+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF...

Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF...

Date post: 07-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
185
28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case No. 13-53846 ) Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes ) NOTICE OF SUBPOENAS TO RICHARD DALE SNYDER, DAVID BING, ANDREW DILLON, RICHARD L. BAIRD, LAMONT SATCHEL, DENNIS MUCHMORE, JOHN ROBERTS, ALLISON SCOTT, WILLIAM SCHUETTE, THOMAS QUASARANO, BRIAN DEVLIN, DARRELL BURKS, RONALD E. GOLDSBERRY, FREDERICK HEADEN, THOMAS H. MCTAVISH, KENNETH WHIPPLE, KYLE HERMAN, KENNETH A. BUCKFIRE, JAMES DOAK, CYNTHIA A. THOMAS, GUARAV MALHOTRA, CONWAY MCKENZIE, JUAN SANTAMBROGIO, DANIEL JERNEYCIC, KEVYN D. ORR, HARRY WILSON TO PARTIES IN INTEREST: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, on the date hereof, The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees filed and served deposition subpoenas addressed to the following: 1. Governor Richard Dale Snyder 2. Mayor David Bing 3. Treasurer Andrew Dillon 4. Transformation Manager Richard L. Baird 5. Assistant Attorney General Brian Devlin 6. Director of Labor Relations Lamont Satchel 7. Chief of Staff Dennis Muchmore 8. John Roberts 13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 1 of 185
Transcript
Page 1: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26569593.1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE OF SUBPOENAS TO RICHARD DALE SNYDER, DAVID BING, ANDREW

DILLON, RICHARD L. BAIRD, LAMONT SATCHEL, DENNIS MUCHMORE, JOHN

ROBERTS, ALLISON SCOTT, WILLIAM SCHUETTE, THOMAS QUASARANO,

BRIAN DEVLIN, DARRELL BURKS, RONALD E. GOLDSBERRY, FREDERICK

HEADEN, THOMAS H. MCTAVISH, KENNETH WHIPPLE, KYLE HERMAN,

KENNETH A. BUCKFIRE, JAMES DOAK, CYNTHIA A. THOMAS, GUARAV

MALHOTRA, CONWAY MCKENZIE, JUAN SANTAMBROGIO, DANIEL

JERNEYCIC, KEVYN D. ORR, HARRY WILSON

TO PARTIES IN INTEREST:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, on the date hereof, The Michigan Council 25 of the

American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98,

City of Detroit Retirees filed and served deposition subpoenas addressed to the following:

1. Governor Richard Dale Snyder

2. Mayor David Bing

3. Treasurer Andrew Dillon

4. Transformation Manager Richard L. Baird

5. Assistant Attorney General Brian Devlin

6. Director of Labor Relations Lamont Satchel

7. Chief of Staff Dennis Muchmore

8. John Roberts

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 1 of 185

Page 2: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

- 2 -

9. Executive Director to Governor Allison Scott

10. Attorney General William Schuette

11. Assistant Attorney General Thomas Quasarano

12. Darrell Burks

13. Ronald E. Goldsberry

14. Frederick Headen

15. Thomas H. McTavish

16. Kenneth Whipple

17. Kyle Herman of Miller Buckfire

18. Kenneth A. Buckfire of Biller Buckfire

19. James Doak of Miller Buckfire

20. Cynthia A. Thomas of E&Y

21. Guarav Malhotra of E&Y

22. Juan Santambrogio of E&Y

23. Daniel Jerneycic of E&Y

24. Charles M. Moore of Conway McKenzie

25. Emergency Manager Kevyn D. Orr

26. Harry Wilson

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 2 of 185

Page 3: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

- 3 - - 3 -

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, unless otherwise agreed to by the

undersigned counsel, the depositions will take place at the time and place set forth in each

subpoena.

