%
17%10%
14%20%19%
17%25%
18%18%
16%22%
24%23%
22%27%
20%21%
34%32%
20%
5%20%
18%21%
21%29%
26%23%24%29%
22%30%30%
31%26%
25%28%
29%26%
34%36%
26%28%
25%
30%22%19%
16%7%
10%16%
11%5%
12%10%
12%12%
15%10%
5%24%
12%10%
14%8%
10%15%
13%
19%22%
21%24%
30%30%
27%21%
23%28%
24%24%
25%25%
24%21%
20%23%23%
23%21%
21%17%
23%
21%16%
10%12%
11%14%
9%13%
15%10%
10%11%
10%7%
11%14%
4%8%7%
3%11%
4%6%
10%
23%6%
13%10%
15%6%
8%12%
14%4%
8%5%5%5%
7%12%
3%7%7%
6%3%
5%2%
8%
Slightly more likely to vote for that party or leader Don't know Slightly less likely to vote for that party or leader Much less likely to vote for that party or leader
Q19_4. I'd now like you to think about what is important and what is not important to you when deciding what party to vote for. Would each of the following make you more or less likely to vote for a political party or leader, or would it make no difference? - A political party with a leader who says what he/she thinks, even if it offends others
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
33 ©Ipsos.
On average just under half attracted by a political party or leader that prioritises people born in own country – again Hungary and Turkey top
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Sw e de nJapan
Ge r m anySpain
Fr anceGr e at Br it ain
Br az i lA ust r al ia
CanadaBe lgium
Sout h Kor e aPolandMe xico
USIt aly
A r ge nti naIndiaPe r u
Se r biaIsr ae l
Sout h A fr icaTur ke y
Hungar yTot al
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
7%11%
15%17%
21%17%
20%18%
20%18%
14%18%
21%25%26%
28%28%
26%31%
22%29%
34%42%
22%
13%19%
17%19%
16%21%
18%21%
19%21%
27%24%
23%20%20%
20%24%
29%25%
34%27%
26%20%
22%
12%34%
15%12%
21%11%
19%9%9%
14%12%
21%8%
11%15%9%
9%5%
10%7%
4%8%
12%12%
22%27%
26%29%
23%27%
27%31%32%
26%34%
25%34%
27%23%
29%27%
28%27%
26%27%
22%17%
27%
11%7%
12%10%
6%11%
7%12%
10%9%
7%6%
8%9%7%
6%8%8%
3%7%
8%4%
5%8%
35%3%
14%13%13%
14%9%8%
10%12%
5%5%
7%8%
9%8%
5%5%5%5%5%
6%4%
9%
Much more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly less likely to vote for that party or leader Much less likely to vote for that party or leader
Q19_5. I'd now like you to think about what is important and what is not important to you when deciding what party to vote for. Would each of the following make you more or less likely to vote for a political party or leader, or would it make no difference? - A political party or leader that prioritises people born in ... over immigrants
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
34 ©Ipsos.
On average people are more likely to vote for a political party or leader that is prepared to make compromises – but less so in Italy and Israel
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
It alyJapanIndia
Fr anceIsr ae l
Be lgiumGe r m any
Sout h Kor e aSw e de n
Gr e at Br it ainPoland
USA ust r al ia
Se r biaA r ge nti na
Br az i lTur ke yCanada
Hungar ySpainPe r u
Sout h A fr icaMe xico
Tot al
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
9%5%
19%14%
12%13%14%
18%16%
15%21%
22%19%
25%35%
45%34%
20%35%35%
38%37%
41%24%
18%27%
22%30%
31%36%35%
36%38%
40%34%
34%38%
32%27%
18%29%
43%33%
35%32%33%
32%32%
18%32%
9%24%
10%15%15%
11%16%
11%20%
10%11%10%
9%17%
8%10%
13%10%
5%3%
7%13%
24%25%
28%23%
17%27%
28%27%
24%27%
18%21%
26%24%
18%11%
18%21%
12%16%
15%17%
14%21%
15%8%
15%7%
16%7%
6%5%
5%6%
4%9%
5%6%
5%6%
6%3%
5%3%
6%6%
4%7%
16%3%
7%4%
13%3%
1%3%
0%1%
3%4%
1%3%
6%3%
5%2%2%2%
4%3%3%
4%
Much more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly less likely to vote for that party or leader Much less likely to vote for that party or leader
Q19_6. I'd now like you to think about what is important and what is not important to you when deciding what party to vote for. Would each of the following make you more or less likely to vote for a political party or leader, or would it make no difference? - A political party or leader that is prepared to make compromises
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
35 ©Ipsos.
