61
January – June 2011 Biannual Economic and Capacity Survey
| Date post: | 16-Dec-2015 |
| Category: |
Documents |
| Upload: | scot-morgan |
| View: | 218 times |
| Download: | 0 times |
January – June 2011
Biannual Economic and Capacity Survey
Firm distribution based on Annual Turnoverbased on responses received
Category by gross annual income
% of firms
0 – R1,5m 10.4%
R1,5m – R11,5m 39.5%
> R11,5m 50.0%
Total 100.0%
0-1.510.4%
1.5-11.539.5%
>11.550.1%
Firm distribution based on turnover
Category by gross annual income
% of firms
0 – R1,5m 7.8%
R1,5m – R11,5m 29.7%
> R11,5m 62.5%
Total 100.0%
0-1.57.8%
1.5-11.529.7%
>11.562.5%
Firm distribution based on turnover
January – June 2011 July – December 2010
Economic ImpactCESA Membership earnings % of GDP
Source: RBQN, CESA BECS, Industry Insight
JUN97
DEC97
JUN98
DEC98
JUN99
DEC99
JUN00
DEC00
JUN01
DEC01
JUN02
DEC02
JUN03
DEC03
JUN04
DEC04
JUN05
DEC05
JUN06
DEC06
JUN07
DEC07
JUN08
DEC08
JUN09
DEC09
JUN10
DEC10
JUN11
0.0%
0.1%
0.2%
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.6%
0.7%
Relationship to Gross Fixed Capital Formation
Source: RBQN, CESA BECS, Industry Insight
Consulting Engineering IndustryFee income, Rm Constant 2000 prices (CPI Deflated) Annualised
Jun-96 Jun-97 Jun-98 Jun-99 Jun-00 Jun-01 Jun-02 Jun-03 Jun-04 Jun-05 Jun-06 Jun-07 Jun-08 Jun-09 Jun-10 Jun-110
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Source: CESA BECS
Consulting Engineering IndustryReal Fee income (CPI deflated), 2000 prices: Annual Change
Source: CESA BECS
Jun-
97
Dec-9
7
Jun-
98
Dec-9
8
Jun-
99
Dec-9
9
Jun-
00
Dec-0
0
Jun-
11
Dec-1
1
Jun-
11
Dec-1
1
Jun-
11
Dec-1
1
Jun-
11
Dec-1
1
Jun-
11
Dec-1
1
Jun-
11
Dec-1
1
Jun-
11
Dec-1
1
Jun-
11
Dec-1
1
Jun-
11
Dec-1
1
Jun-
11
Dec-1
1
Jun-
11-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
CESA Confidence Index
Source: CESA BECS
Jun-9
5Ju
n-9
6Ju
n-9
7D
ec-
97
Jun-9
8D
ec-
98
Jun-9
9D
ec-
99
Jun-0
0D
ec-
00
Jun-0
1D
ec-
01
Jun-0
2D
ec-
02
Jun-0
3D
ec-
03
Jun-0
4D
ec-
04
Jun-0
5D
ec-
05
Jun-0
6D
ec-
06
Jun-0
7D
ec-
07
Jun-0
8D
ec-
08
Jun-0
9D
ec-
09
Jun-1
0D
ec-
10
Jun-1
1D
ec-
11
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
-10
10
30
50
70
90
110
% Change (Survey to Survey) Index
%
Change f
rom
pre
vio
us s
urv
ey
% R
espondents
sati
sfi
ed
Industry Confidence
Source: CESA BECS, BER
Jun-9
6
Jun-9
7
Jan-9
8
Jun-9
8
Jan-9
9
Jun-9
9
Jan-0
0
Jun-0
0
Dec-
00
Jun-0
1
Dec-
01
Jun-0
2
Dec-
02
Jun-0
3
Dec-
03
Jun-0
4
Dec-
04
Jun-0
5
Dec-
05
Jun-0
6
Dec-
06
Jun-0
7
Dec-
07
Jun-0
8
Dec-
08
Jun-0
9
Dec-
09
Jun-1
