Jansen Lane Phase I ESA

8/20/2019 Jansen Lane Phase I ESA

1/157

PHASE I

ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

Site Name: “Jansen Lane”28 Jansen Lane

Berne, New York

Prepared for:

Prepared By:

IVI Telecom Services, a CBRE Company

White Plains, New York

IVI Project No.: TS50714170August 19, 2015

THIS REPORT IS THE PROPERTY OF IVI AND PYRAMID & ALBANY COUNTY AND WAS

PREPARED FOR A SPECIFIC USE, PURPOSE, AND RELIANCE AS DEFINED WITHIN THE

AGREEMENT BETWEEN IVI AND PYRAMID & ALBANY COUNTY AND WITHIN THIS REPORT.

THERE SHALL BE NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES, INTENDED OR IMPLIED, UNLESS

SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED HEREIN.


2/157

ENVIRONMENTAL & REGULATORYDUE-DILIGENCE

IVI TELECOM SERVICES, A CBRE COMPANY55 West Red Oak Lane

White Plains, New York 10604

914.694.9600 (tel)914.694.8549 (fax)

www.ivi-intl.com

NEW YORK CHICAGO LOS ANGELES MIAMI WASHINGTON, DCBARCELONA LONDON PARIS STOCKHOLM

Member of SOCOTEC Group with 140 offices worldwide

August 19, 2015

Ms. Meredithe Mathias

Pyramid Network Services, LLC6519 Towpath Road

East Syracuse, NY 13057

Re: Phase I Environmental Site AssessmentSite Name: “Jansen Lane”

28 Jansen Lane

Berne, New York

IVI Project No.: TS50714170

Dear Ms. Mathias:

IVI Telecom Services, a CBRE Company (“IVI”) is pleased to submit this copy of our Phase I

Environmental Site Assessment on the above-referenced property. This report outlines the

findings of IVI’s site reconnaissance, historical land use research, review of governmental records,

and interviews.

I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of

environmental professional as defined in § 312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and I have the specificqualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature,

history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate

inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.

Please call the Environmental Professional indicated below at 602-566-1554 should you have any

questions.

Sincerely,

IVI Telecom Services, a CBRE Company

Ruthann M. Gates

Environmental Professional


3/157


4/157


Page 1

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report documents IVI’s findings from our Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

on the proposed wireless telecommunications facility located at 28 Jansen Lane, Berne,

New York (the “Subject”). The Subject is situated in a rural setting characterized byresidential development, undeveloped wooded land, and agricultural land. The Subject is

currently undeveloped wooded land. Prior to development of the Parent Parcel in 1952,the Subject was undeveloped wooded land. The Parent Parcel is owned by Jody Jansen.

Pyramid Network Services, LLC c/o Alabany County proposes to construct

a wireless telecommunications facility on the Parent Parcel. Specifically, Pyramid proposes a 180’ self-support tower, with ancillary equipment at grade within an

approximate 50’ x 60’fenced equipment compound. Pyramid proposes the

installation of a 1,000 gallon propane AST, a 12’ x 16’ equipment shelter, a telcocabinet, electric transformer, and a 50kw propane generator within a

telecommunications compound. Additionally, Pyramid c/o Albany County proposes to

trench for new underground conduits that will run from the proposed equipment

cabinet to the existing utilities location (see attached Lease Exhibits for additionalinformation). The proposed collocation of antennas, ancillary equipment, proposed

generator, connecting conduit and all areas proposed to be disturbed as part of the

Pyramid installation are the focus of this report.The purpose of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was to assess existing site

conditions and render an opinion as to the identified or potential presence of recognized

environmental conditions in connection with all areas proposed to be disturbed as partof the Pyramid c/o Albany County installation in accordance with the scope

and limitations of ASTM International's Standard Practice for Environmental

Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process E 1527-13 and

the limitations identified herein. Exceptions to or deletions from the scope of work are

described in Section 2.0.This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions

(RECs) in connection with the Subject and no further action is currently recommended.


5/157


Page 2

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 General and Reliance

IVI was retained by Pyramid Network Services c/o Albany County to preparea Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, in conformance with ASTM

International's Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase IEnvironmental Site Assessment Process E 1527-13. Any exceptions to, ordeletions from, this practice are described below.

IVI has produced this document under an agreement between IVI and Pyramid.All terms and conditions of that agreement are included within this document by

reference. This report was prepared for and may be relied upon by Pyramid. Any

future party seeking to rely on this report may apply to IVI Telecom Services, aCBRE Company and Pyramid for a letter of reliance.

2.2 Purpose and Scope

2.2.1 Purpose

The purpose of this report is to identify Recognized EnvironmentalConditions in connection with the property, using the methodology

recommended by ASTM International in order to qualify for the innocent

landowner defense to CERCLA liability and/or to help understand potential environmental conditions that could materially impact the

operation of the business associated with the Subject. Specifically, this

methodology is referred to as Standard Practice for Environmental Site

Assessments: Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Process

Designation: E 1527-13.

The term Recognized Environmental Conditions is defined by ASTMStandard E 1527-13 as “...the presence or likely presence of any hazardous

substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to releaseto the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the

environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future

release to the environment. De minimis conditions are not recognizedenvironmental conditions.”

2.2.2 Scope

In general, the scope of this assessment consisted of reviewing readily

available information and environmental data relating to the property;

interviewing readily available persons knowledgeable about the site;reviewing readily available maps, aerial photographs and records


6/157


Page 3

maintained by federal, state, and local regulatory agencies; and conducting

a site visit.

Of importance, the client is advised that federal, state, and local laws may

impose environmental assessment obligations beyond the scope of this practice. The client is also notified that there are likely to be other legal

obligations with regard to hazardous substances or petroleum productsdiscovered on the Subject that are not addressed in this practice and thatmay pose risks of civil and/or criminal sanctions for non-compliance.

The specific scope of this assignment included the following:

2.2.2.1 Performing a site reconnaissance to characterize on-site

conditions and assess the site’s location with respect to

surrounding property uses and natural surface features. Inaddition, IVI conducted a reconnaissance of nearby surrounding

roads and readily accessible adjacent properties to identify

obvious potential environmental conditions on neighboring properties. Photographs taken as part of the site reconnaissance

are provided in Appendix A.

The site visit was conducted on August 3, 2015, by Taylor R.

Weber representing IVI. The site was not represented at the timeof the site visit. It was sunny and the temperature was

approximately 79° F at the time of our site survey. IVI

conducted the site reconnaissance in a systematic manner,

surveying in a grid pattern.

