Iterative Frequency-Domain Detection for Single CarrierDetection for Single-Carrier
Modulations
Rui Dinis
1
SummarySummary
1 Context and motivation1. Context and motivation2. OFDM and SC-FDE modulations3 h i3. IB-DFE techniques4. Applications
– MIMO systems– Network diversity schemesy– BS cooperation
5 Conclusions
2
5. Conclusions
Equalization TechniquesEqualization Techniques• Frequency selective channels (time-dispersive)q y ( p )
– Inter-Symbol Interference (ISI)– Performance degradation
• MLSE receiver– Optimum receiver– Efficient implementation: Viterbi equalizer – Exponential complexity
C i l li• Conventional equalizers– Time-domain implementation
C l it li ith L
3
– Complexity linear with LC
– Suitable for moderately dispersive channels
Block Transmission TechniquesBlock Transmission Techniques• Block transmission techniquesq
– Frequency-domain receiver implementation– Low complexity FFT-based receivers – Suitable for severely time-dispersive channels
• OFDM techniques– Multicarrier modulation– CP-assisted block transmission
Hi h i h i ti i t– Higher carrier synchronization requirements– High envelope fluctuations
=> Amplification difficulties 2
3
4
=> Amplification difficulties
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
1
2
t/T
|s(t)|
SC-FDE Modulations
• CP-assisted block transmissionCP assisted block transmission• Lower envelope fluctuations• FDE structure• FDE structure
kS kY nyDFT X IDFT
ns
1/ ZFH
kF
• FDE coefficients *
2
1/ , ZF
, MMSE/
k
kk
HHF
5
21/ kSNR H
SC-FDE vs OFDM
kS ns ny kY kS ˆkS
ns ny kY kS ˆns ns
• Similar overall complexitySC FDE ith i l t itt > li k• SC-FDE with simpler transmitter => uplink
• OFDM with simpler receiver => downlink=> Hybrid OFDM/SC-FDE systems (e.g., LTE)
6
y y ( g , )
SC-FDE Performance
MFB (Matched Filter Bound):MFB (Matched Filter Bound):
1 2
, 00
12k
Nbb MFB kH k
EP E Q HN N
10-1
100
_ _ : OFDM____ : SC-FDE (ZF)
10-2
10
BER
__o__ : SC-FDE (MMSE) : MFB
10-3
B
70 5 10 15 2010
-4
Eb/N0(dB)
Performance Constraints f SC FDEfor SC-FDE
• Linear FDE => Noise enhancement, residual ISILinear FDE Noise enhancement, residual ISI• Better performance with nonlinear equalizers • Conventional DFE• Conventional DFE
– Good performance/complexity tradeoffs– Error propagationp p g
y sny
nsns
8Can we make a DFE for SC-FDE?
IB-DFE Designg kS kY ny ˆns ns
kF ˆkS ˆns
• Iterative FDEO ti i ffi i t
kB
• Optimum receiver coefficients
*
221
1/ 1k
k k k kHF B F H
SNR H
with selected to ensure 110
1Nk kN k
F H
* 2
21/ 1 kSNR H
and9
* 2ˆ / | | 1 2 (for QPSK)n n n bE s s E s P
IB-DFE Performance
100
10-1
____: IB-DFE : MFB
10-2
BER
(+): Iter. 1(*): Iter. 2(): Iter. 3( ) It 4
10-3
(o): Iter. 4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1610
-4
10BER for iterations 1 (linear FDE), 2, 3 and 4Eb/N0(dB)
IB-DFE for General C t ll tiConstellations
kF
kYX IDFT
kS
+ -
s
ns
kS
LLRcomput.
( )mn
Dec.
A ’
• Required operations
x kB DFT ns k Average’s
comput.
– Computation of bits’ LLRs– Computation of average bit valuesp g– Computation of average symbol values– Computations of block reliabilities
11
p
Generalized Mapping Rulepp g
• Constellation symbols expressed as function of theConstellation symbols expressed as function of the corresponding bits as:
1
)(1
)3()2()1()2()1( ,bgbgbbgbgbggs mM
im
.oftionrepresentabinarytheis,,..,,
,...
