Kerendan ESIA

8/13/2019 Kerendan ESIA

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kerendan-esia 1/809

DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 1 of 369

Revision: Rev 0 Date: August, 2013

Document Title: KERENDAN BLOCK DEVELOPMENT ESIA STUDY

DocumentTitle:

KERENDAN BLOCKDEVELOPMENTENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIALIMPACTASSESSMENT (ESIA)

DocumentNumber: DD-BK00-0Q-003

THIS IS A CONTROLLED DOCUMENT -NUMBERTHIS IS AN UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT X

Controlled documents will automatically be re-issued to recipients as and whenchanges occur. It is recipients’ responsibility to replace the old version anddestroy it.

Uncontrolled documents will not automatically be re-issued and users should assurethemselves that they have the correct version in circulation.

Revision Description By Designation Signature Date

Rev 0

Approved August 2013

Endorsed August 2013

Reviewed August 2013

Prepared August 2013



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 2 of 369



DISTRIBUTION LIST

No Name Title Hard Copy Soft Copy

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 3 of 369



TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 21

RINGKASAN EKSEKUTIF 24

1 INTRODUCTION 26

1.1 General Overview 261.2 Project Location 26

1.3 Project Objectives 271.4 Other Development Opportunities 271.5 Project Proponent 271.6 Purpose and Scope of ESIA 281.7 ESIA Structure 29

2 APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND REGULATORY PROVISIONS 32

2.1 Introduction 322.2 Indonesian Regulatory Process Outline 32

2.2.1 Environmental Assessment 322.2.2 Other National and Regional Regulatory Provisions 32

2.3 International Processes and Standards 332.3.1 The International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance

Standards 332.3.2 IFC Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) Guidelines 1 34

2.4 Comparison of Indonesian and IFC Standards 352.5 IFC Gap Assessment 36

3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 37

3.1 Introduction 373.2 Project Overview 37

3.2.1 Project Area of Influence 373.2.2 Location 383.2.3 Area of Project Disturbance 383.2.4 Project History 393.2.5 Project Target and Objectives 403.2.6 Need for the Project 423.2.7 Project Alternatives 423.2.8 Current Project Status and Schedule 433.2.9 Gas field Component 443.2.10 Pipeline 46



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 4 of 369



3.2.11 Gas Processing Facility 47

3.2.12 Other Facilities 503.2.13 Associated Facilities 51

3.3 Pre-Construction 523.3.1 Project Land Use 523.3.2 Permits 53

3.4 Construction 543.4.1 Wellhead Cluster Pad 543.4.2 Access Roads 543.4.3 Helipad and Flyway Area 55

3.4.4 Pipeline 553.4.5 Kerendan Gas Processing Facility 563.4.6 Hours of Construction 573.4.7 Wellhead Cluster Pad 57

3.5 Operation 573.5.1 Pipeline 573.5.2 Kerendan Gas Processing Facility (KGPF) 58

3.6 Decommissioning 583.6.1 Removal of Plant and Equipment 593.6.2 Contaminated Site Management 593.6.3 Site Rehabilitation 60

3.7 Workforce Requirements 603.7.1 Construction 603.7.2 Operations 613.7.3 Local Employment Opportunities 613.7.4 Temporary Residential Facilities (Construction Camps) 61

3.8 Water Supply and Storage 62

3.8.1 Drilling Water 623.8.2 Hydrotesting 623.8.3 Potable and Non-potable Water 623.8.4 Fire water 63

3.9 Sewage and Drainage 633.9.1 Clean Water Drainage 633.9.2 Oily Water Collection and Drainage Systems 643.9.3 Sanitary Sewers 64

3.10 Energy Supplies 64

3.11 Traffic and Transport 643.12 Waste and Discharges 67

3.12.1 Waste Management 68



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 5 of 369



3.13 Air Emissions 72

3.13.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 733.14 Lighting and Visual Amenity 733.15 Noise and Vibration 74

3.15.1 Continuous Noise Limits 743.15.2 Start-up and Intermittent Service Noise Limits 743.15.3 Impulse and Impact Noise Limits 743.15.4 Emergency Services 743.15.5 Far-Field Noise Limits 74

3.16 Unplanned Events 74

4 IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 76

4.1 Introduction 764.2 Screening 774.3 Scoping 774.4 Project Description 784.5 Baseline Conditions 794.6 Stakeholder Engagement 794.7 Impact Assessment 79

4.7.1 Prediction of Impacts 804.7.2 Characterisation of Impacts 80

4.8 Identification of Mitigation and Enhancement Measures 844.9 Residual Impact Evaluation 854.10 Management, Monitoring and Audit 85

5 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE 87

5.1 Introduction 875.2 Project Setting Regional Context 875.3 Climate 875.4 Topography 885.5 Geology 895.6 Air Quality 90

5.6.1 Baseline Air Quality Data 915.7 Noise 955.8 Soils 95

5.8.1 Kerendan UKL/UPL Surveys (2005) 955.8.2 Soil Sampling Survey 2013 96

5.9 Hydrology 985.9.1 Baseline Water Quality Data 99

5.10 Biodiversity and Habitats 1035.10.1 Desktop Review 104



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 6 of 369



5.10.2 Biodiversity Survey Results 117

5.10.3 Biodiversity Values 1225.11 Ecosystem Services 128

5.11.1 IFC PS Expectations 1295.11.2 Ecosystem Services Data Gathering 1295.11.3 Ecosystem Services Prioritisations 131

6 SOCIAL BASELINE 136

6.1 Introduction 1366.1.1 Methodology 1366.1.2 Study Limitations 139

6.2 Overview of Communities in the Project Area 1406.2.1 Ethnicity 1426.2.2 Village Characteristics 1436.2.3 Demographics 1436.2.4 Sex Ratio 1436.2.5 Population Density 1446.2.6 Population Growth 1446.2.7 Age and Gender Distribution 145

6.2.8 Religion and Ethnicity 1466.3 Economic Profile 148

6.3.1 Employment and Livelihoods 1486.4 Community Infrastructure 157

6.4.1 Clean Drinking Water 1576.4.2 Sanitation 1576.4.3 Electricity 1586.4.4 Transportation Facilities 159

6.5 Community Health 161

6.5.1 Life Expectancy 1616.5.2 Mortality 1616.5.3 Morbidity 1626.5.4 Communicable Diseases 1626.5.5 Sexually Transmitted Diseases (HIV/AIDS) 1656.5.6 Nutritional Status 1656.5.7 Health Facilities 165

6.6 Education Facilities 1676.7 Economic Infrastructure 1706.8 Cultural Heritage 171

7 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 173

7.1 Introduction 173



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 7 of 369



7.2 Historical Consultation Activities Undertaken 174

7.3 Community Perceptions 1777.3.1 Community Awareness of the Project 1777.3.2 Community Perceptions of Salamander’s Consultation Level 1777.3.3 Expectations of Salamander Benefits 1787.3.4 Community Concerns Associated with Salamander Impacts 180

7.4 Disclosure and Planned Future Consultation Activities 1817.5 Salamander’s Grievance Mechanism 182

8 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) ACTIVITIES 184

8.1 Overview of Salamander's CSR Activities In Indonesia 1848.2 CSR Approach, Policy, and Procedure 1848.3 CSR Principles 1858.4 CSR Strategy 1868.5 Governance and Accountability 1888.6 Previous CSR Activities Undertaken 189

8.6.1 Improvement of Public Roads in Kerendan and Muara PariVillage 189

8.6.2 Independence Day Ceremony in Kerendan Village 189

8.6.3 Sports Facilities Renovation in Kerendan and Luwe HuluVillage 1908.6.4 Salamander Cup in Lahei Sub-District 1908.6.5 Other CSR Contributions 191

9 ESIA SCREENING AND SCOPING 194

9.1 Scope of the Assessment 1949.2 Methodology 1949.3 Screening Results 195

9.3.1 IFC Gap Assessment 1969.3.2 Project Land Use Audit 197

9.4 Scoping Results 1979.4.1 Interaction Matrix 1989.4.2 Prediction of Impacts 201

10 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 209

10.1 Introduction 20910.2 Environmental Impact Assessment Results 20910.3 Impacts to Terrestrial Flora 209

10.3.1 Direct Loss of Vegetation from Land Clearing 21010.3.2 Impacts on Vegetation from other Project activities 21110.3.3 Invasion and Spread of Invasive and/or Exotic Flora Species 213



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 8 of 369



10.3.4 Impacts to Threatened Flora Species 214

10.4 Impacts to Terrestrial Fauna 21610.4.1 Loss of Habitat as a Result of Land Clearing 21610.4.2 Mortality from Project Related Traffic and Hunting 21810.4.3 Impacts to Fauna as a result of Pipeline Construction and

Habitat Fragmentation 21910.4.4 Impacts to Fauna Behaviour from Operation of Facilities,

Equipment and Machinery 22010.4.5 Impacts to Fauna Species of Conservation Significance 222

10.5 Ecosystem Services 224

10.5.1 IFC PS Expectations 22410.5.2 Ecosystem Services Data Gathering 22510.5.3 Discussion of Impacts 22610.5.4 Impact Evaluation and Significance 231

10.6 Soil 23510.6.1 Discussion of Impacts 23510.6.2 Impact Evaluation and Significance 23510.6.3 Additional Mitigation Measures, Management, and Monitoring 23610.6.4 Significance of Residual Impact 236

10.7 Surface Water 23710.7.1 Discussion of Impacts 23710.7.2 Impact Evaluation and Significance 23710.7.3 Significance of Residual Impact 238

10.8 Ground Water 23810.8.1 Discussion of Impacts 23810.8.2 Impact Evaluation and Significance 239

10.9 Air 239 10.9.1 Discussion of Impacts 23910.9.2 Impact Evaluation and Significance 24010.9.3 Additional Mitigation Measures, Management, and Monitoring 24110.9.4 Significance of Residual Impact 242

10.10 Noise and Vibration 24210.10.1 Discussion of Impacts 24210.10.2 Impact Evaluation and Significance 24310.10.3 Additional Mitigation Measures, Management, and Monitoring 24610.10.4 Significance of Residual Impact 246

10.11 Aesthetics 24610.11.1 Discussion of Impacts 24610.11.2 Impact Evaluation and Significance 24710.11.3 Additional Mitigation Measures, Management, and Monitoring 248



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 9 of 369



10.11.4 Significance of Residual Impact 248

10.12 Unplanned/Non-Routine Events 24910.12.1 Impacts from a Fire, Explosion or Gas Leak 24910.12.2 Impacts from Accidental Hydrocarbon, Chemical or Hazardous

Material Spills 25110.12.3 Impacts from Process Upset or Emergency Flaring 253

10.13 Associated Facilities 25310.13.1 Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base 254

11 SOCIAL AND HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT 260

11.1 Introduction 26011.2 Social Impact Assessment Definitions 260

11.2.1 Determining Magnitude 26011.2.2 Determining Vulnerability 261

11.3 Evaluating Significance for Social and Health Impacts 26311.3.1 Integration of Stakeholder Perceptions 26511.3.2 Interpretation of Social Impact Significance 266

11.4 Social Impact Assessment Results 26711.5 Communicable Diseases 268

11.5.1 Discussion of Impacts 26811.5.2 Impact Evaluation and Significance 26911.5.3 Additional Mitigation Measures, Management, and Monitoring 270

11.6 Community Safety and Security 27111.6.1 Discussion of Impacts 27111.6.2 Impact Evaluation and Significance 27211.6.3 Additional Mitigation Measures, Management, and Monitoring 273

11.7 Environmental Quality 27411.7.1 Discussion of Impacts 274

11.7.2 Impact Evaluation and Significance 27411.7.3 Additional Mitigation Measures, Management, and Monitoring 27511.7.4 Significance of Residual Impact 275

11.8 Economy and Livelihood 27611.8.1 Discussion of Impacts 27611.8.2 Impact Evaluation and Significance 27711.8.3 Additional Mitigation Measures, Management, and Monitoring 278

11.9 Community Infrastructure and Services 27811.9.1 Discussion of Impacts 27811.9.2 Impact Evaluation and Significance 27911.9.3 Additional Mitigation Measures, Management, and Monitoring 280

11.10 Cultural Heritage 280



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 10 of 369



11.10.1 Discussion of Impacts 280

11.10.2 Impact Evaluation and Significance 28011.11 Social/Cultural Structure 281

11.11.1 Discussion of Impacts 28111.11.2 Impact Evaluation and Significance 28211.11.3 Additional Mitigation Measures, Management, and Monitoring 282

12 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 283

13 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANINTRODUCTION 285

13.1 Environmental and Social Management Requirements 28513.1.1 Content of the ESMP 28613.2 Salamander Energy’s Corporate EHS Principles 286

13.2.1 EHS Principles 28613.2.2 EHS Policies 288

13.3 Salamander Energy Indonesia HSE Management System 29213.3.1 HSE Roles and Responsibilities 29213.3.2 General Manager 29213.3.3 Managers HSE Responsibility 292

13.3.4 Operations/Drilling Manager 29313.3.5 HR Manager 29313.3.6 HSE Manager 29313.3.7 Area Superintendent HSE Responsibility 29413.3.8 Supervisor HSE Responsibility 29413.3.9 Employee HSE Responsibility 29413.3.10 Contractors 29413.3.11 Role of Sub-Contractors 295

13.1 Kerendan Gas Development Project Organisation 29613.4 Training, Awareness and Competence 298

13.4.1 Competency Levels 29813.5 Monitoring, Review, Audit and Reporting 299

13.5.1 Audits and Verification 29913.5.2 Non Compliance and Corrective Action 300

13.6 Project Environmental and Social Management Plan 30013.6.1 ESMP Link to Other HSE Management System Plans 301

14 CONCLUSIONS 313

15 REFERENCES 322



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 11 of 369



List of Tables

Table 3.1 Project Total Area of Disturbance 39

Table 3.2 Kerendan Gas Field Ownership History 40

Table 3.3 Kerendan Gas Development Project Gas Specifications 41

Table 3.4 Project Schedule 43

Table 3.5 Kerendan Gas field Wellhead Development Summary 45

Table 3.6 Average Gas Composition of Kerendan Gas Field 45

Table 3.7 Infrastructure Required for Gas Processing Facility 50

Table 3.8 Project Operational Permits 53

Table 3.9 Average Daily Project Traffic during Construction 65

Table 3.10 Transportation Schedule for Delivery of Project Materials 65

Table 3.11 Predicted Waste Volumes to be Generated during Constructionand Operations 69

Table 3.12 Summary of GHG Emissions from KGPF and Gas Production(Tonnes/Year) 73

Table 4.1 Resources/Receptors and Impacts Considered in Scoping 77

Table 4.2 Impact Characteristic Terminology 80

Table 4.3 Definitions for Likelihood Designations 82

Table 5.1 Climate within the Project Area 88

Table 5.2 Ambient Air Quality Standards 90

Table 5.3 Air Quality Sampling for Kerendan UKL/UPL (2005) 92

Table 5.4 Air Quality in Project Area 92

Table 5.5 Noise Quality Sampling for Kerendan Location (2010) 95

Table 5.6 Fauna in the Juboi-1, Sungai Lahei-1 and West Kerendan-1UKL/UPL Study Area 106

Table 5.7 Likelihood of IUCN Species (Known to Occur in Kalimantan)Occurring in the Project Area 108

Table 5.8 Threatened IUCN Listed Species Known to Occur orPotentially Occur within the Project Area 123

Table 5.9 Appraisal of Project Against Relevant IFC PerformanceStandards 125

Table 5.10 Criteria and Thresholds for Identifying Critical Habitat underIFC Performance Standard 6 (2012) 127

Table 5.11 Ecosystem Services Summary 130

Table 5.12 Ecosystem Service Prioritisation Summary (Project Specific) 133

Table 6.1 Morning Open Day Schedule 138

Table 6.2 Afternoon Open Day Schedule 139

Table 6.3 Demographic Data of Villages in the Project Footprint 143

Table 6.4 Number of Population, Household, Sex Ratio by District 2011 144



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 12 of 369



Table 6.5 Population Growth in Project Affected Villages 2011 144

Table 6.6 Age and Gender Distribution of North Barito Regency 2011 145 Table 6.7 Population by Religion in Barito Utara Regency 2010 146

Table 6.8 Number of Population by Religion in Project Area Villages 2011 146

Table 6.9 Population 15 years old and over of Barito Utara Regency byMain Activity 2011 149

Table 6.10 Land Use Area in Project Affected Villages 2011 (In Ha.) 149

Table 6.11 Agricultural Production by Region 2011 (Ton) 152

Table 6.12 Area Production and Number of Smallholder RubberPlantation by Regency 2011 152

Table 6.13 Number of Households by Lighting Sources in Village AffectedProject 2011 159

Table 6.14 Number of Households by Cooking Fuel Source in ProjectAreaVillages 2011 159

Table 6.15 Health Facilities in the Project Affected Villages 166

Table 6.16 Number of Health Care Practitioners in the Project AffectedVillages 2013 166

Table 6.17 Number of Schools in the Project Affected Village 2013 167

Table 6.18 Number of Students per School in the Project Affected Village

2011 167

Table 6.19 Number of School, Students and Teacher of Junior High Schooland Senior High School in Lahei Sub District 2011/1012 168

Table 6.20 Number of Teacher and Education Background in ElementarySchool and Junior High School in the Project Affected Village2011 168

Table 6.21 Numbers of Teacher and Education Background in EarlyChildhood Education (PAUD) and Islamic School in the ProjectAffected Village 2011 168

Table 6.22 Number of Economic Facilities in the Project Affected Village2011 170

Table 6.23 Typical Dayak Dusun Malang Ceremonies 172

Table 7.1 Historical LAQ Consultation undertaken by Salamander 175

Table 8.1 Salamander CSR Program 2013 192

Table 9.2 Scoping Interaction Matrix (A3) 199

Table 9.3 Scoping Prediction of Impacts 202

Table 10.1 Loss of Vegetation from Land Clearing Activities 210

Table 10.2 Impacts on Vegetation from other Project Activities 212

Table 10.3 Impacts to Native Vegetation as Result of the Introduction ofInvasive or Alien Species 214

Table 10.4 Impacts to Threatened Flora Species from Clearing Activities 215



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 13 of 369



Table 10.5 Impacts to Fauna from Loss of Habitat as a result of Land

Clearing 217 Table 10.6 Impacts to Fauna as a Result of Hunting and Traffic Pressures 219

Table 10.7 Impacts to Fauna as a Result of Pipeline Construction andHabitat Fragmentation 220

Table 10.8 Impacts to Fauna from Operation of Facilities, Equipment andMachinery 221

Table 10.9 Threatened IUCN listed Species Assessed 222

Table 10.10 Impact to Conservation Significant Fauna Species as a Result ofHabitat Clearing 223

Table 10.11 Ecosystem Services Summary 226

Table 10.12 Ecosystem Services Prioritisation Matrix 228

Table 10.13 Ecosystem Services Prioritisation Summary (Project Specific) 229

Table 10.14 Impact Assessment Matrix for Impacts to Ecosystem Services 231

Table 10.15 Impacts to Ecosystem Services 232

Table 10.16 Assessment of Impacts to Priority Ecosystem Services 233

Table 10.17 Impacts to Soils 236

Table 10.18 Impacts to Surface Water Quality during Construction andOperation 238

Table 10.19 Impact to Air Quality during Construction 241 Table 10.20 Impacts on Air during Operation 241

Table 10.21 IFC PS Noise Level Guidelines 243

Table 10.22 Indonesian Noise Regulatory Standards (dBA) 243

Table 10.23 Impact Magnitude Terminology 243

Table 10.24 Construction Noise Impact Magnitudes (LAeq dB) 244

Table 10.25 Operational Noise Impact Magnitudes 244

Table 10.26 Impacts from Project Noise and Vibration during Construction 245

Table 10.27 Impacts from Project Noise and Vibration during Operation 246

Table 10.28 Impacts from Project Lighting 248 Table 10.29 Impacts from Impacts from Largecale Event (Fire, Explosion or

Gas Leak) on Immediate and Surrounding Environment 250

Table 10.30 Impacts from Accidental Spillages of Hydrocarbons, Chemicalsand/or Hazardous materials 252

Table 10.31 Impacts from Process Upset or Emergency Flaring 253

Table 10.32 Potential Impacts on Soil from Operation of the Luwe HuluSupply and Support Base 255

Table 10.33 Potential Impacts on Surface Water from Operation of the

Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base 256 Table 10.34 Potential Impacts of Noise and Vibration at the Luwe Hulu

Supply and Support Base 258

Table 11.1 Designation of Social Magnitude 261



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 14 of 369



Table 11.2 Levels of Vulnerability 263

Table 11.3 Significance Rankings for Social and Community HealthImpacts 264

Table 11.4 Description of Social Impact Assessment Significance Rankings 267

Table 11.5 Communicable Disease Impacts 270

Table 11.6 Community Safety and Security Impacts 273

Table 11.7 Environmental Quality Impacts 275

Table 11.8 Economy and Livelihood Impacts 278

Table 11.9 Community Infrastructure, Services and Resources Impacts 279

Table 11.10 Cultural Heritage Impacts 281

Table 11.11 Social/Cultural Structure Impacts 282 Table 13.1 Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMS) Kerendan

Gas Development Project (A3) 302

Table 13.1 Kerendan Gas Development Project ESIA Outcomes 315

Table H-1 Environmental Impact Assessment – Kerendan GasDevelopment Project (A3) 353

Table I-2 Social Impact Assessment – Kerendan Gas DevelopmentProject (A3) 358

Table I-3 Non Routine Impact Assessment – Kerendan Gas Development

Project (A3) 365

List of Figures

Figure 1.1 Project Location 31

Figure 2.1 IFC Performance Standards 33

Figure 3.1 KGPF General Process Schematic Diagram 48

Figure 3.2 Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad (April 2013) 54

Figure 4.1 Impact Assessment Process 76 Figure 4.2 Impact Assessment Process 79

Figure 4.3 Assessing the Level of Magnitude 81

Figure 4.4 Impact Significance Rankings 83

Figure 4.5 Context of Impact Significance 84

Figure 4.6 Impact Mitigation Hierarchy 85

Figure 5.1 Cross Section of the Kerendan Gas Field 89

Figure 5.2 Locations of Air, Water Quality and Soil Sampling Undertakenwithin or near the Project area from 2005 – 2013 93

Figure 5.3 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring/Sampling Stations 94 Figure 5.4 Soil Sampling Locations 97

Figure 5.5 Water Sampling Locations in the Project Area (2013) 101



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 15 of 369



Figure 5.6 Logging Transportation on the Barito River 116

Figure 5.7 Cleared Forest Areas for Plantations and Logging along AccessRoads 117

Figure 5.8 Vegetation at KGPF (left), evidence of clearing area in KGPF(right) 118

Figure 5.9 Vegetation along Sales Gas Pipeline Route (left) Plantation nearPLN Section (right) 119

Figure 5.10 Vegetation at Survey Site GT05 along the Gathering PipelineRoute 120

Figure 5.11 Vegetation at the Kerendan Wellsite (July 2013) 121

Figure 5.12

Ecosystem Service Prioritisation Matrix 132

Figure 6.1 Locations of Villages in Relation to the Kerendan GasDevelopment Project Facilities 141

Figure 6.2 Typical Scenery in the Project Villages 142

Figure 6.3 Mosques in the Villages of Kerendan and Haragandang 147

Figure 6.4 Basarah Hall in Muara Pari 148

Figure 6.5 Economic Activities in Luwe Hulu 156

Figure 6.6 Toilet in Kerendan on the Lahei River 158

Figure 6.7 Haragandang and Muara Pari Access Roads during the Rainy

Season 161

Figure 6.8 Map of Malaria Endemic Areas in Central Kalimantan 163

Figure 6.9 Elementary Schools in Luwe Hulu and Muara Pari 170

Figure 7.1 Community Consultations Undertaken 176

Figure 7.2 Community Awareness of the Project 177

Figure 7.3 Community Perceptions of Project Consultation Activities 178

Figure 7.4i Expectations of Salamander Benefits in Haragandang 178

Figure 7.5 Community Concerns Associated with Salamander Impacts 180

Figure 7.6 Salamander Grievance Submission Flows 183

Figure 8.1 CSR Procedure 186 Figure 8.2 Sports Facilities constructed by Salamander 190

Figure 11.1 Vulnerable Groups – Definition 262

Figure 11.2 Building in Perceptions, Stakeholders and Planning intoSignificance Ratings 266

Figure 13.1 Salamander Energy’s Corporate Senior Management Team 287

Figure 13.2 Salamander Energy’s Corporate HSE Policy 289

Figure 13.3 Salamander Energy’s Corporate CSR Policy 291

Figure 13.4 Kerendan Gas Development Project Organisation Chart 297



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 16 of 369



Annexes

Annex A Applicable Standards

Annex B Environmental Baseline Sampling Assurance Report

Annex C Biodiversity Study

Annex D Eco-system Services Questionnaire and Observation Form

Annex E Public Consultation Attendance Record

Annex F Group Discussion

Annex G Community Perception Questionnaire

Annex H Environmental and Social Impact Assessment

Annex I Salamander Energy Indonesia HSE Management System



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 17 of 369



UNITS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

ALARP As Low As Reasonably Practicable

AMDAL Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan

API American Petroleum Institute

Bcf Billion Cubic Feet

BOD Biochemical Oxygen DemandBOPD Barrels of Oil Per Day

CAR Corrective Action Record

CBI Competency Based Interview

CDR Case Detection Rate

CE Critically Endangered

CH 4 Methane

Cm Centimeters

CO Carbon Monoxide

CO2 Carbon Dioxide

COD Chemical Oxygen Demand

CSR Corporate Social ResponsibilitydB Decibel

DBH Diameter at Breast Height

DCQ Daily Contract Quantity

DHSV Down Hole Safety Valve

DIV Dutch Intervention Values

DO Dissolved Oxygen

EBE Elnusa Bangkanai Energy

EHS Environmental, Health, and Safety

EMP Environmental Management Plan

EN Endangered

EP Equator Principles

EPCI Engineering, Procurement, Construction and InstallationERM Environmental Resources Management

ESAP Environmental and Social Action Plan

ESIA Environment and Social Impact Assessment

ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan

ESS Emergency Shutdown System



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 18 of 369



FEED Front End Engineering Design

FGS Fire and Gas SystemFTHT Flowing Tubing Head Temperature

GHG Green House Gases

GIIP Good International Industry Practice

GN Guidance Note

GOI Government of Indonesia

GRU Grievance Redress Unit

GSA Gas Sales Agreement

H 2S Hydrogen SulphideHa Hectare

HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus

HP High Pressure

HPT High Pressure Temperature

HSE Health, Safety and Environmental

IA Impact Assessment

ICSS Integrated Control and Safety System

IFC International Finance CorporationIMR Infant Mortality Rate

IPs Indigenous Peoples

IUCN International Union for the Conservation of NatureKg Kilogram

KGPF Kerendan Gas Processing Facility

Km kilometre

KO Knock Out

kph Kilometres Per HoursKUD Koperasi Unit Desa

LBW Low Birth Weight

LP Low Pressure

LT Level Transmitter

LV Low Voltage

m MeterMAOP Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure

MCC Monitor Control CentreMDQ Maximum Daily Quantity

MMboe Million Barrels of Oil Equivalent



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 19 of 369



Mmbtu Million British Thermal Units

MMSCFD Million Standard Cubic Feet Per DayMoC Management of Change

MP Medium Pressure

MS Management System

MV Manifold Valve

MW Mega Watt

N 2 Nitrogen Gas

N ₂ O Nitrogen Dioxide

NGOs Non-Governmental OrganisationNm 3 Nano Meter Cubed

NOX Nitrogen Oxides

NTPs Non Timber Products

O3 Oxidant

OCP Organo-Chlorine Pesticides

OGP Oil and Gas Producers

OPP Organo-Phosphate Pesticides

Pb LeadPC Process Control

PCDP Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan

PM Particulate MatterPOD Plan of Development

PPE Personal Protection Equipment

PS Performance Standards

PSC Production Sharing Contract

PT PLN PT Perusahaan Listrik NegaraRO Reverse Osmosis

ROW Right of Way

RSL Regional Screening Level

Scf Standard Cubic Feet

SDV Shut Down Valve

SEIA Social and Environmental Impact AssessmentSIS Safety Instrumental System

SITP Shut-in Tubing pressureSOx Sulphur Oxides

SVOC Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 20 of 369



TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure

TDS Total Dissolved SolidsTEG Tri Ethylene Glycol

TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

TSP Total Suspended Particulates

UKL Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan

UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund

UPL Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan

UPS Uninterrupted Power Supply

USEPA United States Environmental Protection AgencyVOC Volatile Organic Compounds

VRU Vapour Recovery Unit

VU Vulnerable

WHCP Wellhead control panel

WHO World Health Organisation

WK-1 West Kerendan

WMP Waste Management Plan

WV Water Valve



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 21 of 369



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Salamander Energy Indonesia through the wholly-owned subsidiary Salamander Energy(Bangkanai) Limited Group (Salamander) is in the process of developing the Kerendan gasfield (termed the Kerendan Gas Development Project). The Kerendan gas field is located inthe Bangkanai Production Sharing Contract (PSC) in the North Barito Regency, CentralKalimantan. The Bangkanai PSC covers an area of approximately 1,385 m², approximately200 km west of Balikpapan and 330 km north of Banjarmasin. The block is located on thenorthern edge of the Barito Shelf and the west side of the Kutei Basin.

The gas field was discovered in the early 1980’s however it was not commercialised at the

time of discovery due to challenges associated with its remote location. Salamander haspartnered with the Indonesian State power company, PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PTPLN (Persero)), to develop the Kerendan gas field as an integrated gas to power project. PTPLN will construct a 320 MW power plant and transmission lines connecting to theKalimantan electrical grid. Salamander will be responsible for developing, processing anddelivering gas to the power plant.

An initial Gas Sales Agreement (GSA) was signed by PLN in mid-2011 for a 20 year period,with first gas deliveries anticipated to commence in mid-2014. To date, 122.6 Bcf of theKerendan gas field has been committed for sale under the GSA, with an initial developmentcapital expenditure of $120 million. A further 160 Bcf of contingent resource is identified inthe field, providing potential for commercialisation of additional gas volumes.

The well sites being developed as part of the Project are located within the KerendanWellhead Cluster Pad adjacent to the Lahei River. Production fluids from the well sites willbe transported via a pipeline to the Kerendan Gas Processing Facility (KGPF), approximately3 km west of the Wellhead Cluster Pad. From KGPF, gas will be delivered via a Sales GasPipeline to the PLN Power Plant, which will be constructed by PLN approximately 3kmsouth of the facility. The location, layout and schedule for the Project are illustrated in FigureES-1 .

The Kerendan gas field obtained its environmental approval from the Indonesiangovernment in 2006 and is currently managed under the Environmental Management Plan(UKL) and Environmental Monitoring Plan (UPL) prepared in fulfilment of the Indonesianregulatory environmental approval process. An environmental impact assessment in theform of an AMDAL was not required as the project will have a gas field production rate of≤30 MMSCFD.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 22 of 369



Figure ES-1 Kerendan Gas Development Project – Layout and Schedule

Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base

Project Schedule

LOCATION

Kerendan Cluster Development Drilling



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 23 of 369



Salamander appointed Environmental resources Management (ERM) to assist in conducting

a full Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) to international standards incompliance with the International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standards andGuidelines. This ESIA represents one element of Salamander’s overarching Health, Safetyand Environmental (EHS) Management System governing the Company’s commitments inmanaging Environmental, Health and Safety, and minimizing risk to communitiessurrounding all of Salamander’s activities and operations in Indonesia.

Construction of the Project commenced in mid-2012 followed by the development drillingprogram at the Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad. Project activities that had already beenconducted at the time of this ESIA were excluded from the predictive impact assessment

process. These activities have been managed in accordance with the Project’s UKL/UPL andwere subject to a compliance review against international standards, with recommendedcorrective actions where required. For the ESIA, the focus of the impact assessment is onconstruction and operational activities that have yet to occur. The scope of this ESIA is:

• Construction and operation of the Gathering and Sales pipeline;

• Construction and operation of the Kerendan Gas Processing Facility (KGPF);

• Operation of the Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad upon first gas production;

• Construction and/or operation of other site infrastructure (e.g. temporary residentialfacility and access roads) required to support the construction and operation of thepipeline, KGPF and gas field components; and

• Consideration of facilities associated with the Project that Salamander have an abilityto influence in terms of the environmental/social management and operationalperformance. This includes the Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base, and accessroads to the Kerendan facilities. The PLN Power station is not part of this assessment.

Surveys and sampling programs were conducted to obtain additional information on

environmental (air, soil and surface water conditions), biodiversity and ecosystem services,stakeholder consultation and social baseline characteristics. This report presents the findingsof these studies in the context of an updated project description and an assessment ofpotential impacts from proposed project activities. The ESIA concludes with Salamander’scommitments on mitigation and monitoring measures to manage the environmental andsocial performance of the Project to acceptable levels under applicable national andinternational standards, in accordance with Salamander’s HSE Management System.

The following provides the Executive Summary text in Bahasa Indonesia.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 24 of 369



RINGKASAN EKSEKUTIF

Salamander Energy Indonesia melalui anak perusahaan yang sepenuhnya memilikiSalamander Energy (Bangkanai) Limited Group (Salamander), sedang dalam prosesmengembangkan lapangan gas Kerendan (disebut sebagai Proyek Pengembangan GasKerendan). Lapangan gas Kerendan terletak di Bangkanai Production Sharing Contract(PSC) di Kabupaten Barito Utara, Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. Bangkanai PSC meliputiwilayah sekitar 1,385 km², berjarak sekitar 200 km sebelah barat dari Balikpapan dan 330 kmsebelah utara Banjarmasin. Blok ini terletak di tepi utara lempeng Barito dan sisi baratCekungan Kutai.

Lapangan gas ditemukan pada awal 1980-an namun itu tidak dikomersialkan pada saatpenemuannya karena tantangan yang berkaitan dengan lokasinya yang terpencil.Salamander telah bermitra dengan perusahaan listrik Negara Indonesia, PT PerusahaanListrik Negara (PT PLN (Persero)), untuk mengembangkan ladang gas Kerendan sebagai gasterintegrasi untuk proyek pembangkit listrik. PT PLN akan membangun pembangkit listrikberkekuatan 320 MW berserta jaringan transmisinya yang akan menghubungkannya jaringan listrik di pulau Kalimantan. Salamander bertanggung jawab untukmengembangkan, memproses dan memasok gas ke pembangkit tenaga listrik tersebut.

Perjanjian Penjualan Gas awal (Gas Sale Agreement) yang telah ditandatangani oleh PLNpada pertengahan 2011 untuk jangka waktu 20 tahun, dengan pengiriman gas pertama yangdiharapkan akan dimulai pada pertengahan 2014. Sampai saat ini, 122,6 milyar kaki kubikdari lapangan gas Kerendan telah disepakati untuk dijual sesuai perjanjian GSA, denganbelanja modal pengembangan awal sebesar USD 120 juta. Sebanyak 160 milyar kaki kubiksumber daya cadangan telah teridentifikasi di lapangan, yang dapat memberikan potensivolume gas tambahan untuk komersialisasikan.

Lokasi sumur sumur pengeboran juga sedang dikembangkan sebagai bagian dari Proyekyang berada di Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad berdekatan dengan Sungai Lahei. Produksifluida migas dari lokasi sumur akan disalurkan dengan pipa ke Fasilitas Pengolahan GasKerendan (KGPF) untuk diolah, berjarak sekitar 3 km sebelah barat dari Wellhead ClusterPad. Dari KGPF, gas akan di alirkan dengan Pipa Gas ke Pembangkit Tenaga Listrik PLN,yang akan dibangun oleh PLN sekitar 3km sebelah selatan fasilitas KGPF. Lokasi, tata letakdan jadwal untuk Proyek diilustrasikan pada Gambar ES-1.

Lapangan gas Kerendan memperoleh Izin Lingkungan dari pemerintah Indonesia padatahun 2006 dan saat ini pengelolaan lingkungan a mengacu kepada Upaya KelolaLingkungan (UKL) dan Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan (UPL) yang diperlukan sebagaisyarat dalam proses persetujuan Izin dari Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia. Analisa dampaklingkungan dalam bentuk AMDAL tidak diperlukan karena proyek yang hanya memilikitingkat produksi lapangan gas ≤ 30 MMSCFD.

Salamander menunjuk konsultan Environmental Resources Management (ERM) untukmembantu melakukan Kajian Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan dan Sosial (ESIA) yangmengacu kepada standar internasional yaitu Standar Kinerja (Performance Standard) dan



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 25 of 369



Pedoman dari International Finance Corporation (IFC). ESIA ini merupakan salah satu unsur

yang mewakili Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Lingkungan (EHS) Salamander Energyyang mengatur komitmen Perusahaan dalam mengelola Lingkungan, Kesehatan danKeselamatan, dan meminimalkan risiko bagi masyarakat sekitarnya di semua kegiatan danoperasi Salamander di Indonesia

Pembangunan Proyek dimulai pada pertengahan 2012 diikuti oleh program pengembanganpengeboran di Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad. Kegiatan proyek yang telah berjalan padasaat ESIA ini disusunterbitkan tidak meliputi proses penilaian dampak yang diperkirakan.Kegiatan ini telah dikelola sesuai dengan UKL / UPL Proyek dan mengacu kepada tinjauanulang atas kepatuhannya terhadap standar internasional, dengan rekomendasi tindakan

korektif jika perlu. Untuk ESIA, penilaian dampak akan fokus pada kegiatan konstruksi danoperasional yang akan dilaksanakan.

Ruang lingkup ESIA adalah sbb:

• Pembangunan dan pengoperasian Stasiun Pengumpul dan pipa Penjualan;

• Pembangunan dan pengoperasian fasilitas Pengolahan Gas Kerendan (KGPF);

• Pengoperasi Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad dan pengoperasian awal produksi gas

•

Pembangunan dan / atau pengoperasian infrastruktur lokasi lain (misalnya fasilitastempat akomodasi sementara dan jalan akses) yang diperlukan untuk mendukungpembangunan dan pengoperasian jalur pipa, KGPF dan komponen lapangan gas, dan

• Fasilitas lain yang dipertimbangan terkait dengan Proyek dimana Salamander akanberperan dalam hal pengelolaan lingkungan / sosial dan kinerja operasional.Termasuk Fasilitas layanan logistik di Luwe Hulu, serta jalan akses ke fasilitasKerendan. Pembangkit Tenaga Listrik PLN bukan merupakan bagian dari lingkupkajian ini.

Survei dan program pengambilan sampel telah dilakukan untuk mendapatkan informasitambahan mengenai rona lingkungan awal (udara, tanah dan kondisi air permukaan),keanekaragaman hayati dan ekosistem, konsultasi dengan para pemangku kepentingan dankarakteristik rona awal sosial. Laporan ini menyajikan hasil temuan-temuan dari studi iniberdasarkan deskripsi proyek yang mutakhir dan penilaian potensi dampak dari kegiatanproyek yang diusulkan. ESIA ini dilengkapi dengan komitmen Salamander untukmelakukan penanggulangan dan pemantauan dalam mengelola kinerja lingkungan dansosial dari proyek dengan tingkat yang dapat diterima yang mengacu kepada standarnasional dan internasional yang berlaku, sesuai dengan Sistem Manajemen HSE Salamander.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 26 of 369



1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW

Salamander Energy Indonesia through the wholly-owned subsidiary Salamander Energy(Bangkanai) Limited Group (Salamander) is in the process of developing the Kerendan gasfield within the Salamander operated Bangkanai Production Sharing Contract (PSC), CentralKalimantan, Indonesia. The gas field was discovered in the early 1980’s however it was notcommercialised at the time of discovery due to challenges associated with its remotelocation.

Salamander has partnered with the Indonesian State power company, PT PLN (Persero), todevelop the Kerendan gas field as an integrated gas to power project. Salamander will beresponsible for developing, processing and delivering gas to the PT PLN (PLN) plant whilePLN will construct a power plant and transmission lines connecting to the Kalimantanelectrical grid. An initial gas sales agreement (GSA) was signed by PLN in mid-2011 for a 20year period, with first gas deliveries anticipated to commence in mid-2014.

The Kerendan gas field obtained its environmental approval from the Indonesiangovernment in 2006 and is currently managed under an Environmental Management Plan(UKL) and Environmental Monitoring Plan (UPL). An environmental impact assessment in

the form of an AMDAL was not required as the project will have a gas field production rateof ≤30 MMSCFD.

Government approval has allowed Salamander to commence development activities,however an additional assessment of the Kerendan Gas Field Development Project (hereinreferred to as the “Project”) is required to satisfy International Finance Corporation (IFC)investment requirements. This Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) hassubsequently been developed to align the Project with IFC Performance Standards andguidelines (Section 2.3.2).

1.2 PROJECT LOCATION The Kerendan gas field is located in the Bangkanai Production Sharing Contract (PSC) in theNorth Barito Regency, Central Kalimantan (Figure 1.1 ). The Bangkanai PSC covers an areaof approximately 1,385 m², approximately 200 kilometres west of Balikpapan and 330kilometres north of Banjarmasin. The block is located on the northern edge of the Barito Shelfand the west side of the Kutei Basin.

The well sites being developed as part of the Project are located within the KerendanWellhead Cluster Pad adjacent to the Lahei River. Production fluids from the well sites willbe transported via a pipeline to the Kerendan Gas Processing Facility, approximately 3 kmwest of the Wellhead Cluster Pad. From the KGPF gas will delivered via the Sales GasPipeline to the PLN Power Plant, which will be constructed by PLN approximately 3kmsouth of the facility, near the existing logging road.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 27 of 369



Access to the Project area is by river and road only, via the village of Luwe Hulu, located

approximately 65 km or 35 nautical miles north of Muara Teweh on the Barito River. Alogging road that extends approximately 50 km is used to access the Project area from LuweHulu.

1.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES

To date, 122.6 Bcf of the Kerendan gas field has been committed for sale under a Gas SalesAgreement between Salamander and PLN, with an initial development capital expenditureof $120 million. A further 160 Bcf of contingent resource is identified in the field, providingpotential for commercialisation of additional gas volumes. A 320 MW power plant will beconstructed approximately 3 km from the Kerendan field with the capacity to handle threetimes the volume of the initial GSA.

Construction of the Project commenced in mid-2012 with the undertaking of thedevelopment drilling program at the Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad.

1.4 OTHER DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES

There are a number of prospects within the Bangkanai licence area that could become aneconomical resource. The initial focus is on the development of West Kerendan (WK-1) andSungai Lahei, which have a combined mean prospective resource of 900 Bcf. These wells areconsidered significant as they have the potential to open up access to the more lucrative EastKalimantan gas market. In addition to WK-1 and Sungai Lahei, there are other prospectscontained in the Bangkanai PSC, including the large Jupoi surface anticline. Volumes inexcess of 500 Bcf are required to provide economic justification for the construction of apipeline to the east coast.

Development drilling of WK-1 commenced in mid-2013 following site preparation activitieswhich included clearing land for the wellsite and a 1 km road that connects to the existinglogging road. The WK-1 site is located near the Project area, approximately 23 km from theKerendan site (Figure 1.1 ).

In 2013, the Salamander Group was also awarded two new licences for Northeast Bangkanaiand West Bangkanai, which may provide for further expansion of gas development in theregion. These licence areas present potential acreage additions to Bangkanai PSC, in an areawhere there is a clear market for incremental gas volumes to be commercialised.

1.5 PROJECT PROPONENT

Salamander is an independent upstream oil and gas company that focuses on theexploration, development and production of assets in three core areas of South-east Asia:Greater Bualuang in the Gulf of Thailand and North Kutei and Greater Kerendan inIndonesia.

The company formed in 2005 and is listed on the London Stock Exchange (Ticker: SMDR)and FTSE 250 index. It has approximately 300 employees based in offices in London,Singapore, Jakarta and Bangkok.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 28 of 369



Salamander operates over 80% of its production, with the Salamander Group entering 2012

with 75.3 MMboe of proved and probable (‘2P’) reserves. During the year productiontotalled 3.9 MMboe and there were downward reserves revisions totalling 1.4 MMboeagainst the Kambuna field. Set against this was an upgrade of 2.1 MMbo at the Bualuangfield. These additional reserves are associated with the T2 and T5 reservoir horizons. As aresult of these movements the Group’s 2P reserves as at 31 December 2012 were 73.3MMboe. In 2012 average daily production averaged 10,800 boepd and this figure is expectedto grow to between 12,500 and 15,500 boepd in 2013.

Production in 2012 was down year on year following the decision to sell the OffshoreNorthwest Java and Southeast Sumatra PSC’s in the second half of 2011 and to re-invest the

capital into growing production from fields that produce higher value barrels.Production growth in 2013 will be driven by an anticipated increase of at least 50% inproduction at the Bualuang oil field, the field which has the highest cash margin per barrelmetrics within the Group’s portfolio.

The Group’s activities in Indonesia are currently focused on the operated Greater Kerendanand North Kutei areas. There is further production from the operated Kambuna field,offshore North Sumatra, and development projects associated with the non-operatedBengara and Simenggaris licence areas. The Group also has non-operated interests in theKutai and South Sokang PSCs.

Salamander:

Geoff CallowHead of Corporate AffairsTel: +44 (0) 20 7432 2680Brunswick Group LLP

Patrick Handley/Elizabeth Adams16 Lincoln's Inn FieldsLondon WC2A 3EDTel: + 44 (0) 20 7404 5959

1.6 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF ESIA

Salamander commissioned Environmental Resources Management (ERM) to undertake anEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) of the Kerendan Gas DevelopmentProject. The purpose of the ESIA is to provide an environmental and social assessment of theProject which addresses IFC Performance Standards. Salamander has received funding fromthe IFC to develop the Project and is therefore committed to meeting the IFC PerformanceStandards 1- 8 (IFC PS) for the life of the Project. The Performance Standards provide a clearset of environmental and standards that should be applied to a Project.

This document provides an overview of the Project as well as a summary of key impacts and

suggested management measures to align the Project with applicable IFC standards. Certainaspects of the Project have already been developed or constructed and as such have beenexcluded from the impact assessment process. The focus of the impact assessment is onconstruction and operational activities that have yet to occur. This includes:



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 29 of 369



• Construction and operation of the Gathering and Sales pipeline;

• Construction and operation of the Kerendan Gas Processing Facility (KGFP);

• Operation of the Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad upon first gas production; and

• Construction and/or operation of other site infrastructure (e.g. temporary residentialfacility and access roads) required to support the construction and operation of thepipeline, KGPF and gas field components.

Activities undertaken to date have been managed in accordance with Indonesian regulatoryapproval requirements and the Project’s UKL/UPL.

1.7 ESIA STRUCTURE

This document has been structured and prepared with reference to the IFC’s PerformanceStandards and Guidelines. Specifically, the structure and contents of the ESIA reflect thefollowing:

• IFC Performance Standard 1 – Social and Environmental Assessment andManagement Systems;

• IFC Guidance Note 1 – Social and Environmental Assessment and Management

Systems;

• IFC Guidance Note 1, Annex A – Social and Environmental Impact Assessment (SEIA)Report.

This document is structured as follows:• Executive Summary;

• Chapter 1: Introduction;

• Chapter 2: Applicable Standards and Regulatory Provisions• Chapter 3: Project Description;

• Chapter 4: Impact Assessment Methodology;

• Chapter 5: Environmental Baseline;

• Chapter 6: Social Baseline;

• Chapter 7: Stakeholder Engagement;

• Chapter 8: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities; and

• Chapter 9: ESIA Screening and Scoping;



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 30 of 369



• Chapter 10: Environmental Impact Assessment;

• Chapter 11: Social and Health Impact Assessment;

• Chapter 12: Cumulative Impacts;

• Chapter 13: Environmental and Social Management Plan

• Chapter 14: Conclusions

• Annexes: Supporting Information.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 31 of 369



Figure 1.1 Project Location



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 32 of 369



2 APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND REGULATORY PROVISIONS

2.1 INTRODUCTION

There are two levels of regulatory provisions applicable to the Project. The first is theIndonesian assessment and approvals process (Section 2.2). ERM also understands theSalamander has received funding from the IFC and the Kerendan Project will be included inthis loan agreement. As such, Salamander is committed to meeting the 2012 IFC PerformanceStandards 1- 8 (IFC PS) and also IFC EHS guidelines during the construction, operation anddecommissioning of the project.

2.2 INDONESIAN REGULATORY PROCESS OUTLINE

2.2.1 Environmental Assessment

Indonesia’s Environmental Law requires a project proponent to undertake an EnvironmentImpact Assessment (Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan or AMDAL) where it isconsidered that the project has the potential to result in potential significant environmentalor social impacts. The Indonesian government imposes a “positive list” for a project and/oractivity that requires AMDAL according to the type, scale and location of the proposedactivity.

Projects not listed are not believed to result in significant impacts. These projects arerequiredto prepare Environmental Management Effort (termed Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan orUKL) and Environmental Monitoring Effort (Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan or UPL)documents. The UKL/UPL details the implementation of environmental management andmonitoring activities for the proposed project.

Based on Environmental Minister Decree No. 17 Year 2001 regarding the types ofcommercial plan and/or activities, activities that need to undertake an AMDAL are oil andgas developments that will produce ≥ 5,000 BOPD oil or ≥30 MMSCFD gas. Thedevelopment plan submitted by Elnusa for the development of Kerendan natural gas fieldwas based on a gas production of approximately 20 MMSCFD. Therefore an AMDAL studywas not required and the project was subject to a UKL/UPL dated January 2006. Chapter 1.3of the UKL/UPL details valid Government Legislations and Regulations pertaining to theproject and these are not repeated here.

The Kerendan Project has received Indonesian Regulatory approval to proceed with theproject, in the form of an updated UKL/UPL dated 2006.

2.2.2 Other National and Regional Regulatory Provisions

In addition to the overarching requirements to manage environmental, social and healthimpacts through the AMDAL or UKL/UPL processes, there a range of other regulatoryprovisions that apply to the Project:

• Indonesian Laws;



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 33 of 369



• Government Regulations;

• Presidential Decrees;

• Ministerial Regulations;

• Regencial Regulations (Decrees of Head of Environmental Impact ManagementAgency and National Land Agency); and

• Local Regulations and Governor Decrees.

Chapter 1.3 of the UKL/UPL details valid Government Legislations and Regulations

pertaining to the project and these are not repeated here.

2.3 INTERNATIONAL PROCESSES AND STANDARDS

2.3.1 The International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standards

In April 2006, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), a member of the World BankGroup, released a set of Performance Standards (PSs) based upon the original World BankGroup Safeguard Policies, which recognised further the specific issues associated withprivate sector projects. EP Three: Applicable Social and Environmental Standards requiresthat projects in non-OECD countries be undertaken in accordance with IFC PerformanceStandards, General EHS Guidelines and Industry Specific Guidelines. The IFC PSs have beenbroadened to include issues such as greenhouse gases, human rights, community health, andsafety and security. A revised set of Performance Standards came into force on January 1,2012. The complete list of PS’s is provided in Figure 2.1 .

Figure 2.1 IFC Performance Standards



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 34 of 369



The IFC PS can be found on the IFC website 1.

PS1: Social and Environmental Assessment and Management Systems is the key driverbehind the development of this ESIA and associated management plans. In particular, thefollowing key steps as outlined within PS1 have been adhered to as basic principles withinthe ESIA preparation:

• Project definition;

• Initial screening and risk assessment of the project;

• Scoping of the assessment process based upon the outcomes of the initial screening

and risk assessment;• Stakeholder identification;

• Gathering of social and environmental baseline data;

• Impact identification and analysis;

• Generation of mitigation or management measures; and

• Development of management action plans.

This ESIA has been prepared to be consistent with, and address the expectations of thePerformance Standards.

2.3.2 IFC Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) Guidelines 1

Supplementing the IFC PS’s are the IFC General Environmental Health and Safety (EHS)Guidelines that were released in April 2007. The EHS Guidelines are technical referencedocuments with general and industry-specific examples of Good International IndustryPractice (GIIP), as defined in IFC's Performance Standard 3: Resource Efficiency andPollution Prevention.

The EHS Guidelines contain performance levels and guidance measures that are generallyconsidered to be achievable by new facilities using existing technology at a reasonable cost.Application of the EHS Guidelines to existing facilities may involve the establishment of site-specific targets with an appropriate timetable for achieving them.

The following IFC EHS Guidelines are applicable to the Kerendan Gas Development Project:

• Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Guidelines. GENERAL EHS GUIDELINES.

1 http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/Topics_Ext_Content/IFC_External_Corporate_Site/IFC+Sustainability/Sustainability+Framework/Sustainability+Framework+-+2012/Performance+Standards+and+Guidance+Notes+2012/

http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/Topics_Ext_Content/IFC_External_Corporate_Site/IFC+Sustainability/Sustainability+Framework/Sustainability+Framework+-+2012/Performance+Standards+and+Guidance+Notes+2012/









DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 35 of 369



The General EHS Guidelines contain standards relating to:

• Environment: air, energy, waste, hazardous materials management, noise andcontaminated land.

• Occupational Health & Safety.

• Community Health & Safety.

• Construction & Decommissioning

The General EHS Guidelines are designed to be used together with the relevant IndustrySector EHS Guidelines which provide guidance to users on EHS issues in specificindustry sectors.

• Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines. ONSHORE OIL AND GASDEVELOPMENT.

The Guidelines describe Industry-Specific Impacts and Management, with PerformanceIndicators and Monitoring.

2.4 COMPARISON OF INDONESIAN AND IFC STANDARDS

Annex A provides a comparison of Indonesian regulatory standards against the IFC EHSguidance for specific effluents, emissions and discharges, where available. It can be seenfrom the tables that there are differences between parameters that are regulated undernational legislation and the guidance values of the IFC. There are also common parametersthat have different standards between the two systems. The more stringent standard ishighlighted for clarity.

When host country regulations differ from the levels and measures presented in the IFC EHSGuidelines, projects are required to achieve whichever is the more stringent. If less stringentlevels or measures than those provided in the EHS Guidelines are appropriate in view of

specific project circumstances, a full and detailed justification must be provided for anyproposed alternatives through the environmental and social risks and impacts identificationand assessment process. This justification must demonstrate that the choice for any alternateperformance levels is consistent with the objectives of Performance Standard 3.

The applicable standards are further discussed in the relevant subsections of the ImpactAssessment (Chapters 10 and 11).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 36 of 369



2.5 IFC GAP ASSESSMENT

Salamander committed to complete an ESIA based on the requirements of IFC PerformanceStandards and EHS Guidelines at a time when the Kerendan project is in execute and anumber of activities have already taken place, notably at Kerendan, West Kerendan and theLuwe Hulu Logistics Supply Base. It was necessary to conduct a site visit and gapassessment of the project, together with screening and scoping. In addition, Project land usecompensation for the Kerendan cluster had been completed at the time of writing this ESIA.A review of the process to use and compensate for the Project land requirements wascompleted to make recommendations for the process going forward. These steps enabledany challenges with meeting IFC Standards for existing activities to be subject to a corrective

action plan, whilst proposed activities could be subject to a predictive assessment throughthe ESIA.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 37 of 369



3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

3.1 INTRODUCTION

This chapter provides a detailed description of the components associated with theconstruction, operation and decommissioning of the Kerendan Gas Development Project.The Project description reflects the current status of the Project. Some components are stillthe front end engineering design (FEED) phase which may result in some refinements to theProject description.

3.2 PROJECT OVERVIEW

This section provides an overview of the Project, its location and components that form partof the Project Area of Influence. Greater detail on individual Project components is providedin the following sub-sections.

3.2.1 Project Area of Influence

The Project area consists of the following components:• Gas Field

− Wellheads K-04, K-06, K-07, and K-08 at the Kerendan Cluster Pad manifold;

− Worker’s camp and helipad (adjacent to Wellhead Cluster pad);• Pipeline

• Flowlines from Wellheads K-04, K-06, K-07, and K-08 to the Wellhead Cluster Pad

• Gathering pipeline route from Wellheads to KGFP

• Pipeline route from KGFP to the PLN power plant

− Produced water reinjection pipeline (likely to be constructed in the same trench as the

gathering pipeline)• Kerendan Gas Processing Facility (KGFP)

− Gas processing facility− Worker’s camp

Staging areas and roads that connect the Kerendan Cluster Pad to the proposed KGPF andPLN power plant locations also form part of the Project.

Associated facilities that are necessary for the development of the Project include the

following:• PLN power plant;

• Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base; and



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 38 of 369



• Main roads used to access the Project area (e.g. Logging road from Luwe Hulu to

Project access roads).3.2.2 Location

The Kerendan Gas Development Project is located in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia.Kalimantan is the Indonesian section of Borneo and represents the bulk of Borneo, coveringapproximately 550,000 square kilometres or 75% of the island. It is divided into fiveprovinces – North, East, Central, South, and West Kalimantan – with Central Kalimantanbeing the second largest province, covering an area of approximately 150,000 squarekilometres. The provincial capital, Palangkaraya, is located in the southern section of theprovince, between the Kayahan and Sabangau Rivers.

The Kerendan Gas field is located within the Bangkanai Production Sharing Contract (PSC),in North Barito District, north-east Central Kalimantan (Figure 1.1). The North Barito Districtis one of the thirteen regencies in Central Kalimantan, covering an area of approximately8300 square kilometres. Muara Tewah is the district’s capital and is located in the south-weston the banks of the Barito River.

The Project is located in the sub-district of Lahei, approximately 50 km north-east of MuaraTeweh. Access to the Project area is by river and road only, via the village of Luwe Hulu,located approximately 65 km or 35 nautical miles north of Muara Tewah on the Barito River.

A logging road that extends approximately 50 km is used to access the Project area fromLuwe Hulu. Road access is currently weather dependant, with parts of the road ofteninaccessible during periods of heavy rainfall.

The nearest village to the Project area is Kerendan, which is located approximately 2 kmsouth of the Kerendan Cluster Pad. Other nearby villages include Haragandang(approximately 15 km north-west of Kerendan Cluster), Muarapari (approximately 10 kmsouth of the proposed PLN power plant) and Luwe Hulu. The nearest district centre isMuara Tewah which is located on the banks of the Lahei River, approximately 30 km southof Luwe Hulu. Access from Muara Tewah to Luwe Hulu is via a 43 km river route.

The locations and characteristics of these communities in nearby villages in the context of theProject area are discussed in Chapter 6.

3.2.3 Area of Project Disturbance

The total Project footprint area over the life of the Project has been calculated to beapproximately 57 hectares, which is based on estimates shown in the Error! Reference sourcenot found..



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 39 of 369



Table 3.1 Project Total Area of Disturbance

Location/Component Including Impact Zone ( m2)

Wellhead cluster pad 53,000

Well site Camp 38,000

Helipad and flyway 38,000

Pipeline Right of Way (ROW) 39,000

Gas Processing Facility 250,000

Access Roads 150,000

Total 568,000

Salamander as required to rehabilitate an area equal to the size of the permit area (Ref. toMinister of Forestry Decree). Rehabilitation is discussed in more detail in Section 3.6.3.

3.2.4 Project History

The Kerendan gas field was originally a part of a larger PSC, known as Teweh PSC. Unocalwas awarded Tewah PSC in 1972 and undertook two 2D seismic surveys in 1975 and1985/1986 (Hichens, Harrison & Co. plc 2006). They also drilled 10 exploration wells andtwo appraisal wells, three of which were drilled within the Kerendan gas field, which was

discovered in 1982 and is estimated to contain 280 Bcf of certified resource.

Unocal submitted a Plan of Development (POD) in 1993 which was approved in 1997 subjectto a Gas Sales Agreement (GSA). However, due to lack of market demand, an agreementcould not be reached and the Tewah PSC was subsequently relinquished by Unocal in 2000(Dwi Cayho et. al 2007).

A new PSC was awarded to Elnusa Bangkanai Energy Limited in 2003 for a period of 30years. Known as Bangkanai PSC, the PSC covers an area of approximately 1,385 m² andincludes six wells drilled by Unocal within the previous Tewah PSC.

Elnusa Bangkanai Energy submitted a POD to BPMIGAS in 2005, which was approved in2006. Under the POD, gas from seven (7) development wells within the Kerendan gas fieldwould be delivered to a power plant near the gas field. Two (2) existing wells were to be re-entered and two (2) new wells drilled to meet a production requirement of 20 mmscfd.

The Project was approved by the Indonesian government in 2006 Development in the formof an Environmental Management Plan (UKL) and Environmental Monitoring Plan (UPL).An environmental impact assessment in the form of an AMDAL was not required as theproj ect will have a gas field production rate of ≤30 MMSCFD.

In 2010, Salamander signed a Sale & Purchase Agreement to acquire the entire share capitalof Elnusa Bangkanai Energy Ltd (“EBE”) from PT Elnusa Tbk. At the time, EBE held 69%interest and operatorship of the Bangkanai PSC (Salamander 2010).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 40 of 369



Salamander increased its interest in the Bangkanai PSC to 80% n Q4 of 2011, however this

was subsequently lowered to 70% during Q1 2013, with interest passed on to Saka EnergiIndonesia (“Saka”) in exchange for the following:• $27 million cash;

• A carry on development costs for the Kerendan field of up to $30 million;

• 2:1 promote on the drilling of the West Kerendan exploration well; and

• 1.25:1 promote on the drilling of the subsequent exploration or appraisal well.

Table 3.2 Kerendan Gas Field Ownership History

Year Details

1982 Kerendan Field discovered by Unocal

2000 PSC relinquished due to lack of gas market

2003 Bangkanai PSC granted to Elnusa

2006 Elnusa’s POD approved by BPMIGAS

2010 Salamander acquired 69% of Bangkanai PSC

2011 Salamander increased PSC interest in Bangkanai PSC to 80%

2013 Salamander interest in Bangkanai PSC reduced to 70% in exchange for other benefits withSaka Energy Indonesia

3.2.5 Project Target and Objectives

Salamander is planning to initially develop approximately 40% the Kerendan gas field (120Bcf) by constructing four wellheads that connect to a gas processing facility via a gasgathering pipeline. Production will be predominantly gas, with a maximum of 25 MMscfdand associated condensate and produced water of 300 bpd and 1870 bpd respectively. Thesales gas will be distributed to PT PLN (Persero) Power Plant via sales gas pipeline, while the

condensate will be stored in condensate storage tank and will be exported via road tankers.Production and gas delivery will occur over a 20 year period, with the processing facilitiesdesigned to operate and maintain the required integrity for a period of 25 years.

A summary of the gas specifications for the Project is provided in Table 3.3 .



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 41 of 369



Table 3.3 Kerendan Gas Development Project Gas Specifications

Description Design Criteria Units

Field life 20 years

Design life 25 years

Sales gas rate (DCQ) 20 mmscfd

Sales gas rate (MDQ) 22 mmscfd

Condensate production rate 300 bpd

Produced water rate 1867 bpd

Max. FWHT 46-58 °C

Shut-in pressure 466 bargCO ₂ for design 5% mol%

H ₂ S for design ≤25 ppmv

Gas Sales Specification (maximum values):

Gross heating value 950-1100 btu/scf

Water content < 10 lb/mmscf

H ₂ S content ≤ 25 ppmv

CO ₂ content 5 % mol%

Nitrogen content 5.8 mol%

Sulphur content 5 grain/100 scf gasDelivery pressure 13.8 – 27.6 barg

Condensate Sales Specification:

Onshore oil in production water 25 mg/l

Storage capacity 30 day

Salamander intend to commercialise the remaining part of the Kerendan gas field and hasalready started the process with the commencement of a development drilling program atWest Kerendan in June 2013 (Figure 1.1 ). Sungai Lahei is another prospect area beingconsidered as part of the Kerendan gas field development. The purpose of the developmentdrilling programme in other prospect areas is to improve Salamander’s understanding of thesub-surface in the area, and potential for further developing gas resources in the GreaterKerendan region.

Development of the West Kerendan well site is not included in this assessment.

To date, 122.6 Bcf of the Kerendan gas field has been committed for sale under a Gas SalesAgreement between Salamander and PLN, with an initial development capital expenditureof $120 million. A further 160 Bcf of contingent resource is identified in the field, providingpotential for commercialisation of additional gas volumes. A 320 MW power plant will beconstructed approximately 3 km from the Kerendan field with the capacity to handle threetimes the volume of the initial GSA.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 42 of 369



3.2.6 Need for the Project

Average domestic gas prices have risen significantly in Indonesia from a price of $2.8 permmbtu in 2006 to $8 per mmbtu in 2012 (Salamander 2012). The domestic price growth inIndonesia is being driven by a combination of socio-economic factors, with the major driversbeing:

• A forecast GDP growth of over 6% per annum in near term driving demand for newpower projects;

• Removal of petroleum subsidies;

•

Rising F&D cost for gas;• Increasing export prices drag domestic price up; and

• Rising costs of competing fuel drive substitution into gas.

Indonesia intendeds to rapidly expand its power network prior to the Asian financial crisis,however the economic events created financial constraints on the state-owned power utilityPerusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN) which subsequently affected network growth (Reegle2012). Generation capacity increased by more than 25% from 1999-2009, however increasedcapacity has failed to keep up with demand. Intermittent blackouts are common and manygrid connected areas across the country are unable to take on new customers Electricitydemand in Indonesia is expected to increase by approximately 7% over the next 10 years(Reegle 2012).

The current shortage of electricity in Kalimantan opens an opportunity to develop theKerendan gas field as fuel for power generation.

3.2.7 Project Alternatives

The Kerendan Gas Development Project will produce gas and associated condensate. The

base case option for the Project is to store the condensate in tanks onsite. Condensate will beproduced at a rate of approximately 200 bbls/day. The condensate will then be transportedfrom Kerendan by truck and taken to the Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base fortemporary tank storage before onward vessel transport to market.

At the time of writing there were two alternative Project options under consideration forcondensate production:

1. Installation of a 4 " condensate pipeline from Kerendan to Luwe Hulu fortransportation. This would remove the requirement for truck transport and providegreater reliability given the seasonal challenges in road access during heavy rains; and

2. Sale of the condensate to PLN for use as a fuel at the power station. This wouldprovide a sales source for the condensate close to the site of production but woulddepend on PLN selecting a dual fuel system at the power station (gas/condensate).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 43 of 369



Neither of these options had been fully evaluated at the time of the ESIA and so are not

considered further.3.2.8 Current Project Status and Schedule

Construction of the Project commenced in early 2012 with mobilisation and site preparationworks undertaken for the development of four wellheads at the Kerendan Wellhead ClusterPad. Construction and operation activities undertaken to date include:

• Site preparation activities at Kerendan Cluster Pad, which included clearingapproximately 13 hectares of vegetation for the construction of the wellsite, campfacility and helipad;

• Completion of the development drilling program at Kerendan Cluster Wellhead (mid-2012 to mid-2013), during which four wellheads were constructed (K-04, K-06, K-07,and K-08); and

• Construction of the following supporting infrastructure:

− Supply base at Luwe Hulu, on the banks of the Barito River;

− Camp facility and helipad at the Kerendan Cluster Well site; and

− Road networks along the proposed pipeline corridor (total length is approximately 6km from the Kerendan Cluster Wellsite Pad to the proposed KGPF and PLN PowerPlant).

The PLN transmission system linking the power plant to the Kalimantan grid is underconstruction and the PLN power plant contract was awarded in June 2013.

The Project’s current schedule is outlined in the Table 3.4 .

Table 3.4 Project Schedule

Task/Phase Start FinishKERENDAN GAS PROCESSING FACILITY

Land clearing, earthmoving and temporary facility construction Aug 2013 Oct 2013

Construction of two groundwater wells (dependent on permit approval)

Foundation fabrication Aug 2013 Mar 2014

Storage tank erection Oct 2013 Mar 2014

Erection of buildings and permanent worker’s camp Nov 2013 May 2014

Equipment installation (mechanical) Jan 2014 Jul 2014

Storage tank hydrotesting Feb 2014 Apr 2014

Mechanical works Mar 2014 Mar 2014Installation of Permanent Fencing May 2014 Jul 2014



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 44 of 369



Task/Phase Start Finish

WELLHEAD CLUSTER PAD Site construction (access roads and Cluster Pad) Jun 2011 Mar 2012

Mobilisation of drilling crew and materials Apr 2012 Aug 2012

Development drilling/wellhead completion Aug 2012 Jun 2013

Construction of road in wellhead area Jan 2014 Mar 2014

Equipment installation Mar 2014 May 2014

Fencing installation Feb 2014 Mar 2014

Foundations Jan 2014 Apr 2014

Installation of equipment and piping Apr 2014 May 2014

PIPELINE ROW site clearing and earthmoving Oct 2013 Dec 2014

Pipeline delivery Dec 2013 Dec 2013

Construction of road in Sales Gas area Jan 2014 Mar 2014

Pipeline handling and stringing Jan 2014 Feb 2014

Trenching and lowering, cathodic protection, installation of optic/powercables, backfilling

Mar 2014 Apr 2014

Hydrotesting Apr 2014 May 2014

Sales Gas line foundation construction Dec 2013 Feb 2014

Electrical and instrument work (Sales Gas line) Feb 2014 Jun 2014Fencing of pipeline metering station Feb 2014 Mar 2014

PRE-COMMISSIONING

Gathering line/Wellhead Cluster Pad Apr 2014 Jul 2014

Sales Gas line/Metering Station May 2014 Jul 2014

Building and worker’s camp Apr 2014 Jun 2014

KGPF Jun 2014 Aug 2014

COMMISSIONING & START-UP

Commissioning and start-up Aug 2014 Aug 2014

First sales gas Sep 2014 -PLN POWER PLANT

Contract award and completion Jun 2013 Sep 2014

3.2.9 Gas field Component

The Kerendan gas field component comprises four onshore wellheads (with provision of 3additional wellheads for future development) located at a wellhead cluster pad. A gatheringpipeline will be located on the wellhead cluster pad which will transport production fluids tothe KGPF.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 45 of 369



Table 3.5 Kerendan Gas field Wellhead Development Summary

Parameter Data

Number of Wells 4

Shut-in Tubing pressure (SITP) 466 barg (max)

Flowing Tubing Head Temperature (FTHT) 46-58 c

Maximum distance from wellhead to KGPF 2470 m

Production from these wells will be approximately 25 mmscfd with a requirement for gassales of 20 mmscfd and condensate.

Further detail on the gas composition of the Kerendan gas field and infrastructure requiredfor preparing the resource for processing is provided below.

Gas Specifications

The feed gas composition of the Kerendan gas field is outlined in the table below. Thecomposition of these components may vary over the production life of the gas field due tochanging pressure in the reservoirs as a result of gas extraction. The compositions presentedin the table are based on 20 years of production. As shown, reservoir fluids consistpredominantly of methane with a small proportion of CO 2, N 2 and hydrocarboncomponents.

Table 3.6 Average Gas Composition of Kerendan Gas Field

Component Gas composition (%Mole)CO 2 2.88N 2 1.55H 2S 0.00Hydrocarbons- Methane 87.83- Ethane 3.65- Propane 1.34- Butane 0.88- Pentane and heavier 1.87Total 95.57%

Gas field Infrastructure

The well head cluster pad area will consist of the following infrastructure:• Flowline tie-ins including space for future tie-ins

• Shutdown system (DHSV, MV, WV, SDV)

• Choke valve



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 46 of 369



• Production manifold

• Multiphase flowmeters

• Gathering pipeline and tie-in

• Nitrogen system

• Methanol injection system

• Provision for temporary pig launcher

•

Wellhead control panel (WHCP)• Vent and drains

• Water injection well and injection pipeline

• Remote SIS controller (remote terminal unit)

• Fire and gas detection

• PCS Remote I/O

• Downhole gauge

The process system at the wellhead cluster pad consists of flowlines, a production manifold,and gathering pipeline. Choke and shutdown valves and wet gas flow meter will be installedon each flowline.

3.2.10 Pipeline

The pipeline component of the Project includes the following flowlines and pipeline services:

•

Four (4) flowlines transporting fluids from Wellheads K-04, K-06, K-07 and K-08 to themanifold at Kerendan Cluster Pad;

• One (1) Gathering pipeline (8” diameter, approximately 2.5 km long), to transportproduction fluids from the manifold to KGPF;

• One (1) Sales gas pipeline (8” diameter, approximately 4.5 km long) , used for thetransport of sales gas from KGPF to the PLN power plant; and

• One (1) 4” Produced water reinjection pipeline, which will be used to reinject waterfrom produced water tanks at the KGPF to reinjection wells at the Kerendan ClusterPad.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 47 of 369



3.2.11 Gas Processing Facility

The KGPF will be located approximately 3 km west of the wellhead cluster pad, within amaximum cleared footprint of approximately 25 hectares. The main components of thefacility include the following:

• Receiving facilities system (HP separator) to separate gas, condensate and water;

• Dehydration system;

• Gas sweetening system/H2S removal (future);

• Condensate stabilisation unit, storage and handling facilities;

• Water storage and handling, and reinjection system for produced water;

• Sales gas superheater;

• Booster gas compressor system (future); and

• Vapour recovery unit.

Schematic diagram and description of the main components of the facility and the gas

production process is shown in Figure 3.1 . Receiving Facilities Systems

The production fluids from the feed gas pipeline will arrive at KGPF as a mixture ofhydrocarbon gas, condensate and water. To separate the gas into individual components (i.e.gas, condensate and water), the fluids will initially go through a 3 stage oil stabilisationsystem using HP, MP and LP separators. The HP and MP separators are three phaseseparators that are designed to accommodate gas, condensate and produced water, while theLP separator is a 2 phase system designed to accommodate off-gas and condensate.

Wet gas produced from the HP system will be sent to the dehydration system, while theremaining off-gas will be processed to the MP and LP systems and routed to the vapourrecovery unit (VRU).

Produced water from the HP and MP separators will be sent to a Degasser Vessel, whilecondensate from the LP separator will be transferred to condensate coolers.

Each separator will have safety shutdown controls in the event a system’s temperatureand/or pressure levels exceed or fall below safe operating standards.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 48 of 369



Figure 3.1 KGPF General Process Schematic Diagram

Dehydration System

The wet gas from the HP separator will be sent to a dehydration system and dehydrated toan export specification of 10 lb/MMscf using a triethylene glycol (TEG) processing system.Dewatering the gas is necessary to prevent problems occurring with downstream processesand equipment.

Gas sweetening system/H 2S removal

Gas sweetening (or amine gas treatment) is the process of removing acid gases such ascarbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide from gas. Removal of acid gases and othercontaminants may be required for the Project to meet sales gas specifications, thereforeprovision of a gas sweetening unit has been included as part of the KGPF design. Solvents(amines) to be used in the process will be selected when the requirement for a gassweetening system has been confirmed.

No provisions have been made for removal of significant levels of hydrogen sulphide orother sulphur components as the feed gas has only trace concentrations.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 49 of 369



Condensate Stabilisation Unit, Storage and Handling

The condensate in the LP separator will be stabilised using an electrical condensate heater.Following this, the stabilised condensate will be sent to two storage tanks via transfer pumpsand stored at temperatures of 45-70°C. The capacity of each condensate storage tank will beapproximately 1500m 3 which will allow for approximately 30 days of full productionstorage.

Condensate will be measured before being transferred to transport vehicles and exportedfrom site. Offloading operations will be performed in batch mode, where the storage tankbeing emptied is isolated and measured for RVP specification prior to export.

Blanket gas will be required to maintain pressure on the storage tanks and this will besourced from fuel gas system and later transferred to the LP flare system. In the event ofblanket gas loss or inability to release blanket gas via the LP flare, the pressure vacuumsafety valve will be installed to protect the tanks.

Produced Water Storage, Handling and Reinjection

Produced water will flow from the HP and MP separators to the Degasser, a three phasesystem designed to separate off-gas, carry-over condensate and water. The off-gas will betransported to the LP flare system, while the condensate will be sent back to the MPseparator using skim oil pumps.

Produced water from the Degasser will be transferred to the storage tanks via a watertreatment pump, with pressure in the Degasser by a pressure controller. Once treated, thewater will be reinjected at wells at the Kerendan Cluster via a 4” buried water pipeline.

Blanket gas will be required to maintain pressure in the produced water tanks. This will besupplied by the fuel gas system and sent to the LP Flare System after use.

Sales Gas Superheater

The Sales Gas Superheater will be used to maintain the sale gas specification rates. The

dewatered gas from the dehydration system is transported to the Sales Gas Pipeline via thesuperheater.

Booster Gas Compressor System

A booster compressor system will need to be installed in the downstream gas outlet of theHP separator to maintain production in the end of life phase. During this phase, the reservoirpressure is depleted and the pressure from the well can be as low as 16.2 barg which couldsubsequently reduce pressure at the KGPF to 6.9 barg. In order to maintain the sales deliverygas pressure and dehydration system performance, a booster gas compressor system willneed to be installed to increase predicted pressures from 6.9 to 37.2 barg. Future requirementfor this system has been considered in the KGPF’s current site design.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 50 of 369



Vapour Recovery Unit

The purpose of the VRU is to recover off-gas from the LP separator and the Degasser. Theoff-gas from the systems will be collected at common suction manifold, at which point theVRU will compress the combined off-gas from 0.34-8.3 barg and transfer it to the fuel gassystem and utilised as a fuel source for other systems.

3.2.12 Other Facilities

In addition to the main processing facilities, the KGPF also requires utility systems detailedin Table 3.7 .

Table 3.7 Infrastructure Required for Gas Processing Facility

Type of Infrastructure Function

Fuel Gas System Drive power generation sets, fuel gas blanketing, and stripping gas in thegas dehydration system

Diesel Fuel System Consists of a diesel storage tank (71m³ capacity), 2x100% diesel transferpumps and diesel filter package. Diesel will be used to run back-up dieselengine generators and firewater pump. Tank is designed to hold diesel tofuel for one generator for 7 days.

Drainage Systems Closed drain systems handle remaining hydrocarbon fluids in pressurisedequipment during maintenance and pumping collected hydrocarbon

liquids to the MP Separator for further condensate stabilisation processing.Open drainage systems will be designed to handle rainwater, freshwater,wash down water (including spillage from drip trays and bunded areas).All streams will be routed to a common open drain header leading to theAPI Separator/Pit.

Instrument Air andUtility Air Systems

Consist of two air compressors and one air dryer system and filters. Willbe installed on a structural skid

Raw Water and UtilityWater System

Consists of a raw water pond and water pump, utility supply pump andraw water filter. The system will support the requirement for utility waterduring plant operation and firewater tank filling during pre-commissioning.

HP Flare System Consists of HP Flare KO drum and associated pumps, flare ignitionpackage, flare tip, and pilot flare. All vessel and piping relief is connectedto the flare header. After separation in the HP flare drum, gas is flared atHP flare tip (only during emergency blowdown). Liquid from the drum ispumped to the closed drain system via HP flare KP drum pumps.

LP Flare System Vented gas from the atmospheric storage tanks is routed to this systemwhich comprises LP Flare header, flare stack ignition package and pilotflare.

Power GenerationSystem

Comprises 2x50% 800kW gas engine driven generators and 1x50% 800kWdiesel engine driven as a backup gas engine generator. One emergencydiesel generator located at worker’s camp.

Firewater System Consists of two diesel driven firewater pumps and an electric jockeypump. Fire hydrants and monitors will be installed at the Facility.Firewater will be sourced from the firewater and utility water tank.A deluge system will be installed in the processing area and at condensatestorage tanks to shield adjacent tanks. This will contain a fire monitor,



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 51 of 369



Type of Infrastructure Function

hydrants and spray and foam systems.Integrated Control andSafety System (ICSS)

Consists of a process control system (PCs), and a safety instrumentalsystem (SIS) which consists of an emergency shutdown system (ESS), anda remote SIS controller and fire and gas system (FGS). SIS will befunctionally independent of the PCS.The safety shutdown system at the wellhead cluster pad and meteringstation at the PLN area will be performed by a remote SIS controller,which will communicate with the ICSS via a fibre optic cable.

3.2.13 Associated Facilities

The execution of the Project will require the use of a number of associated facilities. Thesecurrently include externally owned and operated roads, the Luwe Hulu Logistics SupplyBase facility, the PLN Kerendan Power Plant and local electrical grid infrastructure. Furtherdetail on these facilities is provided below.

Roads

To access the Project area, Salamander requires use of a road, approximately 50 km longfrom Luwe Hulu to the proposed PLN Power plant. The first 27 km of the road is owned bya logging company, however as a dependent user, Salamander contributes to the regular

maintenance of the road to maintain constant site access.Prior to the Project commencing, an abandoned road extended past the end of the loggingroad to the proposed PLN Power Plant location. Salamander has since repaired andupgraded this road and cleared an additional 6km of access tracks from the road to theKGPF and Kerendan Cluster. Salamander will continue to maintain these roads/accesstracks for the life of the Project.

Luwe Hulu Base

The Luwe Hulu Logistics Supply Base is a former coal development site located on the bankof the Barito River. Salamander acquired the site to use as a staging area for the Project,through provision of laydown areas for the storage and transport of materials andequipment. There is capacity for other users such as PLN during construction of the powerplant, to use the base under the direction and management of Salamander.

The supply base substrate is gravel covered and there is an office and mess building anddesignated refuelling and warehouse facilities. The village of Luwe Hulu is adjacent to theLogistics Base and approximately 80% of the 150 employees employed at the base are fromthe local community.

Power Plant

PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN) will be responsible for constructing the 320 MW powerplant and transmission lines connecting to the Kalimantan electrical grid. The power plantwill be constructed approximately 3 km from the KGPF and designed to receive three times



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 52 of 369



the initial volume of the initial gas sale agreement of 20 mmscf over 20 years.

Approximately 220 km of transmission lines will be required to link the PLN Power Plantwith the Kalimantan grid, which includes the following:

• 40 km to Muara Teweh;

• 120 km to Buntok; and

• 60 km to Tanjung.

The transmission system linking the power plant to the Kalimantan grid is currently underconstruction. The PLN power plant contract was awarded in June 2013, with constructionexpected to be completed within 15 months of the contract being awarded.

3.3 PRE-CONSTRUCTION

3.3.1 Project Land Use

The process to gain land for use by the Project process was led by Salamander, inconsultation with the local government and the National Land Agency (BPN), under theguidance of the December 2010 Salamander Land Acquisition and Compensation Plan. Theprocess commenced in 2010 and was completed in 2013 (excluding WK-1 which is currently

ongoing as of August 2013). A total of 47.2 ha of land was required, affecting at least 46landowners. Land was acquired for the following Project activities:

• Sungai Lahei-1 Cluster Drilling Area – 100% of 6 ha;

• Kerendan Gas Processing Facilities (KGPF) 100 %of 25.1 ha; and

• West Kerendan-1 (WK-1) Location is currently on going of 16 ha.

The majority of the land acquired was personally-owned or classed as forest plantation land,though some is classed as unproductive land (which does not provide the affected

households a main source of income). No residences were located within the footprintrequired for the Project.

3.3.1.1 Kerendan Wellhead Cluster

The land coordinates required for the well site are based on the geology of the area; straightholes for exploration well drilling are required. The wellsite is located in the forest and nocommunity resides in the area. The nearest village is Kerendan which is approximately 8 kmfrom the well site location, across the Lahei River.

The land at the well site is swampy and floods when heavy rains occur however the localcommunities grow rubber trees in and around the well site area.

The original land was acquired by Elnusa Bangkanai Energy Limited; 22,250 m 2 in total forthe well site and 61,960 m 2 for the 6 km access road from the abandoned Kerendan village



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 53 of 369



road.

Salamander required a bigger site area and therefore acquired an additional 19,968 m 2 fromone land-owner. A forestry permit for exploration activities was obtained in early 2011 tocover the drilling operations in Kerendan, covering the drill location and the access road. Nopermanent buildings were allowed to be constructed during the exploration stage as per theexploration forestry permit requirement.

3.3.1.2 Kerendan Gas Processing Facilities (KGPF)

The above also applied for the KGPF location where local communities also grow rubbertrees. The total land acquired was 251,060 m 2 owned by none land-owners. All compensationpayments have been carried out.

3.3.1.3 Pipeline

The gathering and sales gas pipeline consists of a 10 m wide corridor along the 6 km pipelineROW. The pipeline will be laid alongside the existing access road requiring minimaladditional land.

3.3.2 Permits

The following operational permits are held by Salamander.

Table 3.8 Project Operational Permits

No Activities Permit Issuing Authority CurrentStatus

1 Any projects (Drilling wells, KGPF,Access Road, etc)

UKL/UPL orAMDAL

EnvironmentalAgency

Obtained

2Projects within Forestry Area(Drilling wells, KGPF, Access

Road, etc)

Forestry Permit Forestry Ministry Obtained

3 Any Projects (Drilling wells, KGPF,Access Road, etc)

Location Permit Local Regency(Bupati)

Obtained

4 Any permanent buildings ConstructoinPermit

Local Regency(Bupati)

Obtained

5 Operational Activities (Plant, officebuildings etc)

DisturbancePermit

Local Regency(Bupati)

Obtained

6 Gas pipeline installation SKPII Director GeneralMigas

Handeled byproject

7 Deep water well drilling SIPPAT Local Regency(Bupati)

Beingprocessed

8 Socialisation program for theproject to local communities andGovernment officials

Communitiesacceptance of theproject

Local communitiesand Governmentofficials

Done



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 54 of 369



3.4 CONSTRUCTION

3.4.1 Wellhead Cluster Pad

Construction of the Wellhead Cluster Pad commenced in the first half of 2012. Sitepreparation activities included the clearing of vegetation, followed by cut and fill earthworksto provide areas suitable for installation of facilities and drainage networks. This includedthe construction of three waste containment pits, with dimensions of approximately 20 m x10 m x 2.5 m. Pits were constructed by mechanically digging and compacting soil until it wasis impermeable. Walls were then coated for added protection, to a thickness ofapproximately 70 cm.

An area spanning approximately 4 hectares was cleared to the west of the pad toaccommodate a temporary residential facility and lay down area for the duration of thedevelopment drilling program (Figure 3.2 ).

Figure 3.2 Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad (April 2013)

3.4.2 Access Roads

Access roads from the main road to the Kerendan Cluster Wellhead were constructed in mid2012. They span approximately 10 m wide (including drainage) and extend approximately 4



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 55 of 369



km north-west of the main road to the proposed KGPF footprint, and 2 km north-east of the

KGPF to the Kerendan Cluster Wellsite.The access roads have been constructed with drainage systems to prevent flooding andobstruction of waterways. Where topography allowed, wide, shallow longitudinal drainagewas used to minimise erosion. The ditches will likely become vegetated with grass over time,which will help bind the soil surface and assist with erosion and water flow management.

Material excavated from the proposed longitudinal drainage areas was used to construct aroadway and raise the road above the surrounding ground level. The surface of the road wassloped at a minimum of 4% to ensure water runs off the surface and into the side drains (orup to 8% if super elevated). The cross section is constant and there are no separate shoulders.

Areas where there are specific problems (usually due to water of poor condition of thesubgrade) may be treated in isolation by localised replacement of subgrade, gravelling,installation of culverts, raising the roadway or by installing other drainage measures.

Water is drained away from the carriageway side drains through lead off drains that divertthe flow into open space. Culverts have been installed perpendicular to the route wherethere is a need to transfer water from one site to another, for example where the road crossesa watercourse. In flat areas, smaller diameter, parallel culverts were preferable to single largeculverts, to maintain discharge at ground level.

3.4.3 Helipad and Flyway Area

A helipad and flyway area was constructed near the Kerendan Cluster Pad during wellsitesite preparation works in early 2012. The helipad was constructed to assist with emergencyresponse (e.g. medical emergency) and regular transport of personnel.

3.4.4 Pipeline

The gathering and sales gas pipelines will be constructed within a right of way (ROW) ofapproximately 10m. This figure includes existing access tracks that were cleared to link the

Kerendan Cluster Pad to the KGPF and main road near the proposed PLN power plant.The pipelines will be installed in trenches with a minimum cover of 1.0m. Bedding andpadding will be used in the ditch to protect the corrosion-resistant coating and providecontinuous uniform support and lateral restraint to the pipe. Ditch soil or materials obtainednearby may be used as bedding and padding with screening being used where necessary toremove rocks and achieve a graduation that does not damage the pipe coating. Bedding andpacking material will be placed above and below the pipe to assist in maintaining theintegrity of the pipe. Marking tapes will be installed to mark buried pipe locations.

The water reinjection pipeline and power and optic cables will be installed in the sametrench as the gas and production fluid pipelines.

Ditch breakers will be installed to control the water flow in the pipeline ditch on stoopswhere backfill washout is anticipated. Distribution line submerged in waterways or swampy



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 56 of 369



areas will also be concrete coated with adequate weight to maintain stability.

Pipeline will be buried under streams and rivers through open cutting, horizontal directionaldrilling and/or boring, at a minimum of 2m under the normalised bed of the river orirrigation channel.

Installation of pipeline across roads will be done by horizontal directional drilling, boring oropen cutting, depending on local regulations, traffic, space and construction equipmentavailability. Where drilling or boring is used, a mechanical protective coating will be appliedover the corrosion-resistant coating. The mechanical protective coating may consist of a thinconcrete coating, an extra-thick corrosion-resistant coating or another material.

After installing the pipelines, hydrotesting will be performed to verify pipeline integrity.Testing will be undertaken after backfilling (but prior to the restoration of the RoW) inaccordance with MIGAS (Indonesian Oil and Gas Regulator) approval requirements.

The hydrotesting process will involve cleaning and filling the pipeline with inhibited waterby the use of pigs. A temporary pig launcher and pig receiver will be installed at both endsof each pipeline section. Sections of the pipeline will then be filled with water to a specifiedtest pressure and held for a 24 hour period to ensure there are no air pockets.

3.4.5 Kerendan Gas Processing Facility

Construction of the KGPF is scheduled to commence in the third quarter of 2013. Sitepreparation (pre-construction survey and site clearing, grubbing, grading) commenced inlate July 2013.

To prepare the facility for operation, the following activities will be undertaken:• Site preparation:

− Pre-construction survey;

− temporary facilities construction;− Site clearing, grubbing, and grading; and− Cut and fill, backfilling and compaction

• Construction of two groundwater wells;

• Foundation construction;

• Installation of site facilities;

• Painting, coating and hydrotesting of storage tanks;

• Concrete Paving; and

• Installation of fencing and gates.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 57 of 369



The types of facilities that will be installed for operation of the KGPF are described in Section

3.5.2.3.4.6 Hours of Construction

Construction will be undertaken 7 days a week, with most activities restricted to a 10 hourdaylight shift. The only exceptions to this are uninterruptible activities or where a scheduleadjustment may be required (e.g. due to adverse weather). This includes:

• Concrete pours;

• Hook-up;

• Pre commissioning; and

• Commissioning.

The above activities will be undertaken over a 24 hour period, 7 days a week.

Construction of the pipeline and KGPF component commence in July 2013 with initial sitepreparation works at KGPF. Construction of foundations and facilities at KGPF is scheduledto commence in August 2013.

Site preparation and civil work activities are expected to take 10 months to complete, withpre-commissioning and commissioning scheduled for completion in August 2014.

3.4.7 Wellhead Cluster Pad

Development of the four well heads at the Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad (K-04, K-06, K-07,and K-08) commenced in August 2012 and was completed in June 2013. Wells were tested ata combined rate of 40 MMscfd, demonstrating the reservoir can comfortably deliver in excessof the 20 mmscfd Daily Contracted Quantity (“DCQ”) in the current Gas Sales Agreement.

The development of the flowlines and wellheads at Kerendan Wellhead Cluster has beencompleted and the wellsite is ready for operation.

Two reinjection wells (for reinjection of produced water) were also constructed at the ClusterPad.

3.5 OPERATION

3.5.1 Pipeline

Operation and maintenance of the pipeline will be managed from a control room at theKGPF. There will be dedicated personnel responsible for monitoring the system on a 24 hourbasis.

The following activities will be undertaken during pipeline operations:



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 58 of 369



• Patrols;

• Monitoring and repair of equipment;

• Cleaning of the pipelines;

• Corrosion monitoring and remediation where necessary; and

• Maintenance of the ROW (including access roads).

Gas flows will be monitored using metering systems and significant imbalances investigatedimmediately to ensure the integrity of the pipelines is maintained.

Regular inspections will be taken along the pipeline route to potential issues such as erosion,interference and re-vegetation. Grass growth will be encouraged to assist with erosion,however the establishment of deep-rooted along the pipeline easement will be discouragedto avoid potential pipeline damage.

Prevention of third-party damage to the pipeline will be achieved by maintaining constantcommunication with easement stakeholders/users and educating them about the potentialdangers of carrying out activities near the pipeline; regularly inspecting the RoW to identifypotential interference; posting signs along the pipeline advising people of its location and

management requirements; and ensuring the pipelines are buried at an appropriate depth. Insome areas additional protection may be installed to further reduce the risk of third-partyinterference.

During operations, the pipeline will be accessed using existing access roads. Security andlocked gates will be constructed around major above-ground facilities to prevent accidentalor unauthorised interference.

The pipeline design incorporates an over-pressurisation system to ensure that operatingpressure remains within the designated maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP) inaccordance with the relevant national and international codes. In addition, remotelycontrolled emergency shutdown valves will be installed which can be activated in the eventof an emergency.

3.5.2 Kerendan Gas Processing Facility (KGPF)

First gas delivery is expected to occur in mid-2014. Gas processing operations and facilitiesrequired for operational activities are described in Section 3.2.11.

3.6 DECOMMISSIONING

The Project is expected to have an operational life of approximately 20 years, and a designlife of 25 years. Significant environmental or social impacts from the decommissioning ofProject infrastructure are not expected to occur, however management measures will beadopted during the construction and operational phases to maintain the integrity of the site



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 59 of 369



for decommissioning and rehabilitation.

A decommissioning and rehabilitation plan will be prepared prior to decommissioning,which will provide details on the methodology to be adopted. There are a range of factorsthat have the potential to impact the process including available technology; changes torecycling or reuse options; legal and regulatory systems; and economic, social and politicalconditions. Therefore, the methodology will be defined closer to the proposeddecommissioning date.

A brief summary of the decommissioning and rehabilitation procedures likely to be adoptedby the Project is provided below.

3.6.1 Removal of Plant and Equipment

Unless directed otherwise by regulators, Salamander currently intends to remove allinfrastructure associated with the KGPF and Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad. The processwill likely include the removal of the following infrastructure in accordance with applicableprovisions or legislation:

• Processing facility and utility equipment (isolated gas streams will be minimised anddisposed of via flare systems prior to purging; facility equipment and piping will bepurged of hydrocarbons and either disposed of or sold for reuse or scrap; flares will beremoved and storage tanks emptied of product and likely removed as scrap, unlessdeemed commercially viable);

• Hardstand areas and access roads not required for future use;

• Waste transfer facilities (disposed off-site to an appropriate disposal location);

• Accommodation camps, administration buildings and warehouses; and

• Well site equipment (wells will be decommissioned by plugging and sealing)

Deep footings and foundations (e.g. piles) that cannot be removed may need to remain insitu. Any infrastructure that cannot be removed during the decommissioning process will bedocumented to assist in future management of the site.

If left in situ, pipelines will be disconnected from all above ground structures, including thecathodic protection systems and purged of gas, in accordance with relevant guidelines orregulatory requirements.

3.6.2 Contaminated Site Management

The Project is not expected to result in significant contamination of soil or groundwaterhowever there is potential for contamination through hydrocarbon spills or leaks, processchemicals or other wastes. The potential for contamination to occur will be reduced byensuring the following:



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 60 of 369



• Appropriate containment and management of chemicals, lubricants and fuels, to

minimise potential for accidental spills;• Supervision of contractors during delivery of chemicals, fuels and lubricants and

removal of waste;

• Development and maintenance of appropriate on-site drainage systems to ensure that,in the unlikely event of a spill, material is contained and the potential for discharge toenvironment is avoided or minimised;

• Providing spill kits at appropriate locations;

• Regularly reviewing management and spill response measures;

• Providing training for personnel involved in the management of site and facilities; and

• Constructing and operating facilities in accordance with relevant legislation andindustry best practice guidelines.

3.6.3 Site Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation will be subject to the proposed use of the site subsequent to decommissioningof the Facility. The nature and extent of rehabilitation will be agreed with the regulatorduring detailed planning for decommissioning. As a holder of forestry permit (IPPKH) forKGPF, Salamander is currently obligated to rehabilitate an area equal to size of area withinthe permit.

The exact method of rehabilitation will be based on site-specific investigations at the time ofrehabilitation. However, it will likely consist of the following activities:

• Earthworks - this will involve preparing the area for rehabilitation (including rippingand implementing erosion control measures)

• Re-vegetation – this will likely be carried out using a number of methods, dependingon the configuration of the final landform in order to ensure that the both short termobjectives (i.e. reducing sediment run-off and erosion) and long term objectives (i.e.creating a self-sustaining native ecosystem or managed productive ecosystem) aremet.

3.7 W ORKFORCE REQUIREMENTS

3.7.1 Construction

Workforce numbers during the construction phase will peak to approximately 350 people,with an estimated 144 general/unskilled workers and 210 skilled workers and Engineering,Procurement, Construction and Installation (EPCI) Contractor employees.

The workforce will be under the day-to-day direction of the EPCI Contractor duringconstruction and commissioning phases. Activities will be supervised by a combination of



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 61 of 369



field engineers, supervisors, superintendents and site management.

Approximately 75 people were employed in a variety of positions for the developmentdrilling program at Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad. Many of these workers are nowinvolved in the development drilling program at WK-1.

3.7.2 Operations

Operations will require a total workforce of approximately 50 people. Only 26 permanentworkers are anticipated to be site at any given time, working on a rotating shift of 2 week on2 weeks off. This workforce figure excludes contractors not involved in the day-to-daymanagement of the site (e.g. supply/waste disposal contractors).

