+ All Categories
Home > Documents > January 2013 - Womyn's Words

January 2013 - Womyn's Words

Date post: 04-Feb-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
20
Q&A: Giessel says AKLNG critical, budget priority; credits an issue page 5 l EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION l UTILITIES l INTERNATIONAL Vol. 21, No. 1 • www.PetroleumNews.com A weekly oil & gas newspaper based in Anchorage, Alaska Week of January 3, 2016 • $2.50 page 10 www.MiningNewsNorth.com The weekly mining newspaper for Alaska and Canada's North Week of January 3, 2016 l TECHNOLOGY Metals prices expected to slip further before bouncing in 2016 NORTHERN NEIGHBORS Compiled by Shane Lasley Dolly Varden drills northern silver targets Dolly Varden Silver Corp. Dec. 23 reported results from a 2,037-meter drill program at its Dolly Varden silver property in northwestern British Columbia. The known Dolly Varden deposits exhibit both volcanogenic massive sulfide (Eskay-like) and epithermal (Brucejack-like) mineralization styles which were the focus of the company’s maiden NI 43-101 mineral resource estimate completed in August. Though this resource remains open to expansion, the goal of the 2015 drill program was to explore targets identified by surface mapping and sam- pling as having similar high-grade potential in the northern half of the property, where lithologies, alteration and geochemical signatures extend on surface from the property’s historic mines, located on the southern portion of the property. Six holes of this year's 10-hole program targeted Ace-Galena, where the drilling confirmed the presence of VMS mineralization and intersected a new epithermal quartz vein and breccia with high-grade silver. Historical trench and recent surface samples at the McKay showing on Ace-Galena returned assays of up to 3,360 grams per metric ton silver over 1.3 meters. The Ace-Galena trend is projected to extend over a distance of five kilometers (three miles) to the Sault showing, also in the northern half of the Dolly Varden property. The 2015 drill holes at Ace-Galena were targeted to examine this VMS horizon down-dip and along DOLLY VARDEN SILVER CORP. A geologist collects samples from one of four historical high- grade silver mines located in the southern half of the Dolly Varden property in northwestern British Columbia. A ten-hole drill pro- gram completed by Dolly Varden Silver tested targets in the northern half of the property that show similarities to the past producing mines. LNG-fueled mine rigs Teck pilots dual fuel-haul trucks; Donlin Gold hopes tech is ready for mine By SHANE LASLEY Mining News D iesel has long been the fuel of choice for the enormous haul trucks, dozers, shovels and other equipment that most mines use. Many industry leaders, however, are looking ahead to natural gas as an economically and environmentally friendlier source of energy for the colossal machines. “LNG (liquefied natural gas) is a fuel source that has the potential to lower costs, significantly reduce emissions and improve environmental performance at our operations,” said Teck Resources Ltd. President and CEO Don Lindsay. “We are committed to minimizing our own carbon footprint, while at the same time continuing to provide the mining products that are essential to building a modern, low-carbon society.” To this end, Teck is piloting a project that is using a mixture of LNG and diesel to fuel six haul trucks at its Fording River steelmaking coal operation in southeastern British Columbia. In Alaska, LNG is one of the alternatives proposed to power haul trucks in a recently completed draft environmental impact statement for the Donlin Gold project, as a means of reducing the amount of diesel that would be needed to barged to the large open-pit mine once it is built and begins production. The technology needed to make LNG fuel a viable alternative, however, is relatively young and has only recently been put into commercial use on a limited basis. Piloting LNG trucks The LNG system being tested by Teck does not completely eliminate the need for diesel. Instead, a conversion is retrofitted on conventional diesel haul trucks that injects natural gas into air intake, supple- menting the heavier fuel. GFS Corp., the company that manufactures the units being tested, claims the system reduces diesel consumption by 50 to 70 percent while retaining the crucial power and torque for which diesel engines are notable. As an added benefit, LNG produces virtually no sulfur dioxide or particulates, and LNG-diesel trucks emit about 20 percent less greenhouse gas, compared with their conventional contemporaries. Teck says there is a potential to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 35,000 metric tons per year and save C$20 million annually if the technology was implemented across its B.C. steelmaking coal opera- tions. This would be another step towards Teck’s overall goal of reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 450,000 metric tons per year by 2030. Since imple- menting this plan in 2011, the diversified miner has cut annual CHG output by about 170,000 metric tons. “Like British Columbia, Teck is a global leader in finding innovative ways to reduce GHG emissions while continuing to create opportunity,” said B.C. Premier Christy Clark. “It’s a concrete example of the difference clean-burning LNG can make in the fight against climate change.” FortisBC, which distributes natural gas in the western province, is supplying the fuel and is helping see LNG FUEL page 12 see NORTHERN NEIGHBORS page 12 Teck Resources is piloting a project that is using a mix- ture of LNG and diesel to fuel six haul trucks at its Fording River steelmaking coal operation in south- eastern British Columbia. Upon completion of the trial, the diversified miner will evaluate the potential of implementing the LNG-diesel technology across a wider section of its haul-truck fleet. TECK RESOURCES L TD. This week’ s Mining News Many industry leaders are looking ahead to natural gas as a source of energy for the colossal mining haul trucks. Page 9 Celebrating 20 years: 1996-2016 ’15 dr i ll i ng up fro m ’14 Prudhoe Bay, Kuparuk River well counts increase by more than 30 percent By ERIC LIDJI For Petroleum News E ven decades after their discovery, and years past peak production, the Prudhoe Bay unit and Kuparuk River unit continue to be the two most active oil fields in Alaska. Although oil prices were drastically lower in 2015 than 2014, both units saw greatly increased drilling, according to Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission records. Those records provide an opportunity to com- pare the development drilling at the two units between this year and last year — with two dis- claimers. First, as Petroleum News went to print, records were only available through mid- December 2015. With two additional weeks, the 2015 totals might be higher than what is reported here. Second, completion reports occasionally lag behind actual activity and are regularly revised, which means these numbers measure administra- tive filings as of mid-December 2015. Prudhoe up nearly 30 percent When BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. sold much Although oil prices were drastically lower in 2015 than 2014, both units saw greatly increased drilling, according to Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission records. see DRILLING NUMBERS page 19 Ch i na’s i nvest ment lull State-owned companies backing away from 2009-12 flurry of Canadian deals By GARY PARK For Petroleum News T o all intents, the Chinese appetite for Canadian oil and natural gas assets might seem to have evaporated at a time when it might have been expected to thrive. The combination of cheap commodities, the beginnings of global consolidation and China’s own rising crude consumption would, in other times, have been the basis for a second round of the buy- ing spree that preoccupied the industry and govern- ments in the 2009-12 period. The giant PetroChina led the charge with US$15.3 billion in deals in Canada and Australia, sending such a shiver across Canada that the federal government moved with haste to ban the outright takeover of oil sands operated by foreign state- owned enterprises. The resulting slowdown has been confined over the past two years to only one significant deal — the C$1.1 billion PetroChina paid to complete its Further gr i d progress Utilities report to RCA on progress forming single Railbelt transmission company By ALAN BAILEY Petroleum News T he Alaska Railbelt electric utilities have filed a joint report with the Regulatory Commission of Alaska, notifying the commission of progress towards the voluntary formation of a transmission company, or transco, to operate the Railbelt power transmission grid. Five of the six Railbelt utilities independently own and operate different sections of the grid, with the state of Alaska also owning one section. The aging grid, which stretches from Homer and Seward on the southern Kenai Peninsula to the Fairbanks region in the Alaska Interior, suffers from single points of failure and capacity constraints which limit the ability to flexibly ship power between power generation facilities and the various power demand centers along the grid’s length. Reports required Following a directive from the Alaska Legislature to investigate whether there would be benefit in transferring management of the grid to some form of independent operator, at the end of June the RCA reported that there would indeed be significant advantage in a transition to a single oper- “If Chinese oil companies don’t find a way to buy quality companies such as BP quickly, someone else such as ExxonMobil may.” —Gordon Kwan, Nomura see INVESTMENT LULL page 18 The transco would recover its costs through non-discriminatory, open-access transmission rates. see GRID PROGRESS page 20 Federal budget has Arcti c funds, money for i nfrastructure upgrades The year-end federal budget bill, signed by President Obama on Dec. 18, contains a number of funding items specific to the Arctic, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said in a Dec. 22 press release. Arctic fund- ing approved for the 2016 financial year will help pay for a number of Arctic initia- tives such as Arctic infrastructure improve- ments, including preparatory work for the construction of a new heavy-duty U.S. ice- breaker. “The Arctic is a national asset and should be treated as a DOG approves Great Bear seismic survey to cover 450 square miles Alaska’s Division of Oil and Gas has issued a permit, approving Great Bear Petroleum Operating LLC’s 3-D seis- mic survey, planned to be carried out this winter on the North Slope. The survey, to be conducted by Geokinetics Inc., will cover an area of about 450 square miles immediately south and southwest of Deadhorse. The new survey comes as part of Great Bear’s search for drilling targets in its North Slope acreage. In 2010 the compa- ny purchased a broad swathe of state leases along a fairway to the south of the central North Slope, to pursue the possibility of producing oil directly from the prolific oil source rocks of northern Alaska. The company has since expanded its lease holdings in the same general area and modified its exploration strategy, using high-resolution 3-D seismic surveying both to see ARCTIC FUNDING page 14 see SEISMIC PERMIT page 19 SEN. LISA MURKOWSKI SHANE LASLEY
Transcript
Page 1: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

Q&A: Giessel says AKLNG critical,budget priority; credits an issue

page5

l E X P L O R A T I O N & P R O D U C T I O N

l U T I L I T I E S

l I N T E R N A T I O N A L

Vol. 21, No. 1 • www.PetroleumNews.com A weekly oil & gas newspaper based in Anchorage, Alaska Week of January 3, 2016 • $2.50

page10

www.MiningNewsNorth.com The weekly mining newspaper for Alaska and Canada's North Week of January 3, 2016 l T E C H N O L O G Y

Metals prices expected to slipfurther before bouncing in 2016

NORTHERN NEIGHBORSCompiled by Shane Lasley

Dolly Varden drills northern silver targetsDolly Varden Silver Corp. Dec. 23 reported results from a

2,037-meter drill program at its Dolly Varden silver property innorthwestern British Columbia. The known Dolly Vardendeposits exhibit both volcanogenic massive sulfide (Eskay-like)and epithermal (Brucejack-like) mineralization styles whichwere the focus of the company’s maiden NI 43-101 mineralresource estimate completed in August. Though this resourceremains open to expansion, the goal of the 2015 drill programwas to explore targets identified by surface mapping and sam-pling as having similar high-grade potential in the northern halfof the property, where lithologies, alteration and geochemicalsignatures extend on surface from the property’s historic mines,located on the southern portion of the property. Six holes of thisyear's 10-hole program targeted Ace-Galena, where the drillingconfirmed the presence of VMS mineralization and intersecteda new epithermal quartz vein and breccia with high-grade silver.Historical trench and recent surface samples at the McKayshowing on Ace-Galena returned assays of up to 3,360 gramsper metric ton silver over 1.3 meters. The Ace-Galena trend isprojected to extend over a distance of five kilometers (threemiles) to the Sault showing, also in the northern half of theDolly Varden property. The 2015 drill holes at Ace-Galena weretargeted to examine this VMS horizon down-dip and along

DO

LLY

VAR

DEN

SIL

VER

CO

RP.

A geologist collects samples from one of four historical high-grade silver mines located in the southern half of the Dolly Vardenproperty in northwestern British Columbia. A ten-hole drill pro-gram completed by Dolly Varden Silver tested targets in thenorthern half of the property that show similarities to the pastproducing mines.

LNG-fueled mine rigsTeck pilots dual fuel-haul trucks; Donlin Gold hopes tech is ready for mine

By SHANE LASLEYMining News

D iesel has long been the fuel of choice for theenormous haul trucks, dozers, shovels and

other equipment that most mines use. Many industryleaders, however, are looking ahead to natural gas asan economically and environmentally friendliersource of energy for the colossal machines.

“LNG (liquefied natural gas) is a fuel source thathas the potential to lower costs, significantly reduceemissions and improve environmental performanceat our operations,” said Teck Resources Ltd.President and CEO Don Lindsay. “We are committedto minimizing our own carbon footprint, while at thesame time continuing to provide the mining productsthat are essential to building a modern, low-carbonsociety.”

To this end, Teck is piloting a project that is usinga mixture of LNG and diesel to fuel six haul trucks atits Fording River steelmaking coal operation insoutheastern British Columbia.

In Alaska, LNG is one of the alternatives proposedto power haul trucks in a recently completed draftenvironmental impact statement for the Donlin Goldproject, as a means of reducing the amount of dieselthat would be needed to barged to the large open-pitmine once it is built and begins production.

The technology needed to make LNG fuel a viablealternative, however, is relatively young and has onlyrecently been put into commercial use on a limitedbasis.

Piloting LNG trucksThe LNG system being tested by Teck does not

completely eliminate the need for diesel. Instead, aconversion is retrofitted on conventional diesel haultrucks that injects natural gas into air intake, supple-menting the heavier fuel.

GFS Corp., the company that manufactures theunits being tested, claims the system reduces dieselconsumption by 50 to 70 percent while retaining the

crucial power and torque for which diesel engines arenotable.

As an added benefit, LNG produces virtually nosulfur dioxide or particulates, and LNG-diesel trucksemit about 20 percent less greenhouse gas, comparedwith their conventional contemporaries.

Teck says there is a potential to reduce carbondioxide emissions by 35,000 metric tons per year andsave C$20 million annually if the technology wasimplemented across its B.C. steelmaking coal opera-tions.

This would be another step towards Teck’s overallgoal of reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by450,000 metric tons per year by 2030. Since imple-menting this plan in 2011, the diversified miner hascut annual CHG output by about 170,000 metric tons.

“Like British Columbia, Teck is a global leader infinding innovative ways to reduce GHG emissionswhile continuing to create opportunity,” said B.C.Premier Christy Clark. “It’s a concrete example of thedifference clean-burning LNG can make in the fightagainst climate change.”

FortisBC, which distributes natural gas in thewestern province, is supplying the fuel and is helping

see LNG FUEL page 12

see NORTHERN NEIGHBORS page 12

Teck Resources is piloting a project that is using a mix-ture of LNG and diesel to fuel six haul trucks at itsFording River steelmaking coal operation in south-eastern British Columbia. Upon completion of thetrial, the diversified miner will evaluate the potentialof implementing the LNG-diesel technology across awider section of its haul-truck fleet.

TEC

K R

ESO

UR

CES

LTD

.This week’s Mining News

Many industry leaders are looking ahead to natural gas as asource of energy for the colossal mining haul trucks. Page 9

Celebrating 20 years: 1996-2016

’15 drilling up from ’14Prudhoe Bay, Kuparuk River well counts increase by more than 30 percent

By ERIC LIDJIFor Petroleum News

Even decades after their discovery, and years

past peak production, the Prudhoe Bay unit

and Kuparuk River unit continue to be the two

most active oil fields in Alaska.

Although oil prices were drastically lower in

2015 than 2014, both units saw greatly increased

drilling, according to Alaska Oil and Gas

Conservation Commission records.

Those records provide an opportunity to com-

pare the development drilling at the two units

between this year and last year — with two dis-

claimers. First, as Petroleum News went to print,

records were only available through mid-

December 2015. With two additional weeks, the

2015 totals might be higher than what is reported

here. Second, completion reports occasionally lag

behind actual activity and are regularly revised,

which means these numbers measure administra-

tive filings as of mid-December 2015.

Prudhoe up nearly 30 percentWhen BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. sold much

Although oil prices were drastically lowerin 2015 than 2014, both units saw greatlyincreased drilling, according to Alaska Oil

and Gas Conservation Commissionrecords.

see DRILLING NUMBERS page 19

China’s investment lullState-owned companies backing away from 2009-12 flurry of Canadian deals

By GARY PARKFor Petroleum News

To all intents, the Chinese appetite for Canadian

oil and natural gas assets might seem to have

evaporated at a time when it might have been

expected to thrive.

The combination of cheap commodities, the

beginnings of global consolidation and China’s own

rising crude consumption would, in other times,

have been the basis for a second round of the buy-

ing spree that preoccupied the industry and govern-

ments in the 2009-12 period.

The giant PetroChina led the charge with

US$15.3 billion in deals in Canada and Australia,

sending such a shiver across Canada that the federal

government moved with haste to ban the outright

takeover of oil sands operated by foreign state-

owned enterprises.

The resulting slowdown has been confined over

the past two years to only one significant deal —

the C$1.1 billion PetroChina paid to complete its

Further grid progressUtilities report to RCA on progress forming single Railbelt transmission company

By ALAN BAILEYPetroleum News

The Alaska Railbelt electric utilities have filed a

joint report with the Regulatory Commission of

Alaska, notifying the commission of progress

towards the voluntary formation of a transmission

company, or transco, to operate the Railbelt power

transmission grid.

Five of the six Railbelt utilities independently

own and operate different sections of the grid, with

the state of Alaska also owning one section. The

aging grid, which stretches from Homer and Seward

on the southern Kenai Peninsula to the Fairbanks

region in the Alaska Interior, suffers from single

points of failure and capacity constraints which limit

the ability to flexibly ship power between power

generation facilities and the various power demand

centers along the grid’s length.

Reports requiredFollowing a directive from the Alaska

Legislature to investigate whether there would be

benefit in transferring management of the grid to

some form of independent operator, at the end of

June the RCA reported that there would indeed be

significant advantage in a transition to a single oper-

“If Chinese oil companies don’t find a wayto buy quality companies such as BP

quickly, someone else such as ExxonMobilmay.” —Gordon Kwan, Nomura

see INVESTMENT LULL page 18

The transco would recover its coststhrough non-discriminatory, open-access

transmission rates.

see GRID PROGRESS page 20

Federal budget has Arctic funds,money for infrastructure upgrades

The year-end federal budget bill, signed

by President Obama on Dec. 18, contains a

number of funding items specific to the

Arctic, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska,

said in a Dec. 22 press release. Arctic fund-

ing approved for the 2016 financial year

will help pay for a number of Arctic initia-

tives such as Arctic infrastructure improve-

ments, including preparatory work for the

construction of a new heavy-duty U.S. ice-

breaker.

“The Arctic is a national asset and should be treated as a

DOG approves Great Bear seismicsurvey to cover 450 square miles

Alaska’s Division of Oil and Gas has issued a permit,

approving Great Bear Petroleum Operating LLC’s 3-D seis-

mic survey, planned to be carried out this winter on the North

Slope. The survey, to be conducted by Geokinetics Inc., will

cover an area of about 450 square miles immediately south

and southwest of Deadhorse.