A political party or leader that listens to what experts say is best for the country is more likely to receive support across countries – but less so in richer countries
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Sout h Kor e aGe r m any
JapanFr ance
Be lgiumUS
Gr e at Br it ainSw e de n
It alyPoland
Isr ae lCanada
A ust r al iaBr az i lIndia
Se r biaA r ge nti na
SpainTur ke yMe xico
Hungar ySout h A fr ica
Pe r uTot al
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
7%15%
16%17%
17%20%
19%16%
23%21%
14%19%20%
33%32%
44%40%
39%41%
45%47%
42%45%
27%
23%28%
30%29%30%
28%30%
35%28%
30%37%
34%34%
27%29%
23%28%31%
29%26%
25%30%
31%29%
13%17%
32%24%
15%10%
11%16%15%
19%8%
10%11%
17%7%
9%10%
10%8%6%
12%4%
5%13%
40%32%
18%23%
26%26%
31%26%
21%22%
27%28%
26%13%
19%17%
17%15%
16%15%
10%14%
14%22%
10%6%
3%5%
8%10%
7%6%
6%5%
9%7%6%
5%9%
3%1%
3%4%
4%4%
7%3%
6%
8%4%
1%3%
4%6%
2%3%
6%3%
4%2%3%
5%4%
3%4%
2%2%
4%2%
3%2%
3%
Much more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly less likely to vote for that party or leader Much less likely to vote for that party or leader
Q19_7. I'd now like you to think about what is important and what is not important to you when deciding what party to vote for. Would each of the following make you more or less likely to vote for a political party or leader, or would it make no difference? - A political party or leader that listens to what experts say is best for the country
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
36 ©Ipsos.
A political party or leader that wants to attract more foreign companies and workers to the country would divide support
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Fr anceA ust r al ia
JapanIsr ae l
Ge r m anyBe lgium
CanadaUS
A r ge nti naSout h Kor e a
Tur ke yHungar ySw e de n
Gr e at Br it ainBr az i l
Me xicoSpainIt aly
PolandPe r u
Sout h A fr icaInd ia
Se r b iaTot al
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
5%4%
3%7%
5%8%8%8%
11%8%
12%11%
8%8%
16%15%
13%14%
12%15%
20%20%
25%11%
10%11%
12%11%15%
15%18%17%
15%19%
15%18%
21%23%
15%17%
19%19%
22%21%
25%27%
25%18%
24%12%
36%9%
17%16%
11%12%12%
13%11%
16%17%
12%20%
7%15%
19%22%
5%5%
9%10%
14%
27%37%
32%27%
42%34%
34%30%
29%39%
27%25%
39%38%
23%30%
36%27%
30%29%
28%25%
26%31%
14%20%
12%26%
14%15%
20%18%
18%14%
15%16%
10%11%
14%15%
11%11%
9%18%
12%12%
6%14%
20%16%
3%21%
7%13%
9%15%
16%7%
21%14%
5%7%
12%17%
7%10%
5%11%
10%8%7%
11%
Much more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly less likely to vote for that party or leader Much less likely to vote for that party or leader
Q19_8. I'd now like you to think about what is important and what is not important to you when deciding what party to vote for. Would each of the following make you more or less likely to vote for a political party or leader, or would it make no difference? - A political party or leader that wants to attract more foreign companies and workers to [country]
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
37 ©Ipsos.
