Date post: | 01-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | darren-cameron |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
IRRIIS- FP6-2005–IST-4
EC - LOGO
IRRIIS Reference Scenarios
Workshop 1.4Rome 8th of February 2007
Walter Schmitz
IRRIIS
1.Objectives of “Scenario Analysis 3
2.Critical Infrastructures today 5
3. Importance of Scenarios 10
4.Scenario Approach 15
5.Results: Scenario Interpretation 34
Agenda
Page
IRRIIS
WP1.2 Objectives
WP1.2 objectives are: to identify future scenarios which will serve as key
environments for threat-, risk-, and assessment of MIT solutions and LCCI countermeasures
to gather information concerning LCCIs confronted with such scenarios
to develop an advanced methodology for the vulnerability assessment and contingency planning.
WP1.2: Scenario and Risk Analysis
IRRIIS
Critical Infrastructures are highly netted, most of them globally e.g. energy transport telecommunications banking and finance
The Nature of Critical Infrastructures
Critical Infrastructures are
vital backbones of modern
societies
IRRIIS
Critical Infrastructures are increasingly depending on IT-and communication networks.
Critical Infrastructures are becoming preferred targets of future threats.
User
User Databank
Filter
Threats are becoming more and more asymmetric, cyber threats are becoming reality.
Role of ICT
IRRIIS
Fault-tolerance and self-healing should be important design criteria of complex systems such as CI
Natural disasters
Man made disasters
Terror attacks
Complexity of systems due to IT-penetration
Cause and effect in complex systems are hardly distinguishable
Critical Infrastructures: Threats
IRRIIS
CI Situation
Economic and societal relevance of CI dependability
Insufficient understanding of ICT-related dependencies, services
New market developments
New technologies
Emerging threats and vulnerabilities
Reverse trends:
Redundancy => increasing costs => decreasing shareholder value
Privatisation => shareholder value oriented =>reduction of costs
New business models are needed => PPP => information sharing
Development and usage of novel technologiesValidation by using novel scenarios
IRRIIS
Scenario: Problems & Obstacles
Nobody knows the future
Two extreme behaviours of planners:
(1) asserted certainty with extrapolation of the traditional planning
(2) total uncertainty without any indication for the future
Three Obstacles have to be overcome:
(1) Imagination that we deal with an exactly predictable future
(2) The hard rule of cause and effect in highly complex world
(3) Sole focusing on the current success that can be a future flop
Three groups of opponents
(1) Traditional planners and controllers: “only one future!”
(2) Wrights: networked thinking is an intellectual baublery
(3) Successful colleagues point to their impressive balance sheet
IRRIIS
Future Oriented Organisations
… should not neglect
(1) Thinking and acting open for each possible future
(2) Networked thinking and acting
(3) Strategic thinking and acting
Scenario means alternative descriptions of future
complex systems like CIs.
The integration of such scenarios into the process of
the strategic management leads to
“Scenario Management”.
IRRIIS
Scenario Management
Scenario management applies alternative scenarios
in order• to identify and tap new success factors• to detect and process weak signals
earlier than competitors.
But how to detect and process them in a goal-oriented
way in order to enable the organisation to react quickly
and adequately?
IRRIIS
Future oriented organisations need a strategic early detection capability:
(1) Scanning of the whole environment
(2) Examination of identified signals
(3) Observation of crisis indicators / critical factors
(4) Scenarios as a grouping of trend projections
Advantages:
(1) More time for decision making
(2) The integration of the detected signals into the decisionprocess enlarges the scope of design and control
Early Detection
IRRIIS
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4
ImpactAnalysis
ScenarioInterpretation
FailureAnalysis
Step 8 Step 6 Step 5 Step 7
Scenario-Transfer
Scenario Approach
ProblemAnalysis
InfluenceAnalysis
ScenarioProjection
Grouping ofAlternatives
IRRIIS
Step 1: Problem Analysis (1)
Several drivers aggravate the CIP problem:
1) interlinked aspects of market forces2) technological evolution, and3) emerging risk factors.
w.r.t. 1) Globalisation of information services will lead to increasing connectivity and ill-understood behaviour of systems and vulnerabilities.w.r.t. 2) Security has not been a design driver, pressure to reduce time to marketw.r.t. 3) Increasingly large parts of CIs will be under control of private sector and will be trans-national.
