Anomalous Supercurrent from Majorana States in Topological Insulator JosephsonJunctions

Andrew C. Potter and Liang FuDepartment of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

We propose a Josephson junction setup based on a topological insulator (TI) thin film to detectMajorana states, which exploits the unique helical and extended nature of the TI surface state.When the magnetic flux through the junction is close to an integer number of flux quanta, Majoranastates, present on both surfaces of the film, give rise to a narrow peak-dip structure in the current-phase relation by hybridizing at the edge of the junction. Moreover, the maximal Majorana-statecontribution to Josephson current takes a (nearly) universal value, approximately equal to thesupercurrent capacity of a single quantum-channel. These features provide a characteristic signatureof Majorana states based entirely on supercurrent.

PACS numbers: 71.10.Pm, 73.23-b, 74.50+r, 74.90.+n

Majorana bound-states in superconductors are local-ized quasi-particles that are equal weight superpositionof electron and hole, which have non-Abelian braid-ing statistics[1, 2]. The presence of Majorana bound-states can produce unusual transport phenomena suchas a 4π-periodic Josephson effect[3, 4], resonant An-dreev reflection[5], and inherently nonlocal transport[6].Over the last few years, proposals for realizing Majo-rana states in various superconducting solid-state sys-tems have sparked tremendous interest and intensive ac-tivity (see [7, 8] and references therein). Recent exper-iments on semiconductor nanowires with proximity in-duced superconductivity[9, 10] observed signatures[11–14] interpreted as evidence of Majorana states.

Among the proposed material systems for realizingMajorana states, the superconductor (S)-topological in-sulator (TI) hybrid structure[15] has several distinctivefeatures. First, as a parent phase for Majorana states,the S-TI interface is topologically nontrivial even at zeromagnetic field. Consequently, the induced superconduc-tivity on the topological surface states of a TI is immuneto disorder[16]. This provides a robust route to realiz-ing Majorana states at elevated temperatures. Second,by their topological nature, surface states of a TI extendthroughout the entire sample boundary. The extendednature of such states has motivated us to propose a TI-based setup for detecting Majorana states.

In this paper, we study anomalous Josephson cur-rent signatures of Majorana states in a superconductor-topological insulator thin film-superconductor junctionunder an applied magnetic field. Importantly, the super-conductors and the TI film are arranged in such a waythat induced superconductivity exists on both top andbottom surfaces of the TI. The conceptually simplest ex-ample of such a setup is shown in Fig. 1a, in which thesuperconductors wrap around the TI in the entire y andz direction and the supercurrent flows in the x direction.This geometry will provide a useful starting point for the-oretical analysis. However, our results will also apply tothe simpler to fabricate geometry where the supercon-

y

θ(y)

0

2π

4π

Wy1 y2θ0

L

W

SC

SC

TI

θR

θL

B

xy z

|m0(y)|2

λB

ℓBy

a) b)

FIG. 1. Panel a) shows a depiction of the conceptually sim-plest device geometry considered in the main text (simpler tofabricate devices such as those measured in Ref. [17–22] arealso discussed). The top and bottom surfaces of the topologi-cal insulator (grey layer labeled TI) are in contact with super-conductors (blue layers). As the global-phase offset betweenthe left and right superconductors (θ0 = θR− θL) is adjusted,Majorana modes (shown as red-circles) bound to Josephsonvortices are created at one end of the junction, move along thejunction, and fuse on the opposite side of the junction. Panelb) shows the local phase difference θy for along the junction3Φ0 > ΦB > 2Φ0 and fixed θ0, and the corresponding massterm of Eq. 3. Wherever θy = π mod 2π, there is a local gapclosing that binds a Majorana state.

ductors are deposited only on the top surface, providedthat the superconductivity is transmitted to the bottomsurface through either bulk states (which are present inall experimentally realized TI materials), or side surfaces.Supercurrent through such SC-TI-SC junctions has beenrecently observed[17–22].

Our main findings and the basic physics behind themcan be stated in simple terms. Applying a magnetic fieldto the S-TI-S junction induces a one-dimensional arrayof Josephson vortices, due to the winding of the phasedifference between the two superconductors, θy ∝ By,in the y direction parallel to the junction. Each vortextraps a localized Majorana state on the top surface of theTI, and one on the bottom surface. The two are alignedvertically (see Fig. 1). The magnetic flux through the

arX

iv:1

303.

