+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ITU PSTN-to-NGN

ITU PSTN-to-NGN

Date post: 14-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: jack22345
View: 242 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend

of 19

Transcript
  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    1/19

    InternationalTelecommunication

    Union

    NGN Migration scenarios and strategies:

    A vision from ITU Specifications

    Souheil MarineDigital Bridge Manager, Alcatel-Lucent

    ITU Regional Development Forum 2008:Bridging the standardization Gap in Developing Countries

    Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    2/19

    2NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    Some Terminology

    Evolution to NGN: A process in which wholeor partsofthe existing networks are replacedor upgraded to thecorresponding NGN components providing similar orbetter functionality, while attempting to maintain the

    services provided by the original network and thepossibility ofadditional capabilities

    From ITU-T specification Y.2261: PSTN/ISDN Evolution to

    NGN.

    Migration to NGN synonymous to evolution to NGN

    SoftSwitch and Call Server terms synonymous

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    3/19

    3NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    The NGN Migration Problematic

    Developing countries characterized by:

    Growth of their voice service market Dilemma to grow with legacy PSTN/ISDN or with NGN

    Inter-working with existing legacy equipment

    Seamless continuity of services

    Plus the possibilities offered through NGN migration togrow new markets (broadband, triple-play) and enrichinfrastructure competition between distinct accessplatforms

    Need for a phasedapproach for operators with existinglegacyequipment Example scenarios from specification Y.2261

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    4/19

    4NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    Migration Scenarios Envisaged by Y.2261

    Call Server (SoftSwitch) based approach of the Core

    network with three variants (scenarios):

    Scenario 1: Migration starts from Local Exchanges (LE)

    Scenario 2: Migration starts from Transit Exchanges (TE)

    Scenario 3: One-step approach

    One step evolution of the core network to IP

    Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) xDSL Access network evolution to NGN

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    5/19

    5NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    Core network consolidation before migration Reduce number of LE and transfer of affected user access modules (UAM), Private

    Automatic Branch Exchanges (PABX) and Access Network to remaining LEs.

    L E

    L E

    L E

    L E

    T ET ET E

    P A B XP A B X

    P A B XP A B X

    U A M

    U A M

    U A M

    U A M

    A N

    A N

    A N

    A N

    L E L E

    T ET ET E

    P A B XP A B X

    P A B XP A B X

    U A M

    R U A M

    U A M

    R U A M

    A N

    A N

    A N

    A N

    V o i c e S ig n a l lin g

    P S T N / I S D N

    P S T N / I S D N

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    6/19

    6NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    Scenario 1: Migration from LE Step 1

    Some of the LEs are replaced by Access Gateways (AG) controlled by aCall Server (CS).

    Access elements originally connected to the removed LEs, are now

    directly connected to AGs : PABXs and Access Nodes (AN). User Access Modules Functionality (UAM) assumed by AG and CS.

    Trunking Media Gateways (TMG) and Signaling Gateways (SG) aredeployed for interconnection between the PSN and the TEs of the legacy

    network as well as other operators' PSTNs/ISDNs. AGs and TMGs are all controlled by the CS.

    Step 2

    Remaining LEs are replaced by the AGs,

    Transit Exchanges (TE)s are removed and their control functions areperformed by CS.

    TMGs and SGs are deployed for interconnection between PSN and otheroperators' PSTNs/ISDNs.

    AGs and TMGs are all controlled by the CS.

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    7/19

    7NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    L E

    L E

    T ET ET E

    P A B XP A B X

    P A B XP A B X

    U A M

    U A M

    U A M

    U A M

    A NA N

    A N

    P S T N / I S D N

    A NL E

    L E

    P A B X

    A NA N

    P a c k e t S w i t c h e d

    N e t w o r k

    A GP A B X

    A G

    A G

    L E T E

    P A B XP A B X

    U A MU A M

    A NA N

    P S T N / I S D N

    L ET ET E

    T M G

    S GC S

    P A B XP A B X

    P A B X

    A N

    A N

    A N

    A N

    P a c k e t S w i t c h e dN e t w o r k

    A G

    C S

    A G

    P A B X

    A G

    A G

    V o i c e

    S i g n a l li n gD a t a

    B e a r e r a n d S ig n a l lin g t ra f f ic f ro mo t h e r o p e r a t o r s P S T N

    S GT M G

    T M G

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    8/19

    8NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    Scenario 2: Migration from TE

    Step 1 All TE functions are performed by the TMGs and the SGs under the

    control of the CS.

    LEs are connected to the Packet Switched Network (PSN) via TMGsand SGs.

    TMGs & SGs are deployed for interconnection between PSN and otheroperators PSTNs/ISDNs.

    AGs & TMGs are all controlled by CS.

    Step 2 All LEs are replaced by AG controlled by CS

    Access elements originally connected to the removed LEs, are nowdirectly connected to AGs : PABXs and Access Nodes (AN).

    User Access Modules Functionality (UAM) assumed by AG and CS.

    TMGs & SGs are deployed for interconnection between PSN and otheroperators PSTNs/ISDNs.

    AGs & TMGs are all controlled by CS.

