KATAHIRA & ENGINEERS INTERNATIONAL - All...

RP24Volume 6

REPUBUC OF THE PHIUPPINESDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS

PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE FOR IBRD

NATIONAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENTPROJECT - PHASE I (NRIMP-I)

DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN AND PREPARATION OF BIDDING DOCUMENTSFOR REHABILITATION OF

SURIGAO-DAVAO COASTAL ROAD (CW-RU-1.4 A)

BACUAG-GIGAQUIT-CLAVER SECTION

RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP)(Volume 1/6)MAIN TEXT

JUNE 2002JUE202FILE COPYLIZ EI KATAHIRA & ENGINEERS INTERNATIONAL

in association with

ialCrow HALCROW GROUP LIMITED TECHNIKS GROUP CORPORATION

{|> wDCCD ENGINEERING CORPORATION MULTI-INFRA KONSULT, INC.

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP)

NATIONAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT ANDMANAGEMENT PROGRAM PHASE I(NRIMP-I)

BACUAG-GIGAQUIT-CLAVER SECTION

VOLUME I

JUNE 2002'

KATAHIRA & ENGINEERS INTERNATIONAL

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Volume I (Main Text)Page

Executive Summary

1. Rationale 1

2. Objectives 1

3. Methodology

3.1 Institutional Collaboration 23.2 Data and Sources 23.3 Population 33.4 Analytical Tools 3

4. Public Consultation Proceedings 4

5. Resettlement Action Plan

5.1 Project Description 4

5.2 The Local Government Units 65.2.1 Bacuag 65.2.2 Gigaquit 75.2.3 Claver 8

5.3 Socio-Economic Profile of Project Affected Families 95.3.1 Demography 105.3.2 Economy 135.3.3 Level of Living 15

5.4 Project Impacts5.4.1 Impacts on Land 175.4.2 Impacts on Structures 175.4.3 Loss of Income 175.4.4 Impact on Land Improvements 18

5.5 Compensation Package5.5.1 Entitlements 185.5.2 Affected Structures 185.5.3 Severely Affected Structures 195.5.4 Compensation Matrix 19

5.5.5 Value of Land Improvement in AbsenteeLandholdings 27

5.5.6 Compensation Matrix for Residents PAFs 27

5.5.7 Compensation Package 27

5.5.8 RAP Implementation Cost 30

5.5.9 Distribution of Total Compensation by Municipality30

5.5.10 Total RAP Cost 32

6. Implementation Schedule 33

6.1 MOU and Establishment of Committees 336.2 Training-Orientation on RAP Implementation 336.3 Validation of RAP Report 336.4 Public Information Campaign 336.5 Finalization of the Compensation Package 346.6 Public Meeting/Disclosure 346.7 Cut-off Date 346.8 Payment 346.9 Handing Over the Site for Civil Works 34

7. Monitoring and Evaluation 35

Appendix A Public Consultations

1. Orientation on the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP)for Surigao-Davao Coastal Road, DPWH-XIIIRegional Office, Butuan City, Agusan del Sur,January 3, 2001

2. Orientation on the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP)for the Surigao-Davao Coastal Road, DPWH Surigao City,Surigao del Norte, January 4, 2001

3. Public Consultation on the Resettlement ActionPlan (RAP) for the Surigao-Davao Coastal RoadGigaquit Municipal Hall, Surigao del Norte,January 22, 2001

Appendix B List of PAFs

Appendix C List of Perennials

Volume II (Appendix)

Appendix D Composite Profile of Marginally Affected PAFs

Appendix E Composite Profile of Severely Affected PAFs

Appendix F Questionnaire

LIST OF TABLES

Table No.

5.1 Road Length by Segment and by Type of Road, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.2.1 Road Classification by Type of Pavement in Bacuag, Surigao del Norte,2001

5.2.3 Road Classification by Type of Pavement in Claver, Surigao del Norte,2001

5.3 Distribution by Type of Respondents and by Municipality, Surigao delNorte, 2001

4.3.1a Distribution of Respondents by Ethnicity and by Extent of Impact andmunicipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.3.1b Mean Age of Respondents by Educational Level and by Municipality,Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.3.1c Distribution by Household Size and by Municipality, Surigao del Norte,2001

5.3.1d Distribution by Household Structure and by Municipality, Surigao delNorte, 2001

5.3.2a Primary Occupation by Municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.3.2b Mean and Median Income by Source and by Municipality, Surigao delNorte, 2001

5.3.3 Level of Household Amenities by Municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.5.4 Compensation Entitlement Matrix

5.5.7 Compensation Package for Resident PAFs by Use of Structure and OtherEntitlements, RAP, Surigao Del Norte, 2001

5.5.8 Budget requirement for RAP Implementation, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.5.10.1 Estimated Compensation Package for Marginally Affected Structures byMunicipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.5.10.2 Estimated Compensation Package for Severely Affected Structures byMunicipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.5.10.3 Estimated Compensation Package fro Crop Improvements by Municipality,Surigao del Norte, 2001

6 RAP Implementation Schedule by Activity, Surigao del Norte, 2001

NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaguit-Claver Road

Resettlement Action Plan: Bacuag-Qigaquit-Claver Road

Executive Summary

1. Development interventions such as physical infrastructures undoubtedly resultinto significant positive impacts to the community and the residents both interms of economic and social activities. However, it is equally true that anydevelopment intervention results in some negative externalities. In the case ofroad infrastructure projects, the obvious negative consequence would be in termsof the social costs associated with environmental damage and human dislocation.

The department has promulgated the social policy framework and specificguidelines for the implementation of projects under NRIMP. The framework andspecific guidelines are operationalized in the Policy Framework for LandAcquisition Resettlement and Rehabilitation (LARR) in general, and in theprinciples outlined for the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP), in particular. Thesaid framework is anchored on the philosophy that the adverse impact of NRIMPshould be avoided, minimized and/or mitigated to ensure that the ProjectAffected Persons (PAPs) will not be worse off, if not, benefit from the project.Implicit in the framework are elements of just disturbance compensation based onfair market value and replacement cost, participatory process through localconsultations, and internal/external monitoring to ensure proper and effectiveimplementation of the projects. In order to operationalize the policies andprinciples outlines earlier, it is necessary to conduct rigorous and systematicassessment of the project areas based on acceptable standards in researchmethods and analysis.

2. In general, the objective of the RAP is to assess the extent of disturbance thatNRIMP project will cause to local settlers and to provide the structure for RAPincluding the logistical requirements for implementation. Specifically, theobjectives of RAP include: to set up a process to allow for public consultationswith PAPs on the NRIMP projects; to determine the number and geographicallylocate the PAPs and assess the extent of disturbance; to estimate, based oncurrent market value and replacement cost, the disturbance compensation; toprovide the operational mechanisms for timely -RAP implementation includingtotal budgetary allocations; and to formulate the terms of reference for internaland external monitoring of RAP implementation.

RAP preparation and implementation was designed as a collaborative effortamong three key institutions, DPWH, the LGUs, and the consulting firm. Toensure smooth implementation and effective coordination among theseinstitutions, a series of orientation and public consultations were organized.

The basic inputs for RAP preparation include primary and secondary data.Secondary data about the overall social and economic situation obtaining in thecommunities along the project sites were generated through municipal

NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaguit-Claver Road ii

documents. Further, secondary data were also generated pertaining to assessedvalues of land improvement including structures and productive crops.Secondary data pertaining to the technical description of the project design wereused in the linear acquisition and mapping. The determination of thecompensation matrix for each of the affected households and the totalcompensation package was fairly straight forward. Valuation of structuresaffected by the Project were based on the concept of Replacement Cost. Valueswere determined based on the estimated quantity of materials needed to put up astructure similar to the one that will be demolished due to the Project andmonetized using the current prices of materials as per records of the DistrictEngineer's Office. Similarly, valuation of agricultural and other biological landimprovements were based on the assessed value provided for by the DistrictEngineer's Office. In special cases where additional entitlements were required,valuation schemes based on the principles outlined in the LARR Policy wereadopted. The mechanical routine of generating summary of actual values wereaccomplished by simple algorithmic instructions for the computers using standardapplication software. The cost component of RAP implementation wasdetermined by employing simple budget planning.

4. To ensure that the implementation of RAP will be done smoothly, it wasembodied in the policy framework of NRIMP to undergo a series of publicconsultation. The public consultation was done at two levels. i.e. at themunicipal level and at the barangay level.

5. The Bacuag-Claver Provincial Boundary Road segment under NRIMP I is part ofthe long- term development of the Surigao-Davao Coastal Road. However, forPhase I of NRIMP, the Surigao Norte Contract Package is only one of the threewhich includes Marihatag-Barobo-San Francisco Road in Surigao del Sur andMati-Manay in Davao Oriental.

The Bacuag-Claver Provincial Boundary road improvement section comprises oftwo sections which apparently stretches across the three municipalities for a totalroad length of about 44.5 kilometers.

The other segment which starts from the town of Claver up to the provincialboundary is generally a gravel road. Only about 2.7 kilometers of road is pavedwith concrete and the remaining stretch of roughly 26 kilometers is paved withgravel characterized as either in very bad or bad condition.

6. The total number of affected structures is 159. However, some affectedstructures did not have any valid responses with respect to the type ofrespondents (60). This is because some are public infrastructures and publicutilities where it is not possible to identify a specific respondent for such type ofstructures. In some cases, the owners of the affected structures are absentees ornot available. These types of affected structures totaled to 60 which account forabout 38 percent of the total number of structures. Therefore, in the foregoing

NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaguit-Claver Road j

social and economic characterization, most responses will only be valid for 99cases.

7. Across the entire stretch, from Bacuag to the Boundary of Surigao del Norte, themodal ethnic origin of the PAFs is Bisaya which accounts for 67 percent. Thenext significant (30.8%) group is categorized as others and this group generallyrefers to the ethno-linguistic affiliation indigenous to the area which is"Surigaonon". These two groups account for practically all of the respondents(98%).

The average age of the respondents is about 47 years old. Across municipalities,the mean age ranges from 37 years in Bacuag to 51 years in Gigaquit. Theaverage age among Claver respondents which is roughly 46.5 years is muchcloser to the mean.

In terms of the level of educational attainment, the modal class is elementarygraduate with proportion estimated to be 31.3 percent. In cumulative terms,about 60 percent of the respondents were unable to complete high schooleducation. About 17 percent completed high school and college graduatesaccount for 14 percent of the total respondents. It is interesting to note that theproportion of those who did not have any form of education at all is only onepercent.

The modal household size is 5 per family. However, it must be noted thathousehold sizes of 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 each have proportions clustering between 10and 11 percent. At the extreme ends of the distribution, about six percent aresingle households and about 2 percent have either 11 or twelve members.

Slightly more than half (50.5%) of the respondents are characterized under anuclear household. However, also a relatively higher proportion (43%) areextended households. This, implies that, as the household matures, in aconsiderable number of cases, members are unable to establish their ownhouseholds. Extended households can be interpreted as an indication of verylimited economic opportunities in the community.

8. The modal occupation of the Project Affected Families (PAFs) is businessoperation. This primary occupation accounted for roughly 35 percent of therespondents. Farming is also relatively significant with an estimated proportionof about 15 percent of the respondents. The same proportion is attributed tothose who are engaged in fulltime housekeeping. The very notable statisticalinformation is the fact that about 21 percent of the respondents are not engaged inany occupation at all. The very minimal proportion of those engaged in otheroccupations is indicative of the very limited opportunities in the community.Only about 4 percent are employed in their respective profession, 5 percent asskilled laborers and one percent as hired farm worker.

NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaguit-Claver Road iv

9. To put the income distribution in proper perspective, it must be recalled that theinstrument was designed to solicit income information only if the structure will beaffected severely. Hence, income variables are only supposed to be valid forsevere PAFs. Further, it must also be recalled that there are severely affectedstructures which are public by nature, thus, there are no valid responses toincome variables. There are also absentee owners where soliciting the requiredincome variables were not possible.

Given the various primary occupation, the average level of total income is aboutPhP92,921. The mean is highest among Bacuag residents and lowest from thePAFs in Claver. Respondents from Gigaquit are also relatively well off with anestimated average total income of about PhP118,349. Farm income is veryminimal. This implies that the PAFs are relying more on non-farm economicopportunities.

It must be noted that in all cases, the mean is higher than the median whichindicates a relatively skewed income distribution. Relatively few individuals areearning extremely high levels of income and the majority are earning low. In fact,in case of farm income, the median is zero which indicates that at least half of therespondents did not have farm-income opportunities.

10. The modal type of dwelling among the PAFs across all municipalities istemporary (35.7%). Semi-permanent dwelling account for about 32 percent.However, a relatively higher proportion are also living in permanent dwellings(17.9%). It must be noted that about 14.3 percent of the PAFs are living inshanties. By municipality, Gigaquit does not reflect the modal class of all thePAFs combined because in the town, the modal class is semi-permanent. The fewPAFs in Bacuag are split equally between those living in permanent and those intemporary dwellings with each sharing an estimated proportion of 3.6 percent.

The proportion of the respondents with access to electrical power is relativelyhigh. About 90 percent of the total household respondents are able to accesselectrical energy. The other ten percent is divided into two: those who are usingkerosene gas for lighting (3.6%) and those using oil for lamp (7.1%). Thekerosene users are concentrated in Claver while the oil lamp users are mostlyresidents of Gigaquit.

Majority of the PAFs, in aggregate terms, have access to potable water throughpump well system. Access to the other types of water system is practically splitbetween the two extremes. On the one hand, about 28 percent access waterthrough pipe systems. On the other hand, 21 percent of the PAFs are stillcollecting rain water.

NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaguit-Claver Road v

The modal fuel type used is wood (67.9%) and about 28.6 percent are using LPGfor cooking. The remaining 3.6 percent is accounted for by those who usekerosene gas for cooking. About 68 percent of the respondents are using eithersemi flush toilet facilities. However, the proportion of those who are still usingthe antipolo system is still relatively high at 14.3 percent. It must be stressedhere that also a relatively higher proportion of the PAFs does not have any toiletfacilities at all.

11. The project design for the entire Bacuag-Claver Provincial Boundary section ofNRIM-Phase I generally followed the center line of the existing road pavements.There were a few cases where realignments were made; however, theserealignments are within the existing Right of Way (ROW) as established by theDistrict Engineer's Office in Surigao City, Surigao del Norte. Hence, there areno land acquisitions in this particular section of the road improvement project

12. Based on the RAP Census, 159 structures will be affected by the roadimprovement project: 113 are privately owned structures. Of these 113, 82 PAFsare severely affected while 31 are marginally affected. 46 structures are publicsuch as Barangay Waiting Sheds, electric posts and structures for public utilitiesamong others.

Of the total 159 structures, about 119 will be severely affected and 40 will bemarginally affected. In Bacuag, there are more public than private structureaffected. The same pattern is also true for Claver. However, in Gigaquit, moreprivate structures are affected.

The most common use of the structures affected is residential (39.5%).Structures used both for residential and commercial purposes are also fairlycommon. These structures account for about 21 percent of those affected by theproject. A considerable number of commercial structures have also been affectedby the project as well as public structures and utilities and a smaller proportion ofother structures such as churches and fences.

13. In some cases, particularly if the structures are used for commercial purposes,income loss is also a significant consequence of the road improvement projects.The proportion of structures used fully or partially for commercial purposes willprovide an indicative extent of the income loss. Based on the LARR policy,income loss is estimated on the basis of foregone earnings of the commercialestablishment during the construction period not exceeding the equivalent incomefor thirty days.

14. Within the area of affected structures particularly those which are residential,there are agricultural improvements that will be affected by the project. The mostcommon crops are coconuts and fruit trees. However, the bulk of the disturbanceon agricultural crop improvements are along the less settled areas of the road

NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaguit-Claver Road vi

where lands are cultivated but the farmers are non-residents in that specific area.In such cases, the census was done to merely locate the specific cropimprovements and value the crops in terms of the current prices available at theDistrict Engineers' Office.

15. The most number of severely affected structures is in the municipality of Claverwith a count of 58 and an estimated share of about 49.6 percent, then Gigaquitcomes second highest with an estimated severely affected structures accountingfor roughly 39 percent. Bacuag account for only about 11 percent of the totalseverely affected PAFs. By municipality, the aggregate distribution that moreresidential structures are affected is also reflected in Claver and Gigaquit.However, in the case of Bacuag, there are more public and commercial/residentialthat are affected than there are residential.

There are 40 marginally affected structures in the road improvement section in theBacuag-Claver Provincial Boundary road improvement project. Most of thesestructures are residential which account for about 45 percent of the total. Aconsiderable proportion (25%) of commercial/residential structures will also beaffected. Among these marginally affected PAFs, the high proportion ofresidential structures is consistent across the three municipalities.

On the basis of the first cluster of crop improvements, banana and coconut are themost common valuable crop improvement in areas along the highway. In termsof the broader classifications, fruit trees and forest trees also account for aconsiderable number of the affected improvements on the land. The completelistings of all affected improvements along the highway is outlined in Annex E.

16. The total compensation package for 40 marginally affected structures is estimatedat roughly PhP639,246. This compensation package includes replacement coststo structures, crop improvements within the vicinity of the structure, and forgoneearnings for structures used fully or partially for commercial purposes.