3.7.3 Local Employment Opportunities

Construction labour will be sourced by the EPCI Contractor for specific scopes of work (e.g.site preparation, groundwater well development). There may be opportunities for locals tobe employed by the Project, however the EPCI contractor is ultimately responsible forsourcing the workforce. Selected personnel and the EPCI contractor are howevercontractually bound to meet Salamander’s requirements in regards to the management andbehavioural expectations of workforce involved in the Project.

Salamander will be responsible for the recruiting of operations personnel. Some recruiting

will take place during the construction phase, at which time selected personnel will undergotraining pending start-up of operations. The remainder of the workforce will be recruited intime for the commencement of operations. Locals will be given the opportunity to apply forpositions providing they meet the company’s employment requirements and are capable offilling the required roles, following appropriate training. Selection of personnel will beundertaken in consultation with local village heads.

3.7.4 Temporary Residential Facilities (Construction Camps)

Kerendan Cluster Well Development

A temporary worker’s camp was constructed at the Wellhead Cluster Pad in mid 2012. Thecamp was located to the west of the pad and was constructed to house personnel involved inthe well development program.

The accommodation facility was transported to the WK-1 wellsite in August 2013 to houseworkers involved in the WK-1 well development program. There are currently no intentionsto house employees involved in the construction and operation of the Project at this facility.Separate accommodation facilities will be constructed at KGPF (see below).

Construction

A temporary accommodation facility for construction workers will be built at KGPF uponcompletion of site preparation activities. Approximately 30 non-local contractors currentlyinvolved in site preparation works are being housed in accommodation in Luwe Hulu.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 62 of 369



The temporary camp will consist of two buildings which will have the capacity to house

approximately 350 people during the construction and commissioning phases.Operations

A permanent operations camp will be constructed at KGPF which will house a maximumcapacity of 30 people. The permanent camp will built separate to the facility however it willstill be contained the cleared KGPF footprint and fenced area.

3.8 W ATER SUPPLY AND STORAGE

3.8.1 Drilling Water

Water for the Kerendan Cluster drilling program was sourced from the Lahei River. Drillingwater will be required for the two water supply wells to be constructed at the KGPF. This islikely to also be sourced from the Lahei River; however the water source and volume will beconfirmed as part of the permitting process.

3.8.2 Hydrotesting

The estimated amount of water required for hydrotesting is approximately 70 m³. The sourceof water is currently assumed to be Lahei River, with water pumped from the KerendanCluster site. Before testing, it will be treated with sufficient quantities of chemicals to avoid

any pipeline internal corrosion. Chemicals used in the process will be subject to strictevaluation prior to the start of the hydrostatic testing to ensure environmental requirementsare met. Similarly, upon completion of the hydrostatic testing, water will be tested to ensurethe water satisfies environmental standards before channelling it back to the Lahei River orselected water source.

3.8.3 Potable and Non-potable Water

Two deepwater wells will be constructed at the KGPF to source water for potable and non-potable use. Each well will be designed with a 12 inch hole (with 4 inch casing) and drilled to

a depth of approximately 150 m.An automatic control pump will be used to extract water from the wells which will be storedin a 20m3 raw water tank. The raw water will go through a filtration unit before beingtransferred to a 20m3 Clean Water Tank. Water from the clean water tank will be directed tobuildings for non-potable use, and a reverse osmosis (RO) unit, where will be treated andtransferred to refill units for potable use (i.e. drinking water). For hot water, an electricheater will be used to heat water from the main potable water supply.

Water supply pipes will be buried to protect against corrosion, with flexible connectionsused near building entrances.

Water at Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base is sourced from a shallow well or the BaritoRiver.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 63 of 369



Assuming a daily water use/consumption amount of 90 litres per person, total water

consumption during construction and operations is estimated to be approximately 30 m³ and5 m³ per day respectively.

3.8.4 Fire water

The KGPF layout will maximise the use of passive protection in the form of equipmentspacing and drainage of possible liquid spillages away from critical equipment. Other activemeasures to be included in the facility’s fire protection and safety system design include:

• Separate firewater loops for each single risk area (to be tied into the existing firewaterdistribution system);

• Fire proofing (the degree of structural fireproofing shall be a three (3) hour rating);

• Emergency relief/venting systems (for equipment subject to internal pressure buildupfrom an external source of heat); and

• Fire water pumps.

The basis of unit design will be a single risk area concept i.e. facilities will be divided intoseparate areas of possible fire involvement, with each area considered as a single risk.

Fire water will be supplied via the proposed groundwater wells and will be stored infire water storage tanks.

3.9 SEWAGE AND DRAINAGE

Plant drainage and sewer systems will be designed in accordance with local codes andregulations. They will be free flowing, to collect and transport all wastewaters to theirdisposal location and to prevent fire hazards from spreading from one area to another.

Different types of wastewaters will be segregated in order to reduce the size, complexity andcosts of any treatment facility that is required for managing these wastewaters prior todisposal. This may include separating drainage into the following separate systems, whererequired:

3.9.1 Clean Water Drainage

Discharges to clean water drainage systems will include non-contact storm water, non-contact cooling water (where permitted by the regulations), roadways and access areadrainage, parking lot and roof drainage and possibly firewater.

Stormwater generated from hardstand and other infrastructure areas around the site will becontrolled to prevent contamination of clean water drainage systems (see below).

The clean water drainage system will comprise of area drains, catch basins, ditches andpiping.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 64 of 369



3.9.2 Oily Water Collection and Drainage Systems

Discharges to oily water drainage systems include contact storm water, wash down water,cooling tower blow down, desalted effluent, tank water draw offs, stripper condensates,pump gland cooling water in hydrocarbon service, equipment drips and drains, draw offsfrom sample connections, instruments, labouratories, and other routinely contaminatedwastewater streams (possibly firewater).

Water from potentially contaminated areas will not be discharged to the environment. Oiltraps will be used and domestic waste water kept separate from drainage effluents andtreated before disposal.

This oily water drainage system will comprise of drain hubs, catch basins, sumps, liftstations, manholes and piping. Oily waters will be collected in sewer mains and routed to acentral treatment facility.

3.9.3 Sanitary Sewers

Sewage will be treated at the facility’s water treatment plant (STP) using a Bio Filtration-Anaerobe-Aerobe system. Sewer pipes will be buried underground and effluent treated inaccordance with applicable domestic effluent quality standards.

An open drainage network will be constructed to direct rain water around buildings to theriver using a gravity-based flow system. Canteen and kitchen waste water collectors willinclude grease separators. Decanting basins will also be installed to manage wastewater fromlaundry facilities.

The sanitary sewer system will be composed of drains, manholes, lift stations and piping andwill not receive discharges from other sources.

3.10 ENERGY SUPPLIES

Construction will use power from onsite diesel generators. During the operation of the

KGPF, energy requirements will be met through the use of the following:• One (1) LV gas engine generator provided as a main power supply;

• One (1) incoming power supply from power plant (future); and

• One (1) LV diesel engine back-up generator.

A dual interruptible power supply will be provided via a distribution board forcommunication and safety equipment systems.

3.11 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT

Traffic associated with the construction of the Project will be generated during transport oruse of the following infrastructure:



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 65 of 369



• Heavy machinery e.g. Bulldozers, drill rigs, graders, trucks, trenchers, excavators, and

loaders• Drilling machinery and well site/wellhead equipment;

• KGPF components and supporting site infrastructure (e.g. Office buildings andtemporary worker’s accommodation); and

• Delivery and construction of the pipeline component.

Traffic will also be generated through transport of workers to and from site (daily until anaccommodation facility is constructed at the KGPF), waste disposal, and fuel deliveries. Thetype of transport method will depend upon the availability of plant, equipment andmaterials. Traffic associated with the transport of worker’s to and from site will be reducedonce the accommodation facility at KGPF is constructed.

Estimated average daily traffic associated with the construction phase is presented inTable 3.9 . The greatest volumes of construction traffic are predicted to occur from November2013 to April 2013 when the bulk of construction material will be transported to site. Aschedule of the likely delivery periods for construction material is shown in Table 3.10 .

Table 3.9 Average Daily Project Traffic during Construction

Vehicle Type Average Daily Traffic

Light vehicles 50

Light trucks 10

Single unit trucks 10

Heavy trucks and tractors, trailer trucks 30

Table 3.10 Transportation Schedule for Delivery of Project Materials

Equipment/Material Type 2013 2014Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

TEG regeneration, nitrogenand deluge valve packagesDiesel/gas engine generator,air compressor, instrumentair dryer packagesSales gas fiscal metering andVRU packagesFlare ignition packageMethanol injection packageHP/LP/MP separators,degasser, drums, airreceivers, condensate electricheater, fuel gas/sales gasheaters, pumps (raw water,



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 66 of 369



Equipment/Material Type 2013 2014Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

fire water, water injection,condensate transfer, dieseldistribution, closed drain,produce water, flare)Condensate coolerFuel gas/diesel filtersSkim oil pumpRecycle oil pump Jockey pump

Manual valves, bulk materialSpeciality materialSwitchgear & MCCUPS, power and UPSdistribution panel,TransformerDistribution control system,fire and gas system,emergency shutdownsystem, pressure regulatingvalves,Condensate fiscal meteringstation, shut down and blowdown valves,Wellhead control panelMoisture analyserControl valvesDisplacer type LT, pressurerelief valve,pressure/flow/level/temptransmitter, pressure andtemp gauges, level gauges,flow orifice and flanges + ROplates, fire and gas detectorMultiphase wet gas

flowmeterTelecommunication systemsLine pipeBulk material, cathodicprotection systemInsulation flange,Potable raw water tank,potable water treatmentsystem

Equipment shipment ex JakartaDelivery ex Batam

2nd Equipment shipment ex Jakarta



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 67 of 369



Transport requirements for operations are expected to be signficantly less than that for

construction purposes, with the main transport requirements including the following:• Transport of infrastructure required for the gas field, pipeline or KGPF operations and

maintenance;

• Transport of waste, and site supplies to and from site;

• Transport of personnel to and from site (via helicopter for non-local personnel; localswill make their own way to and from site); and

• Transport of condensate for export.

A traffic management plan has been developed to help control traffic movements duringconstruction and operation of the Project and ensure road user safety.

3.12 W ASTE AND D ISCHARGES

Waste streams and volumes anticipated to be generated during construction, commissioningand operation activities are presented in Table 3.11 . The main activities or events expected togenerate waste include:

• Site preparation;

• Civil and construction activities;

• Pipeline installation;

• Reinstatement and site clean-up;

• Mobilisation/demobilisation of equipment; and

• Oil spills.

During all phases of the Project, the objective is to prevent and minimise the amount ofwaste generate and ensure waste is managed in a way that is cost effective, minimisesimpacts on the environment and complies with all applicable codes and regulations. Thepreferred approach in managing waste is as follows:

• Prevention and reduction;

• Reuse;

• Recycle and recovery;

•

Treatment; and• Disposal.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 68 of 369



3.12.1 Waste Management

All personnel involved in the Project (including subcontractors) are required to comply withthe Waste Management Plan (WMP). Audit and inspections will be carried out on a weeklybasis by and Environment Officer to ensure proper implementation of the WMP.

The objective of the waste management plan (WMP) is to ensure:• Waste is disposed in an environmentally sound manner;

• Waste is managed in accordance with all applicable legislation and company policiesand requirements;

• The risk of legal liability associated with handling waste is minimised;

• All options are taken to minimise, eliminate, recycle or reuse waste materials; and

• The “Best Practical Environment Option” is adopted (i.e. Choosing options that resultin the least environmental damage and are consistent with applicable regulations)

Recycling

Non-hazardous solid waste will be recycled instead of using an incinerator or land fill asdisposal methods. This will be undertaken in the form of a community developmentprogram in accordance with Indonesian regulation.

Prior to commencing the recycling program, Salamander will assess stakeholders and/orcommunities that will be involved.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 69 of 369



Table 3.11 Predicted Waste Volumes to be Generated during Construction and Operations

Waste Type Source

Annual Estimated Waste Volume(m³) Treatment/Disposal MethodConstruction &

CommissioningOperations

NON-HAZARDOUSFood waste Mess/camp 55 110 Compost, incinerationPlastic bottles Mess/camp 7 41 Recycling Cans Mess/camp 9 9 Pressed, recycled Drums KGPF, construction, workshop 146 292 Pressed, recycled, returned to

supplier Metal (cable, bar, cutting steel) KGPF, construction 91 183 Asset Cooking oil Mess/camp 7 14 Return to supplierPaper (magazine, packaging,cardboard)

KGPF, office, construction, camp,supplies

7 14 Recycling, incineration

Plastic packaging KGPF, construction, camp, supplies 10 10 Recycling Wooden packaging (box, pallet) KGPF, construction, supplies 15 15 Recycling, incineration Backyard waste (wood, grass, leaf) KGPF, construction 37 73 Recycling, incineration Fabrics KGPF, construction, workshop 2 2 Incineration Glass KGPF, mess, construction, workshop 0.5 0.5 Landfill Rubber (tyre, seal) KGPF, construction, workshop 5 5 Recycling Fly ash incinerator KGPF, mess, construction 1 2 Landfill HAZARDOUSSolid chemical waste Warehouse, workshop 17 34 Licensed contractor, landfillMiscellaneous contaminated waste KGPF, workshop, service 34 34 As above Oil filters KGPF, transport, workshop 7 14 As above Contaminated chemical packaging KGPF, transport, workshop 7 17 As above

Glass wool Construction, camp, workshop,warehouse

7 10 As above

Carbon active waste KGPF, water/wastewater treatment 3 34 As above





DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 71 of 369



The Project will send recyclable waste to the selected communities or stakeholders in raw

form, at which point the waste will be transformed into recycled products such ashandicrafts or recycled paper. Some of the benefits of the program may include thefollowing:

• Additional revenue for the community or stakeholder (from the sale of recycledproducts);

• Opportunity for improvement to the community’s/stakeholder’s recycling processesthrough capacity building (e.g. Training) and assisting with sourcing of potentialbuyers for produced products; and

• Increased awareness and potential changes to attitudes and behaviour in regards tothe management of and handling of waste in households and the general community.

Waste Handling and Disposal

During construction and operation phases, the handling, transport and disposal of non-hazardous waste will be undertaken by a third party contractor. Food waste will becomposted or incinerated on site to minimise odour and spread of disease.

Domestic wastewater will be disposed to nearest water body receiving with permit byauthority. Produced water will be managed at the KGPF will be treated, stored in tanks and

reinjected at the two reinjection wells at the Kerendan Cluster Pad to via a water pipeline.

Hazardous waste will be transported, treated and disposed of by a licensed hazardous wastetreatment company, with treated waste buried at a secure landfill in Bogor, West Java.

The management of drilling waste mud and the drill cuttings during well development ismanaged in accordance with the UKL-UPL management plan, which specifies that this wastemust be stored in waste containment pits (mud pits) and not discharged to the environment.These pits could contain liquid waste (drilling mud) and solid waste (i.e. drill cuttings ofapproximately 5m³ per day).

Drill cuttings are stored in cutting containers and disposed of offsite. No chemicals or specialmuds are predicted to be required for development of groundwater wells at KGPF, thereforesoil waste from this activity may be used for contouring or levelling ground surfacessurrounding the well locations.

Third Party Assurance

A thorough assessment of waste contractors is undertaken prior to selection to ensure theyare competent in the treatment and handling of waste, with consideration given to thefollowing:

• Proximity of the disposal site operated or used by the contractor;

• Size and financial security;



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 72 of 369



• Experience, technical capability, quality of personnel, equipment and facilities;

• Environmental suitability of the contractor’s facilities and status of relevant permits tohandle or dispose of waste;

• Inspection of the facilities; and

• Verification of licenses, where applicable.

A waste register and transfer is used on site to record volumes of collected and transferredfor disposal by waste contractors. Contractors are required to provide a manifest thatoutlines how waste is transported and treated and provides a certificate of destruction. Thesemanifests are also sent to the Indonesian Environment Ministry office.

Contractors responsible for the disposal of waste on site are subject to periodic audits andspot checks.

3.13 AIR EMISSIONS

Most emissions generated during construction activities will come from vehicle engineexhausts, generators, construction equipment and dust from earthworks and vehiclesmovement. The composition of engine exhaust emissions is expected to be primarily NOX

and CO with small quantities of hydrocarbons.Emissions from vehicles will be transient, intermittent and spatially variable, therefore it isexpected only a small incremental increase in combustion-based air pollutants will begenerated by the Project.

During the normal day-to-day operation of the facility, emissions are likely to bepredominantly generated by the following sources:

• Gas turbines;

• Gas sweetening unit (future);

• Dehydration/TEG regeneration systems;

• Refrigeration systems;

• Fuel gas system;

• Power generators;

• Nitrogen rejection unit; and

• Flaring.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 73 of 369



Potential emission sources from non-normal operations (i.e. conditions or activities not

associated with the general day-to-day operation of the facility) include the following:• Emergency flaring;

• Emissions from normal operating equipment during start-up and shutdown; and

• Vehicle emissions.

Emission rates for these activities may are likely to be variable and not impact air quality ona continual basis.

3.13.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions

A summary of the estimated greenhouse gases (GHG) likely to be generated from theproduction of gas and operation of KGPF is provided Table 3.12 .

Table 3.12 Summary of GHG Emissions from KGPF and Gas Production (Tonnes/Year)

EmissionSource

TotalsGas EngineGenerator

TEGregeneration

Flaring (0.3%feed)

FugitiveEmissions

CO ₂ 8100 960 6 9067CH 4 16 34 202 252

N ₂ O 5 5

CH 4 as CO ₂ e 333 709 4233 5275

N ₂ O as CO ₂ e 45 1648

Total CO e 8478 1699 6 4233 14388Calculation methodology: Compendium of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodologies for the Oil and GasIndustry, Aug. 2009. API and USEPA 42; Indonesia Environment Ministry Regulation No.12/2012 concerningGHG calculation method in Oil & Gas Industry

3.14 LIGHTING AND VISUAL AMENITY

The processing plant and associated facilities will introduce a wide array of light sources intoan environment which are presently dark at night. Night lighting during construction will berestricted to interruptible activities discussed in Section 3.4. During operations, the KGFPand Cluster Pad will require 24 hour lighting around facilities for safety and securitypurposes.

There will be noticeable and permanent visual change associated with the removal ofvegetation and presence of infrastructure; however this is unlikely to affect the communitygiven the distances between the Project area and surrounding villages, and surroundingenvironment (e.g. dense forest).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 74 of 369



3.15 NOISE AND VIBRATION

The main sources of noise and vibration during construction will be generators, earthmovingworks and equipment, facility assembly and construction of foundations (e.g. piling),concrete batching, and plant operation. The principal source of noise emissions duringoperations will be from the operation of the processing facility and the gas turbines used todrive compressors and generators, associated pipe work and the cooling fans.

Noise levels for generators will be enclosed to meet required noise level limits of 85 dB (A) at1 m from generator set enclosures.

The following maximum allowable equipment and piping system noise levels apply at

specific measurement locations. These limits will apply at all operating points within theequipment's normal performance range:

3.15.1 Continuous Noise Limits

The maximum allowable A-weighted Overall Sound Pressure Level, Lp(A), for continuousnoise sources will be 85 dBA. For equipment trains composed of individual equipmentcomponents from different suppliers, the noise limit for each equipment component isreduced so that the equipment train as a whole will meet the 85 dBA limit.

3.15.2 Start-up and Intermittent Service Noise Limits

Noise limits for equipment used for these services will be the same as for continuouslyoperated equipment.

3.15.3 Impulse and Impact Noise Limits

The maximum allowable impulse or impact sound pressure level using a slow responsemeter setting will be 115 dB. At no time will any impulse or impact peak sound pressurelevel exceed 140 dB (while using a peak response or an impulse response meter setting).

3.15.4 Emergency Services

Emergency service equipment, including but not limited to alarms, emergencygenerators and firewater pumps, will not exceed 115 dBA using a slow responsemeter setting.

3.15.5 Far-Field Noise Limits

Far-field noise limits may be specified for special equipment items when noise impacts in thesurrounding community are a concern. Limits will be met at a specified distance, typically122 meters from the centre of the equipment item.

3.16 UNPLANNED EVENTS

There is the potential for unplanned events to occur during the construction, operation ordecommissioning phase of the Project. Examples of unplanned events include:





DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 76 of 369



4 IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

4.1 INTRODUCTION

This section of the ESIA study presents the methodology used to conduct the IA. The IAmethodology follows the overall IA approach illustrated in Figure 4.1 . The IA has beenundertaken following a systematic process that predicts and evaluates the impacts theProject could have on aspects of the physical, biological, social/ socio-economic and culturalenvironment, and identifies measures that the Project will take to avoid, minimise/reduce,mitigate, offset or compensate for adverse impacts; and to enhance positive impacts wherepracticable. The stages of the IA process are described below.

Figure 4.1 Impact Assessment Process

The adoption of a generic impact assessment methodology may not accommodate theidentification or categorization of impacts particular to a project of this type and location.The impact assessment methodology developed within this Chapter has been developedwith reference to internationally recognised best practice. It takes into account issuesspecifically associated with development of onshore gas and associated infrastructure topresent an impact identification and evaluation mechanism which is specific to thedevelopment type, thereby allowing for much more focused and refined assessment.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 77 of 369



4.2 SCREENING

The first stage in any impact assessment is screening. The primary objective of screening is toidentify what Impact Assessment (IA) requirements apply to the Project. Scoping is thenconducted to identify and develop the resulting terms of reference to provide the dataneeded to conduct an informed impact assessment. The results of the screening exercise arereported in Chapter 9 of this ESIA Report.

4.3 SCOPING

Scoping is undertaken to identify the potential Area of Influence for the Project (and thus theappropriate Study Area), to identify potential interactions between the Project andresources/receptors in the Area of Influence and the impacts that could result from theseinteractions, enabling these potential impacts to be evaluated in terms of their likelysignificance.

This stage is intended to ensure that the IA focuses on those issues that are most importantfor design, decision-making and stakeholder interest. The findings of the scoping exercise arereported in Chapter 9.

Table 4.1 defines the resources/receptors considered in the scoping stage, together with thechanges that might indicate a Project-related impact.

Table 4.1 Resources/Receptors and Impacts Considered in Scoping

Resources/Receptors Impact Definitions

Environmental

Geology Changes to geology, geomorphology, topography.

Soil Changes to physical and chemical properties and soil ecology.

Surface Water Changes to physical, chemical or biological quality of rivers, lakes, seas andother surface water bodies;Introduction of exotic species, changes in habitat quality, abundance,

diversity; Effluent discharge.Groundwater Contamination of shallow or deep groundwater resources or change to

ground water resources.Sediments River/waterbed morphology, physical and chemical properties, benthic

organisms.Fisheries Changes in fisheries productivity.

Vegetation Changes to vegetation population, health, species abundance and diversityand impact on endangered and economic species, food chain effects.

Wildlife Changes to wildlife assemblages, impact on endangered and economicspecies, food chain effects.

Air Emissions of NOx, SOx, PM, CO, VOC, greenhouse gases (CO 2, CH 4, andN 2O), ozone, TSP etcNoise and Vibration Changes in noise or vibration levels.

Aesthetics Physical presence of facilities, increased night time light.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 78 of 369



Resources/Receptors Impact Definitions

Social / Socio-economicPopulation andphysical displacement

Changes in population, total population, gender ratio, age distribution.Physical displacement from residence as a result of Project land take, or

Social and CulturalStructure

Disruption in local authority and governance structure; change in socialbehaviours;Alterations to social and cultural networks; intra and inter-ethnic conflict.

Economy andLivelihood

Change in national/local economy, employment, standard of living,occupation.

Resource ownershipand Use

Temporary or permanent displacement from land or water basedlivelihood activities;

Changes in ownership of such resources.Cultural Resources Physical disturbance of tangible cultural resources, such as shrines, burial

grounds, archaeological resources or to intangible cultural heritage (uses,practices associations)..

Education and Skills Change in the availability or quality of education or skills provision.

Infrastructure andPublic Services

Improvement or pressure on existing urban/rural infrastructure or servicesincluding: transportation; power, water, sanitation, waste handling

Community Health

Mortality and KeyHealth Indicators

Change in the mortality profile of the community; changes in lifeexpectancy, birth rates, death rates, maternal mortality rates etc

Community Safetyand Security

Any factor placing the community at risk of danger or harm. Includeshuman rights of the population.

EnvironmentalChange

Decreased air quality (e.g. NOx, SOx, VOC, CO, PM), contamination ofsurface waters and potable ground water, increased vibration and noise,increased night time light beyond acceptable limits, changes to the visual

Communicable andNon Communicable

Change in incidence and /or prevalence of communicable and non-communicable diseases or disease causing factors.

Vector Borne Diseases Changes in the incidence and or prevalence of vector borne diseases, thedensity of these vectors and their breeding grounds.

Nutritional status Changes to nutritional status and food security.

HealthFacilities/RecreationalFacilities

Changes in availability of and access to health care and recreationalfacilities including green space

Lifestyle factors Changing expectations of quality of life/behavioural changes. Druguse/abuse, prostitution, communal violence, crime, suicide and

4.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

In order to set out the scope of the Project features and activities, with particular reference to

the aspects which can impact on the environment, a Project Description is prepared. Detailsof the Project facilities’ design characteristics, as well as planned and unplanned Projectactivities, are provided in Chapter 3.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 79 of 369



4.5 BASELINE CONDITIONS

To provide a context within which the impacts of the Project can be assessed, a description ofphysical, biological, social / socio-economic and cultural conditions that would be expectedto prevail in the absence of the Project is required. The Baseline includes information on allresources/receptors in the Project Area of Influence, i.e. as having the potential to be affectedby the Project.

The baseline characterization is reported in Chapters 5 and 6 of this ESIA Report.

4.6 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

An effective IA Process requires engagement with relevant stakeholders throughout the keystages. This assists in understanding stakeholder views on the Project and in identifyingissues that should be taken into account in the prediction and evaluation of impacts.

Details of the Stakeholder Engagement activities undertaken for the Kerendan GasDevelopment Project to date are presented in Chapter 7.

4.7 IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Impact identification and assessment starts with scoping and continues through theremainder of the IA Process. The principal IA steps are summarised in Figure 4.2 .

Figure 4.2 Impact Assessment Process



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 80 of 369



The principle steps illustrated in Figure 4.2 are:

• Impact prediction: to determine what could potentially happen to resources/receptorsas a consequence of the Project and its associated activities.

• Impact evaluation: to evaluate the significance of the predicted impacts by consideringtheir magnitude and likelihood of occurrence, and the sensitivity, value and/orimportance of the affected resource/receptor.

• Mitigation and enhancement: to identify appropriate and justified measures tomitigate negative impacts and enhance positive impacts.

•

Residual impact evaluation: to evaluate the significance of impacts assuming effectiveimplementation of mitigation and enhancement measures.

4.7.1 Prediction of Impacts

Prediction of impacts is essentially an objective exercise to determine what is likely tohappen to the environment as a consequence of the Project and its associated activities. Fromthe potentially significant interactions identified in Scoping, the impacts to the variousresources/receptors are elabourated and evaluated. The diverse range of potential impactsconsidered in the IA process typically results in a wide range of prediction methods beingused, including quantitative, semi-quantitative and qualitative techniques.

4.7.2 Characterisation of Impacts

Once the prediction of impacts is complete, each impact is described in terms of its variousrelevant characteristics (e.g., nature and type). The magnitude of the impact is assigned as afunction of extent, scale, duration and frequency. The terminology used to describe impactcharacteristics is provided in Table 4.2 and magnitude illustrated in Figure 4.3 .

Table 4.2 Impact Characteristic Terminology

Characteristic Definition DesignationsNature A descriptor indicating the relationship of the

impactPositiveNegative

Type A definition of whether the impact occurs as aresult of the interaction between Project activitiesand resource/receptore.g. air emissions affecting air quality = directe.g. reduced air quality affecting local healthconditions = indirect

DirectIndirect

Extent The “reach” of the impact (e.g., confined to a

small area around the Project Footprint, projectedfor several kilometres, etc).

Local (low)

Regional (medium)International (high)



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 81 of 369



Characteristic Definition Designations

Duration The time period over which a resource / receptoris affected.

TemporaryShort-termLong-term/ irreversible

Scale The size of the impact (e.g., the size of the areadamaged or impacted, the fraction of a resourcethat is lost or affected, etc)

Defined from a numericalvalue or a qualitativedescription of “intensity”

Frequency A measure of the constancy or periodicity of theimpact.

Defined from a numericalvalue or a qualitative

Figure 4.3 Assessing the Level of Magnitude

Magnitude essentially describes the intensity of the change that is predicted to occur in theresource/receptor as a result of the impact. The magnitude assessments as a function ofextent, duration, scale and frequency vary on a resource/receptor basis but the designationsare universal:

•

Negligible;• Small;



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 82 of 369



• Medium; and

• Large.

For a number of other resource/receptor specific interactions/impacts definitions have beendeveloped where international standards or references exist, e.g. for noise or Social andcommunity Health. These resource/receptor-specific designations are discussed inChapters 10 and 11 in this report.

In the case of a positive impact, no magnitude designation is assigned. It is consideredsufficient for the purpose of the IA to indicate that the Project is expected to result in apositive impact, without characterising the exact degree of positive change likely to occur.

Additionally, for unplanned events only, magnitude incorporates a ‘likelihood’ factor. Thelikelihood of an unplanned event occurring is designated using a qualitative scale, asdescribed in Table 4.3 .

Table 4.3 Definitions for Likelihood Designations

Likelihood DefinitionUnlikely The event is unlikely but may occur at some time during normal operating

conditions.

Possible The event is likely to occur at some time during normal operating conditions.Likely The event will occur during normal operating conditions (i.e., it is essentially

inevitable).

In addition to characterising the magnitude of impact, the other principal impact evaluationstep is definition of the sensitivity/vulnerability of the impacted resource/receptor. Thereare a range of factors to be taken into account when defining the sensitivity/vulnerability ofthe resource/receptor, which may be physical, biological, cultural or human. Other factorsmay also be considered when characterising sensitivity/vulnerability/importance, such aslegal protection, government policy, stakeholder views and economic value.

Sensitivity/vulnerability/importance designations, as in the case of magnitude, areuniversally consistent, but the definitions for these designations vary on a resource/receptorbasis (refer to Chapters 10 and 11 Impact Assessment). The sensitivity/ vulnerability/importance designations used herein for all resources/receptors are:

• Low

• Medium

• High

Once magnitude of impact and sensitivity/vulnerability/importance of resource/receptorhave been characterised, the significance can be assigned for each impact. Impact



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 83 of 369



significance is designated using the matrix shown in Figure 4.4.

Figure 4.4 Impact Significance Rankings

Sensitivity/ Vulnerability/ Importance of Resource/ Receptor

Low Medium High

M a g n i t u d e o f

I m p a c t

Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

Small Negligible Minor Moderate

Medium Minor Moderate Major

Large Moderate Major Major

The Impact Significance matrix universally applies to all resources/receptors, and allimpacts to these resources/receptors, as the resource/receptor-specific considerations arefactored into the assignment of magnitude and sensitivity/vulnerability/importancedesignations that enter into the matrix. Error! Reference source not found. provides a contextfor what the various impact significance ratings signify.

It is important to note that impact prediction and evaluation take into account anyembedded controls (i.e., physical or procedural controls that are already planned as part ofthe Project design, regardless of the results of the IA Process). An example of an embeddedcontrol is a standard acoustic enclosure that is designed to be installed around a piece ofmajor equipment. This avoids the situation where an impact is assigned a magnitude basedon a hypothetical version of the Project that considers none of the embedded controls.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 84 of 369



Figure 4.5 Context of Impact Significance

An impact of negligible significance is one where a resource/receptor (including people) willessentially not be affected in any way by a particular activity or the predicted effect isdeemed to be ‘imperceptible’ or is indistinguishable from natural background variations.

An impact of minor significance is one where a resource/receptor will experience anoticeable effect, but the impact magnitude is sufficiently small and/or theresource/receptor is of low sensitivity/vulnerability/ importance. In either case, themagnitude should be well within applicable standards.

An impact of moderate significance has an impact magnitude that is within applicablestandards, but falls somewhere in the range from a threshold below which the impact isminor, up to a level that might be just short of breaching a legal limit. Clearly, to design anactivity so that its effects only just avoid breaking a law and/or cause a major impact is notbest practice. The emphasis for moderate impacts is therefore on demonstrating that theimpact has been reduced to a level that is as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP). Thisdoes not necessarily mean that impacts of moderate significance have to be reduced tominor, but that moderate impacts are being managed effectively and efficiently.

An impact of major significance is one where an accepted limit or standard may be exceeded,or large magnitude impacts occur to highly valued/sensitive resource/receptors. An aim of

IA is to get to a position where the Project does not have any major residual impacts,certainly not ones that would endure into the long-term or extend over a large area.However, for some aspects there may be major residual impacts after all practicablemitigation options have been exhausted (i.e. ALARP has been applied). An example mightbe the visual impact of a facility. It is then the function of regulators and stakeholders toweigh such negative factors against the positive ones, such as employment, in coming to adecision on the Project.

4.8 IDENTIFICATION OF M ITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT MEASURES

Once the significance of an impact has been characterised, the next step is to evaluate whatmitigation and enhancement measures are warranted. The following Mitigation Hierarchy isillustrated in Figure 4.6 .



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 85 of 369



Figure 4.6 Impact Mitigation Hierarchy

The priority in mitigation is to first apply mitigation measures to the source of the impact(i.e., to avoid or reduce the magnitude of the impact from the associated Project activity), andthen to address the resultant effect to the resource/receptor via abatement or compensatorymeasures or offsets (i.e., to reduce the significance of the effect once all reasonablypracticable mitigations have been applied to reduce the impact magnitude).

4.9 RESIDUAL IMPACT EVALUATION

Once mitigation and enhancement measures are declared, the next step in the IA Process isto assign residual impact significance. This is essentially a repeat of the impact assessmentsteps discussed above, considering the implementation of the proposed mitigation andenhancement measures.

4.10 MANAGEMENT , MONITORING AND AUDIT

The final stage in the IA Process is definition of the basic management and monitoringmeasures that are needed to identify whether:

a) Impacts or their associated Project components remain in conformance with applicablestandards; and

b) Mitigation measures are effectively addressing impacts and compensatory measures andoffsets are reducing effects to the extent predicted.

• Avoid at Source; Reduce at Source: avoiding or reducing at source through the design of theProject (e.g., avoiding by siting or re-routing activity away from sensitive areas or reducing byrestricting the working area or changing the time of the activity).

• Abate on Site: add something to the design to abate the impact (e.g., pollution controlequipment, traffic controls, perimeter screening and landscaping).

• Abate at Receptor: if an impact cannot be abated on-site then control measures can beimplemented off-site (e.g., noise barriers to reduce noise impact at a nearby residence or fencingto prevent animals straying onto the site).

• Repair or Remedy : some impacts involve unavoidable damage to a resource (e.g. agriculturalland and forestry due to creating access, work camps or materials storage areas) and theseimpacts can be addressed through repair, restoration or reinstatement measures.

• Compensate in Kind; Compensate Through Other Means: where other mitigation approachesare not possible or fully effective, then compensation for loss, damage and disturbance might beappropriate (e.g., planting to replace damaged vegetation, financial compensation for damagedcrops or providing community facilities for loss of fisheries access, recreation and amenity

space).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 86 of 369



An Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) is then compiled which summarises

all actions which Salamander has committed to executing with respect toenvironmental/Social/ Health performance for the Project. The ESMP includes themitigation measures, compensatory measures and offsets and management and monitoringactivities together with details of who is responsible for implementation, how these measuresare evaluated for performance, timing and reporting responsibilities. The ESMP is providedas an Addendum to this ESIA.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 87 of 369



5 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE

5.1 INTRODUCTION

The baseline conditions within the Project Study Area have been characterised based on aconsideration of secondary data from published sources as well as primary data collected inorder to fill data gaps. It has been compiled using available data and published information,including UKL/UPL reports developed by Elnusa Bangkanai Energy (EBE) from 2006 to2010 and subsequent field investigations managed by Salamander from 2011 to 2013.

5.2 PROJECT SETTING REGIONAL CONTEXT

The Kerendan Gas Development Project is located in the Bangkanai Production SharingContract (PSC) in the North Barito Regency, Central Kalimantan (Figure 1.1 ). The BangkanaiPSC covers an area of approximately 1,385 m², approximately 200 km west of Balikpapanand 330 kilometres north of Banjarmasin. The block is located on the northern edge of theBarito Shelf and the west side of the Kutei Basin.

Central Kalimantan is the 3rd largest Indonesian province by area with a size of 153,800 km 2.It is bordered by West and East Kalimantan provinces to the north, by the Java Sea to thesouth, by South and East Kalimantan provinces to the east, and by West Kalimantan

province to west. The majority of the centre of the province is covered with tropical forest.Commercial forest activities in the area produce rattan, resin and timber such as Ulin andMeranti. The southern part of the province comprises low-level alluvial flood plains andswamps of the major tributaries of the Barito River.

5.3 CLIMATE

Central Kalimantan’s climate is one of a wet weather equatorial zone with an eight-monthrainy season, and 4 months of dry season. Rainfall or precipitation is 2,776 - 3,393 mm peryear with an average of 145 rainy days annually.

Based on climate data from 1995-2004 at Beringin Airport Meteorological Station - MuaraTeweh (Table 5.1 ), the climate in the Project area is consistent with Type A (Q = 7.4%; wetclimate type) of the Köppen Climate Classification system. Type A is a moist tropical climatethat experiences high temperatures and large amounts of rainfall all year round (EBE 2010).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 88 of 369



Table 5.1 Climate within the Project Area

ParameterMonth Yearly

Total/av. J F M A M J J A S O N D

Rainfall1995-2004

mm267 263 366 291 248 153 173 134 147 252 346 322 2962

2007 363 420 331 266 371 184 206 147 128 234 220 485 3355

RainyDays

1995-2004days

27 26 28 28 23 24 21 18 18 20 22 26 284

2007 24 21 20 21 19 19 15 20 12 13 20 22 226

Temp

Max.

ºC

31.7 31.8 32.1 32.3 32.6 32.3 32.1 32.2 32.2 32.4 32.4 32.2 32.2

Min. 23.1 23.3 23.4 23.7 23.8 23.4 23.4 22.7 23.1 23.5 23.3 23.3 23.3

Av. 26.4 26.6 26.7 27.1 27.3 26.9 26.4 26.5 26.6 27.1 26.8 26.7 26.8Humidity

%86 86 86 86 86 85 85 85 84 85 85 85 85

Exposure 49 47 48 59 64 64 53 54 45 46 55 54 53

Wind Speed knot 3 4 5 5 4 3 4 3 4 3 3 4 4

Wind Direction – V TL V BD V BD

Source: Jupoi B-1, Sungai Lahei -1 and West Kerendan-1 UKL/UPL (EBE 2010)

The monthly rainfall data shows average annual rainfall in the area is approximately 3000

mm a year, with the highest amount of rainfall generally occurring between November andMay, with the highest average monthly rainfall in December. The low rainfall period isbetween May to October, with a lowest average monthly rainfall in September. The driestmonths from 1995 to 2007 were between June and September.

Temperature is relatively consistent during the year. The average monthly temperatures areapproximately 27°C, with maximum and minimum monthly temperatures of approximately35°C and 23°C respectively.

Relative humidity is consistent year round (approximately 85 %) which is characteristic of

areas that experience high rainfall. The month to month variation in the relative humidity isrelatively small, which is approximately 5.5% between the average highest and lowesthumidity. Wind speed is also relatively consistent, ranging from 3 to 5 knots.

5.4 TOPOGRAPHY

The topography surrounding the Project area is characterised by undulating plains withslopes ranging from 0-8% in height. Altitude at West Kerendan-1-1 and Lahei River rangesbetween 170-370 m above sea level, while at Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad and the KGPFaltitude generally ranges from 80-95 m above sea level with the land sloping towards theLahei River (EBE 2010).

The Kerendan Cluster location is adjacent to the Lahei River and the site floods regularlywith high seasonal rainfall in the area.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 89 of 369



5.5 GEOLOGY

According to the Central Kalimantan province Thematic 1:500.000 scale Map (1970) andMining Geology 1:250,000 scale map (1977), the geology surrounding the Project area hasbeen influenced by a range of endogenous and exogenous forces (EBE 2010).

In general the geological formation of the Bangkanai PSC consists of volcanic breccia of lateMiocene, early Miocene, late Eocene/Oligocene, and sedimentary rock. This area belongs tothe stratigraphic column of Tanjung area (Barito Basin) and Kutai Basin. The lithologygenerally consists of sandstone, clay, breccia, andestik, gravel, sand, clay, quartzite, browncoal and metallic minerals (EBE 2010).

The Kerendan gas platform is distributed over an area of 176 km² (approximately 11 by 16km) and has an inferred thickness of approximately 1000m (Hichens, Harrison & Co. plc2006). The current structure is believed to have been previously buried at a depth ofapproximately 4300 m, at which depth limestone would have been destroyed. However theacidic water expelled from nearby shales is believed to have preserved some of the porosityin the reef structure area on the outer edge of the platform (Hichens, Harrison & Co. plc2006). The porosities around the platform rim are between 5-13%, in contrast to the interiorwhich has less than 5% porosity.

A cross section of the Kerendan platform is shown in Figure 5.1 .

Figure 5.1 Cross Section of the Kerendan Gas Field

Source: Salamander 2013



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 90 of 369



5.6 AIR QUALITY

This chapter provides an overview of the existing air environment using air quality datafrom the Kerendan UKL/UPL Report (2006) produced by EBE and a recent sampling studyundertaken at various locations in the Project area. The aim of the studies was to compare airquality in the Project area with air quality thresholds outlined in the Government Regulationof the Republic of Indonesia No 41 of 1999 and the IFC General EHS Guidelines:Environmental: Air Emissions and Ambient Air Quality, which also establishes a number ofthreshold limits based upon World Health Authority (WHO) Ambient Air QualityGuidelines.

IFC PS 3 states - When host country regulations differ from the levels and measures

presented in the EHS Guidelines, projects are expected to achieve whichever is morestringent. If less stringent levels or measures are appropriate in view of specific projectcircumstances, a full and detailed justification for any proposed alternatives is needed as partof the site-specific environmental assessment. This justification should demonstrate that thechoice for any alternative performance level is protective of human health and theenvironment.

Ambient air quality standards are outlined in the table below.

Table 5.2 Ambient Air Quality Standards 2

Parameter Period ofMeasurement Unit PP41/1999 IFC EHS

Guidelines

Carbon monoxide (CO)1 hour µg/m 3 30,000 -24 hour µg/m 3 10,000 -

Hydrocarbons (HC) 3 hour µg/m 3 160 -

Nitrogen dioxide(NO 2)

1 hour µg/m 3 400 20024 hour µg/m 3 150 -1 year µg/m 3 100 40

Sulphur dioxide (SO 2)

10 minute µg/m 3 - 500

1 hour µg/m 3 900 -24 hour µg/m 3 365 125*

µg/m 3 50**µg/m 3 20

1 year µg/m 3 60 -

Dust (TSP)24 hour µg/m 3 230 -1 year µg/m 3 90 -

Lead (Pb)24 hour µg/m 3 2 -1 year µg/m 3 1 -

2 World Health Organization (WHO). Air Quality Guidelines Global Update, 2005. PM 24-hour value is the99th percentile.

Interim targets are provided in recognition of the need for a staged approach to achieving the recommendedguidelines.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 91 of 369



Parameter Period ofMeasurement Unit PP41/1999 IFC EHS

Guidelines

Oxidant (O 3)

1 hour µg/m 3 50 -8 hour µg/m 3 - 160*

µg/m 3 - 1001 year µg/m 3 235 -

PM 10

24 hour µg/m 3 150 150*µg/m 3 100**µg/m 3 75***µg/m 3 50

1 year µg/m 3 - 70*µg/m 3 50**µg/m 3 30***µg/m 3 20

PM 2.5

24 hour µg/m 3 15 75*µg/m 3 50**µg/m 3 37.5***µg/m 3 25

1 year µg/m 3 65 35*µg/m 3 25**

µg/m 3 15***µg/m 3 10*

Notes: *Interim target-1 ** Interim target-2 *** Interim target-3

A summary of the air quality assessments conducted in or around the Project area to date isprovided below.

5.6.1 Baseline Air Quality Data

5.6.1.1 Kerendan UKL/UPL Surveys (2005)

In 2005, air quality measurements were collected at the proposed Kerendan-3 wellsite andnear Kerendan Village as part of baseline studies for the EBE Kerendan UKL/UPL Report(EBE 2006).

The air quality study involved measuring the following parameters: NO ₂ , SO₂ , O3, CO,hydrocarbons and dust/particulates. As shown in Table 5.3 , labouratory analytical resultsindicated that the air quality in the sampling area was good, with concentrations found to bebelow ambient air quality standards.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 92 of 369



Table 5.3 Air Quality Sampling for Kerendan UKL/UPL (2005)

ParameterCoordinates µg/m 3

Latitude Longitude SO CO NO O 3 Dust Pb CH 4

Kerendan 0.6159 115.1570 <26.15 <1000 <10 1.49 20.31 <0.05 <6.53

Kerendan- 3

0.5395 115.1208 <26.15 <1000 <10 1.57 19.21 <0.05 <6.53

Regulatory Limit* 900 30000 400 235 230 2 160

*Ambient Air Standard Quality Regulation, PPRI No. 41/1999.Source: Kerendan UKL/UPL (2005)

5.6.1.2 Sungai Lahei -1 and West Kerendan UKL/UPL (2010)

The results of air quality sampling near Sungai Lahei -1 and West Kerendan UKL/UPL (EBE2010) are presented in Table 5.4 . Sampling locations are presented in Figure 5.2 (this figure

shows all sampling locations for the Kerendan and WK-1/Sungai Lahei UKL/UPL studiesand additional water sampling undertaken by Salamander).

The data show that ambient air quality in the areas surrounding the planned drillinglocations is considered relatively good, with parameters meeting the followingEnvironmental Quality Standards (BML):

• PP. 41/1999 for SO 2, NO 2, CO, hydrocarbons, O 3 and dust; and

• LH No. KEPMENEG. KEP-50/1996 for H 2S

Table 5.4 Air Quality in Project Area

Parameter unit

EnvironmentalQuality

Standard(BML)

Locations near Kerendan & Lahei River

Km-27 Km-35 Kerendan Haragandang

PP No. 41/1999Sulphur dioxide (SO 2)

µg/Nm 3

365 ND

Nitrogen dioxide(NO 2) 150 ND 0.46 0.72 0.52

Carbon monoxide(CO) 10.000 ND

Hydrocarbons (HC) 160 3.41 0.82 1.24 0.97

Ozone (O 3) 250 – – – –

Dust 230 28.6 39.5 42.4 37.6

KEPMENEG LH No. KEP-50/1996

Hydrogen Sulphide(H 2S) µg/Nm 3 30,36 1.69 0.91 1.28 1.04

Description: ND = Not detected - = Not analysed





DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 94 of 369



5.6.1.3 Air Quality Survey 2013

Ambient air quality monitoring and sampling activities were conducted at three locations inthe Project area in July 2013. The locations included the Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad (A-01-RG), along the pipeline route between the well site and KGPF (A-02-R II) and within theKGPF footprint (A-03-R III). Sampling locations and shown in the figure below.

Figure 5.3 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring/Sampling Stations

In summary, Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2/1 hour average period), Sulphur Dioxide (SO 2/10-minute averaging period) and Ozone (O 3/8-hour daily maximum) were not detected at thesampled locations. Particulate Matter10 (PM10/24-hour averaging period) was detected at aconcentration of 28.1 µg/Nm 3 on a sample collected from the Wellsite but it did not exceedthe World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines Global Update, 2005(International Finance Corporation [IFC] Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS)Guidelines.

Similarly, Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM2.5/24 hour averaging period) was detected at aconcentration of 18.4 µg/Nm 3 on a sample collected from the Wellsite but it did not exceedthe World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines.

The full results of the air quality sampling program, including methodology used to conductthe study, are detailed in Annex B.

AMBIENT AIR

MONITORING/SAMPLING

ROAD TO MANIFOLD (PLN)

MANIFOLD(Perusahaan Listrik

Negara -GovernmentElectricity Provider)

DRILL SITE

UNCLEARED AREA(HEAVILY VEGETATED)

KGPF AREAA-03-RIII

CAMP

HELIPAD

LAHAI RIVER(R I)

CLEAREDAREA

RIVER (R II)

A-01-RI

A-02-RII



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 95 of 369



5.7 NOISE

Under Indonesian standards, the Decree of Environmental Ministry No. 48/1996 on Noiselevel Quality Standard and IFP regulates ambient noise and establishes a limit of 55 dBa forresidential areas. The IFC EHS Guidelines refer to the Guidelines for Community Noise,World Health Organization (WHO), 1999. This stipulates limits of 55 dBa during the daytime(07:00-22:00) and 45 dBa during night-time (22:00-7:00).

Baseline noise data was reported in the Kerendan UKL/UPL (2005) and Sungai Lahei -1 andWest Kerendan UKL/UPL (2010). Noise levels were recorded at the social receptors ofKerendan and Haragandang Villages as well as along the access roads. Comparativemeasurements were made at other villages.

The noise level data acquired from the measurements conducted in the study area are shownin Table 5.5 . In accordance with UKL/UPL requirements, noise monitoring is undertakenevery 6 months in accordance with the applicable noise monitoring standard.

Noise levels near the three locations ranged from 43.0 to 53.5 dBA (Table 5.5 ), which waslower than the environmental quality standard of ≤ 55 dBA (LH No. KEPMENEG KEP -48/1996) and IFC EHS Guideline recommended standards for daytime noise.

Table 5.5 Noise Quality Sampling for Kerendan Location (2010)

Measurement Location Noise Level (dBA)

Access Roads 27-km from Luwe Hulu 43.0 – 47.2

Access Roads 35-km from Luwe Hulu 43.9 – 46.7

Kerendan Village 44.2 – 47.3

Haragandang Village 44.1 – 47.9

5.8 SOILS

An assessment of soils in the Project area has been undertaken using existing data from theKerendan UKL/UPL Report and the results of a field survey conducted in the Project area in July 2013. Additional sampling was undertaken so soil characteristics could be better definedwithin the area of potential impact, thus allowing for the assessment of erosion potential andpotential for landscape change as a result of the Project.

Existing soil baseline data and results of recent soil sampling in the Project area are describedbelow.

5.8.1 Kerendan UKL/UPL Surveys (2005)

Soil samples were collected at Kerendan-1 and Kerendan-3 drill sites during surveysconducted in 2005 for the Project’s UKL/UPL report developed by EBE (2006). Samplinglocations are highlighted in Figure 5.4 .



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 96 of 369



The soil at the proposed well sites was generally found to be acidic with low levels of

nutrients and organic content (C and N). Base saturation was also found to be low, whilewater content was found to be relatively high.

5.8.2 Soil Sampling Survey 2013

Due to the lack of information provided in the Project UKL/UPL (2005), a soil samplingsurvey was undertaken in the Project area in July 2013. A total of 30 shallow soil samples andtwo (2) duplicate samples were collected at randomly selected locations within the KerendanWellhead Cluster (drillsite) and Camp Area, KGPF, and along the pipeline route. Soilsampling locations are shown in Figure 5.4 .

All 30 soil samples were analysed for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Semi-VolatileOrganic Compounds (SVOCs), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH), Metals; and TotalAlkalinity. Some samples for each location were also analysed for Toxicity CharacteristicLeaching Procedure (TCLP) Metals, Organo-Chlorine Pesticides (OCP) and Organo-Phosphate Pesticides (OPP).

Soil samples were measured against the United States Environmental Protection AgencyRegional Screening Levels (US EPA RSLs) and Dutch Standards (Dutch Intervention Values[DIV] 2009).

5.8.2.1 Results

A brief summary of the soil sampling results for parameters analysed during the study isprovided below. Further detail on the methodology and outcomes of the labouratoryanalysis is provided in the full report, attached as Annex B.

Metals

Overall metal concentrations in soils sampled were found to be within the standard criteriaspecified above (where applicable). The only exceptions to this were Arsenic, Barium andPhosphorus. Two samples from the Wellsite and six samples from the pipeline route and

KGPF exceeded Arsenic criteria under the USEPA RSL.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 97 of 369



Figure 5.4 Soil Sampling Locations



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 98 of 369



Phosphorus was detected at all sampling locations, with all samples recording

concentrations in excess of the USEPA RSL limit of 20 mg/kg. The KGPF recorded thehighest concentration, recording a range of 76.0 to 172.0 mg/kg.

Barium was detected at all sampling locations. However, the Wellsite was the only site toexceed the criteria (DIV), with levels ranging from 5.48 to 1,150.14 mg/kg.

TCLP Metals

Barium and Zinc were detected in soil samples collected from the Wellsite and camp, KGPFand one of the samples collected from Pipeline Route. The detected TCLP concentrations arenot specified in the referenced criteria.

TPH, OCP and OPP, VOCs and SVOCs

OCP and OPP, VOCs and SVOCs and TPH were not detected in soil samples analysed.

Total Alkalinity

Total Alkalinity in soil samples collected from the Wellsite, Pipeline Route and KGPF rangedfrom 30.0 to 2,960.0 mg/kg, 12.0 to 71.0 mg/kg and from 9.0 to 61.0 mg/kg, respectively.Total Alkalinity was not detected from soil samples collected from Kerendan Cluster PadCamp.

5.9 H YDROLOGY

The main rivers near the Project area are the Upper Barito River and the Lahei River andtributaries (Figure 1.1 ). The Barito River originates in the Muller Mountain Ranges in CentralKalimantan and stretches approximately 900 km south to the Java Sea, through Barjarmasin,the capital of South Kalimantan (EBE 2010).

The Lahei river mouth is located approximately half way between the river villages of MuaraTeweh and Luwe Hulu. According to the JB-1, SL-1 and WK-1 UKL/UPL Report (EBE 2010),the width of the downstream section of Lahei River is between 35-40 m, which narrows to

30-35 m midstream and becomes more tapered upstream. The width of the river near theKerendan section ranges from 20-25 m, with a depth of approximately 4-10 m. Riversediments near Kerendan Village are generally in the form of sand-mud, while the upstreamtributaries near Haragandang Village have a somewhat rocky base.

The Inu river mouth is located near the downstream section of the Lahei River, near MuaraInu. The downstream width of the Inu River is between 25-30 m, narrowing to 15-20 m in themiddle section and tapering further upstream. River sediments are similar to Kerendan andconsist of a sand-mud base.

Riverflow is highly variable, depending on rainfall. There are no reliable records from whichto assess trends in baseflow or flooding (possible through hydrological changes due to forestexploitation). Water quality in forest streams is reported to be good even during high flow,except where roads and other activities have caused erosion and sedimentation. Water levels





DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 100 of 369



Water temperatures at the sampling locations ranged from 26.3 to 26.7°C which is considered

normal for tropical regions (EBE 2006). Total dissolved solids (TDS) ranged from 8 to 9mg/L, which was considered low compared to the regulatory maximum standard of 1,000mg/L TDS. Acidity (pH) levels were found to be normal, ranging from 6.44 to 6.84.

5.9.1.2 Sungai Lahei -1 and West Kerendan UKL/UPL (2010)

Water sampling was undertaken in 2008 as part surveys for the Sungai Lahei -1 and WestKerendan UKL/UPL Report produced by EBE. Water samples were collected within theLahei and Inu Rivers, tributaries of the Upper Barito River (Figure 5.2 ).

Overall, the water quality in the upstream tributaries of the Lahei River at the time of

sampling was determined to be relatively good (EBE 2010). Of the 25 parameters tested, two(2) did not meet the BML Class I Water Quality Standards (PP-82/2011), with these beingdissolved oxygen (DO) and chemical oxygen demand (COD). Dissolved oxygen levelsranged from 5.26 to 6.03 mg/L, which was slightly lower than the BML water qualitystandard of 6 mg/L. Dissolved oxygen plays an important role in aquatic ecosystems andbecause if levels fall too low, it can have lethal or sub-lethal effects on aquatic ecosystems(Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment 1999).

Of 35 parameters analysed for the Inu River, 11 parameters did not meet the BML Class I.These were total suspended solids (TSS), acidity (pH), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD),

dissolved oxygen (DO), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total phosphate, various heavymetals and phenol. Differences in river quality were believed to due to the sampling period(i.e. low rainfall) and impacts from land clearing for cultivation (EBE 2010).

5.9.1.3 Additional Water Sampling Surveys – 2011 to 2012

Two water sampling surveys were conducted by Salamander in the Lahei River in December2011 and October 2012. Three locations were sampled in the Lahei River in December 2011,upstream from the Kerendan Cluster Wellhead Pad (Figure 5.2 ). Of the 35 parameters tested,four (4) parameters did not meet the Drinking Water Standard Quality Regulation No.907/Menkes/SK/VI/2002. These were turbidity which ranged from 55 to 94 mg/L(regulatory limit 5 mg/L), coliform and lead (at one sampling location). Acidity (pH) wasslightly lower than Indonesian Regulatory limit, ranging between 5.72 and 6.34; howeverthese were within the World Health Organisation Drinking Water Standard Quality limit.

In October 2012, water sampling was undertaken at various locations near Kerendan,Harangdang and WK-1 wellsite (Figure 5.2 ). A total of 28 parameters were testedduring the sampling. Five parameters did not meet Indonesian Regulatory limits(Permenkes 492/Menkes/Per/IV/2010 and Permen LH No. 19 2010). These werecolour, turbidity and heavy metals, aluminium, iron, and manganese. The greatest

turbidity was recorded near Kerendan and Harangdang. Aluminium and iron levelswere also highest at the Kerendan sampling location. Kerendan was the only site torecord a Manganese level slightly higher (0.48 mg/L) than the water quality standardof 0.4 mg/L.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 101 of 369



5.9.1.4 Surface Water Quality Survey 2013

Surface water was collected as part of a sampling program undertaken by ERM in the Projectarea in July 2013. Water samples were collected from upstream, midstream and downstreamportions of the Lahei River, near the Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad (Figure 5.5 ). TheCluster Pad’s drainage outfall was also sampled (SW-04-RI). In total, four surface watersamples were collected from the Kerendan Wellhead area.

Surface water samples were also collected at a stream passing through the pipeline route anda stream passing through the northwestern corner of KGPF (upstream, midstream anddownstream). Sampling locations are presented below.

Figure 5.5 Water Sampling Locations in the Project Area (2013)

A brief summary of the results for parameters analysed during the water sampling programis provided below. Further detail on the methodology and labouratory results is provided inthe full report, Annex B.

River Flow

SURFAE WATER SAMPLING



Negara- GovernmentElectricityProvider)

DRILLSITE

UNCLEARED AREA

KGPF AREA

SW-09-RIII

CAMP

HELIPAD

LAHAI RIVER(R I)

CLEAREDAREA

RIVER (R II)

SW-08-RIII

SW-07-RIII

SW-03-RI SW-02-RI SW-01-RI

SW-04-RI

SW-05-RII

SW-06-RII

Pipeline layout



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 102 of 369



pH

In general, most samples recorded pH concentrations within the range set by the GOIRegulation No. 82 of 2001, Class 1 (GOI Regulation). The only exceptions to this weresamples collected in the upstream, midstream and downstream sections of the streampassing through the north-western portion of the KGPF. The pH concentrations at theselocations were marginally lower than the minimum limit set by the GOI Regulation, at 5.8,5.9 and 5.9, respectively.

Temperature

Recorded water temperatures generally ranged from a minimum of 27°C to 37 °C, withstreams along the pipeline route recording the highest temperatures. Temperature is notspecified in the GOI Regulation however lower measurements were generally consistentwith temperature measurements recorded during the Kerendan UKL/UPL study.

Turbidity

The sampling location near the Kerendan Wellsite recorded the highest TDS concentration at725 mg/L, however all samples GOI Regulation water quality criteria. All TSS concentrationsmet GOI Regulation criteria and the indicative guideline value applicable to sanitarywastewater discharges to surface water.

Metals

Of the parameters tested during the sampling program, Iron and Manganese were the onlymetals found to exceed water quality standards. Iron concentrations exceeded the GOIRegulation at all sampling locations, although they did not exceed USEPA RSL criteria.

Manganese concentrations exceeded the GOI Regulation for samples collected in theupstream, midstream and downstream section of the stream passing through the north-western portion of the KGPF, recording concentrations of 0.17, 0.08 and 0.04 mg/L,respectively.

Dissolved Metals

Concentrations of dissolved Iron at the upstream and downstream sections of KGPF north-western stream exceeded the GOI Regulation, recording levels of 0.819 and 0.394 mg/L,respectively. However, these concentrations do not exceed the USEPA RSL.

Organics

BOD and COD were only detected in surface water samples collected from the KerendanWellhead drainage outfall. The detected concentration of BOD (74.0 mg/L) exceeded GOIRegulation and IFC EHS Guideline. The COD concentration (122.0 mg/L) also exceeded theGOI Regulation.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 103 of 369



Oil and Grease

Oil and grease was detected in surface water sample collected from the Kerendan Wellheaddrainage outfall and found to exceed the GOI Regulation, with a concentration reading of 8.0mg/L. Oil and grease was not detected in other samples.

Dissolved Oxygen

All DO levels in sampled were found to be below the GOI Regulation minimumrequirement.

Surfactants (MBAS)

Surfactants were recorded in all water samples collected, however concentrations did notexceed the maximum limit required under the GOI Regulation.

TPH, VOCs and SVOCs

TPH, VOCs and SVOCs were not detected in water samples analysed.

5.10 BIODIVERSITY AND HABITATS

The chapter provides an overview of flora and fauna within the Project area and biodiversityvalues in the context of IFC Performance Standard 6.

IFC PS6 defines the parameters of biodiversity and ecosystem services which must beconsidered when assessing the Project against the IFC Performance Standards. This includesthe identification and consideration of habitat values, threatened species, ecosystem services,protected areas and invasive species. The objectives of IFC PS6 are to:

• Protect and conserve biodiversity;

• Maintain the benefits from ecosystem services; and

• Promote the sustainable management of living natural resources through the adoptionof practices that integrate conservation needs and development priorities.

This chapter has been compiled using secondary data from a range of secondary datasources, including the IUCN redlist of threatened species and UKL/UPL reports for theKerendan and West Kerendan well sites and the results of a biodiversity survey undertakenin the Project area in July 2013.

There is very little information on wildlife in the Project area. A biodiversity survey wascommissioned by Salamander in July 2013 to:

(1) Gain a better understanding of flora and fauna in the project area for the purposes of theimpact assessment; and

(2) Address gaps in existing UKL/UPL documents in regards to biodiversity and ecosystemand IFC reporting requirements. This includes providing information on the possiblepresence of species of concern and critical habitat, as defined in IFC PS 6.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 104 of 369



A summary of flora and fauna and biodiversity values that are relevant to the Project are

described below. The full Biodiversity Report which includes a more detailed description ofthe approach, methodology and findings, is attached as Annex C.

5.10.1 Desktop Review

An initial desktop review was undertaken to identify flora and fauna that are known orpotentially occur in the Project area. A brief summary of this review and subsequent fieldassessment is provided below.

5.10.1.1 Regional Context

The Project area is located within what is known as the Mount Muller complex. The Mt.Muller complex is one of few remaining tropical forest areas in Kalimantan and containsimportant habitat for flora and fauna biodiversity within the region. It extends across threeprovinces: West Kalimantan, East Kalimantan, and Central Kalimantan.

The Indonesian Scientific Research Authority (LIPI) recorded significant biodiversity valueswithin the region during an expedition conducted in 2003-2004, recording a total of 66 fishspecies, 17 reptile species, 10 amphibian species, 159 bird species, 8 small mammal speciesand 10 primate species. There are no data on wildlife population sizes or preferred territorieswithin the Project area for these species.

Some of the most eminent species known to occur in the region include the Orangutan(Pongo pygmaeus), Proboscis Monkey ( Nasalis larvatus ), Bornean Gibbon ( Hylobates muelleri)and Sun Bear ( Helarctos malayanus), all of which are listed as Endangered or Vulnerable onthe IUCN Red List.

The floral biodiversity of Kalimantan is made up of at least 3000 plant species, 58% of whichare considered endemic. During a floristic survey undertaken in this forest complex from2003-2004, 75 species of orchid, 3 species of nepenthes, and a large number of speciesbelonging to dipterocarps family were identified. The diversity of flora is often consideredimportant for local communities that rely on forests for subsistence use, using it as a resourcefor traditional medicine, building material, and traditional/ritual.

5.10.1.2 Kerendan UKL/UPL (2006)

A flora and fauna survey was undertaken in 2005 as part of the Kerendan UKL/UPL study.The results of this assessment are described below.

Flora

Vegetation communities were assessed at 8 well sites (Kerendan-1 to Kerendan-8). Theassessment involved recording the type of and amount of vegetation observed, with leafsamples collected for species that could not be easily identified in the field (later identified indendrology labouratory). In general, the vegetation in the study area was found to beconsistent with secondary forest (EBE 2006).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 105 of 369



The natural vegetation at Kerendan-2 and Kerendan-3 well sites was generally mixed with

crops or homogenous rubber tree ( Hevea brasiliensis) plantations grown by the localcommunity. These plantations are generally converted to crop fields (e.g. chilli/pepper Piper sp., and rice Oryza sp.) when rubber plantations are less profitable (EBE 2006).

Terrestrial Fauna

Information on fauna was collected by undertaking a survey in the study area and gatheringinformation from the public. One targeted bird survey was conducted, which identified atotal of 17 species (EBE 2006). None of the species recorded are endemic or currently listed asthreatened species on the IUCN redlist.

A number of other general fauna observations were made during the field survey, howeverit is unknown whether they were of conservation significance as many were not identified atspecies level (i.e. genus only). Of the four species recorded, one, the Freshwater Crocodile orFalse Gharial ( Tomistoma schlegelii) is currently listed as Endangered on the IUCN redlist.

Domesticated or introduced animals that were recorded in the study area included chickens(Gallus gallus), ducks ( Anas spp.), feral pigeon ( Columba livia), goats (Capra hircus), cats (Felis familiaris), pigs (Sus sp.) and dogs ( Canis canis).

Aquatic Biota

A total of 9 phytoplankton genera were found at water sampling locations in the Lahei River.Abundance was found to be high but with a low species diversity value (H '<1) in the rangebetween 0.4330 to 0.5119. No dominance species were identified (D <0.5).

Water samples collected identified 2 genera of zooplankton: Nauplius and Oikopleura,highlighting low diversity (H '<1) in the range of 0.0000 to 0.2764. 1.

5.10.1.3 Sungai Lahei-1 and West Kerendan-1 UKL/UPL (2010)

West Kerendan-1 well site is located approximately 10 km south west of the KGPF. Given theproximity of the wellsite to the Project area, survey results for the Sungai Lahei-1 and WestKerendan-1 UKL/UPL (2010) were reviewed as part of the desktop assessment.

A brief summary of the flora and fauna identified during the field survey, with specificreferences to WK-1 (where possible), is provided below.

Flora

The vegetation types in the area surrounding WK-1 and Sungai Lahei-1 was identified aslowland tropical natural forest. Both locations are within secondary forest logging areas,where the area vegetation type is classified as Secondary Natural Forest (EBE 2010). Peatvegetation, river banks, and springs (within a 200 m radius of the site) were not found in thestudy area (EBE 2010).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 106 of 369



Three protected species were identified in secondary forests surveyed, however overall

species richness and abundance of forest stands was found to be relatively low. Protectedspecies identified included Kempas ( Koompasia malaccensis), Jelutung ( Dyera costulata) andLay / Kalimantan Durian ( Durio sp.).

Plantations in the study area were generally in the form of traditionally cultivated rubberplantations ( Hevea braziliensis) and food crops. They were not intensively cultivated,therefore tended to be irregular and mixed with pioneer plant species/secondary forest.

Fauna

A total of 7 mammals, 5 reptiles, and 16 birds were identified during the Sungai Lahei-1 and

West Kerendan-1 UKL/UPL field survey (EBE 2010). Eight of the species were eitherprotected species under the Indonesian regulation, while three were listed as Endangered orVulnerable on the IUCN redlist. These were the Endangered Proboscis Monkey ( Nasalislarvatus ), and the Vulnerable listed Sambar Deer ( Cervus unicolor ) and Bearded Pig ( Susbarbatus ).

Mammals such as the Bearded Pig and Proboscis Monkey were mostly observed aroundriparian areas, while the Sambar Deer is generally found in secondary forest (EBE 2010). Alist of the threatened species recorded during the survey, their conservation status andpreferred habitat is presented in Table 5.6 .

Table 5.6 Fauna in the Juboi-1, Sungai Lahei-1 and West Kerendan-1 UKL/UPLStudy Area

Common Name Scientific NameStatus

(UU No.5/1990)

IUCNVegetation Type*

HAS HTI SSK

Proboscis Monkey Nasalis larvatus D E - - √

Sambar Deer Cervus unicolor TD V √ - -

Java Mouse-deer Tragulus javanicus D - √ - -

Barking Deer Muntiacus muntjak D LC √ - -

Bearded Pig Sus barbatus TD V √ √ √

Changeable Hawk-eagle Spizaetus cirrcatus D - √ √ √

Blue-eared Kingfisher Alcedo meninting D LC √ - √

- Capsycus sonneratia D - √ - √

Common Hill Myna Gracula religiosa D LC √ - -

Sunbird Nectarinia trigonostigma D - √ - √

Description: TD = not protected, D = protected, LC = Least Concern, E – Endangered, VU =Vulnerable; HAS = secondary natural forest timber, HTI= timber plantations, SSK = riparianvegetationSource: EBE 2010



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 107 of 369



Fauna Habitat

Fauna habitat in the study area was identified as damaged and fragmented due to forestconcession activities and plantation farming.

5.10.1.4 Protected Areas

No legally protected areas are located within the Project area. The Project and surroundingarea is located within Production Forest. The nearest Protected forested area is locatedapproximately 30-40 km north-west of the KGPF.

5.10.1.5 Species of Conservation Significance

A desktop review of available data bases such as the IUCN Redlist was completed to identifyspecies of conservation significance that are known to potentially occur within the regionand project area. For the purpose of this ESIA, species of conservation interest are identifiedas those listed as Critically Endangered (CE), Endangered (EN) or Vulnerable (VU), on theIUCN red list. The species considered relevant to this project are listed at Table 5.7 .

Table 5.7 also provides a brief review of whether the species is considered likely to occurbased on the species known habitat requirements, distribution and also habitats known toexist within the project area. The consideration of likely presence was also based on thepreliminary site visit completed by the project team. This list was then used as part of the

biodiversity survey to confirm or otherwise the potential presence of conservation significantspecies and understand if they are likely to be a relevant consideration during the impactassessment.

From Table 5.7 , it is considered that the project area may provide potential habitat for 18fauna species of conservation significance. While individuals of these species have thepotential to occur within the project area the species are generally distributed acrossKalimantan and other locations within Indonesia and Asia, where suitable habitat occurs.However many of these species are under increasing pressure from habitat removal anddevelopment within the region.

The flora species search revealed an extensive list of species occurring within the region,while little information was identified during the desktop search which would assist in theidentification of species of potential concern. The results of the flora survey presented atSection 5.10.2 have been used as the basis for understanding if species of conservationinterest occur within the project area.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 108 of 369



Table 5.7 Likelihood of IUCN Species (Known to Occur in Kalimantan) Occurring in the Project Area

Genus SpeciesCommon

namesIUCNstatus

Distribution HabitatLikelihood

ofOccurrence

Reason

Sus barbatus BeardedPig,WesternBearded Pig

VU Malay Peninsula,Sumatra, Bangka, andBorneo

Generally tropical evergreenrainforest, but are known to use awide variety of habitat types,ranging from beaches to uppermountain cloud forests

Known Recorded duringWK-1 survey(UPL/UKL)Recorded duringbiodiversity survey

Hylobates muelleri BorneanGibbon,BorneanGreyGibbon,BorneoGibbon

EN Occurs throughoutBorneo except for thesouthwest (where H.albibarbis is found)

Primary, selectively logged andsecondary tropical evergreenforest. Common in areas wheregood forest remains. Averagehome range size approx. 30 ha.Arboreal and diurnal. Generallyfrugivorous but also eat immatureleaves and insects.

Known Recorded duringbiodiversity survey

Tomistoma schlegelii FalseGharial,

MalayanGharial,Tomistoma

EN Widespread, althoughat a low density,

throughout large areasof Sumatra,Kalimantan, Sarawak,and Malaysia

Swamps, rivers and lakes.Terrestrial nest sites and basking

areas

Known Recorded duringKerendan

UPL/UKL survey(2006)

Nasalis larvatus Long-nosedMonkey,ProboscisMonkey

EN Endemic to Borneo,occurring in Brunei,Indonesia (Kalimantan)and Malaysia.

Associated with riparian-riverineforests, coastal lowland forest,including mangroves, peat swamp,and freshwater swamp forest.Rarely ranges far from its localhabitat/waterway. Generally

Likely Recorded aroundWK-1 (UKL/UPL)Communityconfirmationduring biodiversity







DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 111 of 369



Genus SpeciesCommon

namesIUCNstatus


ofOccurrence

Reason

Pardofelis marmorata Marbled Cat VU Tropical Indomalayawestward along theHimalayan foothillswestward into Nepaland eastward intosouthwest China

Primarily associated with moistand mixed deciduous-evergreentropical forest. Some records fromsecondary forest or cleared areasnear forest, but it is likely forest-dependent

Possiblethoughunlikely

Lack of suitablehabitat in Projectarea

Pongo pygmaeus BorneanOrangutan

EN Endemic to Borneo.Present in three of theKalimantan provinces.Four distinctsubpopulations withparticular regionaldiversity andgeographic clustering.Species occurs typicallyat relatively lowabundance: 0.5 to 4.0ind./km² in mostpopulations.

Flood-prone forests and peatswamps produce more regular andlarger fruit crops than drydipterocarp forests and harbourthe highest orangutan densities.More abundant in low-lyingforests (below 500 meters asl) thanin uplands. Large rivers limit theirdispersal due to being impassable.

Possible Known to occur inforested areas ofCentral Kalimantan

Macaca nemestrina Pig-tailedMacaque

VU Brunei, Indonesia(Bangka, KalimantanBorneo, and Sumatra),Malaysia and southernThailand

Found in lowland primary andsecondary forest, as well as coastal,swamp and mountain forest.Prefers dense rainforest but alsofound on agricultural land.Predominantly terrestrial,although capable of foraging inforest canopy. Diurnal and

Possible Habitat occurs inand around Projectarea



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 112 of 369



Genus SpeciesCommon

namesIUCNstatus


ofOccurrence

Reason

frugivorous.

Rheithrosciurus macrotis Tufted

GroundSquirrel

VU Confined to Borneo Only recorded from primary forest

in hilly areas, however, it is notwell surveyed in other habitattypes. Likely dependent on goodquality habitat

Possible

thoughunlikely

Lack of suitable

habitat in Projectarea

Petinomys vordermanni Vordermann's FlyingSquirrel

VU Scattered localities onsouthern Myanmar,Peninsular Malaysia,northern and centralBorneo, and islands offeastern Sumatra

Likely prefers lowland rainforest.Arboreal and nocturnal


Lack of suitablehabitat in Projectarea

Bos javanicus Banteng,Tembadau

EN Java and possibly Bali,and Borneo

Occupies secondary forestformations from logging and fires.Occasionally enters tracts of sub-humid forest


Habitat present butlow numbers (feralspecies also occur inKalimantan)

Pteromyscus pulverulentus

SmokyFlyingSquirrel

EN Rare species accordingto Bornean records -even in optimumhabitat (primary forest)it is rarely seen

Lives in tree hollows inundisturbed primary forest.

Unlikely Lack of suitablehabitat in Projectarea

Crocodylus siamensis SiameseCrocodile

CR Mesangat Lake in theMahakam Riversystem, EastKalimantan Provincesupports the only

Wide range of lowland freshwaterhabitats, including slow-movingrivers and streams, lakes, seasonaloxbow lakes, marshes andswamps. Freshwater records in

Unlikely outside distributionrange



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 113 of 369



Genus SpeciesCommon

namesIUCNstatus


ofOccurrence

Reason

known extantpopulation outsidemainland SoutheastAsia

Borneo include Bandjermassingand Kinabatangan Rivers

Presbytis chrysomelas BorneanBandedLangur,SarawakSurili

CR Endemic to the islandof Borneo. Combinedpopulation estimatesfrom these sites arevery low(approximately 200-500individuals).

Swamp and lowland forests, andmangroves. Group size is 3-7individuals


Chelonia mydas GreenTurtle

EN Highly migratory Turtles migrate to areas rich inseagrass and/or marine algaewhere they forage and grow untilmaturity

Unlikely Project are outsidedistribution range

Elephas maximus AsianElephant,

IndianElephant

EN In Kalimantan,elephants occur only in

the Upper SembakungRiver in TindungDistrict.

Variety of habitats, includinggrassland, tropical evergreen

forest, semi-evergreen forest, moistdeciduous forest, dry deciduousforested, cultivated and secondaryforests.


Hylobates agilis AgileGibbon,Dark-handedGibbon

EN In Indonesia andBorneo, this species isfound in Sumatra(southeast of Lake Tobaand the Singkil River)

Highest densities in dipterocarp-dominated forests, but known toinhabit swamp and lowland foreststo hill, submountain, andmountain forests. Average home




DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 114 of 369



Genus SpeciesCommon

namesIUCNstatus


ofOccurrence

Reason

and PeninsularMalaysia (from theMudah and ThephaRivers in the north tothe Perak and KelantonRivers in the south)

range size of 29 ha.

Hylobates albibarbis BorneanAgileGibbon,BorneanWhite-beardedGibbon

EN Kalimantan, south ofthe Kapuas River andwest of the Barito River(endemic)

Found in primary, secondary andselectively logged tropicalevergreen forests, as well as peatswamp forest types. These arborealand diurnal primates aredominantly frugivorous,preferring fruits high in sugar, butwill also eat immature leaves andinsects. Average home range sizesof 28 ha and 45 ha


Arctictis binturong Bearcat,

Binturong

VU Widespread in south

and southeast Asia

Confined to tall forest, where it

feeds on fruits and small animalslike insects, birds, and rodents, andfish. Primarily arboreal.

Unlikely Lack of suitable

habitat in Projectarea and lowpopulationnumbers

Presbytis frontata White-facedLangur,White-frontedLangur,

VU Endemic to Borneo.Found patchily incentral and easternBorneo, from centralSarawak to thesouthern coast, with a

Primary lowland rainforest,riverine and hill forest, andoccasionally plantations andsecondary forest.

Unlikely Not commonlyfound in habitat inProject area, patchydistribution



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 115 of 369



Genus SpeciesCommon

namesIUCNstatus


ofOccurrence

Reason

few populations inwest

Presbytis hosei Grey LeafMonkey,HosesLangur,Hose's LeafMonkey

VU found in northernBorneo, specificallynorthern Sarawak andSabah (Malaysia),northern EastKalimantan(Indonesia), and BruneiDarussalam

Lowland to hill dipterocarprainforest (on Mount Kinabalu).Found in habitat ranging from 0-1,000 masl. Occasionally enterplantations. Primarily folivorous,but will eat flowers, fruits andseeds, as well as eggs andnestlings.

Unlikely Lack of suitablehabitat in andaround Project area,found in NEKalimantan

Trachypithecus auratus Ebony LeafMonkey, JavanLangur, JavanLutung

VU Endemic to Indonesia,where it occurs on Javaand the smaller islandsof Bali, Lombok, PalauSempu and NusaBarung

Variety of habitat types -mangroves, freshwater swampforests, ever-wet lowland and hillforests, dry deciduous forests,mountain forest up to 3,000-3,500m, teak/rasamala/acaciaforest






DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 117 of 369



Figure 5.7 Cleared Forest Areas for Plantations and Logging along Access Roads

5.10.2 Biodiversity Survey Results

A biodiversity survey was completed for the project and is provided at Annex C. Thisincludes the detailed field methodology employed and the species list for each survey area.

The survey findings for each of the four survey areas are summarised below. A broad

summary of the vegetation and habitat types within the four survey areas is provided below.This information was used to form the basis of the critical habitat assessment.

5.10.2.1 KGPF

Flora and Vegetation

Vegetation at KGPF consists predominantly of Mixed Dipterocarp Secondary Forest, withsome pioneer vegetation. Dominant species recorded during the survey generally belongedto the genera Shorea, Macaranga, Lithocarpus, Callamus, and Ficus genuses. Canangaodorata was also common.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 118 of 369



Figure 5.8 Vegetation at KGPF (left), evidence of clearing area in KGPF (right)

Approximately 40 species from 25 flora families were recorded from sampling plots withinthe KGPF. The dominant tree species in the sample plots are Shorea pinanga, which grows to a

height of approximately 45 metres. This species is one of the 5 species of Dipterocarpaceaerecorded. The other four species is Shorea lamellata, Parashorea maalonan , Hopea ferruginea andDipterocarpus sp.

Common lower stratum and forest floor species included Phyrnium pubigerum which is aspecies of herb clustered on the forest floor. Glochidion capitatum was commonly encounteredwhich is a small tree which often found in secondary forest habitats, often along streams.Other commonly encountered small tree and sapling species included Melastomamalabatricum and Canarium littorale . Melastoma malabatricum was found in plots with an opencanopy, whereas C. littorale was generally observed in plots with dense canopy. M.

malabatricum grow clustered on the edge of the forest, in contrast to C. littorale which growsin forest stands.

Three threatened flora species were recorded, Hopea ferruginea, Shorea lamellate andParashorea malaanonan, which are currently listed as Critically Endangered on the IUCNredlist of threatened species. These species are all canopy tree species that occur within theregion

Fauna

A total of 4 mammals, 20 birds and 5 reptiles were observed in the KGPF survey area. Anadditional 4 mammal species, 6 bird species and a reptile were recorded through indirectevidence such as voice/calls, footprints and scats. Two of these species are listed asthreatened on the IUCN redlist. They include the Bearded Pig (Sus barbatus), currently listedas Vulnerable, and the Endangered Muller’s Gibbon (Hylobates muelleri). Eight of the bird



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 119 of 369



species recorded are protected under the Indonesian Protected by Government Regulation

No. 7 of 1999.Habitat

Some streams were observed within the site boundary and near the access road. There wasevidence of past clearing in the survey area which appears to be ongoing as new plantationswere observed. Although somewhat disturbed, the existing vegetation was still consideredto be potential habitat for key species such as the Sun Bear, Mueller’s Gibbon, and theAsianblack Hornbill. Some tall stands of Dipterocarpaceae with dense canopies still stand,which combined with lianas (woody vines) likely provide useful connections for faunamoving between habitats.

5.10.2.2 Sales Gas Pipeline Route


Vegetation along the Sales Gas pipeline route was primarily found to be modified habitat,consisting of a mixture of plantations (primarily rubber) and Mixed Dipterocarp SecondaryForest.

The canopy level along the Sales Gas pipeline route was the higher than other areas of theProject area surveyed, however evidence of past clearing was observed along the

pipeline/access road route in the survey area which appears to be ongoing for the purpose ofplantation and horticultural farming.

Dominant species generally belonged to the genera Shorea, Macaranga , Lithocarpus, Callamus,and Ficus. As a result of this clearing and disturbance nine commonly encountered specieswere identified consisting of Ficus elastic, Horsfieldia grandis, Knema latifolia, Shorea pinanga,Cananga odorata, Melastoma malabatricum, Macaranga sp., Hevea brasiliensis and Artocarpuscommunis

Figure 5.9 Vegetation along Sales Gas Pipeline Route (left) Plantation near PLNSection (right)



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 120 of 369



Fauna

A total of 4 mammals and 18 bird species were observed while surveying the proposedpipeline route. Nine of these bird species are protected under the Indonesian Protected byGovernment Regulation No. 7 of 1999. Indirect evidence of two IUCN listed mammalianspecies was recorded. These were the Vulnerable Malayan Sun Bear ( Helarctos malayanus),which was identified from scratch markings, and the Muller’s Gibbon.

Habitat

Habitat was a mixture of modified habitat and natural habitat that has been impacted fromclearing activities such as selective logging and plantations. Several trees fromDipterocarpaceae family still standing and dominate the canopy. This may be suitablenesting, shelter and feeding habitat for a number of species identified as protected under theIndonesian regulations such as the Asian Black Hornbill (Anthracoceros malayanus), LittleSpiderhunter ( Arachnothera longirostra ), and Hill Myna ( Anthracoceros malayanus).

5.10.2.3 Gathering Pipeline Route


Vegetation along the Gathering Gas pipeline route was Low Mixed Dipterocarp SecondaryForest, with a relatively homogenous canopy. Dominant plant species generally belonged toDipterocarpaceae, Myrtaceae and Euphorbiaceae families. Some pioneer species werepresent (e.g. Macaranga sp.), but otherwise it is considered to be modified habitat. Fern andrattan dominated in the open area. Several streams were also observed in the forested areaalong the route.

Figure 5.10 Vegetation at Survey Site GT05 along the Gathering Pipeline Route





DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 122 of 369



Results of vegetation analysis conducted at the site Wellsite identified 12 species of flora

from 10 families. In general, the area around Wellsite is dominated by the rubber tree Heveabrasiliensis interspersed with stands of secondary forest plants belonging to other pioneerspecies such as Dillenia excelsa and Koilodepas sp.

Ptenandra coerulescens was another dominant species found in the Wellsite area. Ptenandracoerulescens is one of 14 Ptenandra species found in Borneo and is well adapted toregenerating secondary forest areas. Elateriospermum tapos was also commonly encounteredwithin the lower stratum.

Fauna

A total of 3 mammals, 12 bird species and 8 reptilian and ambibian species were observedduring surveys undertaken at the Kerendan Wellsite. Indirect evidence of the Common PalmCivet and four bird species occuring in the area was also recorded. None of the speciesidentified are currently listed as IUCN threatened species, however 4 birds and the LeopardCat are classed as protected species under the Indonesian Protected by GovernmentRegulation No. 7 of 1999.

Habitat

Although modified habitat, the area may be used as foraging habitat for protected speciessuch as the Leopard Cat ( Prionairulus bengalensis ). This species is semi aquatic and evidence

of it occurring in the Project area was recorded during the field survey. A Hill Myna ( Graculareligiosa) nest was observed in a tree hole near the Wellsite. Protected under IndonesianRegulation, this species lives in open areas, in groups of ten to twenty individuals, and feedon a diet of fruits and insects. According the the community, the Lahei River is alsoimportant habitat for the Probiscus Monkey ( Nasalis larvatus ) which is listed as Endangeredon the IUCN threatened species redlist.

5.10.3 Biodiversity Values

IFC PS6 defines the parameters of biodiversity values and ecosystem services which should

be considered when assessing the Project against the IFC Performance Standards. Thisincludes the identification and consideration of habitat values, threatened species, protectedareas and invasive species. A summary of these values is provided below. This wasdeveloped using secondary data (primarily survey information from UKL/UKL reports) andthe information from the recent biodiversity field assessment.

5.10.3.1 Species of Conservation Interest

A desktop review of available data bases such as the IUCN Redlist was completed in June2013 to inform the biodiversity survey of species of conservation significance that occurwithin the Kalimantan region and potentially, in the Project area. IFC PS6 identifiesthreatened species as those listed on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (the Red List)and species categorised as critically endangered (CR), endangered (EN) and vulnerable (VU)are considered to be at a heightened risk of extinction.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 123 of 369



IUCN conservation significant species known to occur in the Kalimantan region are outlined

in Table 5.8 . Included in the table is a brief review of whether the species is known to occuror could potentially occur in the Project area based on the species known habitatrequirements, distribution and habitats known to exist within the Project area. Theconsideration of likely presence was also based on the preliminary site visit completed by theProject team in April 2013. This list was then used as part of the biodiversity survey toconfirm or otherwise the potential presence of conservation significant species andunderstand if they are likely to be a relevant consideration during the impact assessment.

Table 5.8 Threatened IUCN Listed Species Known to Occur or Potentially Occurwithin the Project Area

Common Name Scientific Name IUCN RedList Status^

Recorded inProject Area#

Recorded inSurrounding

Area#

Bornean Gibbon Hylobates muelleri EN Y

Malaysian Sun Bear Helarctos malayanus VU Y*

Bearded Pig Sus Barbatus VU Y Y

Proboscis Monkey Nasalis larvatus EN Y

Freshwater Crocodile Tomistoma schlegelii EN Y

Sambar Deer Cervus unicolor VU Y

Flat-headed Cat Prionailurus planiceps ENBornean Orangutan Bornean Orangutan EN

Bornean Bay Cat Pardofelis badia EN

Clouded Leopard Neofelis diardi VU

Whisked FlyingSquirrel

Petinomys genibarbis VU

King Cobra Ophiophagus hannah VU

Flores Woolly Bat Kerivoula flora VU

Pig-tailed Macaque Macaca nemestrina VU

Banded Civet Hemigalus derbyanus VU^ IUCN Description: E = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable# Data obtained from Biodiveristy Survey (2013), and UKL/UPL reports for Kerendan and WK-1* Indirect evidence (scratches)

Threatened flora and fauna identified as occurring or potentially occurring in the Project areabased on secondary data research and biodiversity survey results are identified below.

Flora

Three threatened flora species were recorded in the Project area during the 2013 Biodiversitysurvey. These were Hopea ferruginea, Shorea lamellate and Parashorea malaanonan, whichare currently listed as Critically Endangered on the IUCN redlist of threatened species. Thesespecies are all canopy tree species that occur within the region, including Brunei and



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 124 of 369



Malaysia and in some instances Sumatra. These species were recorded at the KGPF site and

along the pipeline route from the well site to the KGPF and were a dominant canopy andsapling species at most vegetation plots. Based on known distribution these species are likelyto be relatively common within the local area wherever similar stands of secondary forestoccur. This reflects the fact that these species are not necessarily restricted to the project area,but are instead under threat regionally as a result of land clearing activities.

Fauna

Three fauna species listed as Vulnerable or Endangered under the IUCN red List have beenrecorded in the Project area. An additional three species have been recorded in thesurrounding area based on evidence such as UKL/UPL reports and interviews with the

community.A review of conservation significant species known to occur in the region and also existinghabitat at the survey site suggests that an additional nine (9) species may potentially utilisethe site, based on known habitat requirements and known records of the species or generalhabitat range.

Habitat

The following habitat categories (as defined by the IFC) need to be considered whendetermining the significance of biodiversity and natural resources:

• Modified Habitat;

• Natural Habitat; and

• Critical Habitat

Definitions for these habitats and an assessment of the presence of the habitats in the Projectarea is provided below while a review of the projects position against the modified andnatural habitat provisions of IFC PS 6 is provided at Table .

Habitat in the Project Area

Habitat in the Project is generally a mixture of modified and natural habitat that hasexperienced modification as a result of ongoing clearing activities to support localcommunity needs (e.g. timber production and plantation farming). The greatest level ofhabitat modification was observed at the Kerendan Wellsite and along the pipelineroutes/access roads, where habitat has been cleared or disturbed as a result of previous andongoing clearing activities.

Vegetation in the Project area consists predominantly of Mixed Dipterocarp SecondaryForest, with some pioneer vegetation. Plantations (e.g. rubber) were present along sections of

the Sales Gas and Gathering Pipeline routes and at the Kerendan Wellsite.Although somewhat disturbed, the vegetation in the Project area was still considered to bepotential habitat for key species listed in Table 5.8 . Some tall stands of Dipterocarpaceae



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 125 of 369



with dense canopies still stand, which combined with lianas (woody vines) likely provide

useful connections for fauna moving between habitats. No specific habitats such as nestingor roosting habitat were identified for these species, however they may use the Project areafor foraging.

Overall, the habitats identified within the Project area would not be considered unique orconsidered to be of particular importance to locally occurring species, over and above thegeneral habitat values which the Project area provides.

Table 5.9 shows how the Project performs against the IFC performance standards (IFC PS 6)relating to natural and modified habitats. The Guidance Notes accompanying IFC PS6 havebeen used to guide the application of these performance standards to this Project.

This review has confirmed that Natural habitats as defined under PS 6 are likely to bedisturbed by the project. Suitable actions to mitigate or offset impacts to these areas are likelyto be required by the project. The requirements of such a program would need to bediscussed following completion of this ESIA and may include a commitment by Salamanderto be included within the Project’s Environmental and Social Action Plan (ESAP).

It is considered unlikely that the project would affect critical habitats. This is assessed indetail in Table 5.10 .

Table 5.9 Appraisal of Project Against Relevant IFC Performance Standards

IFC Performance Standard^ Appraisal of Project Against StandardModified Habitat(12) This Performance Standard applies to thoseareas of modified habitat that include significantbiodiversity value, as determined by the risksand impacts identification process required inPerformance Standard 1 (IFC PS 1). The clientshould minimize impacts on such biodiversityand implement mitigation measures as

appropriate.

(12) Modified habitats of the Project Area andsurrounds include plantations and areas subject tologging and land clearing.. None of these habitatsoccurring in the proposed footprint of the Projectcontribute to biodiversity conservation in asignificant manner as they are not unique habitatsin the local area and will persist (and will remainmanaged) by local people.Mitigation of the impacts of the Project on theseareas is not considered necessary.

Natural Habitat(14) Impacts to natural habitat can only occurafter client demonstrates:

• no other alternatives exist within theregion to develop the Project onmodified habitat (this does not includehabitat that has been modified inpreparation for the development)

• consultation has occurred (IFC PS 1)• mitigation of conversion and

degradation is demonstrated

(14) Clearing for the project is expected to result inthe clearing of approximately 57 ha of secondaryforest and other natural vegetation types.

• Alternatives to clearing this land have notbeen discussed in previous studies orreports. Project design has been finalised,it is recognised that the pipelines willoccur in close proximity to existing roadsto reduce project disturbance.

• Consultation as part of the project hasbeen ongoing and has specifically beenconducted as part of the ESIA process.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 126 of 369



IFC Performance Standard^ Appraisal of Project Against Standard•

Mitigation has not been confirmed as yetand would be confirmed as part of theimpact assessment and follow-upconsultation with Salamander.

(15) Impacts on 'natural habitat' achieve no netloss where feasible - no net loss meaningnegative impacts are balanced by avoidance,minimisation, restoration and offsets.appropriate actions include:• avoidance through identification and

protection of set-asides (areas onsite oradjacent or under client's managementcontrol that are identified as higher biologicalvalue and are set aside for protection)

• implement measures to minimise habitatfragmentation (i.e. biological corridors)

• habitat restoration during and/or afteroperations

• implementing biodiversity offsets

(15) Impacts of the Project in its current form,while not considered significant will result in a‘net loss’ of biodiversity.

• No discussion has been provided in previousstudies or reports detailing the minimisation ofimpacts to natural habitats or the onsitecreation of ‘set-asides’.

• Habitat fragmentation has not been specificallydiscussed however is unlikely to be a keyconsideration for the project,

• Habitat restoration or offsets are to beconfirmed for the project.

1. ^ Numbers in parentheses are those paragraph numbers from the IFC PerformanceStandard 6.

Critical Habitat Determination

Critical Habitat is a concept within the IFC PS6 to facilitate the identification of areas of highbiodiversity value. The intention of delineating Critical Habitat is to define areas in whichdevelopment would be of a particularly sensitive nature and require special attention were itto go ahead. Critical Habitat is not limited to pristine or highly biodiverse areas but ratherincludes the broader landscape that supports the biodiversity values that trigger the CriticalHabitat designation, which typically include a mosaic of modified, natural, and criticalhabitats. The provisions by which Critical Habitat is defined are laid out in Paragraph 9 ofPS6 and related Guidance Note (GN) 6. Critical Habitat is defined as any habitat that exhibits

one or more of seven criteria.

Table 5.10 evaluates the potential for critical habitat to occur based on the biodiversityassessment findings to date. Based on the biodiveristy findings, the Project area is notconsidered to be representative of critical habitat. The projects impacts on conservationsignificant species are evaluated further at Chapter 10.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 127 of 369



Table 5.10 Criteria and Thresholds for Identifying Critical Habitat under IFC

Performance Standard 6 (2012)

Criteria 1 Criteria Met (Yes/No)

Criteria 1. Habitat required for survival of criticallyendangered and/or endangered species 1 1As classified on the IUCN Red List or listsdesignated by the host government.

Unlikely

The Project area may provide general habitatopportunities. IUCN listed species mayperiodically utilise the Project area, howeverthese habitats would not support habitatvalues critical to their survival. Further detailon species and their habitat requirements is

provided in the biodiversity assessment inAnnex C. Project impacts to conservationsignificant species are considered at Chapter10.

Criteria 2. Areas having special significance forendemic or restricted range species 2.2In order to meet this criterion, “large numbers” ofendemic or range-restricted species found only in aspecific area” must be present. Neither PS6 nor GN6

provides a specific threshold for this criterion.Determination must be based on professional expertise and

judgment of qualified experts.

Unlikely

Species endemic to Kalimantan occur withinthe project area however habitats would notbe of particular importance to these species.

Criteria 3. Sites critical for the survival of migratoryor congregatory species 3.3In order to meet this criterion, the habitat must be“required for the survival of particular migratory orcongregatory species”. Neither PS6 nor the supportingGN provides a specific threshold for this criterion.Determination must be based on professional expertise and


No

There is no evidence that congregatory ormigratory species would rely on the projectsite as part of their survival.

Criteria 4. Areas with unique assemblages ofspecies 4 4Defined in GN6 as species assemblages “that cannot

be found anywhere else”.

No

The species identified within the site areexpected to occur elsewhere withinKalimantan, where similar habitat occurs.

Criteria 5. Areas associated with key evolutionaryprocesses 5 5Defined in GN6 as “areas that have key scientificvalue due to the evolutionary or ecological attributespresent”.

