Date post: | 30-Aug-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | truongnhan |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 1
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area NProject: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks etworks (WPANs)(WPANs)
Submission Title: [DBO-CSK Proposal for IEEE802.15.4a]Date Submitted: [January 2005]Source: [(1) Kyung-Kuk Lee, (2) J.W.Chong, S.H.Yoon, J.D.Jeong, S.D.Kim, H.U.Lee]Company [(1) Orthotron Co., Ltd. (2) Hanyang University]Address [(1) 709 Kranz Techono, 5442-1 Sangdaewon-dong, Jungwon-gu, Sungnam-si,
Kyungki-do, Korea 462-120]Voice:[82-31-777-8198], FAX: [82-31-777-8199], E-Mail:[[email protected]]Re: [Response to Call for Proposal by IEEE802.15.4a]
Abstract: [This document has been submitted for an official proposal in January 2005. DBO-CSK Technology is proposed]
Purpose: [Proposal for the IEEE802.15.4a standard]Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 2
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
Differentially BiDifferentially Bi--OrthogonalOrthogonalChirpChirp--ShiftShift--Keying (Keying (DBODBO--CSKCSK))
Kyung-Kuk LeeOrthotron Co., Ltd.
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 3
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION2. M-ary DBO-CSK TECHNOLOGY3. GENERAL SOLUTION CRITERIA
3.1. Unit Manufacturing Cost/Complexity (UMC)3.2. General Definitions3.3. Signal Robustness3.4. Technical Feasibility3.5. Scalability
4. MAC PROTOCOL SUPPLEMENT4.1. MAC Enhancements and Modifications
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.1. Channel models and payload data5.2. Size and Form Factor5.3. PHY-SAP Payload Bit Rate and Data Throughput5.4. Simultaneously Operating Piconets5.5. Signal Acquisition5.6. System Performance5.7. Ranging5.8. Link Budget5.9. Sensitivity5.10. Power Management Modes5.11. Power Consumption5.12. Antenna Practicality
6. Conclusion
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 4
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
1. INTRODUCTION■ Low Power Consumption:
- Digital Tx 0.9mW / Rx 1.13mW @ 500Kbps Data-rate
■ Signal Robustness:- Orthogonal / Quasi-Orthogonal Signal Set are deployed- Robustness: Applicable in Heavy Multi-path, SOP- Low Correlation of Signal with Existing Air-Interfaces
■ Feasibility: 2.4GHz, 5.2/5.7GHz Band- Many existing commercial RF Solutions
■ Ranging: Based on Chirp Signal (TOA/TDOA)- Precision: less then 1m @ Eb/No=24dB
■ Size & Form Factor: Smaller than SD-Memory size
■ Low Cost / Low Complexity: Tx +Rx Baseband Digital (58K gates)
■ Advanced Sleep/Wake-up Capability
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 5
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
2. M-ary DBO-CSK TECHNOLOGY
Chirp SignalChirp Signal
0( ) Re exp[( ) ] [ ( ) ( )]2
BWchirp s chirp
chirp
s t t t u t u t TTωω θ
⎡ ⎤= + + × − −⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ω
SωBWω
t
t
( )chirps t
0( ) Re exp[( ) ] ( )2
BWchirp s RC chirp
chirp
s t t t p t TTωω θ
⎡ ⎤= + + × −⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
Linear Chirp: Rectangular Window
Linear Chirp: Raised-Cosine Window
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Correlation Property of Chirp Signal
Am
plitu
de
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 6
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
2. M-ary DBO-CSK TECHNOLOGY
Chirp vs ImpulseChirp vs Impulse
Chirp Signal
t
t
Chirp
Correlation
Impulse Radio
t
t
Time-Hopping
Correlation
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 7
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
2. M-ary DBO-CSK TECHNOLOGY
Chirp vs ImpulseChirp vs Impulse■ Similarities
■ Differences
Spread-Spectrum: Spreading Gain:- Chirp: Spectrum Spread Signal- Impulse: Need Specially Designed Direct-Sequence Code
High Correlation PeakWide-BandwidthResolvability of Multi-path
Cross-correlation Property:- Chirp: Inherently very low correlation peak Signal- Impulse: Need very long code-sequence to realize low cross-correlation peak
Signal Voltage:- Chirp: low voltage (required low battery voltage)- Impulse: need high peak voltage (required high battery voltage)
PAPR:- Chirp: PAPR = 3dB (Theoretical Minimum value) easily achievable high Eb- Impulse: very high PAPR need high-voltage / long-sequence for high Eb
Same Bandwidth:(Impulse Width) = (Width of Correlation of Chirp)
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 8
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
2. M-ary DBO-CSK TECHNOLOGY
Spectrum of SubSpectrum of Sub--Chirp SignalsChirp Signals
Waveform Spectrum
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 9
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
2. M-ary DBO-CSK TECHNOLOGY
ChirpChirp--ShiftShift--Keying (CSK) Signal sets for SOPKeying (CSK) Signal sets for SOPω
ω
ω
ω
I
II
III
IV
Each of CSK Signal consists of 4 sub-chirp signals.