0
Dec-
10
Jun-1
1
Dec-
11
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Confidence
CO
NFID
EN
CE I
ND
EX
Fee inco
me (
consta
nt
pri
ces)
Consulting Engineering IndustryReal Fee income (CPI deflated) vs confidence
Source: CESA BECS
Jun-9
6
Jun-9
7
Jan-9
8
Jun-9
8
Jan-9
9
Jun-9
9
Jan-0
0
Jun-0
0
Dec-
00
Jun-0
1
Dec-
01
Jun-0
2
Dec-
02
Jun-0
3
Dec-
03
Jun-0
4
Dec-
04
Jun-0
5
Dec-
05
Jun-0
6
Dec-
06
Jun-0
7
Dec-
07
Jun-0
8
Dec-
08
Jun-0
9
Dec-
09
Jun-1
0
Dec-
10
Jun-1
1
Dec-
11
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
200030004000500060007000800090001000011000120001300014000150001600017000180001900020000Confidence Fee income Current prices
CO
NFID
EN
CE I
ND
EX
Fee inco
me,
R m
ill, c
urr
ent
pri
ces
Consulting Engineering IndustryNominal Fee income vs confidence
Source: CESA BECS
CESA Labour Cost Indicator: Y-Y Change
Source: CESA BECS
Jun-
98
Jun-
99
Jun-
00
Jun-
01
Jun-
02
Jun-
03
Jun-
04
Jun-
05
Jun-
06
Jun-
07
Jun-
08
Jun-
09
Jun-
10
Jun-
11
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Consulting Engineering IndustryEmployment vs REAL fee income (CPI / LCI Deflated)
Source: CESA BECS
Dec-9
7
Dec-9
8
Dec-9
9
Dec-0
0
Dec-0
1
Dec-0
2
Dec-0
3
Dec-0
4
Dec-0
5
Dec-0
6
Dec-0
7
Dec-0
8
Dec-0
9
Dec-1
02,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
11,000
12,000
8,500
10,500
12,500
14,500
16,500
18,500
20,500
Income: CPI 2000 prices Income : CESA LCI 2005 pricesEmployment Revised (right axis)
Consulting Engineering IndustryEmployment vs Salary / Wage bill
Source: CESA BECS
Dec-9
7
Dec-9
8
Dec-9
9
Dec-0
0
Dec-0
1
Dec-0
2
Dec-0
3
Dec-0
4
Dec-0
5
Dec-0
6
Dec-0
7
Dec-0
8
Dec-0
9
Dec-1
00
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Salary/Wage bill (Constant) Employment - right axis
Discounting
Question: What is the prevailing discount being offered in a tendering situation to clients by your firm, benchmarked against the ECSA Guideline Fee Scales?
39% of firmsdiscounted by 20% or more
Source: CESA BECS
JUN07 DEC07 JUN08 DEC08 JUN09 DEC09 JUN10 DEC10 JUN110.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
Fee income earned by Sub-disciplines: % ShareJune 2011
AgriculturalArchitecture
Mechanical building ServicesCivil
Electrical / ElectronicEnvironmental
FacilitiesGeotechnical
Industrial Process / ChemicalGIS
Hydraulics
Information Systems / Technology
MarineMechanical
MiningProject Management
Quantity SurveyingStructural
Town planning
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Question: What type of work did your company engage in during the past 6 months?
