REFERENCES

Abney, S. (1987) The English Noun-Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Ph.D.dissenation, MIT.

Acquaviva, P. (1990) TheSyntactic Function ofLenition and Nasalizationin Old Irish. ms., Scuola Nonnale Superiore, Pisa.

Adger, D. (1994) [forthcoming] Aspect, Agreement and Measure Phrasesin Scottish Gaelic. ms., Centre for Cognitive Science, University ofEdinburgh. Revised version to appear in R. Borsley & I. Roberts(Eds.), The Syntax of the Celtic Languages. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Anderson, S. (1992) A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.-- (1993) Wackernagel's Revenge. Language, 69, 69-98.---, & S. Chung (1977) On Grammatical Relations and ClauseStructure in Verb-Initial Languages. In P. Cole & J. Sadock (Eds.),Syntax and Semantics 8: Grammatical Relations,. New York:Academic Press.

Aoun, J. (1978) Structure interne du groupe nominal en arabe, l'?idaafa.Analyses Theorie, Paris V//I, 1.--- (1979) On Government, Case-marking, and Clitic placement. ms.,MIT.--- (1981) The Formal Nature of Anaphoric Relations. Ph.D.dissertation, MIT.--- (1986) Generalized Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.---" & N. Hornstein (1985) Quantifier Types. Linguistic Inquiry, 16,623-636.---" N. Hornstein, D. Lightfoot, & A. Weinberg (1987) Two Typesof Locality. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 537-578.

---, & Y.-H.A. Li (1989) Scope and Constituency. LinguisticInquiry, 20, 141-172.

--, & Y.-H. A. Li (1993) The Syntax ofScope Cambridge, MA: MITPress.

---, & D. Sportiche (1983) On the Fonnal Theory of Government.The Linguistic Review, 2, 211-237.

Atkinson, M. (1992) Children's Syntax: An Introduction to Principles andParameters Theory. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell.

342

REFERENCES 343

Awbery, G. (1990) Dialect Syntax: A Neglected Resource for Welsh. InR. Hendrick (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 23: The Syntax ofthe Modern Celtic Languages. New York: Academic Press.

Baker, C.L. (1970) Notes on the Description of English Questions: TheRole of an Abstract Question Morpheme. Foundations ofLanguage,6(2), 197-219.--- (1991) The Syntax of English NOT: the Limits of Core Grammar.

Linguistic Inquiry, 22,387-430.Baker, M. (1985) The Mirror Principle and Morphosyntaetic Explanation.

Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 373-415.--- (1988) Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function

Changing. Chicago: University ofChicago Press.---" K. Johnson, & I. Roberts (1989) Passive Arguments Raised.

Linguistic Inquiry, 20,219-251.---, & K. Hale (1990) Relativized Minimality and PronounIncorporation. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(2),289-297.

Ball. M., & N. Miiller (1992) Mutation in Welsh. London and New York:Routledge.

Barss. A., & H. Lasnik (1986) A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects.Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 347-354.

Bayer, J. (1983/4) Comp in Bavarian Syntax. The Linguistic Review, 3,209-274.

Belletti, A. (1990) Generalised Verb Movement. Turin: Rosenberg &Sellier.--- (1994) Verb Positions: Evidence from Italian. In D. Lightfoot &N. Hornstein (Eds.) Verb Movement. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Benmamoun, E. (1989) Negation, Minimality and InflectionalMorphology. ms., USC.--- (1991) Negation and Verb Movement. In T. Sherer (Ed.),

Proceedings of NELS 21. pp. 17-32. GLSA: University ofMassachusetts at Amherst

(1992) Functional Categories, Problems of Projection,Representation and Derivation. Ph.D. Dissertation, University ofSouthern California.

Benmamoun, E. (forthcoming) Licensing of pro and the ECP. In S Preuss(Ed.) Proceedings ofWCCFL XIII. CSLI: Stanford.

Berman, R. (1987) A Developmental Route: Learning about the Forms andUse of Complex Nominals in Hebrew. Linguistics, 25, 1057-1085.

Berwick, R.C., & A.S. Weinberg (1984) The Grammatical Basis ofLinguistic Performance: Language Use and Acquisition. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.

Bierwisch, M. (1963) Grammatik des deutchen Verbs. Berlin: Akademie,Verlag.

344 REFERENCES

Bobaljik, J., & A. Carnie (1992) [forthcoming] A Minimalist Approach toSome Problems of Irish Word Order. In Proceedings of The12thAnnual Harvard Celtic Colloquium. Revised version in R. Borsley &I. Roberts (Eds.), The Syntax of the Celtic Languages. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).

Borer, H. (1984a) Parametric Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.--- (1984b) The Projection Principle and Rules of Morphology. In

Proceedings of NELS 14. pp. 16-33. GLSA: University ofMassachusetts, Amherst.--- (1988) On the Morphological Parallelism between compounds andconstructs. Yearbook of Morphology, I, 45-66.

Borsley, R. (1984) VP complements: evidence from Welsh. Journal ofLinguistics, 20, 277-302.--- (1987) A note on traditional treatments of Welsh. Journal of

Linguistics, 23, 185-190.--- (1991a) Syntactic Theory: A Unified Approach. London: EdwardArnold.--- (1991b) On So-Called 'Verb-Nouns' in Welsh. In Spring Meeting,

Linguistics Association ofGreat Britain, Oxford, June 1991.--- (1993) On so-called Verb-Nouns in Welsh. Journal of Celtic

Linguistics, 2, 35-64.---, & M. Tallerman (1993) Phrases and Soft Mutation in Welsh. ms.,University ofWales and University ofDurham.---, M.-L. Rivero & J. Stephens (forthcoming) Long Head Movementin Breton. In R. Borsley & I. Roberts (Eds.), The Syntax of the CelticLanguages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bowers, J. (1990) The Syntax and Semantics of Predication. ms., CornellUniversity.--- (1993) The Syntax of Predication. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(4),591­656.

Burzio, L. (1986) Italian Syntax: a Government-Binding Approach.Dordrecht.: Reidel.

Calder, S. (1923) Gaelic Grammar. Inverness:Cardinaletti, A., & I. Roberts (1991) Clause Structure and X-second. ms.,University ofGeneva & University ofWales.

Carlson, G. (1977) Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D Dissertation,University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Carnie, A., & J. Bobaljik (1993) A Note on the Position of Subjects andObject Raising. ms., MIT.---, & H. Harley (1994) Predicate Raising and the Irish Copula. ms.,MIT.

Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.--- (1965) Aspects of The Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MITPress.

REFERENCES 345

--- (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures.Dordrecht: Faris.--- (1982) Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of

Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.--- (1986a) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use.New York: Praeger.--(1986b) Barriers. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

[1989] Some Notes on Economy of Derivation andRepresentation. ms., MIT. Revised version in I. Laka & A. Mahajan(Eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics #10, 43-74. MIT.--- (1988b) Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua

Lectures. Cambridge: MIT Press.--- (1992) [1993] A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. MIT

Occasional Papers in Linguistics #1. Revised version (1993) in K.Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays inhonor ofSylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.--- (1994) Bare Phrase-Structure. MIT Occational Papers in

Linguistics #5. Cambridge MA: MIT.Christian Brothers (1990) New Irish Grammar. Dublin: c.J. Fallon.Chung, S., & J. McCloskey (1987) Government, Barriers and SmallClauses in Mcxlern Irish. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 173-237.

Cinque, G. (1990) Types of A '-dependencies. Cambridge,Massachusetts.: MIT Press.--- (1993) On the Evidence for Partial N-Movement in the RomanceDP. ms., University of Venice.

Comrie, B. (1981) Language Universals and Linguistic Typology (2nded.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Corbett, G., & N. Fraser (1993) Network Morphology: a DATR Accountof Russian Nominal Inflection. Journal ofLinguistics, 29, 113-142.

Cottell, M.S. (1994). Negation and Tense in Irish and Standard Arabic. InInternational Conference on Language in Ireland: Parasession on theGenerative Grammar of Irish. University of Ulster at Jordanstown:

Crisma, P. (1990) Functional Categories inside the Noun Phrase: A Studyon the Distribution of Nominal Mcxlifiers. Tesi di Lauria, Universityof Venice.

De Bhaldraithe, T. (1975) The Irish of Cois Fhairrge, Co. Galway: APhonetic Description. (1 st. edition (1945». Dublin: Institute forAdvanced Studies.

de Haan, G., & F. Weerman (1986) Finiteness and Verb fronting inFrisian. In H. Haider & M. Prinzhorn (Eds.), Verb-SecondPhenomena in Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.

DeFreitas, L., & M. Noonan (1991) Head Movement, Agreement and theStatus of Negation in Welsh. In The 27th Regional Meeting of theChicago Linguistic Society, II: Parasession on Negation.