There are about 119 severely affected structures with an estimated totalentitlements of PhP3,839,137. This package is spread across the threemunicipalities, by types of structures.

By municipality, as in the case of the marginally affected structures, Claveraccounts for more than half of the total compensation package for the threemunicipalities with an estimated cost of about PhP376,006. Again, the remainingportion is shared between the other two municipalities: PhP243,435 for Gigaquitand for Bacuag, PhP19,806.

17. In addition to the compensation package to the PAFs, RAP implementation willentail overhead and logistical costs. This cost covers the management of theimplementation process, honoraria to field personnel and committee members,maintenance and operating expenses and financial administration, among others.

NRJMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaguit-Claver Road vii

18. The following is the summary of the total estimated cost of the RAP including thecost of implementation:

Compensation Package


Marginal Effect on Structures PhP 639,246

Severe Effect on Structures PhP 3,839,137

Income Loss PhP 662,770

Relocation Allowance PhP 700

Land Improvements PhP 22, 405

Affected Trees PhP 332,725

Sub-Total PhP 5,496,983

Contingencies

Allowance for Inflation (based on the2000 rate for CARAGA @ 3.4) PhP 186,897

Estimation Error @ 5% 274,849

RAP Implementation @ 10 % PhP 549,698of total Compensation


External Monitoring $ 2,000.00

As summarized, the total cost of the RAP is PhP 6,507,427 and $2,000.00

18. The underlying principle of the LARR Policy Framework, in general, and theRAP in particular, is to provide mitigating measures to at least ensure that thePAFs will not be worse off as a consequence of the road improvement project. Itis for this reason that the survey instrument was designed to capture the criticalaspects of the PAFs social and economic conditions to provide the benchmark forfuture assessments in the context of monitoring and evaluation.

NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-Claver Road

RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP)BACUAG-GIGAQUIT-CLAVER ROAD PROJECT

NATIONAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

1. RATIONALE

Development interventions such as physical infrastructures undoubtedly result intosignificant positive impacts to the community and the residents both in terms ofeconomic and social activities. However, it is equally true that any developmentintervention results in some negative externalities. In the case of road infrastructureprojects, the obvious negative consequence would be in terms of the social costsassociated with environmental damage and human dislocation.

Within the framework of the DPWH Medium-Term Development Program (1999-2004),the Department has been introducing institutional reforms. In particular, the Agency hasinstitutionalized, through the creation of offices in the department, the in-house capabilityto assess the social and environmental consequences of the projects under the NationalRoads Improvement and Management Program (NRIMP).

Hence, the department has promulgated the social policy framework and specificguidelines for the implementation of projects under NRIMP. The framework and specificguidelines are operationalized in the Policy Framework for Land AcquisitionResettlement and Rehabilitation (LARR) in general, and in the principles outlined for theResettlement Action Plan (RAP), in particular. The said framework is anchored on thephilosophy that the adverse impact of NRIMP should be avoided, minimized and/ormitigated to ensure that the Project Affected Persons (PAPs) will not be worse off, if not,benefit from the project. Implicit in the framework are elements of just disturbancecompensation based on fair market value and replacement cost, participatory processthrough local consultations, and internal/external monitoring to ensure proper andeffective implementation of the projects.

In order to operationalize the policies and principles outlined earlier, it is necessary toconduct rigorous and systematic assessment of the project areas based on acceptablestandards in research methods and analysis.

2. OBJECTIVES

In general, the objective of the RAP is anchored on two basic principles: prevent, ifpossible, the dislocation of local settlers and if the disturbance is unavoidable then theobjective of RAP is to assess the extent of disturbance that NRIMP project will cause tolocal settlers, provide mitigating measures to minimize the impact and to providecompensation to actual damages to properties and other land improvements. The RAP

NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 2

will also provide the mechanisms for implementation including the logistical andadministrative.

Specifically, the objectives of RAP include:

2.1. to set up a process to allow for public consultations with PAPs on the NRIMPprojects;

2.2. to determine the number and geographically locate the PAPs and assess theextent of disturbance;

2.3. to estimate, based on current market value and replacement cost, the disturbancecompensation;

2.4. to provide the operational mechanisms for timely RAP implementation includingtotal budgetary allocations; and

2.5. to formulate the terms of reference for internal and external monitoring of RAPimplementation.

3. METHODOLOGY

3.1. Institutional Collaboration

RAP preparation and implementation was designed as a collaborative effort among threekey institutions, DPWH, the LGUs, and the consulting Firm. To ensure smoothimplementation and effective coordination among these institutions, a series oforientation and public consultations were organized.

On the one hand, orientation programs were organized to enable DPWH and LGU staffmembers who will be involved in RAP preparation and implementation to appreciate thephilosophy and principles behind the RAP. On the other hand, public consultations weredesigned to inform settlers along the sites about the project and the expectedconsequences to the community and the households.

3.2. Data and Sources

The basic inputs for RAP preparation include primary and secondary data. Secondarydata about the overall social and economic situation obtaining in the communities alongthe project sites were generated through municipal documents. Further, secondary datawere also generated pertaining to the valuation of affected structures and landimprovements. For affected structures, prevailing market prices of constructionmaterials were generated to assess the replacement costs. For agricultural improvements,


current assessed value of crops and other commercial trees were also solicited from theAssessors' Office. Secondary data pertaining to the technical description of the projectdesign were used in the linear acquisition and mapping.

Primary data were also generated through actual Project Affected Persons (PAPs) andkey-informants. Attributes of PAPs at the household level were generated through theadministration of a structured survey instrument and through complete enumeration ofthe identified PAPs. Critical primary data were also solicited from key-informants. Forinstance, technical informations were required to determine the number of ProjectAffected Families (PAFs) and the extent of disturbance. Right of Way (ROW) limitswere solicited from the appropriate key-informants at the District Engineer's Office.

3.3. Population

Because of the nature of the problem, it is required that complete enumeration of allaffected structures, families, and all other land improvements will have to be accountedfor to establish the impact of the road improvement project.

3.4. Analytical Tools

In order to put the Resettlement Action Plan in proper perspective, there was need tocharacterize the communities affected by the project. This was done by employingdescriptive statistical analysis of both secondary and primary data pertaining to therespective communities. Specifically, the analysis involved the use of the standardmeasures of central tendencies, dispersions and distributions.

The determination of the compensation matrix for each of the affected households andthe total compensation package was fairly straight forward. Valuation of structuresaffected by the Project was based on the concept of Replacement Cost. Values weredetermined based on the estimated quantity of materials needed to put up a structuresimilar to the one that will be demolished due to the Project and monetized using thecurrent prices of materials as per records of the District Engineer's Office. Similarly,valuation of agricultural and other biological land improvements were based on theassessed value provided for by the District Engineer's Office. In special cases whereadditional entitlements were required, valuation schemes based on the principles outlinedin the LARR Policy were adopted (Annex A).

The mechanical routine of generating summary of actual values were accomplished bysimple algorithmic instructions for the computers using standard application software.The cost component of RAP implementation was determined by employing simplebudget planning.


4. PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROCEEDINGS

To ensure that the implementation of RAP will be done smoothly, it was embodied in thepolicy framework of NRIMP to undergo a series of public consultation. The publicconsultation was done at two levels. i.e. at the municipal level and at the barangay level.

Two orientation meetings were conducted at the earlier stage of the RAP preparationreport. Both meetings were facilitated by the Chief of EIAPO. The first was conductedat the DPWH CARAGA Regional Office in Butuan City and the second was at theSurigao del Norte District Engineer's Office in Surigao City.

Due to the proximity the three municipalities affected by the Bacuag-Gigaquit-Claverroad improvement project, it was deemed sufficient to hold a single consultation in themunicipality of Gigaquit which is the town at the middle.

To ensure wider participation, particularly among potential PAFs, letters ofcommunications were sent earlier to notify the respective LGU officials. As indicated inAnnex B.3, the consultation was well attended including the three respective mayors, theBarangay Chairmen of the affected communities and potential PAFs.

During this consultation, in attendance was only LGUs but there were representatives ofPAFs in every barangay.

Annex B outlines the highlights of the proceedings in both orientation meeting and publicconsultations. The orientation meetings were basically centered on the introduction ofNRIMP and the LARR Policy Framework because the audience were the implementersof RAP.

Consequently, most of the discussions clustered about issues relating to the Role of theDPWH Regional and District staff members. In contrast, because the audience of thepublic consultations were the potential PAFs, issues revolved around compensation andentitlements.

5. RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN

5.1. Project Description

The Bacuag-Gigaquit-Claver Road segment under NRIMP I is part of the long- termdevelopment of the Surigao-Davao Coastal Road. However, for Phase I of NRIMP, theSurigao Norte Contract Package is only one of the three which includes Marihatag-Barobo-San Francisco Road in Surigao del Sur and Mati-Manay in Davao Oriental.


Figure 5.1. Bacuag-Gigaquit-Claver road section of NRIMP -1, Surigao del Norte, 2001.


The Bacuag-Gigaquit-Claver road improvement section comprises of two sectionswhich apparently stretches across the three municipalities for a total road length ofabout 44.5 kilometers (Table 5.1).

The first segment starts from Bacuag to the town proper of Claver. The segment is about15.7 kilometers long. Only about 4 kilometers of the entire stretch of road is paved withconcrete cement and about half a kilometer is characterized to be in either very bad orbad condition. The remaining segment of about 11.8 kilometers is paved with gravelwhere six kilometers is characterized as either in good or fair condition and theremaining 5.8 is in bad or very bad condition.

Table 5.1. Road length by segment and by type of road, Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Segment | Condition - LengthbyType |'Totail PCC J AC I Grav Earth| Length

Good/Fair -- 3 6.0 J (kn)Bacuag- Claver ^ Bad/V Bad 0.4, 5.8 6.2

| Impassable - F -

.Sub Tote-l ' V | . .8 g

| Good/Fair 2.-7 | _ i 2.7Claver - Boundary - i Bad/V Bad l 26 i2.

.| Impassable _ |l_

Sub ToCaV --- 7 | L - 26.1 ! j 28.2

'- - li ' ' ' - I ' 1' - - I11 '4 . "I

The other segment which starts from the town of Claver up to the provincial boundary isgenerally a gravel road. Only about 2.7 kilometers of road is paved with concrete andthe remaining stretch of roughly 26 kilometers is paved with gravel characterized aseither in very bad or bad condition.

5.2. The Local Government Units

5.2.1. Bacuag

Bacuag is, relatively speaking, an old municipality. The influx of migrants, generallyfrom the province of Bohol, started as early as the 1880s and the municipality itself wasestablished in 1919. In the earlier developments. The municipality was then comprisedof only five brarangays.


The municipality is spread across a total land area of about 14,617 hectares divided into 9different barangays. Close to half (44%) of the municipality are mountainous withpatches of forest, grass lands, swamps, and marshes. The remaining portion of arablelands are being utilized generally for low intensive agricultural production.

Table 5.2.1. Road classification by type of pavement in Bacuag, Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Classification Length PavementConcrete Earth Gravel

National 3.100 3.100Provincial 8.307 8.307Municipal 23.758 1.365 22.393Barangay 86.333 0.210 86.124

Total 99.106 1.575 97.531

Source: MPDO, Bacuag, Surigao del Norte, 1997.

The available statistics based on the socio-economic profile of the municipality is quiteold (1997). In recent years there have been construction of concrete pavement along thenational passing through the municipality. However, for the other portions of themunicipality, most of the characterization in terms of the level of road infrastructureswould still be very relevant. Even the recent characterization presented earlier as part ofthe project description indicated the very low level of concrete pavement in the Bacuag-Claver segment of the road.

The total length of the road network for the municipality is quite minimal. For the totallength of about 99 kilometers of road, only about 1.5 kilometers were paved withconcrete in 1997. The remaining 97.5 kilometers are paved with gravel and the bulk ofthe roads are classifies as barangay roads. In terms of road density, the municipality hasabout 688 meters of gravel pavement per square kilometer of land area and about tenmeters of concrete pavement per square kilometer.

5.2.2. Gigaquit

Gigaquit is the second to the last town to the south towards the provincial boundary toSurigao del Sur. The general topography of the town is mountainous.From a relatively short distance from the shorelines, the area of the town abruptly risestowards the Diwata Mountain ranges.


The municipality is composed of 13 barangays spread across an area of about 23,570hectares. Most of the arabe lands are devoted to the production of coconut and someirrigated lands are devoted to the production of rice.

The road network of the municipality is relatively less extensive. The only portion pavedwith concrete is about a kilometer of road along the highway cutting through BarangaySan Isidro and about 4 kilometers from the highway towards the Central Business Districtof the municipality.

There are on-going attempts by special projects funded by the World Bank to provideirrigation and farm to market roads in the municipality particularly in the in BarangaySan Isidro. Specifically, an eleven kilometer all-weather road is under construction toconnect the upland barangays of Lahi and Sico-sico to the lowland communities. At thispoint in time, the only practical means of access to the upland barangays is throughDaywan river via pump boats.

5.2.3. Claver

Claver, as a geo-political unit, became a municipality only in 1955. Hence, relative to theother municipalities in the province, it is a very young town. The total land area of themunicipality stretches to about 32,262 hectares of land spread across 14 barangaysincluding an island and a few islets. The total population of the town is about 17,376.

While the area is quite huge, most are spread along the mountainous sections and aretherefore classified as forest lands. Only about 30 percent of the land area has beendeclared alienable and disposable (A&D) lands.

Table 5.2.3. Road classification by type of pavement in Claver, Surigao del None, 2001.

Classification Length PavementConcrete Earth Gravel

NationalProvincialMunicipal 8.638 2.484 2.368 3.786Barangay 14.027 1.020 5.722 7.285

Total 22.665 3.504 8.090 11.071

Source: MPDO, Claver, Sungao del Norte, 2000.

NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-Claver Road 9

The available data set provided by the Municipal Planning and Development Office(MPDO) does not contain information on the length and classification of roads under theadministrative jurisdiction of the provincial and national agencies. The total length of theroad network for the municipality of Claver is very low. The total length of concrete isabout 3.5 kilometers; however, but the total road length is only 22.6 kilometers. Further,a high proportion of the road network is still earth pavement.

Considering that the area of the municipality is relatively large, then the road densitywould indeed seem very minimal. In terms of the total road length, the density is onlyabout 70 meters per square kilometer of land area.

5.3. Socio-Economic Profile of Project Affected Families

The total number of affected structures is 159. However, some affected structures didnot have any valid responses with respect to the type of respondents (60). This isbecause some are public infrastructures and public utilities where it is not possible toidentify a specific respondent for such type of structures. In some cases, the owners ofthe affected structures are absentees or not available. These types of affected structurestotaled to 60 which account for about 38 percent of the total number of structures (Table5.3). Therefore, in the foregoing social and economic characterization, most responseswill only be valid for 99 cases.

Among the affected structures with valid responses, the modal type of respondent is thespouse with an estimated proportion of roughly 40 percent. Husbands, as respondents,accounted for about 18 percent and a minimal proportion (3.8%) of the respondents werethe children.

Table 5.3 Distribution by Type of Respondents and by Municipality, Surigao del Norte

Municipality

Bacuag Gigaquit Claver Total

Respondent Not Applicable Count 7 24 29 58

% of Total 4.5% 14.0% 18.5% 36.9%

Husband Count 2 15 12 29

% of Total 1.3% 10.2% 7.0% 18.5%

Spouse Count 8 24 32 64

% of Total 5.0% 15.1% 20.1% 40.3%

Child Count 3 3 6

% of Total 1.9% 1.9% 3.8%

Total Count 17 66 76 159

% of Total 10.7% 41.5% 47.8% 100.00%


53.1. Demography

As raised in the previous section, there are only 99 cases with valid types of respondentsand hence, the only cases where socio-economic characterization is possible. In mostcharacterization, therefore, the number of cases with valid responses is 99.

Across the entire stretch, from Bacuag to the Boundary of Surigao del Norte, the modalethnic origin of the PAFs is Bisaya which accounts for 67 percent, 33 percent of whichare PAFs who owns marginally affected structures while 67 percent are Bisayan PAFswith severely affected structures (Table 5.3.1a). The next significant group generallyrefers to the ethno-linguistic affiliation indigenous to the area, which is "Surigaonon".This group accounts for about 30 percent of the total number of valid cases. Severelyaffected Surigaonon PAFs represents a total of about 77 percent while those marginallyaffected PAFs only represents about one fourth of the total Surigaonon PAFs.

There are no information on the chronology of the influx of Christian migrants in the areaand also with respect to their cultural makeup. Surigaonon and Bisaya are two of thedominant ethno-linguistic groups in the area. These groups, however, are not classifiedas indigenous people.

PAFs along the Bacuag-Claver segment include migrants from Ilocos, Southern Tagalog,and Visayas. However, most identify themselves as either Bisaya or Surigaonon.Majority of the severely affected Bisayan PAFs reside in Claver. Severely affectedSurigaonon PAFs, on the other hand, reside mostly in Gigaquit.

