+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Isolation Acholeplasma Commercial, Serum-Free Tissue ...level, mycoplasma infection. Avery intensive...

Isolation Acholeplasma Commercial, Serum-Free Tissue ...level, mycoplasma infection. Avery intensive...

Date post: 19-Feb-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
7
APPLIu MICROBIOLOGY, June 1974, p. 1046-1052 Copyright 0 1974 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 27, No. 6 Printed in U.SA. Isolation of Acholeplasma laidlawii from Commercial, Serum-Free Tissue Culture Medium and Studies on Its Survival and Detection IOLANDA E. LOW Channing Laboratory, Harvard Medical Unit, and Department of Medical Microbiology, Boston City Hospital; and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02118 Received for publication 1 February 1974 This report documents the first isolation of Acholeplasma laidlawii from a commercial lot of serum-free Dulbecco basal medium. Experimental studies demonstrated survival of the organism for at least 1 year depending on the concentration of the contaminating organism as well as pH and temperature of storage of the serum-free medium. A comparison of isolation methods showed that concentration by filtration through 220-nm membrane filters and testing the filters for mycoplasma recovery, especially when using phenol red-diphasic Hayflick medium, was both sensitive and practical for the average laboratory. In recent years, Acholeplasma laidlawii has become one of the most prevalent mycoplasma contaminants of tissue cultures, partly due to the presence of this organism as well as Myco- plasma arginini and other bovine mycoplasmas in commercially available bovine sera (2, 3). This report documents the first isolation of A. laidlawii from a commercial lot of serum-free basal tissue culture medium and describes pos- sible conditions for the organism's survival as well as methods for detection of suspected mycoplasma contamination in tissue culture materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS Mycoplasma isolation. Mycoplasma testing of tissue cultures and biological materials used in ani- mal cell cultures is performed routinely in this labora- tory by utilizing primarily Hayflick medium (8) for isolation and growth of the contaminating microor- ganisms. The following cultures are set up: duplicate Hayflick agar medium plates to include aerobic and anaerobic incubation, at least one diphasic tube with 1% suitable substrate and 0.002% phenol red as indicator, one plate with Shepard's A-2 formulation (14) to detect any thallium acetate-sensitive or acid pH-preferring organisms, plus a blood agar plate as a check on the possibility of L-form isolation as well as to monitor other microbial contamination. The phe- nol red-diphasic tube has been one of the most useful media for mycoplasma isolation, and both 1% glucose, to detect primarily fermenting organisms by their acid pH shift, and 1% arginine diphasic tubes, to detect arginine utilizing mycoplasma by an increased pH, have been used. However, as a practical point, the 1% glucose diphasic tube has been consistently efficient in the isolation of both fermenting and nonfermenting mycoplasma tissue culture contami- nants. Although a shift in pH usually is considered pre- sumptive evidence for mycoplasma contamination, all diphasic tubes are subcultured at least once to agar plates for identification. False positive pH shifts can occur with low grade bacterial and yeast contamina- tions, and acid pH changes can be observed with actively metabolizing tissue culture cells; false nega- tives can be reported if the mycoplasma's metabolism causes no significant pH changes or if the organisms do not grow to sufficient titer to insure detectable pH changes. All cultures are incubated at 36 C and examined at 2- to 3-day intervals, with appropriate subcultures, for several weeks before discarding as negative. The precaution of avoiding both desiccation and inade- quate incubation was essential, especially in allowing detection of low levels of mycoplasma contamination. Identification of mycoplasmas was by the growth in- hibition paper disk method with appropriate antise- rum (5). Every mycoplasma isolation throughout the experimental period was re-identified using the disk growth inhibition test. "Reconstruction" experiments. The principal se- rum-free tissue culture solution used was Dulbecco modified Eagle medium with and without glutamine or glucose; other basal medium solutions such as minimal essential medium and 199 were tested to check that A. laidlawii survival was not limited to any one formulation. Dulbecco medium was prepared 1046 on February 26, 2020 by guest http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from
Transcript
Page 1: Isolation Acholeplasma Commercial, Serum-Free Tissue ...level, mycoplasma infection. Avery intensive retesting ofall cell lines andserumlots, aswell as rechecking of techniques in

APPLIu MICROBIOLOGY, June 1974, p. 1046-1052Copyright 0 1974 American Society for Microbiology

Vol. 27, No. 6Printed in U.SA.

