Japan’s current Nuclear Energy Policy

Japan’s current Nuclear Energy Policy

Taizo Takahashi

Deputy Commissioner Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, METI

December, 2014

1. Nuclear Energy Policy in the new strategic energy plan of Japan

2. Efforts and challenges after Fukushima

2-1. Untiring Pursuit of Safety

2-2. Maintaining and developing technologies and human resources

2-3. Appropriate Business Environment under the More Competitive Market

2-4. Spent Fuel Accumulation and the nuclear fuel cycle policy

3. Contribution to peaceful use of nuclear power in the world

Table of contents

2. Basic policy regarding measures concerning energy supply and demand

1. Issues related to the energy supply-demand structure in Japan

① Concerns over the safety of nuclear power generation and deteriorated public confidence in the

government and operators

② Outflow of national wealth and increase in dependency on the Middle East, price of electricity and

greenhouse gas emission in Japan due to higher dependency on fossil fuels

③ North America's move toward independency of its energy supply by the shale-gas revolution and

widening gap of regional energy prices in the world

・We will do our utmost to achieve the reconstruction and recovery of Fukushima while reflecting on the

pains felt by the people affected by the accident at TEPCO’s Fukushima nuclear accident. Needless to

say, that is the starting point for rebuilding Japan’s energy policy.

Introduction

① To pursue "Energy Security", "Economic Efficiency" and "Environment" on the premise of "Safety" as

the basic viewpoint, in consideration of "global viewpoint" and "economic growth“

② "Multilayered" supply structure where the strength of each energy source is to be maximized by

appropriately offsetting each other's weakness

③ More "flexible and efficient" energy supply-demand structure where various options are to be prepared

by various suppliers 2

＜Description in the Strategic Energy Plan of Japan＞


Decided by the Cabinet in April, 2014

1. Nuclear power is an important base-load power source as a low carbon and quasi-domestic energy source, contributing to stability of energy supply-demand structure, on the major premise of ensuring of its safety, because of the perspectives;

i. superiority in stability of energy supply and efficiency,

ii. low and stable operational cost and

iii. free from GHG emissions during operation.


3


Ref.) Constitution of Electric Power Supply Corresponding to Demand

１．Increase in dependency on fossil fuels from overseas

About 88% of total power generation is imported from overseas. 【as of FY2013】

- It is more than the level at the time of oil crisis (about 76%).

※ dependency on the Middle East：Crude oil (83％), Natural gas (30％)

２．Increase in fuel cost (due to increase in thermal power generation)

About 3.7 trillion yen 【estimation in FY2014】

３．Increase in price of electricity

An average of about 20% increase from the level before the disaster

（monthly price of standard family：TEPCO about 6,300yen ⇒ about 8,600yen

KEPCO about 6,400yen ⇒ about 8,200yen）

４．Increase in greenhouse gas emissions 【as of FY2012】

The amount of CO2 emissions from general electricity utilities increased by about

110 million tons in FY2012 compared to FY2010. (about 9% of the total amount of

the emissions in Japan)

Energy Security

Peoples’ Life and

Economy

Global Warming

（Ref.）Adverse Effects due to Shutdown of NPPs after the Disaster

4


2. On the premise that safety comes before everything else and that every possible effort is made to resolve the people’s concerns, judgment as to whether nuclear power plants meet the new regulatory requirements will be left to the Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA)

In case that the NRA confirms the conformity of nuclear power plants with the new regulatory requirements ,which are of the most stringent level in the world, GOJ will follow NRA’s judgment and will proceed with the restart of the nuclear power plants.


5

1. 20 units (in blue squares) are under review for restart by the Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) in accordance with its new safety regulations.

2. Two of the NPPs, Sendai 1st and 2nd units, got the first permission towards their restart in September.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 2

1 2

1 3 2

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 2

1 2 3 4

1 1 2 3

1 3 2

1 2

1 2 3 4

3 4 5

1 2 3

NPP in operation

NPP in shutdown

Under review by Nuclear Regulation Authority(NRA)

(Ref.) Nuclear Power Plants in Japan

shutdown 6

7

2. Disaster prevention and evacuation plan • A regional disaster prevention plan (including evacuation plan) against nuclear disaster should be

formulated by local authorities based on the Regional Basic Act on Disaster Control Measures.

