+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

Date post: 06-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: ifama
View: 52 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal. Agenda. What do Australians think about Privacy? The APPs The market and social research industry’s response Questions. What do Australians think about privacy?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
35
Transcript
Page 1: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal
Page 2: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal
Page 3: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

Jayne Van Souwe, Principal, Wallis Consulting Group

Andrew Maher, Partner, HR Legal

Page 5: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

What do Australians think about privacy?

Key findings from “Community Attitudes towards Privacy” – study completed by Wallis for the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner

Page 6: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

Australian Privacy Principles

• Definition and coverage

• The principles and their implications

Page 7: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

The Australian Privacy Principles

Cover all Australian government agencies and most private businesses.

Replace the Information Privacy Principles (previously applied to government) and the National Privacy Principles (applied to businesses)

The market and social research industry had its own set of Privacy Principles (Market and Social Research Privacy Principles) and will have its own Code again.

APPs are minimum standards that can only be exceeded in separate industry codes – previous codes allowed limited trade-offs.

They are data protection laws and only apply to information about private individuals.

Page 8: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

The Australian Privacy Principles

State government agencies excluding SA and WA remain bound by the relevant state data and privacy protection legislation usually administered by state privacy commissioners: ACT – Health records are administered by the Human Rights

Commission, no territory specific privacy law NSW – Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 NT – Information Act 2002 QLD – Right to Information Act 2009, Information Privacy Act 2009 TAS – Personal Information and Protection Act 2004 VIC – Information Privacy Act 2000 (health information is covered

by the Health Services Act administered by the Health Services Commissioner)

Page 9: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

The Australian Privacy Principles

State governments with their own privacy legislation are taking a “wait and see” approach to the APPs. They are likely to bring their own legislation into line eventually.

At present state legislation exceeds base requirements of federal law and/or clarifies state-specific situations, eg states have different systems for managing health records

State and federal laws (and codes that have force of law) always take precedence over industry guidelines.

Researchers should be aware of related guidelines, but recognise their place!

ACT = CODE = LAWGuideline = good practice

Page 10: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

The Australian Privacy Principles

For market researchers the situation is clear – if you abide by the Code of Professional Behaviour of AMSRS you will continue to exceed ANY privacy legislation currently in force. (Note the Code of Professional Behaviour is being re-written so that it complements the new Industry Privacy Code, which in turn references the Code of Professional Behaviour).

Page 11: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

The Australian Privacy Principles

For other areas of business the situation is less clear Federal and state privacy commissioners work together to

ensure that legislation complements rather than conflicts – it is more a matter for ensuring that any companies working for state government agencies are clear about which piece of legislation applies.

If in doubt, comply with the most stringent piece of legislation.

Page 12: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

The Australian Privacy Principles What do we mean by Privacy? Personal information

Information or an opinion that identifies or could reasonably identify a person, whether true or not

Examples include, name, age, DOB, phone number, email address, photograph, credit card details, salary, information collected from customer surveys etc

Sensitive information information about an individual’s racial or ethnic origin, political opinions,

membership of a political association, religious beliefs or affiliations, philosophical beliefs, membership of a professional or trade association, membership of a trade union, sexual preferences or practices criminal record or health information.

Under the APPs, the definition of sensitive information has been expanded to include biometric information used for biometric verification or identification (such as fingerprints, iris recognition, DNA etc).