Table 5.3.1a. Distribution of respondents by ethnicity and by extent of impact andmunicipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

Extent of MunicipalityImpact Bacuag Gigaquit Claver Total

Severe tlocano Count 1 I

% of Total 1.4% 1.4%

Tagalog Count I I

% of Total 1.4% 1.4%

Bisaya Count 3 17 25 45

% of Total 4.3% 24.3% 35.7% 64.3%

Surigaonon Count 3 12 8 23

% of Total 4.3% 17.1% 11.4% 32.9%


% of Total 8.6% 41.4% 50.0% 100.0%,

Marginal Bisaya Count 4 12 6 22

% of Total 13.8% 41.4% 20.7% 75.9%

Surigaonon Count 1 6 7

% of Total 3.4% 20.7% 24.1%


% of Total 13.8% 44.8% 41.4% 100.0%


Table 5.3.1b indicates the mean age of the respondents by levels of educationalattainment and by municipality.

Table 5.3.1b. Mean age of respondents by educational level and by municipality, Surigao del Norte,2001.

Age (years)

Municipality

Bacuag Gigaquit Claver TotalElementary Mean 80.00 63.12 55.38 60.47Undergraduate n 1 8 8 17

% n 1.0% 8.1% 8.1% 17.2%

Elementary Graduate Mean 41.00 58.77 48.06 52.32

n 1 13 17 31

% n 1.0% 13.1% 17.2% 31.3%

HS Undergraduate Mean 29.00 72.33 52.83 53.82

n 2 3 6 11

% n 2.0% 3.0% 6.1% 11.1%

HS Graduate Mean 32.00 37.29 33.80 34.71

n 5 7 5 17

% n 5.1% 7.1% 5.1% 17.2%

College Undergraduate Mean 35.67 29.50 34.13

n 6 2 S

% n 6.1% 2.0%

College Graduate Mean 32.00 38.80 41.63 39.93

n 1 5 8 14

% n 1.0% 5.1% 8.1% 14.1%5.

None Mean 51.00 51.00

n 1

% n 1.0% 1.0%

Total Mean 37.10 51.31 46.57 47.63

n 10 42 47 99

% n 10.1% 42.4% 47.5% 100.0%

At this point, it would be worthy to note the distribution of the respondents bymunicipality. About 90 percent of the respondents are under the political jurisdictions ofthe municipalities of Claver (47.5%) and Gigaquit (42.4%). The remaining 10 percentare within the boundaries of Bacuag.

The average age of the respondents is about 47 years old. Across municipalities, themean age ranges from 37 years in Bacuag to 51 years in Gigaquit. The average ageamong Claver respondents which is roughly 46.5 years is much closer to the mean.


In terms of the level of educational attainment, the modal class is elementary graduatewith proportion estimated to be 31.3 percent. In cumulative terms, about 60 percent ofthe respondents were unable to complete high school education. About 17 percentcompleted high school and college graduates account for 14 percent of the totalrespondents. It is interesting to note that the proportion of those who did not have anyform of education at all is only one percent.

The modal household size is 5 per family (Table 5.3.1c). However, it must be noted thathousehold sizes of 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 each have proportions clustering between 10 and 11percent. At the extreme ends of the distribution, about six percent are single householdsand about 2 percent have either 11 or twelve members.

Table 5.3.1c. Distribution by household size and by municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Municipality

Bacuag Gigaquit Claver TotalHH 1 n 5 1 6size % n 5.2% 1.0% 6.2%

2 n 2 5 3 1(

% n 2.1% 5.2% 3.1% 10.3%

3 n 2 8 1(% n 2.1% 8.2% 10.37A.

4 n 4 6 1(

% n 4.1% 6.2% 10.3%5 n 1 9 15 2'

% n 1 0% 9.3% 15.5% 25.8%.

6 n 4 5 2 ii

% n 4.1% 5.2% 2.1% 11.3%A,7 n 2 4 5 11

% n 2.1% 4.1% 5.2% 11.3%A.8 n 1 3 3 7

% n 1.0% 3.1% 3.1% 7.2S%

10 n 2 3 E.

% n 2.1% 3.1% 5.2%9.

11 n 1 1

%n 1.0% 1.0n

12 n 1 1%n 1.0% 1n.0

Total n 10 41 46 97

% n 10.3% 42.3% 47.4% 100.0%

Slightly more than half (50.5%) of the respondents are characterized under a nuclearhousehold (Table 5.3.1d). However, also a relatively higher proportion (43%) areextended households. This implies that, as the household matures, in a considerablenumber of cases, members are unable to establish their own households. Extended


households can be interpreted as an indication of very limited economic opportunities inthe community.

Table 5.3.1d. Distribution by household structure and by municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Municipality

Bacuag Gigaquit Claver TotalHH Single n 4 1structure % n 4.1% 1.0% 5.2%5

Nuclear n 5 19 25 4')

% n 5.2% 19.6% 25.8% 50.5%9

Extended n 5 17 20 4:'

% n 5.2% 17.5% 20.6% 43.3%;

Joint n I 1

% n 1.0% 1.0LK

Total n 10 41 46 9'7

% n 10.3% 42.3% 47.4% 100.0%

53.2. Economy

The modal occupation of the Project Affected Families (PAFs) is business operation.This primary occupation accounted for roughly 35 percent of the respondents. Farming isalso relatively significant with an estimated proportion of about 15 percent of therespondents.

The same proportion is attributed to those who are engaged in fulltime housekeeping.The very notable statistical information is the fact that about 21 percent of therespondents are not engaged in any occupation at all.

The very minimal proportion of those engaged in other occupations is indicative of thevery limited opportunities in the community. Only about 4 percent are employed in theirrespective profession, 5 percent as skilled laborers and one percent as hired farm worker.


Table 5.3.2a. Primary occupation by municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Municipality

Bacuag Gigaquit Claver Total

Primary Farmer n 5 10 15

Occupation % of n 5.1% 10.2% 15.3%.

Hired Farm Worker n I

%ofn 1.0% 1,0%

Skilled Labor n 3 2 5

%ofn 3.1% 2.0% 5.1%

Professional Employment n 1 3 4

%ofn 1.0% 3.1% 4.1%

Business Operator n 6 15 14 35

% ofn 6.1% 15.3% 14.3% 35.79,

House Keeping n 3 5 7 15

% ofn 3.1% 5.1% 7.1% 15.3%,

Others n I 1 2

% ofn 1.0% 1.0% 2.09.;

None n 11 10 21

% ofn 11.2% 10.2% 2144%

Total n 10 41 47 98

% ofn 10.2% 41.8% 48.0% 100.0%

To put the income distribution in proper perspective, it must be recalled that theinstrument was designed to solicit income information only if the structure will beaffected severely. Hence, income variables are only supposed to be valid for severePAFs. Further, it must also be recalled that there are severely affected structures whichare public by nature, thus, there are no valid responses to income variables. There arealso absentee owners where soliciting the required income variables were not possible.

Consequently, Table 5.3.2b only represent 41 valid responses. Given the variousprimary occupation, the average level of total income is about PhP92,921. The mean ishighest among Bacuag residents and lowest from the PAFs in Claver. Respondents fromGigaquit are also relatively well off with an estimated average total income of aboutPhP118,349. Farm income is very minimal. This implies that the PAFs are relying moreon non-farm economic opportunities.

It must be noted that in all cases, the mean is higher than the median which indicates arelatively skewed income distribution. Relatively few individuals are earning extremelyhigh levels of income and the majority are earning low. In fact, in case of farm income,the median is zero which indicates that at least half of the respondents did not have farm-income opportunities.


Table 5.3.2b Mean and median income by source and by municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

Non-Farm TotalMunicipality Farm Income Income IncomeBacuag Mean 1,667 125,375 127,042

Median 0 82,125 87,125

N 3 3 3

Gigaquit Mean 6,510 111,839 118,349

Median 0 39,000 39,350

N 16 16 16

Claver Mean 3,973 65,802 69,775

Median 0 49,813 49,813

N 22 22 22

Total Mean 4,794 88,127 92,921

Median 0 54,000 54,000

N 41 41 41

5.33. Level of Living

The modal type of dwelling among the PAFs across all municipalities is temporary(35.7%, Table 533). Semi-permanent dwelling account for about 32 percent. However, arelatively higher proportion are also living in permanent dwellings (17.9%). It must benoted that about 14.3 percent of the PAFs are living in shanties. By municipality,Gigaquit does not reflect the modal class of all the PAFs combined because in the town,the modal class is semi-permanent. The few PAFs in Bacuag are split equally betweenthose living in permanent and those in temporary dwellings with each sharing anestimated proportion of 3.6 percent.

The proportion of the respondents with access to electrical power is relatively high.About 90 percent of the total household respondents are able to access electrical energy.The other ten percent is divided into two: those who are using kerosene gas for lighting(3.6%) and those using oil for lamp (7.1%). The kerosene users are concentrated inClaver while the oil lamp users are mostly residents of Gigaquit.

Majority of the PAFs, in aggregate terms, have access to potable water through pumpwell system. Access to the other types of water system is practically split between thetwo extremes. On the one hand, about 28 percent access water through pipe systems.On the other hand, 21 percent of the PAFs are still collecting rain water.


Table 5.3.3. Level of household amenities by municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001.

% of Total

Municipality

Bacuag Gigaquit aaver Total

Type of Permanent 3.6% 3.6% 10.7% 17.9%house S

houseSemi 17 9% 14.3% 32.1%Pcrmonent

Temporary 3.6% 14.3% 17.9% 35.7%

Shanty 7.1% 7.1% 14.3%

Total 7.1% 42.9% 50.0% 100.0%

% of Total

Municipality

Bacruag Gigaqutt Claver TotalLighting Electricity 7.1% 35.7% 46.4% 89.3%

Kerosene 3.6% 3.6%

Oil Lamp 7.1% 7.1%

Total 7.1% 42.9% 50.0% 100.0%

% of Totat

Municpality

B.actag Gigaquit Ctaver Total

Watec Rain 10.7% 10.7% 21.4%

system Spring I River 3.6% 3.6%

Artesian Wetl 3.6% 3 6%

Pump Welt 17.9% 25.0% 42.9%

Piped Water 3.6% 10 7% 14.3% 28 6%

Total 7.1% 429% 50.0% 100.0%

% of Total

Municipality

Bacuag Gigaquit Claver TotalCooking Wood 3.6% 28.6% 35.7% 67.9%

Fuel LPG 14.3% 143% 28.6%

Kerosene 3.6% 3.6%

Total 7.1% 42.9% 50.0% 100.0%

% of Total

Municipality

Bacuag G.gaquit Claver Total

Toilet Open Pit 3 6% 3.6%

facilities Antipolo 7.1% 7.1% 14.3%

Semi Flush 7.1% 321% 28.6% 67 9%

None 14.3% 143%

Total 7.1% 42.9% 500% 1000%


The modal fuel type used is wood (67.9%) and about 28.6 percent are using LPG forcooking. The remaining 3.6 percent is accounted for by those who use kerosene gas forcooking. About 68 percent of the respondents are using either semi flush toilet facilities.However, the proportion of those who are still using the antipolo system is stillrelatively high at 14.3 percent. It must be stressed here that also a relatively higherproportion of the PAFs does not have any toilet facilities at all.

5.4. Project Impacts

5.4.1. Impacts on Land

The project design for mne entire iiacuag-Gigaquit-Claver section of NRIM-Phase Igenerally followed the center line of the existing road pavements. There were a fewcases where realignments were made; however, these realignments are within theexisting Right of Way (ROW) as established by the District Engineer's Office in SurigaoCity, Surigao del Norte. Hence, there are no land acquisitions in this particular sectionof the road improvement project.

5.4.2. Impacts on Structures

Census and inventory of affected assets were conducted in January- March 2001,including the conduct of baseline socio-economic survey for marginally and severelyaffected households. The cut-off date is 13 March 2001.

Based on the RAP Census, 159 structures will be affected by the road improvementproject: 119 are structures which would be severely affected by the road improvementproject and 40 will be marginally affected.

In both severe and marginally affected structures, the common use are residential,commercial, and commercial/residential (structures used for both residential andcommercial purposes). Among severely affected structures, the three categoriesaccount for about three quarters (69%) of the total structures (Table 5.4.2). Theremainder is spread across structures used as public infrastructures, public utilities andother uses such as walkways and school fences, among others.

The proportion of the three categories in the marginally affected structures is even muchhigher, which is estimated at about 77.5 percent. The remaining proportion isdistributed across public infrastructures and other uses.

Of the 159 structures, the road project will affect 113 PAP households who will beadversely affected by the loss of their main structure (i.e. independent house, cum storeor independent shops). 82 PAFs are severely affected and 31 are marginally affected. On


the other hand, 412 PAP households who are losing an estimated 3,810 trees andperennials of various species have been identified.

5.4.3. Loss of Income

In some cases, particularly if the structures are used for commercial purposes, incomeloss will also be a significant consequence of the road improvement projects. Theproportion of structures used fully or partially for commercial purposes will provide anindicative extent of the income loss. Based on the LARR policy, income loss isestimated on the basis of foregone earnings of the commercial establishment during theconstruction period not exceeding the equivalent income for thirty days.

5.4.4. Impact on Land Improvements

Within the area of affected structures particularly those which are residential, there areagricultural improvements that will be affected by the project. The most common cropsare coconuts and fruit trees. In cases such as these, improvements are assessed andvalued using the current market prices of construction materials as provided by theDistrict Engineers Office, Department of Public Works and Highways.

5.5. Compensation Package

5.5.1. Entitlements

There are no land acquisitions in the Bacuag-Claver-Provincial Bdry Road Sectionimprovement project. Hence, the compensation entitlements are limited, as the casemaybe, to affected structures, trees and other improvements and disturbancecompensations such as foregone income and subsistence allowance for PAFs.

5.5.2. Affected Structures

Based on the guidelines, if the total floor area affected exceeds 20 percent of the totalfloor area of the structure, the impact is considered severe. In such cases, the wholestructure will be acquired and estimated for payments. However, in the implementationof the survey, field workers were given the prerogative to deviate from the rigid 20percent cut-off to allow for special cases for considerations. For instance, it will notrequire 20 percent of damage for light structures and shanties to destroy the stability ofthe structure; hence, judgments are made at the field where even at less 20 percent, somestructures were considered to be severely affected. They are also cases where mitigationmeasures can be suggested to spare huge and expensive structures. All structures arewithin the ROW as established by the DPWH. Hence, entitlements are on the basis of


their being owners or tenants of structures. In this case, entitlements are patterned in theschedule outlined in Table 5.5.4.

5.53. Land Improvements in Absentee Landholdings

During the course of the RAP Survey, valuable land improvements along the roads weredetermined to be affected by the road improvement project. However, in cases where thelandowners or tenants are non-settlers in the area, it was deemed appropriate forpractical purposes, to simply locate the specific improvement along the road section andattach the corresponding value.

5.5.4. Compensation Matrix

In line with the aforementioned objectives and principles of resettlement (Chapter 3) andthe legal framework (Chapter 4), the matrix below will be used in the settlement ofclaims for compensation for lost assets of PAPs. Unless otherwise indicated, payment ofcompensation and other entitlements and the extension of assistance will be given to PAPhouseholds, not individuals. No relocation site is being envisaged for the project. PAFsthat will be adversely affected by the loss of their main structures will reorganize theirstructures on adjacent or nearby lots.


