J.~,
~/~' .'e.,••
0.11. 1990/0:3drography'Committee
MEZESCALE VARIABILUY OF HYDROPIIYSlCAL PIELDS GENEIlATED
BI Z!E CANARY CUR...ttErl'T UFWELLING PROM· Tm: NAVIGATIONAL
AND SU'ELLITE OBSERVATIOn DAU
by.
A.G.Xostyenoy end Yu.V.stepanov
Atlentic Scientiric Research Institute of Mar'ne Fieheries end
Oceenogrnphy (.A.tlantllIRO), 5, Dm.Donskogo ·str.,· Kalin1ng:rad,
236000, tlSSR
. Abstract'
During the hydroPhYsical research' 01' canary ~pwellinE; in
'February 1987 on the R/V nMonocrystall" the places·ofappearence.
of mostly cold upwelling waters on the oeeen surface ware localized.
The evolution 01' the filament cr cold upwel~g water, BO km in
length, was demonstra.ted. An 1ntratermoeline eddy 35 km. in di·tl.lneter
• end 150 m in thickness was 1'0und'in the 50-200 m depth layer. The
lII9.:in ch2.rachristies 01' :Lntratermoeline end bottam' lenees, which .
were l'ound 'in the historieal dtlta, ~e presented. It 113 supposed
that the intratermocline ed:l1es are formed as a result .of geo
atrophie adjastment oihomogeneous bottom lenses, generated by
the :Lntense m1%:lng :Ln the bottom layer cl the shelr dur1ng the
upwelling svent.
- 2
Complex·hydrophysical end hydrobiologic~l studies o! the
canary Current upwelling, which is of great importance tor the
fisheries, showed a'considerable mezoscale variability o! the
t~mperature, aalinity,'hydrochemical and biological element !ie11s'
(Voitov, Zhurbaa, 1986; Monin et al., 1981; Fedorov, 1'98.3; Fcdo- ,~. :,.
rov; GinzbUrg~ 1988; HalpeI""\ 'et al., '1911. 'Hayer, 1916; Mittel-estacdt, 1982; TOalczakj 19'73.; Tomczak; Hughes, 1980)., As is evident
!~om the observations, the rise of the water~ to the ocean our~. .face during the upwelling event,is o!'s diocreto-continuous pat-
tern, i.e. ,c~nte.s o! rise,o! the coldest waters associated \Vith
peculiar bottom topcgraph,y a.nd shore line type are observed dthin
the narrow band 0: the coastBl zone. Tho'width o! this.band 1s
determined by a baroclinic radius of Rossby'sdeformation, and
usually does not exceed 50 km (Brüllt, 1983). ,The upwelled water
atructure in a wider zone 200-300 km,orr the shore 18 0: n patchy
pattern. In:the Canary Current upwelling, the cross secUort of
these patches varies trom 20 to 50 km.'the~ occur'~O to 200 km
apart, end are' 0.4-1°0 colderthan the temperature cf the ambient
waters (Tomozak, 1973). In seme hypotheses, the appe~~ce of
these patchea 1s partly related to breakixlg., the interntll waves eagainst the ahel! edge (Tomczak. 1973), to cyclonic eddy format
io~ (BoWrnan et' 81•• 1983; La Violette, 1974) ~d generation of
intrathermocline anÜcycloniC eddics (ITE) in the Cana.ry Current
upwelling (Koatyanoy. Rodionov, 1986). According to Kostyanoy
and Rodionov (1986). the formation of these eddies may rcsult
Ire ~ geostrophic adaptation or homogeneous lellDcs ol. tran.'Jfol':ned.' " .
upwelled waters whlch "stream down" the ahel! into the ocean
depths Bleng 1sopicnal sur!ace. Also the generation of ITEs may
- J -
be caused by instability of the'aubsurface front running between
the Northatlantic ani Soutbatlantic central water massives with
meandcrs und eddies normally 20 km in'e%tent'occurring near the
front (Bartoll"1987). Thermohal1ne intrusions develop along the'
·".ront spreading, aa tor as' 30 km; trom 1t. The year of 1982 was
lloted tor a ,owerful intrusion 150'm thick reaching 100 km in
lcngth and having a +0.7 salinity gradient in the forefront (Bar-. ,
ton, 1987). When broken off, these +.hick intrusive tongues may
also cause the formation of anomalously wr-rm and saline whirling
lenses as a result ol geostrop~ic adaptation.
