1/29/2009Confidential - Do Not Reproduce 2January 26, 2009
ATIS
LTE Business Case
1/29/2009Confidential - Do Not Reproduce 3
David Waite, Altman Vilandrie & Company (AV&Co.)
Consulting Profile
Background
• 45+ Consulting Professionals
• Headquartered in Boston
Core Capabilities
• Specialists in the Communications, Media, and Technology Sectors
• Analytical Approach to Problem Solving
• Deep Economics and Financial Focus
Client Universe
-1-Operating
Companies
Service Providers (CellCos, ILECs, CLECs, RLECs, IXCs, ASPs/ISPs/MSPs, etc.)
Equipment Vendors
Content Creators and Aggregators
-2-Financial Investors
Private Equity Investors
Hedge Funds
Investment Banks
Topic Overview
Today’s focus is on the LTE business case
What are the revenue incentives and investment implications for operators who adopt LTE?
What is the LTE market opportunity and implications for the broader ecosystem, including equipment providers, operators, and device manufacturers?
How could the current economic climate impact the overall LTE business case?
1/29/2009Confidential - Do Not Reproduce 5
LTE Evolution
The Approaching Transition from 3G to 4G
20122003 2006 2009Estimated Time of Commercialization
Mob
ile B
andw
idth
Cap
abili
ty (M
bps)
0.01
0.1
1.0
10.0
100+
EVDO-Rev A
EVDO-Rev B
UMB (EVDO-Rev C)
EVDO
UMTS / HSDPA
LTELTELTE
EDGE
HSPA+
Likely Path for
North American
CDMA Operators
Fixed WiMAXMobile WiMAX 4G
3G
Carriers are beginning the transition to 4G
1/29/2009Confidential - Do Not Reproduce 6
LTE Ecosystem
Network Infrastructure
Providers
Content & Applications Developers
Content & Application Distributors
Device Providers
Component Vendors
Each segment of the ecosystem has a role to play in LTE’s success
• Dual-mode chips to enable seamless 3G/4G coexistence
• Greater computational power on-board
• Improved battery life for media- intensive applications
• Demonstrated potential through 4G lab tests and trials
• Possibly, multi- standard base stations to facilitate migration from and transitional coexistence of 3G to 4G
• Focused efforts to understand & address end-user requirements among consumers and businesses
• Willingness to take measured risks to monetize 4G
• Innovative applications that take advantage of LTE’s bandwidth and latency characteristics
• Rich multimedia content to drive eyeballs to the handset screen
• New, innovative GUI designs to take advantage of rich multimedia content and applications
• Development of new device categories (MIDs) to leverage LTE beyond the handset
1/29/2009Confidential - Do Not Reproduce 7
Success also rests on business case, and underlying economic drivers, for LTELTE Business Case
# Subscribers# Subscribers
ARPUARPU
CPGACPGA
CCPUCCPU
Recurring Margin
Customer Lifetime Value
Confidential - Do Not Reproduce
_
_
x
Customer Lifetime
Customer Lifetime
Total Value(pre-tax,
unlevered)
Total Value(pre-tax,
unlevered)x
Net Customer Lifetime Value
$50
$30
$20 (~40%)
60 months
$1,200
$350
$850
~270 MM, U.S.
~$300 B
Capital Investment
Capital Investment
ROIROI???
???