Table 5.5.4 Entitlement Matrix

Type of Loss Application Entitled Person Entitlement Compensation Amount (Php)Arable Land Actual area needed by Owners with full title, tax declaration For the portion of the land needed: N/Athe road project and the or who are covered by customary law + Cash compensation equivalent to zonal value +None remaining land is still (e.g. possessory rights, usufruct) or 10% (AO 50)

economically viable other acceptable proof of ownership + Topping-up supplemental assistance equivalent tothe difference between the zonal value + 10% andthe fair market value in the area as established by theindependent appraiser to be hired by the project+Cash compensation foT perennials of commercialvalue as determined by the DENR or the concemedappraisal committee+PAP will be given sufficient time to havvest cropson the subject land

PAPs without title, tax declaration, or For the portion of the land needed: N/Aare not covered by customary law +PAP will be given sufficient time to harvest crops(e.g., possessor rights, usufruct) or +Cash compensation for perennials of commercialother acceptable proof of ownership value as determined by the DENR or the concemed

appraisal committee+ Financial assistance to make up for landpreparation in the amount of PhP150 per squaremeter

Remaining land become Owners with full title, tax declaration +Cash compensation equivalent to zonal value +10% N/Aeconomically not viable or who are covered by customary law (AO 50) or, if feasible, 'land for land' will be(i.e., PAP losing >20% (e.g., possessory rights, usufruct) or provided in terms of a new parcel of land ofof land holding or even other acceptable proof of ownership equivalent productivity, at a location acceptable towhen losing c20% but, PAP, and with long-term security of tenure.the remaining land is +Topping-up supplemental assistance equivalent tonot economically viable the difference between the zonal value + 10% andanymore) the fair market value in the area as established bythe independent appraiser to be hired by the project+Subsistence allowance of PhP15,000+PAP will be given sufficient time to harvest crops+Cash compensation for perennials of commercialvalue as determined by the DENR or the concemedappraisal committee+If relocating, PAP to be provided freetransportation+Rehabilitation assistance (skills training and otherdevelopment activities) equivalent to PhP15,000 willbe provided in coordination with other govemmentagencies if the present means of livelihood is nolonger viable and the PAP will have to engage in a

I new income activity


Type of Loss Application Entitled Person Entitlement Compensation Amount (Php)PAPs without title, tax declaration, +Financiat assistance equivalent to the average annual N/Aare not covered by customary law gross harvest for the past 3 years but not less than(e.g., possessory rights, usufruct) or lPb15,000other acceptable proof of ownership +PAP will be given sufficient time to harvest crops

+Cash compensation for perennials of commercial value asdetermined by the DENR or the concerned appraisalcommittee+Financial assistance to make up for land preparation inthe amount of PhP150 per square meter+If relocating, PAP to be provided free transportation+Rehabilitation assistance (skills training and otherdevelopment activities) equivalent to PhP15,000 will beprovided in coordination with other govemment agencies ifthe present means of livelihood is no longer viable and thePAP will have to engage in a new income activity

N/AAgricultural lessees As per RA 6389 and EO 1035:+Disturbance compensation equivalent to five times theaverage of the gross harvest on the land holding during tefive preceding years but not less than PhP15,000.+Rehabilitation assistance (skills training and otherdevelopment activities) equivalent to PhP15,000 will beprovided in coordination with other govemment agencies ifthe present means of livelihood is no longer viable and thePAP will have to engage in a new income activity

N/ATemporary use of land All PAPs +Compensation to be provided for loss of income duringthe period, standing crops, cost of soil restoration anddamaged structures

N/A2 Residential land Actual area needed by Owners with full title, tax declaration For the portion of the land needed:and/or the road project and the or who are covered by customary law +Cash compensation equivalent to zonal value +10% (AOCommercial land remaining land is still (e.g., possessory rights, usufruct) or 50)viable for continued use other acceptable proof acceptable +Topping-up supplemental assistance equivalent to theNone proof of ownership difference between the zonal value +10% and the fair

market value in the area as established by the independentappraiser to be hired by the project+Cash compensation for perennials of commercial value asdetermined by the DENR or the concemed appraisalcommittee


Type of Loss Application Entitled Person Entitlement Compensation Amount (Php)Remaining residential Owners with full title, tax declaration +Cash compensation equivalent to zonal value +10% N/Aor commercial land or who are covered by customary law (AO 50) or, if feasible, 'land for land' will be provided inbecomes not viable for (e.g., possessory rights, usufruct) or terms of a new parcel of land of equivalent market value,continued use. other acceptable proof of ownership at a location acceptable to PAP, and with long-term

security of tenure. The replacement land should be ofacceptable size under zoning laws or a plot of equivalentvalue, whichever is larger, in a nearby resettlement areawith adequate physical and social infrastructure. Whenthe affected holding is larger in value than the relocationplot, cash compensation will cover the difference invalue.+Topping-up supplemental assistance equivalent to thedifference between the zonal value +10% and the fairmarket value in the area as established by the independentappraiser to be hired by the project+Cash compensation for perennials of commercial valueas determine by the DENR or concerned appraisalcommittee+If relocating, PAP to be provided free transportationTemporary use of land All PAPs +Compensation to be provided for loss of income during N/Athe period, standing crops, cost of soil restoration anddamaged structures3 Main Structures Structure, with or Owners of structure will full title or +Compensation in cash for affected portion of the Residential - 18 PAFs(e.g., house, without a building tax declaration to the land or those structure, including the cost of restoring the remaininghouse cum shop)- permit, partially who are covered by customary law structure, as determined by the concemed appraisal Affected structure - Php 186,245affected and the (e.g., possessory rights, usufruct) or committee with no deduction for salvaged building Income loss n/a93 PAFs remaining structure is . other acceptable proof of ownership materials. Relocatiom n/astill viable for +PAPs who have business affected due to partial impact Rehabilitation nlacontinued use. on the structure are entitled to a subsistence allowance for Other n/athe loss of income during the reconstruction period. (Such28 PAFs will be verified and computed by the MunicipalResettlement Implementing committee or RIC). Res'l/Comm'l - 10 PAFs

Affected structure - Php 320,282Income loss - 196,200Relocation - n/aRehabilitation n/aOthers n/a


Owners of structures, including +Compensation in cash for affected portion of theshanty dwellers in urban areas, have structure, including the cost of restoring the remainingno title or tax declaration to the land structure, as determined by the concemed appraisalor other acceptable proof of committee with no deduction for salvaged buildingownership materials.+Shanty dwellers in urban areas who opt to go back toR = 18 PAFs their place of origin in the province or be shifted togovemment relocation sites will be provided freeR/C = 10 PAFs transportation+PAPs who have business affected due to partial impacton the structure are entitled to a subsistence allowance forthe loss of income during the reconstruction period.(Such will be verified and computed by the municipalResettlement Implementing Committee or RIC).+Professional squatters will not receive compensation butthey can collect their salvageable materials.

-Renters (tenants) of leased affected +Given 3 months notice on the schedule of demolition NAstructures, including renters of shanty +If shifting is required, PAP is given transitionaldwellings in urban areas allowance equivalent to one month rent of a similarstructure within the same areaNone +For house tenants renting structures outside of, or withinthe ROW, and who have to transfer elsewhere, freetransportation will be provided+Renting shanty dwellers in urban areas who opt to goback to their place of origin in the province or be shiftedto govemment relocation sites will be provided freetransportationEntire structure affected Owners of structures with full title or +Compensation in cash for the entire structure atOR when the remaining tax declaration to the land or those replacement cost as determined by the concernedstructure becomes not who are covered by customary law appraisal committee without deduction for salvagedviable for continued (e.g., possessory rights, usufruct) or building materials.use, with or without a other acceptable proof of ownership +Inconvenience allowance of PhP10,000 per PAP.building permit +PAPs who have business affected due to the severeimpact on the structure are entitled to a subsistence65 PAFs allowance for the loss of income during thereconstruction period. (Such will be verified andcomputed by the RIC).+If relocation is necessary, free transportation will beprovided+Rehabilitation assistance in the form of skills trainingand other development activities and equivalent toPhP15,000 will be provided in coordination with othergovemment agencies if the present means of livelihood(e.g., house cum shop) is no longer viable and the PAP______

________________________________ will have to engage in a new income activityo_engage_in_a_new_income_ac__vity


Owners of structures., including +Compensation in cash for the entire strructure at Residential - 44 PAFsshanty dwellers in urban areas, have replacement cost as determined by the concemedno title or tax declaration to the land appraisal committee without deduction for salvaged Affected structure - Phpl ,436,723or other acceptable proof of building materials. Income loss n/aownership +Shanty dwellers in urban areas who opt to go back to Relocation n/atheir place of origin in the province or be shifted to RehabilitationR = 44 PAFs govemment relocation sites will be provided free Allowance n/sR/C = 21 PAFs transportation+PAPs who have business affected due to the severeimpact on the structure are entitled to a subsistence House cum shop - 21 PAFsallowance for the loss of income during thereconstruction period. (Such will be verified and Affected structure - Php 1,175,624computed by the RIC). Income loss 191,770+If relocation is necessary, free transportation will be Rehabilitationprovided Allowance n/a+Rehabilitation assistance in the form of skills trainingand other development activities and equivalent toPhP15,000 will be provided in coordination with othergovemment agencies if the present means of livelihood(e.g., house cum shop) is no longer viable and the PAPwill have to engage in a new income activity+Professional squatters will not receive compensation butthey can collect their salvageable materials


Type of Loss Application Entitled Person Entitlement Compensation Amount (Php)Renters (tenants) of leased affected +Given 3 month notice on the schedule of demolitionstructures, including renters of shanty +PAP is given transitional allowance equivalent to onedwellings in urban areas month tent of a similar structure within the same area

+For house tenants renting structures outside of, or withinR = I PAFs the ROW, and who have to transfer elsewhere, freeR/C = 1 PAFs transportation will be provided+Renting shaty dwellers in urban areas who opt to go backto their place of origin in the provicne or be shifted togovemment relocation sites will be provided freetransportation+Rehabilitation assistance in the form of skills training andother development activities and equivalent to PhP15,000will be provided in coordination with other governmentagencies if the present means of livelihood (e.g., housecum shop) is no longer viable and the PAP will have toengage in a new income activity4 Independent Shops, with or without Owners of structure with or without +Compensation in cash for affected portion of the Commercial - 3 PAFsshops (structures) building permit, full ftile or tax declarafion to the land structure, including the cost of restoring the remainingpartially affected and or those who are covered by structure, as determined by the concemed appraisal Affected structure - Php 41,833the remaining structures customary law (e.g., possessory committee with no deduction for salvaged building Income loss 30,00020 PAFs are still viable for rights, usufruct) or other acceptable materials. Relocation n/acontinued use. proof of ownership +As determined by the RIC, PAPs will be entitled to Rehabilitation n/atransitional allowance to cover for their computed income3 PAFs 3 PAFs loss during the demolition and reconstruction of theirshops, but not to exceed a 1 month period.

Renters (tenants of affected shops +As determined by the RIC, shop renters will be entitled toa transitional allowance to cover for their computed

None income loss during the period that their business isinterruptedEntire shop affected OR Owner of structure with or without +Compensation in cash for the entire structure at Commercial - 17 PAFswhen the remaining full title or tax declaration to the land replacement cost as determined by the concemed appraisalstructure becomes not or those who are covered by committee without deduction for salvaged building Affected structure - Php 778,135viable for continued customary law (e.g., possessory materials. Income loss 244,800use, with or without a rights, usufruct) or other acceptable +Subsistence allowance of PhP15,000 to each PAP Relocation 700building permit proof of ownership +Free transportation will be provided if relocating Rehabilitation n/a

+Rehabilitation assistance in the fom of skills training and17 PAFs 17 PAFs other development actvities and equivalent to PhP15,000will be provided in coordination with other govemmentagencies if the present means of livelihood is no longerviable and the PAP will have to engage in a new incomeactivity+Professional squatters will not receive compensation but_ ___________________________________________________________________________________ they can collect their salvageable materials


Type of Loss Application Entitled Person Entitlement Compensation Amount (Php)Renters (tenants) of affected shops Given 3 month notice on the schedule of demolition

+As deternined by the RIC, shop renters will be entitled to aNone transitional allowance to cover for their computed incomeloss during the period that their business is interrupted, butnot to exceed a 3 month period.+If shifting, either permanently or temporarily is required,shop renters are entitled to free transportation+Rehabilitation assistance in the form of skills training andother development activities and equivalent to PhP15,000will be provided in coordination with other govemmentagencies if the present means of livelihood is no longer viableand the PAP will have to engage in a new income activity.S Other fixed assets Loss of, or damage to, +Compensation in cash for affected portion of the structure, Affected other structures:or structures affected assets, partially including the cost of restoring the remaining structure, as Php 237,001or entirely determined by the concemed appraisal committee, with no23 PAFs depreciation nor deduction for salvaged building materials.

6 Electric and/or Loss of, or damage to, +Compensation in cash for affected portion of the structure,water connection affected assets, partially including the cost of restoring the remaining structure, as Affected utilities:or entirely determined by the concemed appraisal committee, with no Php 8,4411 PAFs depreciation nor deduction for salvaged building materials.

7 Loss of, or damage to, +Compensation in cash at replacement cost to respective Affected Public facilities:Public facilities public infrastructure agencies. Php 294,099(e.g., public water22 PAFs tanks, tram lines, bus

stop sheds, loadingplatform, public healthcenter, barangay center,electric or telephonelines, etc.)

8 Trees/Perennials 3,810 trees owned by Php - 332,725412 PAFs


Hence, there are only four distinct types of PAFs in relation to affected structures:marginally affected owners; marginally affected non-owners; severely affected owners;and severely affected non-owners. Additional entitlements depending on the attributesof the PAFs are provided for as outlined in the entitlement matrix in the LARR Policy.

Since the PAFs are thinly stretched along the entire segment, there will be no elaboraterelocation scheme. Each severely affected PAF will have to individually workout theirown relocation process using the proceeds of the compensation package that accrue tothem as part of their entitlements.

5.5.5. Value of affected Perennials

As mentioned earlier, the value of perennials was estimated based on the current marketprices as provided by the District Engineers Office, Department of Public Works andHighways.

All in all, about PhP 332,725.00 will be required to compensate for damages to trees andother perennials.

5.5.6 Compensation Matrix for Resident PAFs

Based on the LARR policy the compensation entitlements are summarized in Table 5.5.4.At this point it is deemed appropriate to outline the basic assumptions adopted tooperationalize the entitlements provided for under the Policy.

5.5.6.1. Replacement Costs.

The affected structures were mainly categorized as residential, commercial,commercial/residential, public infrastructures, public utilities and other types ofstructures. The structures, based on the linear acquisition survey were evaluated as towhether the impact is severe or marginal following the guidelines in the LARR Policyand the appropriate cost entitlements were estimated using the replacement cost concept.

5.5.6.2. Land Improvements

In most cases, other valuable improvements within the home lot were also affected.These improvements were also valued to form part of the total compensation package forthe PAFs. Valuation of other structures were done on the basis of the replacement costsconcept and valuation of crop improvements were done on the basis of the currentmarket value.


5.5.6.3. Income Loss

In cases commercial structures, owners and tenants were entitled to a compensation offoregone income as a projected consequence of the implementation of the roadimprovement project. Income losses were determined as equivalent to the estimatedaverage monthly gross sales of the commercial enterprise.

5.5.6.4. Relocation Allowance

Renters of severely affected structures were expected to be dislocated from their currentdwellings. Hence, as provided for in the LARR policy, these PAFs were entitled to arelocation allowance equivalent to their respective monthly rental.

5.5.7. Compensation Package

Table 5.5.7 summarizes the compensation package for the PAFs based on the estent ofimpact, type of structures and the additional compensation entitlements.


Table 5.5.7. Compensation package for resident PAFs by use of structure and other entitlements, RAP,Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Particulars Extent of ImpactMarginal Severe Total

PAFs Amount PAFs Amount1. Replacement Costs of Structures

Residential 18 186,245 44 1,436,723 1,622,968Commercial 3 41,833 17 778,135 819,968Residential/Commercial 10 320,282 21 1,175,624 1,495,906

Sub Toial 31 -54S,360 82 -. 3,390,482 -3,93S,842.1

Public Infrastructures 2 30,595 20 263,504 294,099Public Utilities 1 8,441 8,441Others 7 60,291 16 176,710 237,001

Sub Toial . 9 90,886. . 37 448.655 539,541

2. Land Improvements 14 10,925 12 11,480 22,405

3. Income Loss 7 226,200 25 436,570 662,770

4. Relocation Allowance 2 700 700

5. Trees/Perennials 412/ 332,7253,810 trees

SubTotal-- . . 237,125 _ __ . 448,750 1,018,600.

TOTAL -. F. 876,371 4.287,887 5,496,983


5.5.8. RAP Implementation Cost

In addition to the compensation package to the PAFs, RAP implementation will entailoverhead and logistical costs. This cost covers the management of the implementationprocess, honoraria to field personnel and committee members, maintenance andoperating expenses and financial administration, among others. It is suggested here thatthe total implementation costs of the RAP be pegged at 10 percent of the totalcompensation to the PAFs. Hence, the implementation cost is projected at about PhP

5.5.9. Distribution of Total Compensation by Municipality

As a matter of policy, RAP implementation will be done by the DPWH DistrictEngineers Office in collaboration with the local government units through the MunicipalRAP Implementing Committee (MRIC). Hence, there is the need to outline the totalcompensation package by municipality.

5.5.9.1. Marginally Affected Structures

The total compensation package for 40 marginally affected structures is estimated atroughly PhP 639,246 (Table 5.5.10.1). This compensation package includes replacementcosts to structures, crop improvements within the vicinity of the structure, and forgoneeamings for structures used fully or partially for commercial purposes.

Table 5.5.10.1. Estimated compensation package for marginally affected structures by municipality,Surigao del None, 2001.

TMARVAL

Municipality

USESTRUC Bacuag Gigaquit Claver TotalResidential n 3 9 6 18

Sum 10,783 110,297 65,165 186,245

Commercial n 1 1. 1 3

Sum 9,023 26,719 6,091 41,833

Commercial / Residential n 4 6 10

Sum 66,846 253,436 320,282

Public Infra n I 1 2

Sum 3,649 26,946 30,595

Others n 4 3 7

Sum 35,923 24,368 60,291

Total n 4 19 17 40

Sum 19,806 243,435 376,006 639,246


The bulk of the compensation accrues to the owners of marginally affected commercialor residential/commercial structures with a combined estimated costs of about PhP360,000. The remaining cost estimate of about PhP280,000 is spread across the otheruses including residential, public facilities and other structures.

By municipality, Claver and Gigaquit have the higher compensation packages estimatedat about PhP 376,006 and PhP 243,435 respectively. The higher compensation forClaver is attributed to the damage to commercial cum residential structures estimated atPhP253,436.

5.5.9.2. Severely Affected Structures

There are about 119 severely affected structures with an estimated total entitlements ofPhP 3,839,136 (Table 5.5.10.2). This package is spread across the three municipalities,by types of structures.

Table 5.5.10.2. Estimated compensation package for severely affected structures by municipality,Surigao del Norte, 2001.