No

Criteria 6. Areas associated with key ecosystemservices 6 6Neither PS6 nor the supporting GN defines ‘key’ecosystem services. No specific threshold for meeting this

criterion exists. Determination must be based on professional expertise and judgment of qualified experts.

No

Ecosystem services in the Project area are notconsidered to be independent of surroundinghabitats which remain accessible to thecommunity.

Criteria 7. Areas having biodiversity of significantsocial, economic, or cultural importance to local

No



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 128 of 369



Criteria 1 Criteria Met (Yes/No)

communities7

7No further guidance provided under this criterion. Determination must be based on professional expertise and


There is no evidence that the Project area is ofsignificant economic, cultural or socialimportance

The criteria and sub-criteria are based on the 2006 version of IFC PS6 (2006) and relevant GN (2007).

5.11 ECOSYSTEM SERVICES

Ecosystem Services are defined as the benefits that people, including businesses, derive fromecosystems (IFC 2012). These services are substantial and varied, underpinning basic human

health and survival needs as well as supporting economic activities, the fulfilment ofpeople’s potential, and enjoyment of life. In order to provide a uniform basis to assess thestatus of all major global habitats across all of the world’s bioregions, the United Nation’sMillennium Ecosystem Assessment (UN 2005) combined these diverse Ecosystem Servicestypologies into a consistent classification scheme.

There are four categories of Ecosystem Services defined in the Millennium EcosystemAssessment as adopted in IFC PS6:

• Provisioning services - those services that can be extracted from ecosystems to supporthuman needs. This term is more or less synonymous with the term “ecosystem goods”that was used in some prior classification schemes, including such tangible assets asfresh water, food, fibre, timber and medicinal plants;

• Regulating services – the benefits obtained from an ecosystem’s control of the naturalenvironment, including the regulation of surface water purification, carbon storageand sequestration, climate regulation, protection from natural hazards, air quality,erosion and pests;

• Cultural services - nonmaterial benefits including diverse aspects of aesthetic, spiritual,recreational, and other cultural values; and

• Supporting services – the natural processes essential to the maintenance of the integrity,resilience, and functioning of ecosystems, thereby supporting the delivery of all otherbenefits. They include soil formation, nutrient cycling and primary production.

The concept of Ecosystem Services highlights the fact that humans are reliant upon thebenefits provided by ecosystems, and that impacts to ecosystems can subsequently impacthuman health and quality of life. Project Affected communities therefore perform animportant role in the identification and prioritisation of Ecosystem Services within thisreview.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 129 of 369



5.11.1 IFC PS Expectations

IFC PS6 has the following requirements regarding Ecosystem Services:• Where a project is likely to adversely impact Ecosystem Services, as determined by the

risks and impacts identification process, the client will conduct a systematic review toidentify Priority Ecosystem Services. Priority Ecosystem Services are two-fold: (i)those services on which project operations are most likely to have an impact and,therefore, which result in adverse impacts to Affected Communities; and/or (ii) thoseservices on which the Project is directly dependent for its operations (e.g., water).

• When Affected Communities are likely to be impacted, they should participate in the

determination of Priority Ecosystem Services in accordance with the stakeholderengagement process as defined in Performance Standard 1.

• With respect to impacts on Priority Ecosystem Services of relevance to AffectedCommunities and where the client has direct management control or significantinfluence over such Ecosystem Services, adverse impacts should be avoided. If theseimpacts are unavoidable, the client will minimize them and implement mitigationmeasures that aim to maintain the value and functionality of priority services.

• With respect to impacts on Priority Ecosystem Services on which the Project depends,

clients should minimize impacts on Ecosystem Services and implement measures thatincrease resource efficiency of their operations, as described in PerformanceStandard 3.

• Additional provisions for Ecosystem Services are included in Performance Standards4, 5, 7, and 8.19.

5.11.2 Ecosystem Services Data Gathering

Ecosystem Services within the Study Area were identified through a process of stakeholderengagement and consultation, as well as biodiversity survey and assessment. The datacollection aimed to directly consult and engage with Project Affected Communities toascertain their views and concerns relating to their use of the local environment andpotential concerns regarding the project. The process included:

• Consultation with the community as well as review of existing available regency dataon land use and livelihood; and

• A field survey to support the Biodiversity assessment

The social and biodiversity findings are described in detail within the respective baselinechapters.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 130 of 369



5.11.2.1 Social Data

The social baseline chapter provides a detailed description of the types of ecosystem servicesupon which the local communities rely or utilize as part of their day to day livelihoods.

These are summarised under the following major subject headings and are used as the basisfor discussing the relevant ecosystem services within the following sections.

• Agriculture;

• Rubber Cultivation;

• Fishing, Hunting;

• Gathering of Forest Products;

• Water Use (domestic); and

• Transportation.

5.11.2.2 Biodiversity Findings

The biodiversity baseline is detailed at the beginning of this chapter. It describes the localarea as consisting of agricultural land, plantation areas as well as secondary forest. Nounique or restricted habitat types were identified within the study area and it wasconsidered that the Project area was likely to provide general foraging habitat for a variety offauna species.

5.11.2.3 Ecosystem Services Descriptions

The provisioning, regulating, cultural and supporting services considered to be relevant tothe project site are listed at Table 5.11 and are described in further detail below. This is basedon the findings of the social and biodiversity surveys but also ERM’s experience on the typesof services that areas such as the Project site would be expected to provide. This primarily

relates to regulating and supporting services. Table 5.11 also identifies if the service is to becarried through for consideration as a priority ecosystem service.

Table 5.11 Ecosystem Services Summary

Occurs within Study Area To be considered for Assessment

Provisioning Services

Wild-caught fish/Wild meatCultivated cropsForest ProductsFreshwater (surface water)Freshwater (groundwater)

YesYesYesYesYes



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 131 of 369




Regulating ServicesRegulation of air qualityClimate regulation: localRegulation of water timing andflowsWater purification and wastetreatmentRiver bank protectionDisease regulationPollination

No, general service unlikely to be significantly affected by theProject.YesYesYesNo, general service unlikely to be significantly affected by theProject.No, general service unlikely to be significantly affected by theProject.

Cultural ServicesNon-use value of biodiversitySpiritual or religious value

No, significant biodiversity values have not been attributed to theproject area.No, significant spiritual or religious values have not beenattributed to the Project site.

Supporting Services

Primary productionNutrient cyclingWater cyclingSoil formationHabitat ProvisionTransportation

No, general ecosystem service.No, general ecosystem service.No, general ecosystem service.No, general ecosystem service.YesYes

5.11.3 Ecosystem Services Prioritisations

Each of the Ecosystem Services considered in this study was evaluated to determine whetherit should be considered for elevation to a Priority Ecosystem Service based on the followingfour criteria:

• Dependence of the Project on the Ecosystem Service;

• The importance of the service to the affected community; and

• The irreplaceability of the Ecosystem Service if it was to be completely removed fromthe region.

The criteria were combined using the matrix in Figure 5.12 . Ecosystem Services with apriority ranking of High Priority or Major Priority were assigned as Priority EcosystemServices. Table 5.12 displays the prioritisation of Ecosystem Services. In summary, thePriority Ecosystem Services identified for the Project are:

• Freshwater (Surface Water);

• Freshwater (Groundwater);



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 132 of 369



• Wild-Caught Fish;

• Animal Hunting

• Cultivated Crops;

• Forest Products; and

• Transportation.

Impacts to these services are assessed in the impact assessment chapter.

Figure 5.12 Ecosystem Service Prioritisation Matrix

Importance to BeneficiariesIrreplaceability

High Moderate Low

Low The service is used and valued by parts of thecommunity, but it is not important in maintainingquality of life or livelihoods of Project AffectedCommunities.

LowPriority

LowPriority

ModeratePriority

Medium The service is readily used by some members of theProject Affected Communities for income orsubsistence, but they are not dependent upon theservice for their livelihoods, and not everyoneutilises the service.

LowPriority

ModeratePriority

HighPriority

High The service is highly important in maintaining thelivelihoods of the Project Affected Communities,and is used by most of the community regularly.

ModeratePriority

HighPriority

MajorPriority

Essential The service is essential to maintain the health of theProject Affected Communities, and the service isused by all members of the community.

HighPriority

MajorPriority

MajorPriority

Irreplaceability definition

High Many spatial alternatives exist that are readily available to the Project Affected

Communities, and there are no major impediments to their usage. Moderate Spatial alternatives exist but are either less accessible than the affected service, or there

are other barriers to their use such as distance, cost and skills required to access theservice.

Low There are few to no spatial alternatives available to the Project Affected Communities.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 133 of 369



Table 5.12 Ecosystem Service Prioritisation Summary (Project Specific)

EcosystemServices

Trends andSustainability Beneficiaries

Importanceto

BeneficiariesIrreplaceability Summary of Rationale Priority


Freshwater(SurfaceWater)

Water quality generallygood, although highlevels of turbidity andcertain metals (e.g. iron)has been recordedduring sampling ofLahei River

Villagers Essential Low Communities are reliant on riverwater for theirdomestic water use including bathing anddrinking water.

Major

Freshwater(Groundwater)

No trends identified Villagers High Low The community at Luwe Hulu utilizesgroundwater for drinking and other domesticuses. This is also utilised by Salamander.

Major

Wild-CaughtFish

Species such as the Jelawat fish are the mostpopular but arebecoming quite rare. Notrends identified forother species.

FishermenConsumers offish

High Low Fish is an important element of the diet withinthe four project affected communities. Most ofthe fishing is conducted for householdconsumption rather than fulltime employment.The activity is primarily undertaken whilevillages are not farming and rubber tapping.

Major

AnimalHunting

Communities havefound that they need toventure further into theforest and animals arebecoming increasinglydifficult to find.

Dayak peopleand localvillages.

Medium Low Intensive hunting is no longer conducted and itgenerally occurs after harvesting. Communitiesalso catch birds to supplement their existinglivelihood.

High

CultivatedCrops

No specific trends Villagers. High Moderate Agriculture is the primary livelihood for localcommunities.

High



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 134 of 369



EcosystemServices


Importanceto


ForestProducts

The area of native forestis likely to havedecreased within the

local area as a result ofclearing for cultivation,plantation and miningactivities

Villagerscollecting,growing and

selling timberand collectingforest products tosupport theirlivelihood.

High Moderate Besides hunting animals in the forest somevillagers gather various types of plants. Theseplants are gathered primarily for medicinal or

traditional purposes (i.e. to treat diseases,increase stamina, as materials for constructinghouses and home furnishings and forconducting traditional ceremonies). In addition,some plant species collected from the forest aresold in the market.

High

Regulating Services

ErosionRegulation

No trends identified River water usersFishermendependent ongood waterquality forfisheryproduction

Low Moderate Shoreline vegetation is likely to play a role inpreventing or reducing sediment laden runoffentering local river systems. These services willcontinue to persist following projectconstruction and operation.

Low

Regulation ofWater Timingand Flows

No trends identified Villagers livingclose to rivers

Medium Moderate Vegetation and other groundcover is likely to beimportant in regulating water timing and flowspotentially preventing or managing flooding insome instances.

Moderate

WaterPurificationand WasteTreatment

No trends identified River water usersFishermendependent ongood waterquality forfisheryproduction

Medium Moderate Vegetation and other groundcover is likely to beimportant in capturing wastes and managingwater quality entering local river systems. Theseservices will continue to persist followingproject construction and operation.

Moderate



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 135 of 369



EcosystemServices


Importanceto


River BankProtection

No trends identified Villages livingclose to the riversystem

Medium Moderate Engineering solutions can provide shorelineprotection, however these can have adverseimpacts on other shoreline processes. These

services will continue to persist followingproject construction and operation.

Moderate

Supporting Services

HabitatProvision

No trends identified Fishermen,hunters andpeople whovalue theconservation ofbiodiversity

Medium Moderate Riverine and terrestrial habitats support thebiodiversity values which are utilised to supportthe livelihoods of local communities.

Moderate

Transportation No Trends identified Local villagesand businesses,includingSalamander

High Moderate All 4 villages are located along the rivertherefore there is a strong reliance on the riverfor transportation of goods and people.

High



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 136 of 369



6 SOCIAL BASELINE

6.1 INTRODUCTION

This section provides information on the socio-economic baseline conditions in the proposedProject area, which will be used to inform the process of identifying and assessing thepotential social and community health impacts. Baseline data presented includes:

• Demographics such as population growth, religion and ethnicity;

• Economics including livelihoods and employment;

• Community infrastructure including water, sanitation and electricity;

• Community health including key health indicators;

• Education such as literacy levels; and

• Cultural heritage sites.

6.1.1 Methodology

A Social Baseline Study was conducted using secondary and primary data to triangulate theinformation gathered at the regency and local level. The secondary data analysed wasprovided either by Salamander or from the regency statistical office at the sub-district andregency level.

Secondary data gathered was used to identify key data gaps; this helped to focus the primarydata collection that took place in the four potentially impacted villages of Kerendan, LuweHulu, Harangandang and Muara Pari.

Tools used in the field to gather the primary data included an eco-system servicesquestionnaire and an observation form. Consultation notes were also taken in relation to

community perceptions towards Salamander, as well as summaries of the focus groupdiscussions held. The consultations had several objectives:

• To gather valuable local level primary data;

• To share Project information with the communities;

• To build Salamander’s relationship with its local level stakeholders; and

• To manage the communities expectations around Project benefits and communityinvestment.

In each village the same four-hour consultation process was held:

• Arrival and greeting by community members: Salamander and ERM consultants metand greeted community members upon arrival and recorded attendance.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 137 of 369



• Project Introduction: Salamander provided an introduction to the Project using visualprops such as posters and photographs. During the introduction Salamanderdiscussed:

− The aims and objectives of the Project;− The Project timeline, status and planned future activities;

− Salamander’s Environmental and Social commitments;− CSR activities undertaken to date and the process of how investment is decided and

implemented; and− ERM’s role and activities whilst in the Project area.

Approximately 50% to 60% of households attended the village meetings - representing asuitable cross-section of each potentially impacted community. This enabled the team togather a robust understanding of overall community perceptions.

• Group Discussions: The group discussion, led by ERM, involved asking a series ofquestions in an open discussion format (see Annex F). Questions were structured inorder of importance, due to potential time constraints. During these group sessionsthe participants were split into two groups (Group 1: women and children and Group2: men), in order to obtain more detailed baseline data and perceptions.

• Community Perception Questionnaire: Questionnaires were completed in each of thegroup sessions. The aim of this questionnaire was to enable Salamander to gain abetter understanding of how each community perceives Salamander and its Projectactivities (see Annex G).

• Closing: Salamander concluded each meeting with a short speech, thanking thecommunity for their participation, providing a brief summary of what to expect nextand where additional information could be accessed.

ERM then returned to each village the following day to gather visual baseline data (Table 6.1

and Table 6.2 show the daily schedule).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 138 of 369



Table 6.1 Morning Open Day Schedule

TimeItem Facilitator Resources Required

Start Finish

0800 0815 Arrival/greeting ofcommunity members

Salamander/ERM Record of Attendance Sheet

0815 0845 Project introduction &meeting structure overview

Salamander Interactive display (posters,pictures etc. of Project areaand activities)

0845 0945 Group discussion ERM Group discussion promptquestions (for ERM use only– do not distribute)

0945 1015 Break – snack andrefreshments

Salamander Snack and refreshments

1015 1100 Group discussion continued ERM As above

1100 1115 Perception Questionnaireoverview (instructions onhow to complete) andquestionnaire distributionquestionnaire

ERM Perception Questionnaire;support from Salamander todistribute

1115 1130 Community completesquestionnaire

ERM Pens/clipboards Supportfrom Salamander to collect

1130 1200 End of meeting. Salamanderprovide a brief (<5 min)speech after completion ofquestionnaires to concludemeeting and thankcommunity for their time.Lunch and refreshmentsserved upon conclusion

Salamander Lunch and refreshments



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 139 of 369



Table 6.2 Afternoon Open Day Schedule

TimeItem Facilitator Resources Required

Start Finish1300 1330 Arrival/greeting of

community members. Lunchand refreshments servedupon arrival

Salamander/ ERM Record of Attendance Sheet

1330 1400 Project introduction &meeting structure overview

Salamander Interactive display (posters,pictures etc. of Project area

1400 1500 Group discussion ERM Group discussion promptquestions (for ERM use only

– do not distribute)1500 1515 Break – snack andrefreshments

Salamander Snack and refreshments

1515 1615 Group discussion continued ERM As above

1615 1630 Perception Questionnaireoverview (instructions onhow to complete) andquestionnaire distribution

ERM Perception Questionnaire;support from Salamander todistribute

1630 1645 Community completesquestionnaire

ERM Pens/clipboards Supportfrom Salamander to collect

1645 1650 End of meeting. Salamander

provides a speech aftercompletion of questionnaireto conclude meeting andthank community for theirtime.

Salamander

6.1.2 Study Limitations

There were a number of limitations whilst undertaking the community consultationactivities and when gathering the secondary data:

• Low literacy levels: During the community consultations initially the perceptionquestionnaires were to be completed by all the group participants. However due tothe low literacy levels in the Project area many people had difficulties in reading andanswering the questions. To address this issue local literate people (i.e. teachers andnurses) were asked to assist those who were illiterate.

• Availability of participants: The majority of people in the village tap rubber in themorning thus consultation activities held during this period had a lower participantrate than in the afternoon and evening. Where possible consultation activities wereheld once the villagers had returned back to their villages for the day.

• Secondary data reliability: There were a number of inconsistencies in the secondarydata gathered; specifically between the statistics gathered by the Central Bureau of



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 140 of 369



Statistics compared to that provided in the local villages. The more reliable source wasutilised for this baseline.

6.2 O VERVIEW OF COMMUNITIES IN THE PROJECT AREA

The following subsections describe the characteristics of the people who live in the Projectarea. Figure 6.1 illustrates the names and locations of villages in the Project area in relation toProject facilities. Figure 6.2 presents the four Project villages.

There are four villages in the Project area; Haragandang, Kerendan, Muara Pari and LuweHulu, all formerly within the Lahei sub district government administrative region. Howeversince October 2012, the village of Luwe Hulu has been incorporated into the West Lahei

administrative district as a result of the expansion of the Lahei sub district.

Haragandang, Muara Pari and Kerendan are located inland along the banks of the LaheiRiver. Muara Lahei town is located at the mouth of the Lahei River and is the capital of theLahei sub district. The town of Muara Lahei is located on the interface between the mouth ofLahei and Barito Rivers – the Barito River being one of the largest and the longest rivers onthe island of Borneo. It is also one of the main transportation routes to the main cities in thesouth such as Muara Teweh (the capital of North Barito regency) and Banjarmasin (thecapital of South Kalimantan province). Luwe Hulu, which is located directly on the banks ofthe Barito River, therefore has the most access to other towns and cities in area.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 141 of 369



Figure 6.1 Locations of Villages in Relation to the Kerendan Gas Development ProjectFacilities



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 142 of 369



Figure 6.2 Typical Scenery in the Project Villages

6.2.1 Ethnicity

The villagers of Haragandang, Kerendan, Muara Pari and Luwe Hulu all share the sameorigin ancestry – they all derive from the people of Dayak Bakumpai and Dayak DusunMalang.

The Dayak Bakumpai people are descendants of Dayak Ngaju who converted to Islam andinhabited the area along the banks of the Barito River basin in South Kalimantan and CentralKalimantan. Their ancestral villages were spread from Marabahan, Barito Kuala until PurukCahu in Murung Raya. According to the 2000 population census approximately 7.5% of theCentral Kalimantan population is Bakumpai people. Historically many Dayak Bakumpaipeople migrated and settled along the Lahei River.

The people of Dayak Dusun Malang are the indigenous Dayak tribe from the inland area inCentral Kalimantan; descendants of the Dayak Ot Danum clumps (clumps Barito Raya). The

original village of Dayak Dusun Malang was located close to Muara Inu in north-eastern partof Muara Teweh. Similar to the Dayak Bakumpai people, the Dayak Dusun Malang peoplealso migrated to the Lahei River and to this day most Dusun Malang people still embrace thebeliefs of their ancestor Kaharingan.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 143 of 369



6.2.2 Village Characteristics

The settlement patterns of those residing in the four villages are typically clustered accordingto their ethnic group and religion. For example the villagers of the Dayak Dusun Malanggroup are concentrated on the upstream side of the Lahei River while the villagers of theDayak Bakumpai group are clustered in the lower reaches of the river.

Village houses are usually built close together along the banks of the river. Those housesbuilt on the river are traditionally named lanting houses and are quite vulnerable to floodingduring the rainy season. The majority of houses are semi-permanent constructed from woodobtained from the nearby forest. There are a small proportion of more affluent householdswho are building more permanent housing with brick walls and tiled flooring.

Although the two groups have different origins and religious affiliations, they co-existpeacefully and often inter-marital relationships occur. Furthermore both groups share thesame language (Bakumpai); although the people of Dusun Malang have their own language.Bahasa Indonesian is only used for academic teaching.

6.2.3 Demographics

Acording to the 2010 population census, the Barito Utara Regency population was 121,573(48% female and 52% male). Based on the total regency the population density rate was15 people/km, which is a low population density.

In the 2012 Lahei sub-district report, the total population of the four Project villages at theend of 2011 was 3,229 people (or 916 households). That is an average of less than four peopleper household). At the regency level the 2012 report indicated a similar number of peopleper household. Therefore one can assume the potentially impacted villages have for the mostpart small families with only one to two children per household. Table 6.3 provides a moredetailed breakdown of the demographics per village.

6.2.4 Sex Ratio

Based on 2012 Lahei sub district report in 2011 there were 1,754 men and 1,520 women.Meanwhile, at the district and regency level the average population of sex ratio male andfemale is 108 as summarised in Table 6.4 meaning the average sex ratio of males and femalesin the four villages is higher than the sub district and regency levels.

Table 6.3 Demographic Data of Villages in the Project Footprint

Name ofVillage

Area(km 2)

PopulationAverage number of

person per HouseholdSex

RatioDensity / km 2 M F Total House

hold

Haragandang 109,65 321 273 594 139 4 118 5

Kerendan 265,05 299 253 552 151 4 118 2Muara Pari 108,84 305 283 588 235 3 108 5Luwe Hulu 106,28 829 711 1540 391 4 117 14Total 589.82 1754 1520 3229 916 3.75 115 18



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 144 of 369



Table 6.4 Number of Population, Household, Sex Ratio by District 2011

Name of SubDistrict

Area(km 2)

PopulationAverage number of

person per HouseholdSex

RatioDensity /km 2 M F Total House

hold

Montallat 553 5.468 5.136 10.604 2.641 4 106 19

GunungTimang

890 5.187 4.842 10.029 2.537 4 107 11

GunungPurei

1.468 1.261 1.165 2.426 711 3 108 2

Teweh Timur 768 3.789 3.432 7.221 110 4 110 9

TewehTengah

1.708 36.309 33.632 69.941 17.573 4 108 41

Lahei 2.913 11.092 10.260 21.352 5.179 4 108 7

Total 8.300 63.106 58.467 121.573 30.452 4 108 15Source: Lahei Sub District in Figures 2012

6.2.5 Population Density

According to Lahei sub-district report at the end of 2011 the total area of the fourProject villages was 589.82 km 2; with a population of 3,229 people. This means theaverage population density in the four villages is 5.47people/km 2. The lowest populationdensity is in Kerendan (2 people/km 2), while in Muara Pari and Haragandang thepopulation density is 5 people/km 2. The highest population density is in Luwe Hulu (14people/km 2).

6.2.6 Population Growth

The Lahei sub-district report indicates a population growth of 6 people between 2010 and2011 (from 1,534 people to 1,540); a growth of 1.84% per year – this is higher than the sub-district growth rate of 0.95% and the national of 1.49% per year. Table 6.5 below summarises

the Project villages population growth between 2010 and 2011.

Table 6.5 Population Growth in Project Affected Villages 2011

Name of VillagePopulation

2010 2011 Growth Rate (%)

Haragandang 570 594 4,21

Kerendan 546 552 1,10

Muara Pari 565 588 4,07

Luwe Hulu 1.534 1.540 0,39

Total 3.215 3.274 1,84Source: Lahei Sub District in Figure 2012



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 145 of 369



Table 6.5 indicates the population growth rate is the highest in the villagesof Haragandang and Muara Pari - more than 4% per year. This high rate is believed to be dueto migrants from elsewhere marrying local residents as well as moving to the villages due toemployment at the mining and timber companies operating in the area. The migrants areusually relatives from other villages or other regions such as Muara Inu, LuweHulu, Muara Teweh, Marabahan or Banjarmasin. Some migrants who are nowresidents include civil servants employed at the local clinics orschools. The population growth in the villages of Luwe Hulu and Kerendan isreportedly more stable however given the private sector activity in Luwe Hulu thepopulation data is likely to be inaccurate due to limited reporting and recording of migrantactivity in the village.

6.2.7 Age and Gender Distribution

The population in the Barito Utara regency is dominated by the productive age group - between the ages of 15 and 64 years old (79,377 people or 65.35% of the population).Table 6.6 presents the distribution of the regency’s age groups. The data shows that for every100 people of a productive age who are able to work 53 are of a non-productive age thus theregency is burdened with a responsibility for a young (not earning age) generation morethan an elderly population. In addition it indicated there are less females of an incomeearning age in the regency and an overall total population with slightly more males.

Table 6.6 Age and Gender Distribution of North Barito Regency 2011

Age Men Women Total Sex Ratio

0-4 6390 6094 12484 105

5-9 7203 6663 13866 108

10-14 6343 6061 12404 105

15-19 5417 5199 10616 104

20-24 5034 5105 1039 99

25-29 5963 5931 11894 101

30 -34 5837 5241 11078 11135-39 5369 4970 10339 108

40-44 4663 3985 8648 117

45-49 3595 3115 6710 115

50-54 2732 2024 4756 135

55-59 1647 1296 2943 127

60-64 1202 1052 2254 114

65-69 757 743 1500 102

70-74 481 459 940 105

75 + 473 529 1002 89Total 63106 58467 121573 108

Source: Barito Utara in Figure 2012



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 146 of 369



6.2.8 Religion and Ethnicity

The ethnic and religious diversity in Barito Utara regency is less so than in other areas ofKalimantan such as Balikpapan, Samarinda and Pontianak. However logging and miningcompanies who have been growing their operations in Central Kalimantan are attracting anincreasing number of migrants with different religious and ethnic backgrounds to the area.

Dayaks are the identified indigenous peoples (IPs) in the area; a sub-ethnic group of which isthe Bakumpai (often called people from Barito River). The majority of Bakumpai- who areMuslim- migrated to Central Kalimantan one hundred years ago. Table 6.7 summarises theregency by religion.

Table 6.7 Population by Religion in Barito Utara Regency 2010

Name of Village Islam Protestant Catholic Hindu/Kaharingan Buddhism Total

Montallat 7,805 1,025 319 1,855 - 11,004

Gunung Timang 4,651 2,918 1,235 1,842 - 10,646

Gunung Purei 778 578 46 1,220 6 2,628

Teweh Timur 7,267 434 589 15,998 10 24,298

Teweh Tengah 54,097 6,166 2,586 3,418 225 66,492

Lahei 15,414 1,348 111 6,393 - 23,266

Total 90,012 12,469 4,886 30,726 241 138,334Source: Barito Utara in Figure 2012

People who live in the Project Area villages are of Islam; Protestant, Catholic,Hindu and Kaharingan religious backgrounds. Based on the district report (2012), themajority are Muslim (1,332 people or 51.1%). Islam is mainly practiced by the DayakBakumpai people and migrants from Java and Bugis who settled in the village Luwe Huluand work at the mining and logging companies. Luwe Hulu village has the largest Muslimpopulation followed by Haragandang and Muara Pari (Table 6.8 ).

Table 6.8 Number of Population by Religion in Project Area Villages 2011

Name of Village Islam Protestant Catholic Hindu/Kaharingan Buddhism

Haragandang 503 - - 91 -

Kerendan 305 229 -

Muara Pari 467 40 - 81 -

Luwe Hulu 1332 72 54 72 10

Total 2607 112 54 473 10

Source: Lahei Sub District in Figure 2012



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 147 of 369



There is a mosque in each of the four villages- see Figure 6.3 . In addition Luwe Huluand Haragandang also have madrassa schools that teach the basics of Islam to children.During consultations it was reported that there was a lack of Muslim mentors and educatorsof Islam. Therefore, many have an expectation that the Project will provide benefits to thecommunity in terms of religious education facilities and mentors.

Other religion practices in the Project area include Hindu Kaharingan - primarily inKerendan where 473 people (18.14%) are Hindu Kaharingan. Hindu Kaharingan isgenerally only practiced by the Dayak Dusun Malang. Kaharingan is a formof traditional beliefs practiced by the Dayak people in Kalimantan for generations.They believe and worship the Ranying – the god whocreated and mastered nature and human life. As the Indonesian government requiresevery resident and citizen to adopt one of the religions recognised by the governmentthe Kaharingan has been included in the Hindu category since April 20 1980. This is becauseof the similarities in the two religions.

Figure 6.3 Mosques in the Villages of Kerendan and Haragandang

The villages of Muara Pari and Kerendan both have a Basarah Hall established as a placefor gathering and performing rituals of Hindu Kaharingan (Figure 6.4) . Kerendan is alsoplanning a Basarah hall but due to a lack of funds construction is incomplete. Consultationwith villagers in Kerendan indicates they expect support from the Project to completeconstruction of the Basarah Hall.

In addition to the faiths of Islam and Hindu Kaharingan, Christian faiths are also practiced,mainly by a small portion of the Kalimantan Dayak people andethnic migrants from Java, Manado and Batak, as well as those who are working for thelocal mining and logging companies in Luwe Hulu. This is supported by the presence ofa church in Luwe Hulu. In Muara Pari in addition toChristian migrants some Dayak people have converted to Christianity.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 148 of 369



Figure 6.4 Basarah Hall in Muara Pari

6.3 ECONOMIC PROFILE

6.3.1 Employment and Livelihoods

In the Barito Utara Regency (2012) as many as 42 897 people (70.62%) of thepopulation in North Barito regency over the age of 15 years work in theagricultural and plantation sectors. The remaining are employed in the sectors suchas trade, restaurants and accommodation (13.21%), servicecompanies (7.8%), mining and quarrying (3.52%), construction(2.16%), transport, warehousing and communications (1.21%), provision ofutilities (0.62%), industry (0.60%), financial institutions, real estate and leasing (0.23%). Fromthe above data it can be seen that the primary source of livelihood for the majority of thepopulation in the regency is agriculture and plantations (Table 6.9 ).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 149 of 369



Table 6.9 Population 15 years old and over of Barito Utara Regency by Main Activity2011

Main Industry Total Percentage

Agriculture, Plantation, Forestry, Hunting and Fishing 42,897 70.62Mining and Quarrying 2,140 3.52Industry 366 0.60Electricity, Gas and Water Supply 374 0.62Construction 1,311 2.16Trade, Restaurants and Accommodation Services 8,026 13.21Transport, Storage and Communication 738 1.21

Financial Institutions, Real Estate, Leasing and Business Services 142 0.23Social Services, Community and Personal 4,752 7.82Total 60,746 100.00 Source: Barito Utara in Figure 2012

The main source of livelihood for the four villages is shifting agriculture -paddy, vegetablesand rubber plantations. Paddy and vegetables are farmed traditionally therefore generallythe yields are only sufficient to meet their household consumption needs.

The land use area in villages affected by the Project is summarised in Table 6.10 .

Table 6.10 Land Use Area in Project Affected Villages 2011 (In Ha.)

Village Wed Land Dry Land Building Forest Others Total

Haragandang - 952 50 9.748 215 10.965Kerendan - 2.119 34 23.794 603 26.505Muara Pari - 962 45 9.659 218 10.884Luwe Hulu - 960 68 9.407 193 10.628Total - 4.993 197 52.608 1.229 58.982 Source: Lahei Sub District in Figure 2011

According to the above data the majority of the land in the four villages is forest (52,608hectares or 89% of the total 58,982 hectares). The amount used for dry land agricultural is4,993 hectares (or 8.47%). Therefore one can conclude there is still plenty of land for furtherdry land agriculture development.

6.3.1.1 Paddy Agriculture, Vegetables and Fruits

Paddy and vegetable farming is still undertaken by traditional forms - by clearing forestareas and then planting local paddy varieties without using artificial fertilizers, pesticides or

insecticides. Paddy planting season is only done once a year with the growing season toharvest around five months.

Each farming family has on average 20 hectares land of forest for farming located around the



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 150 of 369



village. This land has been either inherited or gained by cultivating forest lands. In general afamily uses one to three areas of land in the forest for farming per year whilst the remainingland is left to be used the next year. If the plots of land have been harvested, the land will beabandoned for several years, allowing the forest to regrow and the soil fertility to improve toits natural form. This form of shifting agriculture is commonly practiced by the Dayakpeople in Kalimantan.

The location of farming land has generally been located in the vicinity of the villages within aradius of 1 to 5km. The location is usually close to the river for easy access to transportationas well drinking water whilst the villagers are working and resting in their fields. As thereare a number of mining and logging companies in the area constructing access roads in theforest, access has opened up significantly hence many villagers are cutting forest areas fornew paddy fields further away from their villages (up to 20 km- reached by motorcycle).

The cycle of paddy farming usually begins with the slashing stage in May and June (theprocess of clearing the forest by cutting weeds and small trees). Once the land is cleared thecutting stage commences in July and August (the process of cutting big trees). If all of thetree trunks and branches felled are dry all the wood is burnt for one day to clean it andproduce charcoal as a fertilizer for the soil. The work of slashing, cutting down and burningtrees in the forest is usually carried out by adult men.

One family typically will open up one to three acres of forest land in one growing season,

depending on the availability and cost of the labour force. The process of forest clearing isusually undertaken, either by each family or through group collaboration (involving morethan 20 families) in order for the work to be easier and faster. When the forest is opened, theland clearing process for each family commences. Those working in the mines or for the locallogging companies will pay labourers up to Rp 75,000 per day to undertake the aboveactivities.

Once the land is cleared paddy seeds are planted by the females and children. This isundertaken by sowing the soil using a piece of wood. For one hectare of land as much asthree cans of paddy seeds are required. The size of the cans varies between villages. In

Haragandang the size of one can is equivalent to 10 kg of paddy, while in the Kerendan onecan is equal to the size of 20 kg paddy. The type of paddy seeds planted consists of localvarieties such as Pangin, Bukar Tahun, Banih Bajang, Bajang Merah and Empa. Among thefive types of local paddy varieties generally the most preferred by the farmers is Pangin dueto its taste and the Bajang Merah as it produces large and fragrant rice.

Usually after planting of the paddy seeds is finished, vegetable and fruit seeds are plantedalongside the paddy seeds. Common vegetable crops grown include cassava, eggplant,cucumbers, chilli, beans, spinach, taro, sweet potato and spinach 3. Typical fruits growninclude papaya, banana and pineapple.

3 An example of price of 1 per kilogram of Cassava and Taro is valued Rp 5.000/ kg, while the price of chili isRp 25,000/ kg and the price of Spinach is Rp2,000/ bundle.





DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 152 of 369



Table 6.11 Agricultural Production by Region 2011 (Ton)

Name of SubDistrict

Dry Land Paddy Maize, Cassava andSweet Potatoes

Peanuts, Soybeans andSmall Green pea Vegetables

AreaHarvest Production Area

Harvest Production* AreaHarvest Production Production

Montallat 1,024 2,981 40 337 - - 88,5

GunungTimang

1.880 4,786 42 366 90 102,2 222

Gunung Purei 324 639 33 235 2 1.8 77,5

Teweh Timur 1,003 2,115 87 618 35 40 516

Teweh Tengah 5,299 11.207 206 583 88 203,5 792

Lahei 1,321 2,936 91 579 13 12,5 233Source: Barito Utara in Figures 2012, * Barito Utara in Figures 2012 and 2011

6.3.1.2 Rubber Cultivation

Rubber cultivation is the main source of income for the Project villages. Rubber cultivation isusually carried out on former paddy farm lands after completing harvest activities.Previously this land would have been left to regenerate as forest. On average farmers haveapproximately 10 acres of rubber plantation, with some working on up to 30 acres (howeverthe quality of rubber sap will be lower as the trees are still young and damage is more likelyas it is harder to maintain a plantation of this size).

Although rubber plantations have been cultivated in South Kalimantan since the beginningof the 20th century during Dutch colonialism times widespread cultivation of rubber in theProject area is relatively new (over the past two decades). In 2011 the selling price of 1 kgof rubber was Rp 15.000 - this encouraged many farmers toplant rubber trees on their former paddy fields. The production acreage and numberof smallholder rubber farmers in North Barito Kabuapetn can be seen in Table 6.12 .

Table 6.12 Area Production and Number of Smallholder Rubber Plantation byRegency 2011

Name of Sub District Area Harvest (Ha) Production (Ton) Number of Smallholders

Montallat 6.165 4.941.25 1.915

Gunung Timang 11.754 9.278,36 2.569

Gunung Purei 2.724 2.148,68 788.0

Teweh Timur 3.114 2.159,42 924.0

Teweh Tengah 21.937 15.894,54 11.548

Lahei 8.925 3.855 4.498Source: Barito Utara in Figures 2012



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 153 of 369



Today the price of 1 kg of rubber sap is valued at Rp 7,000. For Luwe Hulu rubber sap is soldat Rp 6,000/kg to visiting middlemen. Should the farmers want to sell directly in themarket they have to travel to the city of Buntok in the BaritoSelatan regency or to Banjarmasin in South Kalimantan Province.

Rubber tapping activities are usually carried out from 7am until 11am or between taking careof paddy and vegetables. Rubber tapping is undertaken by the plantation owners orby sharecroppers ( Handian ). If undertaken by sharecroppers two-thirds of the sap will begiven to sharecroppers and the remaining to the plantation owners. In good weatherconditions a day’s tapping can produce on average 10 to 15 kg of rubber sap valued aroundRp 60.000 - to Rp 90.000. Although rubber prices continue to decline, and the income isnot sufficient to finance households, many farmers still persist in rubber tapping as they

have limited income alternatives. Other sources of income in the Project area includeselling fish and birds in the local market, working in the city of Muara Teweh or at one of thelocal mining or logging companies.

6.3.1.3 Fishing

Fish is an important element in most villagers diet. In the Project area thereare many types of fish that provide a good source of protein. Fishing (largely for householdconsumption) is carried out in the river by both men and women, either using a fishingpole or nets.

Common fish species consumed by the villagersinclude Tapah, Patin, Baung, Jelawat (Leptobarbus hoevenii), Tabiring, Lais, Tauman/ Dauman and koloi. Among the river fish species the most popular is the Jelawat fish; the price ofwhich can reach Rp 50.000/kg. However it is quite rare to catch this fish in the local riversnow. Other fish widely consumed by the villagers include baung, catfish and lais (which arecheaper than the Jelawat fish).

In addition to fishing in the river in Karenadan fishing is carried outin lakes located around the village (Lake Ode,Punggung Laung, Umpit, Perangun, Halung, Belantik and Pongsong Lonok). Thereare several types of fish commonly caught in the lakes suchas catfish, milkfish, Biawan, flatback, Tauman and Kaloi. In Kerendan and Haragandang upto 10 kg/day can be made fishing, although this activity is only undertaken when thevillagers are not farming or tapping rubber.

Fish cultivation in the river is viewed by villagers as risky as in the rainy season overflowand river currents have been known to destroy the fish cages. In addition, the practice of tubeadat uses toxins from local tree roots when the waters in the river recede in the dry season.This practice has led to the death of many fish cultivated in the river.

6.3.1.4 Animal Hunting

In the past the Dayak people in Kalimantan hunted animals as a food source. This activity isusually carried out in groups of adult men using spears, traps and blowpipes (Sipet) andassisted by several hunting dogs. The native Dayak people are now concerned aboutthe sustainability of forest resources hence they only go hunting when food supplies are



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 154 of 369



limited. Hunting usually takes place after paddy harvesting, or ifa traditional ceremony or party is planned. In the past the Dayak people ofKalimantan never sold the animals they hunted; the meat was divided according to theneeds of people who helped in the hunt.

From recent consultations in Luwe Hulu intensive hunting in the forest is no longerconducted as many wild animals are now hard to find. Animals hunted include deer, boar,moose deer, and partridges (Sakan). When hunting the villagers generally have to go deepinto the forest as it was reported that the logging and mining activities had scared theanimals away. In Haragandang, Kerendan and Muara Pari hunting is still possible aroundthe village.

In addition to hunting many villagers catch birds (Cecak Hijau, Murai, Tinjau Gunung,Pampolo, Tiung, Punai, Baliang, Juwai, Siaw, Pating Danan, Benderang Mato, Bubut,Tingang, Beo dan Moek) in the forest. Once caught, they are traded to local merchants whowill buy some bird species for up to Rp 400.000 for the Cecak Hijau). The Tinjau Gunung isbought for Rp. 125.000 and the Bubut for between Rp. 100.000 and 200.000. The birds areusually hunted deep in the forest at the upper reaches of the LaheiRiver using traps, nets and sticky sap. They are then sold by traders in the bird market in thecity of Palangkaraya and Java Island. Given the potential income that can be made sellingthese birds villagersin Haragandang, Kerendan and Muara Pari often hunt birds to earn additional income. However many of these birds are considered endangered such as the Tingang Bird and Beo.However stopping the practice is difficult given the poverty levelsin Haragandang, Kerendan and Muara Pari.

The native Dayak people are generally not accustomed to keepinglivestock because they prefer to hunt animals in the forest. The same was found in the Projectvillages. Some residents who live on the edge of the river have pigs but this is not awidespread practice. In Haragandang some villagers rearchickens, goats and cows, but only a limited number.

6.3.1.5 Gathering of Forest Products

Besides hunting animals in the forest some villagers gather various types of plants. Theseplants are gathered primarily for medicinal or traditional purposes (i.e.to treat diseases, increase stamina, as materials for constructing houses and homefurnishings and for conducting traditional ceremonies). In addition, some plantspecies collected from the forest are sold in the market.

The types of plants collected from the forest for traditional medicineinclude Pasak Bumi, Seluang Belum, Akar Kuning,

Akar Mambung, Tabat Berituk, Tabalin Bujang, Utin Tangen/Halalang, Kayu Rapat-Rapit,Rambah Rimbangun, Hampalas Bajang, Penawar Sampai, Penawar Seribu, Penawar Kuning,Kareho, Pungkala Tawar and others. Medicinal plant species are still easily found in theforests surrounding the villages.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 155 of 369



Several species of forest plants considered an importanttrading commodity include resin, rattan, eaglewood, ant nests as well as some kindsof timber. Resin and eaglewood are difficult due find now due to the ongoing loggingactivities, although rattan is generally found around the villages, especially along the banksof the Lahei River. In one day a farmer can collect about 50 kg of rattan, however the sellingprice is very low (Rp 100.000/quintal).

Important timber that is tradedincludes Red Meranti, Lampung Lanan, Balau (Meranti Batu), Ulin, Kruing, Meranti Karapeh Undang, Kelapeh Putih, Tahan Bulan, BengkiraiBatu, Marijang, Salumpang, Salumpatei, Kangkula Burung, Kayu Mata Burung, KarangBuku and Tahan Pare. Most timber is used to construct houses, while the Tahan Balau isused for constructing boats.

Ulin wood (Iron wood) is very hard and strong hence resistant to termites and other insects,changes in temperature and humidity and sea water damage. It is widely used as afoundation for housing, bridges and harbour construction or for submerged buildings. Givenits popularity as a strong and resistant construction material the Ulin Wood is becoming rarein the local area. One tree can produce 30 to 50 sheets of board where the pieces of wood aresold at Rp.18.000.

The forest also provides fruit for the villagers such as durian, rambutan, kangkuhis, rupai,tarap (jackfruit), popuan, bonden (cempedak), tampang and salak forest. There are threetypes of durian fruit in the Project area namely ratungan, layung papaken and tawala.The favourite being the papaken, because of its taste and health benefits (lowin cholesterol). During the durian season (in February) the durian fruit is sold at Rp. 5000 inthe village or if sold in Muara Teweh it can reach up to Rp. 30.000 per piece.

6.3.1.6 Employment in the Formal Sector

Many villagers in the Project area are employed as civil servants (school teachers or healthworkers) or in the coal mining and logging industries in the local area. In general villagersclassified as migrants are employed as teachers, health workers (manteri) or midwives.

There are several private companies operating near the village includingPT WIKI, PT. Austral Byna, PT.Sitasa Timber and PT. Antang all engaged in timber logging.In addition, there are several operating coal mining companies in the area -PT. Solid Black Gold and PT. Victor Two Three Mega. In addition to Salamander, which hasbeen present in the region since 2008, a number of sub-contractor companies working for theProject have recruited local people.

As the general level of education amongst the Project villagers is low most are employed inunskilled positions such as contract labourers, security officers, janitors, kitchen staff, speedboat operators, heavy equipment operators, drivers and foremen. Given the high interest inprivate sector employment in the villages (due to the relatively high wage)



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 156 of 369



Salamander provides a quota for each village which is managed by the village governmentofficials.

For those employed by Salamander the income ranges from Rp 2.500.000 to Rp 5.000.000depending on the type of work and level of work experience they have. This is much higherthan the income earned through farming however some villagers have complained about thewage differences between companies and have requested a uniform wage standard beapplied that is tailored to the price of basic commodities in each village. In Luwe Hulu a litreof gas in June 2012 was Rp.12.000 while in Muara Teweh it is Rp. 6.500. In general the priceof goods for basic commodities is higher in the Project villages as most staple items arebrought into the area via river through Muara Teweh.

Villagers indicated that at least Rp 3.000.000 was required per month in order to finance theneeds of a family (meals, fuel for lighting homes, transportation and education). Almost allof the children in the villages surrounding the Project who completed primary school havecontinued their education at the Junior High School and Senior High School in the towns ofMuara Lahei or Muara Teweh. For children who attend school outside the village the costgenerally amounts to between Rp.1.000.000 and Rp. 2.000.000 per month which coversaccommodation, living costs and school fees. Although higher education is greatly valuedthis cost is considered very burdensome.

Figure 6.5 Economic Activities in Luwe Hulu



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 157 of 369



6.4 COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE

6.4.1 Clean Drinking Water

In the four villages affected by the Project most use water river as a source for they dailyneeds. For the villagers who live along the Lahei River (e.g. Haragandang, Kerendan andMuara Pari) the river is used for drinking, cooking, washing and bathing. InHaragandang clean water is accessed via ground water located 500 m from the village.However this cannot be used in the rainy season due to the river flooding.

In Luwe Hulu ground water is distributed to households via a hose line. This wasundertaken by Elnusa when they were present at the Luwe Hulu base. The water is generallyused for cooking and drinking, while the Barito River is used for washing and bathing. Thedistribution of ground water is managed by the village head. In the dry season some thevillagers have complained that the water supply has decreased due to Salamander and othercompany water demands in Luwe Hulu. Currently every home has water twice a week.

In the rainy season the river often overflows, as it contains lots of mud carriedby rain water from eroded soils, therefore the river is not generally used as a water sourceduring this period. The soil erosion is believed to be due to the local mining and

logging activities in the area, as well as the mud resulting from access roads constructionactivities.

According to the 2012 regency report the service of clean water installation by the localgovernment has only reached two sub districts (Lahei I and Lahei II with 382 consumers)and although tapped household water services have reached the Lahei sub district, theProject villages have not yet been connected to this service.

6.4.2 Sanitation

At the end of 2012 the Barito Utara regency has developed a Community Based TotalSanitation program (STBM) managed by 15 health centers across six sub-districts. Themain objectives of the STBM are to:

• Change hygiene behaviour;

• Avoid water wastage;

• Encourage the washing of hands with soap;

• Manage safe drinking water and food practices; and

• Manage the safe disposal of human and household waste.

Despite the above program, sanitation conditions in most of the villages in the Barito UtaraRegency, and especially in Lahei sub-district, are poor; with human waste disposed of in the



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 158 of 369



Lahei, Pari and Barito Rivers.

Disposal drains in all the Project villages are not well developed and as the overall conditionof rural roads is poor during the rainy season standing water is common.

As there are no local landfills all households throw their waste in the river. Furthermoremost defecate in the river by building a small bathroom above the flow. For houses locatedaway from the river domestic waste is discharged under the house creating pools of standingwater around the house.

Figure 6.6 Toilet in Kerendan on the Lahei River

Electricity

The 2012 Lahei sub district report indicated that of the 24 villages in the sub district as manyas 15 villages are connected to the national grid (PLN). Luwe Hulu has, since 2011,had electrical power generated from diesel generator engines capable of producing 759430 KwH. 4 Consultations in Luwe Hulu indicate as many as 159 homes now have electricityfrom PLN, with 43 households still using kerosene and 189 households usingprivate diesel engines. The service of PLN’s electrical installation is only supplied to atnight for lighting homes enabling many households to view televisions.

Meanwhile the rest of the nine villages in the sub district of Lahei are not yet connected toelectricity, including Haragandang, Kerendan and Muara Pari, with most

4 Source: State Electricity Company (PLN), Muara Teweh year 2011.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 159 of 369



either using kerosene fuel for lighting homes or private diesel engines (Table 6.13 ).

Table 6.13 Number of Households by Lighting Sources in Village AffectedProject 2011

Name of VillageElectricity

Kerosene OthersPLN Non PLN

Haragandang - 102 37 -Kerendan - 17 134 -Muara Pari - 114 121 -Luwe Hulu 159 43 189 -Total 159 276 481 -Source: Lahei Sub District in Figure 2012.As many as 852 households (90% of the four villages) still use firewood for cooking with theremaining 64 households (10%) using kerosene (especially in Luwe Hulu) as shown inTable 6.14 .

Table 6.14 Number of Households by Cooking Fuel Source in Project AreaVillages2011

Name of Village Kerosene Kayu Bakar Electricity

Haragandang 10 129 -

Kerendan 4 147 -

Muara Pari 11 224 -

Luwe Hulu 39 352 -

Total 64 852 -Source: Lahei Sub District in Figure 2012.

6.4.4 Transportation Facilities

As discussed previously, all 4 villages are located along the river therefore there is a strongreliance on the river for transportation of goods and people. According to data from the 2012regency report transportation facilities available in the Lahei sub district includes:

• 6 motor boats/ water buses/ boat trades;

• 30 klotok boats/ motor geteks;

• 4 outboard motor boats/ speed boats; and

• 3 tiung / barge. 5

However these facilities are not considered sufficient to serve the entire population ofthe Lahei sub district (21,488 people in 24 scattered villages).

5 Transportation and Communication Office Service of Barito Utara Regency year 2011.





DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 161 of 369



the villages in the northern region; only reaching Nihan village 2 km from Luwe Hulu. Eventhis road is heavily damaged. The access road from Nihan to Muara Teweh is often usedas an alternative road for the villagers to get to the town of Muara Teweh. Unfortunately toreach Nihan one needs to cross the Barito River from Luwe Hulu. However there are noavailable ferry facilities for crossing vehicles therefore after reaching Nihan one must use anojeg motorbike at a cost of Rp. 100,000.

Figure 6.7 Haragandang and Muara Pari Access Roads during the Rainy Season

6.5 COMMUNITY HEALTH

6.5.1 Life Expectancy

According to the 2011 Central Kalimantan Province report male life expectancy is69.31 years and 73.21 years for females. In the North Barito regency the male lifeexpectancy is 70.17 years and 74.02 years for females; therefore slightly higher than theprovince figures (and the national - 67.51 years for men and 71.74 years for females).

6.5.2 Mortality

Generally maternal and child mortality rates in Indonesia are very high. Despite a decline ofmore than half a year since 1990 due to improvements in the health policy, anestimated 150,000 children die in Indonesia every year before they reach their fifthanniversary, and nearly 10,000 women die every year dueto pregnancy and childbirth. 6 According to UNICEF under-five mortality rates among poorfamilies is more than three times higher than in the richest households and only 15% of

6 UNICEF states on press release to Kompas.com, Thursday (06/14/2012)



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 162 of 369



uneducated mothers gave birth in a health facility compared to 71% amongst secondaryschool educated mothers. The percentage of births attended by skilled health personnel alsoincreased as the income of a mother or educational status increases.

In 2012 in Central Kalimantan the Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) was estimated to be 49(stillbirths or neonatal death) per 1000 live births and the child mortality rate for under fiveyears old estimated at 56 per 1,000 live births. 7 The main caused of infant mortality isassociated with poor nutritional status. To address this issue Indonesia is in the process ofimplementing a Safe Motherhood Program, which includes the Child Survival and GrowthDevelopment Program. However, more support is required for the South Barito localgovernment to implement this program, as these two regencies are under developed; lackinghealth facilities and services.

Other causes of infant mortality include neo-natal conditions, haemorrhaging, acuterespiratory infections and severe infections.

According to head of the provincial health bureau of Central Kalimantan, multiple factorsresult in high maternal and child mortality rates in central Kalimantan- the key reason beingdue to limited qualified health professionals.

Limited access to a skilled health personnel and an inadequate referral system has resultedin nearly 40%of women giving birth without the help of a skilled health workers and 70% do

not receive postnatal care within 6 weeks after childbirth. This is being addressed by healthoffice that is collaborating with traditional midwives to provide additional support in thisarea. 8

6.5.3 Morbidity

Based on the results of the 2010 Susenas report, the morbidity ratein Central Kalimantan Province was 18.74%; an increase from the previous year (17.20%).Urban and rural rates were 16.30% and 19.97% respectively. Based on the 2011 CentralKalimantan Province Health Profile the highest morbidity is found in North Baritoregency (27.82%).

6.5.4 Communicable Diseases

Communicable diseases are one of the major causes of mortality in Indonesia. Althoughstrategies have been developed to address the spread of communicable diseases,implementation has been weak, particularly in under developed areas. This has largely beenattributed to the decentralised health system in Indonesia which has resulted incommunicable diseases continuing to be an issue.

7 Report of Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey 2012. Central Bureau of Statistics , the National Population and FamilyPlanning , Ministry of Health , MEASURE DHS, ICF International.

8 KaltengPos.Web.id. Mother and Baby Mortality Rate is Still High, Friday , 30 March, 2012.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 163 of 369



6.5.4.1 Malaria

Malaria is an infectious disease caused by plasmodium parasites that live and breed inhuman red blood cells. It is transmitted via the female mosquito (Anopheles) and can affectboth men and women of all age groups. Over 45% of the population resides in an area that isconsidered; these are generally remote areas with poor environmental conditions and limitedaccess to transportation, communications or healthcare facilities. In addition the communitygenerally has a low of education level, poor socio-economic status and limited sanitationfacilities. These characteristics are similar to those in the four Project villages.

The 2012 Central Kalimantan Province Health Profile identified the South Barito Regency asa moderate endemic area, especially in the Lahei sub district area – see Figure 6.8 below. Ineach of the Project villages between two and five people are infected by malaria each month.

Figure 6.8 Map of Malaria Endemic Areas in Central Kalimantan

Source: Central Kalimantan Provincial Health Office in 2012

6.5.4.2 Dengue Fever

Dengue fever is a seasonal vector-borne disease that can lead to death. It usually occurs inthe rainy season when vector breeding grounds are abundant. In Central Kalimantan thereare a reportedly high number of cases of dengue fever; 12 in the sub-districts and 31 in thevillages (Central Kalimantan Province Health Profile, 2011). The number of dengue fevercases in the last 3 years (prior to 2011) was as follows:

• 2008 - 952 cases (44.64 per 100,000 population);



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 164 of 369



• 2009 - 1,332 cases (61 per 100,000 population);

• 2010 - 1,397 cases (63.2 per 100,000 population); and

• 2011 - 68 cases (30.4 per 100,000 population).

It is important to note that although the number of cases significantly reduced in 2011fatalities increased by 8 cases - indicating treatment of dengue cases still requiresimprovement.

6.5.4.3 Tuberculosis (TB)

Tuberculosis (TB) is caused by a bacteria called Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. This diseaseoften occurs in under developed areas in Indonesia with poor sanitation conditions and alow level of health awareness. In 2010 the Health Ministry set a target of at least 73% CDR(Case Detection Rate) as an early prevention to mitigate the increased number of cases. TheCDR number was identified from the proportion of new positive patients seeking earlytreatment compared to the estimated number of existing positive patients.

Based on the 2011 Central Kalimantan Province Health Profile the number of TB cases in2011 was 2,668 (70.39% were new cases); the prevalence was 93 per 100,000 population andthe number of deaths was 25 per 100,000 population. Compared with 2010 there has been a

significant decline in the number of cases (4,174 cases mostly amongst males (2,482 cases);there were 1,692 female cases. The number of deaths was 25 per 100,000 population. In 2011the estimated number of new cases was 4,656 cases (35.17% are smear positivetuberculosis (CDR)) - lower than the target of 70% however an increase of 28.28% from 2010.

A TB eradication program is being developed and implemented by the national governmentthrough counselling and intensive treatment. However, implementation of the program atthe local level is still low.

6.5.4.4 Diarrhoea

In 2011 the Central Kalimantan Province Health Profile estimated there were 95,139 cases ofdiarrhoea; with 63.5% of patients treated at local health facilities. This is an increase from theprevious year (93 571 cases and 53.1% of patients treated). In the North Barito regency 5,229cases were reported with 2,742 patient treated (52.44%).

6.5.4.5 Respiratory Diseases

The 2011 Central Kalimantan Province Health Profile reported 22,406 cases (9.51%) of infantswith pneumonia; 235,649 children were under five. This is a decline from 2010 where 22,302cases (10%) were reported (and 223,018 children under five). The number of infant patients

with pneumonia dealt by health facilities in 2011 was 735 cases (3.3%) -a slight decrease from2010 where 775 cases were reported (3.5%).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 165 of 369



6.5.5 Sexually Transmitted Diseases (HIV/AIDS)

The number of new AIDS cases, according to the Central Kalimantan Province HealthProfile, was 84. The majority of cases were male (52 cases) - 32 cases were female. In 2011only three AIDS cases resulted in death; however this may be due to under reporting.

In addition to the reported AIDS cases, there were 64 cases of HIV reported and 431 of othersexual infections. In 2011, 85.7% of AIDS cases were reported compared to 83.87% in 2010. In2005 only one district had reported cases of AIDS; whereas in 2011 14 districts / cities in theCentral Kalimantan region had reported cases. The low level of knowledge regardingHIV/AIDS transmission is believed to be the main cause for the increased number of cases;only a reported 57.5% of the Central Kalimantan province population, greater than 15 yearsof age, has a comprehensive knowledge regarding HIV/AIDS.

6.5.6 Nutritional Status

LBW is defined as an infant with a birth weight of less than 2,500 grams weighed at birth upto 24 hours after birth. LBW is largely as a result of mothers suffering from severemalnutrition, anaemia, malaria or sexually transmitted diseases beforeconception or during pregnancy.

Babies born with LBW suffer the risk of dying before the age of one year old (10 to 17 times

greater than babies born with normal weight). The 2011 Central Kalimantan Province HealthProfile reported LBW amongst 1.68% of 43 959 live births; this is a decrease from theprevious year (2.1%).

Malnutrition, especially in children under five can lead to an increased risk of death, andcan disrupt the growth of physical, mental development, and intelligence. In 2011 ofthe 98,243 children under five 3.98% were reported as suffering from malnutrition and 0.10%suffering from poor nutrition- a decrease from 2010 ( or the 33.418 infants weighed 12.67%were malnourished and 4.10% suffering from poor nutrition.

6.5.7 Health Facilities

Table 6.15 shows the existing health facilities in the four Project affected villages. None of thevillages have a public health centre or clinic. However all villages have subsidiary publichealth centres and integrated health centres. In general the facility conditions are poor with alack of modern equipment and supplies.

In Kerendan an on duty midwife often serves people at her home instead of at the healthcentre. Whilst in Haragandang there is no maternity clinic due to a lack of midwives orfacilities. Therefore most pregnant females give birth at the sub district public healthcentre located in Muara Lahei. Should more advanced medical treatment be required the

villager must travel to Muara Teweh. However in Haragandang many rely on traditionalbirth attendants in the village at the time of giving birth. Doctors from the regency hospitalvisit the villages once every three months.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 166 of 369



Table 6.15 Health Facilities in the Project Affected Villages

Name ofVillage

Public HealthCentre

Subsidiary of PublicHealth Centre

MaternityClinic

IntegratedHealth Centre Clinic

Haragandang - 1 - 1 0

Kerendan - 1 1 1 0

Muara Pari - 1 1 1 0

Luwe Hulu - 1 1 1 0

Total 0 4 3 4 0Source: ERM Field Observations 2013

Table 6.16 presents the number of health care practitioners associated with the healthfacilities in the four villages. In Muara Pari the midwife is from Muara Teweh therefore sheis only present in the village for two weeks per month, in Haragandang the paramedic isfrom Muara Teweh therefore only stays in the village for a week per month whilst themidwife is from Luwe Hulu so stays three weeks per month. In Luwe Hulu the midwifelives in the village therefore has a permanent presence. Given the generally limited healthresources in the Project villages the communities are not satisfied with the health servicesprovided. It is considered that the number of healthcare professionals per facility isinadequate, especially considering the total population size. In addition there are no doctors

currently practicing in any of the village facilities with only paramedic staff and midwivesare on duty to serve the sick villagers.

Table 6.16 Number of Health Care Practitioners in the Project Affected Villages 2013

Sub-District /Village Doctor Paramedic Staff Midwife Traditional Birth Attendant

Haragandang - 1 3

Kerendan - 1 3

Muara Pari - 1 2

Luwe Hulu - 1 1 4

Total 0 2 3 12Source: ERM Field Observations 2013

Figure 6.9 Subsidiary Public Health Centres in Haragandang and Kerendan



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 167 of 369



6.6 EDUCATION FACILITIES

The following tables show the existing education facilities and attendee numbers in theProject area. All four villages have an elementary school (with a total of 554 students) butnone have a senior high school and only Luwe Hulu has a junior high school.

Table 6.17 Number of Schools in the Project Affected Village 2013

Name ofVillage

KinderGarten/PAUD

ElementarySchool

Junior HighSchool

Senior HighSchool Madrasah

Haragandang 1 1 - - 1Kerendan 1 - - 1

Muara Pari 1 - - -

Luwe Hulu 1 1 1 - 1

Total 2 4 1 0 3Source: ERM Field Observations 2013

Table 6.18 Number of Students per School in the Project Affected Village 2011

Name of Village KinderGarten/PAUD ElementarySchool Junior HighSchool Senior HighSchool

Haragandang 34* 82 - -

Kerendan 83 - -

Muara Pari 132 - -

Luwe Hulu 40 257 88 -

Total 74 554 88 0Source: Lahei Sub District in Figure 2012, * Field Observation (secondary data not available)

The Junior High School located in Luwe Hulu was founded in 2008 and funded by PT. Wiki.However the school building and educational facilities are now in a poor condition due toa lack of maintenance. Originally the school operations were financed by PT. Wiki howeverpresently the charity board is no longer active hence the management of the school has



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 168 of 369



been neglected. In 2013, 88 students attended the Junior High School. For students inHaragandang, Kerendan and Muara Pari after finishing elementary school they continue atthe Junior High School in Muara Lahei where there are four state Junior High Schools andthree private Junior High Schools. Those that continue to Senior High School attend a schoolin Muara Lahei where there is one state Senior High Schools and two private Senior HighSchools (Table 6.19 ).

Table 6.19 Number of School, Students and Teacher of Junior High School and SeniorHigh School in Lahei Sub District 2011/1012

Level of EducationSchool Student Teacher

State Private State Private State Private

Junior High School 4 3 347 218 24 18

Senior High School 1 2 173 154 46 19

Vocational School - - - - - -Source: Barito Utara in Figure 2012

Table 6.20 and Table 6.21 below summarise teachers per school and their qualifications. Asmany as 23 elementary school teachers have an undergraduate education. This is largely asa result of the government’s affirmative action education program through the Open

University. The Junior High School located in Luwe Hulu is private although ithas limited facilities all the teaching staff are graduate scholars from a varietyof majors. The teachers are paid only Rp. 10.000/ day.

Table 6.20 Number of Teacher and Education Background in Elementary School and Junior High School in the Project Affected Village 2011

Name of Village

Education category

Elementary School Junior High School

HighSchool Diploma Bachelor S1 High

School Diploma Bachelor S1

Haragandang - - 4 - - -

Kerendan 3 - 3 - - -

Muara Pari 1 7 - - -

Luwe Hulu 9 - 10

Total 3 1 23 10Source: ERM Field Observations 2013

Table 6.21 Numbers of Teacher and Education Background in Early ChildhoodEducation (PAUD) and Islamic School in the Project Affected Village 2011

Name ofVillage

Education Category

Kinder Garten/PAUD Madrasah



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 169 of 369



HighSchool Diploma Bachelor

S1Elementary

SchoolHigh

School Bachelor S1

Haragandang 3 - - 2

Kerendan - - - 1

Muara Pari - - - - - -

Luwe Hulu 3

Total 3 - - 3 - 3Source: ERM Field Observation 2013



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 170 of 369



Figure 6.9 Elementary Schools in Luwe Hulu and Muara Pari

6.7 ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE

Each village has a weekly market where goods such as chickens, fish,vegetables, fruit, clothing and other imported goods by the merchants from Muara Tewehare sold(Table 6.22 ).

In Luwe Hulu a number of shops exist selling a variety of goods. These activities aresupported by the presence of several mining and logging companies operating in the area aswell as the Project.

Table 6.22 Number of Economic Facilities in the Project Affected Village 2011

Name of Village Pasar Umum Toko Kios/Warung Bank KUD/Non KUD

Haragandang 1 17 7

Kerendan 1* 10 6

Muara Pari 12 8Luwe Hulu 1 25 22 1

Total 4 64 43 - 1Source: Lahei Sub District in Figure 2012

In most villages small scale shops conducted out of households exist. In Hulu Luwe thereover 25 shops and 22 stores in the shopping area located around the market. Other facilitiesin Luwe Hulu Village include village unit cooperatives (KUD - Koperasi Unit Desa BinaBersama) with more than 80 people and assets over Rp. 120,000,000.





DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 172 of 369



Table 6.23 Typical Dayak Dusun Malang Ceremonies

1. Tiwah Ceremony

Tiwah ceremony is usually held for a person who has died after being buried.The ceremony intends to align the spirit journey toward heaven so they can live in peace. Inaddition, it is also intended as a procession for minimising bad luck influences.

2. Suhoor Pakanan Lewu Dayak.

The ceremony makes offerings to the ancestors or saints. "Suhoor" is defined as the ancestors orgods that are believed to preserve human life, providing health, safety, peace, blessings and graceto those who believe in Him. "The ritual called Pakan Suhoor Lewu for the Dayak Malang People isusually done once a year. Generally Pakanan Lewu Suhoor is held after the harvest farming andcoincides with the New Year calendar of Dayak, which is approximately in May.

3. Nahunan RitualNahunan Rituals purpose is to give a name to a child and a christening procession according to theKaharingan Religion. The Nahunan ceremony itself comes from the word "Nahun" which meansyear. Thus, this ritual is generally held with babies of one year or more. The result of the ritual is tochoose a name then child for the child.

4. Manyanggar Ritual.

The term of Manyanggar is derived from the word of "Sangga". The ritual of Manyanggarinterpreted as ritual which is performed by humans for making boundaries of life withsupernatural beings that are not visible to the naked eye. The Manyanggar Ritual is held by Dayakpeople because they believe that in life the world, besides humans, also lives delicate creatures. Theneed to make signs to ensure the two do not mutually interfere with each other's lives and as an

expression of respect for the creatures lives. The ritual of Manyanggar is typically held whenhumans want to open a new land for agriculture, establish buildings or before conductingcommunity activities on a large scale.

This ceremony was performed by residents of Kerendan when work was about to commence at theKerendan cluster.

5. Pananan Batu Ceremony

The Pananan Batu ceremony is a traditional ritual that was held after the harvest of the field orfields. Pananan Batu ceremony is intended as an expression of gratitude and thanks to theequipment used during farming. Objects such as rocks are considered as a source of energy, whichsharpens the tools used for farming. It is for sharpening machetes, balayung, ax, ani-ani or otherobjects of iron.

6. Wara Ceremony

The Wara ceremony is a traditional ceremony intended to deliver the bodies and spirits of the deadto the heavens. The ceremony begins with a gong to let the people regard someone passing awayand summoning the spirits of the ancestors in order to pick up the new spirit passing away. Thenext event is the offerings of seven types of food for seven days. The next stage is to lead graveofferings usually done after harvest and lasting for two days. In this ceremony, the spirit of theprevious waiting at Lumut Mountain – (one of the places considered sacred by local people) on theinland rivers Tewei (Teweh) - called back to receive offerings and purification before being broughtto heaven (sacred place). 10 The Wara custom event is concluded with the spirit leading back to theGunung Lumut. Usually an animal sacrifice takes place eg. buffalo or goat.

10 http://www.rad.net.id/online/mediaind/publik/9609/03/MI08-02.03.html , Jonio Suharto, Prosesi RitualPenghantar Jenazah Suku Dayak Melestarikan Upacara Wara , Selasa, 3 September 1996

http://www.rad.net.id/online/mediaind/publik/9609/03/MI08-02.03.html





DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 173 of 369



7 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

7.1 INTRODUCTION

Stakeholder engagement is a key element of the IA process. The purpose of stakeholderengagement is to allow for stakeholders to interact with the decision making process, expresstheir views and influence mitigation and technical solutions to concerns voiced during theprocess.

Stakeholder engagement is an inclusive and culturally appropriate process which involvessharing information and knowledge, seeking to understand the concerns of others andbuilding relationships based on collaboration. It allows stakeholders to understand the risks,

impacts and opportunities of the Project in order to achieve positive outcomes.

The main objectives of stakeholder engagement are:

• To ensure that adequate and timely information is provided to those affected by theProject;

• To provide these groups with sufficient opportunity to voice their opinions andconcerns; and

• To ensure that comments are received in a timely manner so that they can be taken

into account in Project decisions.

Stakeholder engagement and consultation is an integral part of Salamander’s Projectplanning and implementation. Salamander recognizes that achieving effective stakeholderengagement involves building and maintaining constructive relationships over time.Therefore the company has committed to an ongoing consultation and engagement processthat extends throughout the life of the Project.

Stakeholder engagement is also a key part of any ESIA process. For this Project, it was asystematic process, starting with developing an understanding of the issues, creating and

maintaining a stakeholder relationship and partnerships through dedicated companyresources such as the External Affairs Site team based at Salamander’s field office in MuarahTewe. Stakeholder engagement is a two way process, based on a willingness to listen tofeedback, and discuss it in an open and unprejudiced fashion. Processes are built aroundtime frames which allow stakeholders to understand, absorb, respond and interact.

A number of stakeholders have been identified for the Project including:• Salamander;

• SKKMIGAS;

• Regency, and sub-district government;

• Village heads; and



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 174 of 369



• Project affected communities.

7.2 H ISTORICAL CONSULTATION ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN

Salamander has undertaken consultation activities since 2011. Initial activities focussed onconsultation with the forestry department to discuss the Projects forest permit. This wasfollowed by an extensive program of consultation on the land use process. During thesepublic consultation (socialization) sessions Salamander discussed the following:

• Introduction of Salamander as PSC Operator, under SKKMIGAS;

• Name of the Project and location;

• Approved of Forestry Permit and Location Permit;

• Support required from local community;

• The land use processes and status;

• The official land use and compensation team (local officials);

• Time table of the processes;

• Procedure for land price negotiation meeting;

• Payment processes and signing of appropriate land ownership transfer documents;

• The project commencement date; and

• Grievance mechanism and procedure (submission procedure; internal Salamanderdiscussion and process; and resolution or response to stakeholders).

Information on was also provided to village officials to discuss with their village residents.Historical consultation undertaken by Salamander within the affected villages is detailed in

Table 7.1 and illustrated in Figure 7.1 .



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 175 of 369



Table 7.1 Historical LAQ Consultation undertaken by Salamander

Date Activity and StakeholdersInvolved Issues Covered/Raised Location

Early 2011 Initial discussions regarding ,involving:• North Barito Regency

personnel• BPN

Initial discussion on projectlocation.

-

27th April 2011 Lahei Camat and Staff, Headand Secretary KarendenVillage, Head of Rahadenvillage and local leader,Muara Pari village Head,Salamander Representativeand Land-Owners aroundKm. 27 Street until ParauRiver.

Improvement and use ofthe road Km. 27

Lahei Subdistrict office

13th May 2011 Land owner socialisationregarding to well explorationdrilling activity SLH-1 atKerendan village 19,968 m 2

Land owners agree andsupport with that activity

Kerendanvillage

16th May 2011 Negotiation with land owner(H. Surianto) facilitate byCamat Lahei (Sub districtHead)

1. H. Surianto asksinvolved in theprocurement of campmaterials and small cars.Salamander Bangkanaicannot meet because is thecontractor’s responsibility;2. H. Surianto asks IDR32,000 / m 2 for land price.3. Salamander offer priceIDR 25,000 / m 2


16th May 2011 Camat Lahei and staff,Salamander Representative,

and Trees/Crops owners

Negotiation with trees andcrops owner

Rubber small IDR 25,000;Rubber medium IDR

50,000;Rubber large IDR 200,000Others trees and crops referto North Barito RegentAgree No: 188.45/480/2006regarding plant(agricultural, forestry, andplantation).


27th May 2011 Camat Lahei mediationbetween Salamander andFarmer Group: Singa Parung(Matheus, Sastra Jaya, etc.) inKerendan village.

Meeting attendance by CamatLahei, Lahei Sub district Staff,

Recognition of IntersectionEnter km 27 to BM.05/06street by Farmer Group:Singa Parung.




DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 176 of 369



Date Activity and StakeholdersInvolved Issues Covered/Raised Location

Sector Police Personnel,Salamander Representatives,Kades Kerendan and staff,Kades Muara Pari, and land-owners

18th September 2012 Land Technical AdvisoryTeam regarding locationpermit for gas pipeline

Land Technical AdvisoryTeam to give considerationregarding location permitfor gas pipeline

11th January 2013 Muara Pari Head of village,Village Representative Board

(BPD) Muara Pari Village andSalamander representative

Socialisation and negotiationmeet regarding roadwidening at WK-1 location.

Community agreed withroad widening plan form 4m to 10 m with land priceIDR 18,000 / m 2

Site OfficeSalamander

energyBangkanaiLtd, LuweHulu village

14th January 2013 Community at Muara Parivillage and SalamanderRepresentative

Celebrating for startingWK-1 construction

WK01location

Source: Secondary Data Review, 2013

Figure 7.1 Community Consultations Undertaken

Source: Salamander 2013

In addition to consultation activities in the communities discussing the process, formal andinformal activities have been undertaken by the field team. This has included weeklymeetings and discussions updating the community on Project activities, presenting the CSRprogram and progress, opportunities for employment and discussing community concerns.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 177 of 369



Specific documentation on these activities was unavailable at the time of writing.

7.3 COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS

During ERM’s field work in May 2013 to the four impacted villages the team examinedcommunity perceptions associated with Salamanders activities in the area. A series ofquestions were discussed with the community ranging from understanding the communitiesawareness of the Project to perceptions of the Project impacts. The following sectionsummarises the key findings.

7.3.1 Community Awareness of the Project

Findings indicated that community members in Haragandang (women and men) had littleknowledge of the Project. Conversely most men in Luwe Hulu and Muara Pari were awareof Salamanders activities in the area (see Figure 7.2 ). This is likely due to the fact that thebase is located in Luwe Hulu and many are employed by the Project.

Community members reported little consultation has occurred in Haragandang hence theirlimited awareness of the Project. In addition the community reported they were not invitedto participate in the Salamander Cup event in early 2013.

Figure 7.2 Community Awareness of the Project

7.3.2 Community Perceptions of Salamander’s Consultation Level

Men in Luwe Hulu and Haragandang perceive Salamander’s consultation activities as poor;indicating the Project had a preference for consulting with elite villagers only. In addition,some young men discussed how accessing Project information on employment and businessopportunities was difficult. The findings also indicate there is a low level of understanding ofSalamander’s consultation activities in most villages, especially amongst women(see Figure 7.3 ).

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men

Haragandang Karendan Muara Pari Luwe Hulu

Unaware of project

Have heard of the project

Know some details

Fully informed





DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 179 of 369



Figure 7.4ii Expectations of Salamander Benefits in Haragandang

Figure 7.4iii Expectations of Salamander Benefits in Muara Pari

02468

10121416

Karendan Women

Karendan Men

02468

101214

16

Muara Pari Women

Muara Pari Men



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 180 of 369



Figure 7.4iv Expectations of Salamander Benefits in Luwe Hulu

7.3.4 Community Concerns Associated with Salamander Impacts

Men in Haragandang and Luwe Hulu indicated the most interest in understanding negativeProject impacts. However both men and women in Kerendan indicated they were unsureabout the Project impacts (see Figure 7.5 ). This is an indicator that further consultation onProject activities and impacts is required.

Figure 7.5 Community Concerns Associated with Salamander Impacts

02468

10121416

Luwe Hulu Women

Luwe Hulu Men

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men

Haragandang Karendan Muara Pari Luwe Hulu

Not sure

Don’t care

Minimal interest

Moderate interrst

High interest



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 181 of 369



7.4 D ISCLOSURE AND PLANNED FUTURE CONSULTATION ACTIVITIES

Salamander is planning a series of public consultation meetings (inclusive of vulnerablegroups) to disclose the findings of the Project’s ESIA. This process will be designed to enablethe affected communities to meaningfully contribute to the ESIA findings and hence towardsthe overall Project development, particularly through the development of potentialmitigation measures.

The disclosure process is Salamander’s opportunity to build constructive and long termrelationships with its key stakeholders. It provides the opportunity to communicate throughboth oral and written explanations of Project activities, implementation schedules, andassociated risks, impacts and benefits measures. Public consultation and disclosure to theaffected community is an important platform for relaying information to project affectedcommunities. These activities will continue throughout the construction and operationalphase of the Project, and cover the impacts, hazards and risks associated with constructionactivities.

Key messages for planned future public consultation will contain more information aboutthe local employment and business opportunities, community health and safety,environmental and social impacts of construction and operation related activities and CSRactivities.

As such, Salamander is committed to maintaining its ongoing program of consultation anddisclosure and will:

• Maintain regular communications with related stakeholders;

• Provide local residents with regular information on project progress and relatedimplications;

• Provide local residents with information on employment and business opportunities;

• Maintain awareness of safety issues;

• Maintain constructive relationships between local residents and the Project team bycontinuing regular consultation meetings and informal interactions;

• Identify and respond to stakeholder issues and concerns by reviewing the complaintsfile and undertaken stakeholders consultation;

• Monitoring implementation and effectiveness of mitigation measures their CSRprogram; and

• Ensure complaints are addressed according to the established process.

All activities undertaken during future consultation and disclosure will be appropriatelydocumented by Salamander.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 182 of 369



7.5 SALAMANDER ’S GRIEVANCE MECHANISM

Salamander formed a Grievance Committee to address grievances relating to land, security,community, industrial relations and marine affairs, in response to a growing number ofinteractions with land claimants. The Grievance Committee is composed of representativesfrom internal Salamander departments, including Legal, External Relations andCommunications, General Services and Human Relations. Within this Committee, the LandGrievance Team follows a structured procedure for recording, tracking and monitoring,determining required actions, routing to appropriate destinations and documentinggrievances received.

The grievance mechanism developed by Salamander aims to manage any communitycomplaints appropriately. During the process land-owners and other stakeholders couldsubmit a grievance regarding the process to the following institutions or directly toSalamander:

• The Camat Lahei Office as the LAQ Team Chairman;

• The head of Kerendan village;

• The External Relations Officer in Luwe Hulu (Muhammad Idrus); and

• The External Relations Officer in Muara Teweh Office (Tonny Partono andSyahbuddin Yoesoef).

The grievance is submitted providing the following details:• Name of person submitting grievance;

• Subject and grievance details; and

• Local community members involved.

It is preferable that before being submitted the grievance is discussed with the village head.

As of 2012-2013, land grievance cases were lodged and prioritised as follows:• First Priority: Grievances directly affecting the Project development (i.e. grievances

concerning land plots directly within the Project site);

• Second Priority: Grievances relating to significant impacts on the community;

• Third Priority: Grievances with insufficient or unclear evidence or documents,remaining to be clarified and further investigated; and

•

Fourth Priority: Grievances with no supporting evidence or documents.

The grievance mechanism followed by this team is illustrated in Figure 7.6 .



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 183 of 369



Figure 7.6 Salamander Grievance Submission Flows

The grievance settlement must be made within 5 days from receiving the grievance (this was

agreed with the local communities). If this timeframe is not met the complainant must beinformed as to the reasons why.

Grievances are to be discussed internally and then coordination is required with and thelocal Camat or village head and approved by the External Relation Manager or VicePresident, Human Resources and General Affairs before it is conveyed to the stakeholder;

If no acceptable resolution is agreed the grievance is elevated to senior Salamandermanagement and SKKMIGAS to find an acceptable solution. If a resolution is not found thenthe grievance is referred to the legal system.

Several issues have been encountered during the grievance process. After payments weremade, grievances were lodged with Salamander by community members who claimed thatthe payments were given to the wrong person. The majority of these grievances were notsupported with the appropriate legal documentation to prove land rights so the grievanceswere processed according to the hereditary rights.

These grievances were collectively settled according to community preferences through apanel or regional parliament council (DPRD), instead of through legal channels on a case bycase basis.

Additionally in 2013 new grievances were lodged claiming that compensation paid wasinsufficient.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 184 of 369



8 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) ACTIVITIES

8.1 OVERVIEW OF SALAMANDER 'S CSR ACTIVITIES IN INDONESIA

Salamander recognises that maintaining a well-respected operating capability isfundamental to its strategy and business model; this includes a sustainable and participativeCSR approach.

In Indonesia, Salamander has well established CSR programmes in both the Kambuna andNorth Kutei areas which have been running for several years. Through Salamanderspresence in these areas employment opportunities for local people has increased andinfrastructure improvements have been made in the local area through Project investment.

Salamander also supports local cultural festivals with the aim of building a good workingrelationship with the local community whilst generating support for its operational activities.

Salamander has also been supporting the local communities in the Greater Kerendan area.Initial CSR programmes completed in 2011 include the opening of a rubber nursery inKerendan village and constructing a new road connecting Kerendan and Muara Pari villagesto the local town. This has brought significant socio-economic benefits to the localcommunities as the journey previously involved travel by river that could take up to sevenhours. The journey time has now been reduced to less than an hour. Salamander alsosupports local celebrations in the Project area such as Independence Day.

This Chapter provides an overview of Salamanders CSR approach, activities undertaken todate as well as planned future activities.

8.2 CSR APPROACH , POLICY , AND PROCEDURE

Salamander’s main CSR areas focus on the environment, health and safety, employees, localcommunities and its approach to business conduct. Salamanders CSR objectives include:

• Mitigating social risk associated with Project activities;

•

Establishing positive engagement with its Project communities;• Managing NGO and stakeholder concerns;

• Delivering company messages and commitments to Project communities so that theProject can operate safely and securely; and

• Implementing social commitments as mandated by Indonesian regulation.

Salamander’s CSR goal is to strengthen good and trusting relations, between the companyand communities residing in the area where it operates, by implementing a sustainable

program based on a community approach. As such, Salamander is committed to appreciate,and take seriously its responsibilities to conduct its operations safely and in full co-operationwith the communities in which it operates. Salamander will ensure that the health and safetyof its employees is protected; that its impact on the environment is minimised; and that it is



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 185 of 369



sensitive to the needs of the communities in which it operates.

Salamander will also ensure that the interests of the surrounding communities are respected,as well as seek to foster and support self-sustaining community businesses.

Salamander is committed to conduct all of its business in a fair manner and comply fullywith the relevant legal, regulatory and international accord requirements which apply to itsbusinesses. These include the UK Bribery Act, the International Labour OrganisationDeclaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, the UN Universal Declarationon Human Rights, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the InternationalFinance Corporation (IFC) Environmental and Social Performance Standards and theEquator Principles (EPs). The Group benchmarks it’s Health, Safety and Environment (HSE)performance against industry statistics compiled by the International Oil and Gas Producers(OGP).

8.3 CSR PRINCIPLES

Salamander’s CSR policy highlights its commitment to operate in accordance with thefollowing principles:

• Conduct business in compliance with law;

• Act openly and honestly in business dealings;

• Comply with best practice in corporate governance;

• Behave responsibly and with sensitivity to the local community;

• Provide sustainable benefits and avoid the creation of a dependency culture;

• Ensure, wherever possible, that CSR partners are compliant with Salamanderstandards;

• Use continuous assessment to ensure Salamander’s CSR activities meet identifiedperformance objectives;

• Ensure that Salamander activities are conducted in accordance with the IFC’sPerformance Standards; and

• Publish an annual update on all CSR activities.

In order to implement these principles, Salamander established a community developmentstrategy document in 2008 which defines a five phased approach for communitydevelopment implementation as follows:

• Consultation (participatory planning approaches);



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 186 of 369



• Development of program framework and objectives (i.e. expected outcome,parameters for measurement, program reasonable and specific actions to meet theobjectives, specific targets, and clear timetable);

• Establishment of key program indicators (i.e. input, output, outcome, and impact);

• Performance monitoring and evaluation; and

• Grievance mechanism.

The mechanism for Salamander’s CSR procedure is presented in the following figure.

Figure 8.1 CSR Procedure

Source: Salamander Data, 2013

8.4 CSR STRATEGY

Salamander is committed to developing future CSR programs in the following manner:

• Identifying positive and negative social and environmental impacts of the operations;

• Identifying natural and environmental resources in local communities;

• Identifying community needs and aspirations; and



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 187 of 369



• Preparing a sustainable community development program to meet companycommitments and business needs.

In preparing and planning the program, the following steps will be observed by the CSRTeam:

• Build the same perceptions between Salamander, the local government and other keystakeholders around common interest issues;

• Prepare a joint agreement between Salamander and Project stakeholders as the basisfor commitments for implementation;

• Prepare integrated planning with the local government to achieve synergies in theCSR program and appropriate distribution of benefits;

• Conduct CSR dialog and consultation with stakeholders;

• Determine CSR execution schedule, monitoring mechanism and evaluationframework;

• Chose human resources with capability and commitment towards CSR;

• Training of CSR leaders;

• Conduct CSR monitoring and evaluation; and

• Undertake CSR documentation.

Criteria for delivering the CSR program are as follows:

• Meet one of the program priorities that is consistent with meeting stakeholder needs,i.e. infrastructure, education, environment, health, and establishing independentlivelihoods;

•

Focus on the local area, i.e. Barito Utara, Kutai Timur, and Kambuna Regency;• Develop criteria based on consultation with the local community - to understand their

concerns and priorities, as well as ensure the program meets their needs, as well as theneeds of other stakeholders;

• Engage and encourage participation and empowerment of local people in executingthe program through:

− Motivating the community to participate in a process which allows them to expresstheir needs, determine their future, and ensure ownership and sustainability of theprogram; and



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 188 of 369



− Focus on supporting community members to organize themselves to solve their ownproblems, in order to provide sustainable and long-term community developmentprograms.

• Clear objective for measurable program achievement;

• Non-discrimination (benefit to various groups of communities) with specific attentionto vulnerable groups (e.g. children and women);

• Accountability, i.e.:

− Program and budget to be approved by management and SKK Migas; and

− Consultation with regional government and business partners where appropriate.

8.5 GOVERNANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY

During 2012 Salamander completed an internal restructuring of its Corporate CSR SteeringCommittee, streamlining the membership to make it a more efficient and focused group thatcan oversee its CSR activities and relationships with local stakeholders, as well as to improvethe delivery of community relations programmes. It is chaired by the Chief Executive Officer(CEO), and meets bi-annually to discuss Salamander’s investment in community basedprojects. The committee monitors project performance against agreed objectives. CSR

Committees are also convened in the countries where Salamander operate and report to theGroup Steering Committee.

Salamander completes a stakeholder mapping exercise on entering a new licence. The resultsof this are used by the local community development officers to determine with whom toengage. The engagement programme will typically include local recruitment,communication of Salamander’s planned activity, meeting local officials and conductingtown hall style meetings. This process helps to identify community development projectsthat meet the needs of stakeholders.

The Senior Management Team meets quarterly to discuss management level issues and HSEis always a key agenda item. The Corporate HSSE Manager reports directly to the GroupCOO and each of Salamander operated assets has a dedicated HSE and CSR team to monitoractivity and ensure Salamander guidelines are being followed.

During 2012 further policies and procedures in support of Salamander’s anti-bribery andcorruption programme were developed and implemented. Salamander also instigated thefirst series of compliance audits of processes already in place. These, together with theannual anti-bribery and corruption risk assessment carried out towards the end of the year,enabled Salamander to gain a comprehensive understanding of the corruption risks facingthe business and the robustness of its processes. The company has embedded whistle-

blowing procedures that permit employees and contractors to report any concerns they mayhave in confidence to senior management or, if desired, to an external whistle-blowingservice.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 189 of 369



Building strong relationships with local communities is critical to Salamander in maintainingits operating credibility. It adopts a pro-active approach to its community relations, seekingto engage with local stakeholders early in the operational planning stage and recognisingany concerns/issues. The company employs a number of specialist government liaison andcommunity liaison officers, usually from the area of Project operations and has a detailedunderstanding of the local, national and regional environmental and social sensitivities.

8.6 PREVIOUS CSR ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN

The following section summarises Salamanders CSR activities undertaken to date in theKerendan Project area.

8.6.1 Improvement of Public Roads in Kerendan and Muara Pari VillageIn April 2012 Salamander built a land access road for public transportation in Kerendan andMuara Pari village. Previously, approximately 600 households from Kerendan and MuaraPari used boats to travel to their nearest sub-district town. The traditional boat journey,which used the flow of the river, took villagers between five and seven hours or longerdepending on the river flow.

To provide the local communities with a more convenient transportation route Salamanderfunded and constructed the public road which is 14.5km long in Kerendan and 6km long inMuara Pari. Construction of the road has reduced the villagers travel time to within one

hour. This new road access has significantly improved access to health and educationfacilities as well as markets supporting economic growth for both the Kerendan and MuaraPari villages.

8.6.2 Independence Day Ceremony in Kerendan Village

Kerendan village is one of the local communities in and around Bangkanai. In August 2012Salamander worked in partnership with youth groups to support the villagers in theirIndependence Day celebrations.

Assisted by Salamander the organising committee, formed entirely of local villagers, plannedand implemented the celebration activities. At the community’s request, Salamanderorganised a traditional sports competition for the local children and adults to take placethroughout the day. The competition included:

• Panjat pohon pinang (Pinang tree climbing);

• Balap karung (Sack race);

• Volleyball; and

• Badminton.

Salamander also provided the equipment and trophies for each of the events.





DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 191 of 369



January 2013, the event allowed 14 surrounding villages to compete against each other insoccer, volley ball, and badminton. It is hoped the Salamander Cup will become an annualevent, strengthening the relationship of Salamander and the communities in theneighbouring villages.

8.6.5 Other CSR Contributions

Other CSR programs delivered in 2012 included:• Flood donation to the community of Luwe Hulu; and

• Provision of permanent houses for the floating house owners close to the Project jettyin Luwe Hulu.

A summary of Salamanders 2013 CSR activities is presented in Table 8.1 . Activities includereforestation, provision of clean water, improving a community clinic, constructioncommunity centres and provision of loans for fishermen.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 192 of 369



Table 8.1 Salamander CSR Program 2013

Category Program Objective Partnership Status

Environmental ReforestationGenerate a community-based-strategic-planfor reforestation program as a part offorestry permit term of obligation

Consultation with ForestryDepartment for identification oflocation

In progress

Health

Salamander CupCompetition of soccer, volley ball, andbadminton between villages surrounding theProject area

Coordination with National SportCommittee (KONI) Annual event since 2013

Clean water, KerendanVillage

Water well and distribution system fordrinking water and hygiene training

Coordination with local healthagency and public work agencyto form a water committee

Not yet implemented

Community HealthClinic improvement,Kerendan Village

Providing appropriate clinic equipment,basic medicines, and training of localmedical personnel

Work with health agency toform a health committee Not yet implemented

Education

Community Library,Luwe Hulu

Increase reading interest for primary-school-age-children

Coordination with localeducation agency to form acommunity library committee

Not yet implemented

Independence day,Kerendan and MuaraPari

Celebrate Indonesia Independence Day withcommunity

Collaborate with CommunityIndependence Day Committee

Annual program since2012

School boatProvide boat for transporting elementarystudents to their school to decrease travellingtime and absentee

Collabourate in a School BoatCommittee In progress

Economy Soft loan for fishermanProvide soft loan to fisherman atKenyamukan and Bontang Village to buyengine and fishery tools for their boats

Collaborate in a CommunitySoft Loan Committee In progress



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 193 of 369



Category Program Objective Partnership Status

Infrastructure

Sport facilitiesConstruct badminton, volley ball, and soccersport facilities in Kerendan, Muara Pari, andHaragandang Villages

Work with Community SportCommittee

Sport facilities inKerendan is 90%completed, while inMuara Pari and

Haragandang are tofollow

Community Centre,Kerendan

Build a permanent place for the communityto meet and discuss various communalprogram

Work with community todesign, plan, construct, andmanage the facilities

Not yet implemented

Community Centre,Luwe Hulu

Build a permanent place for the communityto meet and discuss various communalprogram

Work with community todesign, plan, construct, andmanage the facilities

Not yet implemented

Total CSR Investment 419,000



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 194 of 369



9 ESIA SCREENING AND SCOPING

9.1 SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT

This ESIA addresses all the potential impacts both within the identified Kerendan Cluster,pipeline and KGPF areas, as well as associated facilities such as the existing access roads andLuwe Hulu Supply and Support Base.

The scope of this impact assessment is to assess the potential impacts of the proposedactivities associated with the Project on the relevant environmental, social, socio-economicand health resources and receptors. The types of impact considered have been categorisedaccording to the Phase of the Project and activity/aspect that they are associated with,

describing the nature of the impact is according to the standard criteria provided in Chapter2 (for example, are they detrimental or beneficial, direct or indirect etc.).

As discussed in Chapter 2, where activities have already occurred, such as the sitepreparation, construction and installation of development drilling infrastructure anddevelopment drilling at the Kerendan Cluster, these are subject to a separate EnvironmentalAction Plan to address any non-conformances with the IFC PS.

9.2 METHODOLOGY

The IA Methodology is discussed in detail in Chapter 4. As discussed, the identification ofimpacts starts in screening/scoping and continues through to the impact assessment. Thecore activity is the prediction, evaluation and mitigation of impacts.

Predication of impacts is essentially an objective exercise to determine what could potentiallyhappen due to the development of the Project and any associated activities. The diverserange of potential impacts considered in the ESIA process results in a wide range ofprediction methods being used including quantitative, semi-quantitative and qualitativetechniques.

Impacts arise as a result of Project activities either through direct interaction or by causingchanges to existing conditions such that an indirect effect occurs. Accurate identification ofpotential impacts is the critical first step within the impact assessment process. Followingscreening, all proposed Project activities were scoped and a judgement made as to whethertheir interaction with the environmental, social or health receptors had the potential to resultin a significant impact.

The following subsections provide the results of the ESIA Screening and Scoping activities.





DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 196 of 369



This preliminary categorisation was undertaken to make a decision to develop an ESIA withthe goal of addressing all impacts in a holistic and integrated manner in line with IFCrequirements. Salamander therefore commits to conduct an ESIA based on the requirementsof IFC Performance Standards and EHS Guidelines. At the time of conducting the ESIA, itwas acknowledged that the Kerendan project is in execute and a number of activities havealready taken place, notably at the Kerendan cluster and the Luwe Hulu Logistics SupplyBase, as described in Chapter 3 Project Description. As such, screening was conducted in twostages, as follows:

• Project review – ERM completed a review of the project scope based on currentengineering information and also available baseline environmental and social

information. This included details of public consultation activities conducted to date.ERM also completed a review of the UKL/UPL report.

• Following the desktop review, a site visit was conducted to further understand theprojects current construction status and the existing environmental and social context.This site visit was conducted over three days and a separate site visit report provided.

• An audit was conducted for the land use compensation process already completed forthe Kerendan cluster site. The audit reviewed the process and implementationconducted to date under Indonesian regulations against the IFC standards to produce

recommendations on the process followed.9.3.1 IFC Gap Assessment

9.3.1.1 Introduction

Initially Salamander’s consultants ERM had proposed an IFC gaps analysis as a desk basedexercise however, is was decided to complete a more detailed ESIA screening exercise once itwas confirmed that significant project construction activities had already commenced. It wasaccepted that the construction activities would affect the approach to the ESIA and a site visitwas required to assess implementation of Project activities and determine how best to

incorporate IFC PS and EHS requirements into the project. This will be achieved eitherthrough the ESIA process (for proposed activities) or as part of a corrective ESAP required toupdate and improve the management of existing Project activities.

ERM reviewed the existing project information including project UKL/UPL, engineeringdocumentation, existing environmental and social data and current constructionmanagement plans and procedures.

In completing the desktop review ERM undertook the following tasks:

• IFC PS Table Preparation – ERM has an established template for reviewing projectstatus against IFC PS requirements; and

• Project review – ERM completed a review of the project scope based on currentengineering information and also available baseline environmental and social



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 197 of 369



information. This included details of public consultation activities conducted to date.ERM also completed a review of the UKL/UPL report. ERM expects that further dataand project information will be provided during preparation of the ESIA.

Following the desktop review, a site visit was conducted to further understand the projectscurrent construction status and the existing environmental and social context. The site visitwas conducted over 2 days and assessed the Kerendan Gas Development Project activitiesconducted at that time, as well as the associated facility of Luwe Hulu Supply and SupportBase.