Dated: August 23, 2013 LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 3 of 185

Page 4: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26552517.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF ALLISON SCOTT

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief Under Chapter 9

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c)

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of Statement of

Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14], Allison Scott

is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to the City of

Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a Case Under

the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on September 19,

2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the Subpoena annexed hereto shall

be served on or before September 16, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 4 of 185

Page 5: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 5 of 185

Page 6: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 6 of 185

Page 7: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Allison Scott

Executive Director to the Governor

Executive Office of the Governor

111 South Capitol Avenue

P.O. Box 30013

Lansing, MI 48909

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 19, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 7 of 185

Page 8: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 8 of 185

Page 9: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 9 of 185

Page 10: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Allison Scott Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4)

Allison Scott, Executive Director to the Governor, Executive Office of the Governor, 111 South

Capitol Avenue, P.O. Box 30013, Lansing, MI 48909.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 10 of 185

Page 11: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26552487.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF JOHN ROBERTS

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief Under Chapter 9

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c)

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of Statement of

Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14], John Roberts

is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to the City of

Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a Case Under

the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on September 16,

2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the Subpoena annexed hereto shall

be served on or before September 13, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 11 of 185

Page 12: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 12 of 185

Page 13: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 13 of 185

Page 14: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

John Roberts

Executive Office of the Governor

111 South Capitol Avenue

P.O. Box 30013

Lansing, MI 48909

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 16, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 14 of 185

Page 15: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or

tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 15 of 185

Page 16: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 16 of 185

Page 17: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of John Roberts Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4) John

Roberts, Executive Office of the Governor, 111 South Capitol Avenue, P.O. Box 30013,

Lansing, MI 48909.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 17 of 185

Page 18: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26552936.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF KENNETH A. BUCKFIRE

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, made applicable to this proceeding by Rules 9014 and 9016 of the Federal

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief

Under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant

to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of

Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14],

Kenneth A. Buckfire is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters

related to the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the

Subpoena in a Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed

hereto, on September 20, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the

Subpoena annexed hereto shall be served on or before September 17, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 18 of 185

Page 19: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 19 of 185

Page 20: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 20 of 185

Page 21: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Kenneth A. Buckfire

Miller Buckfire & Co. LLC

601 Lexington Avenue

22nd Floor

New York, NY 10022

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 20, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 21 of 185

Page 22: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 22 of 185

Page 23: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 23 of 185

Page 24: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Kenneth A. Buckfire Pursuant to Rule 9014 of

the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather

Lennox, Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for

the United States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan,

Bill Schuette, Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202,

and (4) Kenneth A. Buckfire, Miller Buckfire & Co. LLC, 601 Lexington Avenue, 22nd Floor,

New York, NY 10022.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 24 of 185

Page 25: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26552012.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF DAVID BING PURSUANT

TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF

THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, made applicable to this proceeding by Rules 9014 and 9016 of the Federal

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief

Under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant

to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of

Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14],

David Bing, Mayor of the City of Detroit, is commanded to appear for a deposition (the

“Deposition”), on matters related to the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy

Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy

of which is annexed hereto, on September 17, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and

responses to the Subpoena annexed hereto shall be served on or before September 13, 2013 at

3:00 p.m. (ET).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 25 of 185

Page 26: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 26 of 185

Page 27: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 27 of 185

Page 28: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Mayor David Bing

Mayor of the City of Detroit

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center

2 Woodward Avenue - Suite 1126

Detroit, MI 48226

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 17, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 28 of 185

Page 29: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 29 of 185

Page 30: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 30 of 185

Page 31: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of David Bing Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4)

Mayor David Bing, Coleman A. Young Municipal Center, 2 Woodward Avenue - Suite 1126,

Detroit, MI 48226.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 31 of 185

Page 32: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26554492.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF KEVYN D. ORR

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief Under Chapter 9

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c)

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], Memorandum in Support of Statement of

Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14], and

Declaration of Kevyn D. Orr in Support of City of Detroit, Michigan’s Statement of

Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Orr Declaration”)

[Docket No. 11], Kevyn D. Orr, Emergency Manager for the City of Detroit, is commanded to

appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to the City of Detroit’s filing for

chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a Case Under the Bankruptcy

Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on September 16, 2013 at 9:45 a.m.

(ET). Written objections and responses to the Subpoena annexed hereto shall be served on or

before September 13, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 32 of 185

Page 33: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 33 of 185

Page 34: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 34 of 185

Page 35: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Kevyn D. Orr

Emergency Manager for the City of

Detroit

Office of Emergency Manager

2 Woodward Avenue

Detroit, MI 48226

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 16, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 35 of 185

Page 36: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 36 of 185

Page 37: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 37 of 185

Page 38: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Kevyn D. Orr Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4)

Kevyn D. Orr, Emergency Manager for the City of Detroit, Office of Emergency Manager, 2

Woodward Avenue, Detroit, MI 48226.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 38 of 185

Page 39: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26552268.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF RICHARD DALE SNYDER

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, made applicable to this proceeding by Rules 9014 and 9016 of the Federal

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief

Under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant

to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of

Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14],

Richard Dale Snyder, Governor of the State of Michigan, is commanded to appear for a

deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of

the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the

“Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on September 17, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET).