Directional
1/29/2009Confidential - Do Not Reproduce 8
Economic Drivers: ARPU
# Subscribers# Subscribers
ARPUARPU
CPGACPGA
CCPUCCPU
Recurring Margin
Customer Lifetime Value
Confidential - Do Not Reproduce
_
_
x
Customer Lifetime
Customer Lifetime
Total ValueTotal Valuex
Net Customer Lifetime Value
Capital Investment
Capital Investment
ROIROI
Value-added applications
Advertising revenues
Broadband device proliferation
ARPU stands to benefit from higher-bandwidth, lower-latency platform
1/29/2009Confidential - Do Not Reproduce 9
Rich Multimedia ContentRich Multimedia Content
Real-time InteractivityReal-time Interactivity
ARPU: Selected LTE Capabilities
Greater User ConcurrencyGreater User Concurrency
More Simultaneous SessionsMore Simultaneous Sessions
New Computational AlternativesNew Computational Alternatives
Greater Mobility, AvailabilityGreater Mobility, Availability
Network-based Location / PresenceNetwork-based Location / Presence
Better Physical World AwarenessBetter Physical World Awareness
Content and applications will benefit from LTE’s capabilities relative to 3G
LTE
- 4G Application Enablers -
1/29/2009Confidential - Do Not Reproduce 10
2008 2011
LTE?
ARPU: Average ARPU Components
2005
Data($13)
Voice($37)
$50
Data($25)
VoIP($20)
$55
Apps($10)
Data ($5)
Voice($47)
$52 Consumer– Interactive gaming– Mobile TV– Social multi-user video– Mobile commerce
Business– Collaboration– Tele-presence– Telemedicine– M2M– Fleet management– Asset tracking– Interactive sales
Cross-Segment– Customized bandwidth– Remote monitoring– GPS/Navigation
Illustrative,DirectionalIllustrative,Directional
Value-added applications offset ARPU declines in other price components
Consider the opportunity cost of inaction
1/29/2009Confidential - Do Not Reproduce 11
ARPU: Emerging Mobile Applications
A wide range of vertical and horizontal applications already are emerging
Hor
izon
tal
App
licat
ion
Vert
ical
App
licat
ions
Category
Emergency ResponsePattern RecognitionNavigation and TrackingSurveillanceTelemetry and TelecommandInteractive SalesMachine to Machine
CollaborationComputing and StorageSecurity and MonitoringLocation-based Applications
Example Companies
1/29/2009Confidential - Do Not Reproduce 12
Economic Drivers: CCPU
# Subscribers# Subscribers
ARPUARPU
CPGACPGA
CCPUCCPU
Recurring Margin
Customer Lifetime Value
Confidential - Do Not Reproduce
_
_
x
Customer Lifetime
Customer Lifetime
Total ValueTotal Valuex
Net Customer Lifetime Value
Capital Investment
Capital Investment
ROIROI
All-IP networks
Backhaul
Network virtualization
Migration, multiple networks, OSSs, etc.
LTE is likely to reduce operating costs over time, but with caveats
CCPU: Carrier Operating Costs
Switching to an end-to-end IP network with greater spectral efficiency can significantly reduce network expenses
Network Staff19%
Other Operating Expenses
19%
Cell Site Maintence & Rent
35%
Network Expenses
12%
Network Provisioning
5%
Wireless Network OperatorOPEX Breakdown LTE OPEX Impacts
Cell Site• Fewer sites and radios• Reduced maintenance and
part replacement costs
Network Expenses
• Reduced switching and transport costs
• Better able to handle bursts of data
• Reduced backhaul costs (50% by some estimates)
NetworkStaffing
• More remote (i.e., online) maintenance
• Fewer network elements (when fully converted)
Network Provisioning
• Fully IP networks may simplify provisioning
Source: AV&Co. Experience
CCPU: LTE Cost Cushion
Cisco estimates up to 50% savings on backhaul for wireless carriers switching to LTE networks
LTE cost savings have the same EBITDA impact as a ~15% growth in revenue
Example of Potential EBITDA Impact
Sources: Cisco
General Assumptions• Revenue of $40Bn• COGS = 40% of Revenue• Backhaul = 25% of COGS• SG&A = 20% of Revenue
Cost Savings Assumptions• Switching to a 4G network will result in a
