+ All Categories
Home > Documents > IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign...

IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign...

Date post: 27-Mar-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 36 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
26
Disclosure to Promote the Right To Information Whereas the Parliament of India has set out to provide a practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority, and whereas the attached publication of the Bureau of Indian Standards is of particular interest to the public, particularly disadvantaged communities and those engaged in the pursuit of education and knowledge, the attached public safety standard is made available to promote the timely dissemination of this information in an accurate manner to the public. इंटरनेट मानक !ान $ एक न’ भारत का +नम-णSatyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda “Invent a New India Using Knowledge” प0रा1 को छोड न’ 5 तरफJawaharlal Nehru “Step Out From the Old to the New” जान1 का अ+धकार, जी1 का अ+धकारMazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan “The Right to Information, The Right to Live” !ान एक ऐसा खजाना > जो कभी च0राया नहB जा सकता ह Bharthari—Nītiśatakam “Knowledge is such a treasure which cannot be stolen” IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams [WRD 9: Dams and Spillways]
Transcript
Page 1: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

Disclosure to Promote the Right To Information

Whereas the Parliament of India has set out to provide a practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority, and whereas the attached publication of the Bureau of Indian Standards is of particular interest to the public, particularly disadvantaged communities and those engaged in the pursuit of education and knowledge, the attached public safety standard is made available to promote the timely dissemination of this information in an accurate manner to the public.

इंटरनेट मानक

“!ान $ एक न' भारत का +नम-ण”Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda

“Invent a New India Using Knowledge”

“प0रा1 को छोड न' 5 तरफ”Jawaharlal Nehru

“Step Out From the Old to the New”

“जान1 का अ+धकार, जी1 का अ+धकार”Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan

“The Right to Information, The Right to Live”

“!ान एक ऐसा खजाना > जो कभी च0राया नहB जा सकता है”Bhartṛhari—Nītiśatakam

“Knowledge is such a treasure which cannot be stolen”

“Invent a New India Using Knowledge”

है”ह”ह

IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankmentdams [WRD 9: Dams and Spillways]

Page 2: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement
Page 3: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement
Page 4: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

IS : 121. ·1887«R••ttlrmecl 1"7)

Indian StandardCRITERIA FOR

DESIGN OF SMALL EMBANKMENT DAMS

( FUll Reprint FEBRUARY 1999)

UDC 627.81 : 624.136 : 624.31

C Copyright 1988

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDSMANAK BRAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARO

NEW DBLHI 110002

Gr5 Feb",d'" 1988

Page 5: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

IS • 12169 • 1'.7

Indian Standard

CRITERIA FORDESIGN OF SMALL EMBANKMENT DAMS

Dams ( Overflow and Non-Overflow) Sectional Committee. BDC 53

HiDduitaD CoDitructloa Company Ltd, Bombay

Public Work. Department, GoverDment of TamilNadu, Madr..

R'lr'J,."ill,Irrigation Departmeal, GoverDment of Gujarat,

GandhiDa.ar

DIB.CTOB ( Eat RDO-I )D•• VTY DJBBOTOR

( E Ie RDD-I ) (Al",n,,',)DJBBOTOR, IN8'1·ITOTB ur HYDaAO­

Lice & HYDROLOGYSU...I.TDDIMG E.GI....

( D.B.G•• ) ( M,,,,..,, )So. M. V. S. IY••GAB

Kefale State Electricity Board, TrivandrumDbakra Be.. Management Board, NaDlal

TownlhipSRRI J. S. KaURA•• ( ~l"'"," )

S.81 H. S. BSAT In perlOD.I capaeity (No. 599, 10thCross,]a),,-MI", B.,.,Glor, )

SRBI M. V. BRAR.. Tata ConiultiDI EDliaeen, BaDla10r.S8BI R. SlYAB••ltAR ( AI,,,,,.,.)

SBRI B. K. CRADSA Coalulting EDlineering Services ( India) PrivateLtd, New Delhi

Pao.. HARI KRISB.A ( AI'"IUII, )Pao.. M. C. CS.A.TURVEDJ Indian In,titute or TechnololY, New DelhiCBIBI' EMOIN1i:BR (RANIIT SAGAR Irrilation Department. Government of Punjab,

DAM) Chandi.erhDIRBCTOR (R.A.lfIIT SAGAB

DAM ) ( Alt6rnc', )SBRI C. ETTY DAICoWlN In penonal capacity ( P. O. Mu".da, TriotJ"drUfll )DJ.acToR Central Water It Power Research Station, PUDe

SRal S. L. MOKA8HI (All""''')DJB.OTOR OP DB810.N8 Irri.atioD "Waterways Departmeae, Govern-

ment of Welt BeDlal, Calcutta .CeDtral Water CommialioD, New Delhi

CA.ir",.,.SOl V. B. PATBL

M""6,,,8.81 R. BAL••AMA.1tSaBI R..K. BBA81.

(C.,.,j"",d ." /HIg' 2 )

(f) e.t1ri,,,, 1988BUREAU or INDIAN STANDARDS

TIaII publlcatlaD II protected uacler tb. ,.... e."n,,,, ~,' (XIV or 1957 ) aDdnprocl~ ia wbol. 01' iD part by ua, me.. eac.pt with written permiaioD of thepubl'" ..... be d..... to be aD iIIIriap.eat 01 copyrilbt uDder tbe said Act.

Page 6: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

III 12169 • 1987

( C.",in",d f,om /NI" I )

SRBI P. M. SOMI ( Al'ma.', )SUI R. AK IQBAL 8111GB

M,mHrs b/W6unlin,O..FICBR-ON-S PEe I A L D U T Y, Irrigation Department, Government of ADdhr.

