Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
Feasibility Study
Julius West Middle School Addition
Prepared forMontgomery County Board of Education
BySmolen Emr Ilkovitch Architects
October 2011
0
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
Table of ContentsTable of Contents
I. Introduction 2
II E ti S 4II. Executive Summary 4
III. Scope, Methodology & Goals 17
IV. Existing Conditions 20g
V. Description of Options 38
A. Option One 45
B. Option Two 51
C. Option Three 57
D. Summary Table and Cost Comparison 63
VI. Proposed Project Implementation Schedule 64
VII. AppendicesVII. Appendices
A. Educational Specifications
B. Space Summary
1
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
I I t d ti
Julius West Middle School is located in the City of Rockville at 651 Great Falls Road. This feasibility study was conducted forMontgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) by the architectural firm of Smolen Emr Ilkovitch Architects to develop options foradding capacity to Julius West Middle School.
I. Introduction
g p y
Feasibility Study Participants
The Feasibility Study participants reviewed, revised, and approved the design concepts for the addition to Julius West MiddleSchool through a series of work sessions and community meetings The meetings occurred on February 2 2011 February 24School through a series of work sessions and community meetings. The meetings occurred on February 2, 2011, February 24,2010, March 9, 2011, March 23, 2011, and at a PTA presentation on April 12, 2011. The proposed designs are a result of theparticipant’s suggestions and guidance during the feasibility study process.
Feasibility Study Participants
Nanette PoirierH. Dudley DavidsonTomás BaliñoDianne Benjamin
Principal, Julius West Middle SchoolAssistant Principal, Julius West Middle SchoolReporter, Rockville PatchPTA Julius West Middle SchoolDianne Benjamin
Karla BerggrenLinda BrennesAlicia CampbellKate Chai-OnnJyllian ClarkLi d C i i
PTA, Julius West Middle SchoolPTA, Ritchie Park Elementary SchoolParent, Julius West Middle SchoolStaff, Julius West Middle SchoolParent, Beall Elementary SchoolStaff, Julius West Middle SchoolP t J li W t Middl S h lLinda Cruciani
Marti DillonRonni FarberKim GearyLiliana GonzalezCynthia Cotte Griffins
Parent, Julius West Middle SchoolStaff, Julius West Middle SchoolStaff, Julius West Middle SchoolParent, Beall Elementary School Parent, Julius West Middle SchoolParent, Julius West Middle School
2
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
I I t d ti (C ti d)I. Introduction (Continued)
Feasibility Study Participants (Continued)
Rachel HastCheryl Moss Herman
Staff, Julius West Middle SchoolRM Cluster Coordinator y
Neal IrvingAdrienne KaramihasAndy LeeEvan LewisJimmy LittleTina Maynard
Staff, Julius West Middle SchoolPlanner, Department of Facilities ManagementStaff, Julius West Middle SchoolStudent, Julius West Middle SchoolStaff, Julius West Middle SchoolStaff Julius West Middle SchoolTina Maynard
Lori MerrillSean NorrisPaul O’ ConnellCheryl PeirceYvonne Sanya
Staff, Julius West Middle SchoolParent, Julius West Middle SchoolReporter, The GazetteStaff, Julius West Middle SchoolRichard Montgomery Cluster CoordinatorStaff, Julius West Middle School
Michael ShpurJeff SuhrGregory SimpkinsJillian StormsMeghan StylesBelinda Tilley
Architect, MCPS Division of ConstructionParent, Julius West Middle SchoolStaff, Julius West Middle SchoolMaryland State Department of EducationStaff, Julius West Middle School Parent Julius West Middle SchoolBelinda Tilley
Jim TokarJennifer Young
Parent, Julius West Middle SchoolProject Manager, Division of ConstructionPTA, Ritchie Park Elementary School
3
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
II E ti SII. Executive Summary
Purpose
The purpose of this feasibility study is to explore options to increase the student capacity at Julius West Middle School. The studyevaluated a series of potential options that would satisfy the requirements of the Educational Specification and Space Summaryevaluated a series of potential options that would satisfy the requirements of the Educational Specification and Space Summary.The intent of this study is to provide MCPS with specific recommendations and construction costs associated with theimplementation of each proposed option.
History
J li W t Middl S h l i l t d 21 31 it t 651 G t F ll R d hi h i l t d ithi th Cit f R k ill ThJulius West Middle School is located on a 21.31 acre site at 651 Great Falls Road which is located within the City of Rockville. Theexisting facility is 147,223 square feet (sf). The school was built in 4 phases of construction starting with the original buildingcomprising of 101,118 sf built in 1961. In 1964, a 15 classroom wing was constructed adding 25,870 gsf. Then in 1976 a 1,220 sfaddition was added to increase the media center. The entire facility underwent a modernization in 1993 at which point a 19,015 sfaddition was constructed. The 1993 modernization was designed by Smolen Emr Ilkovitch Architects.
The program capacity of the school is currently 995 students with current enrollment of 1046 in Grades 6 through 8. The projectedenrollment is expected to reach 1,400 based on the current enrollment projections. The proposed addition will increase the school’scapacity to 1,445 students.
Methodology
The existing school was evaluated by the design team to determine the most advantageous approach to adding the proposedprogrammed spaces. Additionally, the study indicates the impact, if any, that can be reasonably expected by adding onto theexisting facility, as well as, incorporating limited interior renovations. The evaluation is based on compliance with the EducationalSpecification dated January 10, 2011.
The study is based on the following:The study is based on the following:• Meetings with the Feasibility Study participants & MCPS Staff.• Analysis of the existing physical plant regarding additional capacity.• Review of existing construction documents provided by MCPS.• Analysis of existing site features and meeting with City of Rockville related to storm water management.• Review of the Educational Specifications.
R h d t d b th d i t
4
• Research conducted by the design team.
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
II E ti S (C ti d)II. Executive Summary (Continued)
Overview
Julius West Middle School was originally constructed in 1961 and was originally named West Rockville Junior High School. In1961 th h l h d t i M J li W t b th l l f d b f t f d ti Th i i l1961 the school name was changed to recognize Mr. Julius West, both a local farmer and benefactor of education. The original1961 facility comprised of 101,118 sf and was later added onto in 1964 with a 25,870 sf 15 classroom addition. Then in 1976, a1,220 sf addition was added to the media center. Finally in 1993, Julius West Middle School reopened after an extensivemodernization that added another 19,015 sf bringing the facility to its current 147,223 sf.
The existing two story structure is of non-combustible construction and is fully protected by a sprinkler system. The wallsthroughout the building are of masonry, with brick veneer on the exterior walls. The structural system consists of masonry load-bearing walls, which are constructed on continuous concrete footings. The floors throughout the building are concrete and existas either concrete slabs-on-grade or framed slabs supported by steel joists. The roof is built-up roofing on corrugated metal deck,which is supported by steel joists. Virtually all of the interior walls in the building are masonry, although drywall partitions are usedto subdivide spaces in the administrative area and subdivide the previous technology labs.
Vehicular access to the school is currently through one driveway located off of Great Falls Road. This driveway serves as themain access point for all vehicles entering the site including buses, student drop-off cars, staff member cars and truck loading andunloading. The other driveway, located in the central eastern portion of the property, is currently utilized for bus-loop egress only.On-site sidewalks also link the pedestrian circulation routes of the facility to the public sidewalks along Great Falls Road.
Proposed OptionsProposed Options
Three building addition options were designed with input from the Feasibility Study participants and MCPS Staff. Each of theoptions meet all of the programmatic requirements set forth by the Educational Specifications and explores different approachestoward increasing the capacity of the school. All of the options will impact the existing building and site, however, the school willremain occupied and fully functional during construction.
5
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
II E ti S (C ti d)II. Executive Summary (Continued)
Common Design Elements
All three options have the following common elements:p g
Building
• The two original technology labs, located on the ground floor, will be renovated to meet current multipurpose technologylab curriculum and multipurpose lab requirements.
• The existing classroom located at the north east corner adjacent to the health room will be subdivided for a guidance• The existing classroom located at the north east corner, adjacent to the health room, will be subdivided for a guidanceconference room, and two assistant principal offices.
• The existing guidance conference room will be repurposed to a guidance counselor’s office.• An add-alternate security entrance will be added to the administration suite by renovating an existing assistant principal’s
office.• Expansion of the existing cafeteria and addition of a serving line as well as kitchen support space.
Th i ti t ff l ill b t d t id f METS l d t• The existing staff lounge will be renovated to provide space for a METS classroom and storage room.• The location of the two new auxiliary gymnasiums will be adjacent to the existing gymnasium and locker rooms.
Site
• The shared entrance and egress for cars and buses will be separated.g p• Increased bus loop capacity.• Improved soil conditions on the lower play field.• Increased number of tennis courts (6 tennis courts pursuant to MCPS standards.)• A minimum of 3 basketball courts.• Increased handicap parking to required numbers and locations.
6
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
II E ti S (C ti d)II. Executive Summary (Continued)
Unique Elements of Option One (Preferred)
Option One - The proposed two-story addition adjoins the south face of the existing facility. The addition is held tight to thei ti b ildi d ffi i tl tili i ti id t li k b k t th i ti f ilit Th dditi i t dexisting building and efficiently utilizes existing corridors to link back to the existing facility. The addition is compact and
distributes the new classroom spaces on all floor levels. The new addition will require an automatic sprinkler system.
• The two-story addition will be added onto the south of the existing school onto the current play fields.• The western portion of the addition connects with the ground floor level and first floor level of the existing facility.• The eastern portion of the addition connects with the first floor and second floor of the existing facility.• The proposed addition will include all spaces in accordance with the Educational Specifications.• The addition will require minimal renovation to the existing building.• The bus loop will be expanded to the south of the site, and have a separate entrance and exit off of Great Falls Road.
The student drop-off and parking lot entrance will also have a separate entrance and exit off of Great Falls Road. Thesechanges will substantially improve access to the site, as well as eliminate any potentially mixing of bus, student drop-offcars, and pedestrian traffic., p
• A new courtyard will provide natural light to spaces in both the existing facility and addition.
7
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
II E ti S (C ti d)II. Executive Summary (Continued)
Unique Elements of Option One (Preferred)
Pros
• The floor plan arrangement is compact and provides a looped circulation on the first floor.• The addition efficiently divides classrooms between all three levels of the school increasing flexibility.• The proposed connection to the existing school corridors will increase usage of the central north-south corridor.• The compact nature of the addition as well as central location will have the least travel distance of the other proposed
options.Utili i th d fl f th dditi l l ill di l d i l ti i i ti id• Utilizing the ground floor for three additional classrooms will disperse classrooms and circulation in existing corridorsmore evenly.
• The proposed corridor layout will allow for straight sightlines at key corridor intersections for improved supervision.• The majority of classroom windows will not face Interstate 270 which will result in a natural reduced noise levels in
classrooms.• Construction is localized to one compact area.• Location of auxiliary gymnasium maintains direct access to the fields from the existing north-south corridor adjacent to
the existing gymnasium.
Cons
• The addition encroaches onto the playfields• The addition encroaches onto the playfields.
Estimated construction cost for building and site: Site Cost: $1,312,000
Building Cost: $9 109 000Building Cost: $9,109,000
Total: $10,421,000
8
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
II E ti S (C ti d)II. Executive Summary (Continued)
Unique Elements of Option Two
Option Two - The proposed addition is comprised of a one-story and two-story addition that adjoins the south face of the existingf ilit Th t ti f th dditi i h ld ti ht t th i ti b ildi d tili i ti id t li k b k t thfacility. The one-story portion of the addition is held tight to the existing building and utilizes existing corridors to link back to theexisting facility. The two-story classroom addition is pulled away from the existing building and creates a looped corridorcirculation pattern connecting back at two locations on each floor. The additional separation between the existing and newaddition creates a two-story courtyard. The additions will require an automatic sprinkler system.
• The two-story addition will be added to the south of the school onto the current play fields.• The proposed addition will include all spaces in according with the Educational Specifications.• This option will require the most renovation of the existing building due to the multiple corridor connections.• The extended length of the proposed addition will be the most disruptive to existing classrooms during construction.• The bus loop will be expanded to the south of the site, and have a separate entrance and exit off of Great Falls Road• The student drop-off and parking lot entrance will also have a separate entrance and exit off of Great Falls Road. These
changes will substantially improve access to the site, as well as eliminate any potentially mixing of bus, student drop-off cars,g y p , y p y g , p ,and pedestrian traffic.
• A new courtyard will provide natural light to spaces in both the existing facility and addition.
9
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
II E ti S (C ti d)II. Executive Summary (Continued)
Unique Elements of Option Two
PPros
• The new addition provides a looped circulation pattern on both the first and second floor.
Cons
Th dditi i d t t t fl d ill i t l ti t l• The addition is spread out onto two floors and will increases travel time to classrooms.• Construction is more disruptive to students.• The addition encroaches more onto the fields in the east-west direction.• The addition does not engage the ground floor.• The size of the addition is larger due to replacement of existing classrooms.• Existing band room will not have natural light.• Concern that increase circulation along the existing east-west corridor will create traffic jams between classes.• Distance to new west stairwells on second floor is to far and not be utilized.• Existing north-south corridor adjacent to gymnasium does not lead directly to fields.
Estimated construction cost for building and site: Site Cost: $1 522 000g Site Cost: $1,522,000
Building Cost: $10,489,000
Total: $12,011,000
10
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
II E ti S (C ti d)II. Executive Summary (Continued)
Unique Elements of Option Three
Option Three – The proposed addition is comprised of two separate additions. A one-story addition located on the southwesternf f th i ti h l d t t dditi th t dj i th th t f f th i ti f ilit Th t tface of the existing school and a two story addition that adjoins the southeastern face of the existing facility. The two-storyaddition is skewed at a 45 degree angle from the existing facility and has a prominent exposure along Great Falls Road. Thenew addition will require an automatic sprinkler system.
• The proposed addition will include all spaces in accordance with the Educational Specifications.• The addition will require extensive renovation at the proposed rotunda area connecting back to the existing corridor.• The skewed orientation of the two-story addition has the least impact onto the existing playfields.• The bus loop will be expanded to the south of the site, and have a separate entrance and exit off of Great Falls Road.• The student drop-off and parking lot entrance will also have a separate entrance and exit off of Great Falls Road. These
changes will substantially improve access to the site, as well as eliminate any potentially mixing of bus, student drop-off cars,and pedestrian traffic.
• The construction of two separate additions will require separate constructions areas.p q p
11
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
II E ti S (C ti d)II. Executive Summary (Continued)
Unique Elements of Option Three
Pros
• The addition has the least disturbance to the fields.
Cons
• The addition does not allow a line of sight to the fields from the front of the school.A t th l fi ld b th it i h d b th l ti f th dditi• Access to the playfields by the community is hampered by the location of the addition.
• Two construction sites are required.• Long, dead end corridors with remote stair wells is a security concern.• Travel time from the classroom addition wing would be an issue.• Classroom addition is not intergraded well with the existing classrooms and support spaces.• Congestion at new corridor intersection on both floors will be excessive even with enlarged “rotunda like” area.• The addition is larger due to the replacement of two existing computer labs that will be displaced.• Existing north-south corridor adjacent to gymnasium does not lead directly to fields.
Estimated construction cost for building and site: Site Cost: $1,413,000
Building Cost: $9,701,000
Total: $11,114,000
12
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
II E ti S (C ti d)II. Executive Summary (Continued)
GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR
EXISTING BUILDING
Existing Building = 147,223 SF
ADDITIONS
OPTION ONE (Preferred
E i ti b ildi 147 223 SFRENOVATION
Existing building = 147,223 SFProposed additions = 31,100 SF Renovation = 9,980 SFTotal Gross = 178,323 SF
13
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
II E ti S (C ti d)II. Executive Summary (Continued)
GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR
ADDITIONS
OPTION TWO
Existing building = 147 223 SFExisting building = 147,223 SFProposed additions = 36,060 SF Renovation = 11,970 SFTotal Gross = 183,283 SF
RENOVATIONRENOVATION
14
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
II E ti S (C ti d)II. Executive Summary (Continued)
GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR
ADDITIONS
OPTION THREE
147 223 SFExisting building =Proposed additions = Renovation =Total Gross =
RENOVATION
147, 223 SF33,480 SF10,520 SF
180,703 SF
15
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
II E ti S (C ti d)II. Executive Summary (Continued)
Conclusions and Recommendations
SmolenEmr Ilkovitch Architects recommends the following course of action to meet the program requirements for the additiont J li W t Middl S h l Th d ti i t t ith MCPS t d d t th i t dto Julius West Middle School. The recommendations are consistent with MCPS standards, meet the program requirements, andaddress the interests and concerns of the principal, school staff, the PTA, and the community as represented by the FeasibilityStudy participants.
In accordance with the options developed during the Feasibility Study meetings, it is recommended that Option One asdescribed in Section V and its associated site improvements be implemented. The overall safety of the site is improved withseparation of bus, vehicle, and pedestrian circulation. All of MCPS program requirements are fulfilled with the recommendedbuilding plan.
16
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
III S M th d l & G lIII. Scope, Methodology & GoalsScope and Intent
The purpose of this feasibility study is to explore viable options for increasing the capacity of Julius West Middle School byl ti i f ibl dditi th t ill ti f th i t f th Ed ti l S ifi ti d t d J 10evaluating a series of possible additions that will satisfy the requirements of the Educational Specifications dated January 10,
2011.
The intent of this feasibility study is to offer options for the proposed school expansion to fulfill the educational requirements ofstudents and staff, and respond to the concerns of the community. Each option will address site issues related to safe access forvehicles, bus circulation, and pedestrian access, as well as provide ample parking and preservation of school playfields. Thescope of work also includes a limited survey of the physical plant and evaluation of the existing mechanical, electrical andplumbing systems to determine if existing equipment could be utilized for the proposed addition.
Meetings were held at Julius West Middle School on February 2nd and 24th, 2011 and , March 9th and 23rd, 2011, and a PTApresentation on April 12, 2011. The design team analyzed the educational specification and developed several cost effectiveoptions that maximize the use of the existing facility and address both building addition and site issues. The Feasibility Studyp g y g y yparticipants reviewed the progression of building and site concepts at each meeting. The comments and suggestions werediscussed at each meeting and incorporated when found to be practical and beneficial by those in attendance. The final conceptsare presented as options in this report and were approved by the Feasibility Study participants. Option One best meets MCPSrequirements and was selected as the preferred option by the Feasibility Study participants at the final meeting on March 23,2011.