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    9/19

    9NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    L E

    L E

    T ET ET E

    P A B XP A B X

    P A B XP A B X

    U A M

    U A M

    U A M

    U A M

    A NA N

    A N

    P A B XP A B X

    P A B X

    U A M

    U A MU A M

    A N

    A N

    A N

    A N

    P S T N / I S D N

    P a c k e t S w i t c h e d

    N e t w o r k

    P A B X

    A NL E

    L E

    S G

    B e a r e r a n d S i g n a l lin g t ra f f ic f r o mo t h e r o p e r a t o r s P S T N

    S G

    L E

    L E L E

    L E S G

    U A M

    P A B XP A B X

    P A B X

    A NA N

    P a c k e t S w i t c h e dN e t w o r k

    A G

    P A B X

    A G

    V o i c eS i g n a l l i n g

    D a t a

    B e a r e r a n d S i g n a l li n g t r a ff ic f r o m

    o t h e r o p e r a t o r s P S T N

    S G

    A G A G

    A G

    A G

    T M G

    C S

    C S

    T M G

    T M G T M G

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    10/19

    10NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    Scenario 3: One-Step Approach

    LEs are replaced by the AGs and their functions are transferredto the AGs and the CS.

    All access elements such as user access modules (UAMs), remote

    user access modules (RUAMs), and private automatic branch

    exchanges (PABXs) are connected to access gateways (AGs).

    The access networks (ANs) are either replaced by the access

    gateways (AGs) or are connected to packet based network (PBN)

    through the AGs.

    Transit gateways (TMGs) under the control of the call server (CS),

    and the signalling gateways (SGs), are deployed to replace the TE

    functions and provide interconnection between PSN and other

    operators PSTNs/ISDNs.

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    11/19

    11NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    L E

    L E

    T ET ET E

    P A B XP A B X

    P A B XP A B X

    U A M

    U A M

    U A M

    U A M

    A NA N

    A N

    P S T N / I S D N

    A NL E

    L E

    P A B XP A B X

    P A B X

    A NA N

    P a c k e t S w i t c h e dN e t w o r k

    A G

    P A B X

    A G

    V o i c eS ig n a l lin gD a t a

    B e a r e r a n d S ig n a l lin g t r a f f ic f r o mo t h e r o p e r a t o r s P S T N

    S G

    A G A G

    A G

    A G

    T M G

    C S

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    12/19

    12NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    IMS-based evolution to NGN

    PSTN/ISDN evolves directly to a PSN based on the IMS corenetwork architecture.

    End-users access the network using NGN user equipment orlegacy user equipment connected via an AG.

    Transit and signalling gateways (TMGs & SGs) are deployed for

    interconnection between the NGN and other operatorsPSTNs/ISDNs.

    Concurrent CS-based and IMS-based evolution to NGNimplementations can occur when an existing operator deploys aseparate IMS-based network for new servicesand supports the

    remainder of the services using a CS-based approach. These two types of network implementations need to interoperate.

    Interoperation is possible if SIP is used, but this is beyond thescope of recommendation Y.2261.

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    13/19

    13NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    L E

    L E

    L E

    L E

    T ET ET E

    P A B XP A B X

    P A B XP A B X

    U A M

    U A M

    U A M

    U A M

    A N

    A N

    A N

    A N

    A G

    P A B X

    P A B X

    A N

    A N

    P S T N / I S D N

    P a c k e t S w i t c h e d

    N e t w o r k

    T M G S G

    V o i c e V o I PS ig n a l l i n g

    I M S

    A G

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    14/19

    14NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    What remains of the PSTN/ISDN services:

    Emulation or Simulation ?

    Emulation refers to the Provision ofmost ofthe existing

    PSTN/ISDN service capabilities and interfaces usingadaptation to an IP infrastructure.

    Only a sub-setof PSTN/ISDN could be supported.

    Simulation refers to the same service provision as above

    but there is no guaranteethat all features are provided. New features and capabilitiesmay be provided with respect to

    legacy PSTN/ISDN.

    Specification Y.2262 specifies two types of adaptation

    functions (ADF) for legacy access equipment ADF1 for simulation

    ADF2 for emulation

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    15/19

    15NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    16/19

    16NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    Emulation is complex:

    Call Server-based PSTN/ISDN Emulation Service(CS-PES) Components

    Access Call Server (ACS)

    Controls Access Gateways (AG), subscriber registration and call control

    Breakout Call Server (BCS)

    Controls Trunking Media Gateways (TMG)to interwork withPSTN/ISDN

    IMS Call Server (ICS) Controls interconnection Border Gateway to interwork with Packet-

    based networks (NGN, IP Multimedia, Internet)

    Gateway Call Server (GCS)

    Ensures interoperability between among CS-PESs to provide end-to-endservices

    Routing Call Server (RCS)

    Provides routing function between call servers

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    17/19

    17NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    Emulation Call Server

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    18/19

    18NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    Concluding Remarks

    Y.2261, Y.2262 and Y.2271 provides some functionalguidelines for NGN migration with a focus onemulating existing PSTN/ISDN network

    Scenarios proposed well adapted to the context of legacyoperator willing to move their services as they exist to NGN

    But a bit less to new entrants: reality of NGN voice services bynew entrants leans towards simulation rather than emulation

    Developing countries must contribute more effectivelyto this standardization effort to take into account theirspecific conditions

    Legacy PSTN/ISDN infrastructure generally more modern

    than in developed countries but Growth needs more acute: grow with Emulation, Simulation

    orleapfrog to IMS ?

    The floor is yours: you must contribute !

  • 7/30/2019 ITU PSTN-to-NGN

    19/19

    19NGN Migration, Souheil MarineITU Regional Development Forum, Damascus, 20-22 July 2008

    Thank you for your attention!

    Questions ?

    Souheil Marine

    Digital Bridge Manager

    Alcatel-Lucent

    Tel.: +33 1 3077 [email protected]

    http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/digitalbridge


Recommended