APERL Pradab, HyderabadSUPBRIN'J'BltDJJUJ EJfGI••••

( DAK8 ) ( COO ) (AI,,,,,.,,)Sa.1 M. U. PUROBIT IrrigatioD Department, Government of Gujarat,

Gandbinag.r

SSBJ O. N. T••p.& (AI,,,,,.,, )SUBI G. RAJI£N, Director General, SIS (&-01"10 M'rtlbn )

Director ( Civ Enll )

Irrigation Department, Government of UuarPradelh, Lucknow

SRal BISHAX LAL JATA•• ( A.l'"",," )S••I M. S. RAilA RAO K.rnataka Power Corporation Ltd, BangaloreS••J M. S. RBDDY Central Water Commission, New DelhiRlCpa8sBNTATIVII 1••titutioD of Engineers ( India ), CalcuttaSECRETARY CeDtral Board of Irrigation & Power, New Delhi

DIRJtc'roB ( CIVIL) ( Alt","", )S".JtRINTlIiNDJNO Elf Q I N B • B Irrlladon Department, Government of Mahara-

( MD ), CDO shtra, BombaySaBI K. N. VSNKATAB••AN Major. Medium &t Minor Irrigation Department,

GoYerDmeDt of Madhya Pradttsb, Bhopal

SIn,'.",I SBBI K. K. SHABKA

JoiDt Director ( Ciy Enll ), BIS

Earth and Rockfill Dams Subcommittee, BDC 53 : 2

Co"",,,.,S.al M. U. PUROHIT Irri.atiOD DepartmeDt, GovernmeDt of Gujarat,

OaDdhiaalarMIfIINr,

SUP.RllfTDDI_O EJfQI~J aDO(AI.,,,.,. to Shri M. U. Purohit).BBI N. K. A.o.... Shallra Bea M......m••t Board, NaDiaI

TowDihip8Bal K. K. S. BBAJlD....1 (MImudI )

PROI' M. C. CHATUav.DI ladiaalnltitute of Techaol.,. Ne. DelblS••IIl. P. C80..... Natio.a1 Project. CoaatructioD Corporatioa L'd,

New DelbiS... K. N. TA.IIl. (~".,,..,,)

8••1 It. R. DAT". fa penoaal capacity ( .".. M"'II No.2, 14.S.B.,S••,,,".-, C"'N, ...",)~ lallC.rOa ( It • RDD-I ) CeDlral Water ColDmillloa, New D.lbi

D•• u~y DI •• o~o.( B a RDD-I ) ( ~1InMI, )

(c...-.,." 20)

2

Page 7: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

AMENDMENT NO.1 OCTOBER 2008TO

IS 12169 : 1987 CRITERIA FOR DESIGN OFSMALL EMBANKMENT DAMS

(Page 9, clause 4.1.4) - Substitute 'IS 4999 : 1991·' for 'IS 4999 :1968*' .

(Page 9, footnote marked *) - Substitute the following for the existingfootnote:

'Recommendations for IfOUpina of plWioussoill (ftr. IWUIon). '

(Page 11, clause4.8) - Substitute 'IS SOSO : 1992§' for 'IS S050 : 1968§'.

(Page II, footnote marked §) - Substitute the following for the existingfootnote:

'Code of practicefordOli..., construction IIld maintcnlDCC ofreliefwells(fvs' ,"18;011). t

(Page 12, cltnl.fe S.I.1) - Substitute 'IS 10635 : 1993·' for 'IS 10635 :1983*'.

(Page 12, footnote ",arud *) - Substitute the following for the existingfootnote:

'Freeboard laIuircments in emblDkment cIamI- Guidelines (fir" MluloII). •

(Page 18,clause 7.2.1) - Insertthe following sentenceat the ead:

&After assessment of geo-technical panmeters of flyash and based on techno­economic considerations, tlyash conforming to IS 3812 : 1981 may be used intherandom zones ondownstream of inclinedfilter in a zoned dam.'

(WRD9)

Ropropaphy Unit,DIS,New Delhi.India

Page 8: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

III 1218 • 1987

Indian Standard

CRITERIA FORDESIGN OF SMALL EMBANKMENT DAMS

o. FOREWORD

0.1 This Indian Standard was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standardson 24 August 1987. after the draft finalized by the Dams ( Overflow andNon-overflow) Sectional Committee had been approved by the CivilEngineering Division Council.

0.2 A fairly large number of small embankment dalM are being built allover the country. These are generally designed locally and central designfacilities are not made use of. In designing, a small embankment dammany of the provisions specified in IS: 8826-1978· are required to bemodified or relaxed. It was, therefore, felt that a separate standard shouldbe prepared for guiding the design of small embankment dams.

0.3 For the purpose of deciding whether a particular requirement of thisstandard is comr1ied with, the final value, observed or calculated. expres­sing the result 0 a test or analysis, shall be rounded off in accordance withIS : 2·1960·. The number of significant places retained in the rounded offvalue should be the same as that of the specified value in this standard.

1. SCOPB

1.1 This atandard la)'l down guidelinel for design of 'small embankmentdams.

2. TERMINOLOGY

2.0 For thep~ of this ..taDcIard. the (ollowing definitions in additionto those given in IS : 8826-1978* ahall apply.

2.1 Bm-·.....t Dam - A dam composed of any type of IOU includ­ing rock.

2.2 B.......... BlDh....t Dam - AD embankment dam com­poled or linBle type of material.

eOuld.li.. lor dee••01I MIt""" rock.1I clam..tllu•• for rOUDdiDI • DU aI,•• ( ,,.,. ).

