Jurnal Submit Final

8/21/2019 Jurnal Submit Final

1/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

Proposed Performance Management System Framework byUsing IPMS Method at Center for Pulp and Paper Ministry of

Industry

Journal: International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

Manuscript ID: Draft

Manuscript Type: Standard Paper

Keywords:Performance management, Goverment Research Institution, TOWS Matrix,IPMS Method

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management


2/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

ED EACE AAEE E AE B

ED A CEE AD AE

D

K D

B

I B, I.@..; @...

A

I I C .

I . &D

. , &D

. ,

. C,

&D I C

.

D//A I (I) ,

.

(KI)

I .

A H (AH).

.

F .

.

I

.

C I I A.

/ I C .

C I.

: , G I, , I

1.

I

. I

. C (C) (&D)

I. I 14, 1968

C ,

, , , , .

I 2010 2014

ge 1 of 16 International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management


3/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

2010 2014 5 2010.

,

. , 3

, .

K I (KI)

114 2013.

F 1.

F 1. I ( , 2013)

&D &D &D

. , &D

/ . I

, &D

,

&D .

1

1. B &D D C

Page 2International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management


4/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

2. B E

C

A A

I (BKII). &D

. I C

. C

,

.

. C

&D

. C

:

1. C &D ( B)

2.

3. &D

4. G &D

F ,

.

2011 2013. B 2014,

I .

F 2.

F 2. G 2011 2014

&D

20 27% 2011 2014.

&D 27,70% 2013. D

, &D 2013 2014.

F 3. &D

27,7% 20,95% 2014 (C)

. A &D ,

&D .

. C

&D

. C ,

.

(, 2006).



5/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

F 3. G C &D A

,

, . E

A

,

.

C . F

F 4, 2011 2014.

&D

&D .

F 4. G F &D A

16,67% 2011 0%

2014 &D .

I (I)

. A I

(I) .

&D &D

&D .

&D &D

.

&D .

&D



6/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

&D . F 5 &D

2012, 2011 2012. B

.

&D C

. B

C, (

C).

F 5. G I

&D B

B , C

.

. C

:

1.

2.

&D

3.

4. C &D

&D

5.

C ,

6.

&D

&D .

7. &D

.

8.

&D .

C , &D . I

&D

. ,

I .

3. B

A

. C

.



7/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

B

. A (&D)

.

C , I F 6 .

Problem Diagnosis

•

Lack of approriate performance management system• Poor performance of company core competence in R&D services

• KPI isn’t inline with ministry of industry strategic plan

• Reform of bureaucracy issues

Business Solution

Designing the new Performance Management System based on

Integrated Performance Management System

Proposed Application PMS

Proposed application of Integrated Performance Management System at

Center for Pulp and Paper, Ministry of Industry, Republic of Indonesia

Collection and Processing Data

Identification external and internal Business Environment

Identify the strategic environment of company based on business

environmental analysis

Primary Data

Questionnaire and Forum Group Discussion

Secondary Data

Appropriate document such as goverment

accountability report, strategic plan report and literature

Stage 0 : Foundation

4 principles and 5 rules

Stage 1 : Basic InformationExternal and internal analysis

IPMS design

framework

Stage 2 : Design

•

Vision, mission and strategy analysis• Performance variable

• Linkage

• Benchmark

Stage 3 : Implementation

Recommendation of

framework implementation

Choose the suitable Performance Management System Framework

The choice of PMS available are IPMS, BSC, Performance Prism and SSBSC.

PMS that selected comes from company strategy analysis

Methodology for weight and scoring parameter

Analytical Hierarchy Process



8/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

F 6. D C

) 0 :

. I

, I ,

2,

:

2 I

1.

, ,

/

2.

( )

3.

4.

KI

J KI

5. E

6. C

(B)

7.

8.

C

9.

,

.

) 1 : B

B

,

. I ,

(EE )

( F F ).

1) E

. : C

&D (IB

), &D ( II )

&D (A A).

. E : I &D FI , K

C I (A &D )



9/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

&D I . &D

AEA

I AEC 2015.

(IB) ,

.

.

: C

. B C

. . B B : C .

I .

I

.

. B :

, , I

. ,

.

2)

E

3 E

E E 1)

•

/

2)

E

• C

I GD

• I

AEA

2015

•

C

3)

• E

•

4)

• E

.

I 9

& 6

.

.

G

,

.

I

AEC 2015,

.

.

) 2 : D

. A

F C , :

.

B

, , .

4

K I I



10/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

(B

&D )

&D .

D

&D .

E

, ,

(

, ,

)

D

.

