+ All Categories
Home > Documents > people.trentu.cajebowman/Bowman2000.pdf · 246 MAMMALIA al were -0.27 for botfly sites and 0.78 for...

people.trentu.cajebowman/Bowman2000.pdf · 246 MAMMALIA al were -0.27 for botfly sites and 0.78 for...

Date post: 03-Feb-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
5
Transcript
Page 1: people.trentu.cajebowman/Bowman2000.pdf · 246 MAMMALIA al were -0.27 for botfly sites and 0.78 for non-botfly sites. The discriminant function clas- sified 70% of cases correctly,
Page 2: people.trentu.cajebowman/Bowman2000.pdf · 246 MAMMALIA al were -0.27 for botfly sites and 0.78 for non-botfly sites. The discriminant function clas- sified 70% of cases correctly,
Page 3: people.trentu.cajebowman/Bowman2000.pdf · 246 MAMMALIA al were -0.27 for botfly sites and 0.78 for non-botfly sites. The discriminant function clas- sified 70% of cases correctly,
Page 4: people.trentu.cajebowman/Bowman2000.pdf · 246 MAMMALIA al were -0.27 for botfly sites and 0.78 for non-botfly sites. The discriminant function clas- sified 70% of cases correctly,
Page 5: people.trentu.cajebowman/Bowman2000.pdf · 246 MAMMALIA al were -0.27 for botfly sites and 0.78 for non-botfly sites. The discriminant function clas- sified 70% of cases correctly,

Recommended