17
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
III S M th d l & G l (C ti d)III. Scope, Methodology & Goals (Continued)
Methodology
The existing school has been evaluated by the design team to determine the most advantageous approach to adding theproposed program spaces Additionally we have indicated the impact if any that can be reasonably expected by adding to theproposed program spaces. Additionally, we have indicated the impact, if any, that can be reasonably expected by adding to theexisting facility as well as incorporating limited interior renovations. The evaluation was conducted with the intent of adding tothe existing school to comply with the Educational Specifications – Facility Planning Study dated January 10, 2011. Theevaluation is based on the following:
• Analysis of the existing physical plant and determination of available additional capacity.
• The design team conducted non-destructive visual evaluations, where possible, of the existing facility. This was followed-upwith interviewing MCPS staff when required.
• Review of existing construction documents provided by MCPS: The design team utilized existing documentation tounderstand the existing building construction and systems.
• Analysis of existing site features: Existing amenities, utilities and site access were reviewed to determine if they werecapable of supporting the proposed options.
• Analysis of geotechnical composition of the site: MCPS contracted for a limited geotechnical report to determine compositionof existing soils to identify any rock and/or poor soil conditions.g y y p
• Meetings with the Feasibility Study participants & MCPS Staff: These meetings established the needs and goals for the study.
• Review of the Educational Specifications: – The review established a thorough understanding of the requirements andobjectives of the project.
• Development of multiple building options and site improvement options: All viable options were explored. Each option wasdeveloped and evaluated in conjunction with MCPS Staff and the Feasibility Study participants to identify the preferred option.
18
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
III S M th d l & G l (C ti d)III. Scope, Methodology & Goals (Continued)
The following are the goals and objectives established by the Feasibility Study participants to be addressed by the design teamand MCPS staff in this feasibility study.
Building Goals
The building addition should:• Provide natural light throughout the new addition while preserving natural light to the existing facility.• Minimize construction disruption for students and staff.
P id th f t i t ibl f t d t d t ff d i t ti f th dditi• Provide the safest environment possible for students and staff during construction of the addition.• Maintain the current classroom configurations with convenient circulation connections between the addition and the existing
building circulation.• Maintain existing classrooms in their current locations.• Keep travel distance from the addition to the existing building core support elements to a minimum.• Create new straight corridors with few turns to allow for visual supervision and enhanced security.• Provide separation between noisy and quiet curriculum.
Site Goals
The proposed site should:• Separate student drop off and bus circulation conflicts at the shared entrance• Separate student drop-off and bus circulation conflicts at the shared entrance.• Increase bus loop capacity an additional five spaces.• Improve existing soil conditions on the existing lower play field which is presently underutilized.• Allow for maximum visual security of playfields.• Increase the number of tennis courts to the recommended 6 pursuant to MCPS.• Maintain a minimum of 3 basketball courts
P id l i l i t f t f l i i b b f t• Provide a clear, single point of entry for people arriving by car, bus, or on foot.
19
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV E i ti C ditiIV. Existing ConditionsVicinity Map
JULIUS WEST MIDDLE SCHOOL651 GREAT FALLS ROAD
NOT TO SCALE
20
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV Existing Conditions (Continued)IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)Existing Site Plan BASKETBALL
COURTS
TENNISCOURTS EXISTING
BUILDING
13 PARKING SPACES
BUILDING
125 PARKING SPACESOUTDOOR
STORAGE
5 HC PARKING SPACES
MAINENTRANCE
SOFTBALLFEILDS
BUSES AND CARS
INCARS OUT
0 40’ 80’ 160’ TRACK
BUSES OUT
21
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV E i ti C diti (C ti d)IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)Existing Ground Floor Plan
KEY
C CORRIDORCL CLOSETCR CLASSROOMHR HEALTH ROOME ELECTRICALE ELECTRICALEL ELEVATORJ JANITORSM MECHANICALO OFFICES STORAGET TOILET
1. BOILER ROOM2 AUXILARY GYM
E12
3T
J
J
TT
T
MEL
5
67
M
8
S
9
101010
1211
O
M
MC
9
9 9
2. AUXILARY GYM3. BUILDING SERVICES4. GENERAL TECH LAB5. NOT USED6. STAGE7. TECH OFFICE8. FIN ROOM9. ESOL10. HEALTH11 HEALTH STORAGE
MELM
11. HEALTH STORAGE12. HEALTH OFFICE
0 20’ 40’ 80’
22
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV E i ti C diti (C ti d)IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)Existing First Floor Plan
KEY (CONTINUED)
C CORRIDORCL CLOSETCR CLASSROOMHR HEALTH ROOME ELECTRICALEL ELEVATORJ JANITORS14
151449
5153 53
54 51 CR
13. TRASH14. ART15. KILN ROOM16. ART OFFICE17 DOCK
J JANITORSM MECHANICALO OFFICES STORAGET TOILET
J
13
1416
S
17ST
181920
S
MS
S4849
SS50
5152 52T
T
54 51 CR
EL
17. DOCK18. STAFF LOUNGE19. KITCHEN20. KITCHEN OFFICE21. MULTIPURPOSE ROOM22. COUNSELOR OFFICES23. GUIDANCE OFFICE24. RECORDS25. GUIDANCE CONFERENCE26 VESTIBULE
S
2139
39SMCR
S
33T T
40M
4041
T
T
45
J
48
CLCL CL
6
MAIN
ENTRANCE
28. PRINCIPAL29. ADMINISTRATION OFFICE30. SECRETARY31. FINANCE32. SUSPENSION33. ADMIN CONFERENCE 34. SCHOOL STORE35 THERAPY
26. VESTIBULE27. ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL22
222222
2324
25
26
272729
CR
CR
CR CR
CR
T
T
42 43M
41
41
4445
4647
SS
SS
35. THERAPY36. SPPECH37. SCIENCE38. SCIENCE PREP39. TEAM ROOM40. COMMUNICATION (MEDIA)41. MEDIA STORAGE42. MEDIA OFFICE43. MEDIA WORK ROOM44 CONTROL ROOM
M
27
2829
2930
31 32S
ST
33
CRHR
OT TMS
2634CR
CRCRCR
3536373837
T T M
55
CR MEL
SS M
S
44. CONTROL ROOM45. EDIT ROOM46. MEDIA CENTER47. COURTYARD48. GYM49. MUSIC50. MUSIC OFFICE51. LOCKER ROOM52. P.E. OFFICE53. SHOWER
0 20’ 40’ 80’
HR26O
S
23
53. SHOWER54. LAUNDRY
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV E i ti C diti (C ti d) E i i S d Fl PlIV. Existing Conditions (Continued) Existing Second Floor Plan
CR
39
3959 CR CR 58T
TJ
55
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
T
56
57
CR
CR
37
SO60 O
TT
S
59C CORRIDORCL CLOSETCR CLASSROOMHR HEALTH ROOME ELECTRICALEL ELEVATORJ JANITORSM MECHANICALO OFFICE
55
CR
T CR
CR CR39
37 O S
MCR CR CR T T
M
S
S
S
6060
S
S55. COMPUTER LAB56. MATH57. MATH LAB58. READING59 TEXT STORAGE
S STORAGET TOILETEL
373837383738 373737 3859. TEXT STORAGE60. WORK ROOM61. ALTERNATE SERVING LINE62. ALTERNATE PREP AREA KITCHEN 63. ALTERNATE SECURITY ENTRANCE 64. CAFETERIA EXPANSION65. SMALL INSTRUCTIONAL66. IDA67. OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY68 STAFF DEVELOPMENT68. STAFF DEVELOPMENT
0 20’ 40’ 80’
24
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)g ( )
Existing Site
General Site Information
The Julius West Middle School facility is situated on a 21.31 acre lot at 651 Great Falls Road, Rockville, Maryland. The property is found on ADC Map book grid 5164-D8 and has a tax account number of 4-00143132. The site is zoned R-60 and is bounded to the southwest by the Interstate Highway-270 Corridor, to the southeast by the Falls Road right-of-way, to the east by the Great Falls Road right-of-way, to the northeast by detached single family homes and to the northwest by attached single family homes.
Based on the current City of Rockville Zoning Ordinance, dimensional regulations for the property will include the following:
Front setback – 25’Front setback where established setback exceeds standard - 50'Side setback where street abuts – 20’
Side setback where land abuts - 8'Rear setback – 20’Maximum building height - 35'Maximum site building coverage – 35% Maximum impervious surfaces in front yard - 40%
The zoning ordinance will also require any site improvements to adhere to the landscaping, screening, and lighting requirements associated with the parking lot.p g
Adjoining StreetsThere are three public right-of-ways which border the site. Interstate 270, Falls Road, and Great Falls Road. Of the three, Great Falls Road is the only street which offers vehicular or pedestrian access into the site. This two-lane, 30-mph street is lined on both sides with sidewalks and street trees. The pavement appears to be in good condition, and generally free from substantial cracking. Sidewalks along the streets are also in good condition, however, many curb ramps at the driveway intersections do not have the detectable warning g , , y p y gsurfaces required by ADA. If site improvements are proposed, these areas should be upgraded to meet current ADA requirements.
25
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)g ( )
Existing Site (Continued)
Site Access, Parking and Circulation:
On-Site Pedestrian and Vehicular AccessVehicular access to the school is currently afforded through one driveway located off of Great Falls Road. This driveway servesas the main access point for all vehicles entering the site including buses, student drop-off, staff members and loading. The other driveway, located in the central eastern portion of the property, is currently utilized for bus-loop egress only. On-sitesidewalks also link the pedestrian circulation routes of the facility to the public sidewalks along Great Falls Road.
Driveway EntrancesDriveway EntrancesAs mentioned previously, there are two existing driveways on the property. The main driveway located on the northeasterncorner of the site serves as the main site entrance and is also utilized as the main exit for all vehicles excluding buses. This 55-foot two-way asphalt driveway is divided by a landscaped median in order to separate the two lanes of traffic. Pavement in thisarea appears to be in good condition aside from minor cracks. In terms of visibility, however, the site distance issues can benoticed when looking north on Great Falls Road. Because of the vertical curvature of the roadway coupled with the street trees,oncoming traffic can be difficult to detect for vehicles leaving the siteoncoming traffic can be difficult to detect for vehicles leaving the site.The remaining driveway is located approximately 100-feet to the north of the Falls Road, Great Falls Road intersection on theeastern side of the site. This one-way asphalt driveway is approximately 20-feet in width and provides egress from the bus-loop. Superficially, this driveway also appears to be in decent condition and free from substantial cracking. Again, however, sitedistance deficiencies are prevalent. Here, the issue is centered around the proximity of the driveway to the adjacent intersection.Although the exit is one-way, left turns out of the site may have difficulty as oncoming traffic approaches from the Falls Roadt li ht Oth i i l th b f d t t bl i f th b f b th d i It istop-light. Other issues involve the absence of detectable warning surfaces on the curb ramps of both driveways. It is
recommended that driveway relocations are analyzed in order to improve the safety of vehicles entering and exiting the site. Ata minimum, ADA upgrades should be anticipated for all cross-walks and curb ramps associated with the site improvements.
Bus LoopThe school’s bus-loop consists of 18-chevron style parking spaces and a 20-foot drive aisle along the eastern side of the school.Five extra spaces are also striped in at the end of the bus area as well. For access, buses use the main site entrance and arethen required to cross over general site traffic to enter the bus-loop area, delineated by signage for bus use only. With stripingfor 23 buses and ample width for buses to pass one another, it appears that the size of the bus-loop is sufficient for the 18individual routes that are currently listed as serving the school. Although the existing layout is functional, it is not ideal to havebus-traffic crossing the main exit for the student drop-off/parking lot.
26
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV E i ti C diti (C ti d)IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)
Existing Site (Continued)
In terms of ADA compliance, the bus-loop drop-off area does provide a small handicap ramp; however, the ramp is not up tocurrent code as there is no detectable warning surfaces. Furthermore, there is no passenger loading zone, which is required byADA.
Student Drop-off LoopThe student drop-off loop is located on the northern side of the building and consists of a 200-foot long, 22-foot wide drive aislewhich meanders through the main parking lot. Although there is some discernment between the parking lot and the studentdrop-off, there is not enough separation to prevent confusion between parking lot and drop-off areas. Moreover, with staffp g p p p g pmembers and parents trying to utilize the area at roughly the same time, it is likely that the drop-off/parking lot area can getcongested during peak use times. Currently, handicap access from the drop-off area is accomplished with a curb ramp. Due tothe lack of detectable warning surfaces, this route is not up to current ADA requirements. It is recommended that the parking lotand drop-off area be revised to create a greater separation of uses to increase safety and reduce confusion. At a minimum, anADA accessible route from the student drop-off loop to the building should be created.
On-Site ParkingCurrently, there are two separate areas with parking spaces located on the site. The main parking lot is immediately visibleupon site entry and contains approximately 130 spaces, five of which are designated as handicap accessible spaces. Of thefive handicap spaces, two are classified as van-accessible meeting the current ADA requirements for this lot. The other parkinglot is located in the same general area just to the west of the mechanical yard and loading area on the north side of the school.This lot contains 13 spaces however none are currently designated for handicap usage Although the main parking lotThis lot contains 13-spaces, however, none are currently designated for handicap usage. Although the main parking lotprovides an adequate ratio of handicap spaces, the smaller lot should provide a van accessible space as well in order to fullycomply with the current standards. On the surface, the parking lot is in fair condition. There are areas where curbs have beenbroken and substantial cracking is evident. However, the parking lot seems to offer an adequate number of spaces, and asidefrom the drop-off loop, it seems to be laid out in an orderly fashion. It is anticipated that the along with any other siteimprovements, the smaller lot will be required to provide a van accessible parking space.
On-Site LoadingThe loading area is located on the northwestern corner of the building, between the two parking areas noted above. Access isgained by following the main drive aisle of the parking lot all the way around to the building. Although this area appears to befunctioning as intended, there may be some traffic conflicts associated with the location of the loading area in relation to themain parking lot and drop-off loop. In terms of condition however, the hardscape surfaces associated with the loading area
27
appear to be holding up well.
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV E i ti C diti (C ti d)IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)
Existing Site (Continued)
SidewalksAlthough many of the areas are not in compliance with current ADA standards the site does provide a thorough layout forAlthough many of the areas are not in compliance with current ADA standards, the site does provide a thorough layout forpedestrian circulation. Linked together by the sidewalks of the Great Falls Road right-of-way, on-site sidewalks providemovement between the various athletic fields, playgrounds, bus loop and parking lots. Because of the topography, thesidewalks that come in from the northeastern side of the parking lot and bus loop currently present an area too steep tocontribute to an accessible route. In fact, grades in excess of eight percent were measured in this area. Areas closer to thebuilding do not have the same gradient issues; however, severe cracking has ruined much sidewalks located next to thehandicap parking spaces In other places such as the northwestern corner of the track issues such as poor drainage havehandicap parking spaces. In other places such as the northwestern corner of the track, issues such as poor drainage haveallowed sediment to accumulate. It should be anticipated that site improvements will likely include comprehensive sidewalkreplacement in order to bring all areas of the site within ADA compliance.
Fire AccessCurrently, there are no areas delineated as fire lanes. As the bus-loop and the student drop-off loop both meet the dimensional
i t f fi l it i d th t th h th dditi f i i t t d fi b id drequirements of a fire lane it is assumed that through the addition of signage or paint, up to code fire access can be provided.As the building does have sprinklers, accessibility from both sides can be accomplished within the 500-feet maximum allowed.In either case it can be anticipated that fire truck access to the rear of the building will likely be required with any proposedimprovements.
Site TopographyGenerally, the property slopes from a high-point in the northeast to the southern and western corners of the site. Essentially thesite is relatively flat, however, portions of the property along the eastern boundary boast steep slopes, limiting access optionsoff of Great Falls Road. Retaining walls should be anticipated if proposed site improvements include the alteration of grades inthe eastern portions of the site.
VegetationgThe majority of significant on-site vegetation is concentrated around the perimeter of the property. Here, it will be likely thatmultiple significant trees and areas classified as forest cover can be encountered. It will be important to coordinate siteimprovements to avoid disturbance of any large trees on-site during construction. If the proposed improvements involveimpacts to specimen trees, a variance of the forest conservation law will need to be approved by the City Arborist.
28
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV E i ti C diti (C ti d)IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)
Existing Site (Continued)
Water and SewerThe existing building is served by two sanitary sewer house connections to the 8-inch mainline that runs through the propertyThe existing building is served by two sanitary sewer house connections to the 8 inch mainline that runs through the propertyon the southern side of the existing building. It is assumed that the sanitary sewer service is sufficiently meeting the currentneeds of the building and should also meet the needs of any prospective improvements. The 8” mainline running through theproperty will require relocation and need to be filed and approved by the City of Rockville.Water service is currently gained through a water house connection which runs through the bus-loop and connects to the 10-inch mainline in the Great Falls Road right-of-way. It is assumed that the existing water service is of sufficient capacity to meetthe needs of the prospective improvementsthe needs of the prospective improvements.Per the fire flow test conducted on 03-28-11 on the mainline in Great Falls Road, pressures were determined to be between 42psi and 58 psi. It is assumed that the existing domestic water service is of sufficient capacity to meet the needs of theprospective improvements.
Gas, Electric and Telephone, Etc.All tilit i ti d ith th i i li i th G t F ll R d i ht f El t i d t l hAll utility service connections are made with the main service lines in the Great Falls Road right-of-way. Electric and telephoneservice connections come into the building on the north side from overhead lines which run along the northern property line intothe right-of-way. Gas service is obtained in the same area and connects to the main in Great Falls Road as well. There are noother dry utility service connections known on-site. It should be noted that there are a number of utility poles along the GreatFalls Road right-of-way and the north and northwest property lines. Should site improvements be proposed in these areas,there could be the potential for utility pole relocations.