Written objections and responses to the Subpoena annexed hereto shall be served on or before

September 13, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 39 of 185

Page 40: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 40 of 185

Page 41: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 41 of 185

Page 42: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Richard Dale Snyder

Executive Office of the Governor

111 South Capitol Avenue

P.O. Box 30013

Lansing, MI 48909

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 17, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 42 of 185

Page 43: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or

tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 43 of 185

Page 44: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 44 of 185

Page 45: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Richard Dale Snyder Pursuant to Rule 9014 of

the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather

Lennox, Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for

the United States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan,

Bill Schuette, Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202,

and (4) Richard Dale Snyder, Executive Office of the Governor, 111 South Capitol Avenue, P.O.

Box 30013, Lansing, MI 48909.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 45 of 185

Page 46: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26552248.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF LAMONT SATCHEL

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, made applicable to this proceeding by Rules 9014 and 9016 of the Federal

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief

Under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant

to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of

Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14],

Lamont Satchel, Director of Labor Relations for the City of Detroit, is commanded to appear for

a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of

the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the

“Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on September 17, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET).

Written objections and responses to the Subpoena annexed hereto shall be served on or before

September 13, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 46 of 185

Page 47: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 47 of 185

Page 48: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 48 of 185

Page 49: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Lamont Satchel

Director of Labor Relations

for the City of Detroit

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 316

Detroit, Michigan 48226

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 17, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 49 of 185

Page 50: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or

tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 50 of 185

Page 51: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 51 of 185

Page 52: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Lamont Satchel Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4)

Lamont Satchel, Director of Labor Relations for the City of Detroit, Coleman A. Young

Municipal Center, 2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 316, Detroit, Michigan 48226.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 52 of 185

Page 53: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26552443.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF RICHARD BAIRD

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, made applicable to this proceeding by Rules 9014 and 9016 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain

Relief Under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications

Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in

Support of Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code

[Docket No. 14], Richard Baird is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on

matters related to the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to

the Subpoena in a Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is

annexed hereto, on September 18, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to

the Subpoena annexed hereto shall be served on or before September 13, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 53 of 185

Page 54: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 54 of 185

Page 55: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 55 of 185

Page 56: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Richard Baird

Executive Office of the Governor

111 South Capitol Avenue

P.O. Box 30013

Lansing, MI 48909

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 18, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 56 of 185

Page 57: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 57 of 185

Page 58: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 58 of 185

Page 59: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Richard Baird Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4)

Richard Baird, Executive Office of the Governor, 111 South Capitol Avenue, P.O. Box 30013,

Lansing, MI 48909.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 59 of 185

Page 60: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26552340.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF ANDREW DILLON

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, made applicable to this proceeding by Rules 9014 and 9016 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain

Relief Under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications

Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in

Support of Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code

[Docket No. 14], Andrew Dillon, Treasurer for the State of Michigan, is commanded to appear

for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9

of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the

“Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on September 18, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET).

Written objections and responses to the Subpoena annexed hereto shall be served on or before

September 13, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 60 of 185

Page 61: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 61 of 185

Page 62: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 62 of 185

Page 63: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Andrew Dillon

Michigan Department of Treasury

Austin Building

430 W. Allegan Street

Lansing, MI 48922

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 18, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 63 of 185

Page 64: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 64 of 185

Page 65: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 65 of 185

Page 66: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Andrew Dillon Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4)

Andrew Dillon, Michigan Department of Treasury, Austin Building, 430 W. Allegan Street,

Lansing, MI 48922.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 66 of 185

Page 67: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26552470.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF DENNIS MUCHMORE

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief Under Chapter 9

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c)

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of Statement of

Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14], Dennis

Muchmore is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to the

City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a Case

Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on September

18, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the Subpoena annexed hereto

shall be served on or before September 13, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 67 of 185

Page 68: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 68 of 185

Page 69: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 69 of 185

Page 70: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Dennis Muchmore

Chief of Staff

Executive Office of the Governor

111 South Capitol Avenue

P.O. Box 30013

Lansing, MI 48909

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 18, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 70 of 185

