Date post: | 26-Nov-2014 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | samuel-miles |
View: | 115 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Is advertising a mirror or a maker of the evils in society?
Samuel Miles
MK227
David Wesson
12th December 2008
Introduction
This paper is discussing ethical evils which are used within advertising and the relationship this
advertising has within today’s society. Complaints in advertising have increased by 7.9% since 2006
with violence being at the centre of these complaints (ASA, 2007). We will centre this paper on
violent advertising, but, we will also look briefly at two other ethical issues within advertising, racism
and alcohol we will look at the arguments for and against the effects these forms of advertising have
within today’s society.
Complaints in violent advertising are on the increase, between January and October 2007, 1748
complaints were made (ASA, 2007). Violent advertising is not all the same, there are different types
of violence within advertising the identifiable core areas where violent advertising is present is
within film and game advertising, advertising featuring guns and knives and other types of
advertising depicting types of violence such as domestic violence we will be looking at these areas
within the paper, along with the interpretations of violent advertising and specifically looking at how
it can affect children.
Racism within advertising are now rarely seen due to modern day standards of equality but when an
advertisement is seen to be sexist or racist it sparks a debate within society, we will discuss the
impacts of such advertisements.
Alcohol is not necessarily considered as an evil within today’s society but when the advertising is
viewed by people under the age of 18 it can present a problem, we will look at the effects that
advertising can have on persons under the legal drinking age.
Is advertising a maker of evil in society
Before we can start to look at violence in advertising it is important that we understand what
violence is, the modern day interpretation of violence states that the definition of violence came to
the conclusion that there is various types of violence and it cannot all be accurately defined (Berger,
A. 1994) which therefore means that perceptions of violence can be different within society today.
The committee of advertising practice (CAP) ruling on violent advertising is “Marketing
communications should contain nothing that condones or is likely to provoke violence or anti-social
behaviour.” The CAP codes are put in place so not to cause problems within advertising, those who
do not apply with the CAP codes may be subject to sanctions (Eleventh edition of the British Code of
Advertising, 2004)..
One of the major issues that needs to be addressed is how children see this advertising and
if this advertising makes violence seen as acceptable behaviour within today’s society, previously
research suggests that children’s understanding of advertising remains at a superficial level until
early adolescence (Oats, C. 2001) therefore suggesting that if children were to be exposed to violent
advertising it would not make a significant impact on them because they have a limited
understanding on what the advertising is portraying. In contrast to this a new study has shown that
what we previously thought the age of children’s understanding to advertising is much lower with
children understanding the advertising at the age of seven (Owen, L. 2007), if violence is being
portrayed as a positive thing within advertising and children are being exposed this, it could have an
impact on the way children act within today’s society. The concern with violent advertising is the
how it could effect children’s attitudes towards life, children have a high exposure to advertising it is
estimated that through television alone they watch to 40,000 advertisements a year and these
figures may still be underestimated, it is also suggested that such high exposure to advertisement
will change attitudes this has already been seen through children’s eating habits and the relationship
this has with advertising.(REFRENCE MEDIA HANDBOOK) This can therefore lead us to believe that a
high exposure to violent advertising would change their attitude within life. Children’s television now
only represents less than 30% of their total viewing and now watch other programs not aimed at
them, this is a concern in advertising as they are viewing advertisement which are potentially
unsuitable for them (O'Sullivan,T, 2005). Children watching television programs unsuitable for their
age causes concern, advertisements played during the breaks are not going to be targeted at
children and will therefore contain inappropriate content which could effect the attitudes of the
children watching and would therefore make advertising a maker of an evil within society.
Violent advertising is frequently used within the film and game industry, these
advertisement are often seen within today’s society not necessarily as television advertisement, but
as still images in shop windows, on bus’s or as posters and therefore easily seen by children (ASA,
2007). Recent violent advertisements have shown one man strangling another, blood splattered on a
wall and guns being pointed, all of which encourages violence. The locations of these advertisement
have meant that they would be seen by people under the age of the target market, through drawing
on the information in the studies on children’s understanding on advertising it could again have an
impact on way children view guns and violence and they could easily integrate it into their everyday
life making the advertising a maker of an evil within society.