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by Sub-disciplines: % ShareChange in the last 12 months
AgriculturalArchitecture
Mechanical building ServicesCivil
Electrical / ElectronicEnvironmental
FacilitiesGeotechnical
Industrial Process / ChemicalGIS
HydraulicsInformation Systems / Technology
MarineMechanical
MiningProject Management
Quantity SurveyingStructural
Town planning
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10%
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by Top four disciplines: R mill 2000 pricesAnnual average: 2002 – 2010
Source: CESA BECS
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Structural 475 465 551 574 801 1233 1459 1263.89
1555
Proj Mang 461 320 283 356 442 495 663 783.1 814
Mining 2 18 41 58 178 67 105 532.22 338
Civil - right axis 1926 1745 1869 2041 2392 3234 5576 4760.46
3751
100
300
500
700
900
1,100
1,300
1,500
1,700
500
1,500
2,500
3,500
4,500
5,500
Structural Proj Mang Mining Civil - right axis
Fee income earned by economic sectorPercentage market share December 2009 – June 2011
Income distribution per economic sector
Source: CESA BECS
Wat
er
Tran
spor
tatio
n
Ener
gy
Min
ing
/ Qua
rryi
ng
Educ
atio
n
Health
Tour
ism
/Lei
sure
Housing
Comm
ercial
Agricul
ture
/ Fo
rest
ry /
Fish
ing
Oth
er0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
Dec-09 Jun-10 Dec-10 Jun-11
Fee earnings by selected sectorSmoothed |2 survey average
DEC06 JUN07 DEC07 JUN08 DEC08 JUN09 DEC09 JUN10 DEC10 JUN110
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
WaterTransportationEnergyHealthHousingCommercialWater
Transportation
Commercial
Housing
Energy
Source: CESA BECS
Fee earnings by sectorRm Constant prices
JUN07 DEC07 JUN08 DEC08 JUN09 DEC09 JUN10 DEC10 JUN110
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
OtherAgriculture / Forestry / FishingCommercialHousingTourism/LeisureHealthEducationMining / QuarryingEnergyTransportationWater
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by key economic sectorsJune 2005 – June 2011
Jun-
05
Jan-
06
Aug-
06
Mar
-07
Oct-0
7
May
-08
Dec-0
8
Jul-0
9
Feb-
10
Sep-
10
Apr-1
10
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
Housing
Jun-
05
Jan-
06
Aug-
06
Mar
-07
Oct-0
7
May
-08
Dec-0
8
Jul-0
9
Feb-
10
Sep-
10
Apr-1
10
200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,000
Water
Jun-
05
Jan-
06
Aug-
06
Mar
-07
Oct-0
7
May
-08
Dec-0
8
Jul-0
9
Feb-
10
Sep-
10
Apr-1
10
5001,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,5004,0004,500
Transportation
Jun-
05
Jan-
06
Aug-
06
Mar
-07
Oct-0
7
May
-08
Dec-0
8
Jul-0
9
Feb-
10
Sep-
10
Apr-1
10
100200300400500600700800
Energy
Jun-
05
Jan-
06
Aug-
06
Mar
-07
Oct-0
7
May
-08
Dec-0
8
Jul-0
9
Feb-
10
Sep-
10
Apr-1
10
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Commercial
Jun-
05
Jan-
06
Aug-
06
Mar
-07
Oct-0
7
May
-08
Dec-0
8
Jul-0
9
Feb-
10
Sep-
10
Apr-1
10
50
100
150
200
250
300
Health
Source: CESA BECS
