~J/.J ·hUL~ · Line 13a divided by line 7:::: final neutralization factor (factor multiplied by...

Department of Local Government Finance County Auditor's Certificate of Adjustment to the l3ased Assessed Valuation of T1F Districts

Identify the specific allocation area if more than one allocation area is located in the county.

T1F District THOMPSON ORIGINAL

County Name MONROE COUNTY

Contact Infonnation: Financial Advisoc FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. Name: Address:

Phone:

Amy Gerstman 501 N. Morton St., Suile 216 Bloomington, Indiana 47404

812-349-2510

1. 2012p2013 Gross Real Estate Valuation'" of the allocation area


3. DMde line 1 by line 2 and carry to 5 dedmal places

4. 2012p2013 Gross Real EstateValuation* of the county

5. 2011p2012 Gross Real Estate Valuation'" of the county

6. DMde line 4 by line 5 and carry 10 5 dedmal places

Name: Greg Guerreltaz Address; 2680 E Main Sl, Suite 223

Plainfield, IN 46168

Phone: 317-837-4933

98,993,700

101,627,900

8,942,042,030

8,819,755,744

~Any contested amol1nt of assessed value subject to appeal should not be included In the gross assessed value of real estate.

"'Amounts do not Include non-taxable and government exempt property.

7. 2011p2012 neutralized net base assessed valuation of the allocation area: 23.135.390

0.97408

1.01387

8. Lesser of line 3 or line B 0.97408

g, Une 8 multiplied by line 7::: tentative new 2012p2013 neutralized base assessed value 22,535,720

Determination of Adequate Potential Captured Assessment (This calculation will be specific to each allocation area within the county.)

1a. Amount of potential captured assessment in 20f1p2012. Amount of net assessed value 2011p2012 minus 2011p2012 neutralized base NAV

2a. Abatement reductions, if any, in pre-reassessment values, schedUled to roll off in p2013

3a. Real Growth, estimated in net assessed value first assessed for 2012p2013

4a. Total of line 1a plus line- 2a =. Adjusted Incremental NAV t

Sa. 2011p2012 net tax rate of the TIF district

5b. Estimated 2012p2013 tax rate

6a. Tax revenue without reasses.<;menlline 4a divided by 100 multiplied by line Sa

6b. Tax revenue on rea) growth line 3a divided by 100 multiplied by line 5b

6c. Total estimated tax revenue vJithoul reassessment line 6a plus line 6b

7a. Amount of estimated captured assessment in 2012p2013. Une 6c divided by !lne 5b times 100

S

$

$

42,392,911

1,990

42,394,901

$1.9395

822,249

822,249

41,738,528

$ 1.97000

$

8a. 2012p2013 total net real estate assessed value of the TIF area (no deduction for base assessed value)

9a. Less 2012p2013 contested assessed value of the TIF area (do not include appealed assessed value on real growth shown on line 3a)

10a. Une 8a minus Hne 9a = 2012p2013 net assessed value of the TtF area

11a. Less estimated captured assessment from line 7a

68,071,297

68,071,297

41,738,528

12a.llne 10a minus line 11a:;:; tentative new base net assessed value

13a. Lesser of line 9 or 12a !:: 2012p2013 base assessed value, but not less than ~O

26,332,769 /

__________ ~2~2~,5~3~5~,7=20~,

The amount on Line 13a is the base amount to be used in the certification of the assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing the specific TtF district This amount CANNOT be a negative number. If it does calculate to be a negative number, it must be adjustoo to zero in order to continue the calculation.

14a. Line 13a divided by line 7;= final neutralization factor ____________ 0~,9~7~4~08~.~ (factor multiplied by old parcel base:;:; new base assessed value)

The amount of potential captured assessed valuation pf the spedfic TfF district will depend on whether Line 9 or Une 12a is used in determining Une 13a. (A) if Une 9 is used, the potential captured assessment is Line 10a minus Line 138. (8) If Line 12a is used, the potential captured assessment is the amount on Line 11A. (C) If Line 13a is a negative number that must be adjusted to zero, the potential captured assessment is Une iDa.

\flJhat is the potential captured assessment?

(A) Line 9 is used for the base assessed valuation for March 1, 2012. ~' ________ ~4~5,~S3~S~,S~7"-7 ~ (B) Line 12a was used for the base assessed valuation for March 1, 2012.

"'The amount indicated in either fA) or (8 is the amount shown as a minus amount in the certification of assessed valuation in those taxing dislIicts containing the SpeCirlC TIF distIict.

15. What is the potential tax increment revenue for 2013?

I, Amy Gerstman, Auditor of Monroe County,

$

s 897,051 /

certify to the best of my knowledge that the above base assessed valuation calculation is full, true and complete

for the tax inCfementfinance allocation ar~l • n .. Daledlhis--3.A

ih daYOf~ ,2012.

(J, ~J/.J ·hUL~ .;J J"K-G ====;-i:A"'M:.;yiG"'E:;;R;::S"'TM"'A"'N'--______ __ County Auditor (printed name)

{Please submit the completed form to - Budget Director, Department of Local Government Finance. for action}

SEND COPY TO GOVERNING BODY OF DISTRICT

District Name: 11-l0MPSON ORIGINAL

DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE CERTIFICA nON OF TIF INFORMATION

tment, as certified, has been approved by the Department of Local Government

'~e-'F.-""I----------------------' 2012.

mmen{ Rnancc

Oeparbnent of local Government Finance County Auditor's Certificate of Adjustment to the Based Assessed Valuation of.1t= Districts

Identify the specific allo'cation area if more than one allocation area is located in the county.

TIF District THOMPSON EXPANDED

County Name MONROE COUNlY

Contact Information: Rnandal Advisor: FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. Name: Amy Gerstman Address: 501 N. Morion St, Suile 216

Bloomington, Indiana 47404

Phone: 812-349-2510

1. 2012p2013 Gross Real Estate Valua!jo~· of the allocation area

2. 2011p2012 Gross Real Estate ValuationT of the allocation area

3. Divide line 1 by line 2 and carry to 5 dedmaJ places

4. 2012p2013 Gross Real Estate Valuation"" of the county

5. 2011p2012 Gross Real Estate Valuation" of the county

6. Divide line 4 by line 5 and cany to 5 decimal places

Name: Greg Guerrettaz Address: 2680 E. Main Sl, Suite 223


Phone: 317-837-4933

15,671,300

15,767,000

8,942,042,030

8,819,755,744

TAny contested amount of assessed value subject to appeaf should not be included in the gross assessed value of real estate.

1<Amounts do not include non-taxable and government exempt property.

7. 2011p2012 neutralized net base assessed valuation of the allocation area: 4,713,640

0.99393

1.01387

8. Lesser of line 3 or line 6 0.99393

9. Line 8 multiplied by line 7 =. ten(atfve new 2012p2013 neutralized base assessed value 4,685,030

Determination of Adequate Potential Captured Assessment {This calculation will be specific to each allocation area within the county.)