Fashion advertising has often produced some controversial and violent advertising, Benetton
were the first clothing brand to do this and were shortly followed up with Diesel and Sisley
producing their own violent advertising campaigns, the main purpose to this advertising was too
employee shock tactics to create a certain type of reaction to their product, but, has this advertising
made an negative impact in society today? Violent advertising is controversial and therefore it is
very important that the imagery used agrees with the intended message of the campaign, otherwise
there is a risk that the picture sends out an image which could be interpreted falsely The intended
advertising is meant to make the persuade the target market and through the imagery and the
brand could also persuade the target market that violence is an acceptable, and possibly leading to
changes in the behaviour of the receiver. (Andersson, S. 2004)
Diesel released a poster advertisement advertisement (2005) which depicted a topless man
tied up with an unfinished game of noughts and cross’s scared into his back, around him where two
others holding whips. The complaint was that this advertisement was “excessively violent and
offensive, condoned violence and was degrading, particularly because the poster could be seen by
children” in defence of this advertisement Diesel stated that intended to be an “ironic interpretation
of the communication codes used by the fashion industry, to challenge the conventional way of
thinking and communicating, and to promote debate and stimulate different points of view” This
response to the complaint being made would suggest that this advertising is intended to be a mirror
of violence within today’s society and not intended to affect behaviour, but, should sole
responsibility be put on Diesel or should the blame be shared with the magazine in which the
advertisement was displayed? Marie Claire magazine being a magazine that reports on fashion,
culture and beauty argued that their magazine is aimed at adults and would therefore not be seen
by or cause harm to children, but offense to some of it readers. (ASA. 2005) This violent advertising
has been considered as acceptable too adults as it is seen only as a interpretation, therefore
implying that children are the main concern when it comes to violent advertising as they would not
see the message which the advertisement is trying to deliver but only see the violent imagery and
interpret it in the wrong way.
Racism is an evil within society today and is still found within advertising today, CAP (2004)
addressed the issue of racism within advertising by creating a code that states “Marketing
communications should contain nothing that is likely to cause serious or widespread offence.
Particular care should be taken to avoid causing offence on the grounds of race, religion, sex, sexual
orientation or disability. Compliance with the Code will be judged on the context, medium, audience,
product and prevailing standards of decency” this is another code put in place to prevent
advertisements from creating ethical evils within society today.
Cadbury’s released an advertising campaign for the chewing gun Trident, the advertisement showed
a black man speaking in rhythm with a strong Caribbean accent. The ASA received 519 complaints
based around the advert being offensive and racist, ridiculing black people and the Caribbean
culture. The advertisement was deemed as offensive by the ASA and was not be shown again. This
was the second most complained advertisement of 2007 showing that many people found still find
this type of advertisement offensive and is still therefore an evil within society and is an issue which
should be addressed. (ASA,2007)
A study performed by Jill K Maher (Date) discussed the use of ethnic representation within in
children’s advertising. Advertising has used different types of ethnic prejudice, stereotyping and
showing minorities in bad roles, “Children’s thoughts and beliefs regarding ethnic minorities are
influenced by the messages and images they see on television, both programming and advertising”.
It also states that children don’t just watch advertisements but they learn from them as well, which
can present a problem if children learning messages which are seen as racist and therefore evil
within today’s society. Racial prejudice such as stereotyping is within advertising today and it is
dangerous as children are likely to draw their opinions on the character portal used within
advertising, if the character is race stereotyped or seen as having a bad role within the
advertisement, children may have learnt those stereotypes represented, if ethnic minorities have a
bad role within the advertisement then children will again think negatively towards that race. It is
therefore important for children to get a true sense of the roles played by different races and the
interaction they have with the advertising and is therefore a maker of an evil within society.
Alcohol advertising has presented a problem within society for encouraging under age
drinking. In 2006 alcohol advertising reached expenditure of £194 million (ASA, 2007), studies have
shown that 88% of 10-13 year olds are aware of alcohol advertising and 76% of these could indentify
3 or more adverts when the brand name was masked. (Alcohol concern, 2004) These findings prove
that underage drinkers are well aware of alcohol through advertising but does this encourage
underage drinking? As part of growing up young people want to be older then they actually are, this
was confirmed in the research carried out around young people and alcohol advertising. Alcohol
advertising often use’s attractive well dressed people in bars, clubs and parties this imagery is
appealing to people under the legal drinking age as it promotes the lifestyle which they want to have
but are no yet older enough. This form of advertising is only mirroring society today but when
viewed by underage drinkers it can become a maker of an evil within society through underage
drinking.
The research also suggest that within society today it has become acceptable for adults live a
youthful lifestyle, youthfulness associated with irresponsibility, unsafe and excitement which is what
many adults today look for and advertising uses this “kidult” marketing to aim their products at
adults, and while the kidult marketing is aimed at adults it can blur the advertising lines between
children and adults therefore creating confusion to between these two sectors. Advertising that has
used this method promotes freedom, lack of sophistication and a worlds free of responsibilities, with
these characteristics displayed in alcohol advertising it can lead to irresponsible and childish
behaviour with adult drinking which therefore makes this form of advertising a contributor towards
the binge culture an evil within today’s society. (ASA,2007) Brining these cultures closer together
through advertising presents issue’s due to legal restrictions on drinking and adult drinkers
responding to the characteristics presented within the advertisements which can contribute to
creating evils within society today.