2.2.2.2 Interviewing persons familiar with the property to obtaininformation on present and previous on-site activities potentiallyresulting in the environmental degradation of the site or

adjoining properties. An AAI User Questionnaire was provided

to the User. In this questionnaire, IVI requested title records aswell as information pertaining to whether or not any

environmental liens or activity and use limitations were

associated with the property. The purpose of this questionnaire

was to satisfy the user interview all appropriate inquiryrequirements and disclose any previous or existing hazardous

waste or toxic material conditions, which may not have been

apparent at the time of our site reconnaissance.

2.2.2.3 If provided, reviewing of information such as previously

prepared appraisals, building plans and specifications, andenvironmental reports.


7/157


Page 4

2.2.2.4 Reviewing readily available historical documents, such as

topographic maps, aerial photographs, and/or city directories toidentify previous activities on and in the vicinity of the Subject.

Copies of these documents are included in Appendix C.

2.2.2.5 Reviewing readily available environmental databases maintained

by federal, state, and local agencies within the approximateminimum search distances as described within the RegulatoryReview Section 5.0 of this report. A copy of the Computerized

Environmental Report, provided by Environmental Data

Resources, Inc. can be referenced in Appendix D.

2.2.2.6 Conducting a visual survey of readily accessible areas to identify

the presence of the most obvious and common types of suspect

ACMs. The basis for “suspect” determination is taken from thematerials listed in Appendix G of the United States Environmental

protection Agency (USEPA) publication Managing Asbestos in

Place (also known as the Green Book). All building materialslisted within Appendix G of the Green Book are considered to be

suspect ACMs at the Subject. This screening is not intended to beused for demolition, abatement, renovation, or repair work.

THIS LIMITED SURVEY IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS ACOMPREHENSIVE ASBESTOS SURVEY, WHICH OFTEN

ENTAILS DESTRUCTIVE TESTING OR THE SURVEY OF

AREAS BEHIND WALLS, ABOVE CEILINGS, IN TENANT

SPACES, AND IN OTHER TYPICALLY INACCESSIBLEAREAS. MOREOVER, IVI DOES NOT WARRANT THAT

ALL ACMs AT THE SUBJECT HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED.

2.2.2.7 In the course of conducting representative observations of areas

that are readily accessible, easily visible, and safe with respect to

the field observer, IVI will report the presence of materialquantities of microbial growth.

This limited scan is not to be construed as a microbial growth

survey, which entails a thorough specific inspection and alsooften includes destructive testing or the survey of areas behind

walls, above ceilings, in tenant spaces, and in other typically

inaccessible areas. Moreover, IVI does not warrant that allmicrobial growth at the Subject has been identified, as mold may

exist in inaccessible or non-observable areas or may have

amplified subsequent to our site survey.


8/157


9/157


Page 6

3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

3.1 Property Location

The Subject is identified with the site name “Jansen Lane” and is located at 28Jansen Lane, Berne, Albany County, New York. The Subject’s approximate

latitude and longitude are 42 37 14.36 N and 74 8 40.50 W, respectively. Pleaserefer to Appendix C for copies of maps and/or aerial photographs which give agraphic representation of the Subject.

2013 Google Earth Aerial

Subject


10/157


Page 7

3.2 Surrounding Land Use

Direction Adjacent Properties to Subject Surrounding Properties

North Undeveloped Wooded Land Residential & Commercial Development

South Agricultural Land Agricultural Land & Residential

Development

East Agricultural Land &

Undeveloped Wooded Land

Undeveloped Wooded Land

West Undeveloped Wooded Land Undeveloped Wooded Land & Agricultural

Development

IVI’s review of the surrounding properties did not reveal any environmental

concerns.

3.3 Physical Site Setting

3.3.1 Size and Shape of Parcel

The Parent Parcel is irregularly-shaped and is approximately 128 acre

parcel. The Parent parcel is located on the western side of Jansen Lane.

119BThe proposed Subject consists of a 180’ self-support tower within a 50’ x

60’ rectangular lease area located on the northwestern portion of theParent Parcel west of Jansen Lane.

3.3.2 Topography

The site slopes

in all directions. The topography of the area ischaracterized as hilly. According to the United States Geological Survey(USGS) Rensselaerville, New York 7.5 Minute Series topographic map,

the site’s topographic elevation is approximately 1,449’ above mean sea

level (“amsl”).

3.3.3 Flood plains

IVI reviewed the applicable FEMA flood plain map (#36001C0235D) forthe Subject. According to this review, the Subject is not located within a

mapped floodplain.


11/157


12/157


Page 9

4.0 HISTORICAL USE

4.1 Historical Summary

Prior to the construction of the existing improvements, the Parent Parcel wasagricultural land with interspaced areas of undeveloped wooded land.

None of the Subject property historical uses are thought to have created a REC tothe Subject.

4.2 Topographic Maps

IVI reviewed the following USGS historical topographic maps of the Parent

Parcel area provided by Google Earth. The following summarizes the results ofthe topographic map review:

Year Subject Property Adjacent and Surrounding Properties

1903 Undeveloped wooded landResidential development is visible to the

South and North.

1943Undeveloped wooded land and

agricultural land

Residential development is visible to the

South and North.

IVI’s topographic map review did not reveal any environmental concerns.

4.3 Aerial Photographs

Aerial photographs provide visual documentation of site conditions at the time of

the photographs. Activities such as dumping or industrial use of a site can often be discerned through the examination of historical aerial photographs. IVI

reviewed historic aerial photographs provided by EDR. The following is a

synopsis of the aerial photographs reviewed:


1952

Agricultural Land with dirt roads

constructed through Parcel and someinterspaced areas of undeveloped

wooded land. Residential structure

exists on Parent Parcel.

Primarily agricultural land with interspacedarea of undeveloped wooded land.

Residential development to the North.

1960 No significant changes from the previous aerial photograph.

Residential development to the North andWest.

1977 No significant changes from the

previous aerial photograph.

No significant changes from the previous

aerial photograph.


13/157


Page 10





aerial photograph.




aerial photograph.



More residential development added to thesoutheast with another manmade pond and

a driveway.

2008 No significant changes from the previous aerial photograph.

No significant changes from the previousaerial photograph.




aerial photograph.




aerial photograph.

IVI’s aerial photograph review did not reveal any environmental concerns.

4.4 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps (Sanborn Maps)

Sanborn Maps constitute a source of prior site uses of real property for many

cities and towns in the United States. The maps were originally created to assist

insurance underwriters in understanding the potential fire risk of structuresrequiring insurance; however, they are also useful in determining the previous

uses of a Subject. Sanborn Maps often contain information relating to uses of

individual structures, location of certain petroleum and chemical storage tanks,and the storage of other potentially toxic substances. Sanborn Maps begin their

coverage in 1867 and continue through the 1990s.