The new survey comes as part of Great Bear’s search for

drilling targets in its North Slope acreage. In 2010 the compa-

ny purchased a broad swathe of state leases along a fairway to

the south of the central North Slope, to pursue the possibility

of producing oil directly from the prolific oil source rocks of

northern Alaska. The company has since expanded its lease

holdings in the same general area and modified its exploration

strategy, using high-resolution 3-D seismic surveying both to

see ARCTIC FUNDING page 14

see SEISMIC PERMIT page 19

SEN. LISA MURKOWSKI

SHA

NE

LASL

EY

Page 2: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

2 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016

Petroleum News North America’s source for oil and gas newscontents

ENVIRONMENT & SAFETY

FINANCE & ECONOMY7 Encana grappling with natural gas

Cuts costs, payroll, tightens focus to 4 areas; waitsfor Alberta to complete review; focus on discipline, innovation, sustainability

EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION4 Hilcorp practices take fire from AOGCC

Agency proposing $910,000 in penalties for violationsincluding incident at Milne Point unit where 3 workers overcome by nitrogen

13 Inuit link food to environmental health

Report from Inuit Circumpolar Council-Alaska addressesArctic policy through lens of food; view of food as survival and identify

GOVERNMENT5 Giessel: AKLNG critical, budget priority

Senate Resources co-chair says state needs to be carefulhow it reworks oil tax credit and maintains its role in next year’s budget

INTERNATIONAL8 Norway publishes Arctic safety report

Provides review of techniques, procedures and standardsfor preventing oil pollution from Arctic offshore oil and gas activities

6 AKLNG sends responses to scoping issues

Alaska LNG Project tells FERC it will continue to evaluateagency, public comments, including those received after Dec. 4 deadline

NATURAL GAS

15 Hamm says US quality reflected in price

14 BC looks to LNG as an economic driver

15 Trustee: Checks for train disaster victims

Federal budget has Arctic funds,money for infrastructure upgrades

DOG approves Great Bear seismicsurvey to cover 450 square miles

’15 drilling up from ’14

Prudhoe Bay, Kuparuk River well counts increase by more than 30 percent

China’s investment lull

State-owned companies backing away from 2009-12 flurry of Canadian deals

Further grid progress

Utilities report to RCA on progress forming single Railbelt transmission company

ON THE COVER

page11

Parnell heads governors’ 7-membercoastal states coalition E X P L O R A T I O N & P R O D U C T I O N

N A T U R A L G A S

E X P L O R A T I O N & P R O D U C T I O N

Vol. 17, No. 44 • www.PetroleumNews.comA weekly oil & gas newspaper based in Anchorage, Alaska

Week of October 28, 2012 • $2

The October issue of North of 60 Mining News is enclosed.

October Mining News inside

PHOTO BY CHRIS AREN D, COURT ES Y OF USI BELLI COA L MI NE I NC .

Thomas Tak e, ch arged w ith the large task of repairing

tires at the U sibelli Coal M ine in Healy, holds one of

some 4,500 high-paying mining jobs in Alaska. An

employment forecast published by the Alaska

Depa rtment of Labor and W or kforce Development in

October pegged the state’s mining sector job grow th

from 2010 t o 2020 at 19 percent. Page 14.

A special supplement to Petroleum NewsWEEK OFOctober 28, 2012

3 P en t a g o n ba ck s U cor e in no v a tio n

Contract ties DoD to Bokan, state-of-the-art method for extracting REEs

11 E m er a l ds g l im m e r in g o ld s e tt i n g

North C ountry Gold makes rare gem discovery in Nunavut greenstone belt

24 N e w G old t h ir s t y f or B l a ck w a te r

Miner dri lls 250,000 meters, makes vast land grab in gold-rich central BC

Budget planners cautious; landsales, well authorizations down

Bean counters and number crunchers are in full swing in

Canada assembling 2013 capital budgets against a worrying

backdrop of shaky industry forecasts, sharp declines in gov-

ernment land auctions and plunging new well permits issued

by regulators.The current betting points to troubles for the upstream,

reflected in gyrating oil and natural gas prices, and a contin-

uation of the lackluster showing in the drilling sector that has

extended over recent years.One of the early messages came from Schlumberger Chief

Executive Officer Paal Kibsgaard, who told analysts that liq-

uids activity in North America will “no longer be able to off-Hanging pipeline: September floodsleave Kenai area gas line dangling

Roads and railroad bridges weren’t the only things that

washed out in the heavy rains which hit Southcentral Alaska

in September. Marathon Oil, in the process of selling its Cook Inlet

assets to Hilcorp Alaska, is dealing with a washout along

Kalifonsky Beach Road near Kenai which left a segment of a

gas pipeline dangling. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety

Administration, PHMSA, described the situation and action it

requires in an Oct. 5 corrective action order. The affected line is a 20-inch diameter pipeline transport-

ing natural gas from the Kenai gas field to facilities south of

Kenai. PHMSA said the line was buried parallel to and with-

see BUDGET CAUTION page 18

see FLOODING AFTERMATH page 21

CD-5 is aliveConoco sanctions Alpine West; now needs partner approval; first oil by 2016

By ERIC LIDJIFor Petroleum NewsA fter years of permitting delays, ConocoPhillipsCo. is moving ahead on CD-5, the fourth satel-

lite of its Alpine field on the North Slope, the com-

pany announced Oct. 25.The ConocoPhillips board sanctioned the project

in October, Executive Vice President Exploration

and Production Matt Fox said during a third quarter

earnings call. “The project is now pending partner

approval, which is expected in November,” Fox said.

ConocoPhillips expects CD-5 production to begin

in 2016, Fox said. The company previously estimat-

ed construction would begin in 2014 with first oil in

late 2015.

After bringing the Alpine field at the Colville

River unit into production in 2000, ConocoPhillips

and its partner Anadarko brought three Alpine satel-

lites online over the following decade: Fiord in

August 2006, Nanuq in December 2006 and Qannik

in 2008. Also known as Alpine West, the CD-5 satellite

ConocoPhillips produced some 176,000barrels of oil equivalent per day in

Alaska during the third quarter, downsome 32,000 barrels of oil equivalent per

day from the same period last year.

see CD-5 page 22New field ‘challenge’ExxonMobil: Schedule is tight for achieving first production at Point Thomson

By WESLEY LOYFor Petroleum NewsM eeting the target date for starting productionfrom Alaska’s Point Thomson field will be “a

challenge,” an ExxonMobil executive said.The company has pledged to start producing natu-

ral gas condensate from the remote eastern North

Slope field by the winter of 2015-16.But it still has multiple permitting hurdles to clear

before it can begin construction of production facili-

ties and a pipeline to feed the condensate into the

existing North Slope transportation network.Company representatives appeared Oct. 23 at a

hearing of the Regulatory Commission of Alaska,

which is considering an ExxonMobil subsidiary’s

application for a certificate of public convenience and

necessity to build and operate the 22-mile pipeline.

One commissioner asked the ExxonMobil reps

whether they are on schedule with the Point Thomson

project.“We are on schedule, but it is very tight,” replied

Jeff Ray, vice president of PTE Pipeline LLC, the

company seeking the certificate for the Point

Aside from the certificate, ExxonMobilneeds a number of other major

authorizations before it can proceed withthe Point Thomson development.

see TIGHT SCHEDULE page 23Time for action is hereSouthcentral Alaska utilities are moving forward on options for gas imports

By ALAN BAILEYPetroleum NewsWith natural gas supplies from Cook Inlet set

to fall short of local gas demand by 2014 or

2015, the time has come tomove ahead with arrange-ments to supplement thoselocal supplies with importsfrom elsewhere, Southcentralpower and gas utility executives told the

Regulatory Commission of Alaska during a public

meeting on Oct. 24. Southcentral residents and

businesses depend on gas both for power genera-

tion and for the heating of buildings.“I’m personally done wringing my hands,”

Bradley Evans, CEO of Chugach Electric

Association, told the commissioners, saying he

takes responsibility for ensuring continuity of gas

supplies for his utility. Chugach Electric currently

generates about 90 percent its power using gas-

fueled power plants.

Lee Thibert, senior vice president ofChugach Electric, said that the utilities

have asked potential shippers of importedgas for expressions of interest in theimport arrangements.

see GAS IMPORTS page 24

What's the big attraction?

A. an industry institutionB. quality, accurate reportingC. attractive, readable designD. 98 percent market saturation

To advertise in Petroleum News callSusan Crane at 907-770-5592, orBonnie Yonker at 425-483-9705. Tosubscribe visit PetroleumNews.com,call 907-522-9469, or email [email protected].

6700 Arctic Spur Road

Anchorage, AK 99518

907.677.8220

www.uicdpb.com

General Contracting and Construction Management Government, Commercial, Residential Industrial/Mechanical Water and Fuel Systems Remote Arctic Logistics

INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE EXPERIENCE COMBINED WITH UNRIVALED ARCTIC EXPERTISE

A MEMBER OF THE UKPEAĠVIK IÑUPIAT CORPORATION FAMILY OF COMPANIES

Computing Alternatives

Information Technology Professionals

Ph| 907-644-4522Fx| 907-644-4523

[email protected] Silverado Way, Ste. I

Anchorage, AK 99518

• Custom Web, Desktop, &Mobile apps

• IT Business Analysis• Database Design & Modeling• Microsoft Server Maintenance

• SQL Server DatabaseAdministration

• Oil & Gas Risk Assessment and Regulatory Compliance Tools

• Revenue Taxation• Hospitality Systems

WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING SOLUTIONS TO PUBLIC AND

PRIVATE SECTORS

Page 3: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016 3

Rig Owner/Rig Type Rig No. Rig Location/Activity Operator or Status

Alaska Rig StatusNorth Slope - Onshore

Doyon DrillingDreco 1250 UE 14 (SCR/TD) Prudhoe Bay P1-14 BPDreco 1000 UE 16 (SCR/TD) Prudhoe Bay, Standby BPDreco D2000 Uebd 19 (SCR/TD) Nanuq CD5-09 ConocoPhillipsAC Mobile 25 Kuparuk 2S-01 ConocoPhillipsOIME 2000 141 (SCR/TD) Kuparuk 2S-13 ConocoPhillips 142 Rig Up ConocoPhillipsTSM 7000 Arctic Fox #1 Stacked

Kuukpik Drilling 5 Franklin Bluffs Icewine #1 Accumulate Engery Nabors Alaska DrillingAC Coil Hybrid CDR-2 Kuparuk 2F-18 ConocoPhillipsDreco 1000 UE 2-ES (SCR-TD) Deadhorse Available Mid-Continental U36A 3-S Prudhoe Bay AvailableOilwell 700 E 4-ES (SCR) Prudhoe Bay AvailableDreco 1000 UE 7-ES (SCR/TD) Kuparuk ConocoPhillipsDreco 1000 UE 9-ES (SCR/TD) Kuparuk ConocoPhillipsOilwell 2000 Hercules 14-E (SCR) Prudhoe Bay AvailableOilwell 2000 Hercules 16-E (SCR/TD) Mustang location Brooks Range PetroleumEmsco Electro-hoist-2 18-E (SCR) Prudhoe Bay StackedEmsco Electro-hoist Varco 22-E (SCR/TD) Prudhoe Bay StackedTDS3Emsco Electro-hoist Canrig 27-E (SCR-TD) Point Thomson Exxon1050EEmsco Electro-hoist 28-E (SCR) Prudhoe Bay StackedOilwell 2000 33-E Prudhoe Bay Available Academy AC Electric CANRIG 99AC (AC-TD) Deadhorse AvailableOIME 2000 245-E (SCR-ACTD) Oliktok Point ENIAcademy AC electric CANRIG 105AC (AC-TD) Deadhorse Available Academy AC electric Heli-Rig 106AC (AC-TD) Deadhorse Available

Nordic Calista ServicesSuperior 700 UE 1 (SCR/CTD) Prudhoe Bay Drill Site L-02 BPSuperior 700 UE 2 (SCR/CTD) Prudhoe Bay Well Drill Site 15-49 BPIdeco 900 3 (SCR/TD) Milne Point L Pad, Well 48 Hilcorp

Parker Drilling Arctic Operating Inc. NOV ADS-10SD 272 Prudhoe Bay DS 18 BPNOV ADS-10SD 273 Prudhoe Bay DSW-59 BP

North Slope - Offshore

BPTop Drive, supersized Liberty rig Inactive BP

Doyon DrillingSky top Brewster NE-12 15 (SCR/TD) Stacked

Nabors Alaska DrillingOIME 1000 19AC (AC-TD) Oooguruk ODSN-02 Caelus Alaska

Cook Inlet Basin – Onshore

Miller Energy ResourcesMesa 1000 Rig 37 Mobilized to North Fork to begin Miller Energy Resources drilling this winter

All American Oilfield LLCIDECO H-37 AAO 111 In All American Oilfield’s yard in Kenai, Alaska Available

Aurora Well ServicesFranks 300 Srs. Explorer III AWS 1 Stacked out west side of Cook Inlet Available

Nabors Alaska DrillingContinental Emsco E3000 273E Kenai AvailableIDECO 2100 E 429E (SCR) Kenai Stacked

SaxonTSM-850 147 Ninilchik Unit, Bartolowits pad Hilcorp Alaska drilling Frances #1TSM-850 169 Swanson River Hilcorp Alaska

Cook Inlet Basin – Offshore

XTO EnergyNational 110 C (TD) Idle XTO Spartan Drilling Baker Marine ILC-Skidoff, jack-up Spartan 151 Furie Upper Cook Inlet KLU#1Cook Inlet EnergyNational 1320 35 Osprey Platform RU-1, workover Cook Inlet Energy

Mackenzie Rig Status

Canadian Beaufort Sea

SDC Drilling Inc.SSDC CANMAR Island Rig #2 SDC Set down at Roland Bay Available

Central Mackenzie Valley

AkitaTSM-7000 37 Racked in Norman Well, NT Available

Alaska - Mackenzie Rig ReportThe Alaska - Mackenzie Rig Report as of December 28, 2015.

Active drilling companies only listed.

TD = rigs equipped with top drive units WO = workover operations CT = coiled tubing operation SCR = electric rig

This rig report was prepared by Marti Reeve

Baker Hughes North America rotary rig counts* Dec. 23 Dec. 18 Year AgoUnited States 700 709 1,840Canada 126 162 256Gulf of Mexico 24 24 56

Highest/LowestUS/Highest 4530 December 1981US/Lowest 488 April 1999Canada/Highest 558 January 2000Canada/Lowest 29 April 1992 *Issued by Baker Hughes since 1944

JUDY

PAT

RICK

Page 4: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

By KRISTEN NELSONPetroleum News

T he Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation

Commission is proposing some

$910,000 in penalties against Hilcorp

Alaska for violations it says are “neither

isolated nor innocent” and which it calls

“emblematic of ongoing compliance prob-

lems with Hilcorp rig workover opera-

tions.”

In a statement provided by spokes-

woman Lori Nelson of Hilcorp Alaska the

company said it is taking the “alleged viola-

tions seriously” and conducting its own

review.

“That being said, we do take issue with

the characterization of our conduct by the

AOGCC in its correspondence.”

Following a story first reported by

Alaska Dispatch News, Petroleum News

obtained copies from the commission of its

recent actions against Hilcorp.

Milne Point J-08A workoverThe most significant event — for which

the commission is proposing $720,000 in

penalties — occurred at the Hilcorp Alaska-

operated Milne Point unit in September.

Hilcorp was performing workover oper-

ations with Automated Service Rig No. 1 at

the MPU J-08A well. It had received per-

mission from the commission to pull a

failed electric submersible pump and rerun

a new ESP completion, with a “fill cleanout

step” included in the procedure. The com-

mission said only seawater was referenced

in the sundry work procedure filed by

Hilcorp, but in the course of the work nitro-

gen was used in the well cleanout.

Hilcorp notified the commission Sept.

25 that three ASR1 personnel were “over-

come by something” in the enclosed mud

trailer at the well and were evacuated from

the rig.

An AOGCC inspector sent to the loca-

tion that same day was told that the fill

cleanout was done with nitrogen and sea-

water; the commission subsequently

requested more information from Hilcorp

and determined that a valve was left open

during the workover, providing “a flow

path for the nitrogen in the return fluids to

enter the enclosed mud trailer and displace

oxygen to a deadly level.”

Details of the incident cited by the com-

mission say the three men had initial symp-

toms from exposure to the oxygen-deficient

atmosphere in the mud trailer, but subse-

quently returned to work in the trailer and

then lost consciousness.

“The events associated with subsequent

entry into the oxygen-deficient space would

have been fatal for three ASR1 personnel

except for one worker’s good fortune to col-

lapse into the fresh air environment outside

of the enclosed trailer,” the commission

said.

No approval for nitrogen useThe commission said its regulations

require approval by AOGCC for any

change to an approved program or activity,

and said the approval it provided did not

authorize the use of nitrogen. Hilcorp told

the commission the use of nitrogen for fill

cleanout is a contingent plan executed only

if well conditions warrant it.

The commission said hazards associated

with commercial use of nitrogen are well

known and said “Hilcorp failed adequately

to identify the hazards, to assess the haz-

ards, and to implement actions to mitigate

the hazards and in doing so failed to main-

tain a safe work environment during the fill

cleanout operations.”

“Responsibility for assuring rig opera-

tions comply with good oilfield practices

rests with Hilcorp management and engi-

neering staff,” the commission said.

Not isolated The commission said the violations at

the MPU J-08A well “are neither isolated

nor innocent and are emblematic of going

compliance problems with Hilcorp rig

workover operations.”

AOGCC said issues with Hilcorp

include “ongoing failures to obtain neces-

sary approvals; failures to install, maintain,

and test required well control safety sys-

tems; failures to perform required tests; and

use of equipment that is unsuitable for the

operating environment.”

The $720,000 penalty includes $100,000

for changing work procedures, $600,000

“for failure to maintain a safe work environ-

ment in accordance with good oilfield engi-

neering practices” and $20,000 for failure

to provide results of a BOPE test.

“In addition to the potential severity of

the outcome of Hilcorp’s actions, Hilcorp’s

ongoing history of performing work outside

of approved permits or management-of-

change protocols, its history of compliance

issues and the need to deter are factors in

AOGCC’s analysis.” The commission said

a prior $115,000 penalty “imposed upon

Hilcorp for violations of essentially the

same nature has had no significant impact

on Hilcorp’s conduct.”

Other penalties proposedThe commission is also proposing fines

for failure to notify the commission that

blowout prevention equipment was used at

the MPU 1-03 well and failure to test

BOPE, for which a $40,000 penalty is pro-

posed.

In addition to the proposed penalty,

AOGCC said it intends to require Hilcorp

to provide a description and example of its

“regulatory compliance tracking program”;

“written management of change proce-

dures”; and a written explanation of how

Hilcorp “intends to prevent recurrence of

this violation.”

Two other fines, $75,000 each, are pro-

posed for changing work procedures with-

out approval — in both cases nitrogen was

used in cleanout procedures without com-

mission approval.