A separate site visit report was submitted to Salamander. Many of the requirements of IFC

PS 1 to 8 can be incorporated into the ESIA for common activities in future phases, howeveractivities that had concluded were subject to a number of recommendations. Salamander isreviewing and addressing these through the HSE Management System (refer Chapter 13) aspart of a corrective action plan. These are not discussed further in this ESIA report as thefocus in on predictive potential impact management.

9.3.2 Project Land Use Audit

9.3.2.1 Introduction

Salamander has received financing from the IFC which is also contingent on the Projectmeeting the requirements of the IFC’s PSs. The IFC Gap Assessment identified that theimpacts associated with the Project’s land use had to be assessed against the requirements ofIFC PS 5 and Involuntary Resettlement 11. Therefore Salamander commissioned ERM toconduct a Project land use audit to identify key gaps, outstanding issues, potential impactsand corrective actions to implement moving forward.

The audit included a desktop review of relevant documentation to build on the screeningfindings. This was undertaken via discussions with the social team at Salamanders office in Jakarta and reviewing relevant land documentation provided by Salamander.

The findings of the Project Land Use Audit will be managed through the overarchingSalamander HSE Management System that governs the management of environmental andsocial risks of all the Company; activities, as well as the lifetime of the Project (referChapter 13 ) and as such were scoped out of the ESIA predictive IA Process.

9.4 SCOPING RESULTS

Scoping was undertaken for the potential Area of Influence for the Project (and thus theappropriate Study Area), to identify potential interactions between the Project andresources/receptors in the Area of Influence and the impacts that could result from these

11 http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/Topics_Ext_Content/IFC_External_Corporate_Site/IFC+Sustainability/Sustainability+Framework/Sustainability+Framework+-+2012/Performance+Standards+and+Guidance+Notes+2012/










DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 198 of 369



interactions, and to prioritize these impacts in terms of their likely significance.

9.4.1 Interaction Matrix

Potential impacts were identified through a systematic process whereby the features andactivities (both planned and unplanned) associated with the pre-construction, construction,operation and decommissioning of the Project have been considered with respect to theirpotential to interact with resources/receptors. Potential impacts have each been classified inone of two categories:

• No interaction: where the Project is unlikely to interact with the resource/receptor(e.g., wholly terrestrial projects may have no interaction with the marineenvironment); and

• Interaction: where there is likely to be an interaction, and the resultant impact has areasonable potential to cause a significant effect on the resource/receptor. Potentialpositive as well as negative interactions were considered during this process.

As a tool for conducting scoping, the various Project features and activities that couldreasonably act as a source of impact were identified, and these have been listed down thevertical axis of a Potential Interactions Matrix. The resources/receptors relevant to theBaseline environment have been listed across the horizontal axis of the matrix.

Each resulting cell on the Potential Interactions Matrix thus represents a potential interactionbetween a Project activity and an environmental, social or health resource/receptor. Thecompleted Potential Interactions Matrix is presented in Table 9.2 . Those cells that remainwhite are ‘scoped out’ of further consideration in the IA Process.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 199 of 369



Table 9.1 Scoping Interaction Matrix (A3)

Resource/Receptors Environment Social Health

G e o l o g y

S o i l

S u r f a c e

W a t e r

G r o u n d w a t e r

S e d i m e n t s

F i s h e r i e s

V e g e t a t i o n

W i l d l i f e

A i r

N o i s e / V

i b r a t i o n

A e s t h e t i c s

P o p u l a t

i o n / P h y s i c a l d i s p l a c e m e n t

S o c i a l / C u l t u r a l S

t r u c t u r e

E c o n o m y a n d

L i v e l i h o o d

R e s o u r c e o w n e r s h i p / u s e

C u l t u r a l r e s o u r c e s

E d u c a t i o n / s k i l l s

I n f r a s t r u c t u r e / P u b l i c

S e r v i c e s

M o r

t a l i t y / K e y

h e a l t h i n d i c a t o r s

C o m m u n i t y s a f e t y a n d s e c u r i t y

E n v i r o n m e n t a l Q u a l i t y

C o m m u n

i c a b l e / n o n c o m m u n i c a b l e

d i s e a s e

V e c t o r B o r n e

D i s e a s e s

N u t r i t i o n a l S

t a t u s

H e a l t h

f a c i l i t i e s / r e c r e a t i o n

L i f e s t y l e f a c t o r s

Activities

PRE-CONSTRUCTION

● ● ● ● ● CONSTRUCTION

Access road construction (power plant) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Construction of groundwater well at KGPF ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Construction of wellsite ancillary buildings and facilities ● ● ● ● Installation of wellsite structural, mechanical, electricalcomponents

● ● Pipeline ROW boundary demarcation ● Site preparation (clearing and grubbing, topsoil strip) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Pipeline trench excavation ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Pipeline installation (stringing and bending, welding,testing and inspection, joint coating, placement intrench)

● ● ● ● ●

Trench backfilling/reinstatement ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Pipeline hydrostatic testing ●

●

Tie in and commissioning ● ● KGPF construction (inc pipework, foundations andancillary facilities)

● ● ● ● ● KGPC hydrotesting and commissioning ● ● ● OPERATIONS

Kerendan facilities operation (physical presence) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● -/+ ● ● ● Produced water removal and management ● ● Flaring ● ● ● ● ●



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 200 of 369



Resource/Receptors Environment Social Health

G e o l o g y

S o i l

S u r f a c e

W a t e r

G r o u n d w a t e r

S e d i m e n t s

F i s h e r i e s

V e g e t a t i o n

W i l d l i f e

A i r

N o i s e / V

i b r a t i o n

A e s t h e t i c s

P o p u

l a t i o n / P h y s i c a l d i s p l a c e m e n t

S o c i a l / C u l t u r a l S

t r u c t u r e

E c o n o m y a n d

L i v e l i h o o d

R e s o u r c e o w n e r s h i p / u s e

C u l t u r a l r e s o u r c e s

E d u c a t i o n / s k i l l s

I n f r a s t r u c t u r e / P u b l i c

S e r v i c e s

M o r t a l i t y / K e y

h e a l t h i n d i c a t o r s

C o m m u n i t y s a f e t y a n d s e c u r i t y

E n v i r o n m e n t a l Q u a l i t y

C o m m u n i c a b l e / n o n c o m m u n i c a b l e

d i s e a s e

V e c t o r

B o r n e

D i s e a s e s

N u t r i t i o n a l S

t a t u s

H e a l t h

f a c i l i t i e s / r e c r e a t i o n

L i f e s t y l e f a c t o r s

Activities

ALL PHASES

Workforce presence ● ● ● -/+ ● -/+ ● ● ● Resource use ● ● ● ● Wastes, emissions and discharges generation, handlingand disposal

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Power generation ● ● ● Vehicle use/transportation (workforce, supply andsupport)

● ● ● -/+

Helicopter supply/support activities ● ● ● NON-ROUTINE EVENTS

Process upset/Emergency flaring ● ● ● ● Spillage of fuel, oil, chemicals and hazardous materials ● ● ● ● ● ● Gas well blowout ● ● ● ● Vessel, vehicle, helicopter accident ● ● ● ● Fire/explosions (facilities) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Natural disasters and their implications on operations

(flood, earthquake, lightning)● ● ● ● ● ● ●

ASSOCIATED FACILITIES

Existing access roadsPhysical presence (including drainage) ● ● ● ● -/+ ● + ● ● Vehicle use/transportation ● ● ● ● + ● Maintenance ● ● ● ● + ● +Luwe Hulu Supply and Support BasePhysical presence ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Workforce presence ● -/+ ● Vessel transportation ● ● ● ● Wastes, emissions and discharges generation, handlingand disposal

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 201 of 369



9.4.2 Prediction of Impacts

Prediction of impacts is an objective exercise to determine what could potentially happen tothe environment and society (i.e. social, socio-economic and health) as a consequence of theProject and its associated activities.

It should be noted that the IFC PS describe the standards that should be met throughout thelife of the project to identify and help avoid, mitigate, and manage risks and impacts as away of doing business in a sustainable way. They do not define the level of assessmentrequired to achieve the standards, e.g. how far should the identification of risks associatedwith third party or associated facilities extend? This level of definition is typically achieved

during scoping, through early dialogue with the Lender and through periodiccommunication through the IA process to ensure alignment and agreement on theassessment to be conducted to adequately identify and manage the risks. Salamandermanagement regularly consults with the IFC to communicate the program of work andapproach being followed to manage environmental and social risks of the Project. Thiscommunication was ongoing through the performance of the ESIA work.

Table 9.3 presents the results of scoping for the Project. The following information isprovided for each the impact topics:

• Sources of impact: The potential causes or sources of impact for the topic;

• Potential impacts of significance: Discussion of the types of impacts that could occurfrom construction or operation of the Project based on available information andexisting environmental and social baseline data; and

• Proposed assessment approach: An outline of the work required to complete theassessment and methods used.

The Project/receptor interactions that are likely to lead to significant impacts form the focusof the impact assessment.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 202 of 369



Table 9.2 Scoping Prediction of Impacts

Activity/ Aspect Resource/Receptor Initial Assessment Proposed Assessment Applicable Standard

Project Land Use Social: - Social/Cultural Structure- Economy and Livelihood- Resource Ownership/Use- Cultural Resources

Health: - Nutritional status

Land use and compensation process for the Kerendan cluster and pipeline to KGPF has beencompleted and followed Indonesian Regulations. The nearest village is more than 2kmdistance therefore there is no physical displacement.

It is acknowledged that potential impacts may have resulted from the process. Therefore thefindings of the Project Land Use Audit will be managed through Salamander’s HSEManagement System that governs the management of the environmental and social risksover the lifetime of the Project (refer to Chapter 13 ). As such the assessment of thesepotential impacts were scoped out of the ESIA predictive IA Process.

This has been scoped out of this ESIA. PS 1: Social andEnvironmental Assessmentand Management SystemsPS 5: and InvoluntaryResettlementPS 7: Indigenous PeoplesPS 8: Cultural Heritage

Employmentopportunities(including workforcepresence)

Environment: - Wildlife- Vegetation

Presence of workers, particularly those employed from the nearby villages may result in thehunting/trapping of animals or gathering of forest resources as is common practice in thelocal communities. Some of these species may be of a vulnerable status.

Disturbance to vegetation outside of approved cleared areas is possible if workers ventureoutside of work zones into natural habitat.

Review of biodiversity and species vulnerability(flora/fauna)

PS 1: Social andEnvironmental Assessmentand Management SystemsPS6: BiodiversityConservation and SustainableManagement of LivingNatural Resources

Social: - Social/Cultural Structure- Economy and Livelihood

(+/-)- Education/skills- Infrastructure/Public

Services (+/-)

Health: - Communicable disease- Lifestyle factors- Community Safety and

Security

The Project has the potential to have a positive impact on the community through generationof new employment and training opportunities. Improved disposable income also has thepotential to improve employee lifestyles create flow-on economic benefits in the communitysuch as through generating greater demand for local businesses/economic activity.

The presence of additional workers in the community has the potential to positively affectinfrastructure and services if the increase in demand results in improved infrastructure andservices for the community.

Conversely, the presence of additional workers in the community may also create negativeimpacts such as through causing or accentuating the following:● disturbing existing lifestyles that may be valued by members of the community● transferring communicable diseases● social/cultural tension from the introduction of workers from outside the area with

different cultural values/characteristics● crime or sense of unsafety as a result of non-locals entering the community (even aperceived risk has the potential to disturb the community)● community safety and security from Project security personnel (human rightsconsiderations from armed personnel)● negative impacts on the livelihoods and the economic situation of households that may notreceive direct economic benefit, but are exposed to impacts often associated with economicdevelopment (e.g. increase in land prices, increases in cost of goods and services)● increasing demand for infrastructure and goods and services (e.g. medical, transport,business). This has the potential to negatively affect the community if it results in decreasedaccess or quality of services and infrastructure available prior to the Project commencing● decrease in traditional lifestyle s in the area (hunting/farming) and a change in communitystructure if personnel work for the Project instead or pursing/continuing with traditionalroles.

Review of community social (cultural anddemographic structure) and lifestyle throughprimary and secondary sources. This informationwill be used to inform the Social ImpactAssessment.

Undertake social field visit that includesconsultation with affected communities and visualassessment of villages and existing environment.Consultation will help to identify potential impacts,community concerns and areas of potentialinvestment for the Project.

Undertake social field visit that includes

consultation with affected communities and visualassessment of villages and existing environment.Consultation will help to identify potential impacts,community concerns and areas of potentialinvestment for the Project

PS1: Assessment andManagement ofEnvironmental and SocialRisks and ImpactsPS2: Labour and WorkingConditionsPS4: Community Health,Safety, and Security



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 203 of 369




Transportation ofmaterials/ suppliesand workforce

Environment: - Air- Noise and vibration- Wildlife

Air impacts will be associated with the generation of construction dust from handling,transport and storage of materials and workers on unsealed roads; and exhaust emissionsfrom construction traffic, operational traffic, plant and any other exhaust emitting itemsassociated with the Project.

Noise and vibration impacts can arise from a number of sources during construction andoperation, including from:● movement of construction vehicles on and off site; ● diversion of existing local traffic during construction ● noise and vibration from operational traffic

Wildlife may be impacted through interactions with vehicles (resulting in injury or

mortality) and disturbance from noise and vibration and dust generation (noise andvibration and increased dust may deter fauna from the area of impact, which may result in alocalised temporary displacement.

Review existing baseline assessments on Project areaand surrounding environment.

Undertake a terrestrial biodiversity assessmentaddressing the requirements of IFC PS6. This is to becomprised of:• Baseline assessment, including field surveys inProject area;• Habitat mapping of critical habit ats(if applicable);• Assessment of ecosystem services; • Impact assessment; and • Measures to be included in an Environment

Action Plan to negate any negative impactsidentified in the impact assessment.

For noise, identify sensitive receptors, and provide aquantitative assessment of the predicted impactsfrom construction and operation. Mitigationmeasures will then be developed forimplementation.

PS1: Assessment andManagement ofEnvironmental and SocialRisks and ImpactsPS3: Resource Efficiency andPollution PreventionPS4: Community Health,Safety, and SecurityPS6: BiodiversityConservation and SustainableManagement of LivingNatural Resources

PS8: Cultural Heritage

Social: - Economy and Livelihood

(+/-)- Infrastructure/Public

Services

Health: - Environmental Quality- Lifestyle factors- Community Safety and

Security

The transportation of workers, materials and supplies to and from site has the potential toimpact communities in the following way:● increased risk of traffic related incidents with increase in traffic activity (e.g. car accidents)● transportation requirements may have a positive economic effect if local businessesand/or contractors are be employed to transport workers and materials to and from site● increased transport demand may also open up opportunities for improved transportservices which may improve access to community infrastructure and services for localcommunities● improved access to infrastructure and services (which in turn has the potential to affecttheir livelihood and economic situation). The project area needs to be accessible on a dailybasis therefore Salamander has invested and will continue to invest in developing andupgrading transport networks.

By increasing traffic in the area, the project also has the potential to have a negative impacton infrastructure and services the community currently use as a result of increased demandand use by the Project. This may have flow-on effects if the increase in demand prevents thecommunity from accessing certain areas and/or the impacts associated with increased traffic(e.g. dust generation) affects their health and/or economic livelihood.

Review of community social (cultural anddemographic structure) and lifestyle throughprimary and secondary sources. This informationwill be used to inform the Social ImpactAssessment.

Undertake social field visit that includesconsultation with affected communities and visualassessment of villages and existing environment.Consultation will help to identify potential impacts,community concerns and areas of potentialinvestment for the Project Undertake social fieldvisit that includes consultation with affectedcommunities and visual assessment of villages andexisting environment. Consultation will help toidentify potential impacts, community concerns andareas of potential investment for the Project

Site preparation (e.g.clearing, grubbing,grading, topsoilstorage, levelling,compacting)

Environment: - Soil- Surface Water- Vegetation- Wildlife- Air- Noise/Vibration

Site preparation will require the disturbance of soils, potentially within steep areas whichmay be subject to slope instability. Additionally, there will be an increase in the amount ofexposed soil, therefore there is the potential for increased sediment and other contaminantsto make their way into the river systems.

Construction and earthworks likely to generate dust terms. Exhaust emissions from plantand equipment involved in site preparation may temporarily impact air quality in theimmediate area. Additionally, emissions of greenhouse gases and particulates have thepotential to contribute to anthropogenic climate change

Impacts on vegetation include a direct loss of habitat which has the potential to affectbiodiversity values and wildlife. Vegetation may also be impacted by dust and changes to airquality (smothering may affect transpiration and photosynthesis process). Wildlife may beaffected directly or indirectly through interactions with machinery and personnel, and

Undertake soil and water sampling in the Projectarea to identify baseline conditions that can be usedfor baseline assessment and use in futuremonitoring of activities.

In terms of surface and groundwater impacts, it isproposed to develop some basic Project parameters(instead of undertaking detailed catchmentmodelling, or quantitative assessment of impacts),undertake an impact assessment based on baselineinformation and develop an appropriate suite ofmanagement, mitigation and monitoring measures.

Review existing baseline assessments on Project area

PS1: Assessment andManagement ofEnvironmental and SocialRisks and ImpactsPS3: Resource Efficiency andPollution PreventionPS4: Community Health,Safety, and SecurityPS6: BiodiversityConservation and SustainableManagement of LivingNatural ResourcesPS8: Cultural Heritage



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 204 of 369



Activity/ Aspect Resource/Receptor Initial Assessment Proposed Assessment Applicable Standardimpacts on habitat (e.g. loss of habitat or impacts to habitat/habitat use as a results of noiseand vibration and dust impacts)

Noise and vibration impacts during site preparation will predominantly occur from theoperation of machinery and equipment.

and surrounding environment. Undertake aterrestrial biodiversity assessment addressing therequirements of IFC PS6 (See Transportation above).

For noise, identify sensitive receptors, and provide aquantitative assessment of the predicted impactsfrom construction and operation. Mitigationmeasures will then be developed forimplementation.

Social: - Economy and Livelihood- Resource ownership/use

- Cultural Resources

Potential direct impacts to tangible and intangible heritage caused by disturbance of theground and/or loss of community access to areas.

Increased dust/reduction in air quality and generation of noise and vibration may causegeneral disturbance to the community.

Economy and livelihood may be affected through removal of vegetation converting forestareas that are used by local communities for farming, hunting and gathering of non-timberproducts (NTPs), primarily for subsistence use. Similarly, livelihood may also be affected ifresources surrounding Project activities are impacted by dust or other factors associated withthe Project (e.g. contamination of local waterways used by locals for fishing)

Review existing data sources.

Undertake social field visit that includes

consultation with affected communities and visualassessment of villages and existing environment.Consultation will help to identify potential impactsassociated with construction, community concernssurrounding the Project

Health: - Environmental Quality- Vector Borne Diseases

Dust and air impacts could potentially impact human health, both of workers andsurrounding communities.

Alteration of surface hydrology/drainage may lead to water pooling and stagnation whichmay result in an increase in mosquito breeding and spread of associated diseases (malaria,dengue).

Pipeline trenchexcavation,backfilling andsurface restoration

Environment: - Soil-Wildlife- Vegetation- Air-Noise/Vibration- Surfacewater

Environmental impacts associated with trenching are similar to those associated with sitepreparation including: ● soil exposure - potential for impact on sediment loads in localwaterways from water runoff; wind blown soil/dust impacting adjacent vegetation ● noiseand vibration impacts from machinery and equipment used to complete the activity (maydeter fauna from using the surrounding area) ● loss of topsoil - if topsoil is washed away,this may affect future rehabilitation/re-vegetation ● dust generation and exhaust emissions(air quality impacts) generated during excavation and operation of machinery andequipment (potential to impact surrounding vegetation through smothering effects)Wildlifemay also be impacted by open trenches if they are left open - may impede movementbetween forested areas and/or fauna may become trapped in the trenches, resulting ininjury or mortality.

Apply same level of assessment as SitePreparationConfirm pipeline methodology andlength of time trench will be open, to assist inassessment of impacts to wildlife from trenchexcavation.

PS1: Assessment andManagement ofEnvironmental and SocialRisks and ImpactsPS3: Resource Efficiency andPollution PreventionPS4: Community Health,Safety, and Security

PS6: BiodiversityConservation and SustainableManagement of LivingNatural ResourcesPS8: Cultural Heritage

Social: - Cultural Resources- Resource ownership/use- Economy and livelihood (-)

Cultural artefacts may be uncovered during the excavation of material.

Increased dust/reduction in air quality and generation of noise and vibration may causegeneral disturbance to the community.

Economy and livelihood may be affected if resources surrounding Project activities areimpacted by dust or other factors associated with the construction of trenches (e.g.contamination of local waterways used by locals for fishing)

Assess likelihood of cultural resources occurring inthe area based on secondary and primary data,including outcomes of community consultation andresearch on cultural heritage values in the area.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 205 of 369




Health: - Vector Borne Diseases- Community Safety andSecurity

Pipeline trenches that are unfenced and/or unmanned during the testing procedure maypresent a safety risk to community members using the access roads or surrounding forest.

Dust and air impacts could potentially impact human health, both of workers andsurrounding communities. Similarly, community health may be impacted if alteration ofsurface hydrology/drainage leads to water pooling/stagnation and increases in mosquitobreeding areas, and subsequent spread of associated diseases (malaria, dengue)

Review process of design and HSE managementcontrols.

Construction ofbuildings andfacilities

Environment: - Air- Noise/Vibration- Wildlife- Aesthetics (Lighting)

The main impacts associated with the construction of buildings and facilities at KGPF andKerendan Cluster include the following:● air quality - dust generation and emissions associated with the operation of machinery andequipment used to construct facilities● noise and vibration during the operation of machinery and equipment● lighting associated with night construction

Air quality may be impacted by construction of buildings and facilities as a result of dustgeneration (predominantly from movement of machinery/equipment/vehicles) and exhaustemissions from plant and equipment. Impacts will be temporary and likely restricted to theimmediate area. Construction of sealed surfaces at the KGPF will assist in reducing impactsassociated with dust generation during construction

Fauna may be deterred from the area of activity as a result of noise and vibration andlighting impacts (lighting impacts restricted to construction activities undertaken on a 24hour basis) which could lead to temporary displacement.

Apply same level of assessment as Site Preparation PS1: Assessment andManagement ofEnvironmental and SocialRisks and ImpactsPS3: Resource Efficiency andPollution PreventionPS4: Community Health,Safety, and SecurityPS6: BiodiversityConservation and SustainableManagement of LivingNatural Resources

Health: - Environmental Quality

Increased dust/reduction in air quality could potentially impact human health (both ofworkers and surrounding communities) and cause general disturbance to the community.Similarly, the community may be impacted by noise. The nearest village to the area ofactivity if Kerendan which is approximately 2 km from Kerendan Cluster


Drilling(groundwater well atKGPF)

Environment: - Groundwater- Wildlife- Vegetation- Noise and Vibration- Air

Drilling groundwater wells has the potential to result in impacts to:● wildlife and local community from the presence of equipment and noise/vibration;● air emissions, waste and discharges (refer air, waste sections);● interference/alteration of the groundwater system/aquifer;● surrounding vegetation (directly through smothering from dust generation and/orindirectly through potential interference with groundwater systems)

Addressed in other sections

Social:

- Resource ownership/use- Cultural resources


Potential for community impacts if environmental quality is negatively affected as a result of

increased noise and vibration, air quality impacts, and contamination.Resource use may be impacted if Project groundwater use affects availability of water forlocal communities (refer resource use) which could potentially lead to subsequent impactson nutrition.

Potential direct impacts to tangible and intangible heritage caused by ground disturbance.

Addressed in other sections PS1: Assessment and

Management ofEnvironmental and SocialRisks and ImpactsPS3: Resource Efficiency andPollution PreventionPS4: Community Health,Safety, and Security

Resource use Environment: - Groundwater

Social: - Resource ownership/use- Economy and Livelihood

Health: - Nutritional status

The use of local resources has the potential for positive and negative impacts:● positive impacts from the generation of income and demand for services in the localeconomy;● native impact from over-demand affecting availability of goods and services for the localpopulation;● induced inflation from over demand resulting in escalation of prices and affect on localcommunity cost of living or affordability of goods.● use of community resources (e.g. groundwater) reducing natural supply/availabilitylevels.

Confirm resource needs of the project, includingwater balance study

PS1: Assessment andManagement ofEnvironmental and SocialRisks and ImpactsPS3: Resource Efficiency andPollution Prevention



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 206 of 369




Installation andtesting of facilities(including electricaland mechanicalcomponents)

Environment: - Soil-Wildlife- Air-Noise/Vibration- SurfaceWater

Installation and testing of facilities has the potential to cause air and noise vibration impactsthrough the use of machinery and equipment. If trenches are left open, wildlife couldpotentially become trapped in the trenches, resulting in injury or mortality.Soil may also beimpacted in areas where the surface has been cleared and is exposed to the elements (e.g.wind, rainfall) and vehicle use. This may result in erosion impacts (e.g. from wind-blownsoil and run off during periods of high rainfall) and/or air quality impacts from dustgeneration.Local waterways have the potential to be impacted by hydrotesting as they willbe used as a source and discharge point for hydrotest water.

Confirm pipeline installation method to determinewhether vegetation impacts are likely tooccurReview existing baseline assessments onProject area and surroundingenvironment.Undertake a terrestrial biodiversityassessment addressing the requirements of IFC PS6(see Site Preparation)


Social: - Resource ownership/use

Health: - Environmental Quality- Community Safety andSecurity- Nutrition

Pipeline trenches that are unfenced and/or unmanned during the testing procedure maypresent a safety risk to the community that use the area.

The community uses the river for drinking and fishing therefore negative impacts on localwaterways from contaminated hydrotest water could potentially affect resource use (e.g.water source and fishing) and subsequently nutrition if the ability to source clean drinkingwater or aquatic food resources is impacted.


Confirm community resource use using consultationdata and potential for impact

Physical presenceand operation ofinfrastructure

Environment: - Soil- Wildlife- Surface water- Groundwater- Air- Aesthetics- Noise/Vibration

Soil, surface water and groundwater may be impacted by the presence and operation ofinfrastructure as a result of the following:● use of groundwater as a po table and non-potable water source (a groundwater well will bedrilled at KGPF and water treated and stored in tanks for site use);● drainage systems (freshwater/stormwater runoff directed to the environment); and● erosion of unsealed areas during peri od s of high rainfall (loss of soil, increasedsedimentation in local waterways)

Operations will occur 24 hours a day, therefore there is potential for lighting and noise andvibration impacts.

The presence of infrastructure has the potential to affect wildlife either directly throughdisplacement and loss of foraging/nesting/roosting habitat, and indirectly from impactsassociated with the operation of facilities such as noise and vibration and lighting

Impacts on air quality may also occur from operation of the facility - see Waste section for airimpacts associated with operations

Assessment of drainage systems to be constructedand proposed management and monitoringmeasures to be implemented to ensure waterdirected to the environment is not contaminated.Similarly, identify potential for groundwatercontamination at proposed well location.

Assess suitability of soil stockpile storagemethod/locations (if applicable)

Undertake a terrestrial biodiversity assessmentaddressing the requirements of IFC PS6 (see SitePreparation)

For noise, identify sensitive receptors, and provide aquantitative assessment of the predicted impactsfrom operation. Mitigation measures will then bedeveloped for implementation.

Review of the light source characteristics andestablishment of light emissions influence zonesconsidering the environmental and social receptors.The outputs of these will be utilised to assessimpacts to the adjoining human and ecologicalreceptors.




DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 207 of 369




Social: - Resource ownership/use- Infrastructure/PublicServices- Economy and Livelihood(+/-)


The presence of infrastructure has the potential to disturb the community in ways such asloss of access (can no longer use the area) and changes to the existing environment (refer ,land clearing). Continued exclusion from the area removes the use of the land for possibleplanting and harvesting.

Noise/vibration, light from operations may impact local communities using the area andlocal community villages if propagation of emissions is visible/audible.

Use of groundwater for potable and non-potable water source (a groundwater well will bedrilled at KGPF and water treated and stored in tanks for site use) has the potential to affectgroundwater resources (quantity).

Project also has the potential to improve infrastructure and services either through directinvestment (e.g. CSR programs) or indirectly through the continual maintenance of accessroads, which may improve accessibility between communities/main population centres (andsubsequently improve access to surrounding community infrastructure and services,education and economic opportunities).

Review existing data sources.

Undertake social field visit that includesconsultation with affected communities and visualassessment of villages and existing environment.Consultation will help to identify potential impacts,community concerns and areas of potentialinvestment for the Project

Wastes, emissionsand dischargesgeneration, handlingand disposal

Environment: - Surface water- Ground water- Air- Soil- Wildlife

There will be a number of sources of waste during the construction and operational phasesrequiring disposal. This includes domestic waste associated with onsite workers, and generalconstruction/operational waste. Disposal of these in a manner that is environmentalunsound could lead to impacts off site.

Exhaust emissions from construction traffic, operational traffic, plant and any other exhaustemitting items associated with the Project that have the potential to change the local airquality. The composition of engine exhaust emissions is expected to be primarily NOX andCO with small quantities of hydrocarbons.

Emissions of greenhouse gases and particulates during construction and operations have thepotential to contribute to anthropogenic climate change. The generation of air emissionsfrom construction activities however will be short-term and intermittent.

Produced water will be generated as a result of the Project however this will be reinjectedafter going through treatment at the KGPF (reinjected via a water pipeline from KGPF toKerendan Cluster).

Incorrect management of waste may attract fauna to the area (pest/native), potentiallyresulting in changes to natural behaviour or outbreaks of pest species.

Waste inventories and disposal methods will beoutlined in ESIA.

Assessment of predicted impacts of air pollutantsincluding Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) , carbonmonoxide (CO) and particulate matter (PM10) andhydrocarbons by comparison with air qualityobjectives. GHG emissions inventory and develop abasic greenhouse gas reporting framework to beimplemented during the project.

Assurance of waste management systems (treatment& discharge), and produced water reinjectionrequirements

Review of the light source characteristics andestablishment of light emissions influence zonesconsidering the environmental and social receptors.The outputs of these will be utilised to assessimpacts to the adjoining human and ecologicalreceptors.

PS1: Assessment andManagement ofEnvironmental and SocialRisks and ImpactsPS3: Resource Efficiency andPollution PreventionPS4: Community Health,Safety, and Security

Social: - Economy andLivelihood - Resourceownership/use Health: -Environmental quality -Vector borne diseases -Community Safety andSecurity - Nutrition

Waste management, treatment and disposal could lead to impacts on the community bychanging the environment in which they live, affecting their lifestyles or economic livelihood(e.g. impacts to water quality and effects on the fishing industry), health and safety (e.g.through exposure to hazardous materials), and increasing risk of spreading disease (e.g.from sanitation impacts).

Undertake social field visit that includesconsultation with affected communities and visualassessment of villages and existing environment.Consultation will help to identify concernsassociated with the Project and characteristics ofeach village which will assist in identifyingsignificance of impacts associated with waste onaffected communities.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 208 of 369




Non-routine/unplannedevents

Environment: - Soil- Surface water- Groundwater- Wildlife- Vegetation- Noise and Vibration- Air- Aesthetics (lighting)

Although unlikely to occur, non-routine or unplanned events have the potential to result in anumber of environmental impacts such as the following:● Atmospheric emissions, noise and visual/lighting impacts during flaring ● Impacts on soil, surface and g roundwater from accidental releases or spills of fuels orchemicals stored on site● Loss of habitat and impacts to wildlife as a result of an explosion or fire, or flaring ● Noise and vibration impacts associated with flaring and explosions

Hazard and Risk Analysis for construction andoperations

Assess the status and process of emergencymanagement planning for the Project as appropriatefor the current stage of design

PS1: Assessment andManagement ofEnvironmental and SocialRisks and ImpactsPS2: Labour and WorkingConditionsPS3: Resource Efficiency andPollution PreventionPS4: Community Health,Safety, and SecuritySocial:

- Resource ownership/use- Economy and Livelihood

Health: - Environmental Quality- Community Safety andSecurity- Nutrition

Impacts associated with non-routine or unplanned events have the potential to effectcommunities in the following ways:● loss of land/crops as a result of an explosion or fire ● temporary disturbance associated with flaring (noise, lighting/visu al)● impacts on health and safety as a result of hazardous chemical release and loss ofresources

Review HAZID and other risk assessmentdocuments.

Confirm community resource use using consultationdata and potential areas of impact

Associated Facilities

Luwe Hulu -Physical Presence

Environment: - Soil- Surface water- Groundwater- Air- Aesthetics- Noise/Vibration

Soil, surface water and groundwater may be impacted by the presence and operation ofinfrastructure as a result of the following:● use of groundwater as a potable a nd non -potable water source may deplete supply(community water well is used for water supply to the facility); and● drainage systems (freshwater/stormwater runoff directed to the environment).

Noise/vibration, light from operations may impact local faunal populations if propagationof emissions is visible/audible.

Impacts on air quality may also occur from operation of the facility.

Review Scoping Report which involved assessmentof Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base anddescribes existing facilities

PS1: Assessment andManagement ofEnvironmental and SocialRisks and ImpactsPS3: Resource Efficiency andPollution PreventionPS4: Community Health,Safety, and SecurityPS6: BiodiversityConservation and SustainableManagement of LivingNatural ResourcesSocial:

- Resource ownership/use- Infrastructure/PublicServices

Health: - Environmental Quality- Community Safety andSecurity

The presence of infrastructure has the potential to disturb the community (can no longer usethe area) although community members continue to access through the site which presents ahealth and safety risk (not wearing appropriate PPE, may be unaware of risks associatedwith the operation of the base etc.)

Noise/vibration, light from operations may impact local communities using the area andlocal community villages if propagation of emissions is visible/audible.

Use of groundwater for potable and non-potable water source (community water well isused for water supply to the facility). Use of the river for transportation has the possibilityto interfere with other river users (community, commercial).

Potential for local infrastructure and services to be improved either through directinvestment (e.g. CSR programs) or indirectly through the maintenance of infrastructurewhich may improve accessibility between communities/main population centres (andsubsequently improve access to surrounding community infrastructure and services,education and economic opportunities). Presence of the base may also have a positive impacton local businesses through increased economic activity and demand for local goods andservices.

Uncontrolled access for the local community which is passing through the site without safetyPPE.

Review of social field data collected during visit toLuwe Hulu community



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 209 of 369



10 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

10.1 INTRODUCTION

The overall approach to the rating and evaluation of impacts follows the methodologypresented in Chapter 4. This Section provides greater detail in the evaluation of thesignificance of environmental impacts identified during Scoping. Where resource/receptorspecific magnitude or sensitivity/vulnerability definitions apply, these are discussed in therelevant subsections.

10.2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT RESULTS

The results of the full environmental impact assessment are provided in Annex H. Thefollowing sections identify and discuss the predicted positive and negative environmentalimpacts associated with construction, operation and decommissioning of the Project. Thefocus is on the impacts likely to be experienced by proposed Project activities at theKerendan cluster, KGPF and connecting pipelines to from the production site to KGPF andonward to the PLN power station site. The associated facilities of the Luwe Hulu Supply andSupport Base and access roads are also considered. Whilst the PLN Power station isconsidered an associated facility by the definition of the IFC, it is not assessed as Salamanderhas no direct influence on the construction or operational performance of the facility.

Most of the impacts are similar across both the construction and operation phases of theProject, that is, only the magnitude or location of the impact may differ. Therefore, thefollowing discussion combines construction and operational impacts unless significantdifferences between the impacts during the two phases are anticipated. Post-operationaleffects of the Project are largely unknown at this time since the Kerendan Gas DevelopmentProject post-operational requirements have yet to be defined beyond initial plans to handover the Project to a state operator.

The following sub-sections present the assessment results for the environmental impactsidentified through Scoping.

10.3 IMPACTS TO TERRESTRIAL FLORA

Potential and actual impacts on vegetation resulting from the Project include:• Direct and indirect loss of vegetation from land clearance;

• Degradation of vegetation communities from introduction and spread of invasiveand/or exotic species;

• Physical disturbance from activities of the workforce; and

• Project-related traffic and physical presence, including related dust and vegetationsmothering.

The significance of impact on flora may vary according to the Project activity or aspect,



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 210 of 369



therefore a separate discussion and evaluation of impacts for each activity or aspect isprovided below. Mitigation and management measures and residual impact assessment areaddressed where required.

10.3.1 Direct Loss of Vegetation from Land Clearing

Discussion of Impacts

Approximately 57 ha of vegetation will be directly impacted by the Project by vegetationclearing. This includes vegetation that has already been cleared for the construction of theWellhead Cluster Pad and adjoining worker’s camp; helipad and flyway; and access roadsthat link the Cluster Pad to main road (near PLN power plant location), via KGPF.

Vegetation in the Project area consists predominantly of Mixed Dipterocarp SecondaryForest, with some pioneer vegetation. Plantations (e.g. rubber) were present along sections ofthe Sales Gas and Gathering Pipeline routes and at the Kerendan Wellsite.

Vegetation in the Project is generally a mixture of modified and natural vegetation that haschanged as a result of ongoing clearing activities to support local community needs (e.g.timber production and plantation farming). The greatest level of modification was observedat the Kerendan Wellsite and along the pipeline routes/access roads, where habitat has beencleared or disturbed as a result of previous and ongoing clearing activities. That said, theproject area including KGPF still contains stands of secondary forest which contain floraspecies of conservation significance. Impacts to these species are assessed separately atChapter 10.3.4. The vegetation also provides habitat for locally occurring fauna species.

Impact Evaluation and Significance

Given the total area of vegetation to be cleared and the modified nature of the Project area,the impact from land clearing is assessed as negative and Moderate .

Table 10.1 Loss of Vegetation from Land Clearing Activities

Impact Description Direct loss of vegetation and flora species as a result of land clearingactivities

Impact Nature Positive Negative

Impact Type Direct Indirect

Impact Extent Low Medium High

Impact Duration Short term Mediumterm

Long term/ irreversible

Impact Scale Low Medium High

Frequency Low Moderate High

Magnitude Negligible Small Medium Large

Sensitivity/Vulnerability Low Medium High

Significance Negligible Minor Moderate Major



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 211 of 369



Additional Mitigation Measures, Management, and Monitoring

Timber that is produced from clearing is currently the property of the Forestry Department.Salamander also intends to use some of the cleared timber for constructing facilities uponapproval from the Forestry Department.

Vegetation clearing cannot be avoided therefore a number of management and monitoringmeasures in place to ensure impacts associated with vegetation clearing are minimised anddo not result in disturbance to surrounding vegetation:

• Vegetation clearing only in designated areas for the project footprint; and

• No disturbance to vegetation outside marked areas;

• Topsoil will be stored separately during clearing and will be used to fill and level thearea once grubbing activities have been completed, thereby maintaining the seedbank;

• Pipeline will be installed along the road thereby reducing the land requirements andassociated vegetation clearance; and

• Pipeline ROW will be re-vegetated following installation.

Significance of Residual Impact

While the management measures listed above will assist in managing vegetation clearingactivities and ensuring impacts on surrounding vegetation is minimised, the significancerating for loss of vegetation will be Minor . Vegetation loss will be subject to an offsetprogram whereby Salamander will re-vegetate an area away from the Project, subject todiscussion with the Forestry Department (note: impacts on loss of habitat are addressed inSection 10.4.1).

10.3.2 Impacts on Vegetation from other Project activities


Aspects of the Project that have the potential to impact vegetation surrounding the Projectarea include the following:

• Activities that generate dust or impact quality (if impact results in adverse impacts onplant physiology);

• Small spills or incorrect waste storage (e.g. vegetation may be indirectly impactedthrough soil contamination); and

• Project personnel (potential for vegetation disturbance if workers go outside cleared

boundaries into forested areas and/or partake in the gathering of plant resources, acommon practice in the local community).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 212 of 369




There is potential for accidental spillages to occur, however the design process includescontrols for managing and controlling waste through the installation of separate drainagesystems. Any spillages will likely be contained within these systems or contained within thecleared area.

Dust generation is a potential impact, however this is likely to be negligible duringoperations due to lower traffic volumes and presence of sealed surfaces. The greatest level ofimpact from dust will occur during construction (particularly during clearing) which is atemporary but medium significance impact given the sensitivity of the area due to highlevels of background dust generation.

Given the above, the evaluation of the extent and severity of indirect impacts on vegetationfrom Project activities is subsequently considered Minor .

Table 10.2 Impacts on Vegetation from other Project Activities

Impact Description Impacts to vegetation and flora species as a result of Project activities,including vegetation smothering from dust generation



Impact Extent Low Medium High Impact Duration Short term Medium term Long term/ irreversible





Significance Negligible Minor Moderate Major Additional Mitigation Measures, Management, and Monitoring

Management and mitigation measures currently in place which will help minimise indirectimpacts to vegetation from Project activities are consistent with those described in above, inSection . Additional mitigation measures include:

• Dust suppression on access roads;

• Speed limits (40 km hour or 15 km/hr near worksite and where a road passesvillages);

• Personnel not allowed to capture or remove flora or plant products from site; and

•

Restricting work to designated/cleared boundaries.Significance of Residual Impact

With the implementation of the above measures, the significance rating for indirect impacts



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 213 of 369



to vegetation from Project activities is considered Negligible .

10.3.3 Invasion and Spread of Invasive and/or Exotic Flora Species


The influx of foreign workers, equipment, and materials may spread or introduce “invasive”and/or exotic flora species to the Project area. “Invasive” species are native or non-nativespecies that cause ecological or economic problems (e.g., outcompeting indigenous species oraltering the existing ecological community through rapid development of monocultures).“Exotic” species are those species that have been introduced, or moved, by human activitiesto a location where they do not naturally occur.

Invasive and/or exotic plants are a concern because they can quickly form self-sustainingmonocultures that out-compete native plants and/or reduce the quality of wildlife habitat.Highly invasive species can reduce the amount of available nutrients, light, and wateravailable to native species. Invasive species are typically fast growing and can spread easily,so a small or insignificant disturbance can quickly cause widespread impacts if conditionsfavour explosive growth of the invasive species in question. Ground disturbance related toconstruction and operational activities and distribution of topsoil during vegetationrehabilitation may contribute to dispersal of seeds of invasive and exotic species.


Vegetation and habitat in the Project area is predominantly modified. Construction of accessroads and ground disturbance activities may increase the risk of weeds spreading in the localarea however it is unlikely to results in significant impacts to the quality of existing habitat.Therefore impacts associated with the introduction and spread of invasive and/or exoticflora species on vegetation is assumed minor. Progressive vegetation rehabilitation andimplementation of a robust weed management program to control invasive and exoticspecies may help manage this potential impact to a negligible significance.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 214 of 369



Table 10.3 summarises the impacts anticipated to native vegetation from the introductionand spread of invasive and exotic species.

Table 10.3 Impacts to Native Vegetation as Result of the Introduction of Invasive orAlien Species

Impact Description Impacts to native vegetation communities as a result of the introductionand spread of invasive and/or exotic flora species.




Impact Duration Short term Medium term Long term/ irreversible







Although the habitat in the Project area is modified, there are areas that contain naturalhabitat and pioneer species. Based on the impact assessment findings, no additionalmitigation or management measures were considered necessary.


The impact associated with the introduction of invasive or alien species to the Project area isconsidered Negligible .

10.3.4 Impacts to Threatened Flora Species

Discussion of ImpactsThree threatened flora species were recorded in the Project area during the 2013 Biodiversitysurvey. These were Hopea ferruginea, Shorea lamellatae (White Meranti) and Parashoreamalaanonan (White Seraya), which are currently listed as Critically Endangered on the IUCNredlist of threatened species. These species are all canopy tree species that occur within theregion, including Brunei and Malaysia and in some instances Sumatra. White Seraya forexample is one of the most commercially important timber species in northern Borneo. Thesespecies were recorded at the KGPF site and along the pipeline route and were a dominantcanopy and sapling species at most vegetation plots. Based on known distribution thesespecies are likely to be relatively common within the local area wherever similar stands ofsecondary forest occur. This reflects the fact that these species are not necessarily restrictedto the project area, but are instead under threat regionally as a result of land clearingactivities (refer Chapter 12 Cumulative Impacts ).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 215 of 369



Most of the clearing in the Project area has been completed therefore impacts on threatenedflora species are predicted based on ERM’s understanding of the vegetation composition ofthe project site and surrounding vegetation communities. At the time of the biodiversitysurvey, sections of the KGPF footprint had been cleared. Clearing was completed beforethreatened plant specimens collected during the KGPF survey were identified through theMinistry of Forestry. Given the relative dominance of these tree species within the secondaryforest communities, quantification of the precise number of these species was not considerednecessary as it was unlikely to assist in informing the impact assessment process, particularlyas species dominance within surrounding vegetation communities could not be quantified atthis stage.


Given most clearing in the Project area has been completed. Further clearing will be minimalas the pipeline will be installed along the side of the existing access road. In this instance,mitigation actions cannot be applied as vegetation has been cleared, although it is assumedthat this clearing will have affected the conservation significant species recorded during thebiodiversity survey, therefore the impact significance has been assessed as Moderate . Thisfinding is primarily attributed to the relatively small area of secondary forest that would beremoved as a result of the project, and likely species presence in surrounding areas, wheresimilar vegetation communities occur.

Table 10.4 Impacts to Threatened Flora Species from Clearing Activities

Impact Description Impacts to threatened flora species from clearing activitiesImpact Nature Positive Negative




Impact Scale Low Medium High Frequency Low Moderate High

Magnitude Negligible Small Medium LargeSensitivity/Vulnerability Low Medium HighSignificance Negligible Minor Moderate Major


The following will mitigate and manage impacts to threatened flora species from habitatclearing:

• Re-vegetation along the pipeline ROW as discussed previously will aid in the recoveryof shallow rooted vegetation habitat;

• Implementation of the re-vegetation program discussed earlier to offset net vegetationlosses.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 216 of 369




While re-vegetation is proposed, the residual significance of impact on these species fromclearing remains Moderate, requiring further assessment through Salamander’senvironmental and social management programs. This will be carried through to beaddressed through review and assessment under the framework of Salamander’s HESManagement System (refer Chapter 13 ).

10.4 IMPACTS TO TERRESTRIAL FAUNA

Impacts on fauna resulting from the Project include:• Loss of habitat from land clearance;

• Mortality from Project-related traffic and hunting;

• Impacts from pipeline construction;

• Habitat fragmentation;

• Impacts to behaviour from operation of facilities, equipment and machinery;

• Impacts on fauna species listed as threatened on the IUCN redlist.

As with flora, the significance of impact on fauna may vary according to the Project activityor aspect, therefore a separate discussion and evaluation of impacts for each activity oraspect is provided below. Mitigation and management measures and residual impactassessment are addressed where required.

10.4.1 Loss of Habitat as a Result of Land Clearing


Clearing land to construct the Project will directly remove habitat used by wildlife habitatwithin the footprints of excavations, access, roads, pipeline ROW and other Project-associated infrastructure, such as the KGPF site. The act of clearing land will not onlyremove the habitat, but may result in fauna mortality if those species are not able to avoidthe area or adapt to loss of their habitat.

Although somewhat disturbed, the vegetation in the Project area provides habitat for a rangeof different fauna species. Some tall stands of Dipterocarpaceae with dense canopies stillstand, which combined with lianas (woody vines) likely provide useful connections forfauna moving between habitats. No specific habitats such as nesting or roosting habitat wereidentified in the Project footprint, however species may use the area for foraging.

Impact Evaluation and SignificanceWhile it is considered likely that fauna in the area of impact will continue to persist withinthe local area due to the availability of equal habitat in the vicinity, the area of vegetation tobe removed, coupled with the likely ongoing operational impacts is likely to result in



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 217 of 369



impacts to local faunal communities.

Construction activities will occur successively, specific to the areas being cleared which willallow mobile wildlife to disperse to less disturbed areas. Although these measures will notfully counteract the negative effects of the Project, they will minimise impacts to some extent.

Table 10.5 provides the evaluation of the extent and severity of impacts related to wildlifemortality and wildlife habitat loss as negative and Minor .

Table 10.5 Impacts to Fauna from Loss of Habitat as a result of Land Clearing

Impact Description Fauna habitat loss as a result of land clearing activities

Impact Nature Positive NegativeImpact Type Direct Indirect









Clearing of habitat is required to develop the Project, however the following managementmeasures will assist in ensuring that impacts to vegetation area minimised and impacts onsurrounding habitat are minimised:

Vegetation clearing cannot be avoided. The following management and monitoringmeasures will assist in ensuring impacts associated with vegetation clearing and disturbance

to surrounding habitats is minimised:• Vegetation clearing only in designated areas for the project footprint; and

• No disturbance to vegetation outside marked areas;

• Topsoil will be stored separately during clearing and will be used to fill and level thearea once grubbing activities have been completed, thereby maintaining the seedbank;

• Pipeline will be installed along the road thereby reducing the land requirements andassociated vegetation clearance; and

• Pipeline ROW will be re-vegetated following installation.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 218 of 369




While the management measures listed above will assist in managing vegetation clearingactivities and ensuring impacts on surrounding vegetation is minimised, residual impacts onwildlife mortality and wildlife habitat loss are Negligible .

10.4.2 Mortality from Project Related Traffic and Hunting


Traffic-related injury and mortality of wildlife may occur along Project access roads. Inaddition, the communities in the area commonly hunt for species in the surrounding forest.New access roads may provide access for hunters to reach new areas of forest habitat.

Where the Project employs workers from the local community, these workers may conducthunting in the Project area consistent with their traditions. Bringing in workers fromneighbouring communities may increase this pressure on local wildlife.

In newly opened and cleared areas surrounding the Project footprint and access roads, thefollowing factors may combine to increase the severity of traffic-related and hunting-relatedimpacts on wildlife:

• Forest clearing for roads may expose new areas of wildlife to hunting and trafficpressures;

• Wildlife in these areas may be less accustomed to human presence and lessbehaviourally adept at avoidance; and

• These areas may contain a higher percentage of disturbance intolerant species, whichwill likely move away from their established home ranges to avoid disturbance. Theseindividuals will be more susceptible than usual to hunting and roadkill as they movethrough unfamiliar territory.


Considering that the Project is located in an area with production forest and modifiedhabitat, with human activity as well as hunting already common, impacts on wildlife arepredicted to be negative and minor (Table 10.6 ).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 219 of 369



Table 10.6 Impacts to Fauna as a Result of Hunting and Traffic Pressures

Impact Description Fauna habitat loss as a result of land clearing activities











Mitigation and management measures currently adopted by Project which will assist inreducing impacts on fauna in terms of hunting and traffic pressures include the following:

• Personnel not allowed to capture or remove fauna from site;

• Restricting work to designated/cleared boundaries;

• Limit 24 hour construction to uninterruptible/essential activities (such as concreting);and

• Speed limits (maximum speed limits of 15 kph at worksites and near accommodation;maximum 60 kph on open highway; maximum 40 kph for heavy machineryoperations).


With the implementation of the above mitigation and management measures, thesignificance of traffic and hunting pressures on fauna is considered Negligible .

10.4.3 Impacts to Fauna as a result of Pipeline Construction and Habitat Fragmentation


Forest habitat will be fragmented in several areas as a result of the project, primarily at theProject facilities footprint and along the access road routes. Species richness in isolatedfragments decreases with time after excision from continuous forest, and small fragmentsoften have fewer species recorded for the same effort of observation than large fragments or

areas of continuous forest. Animals that are large, sparsely distributed, or very specialisedand intolerant of edge effects are particularly prone to impact from forest fragments (Turner,1996).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 220 of 369



Evaluation and Significance of Impact

The presence of the Project may reduce fauna movement but most mobile and tolerantspecies will still be able to traverse between habitat areas on either side of the facilities andaccess roads (only above ground facilities such as the KGPF and Wellhead Cluster Pad willbe fenced). The pipeline will be trenched and backfilled in sections, thereby minimisingimpacts to fauna movement between forested areas. Construction the pipeline in sectionswill also reduce the risk of fauna falling into trenches. It is anticipated that trenches will beopen for no longer than 3 days.

In time it is predicted that species will adapt to the new environment and will continue toaccess or traverse pipeline corridors. The pipeline ROW will be reinstated following pipeline

installation and testing. There is the potential for fauna species to enter the Project facilitiesand be injured or killed, however fencing these areas will help minimise this risk.

Given the above, impacts to fauna as a result of pipeline construction and habitatfragmentation and disturbance are assessed as Negligible . The pipeline constructionmethodology reduces the level of impact as far as reasonable practicable throughconstructing in sections and reducing the amount of time trenches are open.

Table 10.7 Impacts to Fauna as a Result of Pipeline Construction and HabitatFragmentation

Impact Description Potential impacts to Fauna as a result of pipeline construction and habitatfragmentation







Magnitude Negligible Small Medium LargeSensitivity/Vulnerability Low Medium High


10.4.4 Impacts to Fauna Behaviour from Operation of Facilities, Equipment andMachinery


The primary impacts on fauna are likely to be associated with vegetation clearing andsubsequent habitat loss. However, the Project also has the potential to affect fauna behaviourthrough generation of dust, noise and vibration and light from traffic and operation ofProject facilities, equipment and machinery. Storage of organic waste on site also has thepotential to attract fauna to the area, including pest species.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 221 of 369




Given construction activities will be temporary, impacts on fauna have been assessed asNegligible . Operational activities will occur over a longer period of time and on a 24 hourbasis, therefore impacts to fauna behaviour have been assessed to be slightly higher thanconstruction, with an impact rating of Minor .

Table 10.8 Impacts to Fauna from Operation of Facilities, Equipment and Machinery

Impact Description Impacts to fauna from operation of facilities, equipment and machinery












The following mitigation and management measures currently in place will assist inminimising future impacts to fauna from the operation of facilities, equipment andmachinery:

• Contractual requirements outlining contractor and personnel expectations andrequirements to minimise environmental impact;

• Preventing the proliferation of pest species by storing organic waste in green bins and

incinerating on a daily basis;• Environment compliance inspections (conducted by contractor); and

• Enforcing speed limits (40 km hour or 15 km hour near worksite);

• Only allowed night driving in the event of an emergency or with prior Projectapproval;

• Noise suppression guards on generators (continuous noise sources will be a maximumof 85 dBA);

• Dust suppression through watering as discussed previously; and



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 222 of 369



• Where possible, restricting construction activities to uninterruptible activities only (toreduce noise, vibration impacts)


While the management measures listed above will assist in minimising impacts to faunafrom the operation of facilities, equipment and machinery, the significance will be managedto be Negligible under normal operating conditions.

10.4.5 Impacts to Fauna Species of Conservation Significance


The biodiversity assessment identified the following conservation significant species asoccurring or potentially occurring within the project area. While listed as being ofconservation significance these species are expected to occur elsewhere within the regionwhere similar habitats occur. Clearing was identified as the primary impact that might affectconservation significant species.

Table 10.9 Threatened IUCN listed Species Assessed

Common Name Scientific Name IUCN RedList Status^

Recordedin Project

Area#

Recorded inSurrounding

Area#

Bornean Gibbon Hylobates muelleri EN YMalaysian Sun Bear Helarctos malayanus VU Y*

Bearded Pig Sus Barbatus VU Y Y

Proboscis Monkey Nasalis larvatus EN Y

Freshwater Crocodile Tomistoma schlegelii EN Y

Sambar Deer Cervus unicolor VU Y

Flat-headed Cat Prionailurus planiceps EN

Bornean Orangutan Bornean Orangutan EN

Bornean Bay Cat Pardofelis badia EN

Clouded Leopard Neofelis diardi VU

Whisked Flying Squirrel Petinomys genibarbis VU

King Cobra Ophiophagus hannah VU

Flores Woolly Bat Kerivoula flora VU

Pig-tailed Macaque Macaca nemestrina VU

Banded Civet Hemigalus derbyanus VU^ IUCN Description: E = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable# Data obtained from Biodiversity Survey (2013), and UKL/UPL reports for Kerendan and WK-1* Indirect evidence (scratches)



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 223 of 369




Consistent with the assessment of clearing impacts as a result of the project, impacts wereidentified as being of Moderate significance). This is primarily due to the relatively smallarea that would be disturbed as a result of the Project and that the Project area likelyprovides general habitat opportunities, but is not representative of critical habitat.

Table 10.10 Impact to Conservation Significant Fauna Species as a Result of HabitatClearing

Impact Description Impacts to conservation significance fauna species as a result ofvegetation clearing and habitat removal











While impacts to threatened fauna species from habitat removal cannot be mitigated further,the following management measures may assist in minimising impacts of the Project onthreatened species that may occur in the Project area:

• Develop a record of (probable or actual) threatened species sightings in the Projectarea and details of any interactions to use as a monitoring tool.

• Speed limits (maximum speed limits of 15 kph at worksites and near accommodation.Maximum 60 kph on open highway. Maximum 40 kph for heavy machineryoperations); and

• No night driving under routine conditions


Implementation of the mitigation measures will manage the impacts to a Negligible residualsignificance.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 224 of 369



10.5 ECOSYSTEM SERVICES

Ecosystem Services are defined as the benefits that people, including businesses, derive fromecosystems (IFC 2012). These services are substantial and varied, underpinning basic humanhealth and survival needs as well as supporting economic activities, the fulfilment ofpeople’s potential, and enjoyment of life. In order to provide a uniform basis to assess thestatus of all major global habitats across all of the world’s bioregions, the United Nation’sMillennium Ecosystem Assessment (UN 2005) combined these diverse Ecosystem Servicestypologies into a consistent classification scheme.

There are four categories of Ecosystem Services defined in the Millennium EcosystemAssessment as adopted in IFC PS6:

• Provisioning services - those services that can be extracted from ecosystems to supporthuman needs. This term is more or less synonymous with the term “ecosystemgoods” that was used in some prior classification schemes, including such tangibleassets as fresh water, food, fibre, timber and medicinal plants;

• Regulating services – the benefits obtained from an ecosystem’s control of the naturalenvironment, including the regulation of surface water purification, carbon storageand sequestration, climate regulation, protection from natural hazards, air quality,erosion and pests;

• Cultural services - nonmaterial benefits including diverse aspects of aesthetic, spiritual,recreational, and other cultural values; and

• Supporting services – the natural processes essential to the maintenance of theintegrity, resilience, and functioning of ecosystems, thereby supporting the deliveryof all other benefits. They include soil formation, nutrient cycling and primaryproduction.

The concept of Ecosystem Services highlights the fact that humans are reliant upon thebenefits provided by ecosystems, and that impacts to ecosystems can subsequently impact

human health and quality of life. Project Affected communities therefore perform animportant role in the identification and prioritisation of Ecosystem Services within thisreview.

10.5.1 IFC PS Expectations

IFC PS6 has the following requirements regarding Ecosystem Services:• Where a project is likely to adversely impact Ecosystem Services, as determined by

the risks and impacts identification process, the client will conduct a systematicreview to identify Priority Ecosystem Services. Priority Ecosystem Services are two-

fold: (i) those services on which project operations are most likely to have an impactand, therefore, which result in adverse impacts to Affected Communities; and/or (ii)those services on which the Project is directly dependent for its operations (e.g.,water).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 225 of 369



• When Affected Communities are likely to be impacted, they should participate in thedetermination of Priority Ecosystem Services in accordance with the stakeholderengagement process as defined in Performance Standard 1.

• With respect to impacts on Priority Ecosystem Services of relevance to AffectedCommunities and where the client has direct management control or significantinfluence over such Ecosystem Services, adverse impacts should be avoided. If theseimpacts are unavoidable, the client will minimize them and implement mitigationmeasures that aim to maintain the value and functionality of priority services.

• With respect to impacts on Priority Ecosystem Services on which the Project depends,clients should minimize impacts on Ecosystem Services and implement measures thatincrease resource efficiency of their operations, as described in Performance Standard3.

• Additional provisions for Ecosystem Services are included in Performance Standards4, 5, 7, and 8.19.

10.5.2 Ecosystem Services Data Gathering

Ecosystem Services within the Study Area were identified through a process of stakeholderengagement and consultation, as well as biodiversity survey and assessment. The data

collection aimed to directly consult and engage with Project Affected Communities toascertain their views and concerns relating to their use of the local environment andpotential concerns regarding the project. The process included:

• Consultation with the community as well as review of existing available regency dataon land use and livelihood; and

• A field survey to support the Biodiversity assessment

The social and biodiversity findings are described in detail within the respective baselinechapters.

Social Data

The social baseline chapter provides a detailed description of the types of ecosystem servicesupon which the local communities rely or utilize as part of their day to day livelihoods.

These are summarised under the following major subject headings and are used as the basisfor discussing the relevant ecosystem services within the following sections.

• Agriculture;

• Rubber Cultivation;•

Fishing, Hunting;• Gathering of Forest Products;

• Water Use (domestic); and



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 226 of 369



• Transportation.

Biodiversity FindingsThe biodiversity baseline is detailed at the beginning of this chapter. It describes the localarea as consisting of agricultural land, plantation areas as well as secondary forest. Nounique or restricted habitat types were identified within the study area and it wasconsidered that the Project area was likely to provide general foraging habitat for a variety offauna species.

10.5.3 Discussion of Impacts

The provisioning, regulating, cultural and supporting services considered to be relevant to

the Project site are listed at Error! Reference source not found. and are described in furtherdetail below. This is based on the findings of the social and biodiversity surveys but alsoERM’s experience on the types of services that areas such as the Project site would beexpected to provide. This primarily relates to regulating and supporting services. The Tablealso identifies if the service is to be carried through for consideration as a priority ecosystemservice.

Table 10.11 Ecosystem Services Summary



Wild-caught fish/Wild meat

Cultivated crops

Forest Products

Freshwater (surface water)

Freshwater (groundwater)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Regulating Services

Regulation of air quality

Climate regulation: local

Regulation of water timing and flows

Water purification and waste treatment

River bank protection

Disease regulation

Pollination

No, general service unlikely to be significantly affected by the Project.

YesYes

Yes



Cultural Services

Non-use value of biodiversity

Spiritual or religious value

No, significant biodiversity values have not been attributed to the projectarea.

No, significant spiritual or religious values have not been attributed to theProject site.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 227 of 369




Supporting Services

Primary production

Nutrient cycling

Water cycling

Soil formation

Habitat Provision

Transportation

No, general ecosystem service.




Yes

Yes

Based on the above assessment, the Priority Ecosystem Services identified for the Project are:• Freshwater (Surface Water);

• Freshwater (Groundwater);

• Wild-Caught Fish;

• Animal Hunting

• Cultivated Crops;

• Forest Products; and

• Transportation.

Each of the Ecosystem Services identified above has been evaluated to determine whether itshould be considered for elevation to a Priority Ecosystem Service based on the followingfour criteria:

• Dependence of the Project on the Ecosystem Service;

•

The importance of the service to the affected community; and• The irreplaceability of the Ecosystem Service if it was to be completely removed from

the region.

The criteria were combined using the matrix in Table 10.12 . Ecosystem Services with apriority ranking of High Priority or Major Priority were assigned as Priority EcosystemServices.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 228 of 369



Table 10.12 Ecosystem Services Prioritisation Matrix

Importance to Beneficiaries Irreplaceability

High Moderate Low

Low The service is used and valued by parts of the community,but it is not important in maintaining quality of life orlivelihoods of Project Affected Communities.

LowPriority

LowPriority

ModeratePriority

Medium The service is readily used by some members of the ProjectAffected Communities for income or subsistence, but theyare not dependent upon the service for their livelihoods,and not everyone utilises the service.

LowPriority

ModeratePriority

HighPriority

High The service is highly important in maintaining the

livelihoods of the Project Affected Communities, and isused by most of the community regularly.

Moderate

Priority

High

Priority

Major

Priority

Essential The service is essential to maintain the health of the ProjectAffected Communities, and the service is used by allmembers of the community.

HighPriority

MajorPriority

MajorPriority

Irreplaceability definitionHigh Many spatial alternatives exist that are readily available to the Project Affected Communities, and

there are no major impediments to their usage.

Moderate Spatial alternatives exist but are either less accessible than the affected service, or there are otherbarriers to their use such as distance, cost and skills required to access the service.

Low There are few to no spatial alternatives available to the Project Affected Communities.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 229 of 369



Table 10.13 Ecosystem Services Prioritisation Summary (Project Specific)

EcosystemServices

Trends and Sustainability Beneficiaries Importance toBeneficiaries

Irreplaceability Summary of Rationale Priority


Freshwater

(Surface Water)

Water quality generally good,

although high levels ofturbidity and certain metals(e.g. iron) has been recordedduring sampling of LaheiRiver

Villagers Essential Low Communities are reliant on riverwater for their domestic

water use including bathing and drinking wa ter.

Major

Freshwater(Groundwater)

No trends identified Villagers High Low The community at Luwe Hulu utilizes groundwater fordrinking and other domestic uses. This is also utilised bySalamander.

Major

Wild-CaughtFish

Species such as the Jelawatfish are the most popular butare becoming quite rare. Notrends identified for otherspecies.

FishermenConsumers of fish

High Low Fish is an important element of the diet within the fourproject affected communities. Most of the fishing isconducted for household consumption rather than fulltimeemployment. The activity is primarily undertaken whilevillages are not farming and rubber tapping.

Major

Animal Hunting Communities have foundthat they need to venturefurther into the forest andanimals are becomingincreasingly difficult to find.

Dayak people andlocal villages.

Medium Low Intensive hunting is no longer conducted and it generallyoccurs after harvesting. Communities also catch birds tosupplement their existing livelihood.

High

Cultivated Crops No specific trends Villagers. High Moderate Agriculture is the primary livelihood for local communities. High

Forest Products The area of native forest islikely to have decreasedwithin the local area as aresult of clearing for

Villagers collecting,growing and sellingtimber and collectingforest products to

High Moderate Besides hunting animals in the forest some villagers gathervarious types of plants. These plants are gathered primarilyfor medicinal or traditional purposes (i.e. to treat diseases,increase stamina, as materials for constructing houses and

High



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 230 of 369



EcosystemServices

Trends and Sustainability Beneficiaries Importance toBeneficiaries

Irreplaceability Summary of Rationale Priority

cultivation, plantation andmining activities

support theirlivelihood.

home furnishings and for conducting traditionalceremonies). In addition, some plant species collected fromthe forest are sold in the market.

Regulating Services

ErosionRegulation No trends identified River water usersFishermen dependenton good water qualityfor fishery production

Low Moderate Shoreline vegetation is likely to play a role in preventing orreducing sediment laden runoff entering local river systems.These services will continue to persist following projectconstruction and operation.

Low

Regulation ofWater Timingand Flows

No trends identified Villagers living closeto rivers

Medium Moderate Vegetation and other groundcover is likely to be importantin regulating water timing and flows potentially preventingor managing flooding in some instances.

Moderate

WaterPurification andWaste Treatment

No trends identified River water usersFishermen dependenton good water qualityfor fishery production

Medium Moderate Vegetation and other groundcover is likely to be importantin capturing wastes and managing water quality enteringlocal river systems. These services will continue to persistfollowing project construction and operation.

Moderate

River BankProtection

No trends identified Villages living close tothe river system

Medium Moderate Engineering solutions can provide shoreline protection,however these can have adverse impacts on other shorelineprocesses. These services will continue to persist followingproject construction and operation.

Moderate

Supporting Services

HabitatProvision

No trends identified Fishermen, huntersand people who valuethe conservation ofbiodiversity

Medium Moderate Riverine and terrestrial habitats support the biodiversityvalues which are utilised to support the livelihoods of localcommunities.

Moderate

Transportation No Trends identified Local villages andbusinesses, includingSalamander

High Moderate All 4 villages are located along the river therefore there is astrong reliance on the river for transportation of goods andpeople.

High



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 231 of 369



10.5.4 Impact Evaluation and Significance

Potential impacts of the Project on Ecosystem Services were assessed using the matrix inTable 10.14 . The assessment has considered impacts to Ecosystem Services that haveoccurred since the commencement of the Project, or which may occur in the future due toconstruction or operational activities, focusing on the Priority Ecosystem Services identifiedin the previous section.

Table 10.14 Impact Assessment Matrix for Impacts to Ecosystem Services

Negative impacts

Vulnerability of ReceptorsLow: Minimalareas ofvulnerabilities;consequentlywith a highability to adapt tochanges broughtby the Project.

Medium: Fewareas ofvulnerability; butstill retaining anability to at leastin part adapt tochange broughtby the Project

High: Profoundor multiple levelsof vulnerabilitythat underminethe ability toadapt to changesbrought by theProject.

M a g n i t u d e o f

I m p a c t

NegligibleChange remains within the rangecommonly experienced within the

household or community

Negligible Negligible Negligible

Low

Perceptible difference frombaseline conditions. The impactresults in a reduction in theavailability or functionality of theEcosystem Service across a smallarea and has implications for asmall number of receptors. Thechange in the service is for a shortduration or occurs with lowfrequency.

Negligible Minor Moderate

Medium

Clearly evident difference frombaseline conditions. The impactresults in a reduction in theavailability or functionality of theEcosystem Service across asubstantial area or number ofpeople and is of medium durationor occasional frequency. Does notthreaten the long-term viability ofthe service.

Minor Moderate Significant

The main impacts to Ecosystem Services will occur as a result of Project land use andclearing of land previously used for cultivation and harvesting of natural materials, andsupported regulating services. Only limited impacts to Ecosystem Services are anticipatedthrough the operational phase. Consideration of these impacts is provided in Table 10.15 .



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 232 of 369



Impacts to ecosystem services have been assessed as negative and Minor . This was primarilyattributed to the services continuing to exist within the local area and minimal impact thatthe Project may have on these values.

Table 10.15 Impacts to Ecosystem Services

Impact Description Impacts to Ecosystem Services as a Result of Clearing and Project relatedactivities






Impact Scale Low Medium High Frequency Low Moderate HighMagnitude Negligible Small Medium LargeSensitivity/Vulnerability

Low Medium High


Table 10.16 provides a further breakdown of the impact significance rankings andexplanations for priority ecosystem services.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 233 of 369



Table 10.16 Assessment of Impacts to Priority Ecosystem Services

EcosystemService

Magnitude Vulnerability Impact Discussion


Fresh SurfaceWater Low Medium Minor The primary use of river water is for domestic uses such as bathing and also drinking water. The projectwill not affect the availability of river water for local communities. During construction there is thepotential for surface water impacts to occur as a result of sedimentation and spills and leaks, however itis likely that this will be managed through construction management actions adopted as part of theproject. Discharges during operations will be discharged in accordance with local water qualityregulations. Further to this the volumes would not be such that changes in river water quality would beexpected to occur.

Groundwater Low Medium Minor The community at Luwe Hulu currently utilizes groundwater for domestic consumption, thisgroundwater is also utilised by Salamander. As advised following the site audit completed by ERM,there is some community concern regarding Salamander’s use of this resource Groundwater wells areexpected to be drilled at the KGPF however communities are not utilizing groundwater within thevicinity of this location. This potential impact will be carried forward under the Salamander HSEManagement System to gain further assurance on community water supply.

Wild-CaughtFish

Negligible Medium Negligible Project affected communities rely on fishing to support their dietary requirements. As described above,river water quality is not expected to be impacted by the project such that fish availability would beaffected. This resource and access to it would be maintained throughout project construction andoperation.

CultivatedCrops

Low Medium Minor Project land use and associated construction will affect community farming areas including rubberplantation areas, community forest cultivation areas and other farming activities. The land use andcompensation process has been assessed outwith the ESIA. While community access to this service hasbeen negatively affected by the project, this is unlikely to be significant given the relatively small area tobe disturbed and continuing availability of this resource within the local area.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 234 of 369



EcosystemService

Magnitude Vulnerability Impact Discussion

Forest Products Medium Low Minor Approximately 57 ha of land will be affected by the project and these areas will no longer be available tothe community to support their day to day livelihoods. Given the area to be disturbed and availability ofsimilar forest areas within the local region, this ecosystem service is unlikely to be significantly affected.Forest products will continue to be available to affected communities within the local area.

Supporting ServicesTransportation Negligible Negligible Negligible Communities will continue to have access to the river systems during project construction and

operation. This resource would not be affected such that community transportation via local riversystems would be disrupted.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 235 of 369



10.6 SOIL


The Project area is expected to have increased erosion and sedimentation activity due theland clearing for Project facilities and access roads, particularly given communities in thearea report increased soils erosion from land clearing with surface runoff affecting localwater quality.

During clearing of large areas, bare soil will become exposed to wind and water erosionwhich may potentially affect local streams and waterways. Potential impacts to water quality

are addressed at Section 10.7.

Rainfall drainage in the area will need to be controlled to ensure that sediment loss into thesurface waters is minimised. The operational facility will have limited open areas of soil, butongoing control of captured surface water runoff will still be required.

There is potential for soil to be contaminated from loss of hazardous materials and liquidwastes at Wellhead Cluster Pad, KGPF, and during refuelling and waste transfer process.However, these are risks associated with most projects and can be managed with appropriatemanagement and mitigation measures.


The significance of impacts to soil during construction has been assessed as negative andModerate , based on evaluation of the following:

• Drainage and water channelling systems included as part of the Project’s design (willassist in controlling and/or minimising erosion);

• Wind and rainfall levels and likelihood of exposed soil being washed or blown away;

• Surrounding vegetation and natural drainage systems; and

• Past history with soil erosion in the Project area before and after land clearing.

Impacts to soil during operations have been assessed as Moderate due to the risk of soilcontamination. It is unlikely erosion impacts will be significant as the pipeline area will bereinstated once installed. The KGPF and Wellhead Cluster Pad will also have sealed surfacesand drainage systems which will assist in managing erosion. Access roads will remainunsealed however, some vegetation will be allowed to re-establish in the pipeline ROW (i.e.vegetation that will not interfere the integrity of the pipeline) which will assist in stabilisingground surface and minimising soil erosion from wind and water.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 236 of 369



Table 10.17 Impacts to Soils

Impact Description Potential impact of erosion and loss of hazardous materials on soil fromcontamination and erosion









10.6.3 Additional Mitigation Measures, Management, and Monitoring

The following mitigation and management measures are in place to minimise impacts to soilfrom erosion and loss of hazardous or contaminated materials:

• Vegetation clearing only in designated areas for the project footprint with nodisturbance to soils outside marked areas;

• Install the pipeline along the road thereby reducing the land requirements andassociated vegetation clearance;

• Placing soil a minimum of 1 m from edge of grading to reduce soil instability; and

• Water spraying required for dust suppression during earthworks; and

• Re-vegetation of pipeline ROW following installation.

10.6.4 Significance of Residual Impact

The implementation of the mitigation measures will reduce the impact significance rating toMinor .



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 237 of 369



10.7 SURFACE W ATER


Impacts to water quality of surface water from routine activities may be caused by thefollowing:

• Increased sedimentation of rivers due to soil erosion during initial land clearingactivities and longer term at the Project facilities locations and access roads;

• Discharge of precommissioning wastes such as hydrotest water;

• Discharge of treated effluents such as sewage; and

• Accidental spills or loss of containment of hazardous materials, including wastes.

The construction phase through to Project decommissioning have the potential to impactsurface water in the Project watersheds. During construction of the access roads and earlyworks on the Project facilities footprint, removal of vegetation and opening up of the soilsurface to rain, and wind erosion has the potential to create sediment laden surface waterrunoff , which once it enters waterways would lead to negative impacts on water quality.Similarly, the soil stripping operations, stockpiling of soil and overburden and theconstruction of infrastructure (drainage channels, pipelines, settling/treatment ponds etc.)

could lead to similar impacts.

Similar impacts are expected along the access roads with the potential for increasedsedimentation into rivers during construction and physical presence/maintenance.

Refuelling stations also have the potential to pollute surface waters through discharge ofwaste water contaminated with hydrocarbons and other chemicals. Waste at these sites willbe carefully managed to avoid and reduce these potential impacts.

The potential for discharges of chemicals into the local waterways from refuelling stations,

operation of plant and equipment and chemical storage has the potential to occur. Theadoption of accepted storage and handling process as well as spill response procedures arelikely to be capable of managing associated risks to the surrounding environment.


Based on current Project information, impacts to surface water quality are assessed asnegative and Minor after consideration of the following factors:

• Construction activities will be localised and temporary in nature; erosion resultingfrom the Project is unlikely to be significant compared to natural erosion that occurs

during periods of heavy rainfall;• Temporary drainage channels will divert surface water from the site, reducing erosion

risks;



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 238 of 369



• Drainage systems will be constructed to control stormwater and wastewater, withclean or treated water collected in a separate drainage system to reduce contaminationrisk and control water flow;

• A closed drainage system is built into the Project design to capture and manage anypotentially contaminated run-off and site drainage;

• Disposal of hydrotest water must meet strict environmental controls and legalrequirements; and

• Sewage will be treated at the facility’s water treatment plant (STP) using a BioFiltration-Anaerobe-Aerobe system. Sewer pipes will be buried underground andeffluent treated in accordance with applicable domestic effluent quality standards.

Table 10.18 Impacts to Surface Water Quality during Construction and Operation

Impact Description Potential impacts to surface water quality during construction andoperations from increased sedimentation, accidental spillages, anddischarges





Impact Scale Low Medium High Frequency Low Moderate High Likelihood* Unlikely Possible LikelyMagnitude Negligible Small Medium LargeSensitivity/Vulnerability Low Medium HighSignificance Negligible Minor Moderate Major*Likelihood additional category for accidental/unplanned events


While the implementation of water treatment and drainage management measures will assistin reducing the risk of surface water contamination, the significance of the impact is stillconsidered Minor . Undertaking regular water sampling will assist in monitoring this impact.

10.8 GROUND W ATER


Potential impacts arising from the utilisation of groundwater as a water resource duringconstruction and operation of the Project may result in:

• Disruption to/depletion of water supply or groundwater levels.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 239 of 369



Two groundwater wells will be constructed at the KGPF and used to source potable andnon-potable water for the KGPF facility. Extracted water will be stored in a raw water tankand treated to use for potable purposes such as drinking water. Total water consumptionduring construction and operations is estimated to be approximately 30 m³ and 5 m³ per dayrespectively.


Based on current project information, the significance of impacts to groundwater is likely tobe Negligible given the following:

• Well construction permit requirements (including environmental standards for

managing pollution/contamination);• Lack of dependence on groundwater systems in the local community (see Section

10.13 for discussion of groundwater impacts associated with Luwe Hulu Supply andSupport Base);

• The total estimated amount of groundwater required during construction andoperations; and

• Waste and drainage systems included in the design of the facilities to ensurewastewater and chemicals are contained and disposed of appropriately.

In the absence of groundwater systems in the area, groundwater monitoring may be anappropriate tool for monitoring the recharge rates and capacities of groundwater systems.

10.9 AIR


Air emissions generated during construction activities will come from vehicle engineexhausts, generators, construction equipment and dust from earthworks and vehiclesmovement. The composition of engine exhaust emissions is expected to be primarily NOXand CO with small quantities of hydrocarbons.

Emissions from vehicles will be transient, intermittent and spatially variable, therefore it isexpected only a small incremental increase in combustion-based air pollutants will begenerated by the Project.

During the normal day-to-day operation of the facility, emissions are likely to bepredominantly generated by the following sources:

• Gas turbines;

• Gas sweetening unit (future);

• Dehydration/TEG regeneration systems;



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 240 of 369



• Refrigeration systems;

• Fuel gas system;

• Power generators;

• Nitrogen rejection unit; and

• Flaring.

Potential emission sources from non-normal operations (i.e. conditions or activities notassociated with the general day-to-day operation of the facility) include the following:

• Emergency flaring;

• Emissions from normal operating equipment during start-up and shutdown; and

• Vehicle emissions.

The applicable standards for air emissions are provided in Annex A.


The mobilisation of construction equipment due to the Project activities is expected toincrease the concentration of dust in the air at a local level. In addition to dust generationfrom vehicle activities, operational emissions over the Project lifetime may periodicallyincrease local air contaminant levels during certain conditions. Vehicle traffic duringoperations will be lower than construction, with traffic generally consisting of periodic truckmovements associated with the transfer of waste and condensate from site, and delivery ofsupplies. Personnel traffic will be minimal, with the transfer of personnel to and from site(from Luwe Hulu) occurring on a fortnightly basis, at the end of each rotation.

Most greatest greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will occur during the operational period dueto the length of time and activities involved (e.g. flaring and fugitive emissions), howevercalculations for the Project are predicted to be less than 25,000 tonnes per annum (see Section3.13.1 for a breakdown of emission calculations).

Non-normal operations will occur intermittently for a short duration, therefore emissionrates for these activities will be variable and unlikely to result in significant adverse impactson air quality.

Overall, impacts to air have been assessed as negative and Moderate due to the level of dustgenerated during construction, and GHG emissions associated with the operations phase.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 241 of 369



Table 10.19 Impact to Air Quality during Construction

Impact Description Impacts to air quality during construction, including dust generation andemissions









Table 10.20 Impacts on Air during Operation

Impact Description Impacts to air quality during operation, including dust generation andemissions











Dust mitigation measures have been discussed in previous sections. The following measuresare currently in place to mitigate, manage and monitor impacts to air quality from pollutantemissions:

• All vehicles, equipment and machinery to contractual requirements and undergo apre-use inspection prior to use and periodic maintenance inspections.

• Contractors and subcontractors will be required to demonstrate that their plant andequipment are maintained to an acceptable safe standard by submitting theappropriate inspection certificates or paper work routinely.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 242 of 369




Implementation of the above management and mitigation measures will assist in reducingair quality impacts from emissions to a Minor significance due to the level of emissionsgenerated during the lifetime of the Project.

10.10 NOISE AND VIBRATION


Noise impacts may arise from the Project from:• Mobilization and transportation of equipment to and from the site;

• Construction of the Project facilities, access roads and pipeline installation;

• Operation of the KGPF and Kerendan gas production site;

• Vehicle support and manpower during construction and operations; and

• Emergency flaring during process shutdown.

Noise assessment typically includes a semi-quantitative process in which future noise levelsare compared against baseline and/or impact threshold levels. In the case when applyingboth jurisdictional and lender standards, the more stringent of the two would be used in theIA. In any case, however, the assessment still evaluates compliance with jurisdictionalrequirements.

The IFC Performance Standards applicable for industrial noise are quoted in Table 10.21 . It isconfirmed that this guidance applies to fixed noise sources only. IFC gives no guidance onconstruction noise. Noise impacts should not exceed the levels presented in Table 10.21 , orresult in a maximum increase in background levels greater than 3 dB at the nearest receptorlocation off-site.

Under Indonesian standards, the Decree of Environmental Ministry No. 48/1996 on Noiselevel Quality Standard and IFP regulates ambient noise. Noise health and safety limits areestablished under the Ministry of manpower Decree No 51 of 1999 (Table 10.22 ).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 243 of 369



Table 10.21 IFC PS Noise Level Guidelines

Receptor1 Hour LAeq (dBA)

Daytime 07:00 – 22:00 Night-time 22:00-07:00

Residential, institutional, educational 55 45

Industrial, commercial 70 70

Table 10.22 Indonesian Noise Regulatory Standards (dBA)

Site National Standard 48/1996 National Standard 51/1999

Residential Area 55 -

Green Open Space 50 -Industrial Area 70 -

Occupational Health & Safety (exposurelimits)

- 85 (8 hours)

- 88 (8 hours)

- 91 (8 hours)

- 94 (1 hours)

- 97 (30 minutes)Source: Ministry of Environment Decree #48, 1996Ministry of Manpower Decree 51, 1999


Where a specific noise standard gives threshold levels above which noise impacts areexpected it is necessary to scale the predicted noise exceedences into the impact magnituderanges required in impact assessment. The terminology to be used to describe impactmagnitudes in such cases is as follows.

Table 10.23 Impact Magnitude Terminology

Extent of Noise Change Impact Magnitude Description0-3 dB Negligible Changes in environmental noise of less than

3dB are often not noticeable to a community.

3-5 dB Small

5-10 dB Medium

>10 dB Large A change of 10dB is often judged assubjectively twice as loud somay have additional significance

In the absence of IFC construction noise guidance, Indonesian standards solely apply.Construction noise impact magnitude is usually judged by exceedance of absolute noisethresholds, because it is usually well above baseline noise levels. It is common practice toclass impact magnitude as negligible if the predicted construction noise levels do not exceed



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 244 of 369



the existing ambient noise levels. Construction noise impact magnitudes based on a reviewof international guidance are presented in Table 10.24 .

Table 10.24 Construction Noise Impact Magnitudes (LAeq dB)

Operation Daytime Night-time Impact Rating Negligible Small Medium Large Negligible Small Medium LargeShort termExposure< 1 month

<70 70-75 >75-80 >80 <55 55-60 >60-65 >65

Medium termexposure

1 to 6 months

<65 65-70 >70-75 >75 <45 45-55 >55-60 >60

Long termexposure> 6 month

<55 55-60 >60-65 >65 <45 45-50 >50-55 >55

For operational noise, the IFC EHS guidelines are based on an interpretation of the relevantsection of the WHO 1999 guidance concerning the effect of noise on people and impliedpotential health effects. As such, these IFC EHS guidelines are used to assess impacts onpeople caused by disturbance and consequential annoyance from industrial noise. The IFCEHS guidelines indicate that significant disturbance effects on people have a threshold of 55dB LAeq,1hr, and 45 dB LAeq,1hr for daytime and night-time, respectively. The noisedisturbance impact magnitude ratings for absolute levels (when Project noise is abovebaseline) are shown in Table 10.25 .

Table 10.25 Operational Noise Impact Magnitudes

Operation Period Daytime Night-time

Impact Rating Negligible Small Medium Large Negligible Small Medium Large

NoiseDisturbanceImpactMagnitude LAeq,1hr dB

<50 50-55 >55-60 >60 <40 40-45 >45-50 >50

Amenity ImpactMagnitude(LAeq, 1hr –LA90, 1 hr) forbackgroundnoise aboveLA9030dB

<5 5-10 >10-15 >15 <5 5-10 >10-15 >15



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 245 of 369



During construction and operations, the maximum allowable A-weighted Overall SoundPressure Level, Lp(A) for continuous noise sources will be 85 dBA. Noise suppressionguards have been included as part of the design process for equipment with noisespecifications > 85 dBA, to ensure noise levels meet regulatory requirements.

From the baseline data, average ambient noise conditions were measured to range between43.0 to 53.5 dBA. The nearest village to the Project is over 2 km distance and so noise impactsseverity will decrease with distance from the propagating source and will be negligible atsensitive receptors.

There will however, be disturbance to fauna and communities active within proximity to theProject area. Noise impact significance has been assessed as negative and Minor forconstruction (Table 10.26 ) and negative and Moderate for operations (Table 10.27 ). Therating is higher for the operational phase due to 24 hour operations and flaring requirements(although irregular and short-lived, flaring generates a high level of noise) and subsequentimpacts on fauna that may surround the Facility.

Table 10.26 Impacts from Project Noise and Vibration during Construction

Impact Description Impacts of noise on sensitive receptors during construction












DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 246 of 369



Table 10.27 Impacts from Project Noise and Vibration during Operation

Impact Description Impacts of noise on sensitive receptors during operation











The following measures discussed in previous sections will mitigate and manage impactsassociated with noise and vibration:

• All vehicles, equipment and machinery to meet contractual requirements and undergoa pre-use inspection prior to use and periodic maintenance inspections;

• Limit 24 hour construction to uninterruptible activities;

• Speed limits (maximum speed limits of 15 kph at worksites and near accommodation.Maximum 60 kph on open highway. Maximum 40 kph for heavy machineryoperations) ;

• Only allowed night driving in the event of an emergency or with prior Projectapproval; and

•

Noise suppression guards on generators (continuous noise sources will be a maximumof 85 dBA).


Implementation of the above management and mitigation measures will assist in reducingnoise and vibration impacts to Minor for construction and for routine activities during theoperational phase.

10.11 AESTHETICS

10.11.1 Discussion of ImpactsThe Project may have an aesthetic impact on the surrounding environment. Given that theProject location is one of dense vegetation, clearing and presence of the Project facilities will



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 247 of 369



be visible. However, the Project is not located in a densely populated area and will not bevisible far from the facilities from ground level. The aesthetic impact of the Project willlargely be restricted to light pollution.

The Kerendan gas production, KGPF plant and associated facilities will introduce a widearray of light sources into an environment which is presently largely dark at night, includingoperational lighting and the safety flare. There is no existing electricity grid in Kerendan,therefore the amount of lighting that exists at night is presently minimal and 24 houroperation of the plant may be visible from a large distance from the source. The intensity,spectral quality, duration and periodicity of exposure from light has the potential to affectthe biochemistry, physiology and behaviour of organisms, as well as cause disturbance tocommunities.

Fauna and flora species have different spectral sensitivities to the spectrum of light that isvisible to humans. Many insects, for example, are able to detect ultraviolet light, which is awavelength that is too short for the human eye to perceive. Some species have a highsensitivity to a narrow band of radiation within their spectral range.

Natural light intensity varies during the day–night (diurnal) cycle, the lunar cycle and theseasonal cycle. Organisms have evolved to respond to periodic changes in light levels inways that control or modulate movement, feeding, mating, emergence, seasonal breeding,migration, hibernation and dormancy, and in plants, flowering and vegetative growth, and

the direction of growth. Given the effects of light on living organisms, the introduction of24 hour artificial light into the natural environment from the Project may result in adisturbance to local species in several potential ways:

• Attraction to the light source, where species (such as insect species) will move towardsa light source. Light attraction is not only a potentially negative impact but can have apositive effect, for example on foraging behaviour.

• Avoidance of light. This is observed in nocturnal species and results in a decrease inthe available area for foraging.

• Photoperiodism. Some species show seasonality in their behaviour, such as annualmigrations or periods of dormancy. Continuous unchanging light has the potential toaffect these behaviours.

• Spectral quality. Impacts to species that respond to particular light regimes fromchanges in the visual spectrum of artificial light stimuli 9.


The closest community village to Kerendan is more than 2 km distance so it is not believedthat the light pollution from the Project site will be significant.

The potential effects on fauna (and possibly fauna) however has demonstrable effects on thebehaviour of the population of organisms in the natural environment, potentially affectingforaging, reproduction, migration and communication of the living organisms in the forest or



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 248 of 369



changes in species routines. The potential impact of this is unknown given the availability ofcurrent data for the Project location. Given that the Kerendan location has a minimal level ofartificial light due to a lack of availability of electricity, the impact evaluation for the visualimpact from the project from light pollution is ranked as negative and Moderate and will becarried forward to be addressed though Salamander’s HSE Management System (Table10.28).

Lighting impacts during construction will be Negligible as most construction will beundertaken during daylight. The only exceptions to this are uninterruptible activities orwhere a schedule adjustment may be required (e.g. due to adverse weather).

Table 10.28 Impacts from Project Lighting

Impact Description Potential impacts of project lighting on fauna











Current lighting for the Facility has been designed to ensure the safety of the plant operators.Further assessment is required to determine whether light spill can be minimised andsubsequently reduce light glow in the adjacent environment. Where possible, lighting shouldnot be installed where it is not required for safety purposes (e.g. limit perimeter fenceillumination and instead use infrared-sensing/motion detection cameras).


In the absence of mitigation and management measures, the potential impact of Projectlighting on fauna remains largely unknown until further study is conducted and so remainsModerate .



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 249 of 369



10.12 UNPLANNED /N ON -ROUTINE EVENTS

There is the potential for unplanned events to occur during the construction, operation ordecommissioning phase of the Project. Unplanned events with potential for environmentalimpact include:

• Fire, gas leak or explosion;

• Accidental spillages of hydrocarbons, chemicals or hazardous materials; and

• Emergency shutdowns/flaring.

With the incorporation of appropriate design and control measures, the likelihood ofunplanned/non-routine Project events resulting in major environmental impact isconsidered unlikely. Potential environmental impacts associated with unplanned/non-routine events are discussed in more detail below.

10.12.1 Impacts from a Fire, Explosion or Gas Leak

Discussion of Impact

Potential environmental impacts associated with a fire, explosion or gas leak at Projectfacilities include the following:

•

Generation of atmospheric emissions and particulates, including greenhouse gases;• Loss of habitat through vegetation loss or disturbance; and

• Wildlife injury or mortality.

A number of controls have been implemented during the design process to mitigate andmanage risks associated with fire, explosions and gas leaks. These include:

• Installation of fire detection and extinguishing systems, including smoke detectors,extinguishers, sprinkler systems, and firewater facilities (hydrant and pumps);

• Spark arrestors for all vehicles and exhaust engine systems;

• Emergency stop work alarms;

• Foam chambers for condensate and diesel tanks;

• Installation of flame detectors on the FG and Flare KO drum;

• Gas detection systems; and

•

Standard Operating Procedures, including gas test/gas monitoring prior to startingwork.

The above controls will (1) assist in reducing the likelihood of the event occurring (2) should



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 250 of 369



it occur, reduce significance of impacts (from implementation of automatic fire managementand alarm systems).


The impact significance of fire, explosion or gas leaks has been assessed as Moderate . Thefacility has been designed to alert personnel of a fire or a gas leak and control impactsthrough automated systems or design features, however there currently is no contingencyplan for fire or explosions that cannot be extinguished or controlled using installed systemsor infrastructure. Firewater facilities have been incorporated as part of the design, howeverfirefighting services are not available due to the Project’s remote location. Automatedsystems may assist in controlling most impacts, however further consideration needs to be

given to how fire or explosions will be managed in the event automated systems fail or areunable to control a fire or explosion.

Table 10.29 Impacts from Impacts from Largecale Event (Fire, Explosion or Gas Leak) onImmediate and Surrounding Environment

Impact Description Potential impacts on the environment (namely air quality, wildlife andvegetation) from a fire, explosion or gas leak event



Impact Extent Low Medium High Impact Duration Short term Medium term Long term/ irreversible



Likelihood* Unlikely Possible Likely



Significance Negligible Minor Moderate Major*Likelihood additional category for accidental/unplanned events


Salamander will provide:

• Dedicated fire response equipment onsite;

• Trained workforce with fire-fighting capability; and

• Regular fire drills and response scenario exercises.


There is no local fire fighting service to assist the Salamander team, nor any regional



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 251 of 369



emergency response capability within the vicinity of the Project. Given the potentialmagnitude of the impact the significance rating remains unchanged ( Moderate ).

10.12.2 Impacts from Accidental Hydrocarbon, Chemical or Hazardous Material Spills


Accidental spillages such as fuel, chemical and hazardous waste spills have the potential tosignificantly impact a number of environmental aspects, including air quality (through therelease of chemicals), soil, surface water, and groundwater. Depending on the level ofimpact, contamination of these systems has the potential to affect the quality of theimmediate and surrounding environment.


Potential impacts on air, soil, surface water, and ground water from accidental spillages ofhydrocarbons, chemicals and/or hazardous materials has been assessed to be of Minor significance based on the following design and operation requirements:

• Volumes of hydrocarbons, chemicals and hazardous materials to be stored on site;

• Installation of drainage and containment systems such as impermeable bunding forhydrocarbons and hazardous waste;

• Sewage will be treated at the facility’s water treatment plant (STP) using a BioFiltration-Anaerobe-Aerobe system. Sewer pipes will be buried underground andeffluent treated in accordance with applicable domestic effluent quality standards;and

• Consideration to waste minimisation during the design process.

Soil is likely to be the most sensitive receptor to spills, as this will likely be the first point ofcontact. The significance of the impact will depend on the type and volume ofmaterial/waste lost.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 252 of 369



Table 10.30 Impacts from Accidental Spillages of Hydrocarbons, Chemicals and/orHazardous materials

Impact Description Potential impacts on air, soil, surface water, and ground water fromaccidental spillages of hydrocarbons, chemicals and/or hazardousmaterials












The following mitigation and management measures are in place to minimise impactsassociated with the loss of hydrocarbons, chemicals and/or hazardous materials:

• Environmental Management Plan and Waste Management Plan outlining contractorand personnel expectations and requirements to minimise environmental impact;

• Site supervisor/HSE officer on site to coordinate and ensure compliance withlegislative, standard operating procedures, and management plan requirements;

• Environment compliance inspections (conducted by contractor on biweekly and

monthly basis using checklists from EMP);• Environmental audit conducted every 6 months;

• Providing spill kits and bunding in high risk areas (e.g. refuelling area); and

• Site refuelling procedures; and

• Environmental Monitoring Program (e.g. review of waste storage undertakenmonthly).

Significance of Residual ImpactWhile the implementation of the WMP, drainage systems and various spill control measureswill assist in reducing the risk of spills, the significance of the impact is still consideredMinor . Incident reporting and regular sampling will assist in monitoring this impact.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 253 of 369



10.12.3 Impacts from Process Upset or Emergency Flaring

Process upset or emergency flaring has the potential to result in noise, vibration and lightingimpacts to wildlife, and increased atmospheric emissions and particulates (includinggreenhouse gases). Given the remoteness of the facility (nearest village is more than 2 kmfrom the Project area), impacts on the community are not expected to be significant,particularly given the duration and irregularity of the event.

The significance of impact on air quality and sensitive receptors from process upset andemergency flaring has been assessed as negative and Minor , primarily due to the following:

• Length of impact (duration of emergency flaring will be short due to the size of the

facility and length of gathering pipeline that may require venting (less than 3 kmlong)); and

• Distance from sensitive receptors.

This impact cannot be mitigated further, therefore the rating remains Minor .

Table 10.31 Impacts from Process Upset or Emergency Flaring

Impact Description Potential impacts on fauna and air quality from a process upset oremergency flaring.

Impact Nature Positive NegativeImpact Type Direct Indirect







Sensitivity/Vulnerability Low Medium HighSignificance Negligible Minor Moderate Major*Likelihood additional category for accidental/unplanned events

10.13 ASSOCIATED FACILITIES

The execution of the Project will require the use of a number of associated facilities. Thesecurrently include externally owned and operated roads, the Luwe Hulu Logistics SupplyBase facility, the PLN Kerendan Power Plant and local electrical grid infrastructure.