Across countries, people are more likely to vote for a political party or leader that listens to alternative points of view
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
J a p a nPo la n d
B ra z ilFra n c e
S o u t h K o re aG er ma n y
I t a lyS we d en
I n d iaI s ra el
Au s t ra liaB elg iu m
G re a t B r it a inS er b ia
UST u r k e yCa n a d a
H u n g a ryMexic o
Pe ruArg e n tin a
S p a inS o u t h Afr ic a
T o t a l
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
20%25%
37%28%
21%26%
30%24%
36%21%
29%27%
29%38%
34%50%
36%44%
49%43%
47%43%
50%34%
34%32%
22%32%
39%36%
33%39%
29%45%
38%41%
40%31%
36%22%
37%30%
26%32%
28%33%
32%33%
30%19%16%
21%11%
14%14%
16%8%
8%9%
13%9%8%
9%7%
8%12%
6%4%
7%9%
2%11%
13%19%
17%15%
23%19%16%
18%17%
19%20%
16%19%19%
16%14%
16%9%
14%15%
13%11%
11%16%
3%4%
4%2%
4%4%
4%3%
6%5%
2%2%2%1%
3%4%
1%3%
3%3%
2%2%
3%3%
1%2%
5%1%2%2%
3%0%
4%2%2%1%1%
2%3%2%
1%2%
3%2%2%2%2%2%
Much more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly less likely to vote for that party or leader Much less likely to vote for that party or leader
Q19_9. I'd now like you to think about what is important and what is not important to you when deciding what party to vote for. Would each of the following make you more or less likely to vote for a political party or leader, or would it make no difference? - A political party or leader that listens to alternative points of view
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
38 ©Ipsos.
On balance people are more likely to vote for a political party or leader that stands up for the rights of minorities
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
J a p a nT u r k e yPo la n dS er b iaFra n c e
I s ra elG er ma n yH u n g a ry
B ra z ilI n d ia
B elg iu mS we d en
G re a t B r it a inUS
Au s t ra liaCa n a d a
S p a inI t a ly
Arg e n tin aMexic o
S o u t h K o re aPe ru
S o u t h Afr ic aT o t a l
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
3%18%
16%19%
18%17%
15%22%
34%27%
21%25%
21%28%
25%25%26%
33%35%
40%31%
38%41%
25%
15%20%
23%22%24%
27%30%
25%16%
24%30%
28%32%
27%31%32%
32%26%
27%24%
35%31%
29%27%
35%10%
21%9%
23%8%
16%13%
17%8%
15%11%
10%9%
9%10%
11%17%
9%6%
10%3%
6%12%
31%33%
30%40%
27%26%
32%24%
19%27%
26%29%
30%26%
26%26%23%
17%20%
19%17%
18%17%
25%
12%9%
7%5%
4%12%
5%8%
6%9%
6%2%
5%6%
5%4%
5%3%
6%6%
4%5%
4%6%
4%10%
3%5%
4%10%
2%9%8%
6%3%
4%2%
5%3%3%
4%4%4%
6%3%
4%4%
5%
Much more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly more likely to vote for that party or leader Slightly less likely to vote for that party or leader Much less likely to vote for that party or leader
Q19_10. I'd now like you to think about what is important and what is not important to you when deciding what party to vote for. Would each of the following make you more or less likely to vote for a political party or leader, or would it make no difference? - A political party or leader that stands up for the rights of minorities
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
PART 1: IS THE SYSTEM BROKEN?
(PREVIOUSLY RELEASED)
©Ipsos. 39
COUNTRY IN DECLINE
©Ipsos. 40
41 ©Ipsos.