Health and safety In the statement which it provided

Hilcorp said: “The health and safety of our

employees and contractors is of the utmost

importance to Hilcorp.” The company said

l E X P L O R A T I O N & P R O D U C T I O N

Hilcorp practices take fire from AOGCCAgency proposing $910,000 in penalties for violations including incident at Milne Point unit where 3 workers overcome by nitrogen

4 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016

Kay Cashman PUBLISHER & EXECUTIVE EDITOR

Mary Mack CEO & GENERAL MANAGER

Kristen Nelson EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

Susan Crane ADVERTISING DIRECTOR

Bonnie Yonker AK / NATL ADVERTISING SPECIALIST

Heather Yates BOOKKEEPER

Shane Lasley NORTH OF 60 MINING PUBLISHER

Marti Reeve SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS DIRECTOR

Steven Merritt PRODUCTION DIRECTOR

Alan Bailey SENIOR STAFF WRITER

Eric Lidji CONTRIBUTING WRITER

Wesley Loy CONTRIBUTING WRITER

Gary Park CONTRIBUTING WRITER (CANADA)

Steve Quinn CONTRIBUTING WRITER

Rose Ragsdale CONTRIBUTING WRITER

Judy Patrick Photography CONTRACT PHOTOGRAPHER

Mapmakers Alaska CARTOGRAPHY

Forrest Crane CONTRACT PHOTOGRAPHER

Tom Kearney ADVERTISING DESIGN MANAGER

Renee Garbutt CIRCULATION MANAGER

Ashley Lindly RESEARCH ASSOCIATE

ADDRESSP.O. Box 231647Anchorage, AK 99523-1647

NEWS [email protected]

CIRCULATION 907.522.9469 [email protected]

ADVERTISING Susan Crane • [email protected]

Bonnie Yonker • [email protected]

FAX FOR ALL DEPARTMENTS907.522.9583

OWNER: Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska LLC (PNA)Petroleum News (ISSN 1544-3612) • Vol. 21, No. 1 • Week of January 3, 2016

Published weekly. Address: 5441 Old Seward, #3, Anchorage, AK 99518(Please mail ALL correspondence to:

P.O. Box 231647 Anchorage, AK 99523-1647)Subscription prices in U.S. — $118.00 1 year, $216.00 2 years

Canada — $206.00 1 year, $375.00 2 years Overseas (sent air mail) — $240.00 1 year, $436.00 2 years“Periodicals postage paid at Anchorage, AK 99502-9986.”

POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Petroleum News, P.O. Box 231647 Anchorage, AK 99523-1647.

www.PetroleumNews.com

Petroleum News and its supple-ment, Petroleum Directory, are

owned by Petroleum Newspapers ofAlaska LLC. The newspaper is pub-

lished weekly. Several of the individ-uals listed above work for inde-

pendent companies that contractservices to Petroleum Newspapers

of Alaska LLC or are freelance writers.

· Industrial Controls

· Valve Automation Systems

· Actuators

· Water & Wastewater Systems

C E L E B R A T I N G 3 0 Y E A R S

1120 E 5th Ave. Anchorage, AK 99501 | 907.277.7555 | arct iccontro ls.com

Anchorage Honolulu Los Angeles

• Commercial Diving• Marine Construction Services• Platform Installation, Maintenance and Repair• Pipeline Installation, Maintenance and Repair• Underwater Certified Welding• NDT Services• Salvage Operations• Vessel Support and Operations

• Environmental Services• Oil-Spill Response, Containment and Clean-Up• Hazardous Wastes and Contaminated Site Clean-

Up and Remediation• Petroleum Vessel Services, e.g. Fuel Transfer• Bulk Fuel Oil Facility and Storage Tank

Maintenance, Management, and Operations

American MarineServices Group

6000 A Street, Anchorage, AK 99518

907-562-5420Deadhorse, AK

907-659-9010www.amarinecorp.com • www.penco.org

[email protected]

The commission said onlyseawater was referenced in thesundry work procedure filed byHilcorp, but in the course of the

work nitrogen was used in the wellcleanout.

see HILCORP PRACTICES page 18

Page 5: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

By STEVE QUINNFor Petroleum News

Senate Resources Chair Cathy Giessel

says she plans on wasting little time

when the Legislature returns to Juneau

for a 90-day session. She says one of the

first committee hearings will be used to

get updates on the AKLNG project.

Still, the Anchorage Republican says

the budget remains a priority and how

Gov. Bill Walker’s administration and

the Legislature recast the current oil tax

credit system plays heavily into the next

budget.

Giessel spoke to Petroleum News

about what she believes lies ahead.

Petroleum News: Before we lookahead, let’s look back at the special ses-sion and what’s transpired since. First,what’s your take on how things went?

Giessel: I was pretty proud of the

Senate Finance Committee who got

down to work and kept us all focused on

the subject. They did a great job with the

questions that were asked. I think as

well, they made a great decision in

determining when enough was enough. I

think there were possibly more questions

committee members wanted to ask and

delve into, but they were getting periph-

eral of the subject of TransCanada termi-

nation, so they did an exemplary job of

managing the subject and moving the

bill at the right time.

Petroleum News: Were there any con-cerns that emerged from the special ses-sion moving forward?

Giessel: I think that I have been

aware and am more aware now that I

should be keeping closer track of what

the AGDC board is doing going forward

now that we have the full 25 percent. I

think we need to know a bit more about

where regulations are coming from that

might be proposed by AGDC and the

role that the attorney general is playing.

Petroleum News: Are you OK withthe role that the attorney general has?

Giessel: Well, the attorney general is

wearing a lot of hats — a lot of hats. He

is advising the AGDC board. He’s craft-

ing the fiscal policy. He sits on the

Permanent Fund board. That’s a lot of

input from a single individual.

Petroleum News: So in the end, you

were a yes vote.What drove that?

Giessel: I had

been a fan of

TransCanada during

the SB 138 process

because I thought

they brought that

expertise that we

needed. I’m not a

fan of government

building large projects. I think roads are

something we’ve been doing for a very

long time and one could even argue the

private sector could do a better job of

building those in some cases.

For this project I have never believed

that our state government should be

building it. So it was difficult for me to

agree to terminate TransCanada. I don’t

know there was ever a choice however.

The governor verbalized his desire for

them to be gone five or six months prior

to that special session.

It was untenable for them to remain.

It was kind of like a wedding. The

groom says he doesn’t want the bride

anymore, what’s the bride supposed to

do. It was an off ramp for us to take,

buying out TransCanada’s share. It

seemed like the issue had aligned in that

direction.

As I’ve said, I’m going to be very

diligent in terms of AGDC’s function

now that it carries that full responsibility

for the state of Alaska. No one on the

AGDC board has ever built a mega proj-

ect, certainly not three mega projects,

which now is what we have — a fully

integrated project of the gas treatment

plant, the pipeline and the export facility.

So we need to make sure that we are

doing the right thing during the whole

process.

Petroleum News: Speaking of AGDC,they’ve had plenty of movement in justover a month since the special session,losing (president) Dan Fauske, (boardchair) John Burns and (vice president)Joe Dubler. Is this a natural settling stillwith the governor completing his firstyear in office, or is this too much move-ment?

Giessel: Certainly the governor had

the authority to remove John Burns. SB

138 gave him the authority to appoint or

remove board members. As far as

removing Dan Fauske and Joe Dubler,

that was the board’s decision.

I am very sorry to see Dan Fauske go.

He had been with the project since the

beginning. He had the trust of the

Legislature. We know he is certainly

skilled in financial issues and can also

manage very large projects and very

large teams of people. He’s demonstrat-

ed that over the years. Losing him I view

as a significant loss.

Joe Dubler was doing a superb job

managing the work at AGDC. He was

leading the ASAP pipeline team. That

team made significant

progress far ahead of the

AKLNG and it was Joe’s

diligence and team leader-

ship and management skills

I think are a credit for that.

Petroleum News: What kind of teamwould you like to see assembled regard-less of their names?

Giessel: Regardless of their names,

we need a president of AGDC that has

the credibility, and the experience,

knowledge to lead this kind of project, a

fully integrated, three megaprojects in

one project. I’m pleased to hear they are

going statewide, nationwide and interna-

tionally to find that person. I find that a

little puzzling since less than one year

ago, three people were removed from the

AGDC board because who had that kind

of experience. They were removed

because they didn’t live in Alaska, two

of them, so this is an interesting devel-

opment.

But that’s who I would like to see as

president, someone with that kind of

experience, certainly the management

lead to replace Joe Dubler.

There are folks who are already on

the team who could step into some

aspects of those roles.

The board chair, Dave Cruz, is filling

that spot. I think he is doing it quite

capably. I’m concerned looking at the

board membership how there is no one

on that board who has gas pipeline or

mega project experience. Probably the

closest person would be

Hugh Short who has expe-

rience as a venture capital-

ist. But as far as having

gas pipeline experience,

it’s simply not there.

Petroleum News: Also since the spe-cial session, the partners on Dec. 3agreed to move forward with the project.This didn’t surprise anyone, certainly,but still what does that tell you?

Giessel: I am pleased that our three

business partners agreed to move for-

ward. Many of us were concerned the

AGDC board would not cast as a yes on

behalf of the state of Alaska. Thankfully,

they did. I think the business partners

that we have are still indicating their

positive outlook on this project and

that’s what we need to know. They are

the people who have done this around

the world. If they are still thinking this is

a viable project, that’s a positive sign to

l G O V E R N M E N T

Giessel: AKLNG critical, budget prioritySenate Resources co-chair says state needs to be careful how it reworks oil tax credit and maintains its role in next year’s budget

PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016 5

GET 0% FINANCING FOR 84 MONTHS OR GET A BIG CASH DISCOUNT*

IDEAL WORKSPACES FOR THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

Hybrid Buildings Benefits of Metal & Fabric Buildings

Foundation SolutionsBuild Anywhere & Quick Construction

Fabric Structures Natural Light & Low Cost Per Sq Ft

WE MANUFACTURE WE INSTALLWE SAVE YOU MONEY

ClearSpan.com/ADPN1.866.643.1010

*RESTRICTIONS APPLY

SEN. CATHY GIESSEL

see GIESSEL Q&A page 17

Page 6: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

By KRISTEN NELSONPetroleum News

T he applicants proposing the Alaska

LNG Project have submitted to the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

responses to issues raised during scoping

for the project. The project proponents

are the Alaska Gasline Development

Corp., BP Alaska LNG, ConocoPhillips

Alaska LNG and ExxonMobil Alaska

LNG.

In a Dec. 18 letter to FERC Karen

Wuestenfeld, environmental impact state-

ment lead for the project, said the

response covers written comments

received by FERC from March 4 to Dec.

4, and comments made during scoping

meetings in October and November.

Wuestenfeld said multiple state and

federal agencies also provided comments

which will be included, along with

responses, in the project’s draft 2

Resource Report which the project plans

to file in the first or second quarter of

2016.

Siting issuesSiting issues which were raised in

scoping meetings and written comments

to FERC included both pipeline routing

and liquefaction plant siting.

In a breakout of responses AKLNG

said factors considered in siting and rout-

ing would be described in Resource

Report No. 10. In an overview of issues

raised the project said the Nikiski lique-

faction site was selected based on criteria

including “access to infrastructure, con-

structability criteria, navigation issues,

water depth, environmental impacts, and

cost.”

Leading the charge for consideration

of an alternative site for the LNG plant

and an alternative pipeline route, the City

of Valdez, in comments from Mayor

Larry Weaver, argued for a pipeline route

to Valdez and a liquefaction facility locat-

ed there. Weaver said “consideration of

an alternative route to Anderson Bay is

supported by previous scoping decisions”

made by FERC, the Bureau of Land

Management and the U.S. Army Corps of

Engineers. Two previous EISs, in 1988

and 1995, “considered a route from the

North Slope to Boulder Point at Nikiski,

and both EISs concluded that the Valdez

Route was a superior alternative.”

On the pipeline route, Weaver said

using the trans-Alaska oil pipeline right

of way and existing camp pads and access

roads would reduce “the impact of con-

struction on otherwise pristine wilderness

areas.”

Pipeline routeOther than the destination for the

pipeline, two other areas were noted in

comments, and in AKLNG responses.

The Fairbanks North Star Borough

highlighted one of the routing issues —

the distance from the proposed line to

Fairbanks.

Borough Mayor Karl Kassel told

FERC that the “50-plus mile lateral line”

which would be required to bring natural

gas to Fairbanks would cost in the multi-

million-dollar range with the cost falling

“on our already cash-strapped citizenry”

and the proposed lateral, while included

in the state’s proposed Alaska Stand

Alone Pipeline, is not included in the

scope of AKLNG. The proposed AKLNG

and the lateral would both be in the Minto

Flats area. “Consideration of this unfortu-

nate reality should be an integral aspect

of any environmental impact assessment

of the project,” the mayor said.

AKLNG said a route closer to

Fairbanks was not proposed based on

“increased pipeline length through wet-

lands, an increased number of cultural

resources, the increased amount of forest-

ed land crossed, a greater proportional

impact on populated areas in the

Fairbanks North Star Borough and the

City of Fairbanks, and an increased cost.”

Denali routing, subsistenceAKLNG said there were issues raised

on the routing through Denali — both the

state and national parks — and said its

“environmental analysis includes an

assessment of potential impacts on the

recreational and visual values and uses of

the Denali area, and mitigation options.”

Individuals who commented at a

November scoping meeting held in Healy

were concerned about the impact of the

pipeline and its construction on views in

the area and on the area’s significant

tourism industry.

Among socioeconomic impacts dis-

cussed, AKLNG said it recognizes the

importance of subsistence and said

Alaska Department of Fish and Game

subsistence surveys provide the basis of

its analysis of subsistence, and will help

identify ways to reduce project impacts.

At scoping meetings on the North

Slope FERC heard concerns about

impacts on subsistence hunting.

North Slope Borough Mayor Charlotte

Brower said in a letter that the EIS analy-

sis must consider: “The full range of

potential impacts to subsistence, includ-

ing those associated with construction

and operation of project facilities, vessel,

vehicle, and aircraft traffic, impediments

to or deflection of caribou movement,

whale or pinniped movement, fish move-

ment, and waterfowl nesting and other

habitat uses, displacement from harvest

areas, and loss of potential harvest oppor-

tunities associated with project-related

employment.”

“The continued availability of and

access to subsistence resources is of criti-

cal importance to the residents of the

North Slope,” the mayor wrote. “North

Slope residents continue to depend heav-

ily on subsistence foods and practices for

maintaining both their physical and cul-

tural health.”

NikiskiAnother area where residents

expressed concern at a scoping meeting

was in Nikiski in October, with numerous

residents expressing concern about the

impact of the proposed LNG facility on

traffic, noise and light impacts from the

proposed facility and impact on adjacent

land values.

AKLNG has been acquiring property

in the Nikiski area, but residents in the

area of the proposed facility told FERC

they were concerned by the closeness of

the proposed plant and impact on the

value of their properties.

AKLNG said it has acquired more

than 560 acres of land in the Nikiski area

and continues negotiations.

In a related matter, AKLNG told

FERC in an Oct. 22 letter that the Kenai

Peninsula Borough has said AKLNG

needs to maintain properties it has

acquired and mitigate hazardous condi-

tions. AKLNG said certain tracts it has

acquired “contain uninhabited, and in

some cases derelict, structures that com-

plicate ongoing property management, in

some cases posing health and safety chal-

lenges,” and said it had made safety

determinations and in some cases been

advised of such concerns by residents,

l N A T U R A L G A S

AKLNG sends responses to scoping issuesAlaska LNG Project tells FERC it will continue to evaluate agency, public comments, including those received after Dec. 4 deadline

6 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016

WELDING SUPPLIESLincoln Miller MilwaukeeStoody Tweco ThermalMathey ESAB Norton

& Victor Gas Equipment

CYLINDER GASESIndustrial, Blueshield Productivity Mixes, Medical and Specialty

Cylinders for rent, lease, and purchase

BULK LIQUID GASESOxygen, Nitrogen, Argon, Carbon Dioxide, and Dry Ice

Toll Free 800 478.1520Anchorage - 6415 Arctic Blvd. • 907 562.2080Fairbanks - 2089 Van Horn Rd. • 907 452.4781Homer - 1104 Ocean Dr. #3 • 907 235.0693Kenai - Mi. 15.1 Spur Hwy. • 907 283.7141Wasilla - 301 Centaur Ave. • 907 376.6000

In a related matter, AKLNG toldFERC in an Oct. 22 letter that theKenai Peninsula Borough has said

AKLNG needs to maintainproperties it has acquired andmitigate hazardous conditions.

see SCOPING ISSUES page 15

Page 7: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

By GARY PARKFor Petroleum News

There was once a time when Encana

seemed untouchable in North

America’s natural gas industry.

It blazed a trail in development of

shale deposits and delivered 4 billion

cubic feet per day of gas into the conti-

nental market from plays that were once

scorned by its peers because of their

reliance on new, largely untested tech-

nologies.

The apparently endless horizon

stretching across the Calgary-based com-

pany’s future, with talk of LNG pro-

pelling the sector to unimagined heights,

emboldened it to spin off the bulk of its

oil and natural gas liquids business into

Cenovus Energy.

But that occurred just in time to see

natural gas prices spiral down.

In short order it was forced to concede

its strategic gamble had failed as it turned

to rebuilding its liquids interest, targeting

growth from 50,000 barrels per day n

2013 to a projected 250,000 bpd in 2017

— a goal that now seems remote with

Encana’s output in the third quarter of

2015 at 140,000 bpd, despite a 30 percent

rise year-over-year.

However, Chief Executive Officer

Doug Suttles is sticking to the high road,

insisting that during the quarter “all

aspects of our strategy came together to

drive performance and deliver value.”

“Disciplined capital allocation in our

core four assets (the Permian and Eagle

Ford plays in the U.S. and Duvernay and

Montney stakes in Western Canada),

combined with fast-paced operational

innovation, delivered sustainable per-

formance improvements and grew high-

margin, high-returns liquids volumes,

which helped offset the quarter-over-

quarter impact of lower liquids prices,”

he said.

Spending up, but not on gasThat sounded like the Encana of old,

with the company tied to bold plans and

groundbreaking technology.

Going forward, Encana aims to raise

spending in the Permian by US$150 mil-

lion by speeding up some projects, result-

ing in overall 2015 capital spending at the

upper end of guidance at US$2.2 billion

— US$900 million in the Permian,

US$550 million-$600 million in Eagle

Ford, US$200 million-$250 million in the

Duvernay and US$160 million-$175 mil-

lion in the Montney.

While the corporate thrust shifts to the

Texas sector, Encana plans to decelerate

its Alberta gas business pending the out-

come of the provincial government’s

review of royalty rates and climate

change policy.

Suttles said his company will push the

“pause” button on a gas processing plant

in northwestern Alberta until results of

the royalty review are made known.

“It’s only prudent to say, ‘We need to

know the rules of the game before we

start to play’,” Suttles said of that deci-

sion, although he is optimistic the New

Democratic Party government of Premier

Rachel Notley won’t make the local ener-

gy industry uncompetitive because it

understands “how important the oil and

gas sector is to Alberta and Canada.”

Concern about royaltiesThat confidence aside, he has no inten-

tion of making risky investment decisions

because any changes to royalties “could

be significant enough to change how

returns on investments would perform.”

For 2016, the capital program has been

set in a range of US$1.5 billion-$1.7 bil-

lion — down 25 percent from 2015 —

with 95 percent tagged for the four core

assets, including 50 percent for the

Permian.

Drilling and completion costs are tar-

geted for a 10 percent to 15 percent

reduction, plus a more than 10o percent

cut in corporate costs.

The budget is described as “highly

flexible ... that can be scaled up or down

and redirected based on market condi-

tions.”

Production from the “big four” is

expected to average 260,000-280,000 boe

per day, accounting for 75 percent of the

corporate total of 340,000-370,000 boe

per day.

Liquids output is projected at 120,000-

140,000 bpd and gas at 1.3 billion-1.4 bil-

lion cubic feet per day, each reflecting the

impact of previously announced and

completed divestitures.

Based on US$50 WTIThe spending is based on assumptions

of US$50 per barrel for West Texas

Intermediate crude and Nymex gas prices

of US$2.75 per British thermal unit and

will be funded through expected cash

flow of US$1 billion-$1.2 billion along

with existing credit facilities.

