Date post: | 16-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | greyson-mince |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
THE RELATIONAL VIEW: COOPERATIVE STRATEGY AND SOURCES OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
JEFFREY H. DYER
HARBIR SINGH
Realized by:- Sonia Infante- Alice Carboni- Simona Morganti
SOURCES OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES
Sources of competitive advantages
Resource based view
Industry structure view
WHAT IS THE RELATIONAL RENT?
Supernatural profit jointly generated in an exchange relationship that cannot be generated
by either firm in isolation and can only be created through the joint idiosyncratic
contribution of the specific alliance partners.
SOURCES OF RELATIONAL RENT
Investment in relational-specific assets;
Substantial knowledge exchange;
Combining of complementary resources;
Lower transaction costs than competitor alliances.
SOURCES OF RELATIONAL RENT
Investment in relational-specific assets;
Substantial knowledge exchange;
Combining of complementary resources;
Lower transaction costs than competitor alliances.
Specialization of assets is a “necessary condition for rent”
Site specificity
Physical specificity
Human asset
specificity
Three kind assets specificity:
(Williamson, 1985)
DEFINITION ADVANTAGES
SITE SPECIFICITYSuccessive production
stages are located close to one another
- Reduce inventory and transport costs;- Lower costs of coordinating activities
PHYSICAL ASSET SPECIFICITY
Transaction specific capital investments (i.e.
customized machinery, tools..)
- Allow product differentiation;- May improve quality
HUMAN ASSET SPECIFICITY
Transaction specific know how accumulated by
transactors through long standing relationships
- Reduce communication errors;- Increase speed to market
…THERE ARE OTHER SCHOLARS THAT HAVE ACKOWLEDGED THE MULTIDIMENTIONAL PROPERTY OF ASSET SPECIFICITY…
MALONE, 1987
JOSKOW, 1988
ERRAMILLI & RAO, 1993
- Site specificity- Physical asset specificity- Human asset specificity- Time specificity
- Site specificity- Physical asset specificity- Human asset specificity- Dedicated specificity
- Professional skills- Specialized know- how- Customization
SUBPROCESSES OF RELATION- SPECIFIC ASSETS
1) The length (in years) of the governance arrangement designed to safeguard against
opportunism influences the ability of alliance partners to invest in relation specific assets
SUPPLIER RELATIONS: JAPANESE COMPANIES
Japanese automobile producers are successful at building close cooperative ties with suppliers
It generated surplus profits and competitive advantages for collaborating firms
HOWEVER: REMEMBER!..: there is an opportunity cost associated with maintaining long term, continuous relationships with suppliers
…infact in 1995 Nissan and Toyota supported large teams of more than 60 internal consultants to provide assistance to
suppliers
TOYOTA CASE-It has built strong and close relationships with its suppliers based on the need for mutual support and a harmonious society-It helped quickly restore normality to production systems after the Great East Japan Earth quake
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrjvfihcboY&feature=youtu.be
SUBPROCESSES OF RELATION- SPECIFIC ASSETS
2) Ability to substitute special- purpose assets for general purpose assets is influenced by the
total volume and breadth of transaction between the alliance partners
SOURCES OF RELATIONAL RENT
Investment in relational-specific assets;
Substantial knowledge exchange;
Combining of complementary resources ;
Lower transaction costs than competitor alliances
INTERFIRM KNOWLEDGE-SHARING ROUTINES
Interorganizational learning is critical to competitive success…
…but
Organizations often learn by collaborating with other organizations
KNOWLEDGE-SHARING ROUTINES:
Is the second potential source of interorganizational competitive advantage
Firm’s alliance partners: source
of new ideas and information
that result in performance-enhancing technology and innovations.
Alliance partners rents by developing superior interfirm knowledge-sharing routines.
Def: “regular pattern
of interfirm interactions that permits the transfer, recombination, or creation of specialized
knowledge . (Grant, 1996)
------- interfirm processes: are useful to facilitate knowledge exchanges between alliance partners
SUBSTANTIAL KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE
2. The greater the alliance partners' investment is in interfirm knowledge-sharing routines,
the greater the potential will be for relational rents.
Many scholars divide knowledge into two types:
information
and
know-how
Information:
easily codifiable knowledge that can be transmitted
Know-how :
involves knowledge that is tacit, complex, difficult to codify and difficult to imitate and transfer
---However, compared to information, know-how is more likely to result in advantages that are sustainable.
SUBSTANTIAL KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE
2 (a). The greater the partner- specific absorptive capacity is, The greater the potential will be to generate relational rents through knowledge sharing.
2 (b). The greater the alignment of incentives by alliance partners is to encourage transparency and reciprocity and to discourage free riding,
The greater the potential will be to generate relational rents through knowledge sharing
A COMPARISON OF TOYOTA'S AND GM'S PRODUCTION NETWORKS
Toyota: knowledge transfers to-and among-suppliers . (These transfers: increase partner-specific absorptive capacity.)