IVI had a search of Sanborn Maps conducted by EDR. This search did not

identify Sanborn Map coverage for the area of the Subject. Searching a database

such as Sanborn Maps constitutes part of the due-diligence necessary for anEnvironmental Site Assessment. The lack of Sanborn Mapping suggests that

there likely was no historical industrial activity on or in the immediate vicinity of

the Subject.

4.5 Chain-of-Title

Although requested, a copy of the Subject’s Chain-of-Title has not been provided

to IVI for review.


14/157


Page 11

4.6 Previous Reports

Although requested, no previously prepared environmental reports such as Phase I

or II Environmental Site Assessments, lead paint surveys, lead-in-water surveys,

asbestos surveys, or geotechnical reports were provided for our review.

4.7 Interviews

Fire Department

IVI has sent a request to the Berne Fire Department for environmental

information pertaining to the Subject. As of this writing, the Fire Department hasnot responded to our request. Should receipt of a response from the Fire

Department change the conclusions of this report, Pyramid will be notified in

writing by IVI.

Albany County Health Department

IVI has sent a request to Albany County Health Department for environmental

information pertaining to the Subject. As of this writing, the Albany CountyHealth Department has not responded to our request. Should receipt of a response

from the Albany County Health Department change the conclusions of this report,

Pyramid will be notified in writing by IVI.

Owner / Operator Interview

Jody Jansen the Owner of the Subject property, did not completed the UserQuestionnaire. Absence of the AAI User questionnaire remains as a data gap in

Section 2.3. If the AAI User Questionnaire is returned to IVI, Pyramid will benotified in writing.


15/157


Page 12

5.0 REGULATORY REVIEW

5.1 Computerized Environmental Report

A copy of regulatory database information contained within a ComputerizedEnvironmental Report (CER) provided by EDR appears in Appendix D. The CER is a

listing of sites identified on select federal and state standard source environmentaldatabases within the approximate minimum search distance specified by ASTMInternational's Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I

Environmental Site Assessment Process E 1527-13. IVI reviewed each environmental

database on a record-by-record basis to determine if certain sites identified in the CERare suspected to represent a material negative environmental impact to the Subject. The

following table lists the number of sites by regulatory database within the prescribed

minimum search distance appearing in the CER:

Databases Reviewed

Approximate

Minimum Search

Distance (AMSD)

Number of

Sites

WithinAMSD

Federal National Priorities List (NPL) One-Mile 0

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,

and Liability Information System (CERCLIS)One-Half Mile 0

CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned

(NFRAP) SitesOne-Half Mile 0

Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Information

System (RCRIS) Treatment, Storage, and Disposal (TSD)Facilities List

One-Mile 0

Federal RCRIS Generators ListOn-Site and Adjoining

Properties0

Corrective Action Tracking System (CORRACTS) One-Mile 0

Federal Emergency Response Notification System

(ERNS) ListOn-Site 0

State Hazardous Waste Sites (SHWS) One-Mile 0

Site State Landfills or Solid Waste Facilities List One-Half Mile 2

Site State Registered Underground Storage Tank (RUST)Facility List

On-Site and AdjoiningProperties

0

Site State Leaking UST/Spill List One-Half Mile 5

State and Tribal Institutional/Engineering Control

Registries On-Site 0

State and Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Sites One-Half Mile 0

State and Tribal Brownfields Sites One-Half Mile 0


16/157


Page 13

IVI’s review of the state and federal databases in the CER report revealed multiple sites

on the SPILLS and SWF databases within the prescribed search radius.

State and Tribal Landfills or Solid Waste Facilities List (SWF/LF)

The SWF list is an inventory of landfills, incinerators, transfer stations, and other sites

that manage solid wastes.

Analysis/Comment: The CER did not identify SWF/LF facilities on the Parent Parcel.

However, the CER identified two (2) properties within the prescribed search distance.

The first listing is an inactive transfer station. The second listing is an active transfer

station for MSW type wastes. The town of Berne currently owns the transfer station. BothSWF/LF listings are in a presumed down gradient location to the Subject and located

approximately 750’ and 1, 875’ northwest of the Subject. Based on the down gradient

location and distance, these SWF/LF listings are not considered a REC to the Subject orParent Parcel.

State Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs)

The LUST list is an inventory of reported spills and leaks, both active and inactive. Itincludes stationary and non-stationary source spills reported to state and federal agencies,

including remediated and unremediated leaking USTs.

Analysis/Comment: The CER did not identify LUST facilities on the Parent Parcel.

However, one (1) LUST facility was identified on properties within the prescribed search

distance. The LUST facility has been granted a “Case Closed” status by the NYDEC,

requiring no further investigation or remedial action. The LUST facility is in a presumeddown gradient location to the Subject and located approximately 1,610’ northeast of the

Subject. As such, this listing is not thought to have created a REC to the Subject orParent Parcel.

State Spills Cases (SPILLS)

The SPILLS list is a compilation of data collected on spills and reported to the NYSDEC

pursuant to either Article 12 of the Navigation Law, or 6 NYCRR Section 595.2.

Analysis/Comment: The CER did not identify SPILLS cases on the Parent Parcel.However, the CER identified four (4) SPILLS on properties within the prescribed search

distance. All four SPILLS have been granted a “case closed” date by the NYDEC,

requiring no further investigation or remedial action. The SPILLS cases are located in a presumed down gradient location to the Subject and are located greater than ¼ of a mile

from the Subject. Based on regulatory status, distance, and down gradient location, these

SPILLS cases are not considered a REC to the Subject or Parent Parcel.


17/157


Page 14

5.2 Vapor Encroachment Screening

IVI conducted a “Tier I” (non-intrusive) Vapor Encroachment Screening (VES) on the

Subject in accordance with the methodology set forth in ASTM E 2600-10 “StandardGuide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate

Transactions”. During the VES, the Area of Concern (AOC) was minimized using themethodology taught in the ASTM Screening for Vapor Encroachment onto PropertyInvolved in Real Estate Transactions Training Course. The purpose of the Tier I VES is

to conduct an initial screen to identify, to the extent feasible, the potential for a vapor

encroachment condition (VEC) in connection with the Subject with respect to chemicals

of concern that may migrate as vapors into the subsurface of the Subject as a result ofcontaminated soil and groundwater on or near the property.