To boost its profitability, Encana said

its cost-cutting efforts, started in 2013,

have now removed US$300 million in

annual costs from the company, while its

payroll has been lowered by more than

400 people, with half stemming from the

sale of Louisiana and Colorado assets.

However, in the run up to Christmas,

Encana said closing the US$900 million

Colorado oil and gas sale was being

delayed by up to six months, without say-

ing why. The result was an immediate

trimming of another 5 percent from its

slumping shares.

The deal, announced in October,

involves offloading liquids-rich produc-

tion and 50,000 acres of DJ basin proper-

ties — which produce about 23,500 bar-

rels of oil equivalent per day, 63 percent

of that from oil and liquids — to Creston

Peak Resources, a new company 95 per-

cent owned by the Canada Pension Plan

Investment Board and 5 percent by The

Broe Group of Denver.

Encana said the effective sale date of

last April 1 and material terms of the deal,

including price, remain the same.

Board predicts big gas lossOn the gas front, the Conference

Board of Canada said the industry will

end 2015 by posting its worst collective

loss of C$1.5 billion before taxes since

2009, reflecting the fall in gas prices

along with related commodities such as

propane, butane, pentane and condensate.

Propane is especially troublesome.

Many gas producers are now having to

pay midstream companies to remove the

unwanted volumes, rather than getting

paid for the commodity.

Board economist Carlos Murillo said

more employment reductions or salary

cuts could come in 2016, while producers

will follow the oil industry in renegotiat-

ed drilling costs, enabling a return to

profitability over the next year.

The board reported that decreasing

revenues in the near term will “result in a

pullback in investment intentions,” with

Murillo forecasting that the largest pro-

l F I N A N C E & E C O N O M Y

Encana grappling with natural gasCuts costs, payroll, tightens focus to 4 areas; waits for Alberta to complete review; focus on discipline, innovation, sustainability

PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016 7

Proudly Serving Alaska’s Oil & Gas Industry For Over 40 Years

PRUDHOE BAY — COOK INLET• CASING SERVICES

• WELDING AND FABRICATION• DAVIS-LYNCH FLOAT EQUIPMENT SALES

• RIG MAT RENTALS

Tel: 907-563-3550Fax: 907-562-6468www.gbroilfield.com

6300 Petersburg St., Anchorage, AK

Tel: 907.563.3000 • Toll Free: 800-478-6205 • Fax: 907.563.1003611 E. International Airport Rd., Anchorage, AK 99518-1302 USA

Kenai – 907.283.4452www.motionindustries.com

While the corporate thrust shiftsto the Texas sector, Encana plans

to decelerate its Alberta gasbusiness pending the outcome of

the provincial government’s reviewof royalty rates and climate

change policy.

see ENCANA page 8

Page 8: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

By ALAN BAILEYPetroleum News

The Norwegian Petroleum Safety

Authority has published a report that

provides a comprehensive overview of

the current status of efforts to prevent the

escape of fluids into the marine environ-

ment from Arctic offshore oil and gas

operations. The report, prepared by

Norwegian risk management firm

Proactima, addresses measures taken to

prevent oil spills but does not deal with

techniques used to respond to a spill, once

a spill has happened. While considering

safety risks from all phases of Arctic off-

shore oil exploration, development and

production, the report does not consider

risks associated with vessels, including

shuttle tankers, operating on the open sea.

Norway plans to deliver the report to

the Arctic Council, the intergovernmental

forum of the eight Arctic nations, in

response to a recommendation from the

council’s Task Force on Arctic Marine Oil

Pollution Prevention. The report takes a

broad view of the geographic extent of

the Arctic, including cold regions such as

Alaska’s Cook Inlet as well as traditional

Arctic seas.

While oil spills can occur for a variety

of reasons, including well blowouts,

pipeline leaks and process leaks, meas-

ures designed to reduce spill risks range

from improved weather forecasting and

ice management to improved drilling

technologies and advanced oil facility

design.

Weather and iceFrom the perspective of weather and

ice forecasting, the report notes that,

despite reductions in the Arctic ice cap, it

remains important to take into account

the possibility of severe ice conditions

when designing technologies and equip-

ment for use in the Arctic. And the reduc-

tion in ice cover may lead to more severe

wave action in Arctic seas. The report

recommends improved weather forecast-

ing for polar regions through higher reso-

lution weather models and improved data

collection.

There are known methods for ice man-

agement including the towing of icebergs

and the disconnection of well risers dur-

ing ice conditions, the report says. But,

given the changing Arctic conditions,

research should focus on dealing with

small icebergs and ice floes — there has

been little research into the handling of

situations in which the sea ice has been

broken into small pieces, the report says.

Research into the dynamic positioning of

floating facilities in pack ice shows prom-

ise but is not yet proven, the report says.

The report also recommends the develop-

ment of technologies for the disconnec-

tion and reconnection of multiple well

risers, with current technologies having

limitations when it comes to multiple

reconnections.

Detecting an oil spill under ice at a

remote location is challenging. Although

two major joint industry projects have

addressed this issue, uncertainty over

detection methods remains and more

research is needed, the report says.

In terms of drilling technology, well

integrity and well control, the report rec-

ommends the continuation of current

work by the oil industry in developing

technologies that act as barriers to the

escape of oil when well control emergen-

cies arise. In addition, research should

emphasize measures that can be taken to

reduce the probability of a well control

problem, the report says.

Although much research has focused

on the protection of pipelines and other

subsea structures from damage from the

keels of ice ridges and icebergs, further

research in this area is needed. Further

work should also be conducted into meth-

ods of detecting leaks from subsea struc-

tures, the report says.

Ice loadsMuch research has also been conduct-

ed into the impact of ice loads on offshore

facilities. However, at this stage it is not

possible to determine whether this

research will result in inherently safe

facility designs, the report says. It is par-

ticularly important to identify the type of

ice feature that is creating an ice load, and

to take account of localized ice loads as

well as the total load on a structure, the

report says. There are international stan-

dards for materials suitable for use for the

manufacture of Arctic facilities.

There are systems for the loading and

offloading of oil at offshore installations

during normal ice drift conditions.

However, with an apparent absence of

loading systems that can operate during

icing conditions, loading should be

delayed, as necessary, until weather con-

ditions permit safe operations, the report

recommends.

While there are existing international

standards for the design and construction

of Arctic offshore structures, standards

for petroleum operations in the Arctic are

under development, the report says. The

report recommends the development of

further safety standards and stresses the

importance of the consistent use of stan-

dards across international borders.

New techniques?There are initiatives for devising new

exploration and oil production techniques

that might be applied in the Arctic off-

shore, although the development of these

techniques takes a considerable time. The

report recommends continuing efforts to

develop a subsea production solution for

use in the Arctic by evaluating known

deepwater technology that might be

transferred to Arctic offshore applica-

tions. Maintenance and inspection tech-

niques applicable in the Arctic could also

be improved, the report says.

The report says that the communica-

tions infrastructure in the Arctic is inade-

l I N T E R N A T I O N A L

Norway publishes Arctic safety reportProvides review of techniques, procedures and standards for preventing oil pollution from Arctic offshore oil and gas activities

8 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016

ducers — Encana, Enerplus and

Tourmaline — will cut their spending by

a combined 21 percent in 2016.

Despite this bleak picture, Canada’s

biggest pension funds, the Canada

Pension Plan Investment Board and the

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, say they

prefer to engage with fossil fuel compa-

nies and advocate for change on climate

change issues from within.

They don’t believe that divestment is a

useful tool, opting to assess long-term cli-

mate risk in their investment decisions.

`We`re much more in the camp of sup-

porting engagement — working with

companies, understanding what they are

doing, how they are managing these risks,

backing them when they are putting

things in place,” Teachers’ Senior Vice

President Barbara Zvan told the Globe

and Mail.

“I don`t think we generally take the

activist route. We would rather work pri-

vately with engagement,” she said.

Zvan said the Teachers’ fund assesses

each transaction on its merits, with a clear

eye to long-term risks as the world transi-

tions to a low-carbon economy. l

continued from page 7

ENCANA

The report says that thecommunications infrastructure inthe Arctic is inadequate for the

operational requirements ofexpected future Arctic maritime

operations.

see NORWAY REPORT page 13

Page 9: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

page10

www.MiningNewsNorth.com The weekly mining newspaper for Alaska and Canada's North Week of January 3, 2016

l T E C H N O L O G Y

Metals prices expected to slidebefore rebounding in year ahead

NORTHERN NEIGHBORSCompiled by Shane Lasley

Dolly Varden drills northern silver targetsDolly Varden Silver Corp. Dec. 23 reported results from a

2,037-meter drill program at its Dolly Varden silver property in

northwestern British Columbia. The known Dolly Varden

deposits exhibit both volcanogenic massive sulfide (Eskay-like)

and epithermal (Brucejack-like) mineralization styles which

were the focus of the company’s maiden NI 43-101 mineral

resource estimate completed in August. Though this resource

remains open to expansion, the goal of the 2015 drill program

was to explore targets identified by surface mapping and sam-

pling as having similar high-grade potential in the northern half

of the property, where lithologies, alteration and geochemical

signatures extend on surface from the property’s historic mines,

located on the southern portion of the property. Six holes of this

year's 10-hole program targeted Ace-Galena, where the drilling

confirmed the presence of VMS mineralization and intersected

a new epithermal quartz vein and breccia with high-grade silver.

Historical trench and recent surface samples at the McKay

showing on Ace-Galena returned assays of up to 3,360 grams

per metric ton silver over 1.3 meters. The Ace-Galena trend is

projected to extend over a distance of five kilometers (three

miles) to the Sault showing, also in the northern half of the

Dolly Varden property. The 2015 drill holes at Ace-Galena were

targeted to examine this VMS horizon down-dip and along

DO

LLY

VAR

DEN

SIL

VER

CO

RP.

A geologist collects samples from one of four historical high-grade silver mines located in the southern half of the Dolly Vardenproperty in northwestern British Columbia. A 10-hole drill pro-gram completed by Dolly Varden Silver tested targets in thenorthern half of the property that show similarities to the past-producing mines.

LNG-fueled mine rigsTeck pilots dual-fuel haul trucks; Donlin Gold hopes tech is ready for mine

By SHANE LASLEYMining News

D iesel has long been the fuel of choice for the

enormous haul trucks, dozers, shovels and

other equipment that most mines use. Many industry

leaders, however, are looking ahead to natural gas as

an economically and environmentally friendlier

source of energy for the colossal machines.

“LNG (liquefied natural gas) is a fuel source that

has the potential to lower costs, significantly reduce

emissions and improve environmental performance

at our operations,” said Teck Resources Ltd.

President and CEO Don Lindsay. “We are committed

to minimizing our own carbon footprint, while at the

same time continuing to provide the mining products

that are essential to building a modern, low-carbon

society.”

To this end, Teck is piloting a project that is using

a mixture of LNG and diesel to fuel six haul trucks at

its Fording River steelmaking coal operation in

southeastern British Columbia.

In Alaska, LNG is one of the alternatives proposed

to power haul trucks in a recently completed draft

environmental impact statement for the Donlin Gold

project, as a means of reducing the amount of diesel

that would be needed to barged to the large open-pit

mine once it is built and begins production.

The technology needed to make LNG fuel a viable

alternative, however, is relatively young and has only

recently been put into commercial use on a limited

basis.

Piloting LNG trucksThe LNG system being tested by Teck does not

completely eliminate the need for diesel. Instead, a

conversion is retrofitted on conventional diesel haul

trucks that injects natural gas into air intake, supple-

menting the heavier fuel.

GFS Corp., the company that manufactures the

units being tested, claims the system reduces diesel

consumption by 50 to 70 percent while retaining the

crucial power and torque for which diesel engines are

notable.

As an added benefit, LNG produces virtually no

sulfur dioxide or particulates, and LNG-diesel trucks

emit about 20 percent less greenhouse gas, compared

with their conventional contemporaries.

Teck says there is a potential to reduce carbon

dioxide emissions by 35,000 metric tons per year and

save C$20 million annually if the technology was

implemented across its B.C. steelmaking coal opera-

tions.

This would be another step towards Teck’s overall

goal of reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by

450,000 metric tons per year by 2030. Since imple-

menting this plan in 2011, the diversified miner has

cut annual CHG output by about 170,000 metric tons.

“Like British Columbia, Teck is a global leader in

finding innovative ways to reduce GHG emissions

while continuing to create opportunity,” said B.C.

Premier Christy Clark. “It’s a concrete example of the

difference clean-burning LNG can make in the fight

against climate change.”

FortisBC, which distributes natural gas in the

western province, is supplying the fuel and is helping

see LNG FUEL page 12

see NORTHERN NEIGHBORS page 12

Teck Resources is piloting a project that is using a mix-ture of LNG and diesel to fuel six haul trucks at itsFording River steelmaking coal operation in south-eastern British Columbia. Upon completion of thetrial, the diversified miner will evaluate the potentialof implementing the LNG-diesel technology across awider section of its haul-truck fleet.

TEC

K R

ESO

UR

CES

LTD

.

Page 10: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

By SHANE LASLEYMining News

The mining sector entered 2015 in the

midst of a deep bear market, and

conditions grew worse as the year wore

on. Metals prices continued a multi-year

downward trajectory, dragging the mar-

ket value of miners and explorers along

with them.

With continued slow growth in China

and a strengthening U.S. dollar, most ana-

lysts don’t see the plight of the mining

sector improving much in 2016.

“Commodities prices are now at or

even below 2009 levels. And absent sig-

nificant production cuts, we don’t see

prices improving over the next several

quarters,” cautioned Carol Cowan, senior

vice president, Moody’s Investors

Service.

Unfortunately for the mining sector,

this bearish sentiment seems to cut across

both industrial and precious metals.

Basement metals pricesThe slow economic growth, not only

in China but globally, coupled with a

strong U.S. dollar has been particularly

rough for base metals, the building mate-

rials of modern society.

The price of copper, often considered a

bellwether of global economic health due

to its widespread domestic and industrial

use, dropped from roughly US$2.90 a

pound going into 2015 to around

US$2.10/lb. at the end of the year. This

27.5 percent drop comes on top of steady

declines since early in 2011, when this

important metal topped US$4.50/lb.

Goldman Sachs, a global leader in

commodities banking, expects copper

prices to remain around US$2.00/lb.

through 2016.

Morningstar Inc. is even more pes-

simistic about the prospects for a recov-

ery in “beaten-down copper prices.”

Analysts for the global investment

research firm “expect ebbing Chinese

demand, which accounts for approxi-

mately half of the global total, to push

prices below $2 in 2016 and 2017.”

Citigroup Inc., on the other hand, sees

prices for the red metal rising steadily

through 2016, ending the year at about

US$2.50/lb.

“Citi’s outlook for end-2016 projects

higher prices for U.S. natural gas, crude

oil, all base metals but especially copper

and nickel as well as platinum and palla-

dium,” analyst Ed Morse inked in a recent

report.

Citigroup foresees even stronger

growth for copper, other base metals and

oil in 2017.

Zinc was perhaps the most disappoint-

ing of the base metals in 2015. While the

roughly 32 percent drop in the price of

this galvanizing metal was not much

worse than copper, there were high hopes

that supply constraints would push zinc

prices upwards this year.

With supplies already in deficit and

two of the world’s largest zinc mines

scheduled for closure, some analysts

were forecasting zinc prices to average

US$1.10/lb. in 2015. While zinc prices

did hit US$1.10 in May, it quickly retreat-

ed from this high mark and has descended

steadily to below US$70 cents/lb., where

it currently sits.

In October, Glencore PLC, the world’s

largest zinc producer, announced plans to

slash its annual zinc output by roughly a

third, or about 1.1 billion lbs.

“The main reason for the reduction is

to preserve the value of Glencore’s

reserves in the ground at a time of low

zinc and lead prices, which do not cor-

rectly value the scarce nature of our

resources,” the Switzerland-based com-

pany explained.

Glencore’s curtailment, combined

with the closures of the Century Mine in

Australia and the Lisheen Mine in

Ireland, removes roughly seven percent

of the world’s zinc supply from the mar-

kets.

The World Bank predicts zinc prices

will average around US95 cents/lb. in

2016 and make modest but steady gains

out until 2020.

Gold, silver fare betterRelying less on economic expansion,

the prices for gold and silver have fared

better than those for their industrial met-

als brethren.

Gold, which was selling for $1,172 per

ounce when the calendars turned to 2015,

quickly shot up to US$1,296/oz. before

January came to a close. After this brief

reprise, however, the safe-haven metal

continued a four-year downtrend.

This slide has stalled at just above

US$1,000/oz. Many analysts, however,

are calling for gold prices to break

through this major psychological barrier.

Citigroup’s believes strong U.S. dollar

sentiment will be enough to push gold

below the US$1,000 mark. The banks

research arm is now predicting the yellow

metal to average US$995 an ounce in

2016.

While many other banks and analysts

agree that gold could slip below

US$1,000, most are more optimistic than

Citi.

ScotiaMocatta – part of Scotiabank

Global Banking and Markets and a global

leader in precious and base metals trading

– believes the fall in the gold price has

neared its end.

“We would not be surprised if gold

prices fall further, but not much further,”

the Canada-based bullion trader wrote in

a recent report. “We expect physical

demand to pick-up in 2016 and firmer

prices also should instill confidence.”

ScotiaMocatta analysts, which were

on target with their 2015 forecast, expect

gold to sell in a range between US$950 to

US$1,280 in 2016.

Silver prices typically follow gold’s

lead and 2015 was no exception.

At the turn of the calendar, silver was

selling at US$15.71/oz. before making a

healthy climb to US$18/oz. before the

end of January. The price of “poor man’s

gold” fell to US$13.71/oz. by mid-

December, but has since recovered to

above US$14/oz.

ScotiaMocatta says the current weak-

ness in silver price do not reflect the

sound supply-demand fundamentals for

the white metal.

The bullion dealer expects demand to

increase by about two percent in 2016,

while production is expected to fall about

2.7 percent for the year.

“Given that we expect another year of

supply deficit and the potential for a price

recovery to lead to restocking and a pick-

up in investor interest we would not be

surprised to see prices move up to the

$18/oz. – $19/oz. range,” ScotiaMocatta

wrote in its 2016 silver forecast report.

The company, however, would not be

surprised to see silver dip to US$12/oz.,

considering the bearish sentiment across

all the metals. l

NEWS NUGGETSCompiled by Shane Lasley

Northern Dynasty raises $5 million;finalizes buyout of Mission Gold Ltd.

Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. Dec. 23 reported completion of a C$5.18

million private placement in which the junior mining company issued

12,573,292 common shares at C41.2 cents each. A referral fee of 300,000

common shares also was paid. The shares are subject to applicable resale

restrictions, including a four-month hold under Canadian legislation.

Following the financing, Northern Dynasty Minerals reported that a plan of

arrangement to acquire all of the issued and outstanding common shares of

Mission Gold Ltd. also has been completed. Pursuant to the arrangement,

Northern Dynasty issued 27,593,341 common shares to the former sharehold-

ers of Mission Gold (0.5467 of a Northern Dynasty common share for each

issued Mission Gold common share). In addition, warrants to purchase an

aggregate of 13,182,076 common shares of Mission Gold at a price of C50

cents per share were exchanged for warrants to purchase an aggregate of

13,182,076 common shares of Northern Dynasty exercisable at a price of C55

cents per share by July 9, 2020 , and warrants to purchase an aggregate of

2,735,433 common shares of Mission Gold at a price of C$2.72 per share

were exchanged for warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,735,433 common

shares of Northern Dynasty exercisable at a price of C$3.00 per share by Sept.