3

Page 9: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

2.3 Lar•• Dam - A dam exceeding 15 m in height above deepest riverbed level and a dam between 10 and 15 m height provided volume ofearthwork exceeds 0·75 million ml and storage exceeds 1 million rnl orthe maximum flood discharge exceedI 2 000 cumecs.

2.'.1 Modifi'd HomDII",DfU E",6""lcm,,,' Dam - An embankment dam inwhich Imall quantities of pervious material. selected to control the actionof seepage, are carefully placed in an otherwise homogeneous dam ($I,Fig. 1 ).

2.4 RockfUI Da. - An embankment consisting of various sizes of rockt? provide Itability and an impervious core of membrane to provide water­tightness.

2.5 Sman D.... - A dam not satisfying the criteria of a large dam( sI,2.3 ).

2.6 Zea'" Bmb••m.at Dam - An embankment dam composed ofzon~. of difF~rent types of soil ( '" Fig. 2A and 2B ).

S. COMPONENTS OP EM8AKMBNT DAM

3.1 An embankment dam generally consists of the following components( Fig.2A and 2B ).

a) Cut-offjb) Core;c) Caling;d) Internal drainage .yltem and foundations;e) Slope protection; andr) Surface drainage.

3.2 The following componenta are provided in lpecial cues:

a) ImpervioUi blanket; andb) R.eliefwell.

~. lVNarJON8 AND DBIION RBQ,UIRBMBNTI

f.' The (unctions and deaigD requirement. of the components are dam­bed in f.1 to fA.

4.1 Cae..•

••1.1 The cut-off is required for the following Coaction.:a) To reduce lou of stored water through foundationl and abut­

mentaj andb) To prevent subsurface erOlion by piping.

4

Page 10: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

Fla.

1C

RO

SS

-SE

CT

ION

OF

MO

Dln

ED

HO

MO

GB

NB

OU

SE

AR

TH

DA

Y

"'"

s:~l_

1.S

elec

ted

Ear

thF

ill

2.Im

perv

ious

Fil

l

3.F

ound

atio

D

4.Im

peri

rous

Su

b·S

trat

um

5.S

aDd

Fil

ter

6.R

ock

Toe

7.R

.ubb

leP

itch

iDg

8.T

eeD

rain

H

= ... N ... C • ... .. •...,.

Page 11: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

0\

fAl

IMP

ER

VIO

US

ST

RA

TU

M

....

TOP

WID

TH

I {

RAN

DO

MFI

LLRE

LATI

VEL

YIM

PER

VIO

US

PER

VIO

US

COV

ER

I; .­ N - • • i

6.lD

cliD

edaD

dH

oriz

onta

lP

ilte

r7.

Roc

kT

oeao

dT

oeD

ram

8.R

.ip

np

wit

hF

ilte

r

9.C

atch

Wat

erD

rain

I.Po

siti.

-eC

ut-o

ft"

2.G

rout

Cur

taiD

3.C

eDtr

alIm

perv

ioul

Cor

e

4.U

pstr

eam

Cu

i..

5.D

OW

DIt

ream

Cu

ing

NQ

IftI

-H

oriz

oDta

lfi

lter

atin

term

edia

tele

vels

are

som

etim

espl

aced

inth

eu

plt

ream

cuia

gzo

new

bere

casiD

Imat

eria

lis

ofIm

perv

ious

Dat

ure.

2AE

mba

nkm

entD

amw

ithC

entr

alC

ore

and

Pos

itive

Cu

t-O

ff

Page 12: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

f.T

urfi

DI

5.B

erm

...,

DO

WN

STR

EAM

CA

SIN

G

INC

LIN

ED

IMPE

RV

IOU

SC

OR

EPE

RV

IOU

SFO

UN

DA

TIO

N

1.Im

perv

ious

Bla

nket

2.R

ock

Toe

aud

Toe

Dram

3.R

elie

rWel

l

28E

mb

an

kme

ntD

amw

ith

Incl

ine

dC

ore

and

Pa

rtia

lC

ut-

Off

Flo

.2

CO

MP

ON

EN

TS

OP

EII

BA

NE

IfB

NT

DA

M

­ • ... N ... • • .... !

Page 13: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

II t 1218 • 1117I

f.~.2 The type of cut-off should be decided on the basis of detailedgeological investigation. It is desirable to provide a positive cut-off.Where this is not possible, partial cut-off with or without upstream imper­vious blanket may be provided. In any case, adequate drainage arrange­ments may be provided on the downstream which may, inter-alia, includerelief well. Cut-off may be in the form of trench, sheet piling, cementbound curation, diaphragm of bentonite, concrete or other imperviousmaterials,

f.l.3 Recommendations for location and size of cut-off are givenin 4.1.3.1 to 4.1.3.6. A drainage cut-off is the most common form ofcut-off.

f.I.S.l The alignment of the cut-off should be fixed in such a waythat itl central line should be within the base of the impervious core.

4.1.3.2 In case of positive' cut-off, it should be keyed at least to adepth of 0-4 m into continuous impervious sub-stratum or inerodible rockformation.

4.1.3.3 The partial cut-off is specially suited for horizontaUy strati­fied foundations with relatively more pervious layer near top. The depthof the partial cut-off in deep pervious alluvium \\ jlJ be governed by:

a) Permeability of substrata; andb) Relative economics of depth of excavation governed usually by

cost of dewatering versus length of upstream impervious blanket.

