SEP 2014 A

HEAD OFFICE www.coway.com12F, 88 Seosomun-Ro, Jung-GU, Seoul, Korea 100-759

P-160L

Under the Sink Water Purifier

Excellent technology Unnecessary waste

NSF/ANSI 42 Aesthetic Effects : Eliminates water contaminants that affect taste, odor, and clarity.NSF/ANSI 53 Health Effects : Reduce a wide range of drinking water contaminants.NSF/ANSI 58 Reverse Osmosis Drinking Water Treatment Systems :Reduction of total dissolved solids (TDS) and other contaminants in drinking water.

Coway’s water filtration is certified to meet internationalstandards for water quality

Powerful 5-stage filtration system An effective solution, even in areas with poor water quality

Plus Sediment Filter Neo-Sense Filter RO Membrane Filter Plus Inno-Sense(Post Carbon Block)

Sand Rust

Large particles Moss

Infusible particles

Deposits Chlorine VOCs

Bacteria Virus Heavy metals Odors Chlorine

Waterborne microorga-nisms

Microbes

VOCs

STEP_1 STEP_2+3 STEP_4 STEP_5

STEP 2Plus-Sediment

STEP 3Pre-

carbon+

The Benefits of CIRCLEWater Saving, Space SavingPower Saving, Filter Saving

Plus Sediment 11 ” Neo Sense 11”(Plus-Sediment + Pre-Carbon)

Membrane 11” Plus Inno-Sense(D) 11”(Post Carbon Block)

Filter

Tank capacity (Usable tank capacity)

6 L

Dimensions (W X D X H)

(235 X 350 X 419 ) mm / (9.2 X 13.7 X 16.4) inch

Power consumption

No power required

Net weight

6 kg / 13.2 lb

Exterior color

White Midnight blue

Model

Elite Premium

1 Step 2+3 Step 4 Step 5 Step

No power systemReduces your electrical bill thanks to its power free system.

Minimizing rejected waterFor conventional UTS, purified water is drained due to back pressure, whereas CIRCLE can minimize the rejected water effectively as is has no back pressure.

Water & Power saving

Stable flow rate Conventional UTS has a high flow rate at the time of faucet opening, but diminishes gradually. However, CIRCLE has a continuously stable flow rate by pushing the flexible inner tank smoothly while filling the outer tank with water.

Actual space(Space efficiency) for purified water compared to tank sizeWhile conventional UTS could only hold 6L of water in a 12L tank due to the pressure of nitrogen, CICRLE is highly effective. CICRLE's tank fully can be filled with purified water because of the +-RO system that doesn't need an air tank.

Convenient features

Compare effective tank capacity

6 L

Effective tank capacity6L of 6L

Effective tank capacity6L of 12L

6 L

Rejected water comparison

The auto flushing of the RO filter ensures a consistent removal rate and keeps the inside of the RO filter clean.

Auto flushing to provideclean water

Improved Removal

RO (Reverse Osmosis)

Maintainingfilterperformance

chlorine bacteria virus waterbornmicroorganism

heavy metal

•Filter life span through auto flushing•Removal rate through no back pressure•Valid tank capacity due to flexible tank

•Rejected water•Unnecessary space consumption•Electricity consumption utilizing the socket

What system is

Coway’s Innovative under-the-sink water purifierwith system,

Featuring an advanced concept of purification and extraction via water pressure through flexible water tanks, unlike the conventional UTS RO system, which has back pressure due to air tank.

Flexible water tankwith no back pressure

No Back Pressure

This new technology by Coway switches water flow and passage during purification and extraction by water flow and pressure, without power.

Smart valve switchingwater passage without power

New System

WORLDpatentedWORLDpatented

LPM

1

2

3

Conventional UTS

Filtration process Extraction process

Faucet

Conventional UTS

TIME

All-in-one design saving spaceWith no external water tank, power cord,

and booster tank, it not only is easy to install and saves space, but also allows you

to utilize the area under the sink in a clean way.

Space saving

Fast filling timePurified water-filling time

in a tank is faster than conventional UTS due to no

back pressure.

Time saving33Minute

6 L

0

ConventionalUTS RO

VS

Conventional UTS RO

CIRCLE's are rejected water 2.5 times compared to conventional UTS