+ All Categories
Home > Documents > June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

Date post: 30-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: dasia-kirkham
View: 218 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
23
June 29, 2009 “Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers” NASUCA – Boston 2009
Transcript
Page 1: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

June 29, 2009

“Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers”

NASUCA – Boston 2009

Page 2: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

2

Agenda

• EnerNOC Overview

• What is the “Smart Grid”?

• The Smart Grid’s First “Killer App”: Demand Response

• Making the Smart Grid a Reality: What will it take?

Page 3: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

EnerNOC Overview

Page 4: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

4

What is EnerNOC?

- Big

Largest Commercial & Industrial Demand Response Provider in North America, with more than 3,000 MW under management from over 2,000 end-use customers across more than 5,000 commercial and industrial sites.

- Experienced

EnerNOC is active in every major electric market in North America with DR programs and also has bilateral relationships with regulated utilities throughout the United States.

- Thought Leader

EnerNOC has received two US Patents for the aggregation of distributed energy and generation resources. We are active at NAESB, NERC and NIST in setting standards for M&V that ensure consumers get what they are paying for.

- Smart Grid Operator

EnerNOC operates its own “Smart Grid” connecting its 5,000+ sites across the United States and Canada to its Network Operation Centers in Boston and San Francisco.

Page 5: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

5

EnerNOC Demand Response

EnerNOC Office

• ISO-New England (ISO-NE) • PJM Interconnection (PJM)• New York ISO (NYISO) • Ontario Power Authority (OPA)• Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT)

PROGRAMS IN RESTRUCTURED MARKETS

BILATERAL PROGRAMS – REGULATED UTILITIES

Burlington Electric Department (VT)

10 MW, 4 year contract

Idaho Power 65 MW, 5 year contract

Pacific Gas & Electric 40 MW, 5 year contract

Public Service Company of New Mexico

30 MW, 10 year contract

Salt River Project 50 MW, 3 year contract

San Diego Gas & Electric25 MW, 10 year contract

25 MW expansion (pending regulatory approval)

Southern California Edison

40 MW, 2 year contract

Tampa Electric Company 35 MW, 4 year contract

Tennessee Valley Authority

110 MW, 3 year contract

Xcel Energy (Colorado) 44 MW, 8 year contract

EnerNOC’s Demand Response Footprint

Page 6: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

6

EnerNOC Growth

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 5/6

Cu

sto

me

r S

ite

s

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

MW

Un

de

r M

an

ag

em

en

t

MW Under ManagementSites Under Management

2008200720062005 2009

Page 7: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

What is the “Smart Grid”?

Page 8: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

A Useful Analogy

- What is the Internet?

- Is it the network switches, server farms, and fiber optic cables?

Or does the Internet, and the value it provides, come from the applications that sit on top of the enabling infrastructure?

The Internet’s “Killer Apps”: email, social networking, the World Wide Web

Page 9: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

“Knowledge is Power” – Sir. Francis Bacon

The Smart Grid is ultimately about information – knowledge – but the true value – or power - of that knowledge lies in how it can be used.

The Smart Grid can be a vehicle to hugely empower consumers

PROVIDED

• It allows customers, or those they designate, to timely and directly access their information

• It prevents unauthorized parties from doing so – the systems are secure

• It provides an open foundation on which to provide services – that is, it is based on open, non-proprietary protocols, as the Internet is

Page 10: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

The Smart Grid is not AMI

- Advanced Meters and the Infrastructure that connects them are not inherently “smart”

- The Smart Grid is more than meters and wires

- Smart Meters and AMI enable “smart” applications

- It is the applications that provide the real value- Demand Response / Price Responsive Load through “smart” rates

- Energy Management

- Grid Management

As with the Internet, it is the applications we haven’t thought of yet, that will probably provide the most value to consumers

Page 11: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

The Smart Grid’s First “Killer App”:Demand Response

“Demand response is clearly the ‘killer application’ of the smart grid.”

- FERC Commissioner Jon Wellinghoff

Page 12: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

12

C&I Demand Response – The First “Killer App”

- Most DR today isn’t “smart” and comes in the form of Interruptible Tariffs (“Press and Pray”) and residential Direct Load Control, with little to no real-time visibility.

- Aggregators like EnerNOC have enabled next-generation demand response without waiting for AMI/Smart Grid deployments – we make existing meters “smarter” and operate our own “smart grid.”

- Post AMI deployment, there is still a crucial role for an Aggregator. C&I demand response will never be plug & play:

– ZigBee chips may allow DLC for refrigerators and washing machines in the home, but that approach won’t work for C&I loads.

– If a meter cannot be successfully attached to loads, its communication and/or control functionality provides limited benefit.