D

. A

B C , :

, ,

,

5

K I I

(

, ,

)

C

D

( )

E

(

,

)

G

.

I

.

.

EFA IFA A

IFA EFA

. IFA

EFA 6 7.

A H (AH) .



11/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

6 IFA A C

(1 5)

()

1 &D

0,10 4 0,40

2

I 17025

I 9001

2009.

0,02 3 0,06

3 &D 80%

(AB). 0,01 3 0,03

4

I

(AKI) I

(AI) 2006

0,02 2 0,04

5 53%

23%

.

0,05 3 0,15

()

1 0,17 3 0,51

2

1986 20040,03 2 0,06

3 &D

12 : 1

0,29 4 1,16

4 70%

0,23 4 0,92

5

0,08 3 0,24

A 1 3,57

7 EFA A C

E

(1 5)

()

1 &D

KA

, I

0,12 3 0,36

2 8

.20

2010

0,11 4 0,44

3

.3

2014

0,05 2 0,10

4 B .100 2012,

0,17 4 0,68



12/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

5 I .9 .6

I

0,03 2 0,06

()

1 B

() 57%

()

0,17 4 0,68

2

0,03 1 0,03

3 D

0,11 4 0,44

4 AEA E C

2015 0,17 3 0,51

5 .190 2012

C

0,04 3 0,12

A 1 3,42

B EFA IFA ,

F 7. A , C

3,42 AH . F,

,

3,57 .

F 7 D C

F , C

. G C

. I , . B

&D , C .

.

C

.

( ), C (

), C ( )

1

2

3

4

5

1 2 4 5

EFAS

I

F A S

GrowthStability

Retrenchment Diversification

CPP

3,57

3,42



13/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

C ( ). F

8, 11 .

8 C

E ()

1.

&D .

2. C

I 17025 I 9001

.

3.

80%

.

4.

.

5.

53%

23%

EAEE ()

1.

2. G

3. &D

4.

5.

E ()

1. I &D

KA

2.

8

3.

4.

C

.

5.

I .9 .6

.

()

• C &D

(5 1,4)

•

(3 1)

• &D

(1 3,5)

()

•

(1 3)

• B

(4 1)

• D

&D

(2,3 4)

EA ()

1.

2.

3. D

4. AEA

E C 2015

5. F

()

• D

(1 4, 5)

• B

(4

3,4)

()

•

(B)

(1 3)

•

(2, 4 3)

•

(5 2,5)

) 3 :

. C

, C

:

EFAS

IFAS



14/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

. H

C,

: , ,

&D .

.

C . .

.

.

A

I

.

.

I

. F,

.

.

F ,

C , .

.

F C,

. E &D

,

, , , ,

, .

.

.

C

. B

,

, ,

. C

&D .

I

(I) .

.

.

. I

&D

.

.

. B

F ,

C , .

.

F

F

(B).

.



15/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

.

.

F

A &D , &D C

.

. AH (A H

) . . H AH 3 , 11

24 . ,

.

9.

9 AH

11

.

C F 8.

1 0,181

2 0,171

3 0.152

4 0,060

5 (AB) 0.0496 (BI) 0.049

7 (B) 0.049

8 0,047

9 0,039

10 0,037

11 0,030

12 I 0,022

13 0,016

14 C 0,015

15 0,015

16 0,014

17 0,010

18 0,010

19 0,00820 () 0,008

21 I (I) 0,008

22 0,005

23 0,003

24 0,003



16/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

F 8 D

C

.

. G

FI (F I )

C. FI E. D &D

C FI 10.

10 &D C FI 2013

()

C

(C)

()

() . 730 . 100,8

/

1 : 4 3 : 10

() 11 189

&D

(E)

8 28

() 20 159• 10 47

• 10 112

()

17 71

() 1 6

()

1 3

()

/A 15

4.

,

, , , . A

, C 5 . D

.

C

.

.

9.



17/17

F o r P

e e r R

e v i e w

F 9 I

C , (2011), C 2010 2014,

I, I.

F I (FI) A , (2013), E, .

G A C , (2011), I,

I.

G A C , (2012), I,

I.

G A C , (2013), I,

I.

I 2010 2014 , (2010), I,

I.

, (2014), I &D I : I I

&D . J , 36, 148

160.

, ., H J. D., (2012), B :

G , E, E : A.

, D., (2012), H C C C : B

D, G : J, I.

, D, (2006), K : K, D D

, E : J, I.


Date post:	07-Aug-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	mahammad-khadafi
View:	215 times
Download:	0 times

Jurnal Submit Final

Documents