+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Journal Club

Journal Club

Date post: 10-Nov-2015
Category:
Upload: thagoon-kanjanopas
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Damage-control resuscitation increases successful nonoperativemanagement rates and survival after severe blunt liver injury
Popular Tags:
23
Damage-control resuscitation increases successful non-operative management rates and survival after severe blunt liver injury Binod Shrestha, MD, John B. Holcomb, MD, Elizabeth A. Camp, PhD et al, Houstan, Texas The Journal of Trauma and Acute care surgery Volume 78, Number 2
Transcript
  • Damage-control resuscitation

    increases successful non-operative

    management rates and survival after

    severe blunt liver injury

    Binod Shrestha, MD, John B. Holcomb, MD,

    Elizabeth A. Camp, PhD et al, Houstan, Texas

    The Journal of Trauma and Acute care surgery

    Volume 78, Number 2

  • Background

    The liver is the most common solid organ in adult

    abdominal trauma

    The management of blunt liver injury had changed to

    non-operative management in lower grade since

    1980s.

    In high grade has still required operative management.

  • In high grade [IV,V,VI]patients always use massive

    amount of fluid during initial resuscitation and didnt

    have a good result due to multiple injury.

    Patients who survive develop more complications, and

    non-operative management tends to fail more than in

    lower-grade injuries.

    Background

  • Damage control Resuscitation

    Crystalloid-based Blood product based and

    permission hypotension enabling perfusion to vital

    organ

    Dilutional coagulopathy & cellular dysfunction

    In OR, abdominal compartment syndrome, organ

    failure, blood product use, hospital charges, fascial

    closure time.

    Background

  • Patients and Method

    Study setting :

    - Memorial Hermann Hospital

    - UTHealths affliiated teaching hospital

    Patient population :

    - Trauma patients who sustained a blunt liver injury from

    January 2005 December 2011

    - Patient with a blunt liver injury of AAST-OIS Grade IV or

    higher

    - Severe or high grade liver injury -> AAST-OIS Grade IV, V, VI

    - Exclusion -> Patients younger than 16 years who were

    transferred from another institution, or who died in

    emergency department (ED)

  • Study setting :

    In-hospital mortality

    Data collection :

    - Standard demographic data

    - Liver injury grading -> surgeons operative note or

    radiologists report from abdominal CT scan

    - Damaged control resuscitation (DCR)

    Patients and Method

  • Pre-DCR

    (2005-2008)

    DCR

    (2009-2011)

    Management in OR/IR

    Management in

    non-operative group

    Management in OR/IR

    Management in

    non-operative group

    Patients and Method

  • PATIENTS AND METHODS

    Definitions :

    - Patients went to the OR -> liver procedure

    - Patients went to the IR suite -> therapeutic angioembolization of

    hepatic vessels

    - Patients in non-operative group :

    1) Didnt go to the OR or IR.

    2) Went to the OR but not for a hepatic procedure.

    3) Went to the IR suite for a diagnostic procedure, but not for

    angioembolization of hepatic vessels.

    - Mortality -> death within the initial hospital stay of any cause

  • PATIENTS AND METHODS

    Definitions (continue) :

    - Morbidity :

    1) Infectious complications (pneumonia, intra-abdominal abscess

    and sepsis)

    2) Liver-related complications (hepatic rebleeding, liver failure and

    biliary complication)

    3) Other complications (bleeding from other sites other than liver,

    ACS, DVT, PE)

    - Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) -> abdominal hypertension

    with organ dysfunction necessitating operative intervention and

    documentation by the trauma attending physician

  • PATIENTS AND METHODS

    Definitions (continue) :

    - Hepatic rebleeding -> Any bleeding from the liver, occurring after

    initial management, necessitating unplanned surgical or radiological

    intervention

    - Biliary complications -> bile leakage, bile peritonitis, biloma, biliary

    fistula and any gall bladder-related events requiring endoscopic or

    surgical intervention documented by the trauma attending physician

    - PE and DVT -> documented after confirmation by CT chest and limb

    U/S

  • PATIENTS AND METHODS

    Definitions (continue) :

    - Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) :

    1) T > 38oC or < 36oC

    2) HR > 90 bpm

    3) RR > 20 /min or PaCO2 < 32 mmHg

    4) WBC count > 12,000/mL or < 4,000/mL or band form > 10%

    - Infectious complications -> SIRS + clinical + culture positive

    - Intra-abdominal abscess -> hepatic abscess and abscess from a

    nonhepatic source after confirmation from radiologic or surgical

    evidence

  • PATIENTS AND METHODS

    Definitions (continue) :

    - Ventilator free days

    = days alive and free from the ventilator

    = 30 total ventilator days

    - For those who died before 30 days and had no days free of

    ventilator, this was recorded as 0.

    - ICU free days

    = days alive and not admitted to the ICU

    = 30 total ICU days

    - Hospital free days

    = days alive and not admitted to the hospital

    = 30 hospital days

  • Statistical analysis :

    - Retrospective study

    - Outcomes were compared by univariate and

    multivariate analysis.

    Patients and Method

  • Patients and Method

  • The full implementation of DCR in 2009, a substantial decrease in the volumes of

    crystalloid and blood products administered during the first 24 hours of hospital

    admission to patients with severe liver injuries was observed.

  • - There was no significant difference in the volume of crystalloid administered in

    patients who did not receive blood products.

    - In patients who received blood products, the patients in the pre-DCR group

    received significantly more blood products and crystalloid volume than the

    patients in the DCR group during the first 24 hours of hospital admission

  • When evaluating only the patients who did not receive blood products, there

    was no difference in survival between pre-DCR

    and DCR groups. The impact on survival seemed to be only among those patients

    who received blood products

  • - There was significant improvement in ventilator-free days and ICU-free days in

    the DCR group.

    - There was no significant difference in the number of patients experiencing

    complications between groups.

  • - Forward stepwise regression was used and generated the core variables for

    analysis (ISS, 24-hour RBC, 24-hour plasma, and 24-hour crystalloid volumes

    and ED GCS). The model demonstrated an R-squared of 0.6842 and adjusted R-

    squared of 0.6404.

    - A multiple logistic regression model was generated using these five variables

    and adding DCR and non-operative

    management.

  • 1.The DCR cohort had an increase in successful nonoperative

    management (from 54% to 74%, p < 0.01)

    2.The DCR cohort had a reduction in initial 24-hour packed red

    blood cell (median, from 13 U to 6.5 U; p < 0.01), plasma

    (median, from 13 U to 8 U; p < 0.01), and crystalloid (median, from

    5,800 mL to 4,100 mL; p < 0.01) administration

    3.The DCR treatment was associated with improved survival, from

    73% to 94% (p < 0.01).

    Conclusion

  • DCR Pre-DCR

    - increased survival rate in patient

    received any blood products

    - successful non-operative

    management rate

    - decreased blood product and

    crystalloid use

    - decreased intra-abdominal sepsis

    rate

    - decreased day in ICU

    - Increased ventilator-free days

    - No difference in hepatic-related, infectious, or thromboembolic

    complications

    Conclusion

  • The largest single-center series to date examining

    severe blunt liver injuries

    DCR

    - increased survival rate in patient received any blood

    products

    - successful non-operative management rate

    - decreased blood product and crystalloid use

    - decreased intra-abdominal sepsis rate

    - decreased day in ICU

    - Increased ventilator-free days

    Conclusion


Recommended