,0,1,2,1
1043210
i
bgbgbbgbgbggs
iiii
mn
iinnnnnn
• The log-likehood ratio of the mth bit of the nth transmitted symbol is by:
s ed sy bo s by:
,
exp
explog~0Pr
~1Prlog
2
)(1
2
2
~
2
~
)(
)()(
n
mn
ss
Sss
m
nm
nmn s
s
12
exp0Pr)(
022
m
n
Snn s
ly.respective,1or0whereofsubsetsareand )(1
)(0 n
mm
Computation of IB-DFE P tParameters
1 1
)()(
)(
output FDE thetodconditionebit values AverageMm
i
0 0
)()( ,
2tanh
i m
mnin
nmn
imbgsb
estimates theofy reliabilitBlock 1 1
)(2M
m im
2tanhwhere,
ˆ )()(
12
0 0
)(
2
*,
mnm
nMi m
mni
n
nn
g
g
sEssE
im
13
0i
ig
Turbo FDE
ns ns
ns ns
14
BER Performance
100
10-1
- - - : Turbo FDE____: IB-DFE (soft) : MFB
10-2
BER
(+): Iter. 1(*): Iter. 2(o): Iter. 4
10-3
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 710
-4
15Coded BER performance for IB-DFE and Turbo FDEEb/N0(dB)
MIMO SystemsMIMO Systems
• P transmitters and RP multiple receiversP transmitters and RP multiple receivers• rth Received signal
( ) ( ) ( )P
r eq r r TY S H N Y H S N
• Detection of a given signal
, ,1
k k p k p k k k k kp
Y S H N
Y H S N
T TS F Y B SDetection of a given signal• Optimum receiver coefficients
, , ,k p k p k k p kS F Y B S
12
2, 2
H HNk p k p k R k
S
F H I P H I H
16, ,k p k k p p B H F e
1 2diag( , ,..., )P P
Network Diversity Techniquesy q
• Noise and/or collisionsNoise and/or collisions => Corrupted packets
C i l h• Conventional schemes– Discard corrupted packets + retransmissions
=> Poor performance• Packet Combining (PC) and Multi-Packet g ( )
Detection (MPD)– Take advantage of information in corrupted packets
17
g p p– Improved performance with retransmissions
Packet Combining (Diversity C bi i )Combining)
• Type-II H-ARQ schemeType II H ARQ scheme• Code-combining based on repetition codes
=> Reduced complexity=> Reduced complexity
SC-FDE with Diversity CombiningCombining
Receiver structure
19
IB-DFE Optimization
• Feedforward coefficients:
p
Feedforward coefficients:
( )*
( )22 ( )1/ 1
rr k
k R r
HFSNR H
• selected to have
11/ 1 kr
SNR H
1N L1 ( ) ( )10 1
1N L r rk kN k r
F H
• Feedback coefficients:
( ) ( )1
1R r rk k kB F H
20
1k k kr
Coping with Fixed Channelsp g
• Ideal conditions: uncorrelated channels (UC)Ideal conditions: uncorrelated channels (UC)• Coping with fixed channels: shifted packet (SP)
2.5
3
N
1.5
2|H
k|
0 5
1
210 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 10
0.5
k/N
PER Performance
22Linear FDE with PC (1, 2, 3, 4 retransmissions)
PER Performance
23IB-DFE with PC (4 iterations; 1, 2, 3, 4 retransmissions)
Gooput Performancep
24Rmax=5 retransmissions and saturated load
NDMA (Network Diversity Multiple Access)Multiple Access)
llCollisions
25
IB-DFE-Based Receiver for NDMA
26
PER Performance
27Turbo IB-DFE (4 iterations)
Q Simultaneous UsersQ
28
Coping with Q>Qmaxp g Q Qmax
• Unsolvable collisionsUnsolvable collisions when Q>Qmax
• Backoff techniques to qreduce the number of transmitters
• Constant backoff (CB)pk = p
• Exponential backoff (EB)pk = pk+1
29
• Optimum p* Saturated throughput with J=8 users and Qmax=4
Throughput for Qmax=1, 2 4 and Jg p Qmax ,
30Eb/N0=11dB Eb/N0=1dB
Base Station CooperationBase Station Cooperation
• Point-to-point linksPoint to point links– Capacity: Shannon limit– Performance close to capacityPerformance close to capacity
• Cellular system (multipoint-to-multipoint)– Different frequencies for different cells– Different frequencies for different cells– Poor spectral efficiency
• Network level techniques to increase spectral• Network-level techniques to increase spectral efficiency
• BS (Base Station) cooperation• BS (Base Station) cooperation31
BS CooperationBS Cooperation• Same frequency for MTsq y
in adjacent cells• Inherent macro-diversity
nature• Muliuser scenario • IB-DFE-based receiver
as in MIMO systems
32
BER PerformanceBER Performance
Macro-Diversity Interference scenario without BS cooperation (P=2, R=1) 33
BER Performance with P=R=2BER Performance with P R 2
Equal-power users Low and high power users 34
Interference AlignementInterference AlignementAnt. 1 Ant. 1
Ant. MBS 1...1,lW
.