This VES utilized readily available data sources previously discussed in this Phase I ESAto include the type of soils, geology and groundwater characteristics of the Subject area

(refer to Section 4.3) as well as known or potentially contaminated sites as identified on

Federal, State, tribal and local databases. IVI also utilized previously discussed standardhistorical sources of information to identify potential historical sources of contamination

on the Subject and surrounding properties which may be indicative of a VEC. This datacollection and analysis was coupled with our site reconnaissance of the Subject and

surrounding properties. Based upon the results of our data collection, reconnaissance and

analysis, a summary of our Tier I VES findings is presented in the table below:

Potential for Vapor Encroachment to Impact the Subject

Area of Concern Conclusion

Subject Property Operations or Existing Conditions None identified (Refer to Sections 3.0 SiteDescription and 6.0 Site Reconnaissance)

Historical Uses of the Subject Property None identified (Refer to Section 4.0 Historical

Use)

Adjoining Property Operations or Existing

Conditions

None identified (Refer to Section 3.2

Surrounding Land Use)

Historical Uses of Adjoining Properties or Nearby

Properties

None identified (Refer to Section 4.0 Historical

Use)

Regulatory Review of sites identified on Federal,

State, tribal and Local Environmental Databases

which were located in Approximate Minimum

Search Distance (AMSD)

Some identified, none of concern. (Refer to

Section 5.1 Regulatory Review)

Analysis/Comment: VEC can be ruled out because it does not exist or is not likely to

exist.


18/157


Page 15

6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE

6.1 Chemical Storage and Usage

Based upon on IVI’s observations, no chemical storage or usage was observed totake place at or in the vicinity of the Subject.

6.2 Bulk Storage Tanks

Based upon on IVI’s observations, no bulk storage tanks were observed at or in

the vicinity of the Subject.

6.3 Site Waste and Wastewater

Solid Waste

Based upon on IVI’s observations, no solid waste disposal was observed at or in

the vicinity of the Subject.

Sanitary Sewage

Based upon on IVI’s observations, no sanitary sewage facility was observed at or

in the vicinity of the Subject.

Hazardous Waste

Based upon on IVI’s observations, no hazardous or petroleum wastes were

observed or reported to be generated at or in the vicinity of the Subject.

Furthermore, IVI's review of the USEPA's database of sites regulated underRCRA did not identify the Subject and underlying parcel as a generator of

hazardous waste.

6.4 Stained Soil, Stains and/or Corrosion on Floors, Walls or Ceilings, or

Stressed Vegetation

Based upon on IVI’s observations, no stained soil, stains and/or corrosion onfloors, walls or ceilings, or stressed vegetation was observed at or in the vicinity

of the Subject.

6.5 Liquid Discharges

Based upon on IVI’s observations, no liquid discharge thought to be an

environmental concern was observed at or in the vicinity of the Subject.


19/157


Page 16

6.6 Pools of Liquid / Standing Surface Water

Based upon on IVI’s observations, no pools of liquid were observed at or in the

vicinity of the Subject.

6.7 Pits, Cisterns, Cesspools, Ponds or Lagoons

Based upon on IVI’s observations, no pits, cisterns, cesspools, ponds, lagoonswere observed at or in the vicinity of the Subject.

6.8 Wells

IVI observed one water well located approximately 2,100’ southeast of the

proposed Subject. The presence of a well is not considered a REC to the Subject.

6.9 On-Site Fill

Based upon on IVI’s observations, no on-site fill was observed at or in thevicinity of the Subject.

6.10 Drums and Containers for Storing Waste

Based upon on IVI’s observations, no drums and containers for storing wastewere observed at or in the vicinity of the Subject.

6.11 Trash or Other Evidence of Solid Waste Disposal

Based upon on IVI’s observations, no trash or evidence of solid waste disposal

were observed at or in the vicinity of the Subject.

6.12 Floor Drains and Sumps

Based upon on IVI’s observations, no floor drains or sumps were observed at orin the vicinity of the Subject.

6.13 Odors

Based upon on IVI’s observations, no odors were noticed at or in the vicinity of

the Subject.

6.14 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) - Transformers

Based upon on IVI’s observations, no transformers were observed at or in thevicinity of the Subject.


20/157


Page 17

6.15 Asbestos Containing Material (ACM)

The use of most sprayed applied surfacing asbestos-containing materials

(“ACM”) were banned by the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air

Pollutants (NESHAPS) during the 1970’s. Specifically, asbestos-containingspray-on fireproofing and insulation were banned under NESHAPS in 1973

followed by the banning of decorative spray-on applications in 1978. In 1975 NESHAPS also banned the installation of wet-applied and pre-formed asbestos-containing pipe insulation and pre-formed boiler and hot water tank insulation.

Although revised in 1990, NESHAPS still prohibits spray-on applications of

asbestos-containing materials to buildings, structures, pipes, and conduits unless

such material is encapsulated in a bituminous or resinous binder that is not friableafter drying.

Under the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) the use of asbestos-containingcorrugated paper, roll-board, commercial paper, specialty paper, flooring felt and

new uses of asbestos were banned in 1989. Notwithstanding the forgoing, most

U.S. firms voluntarily ceased production of asbestos-containing building materialsnot covered by the aforementioned Federal bans by the mid-1980s. Nevertheless,

despite the ban, ACM may be present in newer construction in the form ofmaterials which were manufactured prior to the ban.

As such, IVI requested information regarding ACM at the Subject. IVI did notreceive any information pertaining to ACM at the Subject.

IVI conducted a limited survey consisting of the identification and (if applicable)

sampling of friable and non-friable suspect materials for asbestos analysis wherethere existed a potential for disturbance based on the review of the lease exhibits,

and / or the mention by the client’s representatives. This survey was completedduring IVI’s site visit as part of this report.

Findings:

IVI’s visual reconnaissance did not reveal any areas of suspect ACM which are

proposed to be disturbed by VZW proposed installation.

6.16 Lead-Containing Paint (LCP)

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) defines Lead-BasedPaint (“LBP”) as paint with a concentration of lead equal to or greater than 1.0

mg/cm2, 0.5% by weight. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”)

considers paint containing less than 0.009% lead to be "lead free." However, theOccupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) does not accept that

categorization. If an employer is working with paint which contains any amount


21/157


Page 18

of lead, including those with less than 0.009%, in such a way that would generate

airborne levels to which employees may be exposed, it is the employer's duty toconduct exposure monitoring (or use objective or historical data as defined in 29

CFR 1926.62(d)(3)(iii) through 1926.62(d)(3)(iv)(B) and in 29 CFR

1926.62(n)(4)) to demonstrate that the Lead in Construction standard's actionlevel (30 micrograms/cubic meter of air) is not exceeded. The results of the

exposure assessment then determine whether the employer would need to applythe further protections of that rule. If the levels of lead to which employees areexposed are below the action level (which may occur when the levels of lead in

paint are very low and work is being done in such a way as to not disturb the paint

and, therefore, generate airborne concentrations of lead), then the further

requirements of the standard would not apply.

IVI requested information regarding LCP at the Subject. IVI did not receive any

information pertaining to LCP at the Subject.