I
II
III
IV
ω
ω
ω
ω
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 10
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
3 bits/symbol
Bi-Orthogonal SymbolMapping Table (M = 8)
Bi-Orthogonal Code(01,02,03,04)
Binary(b0,b1,b2)
Decimal(m)
1 1 1 11 -1 1 -11 1 -1 -11 -1 -1 1
-1 -1 -1 -1-1 1 -1 1-1 -1 1 1-1 1 1 -1
0 0001 0012 0103 0114 1005 1016 1107 111
BiBi--Orthogonal ModulationOrthogonal Modulation
2. M-ary DBO-CSK TECHNOLOGY
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 11
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
2. M-ary DBO-CSK TECHNOLOGY
88--ary Differentially Biary Differentially Bi--OrthogonalOrthogonalChirpChirp--ShiftShift--Keying(DBOKeying(DBO--CSK) ModulatorCSK) Modulator
1z −
Chirp-Shift-Keying(CSK)
Generator
S/P SymbolMapper
Binary Data…010011100110001101…
1 3 4 4
P/S
Binary Symbol Bi-OrthogonalSymbol
DifferentiallyBi-Orthogonal
Symbol
8-ary DBO-CSK
Chirp-Shift-Keying
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 12
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
49.4K / 145K
OO10KDeframer & Others
Rx
500 Kbps
Data-RateEstimated Complexity500Kbps / 250Kbps [gates]
BaseBand Digital250 Kbps
1.5K / 1.6K
152K56KTransceiverO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O56Differential Encoder
O
O
X
O
O
O
O
O
O
X
O
5K
95KFEC Decoder (r=1/2)
200Symbol Demapper
1KFramer & Others
Descrambler
Max Selector
Differential Detector
Chirp-pulse Modulator
Symbol Mapper
FEC Encoder (r=1/2)
Scrambler
154
100
39k
Common
290
13
100
154
Tx
3. GENERAL SOLUTION CRITERIA3.1. Unit Manufacturing Cost/Complexity (UMC)
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 13
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
3. GENERAL SOLUTION CRITERIA3.2. General Definitions
■ Payload bit rate and throughput- 500Kbps throughput: 293Kbps- 250Kbps throughput: 173.7Kbps
■ Error rate: see sub-section 5.6
■ Receiver sensitivity: see sub-section 5.11
■ Antenna gain: 0dBi
■ Band in use: - 2.4GHz ISM Band (10MHz Overlapping)- 5.2/5.7GHz Band (Non-overlapping)- 20MHz Bandwidth: Consists of 4 sub-chirp signals per Carrier
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 14
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
3. GENERAL SOLUTION CRITERIA3.3. Signal Robustness■ Co-existence / Interference Mitigation Technique
- Orthogonal / Quasi-Orthogonal Signal Set - High Spectral Processing Gain: Chirp- Near-Far Problem: FDM Channels (7ch @2.4GHz, 8ch @5.2GHz, 6ch @5.7GHz)
■ Interference Susceptibility- Low Cross-Correlation property with Existing Signal
■ Robustness: - Heavy Multi-path Environment- SOP
■ Low Sensitivity for Component Tolerance- Crystal : ± 40ppm
■ Mobility- Wide-band Chirp: Insensitive for Fading & Doppler Shift- Easily Maintaining Timing Sync. of Received Signal
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 15
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
3. GENERAL SOLUTION CRITERIA3.3. Signal Robustness
■ Ingress- High Processing Gain (10log(20/.5)=16dB- Addition Processing Gain by DS-Spreading (Optional)- Low Cross-Correlation with Existing Air-Interfaces
■ Egress- Same Spectrum Mask with W-LAN @ 2.4GHz, 5.2GHz, 5.7GHz- Tx power control: 10mW / 1mW / 0.1mW (Link Margin)
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 16
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
3. GENERAL SOLUTION CRITERIA3.4. Technical Feasibility
D/A
D/A
A/D
A/D
Tx/RxSw.