1a. Amount of potential captured assessment in 2011p2012. Amount of net assessed value 201~P2012 minus 2011p2012 neutralized base NAV

2a. Abatement reductions, IT any, in pre-reassessment values, scheduled to roJl off in p2013

3a. Real Grow1h, estimated in net assessed value first assessed fO( 20f2p2013

4a. Total of line 1a plus line 2a :: Adjusted Incremental NAV

Sa . .2011p2012 net tax rate of the TIF district

Sb. Estimated 2012p20131ax rate

6a. Tax revenue without reassessment line 4a divided by 100 multiplied by line 5a

6b. 'fax revenue on real growth line 3a divided by 100 mUltiplied by line 5b

Sc. Total estimated tax revenue without reassessment line Sa plus line 6b

7a. Amount of estimated captured assessment in 2012p2013, Une 6c divided by line Sb times 100

S

S

10,782,641

10,782,641

$1.9395

209,129

209,129

10,615,685

$ 1.97000

$

8a. 2012p2013 tolal net real estate assessed value of the TIF area (no deduction for base assessed value)

9a. Less 2012p2013 contested assessed value of the TIF area (do nofinclude appealed assessed value on reat growth shown on line 3a)

iDa. Line 8a minus line 9a =- 2012p2013 net assessed value of the TIF area


12a. line lOa minus line 113 =- tentative new base net assessed value

15,545,325

185,900

15,359,425

10,615,685

13a. Lesser of line 9 or 12a =- 2012p2013 base assessed value, but not less than SO

4,743,740 /

____ ~ ____ ~4~,6~8~5~,O~W~

The amount on Line 1Sa is the base amount to be used in the certification of the assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing the specific TfF districl This amount CANNOT be a negative number. If it does calculate to be a negative number, it must be adjusted to zero in order to continue the calculation.

14a. Line 13a divided by line 7:::: final neutralization factor (factor multiplied by old parcel base =- new base assessed value) 0.99393 /

--------"~"'--

The amount of potential captured assessed valuation oftha specific TIF district wil! depend on whether Line 9 or Line 12a is used in deteonining Line 13a. (A) if Line 9 is used, the potential captured assessment is Line 10a minus Une 13a. (B) If Line 12a Is used, the potential captured assessment IS the amount on

Line 11A. (C) If Une 13a is a negative number that must be adjusted to zero, the potential captured assessment is Uoo iDa.

What is the potential captured assessment? (A) Line 91s used for the base assessed valuation for March 1,2012.

(8) Line 12a was used for the base assessed valuation for March 1,2012.

*The amount indicated in either (A) or (8 is the amount sho\;m as a minus amount in the certification of assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing the specifIC TJF district.

15. What is the polential tax increment revenue for 20137


$

s

certify to the best of my knowledge that the above base assessed valuaUon calculation is full, true and complete for the tax increment finance allocation area.

2,-lL (1 n Dated this ~O'- -day Of~_-0-rt.U:.=lj=J'--------_o, 2012.

AMY GERSTMAN Ch"'j .pjAm>-£~ ~Ijy((. County Auditor (signature)- County Auditor (printed name)

(Please submit the completed form to Budget Director, Department of Local Government Finance, for action)


DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE CERTIFICATION OFTIF INFORMATION

District Name: '"T-U~.q·~~ t:....~.p~~

The base assessed valuation adjustment, as certified, has been approved by the Department of Local Governmenf Finance this z.o:'(-"'~day of ~ ....)_"-.T--' ' 2012.

Commissio vemment Rnance

10,674,395 1

210,286 !

Department of Local Government Finance County Auditor's Certificate of Adjustment to the Based Assessed Valuation of "fIF Districts


TIF District WALNUPNINSLOW

County Name MONROE CDUN1Y

Contactlnfonnation: Rnanclal Advisor. FINANClAL SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. Name: Address:

Phone:

Amy Gerstman 501 N. Morton St., Suite 216 Bloomington, Indiana 47404

812-349-2510

1. 2012p2013 Gross Real Estate Valuation"*' of the allocation area

2. 2011p2012 Gross Real Estate Valuation"*' of the allocation area

3. Divide line 1 by line 2 and carry to 5 decimal places

4. 2012p2013 Gross Real Estate Valualion* of the county

5. 2011p2012 Gross Real Estate Valuation- of the county


Name: Greg GuerreUaz . Address: 2680 E. Ma1n St.. Suite 223


Phone: 317-S37-4933

29,189,400

29,549,600

8,942,042,030

8,819,755,744

*Any contested amount of assessed value subject to appeal should not be Included;n the gross assessed value of real estate.

"Amounts do not Include non·faxable and government exempt property.


0.98781

1-01387

8. Lesser of I[ne 3 or fine 6 0.98781

9. Line 8 multiplied by line 7 = tentative new 2012p2013 neutralized base assessed value 23,263,370


1a. Amount of potential captured assessment in 2011p2012. Amounl of nel assessed value 2011 p2012 minus 2011p2012 neutralized base NAV

2a. Abatement reductions, if any, in pre-reassessment values, scheduled to roll off in p2013


4a. Tolal of line 1a plus line 2a "" Adjusted Incremental NAV

5a. 2011p2012 net tax rate of the TIF district


6a. Tax revenue without reassessment line 4a divkled by 100 multiplied by line 5a

6b. Tax revenue on real gro .... 1th line 3a divided by 100 multiplied by l[ne Sb

6c. Total estimated tax revenue without reassessment line 6a plus line 6b

7a. Amount of estimated captured assessment in 2012p2013. Une Be divided by line Sb times 100

$

$

$

4,432,337

4,432,337

$1_9395

85,965

85,965

4,363,706

$ 1.97000

$

8a. 2012p2013 total net real estate assessed value offue TIF area (no deduction for base assessed value)

9a. Less 2012p2013 contested assessed value of the TIF area (do not indude appealed assessed value on real growth shO'o'ln on line 3a)

10a. Line 8a minus line 9a :::; 2012p2013 net assessed value of the TtF area


12a. Line 10a minus line 11a = tentative new base net assessed value

13a. Lesser of line 9 or 12a:::; 2012p2013 base assessed value, but not less than SO

The amount on Line 13a is the base amount to be used-in the certification of the assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing tho specific TIF district This amount CANNOT b& a negative number. If it does calculate to be a negative number, It must be adjusted to zero in order to continue the calculation.