1524

v1 [

cond

-mat

.mes

-hal

l] 6

Mar

201

3

2

junction determines the number of Majorana states andtheir separation. The global phase offset θy=0 definedat a reference point y = 0 is an independent variable,which can be controlled in a SQUID geometry. For agiven magnetic field, increasing θ0 shifts the positions ofall Majorana states along the junction, towards one edgeof the TI sample. When the first pair of Majorana states,one from the top surface and the other from the bottom,approach the edge, they become hybridized due to thewavefunction overlap on the side surface, and eventuallyannihilate each other. As θ0 increases further, this fu-sion event repeats for the next pair of Majorana statesand so on. Meanwhile, an opposite event occurs at theother edge, where pairs of Majorana states are created.Decreasing the phase difference or reversing the directionof the magnetic field will reverse the direction of motionof Majorana states and interchange the role of the twoedges.

Each creation or fusion event causes an energy split-ting of the pair of Majorana states involved, and for thisreason, contributes to the DC Josephson supercurrentan amount that is independent of the width of the junc-tion. When the magnetic flux through the junction is(close to) an integer multiple of flux quanta, the normalcontribution to the supercurrent oscillates with positiony along the junction and (nearly) cancels to zero, whilethe Josephson supercurrent IM from splitting Majoranastates dominates. Advancing θ0 by 2π shifts each Majo-rana state to the next one. During this cycle, the firstpair of Majorana states in the array is fused, and a newpair is created and takes the place of the last one. Thisleads to a narrow peak in Josephson current IM as afunction of phase difference within each 2π period (seeFig.1d).

Model - We now derive the Majorana states and theJosephson current-phase relation for a short and wide S-TI-S junction, under the condition L < ξ < W whereL is the length of the junction, W is the width, and ξis the coherence length of topological surface states withproximity-induced superconducting gap. Moreover, forsimplicity we consider the case that the Josephson cur-rent is unable to screen the external magnetic field.

The Hamiltonian for the top surface of the S-TI-S junc-tion is

H =

∫d2rψ†(r) [vz · (π × s)− µ(r)]ψ(r)

+[∆(r)ψ†↑(r)ψ†↓(r) + h.c.

](1)

Here, πj = −i∂j − eAj(r) (j = x, y), and ψ(r) =(ψ↑(r), ψ↓(r)) describes the TI surface states, which havea Dirac dispersion with Fermi velocity v. Due to dopingfrom the superconductors, the chemical potential in thesuperconducting region µ(r) = µ′ at |x| > L/2 is differ-ent from the junction area µ(r) = µ at |x| < L/2. Aj(r)is the vector potential associated with the magnetic field

B. It is convenient to work in the Landau gauge Ax = 0.Ay(r) is then given by Ay(r) = −Bx for |x| < L/2,−BL/2 for x > L/2 and BL/2 for x < −L/2. In thisgauge, the superconducting gap ∆(r) is given by

∆(r) =

∆eiθy/2 x > L/2∆e−iθy/2 x < −L/20 |x| < L/2

(2)

The phase winding θy = πy/lB ensures zero supercur-rent along the y direction in the superconducting region.Here, the magnetic length is defined as: lB = W Φ0

ΦB,

where ΦB is the magnetic flux through the junction[24]).Since ∆(r) varies slowly with the position y, we use

semiclassical method to first solve the Hamiltonian with-out the kinetic energy term −iv∂ysx at an arbitrary y.This one-dimensional problem was previously solved forTI Josephson junction[15] and for a related problem ingraphene[25]. We quote their results below. When thejunction length L is shorter than the coherence lengthξ ≡ v/∆, there is a single pair of subgap Andreev boundstates at energy ±E(y), where E(y) = ∆ cos(θy/2) de-pends on the local phase difference and oscillates with theposition y (see Fig. 1b). Importantly, the two branchesof Andreev bound states cross each other at E(y) = 0,when the local phase difference θy is an odd multiple ofπ. Such a level crossing corresponds to a local change inthe fermion parity over a cycle, which is robust againstperturbations[26].