Isolation of Acholeplasma laidlawii from Commercial,Serum-Free Tissue Culture Medium and Studies

on Its Survival and DetectionIOLANDA E. LOW

Channing Laboratory, Harvard Medical Unit, and Department ofMedical Microbiology, Boston City Hospital;and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School,

Boston, Massachusetts 02118

Received for publication 1 February 1974

This report documents the first isolation of Acholeplasma laidlawii from a

commercial lot of serum-free Dulbecco basal medium. Experimental studiesdemonstrated survival of the organism for at least 1 year depending on theconcentration of the contaminating organism as well as pH and temperature ofstorage of the serum-free medium. A comparison of isolation methods showedthat concentration by filtration through 220-nm membrane filters and testing thefilters for mycoplasma recovery, especially when using phenol red-diphasicHayflick medium, was both sensitive and practical for the average laboratory.

In recent years, Acholeplasma laidlawii hasbecome one of the most prevalent mycoplasmacontaminants of tissue cultures, partly due tothe presence of this organism as well as Myco-plasma arginini and other bovine mycoplasmasin commercially available bovine sera (2, 3).This report documents the first isolation ofA.

laidlawii from a commercial lot of serum-freebasal tissue culture medium and describes pos-sible conditions for the organism's survival aswell as methods for detection of suspectedmycoplasma contamination in tissue culturematerials.

MATERIALS AND METHODSMycoplasma isolation. Mycoplasma testing of

tissue cultures and biological materials used in ani-mal cell cultures is performed routinely in this labora-tory by utilizing primarily Hayflick medium (8) forisolation and growth of the contaminating microor-ganisms. The following cultures are set up: duplicateHayflick agar medium plates to include aerobic andanaerobic incubation, at least one diphasic tube with1% suitable substrate and 0.002% phenol red asindicator, one plate with Shepard's A-2 formulation(14) to detect any thallium acetate-sensitive or acidpH-preferring organisms, plus a blood agar plate as acheck on the possibility of L-form isolation as well asto monitor other microbial contamination. The phe-nol red-diphasic tube has been one of the most usefulmedia for mycoplasma isolation, and both 1% glucose,to detect primarily fermenting organisms by theiracid pH shift, and 1% arginine diphasic tubes, to

detect arginine utilizing mycoplasma by an increasedpH, have been used. However, as a practical point,the 1% glucose diphasic tube has been consistentlyefficient in the isolation of both fermenting andnonfermenting mycoplasma tissue culture contami-nants.

Although a shift in pH usually is considered pre-sumptive evidence for mycoplasma contamination,all diphasic tubes are subcultured at least once to agarplates for identification. False positive pH shifts canoccur with low grade bacterial and yeast contamina-tions, and acid pH changes can be observed withactively metabolizing tissue culture cells; false nega-tives can be reported if the mycoplasma's metabolismcauses no significant pH changes or if the organismsdo not grow to sufficient titer to insure detectable pHchanges.

All cultures are incubated at 36 C and examined at2- to 3-day intervals, with appropriate subcultures, forseveral weeks before discarding as negative. Theprecaution of avoiding both desiccation and inade-quate incubation was essential, especially in allowingdetection of low levels of mycoplasma contamination.

Identification of mycoplasmas was by the growth in-hibition paper disk method with appropriate antise-rum (5). Every mycoplasma isolation throughout theexperimental period was re-identified using the diskgrowth inhibition test."Reconstruction" experiments. The principal se-

rum-free tissue culture solution used was Dulbeccomodified Eagle medium with and without glutamineor glucose; other basal medium solutions such asminimal essential medium and 199 were tested tocheck that A. laidlawii survival was not limited to anyone formulation. Dulbecco medium was prepared

1046

on February 26, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 2: Isolation Acholeplasma Commercial, Serum-Free Tissue ...level, mycoplasma infection. Avery intensive retesting ofall cell lines andserumlots, aswell as rechecking of techniques in