Page 71: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or

tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 71 of 185

Page 72: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 72 of 185

Page 73: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Dennis Muchmore Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4)

Dennis Muchmore, Chief of Staff, Executive Office of the Governor, 111 South Capitol Avenue,

P.O. Box 30013, Lansing, MI 48909.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 73 of 185

Page 74: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26552564.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF WILLIAM DUNCAN

SCHUETTE PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF

BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief Under Chapter 9

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c)

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of Statement of

Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14], William

Duncan Schuette, Attorney General for the State of Michigan, is commanded to appear for a

deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of

the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the

“Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on September 19, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET).

Written objections and responses to the Subpoena annexed hereto shall be served on or before

September 16, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 74 of 185

Page 75: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 75 of 185

Page 76: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 76 of 185

Page 77: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

William Schuette

Attorney General

for the State of Michigan

Cadillac Place, 10th Floor

3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200

Detroit, MI 48202.

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 19, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 77 of 185

Page 78: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or

tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 78 of 185

Page 79: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 79 of 185

Page 80: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of William Schuette Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, and (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, William

Schuette, Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 80 of 185

Page 81: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26552596.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF THOMAS QUASARANO

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief Under Chapter 9

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c)

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of Statement of

Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14], Thomas

Quasarano is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to the

City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a Case

Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on September

19, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the Subpoena annexed hereto

shall be served on or before September 16, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 81 of 185

Page 82: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 82 of 185

Page 83: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 83 of 185

Page 84: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Thomas Quasarano

Assistant Attorney General

Michigan Department of Attorney General

Cadillac Place, 10th Floor

3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200

Detroit, MI 48202

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 19, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 84 of 185

Page 85: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 85 of 185

Page 86: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 86 of 185

Page 87: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Thomas Quasarano Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4)

Thomas Quasarano, Assistant Attorney General, Michigan Department of Attorney General,

Cadillac Place, 10th Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 87 of 185

Page 88: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26552881.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF KYLE HERMAN

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief Under Chapter 9

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c)

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of Statement of

Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14], Kyle

Herman is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to the

City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a Case

Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on September

20, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the Subpoena annexed hereto

shall be served on or before September 17, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 88 of 185

Page 89: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 89 of 185

Page 90: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 90 of 185

Page 91: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Kyle Herman

Miller Buckfire & Co. LLC

601 Lexington Avenue

22nd Floor

New York, NY 10022

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 20, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 91 of 185

Page 92: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or

tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 92 of 185

Page 93: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 93 of 185

Page 94: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Kyle Herman Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4) Kyle

Herman, Miller Buckfire & Co. LLC, 601 Lexington Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, NY

10022.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 94 of 185

Page 95: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26552695.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF BRIAN DEVLIN

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, made applicable to this proceeding by Rules 9014 and 9016 of the Federal

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief

Under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant

to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of

Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14],

Brian Devlin is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to

the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a

Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on

September 20, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the Subpoena

annexed hereto shall be served on or before September 17, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 95 of 185

Page 96: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Of Page Intentionally Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 96 of 185

Page 97: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 97 of 185

Page 98: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Brian Devlin

Michigan Department of Attorney General

Cadillac Place, 10th Floor

3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200

Detroit, MI 48202

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 20, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 98 of 185

Page 99: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 99 of 185

Page 100: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must:

(i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or

tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 100 of 185

Page 101: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Brian Devlin Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4) Brian

Devlin, Michigan Department of Attorney General, Cadillac Place, 10th Floor, 3030 W. Grand

Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 101 of 185

Page 102: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26553017.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF CYNTHIA A. THOMAS

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, made applicable to this proceeding by Rules 9014 and 9016 of the Federal

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief

Under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant

to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of

Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14],

Cynthia A. Thomas is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters

related to the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the

Subpoena in a Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed

hereto, on September 23, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the

Subpoena annexed hereto shall be served on or before September 20, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 102 of 185

Page 103: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 103 of 185

Page 104: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 104 of 185

Page 105: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Cynthia A. Thomas

Ernst & Young

155 N Wacker Dr, Ste 2000,

Chicago, IL 60606-1721

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 23, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 105 of 185

Page 106: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 106 of 185

Page 107: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 107 of 185

Page 108: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Cynthia A. Thomas Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4)