• Although formulation of regional disaster prevention plan is not a legal requirement for restart, the plan is important to ensure safety of local residents. The government supports local authorities to make a sufficient plan.

• Kyushu Electric Power submitted its application to make changes to the reactor installment license of Sendai NPS Unit 1 and 2 in July 2013.

• NRA compiled a draft evaluation report in 16th July 2014 which admits that Sendai NPPs satisfies new regulatory requirements.

• After the public comment process (until 15th August) and reviewing of the submitted opinions, NRA granted a permission(changes to the reactor installment license) in 10th September for the basic design and safety features of Sendai NPPs.

• Sendai NPPs can be restarted after i) acquiring approval of the detailed design and construction of the nuclear reactors and ii) completing pre-service inspection of operational safety programs.

1. NRA’s Safety Review Sendai NPP

18,600 page document was reviewed & 62 review meetings were held for 110 hours

(Ref.) Efforts towards restart of Sendai NPPs

3. Local Consent of the restart of Sendai NPPs • Both the governor of Kagoshima prefecture and Mayor of Satsumasendai City, hosting Sendai NPPs,

approved the restart of the NPPs, which means the local consent process was completed for those two reactors.


8

○ In the METI’s new Advisory Committee, challenges and necessary measures in using the

nuclear power as an important base-load power source are discussed based on the above

policy.

○ As for the energy mix including nuclear power, GOJ will show quickly in light of the

evaluation of each energy source after assessing the prospects for the restart of nuclear

power plants, introduction of renewable energy and the status of international discussions on

global warming problems including Conferences of the Parties (COP)

○ In order to contribute to the discussion about the energy mix, how to maintain nuclear

technologies and human resources necessary for the safety is also discussed in the

Advisory Committee.

3. Dependency on nuclear power generation will be lowered to the extent possible by energy saving and introducing renewable energy as well as improving the efficiency of thermal power generation, etc.

Under this policy, GOJ will carefully examine a volume of electricity to be secured by nuclear power generation, taking Japan’s energy constraints into consideration, from the viewpoint of stable energy supply, cost reduction, global warming and maintaining nuclear technologies and human resources.


2-1. Untiring Pursuit of Safety

1. Nuclear industry as well as GOJ must shed the so-called “safety myth”, and

pursue the world’s highest level of safety for operations through continuous and

voluntary safety improvement.

2. The industrial circles, including nuclear operators, need to set up business

schemes to persistently pursue safety and make efforts to foster safety culture

that places top priority on the safety of nuclear facilities.

3. Each nuclear power operator, with a firm resolve that it will never let another

nuclear accident to happen, should establish an appropriate risk management

system and implement objective and quantitative risk assessments such as

probabilistic risk assessment (PRA).

・“Proposals for Voluntary and Continuous Improvement of Nuclear Safety Executive

Summary”（Working Group on Voluntary Efforts and Continuous Improvement of Nuclear

Safety Nuclear Energy Subcommittee）（May 2014）

Past measure

9


The Nuclear Risk Research Center (NRRC)

- Established an organization within the Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI) on October 1,2014

- Number of members： About 110

- The authorities of nuclear safety with strong leadership experience were invited to serve as the NRRC’s executives.

10

（Ref.）Voluntary Efforts and Continuous Improvement of Nuclear Safety

Dr. George Apostolakis The Head of the NRRC

• a former member of the U.S. NRC • a professor Emeritus at the MIT • a member of the U.S. National

Academy of Engineering (Probabilistic Risk Assessment)

Dr. Richard A. Meserve The Executive Advisor to NRRC

• a former Chairman of the U.S. NRC • a former Legal Counsel to President

Carter’s science and technology advisor

• an International Advisor of the J-NRA

【 Maintaining and developing nuclear technologies and human resources】

1. Maintaining and developing high-level nuclear technologies and human

resources is imperative for smoothly decommissioning aged nuclear power plants, which are expected to increase in the future, as well as TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plants.