TSEVAL

Municipality

USESTRUC Bacuag Gigaquit Claver Total

Residential n 2 19 23 44

Sum 12,246 620,852 803,625 1,436,723

Commercial n 2 8 7 17

Sum 71,621 416,063 290,450 778,135

Commercial / Residential n 3 6 12 21

Sum 141,683 462,245 571,696 1,175,624

Public Infra n 4 5 11 20

Sum 43,499 47,720 172,284 263,504

Public Utilities n 1 1

Sum 8,441 8,441

Others n 2 8 6 16

Sum 14,378 46,131 116,200 176,710

Total n 13 47 59 119

Sum 283,428 1,601,453 1,954,255 3,839,136


By municipality, Claver and Gigaquit for more than PhP3.5 Million of the totalcompensation package of about PhP3.8 Million. The remaining cost package of aboutPhP280,000 is allocated for PAFs in Bacuag.

Residential structures account for the highest compensation valued at about PhP1.4Million. Residential cum commercial structures also account for a higher entitlement ofroughly PhP1.1. Million.

5.5.10. Total RAP Cost

The following is the summary of the total estimated cost of the RAP including the cost ofimplementation:


Marginal Effect on Structures PhP 639,246

Severe Effect on Structures PhP 3,839,137

Income Loss PhP 662,770

Relocation Allowance PhP 700

Land Improvements PhP 22,405

Affected Perrenials PhP 332,725


Contingencies

Allowance for Inflation (based on the2000 rate for CARAGA @ 3.4) PhP 186,897

Estimation Error @ 5% 274,849

RAP Implementation @ 10 % PhP 548,698of total Compensation


External Monitoring $ 2,000.00

As summarized, the total cost of the RAP is PhP 6,507,427 and $2,000.00


6. Implementation Schedule

The implementation of the RAP follows as soon as the World Bank concurs with thesalient features of the RAP as endorsed by the GOP through DPWH/IBRD-PMO. Afterthe approval of the RAP Report, implementation will be managed by the EIAPO withthe supervision of the IBRD-PMO.

6.1. MOU and Establishment of Committees

Table 6 outlines the fundamental steps, procedures and schedule of the activitiesrequired for the implementation of the RAP. To set up the structural basis for theimplementation of RAP, the institutionalization of the roles of the various stakeholdersin the project will have to be operationalized. This can be done through the signing of aMemorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the DPWH and the Local GovernmentUnits. The MOU will pave the way for the establishment of the various committeesrequired for the implementation of RAP, namely; the municipal-based ResettlementImplementation Committee (RIC) and the Grievance Committee.

6.2. Training-Orientation on RAP Implementation

Because the concept and the process are relatively new even to the DPWH bureaucracy,there is need to orient the District Offices and the counterpart members of the LocalGovernment Units (LGUs) on the RAP Implementation procedures.

Immediately following the formation of the MRIC, its members will be oriented on thework of the committee. Specifically, the MRIC members will be trained in RAP policiesand implementation procedures

6.3. Validation of RAP Report

With the assumptions that the implementing mechanisms for the RAP at all levels hasbeen established, then all the stakeholders can participate in the collaborative work ofvalidating the RAP Report prepared by the consulting Firm. Validation will involvecross checking of the identified PAFs, the accuracy of the linear acquisition, andvalidation of entitlements and compensation.

6.4. Public Infornation Campaign

As soon as the validating team finds the RAP Report to be satisfactory or is incompliance with the standards set in the LARR Policy Framework, then a publicinformation campaign can be launched to reiterate the existence of the project and toallow the PAFs to prepare the necessary supporting documents, if needed, for thecompensation to be made possible.


6.5. Finalization of the Compensation Package

Subject to modifications in response to changing price conditions, the compensationpackage will then be finalized to determine the amount to be paid for each individualPAF. Once completed, PAFs will be asked to fill up some forms to indicate theirconcurrence to the compensation package and to the terms and conditions of thecompensation.

6.6. Public Meeting/Disclosure

In a public forum, PAFs will be made aware of their entitlements as a consequence ofproject disturbance. At this point in time, PAFS will also be informed of the schedule ofpayments and the schedule of civil works to allow the PAFs to prepare for theirreorganization or relocation and to harvest any standing agricultural crops.

6.7. Cut-off Date

As provided for in the policy, only structures existing on or before March 13, 2001 willbe entitled to the compensation package.

6.8. Payment

Payment will have to be done in a public place. Hence, the RIC should coordinate withthe LGU officials to ensure that PAFs within their areas of jurisdiction are made awareof the schedules of payments.

6.9. Handing Over the Site for Civil Works

One month before the scheduled start of civil works, RAP implementation shall havebeen completed. This means that PAFs have been paid, reorganized or relocated, and allthe stakeholders in the implementation process have performed their tasks in accordanceto the DPWH Resettlement Policy.


Table 6. RAP implementation schedule by activity, Surigao del Norte, 2002.

Activity Week1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1. MOU & Establishment of Committees2. Training/Orientation _3. Validation fI I I I 14 Public Information Campaign,i-5. Finalization of Compensation Package _6. Public Hearing/Disclosure7. Payment8. Hand Over of Site _ _ _,

7. Monitoring and Evaluation

The underlying principle of the LARR Policy Framework, in general, and the RAP inparticular, is to provide mitigating measures to at least ensure that the PAFs will not beworse off as a consequence of the road improvement project. It is for this reason that thesurvey instrument was designed to capture the critical aspects of the PAFs social andeconomic conditions to provide the benchmark for future assessments in the context ofmonitoring and evaluation.

The instrument was also designed to capture the salient attributes of the PAFs and theiraffected properties to ensure that the monitoring and evaluation team can validate aswhether or not the determination of the entitlements and the estimation of compensationsare along the principles outlined in the LARR Policy Framework.

The PAFs profile, the entitlements and the estimated compensation packages presentedin the earlier sections are mere summaries of the raw data structured in a standarddatabase format. Electronic copies of the database are provided for to facilitate themonitoring and evaluation of the RAP implementation and impact.

Monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the RAP is designed to be conductedat two levels: internal and external monitoring. Internal monitoring will be conductedby the Environmental and Social Services/EIAPO in collaboration with the DitrictOffices, the local government units (LGUs) and the PAFs. DPWH will solicit theservices of independent agencies such as research and academic institutions, or otherqualified consulting firms to conduct the external monitoring and evaluation (EMA).


APPENDIX A

PUBLIC CONSULTATION


Annex A. Public Consultations

1. Orientation on the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the Surigao-DavaoCoastal Road, DPWH-XIII Regional Office, Butuan City, Agusan del Sur,January 3, 2001

1.1 Attendance

Mr. Benedicto Pepito, Provincial Agent, BisligMs. Anastacia Salas, Engineer II, BisligMs. Evelyn Beray, Engineer II, Regional OfficeMs. Ma. Theresa Diola, Computer Operator II, Regional OfficeMs. Vilma Migrifio, Engineer II, Regional OfficeMr. Samson Hebra, Engineer IV, Regional OfficeMr. Roldan Pedrozo, Special Investigator, TandagMs. Criste Navida, Project Manager, EIAPO-DPWHMs. Sol Abasa, Engineer III, EIAPO-DPWHMs. Charlene Blando, Engineer III, EIAPO-DPWHMr. Jun Castafieto, Katahira and Engineers InternationalMs. Razel Bautista, Katahira and Engineers InternationalDr. Prudenciano Gordoncillo, Katahira Consultant

1.2. Briefing on the National Roads Improvement and Management Program andResettlement Action Plan (RAP)

Engr. Criste Navida, the Project Manager, presented an overview of the National RoadsImprovement and Management Program (NRIMP) and its overall objectives. Theprinciples of the Resettlement Policy were also discussed. Engr. Charlene Blando andEngr. Sol Abasa discussed the concept and process of.implementing the ResettlementAction Plan (RAP).

Also included in the discussion are the requirements of the project and its likely impacts.The implementing units of RAP and their respective duties were also briefly explained.Dr. Gordoncillo on the other hand, presented the tentative schedule of activities for thepublic consultation and provided the questionnaires to be used in the survey proper.

Al-I


1.3. Highlights/Issues Raised

The following are the issues/clarifications raised by the attendee during the orientation:

1.3.1 Settlement of claims for the compensation for lost assets of PAPs. Engr. Navidaassured the attendees that the PAPs will be fairly compensated as mandated inthe Administrative Order 50. Tapping assistance, in addition to zonal value +10% will be provided to affected landowners of residential, commercial, oragricultural lands.

1.3.2. Responsibility of the district and regional offices in the actual payments for thePAPs. Engr. Navida reiterated that the funds will be released only upon therequest of the District Engineering Office. The District Engineering Office,through the Regional Office, must comply with the requirements and submit tothe Head Office the list of PAPs together with the approved vouchers. The fundswill be released as soon as the Head Office receives the abovementionedrequirements.

1.3.3. Cut-off date of the project for the affected areas. It was clarified in theorientation that the cut-off date is the date of commencement of the census ofaffected persons within the project's area boundaries. Those who are not coveredin the census are not entitled to claim for any compensation.

1.3.4. Incentives for the DPWH staff to be involved in the project. Engr. Navidaassured the group that monetary incentives will be given to the DPWH staffwho will be involved in the RAP implementation.

A1-2


2. Orientation on the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for theSurigao-Davao Coastal Road

DPWH, Surigao City, Surigao del NorteJanuary 4, 2001

1. Attendance

Mr. Romeo Abao, District EngineerMr. Policarpio Origenes, Assistant District EngineerMr. Apolinario Larong Sr. Engineer IIIMs. Gina Soriano, Engineer IIMs. Ma. Theresa Diola, Computer Operator II, Reg'l OfficeMs. Evelyn Beray, Engr. II, Reg'l OfficeMs. Criste Navida, EIAPOMs. Sol Abasa, EIAPOMs. Charlene Blando, EIAPOMr. Jun Castafiero, Katahira and Engineers InternationalMs. Razel Bautista, Katahira and Engineers InternationalDr. Prudenciano Gordoncillo, Katahira Consultant

II. Briefing on the National Roads Improvement and Management Program andResettlement Action Plan (RAP)

Engr. Criste Navida, the Project Manager, presented an overview of the National RoadsImprovement and Management Program (NRIMP) and its overall objectives. RAP, itsconcept and process of implementation were also discussed. Also included in thediscussion are the requirements of the project and its likely impacts. The implementingunits of RAP and their respective duties were also briefly explained. Dr. Gordoncillo onthe other hand, presented the tentative schedule of activities for the public consultationand provided the questionnaires to be used in the survey proper.

III. Highlights/Issues Raised

1). Settlement of claims for the compensation for lost assets of PAPs. Engr. Navidaassured the attendees that the PAPs will be fairly compensated as mandated in theAdministrative Order 50. Tapping assistance, in addition to zonal value + 10% will beprovided to affected landowners of residential, commercial, or agricultural lands.

2). Structure of the RAP implementing units. The prime movers of the RAP project wereidentified during the orientation. However, their distinguished duties andresponsibilities as to the RAP implementation must be further clarified.

3). Incentives of the DPWH staff to be involved in the project. Engr. Navida assured thegroup that monetary incentives will be given to the DPWH staff who will be involvedin the RAP implementation.

A1-3

NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad

3. Public Consultation on the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for theSurigao-Davao Coastal Road

Gigaquit Municipal Hall, Surigao del NorteJanuary 22, 2001

I. Attendance

Name Designation/Position Address

Danilo Orquina Mayor BacuagDiosdado Acido Mayor ClaverDomingo Perral Mayor GigaquitTeofilo Llano Brgy. Captain San Antonio, GigaquitGorgonia Pusal Brgy. Captain San Isidro, GigaquitRodulfo Gesta Brgy. Captain Poniente, GigaquitAntonio Mainit Sr. Brgy. Captain Panatan, ClaverJoverto Degolto Brgy. Captain Urbiztondo, ClaverRicardo Bayeta Brgy. Captain Daywan, ClaverBartolome Gerulla Brgy. Captain Cabugo, ClaverSegundino Polam Sr. Brgy. Captain Mahanub, ClaverPedro Paqueo Brgy. Captain Wonge, ClaverVictoria Ata Brgy. Councilor San Isidro, GigaquitArceli Alburo Brgy. Councilor Cagdinao, ClaverCarde dela Rama Brgy. Councilor Cagdinao, ClaverRoberto Regulada Brgy. Councilor Cagdinao, ClaverJovencia Manlimos Brgy. Councilor Cabugo, ClaverOliver Tuyor Brgy. Councilor Ladgaron, ClaverMarciano Basul Brgy. Councilor Tayaga, ClaverDiola Napal Brgy. Councilor Daywan, ClaverAntonio Cesarental Purok Chairman Urbiztondo, ClaverLilibeth Gumapac Day Care Worker San Antonio, GigaquitMaucinita Tupal Brgy. Treasurer Poniente, GigaquitPascasio Lacre Resident Mahanub, ClaverIbar Tac-an Resident Urbiztondo, ClaverSulmesita Mula-an Resident Urbiztondo, ClaverFenlie Balberia Resident Urbiztondo, ClaverJames Bedrano Resident Urbiztondo, ClaverNP Paqueo Municipal Engineer ClaverAlyn Silagan Municipal Engineer BacuagTR Paqueo, VII Municipal Engineer. ClaverLeopoldo Vega Engr. III Chief PDS DPWH, TandagGina Soriano Engr. II DPWH, TandagClaudio Comia Spl. Agent I DPWH, TandagRemegio Comia Clerk II DPWH, TandagJose Beniga DILG BacuagSol Abasa Engineer III EIAPO-Manila

A1-4


Dr. Prudenciano Gordoncillo Katahira Consultant ManilaJun Castafieto Katahira Consultant ManilaEvelyn Beray Engr. II DPWH-XIIIRoldan Pedroso Spl. Investigator DPWH-TandagJay Laurente Engineering Assistant DPWH-TandagJulius Trinidad Engineering Assistant DPWH-TandagMena Escalona Katahira Consultant ManilaRazel Bautista Katahira Consultant Manila

11. Consultation Proper

Part of the process to finalize the draft Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) is to conduct apublic consultation where public officials and the affected population meet and discussthe project and its likely impacts. This was done to ensure that the communityunderstands the nature and extent of the project. A consultation implies sharing of ideas,which help in better understanding of the issues arising in the said activity. Suchgatherings help disseminate information from project officials to the affected population.It provides accurate information to the affected population and also dispels fears andmisconception, thus providing the foundation for collaboration between the affectedpopulation and the project officials.

One week before the scheduled date for public consultation, letters of notice were sent tothe mayors of the municipalities within the project's boundaries, informing them of thepublic consultation to be conducted by the Katahira Consultant and the Engineers fromthe Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH). The letters were also faxed tothe District Engineers in Tandag and Surigao City. Due to some hitch in communication,the letter was not able to reach the office of the District Engineer in Surigao City. Theywere only informed by the consultant upon his arrival in the province.

Dr. Prudenciano Gordoncillo, Katahira consultant, facilitated the public consultation. Hepresented the project including its overall objectives and merits. The concept, as well asthe process of implementing the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) was also brieflyexplained. The roles and responsibilities of the DPWH, the LGUs and the Communitywere further identified during the consultation. The public was also informed of theschedule of the socio-economic survey in their respective municipalities.

III. Highlights/Issues Raised

1). Claims for the compensation for lost assets of PAPs. The consultant assured thepublic that all PAPs residing in, doing business, cultivating land, have rights overresources within the project area will be eligible for compensation for lost assets.PAPs who own private lands must show title, tax declaration or any proof to showownership of the lands. Public physical infrastructure such as waiting sheds, electricposts, water pipes, irrigation system, etc., which will be affected by the project are

Al-5


entitled for compensation. It was also cleared in the consultation that the PAPs wholives within the road right of way will be compensated only for the affected structuresand not for the land. The DPWH will be responsible for the payments for the lostassets.

2). Scope of the project's road construction. Dr. Gordoncillo clarified that the roadconstruction will affect the provinces of Surigao del Norte, Surigao del Sur, Agusandel Sur and Davao Oriental. For Surigao del Norte, the road construction includes 12km from Bacuag boundary to Claver. The road project will improve and rehabilitategravel roads and convert it to Portland Cement pavement. Existing roads that needsrepair will also be rehabilitated. Deteriorating bridges will also be replaced anddrainages will also be put in place.

3). Concreting of roads in Brgy. Urbiztondo, Claver. The Brgy. Captain of Urbiztondo,Claver suggested for a re-route since there would be many structures that will beaffected in the area including a school fence. Engr. Sol Abasa from DPWH headoffice however, told the Brgy. Captain that they will first look into the design madeby Katahira Engineers. However, she reiterated that still, the Katahira Engineers willhave the final decision when it comes to the road design.

4). Assistance from the LGUs. The consultant urged the Mayor and Brgy. Captains ofGigaquit, Bacuag and Claver to orient their barangay members regarding the projectahnd the socio-economic survey to be conducted by the project team. Suchorientation will facilitate the data-gathering process and ensure the quality of dataprovided by the community.