.
.
Ant. MUT 1
1,lG
1,1,lH
2,1,lH
1K lHAnt. 1
Ant. MBS 2..
Ant. 1
.
.Ant. M
UT 2
G
,1,K l
.2,lW
Ant 1
.
.
. 2,lG
Ant 1
.
.2 K lH
1, ,K lH
Ant. 1
Ant. MBS K...
,K lW
. Ant. 1
.
.Ant. M
UT K
,K lG
.
, ,K K lH
2, ,K lH
K-user MIMO interference channel 35
, .
MC-CDMA with Interference AlignementAlignement
• Transmitter Spreading. IA
PrecoIFFT
+Transmitter structure for a generic user with
s/p
.
.
.
Spreading(L)
.
.
.
Precoding
.
.
.
+CP
.
.
.
Antenna 1
IA s/p Spreading(L)
.
.
.IA
Precoding
CSI from
IFFT+
CP Antenna M
• Receiver structure
Other Tx
Antenna 1 FFT-
CP
.
.
.
Antenna M FFT
.
.
.
Equalizer+
Noise Whitening
.
.
.
.
.
.IB-DFE
36
Antenna M-
CP
.
.
CSI Eq. Channels
Receiver Structure
• IB-DFE (PIC approach) applied to the receivedIB DFE (PIC approach) applied to the received signal after noise whitening process
Despreading
x+
-
Despreading(L) Demod.
S/P...
Despreading Demod
M dSpreading
(L) Demod.
xMod.p g
(L)
Mod.Spreading(L)
P/S...
37
(L)
BER Performance for K=3, M=4BER Performance for K 3, M 4
10-1 10-1
4x4 IA ZF4x4 IA MMSE
-3
10-2
ER
4 4 IA ZF 3
10-2
ER
4x4 IA MMSE+IB-DFE 1 iter4x4 IA MMSE+IB-DFE 2 iter4x4 IA MMSE+IB-DFE 3 iter4x4 IA MMSE+IB-DFE 4 iterMF L=128
10-4
10 3
BE 4x4 IA ZF
4x4 IA MMSE4x4 IA ZF+IB-DFE 1 iter4x4 IA ZF+IB-DFE 2 iter4x4 IA ZF+IB-DFE 3 iter
10-4
10-3
BE
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 1410
-5
10
4x4 IA ZF+IB-DFE 4 iterMF L=128
2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 1410-5
10
ZF IA MMSE IA 38
2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Eb/No (dB)
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Eb/No (dB)
Conclusions
• IB-DFE receivers for SC-FDEIB-DFE receivers for SC-FDE• Iterative receivers implemented in the
frequency domainfrequency domain • Extension for network diversity (DC and/or
NDMA) BS iNDMA), BS cooperation, etc. • BER performance close to the MFB• Suitable for broadband wireless systems
39
References
• General IB-DFE issues– A.Gusmão, P.Torres, R.Dinis and N.Esteves, “A Turbo FDE Technique for Reduced-CP SC-Based Block
Transmission Systems”, IEEE Trans. on Comm., Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 16-20, Jan. 2007.– A.Gusmão, P.Torres, R.Dinis and N.Esteves, “A Reduced-CP Approach to SC/FDE Block Transmission for
Broadband Wireless Communications”, IEEE Trans. on Comm., Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 801-809, April 2007.– R.Dinis, P.Silva and A.Gusmão, “IB-DFE Receivers with Space Diversity for CP-Assisted DS-CDMA and
MC-CDMA Systems”, European Trans. on Telecomm., Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 791-802, Nov. 2007.– N.Benvenuto, R.Dinis, D.Falconer and S.Tomasin, "Single Carrier Modulation with Non Linear Frequency
Domain Equalization: An Idea Whose Time Has Come – Again", IEEE Proceedings, Vol. 98, No. 1, page 69-96 Jan 201096, Jan. 2010.