14a. Line 13a divided by line 7 :::: final neutralization factor (factor mullipUed by old parcel base:::; new base assessed value)

The amount of potential captured assessed valuation of the specific TIF district will depend on whether Line 9 or Line 12a is used in determining Line 13a. (A) ifUne 9 is used, the potential captured assessment is Line 10a minus Line 13a. (8) IfUne 12a is used, the potential captured assessment is the amount on

Une 11A. (C) If Une 13a is a negative number that must be adjusted to zero, the potential captured assessment is Line 108.

What is the potential captured assessment? (A) Line 9 is used for the base assessed valuation for March 1, 2012.


"The amount indicated in either (AJ or (B is the amOlmt sho~v.n as a minus amount In the certification of assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing the specific TlF district

15. VVhat is lhe potential tax increment revenue for 2013?

I, Amy Gerslman, Auditor of Monroe County,

$

certify to the best of my know1edge that the above base assessed valuation calculation is full, true and complete forthe tax increment finance allocation area.

Daledlhis ,5D ~uo_~daYOf,jutJ ,2012.

a.ntlc;i/;~~~f:;ure)·f!:j .:P;c::C C d' ( AMY GERSTMAN ounty Au Itar printed name)

{Please submit the completed form to - Budget Director, Department of Local Government Finance, for action}


DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE CERTIFICATION OF TIF INFORMATION

The base assessed valuation adjustment, as certified, has been approved by the Department of Local Government Finance this ~~:-'f"'u day of ~ ~'l . ,2012.

Commission emment Finance

28,063.181

389.300

27,673,881

4,363,706

23,310,175

23,263,370 /

0.98781 /

4,410,511 /

86,887 /

Department of Local Government Finance County Auditor's Certificate of Adjustrn&nt to tho Based Assessed Valuation of TIF Districts


TIF District ORIGINAL DOWNTOWN


Contact Information: Financial Advisor: FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. Name: Address:

Phone:

Amy Gerstman 501 N. Morton S1., Suite 216 Bloomington, Indiana 47404

812-349-2510


2. 2011p2012 Gross Real Eslate Valuation* of the alrocation area

3. DMde line 1 by line 2 and carry to 5 decimal places

4. 2012p2013 Gross Real Estate Valuation* ofthe county

5. 2011p2012 Gross Real Esta(e Valuation'" of the county

6, Divide line 4 by line 5 and carry to 5 decimal places

Name: Greg Guerrettaz Address: 2680 E. Main St., Suite 223


Phone: 317-837-4933

182,937,021

177,334,700

8,942,042,030

8,819,755,744

*Any contested amount of assessed value subject to appeal should not be included in the gross assessed value of real estate.

*Amounts do not include non·taxabfe and government exempt property.

7. 2011p2012 neutralized net base assessed valuation of the allocation area: 61.537,470

1.03159

1.01387



Determination of Adequate Potential Captured Assessment (This calculation will be specific to each a1iocation area within the county.)

1 a. Amount of potential captured assessment in 2011 p2012. Amount of net assessed value 2011p2012 minus 2011p2012 neutralized base NAV

2a. Abatement reductions, IT any, in pre-reassessment values, scheduled to rol! off in p2013

3a. Real Growth, estimated in net assessed value first assessed for 2012p2013'

4a. lotal of line 1a plus line 28 = Adjusted InCfement~1 NAV

5a. 2011p2012 net tax rate of the TIF disbicl


5a. lax revenue \vtthout reassessment line 4a divided by 100 multiplied by line 5a

6b. Tax revenue on real grmvth line 3a divided by 100 multiplied by IJne 5b \

6e. Tolal estimated tax revenue without reassessment line 6a plus line 5b

7a. Amount of estimated captured assessment in 2012p2013. Line 6c divided by line Sb times 100

$

$

$

104,853,195

104,853,195

$1.9395

2,033,628

2,033,628

103,229,848

$ 1.97000

$


9a. Less 2012p2013 contested assessed value of the TIF area (do not include appealed assessed value on real growth sho\'m on line 3a)

iDa. Une 8a minus line 9a::: 2012p2013 net assessed value of the TIF area


12a. Line iDa minus line 11a -= tentative new base net assessed value

13a. Lesser of line 9 or 12a :: 2012p2013 base assessed value, but nolless than $0

The-amount on line 13a is the base amount to be used in the certification of the assessed valuation In those taxing districts containing the specific T1F districl This amount CANNOT be a negative number. If it does calculate to be a negative number, it must bo adjusted to zero in order to continue the calculation.

14a. Line 13a divided byline 7::: final neutralizatkln factor (factor multiplied by old parcel base:= ne\'/ base assessed value)

The amount of potential captured assessed valuation of the spedfic TIF district will depend on whether Line 9 or Line 12a is used in determining Une 13a. (A) if Une 9 is used, the potential captured assessment is Line iDa minus Une 13a. (8) lfUne 12a Is used, the potential captured assessment is the amount on

Une 11A. (C) If Line 13a is a negative number that must be adjusted to zero, the potential captured assessment is Line 10a.

\%at is the potential captured assessment? (A) line 9 is used for the base assessed valuation for Marm1, 2012.

(8) line 12a was used for Ihe base assessed valuation for March 1, 2012.

~The amount indicated in either (A) or (B is the amount shown as a minus amount in the ceriific.3tion of assessed Yaluation in those taxing districts containing the specifIC T1F district.



$

certify to the best of my knowledge that the above base assessed valuation calculation is full, true and complete lor Ihe tax incremenl finance aliocatiOntrea.

DatedAhi. ~ daYOlc..Yj ,2012.

U1~ ,0ik, k." <;~'.:KL AMY GERSTMAN ~ County Auditor (signate) County Auditor (printed name)

(Please submit the completed form to - Budget Director, Department of Local Government finance, for action)


Commission


emmenl Finance

173,672,685

7,689,300

165,983,385

103,229,848

62,753,537

62,390,990 /

1,01387 /

103,592,395 /

2,040,770 /

Oepartment of Local Government Finance County Auditors Certificate of Adjustment to the Based Assessed Valuation of TlF Districts

Identify the specific allocation area if more than one allocation area IS located in the county.

TIF District EXPANDED DOWNTOWN


Contact Information: Financial Advisor. FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. Name: Address:

Phone:


812-34!i-2510

1. 2012p2013 Gross Real Estate Valuation* of the allocation area

2. 2011 p2012 Gross Real Estate Valuation* of the allocation area


4. 2012p2013 Gross Real Estate Valuation* of the county


6. DNide line 4 by line 5 and carl)' to 5 decimal places



Phone: 317-837-4933

23,974,100

22,631,820

8,942,042,030

8,819,755,744

*Any contested amount of assessed value subject to appwl should not be included in the: gross assessed value of real estate.

*Amounts do not include non-taxable and government exempt property.

7. 2011p2012 neutralized net base assessed valuation of the allocation area: 2,917,600.

1.05931

1.01387


9. Une 8 multiplied by line 7::: tentative new 2012p2013 neutralized base assessed value 2,958,070

Determination of Adequate Potential Captured Assessment (ThIs calculation wilt be specific to each allocation area within the county.)