Is advertising a mirror of society
Does advertising mirror society today, Richard W Pollay and Katherine Gallagher (1990) would
suggest that advertising is a mirror as it does reflect culture, but, it will only mirror certain messages
and attitudes, it is selective reinforcement of behaviours and values it also continuous to say that as
culture change so will advertising. Has society now changed to the extent that violence is part of our
society and therefore advertising? This would therefore make it a mirror of today’s society.
As suggested by Andrew Brown (2004) advertising only is their to perform against other
competition if advertising was not used then consumer would be unaware that the product exists, it
is not advertising that has caused problems within society but it has created awareness and
knowledge. Today we live in a society where every one is looking for something to blame their own
problems on and advertising is an easy target to place blame onto. The author then goes onto argue
that advertising to children is a common practice and while they made need special protection they
should not be cocooned to advertising but educated so that the advertising could lead to a better life
style. Chris Preston (2004) also states that it is easy to blame advertising for being an irresponsible
influence on children. These papers both agree that it is easy to place blame on advertising and that
maybe we should not just take advertising into consideration when looking problems our children
have, but, that we should also look within society today and see that many of these problems
already exist and that advertising has just been mirroring them.
In response to the effects that advertising can have on children a study carried out by
Rosemary Duff (2004) stated that “children enjoy advertisements that entertain” violent
advertisement are not aimed at or to entertain children, therefore suggesting that children would
not pay attention to such violent advertising and it would not affect them. The paper also states that
the impact of advertising on children’s attitudes is not to be considered significant and that the main
influence comes from their siblings and peers. It finally suggests that while they do absorb some
advertisement they also disregard many of them.
When looking at violent advertising it has been used in order to reduce real life violence. A
campaign was carried out in Northern Ireland to reduce knife crime, the campaign produced violent
imagery of knifes, real scenarios involving knifes and consequences it can lead to such as serious
injury or death. This violent advertising was aimed at 11-18 year olds and its intentions where to
prevent knife crime, the violent advertisements were a mirror image of what knife crime can lead to.
Through using violent advertising it is able to communicate to the 11-18 year olds and they can be
influenced, the advertising campaign shifted the attitude of violent knife crime and changed the
behaviour towards knifes (IPA,2007) . Using violent advertising in this context only a mirror’s society
today and has had a positive influence in the reduction of knife crime therefore suggesting that
violent advertising is not only acceptable but when used in the right context should be encouraged.
A different argument is present by Jill K Maher (Date) is racism is an evil within society
today but if ethnic stereotypes are not seen as misleading then this form of advertising can lead to
success with ethnic communities and can build brand loyalty. Stereotypes have naturally formed
within the human mind whether for good or bad, the reason for this is being it allows faster thought
processing. This reasoning suggests that this advertising acts also as a mirror within society.
In today’s society an ethical evil can be different things to different people so it is important
that we address this issue. An article on consumer’s response to offensive advertising by Kara Chan
(2007) stated that “offensive advertising is context sensitive” this suggests that variable levels of
ethical evils are acceptable within advertising but it is dependable on what is being advertised and
the level of relevance it has to that the advertisement. It is also important to take into
consideration that the U.K has many different cultures and each culture has different standards, a
study on the consumer’s response to offensive advertising: a cross cultural study say’s “Chinese
consumers were most offended by advertisements with indecent language, anti-social behaviour,
racist images, and nudity” Different cultures find different forms of advertising find offensive,
Britain contains cultures and will therefore have contradicting opinions in what different cultural
groups consider to be offensive, Chris Preston (2004) suggests that “When something is held to be
for or against the interests of society, it invariably amounts to a position in relation to a particular
view that is held by a sub-group within society. Society represents such a diverse multiplicity of sub-
groups that it is difficult to consider anything that is in the interests of everyone within it.” Within
society today it is difficult to ensure that all the cultures dwelling in Britain are not offended by
advertising, but, because of the amount of diversity in culture that Britain contains this is difficult
and therefore the ASA provide codes of conduct that all advertisement have to meet to minimise
wide spread offense.
Ethical evils within advertising today create debate for advertising being both a maker and a
mirror within society. We have identified that there are many ethical evils presented within
advertising and each one comes with a different concerns. Violence is clearly a problem in
advertising today especially within the fashion marketing industry, they have produced some of the
most graphic images in advertising which have been seen by the public. Through looking at the
research I would suggest that this advertising is unsuitable to be presented to society at the present
time firstly because of the implications it can have on younger children , many of these
advertisement are not unsuitable for a younger age and despite the advertisement being aimed at
an older target market there is little the advertisers can do to prevent children from seeing it. Due
to its graphic nature in comparison to other violent advertisements its is more likely to have
significant behavioural effects on children and is therefore more likely to become a maker of an evil
within society.