346 REFERENCES

den Besten, H. (1977) On the Interaction of Root Transformations andLexical Deletive Rules. In W. Abraham (Eds.), On the formal SyntaxofWestgermania. (pp. 47-138). Amsterdam.: Benjamins.

Deprez, V., & K. Hale (1986) Resumptive Pronouns in Irish. InProceedings ofthe 1985 Harvard Celtic Colloquium.

Derbyshire, D. (1977) Word Order Universals and the Existence of OVSLanguages. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 590-599.

---" & G. Pullum (1981) Object-Initial Languages. InternationalJournal ofAmerican Linguistics, 47, 192-214.

Diesing, M. (1992) Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Dillon, M., & D. 6 Cr6inin (1961) Teach Yourself Irish. Sevenoaks:Hodder and Stoughton.

Doherty, C. (1992) Clausal Structure and the Modern Irish Copula. Syntaxat Santa Cruz Vol. I, UC, Santa Cruz.

Dooley Collberg, S. (1990) An Expanded-Inft Syntax for Modem Irish.Working Papers #36, Dept ofLinguistics, Lund University.--- (1991a) Comparative Studies in Current Syntactic Theories.

Working Papers # 37, Department of Linguistics, Lund University.--- (1991b) The Status of Agr in Modern Irish. Working Papers #37,129-160. Department ofLinguistics, Lund University.

Duffield, N. (1989) A Case for Default Values. In F. Brengelman, V.Samiian, & W. Wilkins (Eds.), Proceeedings of the 19th WesternConference on Linguistics. pp. 82-93. Fresno: CSU.--- (1990a) Movement and Mutation in Modem Irish. In S. Uziel & T.Green (Ed.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics: Student Conferencein Linguistics 1990. MIT.-- (1990b) Movement and The Case of the Irish Verbal Noun. In B.Birch, K. Hunt, & V. Samiian (Ed.), Proceeedings of the 20thWestern Conference on Linguistics. pp. 79-87. Fresno: CSU.--- (1991a) Negation, Minimality and Irish Relative Clauses. In The

27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, II:Parasession on Negation. Chicago: CLS.--- (1991 b) Particles and Projections. Ph.D. dissertation, Universityof Southern California.--- (1992) [1994a] The Construct State in Irish and Hebrew: Pan One.ms., Heinrich Heine-Universitat, DUsseldorf. Revised version in A.Henry (Ed.) Belfast Working Papers in LingUistics #13--- (1993a) Irish Construct State Norninals and the Radical pro-DropPhenomenon. In A. Schafer (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 23. 113­127. GLSA: University of Massachusetts at Amherst.--- (1993b) On Case-Checking and NPI Licensing in Hiberno­English. Rivista di Linguistica, 5.2, 215-244.--- (1994) [forthcoming b] Structural Invariance in VSO Languages.ms., McGill University. Revised version to appear in R. Borsley & I.

REFERENCES 347

Roberts (Eds.), The Syntax of the Celtic Languages. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.--- (forthcoming a) Are You Right? On Pronoun-Postposing and otherProblems of Irish Word Order. In S. Preuss (Ed.), WCCFL XIII.CSLI: Stanford Linguistic Association.--- (in prep a) Notes on the Irish Copula. ms., McGill University.--- (in prep b.) Case, Word Order and Dialect Variation in Irish. ms.,McGill University.--- (in prep c.) Constructs and Compounds in Irish. ms., McGillUniversity.

EisenbeiS, S. (1994) Raising to Spec and Adjunction Scrambling inGerman Child Language. In Workshop on the LJ- and L2-AcquisitionofClause-Internal Rules: Scrambling and Cliticization.

EllegArd, A. (1953) The Auxiliary Do: The Establishment and Regulationof its Use in English. In F. Behre (Eds.), Gothernbeurg Studies inEnglish. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.

Emonds, J. (1978) The Verbal Complex V'-V in French. LinguisticInquiry, 7, 363-371.--- (1980) Word Order in Generative Grammar. Journal ofLinguistic

Research, 1, 33-54.--- (1987) The Invisible Category Principle. Linguistic Inquiry, 18,613-632.--- (1992) Talk delivered at Conference on Comparative Celtic

Syntax, University of Wales, June 1992.Ernst, T. (1992) Phrase-Structure and Directionality in Irish. Joumal of

Linguistics, 28(2), 415-443.Everett, D. (1987) Piraha Qitic Doubling. Natural Language and Linguistic

Theory,S, 245-276.Fabb, N. (1984) Syntactic Affixation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Fabri, R. (1993) Kongruenz und die Grammatik des Maltesischen.Tiibingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Fillmore, C. (1968) The Case For Case. In E. Bach & Harms (Eds.),Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt,Reinhart,Winston.

Filppula, M. (1986) Some Aspects of Hiberno-Eng/ish in a FunctionalSentence Perspective. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.

Fukui, N., & M. Speas (1986) Specifiers and Projections. In T. Rapoport,N. Fukui, & E. Sagey (Eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics#8., pp. 128-172. MIT.

Gazdar, G. (1992) Ceteris Paribus. In C. Rohrer & H. Kamp (Eds.),Aspects of Computational Linguistics: Syntax. Semantics. Phonetics.Berlin: Springer Verlag.

--, & G. Evans (1990) The DATR Papers. CSRP 139, School ofCognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex.

348 REFERENCES

Georgopoulos, C. (1991) Canonical Government and the SpecifierParameter: An ECP account of Weak Crossover. Natural Languageand Linguistic Theory, 9, 1-46.

Gesenius, W. (1910) Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar (Cowley, A, Trans.).(2nd 00.). Oxford: Clarendon.

Giorgi, A, & G. Longobardi (1991) The Syntax of Noun-Phrases.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Glinert, L. (1989) The Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Greenberg, J. (1963) [1966] Some Universals ofGrammar with ParticularReference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In J. Greenberg(Ed.), Universals of Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts.: MITPress.--- (1972) Numerals and Substantive Number. In L. Heilman (Ed.),

11th Internationa/ Congress oflinguists. Bologna: nMulino.Gregor, D.B. (1988) Celtic. Cambridge: The Oleandar Press.Grewendorf, G., & C. Wilder (1991) Universal Grammar in German andScandinavian Linguistics. Johann Woflgang Goethe-Universitat,Frankfurt am Main.

Guilfoyle, E. (1988) Parameters and Functional Projection. In NELS. pp.193-207. University ofMassachusetts at Amherst: GLSA--- (1990) Functional Categories and Phrase-Structure Parameters.Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University.--- (1993) Non-finite Clauses in Modem Irish and Old English. In

Proceedings ofChicago Linguistic Society. CLS.--- (1994). Modem Irish VNPs and the Internal Structure of VP. InInternational Conference on Language in Ireland: Parasession onGenerative Grammar Uinversity of Ulster at Jordanstown:

Gussmann, E. (1986) Autosegments, Linked Matrices, and the Irishlenition. In D. Kastovsky & A. Szwedek (Eds.), Linguistics acrossHistorical and Geographical boundaries. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Haegeman, L. (199Ia) Introduction to Governflumt and Binding Theory.Oxford and Cambridge, Massachusetts.: Basil Blackwell.--- (1991b) Negation in West Flemish, ms. University of Geneva.--- (1992) Negation in West Flemish and the Neg Criterion. In

Proceedings of NELS 22, 195-210. GLSA: University ofMassachusetts at Amherst--- (forthcoming) The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Haider, H. (1986) V-Second in German. In H. Haider & M. Prinzhorn(Eds.), Verb-Seond Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Dorrecht:Foris Publications.

Hale, K. (1989) Incorporation and the Irish Synthetic Verb Forms. ms.,MIT.

REFERENCES 349

Halle, M., & A. Marantz (1993) Distributed Morphology. In K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in honor ofSylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hannahs, S.J. (1993) A phonological Account of Soft Mutation in Welsh.ms., University ofDurham.

Harlow, S. (1981) Government and Relativization in Celtic. In F. Heny(Eds.), Binding and Filtering. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.--- (1989) The Syntax ofWelsh Soft Mutation. Natural Language and

Linguistic Theory, 7,289-316.Harris, J. (1994) Minimalist Phonology. Talk delivered at International

Conference on Language in Ireland.Hawkins, J. (1990) A Parsing Theory of Word Order Universals. li, 21,223-26.

Hawkins, J. (1995) A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hendrick, R. (1988) Anaphora in Celtic and Universal Grammar.Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Henry, A. (1987) The Structure of Infinitives. The GLOW Newsletter, .--- (1991) Infinitives in a for-to dialect. ms., University of Ulster atJordanstown.--- (1992) Why We Don't Agree: Singular Concord in BelfastEnglish. ms., University of Ulster at Jordanstown.--- (forthcoming) Dialect Variation and Parameter-setting: a study of

Belfast English and Standard English. Oxford University Press.Hirakawa, Y. (1994) Case-Checking and a Double NominativeConstruction in Japanese. ms., McGill University.