IRRIIS
(1)Technical perspective:
IRRIIS develops technologies to foster information exchange between the different infrastructures to enhance substantially their dependability.
(2)Management perspective: CIIP/CIP is seen as a “service continuity” problem including technical, organisational and human factors.
(3)Dependency perspective: Vulnerabilities induced by dependence on other
infrastructures are the focus of IRRIIS.
IRRIIS Perspectives
IRRIIS
Elem1
Elemn
Elem2Intra-
dependencies
Elem1
Elemn
Elem2Intra-
dependenciesInterdependencies
Politics Technology
Economy Society
Ecology
GlobalEnvironment
Elem1
Elemn
Elem2Intra-
dependencies
SpecificEnvironment
IRRIISResearch Area
Electricity Internet
Telecom.
Step 2: Influence Areas
IRRIIS
Description of Key Factors (1)
Descriptor: D2.3
Short Name: Distributed Generation (DG) and Renewable Energy Sources (RES)
Detailed Description:
Some generators like RES are not controlled by system operators. Generation level of these sources is seldom being planned ahead and is often difficult to pre-dict. Poorly predictable and non-controllable generation requires more control and reserves, which will increase the price of electric power. ICT dependency and costs are limiting factor for improving predictability and controllability.
Actual Status 2006:
RES and DG are aiming at reduction of carbon emissions. The amount of this energy is sensitive in the market and requires increasing regulation and reserves.In some areas further increase is not possible without either higher costs or worse-ning supply reliability. Interfacing, protection, automation and controllability of DG, RES, and DSO network.
IRRIIS
Uncertainty-Impact-Analysis selects the relevant influencefactors in consideration of the following questions:
• How important is the influence factor for the problem to be solved?
• How uncertain is the future status of the influence factor from the current point of view?
veryimportant
lessimportant
highlycertain
highlyuncertain
Follow-on analysis should be focused on factors which are assessed as very important and highly uncertain!
Uncertainty-Impact-Analysis
IRRIIS
D1.1 - Liberalisation of trade
D1.2- Privatisation
D1.3 - Competition
D1.4 - Transnat. character of CIs
D1.5 - Security requirements
D1.6 - Offshore reliance
D2.1 - Globalisation
D2.2 - Market dynamics
D2.3 - Outsourcing
D2.4 - Appropriate security management procedures
D2.5 - ICT-costs
D2.6 - Business models
D2.7 - Flexible organisation of LCCI providersD2.8 - Demand for LCCI-services
4.11 - Interfaces
D3.1 - Conflicting interests of CI stakeholders
D3.2 - Public awareness regarding CI vulnerabilities
D3.3 - Corporate culture
D3.4 - Leadership style
D3.5 - Skills of personnel
D3.6 - White-collar crime
D4.1- ComplexityD4.2 - Mutual depen-dence of CIs
D4.3 - Intelligent and sophisticated networking
D4.4 D4.5
D4.6 - Internet as carrier
D4.7 - Wireless communication
D4.8 - Synchronous and asynchronous communication
D4.9 - ICT equipment of LCCI providers
D4.10 - IT-security
highly uncertainhighly certain
lessimportant
veryimportant
IRRIIS
Analysis of the complexity of the system with the aid of the Cross-Impact-Matrix (CI-Matrix: Driver-Driven-Analyse)
• Which descriptors do strongly influence the system?
• Which descriptors are influenced by which?