14, 2017. Immediately following the buyout, Mission Gold’s wholly-owned

subsidiary, CIC Resources Inc., was sold for 437,597 common shares of a

TSX-listed issuer valued at roughly C$1.5 million based on the closing price

for such shares on Nov. 20. Pursuant to the arrangement, Marcel de Groot, the

co-founder and president of Pathway Capital and former Mission Gold advi-

sor, was appointed a director of Northern Dynasty. Northern Dynasty also

appointed corporate and securities lawyer Desmond Balakrishnan to its board

of directors.

10NORTH OF 60 MINING PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016

Shane Lasley PUBLISHER & NEWS EDITOR

Rose Ragsdale CONTRIBUTING EDITOR

Mary Mack CEO & GENERAL MANAGER

Susan Crane ADVERTISING DIRECTOR

Heather Yates BOOKKEEPER

Bonnie Yonker AK / INTERNATIONAL ADVERTISING

Marti Reeve SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS DIRECTOR

Steven Merritt PRODUCTION DIRECTOR

Curt Freeman COLUMNIST

J.P. Tangen COLUMNIST

Judy Patrick Photography CONTRACT PHOTOGRAPHER

Forrest Crane CONTRACT PHOTOGRAPHER

Tom Kearney ADVERTISING DESIGN MANAGER

Renee Garbutt CIRCULATION MANAGER

Mapmakers Alaska CARTOGRAPHY

ADDRESS • P.O. Box 231647Anchorage, AK 99523-1647

NEWS • [email protected]

CIRCULATION • 907.522.9469 [email protected]

ADVERTISING Susan Crane • [email protected] Yonker • [email protected]

FAX FOR ALL DEPARTMENTS907.522.9583

NORTH OF 60 MINING NEWS is a weekly supplement of Petroleum News, a weekly newspaper.To subscribe to North of 60 Mining News,

call (907) 522-9469 or sign-up online at www.miningnewsnorth.com.

Several of the individualslisted above are

independent contractors

North of 60 Mining News is a weekly supplement of the weekly newspaper, Petroleum News.

Contact North of 60 Mining News:Publisher: Shane Lasley • e-mail: [email protected]

Phone: 907.229.6289 • Fax: 907.522.9583

l M A R K E T S

Across-the-board bearish outlookMost metals analysts predict more pain for the sector before base, precious metals prices tick upward during second half of 2016

“Citi’s outlook for end-2016projects higher prices for U.S.natural gas, crude oil, all base

metals but especially copper andnickel as well as platinum and

palladium.” –Ed Morse, analyst, Citigroup

Page 11: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

11NORTH OF 60 MINING

PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016

Mining Companies

Kinross Fort Knox/Fairbanks Gold Mining Inc.Fairbanks, AK 99707Contact: Anna Atchison, Manager, Community and Government RelationsPhone: (907) 490-2218 Fax: (907) 490-2290E-mail: [email protected]: www.kinross.comLocated 25 miles northeast of Fairbanks, Fort Knox is Alaska’slargest producing gold mine; during 2011, Fort Knoxachieved 5 million ounces of gold produced, a modern recordin Alaska mining.

Usibelli Coal MineFairbanks, AK 99701Contact: Bill Brophy, VP Customer RelationsPhone: (907) 452-2625 • Fax: (907) 451-6543Email: [email protected]: www.usibelli.comOther OfficePO Box 1000Healy, AK 99743Phone: (907) 683-2226Usibelli Coal Mine is headquartered in Healy, Alaska and has700 million tons of coal reserves. UCM produces an average of2 million tons of sub-bituminous coal each year.

Service, Supply & Equipment

Alaska Analytical Laboratory1956 Richardson HighwayNorth Pole, AK 99705Phone: (907) 488-1266ax: (907) 488-077E-mail: [email protected] analytical soil testing for GRO, DRO, RRO, andUTEX. Field screening and phase 1 and 2 site assessments alsoavailable.

Alaska Rubber & Rigging Supply5811 Old Seward Hwy.Anchorage, AK 99518Contact: Mike Mortensen, General ManagerPhone: (907) 562-2200Fax: (907) 561-7600E-mail: [email protected]: www.alaskarubber.com.Alaska’s largest supplier of hydraulic and industrial hose soldin bulk or assembled to spec. We also stock a large selectionor wire rope, crane rope, lifting and transportation chain, soldin bulk or assembled to spec. We fabricate synthetic liftingslings, and supply shackles & rigging hardware. We sell andperform field installs of conveyor belting. We are Arctic Gradeproduct specialists. We sell and service a wide variety ofhydraulic, lubrication, fueling and pressure washing equip-ment. We sell high pressure stainless instrumentation fittingsand tube, sheet rubber, v-belts, pumps, Enerpac equipment,Kamlocks, plumbing fittings, and much more. We performhydro testing up to thirty thousand psi, & pull testing up to350 thousand pounds. All testing comes standard with certifi-cation & RFID certification tracking capabilities.

Alaska Steel Co.6180 Electron DriveAnchorage, AK 99518Contact: Joe Pavlas, outside sales managerPhone: (907) 561-1188Toll free: (800) 770-0969 (AK only)Fax: (907) 561-2935E-mail: [email protected] Full-line steel and aluminum distributor. Complete processingcapabilities, statewide service. Specializing in low temperaturesteel and wear plate.

Arctic Wire Rope & Supply6407 Arctic Spur Rd. Anchorage, AK 99518Contact: Mark LamoureuxPhone: (907) 562-0707Fax: (907) 562-2426Email: [email protected]: www.arcticwirerope.comArctic Wire Rope & Supply is Alaska largest and most com-plete rigging supply source. Our fabrication facility is locatedin Anchorage with distribution Fairbanks. We specialize in cus-tom fabrication of slings in wire rope, synthetic webbing/yarn, chain and rope. Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) isavailable for all of our fabricated products. In addition, weoffer on-site inspection and splicing services. We carry a largeinventory of tire chains for trucks and heavy equipment.

Austin Powder CompanyP.O. Box 8236Ketchikan, AK 99901Contact: Tony Barajas, Alaska managerPhone: (907) 225-8236Fax: (907) 225-8237E-mail: [email protected] site: www.austinpowder.comIn business since 1833, Austin Powder provides statewideprepackaged and onsite manufactured explosives and drillingsupplies with a commitment to safety and unmatched cus-tomer service.

Calista Corporation5015 Business Park Blvd.Suite 3000Anchorage, AK 99503Phone: (907) 275-2800Fax: (907) 275-2919Website: www.calistacorp.comCalista is the parent company of more than 30 subsidiaries. Interms of land area and Shareholder base, Calista is the second

largest of the Regional Alaska Native corporations establishedunder ANCSA in 1971. Like us on Facebook (http://www.face-book.com/calistacorporation) and follow us on Twitter(http://twitter.com/calistacorp).

Construction Machinery Industrial, LLC 5400 Homer Dr.Anchorage, AK 99518Phone: (907) 563-3822Fax: (907) 563-1381Website: www.cmiak.comFairbanks officePhone: 907-455-9600 Juneau officePhone: 907-780-4030 Ketchikan officePhone: 907-247-2228 Sales and service for heavy equipment for construction, log-ging, aggregate, mining, oilfield and agricultural industriesthroughout Alaska. CMI represents more than 40 vendors,including Volvo, Hitachi, Atlas Copco, and Ingersoll-Rand.

GCI Industrial Telecom Anchorage:11260 Old Seward Highway Ste. 105Anchorage, AK 99515Phone: (907) 868-0400Fax: (907) 868-9528Toll free: (877) 411-1484Web site: www.gci.com/industrialtelecomRick Hansen, [email protected] Johnson, Business Development [email protected]:Aurora Hotel #205Deadhorse, Alaska 99734Phone: (907) 771-1090Mike Stanford, Senior Manager North [email protected], Texas:8588 Katy Freeway, Suite 226Houston, Texas 77024Phone: (713) 589-4456Hillary McIntosh, Account [email protected] Industrial Telecom provides innovative solutions to themost complex communication issues facing industrial clientele.We deliver competitive services, reputable expertise and safelyoperate under the most severe working conditions for the oil,gas and natural resource industries. GCI-your best choice forfull life cycle, expert, proven, industrial communications.

Greer Tank and Welding Inc. 3140 Lakeview DrivePO Box 71193Fairbanks, AK 99707Contact: Mark Greer, General ManagerPhone: (907) 452-1711Fax: (907) 456-5808Email: [email protected] offices: Anchorage, AK; Lakewood, WAWebsite: www.greertank.comGreer Tank & Welding are the premier tank and welding spe-cialists of Alaska and Washington. In business for over 57years, they have a long history of providing an array of prod-ucts and services for all contracting and custom fabricationneeds – all from their highly trained and experienced staff.

Hawk Alaska670 W Fireweed Lane, Suite 201Anchorage, AK 99503Contact: Maynard Tapp, Managing MemberPhone: (907) 278-1877Fax: (907) 278-1889E-mail: [email protected]

Hawk Texas16522 Avenplace RoadTomball, Texas 77377Contact: Pat McQuillanPhone: (832) 843-7608

Fax: (832) 761-7692E-mail: [email protected] provides people and resources across multiple indus-tries. Services include project management consulting, supple-mental professionals, client staff augmentation, constructiondispute resolution, management consulting services, craftslabor, inspection and expediting services.

HDR Alaska Inc. 2525 C St., Ste 305Anchorage, AK 99503Contact: Jaci Mellott, Marketing CoordinatorPhone: (907) 644-2091Fax: (907) 644-2022Email: [email protected]: www.hdrinc.comHDR Alaska provides engineering, environmental, planning,and consultation services for mining and mineral explorationclients. Services include: biological studies; cultural resources;project permitting; NEPA; stakeholder outreach; agency con-sultation; and environmental, civil, transportation, energy,and heavy structural engineering.

Judy Patrick Photography511 W. 41st Ave, Suite 101Anchorage, AK 99503Contact: Judy PatrickPhone: (907) 258-4704Fax: (907) 258-4706E-mail: [email protected]: www.judypatrickphotography.comCreative images for the resource development industry.

Last Frontier Air Ventures1415 N Local 302 Rd., Ste CPalmer, AK 99645Contact: Dave King, ownerPhone: (907) 745-5701Fax: (907) 745-5711Email: [email protected] Base (907) 272-8300Website: www.LFAV.comHelicopter support statewide for mineral exploration, surveyresearch and development, slung cargo, video/film projects,telecom support, tours, crew transport, heli skiing. Short andlong term contracts.

LyndenAlaska Marine LinesAlaska West ExpressBering Marine CorporationLynden Air CargoLynden InternationalLynden LogisticsLynden TransportAnchorage, AK 99502Contact: Jeanine St. JohnPhone: (907) 245-1544Fax: (907) 245-1744Toll Free: 1-888-596-3361E-mail: [email protected] is a family of transportation companies with the com-bined capabilities of truckload and less-than-truckload trans-portation, scheduled and charter barges, rail barges, inter-modal bulk chemical hauls, scheduled and chartered airfreighters, domestic and international air forwarding, interna-tional ocean forwarding, customs brokerage, sanitary bulkcommodities hauling, and multi-modal logistics.

Pacific Rim Geological ConsultingFairbanks, AK 99708Contact: Thomas Bundtzen, presidentPhone: (907) 458-8951Fax: (907) 458-8511Email: [email protected] mapping, metallic minerals exploration and industri-al minerals analysis or assessment.

TTT Environmental LLC 4201 “B” St.Anchorage, AK 99503Contact: Tom Tompkins, general managerPhone: 907-770-9041Fax: 907-770-9046Email: [email protected]: www.tttenviro.comAlaska’s preferred source for instrument rentals, sales, serviceand supplies. We supply equipment for air monitoring, watersampling, field screening, PPE and more.

Taiga Ventures2700 S. CushmanFairbanks, AK 99701Mike Tolbert - presidentPhone: 907-452-6631Fax: 907-451-8632Other offices:Airport Business Park2000 W. International Airport Rd, #D-2Anchorage, AK 99502Phone: 907-245-3123Email: [email protected] site: www.taigaventures.comRemote site logistics firm specializing in turnkey portable shel-ter camps – all seasons.

Usibelli Coal Mine100 Cushman St., Ste. 210Fairbanks, AK 99701Contact: Bill Brophy, VP Customer RelationsPhone: (907) 452-2625 • Fax: (907) 451-6543E-mail: [email protected]: www.usibelli.comUsibelli Coal Mine is headquartered in Healy, Alaska and has700 million tons of coal reserves. UCM produces 1 to 2 milliontons of sub-bituminous coal each year.

Advertiser IndexAlaska DreamsAlaska Steel Co.Arctic Wire RopeAustin Powder Co.Calista Corp.Constantine Metal ResourcesConstruction MachineryFort Knox Gold MineGCI Industrial TelecomGreer Tank Inc.Hawk AlaskaJudy Patrick PhotographyLast Frontier Air VenturesLyndenNature Conservancy, ThePacific Rim Geological ConsultingTaiga Ventures/PacWest

Drilling SupplyUsibelli Coal Mine

North of 60 Mining Directory

Page 12: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

12NORTH OF 60 MINING PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016

trend of the projected system. Dolly Varden reports that the 2015 Ace-Galena drill

holes intercepted highly anomalous silver, lead and zinc mineralization in VMS hori-

zons. Highlights from this drilling include five meters of 51.2 g/t silver from a depth of

89 meters and 22.5 meters of 42 g/t silver from a depth of 110 meters in hole

DV15013; and 11 meters of 27 g/t silver from a depth of 90 meters in hole DV15014.

Hole DV15019 cut 3.15 meters of 591 g/t silver, but this intercept is considered to be

at a shallow angle to mineralization, skewing the results. “We are very encouraged by

the results from this new exploration confirming the sub-surface extent of VMS-style

mineralization at Ace-Galena,” said Rosie Moore, director and interim CEO, Dolly

Varden. “As a bonus, one of the Ace-Galena holes encountered a new, epithermal

quartz vein and breccia hosting visible native silver, and returning high-grade silver

assays. Both of these mineralization systems warrant further exploration.” In addition

to the holes drilled at Ace-Galena, a fan of three holes were drilled in the Kitsol area to

follow up on a significant 2014 drill intercept that averaged 712 g/t silver over a true

thickness of 22.6 meters. The new holes were sited 60 meters northeast of hole

DV14010 and were targeted to test the Kitsol vein down-dip form historic trench

results, which graded 626 g/t silver over 4.11 meters. The best intercept from the 2015

drilling at Kitsol was one meter of 117.8 g/t silver from a depth of 148 meters in hole

DV15021. Dolly Varden said the new drilling, along with the integration of a structural

study completed late in 2015 will assist in the future exploration at Kitsol.

Outlook bleak for B.C. miner Banks Island GoldBanks Island Gold Ltd. Dec. 23 reported the cancellation of an equity financing

announced on Dec. 1, due to the lack of sufficient interest to be able to close the C$3

million financing required to support its operations over the coming months. As a

result, the Banks Island has insufficient funds to maintain operations and has received

notice of claims from three significant trade creditors for payment of outstanding debt.

The British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines has confiscated the reclamation

bond posted by Banks Island. The company terminated all of its remaining employees,

effective Dec. 31. The company’s board is currently comprised of Ben Mossman,

Jason Nickel, John Anderson and Frederick Sveinson. Since its formation in 2010,

Banks Island has been working towards reaching commercial production at its Yellow

Giant gold-silver property on Banks Island, British Columbia. The company began

bulk sampling in 2014 and received permits that year for the construction of a 200-ton-

per-day grinding and flotation plant, an underground mine, and associated facilities

including rock stockpiles and other infrastructure. By January 2015, the company

declared commercial production. The company, however, suspended operation in late

July “until permitting and regulatory issues at the project are resolved and the company

has sufficient working capital to re-commence operations.” Banks Island said it is con-

sulting with its legal advisors, and will provide a further update on the company’s sta-

tus in the coming weeks.

Western ready for next phase of permittingWestern Copper and Gold Corp. Dec. 22 reported that its wholly-owned subsidiary,

Casino Mining Corp., has submitted the second supplementary information report for

the Casino copper-gold project to the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic

Board. The supplemental information is part of a permitting process to develop an

open-pit mine with combined flotation mill and gold heap leach processing facilities.

The mill will process an average of 120,000 dry metric tons of ore per day, over a 22-

year mine life. This operation is anticipated to produce an average of 171 million

pounds of copper, 266,000 ounces of gold, 1.43 million oz. of silver and 15.5 million

lbs. of molybdenum per year. Since the filing of the first application for the develop-

ment of a mine at Casino, the company has submitted more than 14,000 pages of infor-

mation and over three years of engagement with regulatory agencies and federal, terri-

torial and First Nation governments. Additionally, the company said it has voluntarily

initiated a number of programs outside of the YESAA process to ensure expanded

technical and community input into the project. The purpose of the assessment process

is to incorporate concerns, views and mitigation from a broad range of stakeholders

into the project plan. In Western’s view, this process is limited until the screening phase

begins. It hopes that the latest supplemental information report will be sufficient to

begin the screening phase of the assessment process.

Copper Fox raises Eaglehead exploration fundsCopper Fox Metals Inc. Dec. 22 reported plans to complete a non-brokered private

placement to raise up to C$1.5 million in flow-through funds, money the company

plans to re-invest in Carmax Mining Corp. The offering will consist of 8,823,529 flow-

through common shares sold at a price of C17 cents each. The first tranche of the offer-

ing closed on Dec. 22, resulting in C$500,000 from the issuance of 2,941,176 flow-

through common shares at C17 cents each. Copper Fox will use the flow-through

funds generated from the offering to subscribe for flow-through common shares in its

wholly-owned, direct subsidiary Northern Fox Copper Inc., which will, in turn, use the

funds to subscribe for flow-through common shares in Carmax Mining, which is a par-

tially-owned, direct subsidiary of Northern Fox. Carmax’s placement will involve 30

million flow-through shares at C5 cents each. Following the financing, Northern Fox

will own 65.4 percent of the outstanding shares of Carmax on an undiluted basis and

68.2 percent on a fully diluted basis. Carmax will use the funds to carry out a 2016

exploration program on the Eaglehead copper-gold property in Northwest British

Columbia. In addition to the flow-through financing, Copper Fox raised C$150,000 by

issuing 1,153,846 common shares sold at C13 cents each. l

to finance the pilot.

“Teck is demonstrating leadership by

adopting natural gas as a cleaner and more

cost-effective fuel solution for their opera-

tions,” said FortisBC President and CEO

Michael Mulcahy. “LNG, as a vehicle fuel

source, provides both an economic and

environmental benefit to industry in our

province. Today’s announcement further

builds on the diversity of the more than 400

natural gas-fueled vehicles in British

Columbia.”

Teck plans to run the pilot until mid-

2016, at which point it can evaluate the

opportunity to implement the LNG-diesel

technology across a wider section of its

haul-truck fleet.