Holmberg, A. (1986) Word Order And Syntactic Features. Stockholm:Hyams, N. (1994) V2, Null Arguments and C Projections. In T. Hoekstra

& B. Schwartz (Eds.), Language Acquisition Studies in GenerativeGrammar. (pp. 401). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Iatridou, S. (1990) About Agr(P). Linguistic Inquiry, 21,551-577.Jackendoff, R. (1977) X'-Syntax: A Study of Phrase-Structure.Cambridge: MIT Press.--- (1987) VP Adjuncts. ms., Brandeis University.--- (n.d.) Babe Ruth Homered his way into the Hearts of America.ms., Brandeis University.

Jaeggli, O. (1982) Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.-- (1986a) Passive. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 587-622.--- (1986b) Three Issues in The Theory of Clitics: Case, DoubledNPs, and Extraction. In H. Borer (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 19:The Syntax ofPrOfWminal Clitics. New York: Academic Press.

Johnson, K. (1991) Object Positions. Natural Language & LinguisticTheory, 9, 577-636.

350 REFERENCES

Jonas, D., & J. Bobaljik (1993) Specs for Subjects: The Role of TP inIcelandic. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics: Papers on Case &Agreement I., 18, 1-34. (Revised version to appear in LinguisticInquiry.)

Katz, J., & P. Postal (1964) An Integrated Theory of LinguisticDescriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kayne, R. (1984) Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.--- (1987) Facets of Romance Past Participle Agreement. ms., MIT.--(1989) Null Subjects and Clitic Climbing. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir(Eds.), The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: K1uwer.--(1993) The Antisymmetry of Syntax. ms., CUNY.Keenan, E., & B. Comrie (1977) Noun-Phrase Accessibility and UniversalGrammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8,63-99.

Kegl,J., & C. Fellbaum (1988) Non-Canonical Argument Identification.In Proceedings ofWCCFL 7 Stanford Linguistic Association.

Kiberd, D., & G. Fitzmaurice (1991) Crann Faoi BhldthlThe FloweringTree. Dublin: Wolfhound Press.

Kitagawa, Y. (1986) Subjects in Japanese and English. Ph.D. dissertation,University ofMassachussets, Amherst.

Klima, E. (1964) Negation in English. In J. Fodor & J. Katz (Eds.), TheStructure ofLanguage. Engelwood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Koch, A. (1991) Theorien syntaktischer Barrieren. In Grewendorf, G.(Ed.) Sprachwissenschaft in Frankfurt 4, Johann Wolfgang Goethe­Universitat, Frankfurt am Main.

Koizumi, M. (1993) Object Agreement Phrases and the Split VPHypothesis. MIT Press (Ed.) In J. Bobaljik & C. Phillips (Eds.) MITWorking Papers in Linguistics #18: Papers on Case and Agreement,MIT.

Koopman, H. (1984) The Syntax ofVerbs. From Verb movement Rules inthe Kru languages to Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.--- (1990) The Syntactic Structure of the Verb-particle Construction.ms., UCLA.

--,& D. Sportiche (1983) Variables and The Bijection Principle. TheLinguistic Review, 2, 139-160.--, & D. Sponiche (1988) Subjects. ms., UQ..A.---, & D. Sportiche (1991) On the Position of Subjects. Lingua,Special Edition, 211-258.

Kornai, A., & G. Pullum (1990) The X-Bar Theory of Phrase Structure.Language, 66, 24-50.

Kratzer, A. (1989) Stage-level and Individual-level Predicates. ms.,University of Massachusetts at Amherst

Kroch, A. (1989) Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Use.Journal ofLanguage Variation and Change, 1, 199-244.

REFERENCES 351

Kubo, M. (1992) Japanese Syntactic Structure and Their ConstructionalMeanings. Ph. D. Dissertation, MIT.

Kuno, S. (1973) The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.

Kuroda, S.-Y. (1985) [1986] Whether we Agree or not. ms., UC, SanDiego.

Laka, I. (1990) Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of FunctionalCategories and Projections. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

Larson, R. (1988) On the Double Object Construction. linguistic Inquiry,19, 335-391.

Lasnik, H., & M. Saito (1984) On the Nature of Proper Government.Linguistic Inquiry, IS, 22-80.

Lebeaux, D. (1988) Language Acquisition and the Fonn of the Grammar.Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Lema, J., & M.-L. Rivero (1990) Long Head Movement: ECP vs. HMC.In 1. Carter (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 20. pp. 333-347. GLSA,University ofMassachusetts at Amherst

Lewis, H., & H. Pedersen (1937) A Concise Comparative CelticGrammar. Gottingen: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht

Lieber, R. (1983) New Developments in Autosegmental Morphology. InM. Barlow, D. Flickinger, & M. Wescoat (Ed.), WCCFL 2. CSLI:Stanford Linguistic Association.

Lightfoot, D., & N. Hornstein (Ed.) (1994). Verb Movement. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Linebarger, M. (1987) Negative Polarity and Grammatical Representation.Linguistics & Philosophy, 10, 325-387.

LObel, E. (1990) Typologische Aspekte funktionaler Kategorien in derNominalphrase. Zeitschriftfilr Sprachwissenschaft, 9, 135-169.

Lyons, C. (1992) The Construct: VSO 'Genitive' Structures. ms.,University of Salford.

Mac Gabhann, R. (1975) Cursa Closamhairc Gaelige. Dublin: NewUniversity of Ulster.

Mahajan, A. (1990) On the A_A' distinction. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Maling, J., M. Yip, & R. Jackendoff (1987) Case in Tiers. Language, 62,217·250.

Mallinson, G., & B.J. Blake (1981) Language Typology: Cross-LinguisticStudies in Syntax. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Marantz, A. (forthcoming) A Reader's Guide to The Minimalist Programfor Linguistic Theory.' In G. Webelhuth (Ed.) The Principles andParameters Approach to Syntact Theory: A Synopsis. Oxford &Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Marcus, M. (1980) A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for NaturalLanguage. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

352 REFERENCES

McCawley, J. (1970) English as a VSO Language. Language, 46, 286­299.

McCloskey, J. (1978) A Fragment ofa Grammar ofModern Irish. TexasLinguistic Forum, 12.--- (1979) Transformational Syntax and Model-theoretic Semantics.Dordrecht: Reidel.--- (1980) A Note on Modern Irish Verbal Nouns and the VP­Complement Analysis. Linguistic Analysis, 6,345-357.-- (1983) A VP in a VSO language? In G. Gazdar, E. Klein, & G.Pullum (Eds.), Order, Concord and Constituency, 9-55. Dordrecht:Foris.--- (1986) Inflection and Conjunction in Modern Irish. Natural

Language and Linguistic Theory, 4, 245-281.(1990) Resumptive Pronouns, A'-Binding and Levels of

Representation in Irish. In R. Hendrick (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics23: The Syntax ofthe Modern Celtic Languages. New York: AcademicPress.--- (1991a) Clause Structure, Ellipsis and Proper Government inIrish. Lingua, 85, 259-302.--- (1991b) Verb-Fronting, Verb Second and the Left Edge ofIP inIrish. ms., UC, Santa Cruz.

---(1991c). One Irish Passive. Invited Talk delivered at University ofSouthern California.

---(1992a) [forthcoming a] On the Scope of Verb-movement in Irish,ms. UC, Santa Cruz. (Revised version to appear in Natural Languageand Linguistic Theory.)--- (1992b) Adjunction, Selection and Embedded Verb-Second, ms.UC, Santa Cruz.--- (1993). Subjects and Subject Positions in Irish. Talk delivered atWorkshop on Verb-Initial Languages. University of Leiden, June1993.--- (1994a) On Configuring Irish. In International Conference on

Language in Ireland, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, June 1994.--- (1994b) [forthcoming b.] Subjects and Subject Positions in Irish.ms., UC, Santa Cruz. Revised version to appear in R. Borsley & I.Roberts (Eds.) The Syntax of the Celtic Languages. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

---, & K. Hale (1984) On the Syntax of Person-Number Inflection inModern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1,487-533.

---, & P. Sells (1988) Control and A-chains in Modern Irish. NaturalLanguage and Linguistic Theory, 6, 143-189.

Millward, C.M. (1989) A Biography ofthe English Language. Fort Worth:Holt, Reinhart, Wilson.

REFERENCES 353

Mohammad, M.A. (1988) On the Parallelism between IP and DP. InSeventh West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. StanfordLinguistic Association.--- (1989) The Sentential Structure of Arabic. Ph.D. dissertation,University of Southern California.