2. Even after the TEPCO’s Fukushima nuclear accident, use of nuclear energy is expected to expand in the world. Japan, with its experience of the accident, is expected to make contributions in the fields of safety, nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear security as an advanced nuclear nation.

3. Because enhancing the nuclear safety in surrounding countries ensures the safety of Japan, maintaining and developing high-level nuclear technologies and human resources which enable Japan contribute to their safety enhancement is essential.


11


【 Promotion of strategic technology development 】

1. GOJ promotes the development of technologies that contribute to safety

improvement of LWRs including countermeasures against severe accidents and enhance their reliability and efficiency in order to reduce risks in case of an accident.

2. Under international cooperation, GOJ also facilitates R&D of nuclear technologies that serves the safety improvement of nuclear use, such as high-temperature gas-cooled reactors which are expected to be utilized in various industries including hydrogen production and which has an inherent safety.


12


2-3. Appropriate Business Environment under the More Competitive Market

【Exploring an appropriate business environment under the more competitive environment】

Nuclear operators are also required to

1) maintain high-level nuclear technologies and human resources,

2) smoothly go through decommissioning work, which will increase in the future

3) quickly take the best safety measures in response to regulations reinforced after the TEPCO’s Fukushima nuclear accident and

4) contribute to global warming countermeasures and stable electricity supply utilizing base-load power sources.

Therefore, GOJ will explore an appropriate business environment in which nuclear power operators can meet the above challenges even under the more competitive environment promoted by the electricity system reform, learning lessons from the overseas examples.


13

小売全面自由化

（参入自由化）

Nov. 13, 2013

1st Reform

(Ref.) Roadmap for Electricity Market Reform in Japan Bills

Reforms

1st Reform: passed in Extraordinary Diet in 2013

1) Establishment of the Organization for Cross-

regional Coordination of Transmission Operators

(OCCTO)

2) Action programs for 2nd and 3rd Reforms etc.

2nd Reform: Passed in Ordinary Diet in 2014

1) Full retail competition

2) Revision of applicable and regulations associated with the abolishment of General Electricity Utility system

3rd Reform: Ordinary Diet in 2015 (Plan)

1) Legal unbundling of transmission/distribution sectors

2) Code of Conduct

Cab

inet D

ecisio

n o

n th

e P

olicy

on

Electricity Syste

m R

ef.orm

Establishment of the

Organization for Cross-

regional Coordination of

Transmission Operators (OCCTO)

Apr. 2, 2013

Cabinet Decision

Abolishment

of retail tariff

Period of transitional arrangement for retail tariff

Legal unbundling of

transmission

/distribution sector

（※At around 2015:Transition to new regulatory organizations）

【1st Stage】 Around 2015

【2nd Stage】 Around 2016

【3rd Stage】 Around 2018 through 2020

2nd Reform

3

rd Reform

Full retail

competition

The

1st B

ill was p

assed

.

14

Construction

Operating Decommis

sion

Operating

start

Early Close Construction

start

Shut down

Close

（original assumption）

＋

－

Nuclear power business requires long and stable payback . The experiences of other countries which have already liberalized their market indicate that it is challenging to pursue "liberalization of electricity market" and "promotion of nuclear power business" at the same time.

• “Nuclear Power in Competitive Electricity Markets (2000)”

by OECD NEA, states

In competitive market , it’s hard to predict long-term

electrical power cost, so that Nuclear power generation,

with long lead time and significant investment cost ,may

have significant investment risk compared with other kind

of power generation.

In Liberalized market, it is unclear to predict future price or

payback of investment. Private investors prefer more

flexible and short-term payback investment.

• In the UK, the electricity market was gradually liberalized

after 1990 and achieved full liberalization in 1999. With

this background as well as with increasing development of

oil and LNG in the North Sea, there were no new

construction of NPPs for 20 years after 1995.

• In the U.S., liberalization of electricity market has been

progressed in each state after 1990. With the decreasing

price of LNG, new construction of NPPs has been

stagnated for a while. Currently there are 4 projects for

new establishment of NPPs .

(2) Influence of liberalized electricity market for Nuclear power generation

(1) Image of the schedule for payback and risk of NPP

15

Additional investment

Early decommission

(Ref.) Nuclear power under the liberalized market

Price set to collect all cost of NPPs including decommission and

disposal of spent fuel. This price will be determined through the

negotiation between utilities and the government.

