+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ir.unimas.my depth study of... · 2015. 5. 22. · Author: OCP8182 Created Date: 12/2/2014 8:49:32...

ir.unimas.my depth study of... · 2015. 5. 22. · Author: OCP8182 Created Date: 12/2/2014 8:49:32...

Date post: 31-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
24
IN DEPTH STUDY OF MALAYSIAN STANDARD FORM OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS: PWD 203A VERSION 2007 Oh Chin Phang Bachelor of Engineering with Honours (Civil Engineering) 2010 Faculty of Engineering
Transcript
  • IN DEPTH STUDY OF MALAYSIAN STANDARD FORM OF

    CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS: PWD 203A VERSION 2007

    Oh Chin Phang

    Bachelor of Engineering with Honours

    (Civil Engineering)

    2010

    Faculty of Engineering

  • UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK

    BORANG PENGESAHAN STATUS TESIS

    Judul: IN DEPTH STUDY OF MALAYSIAN STANDARD FORM OF

    CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS: PWD 203A VERSION 2007

    SESI PENGAJIAN : 2009/2010

    Saya, OH CHIN PHANG

    (HURUF BESAR)

    mengaku membenarkan tesis * ini disimpan di Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik, Universiti

    Malaysia Sarawak dengan syarat-syarat kegunaan seperti berikut:

    1. Tesis adalah hakmilik Universiti Malaysia Sarawak.

    2. Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak dibenarkan membuat salinan

    untuk tujuan pengajian sahaja.

    3. Membuat pendigitan untuk membanguankan Pangkalan Data Kandungan Tempatan.

    4. Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak dibenarkan membuat salinan

    tesis ini sebagai bahan pertukaran antara institusi pengajian tinggi.

    5. ** Sila tandakan (√) di kotak yang berkenaan.

    SULIT (Mengandungi maklumat yand berdarjah keselamatan atau kepentingan Malaysia seperti yang termaktub di dalam AKTA RAHSIA RASMI 1972). TERHAD (Mengandungi maklumat TERHAD yang telah ditentukan oleh organisasi/badan di mana penyelidikan dijalankan). TIDAK TERHAD Disahkan oleh

    _______________________ __ ___________________________ (TANDATANGAN PENULIS) (TANDATANGAN PENYELIA)

    Alamat tetap: 49, Jln Suadamai 4/1

    Bdr Tun Hussein Onn, Bt 10, IR. Ting Sim Nee

    Cheras, 43200, Selangor.D.E. (Nama Penyelia)

    Tarikh: Tarikh:

    CATATAN * Tesis dimaksudkan sebagai tesis bagi Ijazah Doktor Falsafah, Sarjana dan Sarjana Muda

    ** Jika tesis ini SULIT dan TERHAD, sila lampirkan surat daripada pihak berkuasa/organisasi

    berkenaan dengan menyatakan sekali sebab dan tempoh tesis ini perlu dikelaskan sebagai

    SULIT dan TERHAD.

  • The following Final Year Project Report:

    Title : In Depth Study of Malaysian Standard Form of Construction

    Contracts: PWD 203A Version 2007

    Name : OH CHIN PHANG

    Matric No : 17082

    Has been read and certified by:

    Ir. Ting Sim Nee Date

    Supervisor

  • i

    IN DEPTH STUDY OF MALAYSIAN STANDARD FORM OF

    CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS: PWD 203A VERSION 2007

    OH CHIN PHANG

    This project is submitted to

    Faculty of Engineering,

    University Malaysia Sarawak

    in partial fulfilment of

    the requirement for the

    degree of Bachelor of Engineering with Honours

    (Civil Engineering) 2009

  • ii

    To my beloved friends and family

  • iii

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    I wish to express my sincere gratitude to my dissertation supervisor, Ir. Ting

    Sim Nee for her continuous support from the inception till the completion of this

    thesis. She has never given up on me and has continuously been patient and kind to

    me. I would also like to thank her for the ideas and views that she has given to me.

    Meanwhile, I would also like to thank the people in the construction industry

    who were so willing and cooperative in the questionnaire surveys that i passed out.

    They were all kind and really gave good opinions on the topic which I am surveying.