MUller, G., & W. Sternefeld. (1993) Improper Movement &Unambiguous Binding. U, 24, 461-508.

N( Chiosain, M. (1991) Topics in the Phonology of Irish. Ph.D.dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst

Noonan, M. (1992) Case & Syntactic Geometry. Ph.D. dissertation,McGill University.--- (1994a) VP internal and VP external AgraP: evidence from Irish.

In S. Preuss (Ed.) Proceedings ofWCCFL 13. Stanford: CSLI.--- (1994b) The That-trace Filter and Wh-Agreement in Irish. Talk

International Conference on Language in Ireland; ms. UniversityCollege, Dublin.

6 Huallachain, c., & M. 6 MurchU (1976) Irish Grammar. Coleraine:New University of Ulster.

6 Siadhail, M. (1980) Learning Irish. Dublin: Dublin Institute forAdvanced Studies.--- (1989)Modern Irish: Grammatical structure and dialectal variation.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

6 Murchu, M. (1985) The Irish Language. Department of Foreign Affairs& Bord na Gaeilge.

Ouhalla, J. (1988) The Syntax of Head Movement: A Study of Berber.Ph.D. dissertation, University College, London.--- (1990) Sentential Negation, Minimality and the Aspectual Status ofAuxiliaries. The Linguistic Review, 7, 183-231.--- (1991) Functional Categories and Parametric Variation. London:Routledge.--- (1994) Verb Movement andWord Order in Arabic. In D. Lightfoot

& N. Hornstein (Eds.), Verb Movement. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Paul, H. (1920) Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte (5th Edition ed.).TUbingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Pesetsky, D. (1987) WH-in-situ: Movement and Unselective Binding. InE. Reuland & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), The Representation of(In)definiteness. (pp. 98-129). Cambridge: MIT Press.--- (1989) Language-particular Processes and the Earliness Principle.ms., MIT.

Pinker, S. (1994) The Language Instinct. New York: Morrow.Platzack, C. & A. Holmberg (1989) The Role of AGR and Finiteness inSome European Languages. (Ed.) Working Papers in ScandinavianSyntax, 42, 25-43, University of Lund.

354 REFERENCES

Pollock, J.-Y. (1981) On Case and Impersonal Constructions. In R. May& J. Koster (Eds.), Levels of Syntactic Representation, 219-252.Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Pollock, J.-Y. (1985) On Case and the Syntax of Infinitives in French. InJ. Gucron, H. Obenauer, & J.-Y. Pollock (Eds.), GrammaticalRepresentation. (pp. 293-326). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.--- (1988) [1989] Verb-movement, UG, and the Structure of IP. ms.,Universite de Haute Bretagne. Rennes. Revised version in LinguisticInquiry, 20, 365-424.

Pullum, G. (1985) Assuming Some Version of X'-Theory. In 20thRegional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. pp. 323-353.CLS.

Pullum, G. (1991) English Nominal Gerund Phrases as Noun Phraseswith Verb-Phrase Heads. Linguistics, 29, 763-799.

Ramchand, G. (1993) Aspect Phrase in Modem Scottish Gaelic. InProceedings of NELS 23. GLSA: University of Massachussetts­Amherst.

Rhys Jones, T. (1977) Living Welsh. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Ritter, E. (1987) NSO noun-phrases in a VSO language. In J. McDonough& B. Plunkett (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 17, 521-537. GLSA:University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Ritter, E. (1988) A Head-Movement Approach to Construct-State NounPhrases. Linguistics, 26, 909-929.--- (1991) Two Functional Categories in Noun-Phrases: Evidencefrom Modem Hebrew. In S. Rothstein (Ed) Syntax and SemanticsPerspectives on Phrase-Structure. New York: Academic Press.--- (1993) Cross-Linguistic Evidence for Number Phrase. ms.,University of Calgary.

Rizzi, L. (1982) Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.--- (1990) Relativized Minimality. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.

(1991) Residual Verb-Second and the WH-Criterion. ms.,University of Geneva.--- (1992) Early Null Subjects and Root Null Subjects. (Ed.) Geneva

Generative Papers 0.1-2., University ofGeneva.(1993) Some Notes on Linguistic Theory and Language

Development. ms., University ofGeneva.---, & I. Roberts (1989) Complex Inversion in French. Probus, 1, 1­30.

Roberts, I. (1985) Agreement Parameters and the Development of EnglishModal Auxiliaries. Natural Language and Unguistic Theory, 3,21­58.--- (1987) The Representation ofImplicit and Dethematized Subjects.Dordrecht: Foris.

REFERENCES 355

--- (1993) Verb and Diachronic Syntax. DoIdrecht: Kluwer AcademicPublishers.--- (1994) Two Types of Head Movement in Romance. In D.Lightfoot & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Verb Movement. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

---, & U. Shlonsky (forthcoming) Pronominal Enclisis in VSOLanguages. In R. Borsley & I. Roberts (Eds.), The Syntax of theCeltic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rotenberg, J. (1978) The Syntax ofPhonology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Rouveret, A. (1990) X-bar Theory, Minimality and Barrierhood in Welsh.In R. Hendrick (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 23: The Syntax of theModern Celtic Languages. New York: Academic Press.--- (1991) Functional Categories and Agreement. The Linguistic

Review, 8, 353-387.---, & J.-R. Vergnaud (1980) Specifying Reference to the Subject.

Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 97-203.Saftr, K. (1984) Multiple Variable Binding. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 603­638.

Saito, M., & H. Hoji (1983) Weak Crossover and Move- in Japanese.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, I, 245-260.

Schmidt, C. (1994) Satzstruktur und Verbbewegung: eine minimalistischeanalyse zur internen Syntax der IP (Inflection Phrase) im Deutschen.Ph.D. dissertation, UniversiUit zu KOin.

Sells, P. (1984) Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns. Ph.D.dissertation, University ofMassachusetts at Amherst

Shaw, W. (1778) An Analysis of the Galic Language (Second ed.).Edinburgh: R. Jamieson.

Shlonsky, U. (1990) Pro in Hebrew Subject Inversion. linguistic Inquiry,21(2), 273-276.

---(1992) Resumptive Pornouns as A Last Resort. Linguistic Inquiry,23, 443-468.

Speas, M. (1990) Phrase Structure in Natural Language. Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Spencer, A. (1991) Morphological Theory. Oxford and Cambridge, MA:Basil Blackwell.

Sportiche, D. (1988) A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and Its Corollariesfor Constituent Structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 425-450.--- (1990) Movement, Agreement and Case. University of California,Los Angeles.--- (1992) Clitic Constructions. ms., University of California, LosAngeles.

Sproat, R. (1982) Redundancy Rules and Welsh Mutation. ms., MIT.--- (1985) Welsh Syntax and VSO structure. Natural Language and

Linguistic Theory, 3, 173-216.

356 REFERENCES

---, & C. Shih (1991) The Crosslinguistic Distribution of AdjectiveOrdering Restrictions. In C. Georgopoulos & R. Ishihara (Eds.),Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: Essays in Honor ofS.-Y.Kuroda. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Stenson, N. (1981) Studies in Irish Syntax. Tubingen: Gunter NarrVerlag.--- (1989) Irish Autonomous Impersonals. Natural Language and

Linguistic Theory, 7,379-406.Stephens, J. (1982) Word Order in Breton. Ph.D. dissertation, Universityof London.

Stowell, T. (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.--- (1982) The Tense ofInfinitives. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 561-570.--- (1989) Raising in Irish and the Projection Principle. Natural

Language and Linguistic Theory, 7, 317-359.---, & H. Lasnik (1987) Weakest Crossover. ms., UCLA andUConnecticut.

Stump, G. (1984) Agreement vs. Incorporation in Breton. NaturalLanguage and Linguistic Theory, 2, 289-348.

Swingle, K. (1992) The Irish and Other Mutations. In J. Mead (Ed.),WCCFL 11. CSLI: Stanford Linguistics Association.

Takezawa, K. (1987) A Configurational Approach to Case Marking inJapanese. Ph.D. Dissertation, University ofWahsington.

Tallerman, M. (1990a) Relativization Strategies: NP Accessibility inWelsh. Journal ofLinguistics, 26,291-314.--- (1990b) VSO Word-Order and Consonantal Mutation in Welsh.

Linguistics, 28, 398-416.--- (1992) Clause-Structure, the Agr Projection, and Case Marking inWelsh. ms., University of Durham.

Tallerman, M. (forthcoming) Fronting Constructions in Welsh. In R.Borsley & I. Roberts (Eds.), The Syntax of the Celtic Languages.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Timm, L.A. (1988) Relative clause formation in Breton. Word, 39, 79­107.