Overall, there is a sense that society is broken and that their country is in decline (though people tend to be optimistic that this is recoverable). People are also on balance likely to feel that their generation has had a worse life than their parents and are even more pessimistic for the future prospects for today’s youth.
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
“To what extent, if at all, do you feel that your generation will have had a better or worse life than your parents’ generation, or will it have been the same?
“…is in decline”
29%
29%
19%
10%7%
5%AGREE VERY MUCH
AGREE SOMEWHAT
NEITHER AGREE OR DISAGREE
DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
DISAGREE VERY MUCH
DON'T KNOW
“…society is broken” “Do you think [country] can recover from it’s decline or is it irreversible”*
9%
22%
19%26%
18%5% MUCH BETTER
SLIGHTLY BETTER
ABOUT THE SAME
SLIGHTLY WORSE
MUCH WORSE
DON'T KNOW
“And to what extent, if at all, do you feel that today’s youth will have had a better or worse life
than their parents’ generation, or will it have been about the same?”
28%
29%20%
10%8% 5%
AGREE VERY MUCH
AGREE SOMEWHAT
NEITHER AGREE OR DISAGREE
DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
DISAGREE VERY MUCH
DON'T KNOW
67%
15%
18%CAN RECOVER
IS IRREVERSIBLE
DON'T KNOW
7%
19%
20%28%
20%
6% MUCH BETTER
SLIGHTLY BETTER
ABOUT THE SAME
SLIGHTLY WORSE
MUCH WORSE
DON'T KNOW
Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016.* Asked of all those who think their country is in decline
42 ©Ipsos.
Over half think their country is in decline (although not yet irreversible)
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
“…is in decline” “Do you think [country] can recover from its decline or is it irreversible”*
28%
29%
20%
10%
8%5%
AGREE VERY MUCHAGREE SOMEWHATNEITHER AGREE OR DISAGREEDISAGREE SOMEWHATDISAGREE VERY MUCHDON'T KNOW
67%
15%
18%
CAN RECOVER IS IRREVERSIBLE
DON'T KNOW
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016.* Asked of all those who think their country is in decline
43 ©Ipsos.
Majority in 14 nations think their country is in decline – especially South Africa, South Korea, Italy and Brazil….
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalSouth AfricaSouth Korea
ItalyBrazil
HungaryMexico
SpainFrance
BelgiumSerbia
United StatesArgentina
Great BritainTurkey
SwedenPoland
AustraliaGermany
PeruIsraelJapan
CanadaIndia
57%77%
73%73%
72%70%
69%69%
67%64%
61%60%
58%57%
55%53%
50%49%
47%44%
42%40%
38%22%
Strongly Agree/Tend to Agree
Q5 To what extent, if at all, do you agree or disagree with the following statements – “Your country is in decline”
44 ©Ipsos.
…But are optimistic that it can recover (although less so in Japan, Belgium and Germany)
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
T ota lPe ru
Me x i c oIs ra e lIndi a
Arg e nti naB ra z i l
S out h A f r i c aT urk e y
S w e de nPol a nd
U ni t e d S t a t e sS e rbi a
Aus t ra l i aS pa i nI t a l y
H ung a ryCa na daF ra nc e
G re a t B r i ta i nG e rm a nyB e l g i um
S out h K ore aJ a pa n
67%85%84%84%
82%81%
80%78%
76%72%
69%68%66%
66%65%
61%60%60%60%60%
53%52%51%
24%
15%5%
9%2%
15%8%
11%9%
15%11%
13%10%
16%11%
19%19%
15%14%
17%17%
28%29%
21%34%
Can recover Irreversible
Q6 And do you think [country] can recover from its decline or is it irreversible ?
Base: 9,525 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
45 ©Ipsos.