E-Cape W-Cape N-Cape F State N-W Lim Gaut Mpu Kwaz Africa Int'l E-Cape W-Cape N-Cape F State N-W Lim Gaut Mpu Kwaz Africa Int'l
% Share 7.1 16 2.1 3.7 2.1 2.6 39.8 3.2 10.9 10.5 2
Change last 12 months -2.24 -0.29 0.48 -0.93 0.05 -0.13 6.06 0.26 -1.02 -1.84 -0.4
2.50
7.50
12.50
17.50
22.50
27.50
32.50
37.50
42.50
-3
-2
-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
% Share Change last 12 months
% Sh
are (b
ar)Provincial Market Share: June 2011Vs change in market share from June 2011
GA
IN
mark
et
sh
are
Income distribution per province
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by provinceHigh Capacity economies |Annualised smoothed
Income distribution per province
Dec-9
8
Jun-9
9
Dec-9
9
Jun-0
0
Dec-0
0
Jun-0
1
Dec-0
1
Jun-0
2
Dec-0
2
Jun-0
3
Dec-0
3
Jun-0
4
Dec-0
4
Jun-0
5
Dec-0
5
Jun-0
6
Dec-0
6
Jun-0
7
Dec-0
7
Jun-0
8
Dec-0
8
Jun-0
9
Dec-0
9
Jun-1
0
Dec-1
0
Jun-1
1
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
Eastern Cape Western Cape Gauteng Kwazulu Natal
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned (Constant 2000 prices)High Capacity vs lower capacity provincial economies |Smoothed
Income distribution per province
Dec-98
Jun-99
Dec-99
Jun-00
Dec-00
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jun-02
Dec-02
Jun-03
Dec-03
Jun-04
Dec-04
Jun-05
Dec-05
Jun-06
Dec-06
Jun-07
Dec-07
Jun-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Dec-09
Jun-10
Dec-10
Jun-11
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
High Capacity Lower CapacityIndex Dec-98=100
83% of fees were earned in high capacity provinces
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned : RSA vs EX-RSAR mill, 2000 prices | Annualised, smoothed
Income distribution per province
Dec-9
8
Jun-
99
Dec-9
9
Jun-
00
Dec-0
0
Jun-
01
Dec-0
1
Jun-
02
Dec-0
2
Jun-
03
Dec-0
3
Jun-
04
Dec-0
4
Jun-
05
Dec-0
5
Jun-
06
Dec-0
6
Jun-
07
Dec-0
7
Jun-
08
Dec-0
8
Jun-
09
Dec-0
9
Jun-
10
Dec-1
0
Jun-
110
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
Ex-RSA - left axis RSA - right axis
87% of fees were earned in South Africa
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by type of client% Share – January – June 2011
Local (SA) Income distribution per fee paying client type, during the past 6 months
Central14%
Provincial12%
Local20%
Parastatals12%
Private43%
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by type of client% Share
Local (SA) Income distribution per fee paying client type, during the past 6 months
Central Provincial Local Parastatals Private
Jun-08 9.7 15.8 21 12.8 40.7
Dec-08 7 17.7 27.9 10.4 37
Jun-09 6.4 10.7 23 9.8 50.2
Dec-09 15.7 9.9 27.4 12.8 34.2
Jun-10 16.37 13.91 20.42 12.69 36.61
Dec-10 14.8 12 18.14 11.7 43.4
Jun-11 13.6 11.8 19.8 12.1 42.7
5.0
15.0
25.0
35.0
45.0
55.0
Jun-08 Dec-08 Jun-09 Dec-09 Jun-10 Dec-10 Jun-11
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by type of clientR mill 2000 prices | Annualised, smoothed - avg over 2 survey periods
Local (SA) Income distribution per fee paying client type, during the past 6 months