4.1.3." The bottom width of the cut-off trench may be fixed takingfollowing factors into consideration:

a) Provide sufficient working space for compaction equipments;b) Provide sufficient working space to carry-out curtain grouting;

andc) Provide safety against piping.

A minimum width of 4·0 m is recommended. A bottom width or 10to 30 percent of hydraulic head may be provided to satisfy requirement ofpiping. This may be suitably increased to satisfy other requirements ofmechanical equi pments and curtain grouting. The side slopes dependupon sub-strata. Side slopes of at least 1:1 or flatter may be provided incase of overburden, while i: 1 and i: I may be provided in soft rock andhard rock respectively. The back fill material for cut-off trench shall havesame properties as those specified for impervious core in 4.2.1.

4.1.3.5 The cut-off in the flanks on either side should normallyextend up to the top of impervious core.

8

Page 14: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

IS I 1218' • 1117

4.1.3.6 At the abutment contacts of the cut-off trench, care shouldbe taken to avoid seepage by outflanking.

4.1.4 Necessity of grouting below the bed of cut-off trench will arise ifthe cut-off trench is terminated in rock formation and the rock is weathe­red or having cracks, joints and crevices. Necessity of grouting may bedecided based on percolation tests. Rock having a lugeon value of morethan 10 should be grouted so as to bring post-grouting lugeon value ofabout 5. The depth of grouting does not normally exceed half the headof water at the level from which grouting is done. The necessity of grout­ing below the bed in case of partial cut-off trench will be governed by thecost and effectiveness of the grout curtain vis-a-vis the value of water lossthrough seepage below and beyond the partial cut-off trench If groutingis done, provisions of IS : 4999-1968* may be followed. Alluvial stratahaving permeability in excess of 10-1 emls shall be treated thoroughly bygrouping with a suitable material. Strata of permeability between10'" emls and 10-8 emls may be treated to reduce the permeabilityto the extent possible. The grouping or strata having permeability lessthan 10-1 emil will be difficult, expensive and time consuming.4.2 Core .

f.2.1 The core provides impermeable barrier within the body of thedam. Impervious soils are generally suitable for the core. IS: 1498-1970tmay be referred to for suitability of soils for the core. Appendix A Rivesrecommendations based on IS : 1498·1970t. However, soils having highcompressibility and liquid limit and having organic content may be avoi­ded, if possible, as they are prone to swelling and formation of cracks.

f.2.2 The core may be located either centrally or inclined upstream.The locations will depend mainly on the availability of materials, topo­graphy of site, foundation conditions, diversion considerations, etc. Themain advantage of a central core is that it provides higher pressure at thecontact between the core and the foundation reducing the possibility orleakage and piping. On the other hand, inclined core reduces the porepressure in the downstream part of the dam and thereby increases itssafety. It also permits the construction or downstream casing ahead of thecore. The section with an inclined core allows the use of relatively largevolume of random material on the downstream side.

4.2.3 The following practical considerations govern the thickness of thecore:

a) Availability of suitable impervious material;b) Resistance to piping;

• Recommend.tioDI (or lroutlul or previous loill.tClu.iftcatioD and identificatioD of soil. Cor general engineering purposes (first

"';S;otI ).

9

Page 15: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

II • 12181 • 1117

c) Permiilible seepqe through dam;d) Availability of other materials for casing, filter, etc; ande) Minimum width that will permit proper construction.The minimum top width of the core should be 3 m, Its thickness at

any sectlen Ihall not be lesser than gO percent (preferably Dot lesserthan 50 percent ) of maximum head of water acting at that section.

4.2.t The top level of the core should be fixed at 0-5 m above MWL.4.3 ea.la.

f.3.1 Tbe function of caling is to impart stability and protect the core.The relatively pervioul materials, which are not subject to cracking ondirect exposure to the atmosphere, are suitable for casing. IS : 1498-19iO·may be referred to for auitability of loils for casing. Appendix A givesrecommendationa baaed on IS : 1498·1970*.f." late..... DnIa.,. By.te_

4.4.1 Internal drainage sy.tem comprises an inclined or vertical filter,a horizontal filter, a rock toe, a toe drain, etc. For the design of thecomponents of the internal drainage system IS: 9429-1980t may bereferred to. AI far as possible locally available sands, gravels, etc, shouldbe used.

4.4.2 The design of filter consisb of applying the conventional filtercriteria which take into account only the grain size distribution and theshape of the grainse However, in addition to the grain size, the stabilityof the base soil adjacent to a given filter depends on its resistance to dragforces.

In view of this, when the soil containing 20 percent or more clay iaused .s a base soil and hal Don-dispersive properties, the filter criteriamay not be enforced Itrictly and the clean land available locally may beused irrelpective of the gradation. This relaxation should be applied todam. up to 10 m height only. For dams of height more than 10 m, thecriteria for filtea protecting cohesive soil may be relaxed by the designerdepending upon his judgement and experience,

".".3 Inclined or vertical filter together with the base filter. if required,il desirable to be provided especially to protect silty core material. How­ever, the inclined or vertical filter may be deleted in zoned sections havingperviOUI downltream abell and clayey cores but a transition filter betweenthe core and the downltream shell would be necessary in case of damswhere rockfill is used .. Ihell material. In case of dam reaches, where thebead of water il 3 m or JCII, it may not be necessary to provide blanket orchimney filte,.. Adequate toe protection shall, however, be provided.

·C1UlificatloD aDd identification of 1011. for general ~nllneeriDI purpOiN (fir,',lr/isiDII ).