And there is significant pessimism for current and future generations in France, Belgium, Hungary, South Korea, Italy and Spain
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
TotalHungary
SerbiaFrance
ItalySouth Korea
SpainJapan
BelgiumUnited States
CanadaGermany
Great BritainSouth Africa
TurkeyIsrael
MexicoSweden
AustraliaBrazil
PolandArgentina
IndiaPeru
44%65%
63%61%
60%56%56%
54%53%
47%46%
44%43%
41%40%
39%38%38%38%
35%33%
30%22%
19%
Slightly/Much worse
TotalFrance
BelgiumSpain
South KoreaHungary
Great BritainItaly
JapanCanada
GermanyUnited States
SerbiaTurkey
SwedenAustralia
IsraelSouth Africa
BrazilMexicoPoland
ArgentinaIndiaPeru
48%67%
66%65%
63%60%
56%55%55%
53%53%
52%50%
47%45%
44%44%
42%38%
37%36%
30%22%
20%
Slightly/Much worse
Q7 To what extent, if at all, do you feel that your generation will have had a better or worse life than your parents’ generation, or will it have been the same?
Q8 And to what extent, if at all, do you feel that today’s youth will have had a better or worse life than their parents’ generation, or will it have been about the same?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
SYSTEM IS BROKEN
©Ipsos. 46
47 ©Ipsos.
Strong feeling in many countries that the people in charge don’t care about ‘people like me’, and instead favour rich and powerful.
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Politicians should be able to say what’s on their minds regardless of what anyone else thinks about their views
To fix [country], we need a strong leader willing to break the rules
[Country] needs a strong leader to take the country back from the rich and powerful
Traditional parties and politicians don’t care about people like me
42%
27%
15%
5%
6%
4%
The [country’s] economy is rigged to advantage the rich and powerful
36%
29%
18%
6%
7%
5%
28%
21%
19%
6%
11%
14%
40%
23%
17%
6%
7%
6%
37%
27%
18%
6%
7%
4%
STRONGLY AGREE
SOMEWHAT AGREE
SOMEWHAT DISAGREE
STRONGLY DISAGREE
31%
29%
21%
7%
8%
4%
Experts in this country don’t understand the lives of people like me
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
48 ©Ipsos.
Most feel the system favours the rich and powerful – especially Mexico, Peru, Hungary, Israel and Spain
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalMexico
PeruHungary
SpainIsrael
AustraliaIndia
South KoreaFrance
United StatesBrazil
Great BritainItaly
CanadaTurkey
ArgentinaSouth Africa
BelgiumSerbiaPolandJapan
GermanySweden
63%81%
74%72%72%72%
71%71%
70%70%
69%68%
67%67%
65%63%
62%60%
59%59%
53%45%
34%31%
Strongly Agree/Tend to Agree
Q10 [Country] needs a strong leader to take the country back from the rich and powerful
TotalHungary
MexicoSerbiaIsraelPeru
SpainItaly
South KoreaBelgium
FranceBrazil
United StatesTurkey
AustraliaPoland
Great BritainGermanyArgentina
South AfricaIndia
CanadaJapan
Sweden
69%83%
82%81%
80%79%79%
75%74%
71%70%
69%69%
68%68%
67%67%
66%65%
64%63%
59%55%
39%
Strongly Agree/Tend to Agree
Q10 The [country’s] economy is rigged to advantage the rich and powerful
49 ©Ipsos.
Most people feel politicians don’t care about them, especially parts of LATAM and continental Europe
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalMexico
PeruFrance
SpainHungary
ItalyPolandSerbiaBrazil
United StatesArgentina
South AfricaSouth Korea
IndiaBelgium
TurkeyAustralia
Great BritainIsrael
CanadaGermany
SwedenJapan
64%78%
77%76%
75%73%
72%70%70%
69%66%
65%65%65%
64%63%
61%61%
58%57%
56%53%
42%39%
Strongly Agree/Tend to Agree
Q10 Traditional parties and politicians don’t care about people like me
50 ©Ipsos.