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jun-02
Dec-02
Jun-03
Dec-03
Jun-04
Dec-04
Jun-05
Dec-05
Jun-06
Dec-06
Jun-07
Dec-07
Jun-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Dec-09
Jun-10
Dec-10
Jun-11
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
Central Provincial Local Parastatals Private
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by type of clientConstant 2000 prices | Annualised, smoothed - average over 2 survey periods
Local (SA) Income distribution per fee paying client type, during the past 6 months
Jun-
01
Dec-0
1
Jun-
02
Dec-0
2
Jun-
03
Dec-0
3
Jun-
04
Dec-0
4
Jun-
05
Dec-0
5
Jun-
06
Dec-0
6
Jun-
07
Dec-0
7
Jun-
08
Dec-0
8
Jun-
09
Dec-0
9
Jun-
10
Dec-1
0
Jun-
110
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Public Private
Source: CESA BECS
Competition in tendering
During January – June 2011 competition for work was (Tick selection)
DEC06 JUN07 DEC07 JUN08 DEC08 JUN09 DEC09 JUN10 DEC10 JUN110.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
Very Low Low Keen Very Keen Fierce
Source: CESA BECS
Competition in tendering
During January – June 2011 competition for work was (Tick selection)
Jun-00
Dec-00
01-Jun
01-Dec
02-Jun
02-Dec
03-Jun
03-Dec
04-Jun
04-Dec
05-Jun
05-Dec
06-Jun
06-Dec
07-Jun
07-Dec
08-Jun
08-Dec
09-Jun
09-Dec
10-Jun
01-Dec2
Jun-11
% 0.999
0.999
0.975000000000001
0.989
0.98
0.993
0.99
0.982
0.991
0.978000000000001
0.987
0.971000000000001
0.995
0.991
0.976000000000001
0.969000000000001
0.986
1 0.993
0.999
0.913
0.998
0.948
87.0%
89.0%
91.0%
93.0%
95.0%
97.0%
99.0%
101.0%
Source: CESA BECS
% of Firms wanting to increase staff
New June 2005 survey
Eng O Tech Technologist Technicians Support staff
Jun'06 92.13 56.21 87.8 80.85 24
Dec'06 93.5 55.2 91.3 80.8 25.2
Jun'07 91.2 59.9 88.6 89.2 26.5
Dec'07 94.52 52.1 90.58 89.44 28.67
Jun'08 67.4 40.6 67.1 43 18.5
Dec'08 33.2 2.5 11.3 9.3 2.3
Jun'09 26.4 3.8 12.8 12.5 1.9
Dec'09 26.1 14.9 73.6 25.5 14
Jun'10 16.6 11.9 11.9 1.7 0.4
Dec'10 81.5 10.07 18.3 18.34 5.8
Jun'11 66 8.3 51.8 52.75 6.6
5.0
25.0
45.0
65.0
85.0
Source: CESA BECS
Engineering Skills Shortfall
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
De
c-9
7
Ju
n-9
8
De
c-9
8
Ju
n-9
9
De
c-9
9
Ju
n-0
0
De
c-0
0
Ju
n-0
1
De
c-0
1
Ju
n-0
2
De
c-0
2
Ju
n-0
3
De
c-0
3
Ju
n-0
4
De
c-0
4
Ju
n-0
5
De
c-0
5
Ju
n-0
6
De
c-0
6
Ju
n-0
7
De
c-0
7
Ju
n-0
8
De
c-0
8
Ju
n-0
9
De
c-0
9
Ju
n-1
0
De
c-1
0
% o
f re
sp
on
de
nts
% Wanting to increase engineers Difficulties
Fewer firms want to increase engineers
% Experiencing difficulties
Source: CESA BECS
Engineering Skills Shortfall
Dec-9
7
Jun-
98
01-D
ec
01-Ju
n
01-D
ec2
Jun-
00
Dec-0
0
01-Ju
n2
01-D
ec3
02-Ju
n
02-D
ec
03-Ju
n
03-D
ec
04-Ju
n
04-D
ec
05-Ju
n
05-D
ec
06-Ju
n
06-D
ec
07-Ju
n
07-D
ec
08-Ju
n
08-D
ec
09-Ju
n
09-D
ec
10-Ju
n
10-D
ec
Jun-
110.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
% Wanting to increase engineers% of firms experiencing difficulties in recruiting engineers