+c'.ode or practice lor draiDa.e IYlt8m Corearth and rockSl1 dam••

10

Page 16: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

4.4.~ Wherever there is silty material to be filled in the cut-off and thedownstream face of the cut-off is sufficiently open to receive soil particlesmigrating under high seepage Rradienu, it is adviaable to provide a pro­tectivc filter layer along the downstream face of the cut-oft' trench also.

4.5 Slope ProteetloD

4.5.1 Upstr'flm Slop, - The upstream slope protection is ensured byproviding riprap. For design of the riprap, IS : 8237-1985* may be referr­ed. A minimum of 300 mm thick riprap over 150 mm thick filter layermay be provided.

4.5.2 Dowllsl""", Slop, - The downstream slope protection is ensuredby providing riprap or turfing. It is usual practice to protect the down­stream slope from raincuta by providing suitable turfing on the entireslope. For details of downstrcam slope protection, IS : 8237·1985* may bereferred.

4.6 Sarface Oral_aBe - For surface drainage of the downstream alopcof the dam, reference may be made to IS : 8237-1985*.

4.7 Impervlo•• Blaaket

. 4.7.1 The horizontal upstream impervious blanket is provided toincrease the path of seepage when full cut-off is not practicable on pervi­ous foundations. The impervious blanket may be provided either with orwithout partial cut-off. Impervious blanket shall be connected to core ofthe dam as shown in Fig. 2B.

f.7.2 The material used for impervious blanket should have far lesspermeability than the foundation soil. To avoid formation of cracks, thematerial should not be highly plastic. Reference may be made toIS : 1498-1970t for suitability of soils for blanket. Appendix A lives reco­mmendations based on IS : 1498.197Of. A 300 mm thick layer of randommaterial over the blanket is recommended to prevent cracking due toexposure to atmosphere.

4.7.3 The impervious blanket may be designed in accordance withIS : 8414·1977~. As a general guideline, impervious blanket with a mini­mum thickness of 1·0 m and a minimum length of 5 timcs the maximumwater bead measured from upstream toe of the core may be provided.

f.8 ReHel WeD. - If relief wells are provided, I they should meet therequirements of IS : 5050-1968§.

·Cocle or practice for protection of .lope Cor relervolr embaDkmlDti (fi'" "WI;'" ).tcl...iftcatioD aDd identificatioD of .oill Cor leDera. eDliDeerlDI purpose (fi',',.si.II i,~GuideliDeiCor de.ilD or uDder-.eepage control meaaure for eartb.rockfill dam••ICode of practice Cor de.iID, cOD.truction and maiDtelWlce orrelW weill.

11

Page 17: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

II. i2169 .1981

S. BASIC DESIGN REQ,UIREMENTS

5.1 The basic requirements for design of embankment dam are to ensure:

a) safety against overtopping,b) stability, andc) safety against internal erosion.

5.1.1 Ovnto/J/Jing - Sufficient spillway capacity should be provided toprevent overtopping of embankment during and after construction. Thefreeboard should be suffici~nt to prevent overtopping by waves and shouldtake into account the settlement of the embankment and foundation. Freeboard for wave run up on slope shall be provided in accordance with theprovisions contained in IS = 10635-1983*.

5.1.2 Stability Analysis

5.1.2.1 The slopes of the embankment shall be stable under all load­ing conditions. They should also be flat enough so as not to imposeexcessive stresses on foundation.

5.1.2.2 For small dams stability analysis may not be necessary provi­ded a good foundation is available and the designer with his experiencecan decide adequate side slopes. However, where weak foundation condi­tions viz. fissured clay, expensive soils, shales, over consolidated highlyplastic clays, soft clays dispersive soils, etc, are met within the substratumin the dam-seat, extensive investigations of the foundation soil and borrowarea soil are required to be carried out and the design of the embankmentdam carried out in accordance with IS : 7894-1975t

5.1.2.3 The design of small embankment dam sections may be divi­ded into the following three categories based upon the height of theembankment in its deepest portion.

a) Embankments where the height is below and up to 5 m;b) Embankments where the height is more titan 5·0 m and up to

10 m; andc) Embankments where the height is above 10 m and up to 15 m,

For small dams under category Cal and (b) above the stabilityanalysis may not be necessary. General guidelines of the sections and therecommended slopes are given in Table I for guidance of the designer.The average properties considered for different soils are given in Table 2.However, the designer with his experience and judgement may decide the

·GuideIiDe. for Cree board requirement. ID embankment dams.tCode of practice for stability aDaly.is of .arth dam••

12

Page 18: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

.1.1218.1.7

adequate side slopes where special technical or economic considerationsmay have to be taken into account. Stability analysis may be carried outin accordance with IS : i894·1975· based upon the detailed foundationand borrow area investigation and laboratory testing if the soil stratabelow the dam seat consist of weak foundation as given in 5.1.2 2 and/orthe height of embankment is more than 10 m.

6. SPECIAL DESIGN REQ,UIREMENTS

6.0 In addition to basic design requirements given in 5, the followingspecial design requirements, should also be satisfied for embankmentdams.

6.1 Coatrol of CracklDI - Cracking of impervious zone results in thefailure of an embankment dam by erosion, piping, breaching, etc. Dueconsideration to cracking phenomenon shall, therefore, be Riven in thedesign of embankment dam. For classification of cracks and their impor­tance, &.1.1 to 6.1.3 of IS : 8826-1978t may be referred.