AI-6

APPENDIX B

LIST OF PAFs

Appendix B. Case Summaries: Ust of PAF's Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Surname Given Name Location Barangay Severity of

1 Planas Marcelo 1166+080 Campo S2 Calumpusan Jormy 1166+400 Campo S3 Verana Culita 1168+989 Poniente S4 Bayang Cresencia 1169+142 Poniente S5 Panilag Editha 1169+262 Poniente S6 Nuez Elena 1169+318 Poniente S7 Bausing Felicisino 1169+406 Poniente S8 Acabo Romeo 1169+420 Poniente S9 Tutor Daminao 1169+770 Poniente S10 Dumo Roldan 1170+680 San Antonio S11 Dalagan Samuel 1170+720 San Antonio S12 Guzon Cecilia 1170+750 San Antonio S13 Pesito Rodolfo, Jr. 11172+320 San Isidro S14 Napana Carolina 11172+562 San Isidro S15 Basola Ricardo 1172+586 San Isidro S16 Elidia Teodorico 1172+593 San Isidro S17 Absentee 1172+593 San Isidro S18 Susasilo Mary Rose 1172+595 San Isidro S19 Bano Henry 1172+660 San Isidro S20 Ata Victorianoa 1172+760 San Isidro S21 Libong Gregorio 1173+440 San Isidro S22 Saldo Riza 1176+280 San Juan S23 Dedumo Jr. Martin 1176+840 Daywan S24 Cuariz Porferio 1178+030 Ladragon S25 Galagala Rolando 1178+280 Ladragon S26 Galleon Maximino 1181+480 Panatao S27 Cagasan Vivencia 1181+490 Panatao S28 Bagutsay Marcela 1183+192 Wangke S29 Sumaylo Maricel 1184+720 Cabugo S30 Guihapon Emelita 1186+855 Urbiztondo S31 Consigna Anasario, Sr. 1187+280 Urbiztondo S32 Caliwatan Felipe 1187+300 Urbiztondo S33 Calabtan Avella 1187+340 Urbiztondo S34 Diyaluha Elpidio 1187+370 Urbiztondo S35 Tac-an Ivan 1187+380 Urbiztondo M36 Betanio FE 1187+470 Urbiztondo S37 Dagasgas Minelo 1187+500 Urbiztondo S38 Mulaan Prudencio, Sr. 1187+510 Urbiztondo S39 Mulaan Prudencio 1187+512 Urbiztondo S40 Precilda Cresencia 1187+585 Urbiztondo M41 Buaga Poblia 1187+590 Urbiztondo M42 Japitan Mario 1191+724 Taganito S43 Rusiana Emmanuel 1191+920 Taganito S44 Parpan Alfredo 1192+000 Taganito S45 Galeon Emilia 1162+380 Pobladon M46 Iligan Emilyn 1166+160 Campo M

B-I

Appendix B. Case Summaries: List of PAF's Surigao del Norte, 2001.


47 Iligan Emilyn 1166+160 Campo M48 Parba Felicisimo 1168+820 Poniente M49 Peligrino Felipa 1170+745 San Antonio M50 Caga Romulo 1172+582 San Isidro M51 Picatose Rogelio 1172+600 San Isidro M52 Pinggal Glicerio 1172+612 San Isidro M53 Lulab Bemath 1172+665 San Isidro M54 Sistona Gerrarda 1173+120 San Isidro M55 Lusdoc Maria 1173+420 San Isidro M56 Lauro Hermogenes 1175+500 San Isidro M57 Sumaylo Pampila 1175+950 San Juan S58 Samontina Wilia 1180+530 Panatao M59 Vicente Juanita 1183+210 Wangke M60 Guihapon Emelita 1186+855 Urbiztondo S61 Consigna Rosalina 1186+878 Urbiztondo M62 Guihapon Sinona 1191+930 Taganito M63 Cagampang Rowena 1165+900 Campo S64 Geneta Arlene 1166+180 San Isidro S65 Veyra Jeffrey 1172+614 San Isidro S66 Libaste Melito 1172+620 San Isidro S67 Lulab Bernath 1172+665 San Isidro S68 Abandoned 1172+800 San Isidro S69 Dumas Emily 1172+840 San Isidro S70 Galinato Simplicia 1173+135 San Isidro S71 Caueda Eliza 1173+434 San Isidro S72 Avisado Marilen 1173+446 San Isidro S73 Simborio Esmaelita 1176+965 Daywan S74 Apad Romeo 1177+820 Ladgaron S75 Verano Vicente 1179+100 Ladgaron S76 Verano Vicente 1179+100 Ladgaron S77 Patan Lucia 1184+320 Cabugo S78 Manlimos Religioso 1184+788 Cabugo S79 Tac-an Ivan 1187+400 Urbiztondo S80 Gabas Fernando 1166+438 Campo M81 Tiu Jean 1172+650 San Isidro M82 Galds Narciso 1178+180 Ladragon M83 Tino Narciso 1166+085 Campo 584 Bano Segundina 1166+653 Campo S85 Bayang Jose 1169+260 Poniente S86 Suarez Florife 1170+720 San Antonio S87 Lumor Teodora 1171+360 Mahanub S88 Veyra Rosalia 1172+620 San Isidro S89 Eraso Felisedario 1172+950 San Isidro S90 Eufenia Marionito 1172+995 San Isidro S91 Quiri-Quiri Juanito 1178+120 Ladgaron S92 Naiiial Virginia 1180+581 Panatao -S

B- 2



93 Lamanilao William 1184+330 Wangke S94 Lopez Emilia 1184+360 Cabugo S95 Manlimos Teresita 1184+770 Cabugo S96 Gades Enrique 1186+095 Campo S97 Rabadan Rufina 1186+882 Urbiztondo S98 Rabadan Rufina 1186+882 Urbiztondo S99 Balberia Robert 1187+300 Urbiztondo S100 Cayumo Gregoria 1887+310 Urbiztondo S101 Cuarental Antonio, Sr. 1887+310 Urbiztondo S102 Gonzales Nora 1191+650 Taganito S103 Galigao Julie 1192+040 Taganito M104 Asilo Alberto 1168+923 Poniente M105 Tupal Marianita 1169+380 Poniente M106 Yabo Jovita 1172+175 San Isidro M107 Cairon Irene 1172+605 San Isidro M108 Mainit Antonio, Jr. 1179+090 Ladragon M109 Precilda Maura 1183+080 Wange M110 Arecto Marilyn 1184+310 Cabugo M111 Mosquete Luz 1184+760 Cabugo M112 Picate Nilda 1184+950 Cabugo M113 Guihapon Sotera 1191+722 Taganito M114 Purok Waiting Shed 1164+220 Poblacion S115 Waiting Shed 1165+100 Campo S116 Water pipe/faucet 1166+105 Campo M117 Waiting Shed 1166+408 Campo S118 Waiting Shed 1169+440 Poniente S119 Purok Waiting Shed 1170+710 San Antonio S120 Waiting Shed 1171+320 Mahanub S121 Waiting Shed 1172+862 San Isidro S122 Espinaricia Gavina 1173+640 San Isidro S123 Purok Waiting Shed 1176+160 Daywan S124 Purok Waiting Shed 1177+860 Ladragon S125 Waiting Shed 1178+275 Ladragon S126 Purok Waiting Shed 1183+495 Wangke S127 Purok 3 WS 1184+792 Cabugo S128 Waiting Shed 1186+720 Urbiztondo S129 Purok Waiting Shed 1187+280 Urbiztondo S130 Waiting Shed 1187+360 Urbiztondo S131 Purok Waiting Shed 1191+713 Taganito S132 Cagdanao School Fence 1197+250 Cagdianao S133 Purok Waiting Shed 1197+295 Cagdianao S134 Plant Box 1172+645 San Isidro S135 Waiting Shed 1187+900 Urbiztondo S136 Market Stall 1172+500 San Isidro S137 Jamero Alejandro 1162+905 Poblacion S138 Vargas Rosalina 1166+082 Campo S

B -3



139 Pania Pilar 1168+950 Poniente S140 Montajas Mansueta 1169+440 Poniente S141 Pingal Felix 1172+793 San Isidro S142 Wooden Fence 1172+890 San Isidro S143 Eupefna Ninifreda 1172+910 San Isidro S144 Binore Teodolo 1173+372 San Isidro S145 Tapahan 1173+410 San Isidro S146 Sulapas Rina 1173+645 San Isidro S147 Olves Regina 1177+350 Daywan S148 Fence 1178+340 Ladragon S149 Jatulan Arsenia 1178+990 Ladragon S150 Patan Carmen 1184+740 Cabugo S151 Urbiztondo Pedro 1186+740 Urbiztondo S152 Guihapon Victoria 1192+035 Taganito M153 Bano Renato 1171+290 Mahanub S154 Perral Domingo 1172+800 San Isidro M155 Babia Elmer 1172+870 San Isidro M156 Church Pathway 1173+230 San Isidro M157 Sumarca Frency 1177+450 Ladragon M158 Church Fence 1187+900 Urbiztondo S159 Matugas Janet 1192+160 Taganito M

B-4

APPENDIX C

LIST OF PERENNIALS

APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/lnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality: BacuagBarangay: Poblacion I_I_I

1 Palamos, Ciriaco Banana 6 480.00 480.00

2 Cuares, Francisca Banana 8 640.00 754.00_______ ______ _______ ______ M ahogany 2 114.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

3 Cuares, Rey John Banana 10 800.00 800.00Mango (npl) 1 80.00Cacao 3 360.00

4 Galido, Desiderio Banana 2 160.00 1,120.00J.Fruit (np) 3 150.00Coco (p) 3 270.00C acao 2 100.00

5 Galleon, Banana 3 240.00 240.00

6 Pagapong, Nita Banana 2 160.00 210.00Jackfruit (np) 1 50.00 ______

7 Doranta, Delia Banana 5 400.00 460.00Doranta, Delia ~~~~Atis 1 160.00 ______

Coco 1 90.00Coco(5yo) 2 100.00Santol 1 120.00J.Fruit (np) 1 120.00Mango (npl) 1 80.00

8 Alaba, Necipuro Gemelina 6 342.00 2,429.00Calamansi 4 480.00Macopa 1 120.00Coco 4 360.00Banana 4 320.00Coco 3 240.00Mahogany 1 57.00Coco 25 2,250.00

9 Orquina, Jaime Gemelina 2 114.00 2,414.00Jackfruit 1 50.00Coco 21 1,890.00Gemelina 8 456.00

10 Jamero, Alejandro Mahogany 3 171.00 2,797.00Jackfruit 1 120.00Banana 2 160.00Coco 1 90.00

11 Galleon Angel Coco 6 300.00 447.00_ _______________________________ Gem elina 1 57.00

Coco 25 2,250.00Guavano 1 120.00

12 Ladaga, Valmerio Mahogany 36 2,052.00 5,004.00J.Fruit (np) 2 240.00

_ _____________________________ Gemelina. 6 342.00

13 Cuizon, Emerenciana Coco 5 450.00 930.00_______ _______ _______ ______ Coco (5yo) 8 480.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

14 Ayoban, Remedios/Remegia, Borja Coco 5 450.00 930.00Mango (npl) 2 480.00J.Fruit 1 120.00

15 Sancha, Ambid Mango 1 240.00 1,010.00Coco 1 90.00Banana 7 560.00

Page 1 of 23


PAP HH/Institution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Banana 11 880.0016 Naldoza, Porferio Gemelina 1 57.00 1,027.00

Coco 1 90.00

Banana 22 1,540.00

17 Banluta, Gregorio Coco 12 720.00 2,374.00Mahogany 1 57.00Gemelina 1 57.00

18 Banluta, Iniego Bmanagnoa 3 240.00 960.00

19 Bernadino, Pablita Banana 1 80.00 80.00

20 Borja, Remegia Banana 5 400.00 580.0020nCoco 2 180.00

21 Pagapong, Lito Banana (np)4 4 280.00 760.00Banana 6 480.00Banana 14 1,120.00

22 Besquira, Mariano Banana (np)4 4 280.00 1,700.00Coco(5yo) 6 300.00

23 Tan, Jesus P. Banana 6 480.00 620.00Banana (np)2 2 140.00

24 Paler, Jose Jr. Gemelina 16 912.00 912.0025 Cusare, Johnny Banana 14 1,120.00 1,120.0026 Ignalig, Alfreda Gemelina 8 456.00 456.0027 Lawan, Pablito Gemelina 2 114.00 114.0028 Galanda, Rufinp Banana 9 720.00 720.0029 Tado, Amador Banana 20 1,600.00 1,600.0030 Lauron, Isabel Banana 7 720.00 720.00

Gemelina 55 3,135.00

31 Desiderio, Salvacion Coco 10 500.00 5,675.00Banana (np) 12 12 840.00Banana 15 1,200.00 . -

Banana (np) 12 960.0032 Lagat, Ansel Mango (np) 1 50.00 1,010.00

33 Alaba, Sabeniano Banana 13. 1,040.00 1,040.00

34 Elicano, Luciano Banana 5 400.00 600.00_____ ____ _____ ____ _____ ____ Coco 4 200.00

35 Romero, Aurora Banana 4 320.00 320.0036 Florerosos, Rosario Banana 15 1,200.00 1,200.00

37 Galanida, Patok Banana 4 320.00 370.00Galanida, Patol'~~~ Mango (np) 1 50.00 ______

Banana 5 400.0038 Galido, Amold Guavano 1 50.00 530.00

Mango (np) 1 80.00

39 Oval, Cenecio Coco 4 360.00 360.00Subtotal 44,873.00

Page 2 of 23



Municaipality: BacuagBarangay: Campo

40 Galos, Lily Avocado 1 120.00 280.00Galos, Lily ~~~~~Banana 2 160.00 ______

41 Bangcoya, Tessie Banana 5 400.00 400.0042 Dubluis, Leopoldo Banana 4 320.00 320.0043 Elacion, Toto Coconut 1 90.00 90.00

44 Alvina Jonald Banana 2 160.00 250.00_____ ____ _____ ____ _____ ____ C oconut 1 90.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

45 Oval Cenecio Banana 16 800.00 800.00Cocunot 2 180.00

46 Oval, Crecencio Banana 15 1,200.00 2,100.00_ ______________________________ M ango 3 720.00

47 Cuares, Maria Banana 4 320.00 320.0048 Munoz, Tirso Banana 3 340.00 240.0049 Cagampang, Cedronio Banana 4 320.00 320.0050 Tantoy, Pedro Banana 9 720.00 720.00

51 Ocon, dominador BCaoncanat 5 400.00 760.00

52 Odchimar, diego Coconut 1 90.00 570.00Mango 2 480.00 500

53 Aceda, Melguides Banana 10 800.00 920.00A_eda, Melguides Atis 2 120.00

Coconut 1 90.0054 Oval, Alberta Gemelina 1 57.00 307.00

Banana 2 160.00

55 Munoz, Toto Coconut 4 360.00 930.00_____ ____ _____ ____ _____ ____ G em elina 10 570.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

56 Virtudazo, Monica Banana 30 240.00 240.00

57 Sulomona, gloria Banana 5 400.00 850.00Coconut 5 450.00

58 Odhoy, Camelo Coconut 1 90.00 90.0059 Cagampang, Ines Banana 1 80.00 80.00

60 Vivar, Darwin Banana 1 90 80.00Coconut i _ 90.00 17.0

61 Oval, Roberto Banana 2 120.00 360.00

Coconut 3 270.00Coconut (5yo) 1 50.00

62 Gedulla, tomas, Jr. Banana 10 800.00 1,480.00Santol 1 120.00Guavano 2 240.00

63 PBMA, Campo, Bacuag Cacao 4 480.00 560.00______ _____ _____ _____ _____ Banana 1 80.00

64 Deguibo, Danilo Banana 15 1,040.00 1,040.00

65 Naldoza, Proferio Atis 1 60.00 174.00Gemelina 2 114.00

66 Dolor, Emiliana Banana 16 1,280.00 1,280.00

67 Mira, Vicente Banana (p)14 14 840.00 2,120.00___ Banana (np) 16 16 1,280.00 _____

68 Zartiga, Lali Banana 2 160.00 280.00Cacao 1 120. 00

Page 3 of 23



Atis 1 60.00

69 Ging-Ging, Eutegio Banana (p) 8 640.00 1,540.00Banana (p) 14 840.00Banana 11 880.00

70 Teorima, Ambrosio Jackfruit (p) 1 150.00 1,150.00

Jackfruit (np) 2 100.00

71 Esperon, Pedro Banana (p) 8 640.00 940.00Banana (np) 5 300.00Coconut 1 90.00

72 Deguibo, Arsenio Breadfruit 1 120.00 390.00Banana 2 180.00

Subtotal 22,071.00

Page 4 of 23


JPAP HH/lnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municaipality: GiagaguitBarangay: Poniete

73 Senoren, Luisito Banana 8 640.00 640.00

74 Papaya, Florencio Bmanana 5 400.00 880.00

75 Bayang, Luis/Salili Banana 8 640.00 640.0076 Salili, Maldo Jackfruit 1 120.00 120.0077 Bayang, Cresencia Banana 1 80.00 80.0078 Sumampong, Hermelita Banana 1 80.00 80.0079 Bersabal, analyn Guavano 1 120.00 120.0080 Verana, Coleta Jackfruit 1 120.00 120.00

81 Alcantara, Bibiana Cacaoa 1 120.00 360.00

82 Nautan, Virginia Banana 3 240.00 390.00_______ _______ _______ ______ Jackfruit(np) 3 150.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