    Next, special thanks go out to my fellow coursemates, Judith Chan, Micheal

    Chai, Timothy Wong and Samuel a/l Nadarajan who were more than willing to help

    me with my scope of work and also to give very good ideas.

    Besides, without the support of my beloved parents, it would not have been

    possible for me to accomplish this thesis. Here I express my sincere love to them and

    hope that they share in my delight. I dedicate this thesis to them.

  • iv

    ABSTRAK

    Borang kontrak JKR ialah borang kontrak yang lazimnya digunakan oleh sektor

    awam di Malaysia yang merangkumi projek berskala besar dan ianya dibiaya oleh

    kerajaan Malaysia. Borang kontrak JKR telah melalui proses rujukan dari JKR 203A

    (Ruj. 83) kepada JKR 203A (Ruj. 2007) untuk menjadikan ianya lebih efektif

    sebagai borang menetapkan syarat syarat perjanjian. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk

    menjalankan satu analisis terperinci terhadap klausa yang terkandung di dalam

    borang kontrak JKR 203A (Ruj. 2007) dan menilai klausa klausa tersebut dari sudut

    yang neutral dan seterusnya menilai pengaplikasian klausa tersebut dalam industri

    pembinaan di Malaysia. Kaedah survei digunakan untuk mendapatkan pandangan

    golongan profesional untuk menentukan nilai kepentingan lapan (8) elemen yang

    berkait rapat dengan kontrak iaitu elemen kejelasan, kelengkapan, konsistensi,

    fleksibiliti, struktur pengurusan projek yang jelas, keadilan atau pembahagian

    peranan dan pembahagian risiko. Sebanyak tujuh puluh lapan (78) klausa telah

    dianalisis dan dinilai secara keseluruhan dengan tujuh magnitud pernilaian iaitu

    kurang negatif, negatif dan sangat negatif, kurang positif, positif dan sangat positif.

    Daripada kajian ini, borang kontrak JKR 203A ini boleh diklasifikasikan sebagai

    positif. Beberapa cadangan telah dikemukakan untuk memantapkan lagi aplikasi

    klausa klausa dalam borang ini.

  • v

    ABSTRACT

    The PWD forms of contract are the de facto standard forms of contraction contract

    used by the Malaysian public sector and most of these big scaled projects are public-

    funded which makes government a major player in the construction industry. PWD

    standard form has gone through revision from PWD 203A Forms (Rev. 83) to PWD

    203A Forms (Rev. 2007) to make it a better tool in governing project condition. This

    research is aimed to carry out an in-depth study of all the clauses stated in PWD

    203A (Rev. 2007) standard form of construction contract from a view of neutral

    party and determine the adequacy of application of every clauses in the Malaysia

    construction industry. Questionnaires used to collect the public’s opinion on the

    degree of importance on the eight (8) elements identified as essential to a contract

    form in Malaysia construction Industry, namely: clarity, comprehensiveness,

    completeness, consistency, flexibility, clear structured project management

    framework, fairness or role distribution and risk distribution. There are seventy eight

    (78) clauses have been analyzed and evaluate the overall performance of clauses

    based on the total evaluation score with seven magnitude of evaluation such as low

    negative, average negative, high negative, neutral, low positive, average positive and

    high positive. Through this research, the effectiveness and application of the revised

    version of PWD 203A (Rev. 2007) in Malaysian construction industry is considered

    as average positive evaluation and several recommendations have been suggested in

    order to improve the overall performances of clauses.