Source: CESA BECS
Recruitment problems
Eng O Tech Technolo-gist
Technicians Other PDI Eng PDI Tech PDI Techno
Jun'08 97 56 89 40 21 96 68 96
Dec'08 97.81 51.6 63.48 57.64 6.2 98.08 57.76 97.66
Jun'09 95.9 41.15 84.3 70.6 1.6 97.3 82.6 91.7
Dec'09 83.1 33.7 79.9 34.3 0.08 98.4 35.3 95.3
Jun'10 52.7 15.6 41.2 28.8 42.9 60.9 27.8 60.5
Dec'10 86.7 17 25 10 0.4 98 48 35
Jun'11 62.4 56 27.5 31.5 10.8 83 79 68.8
10.0
30.0
50.0
70.0
90.0
110.0
Source: CESA BECS
Bursaries% of Salary / Wage bill
Dec-9
6
01-Ju
n
01-Ju
n2
Jun-
00
01-Ju
n3
02-Ju
n
03-Ju
n
04-Ju
n
05-Ju
n
06-Ju
n
07-Ju
n
08-Ju
n
09-Ju
n
10-Ju
n
Jun-
110.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
Source: CESA BECS
BursariesR mill 2000 prices (Annualised)
Dec-9
6
Dec-9
7
01-Ju
n
01-D
ec
01-Ju
n2
Dec-9
9
Jun-
00
Dec-0
0
01-Ju
n3
01-D
ec4
02-Ju
n
02-D
ec
03-Ju
n
03-D
ec
04-Ju
n
04-D
ec
05-Ju
n
05-D
ec
06-Ju
n
06-D
ec
07-Ju
n
07-D
ec
08-Ju
n
08-D
ec
09-Ju
n
09-D
ec
10-Ju
n
10-D
ec
Jun-
110.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
Source: CESA BECS
Training (Salaries and Direct Training Costs) % of Payroll
Jun'05 Dec'05 Jun'06 Dec'06 Jun'07 Dec'07 Jun'08 Dec'08 Jun'09 Dec'09 Jun'10 Dec'10 Jun'110.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
Dat
a no
t ava
ilab
le
Dat
a no
t ava
ilab
le
Source: CESA BECS
Training (Salaries and Direct Training Costs) Rand millions, Constant 2000 prices
Jun'05 Dec'05 Jun'06 Dec'06 Jun'07 Dec'07 Jun'08 Dec'08 Jun'09 Dec'09 Jun'10 Dec'10 Jun'110.0
500.0
1000.0
1500.0
2000.0
2500.0
3000.0
Dat
a no
t ava
ilab
le
Dat
a no
t ava
ilab
le
Source: CESA BECS
Training (Direct costs)% of Payroll
Dec-9
7
Jun-
98
Dec-9
8
Jun-
99
Dec-9
9
Jun-
00
Dec-0
0
Jun-
01
Dec-0
1
Jun-
02
Dec-0
2
Jun-
03
Dec-0
3
Jun-
04
Dec-0
4
Jun-
05
Dec-0
5
Jun-
06
Dec-0
6
Jun-
07
Dec-0
7
Jun-
08
Dec-0
8
Jun-
09
Dec-0
9
Jun-
10
Dec-1
0
Jun-
110.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
Source: CESA BECS
Training (Direct costs)Rand millions, Constant 2000 prices
Dec-9
7
Jun-
98
Dec-9
8
Jun-
99
Dec-9
9
Jun-
00
Dec-0
0
Jun-
01
Dec-0
1
Jun-
02
Dec-0
2
Jun-
03
Dec-0
3
Jun-
04
Dec-0
4
Jun-
05
Dec-0
5
Jun-
06
Dec-0
6
Jun-
07
Dec-0
7
Jun-
08
Dec-0
8
Jun-
09
Dec-0
9
Jun-
10
Dec-1
0
Jun-
110.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
Source: CESA BECS
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
Jun-
98
Jan-
99
Jun-
99
Dec
-99
Jun-
00
Dec
-00
Jun-
01
Dec
-01
Jun-
02
Dec
-02
Jun-
03
Dec
-03
Jun-
04
Dec
-04
Jun-
05
Dec
-05
Jun-
06
Dec
-06
Jun-
07
Dec
-07
Jun-
08
Dec
-08
Jun-
09
Dec
-09
Jun-
10
Dec
-10
Jun-
11
Uti
lisa
tio
n
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Net
% c
han
ge
exp
ecti
ng
in
crea
se
Net % Change Utilisation
Industry Capacity UtilisationOf existing technical staff
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income outstanding for longer than 90 daysDecember 2010
Source: CESA BECS
Total fee income outstanding for longer than 90 days% of total fee income earned Including foreign clients
Dec-99