Cynthia A. Thomas, Ernst & Young, 155 N Wacker Dr, Ste 2000, Chicago, IL 60606-1721.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 108 of 185

Page 109: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26552954.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF JAMES DOAK PURSUANT

TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF

THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, made applicable to this proceeding by Rules 9014 and 9016 of the Federal

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief

Under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant

to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of

Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14],

James Doak is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to

the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a

Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on

September 23, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the Subpoena

annexed hereto shall be served on or before September 20, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 109 of 185

Page 110: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 110 of 185

Page 111: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 111 of 185

Page 112: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

James Doak

Miller Buckfire & Co. LLC

601 Lexington Avenue

22nd Floor

New York, NY 10022

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 23, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 112 of 185

Page 113: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or

tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 113 of 185

Page 114: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 114 of 185

Page 115: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26552954.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of James Doak Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4) James

Doak, Miller Buckfire & Co. LLC, 601 Lexington Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 10022.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 115 of 185

Page 116: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26553172.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF GUARAV MALHOTRA

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, made applicable to this proceeding by Rules 9014 and 9016 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain

Relief Under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications

Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], Memorandum in Support of

Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14],

and Declaration of Guarav Malhotra in Support of City of Detroit, Michigan’s Statement of

Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Malhotra Declaration”)

[Docket No. 12], Guarav Malhotra is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”),

on matters related to the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant

to the Subpoena in a Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is

annexed hereto, on September 23, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to

the Subpoena annexed hereto shall be served on or before September 20, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 116 of 185

Page 117: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the

Deposition may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to

participate to the extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 117 of 185

Page 118: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 118 of 185

Page 119: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Guarav Malhotra

Ernst & Young

155 N Wacker Dr Ste 2000

Chicago, IL 60606-1721

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 23, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 119 of 185

Page 120: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 120 of 185

Page 121: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 121 of 185

Page 122: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26553172.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Guarav Malhotra Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4)

Guarav Malhotra, 155 N Wacker Dr Ste 2000, Chicago, IL 60606-1721.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 122 of 185

Page 123: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26553249.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF DANIEL JERNEYCIC

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief Under Chapter 9

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c)

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of Statement of

Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14], Daniel

Jerneycic is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to the

City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a Case

Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on September

24, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the Subpoena annexed hereto

shall be served on or before September 20, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 123 of 185

Page 124: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 124 of 185

Page 125: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 125 of 185

Page 126: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Daniel Jerneycic

Ernst & Young

155 N Wacker Dr Ste 2000

Chicago, IL 60606-1721

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 24, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 126 of 185

Page 127: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or

tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 127 of 185

Page 128: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 128 of 185

Page 129: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Daniel Jerneycic Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4)

Daniel Jerneycic, Ernst & Young, 155 N Wacker Dr, Ste 2000, Chicago, IL 60606-1721.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 129 of 185

Page 130: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26553403.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF CHARLES M. MOORE

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief Under Chapter 9

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c)

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], Memorandum in Support of Statement of

Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14], and

Declaration of Charles M. Moore in Support of Detroit, Michigan’s Statement of Qualifications

Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Moore Declaration”) [Docket No. 13],

Charles Moore is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to

the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a

Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on

September 24, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the Subpoena

annexed hereto shall be served on or before September 20, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 130 of 185

Page 131: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 131 of 185

Page 132: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 132 of 185

Page 133: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Charles Moore

Conway McKenzie

401 S. Old Woodward, Suite 340

Birmingham, MI 48009

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 24, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 133 of 185

Page 134: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or

tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 134 of 185

Page 135: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 135 of 185

Page 136: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Charles Moore Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4)

Charles Moore, Conway McKenzie, 401 S. Old Woodward, Suite 340, Birmingham, MI 48009.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 136 of 185

Page 137: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26553344.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF JUAN SANTAMBROGIO

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief Under Chapter 9

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c)

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of Statement of

Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14], Juan

Santambrogio is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to

the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a

Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on

September 24, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the Subpoena

annexed hereto shall be served on or before September 20, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 137 of 185

Page 138: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 138 of 185

Page 139: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 139 of 185

Page 140: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Juan Santambrogio

Ernst & Young

155 N Wacker Dr Ste 2000

Chicago, IL 60606-1721

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 24, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 140 of 185

Page 141: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or

tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 141 of 185

Page 142: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 142 of 185

Page 143: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Juan Santambrogio Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4) Juan

Santambrogio, Ernst & Young, 155 N Wacker Dr Ste 2000, Chicago, IL 60606-1721.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 143 of 185

Page 144: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26553501.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF RONALD E.

