+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)

Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)

Date post: 18-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: marilyn-wright
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Institutional Characteristics 6 Year Grad EIU 6 Year Grad Nat’l* (+/-)Fresh to Soph Retention EIU Fre to Soph Retention National* (+/-) All Public Master’s Granting 59% %+15.1%79%71.1%+9.3% Traditional Selectivity Public ** 59%44.4%+14.7%79%69.3%+9.7% *Source: ACT Institutional Data File, 2012 ** Defined as mean entering cohort ACT of For Fall 2005 entering class
14
Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)
Transcript
Page 1: Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)

Karla Sanders & Kimberlie MoockCo-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts

(CORE)

Page 2: Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)

Selectivity Type First to Second Year Retention

6-Year Graduation Rates

Highly Selective (Top 10%; ACT 25-30)

95% 86%

Selective (Top 25%; ACT 21-26)

81.6% 60.5%

Traditional Selective (Top 50%; ACT 18-24)

69.3% 43.9%

Liberal Selective (Bottom 50%; ACT 17-22)

62.4% 38.5%

Open (No %; ACT 16-21 67.3% 36.8%

ALL Master’s Granting Public

71.1% 44.4%

Page 3: Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)

Institutional Characteristics

6 Year GradEIU

6 Year GradNat’l*

(+/-) Fresh to Soph

Retention EIU

Fre to Soph

Retention National*

(+/-)

All Public Master’s Granting

59%+ 43.9% +15.1% 79% 71.1% +9.3%

Traditional Selectivity Public **

59% 44.4% +14.7% 79% 69.3% +9.7%

*Source: ACT Institutional Data File, 2012** Defined as mean entering cohort ACT of 18-24+For Fall 2005 entering class

Page 4: Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)
Page 5: Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)
Page 6: Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)

 

National Retention

RateIL Public

Retention Difference

National Graduation

RateIL Public

Graduation DifferenceTraditional Selective (Top 50%; ACT 18-24) 69.30% EIU 79% 9.70% 43.90% EIU 59% 15.10%Highly Selective (Top 10%; ACT 25-30) 95% UI-UC 93% -2% 86%

UI-UC 82% -4%

Selective (Top 25%; ACT 21-26) 81.60% ISU 85% 3.60% 60.50% ISU 71% 10.50%Selective (Top 25%; ACT 21-26) 81.60% UI-Ch 79% -2.60% 60.50% UI-Ch 54% -6.50%

Traditional Selective (Top 50%; ACT 18-24) 69.30% NIU 71% 1.70% 43.90% NIU 56% 12.10%

Traditional Selective (Top 50%; ACT 18-24) 69.30% WIU 71% 1.70% 43.90% WIU 53% 9.10%

Traditional Selective (Top 50%; ACT 18-24) 69.30% SIU-C 66% -3.30% 43.90%

SIU-C 45% 1.10%

Traditional Selective (Top 50%; ACT 18-24) 69.30% SIU-E 70% -0.70% 43.90% SIU-E 52% 8.10%

Page 7: Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)

Time to Degree

GraduationFirst Year To Second Year

2011

All First-Time 79%Minority First-Time 76%First Generation 78%Zero EFC* 74%

First-time Cohort Rate 2011Six Year 59%Five Year 54%Four Year 32%MinoritySix Year 45%Five Year 40%Four Year 17%First GenerationSix Year 56%Five Year 50%Four Year 27%

Retention

All First-Time Students2007 4.422011 4.79

Page 8: Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)

78% of our students rely on financial aid 6%

48.65% of our students are first-generation 7.65%

45.8% of the entering class are transfer students 6.8%

21.7% of our students are an ethnic minority 8% 20% of the entering freshman class were admitted through a special

admission program 11%

Page 9: Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)

69.3%79%

85%

43.9%59%

70%

Retention

Graduation

Page 10: Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)
Page 11: Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)

Academic preparation—especially reading Academic success at EIU Undeclared or uncertain about major Financial insecurity Minority students—especially males Transfers in first semester Special admission populations Date of enrollment & delay in registration

each subsequent semester Lack of connection within and outside of

courses

Page 12: Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)

Intentional referrals with follow-up; EAS Develop a plan to intervene with non-registered

students Intentional use of intro courses for major and

career choices Academic support plan for high D/F courses Mentoring structures for high-risk students Individual connections—aiding in changing major,

determining major/career fit Early feedback in courses with graded

assignments Submit midterm grades

Page 13: Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)
Page 14: Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE)

Graduation Rates: National Center for Education Statistics, http://nces.ed.gov/

National Retention and Graduation Benchmarks & Selectivity: ACT Institutional Data File, http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/retain_2010.pdf

EIU Retention and Graduation Rates: Planning and Institutional Studies, http://castle.eiu.edu/~planning/


Recommended