83 Asilo, Alberto Banana 5 400.00 520.00Cacao 1 120.00 ______

84 Alcantara Banana 11 880.00 970.00coco 1 90.00Banana 5 400.00

85 Topal, Florencio mango 1 240.00 690.00Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00Jackfruit(np) 2 192.00

86 Pana, Pilar Atis 2 120.00 504.00Starapple (np) 1 96.00Avocado (np) 1 96.00

87 Galgo, Carlito Banana 1 80.00 80.00mango 1 240.00

88 Beloy, Amy Cacao 1 240.00 1,050.00

Banana 6 480.00Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00

89 Nelida, Ireneo Orange 2 240.00 340.00Santol (np) 1 50.00

90 Bayang, Cresencio Guavano 1 120.00 180.00Atis ~ 1 _ 60.00 ______

Banana 18 1,440.0091 Gesta, Rodulfo B. Coco 1 90.00 1,530.00

Mango 2 480.00Banana 8 640.00

92 Beberino, Paz Jackfruit 2 240.00 2,080.00Cacao 3 360.00Guavano 2 240.00Calamansi 1 120.00Banana 3 240.00

93 Tuyor, Damiano Calamansi 1 120.00 420.00Atis 1 60.00

Subtotal 11,794.00

Page 5 of 23



Municipality GigaguitBarangay: San Antonio

Mango 1 240.0094 Malda, Pablito Calamansi 1 120.00 410.00

Jackfruit(np) 1 50.0095 Legaspi, Justiniana Banana 2 160.00 160.00

96 Limbaga, Leopoldo Banana 1 80.00 80.00Avocado 1 120.00

97 Napoco, constantina Banana 3 240.00 480.00Calamansi 1 120.00

Didic ~~~~~~Banana 6 480.0098 Malda, Didic Banana 6 480.00 960.00

99 Azumen, Claudio Banana 1 80.00 80.00100 Dalagan, Rodulfo Banana 12 960.00 960.00101 Nada, Jesus Banana 6 480.00 480.00102 Molina, Regina Banana 3 240.00 240.00103 Molina, Paquito Banana 3 240.00 240.00104 Asumen, Policarpio Banana 1 80.00 80.00

Jackfruit (np) 1 96.00

105 Dumo, Rodantarapple 1 120.00 516.00

Mango 1 240.00

106 Etabis, Purification Starapple 2 240.00 480.00Cacao 2 240.00 ______

coconut 1 90.00Santol 1 120.00

107 Salvador, Bonifacia Banana 1 80.00 770.00Mango 1 240.00

_ _____________________________ Orange 2 240.00

108 Imalay, Linda Banana 9 720.00 770.00______ ______ _____ ______ _____ Coca (2ya) 1 50.00

109 Asumen, Jaime Banana 4 320.00 434.00_______ _______ _______ ______ G em elina 2 114.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

110 Pepino, Victoria Banana 9 720.00 720.00

111 Jason, Matias Starapple 2 240.00 360.00Cacao 1 120.00 ______

Subtotal 8,220.00

Page 6 of 23


jPAP HHAlnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality: GigaguitBarangay: San Isidro

Santol 1 120.00

112 Cantila, Juana BCaoncaona 21 810.00 2,890.00

Bamboo 4 280.00Banana 14 1,120.00

113 Lauro, Lito Cacao 2 240 00 1,780.00

Mango 1 240.00114 Girtan, Bentoy Banana 2 160.00 160.00115 Guhitia, Uto Banana 6 480.00 480.00

Coco 1 90.00116 Valentin/Teodosia Larong Atis 1 120.00 1,010.00

Banana 10 800.00

117 Baquilo, Sabeniana Gemelina 3 171.00 291.00_______ ______ ______ ______ C acao 1 120.00 _ _ _ _ _

118 Laruga Banana 4 320.00 320.00119 Eupena, Gullermo Starapple 1 120.00 120.00120 Eupena, Nillo Banana 1 80.00 80.00

121 Bugahod, Cherilyn Jackfruit 1 120.00 200.00______ _____ ______ _____ _____ Banana 1 _ 80.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

122 Tac-an, Grgorio Banana 8 640.00 740.00______ _____ _____ _____ _____ Jackfruit 2 100.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

123 Tabacon. Clenio Bamboo 5 350.00 350.00124 Larong, Consing Mahogany 2 114.00 114.00

Cacao 1 120.00125 Elloren, Benito Santol 1 96.00 256.00

Atis 1 40.00

126 Nada, Letecia Banana 2 160.00 388.00______ _____ _____ _____ _____Gemelina 4 228.00

127 Aguilon, Clementino Banana 4 320.00 320.00Banana 1 80.00

128 Velore, Anaclito Calamansi 2 240.00 440.00Cacao 1 120.00

129 Venore, Teodulo CBacaoa 1 120.00 200.00

Banana 2 160.00

130 Dumangas, Crspin Cacaouit 1 120.00 450.00

I ________ _________ _________ Calamansi 1 120.00Coco 3 270.00

131 Heirs of Paray Banana 3 240.00 790.00Bamboo 4 280.00Coco 9 810.00

132 Galgo, Jesus Bamboo 2 140.00 1,190.00Mango 1 240.00

133 Guinsisana, Feliciano Banana 80.00 _ 80.00

134 Bano, Crisente Calaransi 1 120.00 240.00

Banana 4 320.00135 Roluna, Teofisto Guavano 3 360.00 800.00

Avocado 1 120.00

136 Sistona, Gerarda Cacao 2 240.00 480.00

Page 7 of 23



137 Galos, Nemesia Banana 5 400.00 496.00Calamansi 1 96.00 ______

138 Losduc, Deosdidit Banana 2 160.00 160.00139 Galgo, Alberto Banana 2 160.00 160.00

Banana 14 1,120.00

140 Maria, Losduc Cacao 9 1,080.00 2,410.00Coconut 1 90.00Guavano 1 120.00

141 Galeon, Eufracia Banana 2 160.00 160.00Banana 3 240.00

142 Pinggal, Gonzala Mango 1 240.00 600.00Guavano 1 120.00

143 Matildo, Adelo Banana 4 320.00 320.00Mango 1 240.00

144 Egay, Carlos Guavano 1 96.00 606.00Coconut 3 270.00Cacao 1 120.00

145 Espin, Delandrino Guavano 4 480.00 780.00Atis 3 180.00

146 Galolo, Samson Banana 2 160.00 280.00Starapple 1 120.00Cacao 1 120.00Macopa 1 120.00Guavano 2 192.00

147 Legaspi, Juanita Santol 1 96.00 1,068.00Starapple 1 120.00Coconut 2 180.00Bango 1 240.00

148 Caga, William, Jr. Manaoa 1 240.00 320.00Banana 1 80.00

149 Basul, Ricardo Coco(5yo) 1 50.00 250.00Guavano 1 120.00 _

Starapple 2 240.00

150 Reambonaza, Nanette Balamansi 1 120.00 680.00Mango 1 240.00Mango 1 240.00

151 Eupena, Gregoria Starapple 2 160.00 760.00_Guavano 2 240.00

152 Lulab, Bernadette Mango 1 240.00 240.00153 Moleta, Edmund Banana 2 160.00 160.00

Mango 1 240.00Banana 2 160.00Cacao 4 480.00

154 Ata, Victoriana j.Fruit 1 120.00 1,300.00Avocado 1 120.00Atis 1 60.00Calamansi 1 120.00Coconut 2 180.00

155 Pecante, Enriquita Mango 1 240.00 620.00Starapple _____ 1 120.00Banana 1 80.00

Page 8 of 23



mango 2 480.(;_Banana 2 160.00

156 Lebaste, Rolando Coconut 1 90.00 910.00Atis 1 60.00Guavano 1 120.00

157 Naraha, Roberto Coconut 3 270.00 570.00_______ _______ _______ _______ COc (Syo) 6 300.00

Cacao I_ _ 120.00158 Bano, Nelson Macopa 1 120.00 360.00

Guavano 1 120.00Mango 1 240.00

159 Narada, Natividad Banana 2 160.00 490.00Coconut 1 90.00Mango 2 480.00

160 Guhitia, Urbana Coconut 1 90.00 666.00Guavano 1 96.00

161 Garao, Anecito Guavano 2 240.00 240.00Banana 1 80.00

162 Pedrasa, Roberto mango 1 240.00 370.00Jackfruit 1 50.00Mango(np) 1 80.00

163 Paray, Narcisa Banana 6 480.00 680.00.______________________________ O range 1 120.00

Banana 4 320.00Avocado 2 240.00Cacao(np) 9 864.00Cacao (p) 2 240.00

164 Pingal, Lecerio Orange 1 120.00 2,684.00Jackfruit 2 240.00mango 1 240.00Atis 1 60.00Guavano 3 360.00Calamansi 1 120.00Avocado 1 120.00

165 Pingal, Elesio Cacao i 120.00 600.00Orange 1 120.00Jackfruit 1 120.00

166 Galigao, Ronito Banana 4 320.00 320.00

167 Guiritan, Mamerto Banana 10 800.00 800.00167 Guiritan, Mamerto Bamboo 3 210.00 210.00

Cacao 1 120.00168 Delpa, Editha Jackfruit 1 120.00 320.00

Banana 1 80.00Bamboo 2 140.00

169 Larong, Apolinario, Sr. T. Mango 4 960.00 4,100.00Banana 36 2,880.00Breadfruit 1 120.00Coco 6 540.00

170 Delapa, Maximo Guavano 1 120.00 790.00

Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00171 Pecito, Martiniana Cacao 1 120.00 120.00

172 Espin, Melinda Calamansi 1 120.00 200.00

Page 9 of 23



173 Inaya, Pascacio Banana 1 80.00 80.00174 Turaja, Lino Banana 2 160.00 160.00

175 Galigao, Diosdado Banana 5 400.00 520.00____ __ ______ ______ ______ ______ O range 1 120.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

176 Guiritan, Elpidio Avocado 1 120.00 280.00_______ _______ _______ ______ Banana 2 160.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

177 Napal, Crisanto Banana 2 160.00 160.00178 Guiritan, Celso Banana 2 160.00 160.00179 Sulapas, Glenn Banana 1 80.00 80.00180 Veyra, Dodoy Bamboo 5 350.00 350.00

Banana 5 400.00181 Eupena, Floro Starapple 1 120.00 640.00

Guavano 1 120.00Banana 7 560.00

182 Larong, Josepita Bamboo 2 140.00 1,180.00Banana 8 480.00

183 Napana, sofia Banana 8 640.00 720.00______ _____ ______ _____ _____ M ango 1 80.00

Banana 20 1,600.00184 Roman, Catholic church Mango 2 480.00 2,200.00

Cacao 1 120.00Cacao 4 480.00

185 Eupena, Necito Guavano 1 120.00 800.00Jackfruit ___1_ 120.00Banana 1 80.00Cacao 1 120.00

186 Eupena, Herminia Jackfruit 1 120.00 320.00Banana 1 80.00

187 Latore, soledad Cacao 1 120.00 120.00Banana 6 480.00

188 Heirs of Sistona Bamboo 4 280.00 940.00_Coco 2 180.00

Subtotal 48,679.00

Page 10 of 23



Municipality: GigaguitBarangay: Mahanub I

Mango 1 240.00189 Femadez, Feleciana Starapple 1 120.00 440.00

Banana 1 80.00190 Jason, Alejandra Banana 7 560.00 560.00191 Cabanda, Aldigonda Banana 8 640.00 640.00192 Papelleras, Lucina G. Banana 2 160.00 160.00193 Peruda, Manuel Banana 9 720.00 720.00194 Lomor, Teodoro Banana 7 560.00 560.00

Calamansi 1 120.00195 Galolo, Lucina Guavano 1 120.00 320.00

Mango 1 80.00

196 Amarille, Danilo Banana 6 480.00 570.00Coconut 1 90.00Guavano 4 480.00

197 Amarille, Lucio j.Fruit 2 100.00 1,060.00Mango 2 480.00

198 Napana, Ricardo Banana 2 160.00 210.00Coconut 1 50.00

Subtotal 5,240.00

Page 11 of 23



Municipality: ClaverBarangay: Daywan

199 Tuazon, Henry Banana (p) 4 320.00 520.00______ ______ _____ ______ _____ Banana (np) 4 200.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

200 Presilda, Arsenio Banana 6 480.00 600.00______ ______ ______ ______ ____ t~arapple~ 1 120.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

Guavano 1 120.00201 Espinosa Juan Calamansi 1 120.00 800.00

Macopa 2 240.00Banana 4 320.00

202 Velaya, simeon Banana 4 320.00 320.00

203 Bagnol, Guillermo Banana 2 160.00 280.00_______ _______ _______ ______ Santol 1 120.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

Banana 3 240.00

204 Velaya, Teodoro Starapple 1 120.00 600.00Bre-adfruit 1 120.00_Cacao 1 120.00Mango 1 240.00

205 Beguna, Nicolas Jackfruit 5 480.00 1,330.00Cacao 1 120.00Coconut 7 490.00Banana 7 560.00

206 Chato, Esperedion Jackfruit 2 240.00 1,160.00Mango 1 120.00Guavano 2 240.00

207 Baradillo, Pablo Mango 1 240.00 360.00______ ______ _____ ______ _____ Starapple 1 120.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

208 Ocon, Feliciano Calamansi 1_ ' 120.00 216.00______ ______ _____ ______ _____ O range 1 96.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00Cacao 3 360.00

209 Bahigawan, Victor Jackfruit(p) 1 120.00 730.00Macopa 1 120.00Banana 1 80.00Banana 1 80.00

210 Larase, Bonifacio Cacao 1 120.00 250.00Santol 1 50.00

211 Gonzales, Alejandro Cacmnsi 1 120.00 210.00

212 Degulto, Abondo BCaocoanuat 1 280.00 370.00

Banana 2 160.00213 Degulto, Lucia Jackfruit 2 240.00 640.00

Guavano 2 240.00214 Andoy, Teoducio Banana 3 240.00 240.00

Banana 5 400.00Mango 1 240.00Starapple 1 120.00

215 Paranada, Encarnation Avocado 1 96.00 1,186.00Coconut 1 90.00Jackfruit 1 120.00

. ____________________________ M ango 1 120.00216 Giritan, Cresenciana Banana 8 640.00 640.00217 Ladrido, Lamberto Banana 3 240.00 480.00

Mango 1 240.00

Page 12 of 23

APPENDIX C UST OF PERENNIALS


218 Elder, Felipe Banana 10 800.00 800.00219 Cariota, Benito Banana 10 800.00 800.00

220 Giritan, Felisa Banana 7 560.00 680.00_______ _______ _______ ______ G uavano 1 120.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

221 Sanchez, Tereso Coconut 1 90.00 90.00Mango 1 240.00

222 Sering, Samuel Coconut 3 270.00 630.00Cacao 1 120.00

223 Nazi, Eufracia Banana 4 320.00 434.00______ ______ _____ ______ _____ G em elina 2 1 14. 00-

224 Cordova, Remedios Banana 5 400.00 400.00

225 Alegre, Sofia Banana 3 240.00 360.00_________ _________ _________ G uavano 1 120.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

226 Apalisis, Charlito Banana 4 320.00 440.00______ ______ _____ ______ _____ Guavano 1 120.00

227 Alegre, Arsenio Santol 1 120.00 120.00228 Nazi, Sisoy Mango 1 240.00 240.00229 Galido, Anselmo Banana 2 160.00 160.00230 Pamada, Encarnacion Banana 2 160.00 160.00231 Larase, Paulina Banana 1 80.00 80.00

Coconut 9 810.00232 Egay, Carlos Banana 25 2,000.00 3,290.00

Mango 2 480.00233 Vallescas, Benito Banana 1 80.00 80.00

234 Guhita, Nonilona Mango 1 80.00 130.00_______ _______ _______ _______ Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00 1 0 0

235 Laresa, ruben Banana 6 480.00 720.00_______ _______ _______ _______ Starapple 2 240.00 7 0 0

236 Crisaldo, Virgillio Coconuat 16 180.00 1,460.00Coconut 1 90.00

237 Paque, Caridad Coconut 1 560.00 650.00

238 Acilo Maria Coconut 6 480.00 480.00239 Layo, Juana Mango 1 240.00 240.00

Cacao 1 120.00240 Guibao, Emma Guavano 1 120.00 290.00

Jackfruit 1 50.00241 Paqueo, Teofanes, Jr. Banana 2 160.00 160.00242 Catog, Ponciano Banana 10 800.00 800.00243 Napoco, Andre Banana 7 560.00 560.00244 Ladrido, Nelson Banana 4 320.00 320.00245 Desoro, Guillerma Banana 3 240.00 240.00246 Laurderes, Stella Banana 3 240.00 240.00247 Pacito, Felisa Mango 1 240.00 240.00