A. LAIDLA WII ISOLATED FROM COMMERCIAL MEDIUM

from instant tissue culture powder (Grand IslandBiological Co.), although some experiments wereperformed by using commercial liquid preparations.Adequate mycoplasma testing was performed on allmedia used; all solutions were sterilized by doublefiltration through 200- or 220-nm membrane filters,avoiding high pressures as recommended by Lemcke(11). Although residual mycoplasmas have been re-ported after 220-nm filtration (1) and a second filtra-tion using 100 rather than 220-nm filters would bepreferable, especially with high-pressure filtration, inour laboratory the above more practical methodologyhas proven quite effective. The following filtrationunits were used interchangeably: disposable unitsfrom Nalgene (200 nm) and Falcon Plastics (220 nm)as well as standard membrane filters (220 nm; Mil-lipore Corp.).

For the "reconstruction" experiments, 100-ml du-plicate quantities of serum-free tissue culture solu-tions were inoculated with varying concentrations ofA. laidlawii and stored under variable conditions oftime, temperature, and pH as described in Results. Atvarious time intervals, the infected Dulbecco mediumwas tested for recovery of A. laidlawii, (i) directly,without further treatment, (ii) concentrated approxi-mately 100-fold by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 45min, or (iii) filtered through 200- to 220-nm mem-brane filters. The filters were tested for mycoplasmagrowth on both solid and diphasic medium. The fluidsamples in 0.1- to 0.2-ml volumes were tested initiallyon duplicate aerobic and anaerobic Hayflick agarplates, diphasic phenol red-glucose tubes, A-2 plates,blood agar plates, and BHK-21 tissue cultures. Subse-quently A-2 plates, anaerobic cultures, duplicateplates, and BHK-21 tissue cultures were omittedbecause these cultures offered little additional datafor A. laidlawii recovery experiments.

Standard quantitative methods were performed forA. Laidlawii, either by colony counts on agar byappropriate dilutions and expressed as colony-form-ing units per milliliter (CFU/ml) or by titration incomplete Hayflick medium by using phenol red asindicator with 1% glucose as substrate and expressingthe resulting metabolic acid pH shift in color-chang-ing units per milliliter.

RESULTS

Isolation of A. laidlawii from serum-free,commercial Dulbecco medium. The isolationof a mycoplasma from several previously myco-plasma-negative cell lines in a tissue culturelaboratory with a good mycoplasma surveil-lance program pointed to the possibility ofeither a new unsuspected source of contamina-tion or a previously undetected, perhaps low-level, mycoplasma infection. A very intensiveretesting of all cell lines and serum lots, as wellas rechecking of techniques in both tissue cul-ture and mycoplasma laboratories, revealedneither a break in sterile methods, a source of

contamination from materials under suspicionat that time, nor deficiencies in mycoplasmatesting. Yet the following facts seemed to impli-cate a new tissue culture medium component asthe source of the contamination: (i) the isolatewas a glucose-positive, hemolytic, preferentiallyaerobic organism during a period when most ofthe contaminating mycoplasmas were anaero-bic nonfermenters; (ii) all of the originallycontaminated cell lines had been fed a particu-lar tissue culture medium; and (iii) when cleanstock cultures or other previously negative celllines were fed with that medium, they alsobecame mycoplasma positive. At that time, my-coplasmas were not thought to replicate orsurvive any length of time in serum-free tissueculture solutions. However, when the differentbasic formulations with the same serum weretested by using mycoplasma-free cell lines, itbecame obvious that the contaminating myco-plasma came from one lot of Dulbecco medium.When medium in individual, plastic-wrappedsterile bottles was concentrated by centrifuga-tion at 10,000 rpm for 45 min and cultured bothin our laboratory and in a mycoplasma-freelaboratory to avoid any possible charge of cross-contamination, the same mycoplasma was iso-lated. On one testing even an unconcentratedsample became positive with a few CFU perplate; a very rough estimate suggested a level ofcontamination of 1 to 2 CFU/ml, but thetendency to grow in clumps, noted in subse-quent experiments, may have caused an un-derestimation of the actual number of con-taminating mycoplasmas.The organism was identified through the

courtesy of L. Hayflick's laboratory as well as byour laboratory as A. kaidlawii A. Eventually thecommercial company corroborated the isolationfor that particular lot of serum-free Dulbeccomedium; although no explanation for the oc-currence of this single mycoplasma contamina-tion was obtained, aerosol exposure, perhaps tocontaminated bovine serum, was suspected.Because "secondary contamination" could

occur in any tissue culture laboratory during thepreparation or use of media in close proximityto mycoplasma-positive materials, reconstruc-tion experiments were undertaken with thesame resilient A. kaidlawii organism to examinethe effect of concentration of the organism,temperature, pH, and duration of storage aswell as to study methods of detection feasiblefor the smaller laboratory.Reconstruction experiments. Duplicate

