+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Jennes - Material and Energy efficiency in Melting … recovery No Yes ... Production of grey and...

Jennes - Material and Energy efficiency in Melting … recovery No Yes ... Production of grey and...

Date post: 11-May-2018
Category:
Upload: phungthu
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
16
Küttner GmbH & Co. KG Jennes dated 2017-03-16 Material and Energy efficiency in Melting Systems Dr Ing Ralf Jennes Dr.Ing. Ralf Jennes Küttner GmbH& Co. KG Essen, Germany March 16 th 2017, Gauteng, South Africa Weichai Power Foundry, PRC Grey iron 35 t/h Long campaign 3 shift/d Hot blast cupola > 500 °C 1
Transcript

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16

Material and Energy efficiency in Melting Systems

Dr ‐Ing Ralf JennesDr.‐Ing. Ralf Jennes

Küttner GmbH& Co. KGEssen, Germany

March 16th 2017, Gauteng, South Africa

Weichai Power Foundry, PRC

Grey iron 35 t/h Long campaign 3 shift/dHot blast cupola > 500 °C

1

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16Comparison | Conventional vs. modern Cupola plant

Aspect Conventional ModernpCupola Cupola

Campaign length 1 day 1 ~ > 60 days

Blast temperature 20 ~ 400 °C 600 °CBlast temperature 20   400  C 600  C

Pig ironScrap in chargeGalvanized scrap

10 ~ 30 %0 ~ 20 %0 ~ 20 %

0 %  (designed)0 ~ 100 %0 ~ 100 %Galvanized scrap

Returns0   20 %20 ~ 40 %

0   100 %0 ~ 40 %

Iron temperature 1.350 ‐ 1.450 °C > 1.500 °C

Heat recovery No YesHeat recovery No Yes

Slag granulation No Yes, typically in dry system

Environmental Bad, high emissions for dust, SO2 Full completion with latest regulations

2

and CO

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16Plant concepts

Daily operation 1 shift

Continuous3‐shift

Daily operation 2 shift

7 ~ 12 t/h 10 ~ 20 t/h 15 ~ 100 t/h7   12 t/h 10   20 t/h 15   100 t/h

Twin furnaceCold blast

Long campaignHot blast

Twin Furnace/ Long campaignCold or Hot blast

Oxygen OxygenOxygen

Post combustionBasic heat recoveryB h filt

External combustion chamber Sophisticated heat recovery

B h filt

External combustion chamberBetter heat recovery

B h filt

3

Baghouse filter Baghouse filterBaghouse filter

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16Production of grey and ductile iron in Hot Blast cupola (18‐24 h/d)

25 t/h Hot blast cupolafor long campaign operation

Cupola for long campaign operation up to 100 t/h

Automatic batching andbucket charging

Below charge gas take‐off for Below charge gas take‐off for complete combustion of CO to < 100 mg/m3

Combined Hot blast / oxygen

4

Combined Hot blast / oxygen operation

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16Typical operational data Cupola – Cold and Hot Blast

Unit Cold Blast Cupola Hot Blast Cupola

No Oxygen Oxygen No Oxygen Oxygen

Metling rate t/h 10 10 25 25

Oxygen addition % 0 5,3 0 3,4

Oxygen addition m³/h 0 340 0 500

Blast rate m³/h 7 700 4 700 15 400 10 900

Blast temp. ° C 25 25 550 550

Coke rate % 15.0 11.5 12.5 10.0

Iron temp. °C 1 400 1 480 1 500 1 530

5

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16Energy recovery | Energy balance of a Hot Blast Cupola

50% of the heat goes into8%

50% of the heat goes into iron and slag

10 % are recovered in the process as hot blast

25% of the energy are10%

20% 25%

25% of the energy are available e.g. in form of 250 °C thermal oil for heating purposes in the foundry25%

25%

55% 75% y8% is waste gas at low temperature level

5% cooling water losses and 2% wall heat losses 50%

25%

2%% of total balance

55% 75%

5%% of top gas energy

% of excess energy

Basis: 10 5% Coke Hot blast 500°C 4% O Iron 1 540°C

6

Basis: 10.5% Coke, Hot blast 500 C, 4% O2, Iron 1,540 C

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16Heat recovery – Blast heating, Core drying, sand heating, hot water

11 MW11 MW process heat

3.4 MW blast heating1.0 MW shower water

3.0 MW core drying

7

1.0 MW sand storage

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16Annual energy recovery potential and references (25 t/h furnace)

Annual recovery potential depends on efficiency and effective operation timey p p y p

8

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16Energy balance | Gas fired Cupola

760

900

Iron at low sulphur content

900

Cheap energy source

Low CO2 emissions

max 30 % of steel scrap

9

max. 30 % of steel scrap

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16Energy balance | Inductive melting furnace

Energy from grid

Losses primarywinding

LossesLossesinverter

Lossescapacitor

In the energy balance shown energy required for 

Lossesinductor

Thermal losses

gy qlosses during make up are not included

Total energy required for lossesEnthalpy at

gy q1 ton of iron ~ 600 kWh/t

quick changes of iron grade possible

10

06 / 2016 GIESSEREI‐PRAXIS p. 232 ff. Energy efficiency in the Melting shop..., Dötsch et. al.

p

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16Cost comparison Melting furnaces (example)

Capability to process lower p y pgrade cheaper material in  coke fired Cupola is higher than in the other melting solutionssolutions

Cupola needs less than 30kWh/t of electric powerfor operationfor operation

The Cupola furnace can produce grey and base iron for nodular iron at low costfor nodular iron at low cost especially at melting rates > 10 ‐ 15 t/h

11

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16Other energy saving opportunities in foundries

Heat recoveryto safe primary energy 

Air management Air managementmixing & dilution

Dust filter Automatic speed control uto at c speed co t o

Type and number of drives

High efficiency motors (IE 3)

Frequency converter (VVVF)

Moulding line concept

12

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16

Vertical Movement

Energy saving | Drive system in moulding lines

Vertical Movement (flask lifting)

Rack

Brushless Brushless motor

Gearbox

Gearbox

Horizontal Movement (flask transport)

Gearbox

Rack Brushless motor

13

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16

The efficiency is increased by more than 30%, as an absolute value, in favor

Energy saving | Drive system in moulding lines

DATAP (kg) 50000s (mm) 1500t (s) 3tvF 50000'81

of the electro-mechanical alternative. This allows a 41% energy saving (in kWh),compared to the absorbed power in a hydraulic system.

t (s) 3T (s) 18

El-Mecmotor 0,92drive 0,96

TtvFW

3600

5.0000813600

Hydraulicmotor 0,85pump 0 85

gearbox 0,9El-Mec 0,79488

pump 0,85valves 0,9piping 0,8cylinder 0,9 Hydraulic 0,46818

2,36 kWh (Electro-

Mechanical drive)

4,00 kWh(Hydraulic drive)

14

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16

Flask‐less cooling houses with

Energy saving | Jacket cooling

Flask less cooling houses withelectro‐welded steel jacketsguarantee a huge energysaving and a faster cooling( 20% ffi i t)

Jacket cooling less pushing due to (approx. 20% more efficient)

compare to the traditional in‐flask cooling houses.

less pushing due to double cycle operation

lower mass of jacket to be transported only

In flask cooling

Jacket cooling

g

15

Küttner GmbH & Co. KGJennes

dated 2017-03-16Please contact us for further questions …

Dr. Ralf Jennes, Küttner GmbH & Co. KG, GermanyScharl Laubscher, Küttner South Africa (pty) Ltd.

16


Recommended