Such a diveraity of·mesoscale at~ctures in the Canary Current
upwelling must .c,ertainlY call !orth ,a', 'local variability of the,
phyto- and zooplankton and fish aggregations•. Theretore the in-
- depth knowledge of physical processes taking p~ace in thc area
under cons1deration will ensure a h1ghe~ efficiency of the·search
of fish aggregations.
For this purpOSG the research works were carried out on the
RV "MonokristaUn (AtlantNIRO) on 2-10 February 1987 'in the area
between 16-21°N 16-18oW. The resulta of the survey were used to.
e.imate the biomase of tlQ.1n commereial 'Hah species in the area.
The saa surtaoe'temperature field eSST) was constru~ted based on
55 latitudinal tacks made at 9 km interyals with 2 km disereetness.
Besidee, 10 hydrographie lattitudinal·transeots' Ware J:ladn each
'50 km on average (a total or 58 stat10nseaeh 10-20 ~).
,Tne SST cbart dro~ trom·ihe survey data showe~ the ceAters
of the coldest waterrise (T<1?5°~) at 19°10'. 17°20', 16°55'
and 160 20'N. The~e,locations"werealso characterized by amaller
3alinity values (S~35.5) st the ses surface. A single' patch cf..
- 4-
of cold upwolled waters (T< 15°0, AT= -2°0) 25 km in diameter
was recorded at 19°40'N and'16°55'N at a'distance of 50 km.ofr, ,
the share. The SST chartsrecelved:from the'satellite NOAA-9
over the' same perlod contirmed the'existence ol thls patch at
least ove: the period trom 7 to 9 February. /
The satellite SST chatts provlded a broader coverage'(1~- ~
24°N 15-200 W) whicn allowed a:detection of a cold stream of the
upwelled waters in the area between 2JoN end 18°W, and observance
of its evolution. In the coastal upweliings,the transversal jet
systems are narrow (10-60 km) breriks of relatively cold ( AT=
= -1.5-2°0) and nutrient~rich B~face waters directed fro~ the
-shore towards the op~n ses. at distancesfrom some 'tens to '500 km
(Ginzburg, Fedotöv. 1985).~Tranaveraa~ jets can,be orten seen in
satellite images of the Oregon',Oalitornia and Benguella Current,
upwellings, arid,single cases were recorded in the Canarj ~~rent
upwelling ares. oft the Marooco .coast (J20 10 (Bulletin ••• , 198).
, A jet 50 km long o.nd 25 km wide appeare~ on th~ SST cho.rt
on J February (fig. 1). Its tronts'were indistinct and the tempera
ture gradient was -0.8°0. BY·1 Februery, with sizes unchanged.
the fronte became more distinct and the teIIJper3.t~a gra.dient edropped to -t.6°0. 'In a day•. the jet extcnded",to 8Q km, and the
temperature gradient rea.ched the maiio~ value cf -2.400. Approxi
mate11 on 9'February, tho jet re~axation proceas began, which
man:1.fested in jet widening tq 45 km, tront weakening ani reduot-,I '
ion of the,temperature gradient to -1.6°0. During its existence.
the Jut actually did not chanie the position h3ving just bcnded, ,
under the ~~lence of the aloDg coastal c~rent. liownere in the
upwelling regions the jet direction 'was intl'lf:nc.;ld: by the current
- 5
(Ginzburg, Fedotov, 1985).
Lens-11ke .distribution of the temperature T, aalinity S
und density 69 fields (fig. 2) charaeteristie of intrathermoeline
entieyelonic eddie5 observed before in the Canary Current upwel-.
~ling region was.foundalo~ one of the hydrographie transects.
"""'made along 200 05'N in the 50-200 m layer (Kostyanoy, Rodionov•....,....,. .
1986). Sueh a lens was not seen along neighbouring transects
aiong 20°20' and 19°35'N. At 120-140 m depths, it contained an
isolated nucleus with the encmalously warm end saline water'w1th
T ::>,16°C (Tmax > 16.5°C) end 8::>.35.9 (Smai...35.94). In·the sa11nity.
fleld, the isolated nucleus was contoured by the 35.75 isohaline
and was 80 m thick. Isopicnal enomalities T end S were +1~50C
end +O.4% o ,respeetively.oln the density field, the isopicnals.
ware sagged up and down relative to '6~ =26.40 ·(Z=120 m) with· the
surfaea 1nelined in accordance with the riae of aeasonal ;'icno
cline during the upwelling event, and lifte~ to the 60 m horizon
above the eheli. The le~s diameter was estiroated at 35 km.