100-ml bottles of Dulbecco medium were inocu-

VOL. 27, 1974 1047

on February 26, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 3: Isolation Acholeplasma Commercial, Serum-Free Tissue ...level, mycoplasma infection. Avery intensive retesting ofall cell lines andserumlots, aswell as rechecking of techniques in

APPL. MICROBIOL.

lated with three concentrations of A. laidlawiirepresenting a "low" level of contaminationwith 50 CFU per bottle, an arbitary "medium"level of 5,000 CFU, and a "high" level of con-

tamination with 5 x 106 CFU per bottle. Theserepresent final concentration levels of 0.5, 50,and 50,000 CFU/ml, respectively. The Dulbeccomedium was stored at room temperature and at4 C, and was frozen at -20 C for periods of upto a year, simulating the most likely storageconditions in a tissue culture laboratory. Atintervals of 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month or more,in some instances 1 year, the infected Dulbeccomedium was (i) tested directly, without furthertreatment, (ii) concentrated approximately100-fold by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 45min or (iii) filtered through 200- to 220-nm mem-brane filters. The filters and the fluids weretested for mycoplasma growth as described inMaterials and Methods.The results from one such experiment are

summarized in Table 1. The isolation andre-identification of A. laidlawii from one or

more of the inoculated cultures was considereda positive result (+). It was predictable that,with more organisms, the period of positiveisolations would be longer, but the survival ofA.laidlawii at 4 and -20 C for a period of 1 year

was unexpected even for an organism originallyisolated from sewage and capable of replicationon chemically defined medium in the laboratory

(16). For the shorter testing periods of 1 monthor less, it was the higher temperature of storagethat gave consistently positive results for alllevels of contamination, and quantitative stud-ies showed that multiplication did occur atroom and, occasionally, at refrigeration temper-atures.Table 1 also clearly indicates the inadequa-

cies of small volume testing of unconcentratedmaterial for detecting low levels of mycoplasmacontamination. Concentration by filtration wasconsistently more efficient and more practicalfor serum-free tissue culture materials than wasconcentration by centrifugation.

Similar results were obtained using minimalessential medium and the more complex 199basal medium in place of Dulbecco medium.However, the addition of glutamine and glucoseat concentration in themselves not mycoplasmi-cidal decreased the number of positive recover-ies from media with low levels of mycoplasmacontamination; whether inhibitory levels of me-tabolic products were formed with availabilityof the above substrate(s) was not checked. Theaddition of sodium bicarbonate affected recov-ery of A. laidlawii only in correlation with anychange in pH of the media.

Effect of pH. Most of the experiments wereperformed in the range of pH 7.5 0.1 preferredby most tissue culturists. However, the factsthat variations exist in the pH of commercial

TABLE 1. Effect of time, temperature, and concentration of organisms on survival ofA. laidlawii in serum-freeDulbecco medium

Effect on survival

Time Test condition Higha Medium Low

Rom° 4 C -20 C Rom 4 C -20 C Rom 4 C -20 Ctemp5 temp temp

1 day Not concn + + + + + + _ -

Concn by centrifugation + + + + + + + _Concn by filtration + + + + + + + + +

1 week Not concn + + + + + - +/- - -

Concn by centrifugation + + + + + + + _Concn by filtration + + + + + + + + +I-

1 month Not concn + + + + _ _ + _Concn by centrifugation + + + + + _ + _Concn by filtration + + + + + + + +

1 year Not concn _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Concn by centrifugation _ _ + - _ _ _ _Concn by filtration _ + + _ _ _ - _

aContamination level.5Temperatures tested; room temperature is about 25 C.+/-, Results from duplicate or repeat experiments.