Jun-00
Dec-00
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jun-02
Dec-02
Jun-03
Dec-03
Jun-04
Dec-04
Jun-05
Dec-05
Jun-06
Dec-06
Jun-07
Dec-07
Jun-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Dec-09
Jun-10
Dec-10
Jun-11
0
5
10
15
20
25
Sur-
vey
am
ended
to
in-
clude
for-
eig
n
clie
nts
Source: CESA BECS
Change in late payments, by client (Current prices)June 2011 vs December 2010
90 Days > 90 days
90 Days > 90 days
90 Days > 90 days
90 Days > 90 days
90 Days > 90 days
90 Days > 90 days
Central Provincial Local Parastatals_90d Private Foreign
-40.0%
-20.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%1300% (original input) / 177% (revised input)
Source: CESA BECS
Escalation trendsYear-on-Year % Change
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
An
nu
al C
han
ge,
%
% 8.7 6.9 5.8 5.3 5.7 9.2 5.9 1.4 3.4 4.6 6.6 11.6 7.13 4.3 4.8 5.5 5.7 5.9 5.9
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Based on headline consumer inflation
(CPI)Forecasts Industry
Insight Economist Poll
CPI B
ask
et
Revis
ed
in January
2
00
9Source: CESA BECS
Consulting Engineering ProfessionLabour unit cost indicator: Year-on-Year % Change (Smoothed)
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
LUC 15.2% 11.4% 22.5% 21.8% 9.2% -1.9% 3.7% 15.0% 8.0% 2.9% 4.3% 14.3% 21.5% 11.3% 5.3% 7.2% 9.5% 10.6% 9.1% 10.2% 17.8% 25.5% 20.6% 10.7% 4.3% 7.8% 8.5%
J un-98
Dec-98
J un-99
Dec-99
J un-00
Dec-00
J un-01
Dec-01
J un-02
Dec-02
J un-03
Dec-03
J un-04
Dec-04
J un-05
Dec-05
J un-06
Dec-06
J un-07
Dec-07
J un-08
Dec-08
J un-09
Dec-09
J un-10
Dec-10
J un-11
Source: CESA BECS
Consulting Engineering ProfessionLabour unit cost indicator: Annual Average Y-Y Chg
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
LUC 22.2% 3.7% 9.4% 5.4% 9.3% 16.3% 6.30% 10% 9.65% 21.67% 15.64% 4.30% 7.80%
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jun-10 Dec-10
Source: CESA BECS
Typical Employment BreakdownJanuary – June 2011
Professional Engineer Pr.Eng
Professional Architects
Professional Quantity Surveyors
Professional Other
Technologists Pr TEchENg
Technicians PrTechni
Unregistered technical staff: Engineer
Unregistered technical staff: Technologist
Unregistered technical staff: Technician
Unregistered technical staff: Other
Technical Assistants
Draughtspersons
Laboratory / Survey Assistants
Administration / Support staff
Total
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Black Coloured Asian White
Source: CESA BECS
Typical Employment profile: June 2011
Total employment 19 937
Source: CESA BECS
'Dec-03Dec-04Jun-05
Dec-05Jun-06
Dec-06Dec-07Jun-08
Dec-08Jun-09
Dec-09Jun-10
Dec-10
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Black Coloured Asian White
Overall Employment Breakdown, by raceDecember 2003 – June 2011
Source: CESA BECS
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%D
ec
-99
Ju
n-0
0
De
c-0
0
Ju
n-0
1
De
c-0
1
Ju
n-0
2
De
c-0
2
Ju
n-0
3
De
c-0
3
Ju
n-0
4
De
c-0
4
Ju
n-0
5
De
c-0
5
Ju
n-0