  • vi

    TABLE OF CONTENT

    Page

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iii

    ABSTRAK iv

    ABSTRACT v

    LIST OF TABLES xvii

    LIST OF FIGURES xxv

    ABBREVIATIONS xxxiii

    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

    1.1 General and Definitions 1

    1.2 Problem Statement 8

    1.3 Research Hypothesis 12

    1.4 Aim and Objectives 13

    1.5 Scope and Limitation of Study 14

    1.6 Research Significance 14

    1.7 Structure of Thesis 15

    CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW

    2.1 Introduction 18

    2.2 Construction Contract 20

  • vii

    2.3 Standard Form of Contract 28

    2.3.1 Advantage of Standard Form of Contract 32

    2.3.1 Disadvantage of Standard Form of Contract 35

    2.4 Standard Form of Contract in Malaysia 38

    2.5 PWD 203A (Rev. 2007) Standard Form of

    Construction Contract 41

    2.6 Comments on PWD 203A (Rev. 2007)

    Standard Form of Construction Contract 43

    2.7 “Ideal” Standard Form of Contract 59

    2.8 Previous Form Studies 66

    2.9 Summary 79

    CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY

    3.1 General 80

    3.2 Research Framework 83

    3.2.1 Literature Review 83

    3.2.2 Structured Questionnaire 83

    3.2.2.1 Sampling Method 88

    3.2.3 Form Analysis of PWD 203A

    Standard Form of Construction Contract 90

    3.2.4 Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis 90

    3.2.5 Results Summary / Discussion 94

    3.2.6 Conclusion and Recommendations 94

  • viii

    CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DATA ANALYSIS

    4.1 General 95

    4.2 Method 97

    4.2.1 Samples 97

    4.2.2 Calculation of Importance Weights 98

    4.2.3 Calculation of Total Evaluation Score

    in Clause Analysis 103

    4.2.3.1 Example of Calculation of Total

    Score of Evaluation 105

    4.3 Clauses Analysis 107

    4.3.1 Clause No 1.0: Definitions and Interpretation 107

    4.3.2 Clause Analysis No 2.0: Contract Period 111

    4.3.3 Clause Analysis No 3.0: The S.O and

    S.O. ’S Representative 114

    4.3.4 Clause Analysis No 4.0: S.O.’S Right

    To Take Action 117

    4.3.5 Clause Analysis No 5.0: S.O.’S Instructions 120

    4.3.6 Clause Analysis No 6.0: Scope of Contract 123

    4.3.7 Clause Analysis No 7.0: Contract Sum 126

    4.3.8 Clause Analysis No 8.0: Contract Documents 129

    4.3.9 Clause Analysis No 9.0: Representations,

    Warranties and Undertakings Of

    The Contractor 133

    4.3.10 Clause Analysis No 10.0: Obligations of

    The Contractor 137

  • ix

    4.3.11 Clause Analysis No 11.0: Inspection of Site 140

    4.3.12 Clause Analysis No 12.0: Programme Of

    Work 143

    4.3.13 Clause Analysis No 13.0: Performance Bond

    or Performance Guarantee Sum 147

    4.3.14 Clause Analysis No 14.0: Indemnity In

    Respect of Personal Injuries and

    Damage to Property 151

    4.3.15 Clause Analysis No 15.0: Insurance Against

    Personal Injuries and Damage

    to Property 154

    4.3.16 Clause Analysis No 16.0: Indemnities to

    Government In Respect Of Claims

    By Workmen 158

    4.3.17 Clause Analysis No 17.0: Employees’ Social

    Security Act, 1969 161

    4.3.18 Clause Analysis No 18.0: Insurance of

    Works 165

    4.3.19 Clause Analysis No 19.0: Setting Out 169

    4.3.20 Clause Analysis No 20.0: Unfixed Materials

    and Goods 173

    4.3.21 Clause Analysis No 21.0: Compliance

    with the Law 176

    4.3.22 Clause Analysis No 22.0: Design 179

  • x

    4.3.23 Clause Analysis No 23.0: Employment

    of Workmen 183

    4.3.24 Clause Analysis No 24.0: Variations 187

    4.3.25 Clause Analysis No 25.0: Valuation

    of Variation 190

    4.3.26 Clause Analysis No 26.0: Bill of Quantities 194

    4.3.27 Clause Analysis No 27.0: Measurement

    of Works 198

    4.3.28 Clause Analysis No 28.0: Payment to

    Contractor and Interim Certificates 201

    4.3.29 Clause Analysis No 29.0: Adjustment of

    Contract Sum 205

    4.3.30 Clause Analysis No 30.0: Fluctuation

    of Price 208

    4.3.31 Clause Analysis No 31.0: Final Account

    And Payment Certificate 211

    4.3.32 Clause Analysis No 32.0: Effect of S.O.'S

    Certificates 215

    4.3.33 Clause Analysis No 33.0: Deduction from

    Money Due To Contractor 218

    4.3.34 Clause Analysis No 34.0: Prime Cost /

    Provisional Sums 221

    4.3.35 Clause Analysis No 35.0: Materials,

    Goods and Workmanship 224

  • xi

    4.3.36 Clause Analysis No 36.0: Inspection and

    Testing Of Materials, Goods

    and Equipment 227

    4.3.37 Clause Analysis No 37.0: Constructional

    Plant, Equipment, Vehicles and

    Machineries 231