1a. Amount of potential captured assessment in 2011p2012. Amount of net assessed value 2011p2012 minus 2011p2012 neutralized base NAV


38. Real Grow1h, estimated in net assessed value first assessed for 2012p2013

4a. Tolal of line 1a plus line 2a ::: Adjusted Incremental NAV

Sa. 2011p2012 net tax rate or the TIF district

5h. Estimated 2012p2013 tax rale

6a. Tax revenue without reassessment line 4a divided by 100 mUltiplied by line 5a

6h. Tax revenue on real growth line 3a divided by 100 multiplied by line 5b

6c. Tolal estim~ted tax revenue without reassessment line 6a plus line 6b

7a. Amount of estimated captured assessment in 2012p2013. Une 6c divided by line Sb times 100

S

S

S

18,784,610

18,784,610

$1.9463

365,603

365,603

18,558,528

$ 1.97{}(}0

$

8a. 2012p2013 total net real estate assessed value of the TfF area (no deduction for base assessed value)

9a. Less 2012p2013 contested assessed value of Ihe TlF area (do not include appealed assessed value on real growth shown on line 3a)

iDa. Line Ba minus line 9a = 2012p2013 net assessed value of the TIF area

11 a. Less estimated captured assessment from line 7a

22,238,140

343,900

21,894,240

18,558,528

12a. Line iDa minus line 11a = tentative new base net assessed value

13a. Lesser aflne 9 or 12a::: 2012p2013 base assessed value, but no11ess Ihan SO

_____ --"'3,,,33"'5"',7-'1=-2 /

2,958,070

The amount on line 13a is the base amount to be used in the certification of the assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing the specific IfF district. This amount CANNOT be a negative number. If it does calculate to be a negative number. it must be adjusted to zero in order to continue the calculation.

14a. Line 13a divided by line 7::; final neutralization factor (factor multiplied by old parcel base::: new base assessed value)

The amount of potential captured assessed valuation of the specific TIF district will depend on whether Une 9 or Une 12a is used in determining Line 13a. (A) if Une 9 is used, the potential captured assessment is Line 10a minus Line 13a. (8) If Line 12a is used, the potential captured assessment is the amount on

Une 11A (C) If Line 13a is a negative number that must be adjusted to zero, the potential captured assessment is Line 10a.

Wnat is the potential captured assessment?

1.01387 /

(A) Line 9 is used for the base assessed valUation for Marchi, 2012.

(B) Line 12a was used for the base assessed valuation for March 1, 2012. __________ ~18~,~9~~,1~70"-~ *Thft amount indicated in either (A) or (8 is the amount shown as a minus amount in the cerlification of assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing the specffic TlF district.


/, Amy Gerstman, Auditor of Monroe County.

$

certify to the best of my knowledge that the above base assessed valuation calculation is fun, true and complete for the tax increment finance allocation area.

Dated this -''-''..L.--__

fh --;-JP"""""+-------, 2012.

AMY GERSTMAN County Auditor (printed name)

(Please submit the completed fonn to - Budget Director, Department of Local Government Finance, for action)



District Name: ~""t<...p~~ ~~"'~":'-.!I~

The base assessed valuation adjllstrnent, as certified, has been approved by the Department of Local Govemment Rnance this a.~",,'V day of d~j ,2012.

Commission emment Finance

373,043 /

Department of local Government Finance County Auditors Certificate of Adjustment to the Based Assessed Valuation ofTIF Districts

Identify the specmc allocation area if more than one allocation area is located in the county.

TIF District WESTSIDE


Contacllnformation: Financial Advisor: FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. Name: Address:

Phone:

Amy Gerstman 501 N. Morton SL, Suite 216 Bloomlngton,lndiana 47404

812·34~2510

1. 2012p2013 Gross Real Estate Valuation" of the allocation area


3. DMde line 1 by line 2 and carry to 5 decimal places

4. 2012p2013 Gross Rea! Estate Valuation" of the county

5. 2011p20t2 Gross Real Estate Valuation'" ofthe county

6. DNlde line 4 by line 5 and carry to 5 decimal places

Name: Greg Guerrettaz Address: 2680 E. Main SL, Suite 223


Phone: 317-<1374933

181,237,340

171,126,800

8,942,042,030

8,819,755,744

"Any contested amount of assessed value subject to appeal should not be included in the gross assessed value of real estate.

"Amounts do not Include non-taxable and government exempt property.

7. 2011p2012 neulraHzed net base assessed valuation of the allocation area: 53,867,310

1.05908

1.01387


9. Une 8 multiplied by line 7::: tentative new 2012p2013 neutralized base assessed value 54,614,450

Determination of Adequate Potential Captured Assessment (This calculation will be specific to each aUocation area within .the county.)

18. Amount of potential captured assessment in 2011p2012. Amount of net assessed value 2011p2012 minus 2011p2012 neutralized base NAV

2a. Abatement red uctions, if any, in pre-reassessment values, scheduled to roll off in p2013


4a. Total of line 1a plus line 2a = Adjusted Incrementa! NAV

5a. 2011 p2012 nel tax rate of the TIF district


6a. Tax: revenue without reassessment line 4a divided by 100 multiplied by line 5a

6b. Tax revenue on real growlh line 3a divided by 100 multiplied by fine 5b

6c. Total estimated tax revenue without reassessment line 6a plus line 6h

7a. Amount of estimated captured assessment in 2012p2013. Une 6c divided by line Sb times 100

$

S

S

95,810,747

1,100,000

96,910,747

$1.6720

1,620,304

1,620,304

91,542,599

$ 1.77000

$

8a. 2012p2013 lotal net real estate assessed value of the T1F area (no deduction for base assessed value)

9a. Less 2012p2013 contesled assessed value of the T1F area (do not include appealed assessed value on real gro'.'lth shown on line 3a)

lOa. Line 8a minus line 9a ;::; 2012p2013 net assessed value of the TIF area


149,114,023

2,140,100

146,973,923

91,542,599

12a. Line 10a minus line l1a := tenlalive new base nel assessed value

_____ "'54"',"'61"'40:,4"'50"-. /

55,431,324

13a. Lesser of line 9 or 12a 0:: 2012p2013 base assessed value, but not less than SO

The amount on Line 13a Is the base amount to be used in the certification of the assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing the specific TIF district. This amount CANNOT be a negative number. If it does calculate to be a negative number, it must b9 adjusted to zero In order to continue tho calculation.

14a. Line 13a divided by line i = final neutralization factor (factor multiplied by ok! parcel base:= new base assessed value)

The amount of potential captured assessed valuation of the specific T1F district will depend on ,whether Une 9 or Line 12a is used in detennining Line 13a. (A) if Line 9 is used, the potential captured assessment is Line lOa minus Line 13a. (B) If line 12a is used, the potential captured assessment is the amount on

Une l1A. (C) If Line 13a is a negative number thai musl be adjusted to zero, the potential captured assessment is line 10a.