Close to two-thirds on average favour outspoken politiciansGLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalArgentina
HungaryIsrael
SerbiaSpainPeru
PolandFrance
South KoreaBelgium
IndiaMexico
GermanyGreat Britain
United StatesAustralia
ItalySwedenCanadaTurkey
BrazilSouth Africa
Japan
65%79%79%79%
76%74%
72%71%
70%68%
66%66%
64%64%64%
60%59%59%
58%57%
53%51%
49%47%
Strongly Agree/Tend to Agree
Q10 Politicians should be able to say what’s on their minds regardless of what anyone else thinks about their views
51 ©Ipsos.
Similarly most people feel misunderstood by experts, especially Spain, France and MexicoGLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalSpain
FranceMexico
HungaryPeru
ArgentinaItaly
PolandUnited States
TurkeySouth Africa
AustraliaIndia
Great BritainCanada
BelgiumSouth Korea
BrazilIsrael
SerbiaGermany
JapanSweden
60%74%
73%72%
70%69%
67%65%
64%64%
62%60%60%60%
59%58%
57%55%55%
53%52%
46%45%
38%
Strongly Agree/Tend to Agree
Q10 Experts in this country don’t understand the lives of people like me
52 ©Ipsos.
Big variation in desire for a strong leader willing to break the rules - especially high in France
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
TotalFrance
IsraelItaly
South KoreaTurkey
IndiaPoland
BelgiumPeru
AustraliaGreat Britain
BrazilSerbia
South AfricaHungary
MexicoCanada
United StatesJapan
ArgentinaSpain
SwedenGermany
49%80%
69%68%
66%66%
65%60%
54%51%
50%50%
48%44%
42%42%
41%41%
40%39%
36%35%
23%21%
Strongly Agree/Tend to Agree
Q10 To fix [country], we need a strong leader willing to break the rules
Click icon to add picture
EXCLUSIONISM
©Ipsos. 53
54 ©Ipsos.
On balance, people are still more likely to feel that opening up their country to foreign business and trade is an opportunity rather than a threat, but across the world people are split on whether their country should protect itself or open up more to the world.
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
26%
42%
31%
37%
OPENING UP [COUNTRY’S] ECONOMY TO FOREIGN BUSINESSES AND FOREIGN TRADE IS A THREAT TO [YOUR COUNTRY]
OPENING UP [COUNTRY’S] ECONOMY TO FOREIGN BUSINESSES AND FOREIGN TRADE IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR [YOUR COUNTRY]
[COUNTRY] NEEDS TO TAKE MORE STEPS TO PROTECT ITSELF FROM TODAY’S WORLD
[COUNTRY] NEEDS TO TAKE MORE STEPS TO OPEN ITSELF UP TO TODAY’S WORLD
BOTH/DON’T KNOW
BOTH/DON’T KNOW
32%
32%
55 ©Ipsos.
People tend to view globalisation as an opportunity, rather than a threat – but not in Italy and France
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
To t al
P e r u
So u t h A fr i c a
G r e at Br i t ai n
Swe d e n
P o l an d
H u n gar y
I sr ae l
Sp ai n
Se r b i a
M e x i c o
A r ge n tin a
Br azi l
I n d i a
Un i t e d S t at e s
Tu r ke y
C an ad a
Be l g i u m
So u t h K o r e a
G e r m an y
A u st r al i a
I t al y
J ap an
F r an c e
26%21%
20%20%
18%19%
21%25%
20%24%
29%34%
21%28%29%
32%26%
29%22%
28%31%
38%22%
33%
42%55%
54%54%
51%50%
50%50%49%49%
46%45%44%44%
39%39%
37%37%
35%34%33%
28%27%
26
Opening up [country's] economy to foreign businesses and foreign trade is a threat to [your country]Opening up [country's economy to foreign businesses and foreign trade is an opportunity for [your country]
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
56 ©Ipsos.