As such, IVI conducted a limited survey consisting of the identification and (if

applicable) sampling of suspect materials for lead analysis where there existed a potential for disturbance based on the review of the lease exhibits, and / or the

mention by the client’s representatives. This survey was completed during IVI’ssite visit as part of this report.

Findings:

IVI’s visual reconnaissance did not reveal any areas of suspect LCP which are

proposed to be disturbed by VZW proposed installation.

6.17 Potential Mold Conditions

Although mold is ubiquitous and may occur in a very short time span, an effortwas made to identify conspicuous mold growth in the common areas surveyed.

Based on the above efforts, conspicuous mold growth was not identified at the

time of our survey.


22/157


Page 19

7.0 INTERVIEWS

7.1 User

The User(s) of the report is Pyramid c/o Albany County. An All AppropriateInquiry (AAI) User questionnaire was submitted to the User. The user

questionnaire is provided to the User of the Phase I Environmental SiteAssessment in order to obtain information pertaining to the past site useand possible presence of recognized environmental conditions. The owner of

the site, Jody Jansen, did not completed the questionnaire on behalf of the User.

7.1.1 Title Records

Although requested, a copy of the Subject’s Chain-of-Title has not been provided to IVI for review. Nevertheless, the Subject underlying tax parcel

is owned by Jody Jansen.

7.1.2 Environmental Clean Up Liens and Activity and Use Limitations(AULs)

Although requested, IVI was not provided with a filled out AAI UserQuestionnaire and, as such, makes no representations in regards to same.

7.1.3 Specialized Knowledge

Although requested, IVI was not provided with a filled out AAI User

Questionnaire and, as such, makes no representations in regards to same.

7.1.4 Relationship of Purchase Price to Fair Market Value Due toContamination in Connection with the Subject



7.1.5 Common Knowledge or Reasonably Ascertainable Information



7.1.6 Purpose for Conducting the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

The purpose of conducting this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

was for landowner liability purposes and to determine any potential RECsassociated with the proposed installation.


23/157


Page 20

7.1.7 Proceedings Involving the Property



7.2 Site Representatives

7.2.1 Owner

Although attempted, IVI was not able to interview the owner of the

underlying parcel and Subject.

7.2.2 Key Site Manager

Although attempted, IVI was not able to interview the key site manager ofthe Subject and underlying parcel.

7.2.3 Occupants & Neighbors

Although attempted, no occupants or neighbors were available forinterview.

7.3 Past Owners

Although attempted, IVI was unable to locate the Subject’s former owner.

7.4 Local Regulatory Agency Interviews and/or File Reviews

Fire Department

IVI has sent a request to the Berne Fire Department for environmental

information pertaining to the Subject. As of this writing, the Fire Department has

not responded to our request. Should receipt of a response from the FireDepartment change the conclusions of this report, Pyramid will be notified in

writing by IVI.

Albany County Health Department

IVI has sent a request to Albany County Health Department for environmental

information pertaining to the Subject. As of this writing, the Albany CountyHealth Department has not responded to our request. Should receipt of a response

from the Albany County Health Department change the conclusions of this report,

Pyramid will be notified in writing by IVI.


24/157


Page 21

8.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

This report documents IVI’s findings from our Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

on the proposed wireless telecommunications facility located at 28 Jansen Lane, Berne,

New York (the “Subject”). The Subject is situated in a rural setting characterized byresidential development, undeveloped wooded land, and agricultural land. The Subject is

currently undeveloped wooded land. Prior to development of the Parent Parcel in 1952,the Subject was undeveloped wooded land. The Parent Parcel is owned by Jody Jansen.

Pyramid Network Services, LLC c/o Albany County proposes to construct

a wireless telecommunications facility on the Parent Parcel. Specifically, Pyramid proposes a 180’ self-support tower, with ancillary equipment at grade within an

approximate 50’ x 60’fenced equipment compound. Pyramid proposes the

installation of a 1,000 gallon propane AST, a 12’ x 16’ equipment shelter, a telcocabinet, electric transformer, and a 50kw propane generator within a

telecommunications compound. Additionally, Pyramid c/o Albany County proposes to

trench for new underground conduits that will run from the proposed equipment

cabinet to the existing utilities location (see attached Lease Exhibits for additionalinformation). The proposed collocation of antennas, ancillary equipment, proposed

generator, connecting conduit and all areas proposed to be disturbed as part of the

Pyramid installation are the focus of this report.The purpose of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was to assess existing site

conditions and render an opinion as to the identified or potential presence of recognized

environmental conditions in connection with all areas proposed to be disturbed as part ofthe Pyramid installation in accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM

International's Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I

Environmental Site Assessment Process E 1527-13 and the limitations identified herein.

Exceptions to or deletions from the scope of work are described in Section 2.0.

This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions

(RECs) in connection with the Subject and no further action is currently recommended.


25/157


Page 22

9.0 LIMITING CONDITIONS

9.1 This report has been prepared in compliance with the ASTM International’s standard entitled

“Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

Process” E1527-13.

9.2 The observations described in this report were made under the conditions stated herein. The

conclusions presented in the report were based solely upon the services described therein, and not onscientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of described services within the constraints imposed

by the client. The work described in this report was carried out in accordance with the Terms and

Conditions of the contract.

9.3 In preparing this report, IVI has relied on certain information provided by federal, state, and localofficials and other parties referenced therein, and on information contained in the files of

governmental agencies, that were readily available to IVI at the time of this assessment. Although

there may have been some degree of overlap in the information provided by these various sources,

IVI did not attempt to independently verify the accuracy or completeness of all information reviewed

or received during the course of this site assessment. Observations were made of the site and of thestructures on the site as indicated in this report. Where access to portions of the site or to structures

on the site was unavailable or limited, IVI renders no opinion as to the presence of direct or indirect

evidence relating to petroleum substances, hazardous substances, or both, in that portion of the siteand structure. In addition, IVI renders no opinion as to the presence of indirect evidence relating to

hazardous material or oil, where direct observation of the ground surface, interior walls, floors,

ceiling or a structure is obstructed by objects or materials, including snow, covering on or over these

surfaces.

9.4 As part of this assessment, IVI submitted requests for information via the Freedom of InformationAct (FOIA) to various governmental agencies. As of the preparation of this report, these requests

may not have been fulfilled. The conclusions of this report are subject to change upon receipt of aresponse from these FOIA requests.

9.5 IVI does not represent that the site referred to herein contains no petroleum or hazardous or toxic

substances or other conditions beyond those observed by IVI during the site walkthrough.