1.01387 /

VVhat is the potential captured assessment? (A) Line 9 is used for the base assessed valuation for March 1,2012. ___________ 9~2~.3~5~9~,4~70_3 ~ {B} Une 12a was used for the base assessed valuation for March 1,2012.

*The amount indicated in either (A) or (B is the amount shOlyn as a minus amount in the certification of assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing the specific TIP district

1-5. What is the potential tax increment revenue for 2013?


$

certify 10 the best of my kno\'w1edge that the above base assessed valuation calculation is full, true and complete for the tax increment finance allocation area.

!J Ii 0 7 Dale t is v O . day of cJu.1fj ,2012.

;!Jbkffn1a.v . IWoY GERSTMAN County Auditor (signature) , County Auditor (printed name)

(Please submit the completed form to - Budget Director, Department of Local Government Finance, for action)

SEND COpy TO GOVERNING BODY OF DISTRICT

District Name: 1,..0-.) ~ --;,. \'0-4.


The base assessed valuation adjustment, as certified, has been approved by the Department of Local Government Finance this ~~\> day of ~u...... ,2012.

Commissio

1,634,763 /'

Department of Local Government Finance County Auditor's Certificate of Adjustment to the Based Assessed Valuatlon of TIF Districts

Identify the specific allocation area if more than one allocation area Is located in the county.

TIF District ADAMS CRDSSING


Contact [nromalion: Financial Ad~sor: FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS GROUP,INC. Name: Address:

Phone:


812-349-2510

1. 2012p2013 Gross Real Estale Valuation'"" of the aUocatiOll area

2. 2011p2012 Gross Real Estate Valuation"" of the allocation area


4. 2012p2013 Gross Real Estate Valuation'"" of the county





Phone: 317~37-4933

41,758,400

42,714,900

8,942,042,030

8,819,755,744

*Any contest~d ;1mount of assessed value subject to appeal should not be included in the gross assessed value of real estate.

*Amounts do not ;nclude non-taxable and government exempt property.


0.97761

1.01387


9. Une 8 multiplied by line 7 == tentative new 2012p2013 neutralized base assessed vakJe 9,613,600

Determination of Adcquatn Potential Captured Assessment (This calculation will be specific to each allocation area within the county.)

1a. Amount of potential captured assessment in 2011p2012. Amount of net assessed value 2011 p2012 minus 2011p2012 neutralized base NAV

2a. Abatement reductions, if any, in pre-reassessment values, sche<luled to roll off in p2013

3a. Real Growth, estimated in net assessed value first assessed for2012p2013

4a. Total of line 1a plus line 2a = Adjusled Incremental NAV



6a. Tax revenue without reassessment line 4a divided by 100 mulliplied by line 5a

6b. Tax revenue on real gro ... .1h line 3a divided by 100 multiplied by line 5b

6c. Total estimated lax revenue without reassessment line 6a plus line 6b

7a. Amount of estimated captured assessment in 2012p2013. Line 6e divided by line 5b times 100

S

$

S

30,756,960

30,756,960

~1.9395

596,531

596,531

30,280,761

S 1.97000

S

8a. 2012p2013 total net real estate assessed value of the TlF area (no deduction for base assessed value)

9a. Less 2012p2013 contested assessed value afthe TfF area (do not include appealed assessed value on real growth shown on line 3a)

iDa. Line 8a minus line 9a ::: 2012p2013 net assessed value of the TIF area


12a, Line 10a minus line 11 a ::: tentative new base net assessed value

13a.lesserofJlne 9 or 12a::: 2012p2013 base assessed value, but not less than $0

The amount on Lina 13a is the base amount to be used in the certification of the assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing the specific TfF district lhis amount CANNOT bo a negative number. If it does calculate to be a negative number. It must be adjusted to zero in order to continue the calculation.

14a. Line 13a divided byline 7 = final neutralization factor (factor multiplied by old parcel base::: new base assessed value)

The amount of potential captured assessed valuation of the specific TIF district will depend on whether Une 9 or Line 12a is used in determining Line 13a. (A) if Line 9 is used, the potential captured assessment is Une iDa minus Une 13a. (B) IfUne 12a is used, the potential captured assessment is the amount on

line 11A. (C) If Line 13a is a negative number that must be adjusted to zero, the potential captured assessment is Line lOa.

Wnat Is the potential captured assessment?

39,889,700

39,889,700

30,280,761

9,608,939

/ 9,608,939

0.97761 /

(A) Line 9 is used for the base assessed valuation for Mard11, 2012.

(8) Line 12a was used for the base assessed valuation for March 1, 2012. _____ -'3~0,"'280~,7,,6~1 / *The amount indicated in either (A) or (B is the amount shown as a minus amount in the cerlHication of assessed vafuation in those taxing districts containing the specifIC TIF district.


I, Amy Gerstman, Audilor of Monroe County,

s

certify to the best of my knowfedge that the above base assessed valuation calculation is full, true and complete

for the tax increment finance allocatiJJon ea..

Dated tIS DJ}- dayo! ~UC-t.1 ,2012 .

..J ,7 j. . bJ/,lf 1>1. a-. ''f:(., AMY GERSTMAN

County Auditor (printed name)

{Please submit the completed form to - Budget DIrector, Department of Local Government Finance, for action}


DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE CERTIFICA nON OF nF INFORMA nON

District Name: p., O~ C--Q.Q.~I~""-.l-

The base assessed valuation adjustment, as certified, has been approved by the Department of Local Government Finance this ~u~.) day of oJ "')-"--/ , 2012.

Commission emmen! Finance

596,531 /

Department of Local Government Finance County Auditor's Certificate of Adjustment to the Based Assessed Valuation of TlF Districts

Identify the specific allocation area if more than one allocation area is located in the counl)'.

TIF District KINSER-PROW


Contact Information: Financial Advisor: FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. Name: Address:

.Phone:


812-349-2510






6. Divide ]jne 4 by line S· and carry to 5 decimal places

Name: Greg GueITeltaz Address: 2680 E. Main St., Suite 223


Phone: 317-837-4933

10,770,100

10,474,400

8,942,042,030

8,819,755,744

*Any contested amollnt of assessed value subject to appeal should not be Included in the gross assessed value of real estate.

"Amounts do not include non-taxable and government exempt property,

7. 2011p2012 neutralized net base assessed yahJation OrUle allocation area: 5,114,700

1.02823

1.01387


9. Line 8 multiplied by line 7 :;: tentative now 2012p2013 neutralized base assessed value 5,185,640

Determination of Adequate Potential Captured Assossment (This calculation will be specific to each allocation area within the county.)