1048 LOW

on February 26, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 4: Isolation Acholeplasma Commercial, Serum-Free Tissue ...level, mycoplasma infection. Avery intensive retesting ofall cell lines andserumlots, aswell as rechecking of techniques in

A. LAIDLA WII ISOLATED FROM COMMERCIAL MEDIUM

tissue culture products (7.0 to 7.4) and thatprolonged storage, especially at room tempera-tures, caused occasional pH drifts above 8.0,prompted a closer look at the effect of pH on

survival of A. laidlawii. Table 2 shows one suchquantitated experiment after 1 week of exposureat the indicated pH values. Again, contrary toexpectation, A. laidlawii survived at rather highpH values but was quite sensitive to neutral andslightly acidic conditions that even M.pneumoniae can survive. The random survivalof small numbers of A. laidlawii on subcultureeven at pH 6.0 and the variation in pH sensitiv-ity of possibly other contaminating mycoplasmaprevent consideration of acidification of basalmedia as a safe method for eradication of lowlevels of mycoplasma contamination.

Sensitivity of testing procedure includingthe use of the BHK-21 cell line. Table 3 detailsthe effectiveness of the various testing maneuv-ers at pH 7.0 and 8.0 at "low" levels of contami-nation. Because anaerobic Hayflick plates, A-2medium, and blood agar plates were only posi-tive with overwhelming A. Iaidlawii contamina-tion, these media are omitted from Table 3. Thedata reemphasize the need for concentration,point to filtration as the method of choice forserum-free solutions, and also indicate that, ofall the culturing systems used, the phenol red-diphasic medium was the most sensitive. At 1year, for a high concentration of organisms, itwas the diphasic medium inoculated with thefilter that gave a clear indication of myco-

plasma survival. The Hayflick plates inoculatedwith filter were also positive, but only twoatypical colonies were found after staining ofHayflick plates inoculated with concentratedcentrifuged material. These plates could easilyhave been interpreted as negative under routineexamination.The question as to whether the negative

culture results at low A. Iaidlawii concentra-tions actually reflected absence of mycoplasmasled to a search for more sensitive detectionmethods. Tissue cultures provide a naturallyoccurring, albeit undesirable, amplification ofeven small numbers of infecting mycoplasmas.This amplification as well as the occurrence ofnoncultivable mycoplasma contaminants in tis-sue culture (10, 16), primarily the porcine strainM. hyorhinis, emphasized the possible need fora sensitive in vitro animal cell system. BSC andVero cell lines were employed originally todetect the source of the A. laidlawii contamina-tion, but the previously published work ofZgorniak-Nowosielska et al. (18) led to the use

of BHK-21 cells.

TABLE 2. Effect of pH at room temperature

Concn of Titration resultspHa A. Laidlawii lb 2 3 4 5

8.5 High +C + + + +Medium + + + _Low + _ _ _ _

8.0 High + + + + -Medium + + +Low-

7.5 High + + + + -Medium + - - - -Low-

7.0 High + + + - -Medium ±+C - - - -Low

6.5 High 4_ _-4Medium 4_ - - - -Low _d

6.0 High _d _Medium _d _Low I- I- I-

a Incubation was for 7 days at indicated pH values.bLog of color-changing units per milliliter.c Symbols: +, color change; -, no color change; ±,

partial color change, positive subculture.d One colony per plate on subcultures.

Preliminary experiments showed that A.Iaidlawii grew to identical titers in BHK-21 cellsand in Hayflick medium; BHK-21 cell-freeextracts had no mycoplasmacidal activity, andneither medium components nor agarose usedin the overlay method (18) showed any inhibi-tory activity. Because the mycoplasma-freeBHK-21 cell line possessed a very active metab-olism causing considerable and rapid acid pHshifts, a more rigorously buffered minimal es-sential medium + 10% fetal calf serum mediumwith Good buffers (7) was eventually used. Astricine had been reported (15) to have elimi-nated mycoplasma tissue culture contamina-tion, the N-N' -bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-amino-ethanesulfonic acid (10 mM), N-tris(hydroxy-methyl)methyl-2-aminomethanesulfonic acid(10 mM), and N-2-hydroxyethyl-piperazine-N'-2'-ethanesulfonic acid (15 mM) combination wassubjected to rigorous testing with negative ef-fect on A. kaidlawii viability.Extensive testing by using monolayers with

overlay and sandwich techniques (18) or directinoculation into tissue culture tubes with subse-quent plate testing revealed that only the mostheavily contaminated materials became posi-tive in the BHK-21 systems (Table 3). It ispossible that the pinpoint mycoplasma coloniesformed in agarose overlay may have been