DBO-CSKMOD
DBO-CSKDEMOD
MACRanging Data
Baseband DigitalRF Analog
A/D , D/A : 3~4 bits
BlockBlock--diagram of DBOdiagram of DBO--CSKCSK TransceiverTransceiver
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 17
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
3. GENERAL SOLUTION CRITERIA3.4. Technical Feasibility■ Manufacturability
- Baseband Digital Chip area: 0.75 / 1.64 mm2 (No FEC / FEC)(0.18um Technology)
■ Time-to-Market- 2005. 5. Proto-type DEMO (FPGA)- 2006. 1. Digital ASIC
■ Regulatory Impact- Availability of Spectrum: 2.4GHz, 5.2/5.7GHz Band
Globally Allowed to use (Unlicensed)- Spectrum Availability:
7 FDM CH. (2.4GHz) + 8 FDM CH. (5.2GHz) + 6 FDM CH. (5.7GHz)- Tx Power: 0.1mW / 1.0mW / 10mW optional class- Some Sensitive Frequency Band: Skip Tx Power for that Band (some SNR loss)
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 18
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submissionfc = 2.412GHz , 2.422GHz , 2.432GHz , 2.442GHz , 2.452GHz , 2.462GHz , 2.472GHz
CSK Signals: 2.4GHz Band (20MHz BW)CSK Signals: 2.4GHz Band (20MHz BW)
-20 -10 fc 10 20 (MHz)
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
Waveform Spectrum
3. GENERAL SOLUTION CRITERIA3.4. Technical Feasibility
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-1
0
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-1
0
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-1
0
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-1
0
1
Fbw = 7.0 MHzrolloff = 0.25;Fdiff = 6.3 MHz;Tc = 4.8usec
Same Spectrum with IEEE802.11bSame Spectrum with IEEE802.11b
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 19
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
Waveform Spectrum
fc-20 fc-10 fc fc+10 fc+20 (MHz)-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
3. GENERAL SOLUTION CRITERIA3.4. Technical Feasibility
fc = 5180MHz , 5200MHz , 5220MHz , 5240MHz , 5260MHz , 5280MHz , 5300MHz , 5320MHzfc = 5725MHz , 5745MHz , 5765MHz , 5785MHz , 5805MHz , 5825MHz
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-1
0
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-1
0
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-1
0
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-1
0
1
Fbw = 7.0 MHzrolloff = 0.25;Fdiff = 6.3 MHz;Tc = 4.8usec
CSK Signals: 5.2/5.7GHz Band (20MHz BW)CSK Signals: 5.2/5.7GHz Band (20MHz BW)
Same Spectrum with IEEE802.11aSame Spectrum with IEEE802.11a
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 20
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
3. GENERAL SOLUTION CRITERIA3.4. Technical Feasibility
CSK Signals: 2.4GHz Band (20MHz BW)CSK Signals: 2.4GHz Band (20MHz BW)■ 4 piconet CSK Signal: Identical Auto-correlation Property
Same Ranging Accuracy
-2 5 0 -2 0 0 -1 5 0 -1 0 0 -5 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 5 00
0 . 2
0 . 4
0 . 6
0 . 8
1
-2 5 0 -2 0 0 -1 5 0 -1 0 0 -5 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 5 00
0 . 2
0 . 4
0 . 6
0 . 8
1
-2 5 0 -2 0 0 -1 5 0 -1 0 0 -5 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 5 00
0 . 2
0 . 4
0 . 6
0 . 8
1
-2 5 0 -2 0 0 -1 5 0 -1 0 0 -5 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 5 00
0 . 2
0 . 4
0 . 6
0 . 8
1
68nsec
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 21
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
3. GENERAL SOLUTION CRITERIA3.4. Technical Feasibility
88--ary DBOary DBO--CSK ModulatorCSK Modulator
1z −
Chirp-Shift-Keying(CSK)