1a. Amoun[ of polential captured assessment in 2011p2012. Amount of net assessed value 2011 p2012 minus 2011p2012 neutralized base NAV

28. Abatement reductions, if any, in pre-reassessment values, scheduled to roll off in p2013


4a. Total of line 1a plus line 2a = Adjusted Incremenlal NAV

5a. 2011p2012 net tax rate afthe TIF district


6a. Tax revenue withou1 reassessment line 4a divided by 100 multiplied by line 5a

6b. lax revenue on real growth line 3a divided by 100 multiplied by line 5b


7a. Amount of estimated captured assessment in 2012p2013. Line Sc dMded by line 5b times 100

$

S

S

4,368,698

4,368,698

$1.9395

84,731

84,731

4,301,066

$ 1.97000

S

8a. 2012p2013 tolal net rea! estate assessed value of the TfF area (no deduction for base assessed value}

9a. Less 2012p2013 contested assessed value of the TtF area (do not include appealed assessed value on real growth shown on line 38)

10a. Une 8a minus line 9a = 2012p2013 nefassessed value oflhe TIF area


12a. Line 10a minus line t 1a = tentative new base net assessed value

13a. Lesser afline 9 or 12a = 2012p2013 base assessed value, but not less than SO

The amount on line 13a is the base amount to be used in the certification of the assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing the specific TlF district This amount CANNOT be a negative number. If it does calculate to be a negative number, it must be adjusted to zero In order to continue the calculation,

14a. Une 138 divided by line 7 = final neutralization factor (factor multiplied by old parcel base = new base assessed value)

ihe amount of polential captured assessed valuation of the specific TIF district will depend on whether Une 9 or Line 12a is used In determining Line 13a. (A) if Une 9 is used, the potential captured assessment is line 10a minus line 13a. (8) If Line 12a is used, the potential captured assessment is the amount on

Une 11A. (C) If Une 13a is a negative number that must be adjusted to zero, the potential captured assessment is Line 10a.

What is the potential captured assessment? (A) Line 9 is used for the base assessed valuation for March 1,2012.

(8) Une 12a was used for the base assessed valuation for March 1, 2012.

""The amount indicated in either (A) or (8 is the amount shown as a minus amount in the certification of assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing the specific TfF district.



s

s

certify to the best of my knowledge that the above base assessed valuation calculation is full, true and complete for the tax increment finance allocation area.

'J}h .(/f)

9,809,720

9,809,720

4,301,066

1.01387 /

4,624,080 /

91,094 /

Oaled Ihis ,2D , daYOfd_.:crL"'J-Gjc.L"C:;-________ , 2012.

a~ /iM4~ % $1«- -=:=-;===:ASMY=GC:':'E=RSC';T~MA"'N ___ _ JCounty Auditor (signature) 0 County Auditor (printed name)

(Please submit the completed form to - Budget Director, Department of Local GOvernment Finance, for action)



The base assessed valuation adjustmen~ as certified, has been approved by the Department of local Government Finance this ~~'() day of ~ ...)"':::1 __ ,2012..

Commission

Department of local Government Finance . County Auditor's Certificate of Adjustment to the Based Assessed Valuation of TlF Districts

Identify the specific allocation area IT more than one allocation area is located in the county.

TIF District WHITEHALUGATES


Contact Information: Financial Advisor: FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. Name: Amy Gerstman Name: Greg Guerretta,z Address: 501 N. Morton St, Suite 216

Bloomington, Indiana 47404 Address: 2680 E. Main St., Suite 223


Phone: 812-349-2510 Phooo: 317-1337-4933

1. 2012p2013 Gross Real Estate Valuation'" of the allocation area 66,873,200

2. 2011p2012 Gross Real Estate Valuation'" of the allocalion area 67,748,700


4. 2012p2013 Gross Real Estate Valuation'" of the county 8,942,042,030

5. 2011p2012 Gross Real Estate Valuation'" of the county 8,819,755,744


"'Any contested amount of assessed value subject to appeal should not be included in the gross assessed value of real estate.

"'Amounts do not Include non-taxable and government exempt properly.

7. 2D11p2012 neutralized net base assessed valuation of the allocation area:

8. Lesser of line 3 or line 6

9. Line 8 muttiplied by line 7 = tentative new 2012p2013 neutralized base assessed value

Determination of Adequate Potential Captured Assessmnnt (This calculation will be specific to each allocation area within the county.)

1a. Amount of potential captured assessment in 2011p2012. Am~unt of net assessed value 2011p~012 minus 2011p2012 neutralized base NAV


3a. Real GrO\vth, estimated in net assessed value first assessed for 2012p2013

4a. Total of line 1a plus line 2a "'" Adjusted Incremental NAY

5a. 2011p2012 net tax rate of the TIF district


6a. Tax revenue without reassessment line 4a divided by 100 multiplied by line Sa

6b. Tax revenue on real grOl.'Ith line 3a divided by 100 multiplied by line 5b

6e. Total estimated tax revenue without reassessment line 6a plus line 6b

7a. Amount of estimated captured assessment in 2012p2013. line 6c divided by line 5b times 100

$

S

S

0.98708

1.01387

0.98708

67,620,700

67,620,700

$2.0243

1,368,815

1,368,815

66,n1,463

. $ 2.05000

$

8a. 2012p2013 tolal net real estate assessed value of the TIF area (no deduction for base assessed value)


1 Oa. Line 8a minus line 9a = 2012p2013 net assessed value of the TlF area

11a. Less estimated captured assessment from line 78

12a. Line 10a minus line 11a:= tentative new base net assessed value

13a. Lesser of Hne 9 or 12a ::; 2012p2013 base assessed value, but not less than SO

The amount on Lioe 13a is the base amount to b9 used in the certification of the assessed valuation in . those taxing districts containing the specific TlF district This amount CANNOT be a negative number. If it does calculate to be a negative number, It must be adjusted to zoro in order to continue the calculation.

14a. Line 13a divided by line 7:= final neutralization factor (factor mulliplied by old parcel base = new base assessed value)

The amount of potential captured assessed valuation of the specific IIF district will depend on whether Une 9 or Line 12a is used in determining Line 13a. (A} if Une 9 is used, the potential captured assessment is Line 10a minus Une 13a. (8) JfUne 12a is used, the potential captured assessment is the amount Dn

Une 11A. (C) If line 13a is a negative number that must be adjusted to zero, the potential captured assessment is line 10a.

What is tne- potential captured assessment? (A) Line 9 is used for the base assessed valuation for March 1, 2012.


7he amount indicated in eHher (A) or (8 is the amount shown as a minus amount in the certification of assessed valuation in lhose taxing districts containing the specifIC TlF district.



$

$

certify to the best of my kr'lOwledge that the above base assessed valuation calculation is full, true and complete for the tax increment finance anocat]iOn rea.