Price set by averaging forward price in the market

Strike Price

Reference Price

(Summary of FiT CfD in the UK) • The difference between the “Reference Price” (introduced by the market price), and the “Strike Price”

(decided by the utilities and the Government to collect all cost of NPPs including decommission and disposal of spent fuel) will be paid either by the utilities or by the Government, to level the profit and loss of NPPs and to improve the predictability of payout.

In October 2013, EDF Group and the UK Government had reached in principle an agreement on the key commercial terms for an investment contract (Feed in Tariff Contract for Difference (FiT CfD)) of the planned Hinkley Point C new nuclear power plants. (The Terms: 1630kW X 2units, Strike Price: ￡92.5/MWh (￠ 15.7/KWh) for 35years).

And also the UK Infrastructure Guarantee Scheme (IUK) is applicable to new nuclear power plants. In October 2014, the European Commission (EC) concluded such measures (FiT CfD and IUK) for

Hinkley Point nuclear power plants are compatible with EU state-aid rules, if the conditions are partly modified.

Pay the

Difference

to Utilities

Utilities Pay

the Difference

＜Image of CfD＞

Reference Price

Strike Price

(Ref.) Measures taken in UK

16

【 Drastic reinforcement of measures for final disposal of high-level radioactive waste 】

1. GOJ will take leadership and strengthen its effort to find proper solutions of final disposal of high-level radioactive waste without putting off implementing measures into the future.

2. GOJ will secure reversibility and retrievability so that the future generation will be able to select the best disposal method when a better solution will be found in the future.

3. Based on this concept, the most up-to-date scientific knowledge concerning the technical reliability of geological disposal will be periodically and continuously evaluated and reflected in the policy. GOJ will promote study and research on alternative disposal options of spent fuel including direct disposal method.

4. In selecting a final disposal site, it is necessary to decide on a location where safety of disposal can be adequately secured. GOJ will therefore seek understanding on the site-selection by suggesting a location that is scientifically considered to be better suited and by explaining the geological and environmental characteristics of the site from scientific viewpoints. A mechanism for local consensus building involving residents representing various positions will be created.

・「Progress report of Radioactive Wastes WG」（May 2014）

17

Past measure



Literature Survey

Preliminary Investigation

Detailed Investigation

Selection of Final Disposal Site

Inviting Municipalities to Apply for Investigations

Apply

Legal P

rocess

Previous Process New Process to Accelerate Selection (Draft)

Selection (Mapping) of Scientifically Promising Areas

・ Applications from municipalities ・ Government submits requests to

multiple areas

Activities to Enhance Understanding to be Carried Out with Priority in

Selected Areas (Explanatory Meetings, etc.)

Note: At each step, consult with the governor and municipal head. If they object, do not proceed to the next stage.

Legal Pro

cess

18 Note: Proposed new or strengthened activities are

underlined.

Securing

reversibility/retrievability

Note: Addressing mechanism to form consensus,

measures to support , etc.

Note: At each step, consult with the governor and municipal head. If they object, do not proceed to the next stage.

Literature Survey

Preliminary Investigation

Detailed Investigation

Selection of Final Disposal Site

○ Research and investigations on alternative

disposal options will be carried out.

○ Technological reliability of geological disposal will be

periodically evaluated.

(Ref.) New Process toward Final Disposal

【 Expanding capacity of spent fuel storage】

1. The storage capacity of spent fuels will be expanded.

2. Specifically, while studying a wide range of locations as possible sites, regardless of whether they are inside or outside the premises of a power plant, GOJ will strengthen its effort for facilitating construction and utilization of new intermediate storage facilities and dry storage facilities.

【 Promotion of technology development on volume reduction and mitigation of degree of harmfulness of radioactive waste 】

1. GOJ will promote technology development on volume reduction and mitigation of degree of harmfulness of radioactive waste.

2. Specifically, development of technologies for decreasing the radiation dose remaining in radioactive waste over a long period of time and enhancing the safety of processing and disposal of radioactive waste, including nuclear transmutation technology using fast reactors and accelerators, will be promoted by utilizing global networks for cooperation.