50% reduction to backhaul costs
Predicated Cost Savings• Gross margin increases to 65% from
60%• EBITDA margin improvement of 5%
(~40% to ~45%)• Cost savings create EBITDA contribution
equivalent to ~15% growth in revenue
Assumptions
1/29/2009 14
$40 $40
$46
$14.0$16 $16
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
$40
$45
$50
Current With CostSavings
EquivalentEBITDA without
Cost Savings
$B
RevenueEBITDA
1/29/2009Confidential - Do Not Reproduce 15
Economic Drivers: Churn
# Subscribers# Subscribers
ARPUARPU
CPGACPGA
CCPUCCPU
Recurring Margin
Customer Lifetime Value
Confidential - Do Not Reproduce
_
_
x
Customer Lifetime
Customer Lifetime
Total ValueTotal Valuex
Net Customer Lifetime Value
Capital Investment
Capital Investment
ROIROI
Sticky 4G applications
More devices per user
Slippery open-access environments
New non-contract pricing models
Customer lifetime may improve, but the outlook remains ambiguous
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.3
3.4
3.3
3.5
3.7
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.2
- 1 2 3 4 5
Difficult to manage professional versuspersonal usage
Lack of IT expertise to managemobility solutions
Scalability
No financing to buy IT/ mobilitysolutions
Flexibility
Hard to develop a mobility strategy forour size business
Unclear about benefits (costs, ROI)
Duration of contract with provider
Affordability: High cost to roll-out for allemployees
Integration concerns
Security concerns
Latency
Bandwidth
In-building coverage
Wireless coverage concerns
Tech
nolo
gica
lB
usin
ess
SMB Mobility Barriers to Adoption
• Limited Network Coverage and Performance – Coverage is critical for businesses to maintain real-time
communication with employees, customers and suppliers
• Security Concerns– Concerns about security of information shared across
wireless networks -beyond the company firewall
• Lack of Device Compatibility & Integration– Workforce has different devices, with different OS
• Cost and Return on Investment– Creating a wireless organization could mean a substantial
investment in technology upgrades of the business
• Business flexibility– Concerns about difficulties in adjust mobile solution to
changes in business needs
• Limited experience in managing mobility– IT department has limited experience/knowledge of
mobile solutions
1
2
3
4
5
5
Source: AV&CO primary research survey, n=500
Don’t forget SMBs and EnterprisesChurn: SMBs, Enterprises
1/29/2009Confidential - Do Not Reproduce 17
Economic Drivers: CPGA
# Subscribers# Subscribers
ARPUARPU
CPGACPGA
CCPUCCPU
Recurring Margin
Customer Lifetime Value
Confidential - Do Not Reproduce
_
_
x
Customer Lifetime
Customer Lifetime
Total ValueTotal Valuex
Net Customer Lifetime Value
Capital Investment
Capital Investment
ROIROI
Economies of scale
Customer acquisition
Higher subsidies – open may offset
LTE’s impact on CPGA remains uncertain
CPGA: Economies of Scale
Scale economies from promise to drive down equipment subsidies
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
GSM/WCDMAHandsets
CDMAHandsets
CPGA: Smartphones
Yet, greater adoption of smartphones and other advanced devices may offset benefits from scale economies, at least in the near-term
6
206
406
606
806
1,006
1,206
1,406
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Con
sum
er W
irel
ess
Dev
ices
(M)
Smartphones Basic Phones
• Smartphones use more data than basic phones• iPhone users consume 30 times the data of other smart phones users (e.g., Youtube)• Even if smartphone penetration growth slows, existing smartphones are becoming much more
data intensive to match the iPhone
1/29/2009Confidential - Do Not Reproduce 20
Economic Drivers: Subscribers
# Subscribers# Subscribers
ARPUARPU
CPGACPGA
CCPUCCPU
Recurring Margin
Customer Lifetime Value
Confidential - Do Not Reproduce
_
_
x
Customer Lifetime