Travis, L. (1984) Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. PhDdissertation, MIT.(1991a) Parameters of Phrase Structure and Verb-Second

Phenomena. In R. Friedin (Eds.), Principles and Paramters inComparative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.--- (1991b) Derived Objects, Inner Aspect and the Structure of VP.

NELS 21.--- (forthcoming) Inner Aspect and the Structure of VP. (working

title). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Tremblay, M. (1991) Possession and Datives. Ph.D. Dissertation, McGillUniversity.

REFERENCES 357

Uriagereka, J. (1993) Why do Clitics move Where? Talk delivered atGoing Romance, December 1993.

Vainikka, A. (1989) Deriving Syntactic Representations in Finnish. Ph.D.Dissertation, University ofMassachusetts at Amherst.--- (1992) Case in the Development of English Syntax. ms.,University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Valois, D. (1991) The Internal Syntax of DP and Adjective Placement inFrench and English. In NELS 21., 367-382. GLSA: University ofMassachusetts at Amherst.

Vergnaud, J.-R. (1974) French Relative Clauses. Ph.D. Dissertation,MIT.

---, & M.L. Zubizarreta (1990) On the Form and Interpretation ofDefinite Noun-Phrases. ms., USc.

---, & M.L. Zubizarreta (1992) The Definite Determiner andInalienable Constructions in French and English. Linguistic Inquiry,23(4), 595-652.

Vikner, S. (1990) Verb Movement and the Licensing of NP-positions inthe Germanic Languages. Ph. D. dissertation, Universite de Geneve.

Visser, F.T. (1963-1973) An Historical Syntax of the English Language.Leiden: EJ. Brill.

Ward, A. (1974) The Grammatical Structure of Modem Irish. Doctoralthesis, Dublin University.

Williams, E. (1994) Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MITPress.

Woolford, E. (1991) VP-internal Subjects in VSO and NonconfigurationalLanguages. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 503-540.

Wunderlich, D. (1993) Funktionale Kategorien im Lexikon. In F.Beckmann & G. Heyer (Eds.), Theorie und Praxis des Lexikons. (pp.54-73). Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Zanuttini, R. (1990) Two Types of Negative Markers. In Proceedings ofNELS 20. pp. 517-530. University ofMassachusetts at Amherst.--- (1991) Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation. A ComparativeStudy of Romance Languages. Ph.D. dissertation, Univerity ofPennsylvania.--- (1993) Re-examining Negative Clauses. ms., GeorgetownUniversity.

Zubizarreta, M.L., & J.-R. Vergnaud (1991) The Definite Determiner andthe Inalienable Constructions in English and French. ms., USc.

Zwart, C.J. (1992) Verb Movement and Complementizer Agreement. ms.,MIT and University ofGroningen.

358 REFERENCES

Zwicky, A. (1984) Welsh Soft Mutation and the Case ofObject NPs. In J.Drogo, V. Mishra, & D. Testen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20thRegional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. pp. 387-402.Chicago: CLS.

INDEX OF NAMES AND SUBJECTS

-A­

a chble, 50, 51,150A- VS. A'-positionA-movement, 287

Abney, S.(1987), 38, 138, 181

ach, 5, 155, 157, 181, 198,214achan, 215, 242,261,328Acquaviva, P.(1989, 1990), 45, 72

Acquisition, 1-4, 15,25,33-37Adger, D.(1994, forthcoming), 128, 131

Adjacencylinear, 84, 278, 315fT.

Adjective Phrasesadjunct vs. specifier distinction,294,296, 300fT., 317fT.

ICM effects, 270fT.ordering restrictions, 18, 295fT.,322

placement, 25, 288, 294-297,300

placement in Semitic, 299Adjunct, 24, 36, 57, 60, 77, 78,171, 199,215, 219fT. 242,261

Adjunction, 5, 22, 23, 25, 28, 56passim, 107, 135, 144, 179,184,207,225,226rightward, see also Postposing267,267,293,329

Adverbs, 16,25, 57fT., 199order of, 40, 77placement, 40,53, 56fT, 81, 87,164, 199,213,261

Affix, 8, 12, 32-4, 92fT, 307, 310bound morpheme, 32, 306suffix, 34, 92ff., 269ff., 285

359

ag,9, 10,47,67, 79,93,94, III,123,124,146-151,155-162,180, 181, 190, I97ff. 213ff,229ff

Agr, see Functional ProjectionsAgreement, Spec-Head, 30ff., 108,205,231

agus, 5, 79, 119, 123, 125, 14Iff.,222, 232ff, 279,291,298,324

ag :::::;> aL Rule, 239-244, 252ff., 263,264

aL, 167, 190,277as complementizer?, I82ff.Alienability, 284aN, 171,208Anderson, S.(1992),33(1993),37Anderson & Chung (1977), 196

Aoun, J.(1978),232,332(1979),30,38,229(1981),227,263Aoun et at. (1987), 28Aoun & Li (1989, 1993), 192

Arabic, 57, 111,232,268,285,287,288,289,300,332

Aspect see also FunctionalProjectionsaspectual morphology, 6, 33, 37,49, 92-95, 234-236, 259

Atkinson, M.(1992),37

Autonomous Verb see VerbsAuxiliarymodal auxiliary, 6, 36, 148, 167

Awbery, G.(1990),204

360 INDEX OF NAMES AND SUBJECTS

-8-

Baker, C. L.(1970), 132(1991), II

Baker, M.(1985, 1988), 13, 27, 33, 253Baker, Johnson & Roberts(1989),52

Hale and Baker (1990), IIIBall, M.Ball & Miiller(1992), 128, 129

Bantu, 12Bayer, 1.(1983-4), 34

Belletti, A.(1992, 1994), 104

Benrnamoun, E.(1991, 1992), 11,53,134,207

Bennan, R.(1987),332

Berwick, R.Berwick & Weinberg (1984),138

Bierwisch, M.(1963),253

binary-branching'. See X'-TheoryBinding Theory, 3, 50, 149, 216,261

Blake, B.Mallinson & Blake (1981), 196

Bobaljik, J.Bobaljik & Carnie (1992,forthcoming), 38, 61 fT., 114,115,131,205, 247ff., 261

Carnie & Bobaljik (1993), 61,114

Jonas & Bobaljik (1993), 69, 93,165

Borer, H.(1984), 129,227,244,268,284,332

(1988), 255, 268, 332Borsley, R.

(1984),262(1987),45(1991),5(1993),227Borsley & Tallennan (1993), 45,129

Borsley el al. (forthcoming), 38Bowers, J.(1990, 1993), 146

Breton, 43, 129, 191,263

-e-Calder, S.(1923),72,176

Cardinaletti, A.Cardinaletti & Roberts (1991),37,58,64,69,156

Carnie, A.Bobaljik & Carnie ( 1992,forthcoming), 38, 61 ff., 114,115,131,205, 247ff., 261

Carnie & Bobaljik (1993), 61,114

Carnie & Harley (1994), 124,133, 139

Caseassignment/checking in noun­phrases, 267

absorption, 263accusative, 116, 117, 226ff., 246,263

assignment/checking, 5, 30, 38,94, 109, 118, 221, 250, 253,256,260

conunon,270ff, 320'Common in Fonn, Genitive inFunction (CIFGIF), 252, 263,321

Exceptional Case Marking(ECM), 70, 80, 222

genitive, 221 ff., 252, 253, 263fT.,285,320,332

INDEX OF NAMES AND SUBJECTS 361

nOrrUnative, ]64,221,228,262fT., 289, 332

Visibility Condition, 38, 194-196,213,221,229,260

Case Condition, 201, 202Causative, 2]5, 242,243,264Celtic, 13, ]5, 40, 43, 48, 52, 129,]43, 168, 191, 196,206

cha(n), 135cheana, 60, 130Chomsky, N.(1957, 1965), 2(198]),3,8, 15,27,30,38,2]6,2]9,229

(I 986a), 3, 56(I986b), 16, 160(]988a, 1989), ] 1-13, 33(1988b),5(1992, 1993), 3, 28, 33ff., 113,

12~ 131,205,24~267

(1994), 37, 283Christian Brothers, The(1990), 123, 133, 136, 169, 189,263,270,314,320

Chung. S.Chung & McCloskey (1987), 5,24,43, 60ff., 78, 79, 97, 101,130, 14Iff., 221, 235, 262

Cinque, G.(1990), ]60,215,216(1993), 292ff., 332Classifier Elements see alsoFunctional Projections, 295,305, 306, 323ff.