    4.3.38 Clause Analysis No 38.0: Possession of Site 234

    4.3.39 Clause Analysis No 39.0: Completion

    of Works 238

    4.3.40 Clause Analysis No 40.0: 0 Damages For

    Non-Completion 242

    4.3.41 Clause Analysis No 41.0: Sectional

    Completion 245

    4.3.42 Clause Analysis No 42.0: Partial Occupation/

    Taking Over By Government 249

    4.3.43 Clause Analysis No 43.0: Delay and

    Extension of Time 253

    4.3.44 Clause Analysis No 44.0: Claims for Loss

    And Expense 257

    4.3.45 Clause Analysis No 45.0: Investigation by

    The Government and Other Persons

    In Case Of Accident, Failure or

    Other Event 261

    4.3.46 Clause Analysis No 46.0: Access for

    Works, Etc. 264

  • xii

    4.3.47 Clause Analysis No 47.0: Sub-Contract

    or Assignment 267

    4.3.48 Clause Analysis No 48.0: Defects after

    Completion 270

    4.3.49 Clause Analysis No 49.0: Unfulfilled

    Obligations 274

    4.3.50 Clause Analysis No 50.0: Suspension

    of Works 277

    4.3.51 Clause Analysis No 51.0: Events And

    Consequences of Default By

    The Contractor 280

    4.3.52 Clause Analysis No 52.0: Termination

    on National Interest 286

    4.3.53 Clause Analysis No 53.0: Termination on

    Corruption 289

    4.3.54 Clause Analysis No 54.0: Payments upon

    Termination 293

    4.3.55 Clause Analysis No 55.0: Certificate of

    Termination Costs 296

    4.3.56 Clause Analysis No 56.0: Surviving Rights 300

    4.3.57 Clause Analysis No 57.0: Effect of Force

    Majeure 303

    4.3.58 Clause Analysis No 58.0: Site Agent and

    Assistants 306

  • xiii

    4.3.59 Clause Analysis No 59.0: Nominated

    Sub-Contractors and/or Nominated

    Suppliers 309

    4.3.60 Clause Analysis No 60.0: Payment to

    Nominated Sub-Contractor or Supplier 313

    4.3.61 Clause Analysis No 61.0: No Liability of

    Government to Nominated and/or

    Sub Contractor or Supplier 317

    4.3.62 Clause Analysis No 62.0: Responsibilities

    of Contractor to Nominated and/or

    Sub Contractors or Suppliers 320

    4.3.63 Clause Analysis No 63.0: Intellectual

    Property Rights 323

    4.3.64 Clause Analysis No 64.0: Antiquities 326

    4.3.65 Clause Analysis No 65.0: Arbitration 329

    4.3.66 Clause Analysis No 66.0: Notice, Etc. 332

    4.3.67 Clause Analysis No 67.0: Amendment 336

    4.3.68 Clause Analysis No 68.0: Confidentiality 339

    4.3.69 Clause Analysis No 69.0: Stamp Duty 342

    4.3.70 Clause Analysis No 70.0: Severability 345

    4.3.71 Clause Analysis No 71.0: Waiver 348

    4.3.72 Clause Analysis No 72.0: Laws Applicable 351

    4.3.73 Clause Analysis No 73.0: Successors Bound 354

    4.3.74 Clause Analysis No 74.0: Epidemics

    and Medical Attendance 357

  • xiv

    4.3.75 Clause Analysis No 75.0: Technology

    Transfer 360

    4.3.76 Clause Analysis No 76.0: General Duties

    and Performance Standard 363

    4.3.77 Clause Analysis No 77.0: Restriction And

    Procedure on Use of Imported Materials

    and Goods 367

    4.3.78 Clause Analysis No 78.0: Time 371

    4.4 Summary of Results 374

    4.4.1 Summary of Results Based On Total

    Evaluation Score of Clause Analysis 374

    4.4.2 Summary of Results for Agreement Level

    of Attribute of Clause 385

    4.4.2.1 Summary of Result in Term of

    Clarity 385

    4.4.2.2 Summary of Result in Term of

    Comprehensiveness 391

    4.4.2.3 Summary of Result in Term of

    Completeness 397

    4.4.2.4 Summary of Result in Term of

    Consistency 403

    4.4.2.5 Summary of Result in Term of

    Flexibility 409

  • xv

    4.4.2.6 Summary of Result in Term of

    Clear Structured Project

    Management Framework 415

    4.4.2.7 Summary of Result in Term of

    Fairness or Role Distribution 421

    4.4.2.8 Summary of Result in Term of

    Risk Distribution 427

    CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION

    5.1 General 434

    5.2 Positive Evaluation of General Conditions 434

    5.2.1 High Positive Evaluation of General

    Conditions 435

    5.2.2 Average Positive Evaluation of General

    Conditions 436

    5.2.3 Low Positive Evaluation of General

    Conditions 442

    5.3 Negative Evaluation of General Conditions 448

    5.3.1 High Negative Evaluation of

    General Condition 449

    5.3.2 Average Negative Evaluation of General

    Condition 452

    5.4 Summary for Positive Evaluation and Negative

    Evaluation of General Condition of Contract 454

  • xvi

    5.5 Overall Performance 457

    CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION

    6.1 General 460

    6.2 Research’s Findings 460

    6.3 Recommendation 462

    6.4 Research’s Constraint 463

    6.5 Suggestion for Future Research 463