• Presentation of the results as follows:
IPassive
Elements
IICritical
Elements
IIIBufferingElements
IVActive
Elements
Passive-Values
Active-Values
Influence-Analysis
IRRIIS
IRRIIS: Selected Key Factors
D1.1 Liberalisation of CI markets
D1.2 Reliance on energy sources outside EU
D1.3 Protection of environment and energy saving
D1.4 Security management
D2.1 Business models
D2.2 Energy market dynamics
D2.3 Distributed generation and renewable energy sources
D3.1 Skills of personnel
D4.1 Complexity and dependences
D4.2 Internet-based and converging networks
D4.3 Information security of ICT
Politics
Economy
Society
Technology
IRRIIS
1. Identify the cross-linkedscenario parameters 2. Select the most relevant influence parameters; ...
today Prognosis Horizontime
... describe several development lines for the selected parametersand assign reasons for theselines ...
Scenario-Field Scenario-Projection Scenario-BuildingScenario-Building
... and combine them toconsistent scenarios
timetoday Prognosis Horizon
Step 3: Trend Projection
IRRIIS
Description of Key Factors (2)
Descriptor: D2.3
Short Name: Distributed Generation (DG) and Renewable Energy Sources (RES)
Projection A (2015):
Continuous growing of DG and RES
Rationale: Communication infrastructure will develop services that improve highlydistributed remote automation and reliable but inexpensive data communication.
Projection B (2015):
Penetration of DG and RES will stop increasing
Rationale: Penetration of DG and RES will be delayed due to
(1) high price of electric power produced by DG and RES
(2) costs caused by the electric power infrastructure
(3) cost of reliable communication to distributed sites
(4) complex protection systems and non-harmonised requirements
IRRIIS
1. Identify the cross-linkedscenario parameters 2. Select the most relevant influence parameters; ...
today Prognosis Horizontime
... describe several development lines for the selected parametersand assign reasons for theselines ...
Scenario-Field Scenario-Projection Scenario-BuildingScenario-Building
... and combine them toconsistent scenarios
timetoday Prognosis Horizon
Step 4: Grouping of Alternatives
IRRIIS
Internet-driven open market Concentration & private networksBundle 1 Bundle 2 Bundle 3 Bundle 4 Scenario #1 Bundle 5 Bundle 6 Scenario #2
D1.1A x x x x xD1.1B x x xD1.2A x x x x xD1.2B x x xD1.3A x xD1.3B x x x x xD1.4A x x x x xD1.4B x x xD2.1A x x x x xD2.1B x xD2.2A x x x x xD2.2B x x xD2.3A x x x x xD2.3B x x xD3.1A x x x x x xD3.1B xD4.1A x x xD4.1B x x x x xD4.2A x x x x xD4.2B x x xD4.3A x x x x xD4.3B x x x
Liberalisation of CI markets
Reliance on Energy Sources Outside EUProtection of the Environment and Energy Saving
Security Management
Complexity and Dependences
Sophisticated and Converging Network based on the Internet
Information Security of ICT
Business Models
Energy Market Dynamics
Distributed Generation and Renewable Energy Sources
Skills of personnel
Grouping of Alternatives
IRRIIS
Concentration and private networksD1.2B Weak reliance
D1.3B Diminished protectionD1.4B Diminished security mgmtD2.2B Internal energy marketsD2.3B Decreasing DG and RES
penetrationD4.1B Isolated solutions and
increased complexityD4.3B Weakened IT-security
Selection of 2 Extreme Scenarios
Liberalisation of CI-markets (politics)low high
So
ph
isti
cate
d In
tern
et-b
ased
net
wo
rks
high
low
Internet-driven open marketD1.2A Strong reliance on energy
resources outside EUD1.3A Advanced protection of the
environment and energy savingD1.4A Developed security managementD2.2A Competitive open energy marketsD2.3A Growing DG and RESD3.1A Advanced skills of personnel
D4.1A Holistic solutions and reducedcomplexity
D4.3A Strengthened IT-security