Clause-types'small clauses', 5,43,65,66, 78­80, 132, ]42fT, 19],204,205,221,222,235,236

finite, 14, ]6,23,24,29, 40ff.,I ]4fT., 182fT, 213fT., 236,237, 249-25] fT.

infinitival, 43, 144fT., 166,204,205, 2] 1fT., 236, 240fT.,252fT.

root clauses, 92, 174, 177fT.,185, 194,208

Clitic, 22, 23, 51, 69, 70, 80, 158,179,182, 188fT., 204,227,238,244,263,268,297,298, 305fT.,322'POSS', 189,227,237,277,305,312fT.

Complementizers, 6,58, 71, 87- 89,101-107, 124, 132, 137, 141,152,154, 173fT., 181, 185, 187,200,208

Comrie, B.(1981), 18Keenan & Comrie (1977), 170

Construct State Nominals (CSN),232, 233, 266fT., 282fT., 299,302,305, 315fT.multiply-embedded CSNs, 285,305,320,321

special lexical forms in, 284vs. Free Genitives, 283-287, 293,302-304, 312

Contrastive and Emphatic Particles,297-299

Copular Constructions, 123fT, 139Cornish, 129Cottell, S.(1994),39

Crisma, P.(1990), 292, 295

Cross-Categorial Harmony, 18,35,267,268,287,288

-D­

De Bhaldraithe, T.(1975), 122

Declension Class, 269, 271Definitenessand ICM, 269fT.and Prepositions, 273fT.

Defmiteness EfTect, 63, 64, 197,213,232,233,263

362 INDEX OF NAMES AND SUBJECTS

DeFreitas, L.DeFreitas & Noonan (1991),169,205,243

Demonstrative Elements see alsoFunctional ProjectionsDO, DP, 268, 305, 313, 314, 315,

322Deprez, V.Deprez & Hale (1986), 55

Derbyshire, D.(1977), 17Derbyshire & Pullum (1981), 17

Determineras Mutation Trigger, 275, 276placement, 266, 268

dha,88, 146, 147,277,278,317,318,323,324,326,327,329

Dialect variationMunster, 107, 119, 175,211,251,257,273Northern vs. Southern, 15, 80,107, 108, 115-118ff., 132,137,145,150,210,222-227,257-259ff.,262,273,316

prepositions and, 273Diesing, M.(1992),63

d', do, -r, 92ff., 133,214Doherty, C.(1992), 122, 133

Dooley Collberg, S.(19901991),5,55,60(1991),61, 109, 137,261

Dutch, 53, 69, 71, 73, 80, 81Duffield, N.(1989),262(1990a), 55ff., 108, 109, 117,134, 138

(1991b), 136,332(1993b), 83, 201, 209(1994),138(forthcoming b.), 131,263,265,332

(in prep. a.), 123

(in prep. b.), 205, 229(in prep. c.), 263, 304, 328, 330

-E-

Eclipsis. See Initial ConsonantMutation (ICM)

Economy, 28, 105,206,221,244,247,310,315

EisenbeiB, S.(1994),77, 165

Emonds, J.(1980),55(1992),19,286

Empty Category Principle (ECP),28, 38, 50, 79, 159, 160

Endocentricity, 17, 146English, 6, 9, 10, 12, 17,29-32,38,39,50,52,60,89,93, 112, 123,131,132,164,197,201-205,213-229,233,240,249,250,262,264,296,301

Ernst, T.(1992),60, 70, 75,314,332

Evans, G.Gazdar & Evans (1990),333

Everett, D.(1987,227,263(1987),227,263

Expletives, 216, 262Extraction, 50, 143, 151,215,234,239

-F-

Fabb, N.(1984),306

Fabri, R.(1993),268,284, 300ff., 311,332

[as, 214, 215, 242, 243Featuresweak vs. strong, 31, 104, 137,158,310,313

fein, 60, 66, 146, 198, 200

INDEX OF NAMES AND SUBJECTS 363

Fellbawn, C.Kegl & Fellbawn (1988), 262

Fillmore, C.(1968),4, 7, 8, 37, 247

Finiteness, 70, 81Fitzmaurice, G.Kiberd & Fitzmaurice (1991),133

French, 71, 73, 87, 94,104,134,202,236,253,254,256,265,295,297

Fukui, N.Fukui & Speas (1986), 12

Function~ Projections, 5ff.AgrP in the Noun-Phrase 293ff.305ff., 318ff,

AgIO, AgIOP, 12,62,84, 114,116,137,145,150,156,210,231, 245ff, 248, 249, 265

AgrS, AgrSP, 12,36,62,84,108-118, 126ff., 137ff., 164,195,205,210,228,230,247­250,258,288

AspP, 14,33,54,62-65,74,76,82, 116, 131, 228ff., 246ff.

Co, CP, 8, 9, 26, 37, 54ff., 73,77ff, 97, 98, 105, 106, 126,130, 132, 141, 142, 152ff.,177, 183ff., 194, 195,203passim, 332

DO, DP, 9, 10, 21 passim, III,227fT., 252ff., 270 ff., 300ff.

head vs. specifier (gan), 1581°, IP, 8ff., 30, 31, 56-58, 70

passim. 144, 152, 159,204NegO, NegP, II, 13,82-84, 101­107fT., 135, 153-158, 162,I79ff., 201, 205,211, 317

Nmrlo, NmrIP, 327ff.Nwn°, NumP, 299, 308ff.ordering, 13, 34 passim, 123ff,134, 188,261,267

1"', TP, II, 13,24,25,33,53,54,62,64,65, 71ff., 101-108,

114ff., 131ff., 153ff., 159­165, 167ff., 188-197, 199­205ff.,250, 288, 317

W", WP, 24, 27, 65, 71fT, 80ff.,105-107, 119fT., 134, 141,153,167, 174fT., 202ff.

Fusion, 95, 124,281

--G-

gach, 23, 135, 153, 154, 168,261,328

gan, 46, 47, 88, 103ftf., 126, 134ftf.,137, 140ff., 182,203-205,256,276,291.as complementizer?, 143, I52ff.blocking efTect, 159

Gazdar, G.(1992),333Gazdar & Evans (1990),333

GB approach, see also Minim~ism,

34,225,307gender-marking, 265, 269-273 289,305,316,325

Germanic, 40, 42, 55, 64, 71 ff.,191,209

German, 17, 18, 53, 58, 63-65ff.,87,94,134,165,174,191-195,209,236,253,295,296,327,328

Giorgi, A.Giorgi & Longobardi (1991),292

Glinert, L.(1989),284,300,301,311,312,332

go, gur, 58, 59, 86ff., 99, 198Government, 27fT., 50, 79, 108,129,149,158-161,215,219,226,233, 240, 258ff., 310

Greenberg, J.(1963, 1966), 18(1972),327

Grewendorf, G.

364 INDEX OF NAMES AND SUBJECTS

Grewendorf& Wilder (1991),253

Guilfoyle, E.(1988),287,305,332(1990),12,55,70,137,260,261(1993,1994),61,117,257,261Guilfoyle et al (1992), 17

Gussman, E.(1986),46

-H-

h-, 42, 43, 91, 148, 149,237,245,270-273ff., 324

Habitual, see also Aspect, 92ff.Haegeman L. (199Ia), 5, 27, 205(199Ia), 5,27(l99Ib, 1992),27, 158,201(forthcoming), 102

Haider, H.(1985), 130, 209

Hale, K.(1989),338McCloskey & Hale (1983,1984),109ff., 136ftf., 149,244,298

Deprez & Hale (1986),55Hale & Baker (1990), III

Halle, M.Halle & Marantz (1993), 33, 35,39,93,98

Hannahs, S.-J.(1993),46

Harley, H.Carnie & Harley (1994),124,133, 139

Harlow, S.(1981), 143, 168,205(1989), 45, 50, 129

Harris, J

(1994), 127Hawkins, J.(1990,1995),37,131

Head Movement, see alsoFunctional Projections, 25, 29,32,34,37CO-lowering, 28, 37, 38, 56, 57,66,97,98,130,257

NegO-raising,98, 105, 134, 135,157,158,182, 184,207,317

N°-raising, 285fT, 299, 304fT,Numo-raising, 328yO-AgrS, 109yO_1°, 49, 55, 81yo_CO, 49, 55ff, 81Verb-raising, 30, 35, 55, 145,287

Hebrew, 57, 268, 284ff, 312,332Henry, A.(1991),204,262(1992, forthcoming), 62, 163,164

Hirakawa, Y.(1994), 164

Holmberg, A.(1986), 115Platzack & Holmberg (1989), 53,71

Holmberg's Generalization, 115Hornstein, N.Aoun et al. (1987), 28Lightfoot & Hornstein (1994),160

Hung, H.Guilfoyle et al (1992), 17

Hyams, N.(1994), 165

-1-

Iattidou, S.(1990),11

Icelandic, 37, 69, 156, 165Imperative, 43, 136Impersonal constructions 133,255,256

Incorporation

INDEX OF NAMES AND SUBJECTS 365

vs. Agreement, 111, 113, 137,149,252ff.