3 ·J/..- & Daled his 0 - day 01 V- / ,2012. /1 J.

'~A J'1?V- ,: 'XL AMY GERSTMAN County Auditor (signature) \. County Auditor (printed name)

(Please submit the completed form to • Budget Director, Department of Local Government Finance. for action)


DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE CERTIFICA nON OF TIF INFORMATiON

District Name: \...fo..)-u---.~ U-n",,-,,- J 6--~

The base assessed valuation adjustment, as certified, has been approved by Ihe Department of Local Government Financethls ~~Q day of ~v.~J' ,2012.

Commission emmen! Finance

66,873,200

10,185,700

56,687,500

66,771,463

(10,083,963)

J

0.00000 /

56,687,500 I

1,162,094 /

Department of Local Government Finance County Auditor's Certificate of Adjustment to the Based Assessed Valuation of TIF Districts


TIF District TAPP ROAD

County Name MONROE COUmY

Conlact Information: Rnancial Advisor. FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. Name: Address:

Phone:

Amy Gerstman 501 N. Morton St., Suite 216 Bloomington. Indiana 47404

812-349-2510

1. 2012p2013 Gross Real Estate Valuation- of the allocation area

2. 2011p2012 Gross Real Estate Valuation;> of the allocation area


4. 2012p2013 Gross Real Estate Valuation;> of the county



Name: Greg Guerrettaz !\ddress: 2680 E Main St., Suite 223


Phone: 317-837-4933

17,545,700

16,477,600

8,942,042,030

8,819,755,744

"Any contested amount of assessed value subject to appeal should not be included in the gross assessed value of rear estate.

*Amounts do not include non-taxable and government exempt property.

7. 2011 p2012 neutralized net base assessed valuation of the allocation area: 534,710

1.06482

1.01387


9. Une 8 multiplied by line 7:: tentative new2012p2013 neutralized base assessed value 542,130


1 a. Amount of potentia! captured assessment in 2011 p2012. Amount of net assessed value 2011 p2012 minus 2011p2012 neutralized base NAV


3a. Rea! Gro\'1th, estimated in nef assessed value first assessed for 2012p2013

4a. T olal of line 1 a plus line 28 = Adjusted Incremental NAV

Sa. 2011 p2012 net tax rate of the TIF district

5b. Estimated 2012p2013 lax rate

6a. Tax revenue without reassessment line 4a divided by 100 multiplied by line Sa

6b. Tax revenue on rea! growth fine 3a divided by 100 multiplied by fine 5b


7a. Amount of estimated captured assessment in 2012p2013. Une 6c divided by line 5b limes 100

S

$

$

12,405,910

12,405,910

$1.9395

240,613

240,613

12,213,858

$ 1.97000

S


9a. Less 2_012p2013 contested assessed value of the TIF area (do not indude appealed assessed value on realgro','llh shown on line 3a)

lOa. line 8a minus line 9a = 2012p2013 net assessed value of the T1F area


12a. Line 10a minus line 11a = tentative new base net assessed value

13a. Lesser of line 9 or 12a "" 2012p2013 base assessed value, but not less than $0

The amount on Line 13a Is the base amount to be used jn the certification of the assessed valuation In those taxing districts containing the specific TIF district. This amount CANNOT be a negative number. If it does calculate to be a negative number, it must be adjusted to zero in ardor to continue the calculation.

14a. Une 13a divided by line 7 "" final neutralization factor (factor multiplied by old parcel base = new base assessed value)

The amount of potential captured assessed valuation of the specific TIF district will depend on whether Line 9 or Line 12a is used in detennining Line 13a. (A) if Line 9 is used, the potentia! captured assessment Is Une lOa minus Line 13a. (8) If Une 12a is used, the potential captured assessment is the amount on

Une 11A. (C) If Line 13a is a negative number that must be adjusted to zero, the potential captured assessment is Une iDa.

What is the potential captured assessment? (A) Une 9 is used for the base assessed valuation for March 1, 2012.


"'The amount indicated in either (A) or (B is the amount shown as a mInus amount in lhe certification of assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing the specific TlF district.

15. VVhat is the potential tax increment revenue for 2013?


$

$

certify to the best of my knowledge that the above base assessed valuation calculation is full, true and complete for the tax increment finance allocation area.

Datejl-\his 3D ~ day of '-.!1~ , L-l1~ 4ih~ Lf?y j!-/;G

,2012.

AMY GERSTMAN County Auditor (printed name)

(prease submit the completed form to - Budget Director, Department of local Government Financel for action)



District Name: ,.-~ Q..u~

The base assessed valuation adjustment, as certified, has been approved by the Department of Local Government Financethis~.Q7T""'''-<)dayof ~v\...y ,2012.

, Commi ot of l( /:;ovemment Finance

13,142,420

13,142,420

12,213,858

928,562 / 542,130

'1.01387 /

12,600,290 '/

248,226/'

Department of local Government Finance County Auditor's Certificate of Adjustment to the Based Assessed Valuation of TIF Districts

Identify the spedfic allocation area if more than one allocation area is located in the county.

TIF District STROAD46


Contact Information: Finandal Advisor. FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. Name: Address:

Phone:


812-349-2510


2. 2011p2012 Gross Real Estate Valualion* of the allocation area

3. Divide line 1 by line 2 and carry to 5 dedmal places


5. 2011p2D12 Gross Real Estate Valuation* of the county

6. Divide Hne 4 by line 5 and carry 10 5 dedrnal places


Plainfield,lN 46168

Phone: 317-1337-4933

21.380.100

18,455,500

8.942.042,030

8,819.755,744

"'Any contested amount of assessed value subject to appeal should not be included In the gross assessed value of real estate.

*Amounts do not {nclude non~taxab/e and government exempt properly.

7. 2011p2012 neutralized net baSe assessed valuation of the allocation area: 7,709,920

1.15847

1.01387



Detennination of Adequate Potential Captured Assessment (This calculation will be specific- to each allocation area within the- county.)