From my research it is clear that racism within advertising is now much less apparent within
advertising today and if there are issue’s with racism they are only very small, looking at the
research I feel that this is not a real issue within advertising and stereotyping will always be present
it is only if these stereotypes are portrayed in a bad way does it raise concern for advertisement
becoming a maker of an evil within society.
Alcohol advertising is a clear problem within society, but, it is difficult to stop society
wanting what it cant have, the advertisement are now under strict regulation in order to prevent its
appeal to underage drinkers, although the new style of kidult marketing does raise concern for both
binge drinking and underage drinking and could therefore become a maker of an evil within society.
From looking at all areas of research it is clear that advertising does create imagery which
could be argued to be promoting evil but many of these images created are diluted to the extent
that they are quite playful and even so many of these evils the advertiser use are present within
society today and therefore the advertising is reflecting what people would only normally see. When
advertising does create an evil which is not normal for society to see then there would be a clear
argument for advertising being a maker but because this rarely happens and when it does it is
quickly taken away from the public eye it does not cause a deep enough impact. I would Therefore
suggest that advertising is only a mirror of society.
Bibilyography
ASA 2007 what are you looking at? Drawing the line on violence in advertising .
http://www.asa.org.uk/asa/news/news/2008/ASA+Annual+Report+2007.htm
http://www.asa.org.uk/asa/adjudications/non_broadcast/Adjudication+Details.htm?
Adjudication_id=42400
Chan, K. Diehl, S. Li, L (2007) “Consumers’ response to offensive advertising: a cross cultural
study”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 606-628,
Availble;http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do?
contentType=Article&contentId=1628135 [accessed 30/11/2008]
Auty, S. Berridge, D. Lewisa, C. Owen, L. (2007) “Children’s Understanding of Advertising: an
Investigation Using Verbal and Pictorially Cued Methods”, Infant and Child Development, Vol. 16,
No. 16, pp. 617-628, Available: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/116331177/abstract?
CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0 [accessed 1/12/2008]
Oates, C., Blades, M., & Gunter, B. (2001) “Children and Television advertising: When do
they understand persuasive intent?”, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 1, No, 3. pp, 238–245,
Available: http://wf2dnvr13.webfeat.org/44KAL163/url=http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?
vid=1&hid=12&sid=ee37580c-49c3-4d70-a235-
9f81b6734d73%40SRCSM1&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=buh&AN=6792993,
[accessed 2/12/2008]
Berger, A. (1994)” Violence. ETC.: A Review of General Semantics”, Vol. 51, No.4 pp. 453,
available: www.nexis.com, [accessed 20/12/2008]
Andersson, S. Hedelin, A. Nilsson, A. Welander, C. (2004) “Violent advertising in fashion
marketing”, Journal of fashion marketing and management, Vol. 8, No, 1. pp. 96-112,
Available:http://wf2dnvr13.webfeat.org/44KAL174/url=http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?
vid=1&hid=5&sid=f1def292-4e9e-4e75-8286-87b3c70933bd
%40sessionmgr2&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d, [accessed 28/11/2008]
ASA (2007) “Young People and Alcohol Advertising, An investigation of alcohol advertising following
changes to the Advertising Code”, Available: http://www.asa.org.uk/NR/rdonlyres/ D311E8A2-C7CD-
44B5-BECD D87BC3812F04/0/Youngpeoplealcoholadvertisin 20071116.pdf, [accessed 22/11/2008]
Maher, J. Herbst, K. Childs, N. Finn, S. (2008) “Racial Stereotypes in Children’s television
Commercials”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 80-93, Available: www.warc.com [accessed
28/11/2008]
O'Sullivan, T. (2005) “Advertising and children: what do the kids think?”, Qualitative Market
Research: An International Journal, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 371-384, Available:
http://wf2dnvr13.webfeat.org/44KAL1101/url=http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?
vid=1&hid=2&sid=094711d6-a844-4b11-a520-
62deea832e04%40sessionmgr2&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d
%3d#db=buh&AN=20171346, [accessed 24/11/2008]
Gallagher, K. Pollay, R. (1990) “Advertising and cultural values: reflections in the distorted
mirror”, International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 9, No. 4, available: http://www.
warc.com/ArticleCenter/Default.asp?CType=A&AID=WORDSEARCH5180&Tab=A [accessed
8/12/2008]
Brown, A. (2004) “The Ethics Of Marketing To Children”, The journal of the Marketing society, Issue.
25, pp. 22-32, available: http://www.warc.com/ArticleCenter/Default.asp?C
Type=A&AID=WORDSEARCH78869&Tab=A [accessed 8/12/2008]
Preston, C. (2004) “Advertising to children and social responsibility”, Young consumers, Vol. 6,
No. 4, pp. 61-67, available: http://www.warc.com/ArticleCenter/Default.asp?CType
=A&AID=WORDSEARCH81141&Tab=A, [accessed 8/12/2008]