6
De
c-0
6
Ju
n-0
7
De
c-0
7
Ju
n-0
8
De
c-0
8
Ju
n-0
9
De
c-0
9
Ju
n-1
0
De
c-1
0
Ju
n-1
1
%Employment profile: Black only (excluding Asian / Coloureds) representation of total employment % Share of total employment
Source: CESA BECS
Professional Indemnity InsuranceRisk profile
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
%
Dec-07 65.2% 30.3% 4.6%
Jun-08 58.7% 39.7% 1.6%
Dec-08 65.8% 34.2% 0.0%
Jun-09 71.4% 28.6% 0.0%
Dec-09 75.0% 17.5% 7.5%
Dec-10 66.7% 33.3% 0.0%
Jun-11 60.0% 37.8% 2.2%
Low Medium High
Source: CESA BECS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%J
UN
06
DE
C0
6
JU
N0
7
DE
C0
7
JU
N0
8
DE
C0
8
JU
N0
9
DE
C0
9
DE
C1
0
DE
C1
1
%
Pty Ltd CC Partnership
Equity Distribution by firm type
Source: CESA BECS
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
JU
N0
6
DE
C0
6
JU
N0
7
DE
C0
7
JU
N0
8
DE
C0
8
JU
N0
9
DE
C0
9
JU
N1
0
DE
C1
0
JU
N1
1
Ownership / Equity: % Share of total employmentPTY, CC & Partnerships
Source: CESA BECS
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
JU
N0
6
DE
C0
6
JU
N0
7
DE
C0
7
JU
N0
8
DE
C0
8
JU
N0
9
DE
C0
9
JU
N1
0
DE
C1
0
JU
N1
1
Bla
ck
eq
uit
y a
s %
of
tota
l Eq
uit
y
Black equity as % of total equity 2 per. Mov. Avg. (Black equity as % of total equity)
Black Ownership / Equity: % Share of total ownership / equityPTY, CC & Partnerships
Black, including Asian & ColouredSource: CESA BECS
DEC07 DEC08 DEC09 DEC10 JUN110.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
8.00%
9.00%
10.00%
WomenBlack women
Black including Coloured & Asian
Women contribution to ownership and equity% of total ownership / equity (PTY, CC and Partnerships)
Source: CESA BECS
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%
Pty_exec
Pty_nonexec
Member of CC
Partner
%
Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Jun-11
Jun-11 15.3% 55.2% 37.0% 22.2%
Dec-10 15.2% 35.9% 45.5% 12.5%
Dec-09 19.6% 88.9% 51.8% 0.0%
Dec-08 13.5% 81.5% 36.8% 0.0%
Dec-07 16.9% 55.0% 24.1% 0.0%
Pty_exec Pty_nonexec Member of CC Partner
Black ownership / equity as % of total ownership / equity by type of companyDecember 2007 – December 2010
Black includes Asian and Coloureds
Source: CESA BECS
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
%
J un-08 100.0% 72.7% 94.4% 75.0% 84.0%
Dec-08 100.0% 93.0% 100.0% 75.0% 84.0%
Jun-09 100.0% 93.3% 100.0% 75.0% 93.0%
Dec-09 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Dec-10 100.0% 93.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.4%
Jun-11 92.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.0% 95.0%
Large Medium Small Micro Total
Quality Management System
Source: CESA BECS
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
%
J un-08 81.8% 36.0% 11.0% 0.0% 30.1%
Dec-08 87.5% 46.7% 20.0% 0.0% 42.0%
Jun-09 90.0% 20.0% 20.0% 12.5% 34.8%
Dec-09 90.9% 42.1% 14.3% 16.7% 45.2%
Dec-10 92.3% 25.0% 0.0% 20.0% 45.0%
Jun-11 53.8% 55.6% 57.1% 12.5% 47.8%
Large Medium Small Micro Total
ISO 9001:2008 Certificate
Source: CESA BECS