Page 13: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

13

*As of 9/30/08

EnerNOC’s DR Technology

Network Operations Center (NOC)

Our two NOCs, staffed 24x7x365,

feature advanced technology and

specialized staff to ensure that load

reductions happen quickly, efficiently,

and consistently for both the utility

and end user.

EnerNOC Site Server (ESS)

The ESS is a gateway device that

establishes communication with sites in

our network and provides near-real time

visibility into end-user energy

consumption. The ESS also allows the

NOC to remotely curtail loads in order to

deliver demand response capacity.

EnerNOC has invested millions in its highly-scalable technology platform, which provides a foundation for consistent and reliable DR event performance.

PowerTrak®

EnerNOC’s web-based energy

management platform, PowerTrak,

monitors energy consumption and

enables end-user load control.

PowerTrak also provides end-users with

a web portal and utilities with the ability

to view load reductions during demand

response events.

Page 14: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

14

Why is Demand Response Important?

Annual Energy Demand

50%

100%

Winter Spring Summer Fall

75%

90%

25%

In 2008, 10% of New England’s peak demand occurred in

46 hours.*

* EnerNOC Analysis of ISO New England market data: http://www.iso-ne.com/markets/hstdata/znl_info/hourly/2008_smd_hourly.xls.

Page 15: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

15

Demand Response Benefits Ratepayers

• ISO-New England: Electricity Costs White Paper (2006)

– Reducing electricity use by 5% during peak times will save consumers $580 million per year

• Brattle Group: Quantifying Demand Response Benefits in PJM (2007)

– $138-281 Million of system benefits to PJM if load curtailed 3% during top 20 5-hour price blocks of 2005

• Summit Blue: Demand Response Resources Valuation and Market Analysis (2006)

– Forecast: Demand response will save $892 million in capacity charges over next 20 years (present value, 2004 $)

Page 16: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

16

What Do We Do? - Demand Response Actions

Curtailment Self-Generation

Examples of Processes that EnerNOC Controls

Air handlersAnti-sweat heatersChiller controlChilled water systems Defrost elementsElevators    EscalatorsExternal lightingExternal water features HVAC systems

Internal lightingIrrigation pumps MotorsOutside signageParking lot lightingProduction equipment Processing linesPool pumps / heatersRefrigeration systemsWater heating

Page 17: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

17

Where Do We Do It? – Typical Providers

Page 18: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

18

0% 50% 100% 150%

How Do We Do It - Aggregation

Customer 1

Customer 2

Customer 3

Customer 4

100% RISK 0% RISK

Customer 8

Customer 9

Customer 10

Customer 11

Customer 12

Customer 13

Customer 14

Customer 5

Customer 6

Customer 7

Customer 15

Customer 16

UtilityEnerNOC

Portfolio Management is a key component of this “Killer App,” allowing participation from

end-users who are too small to directly interface with a market or utility.

0% RISK

0% 50% 100% 150% 0% 50% 100% 150%

Page 19: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

19

How Do We Do It - Performance Coaching

4/23/09 (12:12) [email protected] will make sure his team shuts everything down. I will call him back in 10 minutes with an update.4/23/09 (12:26) [email protected] Bill again to indicate that they are making progress as of 1:20 reading, but still not all the way there. He is on it with his team, and he apologized that “they weren’t on the ball at 12pm.”

Page 20: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

20

Demand Response Benefits to Consumers

Revenue Community Environment

Performance coaching, coupled with portfolio management allows Aggregators like EnerNOC to guarantee performance to utilities and ISOs/RTOs without penalizing participating customers. Reliability is maintained and expensive and dirty new generation is avoided.

Page 21: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

Making the Smart Grid a Reality:

What will it take?

Page 22: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

22

Making the Smart Grid a Reality: What will it take?

• Customer/Agent access to meter data.– Customers need to own their own information and be able to access it on their

own terms

• Interoperability and Open Standards.– The Smart Grid must be a platform that allows innovators to innovate

• Smart Rates– Information is useless if it is not actionable

• Proper incentives.- The enabling technology may be present, but without smart policies,

disincentives still exist.

- Policies are needed that level the playing field between DR and supply-side investments.

- Decoupling addresses some disincentives associated with DSM, but mostly in terms of energy efficiency.

- Carrots appear to work better than sticks at motivating changes in utility behavior.

Page 23: June 29, 2009 Smart Grid, Demand Response & Consumers NASUCA – Boston 2009.

23

Energy Network Operations Center

Aaron Breidenbaugh, Senior Manager of Regulatory Affairs and Public Policy617-224-9918 [email protected]


Recommended