Salamander owns and operates the Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base, therefore anassessment of potential impacts associated with the operation of the facility has beenundertaken.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 254 of 369



Other associated facilities such as the PLN Power Plant are externally owned and operatedtherefore Salamander has no control on the construction, operation and decommissioning ofthis infrastructure. Salamander and PLN Power Plant have entered a partnership through agas sales agreement, however ultimately Salamander will have limited influence on how thisproject is executed and managed. The only exception to this will be in situations where PLNrequire the use of Salamander facilities such as the Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Baseduring construction and operation of the power plant. Use of these facilities will require PLNto adhere to applicable Salamander standards. As such, the below discussion is applicable.

Existing access roads have been considered together with the construction and operation ofnew access roads by Salamander as discussed in the preceding sections.

10.13.1 Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base

Salamander acquired the Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base on Barito River to use as astaging area for the Project. As described in Section 3.2.13, the base is an old coaldevelopment site which is now used by the Project as a laydown area for the storage andtransport of materials and equipment. It also has a site office, and designated refuelling andwarehouse facilities. There is capacity for other users such as PLN to use the base.

Potential impacts associated with the operation of the Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Baseare detailed below. A description of corrective measures required to align operations with

IFC standards is also provided. Impacts have only been considered in the context of ongoingoperations, as impacts from construction have already occurred and therefore cannot bemitigated (corrective management measures may assist in remedying impacts that haveoccurred as a result of construction).

Impacts on Soil

Soil at the Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base has the potential to be affected erosion andcontamination from accidental loss of hazardous materials and liquid wastes. During a sitegap assessment conducted by ERM in 2013 (as detailed in Section 9.3.1), it was found thatmanagement of waste and discharges did not sufficiently meet IFC PS3 and there was a riskassociated with this, most notably in relation to lack of drainage systems, spill preventionand control measures, and hazardous material management. This represents a soilcontamination risk if not managed appropriately Erosion is also a risk, particularly duringheavy rainfall periods as the site is unsealed and does not have dedicated drainage systems.

In the absence of sufficient management and mitigation measures, significance of soilimpacts at the Supply Base have been assessed as negative and Moderate .



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 255 of 369



Table 10.32 Potential Impacts on Soil from Operation of the Luwe Hulu Supply andSupport Base

Impact Description Impacts to Soil during Operation of Luwe Hulu Supply and SupportBase











Corrective Measures

Corrective actions are required to bring pollution prevention and control practices at LuweHulu in line with PS3. Suggested measures include:

• Implementation of an EMP, WMP and refuelling procedure;

• Review of current drainage systems and installation of improved drainage systemswhere required;

• Bunding in refuelling area and chemical/hazardous material storage areas; and

• Provision of spill kits in high risk areas (e.g. refuelling area and storage area);

• Material Safety Data Sheets available in the relevant locations; and

• Education and training in spill management.


With the implementation of the above management measures the significance of impacts tosoil from the operation of the Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base would likely be reducedto Minor .

Impacts on Surface Water

Potential impacts on surface water from the operation of the Luwe Hulu Supply and SupportBase are consistent with those described in Section 10.6.3. These include:



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 256 of 369



• Increased sedimentation of rivers due to soil erosion (site is unsealed and there are nodedicated drainage systems); and

• Accidental spills or loss of containment of hazardous materials, including wastes andfuel from the refuelling area.

The Supply Base is located on the banks of the Barito River. Given its location slope directionto the river, the surrounding waterway is at risk of impact from current site activities.

In the absence of management and mitigation measures, impacts to surface water qualityduring the operation of the Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base have been assessed asnegative and Minor . Vulnerability/sensitivity of the receptor has been assessed as medium

given impacts given the size and current level of usage by industry and other users, andlikelihood of impacts having a localised effect.

The implementation of a WMP and various spill control would likely assist in reducing thecurrent risk of surface water contamination at the Supply Base, however the significance ofthe impact would remain Minor . It is recommended that regular water sampling beundertaken in the area (as with other aspects of the Project) to assist in monitoring waterquality in the area and potential impacts from operation of the facility.

Table 10.33 Potential Impacts on Surface Water from Operation of the Luwe Hulu

Supply and Support BaseImpact Description Impacts to Surface Water Quality from Operation of Luwe Hulu Supply

and Support Base






Frequency Low Moderate High Likelihood* Unlikely Possible Likely




Impacts on Groundwater

Salamander currently uses the community groundwater well as a water source for siteactivities. Potential impacts associated with the use of this resource include:

• Introduction of contaminants and pollutants to the groundwater system and



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 257 of 369



• Disruption to water supply or groundwater levels.

A lack of drainage systems, spill prevention and control measures, and hazardous materialmanagement at the site represent a risk to groundwater systems.

Using the local groundwater well a water source also presents a risk as it a community well.Further assurance is needed in this regard to determine whether the Supply Base has thepotential to, or is impacting local supply, particularly if activity at the base increases anddemand for water subsequently increases.

Based on the above, impacts on groundwater from the operation of the Luwe Hulu Supplyand Support Base are considered negative and of Moderate significance.

Table 10.28 Impacts on Groundwater from Operation of the Luwe Hulu Supply andSupport Base

Impact Description Impacts to Groundwater during Operation of Luwe Hulu Supply andSupport Base





Impact Scale Low Medium High Frequency Low Moderate High Likelihood* Unlikely Possible LikelyMagnitude Negligible Small Medium LargeSensitivity/Vulnerability Low Medium HighSignificance Negligible Minor Moderate Major*Likelihood additional category for accidental/unplanned events

Corrective MeasuresSuggested corrective measures to mitigate and minimise impacts on groundwater during theoperation of the Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base include the following:

• Implementation of spill mitigation and management measures outlined in thepreceding soil impacts section;

• Undertake periodic consultation with local community to assess perception impactsassociated with the Project use of the community well;

• Conduct a groundwater study to determine measure impact and likelihood of futureimpact.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 258 of 369




In the absence of information on the groundwater well and current impacts, the significancerating will remain as Moderate .

Impacts from Noise and Vibration

General vessel movement and handling of materials and equipment at the Supply Base willgenerate noise and vibration which subsequently may cause general to the adjacent LuweHulu community and fauna. Given the base is only operational during daylight hours,impacts have been assessed as negative and of Minor significance.

Table 10.34 Potential Impacts of Noise and Vibration at the Luwe Hulu Supply and

Support Base

Impact Description Impacts of Noise and Vibration at the Luwe Hulu Supply and SupportBase from general vessel movements and handling of materials andequipment





Impact Scale Low Medium High Frequency Low Moderate HighMagnitude Negligible Small Medium LargeSensitivity/Vulnerability Low Medium HighSignificance Negligible Minor Moderate Major

Impacts on Air Quality

Air emissions generated at the Supply Base will be generated from vehicle engine exhausts,generators, equipment, machinery and dust from vehicles and machinery movement. Thecomposition of engine exhaust emissions is expected to be primarily NOX and CO withsmall quantities of hydrocarbons.

The impact on air quality has been assessed negative and Negligible given the small size ofthe area and existing level of soil compaction.

Impacts on Local Aesthetics

The impact of the Supply Base on aesthetics has been assessed as negative and Negligible for the following reasons:

• The base was previously a coal development site, therefore construction of the site hasnot resulted in a significant change to existing aesthetics/visual landscape; and



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 259 of 369



• Site activities are only undertaken during daylight hours, therefore there are nolighting impacts associated with the operation of the base.

No further mitigation of potential impacts on visual amenity and lighting is required as thesignificance of the impact has been assessed as Negligible .



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 260 of 369



11 SOCIAL AND HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT

11.1 INTRODUCTION

The overall approach to the rating and evaluation of impacts follows the methodologypresented in Chapter 4. This Section provides greater detail in the evaluation of the twocomponents that, when analysed together, result in an evaluation of the significance of socialand community health impacts:

• Determining the vulnerability of people and communities (referred to here as socialreceptors), a characteristic that underpins their ability to adapt to socio-economic /cultural or bio-physical changes whilst maintaining their overall livelihood, health

status and quality of life; and• Determining the magnitude of change in social and community health assets and

conditions as a result of the Project.

This Chapter addresses the evaluation of significance of potential social and communityhealth impacts, which is a combination of the above elements and includes consideration ofthe acceptability of the change to stakeholders.

It should be noted that clear distinctions are made in assessing worker health impacts andcommunity health impacts. The former focusses on impacts associated with labour andworking conditions, while the latter considers how the Project will impact on the health ofpeople in the Project’s Area of Influence. The aim is that, where there are no specificrequirements imposed by the regulatory regime or the clients that dictate otherwise, this isthe approach ERM adopts to ensure we present a consistent approach in the evaluation ofsocial and community health impacts.

11.2 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DEFINITIONS

11.2.1 Determining Magnitude

Magnitude of social and community health impacts is understood as a reflection of the ‘size’or degree of change caused by social and community health impacts. As discussed inChapter 4, magnitude is a function of one or more of the following characteristics:

• Extent;

• Duration;

• Scale;

• Frequency; and

• Likelihood (for unplanned events only).

Table 11.1 provides the definitions for impact characteristics that culminate in a rating formagnitude.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 261 of 369



Table 11.1 Designation of Social Magnitude

Designating Magnitude Description

Negligible Change remains within the range commonly experienced within thehousehold or community.

Small Perceptible difference from baseline conditions. Tendency is that impact islocal, rare and affects a small proportion of households and is of a shortduration.

Medium Clearly evident difference from baseline conditions. Tendency is thatimpact affects a substantial area or number of people and/or is of mediumduration. Frequency may be occasional and impact may be regional inscale.

Large Change dominates over baseline conditions. Affects the majority of thearea or population in the Area of Influence and/or persists over manyyears. The impact may be experienced over a regional or national area.

Positive In the case of positive impacts, no magnitude is assigned, unless there isample data to support a more robust characterisation. It is usuallysufficient to indicate that the Project will result in a positive impact,without characterising the exact degree of positive change likely to occur.

11.2.2 Determining Vulnerability

In the social and community health context, vulnerability is the accepted term for describing

the sensitivity of the receiving environment (i.e., societies, communities and households) thatwill experience impacts.

A vulnerable individual or group is one that could experience adverse impacts moreseverely than others, based on his/her vulnerable or disadvantaged status. Vulnerability is apre-existing status that is independent of the project under consideration. Figure 11.1 Error!Reference source not found. provides definitions of vulnerable groups from the World Bankand the International Finance Corporation (IFC).

It is important to understand the vulnerability context as it will affect the ability of social

receptors to adapt to socio- economic/cultural or bio-physical changes. A higher level ofvulnerability can result in increased susceptibility to negative impacts or a limited ability totake advantage of positive impacts. A project may also exacerbate existing vulnerabilities ifthe status of individuals and communities and their coping mechanisms are not adequatelyunderstood or considered.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 262 of 369



Figure 11.1 Vulnerable Groups – Definition

Vulnerability is underpinned by a low existing level of livelihood assets (such as health oreducation) or inadequate access to structures and processes to protect or improvelivelihoods. In order to identify vulnerable receptors, it is necessary to identify receptors thatexperience these circumstances. Table 11.2 provides definitions to assist in this identification.The assessment of vulnerability may include, but is not limited to, the following:

• Ethnic minorities, including those of a different race, religion, caste or language thanthe dominant population;

• Women, particularly female headed households;

• The old, infirm or disabled;

• Those with underlying chronic health conditions especially if there is stigmaassociated with the health condition (e.g., HIV/AIDS);

• Those with differential rights, such as those without legal rights to land;

• Those living below the poverty line / living wage;

Vulnerable Groups (ref: World Bank Glossary of Terms). “This denotes a conditioncharacterised by higher risk and reduced ability to cope with shock or negative impacts.It may be based on socio-economic condition, gender, age, disability, ethnicity, or othercriteria that influence people’s ability to access resources and developmentopportunities. Vulnerability is always contextual, and must be assessed in the context ofa specific situation and time...”

IFC PS Requirements (re IFC PS 1 Guidance Note GN48) “There may be individuals orgroups within the project’s area of influence who are particularly vulnerable ordisadvantaged and who could experience adverse impacts from the proposed projectmore severely than others.

Large-scale projects with a large area of influence and multiple Affected Communitiesare more likely to expose these individuals and groups to adverse impacts than smaller-scale projects with site-specific issues. Where it is anticipated that the project to befinanced will impact one or more Affected Communities, the risks and impactsidentification process should use accepted sociological and health methods to identifyand locate vulnerable individuals or groups within the Affected Community population,collecting data on a disaggregated basis. Using this disaggregated information, the clientshould assess potential impacts, including differentiated impacts, on these individuals

and groups and propose specific (and if necessary separate) measures in consultationwith them to ensure that potential impacts and risks are appropriately avoided,minimised, mitigated or compensated.”



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 263 of 369



• Those without or with limited access to access to basic services such as water,sanitation, health care and education; and

• Those living in areas with pre-existing levels of environmental contaminants.

Table 11.2 Levels of Vulnerability

Ranking Definition

Low Minimal vulnerability; consequently with a high ability to adapt to changes brought bythe Project and opportunities associated with it.

Medium Some, but few areas of vulnerability; still retaining an ability to at least in part adapt tochange brought by the Project and opportunities associated with it.

High Profound or multiple levels of vulnerability that undermine the ability to adapt tochanges brought by the Project and opportunities associated with it.

11.3 EVALUATING SIGNIFICANCE FOR SOCIAL AND HEALTH IMPACTS

The significance of social and community health impacts is evaluated taking into account themagnitude of the impact and the vulnerability of affected receptors. In rating significance forsocial and community health impacts, the matrix in Table 11.3 is used to assign social andcommunity health impact significance for both negative and positive impacts, and includesthe definitions of magnitude and vulnerability designations.

Whilst we default to not rating the significance of positive impacts, it is important to describehow the impact may differentially benefit vulnerable groups.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 264 of 369



Table 11.3 Significance Rankings for Social and Community Health Impacts

VULNERABILITY

Low Minimal areas ofvulnerabilities; consequentlywith a high ability to adapt tochanges brought by the Project

Medium Some but few areas ofvulnerability; but still retainingan ability to at least in partadapt to change brought by theProject

High Profound or multiple levels ofvulnerability that underminethe ability to adapt to changesbrought by the Project

M A G N I T U D E

Negligible Change remains within the range commonlyexperienced within the household or community.

Negligible Negligible Negligible

Small Perceptible difference from baseline conditions.Tendency is that impact is local, rare and affects asmall proportion of receptors and is of a shortduration.

Negligible Minor Moderate

Medium Clearly evident difference from baselineconditions. Tendency is that impact affects asubstantial area or number of people and/or is ofmedium duration. Frequency may be occasionaland impact may potentially be regional in scale.

Minor Moderate Major

Large Change dominates over baseline conditions.Affects the majority of the area or population inthe area of influence and/or persists over manyyears. The impact may be experienced over aregional or national area.

Moderate Major Major



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 265 of 369



11.3.1 Integration of Stakeholder Perceptions

Unlike the environmental impact significance determination, the professional ranking ofsocial significance incorporates an additional step; the consideration of stakeholderperceptions. It is common that the public may have the perception that an impact is higherthan will actually likely be the case. This is commonly referred to as a perceived impact.Perceived impacts are captured, but are clearly differentiated to ‘actual’ impacts as evaluatedin the standard methodology.

Whilst an impact may be considered as negligible significance based on the initial evaluation,stakeholder perceptions need to be accounted for in the management of social issues.Stakeholder views and priorities are considered in the impact assessment by increasingsignificance ratings, where appropriate. This first looks at the significance rating withoutstakeholder views/perceptions, then applying these and clearly explaining the reasoning forany elevated significance in this context.

Where perceived impacts are deemed to be more critical than has been considered in theimpact assessment, they are evaluated separately. This may result in the development ofdifferent mitigation and management measures specific to addressing stakeholderperceptions than for those project activities that may require management to minimise theimpact magnitude by mitigating the activity at source or effect on the social receptor. Suchexamples are strengthening aspects of awareness raising, Project communication and

engagement, participation in Project development and participative monitoring. It shouldalso be noted that perceived impacts are no less important than actual impacts with respectto addressing community acceptance for a Project, and that failure to adequately assess suchimpacts and develop supporting mitigation is just as likely to result in Project delays as inthe case of actual impacts. Error! Reference source not found. illustrates how the assessmentof impacts considers magnitude and vulnerability ratings but also potentially the perceptionsor sensitivities of stakeholders as well as any planning and development objectives laid outfor the administrative area in which the Project is located. This brings stakeholder views onimpacts explicitly into the evaluation, for example by reporting against policy or plans, orreporting the results of stakeholder engagement.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 266 of 369



Figure 11.2 Building in Perceptions, Stakeholders and Planning into Significance

Ratings

11.3.2 Interpretation of Social Impact Significance

Table 11.4 shows how the different designations of significance may be interpreted. Theseare described to reflect the Project context and setting, specifically reflected in planning andpolicy objectives, and stakeholder views as appropriate. It is noted that stakeholder viewsare not considered within these expressions of significance as stakeholder views are specificto the Project and factored into the significance evaluation after the initial rating, asdescribed above.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 267 of 369



Table 11.4 Description of Social Impact Assessment Significance Rankings

Significance Negative Social Impacts Negative Health Impacts

Negligible Inconvenience caused, but with noconsequences to livelihoods, cultureor quality of life.

Receptors may experience annoyance, minorirritation, or stress associated with change;minimal impact to perceived quality of life.Does not require treatment. No long-termconsequences for the health of individualsand the community.

Minor Impacts are short term andtemporary and do not result in longterm reductions in livelihood orquality of life.

Temporary reduction to health status ofcertain individuals that can be easily treatedand does not result in long termconsequences for community health.Impacts may lead to greater healthinequalities in Project area.

Moderate Adverse impacts that notably affectlivelihood or quality of life athousehold and community level.Impacts can mainly be reversed butsome households may suffer long-term effects.

High risk of diseases or injuries as well asexposure to Project operational risks to thelocal community. May result in long term butreversible community health impacts.

Major Diverse primary and secondaryimpacts that will be impossible toreverse or compensate for,possibly leading to long-termimpoverishment, or societalbreakdown.

Loss of life, severe injuries or chronic illnessrequiring hospitalisation. Exposure to andincidence of diseases not commonly seenpreviously in the area. Likely to have long-term consequences for community health.

Note: Positive impacts are not ranked for significance, as discussed above.

11.4 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT RESULTS

The results of the full social impact assessment are provided in Annex H. The followingsections identify and discuss the predicted positive and significant negative social impactsassociated with construction, operation and decommissioning of the Project. The focus is onthe impacts likely to be experienced by the surrounding communities – i.e. Haragandang,Kerendan, Muara Pari, and Luwe Hulu.

Proposed mitigation measures are also presented. These are in addition to the existingcontrols Salamander is planning or has already implemented.

Stakeholder consultation and the implementation of the grievance mechanism are criticalwhen identifying and managing social and community health impacts for a Project of thisnature.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 268 of 369



11.5 COMMUNICABLE D ISEASES


The Project will employ a range of people during construction, operation anddecommissioning. There is potential for the workforce to introduce and/ or increase the rateof communicable diseases to the Project area. (A communicable disease is a disease orinfection that can be passed from person to person, either through direct contact with aninfected person or their discharges, or via a vector, such as a mosquito). This includes theintroduction of a new disease and/ or a more virulent strain of an existing disease.

Given the existing community health baseline discussed in Chapter 7, there is potential for

the workforce/Project to transmit a communicable disease which may have significantconsequences for the community due to the limited health facilities. This is discussed inmore detail in the following Section.

In addition, the Project is likely to result in-migration – i.e. people moving to the Project areato capitalize on employment and business development opportunities. Similar to theworkforce, there is potential for in-migration to introduce and/ or increase the rate ofcommunicable diseases in the surrounding area.

11.5.1.1 Vector Borne Diseases

Another factor that will influence the prevalence and rates of communicable diseases is thecreation of vector habitat during construction and potentially operation phases of the Project.Standing water (a common vector breeding habitat) can be created in a variety of ways, suchas alterations to drainage patterns and the establishment of trenches (which can fill withwater during the rainy season). This can increase the rate of communicable diseasetransmission such as malaria and dengue fever -which are spread by mosquitoes. Given thefact that malaria and dengue are prevalent in the Project area and that the community haveraised this issue as a concern during ERM field consultation sessions this impact is one thatrequires careful attention.

11.5.1.2 Sexually Transmitted Infections

An increase in the commercial sex trade is often associated with large scale resourcedevelopments due to the demand from the male non-local workforce. If appropriateprecautions are not taken, this too can increase the rate of communicable diseasetransmission within the local area especially in the local town of Muara Lahei whereprostitution is already reported to occur. In particular, this behaviour can contribute to anincrease in rates of HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections (e.g. Hepatitis A).





DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 270 of 369



The existing healthcare facilities have limited capacity to respond to any increase incommunicable diseases, which leaves the community vulnerable. This is of particularimportance if left untreated as communicable diseases can lead to long-term healthimplications and/ or in some instances death.

However, Salamander has established a number of measures to reduce the likelihood thatthe impact will occur. This includes the implementation of a workforce Code of Conduct tomanage behaviours, undertaking pest control activities such as fogging in mosquito breedingareas and incinerating organic waste produced by the Project to reduce odour and spread ofdisease and pest species. The focus is on managing the potential for workers to introducediseases and the management of vector habitat.

Despite the existing management measures, which will help reduce the likelihood of theimpact occurring, and the limited extent of the impact, the impact was assessed as negativeand moderate significance (Table 11.5 ). This is primarily due to the limited healthcareservices available and low level of understand of communicable disease transmission in theProject area.

Table 11.5 Communicable Disease Impacts

Impact Description There potential exists for the increase in the transmission of communicablediseases. This is associated with an increase in population due to Project

employment and in-migration and the establishment of vector habitat. Theseimpacts are likely to be further exacerbated by the limited capacity of existinghealthcare facilities to respond to the increase.

Nature Positive Negative

Type Direct Indirect

Extent Low Medium High

Duration Short term Medium term Long term/ irreversible

Scale Low Medium High


Magnitude Negligible Small Medium LargeSensitivity/Vulnerability

Low Medium High



In addition to the steps Salamander has already taken, the management of this potentialimpact will be carried forward to Salamander's HSE Management System that governs

environmental, social and community health risk management throughout the life of theProject.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 271 of 369



11.6 COMMUNITY SAFETY AND SECURITY


11.6.1.1 Safety Management

There are a number of safety related issues that are may arise as a result of the Project. Thisincludes:

• Traffic accidents (road and marine). An increase in traffic due to the Project can lead toan increase in accidents, which can lead to community related injuries and/ orfatalities;

• Increase in crime associated with an increase in the population as a result of Projectemployment and/ or in-migration and also due to increased incomes within the localpopulation (leading to an increased consumption of alcohol and domestic violenceetc.);

• Presence of new infrastructure. There are often safety issues with the establishment ofnew infrastructure – e.g. community members falling in unsecured trenches orinteracting with unsecured equipment in and around the Project site. This can lead toonsite accidents and injuries; and

• Management of hazardous materials and waste onsite. It is particularly important thatthese materials are managed appropriately so as not to contaminate the surroundingwater sources, as many are used by local communities for drinking and/ or otherhousehold activities.

The Project will increase the number of vehicles on the local roads (e.g. through the transportof workers and goods to and from the Project area) as well the number of existing roads (asthe few roads that do exist are of relatively poor quality) in the local area. With an increase invehicles, particularly heavy haulage vehicles, comes the increased potential for accidents tooccur. This is of particular concern in the Project area given the low level of road safety

awareness and poor quality of roads.

In relation to crime management, with an increase in population (due to workers movinginto the area and in-migration) there is likely to be an increase in crime rates or ethnicconflict. (There is a direct correlation between population increase and crime rate increase.)

11.6.1.2 Security Management

The use of security forces is a common management measure - e.g. to reduce the potential ofnon-workers entering the Project site. However, the employment of security forces can leadto additional impacts, in particular the use of undue force during interactions withcommunity members who may be peacefully demonstrating (as has been known to occur onthis Project).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 272 of 369



Increasingly the use of undue force is viewed as not only a social impact, but also a breach ofinternational human rights standards. Given that this issue has arisen on other extractiveindustry projects in Indonesia, it will need to be proactively managed.


Salamander is planning to establish a comprehensive safety management plan, which will beimplemented throughout the Project lifecycle. The focus will be on mitigating safety relatedimpacts (as described earlier).

The management plan will take into account Salamander’s existing health and safety policiesand procedures. Examples of requirements set out in the existing policies and procedures

include, but are not limited to:• Restricting all non-workers accessing the site via fencing and signage/only authorised

personnel in work areas;

• Having a site supervisor/health and safety officer on site to coordinate and ensurecompliance with Salamander’s systems;

• Installing barricades in areas of excavation and provide minimum of two escape ways;

• During backfilling, having a flagman on standby to monitor traffic;

• No night driving/river usage, unless in the event of an emergency or with priorapproval;

• Installing traffic safety signs;

• Establishing camp controls and interaction with the community;

• Implementing workforce random drug and alcohol testing at any time on site;

• Storing waste material in designated areas, in colour coded waste bins;

• Establishing bunding around waste storage areas;

• Ensuring personnel are trained to handle waste and installation of proper safetysignage and material safety datasheets;

• Establishing warning signs/barriers to be applied to work areas;

• Ensuring there is a trained emergency response team; and

• Having an onsite medic and medical facility.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 273 of 369



In addition, and to reduce security risks, Salamander will be undertaking ongoingengagement with local communities throughout the Project lifecycle. This will help tomaintain good working relations with community members and help reduce the potentialfor conflict to occur (i.e. the need for security personnel to respond to community issueswhich in other similar projects is when the use of undue force is most common).

11.6.2.1 Significance of Impact

Community safety and security impacts largely result from an increase in traffic, theestablishment of onsite infrastructure and the use of security forces.

Implementation of a safety management plan will help to mitigate the likelihood that the

impacts will occur – i.e. reduce the likelihood from high to moderate. A key focus of themanagement plan will be on traffic –typically the most significant community health impacton Projects of this nature. However, despite management efforts, the potential outcome ofthe impact is an injury and in some instances a fatality (e.g. as a result of a traffic or onsiteaccident). For the above reasons, the impacts on safety and security were assessed asnegative and moderate significance (Table 11.6 ).

Table 11.6 Community Safety and Security Impacts

ImpactDescription

Safety and security impacts may arise as a result of: an increase in traffic, an

increase in population, the use of security forces on site, use of hazardousmaterials and presence of new infrastructure. The community is mostvulnerable to the increase in traffic -this can lead to accidents, injuries and, insome instances, fatalities.








Sensitivity/Vulnerability

Low Medium High



The management of this potential impact will be carried forward to Salamander's HSEManagement System that governs environmental, social and community health riskmanagement throughout the life of the Project.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 274 of 369



11.7 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY


The construction, operation and decommissioning of the Project will generate:

• Noise, which can result from a variety of onsite activities (e.g. reversing beeps on largevehicles, drilling activities and construction of the building and facilities). Noise canlead to disruption of community activities and has also been linked to an increase indepression and anxiety;

• Vibrations, which can be caused by construction of infrastructure, if strong enoughcan crack the foundation of nearby infrastructure; and

• Dust, due to land clearing and other construction activities, can affect the nearby airquality. This could impact community health, in particular those with existingrespiratory illnesses and other vulnerable groups such as the elderly.

Although the Project is likely to generate noise, vibrations and dust during the constructionof the KGPF these issues are unlikely to affect local communities given the distance betweenthe Project and the nearest community (>2km). However, the Project will be using a numberof local roads to transport equipment and goods thus it is likely that noise and dust willoccur in these localities. This has already been identified as a concern by the Projectcommunities who, during ERM consultations, complained about the level of dust generatedfrom existing Project traffic.

There is also potential, as briefly mentioned earlier, for contamination to occur as a result of aspill or leak – e.g. of hydrocarbons, processing chemicals or waste. This could occur duringroutine activities onsite as well as during the transport of goods and services to the site viaexisting roads and rivers. (The river systems are used by the Project as the roads are ofteninaccessible during periods of heavy rainfall.)

At present, local communities heavily rely on ground and surface water for a variety of

activities including drinking, washing, bathing, and fishing. Given the reliance on existingwater sources, it is unlikely that the local communities would have the ability to adapt towater contamination – e.g. to find an alternative drinking water source.


Salamander is planning to establish an environmental management plan, which will includemeasures to manage noise, vibrations and dust. For example, the management plan willinclude dust suppression techniques along the road from Luwe Hulu to the site, and alongthe site access roads. The water will be sourced from the Barito River near Luwe Hulu. Themanagement plan also includes ongoing monitoring and evaluation of implementationactivities to ensure measures in place are effective.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 275 of 369




The Project is likely to generate noise, vibrations and dust. However, given the managementmeasures currently in place and the distance between the Project and the nearest community,the local community is unlikely to be significantly impacted.

There is a potential for contamination to occur as a result of a spill or leak – should this occurthere is limited capacity for the local communities to adapt, given their heavy reliance onground and surface water.

Given the potential extent of the impact (which could extend beyond the nearbycommunities if contamination were to enter a waterway) and the vulnerability of the local

communities (due to their heavy reliance on local waterways), this indirect impact wasassessed as negative and moderate significance (Table 11.7 ).

Table 11.7 Environmental Quality Impacts

Impact Description The Project, particularly during the construction phase, is likely togenerate noise, vibrations and dust. In addition, there is potential forcontamination of local water resources to occur. The issue that thecommunity is most vulnerable to is potential contamination. Salamanderis planning to develop a number of management measures to reduce thelikelihood for contamination to occur.

Nature Positive NegativeType Direct Indirect









In addition to the steps Salamander has already taken, the management of this potentialindirect impact will be through environmental mitigation (Chapter 10).


Assuming that the recommended environmental mitigation measures are implemented andmonitored over time, the residual impact was assessed as minor and negative. Ongoing

monitoring should occur to track implementation and evaluate the management measures.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 276 of 369



11.8 ECONOMY AND LIVELIHOOD


11.8.1.1 Business Development Opportunities

The Project will require goods and services throughout its lifecycle. There are opportunitiesfor local businesses to provide these goods and services (e.g. construction equipment, foodfor the accommodation camp at Luwe Hulu, re-vegetation post-operation). There are alsoexpectations within the four Project villages (noted in the May 2013 ERM consultations) thatbusiness development opportunities are created due to the Project. Existing local businessesmay expand or new businesses may be established locally to meet these demands.

Salamander has established policies and procedures to encourage the purchase of goods andservices locally – i.e. local content. However, the level of opportunities will depend on theinitiative and capabilities of the local entrepreneurs as well as the needs of the EPCcontractor.

In addition, the workforce is likely to increase the demand for local goods and services.During down time, workers (with their increased disposable income) are likely to spendmoney in the local town – e.g. to eat at local restaurants.

11.8.1.2 Employment Opportunities

The majority of local community members work within the farming sector. However,increasingly there are opportunities to work in government and in private business (e.g.logging and mining).

The Project will generate direct employment opportunities throughout its lifecycle. Thelargest number of opportunities will be generated during construction; this number willtaper off during operation and decommissioning.

During construction it is anticipated that approximately 354 people will be employed. This

includes an estimated 144 general/unskilled workers and 210 skilled workers.

Approximately 50 employment opportunities will be generated during the operation phase.Workers will operate on a rotating shift of two weeks on/ two weeks office, which meansthat only approximately 25 workers will be on site at any given time.

Salamander has put in place policies and procedures to ensure that local employmentopportunities are generated. It is expected that approximately 40% of recruitment will befrom local communities during construction, with a focus on unskilled positions. However,this is likely to change during the operation phase, as many of the positions require skilled

workers.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 277 of 369



In addition to the above direct employment opportunities, the Project is likely to generateindirect employment opportunities. This is linked to the business development opportunitiesdiscussed above – as there will need to be workers to run the businesses that provide goodsand services to the Project. This is likely to generate opportunities for locals; however, it mayalso drive in-migration.

It is also anticipated the Projects CSR program will provide sustainable on-going benefits tothe four local communities (and beyond) throughout the duration (and post) the Project’slifecycle.

11.8.1.3 Training Opportunities

The Project will provide on-the-job training for employees. This will help to increase the skilllevel within the local communities. These skills will not only be useful as part of the Projectbut also increase the future employment opportunities for the community members trained.This, in the longer-term, has the potential to improve the quality of lives of local communitymembers (which is associated with a steady income) .

11.8.1.4 Labour and Working Conditions

Indonesian law and international best practice standards provide clear guidance on theexpectations as they apply to working conditions and the rights of workers. To ensure that

these standards are met (e.g. such as anti-discrimination, no child or slave labour),Salamander is in the process of introducing internal labour standards, which will becascaded down to contractors. These standards will be regularly monitored to ensurecompliance across the Project.

11.8.2 Impact Evaluation and SignificanceSalamander has committed to identifying and capitalizing on local content opportunitieswhere possible. Expectations will need to be managed with regards to these Project benefits(given their duration and small scale). In particular, there are few unskilled positionsavailable; these are the types of employment opportunities (based on the baseline) that are

likely to be filled by local community members.

The resulting impacts (e.g. increase in income for local community members, training toincrease future marketability) were assessed as positive – i.e. beneficial to the community.For this reason, the impact significance was not assessed (Table 11.8 ).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 278 of 369



Table 11.8 Economy and Livelihood Impacts

Impact Description The Project will generate employment, training, and businessdevelopment opportunities for local community members. Salamander’scommitment to local content will help to ensure that these opportunities,where feasible (e.g. due to the limited number of unskilled positionsavailable), are realised.





Scale Low Medium High Frequency Low Moderate High





In addition to the steps Salamander has already taken, the management of this potentialimpact will be carried forward to Salamander's HSE Management System that governs

environmental, social and community health risk management throughout the life of theProject.

11.9 COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES


An increase in population in the local area (due to employment opportunities and in-migration) is likely to place additional pressure on existing infrastructure, resources andservices (e.g. healthcare, transportation, waterways, roads). The result is often a reduction incapacity of existing infrastructure and services to meet the needs of the local communities (aswell as the additional population added by the Project). This can mean longer wait times anddiminished quality of already poor local services as well as reduced access to and increasedwear and tear on infrastructure.

An increase in road traffic can speed up the wear and tear experienced by roads, requiringroads to be fixed earlier than typically required. This is already being experienced in theProject area from the logging activities. Another example is an increase in waterway traffic,which is likely to result from the transport of goods, services and workers into the area.There is potential for this use to reduce the capacity of the rivers to be used by others, such asfor bathing and washing, fishing or for transporting commercial goods and services into thearea.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 279 of 369



Furthermore, the Project may lead to the removal of vegetation/habitats used by localcommunities for subsistence farming, hunting and gathering of non-timber forest productsdue to the presence of a non-local workforce. This may result in an impact on thecommunities’ resources (i.e. availability) and potentially income levels for those who rely onselling products/animals in the local markets.


Salamander is planning to establish a camp onsite to accommodate workers as well asestablish measures to reduce the likelihood that workers will utilize communityinfrastructure, resources and services. These measures will appear in Salamander’s ESMP.


The Project is unlikely to increase the pressure on community infrastructure due to the scaleof the Project and minimal demand for (or availability of) services from the local community.

The workforce is a relatively (by comparison to other extractive industry projects) smallworkforce, particularly during operations. Given this and the distance (required to travel) tothe nearest community, it is anticipated that the workforce will not place a significantdemand on local infrastructure.

As most of the employment opportunities (particularly unskilled positions) will happenduring construction, the impact will occur over a short period of time. In addition, it is likelyto be experienced locally, which means that the extent will be low. For these reasons, theimpact was assessed as negligible (Table 11.9 ).

Table 11.9 Community Infrastructure, Services and Resources Impacts

Impact Description The project may place additional pressure on existing communityinfrastructure and services












DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 280 of 369




In addition to the steps Salamander has already taken, the management of this potentialimpact will be carried forward to Salamander's HSE Management System that governsenvironmental, social and community health risk management throughout the life of theProject.

11.10 CULTURAL HERITAGE


Ground disturbance activities (e.g. clearing, trenching) form a part of the construction

process. There is potential for these activities to disturb, reduce access to, and, in someinstance, destroy existing tangible and intangible cultural heritage sites.

However, a recent survey of local community members indicates that there are no importantcultural heritage sites in and/ or around the Project site. Instead much of their culturalheritage is maintained in the mountainous areas, some distance away from the Project area.There are a number of intangible cultural heritage customs practices in the area however theProject is already aware of these and has been effectively managing these with the localcommunity and traditional leaders.

The communities do have intangible cultural heritage practices, associated with the foresthousing spirits and association with required practices prior to disturbing these forest areas.


Given no tangible sites exist within the project footprint the potential impacts associatedwith cultural heritage (e.g. destruction of significant sites) were assessed as negligible.

However, in line with best practice, Salamander will develop a chance finds procedure (IFCPS8). This will ensure that if a cultural heritage site is discovered (e.g. unearthed) during theconstruction process, it will be managed appropriately. The objective of a chance finds

procedure is to avoid or minimize any physical harm to a cultural heritage site or artefact.

In addition, Salamander will undertake steps to adhere to local culturally appropriatepractices. For example, there is a culturally important ceremony that the Kahringan practicewhen developing new land. The intention is encourage the supernatural beings that occupyan area to move to a new location. The local community members have asked Salamander toundertake this ceremony- which the Project has adhered to.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 281 of 369



Table 11.10 Cultural Heritage Impacts

Impact Description Cultural Heritage ImpactsNature Positive NegativeType Direct Indirect Extent Low Medium High

Duration Short term Medium term Long term/ irreversibleScale Low Medium High Frequency Low Moderate HighMagnitude Negligible Small Medium LargeSensitivity/Vulnerability Low Medium High


11.11 SOCIAL /CULTURAL STRUCTURE

11.11.1 Discussion of ImpactsAlthough employment opportunities bring positive economic benefits, they also can result insocial issues. These are largely associated with the following:

• The movement of skilled workers. Often extractive industry projects offer better payand benefits (when compared to local jobs). The result is a movement in workers fromtheir existing positions to the employment opportunities offered by the Project. This

can reduce the local skills pool;• An increase in disposable income within the local communities. Although this can

have positive benefits such as improvement in nutrition and education (e.g. aseducation outside the community becomes affordable). It often results in negativeimpacts, such as an increase in the use of tobacco, drugs, and alcohol as well as anincreased consumption of fatty and sugary foods. (These types of foods can beintroduced to an area to cater for the non-local workforce.) The induced impacts arean increase in non-communicable diseases (e.g. due to drug and alcohol consumption)and reduced application of traditional practices; and

• The introduction of non-local people in an area. This can lead to conflict within localcommunities. This stems from a variety of issues including differences in ethnicityand/ or religious values as well as jealousy that ‘outsiders’ have successfully securedpositions within the Project. It can also result in a change in the social structure andcommunity networks.

The result is a reduction in the local skills pool, an increase in disposable income andchanges in social interactions. However, given the relatively small (when compared to otherextractive industry projects) workforce, this will likely reduce the severity should theseimpacts occur.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 282 of 369




Salamander has a camp onsite to accommodate workers and will be establishing measures toreduce the interaction between the community and workforce. This will help reduce thepotential for conflicts to arise – e.g. due to differences in ethnicity and religion. As theworkforce is relatively small and contained within the Project area, along with the fact theimpacts will be localised (i.e. low extent) and largely occurring during construction (whenthe largest number of people is employed); the impact was assessed as negative and minorsignificance (Table 11.11 ).

Table 11.11 Social/Cultural Structure Impacts

Impact Description Although employment has a positive economic benefit, it also presents anumber of potential negative social impacts, such as the reduction in thelocal pool of skilled workers and conflict within local communities.However, the relatively small workforce will help reduce the magnitudeof the impacts occurring within the local communities.






Frequency Low Moderate HighMagnitude Negligible Small Medium Large




In addition to the steps Salamander has already taken, the management of this potentialimpact will be carried forward to Salamander's HSE Management System that governsenvironmental, social and community health risk management throughout the life of the

Project.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 283 of 369



12 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS

IFC PS 1 2012 requires that an environmental assessment should also address cumulativeimpacts. The objective of the cumulative impact assessment is to identify thoseenvironmental, social or health aspects that may not on their own constitute a significantimpact but when combined with impacts from past, present or reasonably foreseeable futureProject activities or other projects/activities may result in a larger and more significanceimpact. IFC states that “ Cumulative impacts may result from the incremental impact, on areas orresources used or directly impacted by the project, from other existing, planned or reasonably defineddevelopments at the time the risks and impacts identification process is conducted”12.

Project related or regional cumulative impact examples include:• Increases in sediment loads to a watershed from removal of vegetation;

• The recurring loss of habitat in areas that are disturbed and re-disturbed over anextended period;

• Increases in vehicle or vessel traffic;

• Additional emissions as project facilities are extended and expanded over a period oftime or in combination with other industry emissions in the area;

• Inward migration from progressive development opportunities in a region; or

• Positive impacts from ongoing development of employment opportunities andenhancement of local labour skills base as successive projects (related or unrelated) aredeveloped.

These are considered below.

Increases in Sediment Loads to a Watershed from Removal of Vegetation

The Project is located in an area with existing industries including coal, logging and palm oilplantations. The landuse requirement for the Project and need to clear vegetation in the areacontributes to the cumulative loss of natural habitat in the region. Whilst the landrequirements for the Project are not extensive, this is a cumulative impact on thedeforestation occurring in Central Kalimantan and pressure on an already stressedecosystem. The Project has a commitment to conduct an offset program through re-vegetation, with the location for re-vegetation under discussion with the Indonesian ForestryDepartment.

12 IFC Performance Standard 1. Assessment and Management of Environmental and Social Risks and Impacts. January 1, 2012



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 284 of 369



Recurring Loss of Habitat in Areas

The Project land requirements are approximately 56 ha to bring the gas fields to productionand distribute the gas to a neighbouring power station. There is no current plan forexpansion of facilities requiring additional land take. Land clearing for the Project will occurat the construction phase and areas such as the pipeline ROW will be reinstated followinginstallation. At the end of the operational lifetime of the Project, facilities such as thepipelines will be cleaned, sealed and left in situ to avoid re-disturbance of the vegetation andsoils.

Increases in Vehicle or Vessel Traffic

The Project will result in an increase in the movement of plant equipment and materials. Thisincreased transportation activity will result in a cumulative impact on the quantity of vesselactivity along the Barito river. Vehicle use however, is not expected to result in a cumulativeincrease in vehicle traffic to a significant degree. The Project uses existing logging roads forthe first 27 km of the route from the Luwe Hulu Supply and Support Base. Vehicle demandon this section is low and mainly attributable to the logging industry as the amount of publicvehicle ownership is low. From the 27 km point to the Project site at Kerendan, Salamanderhas constructed an access road as there was no existing alternative. As a result, the projectwill not result in a significant impact through an increase in the demand on localinfrastructure.

Incremental Atmospheric EmissionsWhere a project has the potential to contribute towards adverse global environmentalimpacts, an assessment needs to be undertaken. In this case, the construction and operationof the Kerendan Gas Development Project will likely result in the production of greenhousegases (GHG). The threshold limits for undertaking a greenhouse gas emissions assessment asdetailed by IFC Performance Standards is 100,000 metric tonnes of CO 2 equivalent per yearfor the aggregate emissions of direct sources and indirect sources associated with purchasedelectricity for consumption. The estimated annual emission of CO 2 equivalent gases for theProject is 23,000 tonnes. Salamander will undertake annual quantification and monitoring ofGHG emissions in accordance with internationally recognised methodologies to verify actualemission quantities during the operation of the Project.

Inward Migration

The potential for inward migration from the Project as a cumulative impact to the regionwhen considered with other industry is not considered significant. The greatest number ofworkers required by the Project will peak at construction at approximately 350 people,reducing to 50 staff required during construction.

Employment Opportunities and Enhancement of Local Labour Skills Base

With the exception of the PLN Power Plant associated with the Project (but not underSalamander operating authority), no known plans for other potential future developments inthe area have been finalised.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 285 of 369



13 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANINTRODUCTION

13.1 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS

The ESIA process has identified the key environmental, social and health issues, impacts andrisks associated with the project requiring the implementation of a wide range of mitigationmeasures. The necessary actions required to manage these issues, impacts and risks arepresented in this ESMP; these includes identification of all project commitments (includinglegislative and IFC compliance requirements), mitigation measures that have been identifiedfrom the impact assessment, and other best practice measures designed to avoid, minimiseor reduce negative impacts and enhance positive impacts.

The objectives of an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) are to:• Identify the set of responses to potentially adverse impacts;

• Define the responsibilities for implementation and monitoring;

• Determine requirements for ensuring that mitigation and management measures areimplemented effectively and in a timely manner; and

• Describe the means for meeting those requirements.

This Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) Chapter provides information andinstructions on how Environmental, Social, Health and Safety aspects of the Project will bemanaged from pre-construction through the completion of the construction, operation anddecommissioning phases. The ESMP is a living document which will:

• Incorporate the EHS and community mitigation social measures identified as a resultof the ESIA process into a comprehensive framework to facilitate and ensureappropriate management throughout the Project cycle;

• Provide a framework for procedures and plans specifically for activities that haverisks, as identified in the Impact Assessment;

• Present responsibilities for meeting ESMP requirements including the provision oftraining;

• Provide a framework for the implementation of specific management plans bycontractors; and

• Define the monitoring/verification and reporting program (including corrective

actions).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 286 of 369



13.1.1 Content of the ESMP

The following sub-sections of this chapter are structured as follow:• Salamander Energy’s Corporate EHS Principles;

• Salamander Energy Indonesia HSE Management System;

• Kerendan Gas Development Project Organisation;

• Training, Awareness and Competence;

• Monitoring, Review, Audit and Reporting; and

• Project Environmental and Social Management Plan.

13.2 SALAMANDER ENERGY ’S CORPORATE EHS PRINCIPLES

13.2.1 EHS Principles

Salamander manages business and operational activities through Corporate EHS Principlesand Policies which are also enacted at a country level.

Salamander, in conducting its business and operational activities, is committed to ensure:

• Safety and health of our employees and the people who could be impacted by ouractivities;

• Protection of the environment in which we work; and

• That the interests of the communities in which we work are respected.

Salamander adopts a rigorous, top down approach to Corporate Responsibility. During 2011we completed a restructuring of the organisational structure. In 2012 the focus moved on to

strengthening various functions within the management and operating units. This processsaw new people promoted to the Senior Management Team and a number of new recruitsbolstering our capabilities in the legal, company secretarial, corporate affairs, communityrelations and health and safety departments, as follows:



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 287 of 369



Figure 13.1 Salamander Energy’s Corporate Senior Management Team

The Senior Management Team meets quarterly to discuss management level issues andHealth, Safety and Environment are always key agenda items. The Corporate HSSE Managerreports directly to the Group Chief Operating Officer (COO) and each of our operated assetshas a dedicated HSE and CSR team to monitor activity and ensure Group guidelines arebeing followed.

The CSR Steering Committee was restructured during 2012 to improve the delivery ofcommunity relations programmes. It is chaired by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), andmeets bi-annually to discuss the investment in community based projects. The committeemonitors project performance against agreed objectives. CSR Committees are also convenedin the countries where we operate and report to the Group Steering Committee.

The Group completes a stakeholder mapping exercise on entering a new licence. The resultsof this are used by our local community development officers to determine with whom toengage. The engagement programme will typically include local recruitment,communication of the Group’s planned activity, meeting local officials and conducting townhall style meetings. This process helps to identify community development projects thatmeet the needs of stakeholders.

During 2012 further policies and procedures in support of the Group’s anti-bribery andcorruption programme were developed and implemented. The Group also instigated the

first series of compliance audits of processes already in place. These, together with theannual anti-bribery and corruption risk assessment carried out towards the end of the year,enabled the Group to gain a comprehensive understanding of the corruption risks facing thebusiness and the robustness of its processes.

The Company has embedded whistle-blowing procedures that permit employees andcontractors to report any concerns they may have in confidence to senior management or, ifdesired, to an external whistle-blowing service.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 288 of 369



13.2.2 EHS Policies

Salamander operates in accordance with the following Policies.

Health & Safety (H&S)

Salamander commits to the following H&S principles:

• We will promote a culture within the Company in which all employees share acommitment to a healthy and safe workplace

• We will comply with applicable laws and regulations and apply recognisedinternational standards where laws and regulations are not in place

• We will ensure that employees and contractors are properly trained and aware of theimportance of health and safety matters

The Group has a rigorous set of HSE standards, procedures and guidelines that are madeavailable to all employees via the Group’s Intranet. It is made clear to all employees andcontractors that they are expected to adhere to these standards when engaging in anybusiness related activity on behalf of the company. The Executive Directors reinforce thismessage during management visits that are conducted at least annually and their findingsare reported back to the Board of Directors.

Salamander’s Corporate Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) Policy is provided in Figure13.2. Salamander operates in accordance with the following principles:

• We are committed to protecting and conserving the environment in which we work;

• We will adhere to the International Finance Corporation’s Performance Standards onSocial and Environmental Sustainability;

• We strive to meet the challenges presented to the oil and gas industry by climatechange matters;

• We strive for viable ways to minimise the environmental impact of our operations,reduce waste generation, conserve resources and respect biodiversity; and

• We will comply with applicable laws and regulations and apply recognisedinternational standards where laws and regulations are not in place.

Salamander has set Corporate environmental targets for all projects for 2013:• Keep CO 2 and GHG emissions below OGP average; and

• Continue to seek ways of pollution prevention, emission reduction and improving theenvironmental performance of our operations.

The Corporate Policy is enacted in Salamander Energy Indonesia’s business and operationalactivities through the Company’s HSE Policy (Section 13.3).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 289 of 369



Figure 13.2 Salamander Energy’s Corporate HSE Policy



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 290 of 369



In addition, the Company operates in accordance with the commitments made in theirCorporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Policy (Figure 13.3 ). Salamander is committed tooperation in accordance with the following principles:

• We will uphold the principles outlined in the UN Universal Declaration on HumanRights;

• We will behave responsibly and with sensitivity towards the local communities in theareas in which we operate; and

• We will provide sustainable benefits and avoid the creation of a dependency culture.

Salamander recognises that building strong relationships with local communities is critical inmaintaining its operating credibility. The Company adopts a pro-active approach tocommunity relations, seeking to engage with local stakeholders early in the operationalplanning stage and recognising any concerns/issues (Chapter 7). Salamander employs anumber of specialist government liaison and community liaison officers, usually people whoare from the area of our operations and have a detailed understanding of the local, nationaland regional environmental and social sensitivities.

During 2012 the Company further strengthened the CSR team in Indonesia and restructuredthe Steering Committee, streamlining the membership to improve its focus and effectiveness.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 291 of 369



Figure 13.3 Salamander Energy’s Corporate CSR Policy



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 292 of 369



13.3 SALAMANDER ENERGY INDONESIA HSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

The HSE Management System (MS) prepared by HSE Department forms the generalguideline in achieving company commitment in managing Safety, Health and Environmentand minimizing risk to the community surrounding Salamander Energy Indonesia(Salamander) operations area. The HSE MS is provided in Annex I.

13.3.1 HSE Roles and Responsibilities

The primary responsibility for HSE performance is assigned to and will remain a function ofline management at all levels. HSE staff are provided for assistance, advice and thedevelopment of standards and procedures. The following are the key roles and HSE

responsibilities within Salamander.

13.3.2 General Manager

The General Manager exercises the authority of the company for carrying out HSErequirements placed upon the company by law. He/she will:

• Designate competent Health, Safety and Environment Manager and support staff, andallocate adequate financial resources, as appropriate;

• Demonstrate commitment and leadership by personal example, two way

communications, and through participation in appropriate initiatives, such as, HSECommittees, meetings, incentive and awareness schemes, etc;

• Give Health, Safety and Environmental issues appropriate priority alongside technicaland commercial factors; and

Systematically integrate HSE Policy, Expectations, Company objectives and targets intoplanning and decision making processes, ensuring that a documented HSE ManagementSystem is in place to deliver expected performance. Performance is assessed against Policy,Expectations, objectives and targets.

13.3.3 Managers HSE Responsibility

The Managers are responsible for the management of HSE matters within their sphere ofcontrol. He/she will:

• Ensure organizational arrangements, defined roles and responsibilities aredocumented and maintained for their area of responsibility;

• Their individual Key Performance Indicators are identified;

• Communicate the Salamander Commitment and Policy and HSE Expectations to theirpersonnel; and

Identify HSE Improvement Programs and Work Plans in his/her area of responsibility.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 293 of 369



13.3.4 Operations/Drilling Manager

The operations/Drilling Manager has the following HSE responsibilities:• Establish and develop HSE Management Systems by using Corporate HSE

Management guidelines and ensure systems are implemented;

• Establish HSE improvement program and set an annual HSE targets as part(cascading) of the General Manager Annual HSE targets;

• Ensure that the line Management under his/her supervision include the HSE as partof their performance indicator;

• Implement and taking the responsibility in accordance with Law and implementContractor HSE Management System; and

• Implement duties in accordance with guidelines in the Local Incident ManagementProcedure.

13.3.5 HR Manager

The HR Manager has the following HSE responsibilities:

• Ensure that employee competency meets the job competency including the HSErequirements;

• Ensure that medical examinations performed and the prospective employee personalarchives maintained in the relevant file;

• Ensure that medical examinations of workers regularly carried out and archives arestored in archives of workers concerned;

• Schedule employee certification based on regulation requirements;

•

Develop policies relating to sanctions against violations of regulations relating to theCompany HSE performance appraisal and promotion;

• In cooperation with the HSE to develop HSE training in accordance with the level ofemployee HSE competency; and

• Perform tasks according to the instructions contained in the Local IncidentManagement Procedure.

13.3.6 HSE Manager

The HSE Manager is the 'Custodian' of the HSE Operating Manual and is responsible formanaging the HSE Department which will provide technical support and guidance to linemanagers and others, for all HSE activities.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 294 of 369



The HSE Manager will also be responsible for the introduction and promotion of newinitiatives and techniques designed to improve safety in the workplace; the HSEImprovement Programs and Work Plans and for reporting annually on the health, safety andenvironmental performance of the Company.

13.3.7 Area Superintendent HSE Responsibility

Each Area Superintendent will ensure that HSE is a part of each Supervisor's instruction toemployees when assigning tasks to be performed within their area of responsibility. He/shewill ensure that his/her employee receives adequate instruction and training prior tobeginning a new or special task and that they are retrained as required.

13.3.8 Supervisor HSE Responsibility

Each Supervisor is responsible for familiarizing himself with all Salamander Indonesia HSEPolicy and Procedures that may applies to his/her area of activity and for their application toall function under his/her control. He/she must instruct new or transferred employees inboth job and departmental procedures and institute appropriate disciplinary action forviolations of HSE Regulations. In addition he/she must assist with and promote departmentHSE Programs, establish periodic Safety Meetings and ensure that adequate HSE Training isgiven to all employees under his/her supervision.

13.3.9 Employee HSE ResponsibilityAll Employees working within Salamander Indonesia have a role to play in theimplementation of the HSE Management Systems. Each individual is encouraged to take aproactive approach to HSE responsibilities and exercise a 'duty of care' for their colleagues atwork and others who they may come into contact with. Individuals are also expected tocomply with the General HSE Rules and direct HSE instructions and support initiatives toimprove performance.

Every employee is expected to observe and follow all directives and procedure related towork assignment when initiated by appropriate authority. This requirement also holds trueat all level of supervision and management and forms part of the basis for measuring HSEperformance.

13.3.10 Contractors

Appointed Contractors will be responsible for ensuring compliance with all relevant nationallegislation and international standards, as well as for assuring that they adhere with allenvironmental, social and health controls and mitigation measures specified in the ESMP.

The Contractor will produce a statement setting out its Environmental, Health and Social

(ESH) Policy that demonstrates a visible management commitment to the values ofSalamander and the Project commitments. This will be signed by senior members of themanagement team in order to signify their intent to uphold the policy. The statement shalladdress:



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 295 of 369



• Objectives;

• Method of implementation;

• Compliance with local and contract procedures;

• Availability of qualified resources;

• Continuous improvement; and

• Auditing procedures.

The Contractor will demonstrate to the satisfaction of Salamander, how compliance with theESMP requirements will be ensured through the development of detailed ESH bridgingdocuments that capture all the requirements set out in the ESMP. The Contractor’s ESHPlans, Procedures and Standards will be submitted for review by Salamander following theContractor’s appointment and will be the basis for open discussion to promote anappropriate management regime for the Project.

The Contractor will be required to identify individuals responsible for overall environment,health and social (including community liaison) management, demonstrating commitment tothe ESMP throughout the Contractor’s management structure.

The Contractor will be responsible for minimising the potential environmental, social, safetyand health impacts of contract activities, including the activities of all sub-contractors. TheContractor will be required to undertake regular environmental, social, safety and healthinspections and to provide related reports to the Salamander team, thereby enabling theCompany to monitor and evaluate performance against the measures and objectivesestablished in the ESHIA.

13.3.11 Role of Sub-Contractors

Sub-contractors working for the main Contractor will develop and implement their own ESH

management plans and procedures that are fully aligned with that of the Contractor andtherefore the Project. Sub-contractors will not start work until the Contractor andSalamander have approved their plans.

The Contractor maintains overall responsibility for Sub-contractor performance and willdevelop a set of instructions for the Sub-contractors and their supervisors. The instructionswill be in a format and level of detail, which is targeted at the Sub-contractors and theirsupervisors. The instructions will draw on the legal requirements, standards and guidance ofSalamander, and will incorporate the relevant provisions of the outline ESMP. The rationalebehind the instructions is to:

• Provide the Sub-contractors with the Project specific ESH policies, management plansand procedures as formulated by Salamander specific to the Kerendan gasDevelopment Project;



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 296 of 369



• Provide a framework for the Sub-contractor’s own Project specific ESH managementplan and work procedures that incorporate the requirements of the Project ESMP; and

• Provide the Sub-contractor with relevant health, safety, environmental and socialperformance instructions for their activities.

13.1 KERENDAN GAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ORGANISATION

The Project organisational structure for the Kerendan Gas development Project is providedin Figure 13.4 .



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 297 of 369



Figure 13.4 Kerendan Gas Development Project Organisation Chart



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 298 of 369



13.4 TRAINING , A WARENESS AND COMPETENCE

Salamander provides training for personnel so that the company as a whole complies withlegislative requirements and that the workers have the skills necessary to perform their jobs.Training also provides the means to explain the need for safe operations supports two-waycommunication and gives workers the confidence to work properly and safely. The HSEcommitments to training, awareness and competence are detailed in the HSE ManagementSystem, SEI-HSE 009 (Annex I).

Salamander shall ensure that all personnel responsible for the implementation of this ESMPare competent on the basis of education, training and experience. All personnel shall be

provided with environmental and social training appropriate to their scope of activity andlevel of responsibility.

Environmental and social training activity shall be appropriately documented through thedevelopment and implementation of a Workforce Environmental Training Programmeincluding:

• Definitions of role specific training requirements;

• A training needs assessment; and

• Records of training undertaken including detailing the attendees, content, trainer anddates of the induction/training.

Contractor’s environmental and social management documentation shall describe thetraining and awareness requirements necessary for its effective conduct of their activitieswithin the requirements of this ESMP. Contractor’s training, awareness and competencyprogram, including delivery and verification thereof, is subject to Salamander’s review andapproval.

13.4.1 Competency Levels

Salamander’s HSE Department defines the HSE competency level for every level ofManagement. A HSE development program is established according to the defined HSEcompetency level.

Salamander conducts a Training Need Analysis (TNA) for employees on yearly basis. Aninitial evaluation of environmental training and awareness needs associated with this ESMPwill be undertaken specific to the roles and responsibilities required. The outcomes of theneeds assessment will be used to develop and maintain the Work Program detailing thetraining needs for each position based on job description and level of environmental andsocial responsibility and involvement.

The Work Program shall include several levels of competency and training, including:• Competency Based Interview (CBI) to ensure that the candidate is suitable for the job

which will include HSE knowledge and practices;



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 299 of 369



• Orientation Training for the employee who will be assigned a new task, includingaccident preventive action to be taken in performing the tasks;

• Management Training – for management (Site Supervisors and higher), covering thekey aspects of HSE and this ESMP;

• Job Specific Training – job specific training and awareness for all personnel who havedirect roles and responsibilities within the ESMP or whose specific work activitiesmay have an environmental or social impact.

Salamander evaluates the effectiveness of training from time to time.

Employee training records are kept for all personal that have undergone HSE trainingprograms.

13.5 MONITORING , REVIEW , AUDIT AND REPORTING

Salamander’s mechanisms for monitoring, review, HSE Audits and Reporting are detailed inAnnex I HSE Management System, SEI-HSE 016. A system of regular environmental auditsand checks are undertaken by Salamander and Contractors, as well as independent thirdparties throughout the Project.

13.5.1 Audits and Verification

13.5.1.1 Internal Audit

HSE internal audits are required to be done regularly. Audits are conducted by Salamanderto monitor the achievement of HSE performance, compliance with regulatory standards andadherence to HSE policies and this will be done for this ESMP.

13.5.1.2 Contractor Audit

Contractor Audits are required as part of the Contractor’s own Safety Management System.

Audits are required to be carried out in each phase of work that is categorised as High Riskas follows:• Equipment Pre-mobilization phase;

• Equipment mobilization phase;

• Job execution phase; and

• Equipment demobilization phase.

Contractor audits will also be required to ensure compliance with HSE standards andContractual expectations as well as the implementation and fulfilment of responsibilitiesunder the Project ESMP.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 300 of 369



13.5.1.3 External Audit

In fulfilment of the requirements of the IFC, Salamander will commission independentaudits from qualified and experience third parties to verify the findings of internal andContractor audits. A program of regular audits will be developed which will fulfil not onlyregulatory requirements but more frequent verification requirements in accordance withGood International Industry Practice.

13.5.2 Non Compliance and Corrective Action

Non compliances may include breaches of Salamander Policies, the Project ESMP,unplanned events or community grievances. A Corrective Action Record (CAR) procedure

and system will be established for all non-compliances arising from inspections, audits,incident investigations, emergencies or exercises, formal HSE studies and shall includemechanisms for assignment of responsibilities, effective follow-up and close-out. Wheredeemed necessary, findings from the close out of non-compliances may result inamendments to this ESMP and related sub-plans.

13.6 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Salamander is committed to the minimisation of environmental, social and health (ESH) risksthat are related to the Kerendan Gas Development Project. The development of an ESMP is

considered to be good management practice for any project or activity with the potential toimpact upon the physical, chemical, biological, social or health environment. It providesguidance and a framework for ensuring that the commitments of Salamander are upheld andthat the ESH impacts of the Project are managed to an acceptable level.

The mitigation and management measures take place throughout the Project lifetime, frompre-construction through construction, operation and decommissioning. In addition, thereare common mitigation and monitoring requirements that apply to all phases of the project,e.g. vehicle use/operation. The mitigation and monitoring measures specific to the impactassessment conducted for this Project ESIA are detailed in Table 13.1 , together withinformation on:

• Phase and Activity;

• Impact summary and receptor impacted;

• Mitigation measure, responsibility and timing;

• Monitoring requirement, responsibility and timing; and

• Reporting.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 301 of 369



13.6.1 ESMP Link to Other HSE Management System Plans

Other types of plans are required to facilitate practical implementation of the ESMPcommitments, for example, Environmental Management Plan, Stakeholder EngagementPlans, Biodiversity Action Plans etc. These may be organised by Project Phase specific to themanagement of activities that occur during construction or operation, or may be applicableto common activities in the whole Project. These plans are not substitutes for the overallESMP, but serve to describe how the commitments will be implemented in greater detail(and likely at a later stage in Project development) than in the ESMP. In recognition of this,this ESMP table details the Project Phase and activity for the impact and associatedmitigation commitment discussed.

This ESMP will be part of the Kerendan Project Development Documentation that will beimplemented through daily operation and production. This implementation will be underSalamander Energy’s HSE Management System. It will follow the cycles of management asgovernance and assurance processes will be used on plan, do, check, action. The HSEManagement Committee and CSR Committee ensures the implementation of thecommitments in the ESIA ESMP. This ESMP is a live document and will be updatedperiodically, for example, depending on Project execution and performance.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 302 of 369



Table 13.1 Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMS) Kerendan Gas Development Project (A3)

Phase Activity/Aspect Category Receptor Potential Impacts Mitigation Responsibility Timing MonitoringParameter

MonitoringResponsibility

MonitoringFrequency Reporting

All Phases EmploymentOpportunities (includingworkforce presence)

Environment Vegetation Workers disturbingvegetation fromphysical activity

Personnel not allowed togather/remove flora orplant products from site.

All workers briefed on thispolicy.

Contractor HSE OfficerSalamander HSE Officer

Throughout theProject

HES induction ofworkersHES Toolbox TalksBridging HSEDocument

Contractor HSEOfficer SalamanderHSE Officer

As requiredDaily

As per contract

HSE MonthlyReport

All Phases EmploymentOpportunities (including

workforce presence)

Environment Vegetation Workers disturbingvegetation outside

approved cleared areasand/or taking forestresources

All work to be undertakenin cleared footprint only

Salamander ProjectManager


Constructionfootprint


Completed As builtdrawing


Environment Vegetation Workers disturbingvegetation outsideapproved cleared areasand/or taking forestresources



Prior to construction Constructionfootprint


Completed As builtdrawing


Environment Wildlife Workershunting/trapping fauna

No hunting policy enforcedfor workforce



HES induction ofworkersHES Toolbox Talks


As requiredDaily

HSE MonthlyReport

All phases EmploymentOpportunities (includingworkforce presence)

Social/Health

CommunicableDiseaseVector BorneDisease

Introduction ofcommunicablediseases andreproductive healthissues from bringingworkers from outsidethe area

Personnel will beeducated onhealth/cultural risksthrough onsite training.

Salamander ERManager

Throughout Project& Operation

HSE Induction anddaily reportMedical record

Salamander ERManagerSalamander HSEManager

Monthly HSE DailyReport


Social/Health

Social/CulturalStructure

Introduction of workerswith different culturaland religious values,and social/culturalinteraction issues andtensions

All relevant personnel tobe trained on communityawareness/ interactionand “dos and don’ts”.Personnel will educatedon health/cultural risksthrough onsite training.



HSE Induction anddaily report


Monthly HSE DailyReport


Social/Health Economy andLivelihood (-/+) Positive impact on thecommunity throughgeneration of newemployment andincome generated fromProject demand forlocalbusinesses/economicactivity

Communicate Projectopportunities in advanceand in an accessibleformat to communities

Salamander ERManager & ApplicableContractors

Throughout Project& Operation HR records Salamander ERManager & ApplicableContractors

Monthly External AffairsMonthlyReport



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 303 of 369







Social/Health

Economy andLivelihood (-/+)

Positive impact on thecommunity throughgeneration of newemployment andincome generated fromProject demand forlocalbusinesses/economicactivity

Effective contractdocument requiringappropriate local hiring.

SalamanderProcurement Manager &End-User


Contract Document Salamander ERManager & contractend-user

ContractPerformanceReview

ContractPerformanceReport


Social/Health

CommunitySafety andSecurity

Security personnel forthe Project have thepotential to impact

community safety andsecurity (human rightsconsiderations)

Contract scope for securityprovider:

Socialization of securityarrangement forSalamander site withcommunity.

Salamander Security Throughout Project& Operation

Contract DocumentCommunityengagement record

Salamander VP GA Contractinitiation

External AffairsMonthly

Report

All phases Maintenance of accessroads

Social/Health


Improvements toinfrastructure andservices may improveaccessibility betweencommunities/mainpopulation centres andsubsequently improveaccess to surroundingcommunityinfrastructure andservices, education andeconomic opportunities

CSR activities focus onsustainable projects(enhancing economicopportunities providedthrough infrastructure,access to education,markets etc.)



CSR Implementation Salamander ERManager


All Phases Transportation/Operation of vehicles(construction,materials/supplies andworkforce)

Environment Air Dust generation fromvehicle movement

Water spraying requiredfor dust suppression onaccess roads. Speed limits(maximum speed limits of15 kph at worksites andnear accommodation.Maximum 60 kph on openhighway. Maximum 40 kphfor heavy machineryoperations)

Contractor ConstructionManagerContractor HSEManager

As required Spray truck KmWater volume use


Monthly HSE MonthlyReport


Environment Air Exhaust emissionsfrom operationalvehicles, dustgeneration from vehiclemovement


Contractor ConstructionManagerContractor HSEManagerConstruction Supervisors

Prior to useMonthlymaintenanceinspection

InspectioncertificatesSpot checks



All Phases Transportation/Operation of vehicles,plant and equipment

Environment Air Exhaust emissionsfrom operationalvehicles, plant andequipment

All vehicles, equipmentand machinery to undergoa pre-use inspection priorto use and periodicmaintenance inspections.



InspectioncertificatesSpot checks

Contractor HSEOfficer



Environment Vegetation Smothering from dustgeneration/air qualityimpacts

Water spraying requiredfor dust suppression onaccess roads. Speed limits(maximum speed limits of15 kph at worksites and







DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 304 of 369






near accommodation.Maximum 60 kph on openhighway. Maximum 40 kphfor heavy machineryoperations)









Environment Wildlife Wildlife may beimpacted throughinteractions withvehicles (resulting ininjury or mortality) ordisturbance from dustgeneration, noise andvibration.

Speed limits (maximumspeed limits of 15 kph atworksites and nearaccommodation.Maximum 60 kph on openhighway. Maximum 40 kphfor heavy machineryoperations)


Daily HSE inductionLog booksJob Safety AnalysisrecordsHazard ObservationCardsComplaints registerSite inspectionsIncident/accidentrecordsRecorded faunamortality/injury fromProject activities


Monthly HSE MonthlyReportEnvironmental MonthlyReport(faunaimpacts)


Environment Wildlife Wildlife may beimpacted throughinteractions withvehicles (resulting ininjury or mortality) ordisturbance from dustgeneration, noise andvibration.

No night driving underroutine conditions


Daily Daily reportsHazard ObservationCardsJob Safety AnalysisrecordsJourneyManagement PlanrecordsIncident/accidentrecords



All phases Transportation ofmaterials/supplies andworkforce

Social/Health Economy andLivelihood (-/+) Increased traffic andpressure on existinginfrastructure interferingwith existing road/riveruse

Undertake consultationwith local community(including in local schools)to raise awareness.

Salamander ERManager Throughout Project& Operation CSR Implementation Salamander ERManager Monthly External AffairsMonthlyReport

All Phases Wastes/effluents,handling and disposal

Environment Surface WaterSoil

Surface water or soilcontamination,subsequently reducingenvironmental quality

All designated wastestorage areas on hardstanding with secondaryprotection and closeddrainage (bunding)


Daily Site inspectionHazard ObservationCardsNon-conformances


Weekly HSE WeeklyReport

All Phases Refuelling All vehicleand engines

Environment Surface WaterSoil

Surface water or soilcontamination,subsequently reducingenvironmental quality

All refuelling to beconducted over hardstanding with secondarycontainment and closeddrainage


As required Incident/accidentrecords (Spill record)


When occurred HSEDaily/WeeklyReport



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 305 of 369






All Phases Wastes/effluents,handling and disposal

Environment Wildlife Organic waste mayattract fauna to thearea (pest/native),resulting in changes tonatural behaviourand/or outbreaks ofpest species.

All organic waste stored inthe proper bins andincinerated daily


Daily Waste quantitiesrecordsIncineration records



All phases Wastes/effluentsgeneration, handlingand disposal

Social/Health

Vector BorneDiseases

Project / FacilityDomestic wastemanagement. attractingwildlife (e.g. rats, dogs,insects) and increasing

spread of associateddiseases.

All domestic waste will bedisposed of appropriately.

Salamander ProjectManagerSalamander OperationManager

Daily Wasteimplementation andEMPWaste managementrecords

Salamander HSEOfficer

Daily HSE DailyReport


Social/Health


Impacts onenvironmental qualitythat may affectecosystem servicesand livelihood (e.g.reduction of waterquality effects on thefishing)

All process waste will betreated and disposed ofappropriately.Equipment maintenance.

All work to be undertakenin cleared footprint only.

Salamander ProjectManagerSalamander OperationManager

Daily Wasteimplementation andEMPWaste managementrecordsMaintenance Record


DailyMonthly

HSE DailyReportOperationMaintenanceReport


Social/Health


Impacts on soil andsurface water qualityreducing environmentalquality andsubsequently impactinghuman health

All process waste will betreated and disposed ofappropriately.Equipment maintenance.

All work to be undertakenin cleared footprint only.


Daily Wasteimplementation andEMPWaste managementrecordsMaintenance Record


DailyMonthly


Construction Transportation/Operation of vehicles(construction,materials/supplies andworkforce)

Environment Noise andVibration

Vehicle noise andvibration reducingenvironmental qualityand affecting fauna

Construction activitiesrestricted to daylight hoursexcept for uninterruptibleactivities


Daily Daily reports Contractor HSEOfficer


Construction Site preparation Environment Vegetation Clearing of floraspecies

Vegetation clearing only indesignated areas for theproject footprint; andNo disturbance tovegetation outside markedareas


Daily Contractualagreement withdetailed scope ofwork




Topsoil will be storedseparately during clearingand will be used to fill andlevel the area oncegrubbing activities havebeen completed, therebymaintaining the seed bank






Install the pipeline alongthe road thereby reducingthe land requirements andassociated vegetationclearance


Daily As per design basis Salamander ProjectManager



Re-vegetation of offsetarea to match pipelineROW area

Re-vegetation ProjectManager (Contractor)

As per permit Planted area againstcontract





DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 306 of 369






Construction Site preparation Environment Vegetation Clearing of threatenedflora species

Rehabilitation program forhabitat offsets to gain nonet loss in biodiversity

Re-vegetation ProjectManager (Contractor)

As per permit Planted area againstcontract



Construction Site preparation Environment Vegetation Dust generation andsmothering of fauna

Water spraying requiredfor dust suppressionduring earthworks

Contractor ConstructionManager




Construction Site preparation Environment Surface Water Increased sedimentand contamination fromrunoff

Topsoil will be storedseparately during clearingand will be used to fill andlevel the area oncegrubbing activities havebeen completed, therebymaintaining the seed bank





Construction Site preparation Environment Wildlife Loss of habitat fromvegetation clearing





Monthly As builtdrawing

Construction Site preparation Environment Wildlife Loss of habitat,Interaction withpersonnel andmachinery, increasednoise and vibration






Construction Site preparation Environment Wildlife Interaction withpersonnel andmachinery, increasednoise and vibration






Construction Site preparation Environment Wildlife Interaction withpersonnel andmachinery, increasednoise and vibration

Limit 24 hour constructionto uninterruptible activities





Construction Site preparation Social/Health


Impact to livelihoodsthrough loss ofresource use and abilityto produce or collectsurplus resources forcommercial purposes



Construction As Built drawing Salamander ProjectManager

Drawing issue As Builtdrawing

Construction Site preparation

Pipeline trenchexcavation, backfillingand surface restoration

Social/

Health

Cultural

Resources

Potential direct impacts

to tangible andintangible heritagecaused by disturbanceof the ground and/orloss of communityaccess to areas

Personnel will educated

on health/cultural risksthrough onsite training.

Salamander ER

Manager

Throughout Project

& Operation

HSE Induction and

daily reportMedical record

Salamander ER

ManagerSalamander HSEManager

Monthly HSE Daily

Report

Construction Pipeline trenchexcavation, backfillingand surface restoration

Environment Air Dust generation fromsoil stockpiles

Water spraying requiredfor dust suppression onaccess roads



ConstructionManager



Environment Soil Site drainage anddisturbance of soils(resulting in erosion),potentially within steepareas which may besubject to slopeinstability and erosion.

Soil to be placed at aminimum 1 m from edge ofgrading to reduceinstability risk (trenching)


Daily during pipelinetrenching

Daily reports ConstructionManager




DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 307 of 369







Environment Surface Water Increased sedimentand contamination fromrunoff

Covering top soil andbackfill material to preventerosion.


Daily Daily reportincident report

ConstructionManager



Environment Wildlife Injury/mortality fromopen trenches,impeded movementbetween forested areaswhile trench is open

Trenches will be left openfor a maximum of 3 days


Daily Daily reportincident report

ConstructionManager



Social/Health


Safety risk to thecommunity from openexcavations

Consultation with localcommunity (including inlocal schools) to raiseawareness.


Throughout Project CSR Implementation Salamander ERManager


Construction Construction ofgroundwater well atKGPF

Environment Groundwater Disruptions togroundwater resourceavailability

Water use management &well design / location

Salamander ProjectManagerContractor HSEManager

Prior constructionafter permitapproval

Well monitoringwater usage

ConstructionManager


Construction Construction,installation and testingof Project facilities

Environment Air Atmospheric emissions,dust generation




ConstructionManager




Speed limits (maximumspeed limits of 15 kph atworksites and nearaccommodation.Maximum 60 kph on openhighway. Maximum 40 kphfor heavy machineryoperations)


Daily Vehicle speed record Contractor HSEOfficer




All vehicles, equipmentand machinery to undergoa pre-use inspection priorto use and periodicmaintenance inspections.



Contractualspecification ofvehicleMaintenance record


InspectionReportMonthly

HSE MonthlyReportInspectionreport






ConstructionManager



Environment Wildlife Temporarydisplacement frominteraction withpersonnel andmachinery, noise andvibration, lighting















DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 308 of 369








Limit 24 hour constructionto uninterruptible activities


Prior to construction Daily report Salamander ProjectManager

Daily HSE DailyReport



No hunting policy enforcedfor workforce



HES induction ofworkersHES Toolbox Talks


As requiredDaily

HSE MonthlyReport

Construction Construction,installation and testingof project facilities

Social/Health Vector BorneDiseases Alteration of surfacehydrology/drainagemay lead to waterpooling and stagnationwhich may result in anincrease in mosquitobreeding and spread ofassociated diseases(malaria, dengue)

Comply with basis ofdesign. Salamander ProjectManagerSalamander OperationManager

Throughout Project& Operation As Built drawing Salamander ProjectManagerSalamanderOperation Manager

Drawing issue As Builtdrawing

Operation Lighting of Projectfacilities

Environment Wildlife Disturbance to faunaand behaviouralimpacts

Light impact minimization -to be identified

Salamander projectmanager

Project designphase

Constructionimplementation ofmitigation measures


DuringCommissioning

Commissioning Report

Operation Physical presence andoperation ofinfrastructure

Social/Health


Increased noise,vibration and lightemissions anddischarges to river mayimpact environmentalquality andsubsequently humanhealth

Maintenance program Salamander OperationManager

Daily EnvironmentParameter (airquality, noise,vibration , light)MonitoringMaintenance record

SalamanderOperation Manager

As perEnvironmentalprogram.Monthly.


Operation Physical presence andoperation ofinfrastructure

Social/Health

Infrastructureand Services (-/+)

Potential for localinfrastructure andservices to be improvedeither through directinvestment/maintenance of infrastructurewhich may improveaccessibility between

communities/mainpopulation centres (andsurrounding services,education andeconomicopportunities)

CSR activities focus onsustainable projects(enhancing economicopportunities providedthrough infrastructure,access to education,markets etc.)



CSR Implementation Salamander ERManager


AssociatedFacilities

Luwe Hulu Supply BasePresence and Activities

Environment Groundwater Disruptions togroundwater resourceavailability

Water use management Salamander ProjectManagerSalamander OperationManager

Throughout theProject & OperationLuwe Hulu Base

water usageSalamanderConstructionManager &SalamanderOperation Manager

Daily DailyOperationReport



Environment Noise andVibration

Disturbance to faunafrom noise andvibration from operationof facility, vessels,vehicles and equipment

Noise dampening for allnoise sources withemission levels above85dB

Luwe Hulu BaseManager


Noise Mapping Salamander HSEOfficer




DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 309 of 369








Environment Surface Water Contamination throughuncontrolledrunoff/drainage

All hazardous materials tobe stored on hard standingwith bunding and 110%inventory capacity

Luwe Hulu BaseManager


Wastewater qualityreportIncident report





Social/Health


Positive impact on localbusinesses throughincreased economicactivity and demand forlocal goods andservices


SalamanderProcurement ManagerSalamander ERManager


Contract DocumentCSR Programimplementation

SalamanderProcurementManagerSalamander ERManager




Social/Health


Use of the river fortransportation has the

possibility to interferewith other river users(community,commercial)

Contract Management ofriver services contractors

Comply with RiverTransportation System

Salamander OperationManager


Contract Document SalamanderOperation Manager

ContractPerformance

Review

ContractPerformance

Report



Social/Health

Infrastructureand Services (-/+)

Potential for localinfrastructure andservices to be improvedeither through directinvestment/maintenance of infrastructurewhich may improveaccessibility betweencommunities/mainpopulation centres (andsurrounding services,education andeconomicopportunities)


SalamanderProcurement ManagerSalamander ERManager


Contract DocumentCSR Programimplementation

SalamanderProcurementManagerSalamander ERManager




Social/Health


Safety risk toCommunity membersthat access the site dueto insufficient controls

Contract scope for securityprovider:

Socialization of securityarrangement forSalamander site withcommunity.

Salamander Security Throughout Project& Operation

Contract DocumentCommunityengagement record

Salamander VP GA Contractinitiation

External AffairsMonthlyReport

Non routine/unplannedevents

Fire/explosion AccidentalEvent


Safety risk tosurroundingcommunities (healthimpact, injury, death)

Only authorised personsallowed to enter site(security to preventaccess)

Salamander ProjectManager & SalamanderOperation Manager


Incident/accidentreportsHSE inductions

Contractor HSEOfficer &Salamander HSEOfficer






Community AwarenessProgram/Consultation

Salamander ExternalRelation Manager


ConsultationoutcomesCommunitycomplaints/grievances register

Salamander ExternalRelation Manager

Monthly AssetMonthlyReport





Trained emergencyresponse/fire teamDedicated fire responseequipment



Training register Accident/incidentreportingSite inspections

Salamander HSEManager






Fire drills and responseexercises


6 monthly Drill & ExerciseReport

Salamander HSEManager

6 monthly HSE MonthlyReport



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 310 of 369










Develop operationalemergency response planand disclose this plan withcommunities as part of thecommunity awarenessprogram

Salamander ExternalRelation Manager &Salamander HSEManager

Throughout theProject & operation

ConsultationoutcomesCommunity program

Salamander ExternalRelation Manager &Salamander HSEManager

Quarterly AssetMonthlyReport


Spillage of fuel, oil,chemicals andhazardous materials

AccidentalEvent


People's livelihoodsmay be affected ifresources arenegatively impactedand result in loss ofeconomic value



Daily Incident and accidentreport

Salamander HSEOfficerContractor HSEOfficer

Daily Daily HSEReport



AccidentalEvent Economy andLivelihood (-/+) People's livelihoodsmay be affected ifresources arenegatively impactedand result in loss ofeconomic value

Bunding/secondarycontainment and spill kitsin refuelling area andchemical/hazardousmaterial storage areas


Daily Incident and accidentreport Salamander HSEOfficerContractor HSEOfficer




AccidentalEvent


People's livelihoodsmay be affected ifresources arenegatively impactedand result in loss ofeconomic value

MSDS available in areasof chemical storage anduse. Every activity (e.g.loading and hauling ofhazardous materialchemicals) shall refer tothe MSDS. Chemical tobe stored according tolabel type, with secondarycontainment, spill kits, andvisible warning signs (nosmoking, eating, drinkingand sleeping)







AccidentalEvent


Impacts on air, soil andsurface water qualityreducing environmentalquality andsubsequently impactinghuman health








AccidentalEvent










AccidentalEvent

Groundwater Contamination All hazardous materials tobe stored on hard standingwith bunding and 110%inventory capacity







AccidentalEvent

Groundwater Contamination Bunding/secondarycontainment and spill kitsin refuelling area andchemical/hazardousmaterial storage areas







AccidentalEvent

Groundwater Contamination Train personnel in spillhandling and response



Incident and accidentreport





DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 311 of 369








AccidentalEvent

Nutrition Impacts onenvironmental qualitymay affect nutrition ifthe ability to sourceclean drinking waterand other resources(fish, vegetation) areimpacted








AccidentalEvent

Nutrition Impacts onenvironmental qualitymay affect nutrition ifthe ability to source

clean drinking waterand other resources(fish, vegetation) areimpacted

Bunding/secondarycontainment and spill kitsin refuelling area andchemical/hazardous

material storage areas







AccidentalEvent

Resourceownership/use

Impacts on communityresources e.g. drinkingwater and otherresources (fish,vegetation)








AccidentalEvent










AccidentalEvent

Soil Contamination of soil All hazardous materials tobe stored on hard standingwith bunding and 110%inventory capacity







AccidentalEvent

Soil Contamination of soil Bunding/secondarycontainment and spill kitsin refuelling area andchemical/hazardousmaterial storage areas







AccidentalEvent

Soil Contamination of soil MSDS available in areasof chemical storage anduse. Every activity (e.g.loading and hauling ofhazardous materialchemicals) shall refer tothe MSDS. Chemical tobe stored according tolabel type, with secondarycontainment, spill kits, andvisible warning signs (nosmoking, eating, drinkingand sleeping)







AccidentalEvent

Surface Water Contamination throughincorrect managementand disposal of waste








AccidentalEvent









DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 312 of 369







Vessel, vehicle,helicopter accident

AccidentalEvent


Potential loss of life All personnel trained infirst aid and refreshertraining provided regularlyto maintain skill levels








AccidentalEvent


Potential loss of life All vehicles, equipmentand machinery to undergoa pre-use inspection priorto use and periodicmaintenance inspections.






Non routine/unplanned

events


AccidentalEvent

CommunitySafety and

Security

Potential loss of life Keep all non-workersaway from work area

(authorised personnelonly) and erect warningsigns/barriers to workareas

Salamander ProjectManager & Salamander

Operation Manager








DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 313 of 369



14 CONCLUSIONS

This ESIA has been conducted to evaluate the impacts associated with the Kerendan GasDevelopment Project in in the Bangkanai Production Sharing Contract (PSC) in the NorthBarito Regency, Central Kalimantan. The ESIA has been in compliance with the internationalstandards of the International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standards andGuidelines. This ESIA represents one element of Salamander’s overarching Health, Safetyand Environmental (EHS) Management System governing the Company’s commitments inmanaging Environmental, Health and Safety, and minimizing risk to communitiessurrounding all of Salamander’s activities and operations in Indonesia.

The Kerendan gas field obtained its environmental approval from the Indonesiangovernment in 2006 and is currently managed under the Environmental Management Plan(UKL) and Environmental Monitoring Plan (UPL) prepared in fulfilment of the Indonesianregulatory environmental approval process. Construction of the Project commenced in mid-2012 followed by the development drilling program at the Kerendan Wellhead Cluster Pad.Project activities that had already been conducted at the time of this ESIA were excludedfrom the predictive impact assessment process. These activities were subject to compliancereviews and the findings carried through to Salamander’s HSE Management System as partof a corrective action plan.

Table 13.1 presents the outcomes of the comprehensive assessment of identified impacts as aresult of the various phases and proposed activities of the Project. The findings may besummarised as follows:

Environmental Impacts

Through Salamander’s commitment to the mitigation discussed in the ESIA, the identifiedpotential environmental impacts are mitigated to a residual level of minor – negligible, withthe exception of:

•

Disturbance to fauna and potential behavioural impacts at Kerendan from artificiallight emissions. This has been ranked adopting a precautionary approach recognisingthat IUCN listed species are believed to occur in the vicinity of the Project andreflecting the limited information available on the location and sensitivity of thesespecies;

• Potential disruptions to groundwater resource availability from Project water demandand use of community groundwater wells at the associated facility of the Luwe HuluSupply and Support Base. This is ranked as Moderate, adopting a precautionaryapproach in recognition that communities raised concerns over fluctuating water

supplies during the year and that the water is provided by a supplier to Salamander.The Company recognises therefore, that this requires additional assurance around thecapacity, current community water demand and groundwater recharge rates in theform of a water balance study.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 314 of 369



Groundwater will also be used for Project activities at the Kerendan site, however this

will be subject to permitting which will require investigation on the available resource,capacity and Project demand to demonstrate the Project will not result in a depletionin supply. This impact is ranked as minor on this basis.

In addition, consideration of potential cumulative impacts from the Project, together withadditional primary baseline data acquired during surveys and community consultationhighlighted a regional concern related to the loss of natural habitat, regional biodiversity andecosystem services. Whilst the land use requirements of Salamander’s Project are evaluatedas a minor impact significance, the presence/potential for critically listed species of flora andfauna to be found in the vicinity of the Project was recognised. Salamander commits to carry

this finding forward to be addressed under the Company HSE Management System foradditional action.

Social Impacts

In the assessment of social impacts it was found that many are indirect impacts resultingfrom a direct impact from a Project activity/aspect on an environmental resource/receptor.For those impacts, the management of the environmental component will result in anavoidance of the social impact occurring. This is reflected in the ESMP tables.

A number of social impacts have been identified from the review of Salamander’s activities

and social programs to date, many of which have been completed. These potential impactsmay require changes to plans, procedures and implementation, thereby falling under thecoverage of the Company’s HSE Management System. Salamander commits to carry thesefindings through to the HSE Management System to be addressed, beyond this ESIA process.

Non routine/ Unplanned Events

The evaluation of non routine/ unplanned events incorporated the additional considerationof the likelihood of the event occurring. With additional mitigation it is determined thatthese are manageable to a minor impact significance ranking. Through this process it was

recognised however, that there is no regional emergency response capability from eitherGovernment or private industry. In the absence of this support, Salamander is reliant uponthe Company’s emergency planning and implementation. This is recognised as of moderatesignificance requiring discussion and action with Government and industry partners. Thispotential impact will be carried forward through the HSE Management System.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 315 of 369



Table 13.1 Kerendan Gas Development Project ESIA Outcomes

Environment

Activity/Aspect Receptor Potential Impacts

Impact Evaluation

Pre Mitigation Post Mitigation

All Phases

Employment Opportunities (includingworkforce presence)

Vegetation Workers disturbing vegetation outside approved clearedareas and/or taking forest resources

Minor Negligible

Wildlife Workers hunting/trapping fauna Minor Negligible

Transportation/ operation of vehicles(construction, materials/supplies andworkforce)

Air Dust generation from vehicle movementExhaust emissions from operational vehicles, dustgeneration from vehicle movement

Moderate Minor

Vegetation Smothering from dust generation/air quality impacts Moderate MinorWildlife Wildlife may be impacted through interactions with

vehicles (resulting in injury or mortality) or disturbancefrom dust generation, noise and vibration.

Minor Negligible

Wastes/effluents, handling and disposalWastes/effluents, handling and disposal

Surface WaterSoil

Surface water or soil contamination, subsequently reducingenvironmental quality

Moderate Minor

Wildlife Organic waste may attract fauna to the area (pest/native),resulting in changes to natural behaviour and/or outbreaksof pest species.

Minor Negligible

Construction

Transportation/operation of vehicles(construction, materials/supplies andworkforce)

Noise andVibration

Vehicle noise and vibration reducing environmental qualityand affecting fauna

Minor Negligible



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 316 of 369




Impact Evaluation


Site preparation

Vegetation

Clearing of flora species Moderate Minor

Clearing of threatened flora species Moderate Moderate

Dust generation and smothering of fauna Minor NegligibleSurface Water Increased sediment and contamination from runoff Minor Negligible

Wildlife Loss of habitat, Interaction with personnel and machinery,increased noise and vibration

Minor Negligible

Pipeline trench excavation, backfilling andsurface restoration

Air Dust generation from soil stockpiles Minor Negligible

Soil Site drainage and disturbance of soils (resulting in erosion),potentially within steep areas which may be subject to slopeinstability and erosion.

Moderate Minor

Surface Water Increased sediment and contamination from runoff Minor Negligible

Construction of groundwater well at KGPF Ground water Disruptions to groundwater resource availability Minor NegligibleConstruction, installation and testing ofProject facilities

Air Atmospheric emissions, dust generation Moderate Minor

Wildlife Temporary displacement from interaction with personneland machinery, noise and vibration, lighting

Minor Negligible

Installation and testing of facilities Surface Water Contaminated hydrotest water reducing environmentalquality and secondary impacts on aquatic fauna

Negligible Negligible

Operation

Lighting of Project facilities Wildlife Disturbance to fauna and behavioural impacts Moderate Moderate



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 317 of 369




Impact Evaluation



Luwe Hulu Supply Base Presence andActivities

Ground water Disruptions to groundwater resource availability Moderate Moderate

Air Dust generation and exhaust emissions from vehicles, plantand equipment


Noise andVibration

Disturbance to fauna from noise and vibration fromoperation

Minor Minor

Surface Water Contamination through uncontrolled runoff/drainage Minor Minor

Social/Health


Impact Evaluation


All Phases

Employment Opportunities (includingworkforce presence)

CommunicableDisease

Introduction of communicable diseases and reproductivehealth issues from bringing workers from outside the area

Moderate

Wildlife Workers hunting/trapping fauna Minor NegligibleSocial/CulturalStructure

Introduction of workers with different cultural and religiousvalues, and social/cultural interaction issues and tensions

Minor Minor


Positive impact on the community through generation ofnew employment and income generated from Projectdemand for local businesses/economic activity

Positive Positive


Introduction of workers with different cultural and religiousvalues, and social/cultural interaction issues and tensions

Minor


Security personnel for the Project have the potential toimpact community safety and security (human rightsconsiderations)

Minor Minor



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 318 of 369




Impact Evaluation



Safety risk from workers entering the community (even aperceived risk has the potential to disturb the community)

Minor

Maintenance of access roads


Improvements to infrastructure and services may improveaccessibility between communities/main population centresand subsequently improve access to surroundingcommunity infrastructure and services, education andeconomic opportunities

Positive

Transportation of materials/supplies andworkforce

Increased traffic and pressure on existing infrastructureinterfering with existing road/river use

Minor Negligible

Wastes/effluents generation, handling anddisposal


Domestic waste management attracting wildlife (e.g. ra ts,dogs, insects) and increasing spread of associated diseases.

Minor Negligible


Impacts on environmental quality that may affect ecosystemservices and livelihood (e.g. reduction of water qualityeffects on the fishing)

Minor Negligible


Impacts on soil and surface water quality reducingenvironmental quality and subsequently impacting humanhealth

Minor Minor

ConstructionConstruction, installation and testing ofproject facilities


Alteration of surface hydrology/drainage may lead to waterpooling and stagnation which may result in an increase inmosquito breeding and spread of associated diseases(malaria, dengue)

Moderate Minor

Site preparation


Impact to livelihood from dust or other disturbanceassociated with the Project (e.g. soil erosion andcontamination of surface waters used by locals for domesticwater use and fishing)

Moderate Minor


Noise and vibration, surface water impacts and reduction inair quality could potentially impact environmental qualityand subsequently impact human health

Moderate Negligible


Impact to livelihood from dust or other disturbanceassociated with the Project (e.g. soil erosion andcontamination of surface waters used by locals for domesticwater use and fishing)

Moderate Minor



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 319 of 369




Impact Evaluation


Site preparation Economy andLivelihood (-/+)

Impact to livelihoods through loss of resource use andability to produce or collect surplus resources forcommercial purposes

Moderate Minor

Site preparationPipeline trench excavation, backfilling andsurface restoration

Cultural Resources Potential direct impacts to tangible and intangible heritagecaused by disturbance of the ground and/or loss ofcommunity access to areas


Operation

Physical presence and operation ofinfrastructure


Increased noise, vibration and light emissions anddischarges to river may impact environmental quality andsubsequently human health

Minor Minor

Potential impacts on resources and quality of groundwaterand/or surface water used by the community

Moderate Moderate

Infrastructure andServices (-/+)

Potential for local infrastructure and services to beimproved either through direct investment/maintenance ofinfrastructure which may improve accessibility betweencommunities/main population centres (and surroundingservices, education and economic opportunities)

Positive





Minor Negligible


Positive impact on local businesses through increasedeconomic activity and demand for local goods and services

Positive

Use of the river for transportation has the possibility tointerfere with other river users (community, commercial)

Minor Negligible

Infrastructure andServices (-/+)

Potential for local infrastructure and services to beimproved either through direct investment/maintenance ofinfrastructure which may improve accessibility betweencommunities/main population centres (and surroundingservices, education and economic opportunities)

Positive



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 320 of 369




Impact Evaluation





Minor Negligible


Safety risk to Community members that access the site dueto insufficient controls

Moderate Minor

Non Routine/Unplanned Events


Impact Evaluation


Fire/explosion Air Increase in atmospheric emissions and particulates, GHG Negligible Negligible

Fire/explosion Community Safetyand Security

Safety risk to surrounding communities (health impact, injury, death) Moderate Minor

Fire/explosion Resourceownership/use

Resource use may be impacted if it results in loss of resources (e.g.forest/farmland) or impacts quality or abundance resources used by thecommunity (e.g. forest products)

Minor Minor

Fire/explosion Community Safetyand Security Safety risk to surrounding communities (health impact, injury, death) Minor Minor

Fire/explosion Vegetation Direct loss of vegetation/habitat Negligible Negligible

Fire/explosion Wildlife Injury/mortality Negligible Negligible

Gas leak fromfacilities/pipeline

Air Increase in atmospheric emissions and particulates, GHG


Process Upset/emergencyflaring

Minor Minor



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 321 of 369




Impact Evaluation


Process Upset/emergencyflaring

Wildlife Noise and vibration, light disturbance Minor Minor

Spillage of fuel, oil, chemicalsand hazardous materials


People's livelihoods may be affected if resources are negatively impactedand result in loss of economic value

Moderate Minor


Impacts on air, soil and surface water quality reducing environmentalquality and subsequently impacting human health

Minor Negligible

Groundwater Contamination of groundwater Minor Negligible

Nutrition Impacts on environmental quality may affect nutrition if the ability tosource clean drinking water and other resources (fish, vegetation) areimpacted

Minor Negligible


Impacts on community resources e.g. drinking water and other resources(fish, vegetation)

Minor Negligible

Soil Contamination of soil Moderate Minor

Surface Water Contamination through incorrect management and disposal of waste Minor Minor

Vessel, vehicle, helicopteraccident


Potential loss of life Moderate Minor



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 322 of 369



15 REFERENCES

Dwi Cayho M, Yaman F, Hasani N, & DS Hidayat. 2007. Incentives required to develop astranded gas field: a case study – Kerenden Gas field. Proceedings, Indonesian PetroleumAssociation, 31st Annual Convention and Exhibition May 2007.