Independent vs. Dependent Verb­Fonns, see Verbs

1NFL see also FunctionalProjections, 8ff., 38, 49, 54, 60,75ff., 101, 108, 132, 134, 144ff.,159-161SPLIT-INFL Hypothesis, 11, 12,38,60

Initial Consonant Mutation (ICM),15, 40-43ff., 83, 91, 122, 127,129, 180, 185,222,270,285,315, 323, 326absence of, 89,140,152,157'anti-lenition', 43, 90, 237, 270-277,324

eclipsis, 15, 42ff., 83ff., 106,107, 122ff., 151, 157, 166,173, 179, 207, 237, 272ff.,327,331

F-mutation I'S. L-mutation, 273­282, 315-317, 321-324fT.,

lenition, 42-47, 55, 84fT., 90fT.,125, 129, 133-138fT., 151 fT166,179,180,190,207,210,222,223,237,240,267­282ff., 318-324, 327

Mutation Hypothesis, 54, 55,83ff., 122-127ff, 132, 137fT.,151ff., 165-167, 173,179,182, 187, 203, 247, 260fT

Welsh Soft Mutation, 45, 50, 129Interrogative see also RelativeClause, 8, 43, 96, 132, 137, 140,153,166,169,177,180

is, ha, 4, 15,29,61,67, 79, 80, 88,96, 103, 117, 123-125, 137ff.,164,204, 211fT., 237, 245fT.,277,328

Italian, 102, 104, 109, 158, 215­219,295,296,305

-J-

JackendofT, R.(1977), 17(1987, n.d.), 262

Jaeggli, O.(1982),227(1986),52,244,306

Japanese, 12, 17, 18, 164, 165,202,327

Johnson, K.(1991),69,131,286Baker, Johnson & Roberts(1989),52

Jonas, D.Jonas & Bobaljik (1993), 69, 93,165

-K-

Katz, J.Katz & Postal (1964), 132

Kayne, R.(1984), 15(1989), 188(1993), 20ff., 38, 40, 49, 54, 66,107,119, 128, 142, 143, 184,204,205,283,286

Keenan, E.Keenan & Comrie (1977), 170

Kegl, J.Kegl & Felbaum (1988), 262

Kiberd, D.Kiberd & Fitzmaurice (199\),133

Kitagawa, Y.(1986),7

Kitawa, Y.(1986), 146

Klima, E.(1964), 134

Koch, A.(1991),27

Koizumi, A.(1993),14,115,131,248

366 INDEX OF NAMES AND SUBJECTS

Koopman, H.(1990),69Koopman & Sportiche (1988,1991), 7, 30, 69, 108,225

Komai, A.Komai & Pullum, 15

Kratzer, A.(1989),63

Kroch, A.(1989), 132

Kubo, M.(1992), 164

Kuno, S.(1973), 164

Kuroda, S.-Y.(1985, 1986),7, 146

-L---

Laka, I.(1990),200

Larson, R.(1988),15, 147

Lasnik, H.Lasnik & Saito (1984), 215

Lebeaux, D.(1988), 130

Lema, J.Lema & Rivero (1990), 38

Lenition. See Initial ConsonantMutation (lCM)

Level of RepresentationLF, 31, 32, 38, 54,104,106,113, 118, 135, 158, 229,242ff.,267,291,295,299

PF, 31, 56Lightfoot, D.Aoun el 01. (1987),28Lightfoot & Hornstein (1994),160

Linearity, see also Kayne (1993),20-25,37,38,66,98, 130, 143,184-186,205,330

Linebarger, M.

(1987),200Lobel, E.(1990),292,309,327,332

Locality Effects, 26ff., 139Longobardi, G.Giorgi & Longobardi (1991),292

Lyons, C.(1992),332

-M-

Mahajan, A.(1990),163

mairs/eon, 214, 217, 230, 242passim

Malagasy, 17Mallinson, G.Mallinson & Blake (1981), 196

Maltese, 268, 284ff, 311, 332Manx, 129Marantz, A.(forthcoming), 27 passim, 249,265,310

Halle & Marantz (1993),33passim, 93, 98

mba, see is, ba, 125, 126McCawley, 1.(1970),7,8

McCloskey, 1.(1979),87,89, 129, 140,205,239

(1980),117,211(1983),37,239(1986), 109(1990),99,129,141-144,160,172ff., 182, 243

(1991a, 1991b), 112(199Ic), 137,260,262(1992a, forthcoming a.), 16,55ff., 197

Chung & McCloskey (1987), 5,24,43, 60ff., 101, 130, 141­165ff, 235, 262

INDEX OF NAMES AND SUBJECTS 367

McCloskey & Hale (1983, 1984),109,136,149,244,298

McCloskey & Sells (1988),5,211,221ff.

Middle Irish, 72Millward, C.(1989), 132

Minimalism, 3, 28-3 Iff., 57fI, 71,79,81,93, 109, 113-115, 137,142, 158,225,228, 247ff, 295,304ff.Economy, 28, 105,206,221,244,247,310,315

feature-checking, 34, 106, 205,248,249

Greed, 71, 113,267,287,294Procrastinate, 32, 104,250,267Shortest Movement, see alsoEconomy, 28, 105, 115, 116,129, 136,247ff.

Spell-Out, 31 ff., 62, 73, 84, 104,105,131,135,137,229,277,295,310,313

Minimality, 26-29, 38, 116, 138ff,161,162,184,185,205,330Relativized, 27, 28, 38, 134, 138,142-144, 158fT., 184, 185,205, 215fT

Mirror Principle, see also Baker(1985,1988),33-35,135

Mohammad, M.(1988),268,284-287,305,332(1989),57

Mood, 7, 34, 37, 88fT., IIIMuller, G.Muller & Stemefe1d (1993), 65,130,134,174,191-195,208,209

Muller, N.Ball & Muller (1992), 128, 129

Mutation Hypothesis See InitialConsonant Mutation

-Nt­

Ni Chiosain, M.(1991), 128

-N-

nach, nor, 23, 24, 29, 41 ff., 55,86ff., 98ff., 124, 134, 141, 153,168,181-186, 197, 198,200,207fT.

Narrative-Fronting constructions,see also Topicalization, 57, 83,154, 166, 186, 187,191,196,197, ]98,200

Negation, 6, 7, 11,23,37,46,47,56,83,100-107, ]24, 126,132fT., 151-]58, ]65, ]66, 181­]87,199-203,210seealsogannegative comp1ementizers, 105,107,134, ]52, 183, ]85, ]86,200,207

Negative Polarity, 3, 56, 57,197,200-202, 209

Neg-Criterion, 34, 205NegP see Functional Projections

NegO-raising. See Head Movementni. nior, 23, 4] fT, 56, 61, 64, 72,74, 84fT., 99-105, 112, 113, ]28,130fT., 153fT., ]68, 179, 183­]87, 197, 198-201,207,214,217,241,261,262,317,332

Noonan, M.(1992),14,49,60-62,117,247,260,261

(1994a), 14,84, 115, 116, 136,213,248,257

(1994b), 29, 143, 172, 205, 206,207,244

DeFreitas & Noonan (1991),169,205,243

NP-movement see also A VS. A'­position, 12, 13, 30, 34, 247, 291

Number

368 INDEX OF NAMES AND SUBJECTS

agreement, 109, III, 118, 326,328,330

Numeralsplacement, 277, 278, 286, 306,309, 317, 322-330

and ICM, 277

-6---oHuallachain, C.oHuallachain & 0 Murchu(1976),43,88,112,123,124,136, 139, 206, 24 I, 244, 263,324

oMurchU, D.(1985), 132oMurchu, M.oHuallachain & 0 Murchu(1976), see above

oSiadhail, M.(1989), 19,43,66,76,77,78,118,122,130,131,171,197,206,223,263,269,273

Objects, see also FunctionalProjections, AgrO, AgrOPobject agreement, 12direct, 45, 47,50, 170, 173,206,213, 223, 233, 240ff., 259,263

indirect, 42, 173, 24 IObject-Shift, see also NP­movement, 12,67,69, 75,115, 116

Old English, 224Old Irish, 45, 72, 73, 206Optative Constructions, 87Ouhalla, J.(1990,1991), I 1,13,33,53,134,307

-p-

Partitive Constructions, 325, 330

Passive, 12,30,52, 137,254,259,260

Paul, H.(1920), I

Pinker, S.(1994),2

Platzack, C.Platzack & Holmberg (1989), 53,71

Pollock, J.-Y.(1981),265(1988, 1989), II, 49, 53, 62,10Iff., 134, 188,254

Possessor Noun Phrase see alsoConstruct State Nominal, 19, 24,170, 173,206,23~233,255,266-268, 284ff.,332

Postal, P.Katz & Postal (1964), 132

PostposingPronoun Postposing, 22, 24, 40,47,49, 66ff., 119, 129, 132,189, 191,204,207,237,261,263

Subject Postposing, 19, 49, 64,121, 136

Predicatesadjectival & nominal, 79, 96,100,132, 139, 148

Prepositions, 6, 18,24,43,47,77,126, 129, 136, 138, 140, 149,151,152,157,170,206,214,234-236ff., 261-263, 270- 284,291,302,306,307,316as Mutation Triggers, 276ICM properties, 276

Proclitic elements, 14,42,43,46,92,95,122,126,222,225,236­238,244,298,305,306proclitic vs. enclitic, 305, 306

pro-licensing. See Incorporation vs.