Page 13: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

The Australian Privacy Principles 13 new APPs replace IPPs and NPPs

Single set of principles which apply to both public and private sectors (APP entities)

Structured to reflect the information life cycle — collection, use and disclosure, quality and security, access and correction

Mandatory minimums which must be equalled or exceeded in every case

Provides a single set of rules (at least for the majority of agencies and businesses bound only by them). No longer allows trade-offs in specific industry codes – all agencies and businesses must meet minimum standards

Page 14: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

App 1 – Open and Transparent Management of personal information Agencies must have a clearly expressed

and up to date privacy policy and complaints procedure Agencies must take reasonable steps to implement

processes that will ensure that the agency complies with the APPs

While most organisations have privacy policies they will need to update them and their complaints procedures regularly and ensure that they have processes in place to meet APP requirements

Page 15: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

APP 2 – Anonymity and pseudonymity

Allows individuals to interact with agencies anonymously Permits the individual to use a pseudonym – unless it is

impracticable to deal with an unidentified individual

Organisations need to allow people to use pseudonyms or deal with them anonymously where possible

Page 16: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

APP 3 – Collection of personal and sensitive information Collection must be ‘reasonably necessary’ for, or ‘directly

related’ to, one or more of an agency’s functions or activities

Higher standards for collection of sensitive information (necessary and with consent).

The definition of sensitive information hasn’t changed, but if it can be implied (eg some surnames are particular to specific races and ethnic groups) then information should be treated the same way.

Page 17: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

APP 4 – Dealing with unsolicited personal information Unsolicited personal information now has the same

protections as solicited personal information New principle for handling unsolicited personal

information mandates that such data should be destroyed or de-identified if it could have been collected overtly and is not part of a commonwealth record.

Ensure that only necessary information is transferred to external companies. Companies receiving unsolicited information should destroy it.

Page 18: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

APP 5 – Notification of collection This principle outlines the information that must be given to an

individual when the agency collects their personal information. It includes: Information about an agency’s APP policy Who the agency is and how to contact it The purpose(s) of the collection Any collections from third parties Consequences of non-collection Complaint handling process Potential overseas disclosure

There is no substantial change in this APP compared with previous regulations on data collection

Page 19: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

APP 6 – Use or disclosure

Deals with use and disclosure of personal information

Different (more stringent) obligations apply to the use or disclosure of sensitive information eg must gain permission

New limited exceptions, to permit use or disclosure for secondary purpose to: Locate missing person Establish, exercise or defend a legal equitable claim Confidential alternative dispute resolution

There is no substantial change in this APP compared with previous regulations on data collection

Page 20: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

APP 7 – Direct marketing

Prohibits organisations from using or disclosing personal information for direct marketing purposes, except in specified circumstances

Provides a compulsory ‘opt out’ clause Includes personalised advertisements on websites which

use information gathered from “cookies” and similar to target individuals

This is a completely new Principle and differentiates Direct Marketing practices aimed at selling or marketing products. It includes electronic personalised DM

Page 21: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

APP 8 – Cross border disclosure

Introduces an accountability approach for cross-border disclosure

Agencies must take reasonable steps to ensure overseas recipients do not breach APPs

Agencies may be accountable for a breach of APPs by overseas recipients

While this is now a separate Principle the concepts contained within it were in the NPPs previously.

Page 22: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

APP 9 – Adoption, use or disclosure of government related identifiers Prohibits an organisation from adopting, or using a

government related identifier as its own identifier

Open data sets and the ability to conduct meta-analysis have led to the introduction of this additional measure to ensure data protection. It is recommended that an organisation uses its own identification system for records. It can hold a concordance, but must do so carefully.

Page 23: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

APP 10 – Quality

Requires agencies to take reasonable steps to ensure personal information it collects, uses or discloses is: Accurate Up-to-date Complete

Agencies should ensure that personal information that it uses or discloses is also relevant for the purpose of the use or disclosure

There is no substantial change in this APP compared with previous regulations

Page 24: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

APP 11 – Security

Inclusion of ‘interference’ an agency must take reasonable steps to protect

personal information it holds from misuse, interference and loss, and from unauthorised access, modification or disclosure (including hacking)

There is no substantial change in this APP compared with previous regulations on data handling

Page 25: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

APP 12 – Access Agencies required to respond to requests for access of personal

information within 30 days

Exceptions apply – Freedom of Information Act 1982 or other legislation

Access should be provided in the requested manner (where reasonable and practicable)