Storm Drainage and Stormwater ManagementAll stormwater is currently conveyed to the southwestern corner of the site, where it is eventually discharged to the lowerelevations adjacent to Interstate 270. Runoff in the bus loop and the parking lot are piped and treated by an oil/grit separatorlocated on the western edge of the main parking lot. It should be noted that there is an existing Stormwater ManagementEasement associated with the oil/grit separator. After treatment the water is then piped to the southwestern corner of theg p p pproperty via 21" RCP. All remaining runoff sheet-flows to the vegetated areas between the property and Interstate-270.It can be anticipated that site improvements will be required to include Environmental Site Design (ESD) to the maximum extentpracticable in order to treat all areas inside the limits of disturbance. If ESD efforts are exhausted and the site has still not beenable to reach a hydrologic state of “woods in good condition,” then structural practices may be permitted as determined by TheCity of Rockville.
29
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV E i ti C diti (C ti d)IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)
Existing Site (Continued)
Potential ESD stormwater management practices for the site include both micro-scale practices and alternative surfaces. Micro-scale facilities could include the utilization of bio-swales and micro-bioretention facilities where available open space can be found, such as parking lot islands and around the athletic fields. Alternative surfaces would include vegetative roofing forbuilding additions as well as permeable pavements. Permeable pavements could be utilized instead of traditional hardscapes in all areas where heavy loading or significant fill are not required.
Site SoilsPer the Soil Survey of Montgomery County, Maryland the predominant soils on the site are in the Glenelg, Baile, Legore and y g y y y p g gWheaton series. According to the USDA, the depth to bedrock is usually greater than five feet in all of these soils. However, it should be noted that this estimated depth is based upon virgin soils. Because the site was previously disturbed, bedrock could be encountered at shallower depths. It will be necessary to perform site-specific borings to establish the actual depths to bedrock. In terms of hydrology, Glenelg, Wheaton, and Legore soil groups are characteristically known to provide good drainage and allow adequate infiltration. With a ‘B’ hydrologic soil group classification and typical groundwater depths greater than five feet,allow adequate infiltration. With a B hydrologic soil group classification and typical groundwater depths greater than five feet, limitations on stormwater management facilities and significant anti-flotation measures are not anticipated for site improvements proposed on these soils. Baile soil groups however, are characteristically known to have high groundwater depths and poor drainage. It should be noted that there may be some restrictions on the types of stormwater management facilities that can be utilized in areas where these soils are present.
Flood Plains Stream Valley Buffers and Non Tidal WetlandsFlood Plains, Stream Valley Buffers and Non-Tidal WetlandsInitial investigations reveal that the site is safely located outside of a floodplain in a zone “X” on FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map number 24031C0333D. Furthermore, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Mapping services there are no nationally recognized wetlands located on or around the site.
30
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV E i ti C diti (C ti d)IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)
Existing Building (Continued)
MECHANICAL
GeneralJulius West Middle School was originally constructed in 1961, with an addition in 1964, and a very small addition in 1976. During the 1992-1993 school year, a systemic modernization was performed, along with a 19,000 square foot addition, bringing the school to its present 147,223 square feet. This modernization included upgrades to the building’s mechanical and plumbing equipment. It appears that most of the mechanical and plumbing equipment within the building dates back to the 1993 renovation with the exception of the water heater and some of the piping systems Since this piping is 50 years old we arerenovation, with the exception of the water heater and some of the piping systems. Since this piping is 50 years old, we arevery concerned about the interior condition of the piping. If it is decided to replace this equipment in the near future, all of the associated piping should be replaced.
Heating SystemsTwo steel boilers produce heating water for the building. These boilers were installed during the 1993 renovation and appear to b i d ki diti Th b il f t i B h B il C (M d l 4FW 360A) d th b il fbe in good working condition. The boiler manufacturer is Burnham Boiler Company (Model 4FW-360A) and the boilers are of the fire tube type design with a built-in base. This equipment has a gross output rating of 3,015 mbh per boiler. While the existing boilers are functioning adequately to satisfy the existing school, there does not appear to be enough surplus capacity to support any large addition proposed for this school. The existing boilers were sized to handle 30 btu/hr per square foot based on the industry standard of each boiler being sized for two-thirds of the load as a back-up arrangement if one boiler fails. The 30 btu/hr/sf is marginal even for a well-insulated modern day building. Another concern is that the present installation does not meet the requirements of the current CSD-1 boiler code. The code requires three feet of clearance on three sides of the boiler and above, as well as five feet of clearance in front of the boiler. The three side clearances appear to be available but the five-foot clearance in front is not available for one boiler. Currently, each boiler is provided with one low-water cut-off. There is no automatic low-water cut-off back-up provided. Flues from each boiler connect together into one flue that connects to one masonry stack. Each gas-fired boiler-burner is manufactured by Gordon Piatt. The Gordon Piatt Company is no longer in business and parts for burners are difficult to acquire. The combustion air openings are two louvers in the wall with combustion p q p gair dampers. Each louver is dedicated to a boiler. The present combustion air arrangement does not comply with the current International Mechanical Code (IMC).
Heating water is supplied to the building through the two-pipe chilled/heating water pumps, which will be explained further in the report. The system is equipped with an air separator, shot feeder, and an air-charged expansion tank.
31
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV E i ti C diti (C ti d)IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)
Existing Building (Continued)
MECHANICAL (Continued)
It is anticipated that the existing expansion tank capacity is not capable of supporting any planned building additions. Theexisting tank could be replaced with a diaphragm type to serve the heating system if the existing piping system were expanded.
The existing boiler room still has the original incinerator that connects to the other masonry stack in the building. The incinerator is no longer being used since they were disallowed by the EPA for use in occupied areas. The brick unit could beremoved but must be disassembled so asbestos can be removed and disposed of to meet today's standardsremoved but must be disassembled so asbestos can be removed and disposed of to meet today s standards.
Also located in the lower level boiler room, is a Trane Centravac water-cooled chiller (Model CVHE-456). The centrifugal 456-ton chiller was installed as part of the 1993 modernization and is in reasonably good condition. The chiller uses R-123 refrigerant, which is to be phased out in the next couple of years. We are not aware of any acceptable refrigerant replacement for R-123. There is no excess chiller capacity to support any additions to the building. The chiller is located in the same room
th b il hi h i t d d d t th ibilit f f i t l k A f i t it i t h bas the boiler, which is not recommended due to the possibility of a refrigerant leak. A refrigerant monitoring system has been installed which will shutdown the boilers and water heater and activate the exhaust fan if a refrigerant leak is detected.There are three end-suction pumps that serve the chilled/heating water system and condenser water system. The pump discharge is connected together with a manual valve to separate pump flows. One pump handles the chilled/heating water supply for the building, one pump handles the condenser water loop between the chiller and outside cooling tower for the heatrejection from the chiller, and the one pump in the middle of the group is a standby pump for either loop. By opening certain valves and closing others, pumps can serve either system until repairs are made.
Outside mounted at grade is a Baltimore Air Coil (BAC) forced draft cooling tower with a "Baltibond" coating. The cooling tower (Model VTI-307-OCR) is in very good condition Cooling towers normally only have a maximum life of 20 years, however the Baltibond coating may have extended its life and could be why it is presently in such good condition. None of the exterior water piping is heat traced or insulated which would indicate that the tower is drained every year to prevent pipe from freezing. Thep p g y y p p p gdrains from the cooling tower discharge into a small drain pit and appear to be connected to the storm water system. Presentday codes require these drains to be connected to the sanitary piping system due to the chemical treatment systems that are used on the condenser water loop to extend the life of the piping system. The chemical treatment system is located in the boiler room under the stairs. The system can remain as is for now but when the cooling tower is replaced, MCPS will either have to change the drain arrangement or use one of the new electronic filter type units that do not use any chemicals.
32
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV E i ti C diti (C ti d)IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)
Existing Building (Continued)
MECHANICAL (Continued)
I dditi t hill d t l di t i (DX) t li t i t ithi th b ildi Th DX tIn addition to chilled water, several direct expansion (DX) type cooling systems exist within the building. These DX systemsserve the computer lab, "IT" terminal room(s), administration area, and several air-handling units (AHUs) with interior spaces.These spaces typically require cooling operation at times when chilled water is not available.
HVAC SystemsThe heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems vary slightly throughout the building. Most systems were installedduring the 1993 modernization and appear to be in good condition. The following is a breakdown of the various spaces andtheir associated HVAC system:
•Typical Classroom: Classrooms are heated and cooled through fan-coil units and unit ventilators connected to the building'stwo-pipe chilled/heating water system. Some units have a direct outdoor air connection through a louver mounted in theexterior wall. An exhaust register is provided for each classroom to maintain proper room pressurization. Exhaust air fromg p p p pseveral classrooms is ducted to a fan. Units were installed during the 1993 modernization and appear to be in good workingcondition.
•Air-handling units serve the various Tech ED areas on the lower level of the building. Each unit has supply, return, and outsideair. Units are Trane modular type and are in good condition. Each unit has two coils, one connected to the two-pipechilled/heating water system and the other coil is a DX cooling coil that is activated when cooling is needed and chilled water ischilled/heating water system and the other coil is a DX cooling coil that is activated when cooling is needed and chilled water isnot available. There appear to be five AHU's on the lower level creating five temperature control zones.
•AHU's serve several large areas on the first floor that also have dedicated units. These areas include Cafeteria and Media.The Gymnasium also has a dedicated unit but it is designed for heating only, even though the two-pipe system is connected tothe unit. The air-conditioning portion is blocked by control valves so cooling cannot be activated.
•Administration and Health Suite: The air-handling unit serving the administration and health suite areas is located in thebuilding’s mechanical room. This unit is equipped with both a combination chilled/heating water coil and an additional DXcooling coil. This DX coil provides cooling at times when building chilled water is not available. This unit and associatedcomponents appear to be in good working condition and were installed as part of the 1993 modernization. No switch operatedexhaust fan is provided for the Health Suite area. This fan is recommended for situations where odors need to be purged fromh H l h S i
33
the Health Suite area..
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV E i ti C diti (C ti d)IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)
Existing Building (Continued)
MECHANICAL (Continued)
• Building Exhaust Systems: Roof-mounted fans remove exhaust air throughout the building. These fans and associated roofcurbs appear to be in good condition and were installed during the 1993 modernization. There are select fans that havedamage to their external housing; however, these fans appear to still be operating.
Control SystemThe existing control system for the school is a pneumatic control system Major valves dampers and sensor components areThe existing control system for the school is a pneumatic control system. Major valves, dampers and sensor components areprovided with pneumatic operation. Building control is interfaced with the central MCPS energy management control system foroccupied/unoccupied settings. A duplex type air compressor system complete with a horizontal storage tank is located withinthe boiler room and serves the building’s pneumatic control components. Air supplied from this compressor system is fedthrough a refrigerated dryer system. Both the air compressor and refrigerated dryer systems appear to be in good workingcondition.
Plumbing System
The existing water service to the building should be adequate for the addition but cannot be determined until building layoutsare further developed. New plumbing fixtures used today, like water closets, use less water than in the past but require morepressure due to the pressure drop at the fixture. Existing water closet only requires 25 psi to operate. Present day waterclosets need 35 psi to operate properly. The existing static water pressure is 57 psi total. The need for a booster pump will bereviewed based on line losses and elevation of fixtures.
Domestic hot water was designed in 1993 to be generated by two gas-fired water heaters, with a capacity of about 150 to 200gallons each. Today water heater No. 1 has been disconnected and is sitting empty on the floor. Water heater No. 2 has beenreplaced by an 80-gallon gas-fired heater manufactured by Jetglas with 450 mbh gas input. The heater looks to be one to twop y g g y g g pyears old and is in very good condition, however we are concerned with it being able to satisfy the present school's hot waterdemand. A domestic hot water circulation pump maintains a continuous hot water flow throughout the building. The system isnot equipped with an expansion tank or mixing valve, which is typically provided on today’s new systems. Based on theplumbing requirements of the planned addition, an additional hot water heater is required.
34
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV E i ti C diti (C ti d)IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)
Existing Building (Continued)
PLUMBING (Continued)
Plumbing fixtures appear to be in good condition and were installed as part of the 1993 modernization. The water closets arefloor-mounted, urinals are wall-hung, and the lavatories are individual wall-hung type. The school is equipped with plumbingfixtures that meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
Fire Protection SystemThe building is currently provided with sprinkler coverage throughout A 6 inch fire line is provided with a 6 inch double checkThe building is currently provided with sprinkler coverage throughout. A 6-inch fire line is provided with a 6-inch double-checktype backflow preventer. This fire line serves five zone valve assemblies, four wet and one dry pipe, each located within theboiler room. Sprinkler mains extend from each zone valve assembly and serve sprinkler heads located in respective zones onthe first and second floors. Sprinkler system components appear to be in good condition. The existing 6-inch fire serviceappears adequately sized to support any planned additions to the school.
ELECTRICALELECTRICAL
Power DistributionThe school is fed from a PEPCO transformer located outside the building in an underground vault. The main distributionswitchboard located in the Main Electrical Room is rated 2000-amp, 277/480 volts, 3-phase, 4-wire with a single main fusedload break switch in the switchboard. The switchboard is manufactured by General Electric and was installed in 1994. Thereare three distribution sections that consist of fused switches. The fused switches serve the chiller and mechanical equipment,elevators, approximately seven panelboards, portable classrooms, and a step down transformer. There is another disconnectswitch for the emergency power that is tapped ahead of the mains in the switchboard. The emergency disconnect switch servesthe automatic transfer switch. The switchboard feeds the lighting panelboards throughout the building that, in turn, serve dry-type transformers that feed the building receptacles and other 120/208 panelboards.
Panelboards and dry-type transformers are generally located in closets throughout the building. Each location has a 277/480-volt panelboard for lighting, a dry-type 480-120/208-volt transformer, and 120/208-volt panelboards receptacles and small loads.Panelboards throughout the school were installed in 1994 and appear to be in good condition.
Typical classrooms have receptacles on all four walls. The front and rear walls have quad receptacles for computers.Receptacles along the window wall are located in the toe space below the cabinets
35
Receptacles along the window wall are located in the toe space below the cabinets.
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV E i ti C diti (C ti d)IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)
Existing Building (Continued)
ELECTRICAL (Continued)
There is no dedicated computer power distribution system in the school.
Emergency PowerThere is an emergency generator that provides power through the automatic transfer switch for life safety systems such asemergency lighting, fire alarm system, etc. The generator is a 30 kW Olympian, made by Generac, natural gas fueled unit. Theautomatic transfer switch is an Olympian unit rated approximately 100 amps 277/480 volt The transfer switch servesautomatic transfer switch is an Olympian unit, rated approximately 100 amps, 277/480-volt. The transfer switch servespanelboards EML and EMH in the main electrical room.
LightingFluorescent lighting is used throughout the school. The standard fixture is a 2’ x 4’ recessed lensed fixture.
Fi Al S tFire Alarm SystemThere are several fire alarm panels located in the Main Electrical Room. The main fire alarm panel appears to be a CerberusPyrotronics Panel. There are also several panels manufactured by Silent Knight, including a voice activation panel and a signalpower expander. A Radionics digital communicator by Ark Systems is also present. Fire alarm devices include manual pullstations, duct and area smoke detectors, and audible and visual notification devices.
Intercom and Sound SystemsThe school intercom system is located in a storage room off the main office area. The system manufacturer is RaulandTelecenter. The system has the capability to perform select local calls to classrooms or paging throughout the school. Eachclassroom area has a speaker and a call switch. Speakers are also located throughout the corridors. The system has somespare capacity for additional rooms. However, an upgraded system will be required.
Telephone SystemThe telephone system is a separate key system for telephones in the school offices. The telephone company demarcationpoint is in the Main Electrical Room. The telephone switch is located in the storage room off the main office area, next to theintercom system.
36
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
IV E i ti C diti (C ti d)IV. Existing Conditions (Continued)
Existing Building (Continued)
ELECTRICAL (Continued)
Cable TV SystemCable TV outlets are located in rooms throughout the school. The Blonder Tongue head-end equipment is included in the Data Room next to the Media Storage Room. TV’s are mounted on carts with VCR’s and not permanently mounted in classrooms. There are several Smart Boards in classrooms.
Security SystemSecurity SystemThe security system consists of an intrusion detection system. The intrusion detection system includes keypads and motion sensors in the corridors and door switches on the exterior doors. The main panel is a Magnum Alert system with keypads located in the main office and Building Services Office.
Data Wiring SystemA C t 5E i i t i i t ll d th h t th h l Thi t id ti it f th t l b M diA Category 5E wiring system is installed throughout the school. This system provides connectivity for the computer lab, Media Center, offices, and classrooms. Each typical classroom has both student and teacher outlets. Computer power for classroomsis from the normal receptacle circuits. Separate computer power receptacles have not been provided. The main file server islocated in the Media Director’s Office/ Media Storage Room. The room’s equipment includes a Dell file server cabinet, UPS equipment, and rack and wall-mounted distribution equipment.
37
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O tiV. Description of Options
General
Three design options for expanding Julius West Middle School have been developed in response to MCPS EducationalSpecifications Each option addresses the incorporation of instructional requirements and the physical impact to the schoolSpecifications. Each option addresses the incorporation of instructional requirements and the physical impact to the schoolin a different manner, as well as addressing different approaches to improving site access and circulation.
All three options propose a two-story addition to the rear of the existing building, along the south face, with differentconfigurations for each option. Connecting the proposed addition to the existing building and its systems, will requiredifferent degrees of renovation work within the existing building. Additional renovation work, with regard to relocating orreorganizing programs within the existing building differs slightly for all three options Modifications to the existing schoolreorganizing programs within the existing building, differs slightly for all three options. Modifications to the existing schoolhave been kept to a minimum, such that it will not interfere with the occupancy of the school. Work required in existingoccupied areas can be accomplished during summer break. All proposed work occurs in and connects to the ground, firstand second floors of the existing building.
It is anticipated that the proposed scope of work will take 18 months of construction utilizing two summers when the schoolis empty.
Common Design Elements
Building
The following renovations and proposed additions are common to all three options.
• The two original technology labs, located on the ground floor, have been subdivided into smaller instructional spaces utilizing drywall partitions. The area will be completely renovated to meet current multipurpose technology lab curriculum and multipurpose lab requirements.