Generator
BinaryData
P/S
S/P SymbolMapper
ModulatorDiffe
rentially
Bi-Orth
ogonal
Symbol
Scrambler FEC Encodingr=1, 1/2(option)
PRBSGEN.
SymbolRepetition
Seed
Chirp-Shift-Keying
8-ary DBO-CSK
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 22
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
3. GENERAL SOLUTION CRITERIA3.4. Technical Feasibility
88--ary DBOary DBO--CSK DemodulatorCSK Demodulator
Demodulator (Differential Detection)
RecoveredDataA/D
BasebandSignal
De-Scrambler
SelectLargest
De-Map P/S
DifferentialDetector
(Sub-Chirp)
De-Orthogonal
FECDecoding
TimeDe-
Spread
Demodulator (Coherent Detection)
RecoveredDataA/D
BasebandSignal
De-Scrambler
SelectLargest P/S
RakeReceiver
(Sub-Chirp)
De-Orthogonal
FECDecoding
TimeDe-
SpreadDiff.
DecodeDe-Map
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 23
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
3. GENERAL SOLUTION CRITERIA3.5. Scalability
■ Data-Rate: - 2 rates: 500Mbps / 250Kbps
■ RF Tx Power: - 3 classes: 0.1mW / 1.0mW / 10mW
■ Mobility Value:- Data: Link Margin >= 34.8dB @ 2.4GHz Band- Chirp is insensitive for Doppler Shift: affected very small distance error
-4
Chirp Index:
Doppler Shift:
Ex) 14 , 4.8 sec, 2.4 8.23 10
5
Ranging Error
: 8.20 /
:
f BW chirp
d c f
c f c chirp BW
BW chirp c
f T
f f v c T
T c f v f v T f
f MHz T f GHz d v
v
d
Km h d
µ
µ
µ
µ
• =
• = × = ×∆
• = ∆ × = × = × ×
= = = ⇒ ∆ = × ×
= ∆ =
∆
-4 33 10 50 10 36 1.00 14 [ ]cm× × × =
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 24
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
4. MAC PROTOCOL SUPPLEMENT4.1. MAC Enhancements and Modifications
■ Supplement for Scalability- The proposed PHY has scalability for channelization- Scalability which is included in PHY may be added to
MAC for 15.4a PHY layer (Data-rate / Tx Power / Ranging)
■ Wake-up Mode for Power Consumption Consideration- Power consumption is of significant concern- Needing supplement to 15.4 MAC to support wake-up
mode for low-power consumption
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 25
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.1. Channel models and payload data
■ Channel models and payload data- See sub-section 5.4 in this Document- Payload Data: 32bytes per Packet- Data-rate: 500Kbps / 250Kbps
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 26
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.2. Size and Form Factor
SD Memory (32mm X 24 mm)
Ex)• Battery Capacity: 3V x 30mAh (324Joule)• Dimension: 10 x 2.5 (Dia. x Ht. mm)
SD Memory (32mm X 24 mm)
2.4 GHz 5.1/5.7 GHz
BasebandRFPattern Antenna
(24mm X 14mm)
Button CellButton CellBatteryBattery
Pattern Antenna(12mm X 9mm)
Baseband
RFButton CellButton Cell
BatteryBattery
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 27
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.3. PHY-SAP Payload Bit Rate and Data Throughput
DATA Frame ACK Frame DATA Frame
TACK TLIFT588 / 1104usec 156 / 240usec
Payload: 32byte 5byte
874 / 1474 usec
TACK + TLIFT = 130usec
Payload Bit-rate:■ Data-rate: 500Kbps / 250Kbps per piconet■ Aggregated Data-rate: Max. 2Mbps (4 X 500Kbps) per FDM Channel■ FDM Channels: 7 CH. (2.4GHz), 8 CH. (5.2GHz), 6 CH. (5.7GHz)
Data Throughput:■ Payload bit-rate 500Kbps : Throughput 293 Kbps■ Payload bit-rate 250Kbps : Throughput 173.7 Kbps
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 28
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.3. PHY-SAP Payload Bit Rate and Data Throughput
