Introduction and Overview Results for Potential, Capacitance, and Electric Field
Analytical Results, Advantages, and Prospects
Motivation and Objective The purpose of this project is to study novel carbon
nanotube-embedded chemical sensors that can detectenvironmentally toxic microscopic agents.
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are rolled sheets of carbonwith atoms arranged in a hexagonal pattern. CNTsmeasure about a millionth of a millimeter in diameter andshow great promise for applications in nanotechnology.Use of CNTs in nanoelectronics can lead to nanoscalesensitive devices.
To investigate the electrical properties of such sensors,CNT-embedded metal-oxide-semiconductor structuresare analyzed using numerical modeling.
Traditional Chemicapacitive SensorClean: Contaminated:
When a particle attaches to the metal plate, it is detectedby measuring the capacitance change across the oxide.
Nanotube-embedded Chemicapacitive Sensor Nanotubes replace the metal plate in the proposed design. CNT-embedded sensors are advantageous because they
are more sensitive to toxic agents.
Clean: Contaminated:
The Poisson Equation The Poisson equation is solved to obtain the electrostatic
potential, capacitance, and electric field of sensor devices:
2D Solution: Nonuniform Mesh with Nonuniformwithout Particle
2D Solution: Nonuniform Mesh with Nanotube andParticle
Electric Field at Nanotube The particle disrupts the electric field, which causes the
capacitance to change.Without Particle: With Particle:Capacitance = 0.127 pF/cm Capacitance = 0.136 pF/cm
q where is the electrostatic potential; is the dielectric constant; is the net charge density; q is the electronic charge
Oxide
Metal
Air
Metal PlateParticle
Oxide
Metal
Air
Air
Metal Plate
Oxide
Metal
Air
Particle
Oxide
Metal
Air
NanotubeNanotube
Analytical Solutions
Conclusions: The numerical solutions show unequivocally that the
proposed design for a nanotube sensor is advantageousover the traditional design in terms of sensitivity uponthe insertion of a particle.
According to our calculated results, the highest sensitivityoccurs in sensors which have a high gate width (x-direction) and a low oxide thickness (y-direction).
A higher sensitivity allows detection at a lowerconcentration of toxic agents.
Due to the smaller size of the carbon nanotube sensor,these proposed sensors respond more quickly— adifference that may be lifesaving.
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 100 200 300 400 500 600% D
iffer
ence
bet
wee
n ca
se w
ithou
t par
ticle
and
cas
e w
ith
part
icle
Gate Width (x-direction) (nm)
Percent Difference in Capacitance vs. Gate Width% Difference in nanotube sensor with particle on the left
% Difference in nanotube sensor with particle on the right
% Difference in traditional sensor with particle on the left
% Difference in traditional sensor with particle on the right
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
% D
iffer
ence
bet
wee
n ca
se w
ithou
t par
ticle
and
ca
se w
ith p
artic
le
Oxide Thickness (y-direction) (nm)
Percent Difference in Capacitance vs. Oxide Thickness
% Difference in traditional sensor with particle on the left
% Difference in nanotube sensor with particle on the left
y
x
ypos
ition
x position
Electrostatic Potential InterfacePoint representing particle
4 points representing nanotube
ypos
ition
x position