The eddy was evide~tly at the final stage oi ita iorm~tion
aa it waS not yet completely isolated by a clearly pronouneed
~lensitY front on the shelf water aide. A similar situation was
rcported by K03tyanoy and Rodionov (1986) who assumed that such
edaies could be iormed as a result of geostrophic adaptation of
thc upwelled water lenses· which nstr'eam down" into the oeean
ueptho ao isopicnals. Separate profiles of hydrophysieal anQ
~ydrochem1cal parame~era at the ahel! stations confirmed tae fact
of intensive mixingin the near-bottom layer during the upwelling
event. This haS called forth the necessity cf analysis of histo-
~ie hydrographie data tor the aren ur..lC-:•
investigatian in o:aer
,
- 6 -
to detect mixed isolnted lensea in the shel! near-bottom layer.
These pear-bottom lenses were !ound to occur quite often
both above the ahel! and outside the shel! edge. where'they break
oft the bot tom end C~~~l into anticyclonic eddies of the ITE ' '
,,;. «!g. 3)••iP'cal ,.,. .,••• ver,r~. 20 '0 40 kdhor'ZOn;ally_...l
end !rom 60 to 80 m vertically. Usually the lens 'waters are.mixed 4IIfIIIICk--act"e- "',to complete homogeneity. Ma~ ITE and near-bottom l~ns UU4.~ ~
rist1cs are g1ven in the table.
The fact that all ITE and thermostad lenses are located along
the 100 m 1sobath, which actually'ls the shelf edge. 1s of
interest. Theretore 1t 181mportant to observe the eddy lens
.evolut1on and 'conatruct actual.trajectories of their movement in
the Canary Current upwelling region.
In conclusion'it should be noted"that a large meaoscale dy_.
namie varlabl1ity of hydrophyslcalflelds caused by ~ complex
current system, discrete cont~uous ribd of,the upwelled wnters
to·the sea surface, formation of a peculiar patcby surface water
structure. formation or both sur!ace and subaurface eddies carry-
~ both signa and c! transversal jets 1s observed in the Canary
Current upwelling region. All these, mesoscale eddy formations may ~be of great importance for the !1sheries.'In some other upwelline
areas. the most'biologicallY productive regions very orten 00-
incided with locatlons contoured'by frontal boundaries of cOld
eddles end upwelled transversal eddles which yielded the'largea~
,catch o! the fiah (Bowman' et,al.,' 1983; Laurp et al., 1984; Tra
ganza et al., 1980)~
- 7 -
He!erenees
1. BartoIl E.D•.• 1987.' Meanders, eddies and intrusiOIlS iIl
tbe tbermohaline front off Northwest.Atr1ca. J. Oceanolog1ca Acta.
, 10 (~): 267-283. ."
__ 2. Barton E.D., Hue;hes P. 1982. Isolated ho:ooganeous layers
.- over the contiIlental slope off Northwest Africa. J. Deep-Sea Res.
29 (1): 13.5-14,3.
3. Bowma:o. M.J. et al. Coastal upwe1l1ng cyologenes1s and
squid fiehiIlg neer Cape Farewell, New Zealand. 1983. Ld. 'by
Gada H.G. et al. NAFO Conference aeries, Bar.IV: Marine·se1ences.
11 : 279-310.
4. Brj,nk E.H. 1983. The nea.r-:surface d;rnamica of coastal
upwel.liIlg. J. Progr. Oce8n~6l'. 12 (3)1 22;-257."
5. Bulletin mensuel SATMER. Le Centre de Meteorologie .spati
als. Lannion. Oct. 19B3. ~o.2. p. 21.
6. Fyodorov K.li. 198,3. I'bys1eal nature and strueture of
oceanic .fronts. G1drometizdat,' Leningud. 296 pp. (In !lussian).
7. Fyodorov K.N.,·Ginzburg A.U. 1988. The near-sur!ace
.. elw:Uc' layer~ Gidrometizdat, Leningrad. 303 pp. (In Russian).
