+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

Date post: 22-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: dirk
View: 40 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance . Maxine Schache. Background. Story. Implications. Maxine. Grumble. Background. Background. Results. Representative sample. 64 Drip systems (49 flow rate variations) 59 Low level sprinklers. Results. Results. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
17
Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance Maxine Schache
Transcript
Page 1: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance Maxine Schache

Page 2: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

Background

Story

Implications

Page 3: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

MaxineGrumble

Page 4: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

Background

Page 5: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

Background

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

drip

low level

overhead

Pressure variation %

Disc

harg

e va

riatio

n %

Page 6: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance
Page 7: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

ResultsRepresentative sample

64 Drip systems (49 flow rate variations)

59 Low level sprinklers

Page 8: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

Results

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Drip pressure variation, discharge variation, nominal flow rate

Non PC 6.7,7.4,3

PC 13.6,8.3,2.2

PC 39.2,17.6, 1.6

PC 70.4, 11.4, 4.4

PC 69.2, 8,2.3

PC 11.8, 7.7, 2.3

PC 9.1, 2.4,2

PC 20, 11.5, 2.3

PC 12.1, 4.2, 2.3

PC 23.9, 9.5, 2

PC 10.3, 9.7, 1.6

PC 33.3, 4.2, 2.3

PC 10, 12.5, 2.3

Pressure KPa

Dis

char

ge L

/Hr

Page 9: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

Results

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Drip pressure variation, discharge variation, nominal flow rate

Non PC 6.7,7.4,3

PC 13.6,8.3,2.2

PC 39.2,17.6, 1.6

PC 70.4, 11.4, 4.4

PC 69.2, 8,2.3

PC 11.8, 7.7, 2.3

PC 9.1, 2.4,2

PC 20, 11.5, 2.3

PC 12.1, 4.2, 2.3

PC 23.9, 9.5, 2

PC 10.3, 9.7, 1.6

PC 33.3, 4.2, 2.3

PC 10, 12.5, 2.3

Pressure KPa

Dis

char

ge L

/Hr

6.7% PV7.4% DV

Page 10: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

Results

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Drip pressure variation, discharge variation, nominal flow rate

Non PC 6.7,7.4,3

PC 13.6,8.3,2.2

PC 39.2,17.6, 1.6

PC 70.4, 11.4, 4.4

PC 69.2, 8,2.3

PC 11.8, 7.7, 2.3

PC 9.1, 2.4,2

PC 20, 11.5, 2.3

PC 12.1, 4.2, 2.3

PC 23.9, 9.5, 2

PC 10.3, 9.7, 1.6

PC 33.3, 4.2, 2.3

PC 10, 12.5, 2.3

Pressure KPa

Dis

char

ge L

/Hr

33.3% PV4.2% DV

70.4% PV11.4% DV

Page 11: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

Results

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Drip pressure variation, discharge variation, nominal flow rate

Non PC 6.7,7.4,3

PC 13.6,8.3,2.2

PC 39.2,17.6, 1.6

PC 70.4, 11.4, 4.4

PC 69.2, 8,2.3

PC 11.8, 7.7, 2.3

PC 9.1, 2.4,2

PC 20, 11.5, 2.3

PC 12.1, 4.2, 2.3

PC 23.9, 9.5, 2

PC 10.3, 9.7, 1.6

PC 33.3, 4.2, 2.3

PC 10, 12.5, 2.3

Pressure KPa

Dis

char

ge L

/Hr

9.1% PV2.4% DV

Page 12: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

Results

Drip 9/64 pressure5/49 discharge

Sprinkler38/59 pressure23/59 discharge12/59 DU

Page 13: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

Results

Grade Drips Low level sprinklers

A

B

C D

FAIL

Page 14: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

WHY SO BAD?

PC

Page 15: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

CID&

Industry confidence

&training

Page 16: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

?

Page 17: Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

Recommended