Hichens, Harrison & Co. plc. 2006. Sound Oil Plc. Online Posting. Huff Hamilton. Accessed22 July 2013.

http://www.hulfhamilton.com/downloads/Freelance%20-%20Sound%20Oil.pdf

Renewable Energy and Energy Efficient Partnership (REEEP). 2012. Indonesia 2012 OnlinePosting. Reegle.

Accessed http://www.reegle.info/policy-and-regulatory-overviews/ID

Salamander Energy. 2010 Acquisition of Elnusa Bangkanai Energy Ltd. Online Posting.Salamander Energy. Accessed 22 July 2013.

http://www.Salamander-energy.com/~/media/Files/S/Salamander-Energy/PressReleasesPDFs/2010/2010-11-11.pdf

Salamander Energy. 2012. Annual Report 2012. Online Posting. Salamander Energy.Accessed 22 July 2013.

http://Salamander-energy-ar-2012.production.investis.com/~/media/Files/S/Salamander-Energy-AR-2012/Annual%20Reports/annual-report-2012.pdf

UKL/UPL reports developed by Elnusa Bangkanai Energy (EBE) from 2005 to 2010


http://www.reegle.info/policy-and-regulatory-overviews/ID

http://www.salamander-energy.com/~/media/Files/S/Salamander-Energy/PressReleasesPDFs/2010/2010-11-11.pdf


http://salamander-energy-ar-2012.production.investis.com/~/media/Files/S/Salamander-Energy-AR-2012/Annual%20Reports/annual-report-2012.pdf






http://www.reegle.info/policy-and-regulatory-overviews/ID




DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 323 of 369



ANNEX AApplicable Standards



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 324 of 369



The following air and noise standards are applicable to the Project. The most stringent

standard is highlighted for ease of reference.Table A.1 Ambient Air Quality 13

Parameter Period of Measurement Unit PP41/1999 IFC EHS Guidelines

Carbon monoxide (CO) 1 hour µg/m 3 30,000 -

24 hour µg/m 3 10,000 -

Hydrocarbons (HC) 3 hour µg/m 3 160 -

Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2) 1 hour µg/m 3 400 200

24 hour µg/m 3 150 -

1 year µg/m 3 100 40Sulphur dioxide (SO 2) 10 minute µg/m 3 - 500

1 hour µg/m 3 900 -

24 hour µg/m 3 365 125*

µg/m 3 50**

µg/m 3 20

1 year µg/m 3 60 -

Dust (TSP) 24 hour µg/m 3 230 -

1 year µg/m 3 90 -

Lead (Pb) 24 hour µg/m 3 2 -

1 year µg/m 3 1 -

Oxidant (O 3) 1 hour µg/m 3 50 -

8 hour µg/m 3 - 160*

µg/m 3 - 100

1 year µg/m 3 235 -

PM 10 24 hour µg/m 3 150 150*

µg/m 3 100**

µg/m 3 75***

µg/m 3 50

1 year µg/m 3 - 70*

µg/m 3 50**

µg/m 3 30***

µg/m 3 20

13 World Health Organization (WHO). Air Quality Guidelines Global Update, 2005. PM 24-hour value is the99th percentile.

Interim targets are provided in recognition of the need for a staged approach to achieving the recommendedguidelines.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 325 of 369



Parameter Period of Measurement Unit PP41/1999 IFC EHS Guidelines

PM 2.5 24 hour µg/m 3 65 75*µg/m 3 50**

µg/m 3 37.5***

µg/m 3 25

1 year µg/m 3 15 35*

µg/m 3 25**

µg/m 3 15***

µg/m 3 10*Notes: *Interim target-1 ** Interim target-2 *** Interim target-3

Under Indonesian standards, the Decree of Environmental Ministry No. 48/1996 on Noiselevel Quality Standard and IFP regulates ambient noise. Noise health and safety limits areestablished under the Ministry of manpower Decree No 51 of 1999.

The IFC Performance Standards applicable for industrial noise applies to fixed noise sourcesonly. Noise impacts should not exceed the levels presented in Table A.2 , or result in amaximum increase in background levels greater than 3 dB at the nearest receptor locationoff-site.

Table A.2 Noise Standards (dBA) 14

SiteMoEDec.

#48/1996

NationalStandard51/1999

IFC EHS Guidelines*

Daytime (07:00 -22:00)

Night-time (22:00 -07:00)

Residential;Institutional;educational

55 55 45

Trade and service 70

Office abd trade 65

Green space 50Industrial; commercial 70 70 70

Officials and publicfacility

60

Recreational 70

Airport -

Train station 60

Sea port 70

14 Source: Ministry of Environment Decree #48, 1996Ministry of Manpower Decree 51, 1999IFC General EHS Guidelines. Guidelines values are for noise levels measured out of doors. Source: Guidelines forCommunity Noise, World Health Organization (WHO), 1999.Acceptable indoor noise levels for residential, institutional, and educational settings (WHO 1999).



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 326 of 369



Site

MoE

Dec.#48/1996

National

Standard51/1999

IFC EHS Guidelines*

Daytime (07:00 -22:00) Night-time (22:00 -07:00)

Cultural heritage -

Hospitals 55

Schools 55

Worship place 55

Industrial Area 70 -

Occupational Health &Safety (exposurelimits)

ExposureLimit/Day

LAeq, 8h Max LAmax, fast

- 40-45 (closed offices) -

- 45-50 (Open offices) -85 (8 hours) 85 (heavy industry) 110 (heavy industry)

88 (8 hours)

91 (8 hours)

94 (1 hours)

97 (30 minutes)*LAeq (dBA)

The IFC does not establish standards for surface water quality. Indonesian standards areestablished by Government Regulation (PP) #82/2001 on Water Quality Management andWater Pollution Control, which includes different classes according to use. Class I isapplicable to the Project as standards for drinking water (Class I) and Classes II-IV as watersuitable for use for recreational, fresh water fish cultivation, livestock and irrigation.

Table A.3 Water Quality

Parameters Units IFCPP 82/2001

Class IPP 82/2001

Class IIPP 82/2001Class III

PP 82/2001Class IV

Physical Tests

Temperature °C - 3 deviation 3 deviation 3 deviation 3 deviation

pH - - 6 - 9 6 - 9 6 - 9 5 - 9

Hardness (calc) - - - - -

Total Dissolved Solids,TDS mg/L - 1,000 1,000 1,000 2,000

Total Suspended Solids,TSS mg/L - 50 50

400 400

Anions & Nutrients

Fluoride, F mg/L - 0.5 1.5 1.5 -

Chloride, Cl mg/L - 600 - - -

Sulphate, SO 4 mg/L - 400 - - -

Nitrate Nitrogen, NO 3-N mg/L - 10 10 20 20



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 327 of 369




Class IPP 82/2001


PP 82/2001Class IV

Nitrite Nitrogen, as N mg/L - 0.06 0.06 0.06 -

Total Phosphate, T-PO 4 sebagai P

mg/L - 0.20.2 1 5

Sulphide, H 2S mg/L - 0.002 0.002 0.002 -

Free Ammonia Nitrogen,NH 3-N

mg/L - 0.5- - -

Cyanide, CN mg/L - 0.02 0.02 0.02 -

Dissolve Metals

Arsenic, As mg/L - 0.05 1 1 1

Barium, Ba mg/L - 1 - - -

Boron, B mg/L - 1 1 1 1

Cadmium, Cd mg/L - 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

Chromium Hexavalent,(Cr6+)

mg/L - 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.01

Cobalt, Co mg/L - 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

Copper, Cu mg/L - 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.2

Iron, Fe mg/L - 0.3 - - -

Lead, Pb mg/L - 0.03 0.03 0.03 1Manganese, Mn mg/L - 0.1 - - -

Mercury, Hg mg/L - 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.005

Selenium, Se mg/L - 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.05

Zinc, Zn mg/L - 0.05 0.05 0.05 2

Microbiology

Fecal Coliform MPN/100ml - 100 1000 2000 2000

Total Coli form MPN/100ml - 1,000 5000 10000 10000

Others

Biochemical OxygenDemand, BOD

mg/L - 23 6 12

Dissolve Oxygen, DO mg/L - 6 4 3 0

Chlorine, Cl 2 mg/L - 0.03 0.03 0.03 -

Chemical OxygenDemand, COD

mg/L - 1025 50 100

Surfactant, MBAS µg/L - 200 200 200 -

Oil & Grease mg/L - 1 1 1 1

Senyawa Phenol, as Phenol µg/L - 1 1 1 -

BHC µg/L - 210 210 210 -

Aldrin/Dieldrin µg/L - 17 - - -

Chlordane µg/L - 3 - - -



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 328 of 369




Class IPP 82/2001


PP 82/2001Class IV

DDT µg/L - 2 2 2 2

Heptachlor andHeptachlor epoxide

µg/L - 18- - -

Lindane µg/L - 56 - - -

Methoxychlor µg/L - 35 - - -

Endrin µg/L - 1 4 4 -

Toxaphane µg/L - 5 - - -

Radioactivity

Gross-A Bq/L - 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1Gross- B Bq/L - 1 1 1 1

Class I water used as raw water for drinking water, or other uses that require water quality similar asaforementioned

Class II water used for infrastructure / water recreation facilities, freshwater fish farming, livestock, water forirrigating crops or other uses that require water quality similar as aforementioned

Class III water used for freshwater fish farming, livestock, water for irrigating crops or other uses that requirewater quality similar as aforementioned

Class IV water used to irrigate crops and or other uses that require water quality similar as aforementioned

The following air emissions standards are applicable, according to point (combustion)source.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 329 of 369



Table A.4 Air Emissions

Internal Combustion

Capacity Fuel Parameter UnitEnvironmental MinistryRegulation No. 13 Year

2009IFC a

≤ 570 KWth

OilNO x as NO 2 mg/Nm 3 1000 NA

CO mg/Nm 3 600 NA

GasNO x as NO 2 mg/Nm 3 400 NA

CO mg/Nm 3 500 NA

> 570 KWth

Oil

TSP mg/Nm 3 150 50 - 100b

SO2 mg/Nm 3 800 NA% NA 1.5 - 3c

NO x as NO 2 mg/Nm 3 1000 1460d and 1850e

CO mg/Nm 3 600 NA

Dry Gas, Excess O 2 Content % NA 15

Gas

TSP mg/Nm 3 50 NA

SO2 mg/Nm 3 150 NA

NO x as NO 2 mg/Nm 3 400 NA

CO mg/Nm 3 500 NA

Dry Gas, Excess O 2 Content % NA 15a Engine (3 MWth - 50 MWth)b if justified by project specific considerations (e.g. Economic feasibility of using lower ash content fuel, or

adding secondary treatment to meet 50, and available environmental capacity of the site)c if justified by project specific considerations (e.g. Economic feasibility of using lower S content fuel, or adding

secondary treatment to meet levels of using 1.5 percent Sulphur, and available environmental capacity of thesite)

d If bore size diameter [mm] < 400: 1460 (or up to 1,600 if justified to maintain high energy efficiency.)e If bore size diameter [mm] > or = 400Gas volume measured at standard condition (25°C and 1 atm) and all parameters corrected by O 2 of 13%.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 330 of 369



Turbine Gas

Fuel Parameter UnitEnvironmental MinistryRegulation No. 13 Year

2009IFC

Oil

TSP mg/Nm 3 100 NA

SO2 mg/Nm 3 650 NA

NO x as NO 2 mg/Nm 3 450 NA

Opacity % 20 NA

Gas

TSP mg/Nm 3 50 NA

SO2 mg/Nm 3 150 NA

NO x as NO 2 mg/Nm3

150 NAOpacity % 320 NA

Natural Gas =3MWth to <

15MWth

TSP mg/Nm 3 NA NA

SO2 mg/Nm 3 NA NA

NO x as NO 2 ppm NA 42 a ; 100b


Natural Gas =15MWth to <

50MWth

TSP mg/Nm 3 NA NA

SO2 mg/Nm 3 NA NA

NO x as NO 2 ppm NA 25


Fuels other thanNatural Gas =3MWth to <

15MWth

TSP mg/Nm 3 NA NA

SO2 % NA 0.5% Sc

NO x as NO 2 ppm NA 96 a ; 150b


Fuels other thanNatural Gas =15MWth to <

50MWth

TSP mg/Nm 3 NA NA

SO2 % NA 0.5% Sc

NO x as NO 2 ppm NA 74

Dry Gas, Excess O 2 Content % NA 15a Electric generationb Mechanical drivec or lower percent Sulphur (e.g. 0.2 percent Sulphur) if commercially available without significant excess fuel

costGas volume measured at standard condition (25°C and 1 atm) and all parameters corrected by O 2 of 15% drycondition.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 331 of 369



Boiler, Steam Generator, Process Heater, Heater Treater

Fuel Parameter Unit Environmental MinistryRegulation No. 13 Year 2009 IFC a

Oil

TSP mg/Nm 3 150 50b

SO2 mg/Nm 3 1200 2000

NO x as NO 2 mg/Nm 3 800 460

Opacity % 20 NA

Dry Gas, Excess O2 Content % NA 3

Gas

TSP mg/Nm 3 50 NA

SO2 mg/Nm 3 150 NA

NO x as NO 2 mg/Nm 3 400 320Opacity % 20 NA

Dry Gas, Excess O2 Content % NA 3

Solid

TSP mg/Nm 3 NA 50b

SO2 mg/Nm 3 NA 2000

NO x as NO 2 mg/Nm 3 NA 650

Opacity % NA NA

Dry Gas, Excess O2 Content % NA 6a Only for Boilerb or up to 150 if justified by environmental assessmentGas volume measured at standard condition (25°C and 1 atm) condition.All parameters corrected by O 2 of 5% for oil fuel in dry condition except opacityAll parameters corrected by O 2 of 3% for gas fuel in dry condition except opacity

Flare

Parameter Unit Environmental MinistryRegulation No. 13 Year 2009 IFC

Opacity % 40 NA

Thermal Sulphur Oxidation


SO2 mg/Nm 3 2600 NA



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 332 of 369



Sulphur Capture

Sulphur Feed Rate(ton/day) Unit Environmental Ministry

Regulation No. 13 Year 2009 a IFC

<2 % 70 NA

2-10 % 85 NA

10-50 % 95 NA

>50 % 97 NAa Minimum Sulphur Recovery

Glycol Dehydration

Parameter Environmental Ministry Regulation No. 13 Year 2009 IFC

VOC as TPHEfficiency hydrocarbon 95% NA

0,8 kg VOC as TPH per mscf 24 hour average NAGas volume measured at standard condition (25°C and 1 atm) and all parameters corrected by O 2 of 0% drycondition.

Catalyst Regenerator

Parameter UnitEnvironmental Ministry

Regulation No. 13 Year 2009 IFCTSP mg/Nm 3 400 NA

SO2 mg/Nm 3 1500 NA

NO 2 mg/Nm 3 1000 NA

HC mg/Nm 3 200 NAGas volume measured at standard condition (25°C and 1 atm) and all parameters corrected by O 2 of 0% drycondition.

Class Sulphur Recovery unequipped by Gas Incinerator


TSP mg/Nm 3 400 NA

Reduced sulphur content mg/Nm 3 450 NA


HC mg/Nm 3 200 NAThe measurement in dry condition and corrected by O 2 of 0% Reduced sulphur content is Hydrogen Sulphide (H 2S), Carbonyl Sulphide (COS) and Carbon Disulphide (CS2)



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 333 of 369



Class Sulphur Recovery equipped by Gas Incinerator


TSP mg/Nm 3 400 NA

SO2 mg/Nm 3 1500 NA


HC mg/Nm 3 200 NAGas volume measured at standard condition (25°C and 1 atm) and all parameters corrected by O 2 of 0% drycondition.

Table A.5 Effluent and Discharges

Types Parameter Unit MoE Decree KEP-19/MENLH/2010 Att I.C IFC 15

P r o d u c e d W

a t e r

COD mg/L 200 125

BOD mg/L - 25

Oil and grease mg/L 25 -

Sulphide (as H 2S) mg/L 0.5 1

Ammonia (as NH 3-N) mg/L 5 -

Total Phenols mg/L 2 0.5Temperature °C 40

pH mg/L 6 - 9 6 - 9

TSS mg/L - 35

TDS2 mg/L 4000 -

Heavy metal (total) 3 mg/L - 5

Chlorides mg/L - 600 (average); 1200

Total Hydrocarbon mg/L - 10

D r a i n a g e

W a s t e w a t e r

Oil and grease mg/L 15 -

Total Organic Carbon (TOC) mg/L 110 -

C o o l i n g

w a t e r 6

Temperature °C - Temperature increaseof no more than 3° C

S t o r m w a t e r

d r a i n a g e 5

Oil and grease - 10 mg/L.

15 IFC EHS Guidelines for Onshore Oil and Gas Development



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 334 of 369



Types Parameter Unit MoE Decree KEP-19/MENLH/2010 Att I.C IFC 15

C o m p l e t i o n a n d

w e l l w o r k o v e r

f l u i d s 4 Total Hydrocarbon mg/L - 10

pH - - 6 - 9

H y d r o t e s t

W a t e r 4

COD mg/L - 125

BOD mg/L - 25

Sulphide (as H 2S) mg/L - 1

Total Phenols mg/L - 0.5

pH mg/L - 6 - 9

TSS mg/L - 35

Heavy metal (total) 3 mg/L - 5

Chlorides mg/L - 600 (average); 1200

Total Hydrocarbon mg/L - 10Notes:1. New on-shore oil and gas facility is facility utilised for exploration, drilling, production well, injection well,

well treatment, and oil and gas processing facility whose the plan stage is was conducted after 1996. 2. If the produced water discharged to the sea this is not applicable. 3. Heavy metals include: Arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, vanadium, and

zinc). 4. For discharge to surface water or to land, see parameters for produced water 5. Stormwater runoff should be treated through an oil/water separation system 6. At edge of the zone where initial mixing and dilution take place. Where the zone is not defined, use 100 m

from point of discharge.

Table A.6 Sewage

Parameter UnitIFC EHS Guidelines

Indicative Values for Treated Sanitary Sewage

DischargespH - 6 – 9

BOD mg/l 30

COD mg/l 125

Total nitrogen mg/l 10

Total phosphorus mg/l 2

Oil and grease mg/l 10

Total suspendedsolids mg/l 50

Total coliform bacteria MPNb / 100 ml 400 a



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 335 of 369



Annex BEnvironmental Baseline Sampling Assurance Report



The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Draft Report

ESIA Assurance Sampling for Soil, Surfacewater and Ambient Air

Salamander Kerendan Site, Bangkanai Block PSC,Kabupaten Barito Utara, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia

Salamander Energy Indonesia Pte. Ltd.

August 2013

www.erm.com

Privileged and Confidential



PT. ERM INDONESIA SALAMANDER ENERGY PTE. LTD.PROJECT N O. 0184276 ESIA ASSURANCE SAMPLING

Draft Report

ESIA Assurance Sampling for Soil, Surfacewaterand Ambient Air

PT. ERM Indonesia

Wisma Aldiron Dirgantara2nd floor, Suite 238-239Jl. Gatot Subroto Kav. 72Jakarta 12870Indonesia

Telephone +62 21 7918 1904Facsimile +62 21 7918 1905Website: www.erm.com

Client.

Salamander Energy Indonesia Pte. Ltd.Project No.0184276

Date.

August 2013

Approved by

Denis DaleyPartnerERM Indonesia

1 ESIA Assurance Sampling for Soil, Surfacewater and Ambient Air MAS/ARN/JRG DD DD 23Aug13

0 ESIA Assurance Sampling for Soil, Surfacewater and Ambient Air MAS/ARN/JRG DD DD 19Aug13

Revision Descripti on By Checked Approved Date

This report has been prepared by PT. ERM Indonesia with all reasonable skill, careand diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporating ourGeneral Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resourcesdevoted to it by agreement with the client.

We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect or any mattersoutside the scope of the above.

This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoevernature to any third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known.Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk.

Distribution

InternalPublicPrivileged and Confidential



PT. ERM INDONESIA SALAMANDER ENERGY PTE. LTD. PROJECT N O. 0184276 ESIA ASSURANCE SAMPLING

i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PT. ERM Indonesia (ERM) was commissioned by Salamander EnergyIndonesia Pte. Ltd. (Salamander/Client) to conduct a limited baselineAssurance Soil and Surfacewater Sampling including Ambient Air QualityMonitoring (the “Project”) at Kerendan Wellhead (comprised of the Drill Site

and the Main Camp), Pipeline Corridor and Kerendan Gas ProcessingFacility (KGPF) (collectively referred to as the “Site”), which are locatedwithin the Bangkanai Block Production Sharing Contract (PSC), inKabupaten Barito Utara, Central Kalimantan. ERM, along with itssubcontractors conducted the field work on 10-19 July 2013.

The objectives of the Project were to gather baseline soil, surfacewater andambient air quality data within the Site and its immediate surroundings, insupport of the on-going Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA)currently being conducted at the Site.

Thirty soil samples were collected within the Kerendan Wellhead (Drill Site

and Main Camp), Pipeline Route and KGPF in areas where no contaminationwere visually observed. Three stations of ambient air quality monitoring andsampling were positioned at strategic locations within the KerendanWellhead, Pipeline Route and KGPF. Nine surfacewater samples werecollected from the Lahai River, a stream crossing the Pipeline Route and astream passing through the northwestern corner of KGPF.

Soil samples were sent to PT. ALS Indonesia (ALS) for the laboratory analysisof Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds(SVOCs), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH), 30 Metal Scan and TotalAlkalinity. Two soil samples from Kerendan Wellhead [one sample fromMain Camp and one sample from Drill Site], and two samples each from the

KGPF and the Pipeline Route were analyzed for Toxicity CharacteristicLeaching Procedure (TCLP) 10-Metal Suite, Organo-Chlorine Pesticides(OCP) and Organo-Phosphate Pesticides (OPP).

Ambient air quality samples were analyzed by ALS for Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2)for 10 minutes (min) and 24-hours (hr) averaging periods, Nitrogen Dioxide(NO 2) for 1-hr averaging period, Particulate Matters (PM 10 and PM 2.5) for 24-hr averaging period and Ozone for maximum of 8-hr daily averaging period.

Surfacewater samples were analyzed by ALS for VOCs, SVOCs, TPH, 30Metal Scan, Total Metals, Dissolved Metals and Total Surfactants (MBAS),BOD5, COD, Total Nitrogen, Total Phosphorus, Oil and Grease, Total

Suspended Solids (TSS) and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS).IFC’s Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Guidelines were applied (asavailable and applicable) in the qualitative assessment of baseline soil,ambient air and surfacewater analytical results. However, in the absence ofavailable IFC EHS Guidelines, applicable Indonesian regulations, relevantindustry sector EHS guidelines such as the United States EnvironmentalProtection Agency (USEPA) Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) and the DutchStandards (Dutch Intervention Values [DIV] 2009), were referenced.




ii

Based on the results of the Project, the following conclusions were drawn:

Kerendan Wellhead (Drill Site and Main Camp)

Soil Baseline Status:

The profile of surface soil is dominated by clay; The baseline soil was detected with concentrations of Aluminum,Arsenic, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Chromium, Cobalt, Copper, Iron,Lead, Magnesium, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Phosphorus,Potassium, Sodium, Sulfur, Strontium, Vanadium, Zinc, Lithium,Titanium, and Mercury;

The detected Phosphorus concentrations (in all soil samples) exceededthe USEPA RSL of 20 mg/kg. Three samples showed elevatedconcentrations (from 162 mg/kg to 170 mg/kg] which might beinfluenced by the current activities at the Drill Site given the locationwhere the soil samples were collected (i.e.; from the Drill Site and between the Drill Site and the Lahai River). Phosphorus is notspecified in the DIV;

The detected concentration of Arsenic (in two soil samples from theDrill Site; one close to the Lahai River [12 mg/kg] and one close to theMain Camp [2 mg/kg]) exceeded the USEPA RSL of 1.6 mg/kg (theUSEPA RSL for Arsenic is more stringent than the DIV [76 mg/kg]).The soil sample which showed elevated concentration (i.e.; 12 mg/kg)might have been influenced by the activities at the Drill Site;

The detected concentration of Barium in one soil sample from theDrill Site (close to the Lahai River [1,150.14 mg/kg]) exceeded the DIVof 920 mg/kg (the elevated concentration might have been influenced by the activities at the Drill Site). The DIV for Barium is morestringent than the USEPA RSL [19,000 mg/kg]);

Concentrations of Barium and Zinc were detected in two soil samplesanalyzed for TCLP Metals; and

TPH, VOCs, SVOCs, OCP and OPP were not detected in all soilsamples.

Ambient Air Baseline Status:

NO 2 (1-hour averaging period), and O 3 (8-hour daily maximum) werenot detected;

SO2 was detected for two-10-min averaging periods (ranged from 525to 788 µg/m3) and for 24-hr averaging period (167µg/m3). The

detected SO 2 concentrations for the two-10-min and 24-hr andaveraging periods exceeded the IFC EHS Guideline of 500 µg/m 3 and20 µg/m 3, respectively (SO 2 is not specified in GOI National AmbientAir Quality Standard No. 41/1999). The detection of SO 2 in two-10-min and 24-hr averaging periods might have been attributed by theactivities at the Drill Site. Also, it should be noted that one dieselengine was operational at the Drill Site during the ambient air qualitymonitoring and sampling activities.




iii

PM10 was detected at a concentration of 28.1 µg/Nm 3 and PM 2.5 atconcentration 18.4 µg/Nm 3 for 24-hr averaging period but theseconcentrations did not exceed the IFC EHS Guidelines (PM 10: 50µg/Nm 3 and PM 2.5: 25 µg/Nm 3) and the GOI National Ambient AirQuality Standard No. 41/1999 (note that the IFC EHS Guideline ismore stringent that the GOI National Ambient Air Quality StandardNo. 41/1999 [PM 10: 150 µg/Nm 3and PM 2.5: 65 µg/Nm 3]). It should benoted that the surrounding area where the ambient air qualitymonitoring and sampling equipment was set-up is bare ground (i.e.;no concrete/asphalt pavement or gravel bedding).

Surfacewater Baseline Status:Lahai River

Recorded/detected baseline pH, TDS and TSS were within thespecified range or did not exceed the referenced criteria;

The baseline Total Alkalinity and Total Nitrogen ranged from 4-5mg/L and from 0.6-2.5 mg/L, respectively;

The baseline surfacewater was detected with Total Metalconcentrations of Aluminum, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Iron,Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium, Strontium,Sulphur and Zinc;

The baseline surfacewater was detected with Dissolved Metalconcentrations of Aluminum, Barium, Calcium, Iron, Manganese,Sodium, Strontium, Sulphur, Zinc and Lithium;

Detected (total) Iron concentration in all Lahai River surfacewatersamples exceeded the GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 for Class 1 (0.3

mg/L); Detected (dissolved) Iron concentrations in four Lahai Riversurfacewater samples exceeded the GOI Regulation No 82/2001 forClass 1;

BOD, COD, Oil and Grease were not detected from all Lahai Riversurfacewater samples, while DO and Surfactant were detected but didnot exceed or within the range of the referenced criteria; and

TPH, VOCs and SVOCs were not detected in all Lahai Riversurfacewater samples.

Canal Outfall


The baseline Total Alkalinity and Total Nitrogen were detected at 387mg/L and 157 mg/L, respectively;

The baseline surfacewater was detected with Total Metalconcentrations of Aluminum, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Copper, Iron,Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium, Strontium,Sulphur and Zinc;




iv

The baseline surfacewater was detected with Dissolved Metalconcentrations of Aluminum, Arsenic, Barium, Boron, Calcium,Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium,Sodium, Strontium, Zinc and Lithium;

Total Iron concentration exceeded the GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 forClass 1;

The baseline (dissolved) Iron concentration exceeded the GOIRegulation No. 82/2001 for Class 1;

BOD and Oil and Grease exceeded the GOI Regulation No. 82/2001for all water classes (Classes 1, 2, 3 and 4) ;

COD exceeded the GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 for Class 4; DO is lower than GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 for Class 1 minimum

required concentration; Surfactant did not exceed/ within the range of available standard; and TPH, VOCs and SVOCs were not detected.

Pipeline Route


The profile of surface soil is predominantly clay and silt; The baseline soil was detected with concentrations of Aluminum,

Arsenic, Antimony, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Cobalt, Copper,Chromium, Iron, Lead, Lithium, Magnesium, Manganese, Mercury,Nickel, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium, Sulfur, Strontium, Thallium,Titanium, Vanadium and Zinc;

Barium and Zinc were detected in one soil samples analyzed forTCLP Metals;

Detected concentration of Phosphorus in all soil samples exceeded theUSEPA RSL of 20 mg/kg (note that Phosphorus is not specified in theDIV);

The detected concentration of Arsenic in six soil samples (one between the Drill Site and KGPF [3 mg/kg] and five between theKGPF and the Manifold [2-4 mg/kg]) exceeded the USEPA RSL of 1.6mg/kg (the USEPA RSL for Arsenic is more stringent than the DIV[76 mg/kg]); and

TPH, VOCs, SVOCs, OCP and OPP were not detected in soil samplesfrom the Pipeline Route.


SO2 (for both 10-min and 24-hr averaging periods), NO 2 (1-houraveraging period), O 3 (8-hour daily maximum), PM 10 and PM 2.5 (bothfor 24-hr averaging period) were not detected.




v

Surfacewater Baseline Status:


Total Alkalinity of all surfacewater samples collected from the streamsalong the Pipeline Route was recorded at 4 mg/L while the TotalNitrogen ranged from 0.6-1.0 mg/L;

The baseline surfacewater was detected with Total Metalconcentrations of Aluminum, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Chromium,Copper Iron, , Lithium Magnesium, Manganese, Potassium, Sodium,Sulphur, Strontium, Titanium and Zinc;

The baseline surfacewater was detected with Dissolved Metalconcentrations of Aluminum, Barium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium,Manganese, Sodium, Strontium, Zinc and Lithium;

Detected total Iron and dissolved Iron concentrations in all PipelineRoute surfacewater samples exceeded the GOI Regulation No 82/2001for Class 1;

BOD, COD, Oil and Grease were not detected, while DO was lowerthan recommended range of GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 for Class 1;

Surfactant were detected but did not exceed any referenced criteria;and

TPH, VOCs and SVOCs were not detected in all Pipeline Routesurfacewater samples.

KGPF


The profile of surface soil is dominated by organic clay; The baseline soil was detected with concentrations of Aluminum,

Arsenic, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Cobalt, Copper, Iron, Lead,Magnesium, Manganese, Nickel, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium,Sulphur, Strontium, Vanadium, Zinc, Lithium, Titanium, andMercury;

Concentrations of Barium and Zinc were detected in two soil samplesanalyzed for TCLP Metals;

The detected Phosphorus concentrations (in all soil samples) exceededthe USEPA RSL of 20 mg/kg ( Phosphorus is not specified in theDIV);

The detected concentration of Arsenic in six soil samples from theKGPF exceeded the USEPA RSL of 1.6 mg/kg (the USEPA RSL forArsenic is more stringent than the DIV [76 mg/kg]); and

TPH, VOCs, SVOCs, OCP and OPP were not detected in soil samplesfrom the KGPF.




vi


SO2 (for both 10-min and 24-hr averaging periods), NO 2 (1-houraveraging period), O 3 (8-hour daily maximum), PM 10 and PM 2.5 (bothfor 24-hr averaging period) were not detected.


Recorded baseline pH (5.8-5.9) in all KGPF surfacewater sampleswere lower than the specified range under the GOI Regulation No.82/2001 for Class 1, 2 and 3;

Recorded/detected baseline TDS and TSS were within the specifiedrange of the referenced criteria;

The recorded baseline Total Alkalinity from 4-7 mg/L while TotalNitrogen was not detected;

The baseline surfacewater was detected with Total Metalconcentrations of Aluminum, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Chromium,Copper, Iron, Lithium, Magnesium, Manganese, Potassium, Sodium,Strontium, Sulphur, Titanium and Zinc;

The baseline surfacewater was detected with Dissolved Metalconcentrations of Aluminum, Barium, Calcium, Copper, Iron, Lithium,Magnesium, Manganese, Potassium, Sodium, Strontium, Sulphur andZinc;

Detected total Iron and dissolved Iron concentrations in all KGPFsurfacewater samples exceeded the GOI Regulation No 82/2001 forClass 1;

BOD, COD, Oil and Grease were not detected, while DO was lower

than minimum range set by GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 for Class 1; Surfactant were detected but did not exceed any referenced criteria;andTPH, VOCs and SVOCs were not detected in all Pipeline Routesurfacewater samples.

These conclusions are considered to represent the current condition of thesampling locations.




vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... I

TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................ ............................................ VII

1 INTRODUCTION ................................................ .......................................... 1 1.1 B ACKGROUND AND O BJECTIVE ...................................................................... 1

1.2 L IMITATION ..................................................................................................... 1

2 FIELDWORK ................................................... ............................................... 3

2.1 F IELDWORK SCHEDULE ......................................... .......................................... 3

2.2 F IELD ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................. 3

3 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ....................................................... 4

3.1 SOIL BORING AND SOIL S AMPLING ............................................................... 4

3.2 A MBIENT A IR QUALITY M ONITORING /S AMPLING ....................................... 6

3.3 SURFACEWATER S AMPLING .................................................. .......................... 6

3.4 A NALYTES OF C ONCERN ................................................ .................................. 7

3.4.1 Soil Samples .................................................. .................................. 7

3.4.2 Ambient Air Quality Samples ................................................. ..... 8

3.4.3 Surfacewater Samples .................................................. .................. 8

4 FIELD OBSERVATIONS ............................................... ............................... 9

4.1 SOIL BORING AND SOIL S AMPLING ............................................................... 9

4.1.1 Kerendan Wellhead (Drill Site and Main Camp) ...................... 9

4.1.2 Pipeline Route .................................................. ............................... 9 4.1.3 KGPF .............................................. ................................................ 10

4.2 A MBIENT A IR QUALITY M ONITORING AND S AMPLING ............................. 10

4.2.1 Kerendan Wellhead (Drill Site and Main Camp) .................... 10

4.2.2 Pipeline Route .................................................. ............................. 11

4.2.3 KGPF .............................................. ................................................ 11

4.3 SURFACEWATER S AMPLING .................................................. ........................ 11

4.3.1 Kerendan Wellhead (Drill Site and Main Camp) .................... 11

4.3.2 Pipeline Route .................................................. ............................. 11

4.3.3

KGPF .............................................. ................................................ 12

5 REFERENCE CRITERIA.......................................................................... ... 13

5.1 I NTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 13

5.2 SOIL ................................................................................................................ 13

5.2.1 USEPA RSLs ................................................................................. 13

5.2.2 Dutch Standards ........................................... ................................ 13

5.3 A IR .................................................................................................................. 14




viii

5.4 SURFACEWATER ............................................................................................. 14

5.4.1 GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 ....................................... ................ 14

6 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS .................................................. ................... 16

6.1 SOIL ................................................................................................................ 16

6.1.1

Kerendan Wellhead (Drill Site and Main Camp) .................... 16

6.1.2 Pipeline Route .................................................. ............................. 17

6.1.3 KGPF .............................................. ................................................ 18

6.2 A MBIENT A IR ................................................................................................. 18

6.3 SURFACE W ATER ........................................................................................... 19

6.3.1 Kerendan Wellhead .............................................. ........................ 20

6.3.1.1 Lahai River ...................................................................................... 20

6.3.1.2 Canal Outfall ........................................... ........................................ 21

6.3.2 Pipeline Route .................................................. ............................. 21

6.3.3 KGPF .............................................. ................................................ 22

7 CONCLUSIONS ........................................... ................................................ 24




1

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 B ACKGROUND AND O BJECTIVE

PT. ERM Indonesia (ERM) was commissioned by Salamander EnergyIndonesia Pte. Ltd. (Salamander/Client) to conduct a Limited BaselineAssurance Soil and Surfacewater Sampling including Ambient AirQuality Monitoring (the “Project”) at Kerendan Wellhead (comprised ofthe Drill Site and the Main Camp), Pipeline Corridor and Kerendan GasProcessing Facility (KGPF) (collectively referred to as “Site”) whicha r e located within the Bangkanai Block Production Sharing Contract(PSC), in Kabupaten Barito Utara, Central Kalimantan, some 200kilometers (km) west of Balikpapan. Figure 1 presents the Site Location.

Figure 1: Site Location

The objectives of this Project were to gather baseline soil, surfacewaterand ambient air quality data within the Site and its immediatesurroundings, in support of the on-going Environmental and SocialImpact Assessment (ESIA) currently being conducted at the Site.

ERM, along with its subcontractors conducted a field work at the Site on10-19 July 2013.

This report presents the results of the Project.

1.2 L IMITATION

The findings of this report are based on the Scope of Work agreed withthe Client which reflects ERM’s best judgment based on the informationavailable at the time of report preparation. ERM performed the servicesin a manner consistent with the normal level of care and expertiseexercised by members of the environmental assessment profession. Thisreport was prepared for the exclusive use of the Client. Any third party

Site Location




2

use of this report, or any reliance on or decisions made on the basis ofthis report, is the responsibility of such third party. ERM accepts noresponsibility for any damages, if any, suffered by a third party as aresult of decisions made or actions taken based on this report.

Subject to the Scope of Work, ERM’s assessment is limited strictly toassessing typical environmental conditions associated with the subjectproperty and does not evaluate structural conditions of any buildings onthe subject property, nor any other issues.

This assessment is based on the sampling and analyses described in thereport, information provided by the Client and review of availablehistorical information. All conclusions and recommendations made inthe report are the professional opinions of the ERM personnel involvedwith the project and, while normal checking of the accuracy of data has been conducted, ERM assumes no occurrences outside the scope of thisproject.

The lack of full knowledge of prior use and site activities may affect ourability to completely assess risks or hazards at the Site. Furthermore,there can be no assurance that any sampling techniques employed willnecessarily disclose all contaminants at the Site due, among other thingsand without limitation, to such factors as a practical and economiclimitation on the number and location of samples, sample depth, and thelike. Further, we assume no liability for existing conditions on the Site.

To the extent that the services require judgment, there can be noassurance that fully definitive or desired results will be obtained, or if

any results are obtained, that they will be supportive of any givencourse of action. The services may include the application of judgmentto scientific principles, to that extent that certain results of this work may be based on subjective interpretation. ERM's findings are drawn fromprofessional judgment based on the targeted sampling and analysisprogram and to allow informed decisions to be made by the Client onany liability issues or remediation requirements necessary. We make nowarranties, express or implied, including without limitation, warrantiesas to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.




3

2 FIELDWORK

2.1 F IELDWORK SCHEDULE

The field team mobilized from Jakarta to Balikpapan on 10 July 2013then from Balikpapan to the Site on 11 July 2013.

Site kick-off meeting (KOM) and health and safety (H&S) briefing wereconducted in the morning of 12 July 2013. After the completion of KOMH&S briefing, ambient air quality monitoring equipment were set-upand soil sampling started. Surfacewater sampling started on 16 July2013. All field activities were completed on 17 July 2013.

The field team demobilized from the Site to Balikpapan on 18 July 2013then from Balikpapan to Jakarta on 19 July 2013.

2.2

F IELD ACTIVITIES

The following activities were completed at the Site and its immediatesurroundings during the fieldwork:

• Soil sampling - soil samples were collected in areas where nocontamination was visually observed within the followinglocations:

o Kerendan Wellhead (composed of the Drill Site and theMain Camp);

o Pipeline Route; ando KGPF;

• Ambient air monitoring – ambient air monitoring equipment waspositioned on the following locations:

o Kerendan Wellhead;o Pipeline route; ando KGPF.

• Surfacewater sampling – surfacewater samples were collectedfrom the following locations:

o Lahai River (upstream, midstream and downstream) closeto Kerendan Wellhead;

o canal outfall at the Kerendan Wellhead;o a stream crossing by the pipeline route; ando a stream at the southeast corner of the KGPF (upstream,

midstream and downstream).




4

3 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

3.1 SOIL BORING AND SOIL S AMPLING

To enable the collection of soil samples, soil borings were advanced fromthe ground surface to a maximum of 0.5 meters below ground surface(mbgs) using post-hole diggers. Soil samples were collected within thisdepth. Soil bores were positioned in areas where no contamination wasobserved. The soil bores were logged for geological description. Thecoordinates of soil boring/sampling locations were recorded usingGlobal Positioning System (GPS).

Thirty soil samples were collected within the Kerendan Wellhead (DrillSite and Main Camp), pipeline route and KGPF. A set of 10 soil sampleswere collected each from Kerendan Wellhead (Drill Site and MainCamp), pipeline route and KGPF. Two field duplicate samples were also

collected for field quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC).

Figure 2 below shows the soil sampling locations along withrepresentative photos during the soil sampling process. Attachment A shows the Project’s sampling and analysis plan.



PT. ERM INDONESIAPROJECT NO. 0184276

5



Negara- Government!e"tri"it# Provi$er%

D&ILLSIT

'NCL A& D A& A

S -)*-+GPF,) ../0

/10/0N*,M

S -.2-PL II,) .2,)

// **N*,M

S -.3-PL II,) .0.0

//133N*,M

S -.0-PL II

,) ),/2//,,/N*,M

S -. -PL II,) ))3*

/)13*N*,M

S -),-PL II,) )2 )

/.*2,N*,M

S -).-+GPF,) ./*1

/1/03N*,M

S -))-+GPF,) .//3

/1/3 N*,M

S -)/-+GPF,) ./).

/110)N*,M

S -)1-+GPF,) .)**

/12,3N*,M

CAMP

H LIPAD

LAHAI &I4 &(& I%

S -,)-&G,) //.)

/*01,N*,M

S -,/-&G,) /)/,

/*0)*N*,M

S -,.-&G,) //00

/*0**N*,M

G&-&I0293388E

9935855N*,M

S -,*,) /.02

/* /3N*,M

S -,2,) /.)*

/* 3)N*,M

S -,3,) /.2)

/**,

S -,0,) /.)*

/**,M

S -,,) /,1,

/* /*,M

S -.,-CP,) /,01

/*010N*,M

S -..-PLI,) )2//

/*2. N*,M

S -)2-+GPF,) .,1.

/1303N*,M

S -) -+GPF

,) ,0 0

S -)0-+GPF

,) ,0*3/13,,N

S -)3-+GPF

,) , 2//1312N

S -/,-+GPF,) , 3*

/13/)N*,M

S -.)-PLI,) ).12

/*,12N*,M

S -.*-PLI,) ..3

/1023N*,M

CL A& D A& A S -./-PLI,) )20.

/*.23N*,M

S -.1-PLI,) .)..

/1 10N*,M&I4 & (& II%

PIPELINE LAYOUT

Figure 2: Soil Sampling Locations




6

3.2 A MBIENT A IR QUALITY M ONITORING /S AMPLING

The ambient air quality monitoring and sampling activities wereconducted at the Kerendan Wellhead area, an area along the pipelineroute and within KGPF.

The air quality monitoring/sampling equipment was stationed at theDrill Site (A-01-RG), close to Lahai River, between the Drill Site andKGPF (A-02-R II) [along the pipeline route] and within the KGPF (A-03-R III).

The equipment that was used for the ambient air qualitymonitoring/sampling is Gray Wolf Sensing Solutions’ proprietaryAdvanceSense®/DirectSense® Toxic Gas Test Meters.

Figure 3 below shows the locations of the ambient air quality monitoring

stations. Attachment A shows the Project’s sampling and analysis plan.

AM I NT AI&MONITO&ING5SAMPLING



Negara-Government!e"tri"it#Provi$er%

D&ILL SIT

'NCL A& D A& A(H A4IL6 4 G TAT D%

+GPF A& AA-,/-&III

CAMP

H LIPAD

LAHAI &I4 &(& I%

CL A& DA& A

&I4 & (& II%

A-,.-&I

A-,)-&II

Figure 3: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring/Sampling Stations

3.3 SURFACEWATER S AMPLING

A total of nine surfacewater samples were collected, via grab samplingmethod (a weighted decontaminated bailer was used from the bank ofthe water features), from the upstream, midstream and downstreamportions (one sample each) of the Lahai River along the KerendanWellhead area. One surfacewater sample was also collected from theoutfall of Kerendan Wellhead’s canal. A total of four surface watersamples were collected from the Kerendan Wellhead area.




7

Additionally, two surfacewater samples were collected (via grabsampling method) at a stream that is passing through the pipeline routeand three surface water samples were also collected from a stream (atthe upstream, midstream and downstream) passing through thenorthwestern corner of KGPF.

One field duplicate surfacewater sample was also collected for thisproject (from Kerendan Wellhead canal outfall). Additionally, oneEquipment Blank was collected for QA/QC.

Surface water chemistry such as pH, temperature and DO weremeasured in situ.

Figure 4 below shows the locations of surface water sampling. Attachment A shows the Project’s sampling and analysis plan.

&iver F!o7

S'&FA 8AT &SAMPLING

ROADTO MANIFOLD (PLN)


Negara-Government!e"tri"it#Provi$er%

D&ILLSIT

'NCL A& DA& A

+GPF A& A

S8-, -&III

CAMP

H LIPAD

LAHAI &I4 &(& I%

CL A& DA& A

&I4 &(& II%

S8-,0-&III

S8-,3-&III

S8-,/-&I S8-,)-&I S8-,.-&I

S8-,1-&I

S8-,*-&II

S8-,2-&II

Pipeline layo !

Figure 4: Location of Surfacewater Sampling

3.4 A NALYTES OF C ONCERN

3.4.1 Soil Samples

All 30 soil samples and two field duplicate samples (QA/QC) were sentto PT. ALS Indonesia (ALS) for the analysis of Volatile OrganicCompounds (VOCs), Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs),Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH), 30 Metal Scan and TotalAlkalinity. In addition, two samples from Kerendan Wellhead [one




8

sample from the Main Camp and one sample from the Drill Site], andtwo samples each from the KGPF and the pipeline route (six samples intotal) were submitted for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure(TCLP) 10-Metal Suite, Organo-Chlorine Pesticides (OCP) and Organo-Phosphate Pesticides (OPP) analysis.

It should be noted that Phosphorus and Sulphur are not categorized asMetals; however, it is a common practice in industrial analysis toinclude these analytes when conducting a Metal Scan. Thus, theirdetected concentrations were presented along with other detectedMetals that were included in the 30 Metal Scan.

3.4.2 Ambient Air Quality Samples

Ambient air quality samples were sent to ALS for the analysis of IFCrecommended ambient air quality compounds such as Sulfur Dioxide(SO2) for 24-hour (hr) and 10-minutes (min) averaging period, NitrogenDioxide (NO 2) for 1-hr averaging period, Particulate Matters (PM 10 andPM2.5) for 24-hr averaging period and Ozone for maximum of 8-hr dailyaveraging period.

3.4.3 Surfacewater Samples

Surfacewater samples (including equipment blank [EB]) were sent toALS for VOCs, SVOCs, TPH, 30 Metal Scan, Total Metals, DissolvedMetals, Total Surfactants (MBAS), BOD 5, COD, Total Nitrogen, TotalPhosphorus, Oil and Grease, Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and TotalDissolved Solids (TDS), analysis. Additionally, conductivity wasanalyzed in the laboratory.

A Trip Blank (TB) was sent to ALS along with the surfacewater samplesfor VOC analysis only.

The analytes of concern and analytical plan for the Project are detailed in Attachment A .




9

4 FIELD OBSERVATIONS

Described below are the observations made during the field work.

4.1 SOIL BORING AND SOIL S AMPLING

4.1.1 Kerendan Wellhead (Drill Site and Main Camp)

• Three soil samples were collected from the Drill Site area (SB-01-RG, SB-02-RG, and SB-03-RG):

o Soil sampling points within the Drill Site were located inthe eastern portion close to container’s zone and wiremesh fence; and

o Soil profile at the Drill Site is predominantly silty clay.

• Four soil samples and one field duplicate sample were collectedfrom the Main Camp (SB-07-CP, SB-08-CP, SB-09-CP, and SB-10-CP):

o Soil sampling points within the Main Camp located atfour corners of the area close to wire mesh fence; and

o Soil profile at the Main Camp is mostly silty clay andsandy clay.

• Two soil samples were collected on vacant land between DrillSite and Main Camp (SB-05 and SB-06):

o The area between the Drill Site and the Main Camp is avacant land with some grasses and trees. Some part of theland is being used as roadway; and

o Soil profile in the area between the Drill Site and the MainCamp is clayey silt.

• One soil sample was collected between Drill Site and Lahai River(RG-RI):

o The area is grassy and dominated by clay formation.

4.1.2 Pipeline Route

• Five soil samples were collected along the pipeline route fromDrill Site to KGPF (SB-11-PL I, SB-12-PL I, SB-13-PL I, SB-14-PL I,and SB-15-PL I);

• Soil sampling was conducted on the bank of the road (right sidegoing to the direction of KGPF from Kerendan Wellhead) wherethe pipeline will be passing. Soil samples were collected with aspacing of approximately 50 m from each sampling location;




10

• Both sides of the pipeline route and the road (between KerendanWellhead and KGPF) are heavily vegetated with trees and grasses;

• Five soil samples were collected along the pipeline route fromDrill Site to the Manifold (Perusahaan Listrik Negara [PLN] -Government Electricity Provider) [SB-16-PL II, SB-17-PL II, SB-18-

PL II, SB-19-PL II, and SB-20-PL II];• Soil sampling was conducted on the bank of the road (right sidegoing to the direction of the Manifold from KGPF) where thepipeline will be passing. Soil samples were collected atapproximate 50 m spacing;

• Both sides of the pipeline route and the road (between KGPF andManifold) are heavily vegetated with trees and grasses; and

• Soil general soil profile within the pipeline route ispredominantly clay and silt.

4.1.3 KGPF

• Ten soil samples and one field duplicate sample were collectedwithin KGPF (SB-21-KGPF, SB-22-KGPF, SB-23-KGPF, SB-24-KGPF, SB-25-KGPF, SB-26-KGPF, SB-27-KGPF, SB-28-KGPF, SB-29-KGPF and SB-30-KGPF);

• Samples were collected from the northern and eastern edges ofKGPF, since most part of the KGPF is still heavily forested andcould not be accessed by ERM personnel; and

• Soil general soil profile at the northern and eastern edges ofKGPF is predominantly organic clay.

Attachment B (Soil Boring Logs) details the soil formations encounteredduring the soil boring.

4.2 A MBIENT A IR QUALITY M ONITORING AND S AMPLING


• The ambient air quality monitoring/sampling activity wasconducted at Drill Site area (A-01-RG), close to the Lahai River;

• Within the Drill Site area, two diesel engines for electricity supplyand the water pump were observed. It was noted that one dieselengine was operational during the ambient air qualitymonitoring and sampling and the other one was on stand-by. The

distance between the position of the ambient air monitoringequipment and the diesel engine was around 100 m (based on theERM’s air quality subcontractor [ALS], this distance wassufficient that emissions from the diesel engine would notadversely impact the baseline results); and

• An incinerator was also observed within the Main Camp area.The distance between the position of the ambient air qualitymonitoring equipment and the incinerator was around 200 m.




11

The incinerator was not active during the entiremonitoring/sampling duration.


• The ambient air quality monitoring and sampling equipment waspositioned near a stream (crossing the pipeline route and theroad) near the edge of the forest, about 10 m away from theroad; and

• It was observed that vehicles passed the location of the ambientair quality monitoring and sampling equipment less than 10times a day.

4.2.3 KGPF

• The ambient air quality monitoring and sampling equipmentwas positioned at the northwestern portion of KGPF (A-03-R III);

• Most of the surrounding areas are heavily forested (some areashas been cleared); and

• It was observed that vehicles passed the location of the ambientair quality monitoring and sampling equipment less than 10times a day.

4.3 SURFACEWATER S AMPLING


• Four surfacewater samples were collected from the Lahai River (aportion of which passes through the vicinity of KerendanWellhead): One surfacewater sample was collected from the upstream

portion of the river (SW-01-R I); One surfacewater sample was collected from the midstream

portion of the river (SW-02-R I); One surfacewater sample was collected from the

downstream portion of the river (SW-03-R I); and One surfacewater sample from the Kerendan Wellhead

canal outfall (SW-04-R I).


• Two surfacewater samples were collected from a stream crossingthe pipeline route and the road between the Drill Site and KGPF: One surfacewater sample was collected from the upstream

portion (SW-06-R II); and




12

One surfacewater sample was collected from the downstreamportion (SW-05-R II).

• Fishing activity by the residents of the nearby community wasobserved during the sampling; and

• Most of the surrounding areas are heavily vegetated with trees

and grasses.

4.3.3 KGPF

• Three surface water samples were collected from the streamcrossing the southwestern corner of KGPF: One surfacewater sample was collected from the upstream

portion (SW-07-R III); One surfacewater sample was collected from the midstream

portion (SW-08-R III); and One surfacewater sample was collected from the downstream

portion (SW-09-R III).




13

5 REFERENCE CRITERIA

5.1 I NTRODUCTION

Since the development of the Site is partly funded by the InternationalFinance Corporation (IFC), as such the IFC’s Environmental, Health, andSafety (EHS) Guidelines were applied (as available and applicable) inthe qualitative assessment of baseline soil, ambient air andsurfacewater analytical results. It should be noted that the IFC EHSGuidelines are designed to be used together with relevant IndustrySector EHS Guidelines and host country regulations. Thus, in theabsence of available IFC EHS Guidelines, applicable Indonesianregulations, the United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA) Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) and the Dutch Standards(Dutch Intervention Values [DIV] 2009), were referenced.

5.2 SOIL

The IFC has no established standards for soil. Similarly, Indonesia hasno existing “specific standards or regulations” relating solely tocontaminated soil. Thus, the USEPA RSLs and the DIV were used in thequalitative assessment of the detected concentrations of soil analytes ofconcern. Brief descriptions of these criteria are presented below:

5.2.1 USEPA RSLs

The USEPA RSLs are risk-based concentrations derived fromstandardized equations combining exposure information assumptionswith EPA toxicity data. RSLs are considered by USEPA to be protective

for humans (including sensitive groups) over a lifetime, underresidential and industrial exposure scenarios.

Generally, at sites where contaminant concentrations fall below theRSLs, no further action or study is warranted under the US Superfundprogram; thus as long as the exposure assumptions at a site match thosetaken into account by the RSL calculations. Chemical concentrationsabove the RSLs would not automatically designate a site as "dirty" ortrigger a response action; however, exceeding an RSL suggests thatfurther evaluation of the potential risks by site contaminants isappropriate.

5.2.2 Dutch Standards

The Dutch Standards are environmental pollutant reference values (i.e.concentrations in environmental medium) used in environmentalremediation, investigation and clean-up.

The DIV (2009) indicates the environmental quality level, above whichthe maximum allowable risk of adverse effects on human and theenvironment is considered unacceptable. It is recognized that the Dutch




14

standards have been developed to assess the acceptability ofcontaminated soils and groundwater at housing estates in theNetherlands, without reference to commercial or industrial land inIndonesia.

Table 1 presents the comparison between the USEPA RSLs, DIV

Standards and the detected concentrations of soil analytes of concern.

5.3 A IR

The IFC (based on the World Health Organization [WHO] Air QualityGuidelines Global Update, 2005) and Indonesia (Government ofIndonesia [GOI] National Ambient Air Quality Standard No. 41 of 1999)have existing regulations on ambient air quality.

The IFC and GOI National Ambient Air Quality Standard No. 41/1999

were both used in the qualitative assessment of the detectedconcentrations of Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2), Sulphur Dioxide (SO 2),Ozone (O 3), Particulate Matter 10 (PM10) and Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM2.5).

Table 2 presents the comparison between the IFC Standards, GOINational Ambient Air Quality Standard No. 41/1999 and the detectedconcentrations of ambient air analytes of concern.

5.4 SURFACEWATER

The IFC has no established standards for surfacewater quality.However, in Indonesia, the GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 is used for themanagement of water quality and control of water pollution.Additionally, the USEPA RSLs and the DIV Standards are commonlyused by Industry Sectors in assessing groundwater (which includessurfacewater). Thus, the GOI Regulation No. 82/2001, the USEPA RSLsand the DIV Standards were used in the qualitative assessment ofdetected analytes in surfacewater. A brief description of GOI RegulationNo. 82/2001 is described below (brief descriptions of USEPA RSLs andDIV Standards were discussed in the previous sections).

5.4.1 GOI Regulation No. 82/2001

The GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 is used in Indonesia for water qualitymanagement and water pollution control. This regulation categorizeswater quality into four classes as described below:

• Class 1 : designated for drinking water resources, and/or otherpurposes that require equal water quality;

• Class 2 : Designated for buildings and water recreationalinfrastructures, fresh water fish cultivations, cattle breeding,




15

agricultural irrigation, and/or other purposes that require equalwater quality;

• Class 3 : Designated for fresh water fish cultivations, cattle breeding, agricultural irrigation, and/or other purposes thatrequire equal water quality; and

•

Class 4 : Designated for plants irrigation and/or other purposesthat require equal water quality.

It should be noted that in this Project the GOI Regulation No. 82/2001has been used solely for purposes of comparing analytical results andnot to classify the water bodies within the vicinity of the Site.

The GOI Regulation No. 82/2001, USEPA RSLs and DIV Standards wereused in the qualitative assessment of the detected concentrations ofsurfacewater analytes of concern.

Table 3 presents the comparison between the GOI Regulation No.

82/2001, USEPA RSLs, DIV and the detected concentrations ofsurfacewater analytes of concern.




16

6 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

6.1 SOIL

Thirty soil samples and two field duplicate soil samples (for QA/QC)were sent to ALS for VOCs, SVOCs, TPH, 30 Metal Scan and TotalAlkalinity. In addition, two samples from Kerendan Wellhead (onesample from the Main Camp and one sample from the Drill Site), andtwo samples each from the KGPF and the pipeline route were asked to be analyzed for TCLP 10-Metal Suites, OCP and OPP. Summarized below are the results of laboratory analysis for soils (with the exemptionof QA/QC soil samples) collected from Kerendan Wellhead (Drill Siteand Main Camp), Pipeline Route and KGPF ( Table 1 presents thedetailed analytical results and their comparisons with referencedcriteria).


Aluminum, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Chromium, Iron, Lead,Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium,Strontium, Vanadium, Zinc, Lithium, Titanium, andMercury were detected above the laboratory Limit ofReporting (LOR) in soil samples analyzed for 30 Metal Scanfrom both the Drill Site and the Main Camp;

Arsenic (from two soil samples), Antimony (from one soilsample) and Cobalt (from three soil samples) were detectedabove the laboratory LOR only from the Drill Site;

Copper was detected above the laboratory LOR in five soilsamples from the Drill Site and three soil samples from the MainCamp;

Molybdenum was detected above the laboratory LOR in two soilsamples from the Drill Site and in one soil sample from the MainCamp;

Sulphur and Nickel were detected above the laboratory LOR infive soil samples from the Drill Site and in four soil samples fromthe Main Camp;

Total Alkalinity that was detected above the laboratory LORranged from 30 to 2,960 mg/kg in some soil samples from theDrill Site but it was not detected (or below the laboratory LOR)in soil samples from the Main Camp. Total Alkalinity is notspecified in both USEPA RSL and DIV;

Barium and Zinc were detected above the laboratory LOR in twosoil samples analyzed for TCLP Metals from the Drill Site andthe Main Camp;

Phosphorus was detected above the laboratory LOR in all soilsamples collected from the Kerendan Wellhead (Drill Site andMain Camp) [ranged from 57 mg/kg to 170 mg/kg] with threesoil samples showing elevated concentrations (from 162 mg/kgto 170 mg/kg], which might be influenced by the current




17

activities at the Drill Site given the location where the soilsamples were collected (i.e.; from the Drill Site and between theDrill Site and the Lahai River). All detected concentrations ofPhosphorus exceeded the USEPA RSL of 20 mg/kg (note thatPhosphorus is not specified in the DIV);

The detected concentrations of Arsenic in two soil samples, one

from the Drill Site (close to the Lahai River [12 mg/kg]) and oneclose to the Main Camp (2 mg/kg) exceeded the USEPA RSL of1.6 mg/kg (the USEPA RSL for Arsenic is more stringent thanthe DIV [76 mg/kg]). The soil sample which showed elevatedconcentration (i.e.; 12 mg/kg) might have been influenced by theactivities at the Drill Site;

The detected concentration of Barium in one soil sample from theDrill Site (close to the Lahai River [1,150.14 mg/kg]) exceededthe DIV of 920 mg/kg (the elevated concentration might have been influenced by the activities at the Drill Site). The DIV forBarium is more stringent than the USEPA RSL [19,000 mg/kg]);and

TPH, VOCs, SVOCs, OCP and OPP were not detected in soilsamples from the Drill Site and the Main Camp.


Aluminum, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Chromium, Iron, Lead,Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium,Strontium, Thallium, Vanadium, Titanium and Mercury weredetected above the laboratory LOR in soil samples analyzed for30 Metal Scan from the Pipeline Route;

Arsenic (from seven soil samples), Antimony (from two soilsamples), Cobalt (from five soil samples) and Copper, Nickel,Sulphur, Zinc, and Lithium (from nine soil samples) weredetected above the laboratory LOR from the Pipeline Route;

Total Alkalinity that was detected above the laboratory LORranged from 12 to 71 mg/kg in some soil samples from thePipeline Route. Total Alkalinity is not specified in both USEPARSL and DIV;

Barium was detected above the laboratory LOR in one of thetwo soil samples analyzed for TCLP Metals from the PipelineRoute;

Zinc were detected above the laboratory LOR in two soil

samples analyzed for TCLP Metals from the Pipeline Route; Phosphorus was detected above the laboratory LOR in all

collected soil samples from the Pipeline Route. The detectedconcentrations exceeded the USEPA RSL of 20 mg/kg (note thatPhosphorus is not specified in the DIV);

The detected concentration of Arsenic in six soil samples fromthe Pipeline Route (one between the Drill Site and KGPF [3mg/kg] and five between the KGPF and the Manifold [2-4




18

mg/kg]) exceeded the USEPA RSL of 1.6 mg/kg (the USEPARSL for Arsenic is more stringent than the DIV [76 mg/kg]); and

TPH, VOCs, SVOCs, OCP and OPP were not detected in soilsamples from the Pipeline Route.

6.1.3 KGPF

Aluminum, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Copper, Iron, Lead,Magnesium, Manganese, Nickel, Phosphorus, Potassium,Sodium, Strontium, Vanadium, Zinc, Lithium, Titanium,and Mercury were detected above the laboratory LOR insoil samples analyzed for 30 Metal Scan from the KGPF;

Arsenic (from eight soil samples), Cobalt (from seven soilsamples) and Sulphur (from eight soil samples) were

detected above the laboratory LOR from the KGPF; Total Alkalinity that was detected above the laboratory LORranged from 9 to 68 mg/kg in some soil samples from the KGPF.Total Alkalinity is not specified in both USEPA RSL and DIV;

Barium and Zinc were detected above the laboratory LOR in twosoil samples analyzed for TCLP Metals from the KGPF;

Phosphorus was detected above the laboratory LOR in allcollected soil samples from the KGPF. The detectedconcentrations exceeded the USEPA RSL of 20 mg/kg (note thatPhosphorus is not specified in the DIV);

The detected concentration of Arsenic in six soil samples fromthe KGPF exceeded the USEPA RSL of 1.6 mg/kg (the USEPA

RSL for Arsenic is more stringent than the DIV [76 mg/kg]); and TPH, VOCs, SVOCs, OCP and OPP were not detected in soil

samples from the KGPF.

Table 1 presents the summary of soil laboratory analytical results andthe comparisons of detected concentrations of analytes with thereferenced criteria.

Attachment C presents the Laboratory Analytical Certificates.

6.2 A MBIENT A IR

Ambient air quality monitoring and sampling activities were conductedat the Drill Site (Monitoring/Sampling Station A-01-RG), close to theLahai River, between the Drill Site and KGPF (Monitoring/SamplingStation A-02-R II) [along the pipeline route] and within the KGPF(Monitoring/Sampling Station A-03-R III).




19

At the three monitoring/sampling stations (Drill Site, Pipeline Route,and KGPF), NO 2 (1-hour averaging period), and O 3 (8-hour dailymaximum) were not detected.

SO2 was not detected at Pipeline Route and KGPF monitoring/samplingstations for both 10-min and 24-hr averaging periods.

SO2 was detected at the Drill Site monitoring/sampling station for the24-hr averaging period (167µg/m 3) and for two-10-min averagingperiods (ranged from 525 to 788µg/m 3). The detected SO 2 concentrationsfor two- 10-min averaging periods and 24-hr averaging period exceededthe IFC EHS Guidelines of 500 µg/m 3 and 20 µg/m 3, respectively (SO 2 isnot regulated under the GOI National Ambient Air Quality Standard No.41/1999). The detection of SO 2 in two-10-min averaging periods and 24-hr averaging period might have been attributed by the activities at theDrill Site. Also, it should be noted that one diesel engine wasoperational at the Drill Site during the ambient air quality monitoringand sampling activities.

PM10 was detected at a concentration of 28.1 µg/Nm 3 and PM 2.5 atconcentration 18.4 µg/Nm 3 on a sample collected from the Drill Site for24-hr averaging period but they did not exceed the IFC EHS Guidelines(PM10: 50 µg/Nm 3 and PM 2.5: 25 µg/Nm 3) and the GOI NationalAmbient Air Quality Standard No. 41/1999 (note that the IFC EHSGuideline is more stringent that the GOI National Ambient Air QualityStandard No. 41/1999 [PM 10: 150 µg/Nm 3and PM 2.5: 65 µg/Nm 3]). Itshould be noted that the surrounding area where the ambient air qualitymonitoring and sampling equipment was set-up is bare ground (i.e.; noconcrete/asphalt pavement or gravel bedding).

Table 2 presents the summary of air laboratory analytical results and thecomparisons of detected concentrations of analytes with the referencedcriteria.

Attachment C presents the Laboratory Analytical Results.

6.3 SURFACE W ATER

Surfacewater samples were collected, from the upstream, midstream anddownstream portions (one sample each) of the Lahai River along the

Kerendan Wellhead area. Kerendan Wellhead’s canal outfall was alsosampled. A total of four surface water samples were collected from theKerendan Wellhead area.

Two surfacewater samples were collected at a stream passing throughthe Pipeline Route. Three surface water samples were also collected froma stream (at the upstream, midstream and downstream) passing throughthe northwestern corner of KGPF.




20

One field duplicate surfacewater sample was also collected for thisproject (from Kerendan Wellhead canal outfall) and one EquipmentBlank was also collected for QA/QC.

Surface water chemistry such as pH, temperature and DO were alsomeasured.

Summarized below are the results of laboratory analysis for surfacewater(with the exemption of QA/QC soil samples) collected from KerendanWellhead (Drill Site and Main Camp), canal outfall, Pipeline Route andKGPF.

6.3.1 Kerendan Wellhead

6.3.1.1 Lahai River

Recorded pH was within the specified range in the referencedcriteria;

TDS and TSS did not exceed the referenced criteria; Total Alkalinity ranged from 4-5 mg/L; Total Nitrogen ranged from 0.6-2.5 mg/L; Aluminum, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Iron, Magnesium,

Manganese, Sodium, Strontium and Sulphur were detectedabove the laboratory LOR in surfacewater samplesanalyzed for Total Metals from the Lahai River;

Aluminum, Barium, Calcium, Iron, Manganese, Sodium,Strontium and Sulphur were detected above the laboratoryLOR in surfacewater samples analyzed for DissolvedMetals from the Lahai River;

Boron was detected from midstream and downstreamsurfacewater samples analyzed for Total Metals;

Sodium was detected from upstream, midstream anddownstream surfacewater samples analyzed for DissolvedMetals;

Strontium and Sulphur were detected from midstream anddownstream surfacewater samples analyzed for DissolvedMetals;

Zinc was detected only in downstream surfacewater samplesanalyzed for Total and Dissolved Metals;

Lithium was detected only in downstream surfacewater samplesanalyzed for Dissolved Metals;

Detected (total) Iron concentration in all surfacewater samplescollected from Lahai River exceeded the GOI Regulation No.82/2001 for Class 1 (0.3 mg/L);




21

Detected (dissolved) Iron concentrations in four surfacewatersamples collected from the Lahai River exceeded the GOIRegulation No 82/2001 for Class 1;

BOD, COD, Oil and Grease were not detected from all LahaiRiver surfacewater samples, while DO and Surfactant weredetected but did not exceed or within the range of the referencedcriteria; and


6.3.1.2 Canal Outfall


TDS and TSS did not exceed the referenced criteria; Total alkalinity was detected at 387 mg/L;

Total Nitrogen was detected at 157 mg/L; Aluminum, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium,Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium, Strontium,Sulphur and Zinc were detected above the laboratory LOR inCanal Outfall surfacewater sample analyzed for Total Metals;

Aluminum, Arsenic, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Copper, Iron,Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Zinc andLithium were detected above the laboratory LOR in Canal Outfallsurfacewater sample analyzed for Dissolved Metals;

Detected (total) Iron concentration from the Canal Outfallsurfacewater sample exceeded the GOI Regulation No. 82/2001

for Class 1; Detected (dissolved) Iron concentration from the Canal Outfall

surfacewater sample exceeded the GOI Regulation No. 82/2001for Class 1;

BOD and Oil and Grease exceeded the GOI Regulation No.82/2001 for all water classes (Classes 1, 2, 3 and 4) ;

COD exceeded the GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 for Class 4; DO is lower than GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 for Class 1

minimum required concentration; Surfactant did not exceed/ within the range of available

standard; and

TPH, VOCs and SVOCs were not detected in the canal outfallsurfacewater sample.



TDS and TSS did not exceed the referenced;




22

Total Alkalinity of all surfacewater samples collected from thestreams along the Pipeline Route was recorded at 4 mg/L;

Total Nitrogen ranged from 0.6-1.0 mg/L; Aluminum, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Iron, Magnesium,

Manganese, Potassium, Sodium, Strontium, Zinc, Lithium andTitanium were detected above the laboratory LOR in PipelineRoute surfacewater samples analyzed for Total Metals;

Aluminum, Barium, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Sodium, Zinc,and Lithium were detected above the laboratory LOR in PipelineRoute surfacewater samples analyzed for Dissolved Metals;

Copper, Sulphur and Titanium analyzed for Total Metals weredetected in only one of the two Pipeline Route surfacewatersamples;

Copper and Strontium analyzed for Dissolved Metals weredetected in only one of the two Pipeline Route surfacewatersamples;

Detected total Iron and dissolved Iron concentrations in allPipeline Route surfacewater samples exceeded the GOIRegulation No 82/2001 for Class 1;

BOD, COD, Oil and Grease were not detected in all PipelineRoute surfacewater samples, while DO was lower thanrecommended range of GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 for Class 1;

Surfactant were detected but did not exceed any referencedcriteria; and


6.3.3 KGPF

Recorded pH (5.8-5.9) in all KGPF surfacewater samples werelower than the specified range under the GOI Regulation No.82/2001 for Class 1, 2 and 3;

TDS and TSS did not exceed any the referenced criteria; Total Alkalinity ranged from 4-7 mg/L; Total Nitrogen was not detected; Aluminum, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Chromium, Copper, Iron,

Magnesium, Manganese, Potassium, Sodium, Strontium andSulphur were detected above the laboratory LOR in KGPF

surfacewater samples analyzed for Total Metals; Aluminum, Barium, Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium,Manganese and Potassium were detected above the laboratoryLOR in KGPF surfacewater samples analyzed for DissolvedMetals;

Total Chromium was only detected in only one of the threeKGPF surfacewater samples;




23

Total Potassium was detected in two of the three KGPFsurfacewater samples;

Dissolved Copper, Sulphur, and Zinc were in two of the threeKGPF surfacewater samples;

Dissolved Potassium was only detected in only one of the threeKGPF surfacewater samples;

Total Iron (in all surfacewater samples collected from KGPF),Dissolved Iron (in two KGPF surfacewater samples) andManganese (in one KGPF surfacewater sample) exceeded the GOIRegulation No. 82/2001 for Class 1;

BOD, COD, Oil and Grease were not detected, while DO in twoKGPF surfacewater samples was lower than minimumconcentration set by GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 for Class 1;


TPH, VOCs and SVOCs were not detected in all KGPF

surfacewater samples.

Table 3 presents the detailed analytical results and their comparisonswith referenced criteria.

Attachment C presents the Laboratory Analytical Results.




24

7 CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of the Limited Baseline Assurance Soil andSurfacewater Sampling which includes Ambient Air Quality Monitoringconducted by ERM on 10-19 July 2013, the following conclusions weredrawn:

Kerendan Wellhead (Drill Site and Main Camp)


The profile of surface soil is dominated by clay; The baseline soil was detected with concentrations of

Aluminum, Arsenic, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Chromium,Cobalt, Copper, Iron, Lead, Magnesium, Manganese,Molybdenum, Nickel, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium,Sulfur, Strontium, Vanadium, Zinc, Lithium, Titanium, andMercury;

The detected Phosphorus concentrations (in all soil samples)exceeded the USEPA RSL of 20 mg/kg. Three samples showedelevated concentrations (from 162 mg/kg to 170 mg/kg] whichmight be influenced by the current activities at the Drill Sitegiven the location where the soil samples were collected (i.e.;from the Drill Site and between the Drill Site and the LahaiRiver). Phosphorus is not specified in the DIV;

The detected concentration of Arsenic (in two soil samples fromthe Drill Site; one close to the Lahai River [12 mg/kg] and oneclose to the Main Camp [2 mg/kg]) exceeded the USEPA RSL of1.6 mg/kg (the USEPA RSL for Arsenic is more stringent thanthe DIV [76 mg/kg]). The soil sample which showed elevatedconcentration (i.e.; 12 mg/kg) might have been influenced by theactivities at the Drill Site;

The detected concentration of Barium in one soil sample from theDrill Site (close to the Lahai River [1,150.14 mg/kg]) exceededthe DIV of 920 mg/kg (the elevated concentration might have been influenced by the activities at the Drill Site). The DIV forBarium is more stringent than the USEPA RSL [19,000 mg/kg]);

Concentrations of Barium and Zinc were detected in two soilsamples analyzed for TCLP Metals; and

TPH, VOCs, SVOCs, OCP and OPP were not detected in all soilsamples.


NO 2 (1-hour averaging period), and O 3 (8-hour daily maximum)were not detected;

SO2 was detected for two-10-min averaging periods (ranged from525 to 788 µg/m3) and for 24-hr averaging period (167µg/m3).The detected SO 2 concentrations for the two-10-min and 24-hrand averaging periods exceeded the IFC EHS Guideline of 500




25

µg/m 3 and 20 µg/m 3, respectively (SO2 is not specified in GOINational Ambient Air Quality Standard No. 41/1999). Thedetection of SO 2 in two-10-min and 24-hr averaging periodsmight have been attributed by the activities at the Drill Site. Also,it should be noted that one diesel engine was operational at theDrill Site during the ambient air quality monitoring and samplingactivities.

PM10 was detected at a concentration of 28.1 µg/Nm 3 and PM 2.5 atconcentration 18.4 µg/Nm 3 for 24-hr averaging period but theseconcentrations did not exceed the IFC EHS Guidelines (PM 10: 50µg/Nm 3 and PM 2.5: 25 µg/Nm 3) and the GOI National AmbientAir Quality Standard No. 41/1999 (note that the IFC EHSGuideline is more stringent that the GOI National Ambient AirQuality Standard No. 41/1999 [PM 10: 150 µg/Nm 3and PM 2.5: 65µg/Nm 3]). It should be noted that the surrounding area wherethe ambient air quality monitoring and sampling equipment was

set-up is bare ground (i.e.; no concrete/asphalt pavement orgravel bedding).

Surfacewater Baseline Status:Lahai River


The baseline Total Alkalinity and Total Nitrogen ranged from 4-5mg/L and from 0.6-2.5 mg/L, respectively;

The baseline surfacewater was detected with Total Metal

concentrations of Aluminum, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Iron,Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium,Strontium, Sulphur and Zinc;

The baseline surfacewater was detected with DissolvedMetal concentrations of Aluminum, Barium, Calcium, Iron,Manganese, Sodium, Strontium, Sulphur, Zinc and Lithium;

Detected (total) Iron concentration in all Lahai River surfacewatersamples exceeded the GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 for Class 1(0.3 mg/L);

Detected (dissolved) Iron concentrations in four Lahai Riversurfacewater samples exceeded the GOI Regulation No 82/2001

for Class 1; BOD, COD, Oil and Grease were not detected from all LahaiRiver surfacewater samples, while DO and Surfactant weredetected but did not exceed or within the range of the referencedcriteria; and





26

Canal Outfall


The baseline Total Alkalinity and Total Nitrogen were detected at387 mg/L and 157 mg/L, respectively;

The baseline surfacewater was detected with Total Metalconcentrations of Aluminum, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Copper,Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium,Strontium, Sulphur and Zinc;

The baseline surfacewater was detected with Dissolved Metalconcentrations of Aluminum, Arsenic, Barium, Boron, Calcium,Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium,Sodium, Strontium, Zinc and Lithium;

Total Iron concentration exceeded the GOI Regulation No.82/2001 for Class 1;

The baseline (dissolved) Iron concentration exceeded the GOIRegulation No. 82/2001 for Class 1;

BOD and Oil and Grease exceeded the GOI Regulation No.82/2001 for all water classes (Classes 1, 2, 3 and 4) ;

COD exceeded the GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 for Class 4; DO is lower than GOI Regulation No. 82/2001 for Class 1

minimum required concentration; Surfactant did not exceed/ within the range of available

standard; and TPH, VOCs and SVOCs were not detected.

Pipeline Route


The profile of surface soil is predominantly clay and silt; The baseline soil was detected with concentrations of

Aluminum, Arsenic, Antimony, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Cobalt,Copper, Chromium, Iron, Lead, Lithium, Magnesium,Manganese, Mercury, Nickel, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium,Sulfur, Strontium, Thallium, Titanium, Vanadium and Zinc;

Barium and Zinc were detected in one soil samples analyzed forTCLP Metals;

Detected concentration of Phosphorus in all soil samplesexceeded the USEPA RSL of 20 mg/kg (note that Phosphorus isnot specified in the DIV);

The detected concentration of Arsenic in six soil samples (one between the Drill Site and KGPF [3 mg/kg] and five between theKGPF and the Manifold [2-4 mg/kg]) exceeded the USEPA RSLof 1.6 mg/kg (the USEPA RSL for Arsenic is more stringent thanthe DIV [76 mg/kg]); and




27

TPH, VOCs, SVOCs, OCP and OPP were not detected in soilsamples from the Pipeline Route.


SO2 (for both 10-min and 24-hr averaging periods), NO 2 (1-houraveraging period), O 3 (8-hour daily maximum), PM 10 and PM 2.5 (both for 24-hr averaging period) were not detected.



Total Alkalinity of all surfacewater samples collected from thestreams along the Pipeline Route was recorded at 4 mg/L whilethe Total Nitrogen ranged from 0.6-1.0 mg/L;

The baseline surfacewater was detected with Total Metal

concentrations of Aluminum, Barium, Boron, Calcium,Chromium, Copper Iron, , Lithium Magnesium, Manganese,Potassium, Sodium, Sulphur, Strontium, Titanium and Zinc;

The baseline surfacewater was detected with Dissolved Metalconcentrations of Aluminum, Barium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium,Manganese, Sodium, Strontium, Zinc and Lithium;

Detected total Iron and dissolved Iron concentrations in allPipeline Route surfacewater samples exceeded the GOIRegulation No 82/2001 for Class 1;

BOD, COD, Oil and Grease were not detected, while DO waslower than recommended range of GOI Regulation No. 82/2001for Class 1;



KGPF


The profile of surface soil is dominated by organic clay;

The baseline soil was detected with concentrations ofAluminum, Arsenic, Barium, Boron, Calcium, Cobalt,Copper, Iron, Lead, Magnesium, Manganese, Nickel,Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium, Sulphur, Strontium,Vanadium, Zinc, Lithium, Titanium, and Mercury;

Concentrations of Barium and Zinc were detected in two soilsamples analyzed for TCLP Metals;




28

The detected Phosphorus concentrations (in all soil samples)exceeded the USEPA RSL of 20 mg/kg ( Phosphorus is notspecified in the DIV);

The detected concentration of Arsenic in six soil samples fromthe KGPF exceeded the USEPA RSL of 1.6 mg/kg (the USEPARSL for Arsenic is more stringent than the DIV [76 mg/kg]); and

TPH, VOCs, SVOCs, OCP and OPP were not detected in soilsamples from the KGPF.


SO2 (for both 10-min and 24-hr averaging periods), NO 2 (1-houraveraging period), O 3 (8-hour daily maximum), PM 10 and PM 2.5 (both for 24-hr averaging period) were not detected.


Recorded baseline pH (5.8-5.9) in all KGPF surfacewater sampleswere lower than the specified range under the GOI RegulationNo. 82/2001 for Class 1, 2 and 3;

Recorded/detected baseline TDS and TSS were within thespecified range of the referenced criteria;

The recorded baseline Total Alkalinity from 4-7 mg/L while TotalNitrogen was not detected;

The baseline surfacewater was detected with Total Metalconcentrations of Aluminum, Barium, Boron, Calcium,Chromium, Copper, Iron, Lithium, Magnesium, Manganese,Potassium, Sodium, Strontium, Sulphur, Titanium and Zinc;

The baseline surfacewater was detected with Dissolved Metalconcentrations of Aluminum, Barium, Calcium, Copper, Iron,Lithium, Magnesium, Manganese, Potassium, Sodium,Strontium, Sulphur and Zinc;

Detected total Iron and dissolved Iron concentrations in all KGPFsurfacewater samples exceeded the GOI Regulation No 82/2001for Class 1;

BOD, COD, Oil and Grease were not detected, while DO waslower than minimum range set by GOI Regulation No. 82/2001for Class 1;

Surfactant were detected but did not exceed any referenced

criteria; andTPH, VOCs and SVOCs were not detected in all Pipeline Routesurfacewater samples.

These conclusions are considered to represent the current condition ofthe sampling locations.




T

Tables





Drill

A-01-

RESU

Nitrogen Dioxide (1-hour averaging period) NO 2 g/m 3 20 200 400 <LOR

Sulphur Dioxide (10-minute averaging period) g/m 3 300 500 NR 4525-7

(08:36-11:106:5

Sulphur Dioxide (24-hour averaging period) g/m3

12.5 20 365 16

Ozone (8-hour daily maximum) O 3 g/m 3 20 100 NR <LO

Particulate Matter 10 (24-hour averaging period) PM 10 g/Nm 3 5 50 150 28.1

Particulate Matter 2.5 (24-hour averaging period) PM 2.5 g/Nm 3 5 25 65 18.4

Notes:

1

2

3 : Government

of

of

Indonesia

(GOI)

National

Ambient

Air

Quality

4 : Not Regulated

5 : Exceeded the IFC EHS Guideline

: International Finance Corporation Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Guidelines (based on World Health Organization [WHO], Air Quality Guidelines Global Update, 2005 Table 1.1.1)

GOI National Ambient AirQuality Standards No. 41 of

1999 3

: Limit of Reporting

TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR AMBIENT AIR

ANALYSIS DESCRIPTIONIFC (Based on

WHO Air QualityGuideline) 2

SO 2

UNIT LOR 1



SW-01-R I SW-02-R I SW-03-R I SW-04-R I SW-05-R II SW-06-R II SW-07-R III SW-08-R III SW-09-R III Water

(River)EB TB

Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS

Physical PropertiespH - - NS 4 NS 6-9 6-9 6-9 5-9 6.20 6.60 6.20 7.60 6.20 6.20 5.80 5.90 5.90 7.40 NA9 NAConductivity mhos/cm 5 1 NS NS NS NS NS NS 11.00 11.00 11.00 1,070.00 12.00 13.00 22.00 16.00 12.00 1,100.00 NA NA

Temperature °C 6 - NS NS NS NS NS NS 29.30 29.40 30.40 31.40 37.40 27.00 28.90 28.90 27.90 31.40 NA NATotal Dissolved Solids (TDS) mg/L 7 1 NS NS 1,000 1,000 1,000 2,000 7.00 8.00 8.00 725.00 8.00 9.00 15.00 11.00 8.00 747.00 1.00 NA

Total Suspended Solids(TSS) mg/L 1 NS NS 50 50 400 400 12.00 11.00 11.00 14.00 19.00 19.00 31.00 8.00 12.00 13.00 2.00 NA

Dissolved AnionAlkalinity-Total CaCO 3 mg/L 1 NS NS NS NS NS NS 5.00 4.00 4.00 387.00 4.00 4.00 7.00 6.00 4.00 383.00 4.00 NA

NutrientsTotal Phosphorus P-PO 4 m g/L 0.01 NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.08 0.07 0.08 8.43 1.10 1.20 0.05 0.10 0.11 8.42 0.03 NA

Total Nitrogen T-N mg/L 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS NS 2.50 0.60 1.00 157.00 0.60 1.00 <LOR 8 <LOR <LOR 145.00 <LOR NA

Total MetalsAluminum Al mg/L 0.01 NS 23,000 NS NS NS NS 0.64 0.81 0.81 0.21 1.26 1.46 1.47 0.45 1.08 0.17 <LOR NA

Arsenic As mg/L 0.001 0.06 1300 0.05 1 1 1 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR 0.00 <LOR NA

Antimony Sb mg/L 0.001 0.02 27 NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Barium Ba mg/L 0.001 0.625 120 1 NS NS NS 0.01 0.009 0.009 0.031 0.016 0.015 0.040 0.014 0.013 0.03 <LOR NA

Beryllium Be mg/L 0.005 NS 13 NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Boron B mg/L 0.005 NS NS 1 1 1 1 <LOR 0.013 0.012 0.022 0.008 0.007 0.009 0.008 0.006 0.02 <LOR NA

Cadmium Cd mg/L 0.001 0.006 0.52 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Calcium Ca mg/L 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS NS 1.70 1.90 2.10 7.10 1.60 1.30 2.00 1.60 1.40 6.00 <LOR NA

Chromium Cr mg/L 0.001 0.03 NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR 0.001 0.001 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Cobalt Co mg/L 0.005 0.1 0.21 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Copper Cu mg/L 0.001 0.075 22 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.2 <LOR <LOR <LOR 0.007 0.001 <LOR 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.01 <LOR NA

Iron Fe mg/L 0.005 NS 270 0.3 NS NS NS 0.558 0.636 0.618 0.410 1.270 1.280 2.760 1.170 1.100 0.359 <LOR NA

Lead Pb mg/L 0.005 0.075 NS 0.03 0.03 0.03 1 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Magnesium Mg mg/L 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.50 0.500 0.600 2.400 0.700 0.600 1.200 0.900 0.700 2.40 <LOR NA

Manganese Mn mg/L 0.001 NS 21 0.1 NS NS NS 0.03 0.027 0.027 0.069 0.044 0.043 0.171 0.082 0.040 0.06 <LOR NA

Molybdenum Mo mg/L 0.005 0.3 1.6 NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NANickel Ni m g/ L 0. 005 0.075 NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NAPhosporus P mg/L 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR 9.20 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR 8.40 <LOR NAPotassium K mg/L 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR 15.30 0.60 0.60 1.00 0.60 <LOR 15.20 <LOR NASelenium Se m g/ L 0. 001 NS 0.4 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.05 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NASilver Ag m g/ L 0. 005 NS 0.6 NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NASodium Na mg/L 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS NS 5.80 6.20 5.00 35.50 5.20 4.80 5.10 4.90 4.90 35.40 <LOR NAStrontium Sr m g/ L 0. 005 NS 330 NS NS NS NS 0.011 0.009 0.01 0.029 0.006 0.006 0.013 0.008 0.006 0.028 <LOR NA

Sulphur S mg/L 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS NS 1.80 1.50 1.20 11.40 0.90 <LOR 4.20 2.10 1.20 10.60 <LOR NAThallium Tl m g/L 0.01 NS NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NATin Sn m g/ L 0. 005 NS 2300 NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NAVanadium V m g/ L 0. 005 NS 78 NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Zinc Zn m g/L 0. 005 0.8 290 0.05 0.05 0.05 2 <LOR <LOR 0.007 0.041 0.012 0.015 0.013 <LOR 0.008 0.038 <LOR NALithium Li m g/ L 0. 001 NS 9.3 NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 <LOR <LOR NATitanium Ti m g/L 0.05 NS NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NAMercury Hg mg/L 0.0005 0.0003 0.033 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.005 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Dissolved MetalsAluminum Al mg/L 0.01 NS 23000 NS NS NS NS 0.40 0.29 0.19 0.06 0.41 0.40 0.48 0.15 0.34 0.06 <LOR NA

Arsenic As mg/L 0.001 0.06 1300 0.05 1 1 1 <LOR <LOR <LOR 0.003 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR 0.003 <LOR NA

Antimony Sb mg/L 0.001 0.02 27 NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Barium Ba mg/L 0.001 0.625 120 1 NS NS NS 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.019 0.013 0.010 0.027 0.007 0.007 0.018 <LOR NA

Beryllium Be mg/L 0.005 NS 13 NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Boron B mg/L 0.005 NS NS 1 1 1 1 <LOR <LOR <LOR 0.012 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR 0.011 <LOR NA

Cadmium Cd mg/L 0.001 0.006 0.52 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Calcium Ca mg/L 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.8 0.8 0.9 5.9 <LOR <LOR 1.10 0.60 <0.5 5.9 <LOR NA

Chromium Cr mg/L 0.001 0.03 NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Cobalt Co mg/L 0.005 0.1 0.21 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Copper Cu mg/L 0.001 0.075 22 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.2 <LOR <LOR <LOR 0.004 0.001 <LOR 0.001 <LOR 0.001 0.004 <LOR NA

Iron Fe mg/L 0.005 NS 270 0.3 NS NS NS 0.362 0.300 0.207 0.263 0.449 0.444 0.819 0.287 0.394 0.209 <LOR NA

Lead Pb mg/L 0.005 0.075 NS 0.03 0.03 0.03 1 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Magnesium Mg mg/L 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR 2.20 0.60 0.60 1.10 0.70 0.50 2.20 <LOR NA

Manganese Mn mg/L 0.001 NS 21 0.1 NS NS NS 0.014 0.011 0.008 0.066 0.014 0.016 0.075 0.013 0.015 0.052 <LOR NA

Molybdenum Mo mg/L 0.005 0.3 1.6 NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NANickel Ni m g/ L 0. 005 0.075 NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NAPhosporus P mg/L 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR 7.6 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR 7.6 <LOR NAPotassium K mg/L 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR 14.8 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR 0.6 14.8 <LOR NASelenium Se m g/ L 0. 001 NS 0.4 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.05 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NASilver Ag m g/ L 0. 005 NS 0.6 NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NASodium Na mg/L 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.6 0.5 0.5 29.0 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.7 29.0 <LOR NAStronsium Sr m g/ L 0. 005 NS 330 NS NS NS NS <LOR 0.005 0.006 0.028 0.006 <LOR 0.011 0.007 0.005 0.024 <LOR NA

Sulphur S mg/L 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS NS <LOR 0.60 0.60 8.10 <LOR <LOR 0.80 <LOR 0.60 8.50 <LOR NAThallium Tl m g/L 0.01 NS NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NATin Sn m g/ L 0. 005 NS 2300 NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NAVanadium V m g/ L 0. 005 NS 78 NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Zinc Zn m g/L 0. 005 0.8 290 0.05 0.05 0.05 2 <LOR <LOR 0.006 0.021 0.010 0.0013 0.013 <LOR 0.006 0.012 <LOR NALithium Li m g/ L 0. 001 NS 9.3 NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR 0.006 0.021 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 <LOR <LOR NATitanium Ti m g/L 0.05 NS NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NAMercury Hg mg/L 0.0005 0.0003 0.033 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.005 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Organic

Chemical Oxygen Demand COD mg/L 10 NS NS 10 25 50 100 <LOR <LOR <LOR 122.00 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR 118.00 <LOR NAOil and Grease O&G mg/L 5 NS NS 1 1 1 1 <LOR <LOR <LOR 8.00 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR 6.00 <LOR NA

Dissolved Oxygen DO mg/L 1 NS NS 6 (min) 4 3 0 6.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 6.00 4.00 NA NASurfactants MBAS mg/L 0.01 NS NS 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.15 0.08 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.08 <LOR NA

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH)C6 - C9 mg/L 0.05 NS NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

C10 - C14 mg/L 0.05 NS NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA



Total TPH ( C6 - C36 ) mg/L 0.1 NS NS NS NS NS NS <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS *11 * * * * * <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR

** * * * * <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR NA

Note:(1) DIV : Dutch intervention Value(2) USEPA RSLs : Unit ed S ta te s Env ironmental P ro tect ion Agency Regional Screen Leve ls(3) GOI : Government of Indonesia

(4) NS : Not specified(5) µmhos/cm : Micromohs per centimeter (6) oC : Degrees Celcius(7) mg/L : Milligram per Liter (8) <LOR : Below laboratory Limit of Reporting(9) NA : Not analyzed( 10 )* : Cri te ri on va lu es a re ava il ab le bu t t he an al yt ic al re su lt s a re be lo w t he la bor at or y l im it of re po rt in g

: Range is lower or higher than both the GOI Regulation No 82 year 2001 (Class 1) and IFC Environmental Health and Safety Guidelines - Indicative Values For Treated Sanitary Sewage Discharges (Table 1.3.1): Exceeded the IFC Environmental Health and Safety Guidelines - Indicative Values For Treated Sanitary Sewage Discharges (Table 1.3.1): Exceeded GOI Regulation No. 82 year 2001 (Class 1) or detected value is lower than the "minimum value" set by the regulation (e.g. DO): Exceeded the GOI Regulation No. 82 year 2001 (Class 2) or detected value is lower than the "minimum value" set by the regulation (e.g. DO): Exceeded the GOI Regulation No. 82 year 2001 (Class 3) or detected value is lower than the "minimum value" set by the regulation (e.g. DO): Exceeded the GOI Regulation No. 82 year 2001 (Class 4) or detected value is lower than the "minimum value" set by the regulation (e.g. DO): Exceeded the GOI Regulation No. 82 year 2001 (Classes 1-4) or detected value is lower than the "minimum value" set by the regulation (e.g. DO)

NS <LOR NA

USEPA RSLs2012 For

Groundwater 2DIV 2009 1

<LOR <LORNS 2

Locations Field Quality Control/Quality Assurance Samples

Sample Identification

Drill Site and Main Camp Pipeline Route KGPF

<LOR

GOI Regulation No. 82 year 2001 (Class 1) 3

3 6 12

TABLE 3. SUMMARY OF LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR SURFACEWATER

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS

Biochemical Oxygen Demand BOD 5 mg/L 5

AN ALYSI S D ES CR IPTI ON UN IT LO R

74.00 78.00<LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR<LOR



PT. ERM INDONESIA SALAMANDER ENERGY PTE . LTD . PROJECT N O . 0184276 ESIA A SSURANCE SAMPLING

A

Attachment A: Samplingand Analysis Plan






B

Attachment B: Soil Boring Logs



SOIL BORING LOG Soil bore No SB-01-RG

Project No: MAS & AF

BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

3.0 3.0 Near Ex - STP

SB - 01 - RG

Hole Size: 4 in Screen Interval: NA Drilled By: PT. Geoteknika

Casing Size: NA Initial Water Level: - Drill Date:

Total Casing Depth: NA Static Water Level: - Drill Method: Post Hole Digger

Coordinate (m) E N : Z: 53 m Zone : 50 M

Silty CLAY (CL), redish brown, soft

0184276 Logged by:

Project: Assurance Sampling Reviewed by

15o 45oGROUND SURFACE

FILL

Salamander Energy Approved by

SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE

Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)

low plasticity, moist

0293388 9935855

12-Jul-2013

no hydrocarbon impact

0.5

0.0

0.25

PT. ERM IndonesiaWisma Aldiron

Dirgantara2/F Suite # 238-239

Jl. Gatot Subroto Kav. 72 Jakarta 12780 Indonesia

Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT

FIRST APPEARANCE LEVEL

STATIC GROUNDWATER LEVEL

GRAVEL

Silty CLAYSandy CLAY

Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders

Concrete and Cobbles





BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

0.3 0.3

SB - 02 - RG





12-Jul-2013

0293312 9935840


FILLSilty CLAY (CL), redish brown, softlow plasticity, moist



Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


0184276 Logged by:


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

0.5 0.5

SB - 03 - RG





12-Jul-2013

0293230 9935825


FILLSilty CLAY (CL), redish brown, softlow plasticity, moist



Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


0184276 Logged by:


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders




SOIL BORING LOG Soil bore No SB-04


BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

0.0 0.0

SB - 04





12-Jul-2013

0293178 9935921

plasticity, dry, no hydrocarbon impact

Clayey SILT (SM)Yellowish brown, Medium, low


Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)



0184276 Logged by:


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

1.7 1.7

SB - 05





0184276 Logged by:




Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Clayey SILT (SM),Yellowish brown, medium, lowplasticity, dry, no hydrocarbon impact

12-Jul-2013

0293186 9935937

0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

1.7 1.7

SB - 06





0184276 Logged by:




Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Clayey SILT (SM),Dark brown, medium, low plasticity,dry, no hydrocarbon impact

12-Jul-2013

0293153 9935943

0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders




SOIL BORING LOG Soil bore No SB-07-CP


BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

3.8 3.8

SB - 07 - CP





0184276 Logged by:


Silty CLAY (CL), brown, soft,



Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


FILL

12-Jul-2013

0293162 9935903

Near Canteenlow plasticity, moist


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

7.0 7.0

SB - 08 - CP





0184276 Logged by:


Sandy CLAY (CL), redish brown, softlow plasticity, dry



Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


FILL

12-Jul-2013

0293125 9935972


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

7.2 7.2

SB - 09 - CP





DUPLICATE

0184276 Logged by:


Silty CLAY (CL), redish brown, softlow plasticity, moist



Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


FILL

12-Jul-2013

0293040 9935931


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

6.3 6.3

SB - 10 - CP





0184276 Logged by:


Silty CLAY (CL), yellowish brown, softlow plasticity, moist



Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


FILL

12-Jul-2013

0293084 9935848

Near Incinerator


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders




SOIL BORING LOG Soil bore No RG - R I


BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

16.0 16.0 Near River (R I)

andRG - R I Wellpad




Coordinate (m) E N : Z: 44 m Zone : 50 M0293268 9935971

13-Jul-2013



Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


CLAY (CL)Dark brown, soft, high plasticity, wetcontain fiber root and organic matter


0184276 Logged by:


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders




SOIL BORING LOG Soil bore No SB-11-PL I


BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

15.2 15.2

SB - 11 - PL I





0184276 Logged by:




Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


CLAY (CL)Brown, soft, medium plasticity, moistno hydrocarbon impact

13-Jul-2013

0292633 9935619

0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

11.5 11.5

SB - 12 - PL I





13-Jul-2013

0292146 9935406

Grey, medium, low plasticity, moist,no hydrocarbon impact


Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Sandy SILT (SM)


0184276 Logged by:


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

14.8 14.8

SB - 13 - PL I





13-Jul-2013

0291681 9935167

Light brown, medium, low plasticity,wet, no hydrocarbon impact


Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Clayey SILT (SM)


0184276 Logged by:


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

19 19

SB - 14 - PL I





13-Jul-2013

0291211 9934948


Dark brown, medium, mediumplasticity, wet, contain organic matter


Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Clayey SILT (SM)


0184276 Logged by:


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

10.2 10.2

SB - 15 - PL I





13-Jul-2013

0291179 9934867

contain organic matter, no hydrocarbon

impact

Brown, Soft, Low Plasticity, Wet


Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Organic Clay


0184276 Logged by:


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders




SOIL BORING LOG Soil bore No SB-16-PL II


BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

17.3 17.3

SB - 16 - PL II





13-Jul-2013

0291602 9933955


Clayey SILT (SM)Dark brown, medium, mediumplasticity, wet, no hydrocarbon impact


Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


0184276 Logged by:


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

16.0 16.0

SB - 17 - PL II





13-Jul-2013

0291818 9933477


Clayey SILT (SM)Light brown, soft, low plasticity, wet,contain fiber root, and organic matter,



Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


0184276 Logged by:


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

19.3 19.3

SB - 18 - PL II





0184276 Logged by:




Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


CLAY (CL)Light brown, soft, medium plasticity, wet,contain fiber root and organic matter,


13-Jul-2013

0292036 9933003

0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

17.4 17.4

SB - 19 - PL II





0184276 Logged by:




Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


CLAY (CL)Brown, medium, high plasticity, wet,contain organic matter,


13-Jul-2013

0293230 9935825

0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

17.5 17.5

SB - 20 - PL II





0184276 Logged by:


Redish brown, soft, medium plasticity,wet, contain fiber root, and organic



Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


CLAY (CL)

13-Jul-2013

0292692 9931560

matter, no hydrocarbon impact

0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders




SOIL BORING LOG Soil bore No SB-21-KGPF


BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

12.9 12.9

SB - 21 - KGPF





0184276 Logged by:


Light brown, soft, low plasticity, moist,contain fiber root and organic matter,



Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Organic CLAY (CL)

13-Jul-2013

0291354 9934387


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

11.9 11.9

SB - 22 - KGPF





0184276 Logged by:

Project: Assurance Sampling Reviewed by:

Brown, soft, low plasticity, wet, containfiber root and organic matter,



Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Organic CLAY (CL)

13-Jul-2013

0291337 9934379


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

16.3 16.3

SB - 23 - KGPF





0184276 Logged by:


Brown, soft, low plasticity, wet, containfiber root and organic matter,



Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Organic CLAY (CL)

13-Jul-2013

0291321 9934482


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

13.4 13.4

SB - 24 - KGPF





0184276 Logged by:


Brown, soft, low plasticity, wet, contain



Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Organic CLAY (CL)

13-Jul-2013

0291255 9934607

fiber root and organic matter,


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

7.7 7.7

SB - 25 - KGPF





DUPLICATE

0184276 Logged by:




Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Organic CLAY (CL)Brown, soft, low plasticity, wet, containfiber root and organic matter,


13-Jul-2013

0291138 9934838

0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

8.9 8.9

SB - 26 - KGPF






0184276 Logged by:

Project: Salamander ESHIA Reviewed by

Light brown, soft, medium plasticity,wet, contain organic matter and fiber


Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Organic CLAY (CL)

15-Jul-2013

0291041 9934787

root, no hydrocarbon impact

0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

7.2 7.2

SB - 27 - KGPF






0184276 Logged by:




Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Organic CLAY (CL)

15-Jul-2013

0290963 9934746


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

8.2 8.2

SB - 28 - KGPF






0184276 Logged by:




Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Organic CLAY (CL)

15-Jul-2013

0290857 9934700


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

9.4 9.4

SB - 29 - KGPF






0184276 Logged by:




Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Organic CLAY (CL)

15-Jul-2013

0290898 9934699


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders






BHH

Client: DD

S y m b o l

L a b

A n a l y s i s

14.0 14.0

SB - 30 - KGPF






0184276 Logged by:




Remarks

D e p

t h ( m )

D e s c r i p

t i o n

S a m p

l e I D

P I D ( p p m

)


Organic CLAY (CL)

15-Jul-2013

0290975 9934732


0.5

0.0

0.25




Tel. +62 21 7918 1904

BENTONITE

GROUT

SAND PACK

SCREEN

SAND

CLAYClayey SAND

Clayey SILT

Sandy SILT



GRAVEL


Concrete Slab

Debris

Sandy GRAVEL

Gravelly SAND

Boulders





C

Attachment C: Laboratory Analytical Certificates



Date Completed:

ALSI File No: ALSI03361a

Report on: Soil Analysis

SALAMANDER #0184276 RG & CP

Report to: PT. ERM INDONESIAWisma Aldiron Dirgantara2nd Floor Suite 238-239Jakarta 12780

Attention: Mr. Jess Gabriel

Date received:

Sampled by: Client

PT. ALS IndonesiaReviewed by:

Sisca NurhafifaLaboratory Supervisor

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

26 July 2013

18 July 2013



CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISBatch : ALSI03361aDate of Issue :

Client : PT. ERM INDONESIA

REMARKS

26 July 2013

Please notify that CoA of ALSI03361a is a combine CoA of ALSI03359, ALSI03360 & ALSI03361.