9.6 IVI has produced this document under an agreement between IVI and CLIENT on behalf of Pyramidon behalf of New York Transco, LLC and Jansen Lane County. All terms and conditions of that

agreement are included within this document by reference. Any reliance upon this document, or

upon IVI’s performance of services in preparing this document, is conditioned upon the relying party’s acceptance and acknowledgement of the limitations, qualifications, terms, conditions and

indemnities set forth in that agreement, and property ownership/management disclosure limitations,

if any. It is not to be relied upon by any party other than Pyramid nor used for any purpose other

than that specifically stated in our Agreement or within this Report’s Introduction section without

IVI’s advance and express written consent.

9.7 TIME LIMITATION TO ENACT CLAIM AGAINST IVI. If in the opinion of the Client, or any

third party claiming reliance on IVI’s report or services, that IVI was negligent or in breach of

contract, such aforementioned parties shall have one year from the date of IVI’s site visit to make a

claim.

9.8 Unless specifically identified within Section 2, Chinese drywall, indoor air quality and any other

non-ASTM scope issues as identified in ASTM E1527-13, Section 13.1.5, are excluded from the

scope of this assessment.


26/157

Jansen LaneBerne, New York

Telecom Services, A CBRE Company IVI Project No. TS50714170

Subject looking South

Subject Looking West

2

1


27/157



Subject Looking North

Subject Looking East

4

3


28/157



Looking away from Subject towards North

Looking away from Subject towards West

6

5


29/157



Looking away from Subject towards South

Looking away from Subject towards East

7

8


30/157



Proposed Subject Location

Existing Drive (to be improved as needed)

9

10


31/157



Well

Proposed Drainage Swale (area to be regraded)

11

12


32/157



Existing Pathway (to be improved as needed)

Hay Storage Barn

13

14


33/157


34/157


35/157


36/157


37/157


38/157


39/157


40/157


41/157


42/157


43/157


44/157


45/157


46/157


47/157


48/157


49/157


50/157


51/157


52/157


53/157


54/157


55/157

Tax Map Source: Parcel Access

Parent Parcel Boundary:

Project: JANSEN LANE

BERNE, NEW YORK

Project Number: TS50714170

N

Subject


56/157

Street Map Source: Google Earth



BERNE, NEW YORK


N

Subject


57/157

Historic USGS Topographic Map

1903

Source: USGS Quadrangle Berne, NY

Project: JANSEN LANEBERNE, NEW YORK


N

Subject


58/157

Historic USGS Topographic Map

1946

Source: USGS Quadrangle Rensselaerville, NY

Project: JANSEN LANEBERNE, NEW YORK


N

Subject


59/157

Historic Aerial Photograph

1952 Source: EDR



BERNE, NEW YORK


N

Subject


60/157


1960 Source: EDR



BERNE, NEW YORK


N

Subject


61/157


1977 Source: EDR



BERNE, NEW YORK


NSubject


62/157

Historic Aerial Photograph1986

Source: EDR



BERNE, NEW YORK


N

Subject


63/157


1995 Source: EDR



BERNE, NEW YORK


NSubject


64/157


2006 Source: EDR



BERNE, NEW YORK


N

Subject


65/157


Source: EDR



BERNE, NEW YORK


NSubject


66/157


Source: EDR



BERNE, NEW YORK


N

Subject


67/157


2011 Source: EDR



BERNE, NEW YORK


N

Subject


68/157

Federal Wetland Map Source: USFWS



BERNE, NEW YORK


N

Subject


69/157

State Wetland Map Source: NJDEP



BERNE, NEW YORK


N

Subject


70/157FORM-LBD-DXG

®kcehCoeGhtiwtropeR™paMsuidaRRDEehT

6 Armstrong Road, 4th floorShelton, CT 06484Toll Free: 800.352.0050www.edrnet.com

Jansen Lane / MOTNY1009

28 Jansen Lane

Berne, NY 12023

Inquiry Number: 04365396.2r

July 27, 2015


71/157

SECTION PAGE

Executive Summary ES1

Overview Map 2

Detail Map 3

Map Findings Summary 4

Map Findings 8

Orphan Summary 19

Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1

GEOCHECK ADDENDUM

Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1

Physical Setting Source Summary A-2

Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5

Physical Setting Source Map A-17

Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-19

Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1

TC04365396.2r Page 1

Thank you for your business.Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050

with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice

This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental DataResources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist fromother sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTALDATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALLENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLYLIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, norshould they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase IEnvironmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for anyproperty. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in wholeor in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All othertrademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


72/157

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC04365396.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standardsand Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for

Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation ofenvironmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.

TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION

ADDRESS

28 JANSEN LANEBERNE, NY 12023

COORDINATES

42.6207000 - 42˚ 37’ 14.52’’Latitude (North):74.1446000 - 74˚ 8’ 40.56’’Longitude (West):Zone 18Universal Tranverse Mercator:570151.8UTM X (Meters):4718835.5UTM Y (Meters):1449 ft. above sea levelElevation:

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY

5939983 RENSSELAERVILLE, NYTarget Property Map:2013Version Date:

5939469 ALTAMONT, NYNortheast Map:2013Version Date:

5939537 WESTERLO, NYSoutheast Map:2013Version Date:

5940017 GALLUPVILLE, NYNorthwest Map:

2013Version Date:

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT

20110715Portions of Photo from:USDASource:


73/157

04365396.2r Page 2

6 APT HOUSE HELDERBERG 1704 HELDEBERG TRAIL NY Spills Lower 2131, 0.4

5 BERNE TRANSFER STATI 1809 HELDERBERG TRAI SWF/LF Lower 1874, 0.3

4 CONKLIN RES HELDERBE 1714 HELDERBERG TRAI NY Spills Lower 1867, 0.3

3 BERNE KNOX WESTERLO 1738 HELDERBERG TRAI LTANKS, NY Spills Lower 1612, 0.3

2 SAINT BERNADETTE CHU 1763 HELDERBERG TRAI NY Spills Lower 1460, 0.2

BERNE SLF (T) BOX 49 SWF/LF Lower 747, 0.14

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY

Target Property Address:28 JANSEN LANEBERNE, NY 12023

Click on Map ID to see full detail.

MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft.

D DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTSITE NAME ADDRESS


74/157

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS

The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.

DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES

No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") governmentrecords either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for thefollowing databases:

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Federal NPL site list

NPL National Priority ListProposed NPL Proposed National Priority List SitesNPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens

Federal Delisted NPL site list

Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions

Federal CERCLIS list

CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information SystemFEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing

Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List

CERC-NFRAP CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned

Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list

CORRACTS Corrective Action Report

Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list

RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal

Federal RCRA generators list

RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity GeneratorsRCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity GeneratorsRCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator

Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries

US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites ListUS INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls


75/157

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


LUCIS Land Use Control Information System

Federal ERNS list

ERNS Emergency Response Notification System

State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS

SHWS Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in New York StateVAPOR REOPENED Vapor Intrusion Legacy Site List

State and tribal leaking storage tank lists

HIST LTANKS Listing of Leaking Storage TanksINDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

State and tribal registered storage tank lists

TANKS Storage Tank Faciliy ListingUST Petroleum Bulk Storage (PBS) DatabaseCBS UST Chemical Bulk Storage DatabaseMOSF UST Major Oil Storage Facilities DatabaseAST Petroleum Bulk StorageCBS AST Chemical Bulk Storage DatabaseMOSF AST Major Oil Storage Facilities DatabaseMOSF Major Oil Storage Facility Site ListingCBS Chemical Bulk Storage Site ListingINDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandFEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing

State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries

ENG CONTROLS Registry of Engineering ControlsINST CONTROL Registry of Institutional ControlsRES DECL Restrictive Declarations Listing

State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites

INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority ListingVCP Voluntary Cleanup Agreements

State and tribal Brownfields sites

ERP Environmental Restoration Program ListingBROWNFIELDS Brownfields Site List

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Local Brownfield lists

US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites

Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites

DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations


76/157

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


ODI Open Dump InventorySWRCY Registered Recycling Facility ListSWTIRE Registered Waste Tire Storage & Facility ListINDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands

Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites

US CDL Clandestine Drug LabsDEL SHWS Delisted Registry SitesUS HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register

Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks

HIST UST Historical Petroleum Bulk Storage DatabaseHIST AST Historical Petroleum Bulk Storage Database

Local Land Records

LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien InformationLIENS Spill Liens Information

Records of Emergency Release Reports

HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting SystemNY Hist Spills SPILLS Database

Other Ascertainable Records

RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer RegulatedDOT OPS Incident and Accident DataDOD Department of Defense SitesFUDS Formerly Used Defense SitesCONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent DecreesROD Records Of DecisionUMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings SitesUS MINES Mines Master Index File

TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory SystemTSCA Toxic Substances Control ActFTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case ListingSSTS Section 7 Tracking SystemsICIS Integrated Compliance Information SystemPADS PCB Activity Database SystemMLTS Material Licensing Tracking SystemRADINFO Radiation Information DatabaseFINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry SystemRAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking SystemRMP Risk Management PlansHSWDS Hazardous Substance Waste Disposal Site InventoryUIC Underground Injection Control Wells

MANIFEST Facility and Manifest DataDRYCLEANERS Registered DrycleanersSPDES State Pollutant Discharge Elimination SystemAIRS Air Emissions Data


77/157

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


E DESIGNATION E DESIGNATION SITE LISTINGINDIAN RESERV Indian ReservationsSCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners ListingPCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration DatabaseCOAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List

US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance InformationEPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LISTUS AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility SubsystemLEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter SitesFinancial Assurance Financial Assurance Information ListingCOAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Site Listing2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program ListPRP Potentially Responsible PartiesCOAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS

EDR Exclusive Records

EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas PlantsEDR US Hist Auto Stat EDR Exclusive Historic Gas StationsEDR US Hist Cleaners EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES

Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives

RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities ListRGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List

SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS

Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.

Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated ona relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximityshould be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have beendifferentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detaileddata on individual sites can be reviewed.

Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.

Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.


State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF: The Solid Waste Faci lities/Landfill Sites records typically contain an inventory of solidwaste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. The data come from the list.

A review of the SWF/LF list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/24/2015 has revealed that there are 2


78/157

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


SWF/LF sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

BERNE SLF (T) BOX 49 NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.141 mi.) 1 8 BERNE TRANSFER STATI 1809 HELDERBERG TRAI NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.355 mi.) 5 16

State and tribal leaking storage tank lists

LTANKS: Leaking Storage Tank Incident Reports. These records contain an inventory of reportedleaking storage tank incidents reported from 4/1/86 through the most recent update. They can be either leakingunderground storage tanks or leaking aboveground storage tanks. The causes of the incidents are tank testfailures, tank failures or tank overfills

A review of the LTANKS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/18/2015 has revealed that there is 1 LTANKS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.


BERNE KNOX WESTERLO 1738 HELDERBERG TRAI NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.305 mi.) 3 9 Program Number: 0506364Spill Number/Closed Date: 0506364 / 11/8/2005

Site ID: 351570



NY Spills: Data collected on spills reported to NYSDEC. is required by one or more of the following:Article 12 of the Navigation Law, 6 NYCRR Section 613.8 (from PBS regs), or 6 NYCRR Section 595.2 (from CBSregs). It includes spills active as of April 1, 1986, as well as spills occurring since this date.

A review of the NY Spills list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/18/2015 has revealed that there are 4 NY Spills sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.


SAINT BERNADETTE CHU 1763 HELDERBERG TRAI N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.277 mi.) 2 8

Site ID: 72754

Spill Number/Closed Date: 9708865 / 12/9/1997spillno: 9708865

BERNE KNOX WESTERLO 1738 HELDERBERG TRAI NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.305 mi.) 3 9

Site ID: 88098

Site ID: 277720Site ID: 327920

Site ID: 274233

Spill Number/Closed Date: 9606873 / 8/29/1996Spill Number/Closed Date: 0205417 / 8/29/2002Spill Number/Closed Date: 9804699 / 4/6/2000

Spill Number/Closed Date: 0112234 / 10/29/2002

spillno: 0112234spillno: 0205417

spillno: 9606873

spillno: 9804699


79/157

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



CONKLIN RES HELDERBE 1714 HELDERBERG TRAI NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.354 mi.) 4 15

Site ID: 107329Spill Number/Closed Date: 9609845 / 6/10/1997

spillno: 9609845

APT HOUSE HELDERBERG 1704 HELDEBERG TRAIL NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.404 mi.) 6 17

Site ID: 83369

Spill Number/Closed Date: 0111883 / 3/18/2002spillno: 0111883


80/157


81/157

DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.