GOLDSBERRY PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF

BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief Under Chapter 9

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c)

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of Statement of

Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14], Ronald E.

Goldsberry is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to the

City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a Case

Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on September

25, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the Subpoena annexed hereto

shall be served on or before September 20, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 144 of 185

Page 145: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 145 of 185

Page 146: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 146 of 185

Page 147: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Ronald E. Goldsberry

c/o Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 25, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 147 of 185

Page 148: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or

tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 148 of 185

Page 149: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 149 of 185

Page 150: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Ronald E. Goldsberry Pursuant to Rule 9014 of

the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather

Lennox, Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for

the United States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan,

Bill Schuette, Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202,

and (4) Ronald E. Goldsberry, c/o Jones Day, North Point, 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland,

Ohio 44114-1190.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 150 of 185

Page 151: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26553507.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF FREDERICK HEADEN

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief Under Chapter 9

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c)

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of Statement of

Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14], Frederick

Headen is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to the

City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a Case

Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on September

25, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the Subpoena annexed hereto

shall be served on or before September 20, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 151 of 185

Page 152: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 152 of 185

Page 153: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 153 of 185

Page 154: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Frederick Headen

c/o Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 25, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 154 of 185

Page 155: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or

tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 155 of 185

Page 156: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 156 of 185

Page 157: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Frederick Headen Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4)

Frederick Headen, c/o Jones Day, North Point, 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44114-

1190.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 157 of 185

Page 158: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26553462.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF DARRELL BURKS

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, made applicable to this proceeding by Rules 9014 and 9016 of the Federal

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief

Under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant

to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of

Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14],

Darrell Burks is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to

the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a

Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on

September 25, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the Subpoena

annexed hereto shall be served on or before September 20, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 158 of 185

Page 159: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Of Page Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 159 of 185

Page 160: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 160 of 185

Page 161: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Darrell Burks

c/o Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 25, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 161 of 185

Page 162: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 162 of 185

Page 163: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 163 of 185

Page 164: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Darrell Burks Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4)

Darrell Burks, c/o Jones Day, North Point, 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 164 of 185

Page 165: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26553538.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF KENNETH WHIPPLE

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, made applicable to this proceeding by Rules 9014 and 9016 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and in connection with Debtor’s Petition to Obtain

Relief Under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications

Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in

Support of Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code

[Docket No. 14], Kenneth Whipple is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”),

on matters related to the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant

to the Subpoena in a Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is

annexed hereto, on September 26, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to

the Subpoena annexed hereto shall be served on or before September 23, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 165 of 185

Page 166: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 166 of 185

Page 167: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 167 of 185

Page 168: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Kenneth Whipple

c/o Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 26, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 168 of 185

Page 169: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 169 of 185

Page 170: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 170 of 185

Page 171: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Kenneth Whipple Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4)

Kenneth Whipple, c/o Jones Day, North Point, 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44114-

1190.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 171 of 185

Page 172: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26553564.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF HARRY WILSON

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF

CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief Under Chapter 9

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c)

of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of Statement of

Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14], Harry

Wilson is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters related to the

City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the Subpoena in a Case

Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed hereto, on September

26, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the Subpoena annexed hereto

shall be served on or before September 23, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 172 of 185

Page 173: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 173 of 185

Page 174: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 174 of 185

Page 175: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Harry Wilson

c/o Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 26, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 175 of 185

Page 176: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 176 of 185

Page 177: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 177 of 185

Page 178: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Harry Wilson Pursuant to Rule 9014 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather Lennox,

Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for the United

States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Bill Schuette,

Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202, and (4) Harry

Wilson, c/o Jones Day, North Point, 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 178 of 185

Page 179: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

28579/2

08/23/2013 26553514.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

NOTICE BY THE MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO AND SUB-CHAPTER 98,

CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES FOR EXAMINATION OF THOMAS H. MCTAVISH

PURSUANT TO RULE 9014 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY

PROCEDURE AND RULES 30(b)(1), (b)(6), AND 45 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, made applicable to this proceeding by Rules 9014 and 9016 of the Federal

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and in connection with the Debtor’s Petition to Obtain Relief