An ALS Limited Company



CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISBatch :Sample Matrix : SoilDate of Issue :Client : PT. ERM INDONESIA

2 3 4 5

ALSI0335928 319

ALSI0335928 320

ALSI0335928321 ALSI0335928

322

SB - 02 - RG SB - 03 - RG SB - 04 - RG SB - 05 - RG

12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul/1314:16 14:26 14:28 14:36

UNIT LOR RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS

Total MetalsAlumunium Al mg/kg 5 6040 6500 cancel analysis 9580Arsenic As mg/kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis 2Antimony Sb mg/kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <1Barium Ba mg/kg 1 14 7 cancel analysis 22Berilium Be mg/kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <1

Boron B mg/kg 1 10 19 cancel analysis 30Cadmium Cd mg/kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <1Calsium Ca mg/kg 1 31 92 cancel analysis 20Chromium Cr mg/kg 1 5 5 cancel analysis 4Cobalt Co mg/kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis 3

Copper Cu mg/kg 1 2 1 cancel analysis 4Iron Fe mg/kg 1 5140 9560 cancel analysis 15300Lead Pb mg/kg 1 8 6 cancel analysis 9Magnesium Mg mg/kg 1 99 140 cancel analysis 355

Mangan Mn mg/kg 1 7 14 cancel analysis 92

Molybdenum Mo mg/kg 1 1 <1 cancel analysis <1Nickel Ni mg/kg 1 1 <1 cancel analysis 4Phosporus P mg/kg 1 57 74 cancel analysis 162Pottasium K mg/kg 1 174 100 cancel analysis 186Selenium Se mg/kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <1

Silver Ag mg/kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <1Sodium Na mg/kg 1 68 70 cancel analysis 68Stronsium Sr mg/kg 5 716 1370 cancel analysis 2170Sulphur S mg/kg 1 75 <1 cancel analysis 87Thalium Tl mg/kg 5 <1 <1 cancel analysis <1

Tin Sn mg/kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <1Vanadium

V mg/kg 5 19 26 cancel analysis 25Zinc Zn mg/kg 1 4 6 cancel analysis 20Lithium Li mg/kg 1 2 3 cancel analysis 5Titanium Ti mg/kg 1 1280 1220 cancel analysis 1730Mercury Hg mg/kg 0.01 0.04 0.04 cancel analysis 0.04

LOR = L imi t o f Repo rti ng ** = Subcont ract

ALSI03361a

ANALYSIS DESCRIPTION

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013

Date SampledTime Sampled

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

Page 1 of 72An ALS Limited Company




2 3 4 5

ALSI0335928 319

ALSI0335928 320

ALSI0335928321 ALSI0335928

322


12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul/1314:16 14:26 14:28 14:36


ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013



OrganicTotal Petroleum HydrocarbonsC6 - C9 mg/kg 5 <5 <5 cancel analysis <5C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 <50 <50 cancel analysis <50C15 - C28 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 cancel analysis <100C29 - C36 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 cancel analysis <100

Dissolved AnionsTotal Alkalinity mg/kg 5 <5 <5 cancel analysis 122

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS**Monocyclic AromaticsBenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Toluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Ethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5meta&para–Xylene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <1Styrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5ortho–Xylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

Isopropylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5n–Propylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.51,3,5–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5sec–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.51,2,4–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5tert–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5p-Isopropyltoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5n–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS2–Butanone (MEK) mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 cancel analysis <54–Methyl–2–pentanone (MIBK) mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 cancel analysis <52–Hexanone (MBK) mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 cancel analysis <5

FUMIGANTS2,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.51,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

cis-1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

trans–1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

1,2–Dibromoethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

LOR = L imi t o f Repo rti ng ** = Subcont ract Page 2 of 72An ALS Limited Company




2 3 4 5

ALSI0335928 319

ALSI0335928 320

ALSI0335928321 ALSI0335928

322


12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul/1314:16 14:26 14:28 14:36


ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013



HALOGENATED ALIPHATICS

Dichlorodifluoromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 cancel analysis <5

Chloromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 cancel analysis <5Vinyl chloride mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 cancel analysis <5

Bromomethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 cancel analysis <5

Chloroethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 cancel analysis <5

Trichlorofluoromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 cancel analysis <5

HALOGENATEDALIPHATICS (Contd)**

1,1–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

trans–1,2–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

1,1-Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

cis–1,2-Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

1,1,1–Trichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

1,1–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Carbon tetrachloride mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

1,2–Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

Trichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

Dibromomethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

1,1,2–Trichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

1,3–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

Tetrachlorethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

1,1,1,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

1,1,2,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

1,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

Pentachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg

0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

LOR = L imi t o f Repo rti ng ** = Subcont ract Page 3 of 72An ALS Limited Company




2 3 4 5

ALSI0335928 319

ALSI0335928 320

ALSI0335928321 ALSI0335928

322


12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul/1314:16 14:26 14:28 14:36


ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013



HALOGENATED AROMATICS

Chlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

Bromobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.52-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

4-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

1,3-dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5



1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

TRIHALOMETHANES

Chloroform mg/Kg 2 <2 <2 cancel analysis <2

Bromodichloromethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

Dibromochloromethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

Bromoform mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS**

PHENOLS

Phenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

2–Chlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

2–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

3&4–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

2–Nitrophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

2,4–Dimethylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

2,4–Dichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

2,6–Dichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

4–Chloro–3–methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

2,4,6–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.52,4,5–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

Pentachlorophenol mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <1

LOR = Limit of Reporting Page 4 of 72An ALS Limited Company




2 3 4 5

ALSI0335928 319

ALSI0335928 320

ALSI0335928321 ALSI0335928

322


12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul/1314:16 14:26 14:28 14:36


ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013



POLYAROMATIC HYDROCARBONS**Naphthalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.52–Methylnaphtalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.52–Chloronaphthalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Acenaphthylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Acenaphthene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Fluorene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Phenanthrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Fluoranthene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5N–2 Fluorenylacetamide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Benz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Chrysene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <17, 12–Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

3–Methylcholanthrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

PHTHALATE ESTERSDimethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Diethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Di–n–butyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Butyl benzyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Bis (2–ethylhexyl) phthalate mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 cancel analysis <5Di–n–octyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

NITROSOAMINESN-Nitrosomethylethylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

N–Nitrosodiethylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5N–Nitrosopyrrolidine mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <1N–Nitrosomorpholine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5N–Nitrosodi–n–propylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5N–Nitrosopiperidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5N–Nitrosodibutylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Diphenylamine & N–Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <1Methapyrilene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5





2 3 4 5

ALSI0335928 319

ALSI0335928 320

ALSI0335928321 ALSI0335928

322


12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul/1314:16 14:26 14:28 14:36


ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013



NITROAROMATICS AND KETONES2–Picoline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Acetophenone mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Nitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Isophorone mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.52,6–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <12,4–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <11–Naphthylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.54–Nitroquinoline–N–oxide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.55–Nitro–o–toluidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Azobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.51,3,5–Trinitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Phenacetin mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.54–Aminobiphenyl mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Pronamide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Dimethylaminoazobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

Chlorobenzilate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

HALOETHERSBis(2–chloroethyl)ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Bis(2–chloroethoxy)methane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.54–Chlorophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.54–Bromophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS1,3–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.51,4–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.51,2–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Hexachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.51,2,4–Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Hexachloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/Kg 2.5 <2.5 <2.5 cancel analysis <2.5Pentachlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Hexachlorobenzene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <1





2 3 4 5

ALSI0335928 319

ALSI0335928 320

ALSI0335928321 ALSI0335928

322


12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul/1314:16 14:26 14:28 14:36


ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013



ANILINES AND BENZIDINESAniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.54–Chloroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.52–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <13–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 cancel analysis <1Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.54–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5Carbazole mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.53,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 cancel analysis <0.5

LOR = Limit of Reporting ** = Subcontract





UNIT LOR

Total MetalsAlumunium Al mg/kg 5Arsenic As mg/kg 1Antimony Sb mg/kg 1Barium Ba mg/kg 1Berilium Be mg/kg 1

Boron B mg/kg 1Cadmium Cd mg/kg 1Calsium Ca mg/kg 1Chromium Cr mg/kg 1Cobalt Co mg/kg 1

Copper Cu mg/kg 1Iron Fe mg/kg 1Lead Pb mg/kg 1Magnesium Mg mg/kg 1

Mangan Mn mg/kg 1

Molybdenum Mo mg/kg 1Nickel Ni mg/kg 1Phosporus P mg/kg 1Pottasium K mg/kg 1Selenium Se mg/kg 1

Silver Ag mg/kg 1Sodium Na mg/kg 1Stronsium Sr mg/kg 5Sulphur S mg/kg 1Thalium Tl mg/kg 5

Tin Sn mg/kg 1Vanadium

V mg/kg 5Zinc Zn mg/kg 1Lithium Li mg/kg 1Titanium Ti mg/kg 1Mercury Hg mg/kg 0.01

L OR = L imi t o f Repo rt ing ** = Subcon tract

ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013


6 6 L Rep 7 8

ALSI0335928 323

ALSI0335928 323 L Rep

ALSI0335928 324

ALSI0335928 325

SB - 06 - RG SB - 06 - RG' SB - 07 - CP SB - 08 - CP

12/Jul /13 12/ Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul /1314:40 14:40 15:14 15:25

RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS

8440 8250 6000 58601 1 <1 <1

<1 <1 <1 <120 20 6 7<1 <1 <1 <1

24 24 16 7<1 <1 <1 <1

969 969 33 274 4 5 54 4 <1 <1

5 5 2 412600 12400 8290 3760

9 8 7 9468 468 106 85

167 161 14 6

<1 <1 <1 35 5 2 2

166 168 56 46282 281 197 163<1 <1 <1 <1

<1 <1 <1 <178 78 69 74

1800 1730 1150 51993 91 41 35<1 <1 <1 <1

<1 <1 <1 <1

24 23 21 1314 14 4 44 4 2 2

1150 1130 1840 26200.06 0.05 0.04 0.04






UNIT LOR

ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013


OrganicTotal Petroleum HydrocarbonsC6 - C9 mg/kg 5C10 - C14 mg/kg 50C15 - C28 mg/kg 100C29 - C36 mg/kg 100

Dissolved AnionsTotal Alkalinity mg/kg 5

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS**Monocyclic AromaticsBenzene mg/Kg 0.5Toluene mg/Kg 0.5Ethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5meta&para–Xylene mg/Kg 1Styrene mg/Kg 0.5ortho–Xylene mg/Kg 0.5

Isopropylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5n–Propylbenzene mg/Kg 0.51,3,5–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5sec–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.51,2,4–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5tert–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5p-Isopropyltoluene mg/Kg 0.5n–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5

OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS2–Butanone (MEK) mg/Kg 54–Methyl–2–pentanone (MIBK) mg/Kg 52–Hexanone (MBK) mg/Kg 5

FUMIGANTS2,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.51,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5

cis-1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5

trans–1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5

1,2–Dibromoethane mg/Kg 0.5


6 6 L Rep 7 8

ALSI0335928 323

ALSI0335928 323 L Rep

ALSI0335928 324

ALSI0335928 325


12/Jul /13 12/ Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul /1314:40 14:40 15:14 15:25



<5 <5 <5 <5<50 <50 <50 <50

<100 <100 <100 <100<100 <100 <100 <100

30 30 <5 <5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<5 <5 <5 <5<5 <5 <5 <5<5 <5 <5 <5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





UNIT LOR

ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013



Dichlorodifluoromethane mg/Kg 5

Chloromethane mg/Kg 5Vinyl chloride mg/Kg 5

Bromomethane mg/Kg 5

Chloroethane mg/Kg 5

Trichlorofluoromethane mg/Kg 5


1,1–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5

trans–1,2–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5

1,1-Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5

cis–1,2-Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5

1,1,1–Trichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5

1,1–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5Carbon tetrachloride mg/Kg 0.5

1,2–Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5

Trichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5

Dibromomethane mg/Kg 0.5


1,3–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5

Tetrachlorethene mg/Kg 0.5

1,1,1,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5


1,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5

Pentachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/Kg 0.5


0.5


6 6 L Rep 7 8

ALSI0335928 323

ALSI0335928 323 L Rep

ALSI0335928 324

ALSI0335928 325


12/Jul /13 12/ Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul /1314:40 14:40 15:14 15:25



<5 <5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5 <5<5 <5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5 <5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





UNIT LOR

ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013



Chlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5

Bromobenzene mg/Kg 0.52-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5

4-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5

1,3-dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5



1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5


TRIHALOMETHANES

Chloroform mg/Kg 2

Bromodichloromethane mg/Kg 0.5

Dibromochloromethane mg/Kg 0.5

Bromoform mg/Kg 0.5


PHENOLS

Phenol mg/Kg 0.5

2–Chlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5

2–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5

3&4–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5

2–Nitrophenol mg/Kg 0.5

2,4–Dimethylphenol mg/Kg 0.5

2,4–Dichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5


4–Chloro–3–methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5

2,4,6–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.52,4,5–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5

Pentachlorophenol mg/Kg 1

LOR = Limit of Reporting

6 6 L Rep 7 8

ALSI0335928 323

ALSI0335928 323 L Rep

ALSI0335928 324

ALSI0335928 325


12/Jul /13 12/ Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul /1314:40 14:40 15:14 15:25



<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<2 <2 <2 <2

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<1 <1 <1 <1





UNIT LOR

ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013


POLYAROMATIC HYDROCARBONS**Naphthalene mg/Kg 0.52–Methylnaphtalene mg/Kg 0.52–Chloronaphthalene mg/Kg 0.5Acenaphthylene mg/Kg 0.5Acenaphthene mg/Kg 0.5Fluorene mg/Kg 0.5Phenanthrene mg/Kg 0.5Anthracene mg/Kg 0.5Fluoranthene mg/Kg 0.5Pyrene mg/Kg 0.5N–2 Fluorenylacetamide mg/Kg 0.5Benz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5Chrysene mg/Kg 0.5Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/Kg 1

7, 12–Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5

3–Methylcholanthrene mg/Kg 0.5Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg 0.5

PHTHALATE ESTERSDimethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5Diethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5Di–n–butyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5Butyl benzyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5Bis (2–ethylhexyl) phthalate mg/Kg 5Di–n–octyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5

NITROSOAMINESN-Nitrosomethylethylamine mg/Kg 0.5

N–Nitrosodiethylamine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosopyrrolidine mg/Kg 1N–Nitrosomorpholine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosodi–n–propylamine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosopiperidine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosodibutylamine mg/Kg 0.5Diphenylamine & N–Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/Kg 1Methapyrilene mg/Kg 0.5


6 6 L Rep 7 8

ALSI0335928 323

ALSI0335928 323 L Rep

ALSI0335928 324

ALSI0335928 325


12/Jul /13 12/ Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul /1314:40 14:40 15:14 15:25



<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<1 <1 <1 <1<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<5 <5 <5 <5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





UNIT LOR

ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013


NITROAROMATICS AND KETONES2–Picoline mg/Kg 0.5Acetophenone mg/Kg 0.5Nitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Isophorone mg/Kg 0.52,6–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 12,4–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 11–Naphthylamine mg/Kg 0.54–Nitroquinoline–N–oxide mg/Kg 0.55–Nitro–o–toluidine mg/Kg 0.5Azobenzene mg/Kg 0.51,3,5–Trinitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Phenacetin mg/Kg 0.54–Aminobiphenyl mg/Kg 0.5Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Pronamide mg/Kg 0.5Dimethylaminoazobenzene mg/Kg 0.5

Chlorobenzilate mg/Kg 0.5

HALOETHERSBis(2–chloroethyl)ether mg/Kg 0.5Bis(2–chloroethoxy)methane mg/Kg 0.54–Chlorophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.54–Bromophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS1,3–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.51,4–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.51,2–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachloroethane mg/Kg 0.51,2,4–Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5

Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/Kg 2.5Pentachlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachlorobenzene mg/Kg 1


6 6 L Rep 7 8

ALSI0335928 323

ALSI0335928 323 L Rep

ALSI0335928 324

ALSI0335928 325


12/Jul /13 12/ Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul /1314:40 14:40 15:14 15:25



<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1





UNIT LOR

ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013


ANILINES AND BENZIDINESAniline mg/Kg 0.54–Chloroaniline mg/Kg 0.52–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 13–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.54–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5Carbazole mg/Kg 0.53,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg 0.5


6 6 L Rep 7 8

ALSI0335928 323

ALSI0335928 323 L Rep

ALSI0335928 324

ALSI0335928 325


12/Jul /13 12/ Jul/13 12/Jul/13 12/Jul /1314:40 14:40 15:14 15:25



<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





UNIT LOR




Mangan Mn mg/kg 1





LOR = L imi t o f Repo rt ing ** = Su bcont ract

ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013


9 11 12

ALSI0335928326 ALSI0335928328 ALSI0335928329

SB - 09 - CP CAMP RG - RI

12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 13/Jul/1315:32 15:35 9:29

RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS

7760 8060 8980<1 <1 12<1 <1 127 7 1150

<1 <1 <1

20 20 38<1 <1 <115 22 21206 6 6

<1 <1 7

<1 <1 1010300 10500 19000

6 7 38100 118 846

21 19 302

<1 <1 <11 <1 9

67 68 17063 78 620<1 <1 <1

<1 <1 <156 83 369

1420 1450 274038 59 221<1 <1 <1

<1 <1 <1

28 29 286 6 4027 32 78

1310 1510 42200.04 0.04 0.12






UNIT LOR

ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013












9 11 12

ALSI0335928326 ALSI0335928328 ALSI0335928329


12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 13/Jul/1315:32 15:35 9:29



<5 <5 <5<50 <50 <50

<100 <100 <100<100 <100 <100

<5 <5 2960

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<5 <5 <5<5 <5 <5<5 <5 <5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5





UNIT LOR

ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013














1,1–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5Carbon tetrachloride mg/Kg 0.5













0.5


9 11 12

ALSI0335928326 ALSI0335928328 ALSI0335928329


12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 13/Jul/1315:32 15:35 9:29



<5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5<5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5





UNIT LOR

ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013











TRIHALOMETHANES

Chloroform mg/Kg 2



Bromoform mg/Kg 0.5


PHENOLS

Phenol mg/Kg 0.5












9 11 12

ALSI0335928326 ALSI0335928328 ALSI0335928329


12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 13/Jul/1315:32 15:35 9:29



<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<2 <2 <2

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<1 <1 <1





UNIT LOR

ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013



7, 12–Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5

3–Methylcholanthrene mg/Kg 0.5Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg 0.5


NITROSOAMINESN-Nitrosomethylethylamine mg/Kg 0.5

N–Nitrosodiethylamine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosopyrrolidine mg/Kg 1N–Nitrosomorpholine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosodi–n–propylamine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosopiperidine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosodibutylamine mg/Kg 0.5Diphenylamine & N–Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/Kg 1Methapyrilene mg/Kg 0.5


9 11 12

ALSI0335928326 ALSI0335928328 ALSI0335928329


12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 13/Jul/1315:32 15:35 9:29



<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<1 <1 <1<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<5 <5 <5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5





UNIT LOR

ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013



Chlorobenzilate mg/Kg 0.5


CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS1,3–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.51,4–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.51,2–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachloroethane mg/Kg 0.51,2,4–Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5

Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/Kg 2.5Pentachlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachlorobenzene mg/Kg 1


9 11 12

ALSI0335928326 ALSI0335928328 ALSI0335928329


12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 13/Jul/1315:32 15:35 9:29



<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<2.5 <2.5 <2.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1





UNIT LOR

ALSI03361a


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

26 July 2013




9 11 12

ALSI0335928326 ALSI0335928328 ALSI0335928329


12/Jul/13 12/Jul/13 13/Jul/1315:32 15:35 9:29



<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5




Batch :Sample Matrix : SoilDate of Issue :Client : PT. ERM INDONESIA

1 2 4 5

ALSI0336028 330

ALSI0336028 331

ALSI0336028 333

ALSI0336028 334

SB - 11 - PLI SB - 12 - PLI SB - 14 - PLI SB - 15 - PLI

13 /Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Ju l/13 13/Jul /1310:14 10:20 10:44 15:39


Total MetalsAlumunium Al mg/kg 5 5330 810 6760 7000Arsenic As mg/kg 1 1 <1 <1 <1Antimony Sb mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1Barium Ba mg/kg 1 14 2 80 14Berilium Be mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1

Boron B mg/kg 1 19 3 41 38Cadmium Cd mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1Calsium Ca mg/kg 1 40 7 41 38Chromium Cr mg/kg 1 4 1 3 4Cobalt Co mg/kg 1 <1 <1 1 <1

Copper Cu mg/kg 1 3 <1 6 6Iron Fe mg/kg 1 9840 1460 20700 20300Lead Pb mg/kg 1 7 1 13 10Magnesium Mg mg/kg 1 130 17 161 161

Mangan Mn mg/kg 1 81 2 77 36

Molybdenum Mo mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1Nickel Ni mg/kg 1 2 <1 2 2Phosporus P mg/kg 1 60 34 179 144Pottasium K mg/kg 1 143 30 205 236Selenium Se mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1

Silver Ag mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1Sodium Na mg/kg 1 68 37 54 62Stronsium Sr mg/kg 5 1400 202 3040 2810Sulphur S mg/kg 1 79 55 167 92Thalium Tl mg/kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Tin Sn mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1Vanadium

V mg/kg 5 22 6 35 36Zinc Zn mg/kg 1 7 <1 10 10Lithium Li mg/kg 1 2 <1 2 3Titanium Ti mg/kg 1 1790 9910 1370 883Mercury Hg mg/kg 0.01 0.07 0.03 0.10 0.05

LOR = L imi t of Repor ti ng ** = Subcont ract

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

26 July 2013

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONNo. Sample





1 2 4 5

ALSI0336028 330

ALSI0336028 331

ALSI0336028 333

ALSI0336028 334


13 /Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Ju l/13 13/Jul /1310:14 10:20 10:44 15:39


ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

26 July 2013


OrganicTotal Petroleum HydrocarbonsC6 - C9 mg/kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50C15 - C28 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100C29 - C36 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100

Dissolved AnionsTotal Alkalinity mg/kg 5 12 <5 <5 <5

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS**Monocyclic AromaticsBenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Toluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Ethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5meta&para–Xylene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1Styrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5ortho–Xylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Isopropylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5n–Propylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,3,5–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5sec–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,2,4–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5tert–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5p-Isopropyltoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5n–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS2–Butanone (MEK) mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <54–Methyl–2–pentanone (MIBK) mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <52–Hexanone (MBK) mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5

FUMIGANTS2,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

cis-1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

trans–1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,2–Dibromoethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

LOR = L imi t of Repor ti ng ** = Subcont ract Page 23 of 72An ALS Limited Company




1 2 4 5

ALSI0336028 330

ALSI0336028 331

ALSI0336028 333

ALSI0336028 334


13 /Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Ju l/13 13/Jul /1310:14 10:20 10:44 15:39


ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

26 July 2013



Dichlorodifluoromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Chloromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5Vinyl chloride mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Bromomethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Chloroethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Trichlorofluoromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5

HALOGENATED ALIPHATICS (Contd)**

1,1–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

trans–1,2–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1-Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

cis–1,2-Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1,1–Trichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Carbon tetrachloride mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,2–Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Trichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Dibromomethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1,2–Trichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,3–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Tetrachlorethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1,1,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1,2,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Pentachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

LOR = L imi t of Repor ti ng ** = Subcont ractPage 24 of 72





1 2 4 5

ALSI0336028 330

ALSI0336028 331

ALSI0336028 333

ALSI0336028 334


13 /Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Ju l/13 13/Jul /1310:14 10:20 10:44 15:39


ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

26 July 2013



Chlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Bromobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.52-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

4-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,3-dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5



1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

TRIHALOMETHANES

Chloroform mg/Kg 2 <2 <2 <2 <2

Bromodichloromethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Dibromochloromethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Bromoform mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5


PHENOLS

Phenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2–Chlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

3&4–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2–Nitrophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2,4–Dimethylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2,4–Dichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2,6–Dichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

4–Chloro–3–methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2,4,6–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.52,4,5–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Pentachlorophenol mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1





1 2 4 5

ALSI0336028 330

ALSI0336028 331

ALSI0336028 333

ALSI0336028 334


13 /Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Ju l/13 13/Jul /1310:14 10:20 10:44 15:39


ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

26 July 2013


POLYAROMATIC HYDROCARBONS**Naphthalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.52–Methylnaphtalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.52–Chloronaphthalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Acenaphthylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Acenaphthene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Fluorene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Phenanthrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Fluoranthene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–2 Fluorenylacetamide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Benz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Chrysene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <17, 12–Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.53–Methylcholanthrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

PHTHALATE ESTERSDimethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Diethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Di–n–butyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Butyl benzyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Bis (2–ethylhexyl) phthalate mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5Di–n–octyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

NITROSOAMINESN-Nitrosomethylethylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–Nitrosodiethylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

N–Nitrosopyrrolidine mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1N–Nitrosomorpholine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–Nitrosodi–n–propylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–Nitrosopiperidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–Nitrosodibutylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Diphenylamine & N–Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1Methapyrilene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





1 2 4 5

ALSI0336028 330

ALSI0336028 331

ALSI0336028 333

ALSI0336028 334


13 /Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Ju l/13 13/Jul /1310:14 10:20 10:44 15:39


ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

26 July 2013


NITROAROMATICS AND KETONES2–Picoline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Acetophenone mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Nitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Isophorone mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.52,6–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <12,4–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <11–Naphthylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Nitroquinoline–N–oxide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.55–Nitro–o–toluidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Azobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,3,5–Trinitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Phenacetin mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Aminobiphenyl mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Pronamide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Dimethylaminoazobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Chlorobenzilate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5HALOETHERSBis(2–chloroethyl)ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Bis(2–chloroethoxy)methane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Chlorophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Bromophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS1,3–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,4–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,2–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Hexachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,2,4–Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Hexachloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/Kg 2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5Pentachlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Hexachlorobenzene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1

ANILINES AND BENZIDINESAniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Chloroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.52–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <13–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Carbazole mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.53,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5LOR = Limit of Reporting ** = Subcontract





UNIT LOR




Mangan Mn mg/kg 1






ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

26 July 2013

No. Sample 7 8 9 10

ALSI0336028 336

ALSI0336028 337

ALSI0336028 338

ALSI0336028 339

SB - 17 - PLII SB - 18 - PLII SB - 19 - PLII SB - 20 - PLII

13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Jul /13 13/Jul /1311:02 11:08 11:21 11:29


10200 8040 7210 97604 2 4 4

<1 <1 2 210 28 32 14<1 <1 <1 <1

47 44 47 64<1 <1 <1 <112 312 403 744 3 1 3

<1 11 15 2

5 10 12 624800 23300 24100 33100

10 10 17 13232 890 1140 305

51 499 539 81

<1 <1 <1 <12 14 11 3

104 129 145 130199 376 577 356<1 <1 <1 <1

<1 <1 <1 <156 61 91 59

3580 3320 3500 470054 60 79 69<5 <5 <5 <5

<1 <1 <1 <1

42 31 30 5412 33 41 146 7 7 5

1800 1830 1590 16000.03 0.04 0.03 0.03






UNIT LOR

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

26 July 2013

No. Sample











7 8 9 10

ALSI0336028 336

ALSI0336028 337

ALSI0336028 338

ALSI0336028 339


13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Jul /13 13/Jul /1311:02 11:08 11:21 11:29



<5 <5 <5 <5<50 <50 <50 <50

<100 <100 <100 <100<100 <100 <100 <100

20 71 26 36

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<5 <5 <5 <5<5 <5 <5 <5<5 <5 <5 <5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





UNIT LOR

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

26 July 2013

No. Sample













1,1–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5

Carbon tetrachloride mg/Kg 0.51,2–Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5











Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5


7 8 9 10

ALSI0336028 336

ALSI0336028 337

ALSI0336028 338

ALSI0336028 339


13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Jul /13 13/Jul /1311:02 11:08 11:21 11:29



<5 <5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5 <5<5 <5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5 <5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





UNIT LOR

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

26 July 2013

No. Sample










TRIHALOMETHANES

Chloroform mg/Kg 2



Bromoform mg/Kg 0.5


PHENOLS

Phenol mg/Kg 0.5












7 8 9 10

ALSI0336028 336

ALSI0336028 337

ALSI0336028 338

ALSI0336028 339


13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Jul /13 13/Jul /1311:02 11:08 11:21 11:29



<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<2 <2 <2 <2

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<1 <1 <1 <1





UNIT LOR

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

26 July 2013

No. Sample


7, 12–Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg 0.53–Methylcholanthrene mg/Kg 0.5

Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg 0.5


NITROSOAMINESN-Nitrosomethylethylamine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosodiethylamine mg/Kg 0.5

N–Nitrosopyrrolidine mg/Kg 1N–Nitrosomorpholine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosodi–n–propylamine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosopiperidine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosodibutylamine mg/Kg 0.5Diphenylamine & N–Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/Kg 1Methapyrilene mg/Kg 0.5


7 8 9 10

ALSI0336028 336

ALSI0336028 337

ALSI0336028 338

ALSI0336028 339


13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Jul /13 13/Jul /1311:02 11:08 11:21 11:29



<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<1 <1 <1 <1<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<5 <5 <5 <5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<1 <1 <1 <1<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





UNIT LOR

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

26 July 2013

No. Sample


Chlorobenzilate mg/Kg 0.5HALOETHERSBis(2–chloroethyl)ether mg/Kg 0.5Bis(2–chloroethoxy)methane mg/Kg 0.54–Chlorophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.54–Bromophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS1,3–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.51,4–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.51,2–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachloroethane mg/Kg 0.51,2,4–Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/Kg 2.5Pentachlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachlorobenzene mg/Kg 1

ANILINES AND BENZIDINESAniline mg/Kg 0.54–Chloroaniline mg/Kg 0.52–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 13–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.54–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5Carbazole mg/Kg 0.53,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg 0.5LOR = Limit of Reporting ** = Subcontract

7 8 9 10

ALSI0336028 336

ALSI0336028 337

ALSI0336028 338

ALSI0336028 339


13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Jul /13 13/Jul /1311:02 11:08 11:21 11:29



<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





1 3 4 5 6

ALSI0336128340

ALSI0336128342

ALSI0336128343

ALSI0336128344

ALSI0336128345

SB - 21 -KGPF

SB - 23 -KGPF

SB - 24 -KGPF

SB - 25 -KGPF

SB - 26 -KGPF

13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 15/Jul/1314:35 14:49 15:02 15:29 9:34

UNIT LOR RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS

Total MetalsAlumunium Al mg/kg 5 11000 8940 5700 7650 8990Arsenic As mg/kg 1 <1 2 2 2 1Antimony Sb mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1Barium Ba mg/kg 1 9 6 18 17 12Berilium Be mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

Boron B mg/kg 1 46 39 33 49 50Cadmium Cd mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1Calsium Ca mg/kg 1 18 8 37 100 54Chromium Cr mg/kg 1 2 4 <1 3 3Cobalt Co mg/kg 1 2 <1 4 2 2

Copper Cu mg/kg 1 5 3 6 9 8Iron Fe mg/kg 1 23800 19900 17200 25600 26100Lead Pb mg/kg 1 11 7 9 12 10Magnesium Mg mg/kg 1 215 158 358 359 289

Manganese Mn mg/kg 1 41 28 90 79 45

Molybdenum Mo mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1Nickel Ni mg/kg 1 2 1 4 3 2Phosporus P mg/kg 1 97 103 76 149 106Potasium K mg/kg 1 171 137 319 460 330Selenium Se mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

Silver Ag mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1Sodium Na mg/kg 1 61 47 63 63 55Stronsium Sr mg/kg 5 3370 2840 2440 3660 3740Sulphur S mg/kg 1 121 <1 79 275 <1Thalium Tl mg/kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Tin Sn mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1Vanadium

V mg/kg 5 37 35 22 36 39Zinc Zn mg/kg 1 15 9 17 18 17Lithium Li mg/kg 1 5 5 4 5 5Titanium Ti mg/kg 1 1920 1810 2290 1470 1220Mercury Hg mg/kg 0.01 0.04 0.12 0.06 0.08 0.06

OrganicTotal Petroleum HydrocarbonsC6 - C9 mg/kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50C15 - C28 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100C29 - C36 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100

LOR = L imi t o f Repo rt ing ** = Subcon tract

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

25 July 2013






1 3 4 5 6

ALSI0336128340

ALSI0336128342

ALSI0336128343

ALSI0336128344

ALSI0336128345

SB - 21 -KGPF

SB - 23 -KGPF

SB - 24 -KGPF

SB - 25 -KGPF

SB - 26 -KGPF



ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

25 July 2013


Dissolved AnionsTotal Alkalinity mg/kg 5 29 <5 15 61 25

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS**Monocyclic AromaticsBenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Toluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Ethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5meta&para–Xylene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1Styrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5ortho–Xylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Isopropylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5n–Propylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,3,5–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5sec–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,2,4–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5tert–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5p-Isopropyltoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5n–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS2–Butanone (MEK) mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <54–Methyl–2–pentanone (MIBK) mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <52–Hexanone (MBK) mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

FUMIGANTS2,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

cis-1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

trans–1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,2–Dibromoethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5


Dichlorodifluoromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Chloromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Vinyl chloride mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Bromomethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Chloroethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Trichlorofluoromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

LOR = L imi t o f Repo rt ing ** = Subcon tract Page 35 of 72An ALS Limited Company




1 3 4 5 6

ALSI0336128340

ALSI0336128342

ALSI0336128343

ALSI0336128344

ALSI0336128345

SB - 21 -KGPF

SB - 23 -KGPF

SB - 24 -KGPF

SB - 25 -KGPF

SB - 26 -KGPF



ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

25 July 2013



1,1–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

trans–1,2–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,1-Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

cis–1,2-Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1,1–Trichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Carbon tetrachloride mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,2–Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Trichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Dibromomethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1,2–Trichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,3–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Tetrachlorethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1,1,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1,2,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Pentachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5


Chlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Bromobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

4-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,3-dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5



1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

TRIHALOMETHANES

Chloroform mg/Kg 2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2

Bromodichloromethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Dibromochloromethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Bromoform mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





1 3 4 5 6

ALSI0336128340

ALSI0336128342

ALSI0336128343

ALSI0336128344

ALSI0336128345

SB - 21 -KGPF

SB - 23 -KGPF

SB - 24 -KGPF

SB - 25 -KGPF

SB - 26 -KGPF



ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

25 July 2013



PHENOLS

Phenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.52–Chlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

3&4–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2–Nitrophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2,4–Dimethylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2,4–Dichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2,6–Dichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

4–Chloro–3–methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2,4,6–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2,4,5–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Pentachlorophenol mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

POLYAROMATIC HYDROCARBONS**Naphthalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.52–Methylnaphtalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.52–Chloronaphthalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Acenaphthylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Acenaphthene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Fluorene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Phenanthrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Fluoranthene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–2 Fluorenylacetamide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Benz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Chrysene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

7, 12–Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.53–Methylcholanthrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





1 3 4 5 6

ALSI0336128340

ALSI0336128342

ALSI0336128343

ALSI0336128344

ALSI0336128345

SB - 21 -KGPF

SB - 23 -KGPF

SB - 24 -KGPF

SB - 25 -KGPF

SB - 26 -KGPF



ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

25 July 2013


PHTHALATE ESTERSDimethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Diethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Di–n–butyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Butyl benzyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Bis (2–ethylhexyl) phthalate mg/Kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5Di–n–octyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

NITROSOAMINESN-Nitrosomethylethylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–Nitrosodiethylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–Nitrosopyrrolidine mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1N–Nitrosomorpholine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–Nitrosodi–n–propylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–Nitrosopiperidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–Nitrosodibutylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Diphenylamine & N–Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

Methapyrilene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

NITROAROMATICS AND KETONES2–Picoline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Acetophenone mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Nitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Isophorone mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.52,6–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <12,4–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <11–Naphthylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Nitroquinoline–N–oxide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.55–Nitro–o–toluidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Azobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,3,5–Trinitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Phenacetin mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

4–Aminobiphenyl mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Pronamide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Dimethylaminoazobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Chlorobenzilate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





1 3 4 5 6

ALSI0336128340

ALSI0336128342

ALSI0336128343

ALSI0336128344

ALSI0336128345

SB - 21 -KGPF

SB - 23 -KGPF

SB - 24 -KGPF

SB - 25 -KGPF

SB - 26 -KGPF



ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

25 July 2013


HALOETHERSBis(2–chloroethyl)ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Bis(2–chloroethoxy)methane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Chlorophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Bromophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS1,3–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,4–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,2–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Hexachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.51,2,4–Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Hexachloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/Kg 2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5Pentachlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Hexachlorobenzene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

ANILINES AND BENZIDINESAniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Chloroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.52–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <13–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Carbazole mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.53,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

LOR = Limit of Reporting ** = Subcontract Page 39 of 72An ALS Limited Company




UNIT LOR




Manganese Mn mg/kg 1

Molybdenum Mo mg/kg 1Nickel Ni mg/kg 1Phosporus P mg/kg 1Potasium K mg/kg 1Selenium Se mg/kg 1





LOR = L imi t o f Repor ti ng ** = Subcont ract

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

25 July 2013

No. Sample 7 8 10 11

ALSI03361283 46

ALSI03361283 47

ALSI03361283 49

ALSI03361283 50

SB - 27 -KGPF

SB - 28 -KGPF

SB - 30 -KGPF

KGPF

15/Jul/13 15/Jul/13 15/Jul/13 13/Jul/139:40 9:57 10:18 15:33


8310 8620 7980 82802 1 <1 2

<1 <1 <1 <18 48 8 18

<1 <1 <1 <1

46 54 41 53<1 <1 <1 <111 14 15 1083 3 4 3

<1 2 <1 3

5 4 4 925000 28900 21700 28000

8 13 8 13173 193 208 330

36 57 35 118

<1 <1 <1 <11 2 1 3

130 172 112 149228 324 252 399<1 <1 <1 <1

<1 <1 <1 <156 52 74 57

3540 4100 3080 4000518 224 152 187<5 <5 <5 <5

<1 <1 <1 <1

39 43 36 4010 15 15 204 3 4 6

1170 1450 1510 16000.05 0.04 0.04 0.05

<5 <5 <5 <5<50 <50 <50 <50

<100 <100 <100 <100<100 <100 <100 <100






UNIT LOR

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

25 July 2013

No. Sample











Chloromethane mg/Kg 5

Vinyl chloride mg/Kg 5





7 8 10 11

ALSI03361283 46

ALSI03361283 47

ALSI03361283 49

ALSI03361283 50

SB - 27 -KGPF

SB - 28 -KGPF

SB - 30 -KGPF

KGPF

15/Jul/13 15/Jul/13 15/Jul/13 13/Jul/139:40 9:57 10:18 15:33



17 9 10 68

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<5 <5 <5 <5<5 <5 <5 <5<5 <5 <5 <5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<5 <5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5 <5

<5 <5 <5 <5





UNIT LOR

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

25 July 2013

No. Sample



trans–1,2–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.51,1-Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5



1,1–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5

Carbon tetrachloride mg/Kg 0.5








1,1,2,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg 0.51,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5



Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5



Bromobenzene mg/Kg 0.5








TRIHALOMETHANES

Chloroform mg/Kg 2



Bromoform mg/Kg 0.5


7 8 10 11

ALSI03361283 46

ALSI03361283 47

ALSI03361283 49

ALSI03361283 50

SB - 27 -KGPF

SB - 28 -KGPF

SB - 30 -KGPF

KGPF

15/Jul/13 15/Jul/13 15/Jul/13 13/Jul/139:40 9:57 10:18 15:33



<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<2 <2 <2 <2

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





UNIT LOR

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

25 July 2013

No. Sample


PHENOLS

Phenol mg/Kg 0.52–Chlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5








2,4,6–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5

2,4,5–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5



7, 12–Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg 0.53–Methylcholanthrene mg/Kg 0.5Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg 0.5


7 8 10 11

ALSI03361283 46

ALSI03361283 47

ALSI03361283 49

ALSI03361283 50

SB - 27 -KGPF

SB - 28 -KGPF

SB - 30 -KGPF

KGPF

15/Jul/13 15/Jul/13 15/Jul/13 13/Jul/139:40 9:57 10:18 15:33



<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





UNIT LOR

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

25 July 2013

No. Sample


NITROSOAMINESN-Nitrosomethylethylamine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosodiethylamine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosopyrrolidine mg/Kg 1N–Nitrosomorpholine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosodi–n–propylamine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosopiperidine mg/Kg 0.5N–Nitrosodibutylamine mg/Kg 0.5Diphenylamine & N–Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/Kg 1

Methapyrilene mg/Kg 0.5

NITROAROMATICS AND KETONES2–Picoline mg/Kg 0.5Acetophenone mg/Kg 0.5Nitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Isophorone mg/Kg 0.52,6–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 12,4–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 11–Naphthylamine mg/Kg 0.54–Nitroquinoline–N–oxide mg/Kg 0.55–Nitro–o–toluidine mg/Kg 0.5Azobenzene mg/Kg 0.51,3,5–Trinitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Phenacetin mg/Kg 0.5

4–Aminobiphenyl mg/Kg 0.5Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Pronamide mg/Kg 0.5Dimethylaminoazobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Chlorobenzilate mg/Kg 0.5


7 8 10 11

ALSI03361283 46

ALSI03361283 47

ALSI03361283 49

ALSI03361283 50

SB - 27 -KGPF

SB - 28 -KGPF

SB - 30 -KGPF

KGPF

15/Jul/13 15/Jul/13 15/Jul/13 13/Jul/139:40 9:57 10:18 15:33



<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<5 <5 <5 <5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





UNIT LOR

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.



ALSI03361a

25 July 2013

No. Sample


CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS1,3–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.51,4–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.51,2–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachloroethane mg/Kg 0.51,2,4–Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/Kg 2.5Pentachlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5Hexachlorobenzene mg/Kg 1



7 8 10 11

ALSI03361283 46

ALSI03361283 47

ALSI03361283 49

ALSI03361283 50

SB - 27 -KGPF

SB - 28 -KGPF

SB - 30 -KGPF

KGPF

15/Jul/13 15/Jul/13 15/Jul/13 13/Jul/139:40 9:57 10:18 15:33



<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<1 <1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1 <1

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5





1 10

ALSI0335928318 ALSI0335928327

SB - 01 - RG SB - 10 - CP

12/Jul/13 12/Jul/1314:06 15:37

UNIT LOR RESULTS RESULTS

Total MetalsAlumunium Al mg/kg 5 6940 7030Arsenic As mg/kg 1 <1 <1Antimony Sb mg/kg 1 <1 <1Barium Ba mg/kg 1 5 12Berilium Be mg/kg 1 <1 <1

Boron B mg/kg 1 22 22Cadmium Cd mg/kg 1 <1 <1Calsium Ca mg/kg 1 123 26Chromium Cr mg/kg 1 6 5Cobalt Co mg/kg 1 <1 <1

Copper Cu mg/kg 1 <1 2Iron Fe mg/kg 1 10900 11400Lead Pb mg/kg 1 6 8Magnesium Mg mg/kg 1 112 100

Mangan Mn mg/kg 1 14 18

Molybdenum Mo mg/kg 1 3 <1Nickel Ni mg/kg 1 1 2Phosporus P mg/kg 1 67 80Pottasium K mg/kg 1 119 164Selenium Se mg/kg 1 <1 <1

Silver Ag mg/kg 1 <1 <1Sodium Na mg/kg 1 67 69Stronsium Sr mg/kg 5 1550 1640Sulphur S mg/kg 1 75 46Thalium Tl mg/kg 5 <1 <1

Tin Sn mg/kg 1 <1 <1Vanadium

V mg/kg 5 30 26Zinc Zn mg/kg 1 4 5Lithium Li mg/kg 1 25 37Titanium Ti mg/kg 1 1250 1800Mercury Hg mg/kg 0.01 0.04 0.04

LOR = L imi t o f Repo rt in g ** = Subcon tract


ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


ALSI03361a

26 July 2013






1 10

ALSI0335928318 ALSI0335928327

SB - 01 - RG SB - 10 - CP

12/Jul/13 12/Jul/1314:06 15:37



ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


ALSI03361a

26 July 2013


OrganicTotal Petroleum HydrocarbonsC6 - C9 mg/kg 5 <5 <5C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 <50 <50C15 - C28 mg/kg 100 <100 <100C29 - C36 mg/kg 100 <100 <100

Total Alkalinity mg/kg 1 54 <5

TCLP MetalsArsenic mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01Barium mg/L 0.01 0.45 0.49Cadmium mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05Chromium mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05Copper mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Lead mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05Mercury mg/L 0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005Selenium mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01Silver mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05Zinc mg/L 0.05 0.22 0.20

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS**Monocyclic AromaticsBenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Toluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Ethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5meta&para–Xylene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1Styrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5ortho–Xylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Isopropylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5n–Propylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.51,3,5–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5sec–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.51,2,4–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5tert–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5p-Isopropyltoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5n–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

LOR = L imi t o f Repo rt in g ** = Subcon tract Page 47 of 72An ALS Limited Company




1 10

ALSI0335928318 ALSI0335928327

SB - 01 - RG SB - 10 - CP

12/Jul/13 12/Jul/1314:06 15:37



ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


ALSI03361a

26 July 2013


OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS2–Butanone (MEK) mg/Kg 5 <5 <54–Methyl–2–pentanone (MIBK) mg/Kg 5 <5 <52–Hexanone (MBK) mg/Kg 5 <5 <5

FUMIGANTS2,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.51,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

cis-1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

trans–1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,2–Dibromoethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5


Dichlorodifluoromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5

Chloromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5

Vinyl chloride mg/Kg 5 <5 <5

Bromomethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5Chloroethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5

Trichlorofluoromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 <5

1,1–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

trans–1,2–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1-Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

cis–1,2-Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1,1–Trichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Carbon tetrachloride mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,2–Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Trichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Dibromomethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1,2–Trichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,3–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Tetrachlorethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,1,1,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

LOR = L imi t o f Repo rt in g ** = Subcon tractPage 48 of 72





1 10

ALSI0335928318 ALSI0335928327

SB - 01 - RG SB - 10 - CP

12/Jul/13 12/Jul/1314:06 15:37



ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


ALSI03361a

26 July 2013



1,1,2,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Pentachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5


Chlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Bromobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

4-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

1,3-dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5



1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.51,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

TRIHALOMETHANES

Chloroform mg/Kg 2 <2 <2

Bromodichloromethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Dibromochloromethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Bromoform mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5


PHENOLS

Phenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2–Chlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.53&4–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2–Nitrophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2,4–Dimethylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

LOR = L imi t o f Repo rt in g ** = Subcon tractPage 49 of 72





1 10

ALSI0335928318 ALSI0335928327

SB - 01 - RG SB - 10 - CP

12/Jul/13 12/Jul/1314:06 15:37



ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


ALSI03361a

26 July 2013


PHENOLS

2,4–Dichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2,6–Dichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Chloro–3–methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2,4,6–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

2,4,5–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Pentachlorophenol mg/Kg 1 <1 <1

POLYAROMATIC HYDROCARBONS**Naphthalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.52–Methylnaphtalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.52–Chloronaphthalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Acenaphthylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Acenaphthene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Fluorene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Phenanthrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Fluoranthene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–2 Fluorenylacetamide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Benz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Chrysene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1

7, 12–Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.53–Methylcholanthrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

PHTHALATE ESTERSDimethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Diethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Di–n–butyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Butyl benzyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Bis (2–ethylhexyl) phthalate mg/Kg 5 <5 <5Di–n–octyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5





1 10

ALSI0335928318 ALSI0335928327

SB - 01 - RG SB - 10 - CP

12/Jul/13 12/Jul/1314:06 15:37



ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


ALSI03361a

26 July 2013


NITROSOAMINESN-Nitrosomethylethylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–Nitrosodiethylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–Nitrosopyrrolidine mg/Kg 1 <1 <1N–Nitrosomorpholine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–Nitrosodi–n–propylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–Nitrosopiperidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5N–Nitrosodibutylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Diphenylamine & N–Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/Kg 1 <1 <1Methapyrilene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

NITROAROMATICS AND KETONES2–Picoline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Acetophenone mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Nitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Isophorone mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.52,6–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1

2,4–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 1 <1 <11–Naphthylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Nitroquinoline–N–oxide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.55–Nitro–o–toluidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Azobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.51,3,5–Trinitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Phenacetin mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Aminobiphenyl mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Pronamide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Dimethylaminoazobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Chlorobenzilate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

HALOETHERSBis(2–chloroethyl)ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Bis(2–chloroethoxy)methane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Chlorophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Bromophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5





1 10

ALSI0335928318 ALSI0335928327

SB - 01 - RG SB - 10 - CP

12/Jul/13 12/Jul/1314:06 15:37



ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


ALSI03361a

26 July 2013

ANALYSIS DESCRIPTIONCHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS1,3–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.51,4–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.51,2–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Hexachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.51,2,4–Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Hexachloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/Kg 2.5 <0.5 <0.5Pentachlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Hexachlorobenzene mg/Kg 1 <1 <1

ANILINES AND BENZIDINESAniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Chloroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.52–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1 <1 <13–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1 <1 <1Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

4–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Carbazole mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.53,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDESAlpha–BHC mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Beta & gamma–BHC mg/Kg 1 <1 <1Delta–BHC mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Heptachlor mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Aldrin mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Heptachlor epoxide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Endosulfan 1 mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.54,4-DDE mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Dieldrin mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Endrin mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Endosulfan 2 mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.54,4’-DDD mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Endosulfan 2 mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.54,4’-DDT mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Endrin Ketone mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Methoxychlor mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.54–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Carbazole mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.53,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5LOR = L imi t o f Repo rt in g ** = Subcon tract Page 52 of 72





1 10

ALSI0335928318 ALSI0335928327

SB - 01 - RG SB - 10 - CP

12/Jul/13 12/Jul/1314:06 15:37



ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


ALSI03361a

26 July 2013


ORGANOPHOSPHORUS PESTICIDESDichlorvos mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Dimethoate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Diazinon mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Chlorpyrifos methyl mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Malathion mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Fenthion mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Chloropyrifos mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Pirimiphos ethyl mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Chlorfenvinphos–E mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Chlorfenvinphos–Z mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Prothiofos mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Ethion mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5





3 3 L Rep 6

ALSI0336028332 ALSI0336028332 L

Rep ALSI0336028335

SB - 13 - PLI SB - 13 - PLI' SB - 16 - PLII

13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Jul/1310:26 10:26 10:52

UNIT LOR RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS

Total MetalsAlumunium Al mg/kg 5 5480 5090 9140Arsenic As mg/kg 1 3 3 3Antimony Sb mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1

Barium Ba mg/kg 1 8 8 14Berilium Be mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1

Boron B mg/kg 1 26 24 50Cadmium Cd mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1Calsium Ca mg/kg 1 13 13 33Chromium Cr mg/kg 1 2 2 4Cobalt Co mg/kg 1 <1 <1 2

Copper Cu mg/kg 1 5 4 4Iron Fe mg/kg 1 13100 12300 26300Lead Pb mg/kg 1 7 7 9Magnesium Mg mg/kg 1 74 69 180Mangan Mn mg/kg 1 25 22 51

Molybdenum Mo mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1Nickel Ni mg/kg 1 1 1 2Phosporus P mg/kg 1 61 60 109Pottasium K mg/kg 1 96 88 201Selenium Se mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1

Silver Ag mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1Sodium Na mg/kg 1 45 41 54Stronsium Sr mg/kg 5 1900 1734 3730Sulphur S mg/kg 1 <1 <1 115Thalium Tl mg/kg 5 <1 <1 <1

Tin Sn mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1Vanadium V mg/kg 5 22 20 44Zinc Zn mg/kg 1 6 6 12Lithium Li mg/kg 1 2 2 5Titanium Ti mg/kg 1 1130 1030 1630Mercury Hg mg/kg 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.03


Client Sample I.D.




ALSI03361a

12 August 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.





3 3 L Rep 6

ALSI0336028332 ALSI0336028332 L

Rep ALSI0336028335


13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Jul/1310:26 10:26 10:52


Client Sample I.D.




ALSI03361a

12 August 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

OrganicTotal Petroleum HydrocarbonsC6 - C9 mg/kg 5 <5 <5 <5C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50

C15 - C28 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100C29 - C36 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100

Total Alkalinity mg/kg 5 30 30 <5

TCLP MetalsArsenic mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Barium mg/L 0.01 0.50 0.50 0.59Cadmium mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Chromium mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Copper mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Lead mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Mercury mg/L 0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005Selenium mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Silver mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Zinc mg/L 0.05 0.23 0.23 0.28

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS**Monocyclic AromaticsBenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Toluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Ethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5meta&para–Xylene mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1Styrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5ortho–Xylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Isopropylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5n–Propylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,3,5–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5sec–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,2,4–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5tert–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5p-Isopropyltoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5n–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

LOR = Limit of Reporting ** = SubcontractPage 55 of 72





3 3 L Rep 6

ALSI0336028332 ALSI0336028332 L

Rep ALSI0336028335


13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Jul/1310:26 10:26 10:52


Client Sample I.D.




ALSI03361a

12 August 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS2–Butanone (MEK) mg/Kg 5 <5 - <54–Methyl–2–pentanone (MIBK) mg/Kg 5 <5 - <52–Hexanone (MBK) mg/Kg 5 <5 - <5

FUMIGANTS2,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

cis-1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5trans–1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,2–Dibromoethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5


Dichlorodifluoromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 - <5Chloromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 - <5

Vinyl chloride mg/Kg 5 <5 - <5Bromomethane mg/Kg 5 <5 - <5

Chloroethane mg/Kg 5 <5 - <5

Trichlorofluoromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 - <51,1–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

trans–1,2–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,1-Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

cis–1,2-Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,1,1–Trichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,1–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Carbon tetrachloride mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,2–Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Trichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Dibromomethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,1,2–Trichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,3–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Tetrachlorethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,1,1,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,1,2,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Pentachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

LOR = Limit of Reporting ** = SubcontractPage 56 of 72





3 3 L Rep 6

ALSI0336028332 ALSI0336028332 L

Rep ALSI0336028335


13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Jul/1310:26 10:26 10:52


Client Sample I.D.




ALSI03361a

12 August 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.


Chlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Bromobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

2-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,3-dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,4-dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,2-dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

TRIHALOMETHANES

Chloroform mg/Kg 2 <2 - <2

Bromodichloromethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Dibromochloromethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Bromoform mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS**PHENOLS

Phenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.52–Chlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.52–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

3&4–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.52–Nitrophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

2,4–Dimethylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.52,4–Dichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

2,6–Dichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54–Chloro–3–methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

2,4,6–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.52,4,5–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Pentachlorophenol mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1





3 3 L Rep 6

ALSI0336028332 ALSI0336028332 L

Rep ALSI0336028335


13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Jul/1310:26 10:26 10:52


Client Sample I.D.




ALSI03361a

12 August 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

POLYAROMATIC HYDROCARBONS**Naphthalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.52–Methylnaphtalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.52–Chloronaphthalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Acenaphthylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Acenaphthene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Fluorene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Phenanthrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Fluoranthene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5N–2 Fluorenylacetamide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Benz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Chrysene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1

7, 12–Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.53–Methylcholanthrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

PHTHALATE ESTERSDimethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Diethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Di–n–butyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Butyl benzyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Bis (2–ethylhexyl) phthalate mg/Kg 5 <5 - <5Di–n–octyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

NITROSOAMINESN-Nitrosomethylethylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5N–Nitrosodiethylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5N–Nitrosopyrrolidine mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1N–Nitrosomorpholine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5N–Nitrosodi–n–propylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5N–Nitrosopiperidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5N–Nitrosodibutylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Diphenylamine & N–Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1Methapyrilene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5






3 3 L Rep 6

ALSI0336028332 ALSI0336028332 L

Rep ALSI0336028335


13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Jul/1310:26 10:26 10:52


Client Sample I.D.




ALSI03361a

12 August 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

NITROAROMATICS AND KETONES2–Picoline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Acetophenone mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Nitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Isophorone mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.52,6–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 1 <1 - <12,4–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 1 <1 - <11–Naphthylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54–Nitroquinoline–N–oxide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.55–Nitro–o–toluidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Azobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,3,5–Trinitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Phenacetin mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54–Aminobiphenyl mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Pronamide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Dimethylaminoazobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Chlorobenzilate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

HALOETHERSBis(2–chloroethyl)ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Bis(2–chloroethoxy)methane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54–Chlorophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54–Bromophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS1,3–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,4–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,2–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Hexachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,2,4–Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Hexachloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/Kg 2.5 <0.5 - <0.5Pentachlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Hexachlorobenzene mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1





3 3 L Rep 6

ALSI0336028332 ALSI0336028332 L

Rep ALSI0336028335


13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 13/Jul/1310:26 10:26 10:52


Client Sample I.D.




ALSI03361a

12 August 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

ANILINES AND BENZIDINESAniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54–Chloroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.52–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1 <1 - <13–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1

Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Aniline (Cntd)4–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Carbazole mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.53,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDESAlpha–BHC mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Beta & gamma–BHC mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1Delta–BHC mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Heptachlor mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Aldrin mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Heptachlor epoxide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Endosulfan 1 mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54,4-DDE mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Dieldrin mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Endrin mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Endosulfan 2 mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54,4’-DDD mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Endosulfan 2 mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54,4’-DDT mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Endrin Ketone mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Methoxychlor mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Carbazole mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.53,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

ORGANOPHOSPHORUS PESTICIDESDichlorvos mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Dimethoate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Diazinon mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Chlorpyrifos methyl mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Malathion mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Fenthion mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Chloropyrifos mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Pirimiphos ethyl mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Chlorfenvinphos–E mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Chlorfenvinphos–Z mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Prothiofos mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Ethion mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5





2 2 L Rep 9

ALSI0336128341 ALSI0336128341

L Rep ALSI0336128348

SB - 22 - KGPF SB - 22 - KGPF' SB - 29 - KGPF

13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 15/Jul/1314:39 14:39 10:10


Total MetalsAlumunium Al mg/kg 5 6420 6440 7800Arsenic As mg/kg 1 3 3 2Antimony Sb mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1Barium Ba mg/kg 1 7 7 19Berilium Be mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1

Boron B mg/kg 1 27 27 45Cadmium Cd mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1Calsium Ca mg/kg 1 20 23 20Chromium Cr mg/kg 1 1 1 3Cobalt Co mg/kg 1 1 1 2

Copper Cu mg/kg 1 3 4 6Iron Fe mg/kg 1 14100 14100 24000Lead Pb mg/kg 1 7 6 11Magnesium Mg mg/kg 1 209 211 258

Mangan Mn mg/kg 1 36 34 45

Molybdenum Mo mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1Nickel Ni mg/kg 1 2 1 2Phosporus P mg/kg 1 101 101 124Pottasium K mg/kg 1 195 195 320Selenium Se mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1

Silver Ag mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1Sodium Na mg/kg 1 66 80 55Stronsium Sr mg/kg 5 2050 2000 3430Sulphur S mg/kg 1 64 64 128Thalium Tl mg/kg 5 <5 <5 <5

Tin Sn mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1Vanadium

V mg/kg 5 22 22 37Zinc Zn mg/kg 1 9 9 14Lithium Li mg/kg 1 3 3 4Titanium Ti mg/kg 1 1600 1580 1350Mercury Hg mg/kg 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

LOR = L imit o f Repo rti ng ** = Subcontr act

Client Sample I.D.




ALSI03361a

25 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.





2 2 L Rep 9

ALSI0336128341 ALSI0336128341



13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 15/Jul/1314:39 14:39 10:10


Client Sample I.D.




ALSI03361a

25 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

OrganicTotal Petroleum HydrocarbonsC6 - C9 mg/kg 5 <5 <5 <5C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50C15 - C28 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100C29 - C36 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100

Total Alkalinity mg/kg 5 16 16 14

TCLP MetalsArsenic As mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Barium Ba mg/L 0.01 0.59 0.45 0.50Cadmium Cd mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Chromium Cr mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Copper Cu mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Lead Pb mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Mercury Hg mg/L 0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005Selenium Se mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Silver Ag mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Zinc Zn mg/L 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.22

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS**Monocyclic AromaticsBenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Toluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Ethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5meta&para–Xylene mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1Styrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5ortho–Xylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Isopropylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5n–Propylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,3,5–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5sec–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,2,4–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5tert–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5p-Isopropyltoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5n–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS2–Butanone (MEK) mg/Kg 5 <5 - <54–Methyl–2–pentanone (MIBK) mg/Kg 5 <5 - <52–Hexanone (MBK) mg/Kg 5 <5 - <5

LOR = L imit o f Repo rti ng ** = Subcontr act Page 62 of 72An ALS Limited Company




2 2 L Rep 9

ALSI0336128341 ALSI0336128341



13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 15/Jul/1314:39 14:39 10:10


Client Sample I.D.




ALSI03361a

25 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

FUMIGANTS2,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

cis-1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

trans–1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,2–Dibromoethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5


Dichlorodifluoromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 - <5

Chloromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 - <5

Vinyl chloride mg/Kg 5 <5 - <5

Bromomethane mg/Kg 5 <5 - <5

Chloroethane mg/Kg 5 <5 - <5

Trichlorofluoromethane mg/Kg 5 <5 - <5

1,1–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

trans–1,2–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,1-Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

cis–1,2-Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,1,1–Trichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,1–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Carbon tetrachloride mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,2–Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Trichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Dibromomethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,1,2–Trichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,3–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Tetrachlorethene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5



1,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Pentachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5





2 2 L Rep 9

ALSI0336128341 ALSI0336128341



13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 15/Jul/1314:39 14:39 10:10


Client Sample I.D.




ALSI03361a

25 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.


Chlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Bromobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.52-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

4-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

1,3-dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5





TRIHALOMETHANES

Chloroform mg/Kg 2 <2 - <2

Bromodichloromethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Dibromochloromethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Bromoform mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5


PHENOLS

Phenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

2–Chlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

2–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

3&4–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

2–Nitrophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

2,4–Dimethylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

2,4–Dichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

2,6–Dichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

4–Chloro–3–methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

2,4,6–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.52,4,5–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Pentachlorophenol mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1





2 2 L Rep 9

ALSI0336128341 ALSI0336128341



13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 15/Jul/1314:39 14:39 10:10


Client Sample I.D.




ALSI03361a

25 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

POLYAROMATIC HYDROCARBONS**Naphthalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.52–Methylnaphtalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.52–Chloronaphthalene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Acenaphthylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Acenaphthene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Fluorene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Phenanthrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Fluoranthene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5N–2 Fluorenylacetamide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Benz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Chrysene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1

7, 12–Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

3–Methylcholanthrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

PHTHALATE ESTERSDimethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Diethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Di–n–butyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Butyl benzyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Bis (2–ethylhexyl) phthalate mg/Kg 5 <5 - <5Di–n–octyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

NITROSOAMINESN-Nitrosomethylethylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

N–Nitrosodiethylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5N–Nitrosopyrrolidine mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1N–Nitrosomorpholine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5N–Nitrosodi–n–propylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5N–Nitrosopiperidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5N–Nitrosodibutylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Diphenylamine & N–Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1Methapyrilene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5





2 2 L Rep 9

ALSI0336128341 ALSI0336128341



13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 15/Jul/1314:39 14:39 10:10


Client Sample I.D.




ALSI03361a

25 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

NITROAROMATICS AND KETONES2–Picoline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Acetophenone mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Nitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Isophorone mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.52,6–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 1 <1 - <12,4–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 1 <1 - <11–Naphthylamine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54–Nitroquinoline–N–oxide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.55–Nitro–o–toluidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Azobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,3,5–Trinitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Phenacetin mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54–Aminobiphenyl mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Pronamide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Dimethylaminoazobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Chlorobenzilate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

HALOETHERSBis(2–chloroethyl)ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Bis(2–chloroethoxy)methane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54–Chlorophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54–Bromophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS1,3–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,4–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,2–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Hexachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.51,2,4–Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Hexachloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/Kg 2.5 <0.5 - <0.5Pentachlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Hexachlorobenzene mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1

ANILINES AND BENZIDINESAniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54–Chloroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.52–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1 <1 - <13–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5





2 2 L Rep 9

ALSI0336128341 ALSI0336128341



13/Jul/13 13/Jul/13 15/Jul/1314:39 14:39 10:10


Client Sample I.D.




ALSI03361a

25 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Aniline (Cntd)4–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Carbazole mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.53,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDESAlpha–BHC mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Beta & gamma–BHC mg/Kg 1 <1 - <1Delta–BHC mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Heptachlor mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Aldrin mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Heptachlor epoxide mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Endosulfan 1 mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54,4-DDE mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Dieldrin mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Endrin mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Endosulfan 2 mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54,4’-DDD mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Endosulfan 2 mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54,4’-DDT mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Endrin Ketone mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Methoxychlor mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.54–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Carbazole mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.53,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

ORGANOPHOSPHORUS PESTICIDESDichlorvos mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Dimethoate mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

Diazinon mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Chlorpyrifos methyl mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Malathion mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Fenthion mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Chloropyrifos mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Pirimiphos ethyl mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Chlorfenvinphos–E mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Chlorfenvinphos–Z mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Prothiofos mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Ethion mg/Kg 0.5 <0.5 - <0.5




CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISBatch : ALSI03361aDate of Issue :Client : PT. ERM INDONESIA

QUALITY CONTROL

MethodBlank

ReferenceMaterial %Recovery

Total MetalsAlumunium Al mg/kg 5 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <5 108Arsenic As mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 110Antimony Sb mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 95Barium Ba mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 111Berilium Be mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 86Boron B mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 100Cadmium Cd mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 111Calsium Ca mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 96Chromium Cr mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 111Cobalt Co mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 115

Copper Cu mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 110Iron Fe mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 96Lead Pb mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 105Magnesium Mg mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 102Mangan Mn mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 97Molybdenum Mo mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 90Nickel Ni mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 115Phosporus P mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 88Pottasium K mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 98Selenium Se mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 99

Silver Ag mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 95Sodium Na mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 92Stronsium Sr mg/kg 5 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <5 103Sulphur S mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 94Thalium Tl mg/kg 5 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <5 111Tin Sn mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 92

Vanadium V mg/kg 5 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <5 115Zinc Zn mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 115Lithium Li mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 97Titanium Ti mg/kg 1 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3120 B <1 95Mercury Hg mg/kg 0.01 Soil APHA 3050 B, APHA 3112 B <0.01 97

TCLP MetalsArsenic As mg/L 0.01 Water USEPA 1311, APHA 3120 B <0.01 98Barium Ba mg/L 0.01 Water USEPA 1311, APHA 3120 B <0.01 100Cadmium Cd mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 1311, APHA 3120 B <0.05 103Chromium Cr mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 1311, APHA 3120 B <0.05 98Copper Cu mg/L 0.01 Water USEPA 1311, APHA 3120 B <0.01 96

Lead Pb mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 1311, APHA 3120 B <0.05 97Mercury Hg mg/L 0.0005 Water USEPA 1311, APHA 3112 B <0.0005 95Selenium Se mg/L 0.01 Water USEPA 1311, APHA 3120 B <0.01 85Silver Ag mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 1311, APHA 3120 B <0.05 95Zinc Zn mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 1311, APHA 3120 B <0.05 97

Total Alkalinity mg/kg 5 Water APHA 2320 <1 96Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon mg/L 50 Water USEPA 8015 B <50 93

Method Blank = A contaminant free sample that undergoes processing identical to that carried out f or samples.

LOR = Limit of Reporting Reference Material = Material whose properties are certified by a technically valid procedure issued by a certified body.

Laboratory ID

26 July 2013

ANALYSIS DESCRIPTION Unit LOR CRMMatrix

Method Reference





QUALITY CONTROL

MethodBlank


Laboratory ID

26 July 2013


Method Reference

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS**Monocyclic AromaticsBenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 98Toluene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 97Ethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 97meta&para–Xylene mg/Kg 1 Soil USEPA 8260 B <1 97Styrene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 100ortho–Xylene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 98

Isopropylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 99n–Propylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 1001,3,5–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 99sec–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 1001,2,4–Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 99tert–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 101p-Isopropyltoluene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 100n–Butylbenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 97

OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS2–Butanone (MEK) mg/Kg 5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <5 964–Methyl–2–pentanone (MIBK) mg/Kg 5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <5 1002–Hexanone (MBK) mg/Kg 5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <5 101

FUMIGANTS2,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 941,2–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 95cis-1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 96trans–1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 991,2–Dibromoethane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 96

HALOGENATED ALIPHATICSDichlorodifluoromethane mg/Kg 5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <5 93Chloromethane mg/Kg 5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <5 96Vinyl chloride mg/Kg 5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <5 98Bromomethane mg/Kg 5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <5 97Chloroethane mg/Kg 5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <5 97Trichlorofluoromethane mg/Kg 5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <5 981,1–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 95trans–1,2–Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 961,1-Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 97cis–1,2-Dichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 971,1,1–Trichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 99

1,1–Dichloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 98Carbon tetrachloride mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 1011,2–Dichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 99Trichloroethene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 96Dibromomethane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 991,1,2–Trichloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 961,3–Dichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 97Tetrachlorethene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 971,1,1,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 1011,1,2,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 1001,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 104Pentachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 1021,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 93Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 113







QUALITY CONTROL

MethodBlank


Laboratory ID

26 July 2013


Method Reference

HALOGENATED AROMATICSChlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 98Bromobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 1012-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 1004-chlorotoluene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 1011,3-dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 1011,4-dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 1011,2-dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 1011,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 981,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 99

TRIHALOMETHANESChloroform mg/Kg 2 Soil USEPA 8260 B <2 100Bromodichloromethane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 102Dibromochloromethane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 103Bromoform mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8260 B <0.5 101

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS**PHENOLSPhenol mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 992–Chlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1012–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 973&4–Methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1022–Nitrophenol mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1042,4–Dimethylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 942,4–Dichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1062,6–Dichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1024–Chloro–3–methylphenol mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 97

2,4,6–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 992,4,5–Trichlorophenol mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 104Pentachlorophenol mg/Kg 1 Soil USEPA 8270 B <1 107

POLYAROMATIC HYDROCARBONS**Naphthalene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1062–Methylnaphtalene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1072–Chloronaphthalene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 106Acenaphthylene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 103Acenaphthene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 106Fluorene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 107Phenanthrene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 106Anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 102Fluoranthene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 106

Pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 104N–2 Fluorenylacetamide mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 99Benz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 104Chrysene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 101Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/Kg 1 Soil USEPA 8270 B <1 1057, 12–Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 92Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 983–Methylcholanthrene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 105Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 90Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 89Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 91







QUALITY CONTROL

MethodBlank


Laboratory ID

26 July 2013


Method Reference

PHTHALATE ESTERSDimethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 105Diethyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 107Di–n–butyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 105Butyl benzyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 101Bis (2–ethylhexyl) phthalate mg/Kg 5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <5 105Di–n–octyl phthalate mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 102

NITROSOAMINESN-Nitrosomethylethylamine mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 99N–Nitrosodiethylamine mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 93N–Nitrosopyrrolidine mg/Kg 1 Soil USEPA 8270 B <1 98N–Nitrosomorpholine mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 98N–Nitrosodi–n–propylamine mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 95N–Nitrosopiperidine mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 102N–Nitrosodibutylamine mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 104Diphenylamine & N–Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/Kg 1 Soil USEPA 8270 B <1 110Methapyrilene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 98

NITROAROMATICS AND KETONES2–Picoline mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 96Acetophenone mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 106Nitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 96Isophorone mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 992,6–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 1 Soil USEPA 8270 B <1 106

2,4–Dinitrotoluene mg/Kg 1 Soil USEPA 8270 B <1 1051–Naphthylamine mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1024–Nitroquinoline–N–oxide mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 105

5–Nitro–o–toluidine mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 98Azobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 981,3,5–Trinitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 94Phenacetin mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1004–Aminobiphenyl mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 100Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 100Pronamide mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 109Dimethylaminoazobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 101Chlorobenzilate mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 103

HALOETHERSBis(2–chloroethyl)ether mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 94Bis(2–chloroethoxy)methane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 934–Chlorophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1044–Bromophenyl phenyl ether mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 101

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS1,3–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1061,4–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1041,2–Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 105Hexachloroethane mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1051,2,4–Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 105Hexachloropropylene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 108Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 102Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/Kg 2.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <2.5 97Pentachlorobenzene mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 101Hexachlorobenzene mg/Kg 1 Soil USEPA 8270 B <1 102







QUALITY CONTROL

MethodBlank


Laboratory ID

26 July 2013


Method Reference

ANILINES AND BENZIDINESAniline mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 934–Chloroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 832–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1 Soil USEPA 8270 B <1 983–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 1 Soil USEPA 8270 B <1 100Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1044–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 97Carbazole mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1003,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 98

PESTICIDES**ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDESAlpha–BHC mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 98Beta & gamma–BHC mg/Kg 1 Soil USEPA 8270 B <1 102Delta–BHC mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 96Heptachlor mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 90Aldrin mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 84Heptachlor epoxide mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 105Endosulfan 1 mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1044,4-DDE mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 103Dieldrin mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 98Endrin mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 104Endosulfan 2 mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 1024,4’-DDD mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 108Endosulfan 2 mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 954,4’-DDT mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 101Endrin Ketone mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 98Methoxychlor mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 103Dibenzofuran mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 83

4–Nitroaniline mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 85Carbazole mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 983,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 90

ORGANOPHOSPHORUS PESTICIDESDichlorvos mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 105Dimethoate mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 106Diazinon mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 100Chlorpyrifos methyl mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 95Malathion mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 103Fenthion mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 109Chloropyrifos mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 104Pirimiphos ethyl mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 108Chlorfenvinphos–E mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 104Chlorfenvinphos–Z mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 102Prothiofos mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 101

Ethion mg/Kg 0.5 Soil USEPA 8270 B <0.5 97






Date Completed:

ALSI File No: ALSI03387

Report on: SALAMANDER Project



Date received:

Sampled by: Mr. Godfrey & Mr. Fahmi Idris




29 July 2013

22 July 2013




Batch :Sample Matrix : AmbientDate of Issue :Client : PT. ERM INDONESIA

1 2 3

ALSI0338728516 ALSI0338728517 ALSI0338728518

A-01- RG A-02- R II A-03- R III

12/Jul/13 14/Jul/13 15/Jul/1314:00 10:30 17:00


Nitrogen Dioxide NO2 µ g/m 3 20 <20 <20 <20(24 Hour Average Period)Sulphur Dioxide SO 2 µ g/m 3 12.5 167 <12.5 <12.5

(24 Hour Average Period)Ozone O3 µ g/m 3 20 <20 <20 <20(24 Hour Average Period)PM 10 µ g/Nm 3 5 28.1 <5 <5

PM 2.5 µ g/Nm 3 5 18.4 <5 <5

LOR = limit Of Reporting

Client Sample I.D.




ALSI03387

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.




Sulfur Dioxide ppm Nitrogen Dioxide ppm Ozone ppm

10 Minute Average Period 1 Hour Average Period 8 Hour Average PeriodUnit (μg/m 3) (μg/m 3) (μg/m 3)

O! "00 #0 #0Date $ime

1#%&ul%1" 0"'0 '1) PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0"'1 '1 PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0"'# '1+ PM *"001#%&ul%1" 0"'" '18 PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0"', '1- PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0"') '#0 PM *"00 *#0

1#%&ul%1" 0,'0 '#1 PM *"001#%&ul%1" 0,'1 '## PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0,'# '#" PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0,'" '#, PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0,', '#) PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0,') '# PM *"00 *#01#%&ul%1" 0)'0 '#+ PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0)'1 '#8 PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0)'# '#- PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0)'" '"0 PM *"001#%&ul%1" 0)', '"1 PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0)') '"# PM *"00 *#0

1#%&ul%1" 0 '0 '"" PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0 '1 '", PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0 '# '") PM *"001#%&ul%1" 0 '" '" PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0 ', '"+ PM *"001#%&ul%1" 0 ') '"8 PM *"00 *#0

1#%&ul%1" 0+'0 '"- PM *"001#%&ul%1" 0+'1 ',0 PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0+'# ',1 PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0+'" ',# PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0+', '," PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 0+') ',, PM *"00 *#01#%&ul%1" 08'0 ',) PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 08'1 ', PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 08'# ',+ PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 08'" ',8 PM )#)

1#%&ul%1" 08', ',- PM )#)

1#%&ul%1" 08') ')0 PM )#) *#01#%&ul%1" 0-'0 ')1 PM +88

1#%&ul%1" 0-'1 ')# PM +88

1#%&ul%1" 0-'# ')" PM +881#%&ul%1" 0-'" '), PM +88

1#%&ul%1" 0-', ')) PM +88

1#%&ul%1" 0-') ') PM )#) *#0

Am.ient Air Monitoring !e/ult/ for o ation A%01% !2Am.ient Air Monitoring !e/ult/ for o ation A%01% !2Am.ient Air Monitoring !e/ult/ for o ation A%01% !2Am.ient Air Monitoring !e/ult/ for o ation A%01% !2






O! "00 #0 #0Date $ime


1#%&ul%1" 10'0 ')+ PM )#)

1#%&ul%1" 10'1 ')8 PM )#)

1#%&ul%1" 10'# ')- PM )#)1#%&ul%1" 10'"+'00 PM )#)

1#%&ul%1" 10',+'01 PM )#)

1#%&ul%1" 10')+'0# PM )#) *#0 *#0

1#%&ul%1" 11'0+'0" PM )#)1#%&ul%1" 11'1+'0, PM )#)

1#%&ul%1" 11'#+'0) PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 11'"+'0 PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 11',+'0+ PM *"00

1#%&ul%1" 11')+'08 PM *"00 *#01"%&ul%1" 1#'0+'0- AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 1#'1+'10 AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 1#'#+'11 AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 1#'"+'1# AM *"001"%&ul%1" 1#',+'1" AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 1#')+'1, AM *"00 *#0

1"%&ul%1" 01'0+'1) AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 01'1+'1 AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 01'#+'1+ AM *"001"%&ul%1" 01'"+'18 AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 01',+'1- AM *"001"%&ul%1" 01')+'#0 AM *"00 *#0

1"%&ul%1" 0#'0+'#1 AM *"001"%&ul%1" 0#'1+'## AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0#'#+'#" AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0#'"+'#, AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0#',+'#) AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0#')+'# AM *"00 *#01"%&ul%1" 0"'0+'#+ AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0"'1+'#8 AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0"'#+'#- AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0"'"+'"0 AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0"',+'"1 AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0"')+'"# AM *"00 *#01"%&ul%1" 0,'0+'"" AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0,'1+'", AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0,'#+'") AM *"001"%&ul%1" 0,'"+'" AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0,',+'"+ AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0,')+'"8 AM *"00 *#0






O! "00 #0 #0Date $ime


1"%&ul%1" 0)'0+'"- AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0)'1+',0 AM )#)

1"%&ul%1" 0)'#+',1 AM )#)1"%&ul%1" 0)'"+',# AM )#)

1"%&ul%1" 0)',+'," AM )#)

1"%&ul%1" 0)')+',, AM )#) *#0

1"%&ul%1" 0 '0+',) AM )#)1"%&ul%1" 0 '1+', AM )#)

1"%&ul%1" 0 '#+',+ AM +88

1"%&ul%1" 0 '"+',8 AM )#)

1"%&ul%1" 0 ',+',- AM )#)

1"%&ul%1" 0 ')+')0 AM )#) *#0 *#01"%&ul%1" 0+'0+')1 AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0+'1+')# AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0+'#+')" AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0+'"+'), AM *"001"%&ul%1" 0+',+')) AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0+')+') AM *"00 *#0

1"%&ul%1" 08'0+')+ AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 08'1+')8 AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 08'#+')- AM *"001"%&ul%1" 08'"8'00 AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 08',8'01 AM *"001"%&ul%1" 08')8'0# AM *"00 *#0

1"%&ul%1" 0-'08'0" AM *"001"%&ul%1" 0-'18'0, AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0-'#8'0) AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0-'"8'0 AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0-',8'0+ AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0-')8'08 AM *"00 *#01"%&ul%1" 10'08'0- AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 10'18'10 AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 10'#8'11 AM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 10'"8'1# AM *"00 *#0





10 Minute Average Period 1 Hour Average Period 8 Hour Average Period

Unit (μg/m 3) (μg/m 3) (μg/m 3)

O! "00 #0 #0Date $ime1"%&ul%1" 11'0#'11 AM *"001"%&ul%1" 11'1#'11 AM *"001"%&ul%1" 11'##'11 AM *"001"%&ul%1" 11'"#'11 AM *"001"%&ul%1" 11',#'11 AM *"001"%&ul%1" 11')#'11 AM *"00 *#01"%&ul%1" 1#'0#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 1#'1#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 1#'##'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 1#'"#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 1#',#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 1#')#'11 PM *"00 *#0

1"%&ul%1" 01'0#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 01'1#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 01'##'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 01'"#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 01',#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 01')#'11 PM *"00 *#01"%&ul%1" 0#'0#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0#'1#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0#'##'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0#'"#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0#',#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0#')#'11 PM *"00 *#01"%&ul%1" 0"'0#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0"'1#'11 PM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0"'##'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0"'"#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0"',#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0"')#'11 PM *"00 *#01"%&ul%1" 0,'0#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0,'1#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0,'##'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0,'"#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0,',#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0,')#'11 PM *"00 *#01"%&ul%1" 0)'0#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0)'1#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0)'##'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0)'"#'11 PM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 0)',#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0)')#'11 PM *"00 *#01"%&ul%1" 0 '0#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0 '1#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0 '##'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0 '"#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0 ',#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0 ')#'11 PM *"00 *#0 *#0

Am.ient Air Monitoring !e/ult/ for o ation A%0#% ! 33Am.ient Air Monitoring !e/ult/ for o ation A%0#% ! 33Am.ient Air Monitoring !e/ult/ for o ation A%0#% ! 33Am.ient Air Monitoring !e/ult/ for o ation A%0#% ! 33







O! "00 #0 #0Date $ime


1"%&ul%1" 0+'0#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0+'1#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0+'##'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0+'"#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0+',#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0+')#'11 PM *"00 *#01"%&ul%1" 08'0#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 08'1#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 08'##'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 08'"#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 08',#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 08')#'11 PM *"00 *#0

1"%&ul%1" 0-'0#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0-'1#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0-'##'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0-'"#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0-',#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 0-')#'11 PM *"00 *#01"%&ul%1" 10'0#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 10'1#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 10'##'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 10'"#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 10',#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 10')#'11 PM *"00 *#01"%&ul%1" 11'0#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 11'1#'11 PM *"00

1"%&ul%1" 11'##'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 11'"#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 11',#'11 PM *"001"%&ul%1" 11')#'11 PM *"00 *#01,%&ul%1" 1#'0#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 1#'1#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 1#'##'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 1#'"#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 1#',#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 1#')#'11 AM *"00 *#01,%&ul%1" 01'0#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 01'1#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 01'##'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 01'"#'11 AM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 01',#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 01')#'11 AM *"00 *#01,%&ul%1" 0#'0#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0#'1#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0#'##'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0#'"#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0#',#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0#')#'11 AM *"00 *#0 *#0







O! "00 #0 #0Date $ime


1,%&ul%1" 0"'0#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0"'1#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0"'##'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0"'"#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0"',#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0"')#'11 AM *"00 *#01,%&ul%1" 0,'0#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0,'1#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0,'##'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0,'"#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0,',#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0,')#'11 AM *"00 *#01,%&ul%1" 0)'0#'11 AM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0)'1#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0)'##'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0)'"#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0)',#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0)')#'11 AM *"00 *#01,%&ul%1" 0 '0#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0 '1#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0 '##'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0 '"#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0 ',#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0 ')#'11 AM *"00 *#01,%&ul%1" 0+'0#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0+'1#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0+'##'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0+'"#'11 AM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0+',#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0+')#'11 AM *"00 *#01,%&ul%1" 08'0#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 08'1#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 08'##'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 08'"#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 08',#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 08')#'11 AM *"00 *#01,%&ul%1" 0-'0#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0-'1#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0-'##'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0-'"#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0-',#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 0-')#'11 AM *"00 *#01,%&ul%1" 10'0#'11 AM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 10'1#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 10'##'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 10'"#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 10',#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 10')#'11 AM *"00 *#0 *#01,%&ul%1" 11'0#'11 AM *"001,%&ul%1" 11'1#'11 AM *"00





10 Minute Average Period 1 Hour Average Period 8 Hour Average PeriodUnit

(μg/m 3)

(μg/m 3)

(μg/m 3)

O! "00 #0 #0Date $ime

1,%&ul%1" 11'1 '1# AM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 11'# '1# AM *"001,%&ul%1" 11'" '1# AM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 11', '1# AM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 11') '1# AM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 1#'0 '1# PM *"00 *#01,%&ul%1" 1#'1 '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 1#'# '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 1#'" '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 1#', '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 1#') '1# PM *"001,%&ul%1" 01'0 '1# PM *"00 *#0

1,%&ul%1" 01'1 '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 01'# '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 01'" '1# PM *"001,%&ul%1" 01', '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 01') '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0#'0 '1# PM *"00 *#0

1,%&ul%1" 0#'1 '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0#'# '1# PM *"001,%&ul%1" 0#'" '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0#', '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0#') '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0"'0 '1# PM *"00 *#01,%&ul%1" 0"'1 '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0"'# '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0"'" '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0"', '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0"') '1# PM *"001,%&ul%1" 0,'0 '1# PM *"00 *#0

1,%&ul%1" 0,'1 '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0,'# '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0,'" '1# PM *"001,%&ul%1" 0,', '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0,') '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0)'0 '1# PM *"00 *#0

1,%&ul%1" 0)'1 '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0)'# '1# PM *"001,%&ul%1" 0)'" '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0)', '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0)') '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0 '0 '1# PM *"00 *#01,%&ul%1" 0 '1 '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0 '# '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0 '" '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0 ', '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0 ') '1# PM *"001,%&ul%1" 0+'0 '1# PM *"00 *#0 *#0

Am.ient Air Monitoring !e/ult/ for o ation A%0"4! 333Am.ient Air Monitoring !e/ult/ for o ation A%0"4! 333Am.ient Air Monitoring !e/ult/ for o ation A%0"4! 333Am.ient Air Monitoring !e/ult/ for o ation A%0"4! 333






O! "00 #0 #0Date $ime


1,%&ul%1" 0+'1 '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0+'# '1# PM *"001,%&ul%1" 0+'" '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0+', '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0+') '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 08'0 '1# PM *"00 *#0

1,%&ul%1" 08'1 '1# PM *"001,%&ul%1" 08'# '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 08'" '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 08', '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 08') '1# PM *"001,%&ul%1" 0-'0 '1# PM *"00 *#0

1,%&ul%1" 0-'1 '1# PM *"001,%&ul%1" 0-'# '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0-'" '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 0-', '1# PM *"001,%&ul%1" 0-') '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 10'0 '1# PM *"00 *#0

1,%&ul%1" 10'1 '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 10'# '1# PM *"001,%&ul%1" 10'" '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 10', '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 10') '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 11'0 '1# PM *"00 *#0

1,%&ul%1" 11'1 '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 11'# '1# PM *"001,%&ul%1" 11'" '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 11', '1# PM *"00

1,%&ul%1" 11') '1# PM *"001)%&ul%1" 1#'0 '1# AM *"00 *#0

1)%&ul%1" 1#'1 '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 1#'# '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 1#'" '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 1#', '1# AM *"001)%&ul%1" 1#') '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 01'0 '1# AM *"00 *#0

1)%&ul%1" 01'1 '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 01'# '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 01'" '1# AM *"001)%&ul%1" 01', '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 01') '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0#'0 '1# AM *"00 *#0

1)%&ul%1" 0#'1 '1# AM *"001)%&ul%1" 0#'# '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0#'" '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0#', '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0#') '1# AM *"001)%&ul%1" 0"'0 '1# AM *"00 *#0 *#0






O! "00 #0 #0Date $ime


1)%&ul%1" 0"'1 '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0"'# '1# AM *"001)%&ul%1" 0"'" '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0"', '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0"') '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0,'0 '1# AM *"00 *#0

1)%&ul%1" 0,'1 '1# AM *"001)%&ul%1" 0,'# '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0,'" '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0,', '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0,') '1# AM *"001)%&ul%1" 0)'0 '1# AM *"00 *#0

1)%&ul%1" 0)'1 '1# AM *"001)%&ul%1" 0)'# '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0)'" '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0)', '1# AM *"001)%&ul%1" 0)') '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0 '0 '1# AM *"00 *#0

1)%&ul%1" 0 '1 '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0 '# '1# AM *"001)%&ul%1" 0 '" '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0 ', '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0 ') '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0+'0 '1# AM *"00 *#0

1)%&ul%1" 0+'1 '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0+'# '1# AM *"001)%&ul%1" 0+'" '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0+', '1# AM *"00

1)%&ul%1" 0+') '1# AM *"001)%&ul%1" 08'0 '1# AM *"00 *#0

1)%&ul%1" 08'1 '1# AM *"00 *#0





Batch : ALSI03387Date of Issue :Client : PT. ERM INDONESIA

QUALITY CONTROL

Method BlankReferenceMaterial %Recovery

Nitrogen Dioxide NO 2 µ g/m 3 20 - Electrochemical Sensor - -

Sulphur Dioxide SO 2 µ g/m 3 300 - Electrochemical Sensor - -

Ozone O3 µ g/m 3 20 - Electrochemical Sensor - -

PM 10 µ g/Nm 3 5 - Mini-vol / Gravimetric - -

PM 2.5 µ g/Nm 3 5 - Mini-vol / Gravimetric - -

Method Blank = A contaminant free sample that undergoes processing identical to that carried out for samples.