Majorana Bound-States - We now take the kineticenergy along the y direction into account, to obtain thelow-energy spectrum of the junction near E = 0. Forthis purpose, it is instructive to first consider the regionnear a level crossing point y = y1. This region can bedescribed[15] by the following effective Hamiltonian interms of two branches of counter-propagating Majoranafermions γL,R:

Heff = ivM (γL∂yγL − γR∂yγR) + iE(y)γLγR, (3)

with E(y) ≈ π∆(y − y1)/lB , and where the velocity vMarises from the kinetic energy along y direction. Thebound state energy E(y) corresponds to the hybridizationbetween the two Majorana states, and vanishes linearlyat y = y1.

The sign reversal of E(y) as a function of y gives riseto a zero-energy Majorana bound state that is spatiallylocalized in the junction at the position y0. The corre-sponding Majorana operator γ1 is given by:

γ1 =

∫dye−(y−y1)2/2λ2

B√2πλ2

B

1√2

[γL(y) + γR(y)] (4)

where the decay length in the y direction λB is: λB =√vM lB/π∆. This Majorana state is confined by the TI

band gap in the z direction, the proximity-induced su-perconducting gap in the x direction, and the magnetic-field-induced linear potential E(y) in the y direction. The

3

decay length in the z direction is given by the penetrationdepth of topological surface states into the bulk, whichis typically a few nanometers. The decay length in thex direction is given by the coherence length ξ (typicallya few hundred nanometers). The velocity vM dependson intrinsic properties of the junction. For a ballisticjunction, it was found that vM ' v(∆/µ)2 for µ = µ′

in Ref.[15] and vM ' v(∆/µ) sin(µL/v) for µ � µ′ inRef.[25]. Since ∆/µ is typically of the order 10−3, in bothcases the decay length of Majorana states λB along thejunction is much smaller than their separation. Thereforethe wavefunction overlap of two Majorana states alongthe junction is vanishingly small. For this reason, weare justified to treat these Majorana states as essentiallynon-interacting, except when a pair of them are near theedge of the TI.

Near each π-crossing the zero-energy Majorana state isaccompanied by other non-zero energy Andreev-bound-states (ABS’s). Approximating the mass term by a linearpotential, E(y) = π∆(y−y1)/`B , (valid in the vicinity ofθ(y) ≈ π), these ABS’s have energies ±En, where En ≈√

2πnvM∆/lB , n = 1, 2, . . . , nmax, and nmax ≈ `B∆/vM .

Contrast to Conventional Junctions - Low-energyAndreev bound-states can also occur near π phase dif-ference in conventional metallic Josephson junctions un-der ideal conditions. For a transparent superconductor-normal interface, and in the absence of spin-orbit cou-pling, a conventional 2D metallic junction can be thoughtof as two separate copies of Eq. 3 one for right mov-ing spin-up electrons and left-moving spin-down holes,and another for the corresponding time-reversed part-ners. This would lead to low-energy ABS’s bound toJosephson vortices similar to those described above, ex-cept doubly degenerate.

However, in practice normal scattering at the S-N in-terface (for example due to the chemical potential mis-match in S and N region) and spin-orbit coupling willpush ABS up in energy towards the bulk gap ∆, andeven completely remove them in a short Josephson junc-tion. In contrast, the helical nature of the TI surfacestate gives rise to topologically protected ABS’s, whichis also robust against disorder. Therefore, in the short-junction limit, the Josephson signatures described beloware particular to the special properties of the S-TI-S junc-tion.

Josephson Current - Having discussed the structureof low-energy Andreev bound-states in the junction, wenow analyze their effect on Josephson current. When thenumber of magnetic flux quanta, ΦB/Φ0, is not close toa non-zero integer then the Josephson current is carriedpredominately by conventional states (extended stateswith E > ∆, and non-zero energy ABS’s) and shows anearly sinusoidal current phase dependence. Near integervalues of flux quanta, ΦB/Φ0 = ±1,±2, etc . . . , however,the conventional contribution becomes vanishingly small.

In this regime, the Majorana bound-state contribu-tion to Josephson current dominates. For simplicity, wewill first describe the situation for ΦB = Φ0 in detail.The case of ΦB = NΦ0 is similar. When ΦB = Φ0,and θ0 6= π, there is exactly one Josephson vortexpiercing the junction, which binds Majorana modes aty0 = W

2 (1 − θ0π ) on both the top and bottom surfaces

of the TI. These Majorana modes hybridize by tunnel-ing into each other around the perimeter of the junction.The resulting energy splitting is exponentially suppressedas e−2 min[y0,(W−y0)]/λB , and is negligibly small when theposition of Majorana modes y0 is more than a few λBaway from the edges of the junction. In this regime, thesplitting is insensitive to y0 and θ0, and the Majoranamodes do not contribute to the Josephson current.