1a. Amount of potential captured assessment In 2011p2012. Amount of net assessed value 2011p2.012 minus 2011p2012 neutralized base NAV

2a. Abatement reductions, jf any, in pre-reassessment values, scheduled to roll off in p2013


4a. Tolal aflkle 1a plus line 2a = Adjusted Incremental NAV


5b. Estimated 2012p2013tax rate

6a. Tax: revenue without reassessment Hne 4a divided by 100 multiplied by line 5a

6b. Tax revenue on real growth line 3a divkled by 100 multiplied by line 5b


7a. Amount of estimated captured assessment in 2012p2013. Une 6c drvlded by line 5b times 100

S

$

$

7.901,504

7,901,504

$1.446790

114.318

114.318

7.672,349

$ 1.49000

$

8a. 2012p2013 total net real estate assessed value of the TtF area (no deduction for base assessed value)

.9a. Less 2012p2013 c:onteslC<f aS$Cssed value of the TIF area (do not include appealed assessed value on real growth shown on line 3a)

10a. Line aa minllS line 9a :0: 2012p2013 net assessed value of the TIF area


18,556,271

18,556,271

7,672,349

12a. Line 10a minus line 11a:o: tentative new base oet,as~essed value

13a. Lesser of line 9 or 12a =- 2012p2013 base assessed value, but not less than SO

10,883,922 /

__________ ~7~,8~1~6~,8~6~0

The amount on Line 13a Is the base amount to be used in the certification of the assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing the specific TIF district This amount CANNOT be a negative number. If it does calculate to be a negative number, it must be adjusted to zero in order to continue the calculation.

14a. Line 13a divided by line 7::: final neutralization factor (factor muttiplied by old parcel base::: new base assessed value)

The amount of potential captured assessed valuation of the specific jlF district will depend on whether Une 9 or Line 12a is used in determining Line 13a. (A) if Une 9 is used, the potential captured assessment is Line 10a minus Une 13a. (8) If Line 12a is used, the potential captured assessment Is the amount on

Une 11A. (C) If line 13a is a negative number that must be adjusted to zero, the potential captured assessment is Une 10a,

What is the potential captured assessment? (A) Une 9 is used for the base assessed valuation for Mard11, 2012.

(B) Line 12a was used for the base assessed valuation for March 1,2012.

*Tlle amount indicated in either (A) or (8 is llle amount shown as a minus amount in the certification of assessed valvation in those taxing districts containing the Specif1C TlF district

15. VVhat is the potential tax increment revenue for 2013?


$

certify to the best of my knowledge that the above base assessed valuation calculation Is full, true and complele

for the lax incr:men~ance alloca1l09'ea.

1.01387 /

10.739,411/

160,017 /

Daled Ihis 1- day of d u1V ,2012.

J>V<..-.. iJL -:)-1£ ====,;A3M",Y=Gc:E:::R=-S~TMA=N,--~~~_ County Auditor {printed name}

(Please submit the completed form to • Budget Director, Department of Local Gove-rome-nt Finance. for action)



District Name: ~ a.o..~ \.:\ "f

The base assessed valuation adjustment, as certified, has been approved by the Department of Local Government Finance this ~""\O day of ~. ,2012.

Commissl overnment Rnance

Department of Local Government Finance County Auditor's Certificate of Adjustment to the Based Assessed Valuation of TIF Districts


TIF District FULLERTON PIKE

County Name MONROE COUN1Y

Contact Information: Financial Advisor: FINANClAL SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. Name: Address:

Phone;


812-34!}-251O

1. 2012p2013 Gross Real Eslate Valuation* of the allocalion area


3. DMde line 1 by line 2 and cany to 5 decimal places


5. 2011p2012 Gross Real Estate Valuation" of lhe county




Phone: 317-837-4933

25,529,200

25,504,000

8,942,042,030

8,819,755,744

"Any contested amount of assessed value subject to appeal should not be included in the gross assessed value of real estate.

""Amounts do not include non-taxable and government exempt property.

7. 2011p2012 neutralized net base assessed valuation ofthe aHocation area: 2,406,990

1.00099

1.01387


9. Line 8 multiplied by line 7::: tentatiVe new 2012p2013 neu1ralized base assessed value 2,409,370

Determination of Adequate Potenlial Captured Assessment (This CalculatIon will be specific to each allocation area within the county.}

1a. Amount of potential captured assessment in 2011p2012. Amount of net assessed value 2011 p2012 minus 2011p2012 neutralized base NAY



4a. Total or line 1a plus line 2a =- Adjusted Incremental NAY


5b. Estimated 2012p2013 lax rate

6a. Tax revenue without reassessment line 4a diVided by 100 multiplied by line 5a

6b. Tax revenue on real growth fine 3a divided by 100 multiplied by line 5b

6e. Total estimated tax revenue without reassessment line 6a plus line 6b

7a. Amount of estimated caplured assessment in 2012p2013. Line 6c divided by line 5b times 100

$

$

S

23,043,501

23,043,501

$1.2695

292,537

292,537

22,677,287

S 1.29000

$

Sa. 2012p2013 total net real estate assessed value of the TIF area (no deduction for base assessed value)


10a. Line 8a minus Hne 9a := 2012p2013 net assessed value of the TlF area


12a. Line 10a minus line 11a :: tentative new base net assessed value

13a. Lesser of line 9 or 12a = 2012p2013 base assessed value, but not less than SO

The amount on Line 13a Is the base amount to be used in the certification of the assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing 1~e specific TIF district This amount CANNOT be a negative number. If it does calculate to be a negative number, it must be adjusted to zero in order to (;ontinue the calculation.

14a. Line 13a divided by line 7:= final neutralization factor (factor multiplied by old parcel base "" new base assessed value)

The amount of potential captured assessed valuation of the specific TlF district will depend on whether Une 9 orUne 12a is used in determining Line 13a. (A) if Une 9 is used, the potential captured assessmenf is Line iDa minus Une 13a. (B) If Line 12a is used, the potential captured assessment is the amount on

Une 11A. (C) If Une 13a is a negative numbe.r that must be adjusted 10 zero, the potential captured assessment is Line 10a.

\!Vhat is the potential captured assessment? (A) Une 9 is used for the base assessed valuation for March 1,2012.

{B} Une 12a VIas used for the base assessed valuation for March 1, 2012.

*The amount indicated in either (AJ or (8 is the amount shown as a minus amount in Lhe certification of assessed valuation in those taxing districts containing the specific rtF district.


I, Amy Gerstman, Auditor of Monroe County, certify to the best of my knowledge that the above base assessed valuation calculation is full, tnJe and complete for the tax incrementanee allocauo~a(fa.

Dale<! )!lis _ 3-0 day of (-3- Ufy , 2012.

ClAlUt,,?}.uI4Fm_<,_ '1~,j lX AMY GERSTMAN I.JCounty Auditor (signature) County Auditor (printed name)

(Please submit the completed form to - Budget Director, Department of Local Government Finance, for action)


DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE CERTIFICA nON OF TlF INFORMATION

District Name: h ...... L.\-'l~ ~~'d'

The base assessed valuation adjustment, as certified, has been approved by the Department of Local Govemment Rnanee this ~~"'~ day of ~ .:>--y ,2012.

Commissio vemmenl Rnanee

25,476,068

25,476,068

22,677,287

2,798,781

/ 2,409,370

1.00099 /

297,560 /

Date post:	13-Jul-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	3 times
Download:	0 times

~J/.J ·hUL~ · Line 13a divided by line 7:::: final neutralization factor (factor multiplied by...

Documents