Date post: | 23-Jan-2018 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | lokesh-saini |
View: | 37 times |
Download: | 1 times |
INPUT/OUTPUT
2/12
R.O. SYSTEM
SEAWATER
WASTEWATER
PERMEATE
RETEN
TATE
Surface water
8%
Waste water
6%
Brackish Water
19%
Sea Water67%
[27]
Type of feed in RO plantsUsed in world
CHALLANGES
1. FOULING
2. ELECTRICITY ASDRIVING SOURCE
3. BORON REMOVAL 4. FLOURIDE
REMOVAL
5. BRINE DISPOSAL
6. SOLID WASTE
7. HEALTHISSUES
8. ENVIRONMENT ISSUES
3/12
BRINE WASTE DISPOSAL4/12
•Reverse osmosis concentrate (ROC) or brine is the byproduct of ROprocess .•30-80% volume of RO feed.•1.2-1.7 times higher in concentration than feed .
•ROC disposal facility – 15% add. Cost.
•Affects ecology of receiving body e.g. ocean, stream & ground water. •Causes death to aqua species.
Why Challenge??
5/12
CHEMICALS, MEMBRANE CLEANING & IT’sDISCHARGE WITH REJECT
CLEANINGPhysical Cleaning
Back Washing
Air Scouring
Chemicals RemovesAlkali-Caustic Soda, pH11-12
Org. Fouling
Oxidative-NaOCl, H₂O₂, KMnO₄
Bio. Fouling
Acid- H₂SO₄, HCL, pH 2-3
Inorganic Fouling
[1],[17],[21]
ChemicalCleaning
[21]
•World RO desalination capacity is 65million m³/day.•@50%; Reject 32.5million m³/day.
Chemicals used in RO process :- coagulants, Acids, antiscalants, antisurfactants, disinfectants, dechlorinating agents
Once a Day
SOLUTIONS USUALLY ADOPTED6/12
•Treat brine by ion exchange, charge adsorption & multistage RO [1],[8].
Disposal Option
Method Benefits
Surface Fresh water, streams, oceans
Can accommodate largevolumes
Sewer Front & end of STP
Uses existinginfrastructure Lowers theBOD of the resultingeffluent.
Land Spray irrigation, infiltration trend, percolation ponds
No marine impactexpected
Deep well Non DW aquifers Possible commercial saltexploitation Lowtechnological andmanaging efforts
Evaporation Pond
Vaporize brine Can be used to irrigate salttolerant species, No marineimpact expected
ZLD Solidify Liquid in salt
Can commercially exploitconcentrate No marineimpact expected
[37]
•500 plants, under CSR, by
industries.(1kl-3kl/hr)
•2000 plants, by unorganized private
agencies(0.25kl-3kl/hr)
•3000 plants, under NRDWP, by GoR
(0.5kl-2kl/hr).
CASE STUDY IN RAJASTHAN•Performance study of community sized RO units in Jaipur &
Barmer, Rajasthan
•8 nos of plants capacity in Jaipur, Capacity 1000l/hr & 12 plants capacity 1000-3000l/hr.
7/12
RO waste water in Life CycleBrine/chemical
discharge to
environment
Plants located near Jaipur (Vidhani & Kalwara)
Avg. hrs of
operation
Unit discharge
(m³/hr or (ml/Yr)
Total
discharge
in its life
Disposal option
adopted
Brine Discharge
m³
6 900 m³/hr 59130 m³ Solar/ drain
Antiscalant
Polyacrylates
(ml/yr)
- - - Not used
pH Adjuster - - - Not used
Chemicals for
cleaning (ml/Yr)
NaOH
HCl
Na₄EDTA
2ml/yr
4ml/yr
2.4lt/yr
60ml
120ml
72lt
Solar/ drain
8/12
Situation of ground water in State(Report on dynamic ground water resources of Rajasthan, CGWD report-2009)
•Total Blocks-239
•Over-exploite-166
•Critical-25
•Semi critical-16•Safe-31
9/12
EXISTING DISPOSAL WAY OF REJECT
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Ju
n-1
6
Ju
l-1
6
Au
g-1
6
Sep
-16
Oct-
16
Kalwara Raw
Kalwara Filter
Kalwara ROC
TDS vs time at Kalwara
** Salt concentration in GW increased
because operator discharged ROC into an
abandoned tube well in the campus itself.
TD
S
DrawlDisposal
mg
/lt
Reject to drain
At Kalwara, Reject in drain At Barmer, Reject in solar pit
10/12
DRAWBACKS IN
EXISTING OPTIONS
• May further deteriorate in G.W.
quality.
• Increase load on plant, maintenance
cost increases.
• Risky for human &
strayed animals.
POSSIBLE
REMIDIES
• Use RO reject in school toilets flushing.
• Construction, Non RCC work e.g road work & Curing
FUTURE RESEARCH
ISSUES
• NF RO FW(90%)
• VMD R
• Improve recoveryratio, by optimizingthe antiscalant:
upto 85%.
SOLUTIONS & ITS
ANALYSIS
11/12