In contrast, when θ0 ≈ π, y0 ≈ 0 and the Majoranastates are strongly coupled near the edge and split awayfrom zero-energy. If the junction height h <∼ λB , then wemay ignore then finite thickness of the TI film, and the

Majorana states are split by energy δEM ≈√

vM∆`B

. As

θ0 approaches π from below, the Majorana states movetowards the junction edge at y = 0 and begin to fuseand split when θ0 ≈ π

(1− λB

W

). Increasing θ0 beyond π

causes a different set of Majorana states to emerge fromnear y = W , and move to decreasing y, reversing the pro-cess that occurred near y = 0 for θ0 > π. The hybridiza-tion of Majorana states at the two edges gives rise to localsupercurrents in opposite directions. At θ0 = π, the split-ting of Majorana states is large, but supercurrents fromtwo edges cancel. Slight deviation from θ0 = π tips thebalance by increasing the magnitude of supercurrent atone edge and suppressing the other, thereby generating anonzero total supercurrent. The sensitivity of the Majo-rana splitting energy to the phase difference implies thatthe Majorana states contribute a peak in the Josephsoncurrent near φ0 ≈ π

(1− λB

W

)followed by a dip in the

Josephson current near φ0 ≈ π(1 + λB

W

).

By these considerations, we find that the maximalsupercurrent carried by the Majorana state is IM ≈2πΦ0

δEM

δθ0≈ ∆/Φ0, which for Al SC layers is IM ≈ 10nA.

We note that this result is largely independent of details.In particular it is completely independent of vM , µ, W ,and L (though it can depend slightly on finer details suchas the degree of asymmetry between the top and bottomsurfaces, or between the two edges). The Majorana cur-rent IM ≈ ∆/Φ0 roughly corresponds to the maximalamount of Josephson current carried by a single quan-tum channel[27]. By comparison, for junctions of a fewµm in width, such as those measured in Ref. 20, there areroughly kFW ≈ 102 − 103 quantum channels in the en-tire junction. Consequently, the Majorana contributionto Josephson current, which dominates near an integerflux quanta, is 10−2 − 10−3 smaller than the maximumsupercurrent for zero flux quanta.

The situation is similar when a larger integer number,

4

3

θ/2π

E/Δ

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

θ/2π

I (n

A)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0

b)

d)

θ/2π

E/Δ

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

θ/2π

I (n

A)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0

a)

c)

1

2

-1

-2

-3

10

20

30

-10

-20

-30

× 103

FIG. 2. Numerical computation of the Andreev bound-statespectrum, and Josephson current for Eq. 3 with the param-eters vF = 4.2 × 105m/s, µ = 10meV, ∆ = 151µeV, andW = 2µm relevant for Al/Bi2Se3/Al junctions. Panels a andb show the low-lying Andreev bound-state spectrum as a func-tion of phase difference θ between the superconductors forΦB = 0.5Φ0 and ΦB = Φ0 respectively. The Josephson cur-rent corresponding to a) and b) are shown in panels c) and d)respectively. Panel d) displays the characteristic sharp peak-dip structure from topological Andreev bound-states fusingat the edge of the junction, as discussed in the text.

N , of magnetic-flux quanta pierce the junction. Here,there are N Josephson vortices, each with a bound Ma-jorana state. For N � W

λB, the splitting of these states

from tunneling between Majoranas is negligible, exceptin the vicinity of θ0 ≈ ±π where Majorana states fuseand annihilate at the edges of the junction. A similarpeak-dip current-structure is observed for higher integernumber of flux, N , with maximal current IM ≈ ∆

Φ0inde-

pendent of N , and with the peak (dip) width δθ ≈ πλB

N`B.

Like the Majorana zero-modes, as y1 → 0,W , the non-zero energy Andreev-bound-states on the top and bottomsurfaces hybridize and split. However, unlike the Majo-rana modes, both branches of the hybridized finite-energyABS’s are occupied and tend to give opposite and can-celling contributions to the Josephson current.