Under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1], Statement of Qualifications Pursuant

to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 10], and Memorandum in Support of

Statement of Qualifications Pursuant to Section 109(c) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 14],

Thomas H. McTavish is commanded to appear for a deposition (the “Deposition”), on matters

related to the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to the

Subpoena in a Case Under the Bankruptcy Code (the “Subpoena”), a copy of which is annexed

hereto, on September 26, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET). Written objections and responses to the

Subpoena annexed hereto shall be served on or before September 23, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (ET).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be conducted at the

offices of The Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 179 of 185

Page 180: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-2-

Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter 98, City of Detroit Retirees (the “AFSCME”) 600 West

Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48226, or such other time and location agreed upon by the

parties.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Deposition will be taken before a

Notary Public or other person authorized to administer oaths pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall continue day to day, excluding weekends and

holidays unless otherwise agreed by the parties, until completed. The testimony at the Deposition

may be recorded by videographic and stenographic means. You are invited to participate to the

extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

[Remainder Intentionally Left Blank]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 180 of 185

Page 181: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-3-

Dated: August 23, 2013

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

By: /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

Wojciech F. Jung, Esq.

Philip J. Gross, Esq.

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

(973) 597-6247 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

-and-

Herbert A. Sanders, Esq.

THE SANDERS LAW FIRM PC

615 Griswold St., Suite 913

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 962-0099 (Telephone)

(313) 962-0044 (Facsimile)

[email protected]

-and-

Richard G. Mack, Jr., Esq.

Miller Cohen, P.L.C.

600 West Lafayette Boulevard

4th

Floor

Detroit, MI 48226-3191

Counsel to Michigan Council 25 of the American

Federation of State, County and Municipal

Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 181 of 185

Page 182: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-4-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF DETROIT

In re SUBPOENA IN A CASE UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

Debtor.

Case No.: 13-53846 (SWR) Chapter 9

To:

Thomas H. McTavish

c/o Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

For Notice Only:

Heather Lennox

Jones Day

North Point

901 Lakeside Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear and testify at the place, date, and time specified below.

PLACE OF TESTIMONY Michigan AFSCME Council 25 600 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, MI 48226

DATE AND TIME September 26, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. (ET)

���� YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents

or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):

PLACE OF PRODUCTION

DATE AND TIME

ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND TITLE /s/ Sharon L. Levine

DATE August 23, 2013

ISSUING OFFICER’S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER Sharon L. Levine, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500

*If the bankruptcy case is pending in a district other than the district in which the subpoena is issued, state the district under the case number.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 182 of 185

Page 183: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-5-

PROOF OF SERVICE

SERVED

DATE:

PLACE:

SERVED ON (PRINT NAME)

MANNER OF SERVICE

SERVED BY (PRINT NAME)

TITLE

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Proof of Service is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________________ DATE

____________________________

SIGNATURE OF SERVER

____________________________

ADDRESS OF SERVER

Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Subdivisions (c), (d), and (e), as amended on December 1, 2007, made applicable in cases under the Bankruptcy Code by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and servicing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents,

electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a

subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel

more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena,

the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,

or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored Information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a

claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or

tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 183 of 185

Page 184: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-6-

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 184 of 185

Page 185: Justia Law · 28579/2 08/23/2013 26569593.1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 9 ) CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) Case

-1-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 9

)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,

) Case No. 13-53846

)

Debtor. ) Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on August 23, 2013, Notice by The Michigan Council 25 of

the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Sub-Chapter

98, City of Detroit Retirees For Examination of Thomas H. McTavish Pursuant to Rule 9014 of

the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rules 30(b)(1), (b)(6), and 45 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure was sent via first class mail to (1) Counsel to the Debtor, Heather

Lennox, Esq., 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114-1190, (2) the Attorney General for

the United States of America, Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001, (3) the Attorney General for the State of Michigan,

Bill Schuette, Cadillac Place, 10th

Floor, 3030 W. Grand Blvd., Suite 10-200, Detroit, MI 48202,

and (4) Thomas H. McTavish, c/o Jones Day, North Point, 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland,

Ohio 44114-1190.

Dated: August 23, 2013 /s/ Sharon L. Levine

Sharon L. Levine, Esq.

LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP

65 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

(973) 597-2500 (Telephone)

[email protected]

13-53846-swr Doc 600 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 18:26:55 Page 185 of 185


Recommended