– F. Silva, R. Dinis and P. Montezuma, “Estimation of the Feedback Reliability for IB-DFE Receivers”, ISRNCommunications and Networking Journal, 2011.
– F. Amaral, R. Dinis, P. Montezuma, N. Souto, “Approaching the MFB with Block Transmission Techniques”, European Trans. on Telecommunications, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 76 - 86, February, 2012.European Trans. on Telecommunications, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 76 86, February, 2012.
– J. Silva, R. Dinis, N. Souto, P. Montezuma, “Single-carrier frequency domain equalisation with hierarchical constellations: an efficient transmission technique for broadcast and multicast systems”, IET Communications, Vol. 6, No. 13, pp. 2065-2073, Sep. 2012
40
References
• MIMO systems– R.Dinis, R.Kalbasi, D.Falconer and A.Banihashemi, "Iterative Layered Space-Time Receivers
for Single-Carrier Transmission over Severe Time-Dispersive Channels", IEEE Comm. Letters, Set. 2004.
– P Silva and R Dinis “Multiuser Detection for the Uplink of Prefix-Assisted DS-CDMA SystemsP.Silva and R.Dinis, Multiuser Detection for the Uplink of Prefix-Assisted DS-CDMA Systems Employing Multiple transmit and Receive Antennas”, IEEE VTC’06(Fall), Montreal, Canada, Sep. 2006.
– P.Silva and R.Dinis, “Frequency-Domain Multiuser Detection for CP-Assisted DS-CDMA Signals” IEEE VTC’06 (Spring) Melbourne Australia May 2006Signals , IEEE VTC 06 (Spring), Melbourne, Australia, May 2006.
– R.Kalbasi, D.Falconer, A.Banihashemi and R.Dinis, "A Comparison of Frequency Domain Block MIMO Transmission Systems", IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 165-175, Jan. 2009.
41
References
• Network Diversity– R.Dinis, P.Carvalho, L.Bernardo, R.Oliveira, M.Pereira and P.Pinto, “Frequency-Domain Multipacket Detection: A High
Throughput Technique for SC-FDE Systems”, IEEE Trans. on Wireless Communications, Vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 3798-3807, Jul. 2009.
– F. Ganhão, M. Pereira, L. Bernardo, R. Dinis, R. Oliveira, P. Pinto, “Performance of Hybrid ARQ for NDMA Access Schemes with Uniform Average Power Control”, Journal of Communications, Vol. 6, No. 9, pp. 691-699, Academy Publishers, Dec. 20112011.
– M. Pereira, L. Bernardo, R. Dinis, R. Oliveira, P. Montezuma, P. Pinto, “Performance of diversity combining ARQ error controlin a TDMA SC-FDE system”, IEEE Trans. on Communications, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 735-746, Mar. 2012.
– F. Ganhão, R. Dinis, L. Bernardo and R. Oliveira , “Analytical BER and PER Performance of Frequency-Domain Diversity Combining, Multipacket Detection and Hybrid Schemes”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 60, No. 8, pp. 2353-2362 A 20122362, Aug. 2012.
– M. Silva, R. Dinis, P. Montezuma, “Iterative Frequency-Domain Packet Combining Techniques for UWB Systems with Strong Interference Levels”, Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 9, No. 9, July, 2012.