• The existing classroom located at the north east corner, adjacent to the health room, will be subdivided for a guidance conference room, and two assistant principal offices. The renovated classroom has been accounted for in all proposed options.
• The existing guidance conference room will be repurposed to a guidance counselor’s office.
38
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V Description of Options (Continued)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Common Design Elements (Continued)
Building (Continued)
• An add alternate security entrance will be added to the administration suite by renovating an existing assistant principal’s office located adjacent to the main entrance vestibule. The security entrance will meet current MCPS operational configuration.
• A 800 sf expansion of the existing cafeteria to increase seating has been added. The small staff dining area adjacent to the kitchen, will be renovated to add an additional serving line as well as kitchen support space., g pp p
• The existing staff lounge located by the media center will be renovated to provide space for a METS classroom and storage room.
• The two new auxiliary gymnasiums have been located adjacent to the existing gymnasium and locker rooms. The configuration of the auxiliary gymnasiums are arranged to allow for a possible operable partition between the two auxiliaryconfiguration of the auxiliary gymnasiums are arranged to allow for a possible operable partition between the two auxiliary gymnasium spaces.
Site Modifications
Currently no relocatable classrooms are located on the school site. It is anticipated that prior to the completion of the proposedaddition enrollment at the school will require relocatable classrooms The location of future relocatable classrooms should beaddition, enrollment at the school will require relocatable classrooms. The location of future relocatable classrooms should belimited to the existing basketball court and tennis court area located on the west side of the facility. This area will allow accessfrom an existing stairwell located on the west in addition to being closely located to the existing main electrical room. Thislocation will afford easy access by emergency vehicles and also not require movement of relocatable classrooms duringconstruction.
P ki d Sit Ci l tiParking and Site Circulation
Currently buses and cars enter the school at the same entrance. In the proposed bus loop reconfiguration the site has oneentrance and exit for buses and a separate entrance and exit for cars. The proposed bus entrance will be on axis with theentrance of the church across Great Falls Road. Additional capacity of the bus loop will be achieved by increasing the lengthtowards the south of the site. New ADA sidewalks and ramps will be utilized to provide access to parking lots, bus loop and
39
play fields.
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Common Design Elements (Continued)
modification of site circulation will vary slightly among the three proposed options, they will be generally modified for all optionsas follows:as follows:
Provide separate access points for bus and car traffic by separating the shared entrance point. This will alleviate thecongestion that occurs in the morning and afternoons as buses enter and cars attempt to leave.
Reconfiguration of ADA parking spaces to provide full compliance with new guidelines.
Installation of detectable warning surfaces at curb ramps.g p
Provide passenger loading zone in accordance with ADA requirements in both the bus and student-drop off.
By improving traffic flow through the site and separating ingress and egress for buses and student drop-off traffic congestionwill be reduced and overall site safety for all users is improved. In addition, adequate ADA-compliant handicap parking spacesand access routes will be provided as required in connection with any improvements to the site and school.
Site Features
Three retaining walls of various heights from 4 feet to 8 feet high will be required in several locations around the perimeter ofthe proposed bus loop. The existing school marquee sign will be relocated along Great Falls Road.
Playfields and Paved AreasPlayfields and Paved Areas
In all options, the playfield and paved surface area requirements have been meet. The playfields and all paved areas willremain on the southern and western ends of the site. In all options, the playfields and track have been modified toaccommodate the proposed addition. Additional improvements include the following:
A new outdoor storage building adjacent to the auxiliary gymnasium addition A new outdoor storage building adjacent to the auxiliary gymnasium addition.
Three separate softball fields which include improvement to existing lower field water drainage issues.
Two additional tennis courts are located at the west of the existing four tennis courts.
Relocation of three basketball courts to allow for the new tennis courts.
ADA l fi ld
40
ADA access ramp to lower fields.
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Common Design Elements (Continued)
Utilities
A connection to the existing public water service, will be provided to serve the proposed additions. A connection to the existing sanitary sewer service, will be provided to serve the proposed additions. Relocation of an existing 8” sewer line will be required. Existing electric and telephone services need to be discussed with the utility companies when final loads are
established during design.
Building structural system
The two-story addition proposed in all options will be constructed of steel frame construction and masonry walls. Theaddition will be supported by a network of steel columns and beams, which will sit on concrete spread footings. Where thenew addition lies adjacent to the existing building, the new building will be supported by a steel frame on continuous
f f fconcrete footings. The ground floor will be concrete slab-on-grade, and the main floor will be a composite concrete slab onmetal deck, supported by steel joists and/or beams, and the steel superstructure. The roof will be a extensive vegetativeroof system over built-up roofing on metal deck, supported by steel joists and/or beams. The horizontal elements of theroof structure will be sloped at a minimum of 1/4” per 1’-0”, so as to provide adequate roof drainage. Exterior walls will beinsulated masonry cavity walls, consisting of a CMU backup on the interior side, and a masonry veneer such as brick onthe exterior side. Interior masonry walls will be single-wythe CMU walls. All masonry walls will be internally reinforced,both horizontally and vertically.
Mechanical
HVAC SystemBased on the proposed size of the addition, the existing boilers and chiller do not have the capacity needed to satisfyBased on the proposed size of the addition, the existing boilers and chiller do not have the capacity needed to satisfyconditions. For this reason, we recommend a new boiler room and air-cooled chiller be added to handle the new addition.Any changes in the present boiler room will require an upgrade to the systems to meet present day codes, which would becostly. The existing equipment is in good condition and should last another 10 to 15 years.
41
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Common Design Elements (Continued)
MECHANICAL (Continued)
We considered providing a different type of system in the new addition but providing two different HVAC systems in aschool for a long period of time can lead to improper operation of some of the equipment.
The HVAC system for the new addition would be a two-pipe system. The boiler would provide heating water and an air-cooled chiller would provide chilled water. An air-cooled chiller is recommended due to the small tonnage required. Two b t d d ti d i l d/l t ill l th hill d/h ti t t th dditi S tbase-mounted end-suction pumps arranged in a lead/lag setup will supply the chilled/heating water to the addition. System accessories such as expansion tank and air separator will be provided. The controls for the new addition will be direct digital controls (DDC). The existing school system controls will be integrated into the new system, as required, to simplifybuilding operations.
Plumbing SystemsThe existing domestic cold and hot water system will be extendable to pick-up the new addition. The existing gas-firedwater heater will be replaced to satisfy the added demand from the addition. Accessories should be added to the waterheater, such as expansion tank and water temperature controller, to meet the present code and manufacturer’srequirements. The new plumbing fixtures will be designed to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and will utilizewater conservation features. Floor-mounted water closets will utilize dual action flush valves with 1.6 gallons or 1.0 gallonper flush. Urinals will be wall-hung with flush valves supplying one-pint per flush. Wall-hung cast-iron lavatories will utilizep g pp y g p p gself-closing faucets that supply 0.5 gallons per minute. The water consumption figures noted are equal to or less thanthose required by code.
Fire Protection SystemThe present fire protection system for the existing school building will be extended to handle the new addition. Based onfirewall separation requirements a new sprinkler zone will be created to serve the new addition Also any air-handling unitfirewall separation requirements, a new sprinkler zone will be created to serve the new addition. Also, any air handling unitsupplying 2,000 cfm or more to a space will be equipped with smoke detectors in the supply and return air ductwork tomeet present codes.
42
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V. Description of Options (Continued)p p ( )
Common Design Elements (Continued)
Electrical
P Di t ib tiPower DistributionThe existing service switchboard is not adequate to serve the new construction. The existing demand load may be smallenough to allow for the new addition, however, the size of the main switchboard is smaller than the MCPS standard formiddle schools and the space available for additional fused switches to be installed in the switchboard is limited. To reusethe existing switchboard would require tapping the bus of the switchboard for a new breaker that would need to beapproximately 1000A. There is no room in the existing electrical room for this new breaker that would be within the code-required 25 feet for a bus tap. Therefore, a new switchboard and power company service is anticipated.
The new service switchboard will be located in a new electrical room in the addition to minimize power outages. The newswitchboard will backfeed the existing switchboard to minimize the impact on the existing electrical system. Alternatively,the new switchboard could replace the existing in the same location. This would be preferred so that the impact on theservice from the power company would be lessened.p p y
A new electrical closet will also be created on each floor in the new addition for the branch circuit panelboards and dry-typetransformers.
The panelboards and associated feeders located throughout the existing building will remain. New 277/480-voltpanelboards will serve lighting and mechanical loads in the new addition. K-rated dry-type transformers in the addition willpanelboards will serve lighting and mechanical loads in the new addition. K rated dry type transformers in the addition willfeed 120/208-volt panelboards for computer power in the new addition. Designated receptacles in all new classrooms willbe connected to the computer power panelboards.
General receptacles in the addition will be connected to new “normal” 120/208-volt panelboards. New conduits will beconcealed in new walls. Where existing walls remain, surface metal raceway will be used to conceal wiring.
Emergency PowerThe current MCPS standard is to provide standby power for heating system components required to keep the building fromfreezing. The existing generator is not large enough to accomplish this task. A larger generator will be required toaccommodate both the life safety and the heating loads of the addition required for freeze protection. The new generatorcan also be sized large enough to serve the heating loads in the existing building required for freeze protection. A second
t ti t f it h ill d t b dd d t t th f i h ti l d
43
automatic transfer switch will need to be added to support these non-freezing heating loads.
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Common Design Elements (Continued)
Electrical (Continued)
LightingMCPS standard classroom lighting will be provided in the classrooms of the new addition. This will consist of high efficientfluorescent pendant fixtures. Lighting controls will include occupancy sensors and multiple levels of lighting.
Fire Alarm SystemFire Alarm SystemThe existing fire alarm control panels will remain. A new addressable fire alarm system will be provided for the addition. Thenew and old panels will be interconnected. Initiation devices and notification devices will be located to meet coderequirements.
Intercom and Sound SystemsNew intercom devices will be provided throughout the addition including call switches and speakers.
The existing Telecenter head-end console will be upgraded to increase the capacity for the new spaces.
Voice, Data, and Video SystemsThe existing voice, data, and video cabling system will be expanded to the new addition. The number of outlets in each roomwill comply with MCPS and Maryland State requirements. A new telecommunications closet will be required on each floor inthe addition to serve the new classrooms.
Security SystemThe existing security system will be expanded to the addition. Intrusion detection will include motion sensors and doorThe existing security system will be expanded to the addition. Intrusion detection will include motion sensors and doorcontacts.
44
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Option One (Preferred)
Descriptionp
Option One achieves the program requirements with the construction of one large two-story addition located on the southface of the existing facility, as noted previously. Characteristics of this option are as follows:
Proposed Addition
Option One achieves the program requirements by the construction of one large two-story addition located on the southface of the existing building. The western portion of the addition comprises of a ground floor and first floor. The easternportion of the addition has a first floor and a second floor. In both cases the alignment of existing floor levels is achievedand a seamless transition has been designed. The ground floor of the addition will align with the existing ground floor leveland will house three classrooms and mechanical support space. The first floor of the addition comprises of two auxiliarygymnasiums a staff lounge four classrooms as well as several instructional and support spaces The second floor of thegymnasiums, a staff lounge, four classrooms, as well as several instructional and support spaces. The second floor of theaddition, connecting to the second floor of the existing building, contains five new classrooms, a team room and a textstorage room. Corridors are provided throughout the addition and connect to the existing building circulation and theexterior, creating a partial loop circulation on the first floor. Two new stairs are provided, one at the far south end of theaddition for both circulation and emergency egress. An additional stair has been centrality located adjacent to the newcourtyard to improve vertical circulation and decrease travel distance between the second floor addition and core buildingspaces. The courtyard is provided between the addition and the existing building to give the interior spaces access tonatural light. As previously noted, additional space has been added to the existing multipurpose room by expanding thenorthern portion towards the parking lot.
Existing Facility Modifications
The majority of existing facility modifications have been previously noted in the common building design elements. Severalexisting support spaces have been relocated to allow for the new corridor connections on both floors. The existing stairwelllocated adjacent to the addition will be filled in and will house the displaced spaces.
45
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V. Description of Options (Continued)
Preferred Option One – Site PlanBASKETBALL
COURTS
TENNISCOURTS EXISTING
BUILDINGPROPOSEDOUTDOOR
11 PARKING SPACES
1 HC SPACE
BUILDING
120 PARKING SPACES
5 HC SPACES
STORAGE PROPOSEDCAFETERIA ADDITION
MAINENTRANCE
SOFTBALLFEILDS
CARS
PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
CARS IN AND
OUT
BUSES INAND OUT
PROPOSEDADDITION
0 40’ 80’ 160’
RE-ALIGNED TRACK RETAINING WALL
46
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)Preferred Option One – Ground Floor Plan
KEY
C CORRIDORCL CLOSETCR CLASSROOMHR HEALTH ROOME ELECTRICALE ELECTRICALEL ELEVATORJ JANITORSM MECHANICALO OFFICES STORAGET TOILET
1. BOILER ROOM2 AUXILARY GYM
12
355 T
J
J
TT
1010
1211
O
M
S
45CRCRCR
S
E
2. AUXILARY GYM3. BUILDING SERVICES4. GENERAL TECH LAB5. MULTIPURPOSE LAB6. STAGE7. NOT USED8. NOT USED9. ESOL10. HEALTH11 HEALTH STORAGE
TT
MEL
12
MM
OC
11. HEALTH STORAGE12. HEALTH OFFICE
0 20’ 40’ 80’
47
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d) KEY (CONTINUED)V. Description of Options (Continued)Option One – First Floor Plan
KEY (CONTINUED)
C CORRIDORCL CLOSETCR CLASSROOMHR HEALTH ROOME ELECTRICALEL ELEVATORJ JANITORSM MECHANICAL
1514
53 5354
13. TRASH14. ART15. KILN ROOM16. ART OFFICE17. DOCK18 STAFF LOUNGE
M MECHANICALO OFFICES STORAGET TOILET
J
13
1416
14
S
17ST
1920
S
MS
S4849
49
SS50
51
52 52TT
5451 CR
ELS
6218
22
S
9
39
C
C C 18. STAFF LOUNGE19. KITCHEN20. KITCHEN OFFICE21. MULTIPURPOSE ROOM22. COUNSELOR OFFICES23. GUIDANCE OFFICE24. RECORDS25. GUIDANCE CONFERENCE26. VESTIBULE27 ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL
6119S
21
39
S39
M
CR
S
40M
4041 T
TJ
48
CLCL CL
47
CRCRCRCR
67
T
T
65
64
6S
9
5966
C
MAIN
ENTRANCE
28. PRINCIPAL29. ADMINISTRATION OFFICE30. SECRETARY31. FINANCE32. SUSPENSION33. ADMIN CONFERENCE34. SCHOOL STORE35. THERAPY36 SPPECH
27. ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL22222222
23
24
26
29CR
CR
CR CR
CR
T
42 43
M
41
41
4445
4647
63
6
C
C
36. SPPECH37. SCIENCE38. SCIENCE PREP39. TEAM ROOM40. COMMUNICATION (MEDIA)41. MEDIA STORAGE42. MEDIA OFFICE43. MEDIA WORK ROOM44. CONTROL ROOM45 EDIT ROOM
M
252727
28
29
29
30
3132SST 33
OT TMS26
34CR
CRCRCR
3536373837
T T M
55
CR
T
M EL
S
C
45. EDIT ROOM46. MEDIA CENTER47. COURTYARD48. GYM49. MUSIC50. MUSIC OFFICE51. LOCKER ROOM52. P.E. OFFICE53. SHOWER54 LAUNDRY0 20’ 40’ 80’
252727HRSO
26CRS
3536373837
48
54. LAUNDRY
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Option One – Second Floor Plan
C CORRIDORCL CLOSETCR CLASSROOMHR HEALTH ROOME ELECTRICALEL ELEVATORJ JANITORS
KEY (CONTINUED)
CR CR59
39
C J JANITORSM MECHANICALO OFFICES STORAGET TOILET
37. SCIENCE38. SCIENCE PREP
CRCRCRCR
55CR
CR
CR
CR
CR39
3959 CR CR 58T
T
56
57
CR
SO60 O
J
59
S
C
CC
55. COMPUTER LAB56. MATH57. MATH LAB58. READING59. TEXT STORAGE60. WORK ROOM61. ALTERNATE SERVING LINE
39. TEAM ROOM
CR
CRT
T
CR
CR
CR CR39
37
37O S
M
TT
CR CR CR T TM
S
6060
S
S
EL
SS
62. ALTERNATE PREP AREA KITCHEN63. ALTERNATE SECURITY ENTRANCE64. CAFETERIA ADDITION65. METS66. INSTRUCTIONAL DATA ASSISTANT67. OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY68. STAFF DEVELOPMENT
373837383738 373737 38
5539M
S
SC
0 20’ 40’ 80’
49
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Option One (Continued)
Advantages
The floor plan arrangement is compact and provides a looped circulation on the first floor. The addition efficiently divides classrooms between all three levels of the school increasing flexibility. The proposed connection to the existing school corridors will increase usage of the central north-south corridor. The compact nature of the addition as well as central location will have the least travel distance of the other proposed
options. Utilizing the ground floor for three additional classrooms will disperse classrooms and circulation in existing corridorsUtilizing the ground floor for three additional classrooms will disperse classrooms and circulation in existing corridors
more evenly. The proposed corridor layout will allow for straight sightlines at key corridor intersections. The majority of classroom windows will not face Interstate 270 which will result in a natural reduced noise levels in
classrooms. Construction is localized to one compact area. Location of auxiliary gymnasium maintains direct access to the fields from the existing north south corridor adjacent to Location of auxiliary gymnasium maintains direct access to the fields from the existing north-south corridor adjacent to
the existing gymnasium.
Disadvantages
The addition encroaches onto the playfields.