1049VOL. 27, 1974

on February 26, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 5: Isolation Acholeplasma Commercial, Serum-Free Tissue ...level, mycoplasma infection. Avery intensive retesting ofall cell lines andserumlots, aswell as rechecking of techniques in

TABLE 3. Effectiveness of testing procedures at low concentrations of A. Iaidlawii

1 Day 1 Week 1 Month

Test procedureat~e~mp 4C -20C temp 4C -20C temp 4C -20C

pH 8.0Not -concnHM _ _ + _ _ + _D-PR + +

BHK-21 - _ _ - _ _ _ _

Concn by centrifugationHM 4e + +

D-PR + _ _ + _ _ + _ _BHK-21 - - - - - - - - -

Concn by filtrationHM + + +

D-PR + + 4 + + + + +_

pH 7.0Not concnHM +

D-PR + _BHK-21 - - - - - - - - -

Concn by centrifugationHM +

D-PR - - - + - - + - -BHK-21 - - - -|- - + | -

Concn by filtrationHM 4- 4- ± ± ± - + - -

D-PR + + + + + + + + _

a Abbreviations: D-PR, diphasic phenol red tube; HM, Hayflick medium plate." Temperatures tested; room temperature is about 25 C.C, A few colonies per plate (not overtly positive).

missed from time to time, but the cumbersome-ness of the technique of searching for mycoplas-mas together with the lack of any overt cyto-pathology or consistently positive autoradiog-raphy (unpublished data) created doubt as tothe acceptability of this method for the averagelaboratory. The practical difficulties in obtain-ing and maintaining mycoplasma-free tissuecultures for some laboratories postponed anyevaluation of other cell lines for detecting lowlevels of mycoplasma contamination of tissueculture products.Although BHK-21 and other cell lines have

been useful in detecting M. hyorhinis tissueculture contamination and may be important indetecting other noncultivable mycoplasmas, theresults with A. laidlawii emphasize that reli-ance on any one technique can be misleading.

DISCUSSIONSince the first reported mycoplasma isolation

from tissue cultures in 1956 (13), a vast litera-

ture has accumulated on the problems thatthese filterable organisms lacking cell walls posefor the cell biologist and virologist. Some ofthese effects exerted by mycoplasmas on mac-romolecular synthesis, cytology, stability of ge-netic material, susceptibility to viruses, andother exogenous materials as well as the misin-terpretations of experimental results due to thesheer mass of their numbers and/or competitionwith cells for medium constituents or presenceof mycoplasmal enzymes have been reviewed byStanbridge (16). New reports on the effect ofmycoplasmas in cell culture, such as the influ-ence on microcytotoxicity tests possibly involv-ing membrane alterations (4), will continue toappear.There have been distinctive patterns of myco-

plasma infections: initially, predominantlyhuman strains were isolated and, althoughdroplet infection was implicated, this was neverdirectly proven. Also suspected but neverproven was the contamination by the porcine

1050 LOW APPL. MICROBIOL.

on February 26, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 6: Isolation Acholeplasma Commercial, Serum-Free Tissue ...level, mycoplasma infection. Avery intensive retesting ofall cell lines andserumlots, aswell as rechecking of techniques in