Donlin eyes developmentsOnce developed, the Donlin Gold Mine

in Southwest Alaska will have a fleet of

enormous haul trucks, an excess quantity of

natural gas and a need to barge and store a

year’s worth of diesel to the remote site

during a 110-day window. This combina-

tion could make the planned operation ide-

ally suited for LNG-fueled haul trucks.

Donlin Gold LLC – equally owned by

subsidiaries of Novagold Resources Inc.

and Barrick Gold Corp. – has been keeping

an eye on emerging technology.

Kurt Parkan, external affairs manager,

Donlin Gold, told Mining News that the

idea of LNG-fueled trucks was considered

when the partnership developed the mine-

plan, but without a surety that the technol-

ogy would be available for commercial

production, Donlin Gold could not build its

preferred mine plan around the fledgling

technology.

Regulators in charge of issuing permits

to develop the 40-million-ounce gold proj-

ect also see natural gas as a potential source

of fuel for the heavy haulers at Donlin.

As part of the EIS process, the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers is tasked with

evaluating the mine plan submitted by the

project proponent as well as coming up

with alternatives that could potentially

reduce environmental risks. In the case of

Donlin Gold, the federal agency deter-

mined that using some of the excess natural

gas to fuel the haul trucks is one such alter-

native.

According to the recently published

draft EIS, LNG-fueled haul trucks could

reduce the amount of diesel needed at the

Donlin Gold operation under evaluation by

29 million gallons per year, or 68.5 percent

less than the 42.3 million gallons that

would be required to fuel conventional

trucks at the proposed large open-pit gold

mine.

“At present, LNG-powered haul trucks

are not currently in full commercial pro-

duction,” the Corps observed in the draft

EIS.

The potential upside of LNG-fired

trucks, however, was too compelling for

the agency to completely ignore.

Fueling the trucks with natural gas

would ease traffic on the Kuskokwim

River, one of the primary concerns the

Corps heard during an initial scoping peri-

od of the Donlin EIS process.

This alternative also would reduce the

amount of fuel storage needed at the mine

site and Bethel, a town at the mouth of the

Kuskokwim River where the river barges

would load diesel and other supplies and

equipment delivered via ships.

“If it does come into commercial pro-

duction, we will totally jump on top of that

because it will allow us to take more diesel

off the barges,” Parkan explained during a

recent interview with Mining News.

To make the natural gas usable for haul

trucks, a plant to convert the natural gas to

LNG and tanks to store the liquefied gas

would need to be built at Donlin. An invest-

ment and endeavor Donlin Gold believes

would be worthwhile if the technology gets

developed commercially.

“The LNG plant that we would need at

the project site is fairly simple and clearly,

the costs associated with putting that in is

compensated by the fuel-cost savings,”

Parkan said.

Donlin Gold is keeping an eye on the

pilot project being carried out by Teck and

other developments that would move the

emerging LNG-fueled haul truck technolo-

gy into the mainstream.

“It is definitely a win-win, if it becomes

commercially viable by the time we need

it,” he said.

Commercial viabilityIn addition to the tests being carried out

by Teck, at least one company in the

United States is increasing its fleet of

LNG-fueled trucks and a number of heavy

equipment manufacturers are developing

natural gas engines for the heavy haulers.

GFS Corp. has developed conversion

kits for a number of different makes and

models of haul trucks.

Arch Coal has been steadily increasing

the number of trucks at its Black Thunder

Mine in Montana that are equipped with

the GFS conversion kits.

Arch Coal converted its first batch of

Komatsu trucks to the LNG-diesel mix in

January 2014. This year, the company

ordered conversion kits for 10 additional

trucks.

In addition to two models of Komatsu,

GFS Corp. has developed conversion kits

for at least two Caterpillar haul-truck mod-

els.

Caterpillar is also working on develop-

ing haul-trucks that burn natural gas with-

out the need of after-market modifications.

“Of particular interest to many mining

customers, and Caterpillar is the potential

to leverage natural gas for reduced fuel

costs and greenhouse gas emissions,” the

company explains on its website. “The

technology we are pursuing for large min-

ing trucks offers substitution of diesel with

natural gas, as well as lower greenhouse

gas and criteria pollutant emissions when

compared to today’s diesel engines. This

technology in our fully integrated solution

will be a key differentiator in the mining

industry.”

Cummins is another company that is

developing natural-gas-fueled trucks

specifically to meet the growing demand

from mining operations.

“The rapid expansion and abundance of

natural gas in some areas of the world is

driving a dramatic cost advantage of natu-

ral gas over diesel fuel, making natural gas

a very economical fuel source for mine

sites,” Cummins explains.

The company said it plans to announce

the roll-out of its first batch of LNG-diesel

engines especially tailored for mining

applications in the near future.

The engines being developed by

Cummins actively monitors the work load

and adjusts the LNG-diesel ratio accord-

ingly. They also could run on diesel alone.

The company estimates that in typical

operations roughly half the energy could

be expected from natural gas, resulting in

about 30 percent in fuel savings.

So, whether a mining company is look-

ing to reduce its carbon footprint, increase

its bottom line or deliver more fuel via

pipeline and less via barge, it seems the

options for commercially available natural

gas fueled mining equipment will be

increasing in the coming months and

years. l

continued from page 9

NORTHERN NEIGHBORS

continued from page 9

LNG FUEL

Page 13: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

By DAN JOLINGAssociated Press

Alaska Inuit hunter John Goodwin for

decades has hunted oogruk, the

bearded seal, a marine mammal prized for

its meat, oil and hide.

The largest of Alaska’s ice seals uses

sea ice to rest and birth pups, and after the

long winter, when ice breaks into floes,

there’s a window of opportunity for

Goodwin to leave his home in Kotzebue

and motor his boat between ice panels,

shoot seals and butcher them before they

migrate north through the Bering Strait.

A hunting season that used to last

weeks, however, has shrunk. Ice that for-

merly froze 5-feet thick or more is a frac-

tion of that. Ice disappears quickly, and so

do the seals.

“As soon as the sun comes out, it starts

melting, or we have a heavy rain,”

Goodwin said. “Basically, it’s the rain

that deteriorates the ice real quick. We

don’t have enough time to hunt.”

The environment is changing and the

Inuit, who consider themselves a part of

it, want measures taken to protect their

culture. A report issued in December by

the Inuit Circumpolar Council-Alaska,

which advocates for Inuit coast villages

from southwest to north Alaska, calls for

policies that protect Inuit traditional food

and the Arctic environment that produces

it.

“When we say food security, it has to

do with the health of all of it,” said

Carolina Behe, the organization’s indige-

nous knowledge and science adviser.

More than 90 percent of the food pur-

chased with cash in Alaska comes in from

elsewhere and a reliable food supply in

more urban communities like Anchorage

means affordable prices and uninterrupt-

ed service on groceries shipped north by

barge or jet.

For the Inuit, who have survived for

thousands of years in one of the harshest

climates on Earth, food is the connection

between the past and today’s culture,

according to the report.

Food is survival and identity. Over

millennia, the capturing of caribou or

seals, the gathering of salmonberries,

how they were processed, stored and

shared was incorporated into art, story-

telling, dance, drumming, education and

language.

“Our traditional foods are much more

than calories or nutrients; they are a life-

line throughout our culture and reflect the

health of the entire Arctic ecosystem,”

report authors said.

As changes arose, Inuit leaders began

talking at public forums about food. Their

concept of secure food differed from the

concept held by people in academia and

government, who spoke of nutritional

value and purchasing power.

“They were talking two different lan-

guages,” Behe said.

At a meeting four years ago, she

recalled, someone asked whether the

Inuit were looking forward to increased

shipping because it would create more

opportunity to move in food.

“Our people were saying the exact

opposite: We’re really concerned about

these ships because they’re going to dis-

rupt our hunting, the noise is disrupting

the animals, the pollutants, and that’s a

threat to food security,” Behe said.

The report, assembled through visits to

15 Inuit villages and with 146 listed

authors, urges Arctic policy decisions

through the lens of food. Inuit leaders

want the baseline data collected on the

Arctic ecosystem using both science and

indigenous knowledge, Behe said.

A scientist researching salmon might

look first at population dynamics. An

elder might taste the water, look at

streamside vegetation, check fish scales

and gauge the texture of the meat, Behe

said.

“You’re asking two different questions

but both of them are really needed,” Behe

said.

The report notes the fragmented nature

of land, ocean and wildlife management.

State officials set hunting seasons, which

may correspond to the best time to

process game, and the handling of food in

group settings. Federal officials oversee

harvesting of marine mammals and

industrial ocean fisheries whose by-catch

affect returns to Inuit on shore.

l E N V I R O N M E N T & S A F E T Y

Inuit link food to environmental healthReport from Inuit Circumpolar Council-Alaska addresses Arctic policy through lens of food; view of food as survival and identify

PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016 13

Safer. Smarter.

Our CDR2-AC rig reflects the latest innovations in Arctic drilling to provide our customers with incident free performance and operational and technical excellence.

CDR2-AC is the first Arctic rig designed and built by Nabors specifically for Coil Tubing Drilling operations. The rig was built to optimize CTD managed pressure drilling to provide precise control

of wellbore pressures for improved safety, decreased costs, and increased wellbore lengths.

Combining safety and environmental excellence with greater efficiency means CDR2-AC can deliver the high value results customers have come to expect from Alaska’s premier drilling contractor.

Learn more about Nabors’ new drilling technologies at Nabors.com.

nabors.com

Better.

quate for the operational requirements of

expected future Arctic maritime opera-

tions. Improved communications systems

are currently being implemented and

developed, with an anticipated result of

better Arctic communications services.

Arctic trainingRealistic training under cold weather

conditions, including relevant fitness

training, should be provided for person-

nel who will be involved in cold climate

operations. And managers involved in

operational decisions should also partici-

pate in training in realistic conditions, the

report recommends.

The report also comments on the num-

ber of research and development centers,

projects and forums that are focusing on

Arctic operations. It is important to main-

tain competence and expertise through

the publication of research and develop-

ment results, the report says. l

continued from page 8

NORWAY REPORT

For the Inuit, who have survivedfor thousands of years in one ofthe harshest climates on Earth,

food is the connection between thepast and today’s culture, according

to the report.

see FOOD LINK page 15

Page 14: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

national priority,” Murkowski said. “As

new possibilities and opportunities emerge

in the Arctic, it is imperative that we invest

today in the infrastructure and the assets that

will be critical to supporting our Arctic

strategy. While the United States chairs the

Arctic Council for the next two years, we

have not only a big role but a tremendous

opportunity to be a global leader in the

region, and I believe we are heading in the

right direction.”

The general lack of a supporting infra-

structure has been a continuing issue for

those interested in commercial develop-

ment, including resource development, in

the Arctic region. And the fact that the

United States only possesses two opera-

tional icebreakers — the Healy and the

Polar Star — tends to figure large in U.S.

Arctic infrastructure concerns. In fact, of

these two vessels, only the Polar Star, an

aging ship commissioned in 1976, is a

heavy duty icebreaker, capable of cutting

through particularly thick polar ice.

The new federal spending bill Includes

$7.2 million in funding towards the eventu-

al construction of a new icebreaker,

Murkowski said. The money will be spent

on pre-acquisition activities, such as hiring

staff, finalizing requirements and preparing

requests for proposals, according to

Murkowski’s office.

In September President Obama, during a

trip to Alaska, pledged that his administra-

tion would accelerate the acquisition of

additional icebreakers to enable the United

States to operate safely in the Arctic. The

president said that he would take action to

enable a new U.S. icebreaker to go into

service in 2020, rather than 2022 as previ-

ously planned.

New Coast Guard cutterArctic infrastructure funding in the fed-

eral budget also includes $640 million for

the construction of a ninth national security

cutter for the U.S. Coast Guard, and

$480,000 for an Army Corps of Engineers

investigation of a small boat harbor at

Kotzebue, Murkowski said.

When it comes to maritime activities in

Arctic seas, accurate maps and marine

charts become critical to both safety and

efficiency. Accurate weather forecasting is

also critically important for marine opera-

tions.

The approved federal budget includes

funding for the National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration to conduct

hydrographic surveys or sonar mapping of

the U.S. coastline. Murkowski said that she

had attached to that funding a provision that

emphasizes the importance of Arctic map-

ping and sets deadlines for federal agencies

responsible for the Arctic region. She also

said that she has included a provision for

investigating the benefits of deploying elec-

tronic navigation buoys for the assistance of

vessels transiting Arctic waters.

Weather forecastingThe funding bill also requires the

National Weather Service to identify any

disparities between weather forecasting in

Alaska and forecasting in the Lower 48, and

to identify the resources needed to correct

these disparities. Despite having some of

the harshest weather in the United States,

Alaska sees less comprehensive weather

forecasting that do the Lower 48 states,

Murkowski said.

In terms of the military presence in

Arctic Alaska, the new federal budget

includes $2.5 million for the development

of new Arctic camouflage for the U.S.

Army. And the budget has set U.S Coast

Guard funding at $10.8 billion, $1 billion

more than the amount that President Obama

requested, Murkowski said. The Coast

Guard funding will improve the agency’s

readiness; enable the modernization of ves-

sels and aircraft; and improve the quality of

life for service members, she said.

The budget bill directs the Department

of the Interior to work cooperatively with

local stakeholders to enhance economic

opportunities for the people who live and

work in the Arctic. The bill also requests the

National Science Foundation to produce a

biennial report on federal activities in the

Arctic, to enable lawmakers and the public

to better understand work being done in the

Arctic, and to identify information gaps and

opportunities for better coordination,

Murkowski said.

—ALAN BAILEY

14 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016

510 L ST., SUITE 700 • ANCHORAGE, AK 99501PHONE: 907-793-2200 • FAX: 907-793-2299

www.guessrudd.com

SERVING THE LEGAL NEEDS OF ALASKA'S OIL INDUSTRY FOR OVER 50 YEARS

ESTABLISHED 1961

OIL & GAS • COMMERCIAL • ENVIRONMENTAL

EMPLOYMENT • INSURANCE • MINING

TIMBER • ALASKA NATIVE LAW • PIPELINES

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LITIGATION

By GARY PARKFor Petroleum News

While the freshly minted Alberta government of

Premier Rachel Notley struggles to keep its head

above water as it faces a C$6.1 billion deficit in 2015-16,

its neighbor on the west side, British Columbia, is

expected to continue leading Canadian economic growth

over the next two years.

But achieving that lofty goal is by no means certain.

The Conference Board of Canada is pinning its out-

look on an assumption that Malaysia’s Petronas-led con-

sortium will give the green light to building an C$11 bil-

lion terminal at Prince Rupert as part of its C$36 billion

Pacific NorthWest LNG project.

Board chair Marie-Christine Bernard said that

“although there is no guarantee that the project will go

ahead,” her agency thought it was appropriate to com-

ment on the possible boost to British Columbia’s con-

struction, service and upstream drilling sector which

could account for a full percentage point of the 3.6 per-

cent growth forecast for the province in 2016.

As well as the liquefaction plant and tanker terminal

near Prince Rupert, the overall Pacific NorthWest invest-

ment includes a pipeline and natural gas development by

Petronas subsidiary Progress Energy, which has been

spending C$2 billion a year in recent years to build up a

supply of gas feedstock.

Despite evidence of a global glut of LNG that has cast

a shadow over British Columbia’s hopes in the sector,

Petronas Chief Executive Officer Datuk Wan Zulkiflee

Wan Ariffin told the Malay Mail recently that Pacific

NorthWest will proceed provided it receives environ-

mental approval from the Canadian government.

The project makes the difference between British

Columbia surpassing or just keeping pace with Ontario

(2.3 percent) and Manitoba (2.5 percent), the next

strongest growth provinces in the board’s forecast.

Although Alberta is expected to remain flat, overall

Canadian economic growth is expected to pick up

momentum, especially in trade-related sectors, because

of stronger U.S. growth and a weaker Canadian dollar

that will boost trade revenues.

While British Columbia has grounds for hope,

Alberta can only hope.

That province’s Finance Minister Joe Ceci told a con-

ference call that he is heartened mostly by some fore-

casts that say there’s nowhere to go but up.

“In some respects, people think we might be at the

bottom of the trough and that things are going to be

building and getting better.”

Not everyone shares that outlook, with Standard &

Poor’s lowering Alberta’s credit rating to AA-plus from

AAA, partly because of the New Democratic Party gov-

ernment’s refusal to adjust its plans, which include C$34

billion in infrastructure spending over the next five years

— a commitment that has some critics accusing the

administration of living in an unreal world. l

l N A T U R A L G A S

BC looks to LNG as an economic driver

continued from page 1

ARCTIC FUNDING

Page 15: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016 15

SteelfabAK.com

Alaska’s fully integrated steel fabricator, service center and coatings facility.

We’re the experts at building for Alaska.

24Hour

Machining Welding

OEM Equipment Production WeldingAccessories Certified Welding

Repair and Overhaul Fabrication

Serving Alaska’s Petroleum Industry for Over 35 Years

APIQR ISO9001:2008, reg. # 0717 • APIQR Spec Q1, reg. # Q1-0456

APIQR ISO/TS 29001, reg. # TS-0268

8875 King St., Anchorage | 907 563-3012 | [email protected] | www.umalaska.com

Threading

API 5CT, lic. # 5CT-1163 • API Spec 7-1, lic. # 7-1-0758 • Vallourec • VAM AB

Tenaris • Hunting • NS Connection Technology • NOV Grant Prideco • Vam USA

A SUMITOMO CORPORATION SUBSIDIARY

International agreements are considered

in salmon and migratory bird decisions.

Sources within the United States and

internationally contribute to warming and

pollutants affecting the Arctic.

Fran Ulmer, chair of the U.S. Arctic

Research Commission, said food and

nutrition security is highlighted in the

commission’s goals. Researchers want a

better understanding on how rapid

change in the Arctic is affecting natural

systems and people. That’s also increas-

ingly important for the Arctic Council,

the eight-country forum that promotes

cooperation and interaction between

Arctic countries, she said.

People who are causing change in the

Arctic from greenhouse gases or pollu-

tion, Behe said, must take responsibility

for actions affecting the Inuit.

“The people causing the pollution

have to have more responsibility and

have to be expected to change their

behavior, as opposed to expecting Inuit to

change theirs,” she said. l

continued from page 13

FOOD LINK

their elected representatives and state

law enforcement representatives.

AKLNG said it “has made plans to

remove structures from properties

determined to present such hazards.”

Relocation of the Kenai Spur

Highway was a concern expressed by

many at the scoping meeting and

AKLNG said while that was not part of

AKLNG it is a “connected action” sup-

porting the proposed Nikiski LNG

location. It said the Alaska Department

of Transportation and Public Facilities

is evaluating potential routes and pro-

viding AKLNG “with guidance and

comments to progress the routing, pub-

lic engagement, permitting and con-

struction of the relocation.”

Residents also expressed concern

about Nikiski area commercial and per-

sonal use fisheries, and about access to

the shore around the proposed facility.

AKLNG said access for the public

around the proposed marine terminal

and LNG carriers will be considered in

project planning “based on current reg-

ulatory requirements.”

LNG shipping from the North SlopeAKLNG also discussed suggestions

that LNG should be shipped from the

North Slope. That was not considered,

it said, “because such an alternative is

not operationally or economically

viable and, accordingly, would not

achieve the purpose and need to com-

mercialize North Slope natural gas.”