50
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Option Two
Descriptionp
Option Two achieves the program requirements with the construction of one large one-story and two-story addition locatedon the south face of the existing facility, as noted previously. Characteristics of this option are as follows:
Proposed Addition
Option Two achieves the program requirements by the construction of one large one-story and two-story addition locatedon the south face of the existing building, as noted previously. Both floors of the two-story area will connect to theirrespective floors in the existing building. On the first floor of the two-story area, there are seven classrooms, a staff loungeas well as several other instructional and support spaces. Located to the west of this area is a one-story area containingthe two new auxiliary gymnasiums. The second floor of the addition contains eight new classrooms, along with otherinstructional and support spaces Corridors are provided throughout the addition and connect to the existing buildinginstructional and support spaces. Corridors are provided throughout the addition and connect to the existing buildingcirculation and the exterior, creating a complete loop circulation on both floors. Two new stairs are provided, one at the fareastern end and the other stair located on the western side of the two-story area. The new stairs will facilitate verticalcirculation between the two floors of the addition, as well as providing egress from the second floor to the exterior. A two-story courtyard is provided between the addition and the existing building to give the interior spaces access to natural light.As previously noted, additional space has been added to the existing multipurpose room by expanding the northern portiontowards the parking lot.
Existing Facility Modifications
The majority of existing facility modifications have been previously noted in the common building design elements. Severalj y g y y g gexisting support spaces have been relocated to allow for the new western corridor connections on both floors. The existingstairwell located adjacent to the western corridor will be filled in and house the displaced spaces. The new easterncorridor will have connections to the existing corridor by renovating a classroom on each floor. The balance of spaceremaining will be converted into a team room and text storage on both floors. The two classroom spaces left have beenreplaced and are included in the new addition.
51
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Option Two – Site Plan
BASKETBALL COURTS
TENNISCOURTS EXISTING
BUILDING
11 PARKING SPACES
1 HC SPACE
BUILDING
120 PARKING SPACES
5 HC SPACES
PROPOSEDCAFETERIA ADDITION
PROPOSEDOUTDOOR STORAGE
MAINENTRANCE
SOFTBALLFEILDS
PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
TWO WAYTRAFFIC
BUSES INAND OUT
0 40’ 80’ 160’
PROPOSEDADDITION
RETAINING WALLRE-ALIGNED
TRACK
52
TRACK
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Option Two – Ground Floor Plan
KEY
C CORRIDORCL CLOSETCR CLASSROOMHR HEALTH ROOME ELECTRICAL
E12
355 T
J
J
TT
T
1010
1211
O
M
S
45
E ELECTRICALEL ELEVATORJ JANITORSM MECHANICALO OFFICES STORAGET TOILET
1. BOILER ROOM2 AUXILARY GYM
CMELMo
2. AUXILARY GYM3. BUILDING SERVICES4. GENERAL TECH LAB5. MULTIPURPOSE LAB6. STAGE7. NOT USED8. NOT USED9. ESOL10. HEALTH11 HEALTH STORAGE11. HEALTH STORAGE12. HEALTH OFFICE
0 20’ 40’ 80’
53
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d) KEY (CONTINUED)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Option Two – First Floor Plan
KEY (CONTINUED)
C CORRIDORCL CLOSETCR CLASSROOMHR HEALTH ROOME ELECTRICALEL ELEVATORJ JANITORSM MECHANICAL1553 53
13 13. TRASH14. ART15. KILN ROOM16. ART OFFICE17. DOCK18 STAFF LOUNGE
M MECHANICALO OFFICES STORAGET TOILET
J
1416
14
S
17ST
20
S
MS49
49
SS50
51
52 52TT
53 5354
51 CR
EL
622
2
S
C
C
64
18. STAFF LOUNGE19. KITCHEN20. KITCHEN OFFICE21. MULTIPURPOSE ROOM22. COUNSELOR OFFICES23. GUIDANCE OFFICE24. RECORDS25. GUIDANCE CONFERENCE26. VESTIBULE27 ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL
1920S
21
39S
M CR
S
40M40 41 T
TJ
4849
CLCL CL
CR
62
9
65
CR
S
TT M
S
59
SS
61
C
C
MAIN
ENTRANCE
28. PRINCIPAL29. ADMINISTRATION OFFICE30. SECRETARY31. FINANCE32. SUSPENSION33. ADMIN CONFERENCE34. SCHOOL STORE35. THERAPY36 SPPECH
27. ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL
22222222
23
24
26
18
CR
CR
CR
39
CR
CR
T
T
42 43
M
41
44 45
46
47
63
CR
TT
CR
CR CRS
SS
59
47
6
CC
ENTRANCE 36. SPPECH37. SCIENCE38. SCIENCE PREP39. TEAM ROOM40. COMMUNICATION (MEDIA)41. MEDIA STORAGE42. MEDIA OFFICE43. MEDIA WORK ROOM44. CONTROL ROOM45 EDIT ROOM
M
28
29
29
30
31 32SST 33
OT TM34
CRCRCR T T M
35
39
T41
MEL
63
CR CR
SS
59 S
C45. EDIT ROOM46. MEDIA CENTER47. COURTYARD48. GYM49. MUSIC50. MUSIC OFFICE51. LOCKER ROOM52. P.E. OFFICE53. SHOWER54 LAUNDRY0 20’ 40’ 80’
252727HROM
SO26
34CR
S3536373837
54
54. LAUNDRY
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Option Two – Second Floor Plan
C CORRIDORCL CLOSETCR CLASSROOMHR HEALTH ROOME ELECTRICALEL ELEVATORJ JANITORS
KEY (CONTINUED)
CRCR CR 58 T
J
CR T T 9 66
S
S
C39 59
J JANITORSM MECHANICALO OFFICES STORAGET TOILET
37. SCIENCE38. SCIENCE PREP
55CR
CR
CR
CR
CR39 T
56
57
CR
CR
37
SO60 O
TT
59
SS
59
CR
CRCR
CR
CR67
CCC
55. COMPUTER LAB56. MATH57. MATH LAB58. READING59. TEXT STORAGE60. WORK ROOM61. ALTERNATE SERVING LINE
39. TEAM ROOM
55
CRT
TCR
CR CR39
37
37O S
MCR CR CR T T
MS
S
60
S
S39 59
CRCR
CRCR
C
EL
62. ALTERNATE PREP AREA KITCHEN63. ALTERNATE SECURITY ENTRANCE64. CAFETERIA ADDITION65. METS66. INSTRUCTIONAL DATA ASSISTANT67. OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY68. STAFF DEVELOPMENT
373837383738 373737 38
0 20’ 40’ 80’
55
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Option Two (Continued)
Advantages
The new addition provides a looped circulation pattern on both the first and second floor.
Disadvantages
The addition is spread out onto two floors and will increases travel time to classrooms. Construction is more disruptive to studentsConstruction is more disruptive to students. The addition encroaches more onto the fields in the east-west direction. The addition does not engage the ground floor. The size of the addition is larger due to replacement of existing classrooms. Existing band room will not have natural light. Concern that increase circulation along the existing east-west corridor will create traffic jams between classes. Distance to new west stairwells on second floor is to far and not be utilized Distance to new west stairwells on second floor is to far and not be utilized. Existing north-south corridor adjacent to gymnasium does not lead directly to fields.
56
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Option Three
Descriptionp
Option Three achieves the program requirements with the construction of one large two-story addition located on thesoutheast face of the existing facility and a one-story addition located on the southwest corner of the existing facility, asnoted previously. Characteristics of this option are as follows:
Proposed AdditionProposed Addition
Option Three achieves the program requirements by the construction of one large two-story addition located on thesoutheast face of the existing building, as noted previously. Unlike Options One and Two, the addition is skewed at a 45degree angle relative to the existing building. The first floor of the addition, which will connect to the first floor of theexisting building, contains six classrooms, a computer lab, staff lounge, mechanical room, as well as several otherinstructional and support spaces The second floor of the addition connecting to the second floor of the existing buildinginstructional and support spaces. The second floor of the addition, connecting to the second floor of the existing building,contains seven new classrooms, a computer lab along with other instructional and support spaces. A single corridor isprovided through the addition and connects to the existing building circulation at a new rotunda space . One new stair isprovided, at the far southeastern end of the addition. The new stairs will facilitate vertical circulation between the two floorsof the addition, as well as providing egress from the second floor to the exterior. An additional corridor located on thenorthwestern side of the first floor has been provide to facilitate egress onto the playfields. The single story addition locatedat the southwestern corner of the existing building will house the two auxiliary gymnasiums. As previously noted additionalspace has been added to the existing multipurpose room by expanding the northern portion towards the parking lot.
Existing Facility Modifications
The majority of existing facility modifications have been previously noted in the common building design elements. The newj y g y y g gcorridor will have connections to the existing corridor by renovating a computer lab on each floor. The balance of spaceremaining will be converted into instructional and support spaces as well as a rotunda space to handle the increasedcorridor traffic. The two computer labs lost have been replaced and are included in the new addition.
57
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V Description of Options (Continued)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Option Three – Site PlanBASKETBALL
COURTS
TENNISCOURTS EXISTING
BUILDING
11 PARKING SPACES
1 HC SPACE
BUILDING
120 PARKING SPACES
5 HC SPACESPROPOSEDOUTDOOR
PROPOSEDCAFETERIA ADDITION
STORAGE
MAINENTRANCE
PROPOSEDONE-STORY
ADDITION
SOFTBALLFEILDS
ENTRANCE
PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
TWO WAYTRAFFIC
BUSES INAND OUT
PROPOSEDTWO-STORY
ADDITIONRETAINING WALL
RE-ALIGNED TRACK
58
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Option Three – Ground Floor Plan
KEY
C CORRIDORCL CLOSETCR CLASSROOMHR HEALTH ROOME ELECTRICAL
E12
355 T
J
J
TT
T
1010
1211
O
M
S45
O
M
C
E ELECTRICALEL ELEVATORJ JANITORSM MECHANICALO OFFICES STORAGET TOILET
1. BOILER ROOM2 AUXILARY GYMT
MELMS
C 2. AUXILARY GYM3. BUILDING SERVICES4. GENERAL TECH LAB5. MULTIPURPOSE LAB6. STAGE7. NOT USED8. NOT USED9. ESOL10. HEALTH11 HEALTH STORAGE11. HEALTH STORAGE12. HEALTH OFFICE
0 20’ 40’ 80’
59
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V. Description of Options (Continued) KEY (CONTINUED)
14
15
16
14
S
49 51
52 52T
53 5354 51 CR
2
Option Three – First Floor Plan
KEY (CONTINUED)
C CORRIDORCL CLOSETCR CLASSROOMHR HEALTH ROOME ELECTRICALEL ELEVATORJ JANITORSM MECHANICAL
J
13S
17ST
611920
S
MS
S48
49
SS50
T
EL
62
2S
13. TRASH14. ART15. KILN ROOM16. ART OFFICE17. DOCK18 STAFF LOUNGE
M MECHANICALO OFFICES STORAGET TOILET
C
21
2222
24
CR
S MCR
CR
S
40
M
40 41T
T
42 43M
4445
J
CLCLCL
65S39
6418. STAFF LOUNGE19. KITCHEN20. KITCHEN OFFICE21. MULTIPURPOSE ROOM22. COUNSELOR OFFICES23. GUIDANCE OFFICE24. RECORDS25. GUIDANCE CONFERENCE26. VESTIBULE27 ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL
C
2222
23
26
2829
30
CR
CR
CR
CR
T
T
M
41
41
M
4647
EL
63SS
SS
MAIN
ENTRANCE27
28. PRINCIPAL29. ADMINISTRATION OFFICE30. SECRETARY31. FINANCE32. SUSPENSION33. ADMIN CONFERENCE34. SCHOOL STORE35. THERAPY36 SPPECH
27. ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL
C
C
M
252727
29
30
31 32S
ST 33
HR
OTMSO26
34CRS
CRCRCR
3536373837
T T MCR
18
55CR
CR59
39
39T68
36. SPPECH37. SCIENCE38. SCIENCE PREP39. TEAM ROOM40. COMMUNICATION (MEDIA)41. MEDIA STORAGE42. MEDIA OFFICE43. MEDIA WORK ROOM44. CONTROL ROOM45 EDIT ROOM
S
CC
55
CRCR
CR
M
0 20’ 40’ 80’
45. EDIT ROOM46. MEDIA CENTER47. COURTYARD48. GYM49. MUSIC50. MUSIC OFFICE51. LOCKER ROOM52. P.E. OFFICE53. SHOWER54 LAUNDRY
60
54. LAUNDRY
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Option Three – Second Floor Plan
KEY (CONTINUED)
C CORRIDORCL CLOSETCR CLASSROOMHR HEALTH ROOME ELECTRICALEL ELEVATORJ JANITORSM MECHANICALCR
39
CR CR 58T
TJ
5939
C
M MECHANICALO OFFICES STORAGET TOILET
37. SCIENCE38. SCIENCE PREP39. TEAM ROOM
55CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
T
T
56
57
CR
CR
37
SO60 O
TT
59
SS
C C
55. COMPUTER LAB56. MATH57. MATH LAB58. READING59. TEXT STORAGE60. WORK ROOM61. ALTERNATE SERVING LINE62. ALTERNATE PREP AREA KITCHEN 63 ALTERNATE SECURITY ENTRANCE
CRT
T
CR
CR CR39
37
37O S
MCR CR CR T T
MS
SS
S
CR
67
CR
9 9
C C
SS
S
EL
63. ALTERNATE SECURITY ENTRANCE 64. CAFETERIA ADDITION65. METS66. IDA67. OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY68. STAFF DEVELOPMENT
373837383738 373737 3839 59
CR
CR
CR
CR
55
TT
S66
S
0 20’ 40’ 80’
CR
CR
CR
61
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)
Option Three (Continued)
Advantages
The addition has the least disturbance to the fields.
Disadvantages
The addition does not allow a line of sight to the fields from the front of the school. Access to the playfields by the community is hampered by the location of the additionAccess to the playfields by the community is hampered by the location of the addition. Two construction sites are required. Long, dead end corridors with remote stair wells is a security concern. Travel time from the classroom addition wing would be an issue. Classroom addition is not intergraded well with the existing classrooms and support spaces. Congestion at new corridor intersection on both floors will be excessive even with enlarged “rotunda like” area. The addition is larger due to the replacement of two existing computer labs that will be displaced The addition is larger due to the replacement of two existing computer labs that will be displaced. Existing north-south corridor adjacent to gymnasium does not lead directly to fields.
62
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
V D i ti f O ti (C ti d)V. Description of Options (Continued)Summary Table and Cost Comparison
Square Footage:Existing 147,223 147,223 147,223g , , ,
New Construction 31,100 36,060 33,480Modernization 0 0 0Renovation 9,980 11,970 10,520Demolition (total) 0 0 0Total Gross Square Feet 178,323 183,283 180,703
Total Construction Cost $10,421,000 $12,011,000 $11,114,000
PDF Feasibility Study Cost Outline (000’s)
Construction Cost Estimate $10,421
Pl i C t 818Planning Costs 818
Contingency and Related Costs 742
Furniture and Equipment 330
This cost estimate in this feasibility study is based on current construction market conditions for both building and site. The estimate will be revised to reflect marketconditions and prevailing construction costs when the project is included in the Capital Improvements Program Request for architectural and construction funding.
Totals $12,311
63
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
VII P d P j t I l t ti S h d lVII. Proposed Project Implementation Schedule
Overall Project Schedule YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D
Architect SelectionSchematic Design
Committee Meetings BOE Approval
Design DevelopmentConstruction DocumentsAdvertise for BIDBID O iBID Opening Construction DocumentsOccupancy
64
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
VII A diVII. Appendices
(A) Space Summary
65
Whe
n th
is p
roje
ct is
com
plet
e, th
e fo
llow
ing
spac
es a
re to
be
prov
ided
:N
etTo
tal N
etFa
cilit
y#
Sq.
Ft.
Sq.
Ft.
Engl
ish/
Fore
ign
Lang
uage
/Mat
h/S
ocia
l Stu
dies
Cla
ssro
om12
900
1080
0M
ET
S1
900
900
Oth
er In
stru
ctio
nal S
uppo
rt A
reas
Tea
m R
esou
rce
Cen
ter/
Wor
kroo
m2
300
600
Inte
rdis
cipl
inar
y T
extb
ook
Sto
rage
315
045
0In
stru
ctio
nal D
ata
Ass
ista
nt R
oom
140
040
0
Spe
cial
and
Alte
rnat
ive
Educ
atio
nO
ccup
atio
nal T
hera
py/P
hysi
cal T
hera
py1
250
250
Mul
tipur
pose
Tec
hnol
ogy
Labo
rato
ry*
Mul
tipu
rpos
e T
echn
olog
y L
abor
ator
y1
1600
1600
Com
pute
r T
echn
olog
y L
abor
ator
y1
900
900
Pre
para
tion
/Sto
rage
Roo
m1
400
400
Mul
tipur
pose
Lab
orat
ory*
M
ulti
purp
ose
Lab
orat
ory
116
0016
00S
tora
ge1
300
300
Phy
sica
l Edu
catio
n
Aux
ilia
ry G
ym (
Dan
ce)
116
0016
00A
uxil
iary
Gym
(W
rest
ling
)1
1600
1600
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Sui
teA
ssis
tant
Pri
ncip
al's
Off
ice
115
015
0S
taff
Dev
elop
men
t Off
ice
120
020
0
Gui
danc
e S
uite
Cou
nsel
or's
Off
ice
115
015
0
Sta
ff F
acili
ties
Sta
ff L
oung
e1
1150
1150
Bui
ldin
g S
ervi
ce F
acili
ties
Pla
nt E
quip
men
t Ope
rato
r O
ffic
e1
7575
Gen
eral
Sto
rage
Roo
ms
225
050
0
Tota
l Tea
chin
g S
tatio
ns a
nd N
et. S
q. F
t.17
2362
5
Juliu
s W
est
Mid
dle
Sch
ool
Squ
are
Foot
Sum
mar
y
*Con
side
rati
on s
houl
d be
giv
en to
rec
reat
e th
e te
chno
logy
labs
that
wer
e or
igin
iall
y bu
ilt i
n th
e bu
ildi
ng.
Als
o,
cons
ider
atio
n sh
ould
be
give
n to
cre
ate
the
need
ed a
uxil
lary
gyn
mas
ium
s ad
jace
nt to
the
exis
ting
aux
illa
ry g
ymna
sium
.