– M. Pereira, L. Bernardo, R. Dinis, R. Oliveira, P. Pinto, “Frequency-Domain Cross-Layer Diversity Techniques: An Efficient Way of Coping with Lost Packets in Broadband Wireless Systems”, IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, 2013.
– M. Pereira, L. Bernardo, R. Dinis, R. Oliveira, P. Pinto, “On the Use of Frequency-Domain Cross-Layer Diversity Techniques to Cope with Lost Packets”, Physical Communication”, Elsevier Physical Communication.
– F. Ganhão, M. Pereira, L. Bernardo, R. Dinis, R. Oliveira, P. Pinto, “Performance Analysis of an Hybrid ARQ Adaptation of NDMA Schemes”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2013.
42
References
• Joint detection/estimation– C.Lam, D.Falconer, F.Danilo-Lemoine and R.Dinis, “Channel Estimation for SC-FDE Systems Using
Frequency Domain Multiplexed Pilots”, IEEE VTC’06(Fall), Montreal, Canada, Sep. 2006.– R.Dinis, C.Lam and D.Falconer, "Joint Frequency-Domain Equalization and Channel Estimation using
Superimposed Pilots", IEEE WCNC'08.– R.Dinis, T.Araújo, P.Pedrosa and F.Nunes, "Joint Turbo Equalization and Carrier Synchronization for SC-
FDE Schemes", European Trans. on Telecomm., Vol. 21, No. 2, pp.131-141, Mar. 2010.– P. Pedrosa, R. Dinis and F. Nunes, “Iterative Frequency Domain Equalization and Carrier Synchronization for
Multi-resolution Constellations”, IEEE Trans. on Broadcasting, Vol.56, No.4, pp. 551-557, Dec. 2010.P P d R Di i d F N “A l ti l P f E l ti f Cl f R i ith J i t– P. Pedrosa, R. Dinis and F. Nunes, “Analytical Performance Evaluation of a Class of Receivers with Joint Equalization and Residual CFO Estimation”, accepted for publication at Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies.
– P. Pedrosa, R. Dinis, F. Nunes, J. Bioucas-Dias, “Phase Drift Estimation and Symbol Detection in Digital Communications: A Stochastic Recursive Filtering Approach”, IEEE Communications Letters, Vol. 16, No. 6,Communications: A Stochastic Recursive Filtering Approach , IEEE Communications Letters, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 854-857, June 2012.
– F. Silva, R. Dinis, P. Montezuma, “Channel Estimation and Equalization for Asynchronous Single Frequency Networks”, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 2013.
43
References
• Offset modulations– J. Luzio, R. Dinis, P. Montezuma, “SC-FDE for Offset Modulations: An Efficient Transmission
Technique for Broadband Wireless Systems”, IEEE Trans. on Communications, Vol. 60, No. 7, pp. 1851-1861, July 2012.
– M Luzio R Dinis P Montezuma “Pragmatic Frequency Domain Equalization for SingleM. Luzio, R. Dinis, P. Montezuma, Pragmatic Frequency Domain Equalization for Single Carrier with Offset Modulations”, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2013.
• NL channels– P.Silva and R.Dinis, "A Turbo SDMA Receiver for Strongly Nonlinearly Distorted MC-CDMA g y y
Signals", Canadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2008.– P.Silva and R.Dinis, “Joint Turbo Equalization and Multiuser Detection of MC-CDMA Signals
With Strongly Nonlinear Transmitters”, IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 2288-2298, Jun. 2009.pp. 2288 2298, Jun. 2009.
– R.Dinis and P.Silva, "Iterative Detection of Multicode DS-CDMA Signals with Strong Nonlinear Distortion Effects", IEEE Tran. on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 58, No. 8, pp. 4169-4181, Oct. 2009.R Di i P Sil d T A új “T b E li ti ith C l ti f N li Di t ti f
44
– R.Dinis, P.Silva and T.Araújo, “Turbo Equalization with Cancelation of Nonlinear Distortion for CP-Assisted and Zero-Padded MC-CDM Schemes”, IEEE Trans. on Communications, Vol. 57, No. 8, pp. 2185-2189, Aug. 2009.