Agreement, also PronounsPronouns

INDEX OF NAMES AND SUBJECTS 369

PRO, 116, 117, 129, 132, 148, 161,21 Iff., 223, 224, 236, 252ff.

Pronouns, see also Postposing,'Pronoun-Postposing'object, 24,42,47, 53, 58,66,80,237

possessive, 189, 227, 277, 305pro, 82,109, 111, 129, 136, 137,149, 171, 173, 188, 189,227,244,260,262,298,299,310

subject, 50, 58, 112, 189,264weak, 64-70tT, 129

Pullum, G.(1991),227Derbyshire & Pullum (1981), 17Kornai & Pullum (1990), 15

-Q-

Quantifier expressions, 51, 135,305,309,323,328

-R-

Raising verbs, 148Ramchand, G.(1993), 128, 131

Referentiality, see also Theta­Theory, 14, 167, 189,216-221,227,244,261,263,313

Relative Clauses'direct' relatives, 72, 73, 167,172, 179fT., 200, 206, 207,246

'indirect' relatives, 51, 89, 98,106, 140, 158, 185, 187,207,244

al. relatives vs. aN relatives, 171,208

Responsive Constructions, 60, 112,251

Restrucnuing,253,256Resumptive Pronouns, see alsoRelative Clauses, 51, 170-173,185-189,207-209, 240ff.,265

Rhys Jones, T.(1977),45

Rightward Movement see alsoKayne (1993), 19,24,49,66,67,70, 78, 80, 98, 119, 129, 130­132,263,267,286,291,294,296, 303, 326ff

Ritter, E.(1987,1988),268,287,305,332(1991),293,308,332

Rivero, M.-L.Borsley et 01. (forthcoming), 38Lema & Rivero (1990),38

Rizzi, L.(1982), 109(1990),27,28,38, 134, 138,158,160-163,215-218

(1992),37,165(1993),62, 134Rizzi & Roberts (1989), 143

Roberts, l.(1985), 102, 132(1987),52(1993),35,143,160, 163(1994),38,205Baker, Johnson & Roberts(1989),52

Cardinaletti & Roberts (1991 ),37, 58,64,69, 156

Rizzi & Roberts (1989), 143Roberts & Shlonsky(forthcoming), III, 113, 189

Romance, 12,64,94,103,107,157,188,216,229,296,301

Rotenberg, 1.(1978),46,95, 106, 133, 134,167,207

Rouveret, A.(1990),205ff.Rouveret & Vergnaud (1980), 38

-s-Saito, M.

370 INDEX OF NAMES AND SUBJECTS

Lasnik & Saito (1984), 215Scandinavian, 13 ISchmidt, C.(1994),63, 77

Scots Gaelic, 43, 99, 127, 128, 131,133,175,206

Scrambling, 39, 76, 209Selection

c(ategorial)-selection, 71, 214,219,262

Sells, P.(1984~ 143, 168,205,207McCloskey & Sells (1988), 5,211,221,225,226,227,228

Semitic, 13,25,53,57,268,269,283ff.,322

sea, sin, siM, 56, 59, 61, 64, 74,88, 103, 123, 124, 130, 139, 148,154, 155, 175, 181, 196, 197,198,200,202,222,235,264,275,311-314

serialization. See Adjectives,ordering restrictions

Shaw, W.(1778),40, 127, 128,210

Shih, C.Sproat & Shih (1991),295,296

Shlonsky, U.(1990, 1992),57,129Roberts & Shlonsky(forthcoming), III, 113, 189

'Singular Concord' in BelfastEnglish, 164

Speas, M.(1992), 15Fukui & Speas (1986), 12

Spell-Out. See Minimalism (MPLT)Spencer, A.(1991),263

Sportiche, D.(1990), 160(1992),69,160Koopman & Sportiche (1988,1991), 7, 30, 60, 69, 108,225

Sproat, R.(1982),46(1985),49,55Sproat & Shih (1991),295,296

Stenson(1981), 122, 125

Stenson, N.(1981),76,101,106,122fT.,133, 137

(1989), 133Stephens, J.Borsley et al. (forthcoming), 38

Stemefeld, W.Muller & Stemefeld (1993), 65,130,134,174,191-195,208,209

Stowell, T.(1981), 15(1982),204(1989),102,134,151,155

Subjects, 7, 9, 31 fT., 54, 60-33fT.,76,81, 108fT.,129, 149, 155ff.,206,209, 219ff., 235, 249, 250,258ff., 295, 298subject-extraction, 161

Swedish, 55Swingle, K.(1992),128

-T-

ta, bhi, 5,9, 10, 15,47, 77, 93, 94,111,123,124,130, 148ff., 180,190, 215ff., 233-239, 242ff., 281

Takezawa, K.(1987), 164

Tallerman, M.(I 990a), 45, 49, 50(1990b), 169,205,207(1992,1993),49

Borsley & Tallerman (1993),45,129

Tamil, 17tareis, 234, 235

INDEX OF NAMES AND SUBJECTS 371

Tense, 35, 49, 54, 71, 76,80,96,100,133-139,154, 177, 180,184,195,204,249,287past, 91, 95, 177present, 95, 135

Tense Morphologydo vs. r, 105, 164, 206, 246, 331

'theoretical motivation formovement', 11,32,34,48,49,62,71,104,109,130,131,137,139, 154,229,244,253,267,287,288,307,309

'timing' ofmovement, 31,157,283,291, 294, 299, 310

Timrn, L.(1988), 196

Topicalization, 166, 191-197,208,209topic position, 156, 195

Travis, L.(1984), 18,27,98, 130,209(1991b, forthcoming), 14,49,62,147,210,247

Guilfoyle el al (1992), 17

-u-Universal Grammar (UG), 1-5, 11­17,19-21,26-29,35,36,48,138,213,268

Uriagareka, J.(1993), 65, 69

-v-Vainikka, A.(1989,1992),231

Valois, D.(1991),292

Verb-Raising. See Head MovementVerbsAutonomous forms, 133Independentvs.IJependentVerb-Forms, 180, 181,208,232,244

synthetic vs. analytic forms, 109,111, 112, 113, 136, 137,251

transitive vs. intransitive, 20, 117,211,215,219,222,223,249,254,257

Verbal Complex, 16,verbal noun, 150, 189, 190,211,214, 222fT., 234fT, 238, 240,245, 252fT., 264

Vergnaud, J. -R.(1974),204,205Rouveret & Vergnaud (1980),38

VP'layered', 78, 147, 151

-w­Wackemagel, 58, 69, 72, 73Ward, A.(1974), 76, 77

Weak Crossover (WCO), 163, 165Weinberg, A.Aoun el al. (1987), 28Berwick & Weinberg (1984),138

Welsh, 43fT., 73, III, 128, 129,169,189,206-208,262,263

WH-Movement, 3, 38, 169, 173,191,208

Wilder, C.Grewendorf& Wilder (1991),253

Williams, E.(1994),37, 146

Woolford, E.(1991), 196

Word OrderNSO,287OV, 17, 144,225,226,248OVS,17SOVX, 17,18,115, 116,214,219ft, 260, 261

SVO,7, 10, 12, 17, 18,22,32,48,50,116,137,205

372 INDEX OF NAMES AND SUBJECTS

Verb-Second, 40, 42, 53,55,65,71,73,130,165,209

vas, 17vsax, 10, 13, 18,24,25, 49ff.,64,77,81,82,114,127, 129,205,213,287

VXS,49Wunderlich, D.(1993),11,33,34,93

-x-X'-Theory, 7, 16-19ff., 76,102,138ff, 152, 161, 196,200,205,228,251,267,297,301,316

-'Zr-

Zanuttini, R.(1990, 1991), 134(1993),101, 102, 104, 107, 157

Zwart, C.(1992), 53, 64, 69, 71, 80, 130,134,209

Zwicky, A.(1984),45