Julius West Middle School Addition Feasibility StudyMontgomery County Public Schools
VIIAdi VII. Appendices
(B)EducationalSpecifications
66
Juliu
s W
est
Mid
dle
Sch
ool
Add
ition
Ed
ucat
iona
l S
peci
ficat
ions
Fe
asib
ility
Stu
dy
Janu
ary
10
, 20
11
M
ontg
omer
y C
ount
y P
ublic
Sch
ools
R
ockv
ille,
Mar
ylan
d 2
08
50
In
trod
uctio
n
2
Tabl
e of
Con
tent
s In
trod
ucti
on ..
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.....
3 G
ener
al P
lann
ing
Con
side
rati
ons .
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
... 4
Tec
hnol
ogy
Fra
mew
ork
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.. 7
Des
crip
tion
of
Fac
ilit
ies .
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.....
8 S
tand
ard
Cla
ssro
oms .
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
8
Inst
ruct
iona
l Sup
port
Roo
ms
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
9
Spe
cial
Edu
cati
on F
acil
itie
s ....
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.. 10
Mul
tipu
rpos
e T
echn
olog
y ...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
11
Mul
tipu
rpos
e L
abor
ator
y ...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
. 13
Phy
sica
l Edu
cati
on ..
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
14
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Sui
te ..
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
... 1
6 G
uida
nce
Sui
te ..
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
17
Sta
ff R
oom
.....
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
... 1
8 B
uild
ing
Ser
vice
Fac
ilit
ies .
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
. 19
Sit
e R
equi
rem
ents
.....
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.... 2
0
Feasibility Study participants.
G
ener
al P
lann
ing
Con
side
ratio
ns
4
Gen
eral
Pla
nnin
g C
onsi
dera
tions
In
the
gene
ral p
lann
ing
of th
is b
uild
ing
and
deve
lopm
ent o
f th
e si
te, s
peci
al c
onsi
dera
tion
sho
uld
be g
iven
to th
e fo
llow
ing
com
men
ts a
nd in
stru
ctio
ns:
□
The
arc
hite
ct is
exp
ecte
d to
bec
ome
thor
ough
ly f
amil
iar
wit
h al
l nat
iona
l, st
ate
and
loca
l fir
e sa
fety
, lif
e sa
fety
, and
hea
lth
code
reg
ulat
ions
and
to f
ollo
w a
ppli
cabl
e ru
les
of th
e S
tate
In
tera
genc
y C
omm
itte
e on
Sch
ool C
onst
ruct
ion.
□ T
he b
uild
ing
is to
be
acce
ssib
le to
the
disa
bled
wit
hin
the
mea
ning
of
the
late
st e
diti
on o
f th
e A
mer
ican
s w
ith
Dis
abil
itie
s A
ct a
nd to
con
form
to a
ll th
e la
test
req
uire
men
ts o
f th
e A
mer
ican
s w
ith
Dis
abil
itie
s A
ct A
cces
sibi
lity
Gui
deli
nes
(AD
AA
G)
as p
ubli
shed
by
the
U.S
. Arc
hite
ctur
al
and
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Bar
rier
s C
ompl
ianc
e B
oard
. (T
he r
egul
atio
n ca
n be
fou
nd a
t ht
tp:/
/ww
w.a
cces
s-bo
ard.
gov/
adaa
g/ht
ml/
adaa
g.ht
m).
In
addi
tion
to th
e A
DA
AG
, the
Mar
ylan
d A
cces
sibi
lity
Cod
e (C
OM
AR
.05.
02.0
2) r
evis
ed in
200
2 al
so is
req
uire
d fo
r pu
blic
sch
ools
. (T
he
regu
lati
on c
an b
e fo
und
at h
ttp:
//m
dcod
es.u
mbc
.edu
/dhc
d2/T
itle
05.p
df)
□
The
fac
ilit
y is
to r
efle
ct a
n ap
peal
ing
visu
al, a
cous
tic,
and
ther
mal
env
iron
men
t and
is to
be
prop
erly
fur
nish
ed a
nd e
quip
ped.
Wel
l-ch
osen
col
ors
and
text
ures
are
to b
e us
ed.
Lig
htin
g m
ust
mee
t cur
rent
sta
ndar
ds a
nd p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
leve
ls.
□
Hig
h qu
alit
y m
ater
ials
are
to b
e us
ed in
the
cons
truc
tion
. T
he a
rchi
tect
sho
uld
refe
r to
the
MC
PS
D
esig
n G
uide
line
s.
□
The
fir
st im
pres
sion
of
a bu
ildi
ng is
impo
rtan
t. T
he m
ain
entr
ance
to th
e sc
hool
sho
uld
have
a
clea
r an
d in
viti
ng id
enti
ty, a
nd th
e en
tran
ce a
rea
shou
ld b
e de
sign
ed a
nd la
ndsc
aped
to
emph
asiz
e it
s im
port
ance
. A
cov
ered
wal
kway
fro
m th
e bu
s lo
adin
g ar
ea to
the
fron
t doo
r is
de
sira
ble.
The
des
ign
of th
e en
try
foye
r ne
eds
to c
onve
y a
feel
ing
of w
arm
th a
nd w
elco
me.
□
An
elec
tron
ic m
essa
ge b
oard
and
bui
lt-i
n C
CT
V m
onit
or s
houl
d be
inco
rpor
ated
into
the
wal
l de
sign
of
the
adm
inis
trat
ive
offi
ce.
□
The
incl
usio
n of
ligh
ted
show
case
s to
dis
play
stu
dent
wor
k sh
ould
be
prov
ided
in th
e co
rrid
ors
of th
e m
ain
entr
ance
, art
, mul
tipur
pose
labo
rato
ries
, gym
nasi
um, a
nd in
eac
h gr
ade
leve
l are
a.
The
y sh
ould
be
rece
ssed
into
the
wal
l wit
h ac
cess
fro
m w
ithi
n a
room
and
hav
e an
ele
ctri
c ou
tlet
.
□ E
very
teac
hing
sta
tion
, sup
port
spa
ce, a
nd c
ore
area
mus
t be
wir
ed f
or c
ompu
ter,
CC
TV
, and
te
leph
one,
alo
ng w
ith
adeq
uate
ele
ctri
cal s
uppl
y in
com
plia
nce
wit
h M
aryl
and
Sat
e de
sign
gu
idel
ines
for
Tec
hnol
ogy
in S
choo
ls a
nd th
e M
CP
S O
ffic
e of
the
Chi
ef T
echn
olog
y O
ffic
e (O
CT
O)
guid
elin
es. F
acil
itie
s m
ust b
e ad
apta
ble
to a
ccom
mod
ate
rapi
d de
velo
pmen
t in
high
te
chno
logy
and
its
equi
pmen
t sin
ce e
duca
tion
al p
rogr
am a
nd o
rgan
izat
ion
in th
is f
ield
are
dy
nam
ic.
Spa
ce a
nd p
ower
sup
ply
mus
t be
flex
ible
to m
eet t
hese
cha
ngin
g ne
eds.
□
Cor
e sp
aces
suc
h as
the
cafe
teri
a, g
ymna
sium
s, in
stru
ctio
nal m
edia
cen
ter,
and
com
mun
icat
ions
ce
nter
, sho
uld
be e
asil
y ac
cess
ible
for
com
mun
ity
use
and
secu
re f
rom
the
rest
of
the
buil
ding
af
ter
scho
ol h
ours
.
G
ener
al P
lann
ing
Con
side
ratio
ns
5
□
An
MC
PS
-des
igne
d al
arm
sys
tem
wil
l pro
vide
sec
urit
y fo
r th
is f
acil
ity.
The
arc
hite
ct w
ill
prov
ide
for
this
sys
tem
in c
onsu
ltat
ion
wit
h th
e D
ivis
ion
of C
onst
ruct
ion
staf
f.
For
max
imum
inst
ruct
iona
l fle
xibi
lity
, lar
ge s
peci
al in
stru
ctio
n ar
eas
such
as
thos
e pr
ovid
ed f
or
gene
ral m
usic
and
mul
tipu
rpos
e la
bora
tori
es s
houl
d be
des
igne
d to
all
ow e
asy
conv
ersi
on o
f so
me
or a
ll o
f th
e sp
ace
for
othe
r ki
nds
of in
stru
ctio
n in
the
futu
re.
□
Som
e w
indo
ws
mus
t be
oper
able
in e
ach
spac
e in
the
buil
ding
. T
rans
mis
sion
of
radi
atio
n th
roug
h w
indo
ws
into
var
ious
por
tion
s of
the
plan
t is
to b
e co
nsid
ered
in r
elat
ion
to h
eati
ng a
nd
vent
ilat
ing
and
in r
elat
ion
to p
lann
ing
the
buil
ding
for
air
con
diti
onin
g. A
ll in
stru
ctio
nal s
pace
s sh
ould
hav
e w
indo
ws,
pre
fera
bly
exte
rior
win
dow
s. I
f th
e de
sign
doe
s no
t per
mit
ext
erio
r w
indo
ws,
win
dow
s on
to c
orri
dors
sho
uld
be p
rovi
ded.
□
Cor
e sp
aces
suc
h as
the
cafe
teri
a, g
ymna
sium
s, a
nd in
stru
ctio
nal m
edia
cen
ter
shou
ld b
e ea
sily
ac
cess
ible
for
com
mun
ity u
se a
nd s
ecur
e fr
om th
e re
st o
f th
e bu
ildin
g af
ter
scho
ol h
ours
.
□
Zon
ing
the
plan
t for
hea
ting
and
air
-con
diti
onin
g sh
ould
be
rela
ted
to a
fter
-hou
rs u
se o
f va
riou
s ar
eas
such
as
offi
ces,
gym
nasi
um, m
ulti
purp
ose
room
, and
the
inst
ruct
iona
l med
ia c
ente
r.
App
ropr
iate
loca
tion
of
park
ing,
cor
rido
r ba
rrie
rs, a
nd to
ilet
roo
ms
is n
eces
sary
for
aft
er-h
ours
us
e. S
ome
clas
sroo
ms
near
by th
e m
ulti
purp
ose
room
sho
uld
be z
oned
for
aft
er h
our
use
as w
ell.
□
For
sec
urit
y pu
rpos
es, a
ll d
oors
into
cla
ssro
oms,
con
fere
nce
room
s, o
ffic
es e
tc. m
ust h
ave
a si
deli
ght w
indo
w w
ith
shad
es.
□
The
arc
hite
ct s
houl
d re
fer
to M
SD
E’s
200
6 C
lass
room
Aco
usti
c G
uide
line
s to
add
ress
the
acou
stic
al q
uali
ties
for
cla
ssro
oms.
In
addi
tion
, the
arc
hite
ct s
houl
d re
fer
to A
mer
ican
Nat
iona
l St
anda
rd, A
cous
tica
l Per
form
ance
Cri
teri
a, D
esig
n R
equi
rem
ents
, and
Gui
deli
nes
for
Scho
ols
(AN
SI
S12
.60-
2002
) fo
r ad
diti
onal
info
rmat
ion.
□
Noi
se a
nd d
istr
acti
ng s
ound
s ar
e to
be
min
imiz
ed.
In a
reas
suc
h as
the
mul
tipu
rpos
e ro
om a
nd
clas
sroo
ms,
whi
ch m
ay b
e us
ed f
or m
eeti
ngs
and
adul
t edu
cati
on, t
he s
ound
of
oper
atin
g fa
ns f
or
vent
ilat
ion
shou
ld n
ot in
terf
ere
wit
h in
stru
ctio
n.
□
Bat
hroo
ms
shou
ld b
e lo
cate
d th
roug
hout
the
buil
ding
. B
athr
oom
s sh
ould
be
cent
ral t
o th
e cl
assr
oom
s, w
ith
som
e pr
ovid
ed f
or e
ach
grad
e le
vel a
rea.
Stu
dent
bat
hroo
ms
also
mus
t be
loca
ted
near
the
cafe
teri
a an
d m
ain
gym
.
□
Adu
lt b
athr
oom
s m
ust b
e pr
ovid
ed o
n al
l lev
els
conv
enie
nt to
inst
ruct
iona
l are
as a
nd m
ust
conf
orm
to th
e la
test
cod
e re
quir
emen
ts.
□
The
arc
hite
ct m
ust d
esig
n al
l ath
leti
c/ph
ysic
al e
duca
tion
fac
ilit
ies
to r
efle
ct e
quit
able
fac
ilit
ies
for
boys
and
gir
ls b
ased
on
Tit
le I
X r
equi
rem
ents
.
□
The
roo
m n
umbe
ring
sys
tem
sho
uld
be lo
gica
l and
und
erst
anda
ble.
□
Bli
nds
capa
ble
of d
arke
ning
to b
e us
ed in
inst
ruct
iona
l are
as, i
nclu
ding
sem
inar
and
co
nfer
ence
-typ
e sp
aces
, wit
h co
mpl
ete
dark
enin
g in
all
sci
ence
roo
ms
shou
ld b
e pr
ovid
ed.
G
ener
al P
lann
ing
Con
side
ratio
ns
6
□
The
loca
tion
of
whi
tebo
ards
and
tack
boar
ds s
houl
d re
late
to c
lass
room
sea
ting
and
win
dow
s. T
he
loca
tion
of
bull
etin
boa
rds
and
show
case
s sh
ould
rel
ate
to te
am g
roup
ings
and
adm
inis
trat
ive
area
s.
□
The
num
ber
of lo
cker
s in
the
corr
idor
sho
uld
be e
qual
to th
e co
re c
apac
ity p
lus
10%
of
the
core
ca
paci
ty.
□
Lan
dsca
ping
is to
be
incl
uded
. P
lant
ing
is to
incl
ude
scre
en p
lant
ing
and
that
nee
ded
for
eros
ion
cont
rol.
Pla
ntin
gs f
or s
idew
alks
, and
woo
ded
and
flow
ered
are
as, a
re to
be
situ
ated
to e
nabl
e th
e ph
ysic
al e
duca
tion
pro
gram
to b
e ca
rrie
d on
wit
hout
und
ue d
istu
rban
ce to
the
clas
sroo
ms.
Oth
er
land
scap
ing
to s
uppo
rt e
nerg
y co
nser
vati
on a
nd to
rel
ate
the
buil
ding
to th
e si
te w
ith
aest
heti
c ap
peal
mus
t be
incl
uded
. N
ote:
Lan
dsca
ping
mus
t be
min
imal
, tas
tefu
l and
all
ow f
or e
asy
mai
nten
ance
.
□
Spa
ces
that
ser
ve n
o re
al e
duca
tion
al f
unct
ion,
suc
h as
cor
rido
rs, s
houl
d be
lim
ited
whi
le a
t the
sa
me
tim
e as
suri
ng a
n ea
sy to
sup
ervi
se a
nd s
moo
th f
low
of
pupi
l tra
ffic
to a
nd f
rom
the
inst
ruct
iona
l med
ia c
ente
r, m
ulti
purp
ose
room
, gym
nasi
um, s
peci
aliz
ed c
ente
rs, a
nd s
uppo
rt
room
s.
□
Car
peti
ng s
houl
d be
lim
ited
to th
e pr
inci
pal’
s of
fice
, ass
ista
nt p
rinc
ipal
’s o
ffic
e an
d co
nfer
ence
ro
om in
the
adm
inis
trat
ion
suit
e an
d th
e m
ain
read
ing
room
of
the
inst
ruct
iona
l med
ia c
ente
r.
□
All
stu
dent
occ
upie
d sp
aces
mus
t be
able
to b
e su
perv
ised
fro
m th
e co
rrid
or o
r an
adj
acen
t spa
ce.
□
The
sha
pe o
f th
e cl
assr
oom
and
the
desi
gn o
f bu
ilt-
in f
eatu
res
and
stor
age
area
s sh
ould
pro
vide
op
tim
um n
et u
sabl
e fl
oor
area
. E
long
ated
roo
ms
and
feat
ures
that
pro
trud
e in
to f
loor
are
a,
lim
itin
g fl
exib
ilit
y, a
re to
be
disc
oura
ged.
Rec
tang
ular
sha
ped
clas
sroo
ms
are
pref
erre
d.
□
The
cla
ssro
oms
shou
ld b
e de
sign
ed to
acc
omm
odat
e va
riou
s si
ze g
roup
s. E
ach
clas
sroo
m s
houl
d be
rea
dily
ada
ptab
le f
or g
roup
wor
k, v
ario
us p
rese
ntat
ion
form
ats,
and
sho
uld
have
max
imum
co
nnec
tivi
ty to
out
side
res
ourc
es.
□
Met
al a
djus
tabl
e sh
elvi
ng is
to b
e pr
ovid
ed in
all
bui
ldin
g st
orag
e cl
oset
s.
□
All
pla
n re
view
s w
ill b
e co
ordi
nate
d th
roug
h th
e D
ivis
ion
of C
onst
ruct
ion.
□
Spe
cial
con
side
rati
on m
ust b
e gi
ven
to e
nerg
y co
nser
vati
on in
clud
ing
tota
l lif
e-cy
cle
cost
s. T
he
curr
ent M
aryl
and
Sta
te D
epar
tmen
t of
Gen
eral
Ser
vice
(D
GS
) re
quir
emen
ts w
ill b
e ap
plie
d as
de
sign
cri
teri
a. L
ife-
cycl
e co
st a
ccou
ntin
g in
acc
orda
nce
wit
h D
GS
cri
teri
a is
req
uire
d.
G
ener
al P
lann
ing
Con
side
ratio
ns
7
Tech
nolo
gy F
ram
ewor
k T
he la
test
tech
nolo
gy s
houl
d be
inte
grat
ed in
to e
very
asp
ect o
f bu
ildin
g. T
he a
rchi
tect
sho
uld
cons
ult w
ith th
e O
ffic
e of
Chi
ef T
echn
olog
y O
ffic
er (
OC
TO
) an
d th
e D
ivis
ion
of C
onst
ruct
ion
(DO
C)
for
the
late
st te
chno
logy
req
uire
men
ts.
The
arc
hite
ct m
ust a
t a m
inim
um p
lan
for
the
follo
win
g el
emen
ts.
□
Thr
ough
the
use
of lo
cal a
rea
and
wid
e ar
ea c
ompu
ter
and
vide
o ne
twor
ks, s
tude
nts
shou
ld h
ave
acce
ss to
eac
h ot
her,
to s
choo
ls th
roug
hout
the
coun
ty w
ith s
imila
r ca
pabi
litie
s, a
nd to
uni
vers
ities
an
d go
vern
men
t ins
titut
ions
thro
ugho
ut th
e w
orld
.