Data Frame:Payload bit-rate : 500Kbps (No FEC) / 250Kbps (FEC r=1/2)
Preamble DelimiterLength
+Rate
5Chirp 1Chirp 6Chirp 86chirp (500Kbps) or 172chirp(250Kbps)
MPDU
588 usec (1Mbps) or 1104 usec (250Kbps)(8 + 1)bit (32X8 +2) bit
ACK Frame:Payload bit-rate : 500Kbps (No FEC) / 250Kbps (FEC r=1/2)
Preamble DelimiterLength
+Rate
5Chirp 1Chirp 6Chirp 14chirp (500Kbps) or 28chirp(250Kbps)
MPDU
156 usec (500Kbps) or 240 usec (250Kbps)(8 + 1)bit (5X8 +2) bit
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 29
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
Multiple piconetMultiple piconet
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.4. Simultaneously Operating Piconets
Waveform
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-1
0
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-1
0
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-1
0
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-1
0
1
I
II
III
IV
ω
ω
ω
ω
Freq. - Time
t
t
t
t
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 30
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
SubmissionEach of CSK Signal consists of 4 sub-chirp signals.
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.4. Simultaneously Operating Piconets
Multiple piconetMultiple piconet
I
II
III
IV
ω
ω
ω
ω
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-5000 0 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Correlation Power (For Preamble Detection)
Correlation Property between the piconetDoes not need Synchronization inter-piconet
t
CSK Signal : Quasi-Orthogonal Property
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 31
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
SubmissionEach of CSK Signal consists of 4 sub-chirp signals.
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.4. Simultaneously Operating Piconets
I
II
III
IV
ω
ω
ω
ω
Multiple piconetMultiple piconet
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
0
0.5
1
Complex Amplitude (for Data Demod)
Correlation Property between piconetCSK Signal : Quasi-Orthogonal Property
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 32
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.4. Simultaneously Operating Piconets
Multiple piconetMultiple piconet
I
II
III
IV
t
ω Duration of 2 Symbols (12 usec)
0.3usec 2.1usecd11 d12
0.6usec 1.8usecd21 d22
0.9usec 1.5usecd31 d32
1.2usec 1.2usecd41 d42
ωt
t
t
ω
ω
4.8 usec
SOP: Assigning Different Time-Gap between the Chirp-Shift-Keying SignalMinimize ISI for CM8 NLOS: Assign the Time-Gap between symbol more then 200nsec
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 33
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
Each of CSK Signal consists of 4 sub-chirp signals. Differential Detection Property between piconet
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.4. Simultaneously Operating Piconets
Multiple piconetMultiple piconet
I
II
III
IV
ω
ω
ω
ω
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2
x 104
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
Interference Test by Packet (32 bytes Random Data)
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 34
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.4. Simultaneously Operating Piconets
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 410-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Dint/Dref
PE
R
System performance with 3 interf. piconet