1 0 8 0

9 6

0

1 0 4

0

9 6

0

9

6 0

1 1

6 0

1 1

2 0

1 0 8 0

1 0 4

0

1 0

4 0

9

6 0

1 0

0 0

9 2 0

9 2

0

9

2

0

9 6 0 9

2 0

9 6

0

9 6 0

9 6 0

9 6 0

9 6 0

1 0 0 0

1 0 0 0

1 0

1 0 0 0

1 0

0 0

1 0 0 0

1 0 4

0

1

1

6

0

1 2 0

0

1

0

4 0

1 0 8

0 1 1

2 0

1

2

0

0

1 0 0 0 9 2

0 9

6 0

1 4 4 0

1

4 0 0

1 0 4 0

1

5

6 0

1 4 00 1

3

6

0

1

3

6

0

1

0 0 0 9

6 0

9 6

0

9

6

01

1

2

0 1

6

0

0

9

2

0

9

2 0

9

2

0

9

2

0

1

5

6

0

1

5 6

0

1 0 8 0

1 2 4 0

1 0

4 0

1 5 2 0

1

5

2

0

1

5

2

0

1 4 8 0

1 4 8 0

1

4

8

0

1

4

8

0

1

4

4

0

1

4

4

0

1 4 4

0

9 6

0

9 6 0

9

6

0

1 4 0 0

1 4

0 0

1

4 0

0

1 3 6 0

1

3

6

0

1 3

6 0

1 3 2 0

1

3

2

0

1 3

2 0

1 3

2 0

1

3

2

0

1 2 8 0

1

2

8

0

1 2 8 0

1 2

8 0

1

2

8

0

1 2 4

0

1

2

4

0

1 2 4 0

1 2

4 0

1 2 0

0

1

2

0

0

1 2

0 0

1

2

0 0

1 1 6 0

1

1

6

0

1 1

6 0

1

1

6

0

1 1 2 0

1

1

2

0

1

1 2

0

1

1

2

0

1 0 8 0

1

0

8

0

1

0

8

0

1

0

8

0

1 0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1 0

0 0

1

0

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 0 4 0

1 0

4 0

1

0

4

0

1

0

4

0

1

0 4

0

1

0 4

0

1 2 0 0

1 6

4 0

1

6

4

0

1 1 6 0

1 2

0 0

1 2

4 0

1 2

8 0

1 3 2 0

1 6

0

0

1

6 0 0

1 3 6 0

1

5

6 0

1 5

6 0

1 4

0 0

1

5

2

0

1

5

2

0

1 5

2 0

1 4 4

0

1

4

8

0

1

4

8

0

1 4

8 0

1

4

4

0

1

4

4

0


82/157

DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.DR Inc.

1 4

4 0

1 4 0 0

1 4 0 0

1

5

6

0

1 4 0 0

1

5 6 0

1 3 6 0

1 3 6 0

1 3 6 0

1 4

1 4 4 0

1 4

0 0

1 3

1 3 6 0

1 3

2 0

1 3

2 0

1 2 8 0

1 2 4 0

1 2 0 0

1 2 0 0

1 1 6 0

1 1 2 0

1 0 8 0

1 0 0 0

1 0 4 0


83/157

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY

SearchTargetDistance Total

Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted


Federal NPL site list

0 NR 0 0 0 01.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 01.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS

Federal Delisted NPL site list

0 NR 0 0 0 01.000Delisted NPL

Federal CERCLIS list

0 NR NR 0 0 00.500CERCLIS 0 NR 0 0 0 01.000FEDERAL FACILITY

Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List

0 NR 0 0 0 01.000CERC-NFRAP

Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list

0 NR 0 0 0 01.000CORRACTS

Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list

0 NR NR 0 0 00.500RCRA-TSDF

Federal RCRA generators list

0 NR NR NR 0 00.250RCRA-LQG 0 NR NR NR 0 00.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 00.250RCRA-CESQG

Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries

0 NR NR 0 0 00.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500US INST CONTROL 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500LUCIS

Federal ERNS list

0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS

State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS

0 NR 0 0 0 01.000SHWS 0 NR 0 0 0 01.000VAPOR REOPENED

State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists

2 NR NR 1 1 00.500SWF/LF

State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 1 NR NR 1 0 00.500LTANKS 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500HIST LTANKS 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500INDIAN LUST

TC04365396.2r Page 4


84/157




State and tribal registered storage tank lists

0 NR NR NR 0 00.250TANKS 0 NR NR NR 0 00.250UST 0 NR NR NR 0 00.250CBS UST 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500MOSF UST 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAST 0 NR NR NR 0 00.250CBS AST 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500MOSF AST 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500MOSF 0 NR NR NR 0 00.250CBS 0 NR NR NR 0 00.250INDIAN UST 0 NR NR NR 0 00.250FEMA UST

State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries

0 NR NR NR 0 00.250ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500INST CONTROL 0 NR NR NR 0 00.180RES DECL

State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites

0 NR NR 0 0 00.500INDIAN VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500VCP

State and tribal Brownfields sites

0 NR NR 0 0 00.500ERP 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500BROWNFIELDS


Local Brownfield lists

0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS BROWNFIELDS

Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites

0 NR NR 0 0 00.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPODI 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500SWRCY 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500SWTIRE 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500INDIAN ODI

Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites

0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 01.000DEL SHWS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL

Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks

0 NR NR NR 0 00.250HIST UST 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST AST

TC04365396.2r Page 5


85/157




Local Land Records

0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS


0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS 4 NR NR 4 0 00.500NY Spills 0 NR NR NR NR 00.125NY Hist Spills

Other Ascertainable Records

0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOD 0 NR 0 0 0 01.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 01.000CONSENT

0 NR 0 0 0 01.000ROD 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR 0 00.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500HSWDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC 0 NR NR NR 0 00.250MANIFEST 0 NR NR NR 0 00.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPDES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPE DESIGNATION 0 NR 0 0 0 01.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR 0 0 00.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance

0 NR NR 0 0 00.500COAL ASH 0 NR NR NR 0 00.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE

TC04365396.2r Page 6


86/157


87/157

MAP FINDINGSMap ID

Direction

EDR ID NumberDistanceEPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation

Not reportedExpiration Date:

Not reportedAuthorization Date: Not reportedAuthorization #:

Not reportedWaste Type:

Not reportedRegulatory Status: Not reportedAccuracy Code:

Not reportedNorth Coordinate:

Not reportedEast Coordinate: Not reportedActive:

Not reportedActivity Number:

Not reportedActivity Desc: Not reportedContact Phone:

Not reportedContact Email:

Not reportedContact City,St,Zip: Not reportedContact Addr2:

Not reportedContact Address:

Not reportedContact Name:

Not reportedOwner Phone: Not reportedOwner Email:

BERNE, NY 12023Owner City,St,Zip:

Not reportedOwner Addr2: BOX 49Owner Address:

PrivateOwner Type:

TOWN OF BERNEOwner Name: Not reportedPhone Number:

4Region Code:

INACTIVEFlag:

SWF/LF:

747 ft.0.141 mi.

Relative:Lower

Actual:1089 ft.

1/8-1/4 BERNE, NY 12023

NW BOX 49 N/A

Date post:	07-Aug-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	acsotweet
View:	226 times
Download:	0 times

Jansen Lane Phase I ESA

Documents