□
Eac
h cl
assr
oom
is to
hav
e a
dedi
cate
d 20
am
p el
ectr
ical
cir
cuit
serv
ing
five
ele
ctri
cal o
utle
ts f
or
com
pute
rs lo
cate
d 3'
apa
rt a
long
the
back
or
side
wal
l.
□
Com
pute
r ne
twor
k ou
tlets
(C
NO
s) c
onsi
stin
g of
a f
lush
mou
nted
sta
ndar
d el
ectr
ical
box
with
1 1
/2"
cond
uit t
o th
e ce
iling
spa
ce o
verh
ead
shou
ld b
e lo
cate
d in
all
clas
sroo
ms,
off
ices
, and
oth
er w
ork
loca
tions
acc
ordi
ng to
the
follo
win
g ge
nera
l rul
es:
□ on
e C
NO
on
the
teac
hing
wal
l of t
he c
lass
room
und
er th
e lo
catio
n fo
r a
Prom
ethe
an B
oard
and
ad
jace
nt to
an
elec
tric
al o
utle
t
□ a s
econ
d C
NO
sho
uld
be lo
cate
d in
the
back
sid
e of
eac
h cl
assr
oom
adj
acen
t to
the
five
co
mpu
ter
elec
tric
al o
utle
ts c
onne
cted
to th
e de
dica
ted
circ
uit
□ on
e C
NO
per
off
ice,
res
ourc
e ro
om, p
lann
ing
room
, etc
. adj
acen
t to
tele
phon
e ou
tlet
□ M
ultip
le C
NO
s in
med
ia c
ente
r at
cir
cula
tion
desk
, ref
eren
ce a
reas
, etc
.
□ on
e C
NO
at e
ach
scie
nce
lab
wor
ksta
tion
□ Al
l oth
er a
reas
suc
h as
the
stag
e, b
ooks
tore
, din
ing
room
, etc
., w
here
com
pute
rs m
ight
be
used
.
□
The
num
ber
and
loca
tion
of te
leco
mm
unic
atio
n cl
oset
s re
quir
ed to
sup
port
the
build
ing-
wid
e co
mpu
ter
netw
ork
is d
epen
dent
on
the
size
and
geo
met
ry o
f th
e bu
ildin
g. T
he la
yout
of
the
tele
com
mun
icat
ion
clos
ets
will
be
dete
rmin
ed d
urin
g th
e de
sign
pha
se o
f the
pro
ject
.
S
tand
ard
Cla
ssro
oms
8
Des
crip
tion
of F
acili
ties
T
he f
ollo
win
g is
an
appr
oach
to th
e de
sign
of
new
and
mod
erni
zed
scho
ols.
Ple
ase
refe
r to
the
sum
mar
y of
spa
ces
for
the
squa
re f
oot r
equi
rem
ents
for
eac
h sp
ace
desc
ribe
d be
low
. S
quar
e-fo
ot
allo
cati
ons
shou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
the
stan
dard
to b
e fo
llow
ed, a
ltho
ugh
min
or d
evia
tion
s ar
e al
low
ed.
Sta
ndar
d C
lass
room
s
□
Cla
ssro
oms
shou
ld b
e ar
rang
ed to
sup
port
the
grad
e le
vel t
eam
org
aniz
atio
n fo
r m
iddl
e sc
hool
s.
Eac
h gr
ade'
s ar
ea o
f th
e bu
ildi
ng a
lso
wil
l hav
e tw
o or
thre
e sc
ienc
e la
bora
tori
es a
nd v
ario
us
inst
ruct
iona
l sup
port
spa
ces.
□
Eac
h cl
assr
oom
sho
uld
be d
esig
ned
as f
ollo
ws:
□ A
lock
able
teac
her's
clo
set,
as p
er D
OC
con
stru
ctio
n st
anda
rds,
is to
be
prov
ided
for
gen
eral
su
pply
sto
rage
, per
sona
l sto
rage
, and
war
drob
e.
□ Bo
ok s
tora
ge s
houl
d be
loca
ted
alon
g th
e w
indo
w-w
all w
ith
half
of
the
cabi
nets
equ
ippe
d w
ith
hing
ed, l
ocka
ble
door
s. A
min
imum
of
60 li
near
fee
t sho
uld
be p
rovi
ded
for
book
st
orag
e. T
he to
ps o
f th
ese
cabi
nets
wil
l ser
ve a
s co
unte
r sp
ace,
whi
ch s
houl
d be
at w
ork-
top
heig
ht.
The
cou
nter
spa
ce a
t the
bac
k of
the
room
sho
uld
be d
esig
ned
wit
h kn
eeho
les
for
use
for
com
pute
rs a
nd p
rint
ers,
and
hav
e el
ectr
ic o
utle
ts a
bove
the
coun
ters
.
□ Ea
ch c
lass
room
sho
uld
have
bet
wee
n 28
and
40
feet
of
whi
tebo
ard
and
abou
t 20
feet
of
tack
boar
d. M
ain
teac
hing
layo
ut w
ill b
e de
sign
ed in
acc
orda
nce
wit
h D
OC
con
stru
ctio
n st
anda
rds.
□ M
ap r
ails
and
tack
rai
ls a
re to
be
plac
ed a
bove
all
whi
tebo
ards
. H
ooks
sui
tabl
e fo
r ha
ngin
g dr
awin
g in
stru
men
ts a
re to
be
plac
ed b
enea
th th
e w
hite
boar
ds in
eac
h ac
adem
ic c
lass
room
.
□ On
e fl
ag h
olde
r at
tach
men
t is
to b
e pl
aced
on
all m
ap r
ails
wit
h fo
ur to
six
map
hol
ders
. T
wo-
inch
cor
k ta
ck r
ails
sho
uld
be p
lace
d in
ava
ilab
le s
pace
in a
ll te
achi
ng s
pace
s an
d in
all
co
rrid
ors.
□ Ea
ch c
lass
room
sho
uld
be e
quip
ped
wit
h tw
o-in
ch b
lind
s.
S
peci
al E
duca
tion
Faci
litie
s
9
Inst
ruct
iona
l Sup
port
Roo
ms
S
patia
l Nee
ds
Tea
m W
orkr
oom
In
terd
isci
plin
ary
Tex
tboo
k S
tora
ge R
oom
Te
am W
orkr
oom
□
Tw
o te
am r
esou
rce
cent
er/w
orkr
oom
s ar
e to
be
prov
ided
for
eac
h gr
ade
leve
l, pr
ovid
ing
spac
e in
ea
ch f
or te
ache
r de
sks
or a
larg
e co
nfer
ence
tabl
e.
□
The
se r
oom
s sh
ould
be
loca
ted
next
to e
ach
othe
r an
d ha
ve a
n in
terc
onne
ctin
g do
or a
nd a
4' x
6'
win
dow
wit
h bl
inds
bet
wee
n on
e an
othe
r.
□
A te
leph
one
wil
l be
loca
ted
in th
ese
room
s.
□
Sto
rage
and
ope
n/cl
osed
boo
kshe
lves
to s
tore
teac
hing
sup
plie
s an
d in
stru
ctio
nal m
ater
ials
sh
ould
be
prov
ided
.
□
A w
ork
coun
ter
wit
h si
nk a
nd e
lect
ric
outl
ets
is n
eede
d.
□
Thr
ee f
eet o
f ta
ckbo
ard
and
four
fee
t of
whi
tebo
ard
are
requ
ired
.
□
Wir
ing
for
four
com
pute
rs in
eac
h te
am r
oom
is r
equi
red.
In
terd
isci
plin
ary
Text
book
Sto
rage
Roo
m
□
An
inte
rdis
cipl
inar
y te
xtbo
ok s
tora
ge r
oom
is to
be
prov
ided
for
eac
h gr
ade
leve
l and
is to
be
easi
ly a
cces
sibl
e fr
om th
e cl
assr
oom
s an
d th
e te
am w
orkr
oom
and
sho
uld
have
adj
usta
ble
buil
t-in
she
lvin
g.
□
The
se r
oom
s m
ust h
ave
adeq
uate
HV
AC
and
ligh
ting
for
fle
xibl
e us
e by
sta
ff a
s of
fice
spa
ce.
□
Sec
ure
stor
age
for
com
pute
rs s
houl
d be
pro
vide
d w
ithi
n th
is s
pace
and
sho
uld
incl
ude
adeq
uate
el
ectr
ic p
ower
for
rec
harg
ing
batt
ery
pow
ered
lapt
op c
ompu
ters
. In
stru
ctio
nal D
ata
Ass
ista
nt R
oom
□
The
roo
m n
eeds
to b
e ce
ntra
lly
loca
ted,
is r
equi
red
for
an a
ide
who
con
duct
s as
sess
men
ts a
nd
upda
tes
indi
vidu
al s
tude
nt r
ecor
ds.
□
Sec
ure
stor
age
for
scho
ol-w
ide
reco
rds
and
mat
eria
ls s
houl
d be
incl
uded
.
S
peci
al E
duca
tion
Faci
litie
s
10
□
The
roo
m s
houl
d be
wir
ed f
or a
com
pute
r w
ith
prin
ter.
□
Thi
s ro
om n
eeds
a te
leph
one.
□
A ta
ckbo
ard
shou
ld b
e in
stal
led.
S
peci
al E
duca
tion
Faci
litie
s
Spa
tial N
eeds
O
ccup
atio
nal T
hera
py/P
hysi
cal T
hera
py R
oom
O
ccup
atio
nal T
hera
py/P
hysi
cal T
hera
py (O
T/P
T) R
oom
□
Eac
h ro
om m
ust h
ave
whi
tebo
ard
that
is m
ount
ed tw
o fe
et o
ff th
e fl
oor.
□ A
tack
boa
rd, o
pen
and
clos
ed lo
ckab
le s
tora
ge, o
pen
shel
ving
, and
a lo
ckab
le te
ache
r w
ardr
obe
are
requ
ired
.
□ A
sin
k w
ith
coun
ter
spac
e is
req
uire
d in
the
OT
/PT
roo
m.
□
Roo
m f
or a
teac
her's
des
k, lo
ckab
le f
ile
cabi
net,
and
asso
rted
-siz
ed f
urni
ture
wit
h ad
just
able
legs
sh
ould
be
prov
ided
.
□ T
he O
T/P
T r
oom
s sh
ould
be
wir
ed f
or a
cces
s to
one
com
pute
r w
orks
tati
on e
ach.
□ T
he O
T/P
T r
equi
res
a ce
ilin
g m
ount
ed h
ook
for
a sw
ing.
The
OT
/PT
roo
m r
equi
res
lock
able
sto
rage
with
suf
fici
ent a
rea
to h
ouse
larg
e gr
oss
mot
or
equi
pmen
t (m
inim
um o
f 35
squ
are
feet
) su
ch a
s th
erap
y ba
lls,
sco
oter
boa
rds,
wal
kers
, bal
ance
be
ams,
ram
ps, e
tc.
Tech
nolo
gy E
duca
tion
Sui
te
11
Mul
tipur
pose
Tec
hnol
ogy
S
patia
l Nee
ds
Mul
tipu
rpos
e T
echn
olog
y L
abor
ator
y C
ompu
ter
Tec
hnol
ogy
Lab
orat
ory
Pre
para
tion
/Sto
rage
Roo
m
□
Suf
fici
ent l
ight
ing
to c
reat
e sh
adow
less
wor
k su
rfac
es.
□
Am
ple
elec
tric
al s
ervi
ce a
nd r
ecep
tacl
es to
acc
omm
odat
e co
mpu
ters
, mac
hine
s, a
nd p
orta
ble
elec
tric
tool
s. S
uffi
cien
t ser
vice
sha
ll b
e pr
ovid
ed to
acc
omm
odat
e fl
exib
ilit
y w
ithi
n th
e st
udio
w
ith
tabl
etop
mac
hine
ry a
nd o
verh
ead
pull
-dow
n re
cept
acle
s, p
rovi
ding
for
mac
hine
s an
d po
rtab
le e
lect
ric
hand
tool
s.
□
If f
loor
rec
epta
cles
are
pro
vide
d, th
ey s
hall
be
flus
h.
□
Hal
lway
wal
ls s
houl
d in
clud
e in
teri
or g
lass
for
vie
win
g in
to th
e la
bora
tory
.
□
Win
dow
s st
arti
ng 3
6” f
rom
the
floo
r sh
ould
be
prov
ided
bet
wee
n al
l of
the
room
s in
this
sui
te.
M
ultip
urpo
se T
echn
olog
y La
bora
tory
□
Ele
ctri
cal a
nd d
ata
outl
ets
shou
ld b
e pr
ovid
ed o
n th
e te
achi
ng w
all f
or a
Pro
met
hean
Boa
rd.
□
Ade
quat
e ve
ntil
atio
n sy
stem
to r
emov
e ai
rbor
ne d
ust i
s re
quir
ed.
□
Flo
or c
over
ing
shal
l be
non-
slip
tile
.
□
Thr
ee e
mer
genc
y co
ntro
l sw
itch
es.
One
sw
itch
in th
e la
b, o
ne ju
st o
utsi
de th
e la
b an
d th
e th
ird
loca
ted
in th
e te
ache
r’s
offi
ce w
ith
a ke
y to
res
tore
pow
er.
□
The
roo
m r
equi
res
whi
tebo
ard
and
tack
boa
rd.
□
Thi
s la
bora
tory
req
uire
s a
was
h-up
sin
k.
□
She
lvin
g sh
ould
be
prov
ided
aro
und
the
peri
met
er o
f th
e ro
om f
or s
tude
nt p
roje
ct s
tora
ge.
The
sh
elvi
ng c
an b
e lo
cate
d be
low
wor
kben
ches
and
ove
rhea
d if
ther
e ar
e no
tool
s be
ing
used
in th
at
area
.
□
Sm
all t
able
top
mac
hine
ry s
hall
be
inst
alle
d al
ong
the
peri
met
er o
f th
e la
bora
tory
. The
hei
ght o
f th
ese
coun
ters
sho
uld
be 2
4".
Tech
nolo
gy E
duca
tion
Sui
te
12
Com
pute
r Te
chno
logy
Lab
orat
ory
□
Thi
s ro
om s
houl
d be
loca
ted
adja
cent
to th
e M
ulti
purp
ose
Tec
hnol
ogy
Lab
orat
ory.
□
Thi
s ro
om s
houl
d be
des
igne
d w
ith
sam
e re
quir
emen
ts a
sta
ndar
d co
mpu
ter
labo
rato
ry.
Pre
para
tion/
Sto
rage
Roo
m
□
The
pre
para
tion
roo
m s
houl
d be
loca
ted
next
to th
e M
ulti
purp
ose
Tec
hnol
ogy
Lab
orat
ory.
□
The
doo
r an
d w
all s
houl
d ha
ve w
indo
ws
into
the
Mul
tipu
rpos
e T
echn
olog
y L
abor
ator
y to
all
ow
for
supe
rvis
ion
by th
e st
aff.
□
One
sid
e of
the
room
sho
uld
be d
esig
ned
have
a c
ount
er w
ith
wal
l and
bas
e ca
bine
ts.
□
Sto
rage
are
a w
ill b
e eq
uipp
ed w
ith
stee
l she
lves
and
cab
inet
s ca
pabl
e of
sto
ring
a v
arie
ty o
f in
stru
ctio
nal m
ater
ials
, sup
plie
s, s
peci
al to
ols,
equ
ipm
ent,
and
stud
ent p
roje
cts.
□
A s
mal
l lum
ber
rack
is n
eces
sary
for
sto
rage
of
leng
ths
of lu
mbe
r an
d m
etal
.
M
ultip
urpo
se L
abor
ator
y
13
Mul
tipur
pose
Lab
orat
ory
S
patia
l Nee
ds
Mul
tipu
rpos
e L
abor
ator
y S
tora
ge
□
Thi
s sp
ace
wil
l be
desi
gned
for
fle
xibl
e us
e by
art
, fam
ily
and
cons
umer
sci
ence
, and
oth
er
elec
tive
cou
rses
.
□
The
des
ign
shou
ld in
clud
e fu
ll c
ompu
ter
acce
ss s
o th
at th
e sp
ace
coul
d be
use
d as
a c
ompu
ter
labo
rato
ry.
□
The
teac
hing
wal
l sho
uld
be d
esig
ned
acco
rdin
g to
DO
C s
tand
ards
.
□
Per
imet
er c
ount
ers
shou
ld b
e pr
ovid
ed a
long
one
or
two
wal
ls o
f th
e la
bora
tory
wit
h w
all a
nd
base
cab
inet
s.
□
Ade
quat
e el
ectr
ical
ser
vice
and
rec
epta
cles
to a
ccom
mod
ate
com
pute
rs, s
mal
l and
larg
e ap
plia
nces
, and
oth
er e
lect
ric
mac
hine
s ar
e es
sent
ial.
□
Acc
ess
from
the
labo
rato
ry to
the
stor
age
room
is n
eede
d.
□
A k
itch
en a
rea
shou
ld h
ave
thre
e ki
tche
n un
its,
(to
be
plac
ed a
long
one
or
tow
adj
oini
ng w
alls
) ea
ch c
onta
inin
g th
e fo
llow
ing:
□ Ei
ght f
eet o
f co
unte
rtop
spa
ce in
clud
ing
a st
ainl
ess
stee
l sin
k;
□ Lo
ckab
le b
ase
and
wal
l sto
rage
wit
h hi
nged
doo
rs, w
ith
a m
inim
um a
mou
nt o
f dr
awer
spa
ce
(2 d
raw
ers
per
kitc
hen)
;
□ W
all o
ven;
□ Am
ple
elec
tric
al o
utle
ts a
long
the
coun
ter
to b
e us
ed f
or s
mal
l app
lian
ces
and
indu
ctio
n ty
pe
stov
es;
□ Ho
t and
col
d w
ater
;
□ On
e of
the
kitc
hens
sho
uld
be A
DA
acc
essi
ble;
□ On
e sa
fety
eye
was
h st
atio
n sh
ould
be
prov
ided
in th
e la
b; a
nd
□ Sp
ace
for
two
resi
dent
ial r
efri
gera
tors
, acc
essi
ble
to th
e ki
tche
ns s
houl
d be
pro
vide
d.
