Join the Revolution: Project RED Learning Community

Presented by:

The Leader in K-12 Technology Implementation Research

September 13, 2012

Which best describes you?

1.Central office and board are investigating technology options.2.District is interested in 1:1, but we are still in the early planning phase.3.Our infrastructure is in place and we are planning for our full rollout.4.We have already implemented, but we are looking at improving or expanding our program.

Agenda

• Review and discuss elements needed for successful 1:1 implementation

• Define action steps to develop a successful foundation

• What’s next…

The Project RED Team

Revolution

Second-order Change

The Problem

The Problem

+

= $100 Billion

The Problem

Source: Project RED Team members from various inspirational sources

The Problem

The Problem

Do More with Less

Project RED Vision

2 x learning

Revenue Neutral

The Research

The Research

Technology Integration in intervention classes

Principal training in 2nd order change

Change management leadership by principal

Online collaboration

Technology integration in core subjects 

Online formative assessments

Student/computer ratio

Virtual field trips

Search engines

Key Implementation Factors (KIFs)

Where do you rank?

5%

11%

15%

21%

15%

13%

8%

7%

4%

1%

None

1 Factor

2 Factors

3 Factors

4 Factors

5 Factors

6 Factors

7 Factors

8 Factors

9 Factors

Percentage of Schools Employing Key Implementing Factors

1:1 Works When Properly Implemented

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Proper 1:1* 100% 92% 90% 89% 83% 63%

All 1:1 88% 65% 70% 58% 68% 57%

All Other Schools 77% 50% 69% 45% 65% 51%

Paperwork Reduction

Disciplinary action

reduction

High-stakes test scores

increase

Drop-out rate

reduction

Paper and Copy

Machine

Graduation Rates

Pct. of RespondentsReporting Improvement

•Proper 1:1: Those schools practicing the top 4 Key Implementation Factors (13 schools).Intervention Classes Every Period, Principal Leads Change management, Online collaboration Daily, Core Curriculum weekly

1:1 Schools Have Greater Savings

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

1:1 Schools 40% 24%

All Other Schools 22% 11%

Paperwork ReductionCopy Machine

Expense Reduction

Pct. of Respondents

RESEARCH

PRACTICE

From Research to Practice

Implementation Components

Are you collaborating?

Are all components being addressed?

Are your learning goals driving these?

The Project RED Learning Community

Signature Districts

• Charleston County, SC

• Clark County, NV

• East Noble, IN

• Ferndale, WA

• Huntsville, AL

• Joplin, MO

• Kent, WA

• Natick, MA

• Owensboro, KY

• Poway, CA

• Quakertown, PA

• Reeds Spring, MO

• Richland District 2, SC

• Salisbury, PA

• Sioux City, IA

• Southern Lehigh, PA

• Springfield, NJ

• Sunnyside, AZ

Signature Districts

• Charleston County, SC

• Clark County, NV

• East Noble, IN

• Ferndale, WA

• Huntsville, AL

• Joplin, MO

• Kent, WA

• Natick, MA

• Owensboro, KY

• Poway, CA

• Quakertown, PA

• Reeds Spring, MO

• Richland District 2, SC

• Salisbury, PA

• Sioux City, IA

• Southern Lehigh, PA

• Springfield, NJ

• Sunnyside, AZ

Project RED Learning Community

Increase your chances of success by:

• Following the Project RED Design™ methodology

• Participating in online discussions, webinars and in-person institutes

•Connect in meaningful ways with other community members

• Sharing your experiences and successes

•

Project RED Website Tools

REDHub: Social Networking Portal

Implementation Timeline

Project Plan Sample

Excerpt from Project RED Design™ Methodology

1:1 Cost Savings Calculator

Put in Image

Questions

Join US

www.One-to-oneinstitute.org

www.projectred.org

@Project_RED

Facebook.com/ProjectRED.org

Thank You

Thank you to our sponsors and supporters!