Date post: | 14-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Law |
Upload: | mani-mishra |
View: | 58 times |
Download: | 5 times |
&
AGENDA
POLITICS & INDIAN POLOTICAL SCENARIO
CURRENT ANTI-CORRUPTION LAWS AND ORGANIZATIONS
ANTICURROPTION BILLS
JANLOKPAL BILL
COMPARISONS
SHORTCOMING IN JANLOKPAL
CONCLUSION & FINIDINGS
POLITICS & INDIAN POLITICAL SCENARIO
Politics: Art of gaining power & craft of retaining power
Power corrupts & absolute power corrupts absolutely.
India is the biggest Democracy in the world
Politics in India takes place within the framework of a constitution.
India is a federal parliamentary democratic republic in which the President of India is head of state and the Prime Minister of India is the head of government. Nominally, executive power is exercised by the president and is independent of the legislature.
Legislative power is vested in both the
government and the two chambers of the
Parliament of India, the Lok Sabha and the Rajya
Sabha. Federal and state elections generally take
place within a multi-party system, although this is
not enshrined in law.
The judiciary is independent of the executive and
the legislature, the highest national court being
the Supreme Court of India.
India is as a nation has been labelled as a
"sovereign socialist secular democratic republic"
which is "egalitariansecular".
CURRENT INDIAN POLITICAL SCENARIO
Transparency International survey report of
2005 says that more than 62% of Indians
had firsthand bribe experience
In 2012 survey INDIA ranked 94th out of
176 countries.
In 2012 India has ranked 94th out of 176
countries in Transparency International's
Corruption Perceptions Index
CURRENT ANTI-CORRUPTION LAWS
AND ORGANIZATIONS
Central Vigilance Commission (CVC)
Anti corruption Department of CBI
These agencies are not so effective due tolimitations of staff and sufficient powers toprosecute against corrupt government officials
Currently these are not independent of thegovernment and free from ministerial influencein its investigations.
Indian Penal Code, 1860
Prosecution section of Income Tax Act,1961
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 to prohibit benamitransactions.
Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002
JOURNEY OF LOKPAL BILL IN
INDIAN POLITICS
The Lokpal Bill was first introduced by Adv. ShantiBhushan in 1968 and passed the 4th Lok Sabha in 1969. But before it could be passed by Rajya Sabha, the Lok Sabha was dissolved and the bill lapsed.
Subsequent versions were re-introduced in 1971, 1977, 1985, 1989, 1996, 1998, 2001, 2005, 2008 and in 2011, but none of them were passed.
The Lokpal Bill was finally passed on 17 Dec 2013 in the Rajya Sabha and in the Lok Sabha on 18 December 2013
JANLOKPAL BILL
Institution of
◦ Jan Lokpal - at central govtlevel
◦ Jan Lokayukta - at state level
Correspondingly Jan Lokpal to accept corruption complaints against Central govtdept and Jan Lokayukta against state govtdept
Each will have 10 members and 1 chairperson (50% from Judiciary)
Will be completely Independent
Will get whatever financial resources they
require and will be empowered to select
and employ any number of employees from
within the government or outside.
Time bound investigations
Power to dismiss corrupt officers
Time bound trial
Recovery of loss caused to government.
Provision for Confiscation of Assets
If undeclared assets are found, a case will be
registered
Power to punish if its orders are not followed
Timeline and cost
The Lokpal Bill has been introduced in the Parliament a total of eight times since 1968.
1968 – 2 lakh
1971 – 20 lakh
1977 – 25 lakh
1985 – 25 lakh
1989 – 35 lakh
1996 – 1 crore
2001 – 35 crore
2011 – 1700 crore
2012 – 2050 crore
2013 – 2100 crore
COMPARISON
CURRENT SYSTEM JAN LOKPAL-JAN LOKAYUKTA
SYSTEM
JUD
GES
–SC
& H
C
No FIR can be registered
against any Supreme
Court or High Court judge
without the permission of
Chief Justice of India.