19



【Promotion of the nuclear fuel cycle policy】

1. GOJ will make efforts to reduce the volume and harmfulness of radioactive waste and create a nuclear fuel cycle that contributes to effective utilization of resources while adequately taking the past history into consideration and continuing to seek the understanding of relevant municipalities and the international community and will promote reprocessing and plutonium use in LWRs.

2. Specifically, GOJ will promote plutonium use in LWRs, and proceed with such measures as completion of the Rokkasho reprocessing plant, construction of a MOX fuel processing plant, and completion of the Mutsu interim storage facility on the underlying premise of ensuring safety. GOJ remains committed to the policy of not possessing reserves of plutonium without specified purposes. Also GOJ will promote R&D of fast reactors, etc., through international cooperation with the U.S. and France etc.

3. GOJ will position Monju as an international research center for technological development, such as reducing the amount and toxic level of radioactive waste and technologies related to nuclear nonproliferation. GOJ will take necessary measures for issues to be overcome , such as the re-establishment of systems to implement the above mentioned actions on its own responsibility.


20


Technical Option

Comparison Items Direct Disposal

Reprocessing

LWR FR

Waste Image of Disposal

Volume Ratio of Waste Generated※1

1

app.0.22

app. 0.15

Potential

Radiotoxic

ity

Reduction Period down to Natural Uranium Level※2

app 100,000 yrs app. 8,000 yrs

app. 300 yrs

Radiotoxicity after 1,000 yrs※2 1

app 0.12 yrs app. 0.004 years

cost※3

Nuclear Fuel Cycle – Total (Total of Front End & Back End)

JPY 1.00～1.02／kWh JPY 1.39～1.98／kWh N/A

※The 2nd Reprocessing Plant for FR is required Cost of Disposal JPY 0.10～0.11／kWh JPY 0.04～0.08／kWh

Canister for Used Fuel （3.98m3）

Fuel Pellets in Canister （PWR）（0.103m3）

Glass （0.15m3）

Canister （stainless steel）

Vitrified Object

Oerpack （0.91m3）

1.3

4m

0.43m 0.82m

1.7

3m

Mitigation to about 1/330

Mitigation to about 1/12

Reduction to about 1/4

Reduction to about 1/7

* 1. Based on the estimate by Japan Atomic Energy Agency. The figure shows the relative value compared to the canister for the direct disposal set as 1. * 2. Source: Nuclear Energy Policy Guideline The upper column shows the period required to make equivalent to the potential harmfulness level of the volume of natural uranium necessary for the power generation of 1 GWy. The lower column shows the relative value compared to the harmfulness of the direct disposal set as 1. * ３. Provisional Estimate by Nuclear Regulation Authority (Nov. 2011) (Case of Discount Rate 3 %) The figures of LWR disposal were calculated with two models, one with the current reprocessing & storage of used fuel, and the other with continuous reprocessing.

(1) Reprocessing spent fuel in LWRs enables a 75% volume reduction of high-level radioactive waste, and shortens the period required to reduce the radioactive harmfulness level down to that of natural uranium to below 1/10th. (2) Implementation of the FR/FBR fuel cycle might be able to further reduce the long-term residual radiation dosage in high level radioactive waste, and substantially mitigate the environmental load per energy generated.

* In case of direct disposal, fission products such as uranium and plutonium remain in the waste. On the other hand, in case of vitrified radioactive materials after reprocessing, uranium and plutonium are removed and they subsequently lower the degree of radiotoxicity. * In case of FR/FBR, since radioactive nuclides with extremely long half-lives can be used, further mitigation of the degree of radiotoxicity could be expected.

21

(Ref.) Significance of Nuclear Fuel Cycle – Volume Reduction and Mitigation of Degree of Harmfulness

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

(Ref.) Current situation of Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant

Water Tests

Chemical Tests

Active Tests

Uranium Tests

Apr.2001 Sep.2004

Nov.2002 Dec.2005

Dec.2004 Jan.2006

Mar.2006

Ste

p1

Ste

p2

Ste

p3

Ste

p4

Ste

p5

Mar.2016

(Planned)

Completion

(Planned)

In January 2014, JNFL applied for a conformity assessment with the

new safety standards which were enforced in December 2013.