Numerical Solution - To illustrate the predictionsof the semiclassical treatment of this simple model, wehave also numerically computed the spectrum of Andreevbound-states and their contribution to Josephson currentby discretizing Eq. 3 on a finite lattice of spacing a, with

E(y) ≈ ∆ cos(πy`B

). In this simulations, we used realistic

parameters of vF and ∆ for an Al/Bi2Se3/Al junction,and junction geometry comparable to that in Ref. 20–22. While µ for Bi2Se3 is typically ≈ 0.1eV, for simplic-ity, we illustrate the case for smaller µ ≈ 10meV whichcan readily be achieved by gating[17, 22]. The Andreevbound-state spectrum and corresponding Josephson cur-rent are shown in Fig. 2 for half a magnetic flux quantum(left panel) and a single magnetic flux quantum (right).

For half a magnetic flux quantum, there is a single

θ/2π

I (n

A)

0 0.5 1

0

1

2

4

5× 103

00.25

0.5

0.75

1

b)a)

3

-4

-3

-1

-5

-2

θ/2π

I (n

A)

0 0.5 1

0

× 102

0.93

0.95

0.97

11

2

3

4

-1

-2

-3

-4

FIG. 3. Current-phase relationship for the parameters listedin Fig. 2 for a wide range of flux, Φ, (left) and for ΦB withina few percent of Φ0 (right). Each curve is labeled by value ofΦB/Φ0. The Majorana contribution to the Josephson currentbecomes appear as a shoulder in the curves of the right panelwhich grows and eventually dominates very close to Φ = Φ0.

3

ΦB/Φ

0

I c(nA

)-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

0

ΦB/Φ

0

I c(nA

)

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3101

102

103

1

2

× 103

FIG. 4. Critical current, IC , as a function of flux, ΦB in linear(left) and log- scale (right). The curve is quite close to theconventional Frauenhofer pattern, with the exception that ICdoes not vanish at integer number of flux quanta due to theextra contribution of the Majorana bound-states (as can beseen in the log-scale plot).

Majorana zero-mode when θ0 ∈ [0, π], however, the cur-rent is dominated by conventional states. For a full fluxquantum, there are Majorana bound-states for all valuesof θ0, which fuse at the junction edge when θ0 ≈ π asdescribed above. Away from θ0 ≈ π, the spectrum isroughly independent of phase. Near θ0 = π, the ABS’snear the π-crossings on the top and bottom surfaces hy-bridize and contribute to Josephson current. However,since the non-zero energy ABS’s split in opposite direc-tions the Josephson current is predominately carried bythe lowest-energy state, as described above.

The results are similar for larger chemical potential, ex-cept that vM is smaller, leading to a smaller level spacingfor the non-zero energy ABS’s, and a narrower peak-dipstructure at ΦB = Φ0. Importantly though, the maxi-mum current in the peak-dip structure shown in Fig. 2d.is independent of vM , in agreement with the analytic ar-guments presented above.

Fig. 3 shows the current phase-relation for various val-ues of flux through the junction. The Majorana modecontribution only starts to become visible for flux within≈ 5% of a single flux quantum (see right panel of Fig. 3).This contribution appears initially as a shoulder on thebackground sine-curve, which strengthens and becomesdominant within 1% of a single flux quantum.

Finally, Fig. 4 shows the critical current, IC , as a func-

5

θ/2π

I (n

A)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

05nm

20nm

40nm

60nm

100

200

-100

-200

FIG. 5. Current-phase relationship for a single magnetic flux,and varying TI thickness h = 0nm, 20nm, 40nm, and 60nm.Thicker sides tend to contribute conventional Josephson sig-natures that mask the topological Andreev-bound-state con-tributions.

tion of flux through the junction. IC nearly follows thecharacteristic Frauenhofer pattern, except that IC doesnot vanish for integer flux due to the Majorana contri-butions to the Josephson current. In the experiments ofRef. 20, the avoided zero in the Frauenhofer pattern issubstantially larger (≈ 10% of the maximal IC). As de-scribed below (and illustrated in Fig. 5), this discrepancycan be explained by accounting for the non-negligiblethickness of the TI film in these experiments.