    6.6 Conclusion 464

    REFERENCES 465

    APPENDIX 475

  • xvii

    List of Table

    Tables Page

    3.1

    4.1

    4.2

    4.3

    4.4

    4.5

    4.6

    4.7

    4.8

    4.9

    4.10

    The Magnitude of Evaluation of the General Conditions

    for Clause

    Format of Table to Analyze Result of Structured

    Questionnaire Survey

    Importance Weight of Criteria

    Importance Weight of Each Criterion in Percentage Form

    The Magnitude of Evaluation of the General Conditions

    for Clause

    Example of Calculation for Total Evaluation Score of a

    Sample Clause

    Summary of Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of

    Evaluation

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No.1.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No.2.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 3.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 4.0

    93

    99

    100

    102

    104

    105

    107

    110

    113

    116

    119

  • xviii

    4.11

    4.12

    4.13

    4.14

    4.15

    4.16

    4.17

    4.18

    4.19

    4.20

    4.21

    4.22

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 5.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 6.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 7.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 8.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 9.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 10.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 11.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 12.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 13.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 14.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 15.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 16.0

    122

    125

    128

    132

    136

    139

    142

    145

    150

    153

    157

    160

  • xix

    4.23

    4.24

    4.25

    4.26

    4.27

    4.28

    4.29

    4.30

    4.31

    4.32

    4.33

    4.34

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 17.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 18.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 19.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 20.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 21.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 22.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 23.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 24.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 25.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 26.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 27.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 28.0

    164

    168

    172

    174

    178

    182

    186

    189

    193

    197

    200

    204

  • xx

    4.35

    4.36

    4.37

    4.38

    4.39

    4.40

    4.41

    4.42

    4.43

    4.44

    4.45

    4.46

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 29.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 30.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 31.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 32.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 33.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 34.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 35.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 36.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 37.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 38.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 39.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No.40.0

    207

    210

    214

    217

    220

    223

    226

    233

    237

    237

    241

    244

  • xxi

    4.47

    4.48

    4.49

    4.50

    4.51

    4.52

    4.53

    4.54

    4.55

    4.56

    4.57

    4.58

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 41.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 42.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 43.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 44.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 45.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 46.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 47.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 48.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 49.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 50.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 51.0

    Total Evaluation Score and Magnitude of Evaluation for

    Clause No. 52.0

    247

    252

    256

    260

    263

    266

    269

    273

    276

    279

    284

    288


Recommended