Mango (p) 3 720.00Mango (np) 1 120.00

248 Verano, Rudy Coconut 4 360.00 1,616.00Banana 4 320.00Santol 1 96.00Banana 6 480.00

249 Sebrian, Doreteo Cacao 9 1,080.00 1,800.00Mango 1 240.00Mango 1 240.00

250 Comandante, Naning B. Coconut 1 90.00 650.00Banana 4 320.00 1

Page 13 of 23



Coconut 2 180.00Mango 5 1,200.00

251 Seventh Day Advantist Macopa 1 120.00 1,740.00Avocado 1 120.00Santol 1 120.00Mango 3 720.00

252 Crisaldo, Virgillio Banana 3 240.00 1,230.00Coconut 3 270.00Coconut 1 90.00

253 Napocor, Andre Mango 1 240.00 420.00Banana 1 90.00

254 Bonite, Jose Mango 15 1,200.00 1,680.00lBanana 15 1,200.00 1600

Subtotal 35,362.00

Page 14 of 23



Municipality: ClaverBarangay: Cabugo

Coco 13 1,170.00Coco (yo) 18 900.00

255 Avelino, Rodrigo Banana 59 4,720.00 7,750.00Mango (np) 3 720.00Mango 3 240.00Coco 4 360.00

256 Erazo, Juan Coco(yo) 11 550.00 2,670.00Banana 21 1,680.00 2600_Mango(np) 1 80.00Banana 15 1,200.00

257 Erazo, Camilo Coco 2 180.00 1,734.00Mango 1 240.00Gemelina 2 114.00

258 Lopez, Eugenio Banana 5 400.00 400.00Santol(np) 1 50.00

259 Alceran, Comelio Guavano(np) 1 50.00 220.00Banana(np) 2 120.00

260 Dumadag, Salome Coco 1 90.00 90.00

261 Auceran, Teodocia Santol 1 120.00 360.00______ _____ _____ _____ _____ M ango 1 240.00 3 0 0

Avocado (np) 1 50.00Santol (np) 1 50.00

262 Iligan, Lydia Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00 354.00Gemelina 2 114.00Coco 1 90.00

263 Magpayoc, Lydia Banana 1 80.00 80.00

264 Lambus, Pedro Banana 2 160.00 400.00

Starapple 1 120.00

265 Nasayao, Nonito Coca 2 180.00 410.00Jackfruit 1 50.00Atis i i 60.00Macopa 1 50.00Banana 1 60.00

266 Buca, Teofilo Mango 1 80.00 297.00Cacao 1 50.00Gemelina i 57.00

267 Pejo, Felisa Coco 2 6000 240.00Banana (np) i __ 60.00

268 Degolto, Nenencia Starapple 1 120.00______ _____ _____ _____ _____ M ango i __ 240.00 3 0 0

269 Mendoza, domingo Mango 1 240.00 240.00Banana (np) 1 60.00

270 Pejo, Alvina Coco 13 1,170.00 1,780.00_ ____________________________ Coco 11 550.00

271 Vicente, Leonora Santol 1 120.00 120.00Gemelina 1 57.00

272 Manlimos, Relioso Banana 7 560.00 1,397.00Coco 7 630.00Coco (np) 3 150.00

273 Ranioso, Jacinto Coco 9 810.00 1,210.00aCoco(np) 158 o 400.00

Page 15 of 23



Coco 15 1,350.00274 Gedi, Cocordia Coco(np) 10 500.00 2,570.00

Banana 9 720.00Coco 23 2,070.00

275 Gasulas, Florencio P. Mango 1 240.00 2,790.00Banana 6 480.00

276 Pecate, Nicanor Guavano 1 120.00 120.00277 Digol, Antonio Banana 2 160.00 160.00278 Nautan, Sulina Banana 1 80.00 80.00279 Bernales, Teofilo Coco 10 900.00 900.00280 Bernales, Roger Banana 3 240.00 240.00281 Yamit, Adela Gemelina 1 57.00 57.00282 Pecate, Renerio Gemelina 4 228.00 228.00

283 Pejo, Jeffrey Banana 9 720.00 990.00_____ ____ _____ ____ _____ ____ C oc a 3 270.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

284 Dagasdas, Pedro Coco 1 90.00 90.00285 Nasayao, Maria Avocado 1 120.00 120.00

286 Geda, Abundio Banana 3 240.00 360.00Orange 1 120.00 ______

287 Sanchez, Eugene Banana 2 160.00 160.00288 Opalia, Lucresia Coco 27 2,430.00 2,430.00

Banana 17 1,360.00289 Pejo, Herculando Coco 15 1,350.00 3,190.00

Mango 2 480.00Banana 7 560.00

290 Mira, Ires Coco 9 810.00 1,520.00Coco (np) 3 150.00

Subtotal 36,117.00

Page 16 of 23



Municipality: ClaverBarangay: Wangke

Jackfruit 1 120.00

291 Naldoza, Reynalda Orange 1 120.00 410.00Avocado(np) 1 50.00Guavano 1 120.00

292 Dialoja, Panfilo Banana 8 640.00 640.00Coco 1 90.00Avocado(np) 1 50.00

293 Begonia, Hermeggildo Macopa 1 120.00 670.00Santol 2 240.00Orange 1 120.00

_ _______________________________ Jackfruit (np) 1 50.00294 Sumalyo, Mansuete Banana 3 240.00 240.00

Banana 3 240.00295 Bagotsay, Marcela Starapple 1 120.00 410.00

._______________________________ Santol (np) 1 50.00296 Gerida, Teodora Banana 8 640.00 640.00297 Acido, Ester Coco 1 90.00 90.00

298 Lamanilao, Juan MaCnoo 32 720.00 3,600.00

299 Sabalbaro, Expedita/ Bamboo 2 140.00 140.00Breadfruit 1 120.00

300 Escalada, Reynaldo Mango 1 240.00 1,170.00Coco 9 810.00Coco 43 3,870.00Mango 9 2,160.00Santol 3 360.00

301 Paqueno, Pedro Santol (np) 1 50.00 10,290.00Banana 3 240.00Cacao 1 120.00Bamboo 1 70.00Gemelina 60 3,420.00

302 Chua, roberto Bamboo 6 350.00 530.00Coca 2 180.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

303 Presilda, Eugenia Coca 18 1,620.00 1,970.00Coco (yo) 7 350.00 ______

304 Paqueno, Valentina Bamboo 12 940.00 930.00

Coco 30 2,700.00

305 Paque, Paulina Mango 2 480.00 3,930.00Paque, Paulina ~~~Banana 1 80.00Coco (yo) 11 550.00Guavano 1 120.00

306 Obedencio, dioesia Santol (np) 1 50.00 290.00Calamansi 1 120.00

307 Peid,JreJackfruit 1 120.00 600.00307 Presilda, Jorge Mango 2 0480.00

Subtotal 26,550.00

Page 17 of 23



Municipality: ClaverBaran ay: Panatao _

308 Gonzaga, Ricardo Banana 2 160.00 160.00Starapple 1 120.00

309 Sumalyo, Esmeralda Cacao 4 480.00 840.00Mango 1 240.00

310 Gonzaga, Pablito Banana 7 560.00 560.00Banana 2 160.00

311 Pagueo, Rodulfo Mango 1 240.00 2,380.00Coco 22 1,980.00

312 Bayang, Marcelina/ Mango 3 720.00 720.00

313 Elimanco, Zacarias aocnoana 27 240.00 2,670.00

314 Sulapas, Carmelito/Jose Banana 18 1,440.00 1,680.00Mangqo 1 240.00

315 Debulos, Barbara Coco 26 2,340.00 2,340.00

316 Marlique, Shirley Mango 1 240.00 320.00Banana 1 80.00 ______

317 Almansa, Vilma Banana 5 400.00 480.00F~~im~flSd, VIiIIId Mango 1 80.00

318 Patan, Paulino Mango 1 240.00 240.00

319 Escalada, Raymundo Coco 7 630.00 950.00Banana 4 320.00

320 Verano, Vicente Coco 11 990.00 1,550.00_____ ____ _____ ____ _____ ____ Banana 7 560.00 _ _ _ _ _ _ _

321 Najjal, Virginia Banana 1 80.00 80.00322 Laroga, Sergio Banana 13 1,040.00 1,040.00

Banana 20 1,600.00323 Sulapas, Ernesto Coco 3 270.00 1,870.00

324 Go, Jose Pepe/Sumaylo Mango 2 480.00 480.00325 Es,eralda Coco 3 270.00 270.00

326 Ruaya, FederiCoc Banana 3 240.00 420.00

Subtotal 19,050.00

Page 18 of 23


PAP HH/Anstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality: ClaverBarangay: Ladgaron

Banana 1 80.00327 Patan, Armando Atis 1 60.00 310.00

Orange 1 120.00

328 Andoy, Ricardo Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00 170.00

Gemelina 2 114.00329 Quire, Cirilo Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00 244.00

Mango 1 80.00Banana 6 480.00Banana(np) 4 240.00

330 Paglinawan, Syvia Atis 4 240.00 1,320.00Mango 1 240.00Cacao 1 120.00

331 Origenes, Vicente Starapple 1 120.00 120.00332 Galanida, Rogelio Guavano 1 120.00 120.00

333 Patan, Berto Coco 2 180.00 340.00Patan, Berto ~~~~Banana 2 160.00 ______

Atis 1 60.00334 Sulapas, Esteban Banana 4 320.00 620.00

. _____________________________ Cacao 2 240.00Banana 4 320.00

335 Galagala, Rogelio Mango 1 240.00 660.00Jackfruit(np) 2 100.00

336 Paglinawan, Ernesto Banana 7 560.00 610.00Santol(np) i __ 50.00

337 Galagala, Lea Cacao i 120.00 180.00Galagala, Lea M~~~As i __ 60.00Starapple 3 360.00

338 Bronilda, Carol Coco (yo) 2 100.00 620.00Mango(np) 2 160.00

339 G a l i n a t o , C o r n e l i p Gemelina 10 570.00Galinato, Cornel;o ~Starapple(np) 1 50.00 ______

340 Galos, Dionisio Banana 2 160.00 400.00~~o.su~~ Dionislo ~Mango 1 240.00

341 Galagala, Adela Banana 3 240.00 240.00342 Galgo, Feliciano Banana 2 160.00 160.00

343 ~~~~ia r,.. ~~~Cacao 1 120.00 100343 Galindos, Rosita Atis(np) 1 40.00 160.00

Banana 1 80.00Avocado 1 120.00

344 Dingding, Felicitas Avocado(np) 1 50.00 540.00Starapple 1 120.00Starapple(np) 1 50.00Guavano 1 120.00

345 Sulapas, Anaclito Banana 3 240.00 240.00346 Galos, Carlito Banana 1 80.00 80.00

347 Galgo, Sofronio Banana 2 160.00 400.00~..2cZIYU, QUIIUIIIU Mango 1 f240.00

Subtotal 8,154.00

Page 19 of 23


PAP HHlnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality: ClaverBarangay: Cagdianao

Coco 1 90.00348 Molinar Tornting Avocado (np) 1 50.00 220.00

Banana 1 80.00349 Ligtas, Fe Mango 1 240.00 240.00350 Legaspi, rodrigo Banana 5 400.00 400.00

351 Urbiztondo, Percibal Coco 3 270.00 910.00Banana 8 640.00 ______

352 Nabale, Luis Banana 4 320.00 320.00353 Guhita, Florante Banana 3 240.00 240.00

354 Urbiztondo, Astero Coco 10 900.00 160_______ ______ _______ ______ Banana 2 160.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

355 Uncuna, David Coco 5 450.00 450.00356 Genaro Banana 4 320.00 320.00

Jackfruit 1 120.00

357 Arguilles, Geronimo, Jr. Banana 02 800.00 1,320.00______ ______ ______ ______ __ B anango 1 240.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

Mango 1 240.00

358 Escanilla, Maring Banana(np) 3 180.00 260.00

359 Caliwatan, Mecedonio Banana 5 400.00 450.00_____ _____ ____ _____ _____ ____ C oco(np) 1 50.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

360 Usondra, Mario Banana(np) 2 120.00 120.00

361 Ebol, Alfredo Jackfruit 1 120.00 210.00Coco 1 90.00

Subtotal 6,520.00

Page 20 of 23



Municipality: ClaverBarangay: Tagnito362 Matugas, Janeth Banana 1 80.00 80.00363 Galigao, Julieta Avocado 1 120.00 120.00

Banana 7 560.00Coco 8 720.00Coco(yo) 5 250.00

364 Guihapon, sotera Coco 9 810.00 4,450.00Coco(3-5 yo) 8 400.00Coco 2 180.00Coco 17 1,530.00Banana 55 4,400.00

365 Guihapon, Nicolas Coco 7 630.00 5,770.00Coca (3yo) 10 500.00Cacao 2 240.00Coco 10 900.00

366 Dagasdas, Maximo Banana 20 1,600.00 2,580.00_ _______________________________ M ango (np) 1 80.00

367 Guihapon, Pureza Coco 2 180.00 180.00368 Guihapon, Cenona Banana 4 320.00 320.00

Banana 21 1,680.00

369 Rusiana, Manuel Starapple 1 120.00 2,400.00Mango 2 480.00Guavano 1 120.00

370 Guihapon, Jovita Mango 2 480.00 600.00Avocado 1 120.00

Subtotal 16,500.00

Page 21 of 23



Municipality: ClaverBarangay: Urbiztondo

Mango 2 480.00Banana 3 240.00

371 Gonzaga, Lillia Coco 33 2,970.00 4,110.00

Coco(5yo) 6 300.00Orange 1 120.00

372 Opalia, Lucresia Macnogo 1 270.00

Banana 11 880.00

373 Nasayao, Guilermo Coco (np) 21 150.00 3,160.00

Mango 1 240.00Coco 39 3,510.00Mango 2 480.00

374 Urbiztondo, Franciso Gemoe(npa) 6 30000 5,080.00

Banana 2 160.00

Atis 1 60.00Mango 1 240.00

375 Chua, Lolong Coco 6 540.00 920.00Bamboo 2 140.00Coco 13 1,170.00

376 Ebol, Silvestre Banana 37 2,960.00 4,370.00Mango 1 240.00

377 Ebol, Silvestre Guavano 1 120.00 4,490.00

Coco 5 450.00

378 Pahinados, Lope BCancana 1 80.00

Mango 1 240.00

379 Gedi, Romeo Jackruit (np) 4 200.00 250.00Gedi, Romeo ~~~~~Starapple(np) 1 50.00 ______

Gemelina 1 57.00

380 Sela Pena, Leonora Banana 1 80.00 377.00Mango 1 240.00

381 Patan, Marcelo Banana 6 480.00 560.00381 Patan, Marcelo ~~~Mango (np) 1 80.00

382 Ebol, Joventino Banana 3 240.00 240.00

383 Panatao, Marie Mango 1 240.00 300.00Banana 1 60.00

384 Bisnar, Rogelio Banana 2 160.00 160.00Banana 3 240.00

385 Allocod, Luisa Mango (np) 3 240.00 708.00Gemelina 4 228.00

386 Bustriguez, Elisio BCancana 52 450.00 610.00

Mango 1 240.00

387 Toda, Leonardo Coco 1 90.00 410.00Banana 1 80.00Coco 3 270.00

388 Caliwatan, Sophia Jackfruit 120.00 510.00Starapple 1 120.00

Page 22 of 23



Coco 2 180.00

389 Rapas, Benito Banana 3 240.00 950.00Mango 2 480.00Avocado(np) 1 50.00

390 Rapas Coco 11 990.00 990.00

391 Vallejos, Ricardo Coca 9 810.00 1,370.00_____ ____ _____ ____ _____ ____ Banana 7 560.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

392 Nasayao, Marivel Coco 1 90.00 490.00____ ___ ____ ___ ____ ___ _ 3Banana 5 400.00

393 Betanio, Elido Mango 1 240.00 240.00394 Rapas, Pastora Guavano 2 240.00 290.00

________________________________ Jackfruit (np) 1 50.00395 Dalubatan, Gonzalo Mango 1 240.00 240.00

Santol (np) 1 50.00

396 Ligaya, Demetrio Banana 2 160.00 350.00Starapple 1 50.00 300Coco 1 90.00

397 Mesias, agustin, Jr. Mango 1 240.00 360.00Mesias, agustin, Jr. Cacao 1 120.00 ______

398 Rapas, Manuel Coco 3 270.00 270.00399 Cabdan, Felix Coco 1 90.00 90.00

400 Rapas, Teotimo Coca (yao) 14 700.00 1,020.00_ _______________________________ Banana 4 32 0.0

401 Nasayao, florencio Mango 1 240.00 290.00Coco (np) 1 50.00

402 Mulaan, Prodencio, Sr. Mango 1 240.00 330.00_____ ____ _____ ____ _____ ____ C oc a 1 __ _ 90.00

403 Dagadas, Percilliano Mango 1 240.00 240.00404 Rapas, Edilberto Mango 2 480.00 480.00405 Mulaan, Solmerita Coco 1 90.00 90.00

406 Sumaylo, Saturnina Jackfruit 2 240.00 360.00______ _____ ______ _____ _____ G uavano 1 120.00 _ _ _ _ _ _

407 Vallejos, quintin Banana 2 160.00 160.00408 Espinol, Ernie Banana 1 80.00 80.00

409 Arquiles, Sophia Coco 5 450.00 600.00Coca (Sya) 3 150.00

410 Raps, Benjamin Coco 34 3,060.00 3,060.00

411 Mesias, Augustin Coco 7 630.00 1,330.00______ _____ _____ _____ _____ Coca (3yo) 14 1 700.00

412 Pulvera, Peling Coco 24 2,160.00 2,230.00Bamboo 1 70.00

Subtotal 43,595.00Grand Total [ 332,725.00

Page 23 of 23

Date post:	13-Aug-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	buitruc
View:	220 times
Download:	0 times

KATAHIRA & ENGINEERS INTERNATIONAL - All...

Documents