Discussion - Up to now we have assumed that thethickness, h, of the TI film is smaller than the size of theMajorana states, λB . In practice, λB is at most a fewtens of nanometers. For thicker films with h > λB , theside of the TI may host additional states compared toh = 0 when the phase difference at the edge is close toπ. As shown in Fig. 5, these states will conduct Joseph-son current, as their energies are sensitive to the phasedifference along the sides of the junction. Like the Ma-jorana contribution described above, the contribution ofcurrent from these sides can dominate when there areclose to an integer number of magnetic-flux quanta pierc-ing the junction. Unlike the Majorana contribution how-ever, these states exhibit a more conventional sinusoidalcurrent-phase relationship, rather than a sharp peak-dipstructure (see Fig.5).

Therefore, for the purpose of observing Josephson-current signatures of Majorana fermions, it is advanta-geous to make the TI film as thin as possible withoutstrongly hybridizing the top and bottom surfaces. Sincethe confinement length in the z-direction is only a fewnanometers, this last constraint is not too severe. Fur-thermore, it is advantageous to limit the junction widthW (while maintaining W > λB) in order to suppress thecontributions from conventional extended states (whichscales as I ∼ W , in contrast to the width independentcontribution from the Majorana bound-states).

Lastly, while we have mainly considered the geometryshown in Fig. 1, where superconductors are depositedon the top and bottom surfaces. In practice it is easierto fabricate devices where superconductors are depositedonly on the top surface. As described above, we expect

our analysis to also apply to this simpler to fabricate ge-ometry, so long as the TI thickness is less than a coher-ence length, and so long as superconductivity is transmit-ted from top to bottom surfaces via either bulk TI statesor boundary states on side surfaces. The main differencefrom the case discussed in the text is that there will bea non-zero hybridization of the ABS’s on the top andbottom surfaces through the bulk. Nonetheless, in thiscase the energy splitting of the top and bottom ABS’s isposition independent, which will not qualitatively alterthe Josephson signatures discussed above so long as thesplitting is much smaller than the bulk gap ∆.

Throughout this work we have implicitly assumed thatthe system is in its ground state. Finite temperature willnot qualitatively alter our results, provided T < δEM .Deviations from ground-state behavior may also occurdue to sources of single electrons, such as localized impu-rity states near the junction. When the Majorana statesare far from the junction edge, their mutual fermion par-ity can be switched by tunneling to local single-electronsources. After such a parity switching, the Majoranamodes will follow the positive energy branch as theyapproach the junction boundary and fuse, thereby con-tributing the opposite sign of Josephson current com-pared to the equilibrium case discussed above. Suchparity switching events can thereby lead to hystereticcurrent-phase behavior, whose observation would providestrong evidence for the Majorana character of the An-dreev bound-states in the junction.

Acknowledgements - We thank Pouyan Ghaemi, PatrickA. Lee, Joel Moore and especially Bertrand I. Halperinfor useful discussions. ACP acknowledges funding fromDOE Grant No. DEFG0203ER46076, and also thanksthe Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics at UC SantaBarbara, supported in part by the NSF Grant No. NSFPHY11-25915, for hosting part of this research.

[1] N. Read and D. Green, Paired states of fermions in twodimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal sym-metries and the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys.Rev. B 61, 10267 (2000).

[2] D. A. Ivanov, Non-Abelian statistics of half-quantum vor-tices in p-wave superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 268(2001).

[3] A.Y. Kitaev Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantumwires. Phys.-Usp. 44, 131 (2001)

[4] H. J. Kwon, K. Sengupta and V. M. Yakovenko, Frac-tional ac Josephson effect in p-and d-wave superconduc-tors. Low Temp. Phys. 30, 613 (2004).

[5] K. T. Law, Patrick A. Lee, and T. K. Ng, Majoranafermion induced resonant Andreev reflection. Phys. Rev.Lett. 103, 237001 (2009).

[6] L. Fu, Electron Teleportation via Majorana Bound Statesin a Mesoscopic Superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104,056402 (2010).

6

[7] C. Beenakker, Search for Majorana fermions in super-conductors arXiv:1112.1950, (2011)

[8] J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majoranafermions in solid state systems. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75,076501 (2012).

[9] R. M. Lutchyn, J.D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Ma-jorana fermions and a topological phase transitionin semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures. Phys.Rev. Lett. 105, 077001 (2010).

[10] Y. Oreg, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, Helical Liquidsand Majorana Bound States in Quantum Wires. Phys.Rev. Lett. 105, 177002 (2010).