A. LAIDLA WiI ISOLATED FROM COMMERCIAL MEDIUM

strain, M. hyorhinis (GDL isolate), prevalent inthe mid-1960s; implicated were trypsin or bo-vine sera contaminated in slaughter houses thathandle pigs (1). However, the present epidemicof bovine mycoplasma strains, predominantlyA. laidlawii and M. arginini (2, 3), has beendefinitely linked to the use of contaminatedbovine serum products by Barile and Kern (3).Because prevention is the best protectionagainst mycoplasma contamination, recogni-tion and adequate testing of potential sources ofcontamination is of paramount importance.Aerosolization has been shown to cause cross-contamination in the tissue culture laboratory(9, 10) and has been suspected in the case ofcontamination of horse serum by bovine myco-plasmas (1) (L. Hayflick, personal communica-tion) as well as in this incidence resulting in theisolation of A. laidlawii from one lot of commer-cial serum-free basal medium. At the presenttime, no further isolations from commercialserum-free tissue culture media have been re-ported; however, this isolation of A. kaidlawiiand demonstration of prolonged survival foreven 1 year in serum-free tissue culture media,depending on concentration of the contaminat-ing organism as well as temperature, pH, andduration of storage, indicate possible new haz-ards for any tissue culture laboratory that couldbe difficult to trace unless careful and sensitivedetection maneuvers are instituted.The possibility of aerosol contamination from

tissue culture to tissue culture is well recog-

nized, but less awareness exists that aerosolsfrom tissue cultures, sera, and other biologicalproducts can infect such seemingly nonsuppor-tive solutions as the Dulbecco basal medium forany length of time. That such contaminatedmaterial can then initiate a round of infectioneither by direct use in tissue culture medium or

more indirectly by aerosolization was demon-strated by "mini-experiments" done in our

laboratory. Hayflic agar plates were placed atvarying distances from the working centerwhere the contaminated Dulbecco basal me-

dium was handled; irrespective of whether pi-petting, with or without blowing, or pouring wasemployed, a majority of plates within a 1-ft (30cm) radius, although not 2 ft (60 cm), becamecontaminated by droplet infection. The per-

centage of positive cultures increased in directrelation to the casualness of laboratory tech-niques employed. The suspicion has grown thatthis kind of secondary infection may be occur-

ring in some cases of A. laidlawii and M.arginini contamination despite reasonable in-formation that no bovine or horse sera or tissuecultures using such commercial products have

been introduced into the laboratory (unpub-lished data).

In addition to awareness of potential sourcesof contamination, adequate detection systemsfor mycoplasma contamination must be workedout for each tissue culture laboratory; many ofthese guidelines have been published in the past(2, 3, 16).Although commercial companies have been

trying to improve their quality control stand-ards under FDA guidelines, including doublefiltration through 220-nm filters, the use of highpressure allows occasional low levels of contami-nation to occur (1, 11). Thus, testing of tissueculture materials as well as using double filtra-tion, if feasible, by individual laboratories isimportant. Furthermore,-heat inactivation at 56C of serum components might be considered forthose cultures not affected nutritionally by sucha maneuver. Other means of inactivating myco-plasma, such as irradiation, face the problem ofadequately penetrating and killing of myco-plasma aggregates. For the larger tissue culturelaboratory it is not too difficult to incorporateadditional safeguards by testing large lots ofsera or tissue culture media by using the largevolume method suggested by Barile and Kern(3). However, for the smaller laboratory thismay not be feasible; the use of concentratingtechniques such as the centrifugation and filtra-tion methods used in the reconstruction experi-ments offer considerable advantage for theirsimplicity in any testing procedure. Centrifuga-tion proved to be less effective for serum-freesolutions but was useful for serum where par-ticulate matter allowed a concentrated pellet tobe formed. Filtration through 200- to 220-nmmembrane filters with use of the filters forculture proved to be optimal for detection ofmycoplasma contamination in serum-free me-dia. It has also the advantage that a secondfiltration, if possible by using a 100-nm filter,would make the media mycoplasma-free. Thedisadvantages of filtration are that any solutionwith a high concentration of serum necessitatesthe use of high pressure (although filters canstill be tested) and also that the use of filtersmay seriously affect experimental results asreported, for example, by Fowles et al. in apaper on the effect of activated lymphocyteproducts on macrophage bacteriostasis (6).The effectiveness of using a phenol red-di-

phasic medium has been discussed; however, itis urged that reliance should not be placed onone medium or on any single method for myco-plasma testing: other mycoplasma contami-nants may appear, variability of medium com-ponents as well as toxic factors may occur from

VOL. 27, 1974 1051

on February 26, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 7: Isolation Acholeplasma Commercial, Serum-Free Tissue ...level, mycoplasma infection. Avery intensive retesting ofall cell lines andserumlots, aswell as rechecking of techniques in

APPL. MICROBIOL.