It has been seen in the
past that the Chief Justice
of India tries to protect
his own fraternity of
judges and rarely gives
such a permission.
Under Jan Lokpal Bill, the full bench
of Lokpal will give permission to file
a case against any judge.
No permission will be required from
Chief Justice of India. Therefore,
corruption in higher judiciary will
also be checked through Jan Lokpal
Bill.
14
COMPARISON
15
CURRENT SYSTEM JAN LOKPAL-JAN LOKAYUKTA
SYSTEM
PU
NIS
HM
ENT
The quantum of
punishment for
people convicted of
corruption ranges
from:
6 months to 7 years
of imprisonment
which is inadequate!
The punishment will range
from:
1 year rigorous
imprisonment to life
sentence.
Higher punishment for
those in higher rank.
COMPARISON
16
CURRENT SYSTEM JAN LOKPAL-JAN LOKAYUKTA
SYSTEM
EVID
ENC
E
In the current
system, if anyone
obtains any benefit
from the
government
illegally, it is
difficult to prove
that the person did
so by paying bribes
If a person obtains any
benefit from the government
in violation of a law or rules
and regulations, that person
along with concerned public
servants shall be deemed to
have indulged in corrupt
practices.
COMPARISON
17
CURRENT SYSTEM JAN LOKPAL-JAN LOKAYUKTA
SYSTEM
Wh
istl
eb
low
ers
Currently, people who
report corrupt
practices or raise their
voice against
corruption are being
threatened, victimized
and even murdered.
There is no protection
for them.
Jan Lokpal and Jan Lokayukta will
be responsible for providing the
whistleblowers, whether inside
or outside the government,
protection from:
- Professional threat or
victimisation
- Physical threat or ictimisation
COMPARISON
18
CURRENT SYSTEM JAN LOKPAL-JAN LOKAYUKTA
SYSTEM
Mu
ltip
le A
nti
-C
orr
up
tio
n
Age
nci
es
Presently there are
multiple anti-
corruption agencies
like: CBI, CVC, ACB,
state vigilance
department
All these are
controlled by corrupt
officials and
politicians and are
ineffective.
At central govt level,
Anti-corruption branch of CBI,
CVC and all internal vigilance
wings of all dept will be
merged into Jan Lokpal.
At state level,
Anti-corruption branch of state
police, the state vigilance
department, internal vigilance
wings of all departments and
existing Lokayuktas in states
will be be merged into Jan
Lokayukta of that state.
The Bill as passed by the Lok Sabha left the selection of the Lokpal essentially in the hands of the government. It also left the accountability of the Lokpal in government hands, thus completely compromising the independence of the Lokpal
Equally importantly, this bill left the Lokpal’scorruption investigations in the hands of a government controlled CBI
Also, the bill did not contain even a single one of the 3 provisions which the Parliament had unanimously promised Anna Hazare before he broke his fast. Only group A public servants and not all were brought within the Lokpal’s purview
There was no provision for a State Lokayukta’s in this bill
There was no mention of a citizens charter.
The investigation of the Lokpal was crippled by the need to first have a preliminary inquiry where the accused public servant would have to be heard (thus allowing him to destroy evidence) before even the FIR could be registered.
And if a person whose complaint was labeled “frivolous or vexatious” by this government controlled Lokpal could be imprisoned for upto 5 years (even more than the punishment for corruption)
CONCLUSION AND FINDINGS
The jan lokpal bill as drafted by the civil society was an efficient tool to eradicate corruption from grass-root level.
But lokpal bill passed by Govt. of India is an amended version of it.
Political parties have realised that they have lost credibility and need to restore it before 2014 elections, therefore they passed an ammendedversion of Lokpal to win public sympathy.
The victory of the AAP made them realise that the people had reached the end of their patience and were looking for change.
The victory of the AAP made them realise
that the people had reached the end of their
patience and were looking for change.
The Congress hopes that this Lokpal bill
along with the welfare measures like
MNREGA, the Food security bill and land
acquisition bill might come to its rescue in
the 2014 polls.
THANK YOU