AKLNG said “extreme weather and ice

conditions in the Arctic, and shallow

nearshore waters, would require the

design and construction of unique spe-

cialized vessels and offshore facilities

to operate year round.” And the cost to

construct LNG and marine terminal

facilities on the North Slope “would be

significantly higher,” AKLNG said. l

continued from page 6

SCOPING ISSUESFINANCE & ECONOMYTrustee: Checks for train disaster victims

A C$460 million settlement

fund for victims of an oil train dis-

aster in Canada is fully funded,

keeping the process on track for the

first payments to victims early in

the new year.

Robert Keach, the court-

appointed bankruptcy trustee in

Portland, Maine, announced that

the settlement is being wired to a

wrongful-death trustee and to the Canadian monitor, Richter Group.

About $114 million will be used to settle wrongful-death claims, and Keach

says the wrongful-death trustee will begin distributing those checks “as soon as

possible.” Distribution of the remainder to other victims will proceed as well.

The disaster was caused when a runaway train with 72 oil tankers derailed in

July 2013, in Lac Megantic, Quebec, killing 47 people and causing raging fires.

—ASSOCIATED PRESS

Hamm says US quality reflected in priceA prominent Oklahoma oilman says the high quality of U.S.-produced oil is

reflected in its rising price on international markets.

U.S. oil is trading higher than the international standard for the first time since

2010 after President Barack Obama signed a measure lifting the nation’s four-

decade ban on oil exports, the Oklahoman reported Dec. 25

(http://bit.ly/1kjEGmT ).

Domestic oil gained 60 cents to $38.10 a barrel Dec. 24 while oil produced

elsewhere added 53 cents to close at $37.89.

Harold Hamm, CEO of Continental Resources, says it’s a

sign that the world sees domestic light, low-sulfur oil as

superior to international oil, much of which is denser and

higher in sulfur.

“Now the premium quality of U.S. light sweet crude is

being recognized globally and rewarded by the market,” said

Hamm, chairman of the Domestic Energy Producers

Alliance.

Most refineries in Europe and Asia are designed to handle

primarily light sweet crude like that produced in the United

States. Light sweet historically has traded at a premium to

heavy sour blends.

But a rapid increase in domestic production over the past decade helped flip

the prices, setting domestic prices below the international rate.

As pipeline and other infrastructure struggled to keep up with new domestic

production, the spread between U.S. and international prices widened to as much

as $30 a barrel.

New pipelines and the increased use of trains to transport oil alleviated the

biggest glut in Cushing, Oklahoma, where domestic oil is priced, but the spread

didn’t disappear.

The spread remained at about 10 percent until November, when it gradually

began to shrink. Some industry observers have attributed the decline to a growing

belief that the export ban would be lifted. Others attributed it to slowing domestic

production alongside an increase in production in Saudi Arabia and other parts of

the Middle East.

—ASSOCIATED PRESS

HAROLD HAMM

About $114 million will be used tosettle wrongful-death claims, andKeach says the wrongful-death

trustee will begin distributing thosechecks “as soon as possible.”

Distribution of the remainder toother victims will proceed as well.

Page 16: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

16 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016

Oil Patch Bits

ADVERTISER PAGE AD APPEARS ADVERTISER PAGE AD APPEARS ADVERTISER PAGE AD APPEARS

Companies involved in Alaska and northern Canada’s oil and gas industry

All of the companies listed above advertise on a regular basis with Petroleum News

Fugro wins state of Alaska North Star awardAlaska Gov. Bill Walker has

announced Fugro as winner of the2015 Governor’s North Star awardfor international excellence in thecategory of scientific exchange. Thisimportant accolade follows theSpotlight on Arctic Technologyaward announced during the annu-al Arctic Technology Conference lastyear.

Fugro was honored for its devel-opment of an airborne sea-ice man-agement capability that enables icethickness mapping, characteriza-tion, and monitoring over large geographic areas. Utilizing a unique radar mapping systemknown as GeoSAR, the ice management capability is designed to reduce risk in Arctic opera-tions.

Fugro’s Alaska Division Manager Rada Khadjinova accepted the award, saying, “It is anhonor to be recognized by Gov. Walker for this important work. This is truly an Alaska-borndiscovery, made during our early work on the Alaska Statewide Digital Mapping Initiative, andnow being utilized in other Arctic regions.”

Originally designed as a regional-scale topographic mapping solution, Fugro deployed theGeoSAR system to Alaska in 2010 to help update the state’s baseline mapping data. It wasduring this project that Fugro realized the depths to which its GeoSAR system could penetratesnow and ice. Efforts to exploit this capability began in 2012 and have continued every sum-mer since then. In 2016, Fugro anticipates bringing the capability into commercial operations.

Crowley recognized for road safety efforts in Costa RicaCrowley Maritime Corp.’s liner and logistics

group in Central America recently receivednational road safety recognition from the CostaRica Ministry of Public Works for their focus onregional, national and local road safety. Duringan awards ceremony, which took place Dec. 10,in San José, Costa Rica, Crowley was recognizedfor their strategies to reduce accidents and fatal-ities while transporting cargo.

Bernard Paniagua, Health, Safety, Securityand Environment, regional road safety projectmanager, accepted the special recognition onbehalf of Crowley.

“This special recognition would not have been possible without the support of CentralAmerica senior management, especially Jorge Campabadal, southern zone vice president,who championed the initiative,” said Paniagua. “The land operations team’s focus onCrowley’s goal of zero — zero harm to people, property and the environment — also con-tributed heavily. Together, we are focusing on setting the regional road safety benchmarkwhen it comes to moving cargo.”

The national road safety recognitions are presented to companies which take a leader-ship position by formulating and implementing high level road safety initiatives. In 2015,Crowley met all the requirements of this program by analyzing drivers’ traffic infractionsand road safety risk factors; attending more than 25 road safety management trainingcourses; and developing and sharing road safety best practices, such as their expert drivercampaign which is focused on carriers, owners, coordinators, drivers and other industrystakeholders.

AABRAECOM EnvironmentaeSolutionsAir Liquide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6Alaska Clean Seas (ACS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18Alaska DreamsAlaska Frontier Constructors (AFC)Alaska Marine Lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20Alaska Metrology & Calibration ServicesAlaska RailroadAlaska RubberAlaska Steel Co.Alaska Textiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14Alaska West Express . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20Alpha Seismic CompressorsAmerican Marine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4Arctic Catering & Support Arctic Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4Arctic Wire Rope & SupplyARCTOSArmstrongASRC Energy ServicesAT&TAutomated Laundry Systems & SupplyAvalon Development

B-FBald Mountain Air ServiceBombay DeluxeBowhead TransportBrooks Range SupplyCalista Corp.Canrig Drilling TechnologyCarlile Transportation ServicesCH2MClearSpan Fabric Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5Colville Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18Computing Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2CONAM ConstructionConocoPhillips AlaskaConstruction Machinery IndustrialCrowley SolutionsCruz ConstructionDelta Leasing

DET-TRONICSDowland-Bach Corp.Doyon AnvilDoyon AssociatedDoyon DrillingDoyon, LimitedDoyon Universal Servicesexp Energy ServicesF. Robert Bell and AssociatesFairweatherFlowline AlaskaFluorFoss MaritimeFugro

G-MGBR Oilfield Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7GCI Industrial Telecom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8Global Diving & SalvageGlobal Geophysical ServicesGMW Fire ProtectionGolder AssociatesGreer Tank & WeldingGuess & Rudd, PC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14Harley Marine ServicesHawk ConsultantsHDR AlaskaInspirationsJudy Patrick PhotographyKenworth AlaskaLast Frontier Air VenturesLounsbury & Associates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5Lynden Air Cargo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20Lynden Air Freight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20Lynden Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20Lynden International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20Lynden Logistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20Lynden Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20MagTec AlaskaMapmakers of AlaskaMAPPA TestlabMaritime HelicoptersMotion Industries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7

N-PNabors Alaska Drilling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13

NalcoNANA WorleyParsonsNature Conservancy, TheNEI Fluid TechnologyNordic CalistaNorth Slope Telecom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18Northern Air CargoNorthwest LiningsOpti Staffing Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14Pacific Alaska LumberPacific Pile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19PacWest Drilling SupplyParker DrillingPENCO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4Petroleum Equipment & ServicesPolyguard ProductsPND Engineers Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8PRA (Petrotechnical Resources of Alaska)ProComm AlaskaPrice Gregory International

Q-ZResource Development CouncilRavn AlaskaSAExplorationSTEELFAB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15Stoel RivesTaiga VenturesTanks-A-LotThe Local PagesTotal Safety U.S. Inc.TOTE-Totem Ocean Trailer ExpressTotem Equipment & SupplyTTT EnvironmentalTurnagain Marine ConstructionUIC Design Plan Build . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2UIC Oil and Gas Support ServicesUnique Machine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15Univar USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18UsibelliVigor AlaskaVolant ProductsWeston Solutions, Inc.

From left, Bernard Paniagua, CarlosSegnini Villalobos and JorgeCampabadal.

CO

URT

ESY

FUG

RO

CO

URT

ESY

CR

OW

LEY

Page 17: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

me. That’s what I’m looking for is their

expertise and knowledge to let us know

if this is doable.

Petroleum News: Now looking aheadto the coming session, what are your pri-orities, first for the session and possiblyfor a special session afterward?

Giessel: The No. 1 priority in all of

the Senate’s minds is the budget and

how we are going to manage the $3 bil-

lion to $4 billion shortfall because of the

price of oil. That’s No. 1. Going along

with that, as the Senate Resources chair,

my focus has always been is how to

grow the pie — the pie being the devel-

opment of our resources which ultimate-

ly leads to revenue through production

taxes, royalty, property taxes and corpo-

rate income taxes.

My attention has been on the projects

going on the North Slope as well as

Cook Inlet, and their success. That leads

me to, of course, the oil tax credit, which

was the focus of a working group con-

vened this summer. We arrived at some

recommendations. They are high level

recommendations and yet in a sense they

are concrete as we look at the principles

demonstrated in those recommendations

then look at the governor’s budgets,

there will be some discussions.

The governor’s budget was pretty

vague in terms of the tax credit. There is

a single line on his fiscal 2017 spread-

sheet — line 33 — he showed $73.4 mil-

lion in oil and gas tax credits line. This

is the statutory required level for those

tax credits. Under that there is new legis-

lation placeholder $1.2 billion, so he has

verbalized his intent to start a revolving

loan program for the tax credits. I have

not seen legislation that backs up what I

see on the spread sheet. So truly any-

thing related to this is speculation.

The fact is the tax credits are signifi-

cantly supporting our oil and gas proj-

ects around the state, in Cook Inlet, the

North Slope as well as the frontier basin

in the Interior. While I agree the tax

credits need some adjustment, I’ll use

the phrase the governor has used last

year based on the Senate budget cuts, in

this case I think the governor has gone

too far.

So this will be a discussion point, cer-

tainly for me and for my committee and

I believe the Finance Committee as well.

About 50 percent of the members of my

working group were finance members

and that was done by design as this is a

finance topic.

Petroleum News: what was your

biggest take away from the workinggroup that you convened?

Giessel: Some of the main talking

points were major changes should be for-

ward, meaning none of them retroactive.

There are many projects under develop-

ment right now that to remove those tax

credits abruptly would cause those proj-

ects to falter. It would be false economy

to say we aren’t going to give those tax

credits because it costs too much. We’ve

already invested with them. We’ve part-

nered with them. To stop partnering with

them now would cause our previous

investment to be wasted. That would not

be prudent.

The thing that I think is lost on many

people is the fact that the tax credit is

importing capital into the state and that

comes from capital investors like Bank

of America and IMG.

Some people have asserted that these

big oil companies come in, take our

resources and leave the state. These tax

credits are importing new capital into

Alaska. This is one of the key reasons I

oppose setting up a revolving loan sys-

tem through AIDEA using state money.

That’s simply taking our own money and

re-running it, using it in-state and hoping

the project will pay back. It’s far more

reasonable and strategic to allow those

tax credits to be used as collateral by

these smaller companies who go outside

the state, get loans from the entities that

work internationally and carefully vet

these projects and bring that new capital

back into the state.

Another topic was the production tax

floor. In SB 21, the Legislature instituted

a minimum production tax, in other

words it can’t go below 4 percent. It has

come to our awareness that with some of

the taxpayer liability issues that it would

actually be possible to penetrate that 4

percent floor. Our recommendation is

that the 4 percent minimum tax be hard-

ened. In other words, not able to use net

operating loss credits to go below 4 per-

cent tax.

We looked at the frontier basin, the

basins throughout the Interior and the

Northwest Arctic area. One of the things

that came out was the frontier basin

credits were not all that helpful. They

take much longer for the companies to

get the credits. They are not as nimble.

So those companies are using Cook Inlet

credits in the frontier basin. So those

frontier basin credits are due to expire.

Our recommendation was let them

expire.

Our last recommendation is we hear a

lot from the tax credit opponents who

say we don’t really know what the com-

panies are investing. We are giving them

tax credits but we don’t know what they

are doing with it. That’s one of the rec-

ommendations we are suggesting: that

the companies consider allowing some

of their investment information to be

public. This would be a voluntary thing,

but let us know what are you investing

in Cook Inlet and the Cosmopolitan field

for example and how much in credits are

you getting to offset your investment.

Petroleum News: So in the end, doyou believe you’ve got to have somethingyou can afford but isn’t something youfeel is punitive?

Giessel: That is exactly the goal,

something that isn’t going to decimate

our heretofore partnership with the com-

panies. These are the smaller and mid-

size companies. They are not the big

three we talk about. You might remem-

ber former DNR commissioner spent a

lot of time traveling to the Lower 48 and

overseas talking to companies and tout-

ing the resources here.

They looked at what we were offering

in terms of tax credits, what it costs to

work up here, what the climate was like,

what the workforce was like, what the

infrastructure was like and they decided

to come here. For us to suddenly change

the tax credit, which helped make these

projects economic, will be hurtful to our

credibility going forward.

We’ve heard not only from the capital

investment companies but also the lead-

ers of the smaller companies how they

trusted the state when they said the tax

credits were available. Now for them to

suddenly disappear when these projects

are midway through their development,

I’m not sure we will be able to redeem

our credibility if we decimate this pro-

gram now.

Petroleum News: Back to the gas line,what would you like to see done duringsession and beyond now that the

TransCanada issue has been resolvedand the partners have committed to mov-ing forward?

Giessel: When we are talking about

priorities, the budget is No. 1 and tax

credits play a role in that of course. Also

on the plate for Senate Resources is the

AKLNG. We’ve been getting updates to

stay on top of what’s been happening.

We will likely open up the first commit-

tee hearings with an AKLNG update

again.

There are aspects of it that the state

hasn’t settled on our side of the table and

one of them is the PILT, the payment in

lieu of taxes. Commissioner (Randall)

Hoffbeck has been leading that process

and meeting with the municipal advisors

group. The most recent information that

I have is the state is proposing that the

state take 50 percent of the impact and

other taxes.

That was an interesting proposal that I

had not seen prior. It was my under-

standing that the payment in lieu of taxes

would go to the very municipalities that

were being impacted by the project. That

gives me some concern that the adminis-

tration is taking a new approach to this.

Petroleum News: What are yourthoughts on a prospective constitutionalamendment that some believe is neces-sary to lock in fiscal agreements andadvance the project?

Giessel: The constitutional amend-

ment question is an interesting one and

not without questions. It’s my under-

standing — and I’ve heard from folks on

both sides of this topic — the governor

and the attorney general are convinced

that it is required.

I know the governor is planning to

propose a constitutional amendment. In

PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016 17

alaskacleanseas.orgAnchorage (907) 743-8989Prudhoe Bay (907) 659-2405

Alaska Clean SeasNorth Slope Spill Response

Alaska Clean Seas provides oil spill prevention and response services to exploration and production companies on the North

Slope. With 35 years of experience, this not-for-profit cooperative delivers world class emergency and environmental services.

continued from page 5

GIESSEL Q&A

see GIESSEL Q&A page 19

Page 18: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

18 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016

No matter what segment of the Oil & Gas industry, we leverage our global reach, innovative service solutions, and synergistic partnerships to help secure the long term success of your business.

Chemistry DeliveredTM

+1 855 888 8648univar.com

For availability and rates: [email protected] colvilleinc.com

Home… Away from Home

When you work in the rugged climate of Alaska’s North Slope, having a comfortable, modern place to rest is a

necessity. At Brooks Camp, each sound insulated room includes a private bathroom, rocker recliner,

buyout of Athabasca Oil Corp’s Canadian

Oil Sands project.

That followed PetroChina’s C$1.2 bil-

lion investment in a joint venture with

Encana to develop Alberta’s Duvernay

shale formation.

The other big plays were CNOOC’s

takeover of Nexen for US$15.1 billion in

2012 and Sinopec’s acquisition of

Daylight Energy for C$2.2 billion and the

C$4.65 billion it spent on a stake on the oil

sands consortium Syncrude Canada, both

in 2010.

Internal issuesBut external factors have had the least

impact on the drive by China’s biggest oil

companies to dust off their files on acqui-

sition targets.

PetroChina and Sinopec have been

caught up in government corruption

probes and Beijing’s plans to remake the

public sector.

In particular, the overhang of the

sweeping probe that has snared more than

a dozen executives since 2013 is a serious

distraction for PetroChina.

“If Chinese oil companies don’t find a

way to buy quality companies such as BP

quickly, someone else such as

ExxonMobil may,” said Gordon Kwan,

Hong Kong-based head of regional oil and

gas research at Nomura.

“High quality assets only become avail-

able once in a while and it may take anoth-

er decade for similar opportunities to

emerge again.”

The clearest signal about China’s off-

shore ambitions occurred in March when

PetroChina President Wang Dongjin said

his company had narrowed its overseas

interest to asset swaps to lower transaction

costs, or takeovers of smaller companies.

Long Run acquisitionThat shift in priorities has been evident

in Canada, reflected in a Dec. 21 word that

an unnamed group of Chinese investors

had agreed to acquire debt-burdened Long

Run Exploration for about C$100 million,

ending the Calgary-based producer’s

struggles with a falling stock price.

Under the deal, which is expected to

close in April assuming it is approved by

shareholders, lenders, Investment Canada

and possibly Chinese authorities, Long

Run investors will be paid 52 cents a

share, a 215 percent premium over Long

Run’s closing price on the previous trading

day.

Long Run Chief Executive Officer Bill

Andrew expressed disappointment that

investors in his company will not recover

what they paid for shares.

“Market conditions are horrible and we

got caught on the wrong side of some

acquisitions,” he said.

Long Run said it has now cancelled

without penalty an earlier agreement

under which Hong Kong-based Maple

Marathon Investments would buy 155 mil-

lion units at C$1.30 each to pay down

Long Run’s debt which stood at C$709

million at mid-2015.

That amounts to a default under Long

Run’s credit facilities, but the company

said it intends to seek a waiver from its

lenders.

Chad Ellison, an analyst with Dundee

Securities, said in a note that the new

arrangement represents about C$27,845

per flowing barrel of oil equivalent per day

based on forecast production for 2016.

He said the deal partly saves Long Run

from a series of looming debt deadlines

over the next year — C$100 million in

January, C$125 million in May and C$125

million in November.

“Given the state of current commodity

and capital markets, there was little cer-

tainty that one-off asset sales could cover

... the required repayments,” Ellison

wrote, adding that the deal is “beneficial to

all stakeholders versus operating as a

going concern in the current commodity

market.”