… there is significantly greater knowledge sharing between Toyota and its suppliers than between GM and its suppliers.
GM:
and its suppliers have a history of keeping innovations proprietary.
GM has not cultivated a stable network of supplier companies and consequently, suppliers rationally refuse to engage in costly knowledge-sharing activities
SOURCES OF RELATIONAL RENT
Investment in relational- specific assets;
Substantial knowledge exchange;
Combining of complementary resources ;
Lower transaction costs than competitor alliances.
COMPLEMENTARY RESOUCES ENDOWMENT
“Distinctive resources of alliance partners that collectively generate greater rents than the sum of those obtained from the individual endowments of
each partner”.
COCA-COLA & NESTLE ALLIANCE
Nestle’s brand names and
competence in producing
soluble coffee and tea
Coca-Cola’s powerful
international distribution and vending
machine network
“ The greater the proposition is of synergy- sensitive resources owned by alliance partners that, when combined,
increase the degree to which the resources are valuable, rare and difficult to imitate, the grater the
potential will be to generate relational rents”.
COMPLEMENTARY RESOURCES ENDOWMENT
SUBPROCESSES OF COMPLEMENTARY RESOURCES ENDOWMENT
1) Ability to identify potential partners and value their complementary resources.
Prior alliance experience;
Evaluation capability ;
Acquisition of information.
SUBPROCESSES OF COMPLEMENTARY RESOURCES ENDOWMENT
2) Ability to develop an organizational complementary .
compatible organizational system , processes and culture
SOURCES OF RELATIONAL RENT
Investment in relational-specific assets;
Substantial knowledge exchange;
Combining of complementary resources;
Lower transaction costs than competitor alliances
EFFECTIVE GOVERNACE
1.Third-party enforcement of agreements
2.Self-enforcing agreements
informal formal
SUBPROCESSES OF EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE
1) Ability to develop a self-enforcing mechanism rather than a third-party
enforcement .Avoid
contracting costs
Lower costs of monitoring
Lower costs of adaptation
No time limitation
SUBPROCESSES OF EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE
2) Ability to imploy an informal self-enforcing mechanism rather than a formal self-
enforcing .
Lower marginal costs
Difficult to imitate
MECHANISMS THAT PRESERVE RELATIONAL RENTS
generated by alliance partners:
-Interorganizational asset interconnectedness -Partner scarcity -Resource indivisibility -Institutional environment
Interorganizational Asset Interconnectedness
alliance partners may need to make "bundles" of related relation specific investments in order to realize the full potential of those investments in an alliance relationship.
Partner Scarcity
The creation of relational rents is often contingent on a firm's ability to find a partner with:
---complementary strategic resources
---a relational capability
<<< there are strong first mover advantages >>>
Resource Indivisibility
Partners may combine resources or jointly develop capabilities in such a way that the resulting resources are both:
idiosyncratic and indivisible
Institutional Environment
An institutional environment that encourages or fosters trust among trading partners may facilitate the creation of relational rents (North, 1990)
IN SUMMARY…
the relational rents generated by alliance partners are preserved because competing firms:
cannot imitate practices or investments cannot find a partner with the requisite complementary strategic
resources or relational capability cannot access the capabilities of a potential partner because these
capabilities are indivisible cannot replicate a socially complex institutional environment
COMPARING DIFFERENT VIEW…
RBV VIEW: focuses on individual firms generate supernatural returns based upon resources, assets and capabilities that are housed within firm
VS
RELATIONAL VIEW: a firm in isolation, irrespective of its capabilities or resources cannot enjoy these rents
RBV VIEW: an individual firm should attempt to protect valuable proprietary know- how
VS
RELATIONAL VIEW: share valuable know- how with alliance partners
INDUSTRY STRUCTURE VIEW: firms should increase number of suppliers
VS
RELATIONAL VIEW: firms can increase profits by increasing their dependence on a small number of suppliers
Relationships between firms are an increasingly important unit of analysis for
explaining supernatural profit results
The relational view offers a useful theoretical lens through wich researches can
examine and explore value- creating linkages between organizations
…Conclusion…
BIBLIOGRAPHY/ SITOGRAPHY
- “The relational View: Cooperative strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage”, Dyer and Singh, 1998
- “Remade in America, translating & transforming japanese management systems”, edited by Jeffrey K. Liker, W. Mark Fruin & Pave S. Adler
- “The determinants of inter-firm trust in supplier- automaker relationships in te U.S., Japan, Korea”, Jeffrey H. Dyer, 1997
- http://www.toyota-global.com/sustainability/of_initiatives/stakeholders/partners/#supplier
- www.youtube.com