AWGNCM8CM1CM5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 310-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Dint/Dref
PE
R
System Performance in 1 interf. piconet
AWGNCM8CM1CM5
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.510-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Dint/Dref
PE
R
System performance with two interf. piconet
AWGNCM8CM1CM5
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 35
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.5. Signal Acquisition
Signal AcquisitionSignal Acquisition
DifferentialDetector
(T1)Symbol
De-MapperSelect
LargestData
A/D
DifferentialDetector
(T2)
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 36
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.5. Signal Acquisition
Miss Detection Probability
1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
In AWGN, at FA=3.2x10-5, TxPower=10mW
Distance : meter
Pm
2 Chirp Symbols3 Chirp Symbols4 Chirp Symbols
Preamble Detection
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 37
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.6. System Performance
Data Rate : 500kbps
10 12 14 16 18 20 2210-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Eb/No
PE
RSystem Performance
AWGNCM8CM1CM5
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 38
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.7. Ranging
Timing DetectionTiming Detection■ Coarse Timing Detection
- Peak of Differential Detection (Averaging over 4 or more Symbols)
■ Fine Timing Detection- Cross-Correlation of Sampled Input Signal- Fine Timing by Interpolation (Fraction of Sampling-Clock Resolution)- Averaging over 4 or more Symbols- Less than 1m Ranging Resolution @ Eb/No >= 24dB
Arbitrary Sampling Instant
Detected TimingDetected TimingPeak
Edge
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 39
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 2 0 2 2 2 4 2 6 2 81 0
0
1 0 1
1 0 2
E b /N o (d B )
time
erro
r dev
iatio
n (n
sec)
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.7. Ranging
Timing-error Variance (Chirp BW: 20MHz)
■ TDA / TDOA Based Ranging with Chirp Signal
■ Estimation Precision: < 1m @ Eb/No greater than 24dB
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 40
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.8. Link Budget
dBm-94.5 -94.5 -94.5 Proposed Min. Rx Sensitivity Level
dB27.4 28.2 34.8 Link Margin(M=Pr-Pn-S-I)
dB333Implementation Loss(I)
dB12.512.512.5Minimum Eb/No(S)
dBm-110.0 -110.0 -110.0 Average noise power per bit(Pn=N+Nf)
dB777Rx Noise Figure(Nf)
dBm-117.0 -117.0 -117.0 Average noise power per bit
dBm-67.1 -66.3 -59.7 Rx power(Pr = Pt+Gt+Gr-L1-L2(dB))
dBi000Rx antenna gain(Gr)
dB29.5 29.5 29.5 path loss at d m(L2=20log10(d))
m 303030distance
dB47.6 46.8 40.2 Path loss at 1meter(L1=20log10(4pifc'/c))
GHz5.75.20 2.44 fc' = sqrt(fminfmax) -10dB
dBi000Tx antenna gain(Gt)
dBm101010Average Tx Power(Pt)
mW101010Average Tx Power(Pt)
kbps500500500peak payload bit rate(Rb)
UNII(5.7GHz)UNII(5.2GHz)ISM(2.4GHz) Parameter
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 41
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.9. Sensitivity
CM5
CM1
CM8
AWGN
-86.5dBm
-87dBm
-85.5dBm
-94.5dBm
Rx Sensitivity level(500kbps)
Bandwidth: 20MHz (2.4GHz Band)
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 42
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.10. Power Management Modes
■ Low-power Mode with Advanced Wake-up– The proposed PHY has differentially bi-orthogonal detection
