+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Date post: 28-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: timmagill
View: 16 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
24
Jentu Technologies Inc. ü A secure latency free platform for IT Infrastructure Management Jentu Provisioning Server
Transcript
Page 1: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Je n tu Te ch n ologie s In c.

ü

A secure latency free plat form for IT Infrastructure

Management

Jent u Provision ing

Server

Page 2: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Je n tu Te ch n ologie s In c.

ü

01 Too many desktops to easily deal with, exhausts admins

02 Too much time spent administering those desktops

03Too many application updates

and a never‐ending desktop life cycle replacement process

04 Poor desktop security and frustrated end‐users

Trad it ional Ent erp rise Desk t op Managem ent

Page 3: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

In d u s t ry Re sp o n se :Virt u a l De sk t o p In fra s t ru c t u re

Server based processing with centralized management

Page 4: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Je n tu Te ch n ologie s In c.

ü

Server based hard drive provisioning with

centralized management

No hard drive at the endpoint

J e n t u

The VDI Al t ernat ive

Page 5: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Je n tu Te ch n ologie s In c.

üJ e n t uEa s ily m a n a g e h u n d re d s o r t h o u s a n d s o f e n d p o in t s

GROUPIndicates which group machine belongs to

MACMAC address is used to determine which machines are authorized to boot

ACTIONS(Un)lock, merge, reboot, shutdown, delete or get machine details

SERVERDetermines which server to use for boot

Page 6: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Je n tu Te ch n ologie s In c.

ü

Desktop Processing

Desktop processing is done on the server requiring powerful equipment and introducing network latency

220 ms

average latency1

Chal lenges posed by VDI

1 Eliminating VDI network bottlenecks and latency issueshttp://searchvirtualdesktop.techtarget.com/tip/Eliminating-VDI-network-bottlenecks-and-latency-issues 6

Page 7: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Je n tu Te ch n ologie s In c.

ü

Desktop Processing

No desktop virtualization therefore no network latency

All processing is done at the local machine for maximum bare‐metal performance and minimum server load.

.022latency with 30 active

workstationsduring real officeday operations

Jent u –Lat ency Free

ms

7

Page 8: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Je n tu Te ch n ologie s In c.

ü

Hypervisor

The hypervisor has the disadvantage of being potentially attacked in one of two ways, from either the network layer or from the host running on that hypervisor

15patches for ESXI

to date in March 2015 2

Securit y Chal lenges posed by VDI

2 IBM Internet Security Systems – ESXI Searchhttp://search.iss.net/Search.do;jsessionid=755CF2D70424BE78BD64720A4068E1F7?keyword=esxi&searchType=keywd&start=0&sort=date%3aD%3aL%3ad1 8

Page 9: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Je n tu Te ch n ologie s In c.

ü

Security

Enhanced data breach and IT risk mitigation. Ease of reverting back to a stable state (or swapping out an image) just by rebooting the desktop. (It’s like an instant version of Ghost, or a more secure version of Deep Freeze.)- Brian Madden

Jent u –No Hypervisor Required

InstantRollback, Restore, Replication

9

Page 10: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Je n tu Te ch n ologie s In c.

ü

Virtualization

Apps, HDD,OS,CPU/GPU, NIC, RAM, and IO

1:2

Hard Drive

Most implementations still use a hard drive introducing security issues and increased

failure rates

Average CPU core-to VM ratio

(one core for every two VMs) 3

Add it ional chal lenges posed by VDI

3 Eliminate I/O bottlenecks, improve VM performancehttp://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/feature/Eliminate-I-O-bottlenecks-improve-VM-performance 10

Page 11: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Je n tu Te ch n ologie s In c.

ü

No virtualization

Applications run in native stateUtilizes full CPU capabilities

20 ms

No Hard Drive

No hard drive on the desktop therefore no place for malware to

reside

Maximum application

latency using Jentu

Jent u –No Virt ual izat ion and No Hard Drive

X

11

Page 12: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Je n tu Te ch n ologie s In c.

ü

Cost

$350‐700

Hardware, software, licensing, ongoing support and consulting services

per instance/month

VDI - Tot al Cost of Ow nersh ip

$

12

Page 13: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Je n tu Te ch n ologie s In c.

ü

Cost

90%

Reduced TCO vs VDI by 50%Fast implementation and easy support

reduction in desk-side support

calls

Jent u –Low TCO

13

Page 14: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Fle xib le Arch it e c t u re s

Page 15: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

for OS and App StreamingJentu On-Premises Server

for data

Microsoft File Server or Cloud Storage

Commands sent over encrypted

tunnel

Using the Jentu Panel

Administrator

J e n t u On -Pre m is e s Arch it e c t u reSecure and Latency Free Provisioning

15

Page 16: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

J e n t u On -Pre m is e s Arch it e c t u reSecure and Latency Free Provisioning

16

Page 17: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

for OS and App StreamingJentu Server in Data Centre

for data

Microsoft File Server in Data Centre or Cloud Storage

Commands sent over encrypted

tunnel

Using the Jentu Panel

Administrator

J e n t u Da t a Ce n t re Arch it e c t u reJentu master server provisions images from data centre

17

Page 18: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

J e n t u Da t a Ce n t re Arch it e c t u reJentu slave server provisions images locally

18

Page 19: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

for OS and App StreamingJentu Server in Data Centre

for data

Microsoft File Server in Data Centre or Cloud Storage

Commands sent over encrypted

tunnel

Using the Jentu Panel

Administrator

J e n t u Ho s t e d De s k t o p Arch it e c t u reData Centre

19

Page 20: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

J e n t u Ho s t e d De s k t o p Arch it e c t u reLocal

20

Page 21: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

W h e re yo u h o s t is u p t o yo u

Page 22: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Je n tu Te ch n ologie s In c.

ü

“After the installation we were extremely happy to find thepromised speed has been delivered and Jentu works justlike the concept did, any tasks on the computers areextremely fast, as many users have given our teamfeedback (feels like SSD speeds). The network/internetspeed seems be unaffected with our current group ofcomputers running Jentu on our network and we have noproblems since implementation. We are thankful with theresults delivered by the Jentu team”

Christopher Diesinger, IT Director, ILAC –International Language Academy of Canada

Th e J e n t u Exp e rie n ce

Page 23: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Je n tu Te ch n ologie s In c.

ü

October 2014

“Rem em ber how Ardence w as aw esom e before Cit rix screw ed it up? You need t o know about Jen t u.”

November 2014

“Re m e m b e r t h a t MAPS a c ron ym from Cit rix?Ma n a g e m e n t , Acce ss,

Pe rfo rm a n ce , a n d Se cu rit y.

Jen t u is bat t ing 4 for 4 on t h is.”

ITWorld Canada

December 2014

“2014 w as not a b ig year for startups in the desktop virtualizat ion space, as t he on ly one w e w rot e about

w as Jent u.”

Brian Madden

Michael Ball

Brian Madden

What The Indust ry Is Saying

23

Page 24: Jentu_vs_VDI_March.10.15

Je n tu Te ch n ologie s In c.

ü

A demonstrat ion of theJentu Experience

Dem o


Recommended