JNFL now plans to complete the RRP in March 2016.

22

(Ref.) Current situation of MOX Fuel Fabrication Plant

Maximum fabrication capacity 130 ton-HM / year

Products MOX fuel assembly for domestic Light

Water Reactors（BWR and PWR）

Size of main building 85 m x 85 m

3 basements, 2 elevated

Location place Neighborhood of

Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant

Construction cost 210 billion yen

Although JNFL started construction work of MOX Fuel Fabrication Plant in October 2010,

construction work was interrupted temporarily by the influence of the earthquake etc.

In January 2014, JNFL applied for a conformity assessment with the new regulations

which were enforced in December 2013.

JNFL now plans to complete the MOX Fuel Fabrication Plant in October 2017.

Progress of construction: 8.6%

(September 2014)

23

24

General arrangement “GENERAL ARRANGEMENT ON THE ASTRID PROGRAM AND SODIUM FAST REACTOR COLLABORATIONBETWEEN THE FRENCH COMMISSARIAT A L’ENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES, THE JAPANESE MINISTRY OF ECONOMY, TRADE AND INDUSTRY AND THE JAPANESE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, CULTURE, SPORTS, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY” was signed on May 5th, 2014 (Termination: Dec. 31st, 2019).

Implementing Arrangement “IMPLEMENTING ARRANGEMENT ON THE ASTRID PROGRAM AND SODIUM FAST REACTOR COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE FRENCH COMMISSARIAT À L’ÉNERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ÉNERGIES ALTERNATIVES, AREVA NP, JAPAN ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD., AND MITSUBISHI FBR SYSTEMS, INC. ” was signed on August 8th, 2014 (Termination: Dec. 31st, 2019).

Japan and France are cooperating SFR development, including ASTRID program in the area of plant system design and R&Ds (Component and analysis code development, Measures for severe accident, Fuel).

General Arrangement Signing Ceremony at Palais de l'Élysée

(May 5th, 2014)

(Ref.) Japan-France Cooperation on ASTRID Project

- Outline of Cooperation -


1. As nuclear power generation is expected to be increasingly used in emerging nations, including Asian nations, it is a responsibility that Japan must fulfill and the world expects it to fulfill to make proactive contributions to improvement of nuclear safety, peaceful use of nuclear power, nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear security in the world, by sharing the experiences and lessons learnt from the TEPCO's Fukushima nuclear accident.

2. It is imperative for Japan to proactively contribute to formulating international standards of nuclear safety, such as the IAEA standards.

3. Japan will contribute to improvement of nuclear safety in the world by continuing to share nuclear technologies with our enhanced safety and improved safety culture with other countries based on the experiences and lessons learnt from the accident, while confirming that a proper consideration is given to nuclear facilities' safety secured mainly by hosting countries in reference to the Convention on Nuclear Safety and the IAEA safety standards when public finance is offered on providing nuclear power technologies to overseas, including exports of nuclear power plants.

25

＜Description in the Strategic Energy Plan of Japan ①＞


1. By making use of its experience as a non-nuclear armed country, Japan will also actively contribute to strengthen nuclear nonproliferation through reinforcement of the IAEA safeguards and stringent export control and international nuclear security through actively participating global initiative such as nuclear security summits.

2. In particular, in the non-proliferation field, it is important to intensify the efforts toward the nuclear non-proliferation by promoting international collaboration in enhancing proliferation resistance of nuclear fuel, and R&D to strengthen technology of nuclear forensics, detection and safeguards, etc. Japan will go through these efforts in cooperation with the countries such as the U.S. and France.

3. GOJ will also set up an integrated implementing body to support development of human resources, institutional infrastructure and others for countries that will newly introduce nuclear power, through cooperation with international organizations such as the IAEA.

26

＜Description in the Strategic Energy Plan of Japan ②＞

Date post:	16-Jul-2015
Category:	Presentations & Public Speaking
Upload:	joe-bacchus
View:	183 times
Download:	0 times

Japan’s current Nuclear Energy Policy

Presentations & Public Speaking