6.1.1 ~1'(Jsu"'fo, Control '!f Cratki", - Following measure! are recom­mended for control of cracking:

a) Use of plastic clay core and rolling the core material at slightlymore than optimum moisture content, In case orl~ss plastic clay,2 to 5 percent bentonite of 200 to 300 liquid lirnit may be mixe dto increase the plasticity.

b) Use of wider core to reduce the possibility of transverse or hori­zontal cracks extending through it.

c) Careful selection of fill materials to reduce the differential move­ment. To restrict the rockfill in lightly loaded outer casings andto use well graded materials in the inner casings on either side ofthe core.

d) Wide transition zones of properly graded filters ofadequate widthfor handling drainagr. if cracks develop.

e) Special treatment. such al preloading, presaturation. removalof weak material, etc, to the foundation and abutment. ifwarranted.

f) Delaying placement of core material in the crack region till mOltof the settlement takes place.

R) Arching the dam horizontally between Iteep abutments.h) Flattening the downstream slopes to increase slope stability in the

event of saturation from crack leakage.j) Cutting back the steep abutment slopes.

-Code of practice for I'ability analysis of earth dams.tGuidelincl £01' deailD of larle eanb aDd rocldill dams.

13

Page 19: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

III 1218 • 1917

6.2 ltablU*7 at J_.ctl... - Junctions of embankment dam withfoundation abutments, masonry structures, like overflow and non-overflowdams and outlets need special attention with reference to one or all of thefollowing criteria:

a) Good bond between embankment dam and foundation;b) Adequate creep length at the contact plane;c) Protection of embankment dam slope against scouring action;

andd) Easy movement of traffic.

6.2.1 JII1I,';01l wi'h Fo"ndtlli01l - Embankment dam may be founded onsoil overburden or rock. For foundation on soils or non-rocky strata, vege- /tation like bushes, grass roots, trees, etc, should be completely removed.'After removal of these materials, the foundation surface should be moist­ened to the required extent and adequately rolled before placing embank­ment material. For rocky foundation, the surface should be cleaned of aHloose fragments including semi-detached and overhanging surface blocksof rocks. Proper bond should be established between the embankment andthe rock surface prepared.

8.2.2 ]"",tio", wil" AlJutmlnlJ - The rocky abutments should be suitablyshaped and preapred in order to get good contact between the imperviouscore of the embankment and the rock over-hangs, if any, should beremoved. Vertical surfaces should be excavated to form slopes, not steeperthan 0·25 H to 1 V. A wider impervious zone and thicker transitionsshould be provided, at the abutment contacts to increase the length ofpath of seepage and to protect against erosioD.

6.2.2.1 The bond between rocky or non-rocky abutment should beestabU.hed al in 6.2.1. In additioD, sufficient creep length should ~provided between impervious aection of the dam and the abutment, 10 alto provide safety ag&lDlt ~ping. The creep length mould be not leal than4 times the hydraulic bead. \ .

1.2.3 .1.,"'",11 wit"N'''-DWi/ID. Da", - Junction of Don-overftow masonryconcrete dam with embankment dam is provided by a better not .teeperthan 0-5 H to 1 V to the end race or the non-overSow block cominl incontact with the imperviOUI core. A wider impervioUi zone and thickertransitioDi shall be provided at the abutment CODtaetl to increue thelenBth 01path of leepale and to protect alainlt eroaiOD. Sometimes thaecontact layen are mixed with 2 to 5 perceDtbentonite with liquid Umit of200 to 300 to callie expansion and hence to have ti.ht joiDta. Sometimesthe junction of earth dam with Don-ovdflow dam ia provided with earthretaining wall. perpendicular or akew at. the jUDctioa or DOD-ovcr8ow clam

14

Page 20: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

TAiLlI GBNIIAL GUmlLINII rOIPIIAND11NT IICTlONI

(ClaI' 5,1.2,3 )

18 1121" •1181

SL DIIOllftIOI WIIGI! U.TO 5m IllIG.! AloVi 5m'ID V'TO 10 m Hllos! AJmlO mAIDNo. U.fO 151l

i) Type of lectiOO HOlloteneoul lectioa/Modi&ed ZoDed IICtioD/Modified helBO.'. ZODed section/Modified homOle·homopoeoul HetioD OIOUilectioa/Homopleoul oeoulllCtioa/HoDaOIeDeoUi

IICtioD lIetlOl,.... #,~

,.__-.A--.__~ ,.-_...A._____.......ii) SI." U,,,,.. DelIS". UIs"· D."". U,st,.. D,w""',.,,.

a) Cot.drained loil Not Iuitable Not luitlble Not luitable for core(OW. p.SW, SP) Suitable for cum, Iooe

b) CoIne IralDed lOiI (H) (V) (H) (V) (H) (V) (H) (V) Section to be decided baaed UpoD(GC. GM, SC, 8M) 2 : 1 2: I 2 : 1 2: I the 'tibilitllaDlly. iaaccord-

lice with S: 7894-1975

c) FiDe ~rained 1011 (H) (V) (H) (V) (H) (V) (H) (V) do(eL. L, CI, MI) 2: I 2 : I 2'5: I 2'251 : I

d) FiD, pined lOiI (H) (V) (H) (V) (H) (V) (H) (V) do(CH,MH) 2: I 2: I 3'75: 1 2'5: I

iii) H_,IODe Not required May be provided Nuaary

a) Top width 3m Sm

b) Top level 0'5 mabove MWL 0'5 Dlabove MWL

iv) Rock toe beilbt Not leeeuary up to 3m, Above Neceury NecessarySmheiahl, IDl htl or rock Ht5. where Hiltbe heilht H/S. where H it tbe beilht ortoe .IYbe provid ofembWm.at emblDkmeD'

v) Bera Notoec_ry Notnle." The berm may be provided uper del:. Tbe miJaimum bermwidth II b.3m, The bermmay be provided alto on tb,_Iream lIope ror (acilitiesduriq maiDt.....