M
ultip
urpo
se L
abor
ator
y
14
Sto
rage
□
The
sto
rage
roo
m s
houl
d ha
ve th
e fo
llow
ing:
□ Lo
ckab
le d
oor
wit
h ac
cess
to th
e te
achi
ng s
tati
on;
□ Th
e ro
om is
to b
e eq
uipp
ed w
ith
met
al s
helv
ing
secu
red
to th
e pe
rim
eter
wal
ls;
□ Sp
ace
and
elec
tric
al a
nd p
lum
bing
req
uire
men
ts s
houl
d be
des
igne
d fo
r A
hea
vy-d
uty
was
her
and
wal
l-ve
nted
dry
er;
□ Pe
rim
eter
cou
nter
s sh
ould
be
adja
cent
to th
e w
ashe
r/dr
yer
and
be a
min
imum
of
24”
deep
;
□ Sp
ace
for
one
resi
dent
ial r
efri
gera
tor
and
one
resi
dent
ial f
reez
er; a
nd
□ A
sink
.
Phy
sica
l Edu
catio
n S
patia
l Nee
ds
Aux
ilia
ry G
ymna
sium
(D
ance
) A
uxil
iary
Gym
nasi
um (
Wre
stli
ng)
Aux
iliar
y G
ymna
sium
s
□
The
aux
ilia
ry g
ymna
sium
s sh
ould
be
loca
ted
adja
cent
to th
e gy
mna
sium
are
a an
d th
e lo
cker
s ro
oms
and
have
six
teen
-foo
t cei
ling
s.
□
The
two
auxi
liar
y gy
mna
sium
s sh
ould
be
loca
ted
next
to e
ach
othe
r.
□
Dir
ect a
cces
s to
the
corr
idor
is d
esir
ed.
□
Pro
ject
ions
, pos
ts, o
r ot
her
haza
rds
are
to b
e av
oide
d.
□
The
se g
ymna
sium
s m
ust h
ave
a ve
ntil
atio
n sy
stem
.
□
The
min
imum
wid
th o
f th
e au
xili
ary
gym
nasi
ums
shou
ld b
e 34
fee
t.
□
Ele
ctri
c ou
tlet
s sh
ould
be
loca
ted
on a
ll f
our
wal
ls.
□
Bot
h au
xili
ary
gym
s m
ust i
nclu
de a
sm
all r
eces
sed
lock
able
clo
set w
ith
shel
ving
.
□
A s
mal
l 6' x
4' t
ack
boar
d an
d w
hite
boar
d ar
e to
be
inst
alle
d in
eac
h au
xili
ary
gym
nasi
um.
P
hysi
cal E
duca
tion
15
□
Aco
usti
cal p
anel
s, ta
ckbo
ard,
bul
leti
n bo
ard,
aux
ilia
ry s
tere
o so
und
syst
em, c
ompu
ter
and
cabl
e T
V h
ooku
ps a
nd c
lock
s w
ith
cage
s sh
ould
be
incl
uded
in th
e tw
o au
xili
ary
gym
nasi
ums.
□
Ope
rabl
e w
indo
ws
are
to b
e in
stal
led
wit
h gr
ates
.
□
Wal
l gra
phic
s ar
e to
be
spec
ifie
d by
MC
PS
sta
ff.
□
Ext
erio
r do
ors
are
to b
e ke
yed
for
reen
try.
□
Lig
ht s
wit
ches
are
to b
e ke
yed.
D
ance
/Wre
stlin
g
□
Sus
pend
ed w
ood
floo
rs a
re to
be
inst
alle
d in
the
danc
e st
udio
.
□
The
roo
m w
ill n
eed
to a
ccom
mod
ate
wre
stli
ng m
at s
tora
ge o
r ho
ist.
□
One
wal
l mus
t be
mir
rore
d w
ith
a ba
rre
prov
ided
wit
h an
eye
bolt
6'2
" hi
gh, d
ivid
ing
the
spac
e in
ha
lf lo
ng-w
ay.
A
dmin
istr
atio
n S
uite
16
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Sui
te
S
patia
l Nee
ds
Ass
ista
nt P
rinc
ipal
’s O
ffic
e S
taff
Dev
elop
men
t Off
ice
Pri
ncip
al’s
and
Ass
ista
nt P
rinc
ipal
s’ O
ffic
es
□
The
pri
ncip
al's
and
ass
ista
nt p
rinc
ipal
s' o
ffic
es a
re to
rel
ate
effe
ctiv
ely
wit
h ea
ch o
ther
as
wel
l as
to th
e ge
nera
l off
ice.
□
The
pri
ncip
al's
off
ice
is to
hav
e a
priv
ate
and
publ
ic.
□
An
area
(al
cove
) is
to b
e de
sign
ated
just
out
side
the
prin
cipa
l's o
ffic
e fo
r th
e pr
inci
pal's
sec
reta
ry;
50 s
quar
e fe
et m
ay b
e de
duct
ed f
rom
the
prin
cipa
l's o
ffic
e fo
r th
is p
urpo
se if
req
uire
d.
□
A w
aiti
ng a
rea
for
stud
ents
sho
uld
be d
esig
ned
next
to th
e as
sist
ant p
rinc
ipal
s' o
ffic
es.
S
taff
Dev
elop
men
t O
ffic
e
□
The
sta
ff d
evel
opm
ent o
ffic
e sh
ould
be
cent
rall
y lo
cate
d an
d in
or
near
the
adm
inis
trat
ive
suit
e.
□
Thi
s of
fice
nee
ds a
spa
ce f
or a
des
k, f
ile
cabi
net,
and
roun
d ta
ble
wit
h ch
airs
.
□
The
off
ice
also
nee
ds w
hite
boar
d, ta
ckbo
ard,
clo
set,
and
vide
o, v
oice
and
dat
a ou
tlet
s.
G
uida
nce
Sui
te
17
Gui
danc
e S
uite
Spa
tial N
eeds
C
ouns
elor
’s O
ffic
e
□
The
gui
danc
e su
ite
shou
ld b
e se
para
te f
rom
the
adm
inis
trat
ion
suit
e, b
ut e
asil
y ac
cess
ible
fro
m
the
mai
n en
tran
ce.
□
Cou
nsel
or’s
off
ices
sho
uld
be p
rovi
ded
at th
e ra
te o
f on
e pe
r ev
ery
250
stud
ents
.
□
Min
i bli
nds
mus
t be
prov
ided
for
tim
es w
hen
priv
acy
is r
equi
red.
□
Eac
h of
fice
sho
uld
be p
lann
ed f
or th
e co
unse
lor's
des
k w
ith
com
pute
r, p
hone
, fil
e ca
bine
ts, a
nd a
sm
all r
ound
tabl
e w
ith
four
cha
irs
for
smal
l gro
up c
ouns
elin
g.
S
taff
Roo
m
18
Sta
ff R
oom
Spa
tial N
eeds
S
taff
Roo
m
□
The
sta
ff r
oom
pro
vide
s te
ache
rs w
ith
a pl
ace
to r
est,
plan
, stu
dy, a
nd th
ink
toge
ther
.
□
The
sta
ff lo
unge
sho
uld
cont
ain
a co
mpa
ct b
uilt
-in
kitc
hen
wit
h si
x li
near
fee
t of
coun
ter
spac
e fo
r a
mic
row
ave
and
sink
and
a s
pace
for
a r
efri
gera
tor
(NIC
).
□
Thi
s sp
ace
is to
be
carp
eted
.
□
Toi
let r
oom
s as
soci
ated
wit
h th
e st
aff
room
are
to b
e pr
ovid
ed f
or b
oth
men
and
wom
en a
nd
shou
ld b
e lo
cate
d in
cor
rido
r ju
st o
utsi
de o
f st
aff
room
.
□
A p
hone
boo
th is
req
uire
d.
□
Aco
usti
cal t
reat
men
t is
impo
rtan
t.
□
Thi
s ar
ea s
houl
d ha
ve e
xter
ior
win
dow
s an
d do
or to
out
side
sta
ff p
atio
if d
esig
n al
low
s.
□
Com
pute
r ac
cess
sho
uld
be p
rovi
ded.
B
uild
ing
Ser
vice
s Fa
cilit
ies
19
Bui
ldin
g S
ervi
ce F
acili
ties
Spa
tial n
eeds
Pl
ant E
quip
men
t Ope
rato
r O
ffic
e G
ener
al S
tora
ge
Bui
ldin
g Se
rvic
e C
lose
ts
P
lant
Equ
ipm
ent
Ope
rato
r O
ffic
e
□
Thi
s of
fice
nee
ds to
be
adja
cent
to th
e bo
iler
roo
m.
□
The
off
ice
need
s to
acc
omm
odat
e a
desk
and
app
ropr
iate
dat
a w
irin
g fo
r co
mpu
ter
and
phon
e.
Gen
eral
Sto
rage
□
Fle
xibl
e sh
elvi
ng t
o ac
com
mod
ate
book
s, t
each
ing
aids
, la
rge
size
(24
" x
36")
pap
er,
and
othe
r in
stru
ctio
nal s
uppl
ies
is r
equi
red.
□
Goo
d li
ghti
ng a
nd e
asy
acce
ss to
mat
eria
ls b
eing
sto
red
are
requ
ired
.
□
Ele
ctri
cal
outl
ets,
upg
rade
d li
ghti
ng a
nd v
enti
latio
n m
ust
be p
rovi
ded
in a
ll l
arge
sto
rage
roo
ms
for
futu
re f
lexi
bili
ty.
Bui
ldin
g S
ervi
ce C
lose
ts
□ A
t a m
inim
um, t
here
sho
uld
be a
bui
ldin
g se
rvic
e cl
oset
for
eac
h 19
,000
gro
ss s
quar
e of
the
faci
lity
. In
add
itio
n, th
ere
shou
ld b
e a
buil
ding
ser
vice
clo
set o
n ea
ch f
loor
and
eac
h w
ing
of th
e fa
cili
ty.
□ T
he c
lose
ts s
houl
d be
a m
inim
um o
f 2
5 sq
. ft.
□ T
he b
uild
ing
serv
ice
clos
et m
ust a
ccom
mod
ate
a m
inim
um o
f on
e ut
ilit
y ca
rt.
□ T
he c
lose
t req
uire
s sh
elvi
ng f
or c
lean
ing
supp
lies
.
□ T
he c
lose
t req
uire
s a
floo
r m
op s
ink
wit
h ho
t and
col
d ru
nnin
g w
ater
and
a f
loor
dra
in.
□ A
mop
/bro
om h
olde
r is
req
uire
d.
S
ite R
equi
rem
ents
20
Site
Req
uire
men
ts
□
The
arc
hite
ct s
houl
d co
nsid
er th
e ar
chit
ectu
re o
f th
e ne
ighb
orho
od in
des
igni
ng th
e bu
ildi
ng.
□
The
des
ign
shou
ld r
etai
n as
man
y tr
ees
as p
ossi
ble
in o
rder
to b
uffe
r th
e sc
hool
and
the
play
ing
fiel
ds.
□
Ped
estr
ian
acce
ss m
ust b
e pr
ovid
ed f
rom
the
surr
ound
ing
neig
hbor
hood
s.
□
An
unim
prov
ed a
rea
on-s
ite
shou
ld b
e de
sign
ated
to s
erve
as
an e
nvir
onm
enta
l stu
dy a
rea
in th
e fu
ture
.
□
A c
over
ed a
rea
for
stud
ents
in th
e bu
s lo
adin
g ar
ea m
ust b
e pr
ovid
ed.
□
Bik
e ra
cks
shou
ld b
e pr
ovid
ed n
ear
the
buil
ding
.
□
20 u
seab
le a
cres
(m
ore
than
20
acre
s m
ay b
e ne
eded
due
to te
rrai
n or
for
env
iron
men
tal
prot
ecti
on r
equi
rem
ents
) D
rive
way
□
A s
epar
ate
entr
ance
and
exi
t or
turn
arou
nd f
or b
uses
wit
h st
acki
ng f
or u
p to
20
buse
s at
a ti
me
wit
h a
24-f
oot m
inim
um w
idth
and
50-
foot
min
imum
rad
ius
from
the
cent
erli
ne o
f th
e ro
adw
ay
is r
equi
red
to m
aneu
ver
a bu
s ad
equa
tely
.
□
A s
tude
nt d
rop-
off
area
als
o sh
ould
be
incl
uded
.
□
Dri
vew
ay a
pron
s sh
ould
be
perp
endi
cula
r to
the
cent
erlin
e of
the
stre
et; a
nd if
ther
e is
an
inte
rsec
ting
str
eet o
n th
e op
posi
te s
ide
from
the
prop
osed
dri
vew
ays,
then
the
driv
eway
apr
on
shou
ld li
ne u
p w
ith
the
inte
rsec
ting
str
eet,
if p
ossi
ble.
□
The
gra
de o
f th
e dr
ivew
ays
shou
ld n
ot e
xcee
d ei
ght p
erce
nt.
□
Car
e fo
r sa
fety
of
stud
ents
mus
t be
exer
cise
d in
dev
elop
ing
the
driv
eway
s in
clud
ing
use
of s
afet
y ra
ils
in th
e bu
s lo
adin
g ar
ea.
□
Par
king
spa
ces
for
125
cars
are
to b
e pr
ovid
ed.
At l
east
hal
f of
the
park
ing
area
sho
uld
be
read
ily
acce
ssib
le to
the
gym
nasi
um.
Out
door
ligh
ting
for
all
par
king
are
as a
nd e
ntra
nces
mus
t be
ade
quat
e fo
r sa
fety
and
cro
wd
cont
rol.
□
An
area
for
sta
ff a
nd p
aren
ts to
dro
p of
f he
avy
item
s fr
om th
eir
car
wit
h ea
sy a
cces
s in
to th
e sc
hool
mus
t be
deve
lope
d.
S
ite R
equi
rem
ents
21
Ser
vice
Dri
ve
□
The
ser
vice
dri
ve is
req
uire
d fo
r th
e ki
tche
n, b
oile
r ro
om, s
hops
, and
gen
eral
del
iver
y ar
eas.
□
5' m
inim
um w
idth
, wit
h ad
equa
te tu
rnar
ound
is r
equi
red.
□
The
ser
vice
dri
ve m
ust b
e de
sign
ed s
o th
at s
tude
nts
do n
ot n
eed
to c
ross
the
serv
ice
driv
e to
get
to
the
play
fie
lds.
□
If
oil h
eat i
s pr
ovid
ed, t
he o
il f
ille
r pi
pes
shou
ld b
e ea
sily
acc
essi
ble
for
trac
tor-
trai
ler
wit
h ad
equa
te o
verf
low
pip
es.
Pla
ying
Fie
lds
□
One
400
’ x
400’
pla
ying
fie
ld is
req
uire
d fo
r ge
nera
l use
.
□
One
300
' x 3
00' p
layi
ng f
ield
wit
h tw
o se
ts o
f so
ccer
goa
ls s
houl
d be
inst
alle
d
Soft
ball
Fiel
ds
□
Fou
r so
ftba
ll f
ield
s ar
e re
quir
ed.
□
250'
min
imum
rad
ius
wit
h ba
ckst
ops
are
requ
ired
—on
e w
ith
hood
, ben
ches
, and
saf
ety
fenc
es.
□
The
bas
elin
e of
the
mai
n fi
eld
shou
ld b
e sk
inne
d an
d in
fiel
d m
ix a
dded
. Tr
ack
And
Fie
ld A
rea
□
A lo
ng ju
mp
pit s
houl
d be
con
stru
cted
.
□
A s
hort
, 60-
yard
, 6-l
ane
trac
k fo
r sh
ort d
ista
nces
and
hur
dle
prac
tice
shou
ld b
e de
sign
ed f
or tr
ack
and
fiel
d in
stru
ctio
n. T
his
trac
k sh
ould
be
conn
ecte
d to
a w
alki
ng a
spha
lt p
ath
arou
nd th
e pe
rim
eter
of
the
fiel
ds.
□
Sev
eral
per
man
ent t
rash
cans
sho
uld
be p
rovi
ded
in th
is a
rea.
B
aske
tbal
l Cou
rts
□
Thr
ee c
ourt
s fe
nced
wit
h si
x go
osen
eck
post
s w
ith
heav
y-du
ty b
aske
tbal
l bac
kboa
rds
wit
h go
als
shou
ld b
e in
stal
led.
S
ite R
equi
rem
ents
22
□
A th
ree-
leve
l chi
nnin
g ba
r sh
ould
be
plac
ed n
ear
the
blac
k to
p ar
ea.
Pav
ed P
lay
Are
a
□
One
pav
ed p
lay
area
, 55’
x 1
10',
wit
h al
l-w
eath
er s
urfa
ce p
lay
area
sho
uld
be p
rovi
ded
near
the
cafe
teri
a an
d se
para
te f
rom
the
othe
r P
E a
reas
. Te
nnis
Cou
rts
□
Six
tenn
is c
ourt
s ar
e re
quir
ed e
ach
wit
h al
l-w
eath
er s
urfa
cing
and
nyl
on n
ets.
Met
al n
ets
shou
ld
not b
e in
stal
led
at th
e m
iddl
e sc
hool
.
□
One
ele
ctri
cal o
utle
t on
the
outs
ide
of th
e fe
nce
of o
n on
e co
urt i
s re
quir
ed.
□
Sev
eral
ben
ches
and
out
side
tras
hcan
s sh
ould
be
perm
anen
tly
inst
alle
d.
□
A c
omm
on "
rebo
und"
wal
l con
tigu
ous
wit
h th
e te
nnis
cou
rts
shou
ld b
e pr
ovid
ed.
Sto
rage
She
d
□ A
12'
x 1
6' s
tora
ge s
hed
shou
ld b
e pr
ovid
ed a
t the
far
end
of
the
site
.
□ N
o el
ectr
ic o
r w
ater
is n
eede
d.
□ I
t mus
t be
desi
gned
wit
h do
uble
ste
el d
oors
wit
h he
avy-
duty
har
dwar
e an
d sh
elve
s on
one
wal
l.