Andrew said “any of the investment

bankers will tell you there’s a lot of inter-

est from Asia” in companies or property

that are being marketed in Canada, with

Asia now on an equal footing with

Canadian, United States and European

investors.

Other Canadian purchasesThe Long Run proposal is similar to the

purchase earlier this year of private

Calgary-based producer New Star Energy

for C$215 million, including C$45 million

of assumed debt.

The buyer in that case was Sinoenergy

Pacific Corp., a Beijing-based supplier to

the natural gas transportation industry that

said its first Canadian purchase will be

used as a base to grow production.

The other Chinese purchases of

Calgary companies since acquisitions

tapered off in 2012 were the sale of Novus

Energy to Yanchang Petroleum

International for C$320 million in 2013,

the purchase of Baccalieu Energy for

C$236 million in 2013 by China Oil and

Gas Group and the sale of Hyperion

Exploration to Tri-Win International

Investment Group for C$32 million last

January.

Greater hopes shelvedBut the greater hopes that Canada’s

energy production of oil sands crude and

natural gas for LNG export would benefit

from continuing economic growth, in

countries such as China and India, have

been shelved.

Yuen Pau Woo, president of HQ

Vancouver, a public-private partnership

linked to the Business Council of British

Columbia, told the Financial Post recently

that the Chinese economy is now undergo-

ing a structural change as a result of the

evolution of the energy market and the

policies of China’s President Xi Jinping.

Woo, who is working to attract Asian

companies to establish their North

American bases in Vancouver, said he

thinks the influx of Chinese capital into

Canada will continue, but will not be

focused on capturing oil and gas

resources.

He said Chinese companies have

grown in their domestic market and have

little or no experience operating in North

America or Europe.

As a result, he said, their initial offshore

investments “will be to try to learn to oper-

ate outside” China, which seems consis-

tent with the bite-sized stakes that are cur-

rently being picked up in Canada’s oil

patch.

Concern with Chinese investmentWhile many smaller oil sands players

who are grappling with high debt levels

might welcome rescue missions from

Chinese entities, the wider mood in

Canada is far less positive.

The Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada

reported in mid-2015 that although

Canadians are generally open to foreign

investment a poll showed that Chinese

participation was viewed more cautiously

than investment from the United States,

Japan and South Korea.

Driving that unease was the suspicion

of Chinese influence over strategically

important industries, especially oil and gas

and the use of temporary foreign workers

in Canada to develop resources.

In another survey by the China Institute

at the University of Alberta, Albertans

showed enthusiasm for new pipelines to

export energy to China, but a steadily

shrinking percentage welcomed Chinese

investment in the province.

The results showed only 43 percent

thought the door should be opened to that

investment, declining from 55 percent in

2011 and 49 percent in 2013.

Only 42 percent of respondents thought

more Chinese investment in energy and

resources should be facilitated compared

with 52 percent and 43 percent in the ear-

lier surveys.

Concern with China’s recordInstitute director Gordon Houlden said

Albertans increasingly feel that resources

in the ground belong to Canadians and are

“not all that keen” on any foreign owner-

ship, especially when they factor in

China’s record on human rights, gover-

nance, labor relations and the environ-

ment.

“You can like or dislike China ... but in

this 21st Century you just can’t ignore it,

particularly if you want diversification,”

he said.

However, of those surveyed, only 48

percent agree that Alberta needs stronger

ties with China, compared with 57 percent

in 2011 and 56 percent in 2013, while only

41 percent thought Alberta’s economy

benefitted from China’s growing presence

in the province, compared with 58 percent

in 2011 and 52 percent in 2013.

On other topics, 54 percent said Canada

should reduce its dependence on the

United States as an export market, 69 per-

cent favored more trade with Asia and 77

percent viewed China as a valuable outlet.

The institute calculates that Chinese

investment in Alberta peaked at almost

C$20 billion in 2013, slumping top C$1.6

billion in 2014 and has barely touched C$1

billion this year.

Houlden said the Chinese may have

either overpaid for their investments, or

seen the value of those assets decline, but

he doubts the Chinese have “gone away

for good.” l

continued from page 1

INVESTMENT LULL

the personnel affected by the nitrogen

were employed by a well service contrac-

tor, and said they were “temporarily

overcome by nitrogen gas during a well

cleanout operation, but quickly regained

consciousness and were released for

duty.”

The company said it takes the allega-

tions seriously and is conducting its own

review.

It also said that “Hilcorp, like other

operators in Alaska, will receive pro-

posed enforcement actions from the

AOGCC. However, Hilcorp maintains a

strong record of regulatory and safety

compliance in its operations across the

United States.”

The company said in the statement,

sent by email Dec. 24, that it is “engaged

with AOGCC on these matters and con-

tinue to work to ensure we are providing

a safe work environment and are devel-

oping Alaska’s resources responsibly.” l

continued from page 4

HILCORP PRACTICES

Page 19: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

of its Alaska holdings to Hilcorp Alaska

LLC in 2014, the company said it wanted

to devote more resources to Prudhoe Bay.

The development program at the

Prudhoe Bay unit in 2015 was larger than

the 2014 program in many ways. There

was more overall drilling, greater geo-

graphic focus, more attention to satellites, a

greater mix of well types and a greater mix

of well design.

Overall drilling at Prudhoe Bay

increased approximately 30 percent

between 2014 and 2015, according to the

reports. BP completed 48 wells in 2014 and

67 wells in 2015.

The 2014 program was exclusive to the

main Prudhoe Bay field. Of the 48 wells

BP drilled during the year, three were serv-

ice wells and the rest were producing wells.

In the eastern half of the unit, the high-

est density of drilling occurred near the

center of the unit, along the coastline. The

program included five wells at Drill Site 2

and three wells at Drill Site 18, immediate-

ly to the north. The program also included

one well at Drill Site 1, one well at Drill

Site 3, two wells at Drill Site 6, two wells

at Drill Site 9, two wells at Drill Site 11,

one well at Drill Site 14 and one well at

Drill Site 15.

In the western half of the unit, the high-

est density of drilling occurred about five

miles to the west of the Prudhoe Bay Delta.

The program included four wells at Drill

Site H and four wells at Drill Site Y imme-

diately to the south. The program also

included one well at Drill Site A, three

wells at Drill Site B, three wells at Drill

Site C, two wells at Drill Site D, three wells

at Drill Site E, two wells at Drill Site F,

three wells at Drill Site G, one well at Drill

Site K, one well at Drill Site N, one well at

Drill Site R, one well at Drill Site U, two

wells at Drill Site W, one well at Drill Site

X and one well at Drill Site Z.

Focus on main fieldThe 2015 program was mostly focused

on the main Prudhoe Bay field, although

BP also drilled two Aurora wells, three

Lisburne wells and one Midnight Sun well.

Of the 67 wells BP drilled during the year,

nine were service wells and the rest were

producing wells.

In the eastern half of the unit, the high-

est density of drilling occurred north of

Deadhorse with three wells at Drill Site 3

and three wells at Drill Site 9 and a second

cluster of four wells at Drill Site 7 south of

the Prudhoe Bay Delta. The program also

included one well at Drill Site 2, one well

at Drill Site 4, two wells at Drill Site 11,

one well at Drill Site 14, two wells at Drill

Site 15, one well at Drill Site 17 and two

wells at Drill Site 18.

In the western half of the unit, the pro-

gram included three clusters: nine wells at

Drill Site F and four wells at nearby Drill

Site G, seven wells at Drill Site R and four

wells at nearby Drill Site S (two targeting

Aurora), and three wells at Drill Site Y. The

program also included two wells at Drill

Site D, one well at Drill Site E, two wells at

Drill Site H, one well at Drill Site J, two

wells at Drill Site K, two wells at Drill Site

N, four wells at Drill Site P (one targeting

Midnight Sun), one well at Drill Site X and

one well at Drill Site Z. The company also

drilled four wells at Drill Site L (three tar-

geting Lisburne).

And while the 2014 program included

only one lateral among 48 wells, the 2015

program appears to have included five lat-

eral wells among 67 wells, according to the

reports.

Kuparuk up 36 percentConocoPhillips launched a major

development program at Kuparuk in

recent years, including increased infill

drilling, the new Drill Site 2S and plans to

expand Drill Site 1H.

Overall drilling at Kuparuk increased

some 36 percent between 2014 and 2015,

according to the reports. ConocoPhillips

completed 45 wells in 2014 and 74 wells

in 2015.

The programs from the two years show

ConocoPhillips devoted considerable

resources in the northern end of the unit,

south of Oliktok Point, around Drill Sites

3N, 3Q and 3O.

The 2014 program included 37 wells at

the main Kuparuk River field, seven wells

at the Tarn satellite and one well at the

Tabasco satellite. Of the 47 wells

ConocoPhillips completed during the

year, 11 were service wells and the rest

were producing wells.

At the main Kuparuk River oil field,

ConocoPhillips drilled four wells at Drill

Site 1G, two wells at Drill Site 2B, five

wells at Drill Site 2E, three wells at Drill

Site 2G, five wells at Drill Site 2K, six

wells at Drill Site 2T, one well at Drill Site

3C, two wells at Drill Site 3G, two wells

at Drill Site 3N and seven wells at Drill

Site 3Q.

At Tarn, the company drilled four wells

at Drill Site 2L and three wells at Drill

Site 2N. The single well at the Tabasco

satellite was drilled from Drill Site 2T.

The program included several multilater-

als, including two quadrilateral wells —

one at Drill Site 1G and one at Drill Site

3Q.

2015 Kuparuk programThe 2015 program included 56 wells at

the main Kuparuk River field, 10 wells at

the West Sak satellite, seven wells at the

Tarn satellite and one well into an unde-

fined Torok pool. Of the 74 wells, 18 were

service wells and the rest were producing

wells.

At the main Kuparuk field,

ConocoPhillips drilled one well at Drill Site

E, two wells at Drill Site F, 11 wells at Drill

Site 1G, two wells at Drill Site 1H, three

wells at Drill Site 1L, one well at Drill 2E,

two wells at Drill Site 2F, two wells at Drill

Site 2G, two wells at Drill Site 2H, three

wells at Drill Site 2K, three wells at Drill

Site 2M, four wells at Drill Site 2S, three

wells at Drill Site 2T, three wells at Drill

Site 3F, one well at Drill Site 3K, 13 wells

at Drill Site 3O. The well reports may fail

to reflect the full extent of the drilling at the

new Drill Site 2S, which ConocoPhillips

brought on line in late 2015.

At West Sak, the program included three

wells at Drill Site 1C and seven wells at

Drill Site 1D. At Tarn, the program includ-

ed three wells at Drill Site 2L and four wells

at Drill Site 2N. The well into the undefined

Torok pool was drilled from Drill Site 3S.

The program also included numerous

multilateral, including at least two quadri-

lateral wells — at Drill Site 1D and Drill

Site 1G — and a quint-lateral well at Drill

Site 3O. l

PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016 19

Alaska’s Premier Motorola DealerProviding Alaskans with two way radio and wireless communications.

The future of two-way radio.

NORTH SLOPETELECOM, INC.

907.751.8200 | www.nstiak.com

MOTOTRBOTM PROFESSIONALDIGITAL TWO-WAYRADIO SYSTEM.

fact, he proposed one — or presented us

with one — at one of the update meet-

ings that we had in the summer in

Nikiski — a very brief proposal. I think

there were about three sentences to it. It

was not discussed at length. It was just

brought to the table and left there. I

know since that proposal was put for-

ward he has indicated that he wants

whatever the constitutional amendment

to be quite specific — that is to contain

fiscal criteria.

I think this will be an interesting dis-

cussion. As any citizen looks at the con-

stitution, you’ll probably see that it

makes broad statements that give author-

ity. It doesn’t spell out details. Most con-

stitutions are broad authority giving doc-

uments.

So to put specific fiscal terms into a

constitutional amendment I think is

going to require some significant discus-

sion and legal advice.

Petroleum News: Then there is thequestion of royalty in kind v. royalty invalue.

Giessel: This question will be deter-

mined by the commissioner of Natural

Resources. As I’ve spoken to

Commissioner (Mark) Myers, and

Deputy Commissioner (Marty)

Rutherford, they are in need of further

details in terms of the fiscals for the

project before they would feel comfort-

able making that determination.

That is somewhat on hold as we work

through some of these other issues.

You’re aware that the governor asked

that the project consider a larger diame-

ter pipeline. He has asked for the costs

for a 48-inch line and that won’t be com-

pleted until April of 2016 at additional

costs of several million dollars.

So until that kind of basic issue is set-

tled, it’s hard to figure out the fiscals for

any high level estimate on the project.

That hampers the RIK/RIV decision that

Commissioner Myers has to make. You

can see there are a lot of complex mov-

ing parts to this process.

The AKLNG project is a high risk

project. There is no one who can guaran-

tee this project is going to go forward.

There is a tremendous amount of data

that is still under development before we

will be able to go to the next step of get-

ting hard figures on what it’s going to

cost. That is something Alaskans need to

be aware of. l

continued from page 17

GIESSEL Q&A

continued from page 1

DRILLING NUMBERS

identify potential “sweet spots” for

source rock development and to locate

conventional oil prospects.

In the summer and fall of 2012 the

company drilled two wells off the

Dalton Highway, to the south of

Deadhorse, and acquired rock core

from oil source rocks penetrated by

these wells. And last winter the compa-

ny drilled a third well, the Alkaid No. 1

well to the west of the Dalton Highway

— testing has yet to be conducted on

that well.

Since the winter of 2012 Great Bear

has been conducting annual seismic

surveys, progressively covering its

North Slope acreage as part of its

exploration strategy. The company has

also carried out LIDAR — light detec-

tion and ranging — surveys, to con-

struct detailed topographic maps of its

acreage, to enable the efficient plan-

ning of ground operations.

According to DOG’s permit

approval documentation, this winter’s

seismic survey will involve the use of

12 to 14 tracked vibrators as seismic

sound sources, supported by tracked

cable trucks and Tucker SnoCats.

Vibrator sound source lines will run

north to south in the survey area, with

lines being placed 500 to 800 feet

apart. At any one time, 20 to 26 seismic

sound receiver lines may be place on

the ground, with groups of one to three

geophones placed along each line.

—ALAN BAILEY

continued from page 1

SEISMIC PERMIT

Page 20: January 2013 - Womyn's Words

ating company. And, as part of its findings,

the commission required the utilities to file

reports in September and December on

voluntary efforts towards forming a single

operating company for the grid.

The six Railbelt utilities reported, as

required, in September and have now filed

their December report.

The December report says that the utili-

ties are working with American

Transmission Co. to develop a business

model whereby a single transco would

operate, maintain and upgrade the grid — a

draft version of a business plan for the

transco is attached to the report. American

Transmission Co., or ATC, operates a

transmission grid in Wisconsin and the

Upper Peninsula of Michigan, as a conse-

quence of a similar transition in grid man-

agement to what is envisaged for the

Railbelt.

The various components of the due dili-

gence tasks needed to reach a decision

point for transco implementation are at var-

ious stages of completion, with a current

expectation of a proposal going to utility

governing boards and stakeholders in the

third quarter of 2016. That would lead to an

application for an operating certificate

going to the RCA in that same quarter, the

report says.

Started December 2014The work program dates back to

December 2014, when the managers of the

utilities and ATC endorsed a set of guiding

principles for an Alaska Railbelt transco

and established a working group to move

the transco concept forward. A work plan is

focusing on due diligence by each utility,

the formation of a Railbelt transco business

model, the validation of the benefits to be

gained from transco formation and the sub-

mission of an application to the RCA for a

certificate of convenience and public

necessity, the report says. And in

November 2015 the utility managers also

tasked the working group with developing

methods for conducting the Railbelt-wide

economic dispatch of power and develop-

ing a means of settling between the utilities

the economic-dispatch-related transac-

tions.

The term “economic dispatch” refers to

meeting power loads across the grid

through the optimum use of the most eco-

nomically favorable power generation

units on the grid. Achievement of econom-

ic dispatch is anticipated to be a key benefit

to be gained from grid unification.

However, given the need to make flexible

use of different generating facilities owned

by different entities along the grid, to

achieve overall benefits, it is necessary to

have some equable formula for distributing

the income and costs associated with

power sales.

Transco missionThe utilities’ report says that the mis-

sion of the Railbelt transco is to “operate,

maintain, plan and provide reliable eco-

nomic service through prudent capital

investment and associated construction

(of) the Railbelt’s transmission assets,”

operating, maintaining planning and con-

structing transmission lines in and around

the utilities’ existing service territories. The

transco would recover its costs through

non-discriminatory, open-access transmis-

sion rates. And, through not owning any

power generating capacity, the transco

would be able to operate under transparent

and non-discriminatory planning and relia-

bility standards.

An open access transmission tariff

would allow equal access to the grid for

load serving entities and independent

power producers, the report says.

Eight subgroupsSubgroups within the overall working

group are working on eight distinct compo-

nents of the transco proposal: transco gov-

ernance; organizational structure; regulato-

ry strategy; operations and maintenance;

grid reliability standards; economic dis-

patch; real estate and land rights; and

finances. Due diligence work under these

subgroups is about 75 percent complete,

with full completion anticipated in the first

or second quarters of 2016, the report says.

Based on work conducted to date, the

concept is that income from the transco’s

tariff would fund the operation of the trans-

mission grid, while capital projects for grid

upgrades would depend on the issuance of

debt and capital calls to transco members.

The economic dispatch subgroup has

been guiding the efforts of two modeling

teams, to develop a computer-based model

of the Railbelt grid that can simulate the

benefits to be gained from various sensitiv-

ity cases for grid unification and the pool-

ing of generation resources. The model

will be benchmarked against an existing

data set for the grid, the report says.

In parallel with the work of the sub-

groups, a validation of the benefits of

Railbelt-wide economic dispatch is 60 per-

cent complete; the design of a tariff for the

transco is 25 percent complete; and the

design of a transco business model is 65

percent complete, the report says. An over-

all evaluation of the transco proposal by

the parties involved is ongoing, as the work

proceeds, with that evaluation anticipated

to be complete in the second or third quar-

ter of 2016, the report says.

Voluntary solutionOne of the guiding principles for the

transco working group emphasizes the vol-

untary nature of what emerges from the

working group’s efforts.

“Transco formation will result from a

commercial transaction between the

Railbelt utilities and American

Transmission Company,” the guiding prin-

cipal says. “While each entity’s participa-

tion in the Transco is important to its suc-

cess, each entity will voluntarily enter into

this transaction.”

Ultimately each party in the utilities’

voluntary project will need to make its own

decision on whether to proceed with

transco formation, based on factors such as

the economic impacts to electricity con-

sumers, regulatory certainty and the

transco’s governance structure, the report

says. l

20 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF JANUARY 3, 2016

www.lynden.com 1-888-596-3361

At Lynden, we understand that plans change but deadlines don’t. That’s why we proudly offer our exclusive

Dynamic Routing system. Designed to work around your unique requirements, Dynamic Routing allows you

to choose the mode of transportation — air, sea or land — to control the speed of your deliveries so they

arrive just as they are needed. With Lynden, you only pay for the speed you need!

Only pay for the speed you need... Dynamic Routing!SM

continued from page 1

GRID PROGRESS


Recommended