8. Ginsburg A.l., Fedotov K.N. 1985. ~ansversal jet system
i.D. insllore up"elliIlg zones: satellite date. end phys10al hypo-
I theEis. J. Earth Res. from Cosmos. No. 1: .3-10. (In Hussien).k~ 9. Halpern D. et al. Cross welt' ciroulation on the conti-
nental deli' off llorthwest Africa during upwell1ne;. 1977. J. llar.
Jes. 35 (4): 757-79C.
10. Bayer A. 1976. A oomparison of upwelliIlg events in two
locations: OreE;On and Northwest·Africa. :J. Mar. R~!J. V. ;41551-;;46.
-8-
11. Kos-c;yenoy A..G•• Rodionov V.B. 1986. On 1ntrathermoel1ne
eddy formation 'in the Cenary upwelUng. J. OeeanolOgia. 25 (6):
'892-895. <In Hussien).
12. Kostyanoy .1. __ ., Rodionov V.B. 1986. The inshore upwelling ...
zone as the souree 01' intratt:-0rmoeline eddy formation. intrather~cline eddies in the oeeen, pp. 50-55. Ed.b;y Fyodorov K.N. IOAN"""- .USSR. l.Ioscow., (In Ruf:pian):
13. La 7iolette T.E. 19740• .1 satell1ta-a1J:eraft therI:lal
S'tUdy 01' the upwelled water off Speniah Sahara. J. I'h;ys. Oeeen0Gr.
,40 (5): 679-684.1976
140. Laurs R.M. e1: al:v11baeore tuaa catch distribution rela-
tive to enviro:amental features observed !rom satellites. J. Deep
-Sea Res. 31 (9): 1085-1093. _
15. nttelstaedt·E. 1982. The upwelling area.,off Northwest~,
·A.frica• .1 descriPtio~ 01' phenomena rnlated to eoastal upwelling~
.. ' J. Progr. Oeeanoe;r. V.12: 3r:t1-332.
'16. Uonin .1.8. et al~ 1987~: On hydrophysleaJ. mezostrueture.
01' the inshore upwelling. Rep.,o! .lead. 01' Ses. 01' US~. 297 (3):
706-710 (In Hussian) •.
17. Feters' H. 1977.Meendera' and eddles off Northwest .\i'riCc.~Folymode News. No. 25= 1, 4.
18. Tomczak M., Jr. 1973. 'An investigation into occurence and
development of cold water patcbes in the upwelJ.ing region 01';:
N. 'N. Uriea Crtosabrelten:-,;Expedltion 1970); "Me;;eor n Fors:ehun;;s
ergebo.1sse. No • .113: 1-402•.
19. ,Tomczak M•• Hughas P. 1980. Three dimenzional variabilit;·
'or wate: lllasses end currenta in the Cana.r;y Curren.t upwelling
re.;1on. "Lleteor" ForschungserGebnisse. No. A21: 1-24.
9 -
20. Traganza E.D. e't al. 1980. Batellite observa"Cicn of '
nutZ'1ent upwelling off the coast cf Calilornia. J. GeophJ's. lies.
85 (C?): 4101-4106.
21. Voitov V.1•• Zhurbas V.M. 1986. Complex studies of thc
Canary Current upwelling. Phy~1cal and oceanographic research in
~&OPiCal Atlant1c. pp. 112-128. Nauka. Mosco\v. (In Russian) •
•
- 11 -
Figure legends
Figure 1. Satellite SST charts.
NOAA-9 for 0).02.67 (a), 07.02.87 (b). 08.02.87 (c),
09.02.87 (d). Figures indicate temperature contrasts
between isolines estimated at O.8°C.
2. Transects across anticyclonic intrathermocline eddy in
temperature (a),-salinity (b) and potential density
(c) fiel.ds.
Figure 3. Transects across near-bottom lenses in the temperature
!1eld made on 12.02.85 (a) and 29.08.86 (b) •
•
I!
I J
a)
-~~,-- -~~-----
- 12 -
b)
d)
I
I
.100
~oo -----_--:...
-13-
b)
~g. 2
,I
- 14 -
100
200_~
0)
. Pig. 2
..; 15 -
a)
fig. ')
.-_2~----':~'~b~)-::- . ~. Aua.'I1'ffirro
3aK!l3 II58 203 ~. ~
'18,0
• '0