is

Page 21: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

18 , 12169 • 1981

TAILE 2 AVlRAGI PROPERTIES 'ORDmERENT TYpg or lOlLS(Cilu5.1,2.3)

SL ENGINEBRING AV.BAGI PROPl.TIIIorSOILNo. CLUtl- ,-----------_..Jt.-___...____t ___..,

'101'1'1010' MDD OMC Coh,.iDD TID~SOIL (,,, k./ma perceDt k"m'

IS:1498-1970-)

i) GO >1840 <15 NA >0'60ii) OM >1830 <15 NA >0'67iii) SM 1830 ±16 15 ±04 500±500 O'58:!: 0'07iv) so 1840 ± 16 IS:!: Off 1100 Z 600 0'6 ±0'07v) ML 1650 :I: 16 19 ±0'1 900 ±NA 0'62 ±0'04

vi) CL I 730 ± 16 17 ±0'03 1200 ±200 0'54 :t: 0'04vii) CH 1510 ±32 25:1: )'2 I !OO ±600 0'35 ±0'09

viii) MH 1310:i: 64 36 ±3'2 2000 :: 900 0'.7 :l: 0'05

'Claujfication ud ideDti6catioD or loil. for ,eneral eD,meeriDl purpolea (firs' ,,,"ill ).

SOIL Co'I'AftI '01RICO.IIIDIDSLOP.t" --.A.-__--""

MDD OMC CobIll. TID'kl/ml percelt kl/m'

I800 IS I 100 0'60

1650 19 900 0'55

1300 35 1sao 0'35

16

Page 22: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

with the overftow dam. Such retaining walls shorten the length of non­overflow dam (transition length) but they themselves add to the cost.The alignment or the dam and the junction may sometimes have to bemodified to suit smooth transition of road on top ofdam from non-overflowsection to embankment dam section.

6.2.t Ju"ctio" with Outl,tr - Proper bond should be provided betweenthe earthwork and the outlet walls. Staunching rings should be providedalong the outlet conduits in the impervious zone, at intervals, so as toincrease the path of percolation along the contact. Backfilling of thetrench for the outlet conduit should be done with concrete up to the topof rock surface and the portion of the trench above the rock level shouldbe refilled with impervious material compacted with moisture contactabout 2 percent more than optimum. The shape of conduit ceming incontact with earthwork shall be given a aide better of 0·25 H to 1 V toprovide a better contact with the earthwork. Sharp corners at the topshould be avoided. Special care should be taken to ensure tigbt contactsbetween the trench fact and the backfill.

7. SELECTION OF DAM SECTION

7.1 No single type or core-section of embankment dam is suited for aU liteconditions. The adoption of the particular type of embankment sectiondepends upon the following factors:

a) Availability of the suitable local material in sufficint quantitywithin reasonable range;

b) Foundation conditions and cut-oft' requirements;c) Types of construction plant, earth moving, compaction and other

equipment;d) DivenioD consideratioDi and construction Icheduleie) Climatic conditions in relation to placement, moisture content

control, lublequent moisture content change, etc; andr) Safety with respect to ltability and seepage.

7.2 7.0'-- - If only one type of lUitabJe material is readily availablenearby, a homOleneoua section iI genenlJy preferred. If the materialavailable 11 impervious or aemi-perviouI, a amall quantity or perviouamaterial II required u cuiDB Cor proteclioD asUDII cr.cki~l. On the otherhand, if it it perviou.. a thin imperviOUI memberane iI required 10 .. toform. wat~rbarrier.

17

Page 23: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

IS I 12169 • 1981

7.2.1 A zoned dam ii, however, preferred where different types oflOilaare available from borrow area. I t also facilitates the we of compulsoryexcavation from foundation, approach channel, tail channel, etc. Thezoned embankment dam is generally composed of an impervious corebounded by transitions and/or outer casing of pervious material. In zonedembankment dam, the weaker materials are oflen utilized most econmi­cally in the form of random zones. Maximum utilization of the materialavailable from compulsory excavation should be aimed at. Random zoneaare generally provided below minimum draw down level on upstream sideand on downstream of inclined filter. When upstream casing zone is ofrelatively impervious mateI ial J horizontal filters at suitable intervals, say5 to 6 m, may be provided to limit the drawdown pore pressures for damsof height more than 10 m, ( &, Note below Fig. 2A).

7.2.2 The zoning of embankment dam as planned in the design mayhave to be altered or modified during execution stage in view of thelollowing:

a) The materials estimated are not available according to require­ment;

b) Different types of material encountered whicb could not be ascer-tained during investigations;

c) Construction difficulties;d) Construction schedule; ande) New foundation features.

7.3 Top Wiclt. --.,. The width of the dam at the crest should be fixedaccording to the working space required at the top. No dam should havecrest width of leal than 4·5 m,

Page 24: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

III 12169 • 1117

APPENDIX A( Claus" 4.2.1, 4.3.1 and 4.7.2 )

SUITABILITY OF SOIL FOR CONSTRUCTION OP DAMS

R,I.,irJ' HomtJlnuoul ~o",d Dam l",JImIitnuSu;lflbility Dylc" r-------v-------~ Bl""k"

Impervious PerviousCore Casing

Very 8uitable GO GC SW,GW GO

Suitable OLtOI OL,OI OM CL,OI

Fairly suitable SP,8M GM,GO SP, GP OR, 8MOR SM, SC, OR SO, GO

Poor ML,MI,MH

Net suitable OL, 01, ORPt.