Individual not to be charged

Written reasons for the refusal and complaint mechanism

There is no substantial change in this APP compared with previous regulations

Page 26: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

APP 13 – Correction Agencies required to take ‘reasonable steps’ to correct personal information

to ensure it is accurate, up-to-date, complete, relevant and not misleading, if: agency satisfied it needs to be corrected, or individual requests correction

Agency to respond to request within 30 days Individual not to be charged Statement required if agency refuses to correct and individual requests

statement Written reasons for refusal and complaint mechanism

There is no substantial change in this APP compared with previous regulations

Page 27: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

Commissioner’s New Powers

Ability to investigate a potential privacy breach without receiving a complaint (own motion investigations - OMIs) as well as in response to complaint

Wider range of action to be taken if a breach of the Act is substantiated whether as a result of OMI or complaint (as before)

Written undertakings can now be enforced

Seek civil penalties for serious or repeated breaches (up to $1.7 million for corporations)

Commissioner can take unilateral action, fines are larger.

Page 28: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

Market Research Industry Response

• New Privacy Code

• Information/template pack for AMSRO companies

Page 29: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

New Market and Social Research Industry Privacy Code New codes must follow the format of the APPs and add to it To our knowledge the market research industry is the only one

that has tendered its own Code for ratification. This will mean that the Code administrator is the industry body (AMSRO) rather than the OAIC.

Page 30: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

New Market and Social Research Industry Privacy Code The main areas of change are:

Subscribers to Code (AMSRO members) will have access to an industry Dispute Resolution mechanism, but must ensure public access to Privacy Policies, Complaints Procedures and the industry Code, as well as reporting complaints systematically and regularly to AMSRO

Allow respondents to use a pseudonym if a name is needed and it is practicable Definition of personally identified information – care in what happens with de-

identified data sets in public arena. MR data falls into three areas irrespective of the collection method: Contact details of research participants/sample Research status Research data

New Privacy Principle for Direct Marketing will allow the industry to differentiate practice further

Page 31: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

New Market and Social Research Industry Privacy Code Main changes are…..:

Government identifiers must not be used as research identifiers, unless : Is reasonably necessary for verifying the person’s identity Is reasonably necessary for the organisation to fulfil its

obligations to an agency or a state/territory authority It is authorised by or under an Australian law or a court order It is necessary for enforcement activities

If a respondent requests that their personally identified data be amended or corrected and this would damage the original point in time data, keep a record of the amendment if practical

Page 32: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

PRIVACY Do’s and Don’ts1. Do ensure appropriate systems and processes are in place to comply with the

APPs2. Don’t collect more personal information than is necessary or relevant3. Do tell individuals what you are going to do with the collected information4. Don’t use information for an unrelated secondary purpose without consent5. Don’t disclose personal information unnecessarily6. Do give people access to their personal information if they ask unless there are

proper grounds not to7. Do keep information secure and free from interference8. Don’t keep personal information you no longer need or are no longer required

to retain9. Do keep personal information accurate and up to date10. Don’t disclose information to overseas recipients in countries without

equivalent privacy laws and the ability to enforce those rights unless consent is provided

11. Do make someone in the organisation responsible for privacy complaint handling, processes and systems.

Page 33: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

Information pack for AMSRO companies

AMSRO has produced information for members to help them comply with the requirements in particular: Templates for privacy policies Guidance on how to meet the requirements

Page 34: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

The Trustmark The Trustmark guarantees business and government decision

makers that they are buying research that is quality-assured and meets not only ethical standards, but also the new Privacy Code.

AMSRO member organisations operate under the following stringent, mandatory criteria: Privacy: Adherence to the Market & Social Research Privacy Code Quality assurance: Companies must have the International

Standard for Market, Opinion and Social Research qualifications (ISO 20252)

Ethics: Adherence to the AMSRS Code of Professional Behaviour

Page 35: Jayne Van Souwe , Principal, Wallis Consulting Group Andrew Maher , Partner, HR Legal

Questions?


Recommended