and correlatively independent chirp-pulse waveform for multiple piconet=> Low-power is achieved by advanced wake-up that the only
desired group of nodes are called and the other nodes canestimate wake-up time from sleep state
=> Reducing Duty-Cycle and Extending Battery-life– This is compliant to “power consumption considerations” of
802.15.4 standard, and the mode of operation for advanced wake-up may be added to this standard
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 43
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.11. Power Consumption
■ RF: 140mW for Tx (@10mW RF Power), 35mW for Rx
■ Baseband (BB) Digital: 0.9mW for Tx , 1.13mW for Rx
■ RF part consume lot more power than Baseband Digital- Power Reduction of RF ASIC is Essential (C-MOS)
■ Idea for Operating Power Saving:- Use Max. Data-rate mode: shorter time for Tx Data- Sleeping: Longer Time- Save Power: by reducing active time of RF
■ Further Reduction of Power Consumption- Apply 0.13um / 0.09um Technology for ASIC (RF / Baseband)
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 44
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.11. Power Consumption
Rx
Tx 141 mW141 mW56KTotal
37.5 mW5.24 mm2152K
36.1 mW4.35 mm2
0.52 mW0.06 mm21.6K0.48 mW0.04 mm21.5KTx
10 mW0.3 mm2-10 mW0.3 mm2-Common
130 mW1.7 mm2-130 mW1.7 mm2-Tx + D/A
5K
49.4K
-
Logic
5 uW
0.42 mW
2.08 mW
25 mW
Power
1.5 mm2145K0.71 mW0.63 mm2Rx
250Kbps (FEC: r=1/2)500Kbps (No FEC)
5 uW
0.42 mW
25 mW
Power
0.08 mm2
1.6 mm2
Die Area
Common
Rx + A/D
Deep Sleep
Baseband@ Sampling-rate:
40MHz
RF@ Tx Power:
10mW
0.08 mm25K
1.6 mm2-
Die AreaLogic
Target Library : 0.18 um Technology
■ Power Consumption for Average Throughput 1 Kbps (w/o FEC)- Average Throughput (500Kbps mode): x Kbps- PTX : 141[mW] / 293 = 481 [uW/sec]- PRX : 36.1[mW] /293 = 123 [uW/sec]
■ Battery: 324[Joule] for Button Cell (10mm D. X 2.5mm H) / 12,000[Joules] for AA Alkaline Cell- (PTX + 50 X PRX)/51 = 130[uW] ----- (Assume TTX : TRX = 1:50 duty-cycle for sensor node)- Battery Life TB = 324/130e-6/3600/24 = 28.8 days Continuously (Button Cell)- Battery Life TB = 12000/130e-6/3600/24/365 = 2.93 years Continuously (AA Alkaline Cell)
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 45
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
5. PHY LAYER CRITERIA5.12. Antenna Practicality
■ Antenna Size- less than SD-Memory size: 24mm X 14mm @2.4GHz
12mm X 9mm @5.2/5.7GHz
■ Frequency / Impulse Response- Almost Flat Freq. Response: Narrow-band
■ Radiation Characteristics- Isotropic: 0dBi
Jan 2005
Kyung-Kuk Lee (Orthotron Co., Ltd.)Slide 46
doc.: IEEE802.15-05-0025-02-004a
Submission
6. Conclusion■ Low Power Consumption: Digital Baseband Tx 0.9mW, Rx 1.13mW
- Power Consumption is heavily depend on RF-chip.
■ Signal Robustness:- Orthogonal / Quasi-Orthogonal Signal Set - Robustness: Tolerance for Heavy Multi-path / SOP, - Low Correlation with Existing Air-Interfaces
■ Feasibility: 2.4GHz ISM Band- Existing commercial RF Solutions- 2.4GHz / 5GHz band is allowed for unlicensed operation- Low Voltage Operation: Low PAPR
■ Ranging: Based on Chirp Signal (TDA / TDOA)- Precision: less then 1m (Standard Deviation) @Eb/N0 = 24dB
■ Size & Form Factor: Less than SD-Memory size
■ Low Cost / Low Complexity: Tx +Rx Baseband Digital (56K gates)
■ Support Advanced Sleep / Wake-up Capability
■ Orthotron will pursue opportunities for future collaborations anOrthotron will pursue opportunities for future collaborations and mergingd merging