NOTB - R.Cer to IS : 1498-1970 ·CI...ifie.doD and id~Dtific.tion of lOll. forleDeral eDliDeeriDI purpOlea (firs' r.isi.,. ) ••

'9

Page 25: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

18 I 12169 • 1987

SBBI V. K. JAI.

SOI'DI.TDDJl\l1G ENOIN.... DAMCOJl8TBUCTIO. Zo••

SUPRBINTENDJNG E 11 0 III •• B(EA.TH DAM), CDO

EX.OUTIVB ENOIJ'••S ( EARTH

D AX ) J CDO ( ~l'""," )

()I'I'IOn-oJ(-S •• o I A L D U Tor,APERL

SUJ-.BnrrzlfDI_O bGIOBB( DAMS) ( CDO ) (AII'rI."" )

SRBI BaIlENDBA KOMAR SHARMA National Hydro-Electric Power CorporatioD Ltd.New Delhi

IrrilatioD Departmeat, GovernmeDt of Bibar,Pataa

Irril_doD Department, GoVel1lmflDt or Mahan­.btra, Bombay

( CIIfIIirIuHft.", Pa,' 2 )

M""IJ", R.",."",DIBIlCTOB (DAII) ( It .& )I J I T Irri,adon Department, Governmeat or PUDjab.

SAOAR DAM) Chandilarh8a81 Y. B. MATHUR (All"..,,)

DB M. C. GOBL Water R.esource. Development and TraininlCentre. Univenity of Roorkee, Roorkee

Irrigation Department. Government of UttarPrade.h, Lucknow

SR.I Bllt8AM BALDBV RAJ ( All"."" )SRaI D. G. KADEAD. Jaiprakaah Aaociated Private Ltd, New DelhiSHaI T. K. NATABAJAJf CeDtral Road Research IDlthule (CSIR), New

DelhiIrritratioD Department, Governm~Dt or ADdbr.

Pradesh, Hyderabad

20

Page 26: IS 12169 (1987): Criteria for design of small embankment dams · be prepared for guiding thedesign ofsmall embankment dams. 0.3 For the purpose ofdeciding whether a particular requirement

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS..."".....,.:MM. BhaV." 9 e.hadur ShM zalar Marg. NEW DELHI 110002Telephones: 323 0131, 323 3375, 323 8402F8x : 91 11 3234082, 91 11 3239380, 91 11 3239382

323 78 173378882803843

236 23 1&

132 82 86

T.-grams : Manakl8nstha(Common to all Offices)

TII8phone8-77 00 32

c..fnII~:Plot No. 2018, Site 1\1, 8ahIbabad Industrial Area. SAHIBABAD 201010

R..,...,Ome.:

ceratr.. :Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah lafar Marg, NEW DELHI 110002-Eutern : 1/14 CIT Scheme VII M, V.I.P. Road, Manlktola. CALCUTTA7000s.

Northern: seo 335-336, Sector 34-A, CHANDIGARH 180022

Southern : C.I.T. campus, IV Cross Road, CHENNAI 800113tW.3tern : Manakalaya, E9 Behind Marol T_hone Exchange, Anetter; (Ealt),

MUMBAI 400093

BlWIICh Ome.:

'Pushpak', Nurmohamed Shaikh M_g, Khanpw, AHMEDABAD 380001*Peenya Industrial Atea, 1st Stage, BengaIore- TUmkur Road,

BANGALORE 560058Gangotrl Complex, 5th Floor, Bh8dbhada Road, T.1: Nagar, BHOPAL .e2OO3Plot No. 62-63, Unit VI, Ganga Nagar, BHUBANESHWAR 751001Kalaikathlr Bullclnga, 870 Avlna.hl Road, COIMBATORE 841037

Plot No.•3, Sector 18 A. Mathur. Road, FARIDABAD 121001

Savltrt Complex, 118 0.1: Road, GHAZIABAD 201001

5316 W.d No. 29, R. G. B.ua Road, 5" By-I."., GUWAHATI 781003

5-8-58C, L. N. Gupta Marg, Nampally Station Road, HYDERABAD 500001

E-52, Chitaranjan Marg, C-Scheme, JAIPUR 302001

117/.18 B, Sarvodaya Nag8f, KANPUR 208005

seth Shawan, 2nd Floor, BehInd LMla Cinema, N8VaI Kiahor. Road,LUCKNOW 228001

Patllputra Indultr181 e..., PATNA 800013

T. C. No. 14/1421, Un'v••1ly P. O. Palayam,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM II5OS4

NIT Bulking, second Floor, Gokulpat Mnet. NAGPUR 440010

Institution of Er9n'" ( Incla ) Bulking, 1312 Shlvejl NagIr, PUNE 411005

550 13 48839 49 &6

554021

40 38 2721 01 .1

8-28 88 01

8-71 19 9854 11 37

20 10 83

372925

21 88 78

231923

282305

e 21 17

62 61 71123135

·S•• 0ftIce I. at 5 Chowrtt9'M ApprC*h, ~ O. Prlncep Str..t,CALCUTTA 700072

tBaIM ome. 18 at Novelty Chamber', G,ent Road, MUMBAJ «XJ007*a.. Offtce II at 'F' Block, Unity Bulking, tWMhIrMr. Sq.,.,

BANBALORE 680002

~ 1081aoe II 28222 tl71


Recommended