[11] V. Mourik, K. Zuo, S.M. Frolov, S.R. Plissard, E.P.A.M.Bakkers, and L.P. Kouwenhoven, Signatures of Majo-rana Fermions in Hybrid Superconductor-SemiconductorNanowire Devices. Science 336, 1003 (2012).

[12] A. Das, Y. Ronen, Y. Most, Y. Oreg, M. Heiblum, H.Shtrikman, Zero-bias peaks and splitting in an Al-InAsnanowire topological superconductor as a signature ofMajorana fermions. Nat. Phys. 8, 887 (2012).

[13] M. T. Deng, C.L. Yu, G.Y. Huang, M. Larsson, P.Caro, H.Q. Xu, Observation of Majorana Fermionsin a Nb-InSb Nanowire-Nb Hybrid Quantum Device.arXiv:1204.4130 (2012).

[14] L. P. Rokhinson, X. Liu and J. K. Furdyna, Thefractional ac Josephson effect in a semiconductor-superconductor nanowire as a signature of Majorana par-ticles. Nat. Phys. 8, 795 (2012).

[15] L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Superconducting proximity effectand Majorana fermions at the surface of a topologicalinsulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008).

[16] A. C. Potter and P. A. Lee, Engineering a p+ip supercon-ductor: Comparison of topological insulator and Rashbaspin-orbit-coupled materials. Phys. Rev. B. 83, 184520(2011).

[17] B. Sacepe, J.B. Oostinga, J. Li, A. Ubaldini, N.J.G.Couto, E. Giannini, and A.F. Morpurgo, Gate-tuned nor-mal and superconducting transport at the surface of atopological insulator. Nat. Comm 2, 575 (2011).

[18] D. Zhang, J. Wang, A. M. DaSilva, J. S. Lee, H. R.Gutierrez, M. H. W. Chan, J. Jain and N. Samarth, Su-

perconducting proximity effect and possible evidence forPearl vortices in a candidate topological insulator. Phys.Rev.B. 84, 165120 (2011).

[19] M. Veldhorst, M. Snelder, M. Hoek, T. Gang, V. K.Guduru, X. L.Wang, U. Zeitler, W. G. van der Wiel, A.A. Golubov, H. Hilgenkamp and A. Brinkman, Joseph-son supercurrent through a topological insulator surfacestate. Nature Mat. 11, 417 (2012).

[20] J.R. Williams, A. Bestwick, P. Gallagher, S. Hong, Y.Cui, A. Bleich, J. Analytis, I. Fisher, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Unconventional Josephson Effect in HybridSuperconductor-Topological Insulator Devices. Phys. Rev.Lett. 109, 056803 (2012).

[21] F. Qu, F. Yang, J. Shen, Y. Ding, J. Chen, Z. Ji, G. Liu,J. Fan, X. Jing, C. Yang and L. Lu, Strong Superconduct-ing Proximity Effect in Pb-Bi2Te3 Hybrid Structures. Sci.Rep. 2, 339 (2012)

[22] S. Cho, B. Dellabetta, A. Yang, J. Schneeloch, Z. Xu,T. Valla, G. Gu, M.J. Gilbert, and N. Mason SymmetryProtected Josephson Supercurrents in Three-DimensionalTopological Insulators. arXiv:1209.5830 (2012).

[23] P. Zareapour, A. Hayat, S. Yang, F. Zhao, M. Kreshchuk,A. Jain, D. C. Kwok, N. Lee, S. W. Cheong, Z. Xu,

A. Yang, G. D. Gu, S. Jia, R. J. Cava, K. S. Burch,Proximity-induced high-temperature superconductivity inthe topological insulators Bi2Se3 and Bi2Te3. Nat. Com-mun. 3, 1056 (2012).

[24] Flux expulsion from the superconductors can concentrateflux into the junction region. Consequently the magneticflux through the junction, ΦB , defines an effective area:Aeff = ΦB/B which is in general different than the ge-ometry area W × L.

[25] M. Titov and C.W.J. Beenakker, Josephson effect in bal-listic graphene. Phys. Rev. B 74, 041401(R) (2006).

[26] L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Josephson current andnoise at a superconductor/quantum-spin-Hall-insulator/superconductor junction. Phys. Rev. B79, 161408(R) (2009).

[27] C. W. J. Beenakker and H. van Houten, Josephson cur-rent through a superconducting quantum point contactshorter than the coherence length. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66,3056 (1991)