Customer Lifetime
Total ValueTotal Valuex
Net Customer Lifetime Value
Capital Investment
Capital Investment
ROIROI
New applications tap new segments
Greater bandwidth targets performance hold-outs
Machines
MIDs
LTE seems likely to attract new subscribers and more devices per subscriber
1/29/2009Confidential - Do Not Reproduce 21
Economic Drivers: CapEx
# Subscribers# Subscribers
ARPUARPU
CPGACPGA
CCPUCCPU
Recurring Margin
Customer Lifetime Value
Confidential - Do Not Reproduce
_
_
x
Customer Lifetime
Customer Lifetime
Total ValueTotal Valuex
Net Customer Lifetime Value
Capital Investment
Capital Investment
ROIROI
Economies of scale
All-IP network & spectral efficiency
Network virtualization
Multiple networks in transition
Capital efficiency is set to improve with LTE deployments
CapEx: All-IP
Standardized, IP-based network equipment for LTE will reduce capital costs
Maintenance60%
Network40%
Wireless Network OperatorCAPEX Breakdown
LTE CAPEX Impacts
Cell Site
• Improved spectrum efficiency• Propagation benefits of 700
MHz spectrum• Spectrum flexibility (channel
width, FDD/TDD)
Network Maintenance
• Simpler network architecture• Lower equipment costs resulting
from standardization
NetworkExpansion
• Lower equipment costs resulting from standardization
• Simpler network architecture
Source: AV&Co. Experience
1/29/2009 22
CapEx: Impact of Spectral Efficiency
Improved spectral efficiency of LTE promises to further enhance the capital efficiency of LTE investments
- LTE - - EVDO Rev-A - - HSDPA -
Theoretical Speed
Channel Bandwidth 1.25-20 MHz 1.25 MHz 5 MHz
(Future plans for 10 MHz)
Range 1-30 Miles(theoretical) 1-5 Miles 1-5 Miles
Spectrum Efficiency ~3-5 bps/Hz ~1-2 bps/Hz ~1-3 bps
DL- 3.1 Mbps UL- 1.8 Mbps
DL- 14 Mbps UL- 5.8 Mbps
Expected Speed DL- 5 Mbps DL- 400 kbps DL- 900 kbps
LTE – 3G Comparison
DL- >100 Mbps UL- >50 Mbps
Source: Ericsson, Alcatel, Qualcomm, Wireless World, AV&Co. interviews with RF engineers
1/29/2009 23
Macroeconomic Considerations
Investments may be impacted by the current economic climate
Barriers
Tight credit markets; depressed equity markets; cash is king
Declining consumer demand
Drivers
Operators’ subscription cash flows
Competitive intensity
Market saturation
Wildcards
Economic stimulus
Cost of capital
Macroeconomic Considerations
Despite economic headwinds, participants across the ecosystem are gearing up for LTE
December ’08: Qualcomm laid out an aggressive LTE roadmap (expect to have samples ready by Q209)
December ’08: Alcatel-Lucent announced an increase in LTE investment
November ’08: Motorola completed its first field test for LTE – expect limited LTE deployments in 2009
December ‘08: Nokia demonstrated LTE technology
November ’08: HTC introduced MAX 4G, the world’s first GSM & WiMAX enabled handset in Russia
October ’08: ZTE increases LTE R&D investment as they believe the global recession will not dampen equipment demand for LTE
November ’08: T-Mobile announced plans to forego additional investment into HSPA+ and focus exclusively on LTE
December ’08: Verizon states that LTE service will be launched in 2009 in select U.S. markets
January, ’09: TeliaSonera awards first LTE contract
Conclusions
ARPU
CCPU
CustomerLifetime
CPGA
Sub-scribers
RationalePotential Impact
CapEx
Economies of scale
All-IP network & spectral efficiency
Network virtualization
Multiple networks in transition
New applications tap new segments
Greater bandwidth targets performance hold-outs
Machines
MIDs
Economies of scale
Customer acquisition
Higher subsidies – open may offset
Sticky 4G applications
More devices per user
Slippery open-access environments
New non-contract pricing models
All-IP networks
Backhaul
Network virtualization
Migration, multiple networks, OSSs, etc.
Value-added applications
Advertising revenues
Broadband device proliferation