Peru, Mexico and Argentina want to open up more to the world – but North Americans more likely to say they should protect themselves from the world
GLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
To t al
Un i t e d S t at e s
C an ad a
I sr ae l
A u st r al i a
Br azi l
F r an c e
I t al y
G e r m an y
Be l g i u m
So u t h K o r e a
A r ge n tin a
H u n gar y
J ap an
Tu r ke y
I n d i a
Se r b i a
Swe d e n
M e x i c o
G r e at Br i t ai n
So u t h A fr i c a
Sp ai n
P o l an d
P e r u
31%47%
39%39%
37%36%36%36%
34%33%33%
32%32%32%
31%29%
28%27%
26%25%
24%22%
21%19%
37%25%25%
34%25%
22%24%
27%25%
32%28%
47%38%
24%38%38%
4540%
56%43%
45%51%
48%62
Agree most that [country] needs to take more steps to protect itself from today’s world Agree most that [country] needs to take more steps to open itself up to today’s world
Base: Base: 16,597 adults aged 16-64 across Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States., November 2016
57 ©Ipsos.
MethodologyGLOBAL @DVISOR: POWER TO THE PEOPLE?
• These are the findings of a Global @dvisor survey into the political mood around the world. In total 16,597 interviews were conducted between October 21 – November 4 among adults aged 18-64 in the US and Canada, and adults aged 16-64 in all other countries.
• The survey was conducted in 23 countries around the world via the Ipsos Online Panel system. The countries reporting herein are Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, South Africa, South Korea, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States of America.
• Between 500 and 1000+ individuals participated on a country by country basis via the Ipsos Online Panel. The sample was 1000+ in Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Japan, Spain and the United Stated of America. In all other countries the sample was 500+. The precision of Ipsos online polls is calculated using a credibility interval with a poll of 1,000 accurate to +/- 3.5 percentage points and of 500 accurate to +/- 5.0 percentage points. For more information on Ipsos’ use of credibility intervals, please visit the Ipsos website.
• In countries where internet penetration is approximately 60% or higher the data output generally reflects the overall population. Of the 23 countries surveyed online, 17 yield results that are balanced to reflect the general population: Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Poland, South Korea, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, Great Britain and the United States. The 6 remaining countries surveyed – Brazil, India, Mexico, Peru, South Africa and Turkey - have lower levels of internet connectivity and reflect online populations that tend to be more urban and have higher education/income than the general population.
• Where results do not sum to 100, this may be due to computer rounding, multiple responses or the exclusion of don't knows or not stated responses.
• Data are weighted to match the profile of the population.
58 ©Ipsos.
ABOUT IPSOS
Ipsos ranks third in the global research industry. With a strong presence in 87 countries, Ipsos employs more than 16,000 people and has the ability to conduct research programs in more than 100 countries. Founded in France in 1975, Ipsos is controlled and managed by research professionals. They have built a solid Group around a multi-specialist positioning – Media and advertising research; Marketing research; Client and employee relationship management; Opinion & social research; Mobile, Online, Offline data collection and delivery.
Ipsos is listed on Eurolist - NYSE-Euronext. The company is part of the SBF 120 and the Mid-60 index and is eligible for the Deferred Settlement Service (SRD). ISIN code FR0000073298, Reuters ISOS.PA, Bloomberg IPS:FPwww.ipsos.com
GAME CHANGERS
At Ipsos we are passionately curious about people, markets, brands and society. We deliver information and analysis that makes our complex world easier and faster to navigate and inspires our clients to make smarter decisions.
We believe that our work is important. Security, simplicity, speed and substance applies to everything we do.
Through specialisation, we offer our clients a unique depth of knowledge and expertise. Learning from different experiences gives us perspective and inspires us to boldly call things into question, to be creative.
By nurturing a culture of collaboration and curiosity, we attract the highest calibre of people who have the ability and desire to influence and shape the future.
“GAME CHANGERS” - our tagline - summarises our ambition.