time to time affecting mycoplasma isolations,and noncultivable mycoplasmas should betaken into account (10, 18). This concern for thesensitivity of the present testing methods led tothe use of BHK-21 cells, and, although it was

not useful for A. laidlawii in this instance, itseems important to urge the use of more thanone method of detection (for example, use ofradioactive nucleic acid precursors for myco-

plasma labeling, autoradiography, and electronmicroscopy) in addition to carefully controlledisolation techniques. It will be equally impor-tant to continue to investigate other and newer

approaches to achieve an optimal surveillanceprogram.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This investigation was supported by a grant from theAmerican Cancer Society, Massachusetts Division, Inc., andalso aided, in part, by Public Health Service grant A10661from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Dis-eases.

LITERATURE CITED

1. Barile, M. F., and R. A. DelGiudice. 1972. Isolation ofmycoplasmas and their rapid identification by plateepi-immunofluorescence, p. 165-185. In Pathogenicmycoplasmas. Ciba Foundation Conference. As-sociated Scientific Publishers, New York.

2. Barile, M. F., H. E. Hopps, M. W. Grabowski, D. B.Riggs, and R. A. DelGiudice. 1973. The identificationand sources of mycoplasmas isolated from con-

taminated cell cultures. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.225:251-264.

3. Barile, M. F., and J. Kern. 1971. Isolation ofMycoplasmaarginini from commercial bovine sera and its implica-tion in contaminated cell cultures. Proc. Soc. Exp.Biol. Med. 138:432-437.

4. Bloom, E. T. 1973. Microcytotoxicity tests on humancells in cultures: effect of contamination with myco-

plasma. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 143:244-248.5. Clyde, W. A., Jr. 1964. Mycoplasma species identification

based upon growth inhibition by specific antisera. J.Immunol. 92:958-965.

6. Fowles, R. E., I. M. Fajardo, J. L. Leibowitch, and J. R.David. 1973. The enhancement of macrophage bacteri-ostasis by products of activated lymphocytes. J. Exp.Med. 138:952-964.

7. Eagle, H. 1971. Buffer combinations for mammalian cellcultures. Science 174:500-503.

8. Hayflick, L. 1965. Tissue cultures and mycoplasmas.Texas Rep. Biol. Med. 23(suppl. 1):285-303.

9. Herderschei, D., A. C. Ruys, and G. R. van Rhijn. 1963.Pleuropneumonia-like organisms in tissue cultures.Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek J. Microbiol. Serol. 29:368-376.

10. Hopps, H. E., B. C. Meyer, M. F. Barile, and R. A.DelGiudice. 1973. Problems concerning "non-cultiva-ble" mycoplasma contaminants in tissue cultures.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 225:265-276.

11. Lemcke, R. 1971. Sizing small organisms. Nature (Lon-don) 229:492-493.

12. O'Connell, R. C., R. G. Wittler, and J. E. Faber. 1964.Aerosols as a source of widespread mycoplasma con-tamination of tissue cultures. Appl. Microbiol.12:337-342.

13. Robinson, L. B., R. H. Wichelbrausen, and B. Roizman.1965. Contamination of human cell cultures by pleu-ropneumonia-like organisms. Science 124:1147.

14. Shepard, M. C. 1967. Cultivation and properties of Tstrains of mycoplasma associated with nongonococcalurethritis. Proc. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 143(l):505-514.

15. Spendlove, R. S., R. B. Crosbie, S. F. Hayes, and R. F.Keeler. 1971. Tricine-buffered tissue culture media forcontrol of mycoplasma contaminants. Proc. Soc. Exp.Biol. Med. 137:258-263.

16. Stanbridge, E. 1971. Mycoplasmas and cell cultures.Bacteriol. Rev. 35:206-227.

17. Tourtelotte, M; E., H. J. Morowitz, and P. Kasimer.1964. Defined medium for Mycoplasma laidlawii. J.Bacteriol. 88:11-15.

18. Zgorniak-Nowosielska, I., W. D. Sedwick, K. Hummeler,and H. Koprowski. 1967. New assay procedure forseparation of mycoplasmas from virus pools and tissueculture systems. J. Virol. 1:1227-1237.

1052 LOW

on February 26, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from


Recommended