29 July 2013

Laboratory ID

Method ReferenceCRM

MatrixLORUnitANALYSIS DESCRIPTION




Date Completed:

ALSI File No: ALSI03396

Report on: SALAMANDER KERENDAN

ASSURANCE SAMPLING



Date received:

Sampled by: Mr. Godfrey & Mr. Fahmi Idris




29 July 2013

22 July 2013




Batch :Sample Matrix : WaterDate of Issue :Client : PT. ERM INDONESIA

1 1 L Rep 2 3 4

ALSI033962 8593

ALSI033962 8593 L Rep

ALSI033962 8594

ALSI033962 8595

ALSI033962 8596

SW-01-R I SW-01-R I' SW-02-R I SW-03-R I SW-04-R I

17/ Jul/13 17/Jul /13 17/Jul/13 17/Jul /13 17/Jul/138:38 8:38 9:00 9:41 10:08


Physical PropertiespH - - 6.2 6.2 6.6 6.2 7.6Conductivity µ mhos/cm 1 11 11 11 11 1070

Temperature °C - 29.3 29.3 29.4 30.4 31.4Total Dissolved Solids TDS mg/L 1 7 7 8 8 725Total Suspended Solids TSS mg/L 1 12 12 11 11 14

Dissolved AnionAlkalinity-Total CaCO 3 mg/L 1 5 5 4 4 387

NutrientsTotal Phosphorus P-PO 4 mg/L 0.01 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.08 8.43Total Nitrogen T-N mg/L 0.5 2.5 2.5 0.6 1.0 157

Total MetalsAlumunium Al mg/L 0.01 0.64 0.62 0.81 0.81 0.21Arsenic As mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.003Antimony Sb mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001Barium Ba mg/L 0.001 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.031Berilium Be mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

Boron B mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.013 0.012 0.022Cadmium Cd mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001Calsium Ca mg/L 0.5 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.1 7.1Chromium Cr mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001Cobalt Co mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

Copper Cu mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.007Iron Fe mg/L 0.005 0.558 0.579 0.636 0.618 0.410Lead Pb mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Magnesium Mg mg/L 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 2.4Mangan Mn mg/L 0.001 0.025 0.025 0.027 0.027 0.069

Molybdenum Mo mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

Nickel Ni mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Phosporus P mg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 9.2Pottasium K mg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 15.3Selenium Se mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

** = Subcontract LOR = limit Of Reporting

ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

Time Sampled



Date Sampled






1 1 L Rep 2 3 4

ALSI033962 8593

ALSI033962 8593 L Rep

ALSI033962 8594

ALSI033962 8595

ALSI033962 8596




ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

Time Sampled



Date Sampled

Total MetalsSilver Ag mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Sodium Na mg/L 0.5 5.8 5.6 6.2 5 35.5

Stronsium Sr mg/L 0.005 0.011 0.009 0.009 0.01 0.029Sulphur S mg/L 0.5 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.2 11.4Thalium Tl mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Tin Sn mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Vanadium V mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Zinc Zn mg/L 0.005 0.008 0.007 <0.005 0.007 0.041Lithium Li mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001Titanium Ti mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Mercury Hg mg/L 0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005

Dissolved MetalsAlumunium Al mg/L 0.01 0.40 0.37 0.29 0.19 0.06Arsenic As mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.003Antimony Sb mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001Barium Ba mg/L 0.001 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.019Berilium Be mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

Boron B mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.012Cadmium Cd mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001Calsium Ca mg/L 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 5.9Chromium Cr mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001Cobalt Co mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

Copper Cu mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.004Iron Fe mg/L 0.005 0.362 0.334 0.300 0.207 0.263Lead Pb mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Magnesium Mg mg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 2.2Mangan Mn mg/L 0.001 0.014 0.013 0.011 0.008 0.066

Molybdenum Mo mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Nickel Ni mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Phosporus P mg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 7.6Pottasium K mg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 14.8Selenium Se mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001







1 1 L Rep 2 3 4

ALSI033962 8593

ALSI033962 8593 L Rep

ALSI033962 8594

ALSI033962 8595

ALSI033962 8596




ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

Time Sampled



Date Sampled

Dissolved MetalsSilver Ag mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Sodium Na mg/L 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 29.0

Stronsium Sr mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.005 0.006 0.028Sulphur S mg/L 0 .5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 0.6 8.1Thalium Tl mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Tin Sn mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Vanadium V mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Zinc Zn mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.006 0.021Lithium Li mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.006 0.021Titanium Ti mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Mercury Hg mg/L 0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005

OrganicBiochemical Oxygen Demand BOD 5 mg/L 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 74Chemical Oxygen Demand COD mg/L 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 122Oil and Grease mg/L 5 <5 - <5 <5 8Dissolved Oxygen DO mg/L 1 6 6 6 6 4

Surfactants MBAS mg/L 0.01 0.15 - 0.08 0.09 0.06

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH)C6 - C9 mg/L 0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05C10 - C14 mg/L 0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05C15 - C28 mg/L 0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1C29 - C36 mg/L 0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Total TPH ( C6 - C36 ) mg/L 0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

VOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS**Monocyclic AromaticsBenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Toluene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Ethylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005meta&para–Xylene mg/L 0.01 <0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Styrene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005ortho–Xylene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

Isopropylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005n–Propylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,3,5–Trimethylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005sec–Butylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005







1 1 L Rep 2 3 4

ALSI033962 8593

ALSI033962 8593 L Rep

ALSI033962 8594

ALSI033962 8595

ALSI033962 8596




ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

Time Sampled



Date Sampled

VOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS**1,2,4–Trimethylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

tert–Butylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005p-Isopropyltoluene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005n–Butylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS2–Butanone (MEK) mg/L 0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.054–Methyl–2–pentanone (MIBK) mg/L 0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.052–Hexanone (MBK) mg/L 0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

FUMIGANTS2,2–Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,2–Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005cis-1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005trans–1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,2–Dibromoethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

HALOGENATED ALIPHATICSDichlorodifluoromethane mg/L 0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Chloromethane mg/L 0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Vinyl chloride mg/L 0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromomethane mg/L 0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Chloroethane mg/L 0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Trichlorofluoromethane mg/L 0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1–Dichloroethene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005trans–1,2–Dichloroethene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,1-Dichloroethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005cis–1,2-Dichloroethene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

1,1,1–Trichloroethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,1–Dichloropropylene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Carbon tetrachloride mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

1,2–Dichloroethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Trichloroethene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

Dibromomethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,1,2–Trichloroethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,3–Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Tetrachlorethene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,1,1,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005







1 1 L Rep 2 3 4

ALSI033962 8593

ALSI033962 8593 L Rep

ALSI033962 8594

ALSI033962 8595

ALSI033962 8596




ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

Time Sampled



Date Sampled

HALOGENATED ALIPHATICS1,1,2,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

Pentachloroethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Hexachlorobutadiene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

HALOGENATED AROMATICSChlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Bromobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0052-chlorotoluene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0054-chlorotoluene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,3-dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,4-dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,2-dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

TRIHALOMETHANESChloroform mg/L 0.02 <0.02 - <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Bromodichloromethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Dibromochloromethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Bromoform mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

PHENOLSPhenol mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0052–Chlorophenol mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0052–Methylphenol mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0053&4–Methylphenol mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0052–Nitrophenol mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0052,4–Dimethylphenol mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

2,4–Dichlorophenol mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0052,6–Dichlorophenol mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0054–Chloro–3–methylphenol mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0052,4,6–Trichlorophenol mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0052,4,5–Trichlorophenol mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Pentachlorophenol mg/L 0.01 <0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01


SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS**






1 1 L Rep 2 3 4

ALSI033962 8593

ALSI033962 8593 L Rep

ALSI033962 8594

ALSI033962 8595

ALSI033962 8596




ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

Time Sampled



Date Sampled

POLYAROMATIC HYDROCARBONSNaphthalene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0052–Methylnaphtalene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0052–Chloronaphthalene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Acenaphthylene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Acenaphthene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

Fluorene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Phenanthrene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Anthracene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Fluoranthene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Pyrene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005N–2 Fluorenylacetamide mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Benz(a)anthracene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

Chrysene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/L 0.01 <0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.017, 12–Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Benzo(a)pyrene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0053–Methylcholanthrene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

PHTHALATE ESTERSDimethyl phthalate mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Diethyl phthalate mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Di–n–butyl phthalate mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Butyl benzyl phthalate mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Bis (2–ethylhexyl) phthalate mg/L 0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Di–n–octyl phthalate mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

NITROSOAMINESN-Nitrosomethylethylamine mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005N–Nitrosodiethylamine mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

N–Nitrosopyrrolidine mg/L 0.01 <0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01N–Nitrosomorpholine mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

N–Nitrosodi–n–propylamine mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005N–Nitrosopiperidine mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005N–Nitrosodibutylamine mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Diphenylamine & N–Nitrosodiphenylami mg/L 0.01 <0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Methapyrilene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005







1 1 L Rep 2 3 4

ALSI033962 8593

ALSI033962 8593 L Rep

ALSI033962 8594

ALSI033962 8595

ALSI033962 8596




ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

Time Sampled



Date Sampled

NITROAROMATICS AND KETONES2–Picoline mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Acetophenone mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

Nitrobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Isophorone mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

2,6–Dinitrotoluene mg/L 0.01 <0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.012,4–Dinitrotoluene mg/L 0.01 <0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.011–Naphthylamine mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0054–Nitroquinoline–N–oxide mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0055–Nitro–o–toluidine mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Azobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,3,5–Trinitrobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Phenacetin mg/L 0.0054–Aminobiphenyl mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Pronamide mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Dimethylaminoazobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Chlorobenzilate mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

HALOETHERSBis(2–chloroethyl)ether mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Bis(2–chloroethoxy)methane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0054–Chlorophenyl phenyl ether mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0054–Bromophenyl phenyl ether mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS1,3–Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,4–Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0051,2–Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Hexachloroethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

1,2,4–Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Hexachloropropylene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

Hexachlorobutadiene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/L 0.05 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Pentachlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Hexachlorobenzene mg/L 0.01 <0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01







1 1 L Rep 2 3 4

ALSI033962 8593

ALSI033962 8593 L Rep

ALSI033962 8594

ALSI033962 8595

ALSI033962 8596




ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

Time Sampled



Date Sampled

ANILINES AND BENZIDINESAniline mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0054–Chloroaniline mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

2–Nitroaniline mg/L 0.01 <0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.013–Nitroaniline mg/L 0.01 <0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Dibenzofuran mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0054–Nitroaniline mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005Carbazole mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.0053,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/L 0.005 <0.005 - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005







UNIT LOR

Physical PropertiespH - -Conductivity µ mhos/cm 1

Temperature °C -Total Dissolved Solids TDS mg/L 1Total Suspended Solids TSS mg/L 1

Dissolved AnionAlkalinity-Total CaCO 3 mg/L 1

NutrientsTotal Phosphorus P-PO 4 mg/L 0.01Total Nitrogen T-N mg/L 0.5

Total MetalsAlumunium Al mg/L 0.01Arsenic As mg/L 0.001Antimony Sb mg/L 0.001Barium Ba mg/L 0.001Berilium Be mg/L 0.005

Boron B mg/L 0.005Cadmium Cd mg/L 0.001Calsium Ca mg/L 0.5Chromium Cr mg/L 0.001Cobalt Co mg/L 0.005

Copper Cu mg/L 0.001Iron Fe mg/L 0.005Lead Pb mg/L 0.005Magnesium Mg mg/L 0.5Mangan Mn mg/L 0.001

Molybdenum Mo mg/L 0.005

Nickel Ni mg/L 0.005Phosporus P mg/L 0.5Pottasium K mg/L 0.5Selenium Se mg/L 0.001


ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.

Time SampledANALYSIS DESCRIPTION

Date Sampled

5 6 7 8

ALSI0339628 597

ALSI0339628 598

ALSI0339628 599

ALSI0339628 600

SW-05-R II SW-06-R II SW-07-R III SW-08-R III

16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/1316:30 16:35 16:01 15:10


6.2 6.2 5.8 5.912 13 22 16

37.4 27.0 28.9 28.98 9 15 11

19 19 31 8

4 4 7 6

1.1 1.2 0.05 0.100.6 1.0 <0.5 <0.5

1.26 1.46 1.47 0.45<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.016 0.015 0.040 0.014

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

0.008 0.007 0.009 0.008<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

1.6 1.3 2.0 1.6<0.001 0.001 0.001 <0.001<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

0.001 <0.001 0.002 0.0011.27 1.28 2.76 1.17

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.0050.7 0.6 1.2 0.9

0.044 0.043 0.171 0.082

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.50.6 0.6 1.0 0.6

<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001







UNIT LOR

ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


Date Sampled

Total MetalsSilver Ag mg/L 0.005Sodium Na mg/L 0.5

Stronsium Sr mg/L 0.005Sulphur S mg/L 0.5Thalium Tl mg/L 0.01

Tin Sn mg/L 0.005Vanadium V mg/L 0.005Zinc Zn mg/L 0.005Lithium Li mg/L 0.001Titanium Ti mg/L 0.05

Mercury Hg mg/L 0.0005

Dissolved MetalsAlumunium Al mg/L 0.01Arsenic As mg/L 0.001Antimony Sb mg/L 0.001Barium Ba mg/L 0.001Berilium Be mg/L 0.005



Molybdenum Mo mg/L 0.005Nickel Ni mg/L 0.005Phosporus P mg/L 0.5Pottasium K mg/L 0.5Selenium Se mg/L 0.001


5 6 7 8

ALSI0339628 597

ALSI0339628 598

ALSI0339628 599

ALSI0339628 600


16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/1316:30 16:35 16:01 15:10



<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.0055.2 4.8 5.1 4.9

0.006 0.006 0.013 0.0080.9 <0.5 4.2 2.1

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.0050.012 0.015 0.013 <0.0050.002 0.002 0.002 0.0020.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05

<0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005

0.41 0.40 0.48 0.15<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.013 0.010 0.027 0.007

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

<0.5 <0.5 1.1 0.6<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

0.001 <0.001 0.001 <0.0010.449 0.444 0.819 0.287

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.0050.6 0.6 1.1 0.7

0.014 0.016 0.075 0.013

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001






UNIT LOR

ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


Date Sampled

Dissolved MetalsSilver Ag mg/L 0.005Sodium Na mg/L 0.5


Tin Sn mg/L 0.005Vanadium V mg/L 0.005Zinc Zn mg/L 0.005Lithium Li mg/L 0.001Titanium Ti mg/L 0.05Mercury Hg mg/L 0.0005

OrganicBiochemical Oxygen Demand BOD 5 mg/L 5Chemical Oxygen Demand COD mg/L 10Oil and Grease mg/L 5Dissolved Oxygen DO mg/L 1

Surfactants MBAS mg/L 0.01

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH)C6 - C9 mg/L 0.05C10 - C14 mg/L 0.05C15 - C28 mg/L 0.1C29 - C36 mg/L 0.05Total TPH ( C6 - C36 ) mg/L 0.1

VOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS**Monocyclic AromaticsBenzene mg/L 0.005Toluene mg/L 0.005Ethylbenzene mg/L 0.005meta&para–Xylene mg/L 0.01

Styrene mg/L 0.005ortho–Xylene mg/L 0.005

Isopropylbenzene mg/L 0.005n–Propylbenzene mg/L 0.0051,3,5–Trimethylbenzene mg/L 0.005sec–Butylbenzene mg/L 0.005


5 6 7 8

ALSI0339628 597

ALSI0339628 598

ALSI0339628 599

ALSI0339628 600


16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/1316:30 16:35 16:01 15:10



<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.0050.6 0.6 0.6 1.0

0.006 <0.005 0.011 0.007<0.5 <0.5 0.8 <0.5

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.0050.010 0.0013 0.013 <0.0050.001 0.001 0.001 0.001<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

<0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005

<5 <5 <5 <5<10 <10 <10 <10<5 <5 <5 <55 6 5 3

0.06 0.09 0.05 0.02

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005






UNIT LOR

ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


Date Sampled

VOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS**1,2,4–Trimethylbenzene mg/L 0.005

tert–Butylbenzene mg/L 0.005p-Isopropyltoluene mg/L 0.005n–Butylbenzene mg/L 0.005

OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS2–Butanone (MEK) mg/L 0.054–Methyl–2–pentanone (MIBK) mg/L 0.052–Hexanone (MBK) mg/L 0.05

FUMIGANTS2,2–Dichloropropane mg/L 0.0051,2–Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005cis-1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/L 0 .005trans–1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/L 0.0051,2–Dibromoethane mg/L 0.005

HALOGENATED ALIPHATICSDichlorodifluoromethane mg/L 0.05Chloromethane mg/L 0.05Vinyl chloride mg/L 0.05Bromomethane mg/L 0.05Chloroethane mg/L 0.05

Trichlorofluoromethane mg/L 0.051,1–Dichloroethene mg/L 0.005trans–1,2–Dichloroethene mg/L 0.0051,1-Dichloroethane mg/L 0.005cis–1,2-Dichloroethene mg/L 0.005

1,1,1–Trichloroethane mg/L 0.0051,1–Dichloropropylene mg/L 0.005Carbon tetrachloride mg/L 0.005

1,2–Dichloroethane mg/L 0.005Trichloroethene mg/L 0.005

Dibromomethane mg/L 0.0051,1,2–Trichloroethane mg/L 0.0051,3–Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005Tetrachlorethene mg/L 0.0051,1,1,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.005


5 6 7 8

ALSI0339628 597

ALSI0339628 598

ALSI0339628 599

ALSI0339628 600


16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/1316:30 16:35 16:01 15:10



<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005






UNIT LOR

ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


Date Sampled

HALOGENATED ALIPHATICS1,1,2,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.0051,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/L 0.005

Pentachloroethane mg/L 0.0051,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/L 0.005Hexachlorobutadiene mg/L 0.005

HALOGENATED AROMATICSChlorobenzene mg/L 0.005Bromobenzene mg/L 0.0052-chlorotoluene mg/L 0.0054-chlorotoluene mg/L 0.0051,3-dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.0051,4-dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.0051,2-dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.0051,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.0051,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005

TRIHALOMETHANESChloroform mg/L 0.02Bromodichloromethane mg/L 0.005Dibromochloromethane mg/L 0.005Bromoform mg/L 0.005

PHENOLSPhenol mg/L 0.0052–Chlorophenol mg/L 0.0052–Methylphenol mg/L 0.0053&4–Methylphenol mg/L 0.0052–Nitrophenol mg/L 0.0052,4–Dimethylphenol mg/L 0.005

2,4–Dichlorophenol mg/L 0.0052,6–Dichlorophenol mg/L 0.0054–Chloro–3–methylphenol mg/L 0.0052,4,6–Trichlorophenol mg/L 0.0052,4,5–Trichlorophenol mg/L 0.005Pentachlorophenol mg/L 0.01



5 6 7 8

ALSI0339628 597

ALSI0339628 598

ALSI0339628 599

ALSI0339628 600


16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/1316:30 16:35 16:01 15:10



<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01






UNIT LOR

ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


Date Sampled

POLYAROMATIC HYDROCARBONSNaphthalene mg/L 0.0052–Methylnaphtalene mg/L 0.0052–Chloronaphthalene mg/L 0.005Acenaphthylene mg/L 0.005Acenaphthene mg/L 0.005

Fluorene mg/L 0.005Phenanthrene mg/L 0.005Anthracene mg/L 0.005Fluoranthene mg/L 0.005Pyrene mg/L 0.005N–2 Fluorenylacetamide mg/L 0.005Benz(a)anthracene mg/L 0.005

Chrysene mg/L 0.005Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/L 0.017, 12–Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene mg/L 0.005Benzo(a)pyrene mg/L 0.0053–Methylcholanthrene mg/L 0.005Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene mg/L 0.005Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/L 0.005Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/L 0.005

PHTHALATE ESTERSDimethyl phthalate mg/L 0.005Diethyl phthalate mg/L 0.005Di–n–butyl phthalate mg/L 0.005Butyl benzyl phthalate mg/L 0.005Bis (2–ethylhexyl) phthalate mg/L 0.05Di–n–octyl phthalate mg/L 0.005

NITROSOAMINESN-Nitrosomethylethylamine mg/L 0.005N–Nitrosodiethylamine mg/L 0.005

N–Nitrosopyrrolidine mg/L 0.01N–Nitrosomorpholine mg/L 0.005

N–Nitrosodi–n–propylamine mg/L 0.005N–Nitrosopiperidine mg/L 0.005N–Nitrosodibutylamine mg/L 0.005Diphenylamine & N–Nitrosodiphenylami mg/L 0.01

Methapyrilene mg/L 0.005


5 6 7 8

ALSI0339628 597

ALSI0339628 598

ALSI0339628 599

ALSI0339628 600


16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/1316:30 16:35 16:01 15:10



<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005






UNIT LOR

ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


Date Sampled

NITROAROMATICS AND KETONES2–Picoline mg/L 0.005Acetophenone mg/L 0.005

Nitrobenzene mg/L 0.005Isophorone mg/L 0.005

2,6–Dinitrotoluene mg/L 0.012,4–Dinitrotoluene mg/L 0.011–Naphthylamine mg/L 0.0054–Nitroquinoline–N–oxide mg/L 0.0055–Nitro–o–toluidine mg/L 0.005Azobenzene mg/L 0.0051,3,5–Trinitrobenzene mg/L 0.005Phenacetin mg/L 0.0054–Aminobiphenyl mg/L 0.005Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/L 0.005Pronamide mg/L 0.005Dimethylaminoazobenzene mg/L 0.005Chlorobenzilate mg/L 0.005

HALOETHERSBis(2–chloroethyl)ether mg/L 0.005Bis(2–chloroethoxy)methane mg/L 0.0054–Chlorophenyl phenyl ether mg/L 0.0054–Bromophenyl phenyl ether mg/L 0.005

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS1,3–Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.0051,4–Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.0051,2–Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005Hexachloroethane mg/L 0.005

1,2,4–Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005Hexachloropropylene mg/L 0.005

Hexachlorobutadiene mg/L 0.005Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/L 0.05Pentachlorobenzene mg/L 0.005Hexachlorobenzene mg/L 0.01


5 6 7 8

ALSI0339628 597

ALSI0339628 598

ALSI0339628 599

ALSI0339628 600


16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/1316:30 16:35 16:01 15:10



<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01






UNIT LOR

ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


Date Sampled

ANILINES AND BENZIDINESAniline mg/L 0.0054–Chloroaniline mg/L 0.005

2–Nitroaniline mg/L 0.013–Nitroaniline mg/L 0.01Dibenzofuran mg/L 0.0054–Nitroaniline mg/L 0.005Carbazole mg/L 0.0053,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/L 0.005


5 6 7 8

ALSI0339628 597

ALSI0339628 598

ALSI0339628 599

ALSI0339628 600


16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/13 16/Jul/1316:30 16:35 16:01 15:10



<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005






UNIT LOR

Physical PropertiespH - -Conductivity µ mhos/cm 1

Temperature °C -Total Dissolved Solids TDS mg/L 1Total Suspended Solids TSS mg/L 1

Dissolved AnionAlkalinity-Total CaCO 3 mg/L 1

NutrientsTotal Phosphorus P-PO 4 mg/L 0.01Total Nitrogen T-N mg/L 0.5

Total MetalsAlumunium Al mg/L 0.01Arsenic As mg/L 0.001Antimony Sb mg/L 0.001Barium Ba mg/L 0.001Berilium Be mg/L 0.005



Molybdenum Mo mg/L 0.005

Nickel Ni mg/L 0.005Phosporus P mg/L 0.5Pottasium K mg/L 0.5Selenium Se mg/L 0.001


ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


Date Sampled

9 10 L Rep 10 12

ALSI0339628 601

ALSI0339628 602 L Rep

ALSI0339628 602

ALSI0339628 604

SW-09-R III Water (River)' Water (River) EB

16/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 13/Jul/1314:31 10:12 10:12 10:44


5.9 7.3 7.4 -12 1090 1100 -

27.9 31.4 31.4 -8 744 747 1

12 13 13 2

4 383 383 4

0.11 8.45 8.42 0.03<0.5 144 145 <0.5

1.08 0.16 0.17 <0.01<0.001 0.003 0.003 <0.001<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.013 0.028 0.027 <0.001

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

0.006 0.017 0.015 <0.005<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

1.4 6.0 6.0 <0.5<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

0.001 0.007 0.006 <0.0011.1 0.374 0.359 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.0050.7 2.5 2.4 <0.50.0 0.067 0.063 <0.001

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.5 8.4 8.4 <0.5<0.5 15.4 15.2 <0.5

<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001







UNIT LOR

ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


Date Sampled

Total MetalsSilver Ag mg/L 0.005Sodium Na mg/L 0.5


Tin Sn mg/L 0.005Vanadium V mg/L 0.005Zinc Zn mg/L 0.005Lithium Li mg/L 0.001Titanium Ti mg/L 0.05

Mercury Hg mg/L 0.0005

Dissolved MetalsAlumunium Al mg/L 0.01Arsenic As mg/L 0.001Antimony Sb mg/L 0.001Barium Ba mg/L 0.001Berilium Be mg/L 0.005



Molybdenum Mo mg/L 0.005Nickel Ni mg/L 0.005Phosporus P mg/L 0.5Pottasium K mg/L 0.5Selenium Se mg/L 0.001


9 10 L Rep 10 12

ALSI0339628 601

ALSI0339628 602 L Rep

ALSI0339628 602

ALSI0339628 604


16/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 13/Jul/1314:31 10:12 10:12 10:44



<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.0054.9 35.2 35.4 <0.5

0.006 0.028 0.028 <0.0051.2 10.6 10.6 <0.5

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.0050.008 0.038 0.038 <0.0050.002 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

<0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005

0.34 0.06 0.06 <0.01<0.001 0.003 0.003 <0.001<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.007 0.018 0.018 <0.001

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 0.010 0.011 <0.005<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

<0.5 5.9 5.9 <0.5<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

0.001 0.003 0.004 <0.0010.394 0.216 0.209 <0.005

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.0050.5 2.2 2.2 <0.5

0.015 0.053 0.052 <0.001

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

<0.5 7.6 7.6 <0.50.6 14.9 14.8 <0.5

<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001






UNIT LOR

ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


Date Sampled

Dissolved MetalsSilver Ag mg/L 0.005Sodium Na mg/L 0.5


Tin Sn mg/L 0.005Vanadium V mg/L 0.005Zinc Zn mg/L 0.005Lithium Li mg/L 0.001Titanium Ti mg/L 0.05Mercury Hg mg/L 0.0005

OrganicBiochemical Oxygen Demand BOD 5 mg/L 5Chemical Oxygen Demand COD mg/L 10Oil and Grease mg/L 5Dissolved Oxygen DO mg/L 1

Surfactants MBAS mg/L 0.01

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH)C6 - C9 mg/L 0.05C10 - C14 mg/L 0.05C15 - C28 mg/L 0.1C29 - C36 mg/L 0.05Total TPH ( C6 - C36 ) mg/L 0.1

VOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS**Monocyclic AromaticsBenzene mg/L 0.005Toluene mg/L 0.005Ethylbenzene mg/L 0.005meta&para–Xylene mg/L 0.01

Styrene mg/L 0.005ortho–Xylene mg/L 0.005

Isopropylbenzene mg/L 0.005n–Propylbenzene mg/L 0.0051,3,5–Trimethylbenzene mg/L 0.005sec–Butylbenzene mg/L 0.005


9 10 L Rep 10 12

ALSI0339628 601

ALSI0339628 602 L Rep

ALSI0339628 602

ALSI0339628 604


16/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 13/Jul/1314:31 10:12 10:12 10:44



<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.0050.7 28.7 29.0 <0.5

0.005 0.024 0.024 <0.0050.6 8.5 8.5 <0.5

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.0050.006 0.012 0.012 <0.0050.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

<0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005

<5 74 78 <5<10 125 118 <10<5 - 6 <56 4 4 -

0.03 - 0.08 <0.01

<0.05 - <0.05 <0.05<0.05 - <0.05 <0.05<0.1 - <0.1 <0.1

<0.05 - <0.05 <0.05<0.1 - <0.1 <0.1

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.01 - <0.01 <0.01

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005






UNIT LOR

ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


Date Sampled

VOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS**1,2,4–Trimethylbenzene mg/L 0.005

tert–Butylbenzene mg/L 0.005p-Isopropyltoluene mg/L 0.005n–Butylbenzene mg/L 0.005

OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS2–Butanone (MEK) mg/L 0.054–Methyl–2–pentanone (MIBK) mg/L 0.052–Hexanone (MBK) mg/L 0.05

FUMIGANTS2,2–Dichloropropane mg/L 0.0051,2–Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005cis-1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/L 0 .005trans–1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/L 0.0051,2–Dibromoethane mg/L 0.005

HALOGENATED ALIPHATICSDichlorodifluoromethane mg/L 0.05Chloromethane mg/L 0.05Vinyl chloride mg/L 0.05Bromomethane mg/L 0.05Chloroethane mg/L 0.05

Trichlorofluoromethane mg/L 0.051,1–Dichloroethene mg/L 0.005trans–1,2–Dichloroethene mg/L 0.0051,1-Dichloroethane mg/L 0.005cis–1,2-Dichloroethene mg/L 0.005

1,1,1–Trichloroethane mg/L 0.0051,1–Dichloropropylene mg/L 0.005Carbon tetrachloride mg/L 0.005

1,2–Dichloroethane mg/L 0.005Trichloroethene mg/L 0.005

Dibromomethane mg/L 0.0051,1,2–Trichloroethane mg/L 0.0051,3–Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005Tetrachlorethene mg/L 0.0051,1,1,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.005


9 10 L Rep 10 12

ALSI0339628 601

ALSI0339628 602 L Rep

ALSI0339628 602

ALSI0339628 604


16/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 13/Jul/1314:31 10:12 10:12 10:44



<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.05 - <0.05 <0.05<0.05 - <0.05 <0.05<0.05 - <0.05 <0.05

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.05 - <0.05 <0.05<0.05 - <0.05 <0.05<0.05 - <0.05 <0.05<0.05 - <0.05 <0.05<0.05 - <0.05 <0.05

<0.05 - <0.05 <0.05<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005






UNIT LOR

ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


Date Sampled

HALOGENATED ALIPHATICS1,1,2,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.0051,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/L 0.005

Pentachloroethane mg/L 0.0051,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/L 0.005Hexachlorobutadiene mg/L 0.005

HALOGENATED AROMATICSChlorobenzene mg/L 0.005Bromobenzene mg/L 0.0052-chlorotoluene mg/L 0.0054-chlorotoluene mg/L 0.0051,3-dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.0051,4-dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.0051,2-dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.0051,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.0051,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005

TRIHALOMETHANESChloroform mg/L 0.02Bromodichloromethane mg/L 0.005Dibromochloromethane mg/L 0.005Bromoform mg/L 0.005

PHENOLSPhenol mg/L 0.0052–Chlorophenol mg/L 0.0052–Methylphenol mg/L 0.0053&4–Methylphenol mg/L 0.0052–Nitrophenol mg/L 0.0052,4–Dimethylphenol mg/L 0.005

2,4–Dichlorophenol mg/L 0.0052,6–Dichlorophenol mg/L 0.0054–Chloro–3–methylphenol mg/L 0.0052,4,6–Trichlorophenol mg/L 0.0052,4,5–Trichlorophenol mg/L 0.005Pentachlorophenol mg/L 0.01



9 10 L Rep 10 12

ALSI0339628 601

ALSI0339628 602 L Rep

ALSI0339628 602

ALSI0339628 604


16/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 13/Jul/1314:31 10:12 10:12 10:44



<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.02 - <0.02 <0.02<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.01 - <0.01 <0.01






UNIT LOR

ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


Date Sampled

POLYAROMATIC HYDROCARBONSNaphthalene mg/L 0.0052–Methylnaphtalene mg/L 0.0052–Chloronaphthalene mg/L 0.005Acenaphthylene mg/L 0.005Acenaphthene mg/L 0.005

Fluorene mg/L 0.005Phenanthrene mg/L 0.005Anthracene mg/L 0.005Fluoranthene mg/L 0.005Pyrene mg/L 0.005N–2 Fluorenylacetamide mg/L 0.005Benz(a)anthracene mg/L 0.005

Chrysene mg/L 0.005Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/L 0.017, 12–Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene mg/L 0.005Benzo(a)pyrene mg/L 0.0053–Methylcholanthrene mg/L 0.005Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene mg/L 0.005Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/L 0.005Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/L 0.005

PHTHALATE ESTERSDimethyl phthalate mg/L 0.005Diethyl phthalate mg/L 0.005Di–n–butyl phthalate mg/L 0.005Butyl benzyl phthalate mg/L 0.005Bis (2–ethylhexyl) phthalate mg/L 0.05Di–n–octyl phthalate mg/L 0.005

NITROSOAMINESN-Nitrosomethylethylamine mg/L 0.005N–Nitrosodiethylamine mg/L 0.005

N–Nitrosopyrrolidine mg/L 0.01N–Nitrosomorpholine mg/L 0.005

N–Nitrosodi–n–propylamine mg/L 0.005N–Nitrosopiperidine mg/L 0.005N–Nitrosodibutylamine mg/L 0.005Diphenylamine & N–Nitrosodiphenylami mg/L 0.01

Methapyrilene mg/L 0.005


9 10 L Rep 10 12

ALSI0339628 601

ALSI0339628 602 L Rep

ALSI0339628 602

ALSI0339628 604


16/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 13/Jul/1314:31 10:12 10:12 10:44



<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.01 - <0.01 <0.01

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.05 - <0.05 <0.05

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.01 - <0.01 <0.01<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.01 - <0.01 <0.01

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005






UNIT LOR

ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


Date Sampled

NITROAROMATICS AND KETONES2–Picoline mg/L 0.005Acetophenone mg/L 0.005

Nitrobenzene mg/L 0.005Isophorone mg/L 0.005

2,6–Dinitrotoluene mg/L 0.012,4–Dinitrotoluene mg/L 0.011–Naphthylamine mg/L 0.0054–Nitroquinoline–N–oxide mg/L 0.0055–Nitro–o–toluidine mg/L 0.005Azobenzene mg/L 0.0051,3,5–Trinitrobenzene mg/L 0.005Phenacetin mg/L 0.0054–Aminobiphenyl mg/L 0.005Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/L 0.005Pronamide mg/L 0.005Dimethylaminoazobenzene mg/L 0.005Chlorobenzilate mg/L 0.005

HALOETHERSBis(2–chloroethyl)ether mg/L 0.005Bis(2–chloroethoxy)methane mg/L 0.0054–Chlorophenyl phenyl ether mg/L 0.0054–Bromophenyl phenyl ether mg/L 0.005

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS1,3–Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.0051,4–Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.0051,2–Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005Hexachloroethane mg/L 0.005

1,2,4–Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005Hexachloropropylene mg/L 0.005

Hexachlorobutadiene mg/L 0.005Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/L 0.05Pentachlorobenzene mg/L 0.005Hexachlorobenzene mg/L 0.01


9 10 L Rep 10 12

ALSI0339628 601

ALSI0339628 602 L Rep

ALSI0339628 602

ALSI0339628 604


16/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 13/Jul/1314:31 10:12 10:12 10:44



<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.01 - <0.01 <0.01<0.01 - <0.01 <0.01

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.05 - <0.05 <0.05

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.01 - <0.01 <0.01






UNIT LOR

ALSI03396

29 July 2013

No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


Date Sampled

ANILINES AND BENZIDINESAniline mg/L 0.0054–Chloroaniline mg/L 0.005

2–Nitroaniline mg/L 0.013–Nitroaniline mg/L 0.01Dibenzofuran mg/L 0.0054–Nitroaniline mg/L 0.005Carbazole mg/L 0.0053,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/L 0.005


9 10 L Rep 10 12

ALSI0339628 601

ALSI0339628 602 L Rep

ALSI0339628 602

ALSI0339628 604


16/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 17/Jul/13 13/Jul/1314:31 10:12 10:12 10:44



<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005

<0.01 - <0.01 <0.01<0.01 - <0.01 <0.01

<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005<0.005 - <0.005 <0.005






SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION11

ALSI0339628603

TB

13/Jul/139:00

UNIT LOR RESULTS

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS**Monocyclic AromaticsBenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005Toluene mg/L 0.005 <0.005

Ethylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005meta&para–Xylene mg/L 0.01 <0.01Styrene mg/L 0.005 <0.005ortho–Xylene mg/L 0.005 <0.005

Isopropylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005n–Propylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,3,5–Trimethylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005sec–Butylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005

1,2,4–Trimethylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005tert–Butylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005p-Isopropyltoluene mg/L 0.005 <0.005n–Butylbenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005

OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS

2–Butanone (MEK) mg/L 0.05 <0.054–Methyl–2–pentanone (MIBK) mg/L 0.05 <0.052–Hexanone (MBK) mg/L 0.05 <0.05

FUMIGANTS2,2–Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,2–Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005 <0.005cis-1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/L 0.005 <0.005trans–1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,2–Dibromoethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005

HALOGENATED ALIPHATICSDichlorodifluoromethane mg/L 0.05 <0.05Chloromethane mg/L 0.05 <0.05Vinyl chloride mg/L 0.05 <0.05Bromomethane mg/L 0.05 <0.05

Chloroethane mg/L 0.05 <0.05

Trichlorofluoromethane mg/L 0.05 <0.051,1–Dichloroethene mg/L 0.005 <0.005trans–1,2–Dichloroethene mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,1-Dichloroethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005cis–1,2-Dichloroethene mg/L 0.005 <0.005


ALSI03396

29 July 2013


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.







SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION11

ALSI0339628603

TB

13/Jul/139:00

UNIT LOR RESULTS

ALSI03396

29 July 2013


No. Sample

ALSI Sample I.D.

Client Sample I.D.


1,1,1–Trichloroethane mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,1–Dichloropropylene mg/L 0.005 <0.005Carbon tetrachloride mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,2–Dichloroethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005

Trichloroethene mg/L 0.005 <0.005

Dibromomethane mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,1,2–Trichloroethane mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,3–Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005 <0.005Tetrachlorethene mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,1,1,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005

1,1,2,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/L 0.005 <0.005Pentachloroethane mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/L 0.005 <0.005Hexachlorobutadiene mg/L 0.005 <0.005

HALOGENATED AROMATICSChlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005Bromobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.0052-chlorotoluene mg/L 0.005 <0.0054-chlorotoluene mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,3-dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,4-dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,2-dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.0051,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 <0.005

TRIHALOMETHANESChloroform mg/L 0.02 <0.02Bromodichloromethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005Dibromochloromethane mg/L 0.005 <0.005Bromoform mg/L 0.005 <0.005







QUALITY CONTROL


pH - - - APHA 4500 H - -Conductivity µ mhos/cm 1 Water APHA 2510 B <1 104Temperature °C - - APHA 2550 B - -Total Dissolved Solids TDS mg/L 1 Water APHA 2540 C <1 92Total Suspended Solids TSS mg/L 1 - APHA 2540 D <1 93

Alkalinity-Total CaCO 3 mg/L 1 Water APHA 2320 B <1 96Total Phosphorus P-PO 4 mg/L 0.01 Water A PHA 4500-P A,B,E <0.01 105Total Nitrogen T-N mg/L 0.5 Water - ₃

-<0.5 90

Biochemical Oxygen Dem BOD 5 mg/L 5 Water APHA 5210 B <5 105Chemical Oxygen Demand COD mg/L 10 Water APHA 5220 D <10 98Oil and Grease mg/L 5 Water APHA 5520 B <5 110Dissolved Oxygen DO mg/L 1 Water APHA 4500-O G <1 -Surfactants MBAS mg/L 0.01 Water APHA 5540 A,B&C <0.01 92

Total MetalsAlumunium Al mg/L 0.01 Water APHA 3125 B <0.01 95Arsenic As mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 94Antimony Sb mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 111Barium Ba mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 93Berilium Be mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 94

Boron B mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 102Cadmium Cd mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 93Calsium Ca mg/L 0.5 Water APHA 3120 B <0.5 95Chromium Cr mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 91Cobalt Co mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 96

Copper Cu mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 94Iron Fe mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 92Lead Pb mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 110Magnesium Mg mg/L 0.5 Water APHA 3120 B <0.5 97Mangan Mn mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 92

Molybdenum Mo mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 103Nickel Ni mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 96Phosporus P mg/L 0.5 Water APHA 3120 B <0.5 101 (QC)Pottasium K mg/L 0.5 Water APHA 3120 B <0.5 93Selenium Se mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 90

Silver Ag mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 95Sodium Na mg/L 0.5 Water APHA 3120 B <0.5 94Stronsium Sr mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 91Sulphur S mg/L 0.5 Water APHA 3120 B <0.5 96(QC)Thalium Tl mg/L 0.01 Water APHA 3125 B <0.01 94



UnitANALYSIS DESCRIPTION

29 July 2013

Laboratory ID

Method ReferenceCRM

MatrixLOR






QUALITY CONTROL



29 July 2013

Laboratory ID

Method ReferenceCRM

MatrixLOR

Total MetalsTin Sn mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 99(QC)Vanadium V mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 97Zinc Zn mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 103Lithium Li mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 95Titanium Ti mg/L 0.05 Water APHA 3125 B <0.05 101

Mercury Hg mg/L 0.0005 Water APHA 3112 B <0.0005 89

Dissolved MetalsAlumunium Al mg/L 0.01 Water APHA 3125 B <0.01 95Arsenic As mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 94Antimony Sb mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 111Barium Ba mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 93Berilium Be mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 94

Boron B mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 102Cadmium Cd mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 93Calsium Ca mg/L 0.5 Water APHA 3120 B <0.5 95Chromium Cr mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 91Cobalt Co mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 96

Copper Cu mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 94Iron Fe mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 92Lead Pb mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 110Magnesium Mg mg/L 0.5 Water APHA 3120 B <0.5 97Mangan Mn mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 92

Molybdenum Mo mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 103Nickel Ni mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 96Phosporus P mg/L 0.5 Water APHA 3120 B <0.5 101Pottasium K mg/L 0.5 Water APHA 3120 B <0.5 93Selenium Se mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 90

Silver Ag mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 95Sodium Na mg/L 0.5 Water APHA 3120 B <0.5 94Stronsium Sr mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 91Sulphur S mg/L 0.5 Water APHA 3120 B <0.5Thalium Tl mg/L 0.01 Water APHA 3125 B <0.01 94

Tin Sn mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 99(QC)Vanadium V mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 97Zinc Zn mg/L 0.005 Water APHA 3125 B <0.005 103Lithium Li mg/L 0.001 Water APHA 3125 B <0.001 95Titanium Ti mg/L 0.05 Water APHA 3125 B <0.05 101

Mercury Hg mg/L 0.0005 Water APHA 3112 B <0.0005 89








QUALITY CONTROL



29 July 2013

Laboratory ID

Method ReferenceCRM

MatrixLOR

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH)C6 - C9 mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 8015 B <0.05C10 - C14 mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 8015 B <0.05C15 - C28 mg/L 0.1 Water USEPA 8015 B <0.1C29 - C36 mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 8015 B <0.05Total TPH ( C6 - C36 ) mg/L 0.1 Water USEPA 8015 B <0.1

Monocyclic AromaticsBenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 110Toluene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 111Ethylbenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 110meta&para–Xylene mg/L 0.01 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.01 113Styrene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 110ortho–Xylene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 112

Isopropylbenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 114n–Propylbenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1061,3,5–Trimethylbenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 101sec–Butylbenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 109

1,2,4–Trimethylbenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 113tert–Butylbenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 107p-Isopropyltoluene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 117n–Butylbenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 113

OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS2–Butanone (MEK) mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.05 1004–Methyl–2–pentanone (MIBK) mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.05 1002–Hexanone (MBK) mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.05 100

FUMIGANTS2,2–Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1021,2–Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 106cis-1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 110trans–1,3–Dichloropropylene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1101,2–Dibromoethane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 106


Dichlorodifluoromethane mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.05 112Chloromethane mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.05 110Vinyl chloride mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.05 113Bromomethane mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.05 112Chloroethane mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.05 103



97

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS**






QUALITY CONTROL



29 July 2013

Laboratory ID

Method ReferenceCRM

MatrixLOR

HALOGENATED ALIPHATICSTrichlorofluoromethane mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.05 1111,1–Dichloroethene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 114trans–1,2–Dichloroethene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1121,1-Dichloroethane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 113cis–1,2-Dichloroethene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 107

1,1,1–Trichloroethane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1141,1–Dichloropropylene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 113Carbon tetrachloride mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1121,2–Dichloroethane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 103Trichloroethene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 116

Dibromomethane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1021,1,2–Trichloroethane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1061,3–Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 107Tetrachlorethene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1121,1,1,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 115

1,1,2,2–Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1021,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 105Pentachloroethane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1181,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 93Hexachlorobutadiene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 107

HALOGENATED AROMATICSChlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 113Bromobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1062-chlorotoluene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1104-chlorotoluene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1111,3-dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1081,4-dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1111,2-dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1121,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 1131,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 100

TRIHALOMETHANESChloroform mg/L 0.02 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.02 107Bromodichloromethane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 107

Dibromochloromethane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 104Bromoform mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8260 B <0.005 102








QUALITY CONTROL



29 July 2013

Laboratory ID

Method ReferenceCRM

MatrixLOR

PHENOLSPhenol mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 972–Chlorophenol mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 1072–Methylphenol mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 973&4–Methylphenol mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 982–Nitrophenol mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 1042,4–Dimethylphenol mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 90

2,4–Dichlorophenol mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 912,6–Dichlorophenol mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 914–Chloro–3–methylphenol mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 972,4,6–Trichlorophenol mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 1002,4,5–Trichlorophenol mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 93Pentachlorophenol mg/L 0.01 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.01 91

POLYAROMATIC HYDROCARBONSNaphthalene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 1012–Methylnaphtalene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 1022–Chloronaphthalene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 101Acenaphthylene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 100Acenaphthene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 101

Fluorene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 100Phenanthrene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 101

Anthracene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 102Fluoranthene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 99Pyrene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 99

N–2 Fluorenylacetamide mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 99Benz(a)anthracene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 95

Chrysene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 96Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/L 0.01 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.01 1027, 12–Dimethylbenz(a )anthracene mg/L 0 .005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 93Benzo(a)pyrene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 963–Methylcholanthrene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 102Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 103Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 106Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 102

PHTHALATE ESTERSDimethyl phthalate mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 99Diethyl phthalate mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 100Di–n–butyl phthalate mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 104Butyl benzyl phthalate mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 105Bis (2–ethylhexyl) phthalate mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.05 106Di–n–octyl phthalate mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 105









QUALITY CONTROL



29 July 2013

Laboratory ID

Method ReferenceCRM

MatrixLOR

NITROSOAMINESN-Nitrosomethylethylamine mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 98N–Nitrosodiethylamine mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 95N–Nitrosopyrrolidine mg/L 0.01 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.01 99N–Nitrosomorpholine mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 97

N–Nitrosodi–n–propylamine mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 97N–Nitrosopiperidine mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 105N–Nitrosodibutylamine mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 95

Diphenylamine & N–Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/L 0.01 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.01 101Methapyrilene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 102

NITROAROMATICS AND KETONES2–Picoline mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 94Acetophenone mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 91Nitrobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 101Isophorone mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 992,6–Dinitrotoluene mg/L 0.01 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.01 97

2,4–Dinitrotoluene mg/L 0.01 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.01 1021–Naphthylamine mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 984–Nitroquinoline–N–oxide mg/L 0 .005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 995–Nitro–o–toluidine mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 103Azobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 991,3,5–Trinitrobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 92

Phenacetin mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 1014–Aminobiphenyl mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 101Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/L 0 .005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 94Pronamide mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 103Dimethylaminoazobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 98Chlorobenzilate mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 101

HALOETHERSBis(2–chloroethyl)ether mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 103Bis(2–chloroethoxy)methane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 874–Chlorophenyl phenyl ether mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 944–Bromophenyl phenyl ether mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 92

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS1,3–Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 1021,4–Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 1031,2–Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 98Hexachloroethane mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 901,2,4–Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 86








QUALITY CONTROL



29 July 2013

Laboratory ID

Method ReferenceCRM

MatrixLOR

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONSHexachloropropylene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 86Hexachlorobutadiene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 86Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/L 0.05 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.05 100Pentachlorobenzene mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 91Hexachlorobenzene mg/L 0.01 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.01 89

ANILINES AND BENZIDINESAniline mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 101

4–Chloroaniline mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 922–Nitroaniline mg/L 0.01 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.01 963–Nitroaniline mg/L 0.01 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.01 97Dibenzofuran mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 984–Nitroaniline mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 98Carbazole mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 1043,3’ Dichlorobenzidine mg/L 0.005 Water USEPA 8270 B <0.005 97






DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 336 of 369



Annex CBiodiversity Study



Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

Biodiversity Baseline Report

Prepared for:

PT. Salamander Energy

August 2013



PT. ERM Indonesia

Wisma Aldiron Dirgantara2nd floor, Suite 238-239Jl. Gatot Subroto Kav. 72Jakarta 12870Indonesia

Telephone +62 21 7918 1904Facsimile +62 21 7918 1905Website: www.erm.com

Client. PT. Salamander Energy Project No. 0184276

Summary.This report presents the results of a biodiversity survey completedfor the Kerendan Gas Project

Date.

Included in this report.

Approved by

Miles Lockwood

Partner

ERM Indonesia

Revision Description By Checked Approved Date

This report has been prepared by Environmental ResourcesManagement with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within theterms of the Contract with the client, incorporating our GeneralTerms and Conditions of Business and taking account of theresources devoted to it by agreement with the client.We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect orany matters outside the scope of the above.This report is confidential to the client and we accept noresponsibility of whatsoever nature to any third parties to whom thisreport, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party reliesupon the report at their own risk.

Distribution

InternalPublicConfidential

http://www.erm.com/

http://www.erm.com/

http://www.erm.com/

http://www.erm.com/



ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SALAMANDER ENERGY KERENDAN PROJECT BIODIVERSITY REPORT

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................... I

1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1

1.1 B ACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 1

1.2 SURVEY A REA ................................................................................................... 1

1.3 SURVEY T EAM ................................................................................................... 3

2 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 4

2.1 F LORA ............................................................................................................... 4

2.2 M AMMALS ........................................................................................................ 5

2.3 B IRDS ................................................................................................................ 5

2.4 H ERPETOFAUNA ............................................................................................... 6 2.5 I NSECT ............................................................................................................... 7

3 RESULTS ......................................................................................................... 8

3.1 F LORA ............................................................................................................... 8 3.1.1 KGPF ................................................................................................. 8 3.1.2 Kerendan-1 Wellsite ..................................................................... 13

3.1.3 Pipelines ......................................................................................... 15

3.1.4 Important Species ......................................................................... 17

3.2

F AUNA ............................................................................................................. 17

3.2.1 Mammals ........................................................................................ 17 3.2.2 Birds ................................................................................................ 25

3.2.2.1 Species of Conservation Interest ...................................................... 31 3.2.3 Herpetofauna ................................................................................. 34

3.2.4 Insect ............................................................................................... 37




1

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 B ACKGROUND

Salamander Energy through the wholly-owned subsidiary Salamander Energy

(Bangkanai) Limited (Salamander) is in the process of developing the Kerendangas field within the Salamander operated Bangkanai Production SharingContract (PSC), Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. ERM has been engaged toprepare an ESHIA in fulfillment of the International Finance Corporation (IFC)Performance Standards (PS) 2012 to support the funding requirements of theproject.

IFC Performance Standard 6 specifically addresses Biodiversity Conservationand Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources. The expectations ofthis Performance Standard are discussed in detail within the ESHIA document.

Prior to commissioning the field survey, ERM conducted a site visit andbackground information review to confirm the scope and requirements of thisbiodiversity survey. Following this visit ERM confirmed that while a desktopreview of available information revealed the presence of conservation significantspecies 1, the project area has suffered considerable disturbance as a result ofclearing and agricultural activity, while clearing for some components of theproject such as the Kerendan-1 well site had already occurred. That said someareas of secondary forest were located within the project footprint and warrantassessment as per the requirements of IFC PS 6. As such, a biodiversity surveywas commissioned to gather the required information to inform a biodiversityimpact assessment within the ESHIA document.

1.2 SURVEY A REA

The survey area encompassed the main project components comprising theKerendan Gas Production Facility, Pipelines incorporating the PLN sales GasPipeline and Feed gas pipeline, as well as the area surrounding the existingKerendan – 1 wellsite. A map of the project components and survey area isprovided at Figure 1 .

1 hereafter defined as species listed as Endangered, Critically Endangered and Vulverable on theIUCN Redlist.




2

Figure 1 Biodiversity Survey Locations PT. Salamander Energy




3

1.3 SURVEY T EAM

The survey was conducted between 15 and 23, July 2013 and was completed bythe following specialists.

Entol Muhammad Aaf Afnan as flora survey specialist;

Hery Sudarno as Ornithologist (bird specialist);

Akrom Mubarok as Herpetologist (herpetofauna specialist);

M. Faesal R.K. as Primatologist (primate specialist); and

Panji Fauzan as Ecologist and ERM field lead.




4

2 METHODOLOGY

The methodology adopted for the flora and fauna survey is provided under eachof the separate sub headings below. The survey locations are provided atFigure 1 .

2.1 F LORA

Vegetation survey and analysis was conducted to determine the vegetationstructure and species composition of the project area. The method used was thesquare line method, which consists of sample plots created along the line ofobservation. The plot size was 20 m x 20 m for tree vegetation while, sub-plotswere made for vegetation seedlings (2 m x 2 m), saplings (5 m x 5 m) and forvegetation pole (10 m x 10 m). Data collected for tree and pole was name ofspecies, diameter at breast height, pole height and total height. Data taken for

saplings and seedlings is species names and number of individuals of eachspecies (Soerianegara and Indrawan, 1998).

Vegetation analysis was conducted to determine the composition and dominanceof a species of flora in a vegetation community. Dominance can be seen on theImportance Value Index (INP) and is obtained from the sum of the value of therelative density (KR) and relative frequency (FR) for seedlings and saplings aswell as the added value of the relative dominance (DR) for pole and tree level(Soerianegara and Indrawan, 1998). The equations used are listed below :

Species density of-i (Ki) =

Number of individuals of a species

Total plot

Relative Density (KR) =Density of a species x 100 %

Density of all species

Species dominance of-i(Di) =

Basal area of a species

Total plot

Relative Dominance (DR) =Dominance of a species x 100 %

Dominance of all species

Species frequency of-i (Fi) =Total plot occupy of a species

Total plot

Relative Frequency (FR) =Frequency of a species x 100 %

Frequency of all species




5

Importance Value Index (INP) = KR + FR +DR

Importance Value Index(INP) = KR + FR (Ground Cover Flora)

Basal area of a species =

Note :

d i = species diameter of-i

Identification of flora species from the survey, conducted at PuslitbangDepartment Kehutanan Bogor.

2.2 M AMMALS

Mammals were surveyed opportunistically while the team was in the field. Thisincluded asking community about the potential presence of some species. Thiswas considered to be a suitable approach given the extent of past andsurrounding disturbance and the difficulty in obtaining results from intensivetechniques such as trapping.

Both direct and indirect methods were utilized. Direct methods included activesearching during the field survey while indirect methods include observation offootprints, scratch, scrape, scats, and voice) with line transect method.

Mammals identification in this study using field guide book with the tittle“Panduan Lapangan Mamalia di Kalimantan, Sabah, Serawak & BruneiDarussalam ” J. Payne et al. (2000).

2.3 B IRDS

A road count method was used to survey birds. Through this method theobserver will record all birds encountered along the way, with the assumption allof the individual bird has a same opportunities to be observed.

Observation occurred between 5:00 to 10:00 am and then continued between 3:00to 06:30 pm, with the assumption nocturnal birds will be noticed at that time. Inaddition, bird species recorded outside the schedule and location of the linetransect counts were also recorded and expressed as an additional species (coldsearch).

Bird identification in this study was completed using the guide book with thetittle “Panduan Pengenalan Burung -Burung di Sumatra, Kalimantan, Jawa danBali” John Mckinnon et al. (2010), whereas for the naming nomenclature followthe order of Peter’s Sequence and KUKILA List No.1 by Paul Andrew (1992).

2..4

1i

d




6

Bird protection status assessed by using IUCN ( International Union forConservation of Nature and Natural Resources ) 2011, CITES (Convention onInternational Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora ) 2011, Law ofIndonesian Republic (Law No. 5 of 1990 ; Government Regulation No. 8 of 1990and Government Regulation No. 7 of 1999) and ecological characteristic of the

bird (migratory and endemic).

2.4 H ERPETOFAUNA

Searching for herpetofauna was conducted intensively on the forest floor in areassuch a puddles or grooves, streams and rivers and on the foliage and vegetationaround the observation area. The whereabouts of amphibians and reptiles wasdetermined based on direct encounter either of an individual adult or juvenile.While indirect observations were recorded using signs such as nests, the remainsof the skin, and sound. The methods used is VES (Visually Encounter Survey)

which is referring to book Heyer et al. ( 1994 ).

The technique of observation is executed by observing and looking for specifichabitats or by tracking, especially in places that are potential microhabitat for thetarget species. Tracking is directed to collect data by using line transect with 400meters length and 10 meters width (Figure 2 ).

Figure 2 Scheme Collecting Data using Transect Technique

The second technique is conducted by tracking an area randomly. The venuesuch as tree holes or on the ground, upper roots or barks, leaves or twigs ofshrubs and trees, piles of wood over , puddles, streams and on the sidelines orstone walls of river (Figure 3 ).

Figure 3 Scheme Collecting Data using Time Search Technique




7

Observation of herpetofauna was conducted at noon and evening. The searchtook approximately 2 hours on each occasion.

Herpetofauna that are found can be directly identified or collected in advance toput into a bag for specimen identification at a later date. The handbook for

identification that is used is the work of Leiden (1915), Alexander (1998), Kirono& Santoso (2007), Helen (2002).

2.5 I NSECT

Collecting of insect was conducted along with other observation, morning andevening. Insect collection was completed using an insect net. Insects collectedduring the survey were preserved with alcohol 70%. The insect identification wasthen conducted by UKF (Uni Konservasi Fauna) team.




8

3 RESULTS

3.1 F LORA

The surveys identified low mixed dipterocarp forest, secondary forest, and ex-

rubber plantation in the study area. Within the entire survey area there areevidence of human activities such as logging and plantations. Habitat types inthe survey area is divided into 4 types, such as: (a) old secondary forest; havingrelatively tight canopy closure, (b) young secondary forest; dominated treesaplings at the site KGPF, (c) open area and forest rubber mixture, and (d) amixture of rubber forests and secondary swamp forests around Wellsite area.Secondary forests are interspersed with cultivated vegetation composed ofpioneers such as Ptenandra coerulescens, Talauma condollei, and Dillenia excelsa,whereas cultivated plants such as Hevea brasiliensis and Acacia alba wereidentified.

Other land cover types in the survey area include, logged forests, fields, temporalponds, marshes and open areas. Topography at the entire site is relatively flatand slightly undulating. The study area landscape is generally included in thecategory of lowland forest. This is determined based on the vegetation structureand composition, as well as regional topography with elevation fluctuatingbetween 100-200 m asl.

Broadly speaking, vegetation constituent ecosystems in the study area can beclassified into two groups, namely secondary dipterocarp forests and secondaryforests interspersed mixed crop cultivation. Secondary dipterocarp forestvegetation composed by Dipterocarpaceae family with dominant species isShorea pinanga. Other species recorded include Shorea lamellata, Parashoreamalaanonan , Hopea ferruginea as well as several species of other families likePalaquium seuriceum and Duabanga mollucana .

Shorea lamellata (White Meranti) , Parashorea malaanonan (White Seraya) and Hopea ferruginea are listed as Critically Endangered by the IUCN Red List. These are allspecies or large rainforest trees which occur within similar habitats withinKalimantan and also other rainforest environments within Malaysia (Sabah andSarawak) and in some instances Sumatra Island and the Philippines. The WhiteSeraya for example is one of the most commercially important commercial timberspecies in northern Borneo. These species were identified within the KGPF siteand pipleine from the Kerendan 1 well site to the KGPF.

3.1.1 KGPF

The forest type present in the KGPF area is secondary dipterocarp forestvegetation dominated by species from the family Dipterocarpaceae. The surveyidentified approximately 40 species of flora from 25 families. The speciesidentified and results of vegetation analysis in the KGPF area are shown atTable 1 below.




9

Table 1 Results of Vegetation Analysis in Area KGPF

No. Spesies DensityRelativeDensity

(%)Frequency

RelativeFrequency

(%)Dominant Relative

Dominant (%) Indeks Nilai Penting (%)

Seedling

Milletia sp. 625 0,96 0,25 4,55 5,51

Koilodepas bantamensis 625 0,96 0,25 4,55 5,51

Randia oppositifolia 625 0,96 0,25 4,55 5,51Sterculia rubiginosa 625 0,96 0,25 4,55 5,51

Pternandra coerulescens 625 0,96 0,25 4,55 5,51

Scorodocarpus borneensis 625 0,96 0,25 4,55 5,51

Palaquium obovatum 625 0,96 0,25 4,55 5,51

Phyrnium pubigerum 18125 27,88 0,50 9,09 36,98

Alpinia sp. 6250 9,61 0,25 4,55 14,16

Goniothalamus sp. 625 0,96 0,25 4,55 5,51

Glachidion sp. 625 0,96 0,25 4,55 5,51

Calamus sp. 6875 10,58 0,50 9,09 19,67

Polyalthia sp. 625 0,96 0,25 4,55 5,51

Glochidion capitatum 1250 1,92 0,25 4,55 6,47

Elmerillia molis 625 0,96 0,25 4,55 5,51

Ficus obscura 625 0,96 0,25 4,55 5,51

Vernonia arborea 625 0,96 0,25 4,55 5,51

Dicranopteris linearis 5000 7,69 0,25 4,55 12,24

Lygodium scandens 11250 17,31 0,25 4,55 21,85

Cyperus rotundus 8125 12,50 0,25 4,55 17,05




10


(%)Frequency

RelativeFrequency



Sapling

Endiandra rubescens 100 5 0,25 5,88 10,88

Pternandra coerulescens 100 5 0,25 5,88 10,88

Ochanostachys amentacea 100 5 0,25 5,88 10,88

Aporusa lunata 100 5 0,25 5,88 10,88

Baccaurea sp. 100 5 0,25 5,88 10,88

Teysmanniodendronbogoriense

200 10 0,25 5,88 15,88

Dysooxylum densiflorum 100 5 0,25 5,88 10,88

Parinari oblongifolia 100 5 0,25 5,88 10,88

Orophea sp. 100 5 0,25 5,88 10,88

Canarium littolare 200 10 0,25 5,88 15,88

Sterculia sp. 100 5 0,25 5,88 10,88

Ardisia sp. 100 5 0,25 5,88 10,88

Mallotus blumeanus 100 5 0,25 5,88 10,88

Parashorea malaanonan 100 5 0,25 5,88 10,88

Melastoma malabatricum 200 10 0,25 5,88 15,88

Nauclea orientalis 100 5 0,25 5,88 10,88

Duabanga mollucana 100 5 0,25 5,88 10,88Pole

Durio excelcus 25 14,29 0,25 14,29 4415,63 16,13 44,70

Shorea pinanga 25 14,29 0,25 14,29 3846,50 14,05 42,62

Baccaurea bracteata 25 14,29 0,25 14,29 3846,50 14,05 42,62

Dehaassia caesia 25 14,29 0,25 14,29 2374,63 8,67 37,25

Aglaia sp. 25 14,29 0,25 14,29 1962,50 7,17 35,74




11


(%)Frequency

RelativeFrequency



Parashorea malaanonan 25 14,29 0,25 14,29 7084,63 25,88 54,45

Mallotus blumeanus 25 14,29 0,25 14,29 3846,50 14,05 42,62

Tree

Shorea pinanga 56,25 50 0,25 12,50 107088,72 63,77 126,27

Hopea ferruginea 6,25 5,56 0,25 12,50 24732,41 14,73 32,79

Shorea lamellata 6,25 5,56 0,25 12,50 3066,41 1,83 19,88

Palaquium sericeum 12,50 11,11 0,25 12,50 14375,31 8,56 32,17

Dipterocarpus sp. 6,25 5,56 0,25 12,50 4415,63 2,63 20,68

Sterculia rubiginosa 6,25 5,56 0,25 12,50 6716,66 3,99 22,06

Canarium littorale 6,25 5,56 0,25 12,50 2826 1,69 19,74

Parashorea maalonan 12,50 11,11 0,25 12,50 4714,91 2,81 26,42




12

Figure 4 Vegetation Condition at KGPF A plot (left) and KGPF B plot (right)

Based on seedling growth rate, the species with the highest importance valueindex is Phyrnium pubigerum with 36.98. Phyrnium pubigerum is a species of herb

from the Maranthaceae family which is usually clustered on the forest floor, thisspecies can grow well, even in the dense shade of tree canopy. Non-herb speciesthat had highest importance value index was Glochidion capitatum with a value of6.47. Tropenbos Kalimantan (1994) mentions that the Glochidion genera is smalltree which rarely reaches medium size. The species is very common in secondaryforest, usually along streams.

Common species of saplings included Melastoma malabatricum and Canariumlittorale at 15.88. Melastoma malabatricum are found in the plot with an opencanopy, whereas C. littorale is found in plots with dense canopy . M. malabatricum grows clustered on the edge of the forest, in contrast to C. littorale which growsinto and is associated with other forest stands.

Durio excelsus was the pole species with highest INP at KGPF location (44.7). D.excelsus is one of 19 species of forest durian species ( Durio genera) are reported inKalimantan. This species is characterized by bony lateral leaves approximately 6-11 pairs, rounded fruits breech eggs, up to 11 cm long, diameter about 7 cm, red-coated seeds and fruit cannot be eaten (Trobenbos Kalimantan, 1994).

Dominant tree species in the sample plots are Shorea pinanga with INP 126.27(Figure 5 ). This species is one of the 5 species of Dipterocarpaceae recorded.Tropenbos Kalimantan (1994) stated that S. pinanga is the tree height can reach 45m, diameter up to 1 m. Commonly found in soil rich in clay, especially on a ridgebelow the altitude of 700 m asl. This species is endemic to Borneo, commonlyused for plywood and an important source “tengkawang” good producer.

The other four species were Shorea lamellata, Parashorea maalonan , Hopea ferruginea (Figure 5 ) and Dipterocarpus sp. As noted previously S. lamellata, P. maalonan andH. ferruginea are listed as Critically Endangered by the IUCN.




13

Figure 5 Species from Dipterocarpaceae Family that found at KGPF Location: Hopea ferruginea (left) and Shorea pinanga (right) which is the Dominant Species

Other tree species besides Dipterocarpaceae family, which were recorded include

Palaquium sericeum of Sapotaceae family, Sterculia rubiginosa of Sterculiaceaefamily and Canarium littorale of the Annonaceae family.

3.1.2 Kerendan-1 Wellsite

The Kerendan -1 wellsite was been cleared in the past for drilling activities. Thesurrounding area appears to have been used for cultivation of rubber ( Heveabrasiliensis) as many rubber trees were found standing within this area. . H.brasilienis is one of the main crops of Borneo (Figure 6 ).

In general, it appears the area around Wellsite is ex-slash and burn area that wasconverted to rubber plantations ( H. brasiliensis). The area is interspersed withstands of secondary forest plants belonging to other pioneers such as Koilodepas sp. and Dillenia excelsa. The rubber plants that were found had long beenabandoned and it did not appear that they are currently being harvested.

Figure 6 Vegetation Condition around Wellsite

Results of vegetation analysis conducted around the Wellsite, identified as manyas 12 flora species from 10 flora families (Table 2).




14

Table 2 Vegetation Analisys Result around Wellsite

No Species Density Relative Density(%) Frequency Relative

Frequency (%) Dominant Relative Dominant(%)

Important ValueIndex (%)

Seedling

Koilodepassp. 5000 7,41 0,5 10 17,41

Elateriospermum tapos 2500 3,71 0,5 10 13,70

Litsea sp. 5000 7,41 0,5 10 17,41

Calamus sp. 20000 29,63 1 20 49,63

Panicum enciforme 30000 44,44 1 20 64,44

Derris trivolia 1250 1,85 0,5 10 11,85

Otophora alata 1250 1,85 0,5 10 11,85

Hevea brasiliensis 2500 3,70 0,5 10 13,70Sapling

Elateriospermum tapos 400 28,57 0,5 20 48,57

Pternandra coerulescens 400 28,57 0,5 20 48,57

Cyathocalyx sp. 200 14,29 0,5 20 34,29

Dillenia excelsa 200 14,29 0,5 20 34,29

Litsea sp. 200 14,29 0,5 20 34,29

Pole

Hevea brasiliensis 50 20 0,5 33,33 3925 9,83 63,17

Elateriospermum tapos 50 20 0,5 33,33 3925 9,83 63,17

Pternandra coerulescens 150 60 0,5 33,33 32067,25 80,33 173,67

Tree

Pternandra coerulescens 75 31,58 1 25 3627,49 29,37 85,95

Talauma candollei 50 21,05 1 25 4390,51 35,55 81,60

Hevea brasiliensis 75 31,58 1 25 3007,34 24,35 80,93Elateriospermum tapos 12,5 5,26 0,50 12,50 530,66 4,30 22,06

Dillenia excelsa 25 10,53 0,50 12,50 795,21 6,44 29,46




15

From the vegetation analysis, the seedling growth rate with the highestimportance value index is Panicum enciforme with 64.44 (Figure 7). P. enciforme is aspecies of herb from Graminae family. Other species with high importance valueindex was Calamus sp a rattan species with value of 49.63. Rattan is a commodityof non-timber forest products are often used by local communities at Kalimantan.

At the saplings rate growth, plant species with the highest INP is Ptenandracoerulescens and Elateriospermum tapos with 48.57. Ptenandra coerulescens species isone of 14 species of the Ptenandra genera occurring in Borneo Island. Ptenandracoerulescens is also the dominant species on the pole and tree growth rate, withthe INP value at pole growth rates 173.67 and 85.95 at tree growth rates. Ingeneral, this species dominates at every growth level. P. ceorulescens is a speciesthat grows well in secondary forest.

Figure 7 Ptenandra coerulescens is dominant species around the Wellsite

3.1.3 Pipelines

Surveys were conducted at this location to identify dominant flora specieshowever, because it does not have a definite area, vegetation analysis usingsample plots was not conducted. Instead observations by exploration methodwas conducted at these two locations, namely the pipeline path between PLNand KGPF and Kerendan-1 wellsite to the KGPF or called Pipeline 2. In general,forest type in both the observation point is included in a secondary dipterocarpforest types. Table 3 show types of plants that were found in the locationPipeline.




16

Table 3. Flora list species at Pipeline 2 and PLN

Pipeline 2 PLN

Hopea ferruginea Ficus elastica

Shorea pinanga Horsfieldia grandis

Coelostegia neesiocarpa Knema latifolia

Artocarpus dadah Shorea pinanga

Durio excelcus Cananga odorata

Coelostegia neesiocarpa Melastoma malabatricum

Palaquium obovatum Macaranga sp.

Melastoma malabatricum Hevea brasiliensis

Alstonia spp. Artocarpus communis

Parashorea malaanonan

Sterculia rubiginosa

Baccaurea bracteata

Shorea lamellata

Shorea leprosula

Acacia alba

Durio zibethinus

Artocarpus macrophylla

Litsea garciaeQuercus sp.

Macaranga conifera

Lithocarpus gracilis

Macaranga sp.

As many as 22 flora species were recorded along Pipeline 2. Based on thecomposition of the species recorded the most abundant species was from the

Dipterocarpaceae family (5 species). At the PLN pipeline only 9 species of florawere identified. At the PLN line many areas that have been opened into fieldsand gardens by locals. Flora species that are cultivated by the locals are foodcrops such as rice fields and cassava ( Manihot esculenta).




17

Figure 8. Vegetation condition at Pipeline 2 (left), and Durio excelsus (right) is aspecies that found at Pipeline 2 from Bombacaceae family.

3.1.4 Important Species

The surveys identified Critically Endangered flora species, as designated by theIUCN as occurring at the KGPF and gas gathering pipeline (Pipeline 2). Thesewere Parashorea malaanonan, Shorea lamellata and Hopea ferruginea, each from thefamily Dipterocarpaceae. These species are large rainforest tree species whichare often encountered in rainforest environments within Kalimantan. The impact

of the project on these species has been considered within the ESHIA report.

Figure 9. Important species that found in the Survey Area : Shorea lamellata (left) and Parashorea malaanonan (right).

3.2 F AUNA

3.2.1 Mammals

The survey locations have several characteristics and types. They are low mixeddipterocarp forest with streams, secondary forest, and ex-rubber plantation in the




18

forest boundary. All the locations have a high potential of mammals, botharboreal and terrestrial.. The survey was based on direct and indirect (footprints,scratch, scrape, scats, and voice) with line transect method. The total speciesencountered showed by the diagram below (Figure 10).

Figure 10. Total species encountered in the 4 locations.

Surveys were commenced at the KGPF on the first day. The habitat type is LowMixed Dipterocarp Secondary Forest. The forest patch has several streams insidethe forest. The area is 150 meters from the main road. By the first survey, wefounded 7 species from this site from direct and also indirect observation. Fromdirect observation we founded Painted Treeshrew ( Tupaia picta), LesserTreeshrew ( T. minor ), Black-eared Pygmy Squirrel ( Nannosciurus melanotis ), andPlain Pygmy Squirrel ( Excilisciurus exils). And from indirect observation werecorded Prevost’s S quirrel ( Callosciurus prevostii), Bearded Pig ( Sus barbatus ), andCommon Palm Civet ( Paradoxurus hermaphroditus ). The Bearded Pig is listed asVulnerable by the IUCN.

Figure 11. Painted Treeshrew ( Tupaia picta ) on the branch around 1 meter fromthe ground , photo : Hery Sudarno.




19

Figure 12. Black-eared Pygmy Squirrel ( Nannosciurus melanotis ) in the tree ,photo : Hery Sudarno.

A transect walk was conducted from the Main Camp to KGPF through the mainroad. From the main camp, habitat is secondary forest with several wetlands andstreams. Mixed Dipterocarp Secondary Forest is the forest type in KGPF andsome streams were identified inside the forest, and near from the main road.There are pioneer vegetation in the boundary, such as Macaranga spp., some fernspecies, and also shrubs. These are evidence that the forest was logged in the pastand there are new plantations near the observation site. We recorded 6 speciesfrom daily observation. From direct observation we identified the LargeTreeshrew ( Tupaia tana ), Long-tailed Macaque ( Macaca fascicularis) (Figure 13),and Plantain Squirrel ( Callosciuus notatus ). From indirect observation, wefounded Mueller’s G ibbon ( Hylobates muelleri) (morning call), Malayan Sun Bear(Helarctos malayanus) (scrape, Figure 14), and Bearded Pig ( Sus barbatus ). Muller ’sGibbon is listed as Endangered by the IUCN while the Malayan Sun Bear is listedas Vulnerable.

Figure 13. Long-tailed macaque ( Macaca fascicularis ), the group is habituated bypeople and live near Main Camp, photo : M. Faesal R. K.




20

Figure 14. Malayan Sun Bear ( Helarctos malayanus ) scrape on the dipterocarp tree, photo : M. FaesalR. K.

Habitat characteristics of the Wellsite location were ex-rubber plantation. Thereare evidences of secondary forest, such as Macaranga sp., shrubs, and grass land.We recorded 4 species, they are Plantain Squirrel ( Callosciurus notatus ), Long-tailed Macaque ( Macaca fascicularis), House Shreew ( suncus murinus ) andCommon Palm Civet ( Paradoxurus hermaphroditus ) (scats, Figure 16). We recordedthe Leopard Cat ( Prionairulus bengalensis ) footprints on the boundary of wellsite(Figure 15).

Figure 15. Leopard Cat ( Prionairulus bengalensis ) footprint near Wellsite,

photo : M. Faesal R. K.




21

Figure 16. Common Palm Civet ( Paradoxurus hermaphroditus ) scats,photo : M. Faesal R.K.

The vegetation and landscape at PLN-KGPF are rubber plantation, and low

mixed diptercarp forest. We recorded 3 species from visual encountered, they areLong-tailed Macaque ( Macaca fascicularis) (Figure 17), and Plantain Squirrel(Callosciurus notatus ). From indirect encountered we founded Common PalmCivet ( Paradoxurus hermaphroditus ) scats and Malayan Sun Bear ( Helarctosmalayanus ) scrape (Figure 18).

Figure 17. Single Long-tailed Macaque in the dipterocarp tree founded in the day 5survey, photo : Hery Sudarno .




22

Figure 18. Sun bear scrape, founded in the side main road from PLN-KGPF, photo :Hery Sudarno.

The overall observation result is summerised at Table 4 below. A total of 14mammal species were recorded. The Malayan Sun Bear (VU), Bearded Pig (VU)and Mueller ’s Gibbon (EN ) are listed by the IUCN and are considered to be ofconservation significance.

Table 4. Mammals list species at survey area PT. Salamander Energy

Location Local name Englishname Scientific name IUCN status

KGPF

Tupai tercat PaintedTresshrew Tupaia picta LC

Tupai kecil Lesser

Treeshrew

Tupaia minor LC

Bajing kerdildataranrendah

Plain PygmySquirrel Exilisciurus exilis LC

Bajing kerdiltelinga hitam

Black-earedPygmySquirrel

Nanosciurus melanotis LC

Bajing tigawarna

Prevost’sSquirrel

Callosciurus prevostiii LC

Babi jenggot Bearded Pig Sus barbatus VUMusangluwak

CommonPalm Civet

Paradoxurushermaphrodites LC

Main Camp-KGPF

Tupai tanah LargeTreeshrew Tupaia tana LC

Bajing kelapa PlantainSquirrel Callosciurus notatus LC

Monyet ekorpanjang

Long-tailedMacaque Macaca fascicularis LC

Klampiau Mueller’sGibbon Hylobates muelleri EN

Beruangmadu

MalayanSun Bear Helarctos malayanus VU

Babi jenggot Bearded Pig Sus barbatus VU

Wellsite

Monyet ekorpanjang



Kucingkuwuk Leopard Cat Prionairulus bengalensis LC

Musangluwak

CommonPalm Civet

Paradoxurushermaphroditus LC

Munggisrumah

HouseShrew Suncus murinus LC

PLN-KGPF

Monyet ekorpanjang



Musang Common Paradoxurus LC




23

Location Local name Englishname Scientific name IUCN status

luwak Palm Civet hermaphrodites


Beruangmadu

MalayanSun Bear Helarctos malayanus VU

Main Camp-KGPF (Survey

2)

Codot pisangcoklat

Long-tonguedNectar Bat

Macroglossus minimus LC

Babi jenggot Bearded Pig Sus barbatus VU


Family Tupaiidae

Painted Treeshrew ( Tupaia picta)

Tupaia picta is diurnal species. Spread out is limited in Borneo. Live in thelowland forest (below 1000 m asl). Eat fruits and small vertebrates.

Lesser Shrew ( Tupaia minor )

Diurnal and almost arboreal species. Common on the level 3-8 meters above theground, feeding on the fruit trees and insects. Distributed at Thailand Peninsulaand Malay, Sumatra, and Borneo.

Family Sciuridae

Black eared-pygmy squirrel (Nannosciurus melanotis ) and Plain Pygmy Squirrel(Excilisciurus exilis)

Diurnal, active in the tree with small branches, usually observed on the tree bole.Feeding on the bole surface, bark, and small vertebrates. Live on dipterocarpforest or in the forest with high canopy. Nannosciurus melanotis distributed on Java, Sumatra, and Borneo. Excilisciurus exilis is endemic Borneo.

Plantain Squirrel ( Callosciurus notatus )

Diurnal, active in the mornig to dusk around small trees. Food are fruits andinsects. Distributed on Thailand and Malay Peninsula, Sumatra, Java, andBorneo.

Prevost’s Squirrel ( Callosciurus prevostii)

Diurnal, active from dawn to dusk, arboreal, sometimes walk on the ground tocross the canopy. Distributed on Thailand and Malay Peninsula, Sumatra,Celebes, and Borneo.

Order Insectivora




24

Family Erinaceidae

House Shrew ( Suncus murinus )

Live near house or settlements. Distributed on Africa, Madagascar, Asia,Philipine, Indonesia.

Order Dermoptera

Family Pteropodidae

Long-tongued Nectar Bat ( Macroglossus minimus)

Live in coastal mangrove, dipterpcarp forest, and lower mountain forest. Feedingon nectar, banana’s flower and other pollens. Distributed on Thailand Peninsula,Malay, Southern Philipine, Java, papua New Guinea, Salomon Islands andNorthern Australia.

Order Carnivore

Family Felidae

Leopard Cat ( Prionairulus bengalensis )

Nocturnal and terrestrial. Live in secondary and primary forest. Distributed onNorthern India to Eastern Asia and Siberia, Taiwan,South East Asia, Sumatera, Java, Bali, Palawan, and Borneo.

Family Ursidae

Malayan Sun bear ( Helarctos malayanus)

Regularly active in the afternoon and the night. Live on the ground or the hightrees. Feeding on fruits, bee nest, stingless bee nest, termites, coconut pith, andother small vertebrates. Distributed on Myanmar, Thailand, Malay Peninsula,Sumatra and Borneo. The species is listed as Vulnerable by the IUCN.

Family Viveridae

Common Palm Civet ( Paradoxurus hermaphroditus )

Nocturnal, sleep in the morning and afternoon in the tree. Usually active on theground. Feed on fruits, leaves, arthropods, worms, and mollusc. Distributed onSri Lanka, India, South East Asia, Philipine, Sumatra, Java, Sulawesi, and Borneo.

Order Primate

Family Hylobatidae

Muel ler’s Gibbon ( Hylobates muelleri)

Diurnal, extremely arboreal and monogamous primate. Live with small group,group is consisted by family. Homerange around 20-30 Ha. Great call in the




25

morning, between 08.00-10 am. A female gibbon reacts to playback or tapedfemale song by approaching and singing, and the male joins in the duet. Afemale dominates and interactive duet with a loud bubbling call. EndemicBorneo. Muellers Gibbon is listed as Endangered by the IUCN.

Family CercopithecidaeLong-tailed Macaque ( Macaca fascicularis)

Diurnal and arboreal, although active on the ground. Ability to swiming in theriver. The male dominance hierarchy is less marked than in the other macaques.High rankking individuals leads the group. Multimale-multifemale groups.Habitat are primary, secondary, coastal, mangrove, swamp, riverine forest, evennear settlements. Feed on fruits, seeds, insects, and other vertebrates. Distributedon Myanmar Peninsula, Thailand, Malaysia, Southern Indochina, Philipine,Sumatra, Java, and East Nusa Tenggara.

Family Suidae

Bearded Pig ( Sus barbatus )

Nocturnal but periodically active in the afternoon. Feeding on fruits and seeds onthe ground, worms, roots, pith, and other vertebrates. Distributed on MalayPeninsula, Sumatra, Palawan, and Borneo. The Bearded Pig is listed asVulnerable by the IUCN.

3.2.2 Birds

Field surveys at the Well Site area, KGPF area, KGPF-wellsite 1 pipeline , andKGPF-PLN pipeline identified 63 species of birds from 29 families. Findings Listof bird species and their protection status are presented in Table 5. No specieslisted as Endangered, Critically Endangered or Vulnerable by the IUCN wererecorded.

Table 5. Bird species list and conservation status in survey area PT. SalamanderEnergy

No. Scientific Name Indonesian Name English Name

Conservation Status

IUCN CITESGoI

No. 7of 1999

Accipitridae

1 Pernis ptilorhyncus Sikep madu asiaOriental Honey-buzzard App. II P

2 Aviceda Jerdoni Baza jerdon Jerdon's Baza App. II P

Falconidae

3 Microhierax fringillarius Alap-alap capung Black-thinged Falconet App. II P

Rallidae

4 Amaurornis phoenicurus Kareo padiWhite-breastedWaterhen

Columbidae




26

5 Treron olax Punai kecil Little Green Pigeon

6 Treron vernans Punai gadingPink-necked GreenPigeon

7 Ducula aenea Pergam hijau Green Imperial Pigeon

8 Chalcophaps indica Delimukan zamrud Common Emerald DoveCuculidae

9 Rhopodytes diardi Kadalan beruang Black-bellied Malkoha

10 Rhamphococcyx curvirostris Kadalan birahChestnut-breastedMalkoha

11 Cacomantis sonneratii Wiwik lurik Banded Bay Cuckoo

12 Centropus sinensis Bubut besar Greater CoucalStrigidae

13 Bubo Sumatranus Beluk jempuk Barred Eagle-Owl App. II

Hemiprocnidae

14 Hemiprocne longipennis Tepekong jambul Grey-rumped Treeswift

15 Hemiprocne comata Tepekong rangkang Whiskered TreeswiftAlcedinidae

16 Alcedo meninting Raja udang meninting Blue-eared Kingfisher P

17 Pelargopsis capensis Pekaka emas Stork-billed kingfisher P

Bucerotidae

18 Anthracoceros malayanus Kengkareng hitam Black Hornbill NT App. II P

19 Buceros rhinoceros Enggang cula Rhinoceros Hornbill NT App. II P

Capitonidae

20 Megalaima australis Takur tenggeret Blue-eared Barbet

21 Megalaima lineata Takur bultok Lineated Barbet

22 Megalaima rafflesii Takur tutut Red-crowned Barbet

23 Megalaima haemacephala Takur ungkut-ungkut Coppersmith Barbet

24 Calorhamphus fuliginosus Takur ampis Brown BarbetPicidae

25 Chrysocolaptes lucidus Pelatuk tunggir-emas Greater GoldenbackEurylamidae

26Cymbirhyncusmacrorhynchos Sempur-hujan sungai Black and Red Broadbill

27 Eurylaimus javanicus Sempur-hujan rimba Banded BroadbillPittidae

28 Pitta sordida Paok hijau Hooded Pitta PHirundinidae

29 Hirundo tahitica Layanglayang batu Pasific SwallowAegithinidae

30 Aegithina viridissima Cipoh jantung Green Iora NT

Chloropseidae

31 Chloropsis sonnerati Cica-daun Besar Greater Green LeafbirdPycnonotidae

32 Pycnonotus atriceps Cucak kuricang Black-headed Bulbul

33 Pycnonotus goiavier Merbah cerukcuk Yellow-vented Bulbul

34 Pycnonotus simplex Merbah corok-corok Cream-vented Bulbul

35 Pycnonotus brunneus Merbah mata-merah Asian Red-eyed Bulbul




27

36 Criniger bres Empuloh janggut Grey-cheeked Bulbul

37 Tricholestes criniger Brinji rambut-tunggir Hairy-backed BulbulTimaliidae

38 Pellorneum capistratum Pelanduk topi-hitam Black-capped Babbler

39 Trichastoma bicolor Pelanduk merah Ferruginous Babbler

40 Stachyris maculata Tepus tunggir-merahChesnut-rumpedBabbler NT

41 Stachyris erythroptera Tepus merbah-sampahChesnut-wingedBabbler

Sylviidae

42 Prinia flaviventris Perenjak rawa Yellow-bellied Prinia

43 Orthotomus sericeus Cinenen merah Rufous-tailed Tailorbird

44 Orthotomus ruficeps Cinenen kelabu Ashy TailorbirdMuscicapidae

45 Eumyias indigo Sikatan ninon Indigo Flycatcher

46 Ficedula westermanni Sikatan belang Little Pied FlycatcherMonarchidae

47Terpsiphone paradisi

Seriwang asiaAsian ParadiseFlycather

Rhipiduridae

48 Rhipidura javanica Kipasan belang Pied FantailDicaeidae

49 Prionochilus percussus Pentis pelangiCrimson-breastedFlowerpecker

50 Prionochilus xanthopygius Pentis kalimantanYellow-rumpedFlowerpecker

51Dicaeum chrysorrheum

Cabai rimba

Yellow-vented

Flowerpecker

52 Dicaeum trigonostigma Cabai bunga-apiOrange-belliedFlowerpecker

Nectariniidae

53 Anthreptes simplex Burung-madu polos Plain Sunbird P

54 Anthreptes malacensis Burung-madu kelapaBrown-throatedSunbird P

55Hypogrammahypogrammicum Burung-madu rimba Purple-naped Sunbird P

56 Aethopyga siparaja Burung-madu sepah-raja Crimson Sunbird P

57 Arachnothera longirostra Pijantung kecil Little Spiderhunter P

Estrildidae

58 Lonchura fuscans Bondol kalimantan Dusky Munia

59 Lonchura punctulata Bondol peking Scaly-breasted MuniaPloceidae

60 Passer montanus Burung gereja erasia Eurasian Tree SparrowSturnidae

61 Gracula religiosa Tiong mas Common Hill Myna App. II P

Dicruridae

62 Dicrurus paradiseus Srigunting batuGreater Racquet-tailedDrongo

Corvidae63 Corvus enca Gagak hutan Slender-billed Crow




28

Figure 20. Total species of bird per family that found in survey location PT.Salamander Energy.

Based on Figure 20, family Pycnonotidae has the highest total species, with 6species, followed by family Capitonidae and Nectariniidae with 5 species. Nextare family Columbidae, Cuculidae, Timaliidae, and Dicaeidae with 4 speciesencounter. For the others family of birds only found one or two species.

Each bird species has a habitat type, in accordance with the environment neededto support life (Alikodra, 1990). According Darmawan (2006), based on thediscovery of habitat, bird species classified on several criteria, among others:

1. Forest birds . This group utilizes the forest habitat of forest vegetation(canopy strata) and the forest floor to perform his activities and isonly found in the forest habitat types. Examples of this type of recordinclude: types of birds of Bucerotidae family (Rhinoceros Hornbill andBlack Hornbill), Pittidae family (Hooded Pitta), Monarchidae family(Asian Paradise Flycatcher).

2. Birds of open habitat area, shrubs and cultivated land . Speciesrecorded during the survey include Timalidae family (Black-cappedBabbler, Ferruginous Babbler, Chesnut-rumped Babbler, Chesnut-winged Babbler), Silviidae family (Yellow-bellied Prinia, Rufous-tailed Tailorbird, Ashy Tailorbird), Ploceidae family (Eurasian TreeSparrow), Estrildidae family (Dusky Munia, Scaly-breasted Munia).

3. Riparian bird habitat . Species recorded during the survey includeAlcedinidae family (Blue-eared Kingfisher and Stork-billedkingfisher) and Rallidae family (White-breasted Waterhen).

4. Birds in the canopy . These species predominately use the space abovethe canopy (aerial) to perform activities, such as foraging and hunting.Species recorded during the survey include Accipitridae family

Family

0

1

2

3

4

56

7

A

c c i p i t r i d a e

F a l c o n i d a e

R a l l i d a e

C

o l u m b i d a e

C u c u l i d a e

S t r i g i d a e

H e m

i p r o c n i d a e

A l c e d i n i d a e

B u c e r o t i d a e

C a p i t o n i d a e

P i c i d a e

E u r y l a m i d a e

P i t t i d a e

H i r u n d i n i d a e

A e g i t h i n i d a e

C h l o r o p s e i d a e

P y c n o n o t i d a e

T i m a l i i d a e

S y l v i i d a e

M u s c i c a p i d a e

M o n a r c h i d a e

R h i p i d u r i d a e

D i c a e i d a e

N e c t a r i n i i d a e

E s t r i l d i d a e

P l o c e i d a e

S t u r n i d a e

D i c r u r i d a e

C o r v i d a e

T o

t a l S p e c i e s

Total Species per Family




29

(Oriental Honey-buzzard and Jerdon's Baza), Falconidae family(Black-thinged Falconet), Hemiprocnidae family (Grey-rumpedTreeswift and Whiskered Treeswift), Hirundinidae family (PacificSwallow).

Bird species utilize different food types to survive. Type of feed that is used by

birds can be classified into seven groups of insects (insectivoree), fruit(frugivore), meat (carnivore / predator), seeds (granivore), fish (piscivore),nectar/ pollen (nektarivore) and herbivore (leaf/ flower buds/ stem). Speciescan consume in a single (one type of feed) or a combination of several types offeed.

The feeding habits of the bird species identified during the survey are grouped atTable 6 below.

Table 6. The use of feed types by bird species

Feed Total Bird SpeciesC 4 Pernis ptilorhyncus Microhierax fringillarius Bubo sumatranus

Aviceda jerdoni

G 3 Lonchura fuscans Lonchura punctulata Passer montanus

I 21 Dicrurus paradiseus Hirundo tahitica Cymbirhyncusmacrorhynchos

Pellorneum capistratum Hemiprocne longipennis Eurylaimus javanicus

Trichastoma bicolor Hemiprocne comata Eumyias indigo

Stachyris maculata Prinia flaviventris Ficedula westermanni

Stachyris erythroptera Orthotomus sericeus Terpsiphone paradisi

Centropus sinensis Orthotomus ruficeps Pitta sordidaCacomantis sonneratii Rhipidura javanica Rhopodytes diardi

FG 5 Megalaima australis Megalaima rafflesii Calorhamphus fuliginosus

Megalaima lineata Megalaima haemacephala

FI 14 Pycnonotus atriceps Anthracoceros malayanus Prionochilus percussus

Pycnonotus goiavier Buceros rhinoceros Prionochilusxanthopygius

Pycnonotus simplex Chloropsis sonnerati Dicaeum chrysorrheum

Pycnonotus brunneus Eumyias indigo Dicaeum trigonostigma

Criniger bres Tricholestes criniger

GF 4 Treron olax Treron vernans Ducula aeneaChalcophaps indica

IC 2 Rhopodytes diardi Rhamphococcyx curvirostris

IF 1 Cacomantis sonneratii

IG 1 Aegithina viridissima

IN 5 Anthreptes simplex Hypogrammahypogrammicum Arachnothera longirostra

Anthreptes malacensis Aethopyga siparaja

CFI 1 Corvus enca

FIG 1 Gracula religiosa

PIC 2 Alcedo meninting Pelargopsis capensisNote :C= Carnivore G= Granivore F= Frugivore P= Piscivore




30

I= Insectivore N= Nectarivore H= Herbivore

Note :C= Carnivore G= Granivore F= Frugivore P= PiscivoreI= Insectivore N= Nectarivore H= Herbivore

Figure 21. Percentage of Type Feed Based on Combination of feed.

The most dominant bird species group in the study area of PT. SalamanderEnergy is a group of insectivore bird species. Insects used by 48 species of birds(77%) and 21 species of birds recorded during the surveys (33%) are trueinsectivore, which means that the birds do not eat that kind of food other thaninsects as the main feed. Insectivores group has a very important function for thebalance of the environment as controlling insect populations in nature.

A photolog of some bird species identified during the survey are providedbelow.

C6%

G

5%

I33%

FG

8%

FI22%

GF6%

IC3%

IF2%

IG2% IN

8%

CFI

2%

FIG

2%

PIC3%

Percentage Type of Feed




31

Figure 22. Some of insectivore bird species;(a) Pacific Swallow ( Hirundo tahitica ) Photo : Hery Sudarno and

(b) Yellow-bellied Prinia ( Prinia flaviventris ) Photo : Hery Sudarno.

Figure 23. Some of frugivore bird species;(a) Little Green Pigeon ( Ducula aenea ) Photo: Hery Sudarno and

(b) Hairy-backed Bulbul (Tricholestes criniger ) Photo: Hery Sudarno

3.2.2.1 Species of Conservation Interest

In the survey location, the types of birds that recorded are protected at familylevel and at the level of species. Based on the Government Regulation No. 7 of1999, for protected bird species at the family level, there are 6 families, whichmeans that all members of the family's bird species are protected by Indonesianlaw. The types of birds that are protected at the family level are 2 species of thefamily Accipitridae (Eagles), one species of the family Falconidae (Falcon), 2species of the family Alcedinidae (Kingfisher), 2 species of the family Bucerotidae(Hornbill), 1 species of the family Pittidae (Pitta) and 5 species of the familyNectariniidae (Honey eater). While at the level of the species that is just HillMyna ( Gracula religiosa).

There are several reasons a bird species protected at the level of species. Thereason is partly because these birds have a high potential for trade, endangeredpopulations or populations in the wild is small of number, and have a limiteddistribution also have benefits to balance ecosystem and environmentalsustainability (Sozer et al., 1999).

Accipitridae and Falconidae protected at the level of families by the Indonesiangovernment, because this bird has a very important function for balancing theecosystem. Bird species recorded in the family Accipitridae : Oriental HoneyBuzzard and Jerdon ’s Baza , while in the family Falconidae is Black-thingedFalconet.




32

Figure 24. Some species of birds of prey (raptors);(a) Oriental Honey Buzzard ( Pernis ptilorhyncus ) Photo : Hery Sudarno and

(b) Black-thinged Falconet ( Microhierax fringillarius ) Photo : Hery Sudarno.

Bucerotidae is protected at the family level by the Indonesian governmentbecause this type has great benefits as an indicator of forest health. According toKemp (1993) in Noerdjito (2005) Bucerotidae species members play an importantrole in seed dispersal. Family Bucerotidae prefer forest habitat has a wide canopyclosure, trees with large diameter and there are many fruit trees, so it can be usedto see the level of health or sustainability. Besides this kind in naturalpopulations is very limited, and thus susceptible to interference needs to beprotected. Bird species recorded in the family Bucerotidae are RhinocerosHornbill and Black Hornbill. The uniqueness of the family Bucerotidae is theyalways live in pairs / monogamous, so often seen flying along in addition to it,these birds nest in tree holes are big and tall. Females incubate and guard dutyuntil the child is quite big and can fly, the female will nest trees cover the holewith his own faeces and will come out if her child was big and can fly. While themale in charge of collecting food to be given to female and nestling.

Figure 25. Member of family Bucerotidae :Black Hornbill ( Anthracoceros malayanus ) (a) Male (b) Female; Photo : Hery Sudarno.




33

Alcedinidae also protected in the family level. This family is protected becausethe fish-eating birds (Kingfisher), especially Alcedinidae family can be used as anindicator of habitat. This species has a particular sensitivity to the environmentalhealth of the habitat (Sozer et al., 1999), so it is beneficial for the balance of thenatural environment indicators.

Nectariniidae including protected bird species in the family level. This family hasa high benefit to help pollinate flowers, so it is important for the regeneration offlowering vegetation.

Figure 26. Some bird species from Nectariniidae family ;(a) Little Spiderhunter ( Arachnothera longirostra ) Photo : Hery Sudarno and

(b) Purple-naped Sunbird ( Hypogramma hypogrammicum ) Photo : Hery Sudarno.

Determination of the status by using the international rules that are based on theCITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Faunaand Flora), showed that among the birds recorded in the observation that thereare 7 species of birds included in CITES Appendix II category. Animals arecategorized as CITES Appendix II of this may be traded internationally, but withstrict controls and a certain quota. The birds include Oriental Honey Buzzard, Jerdon ’s Baza , Black-thinged Falconet, Barred Eagle-owl, Black Hornbill,Rhinoceros Hornbill, and Common Hill Myna.

Figure 27. Borneo endemic bird species;




34

(a) Dusky Munia ( Lonchura fuscans ) Photo : Hery Sudarno dan(b) Yellow-rumped Flowerpecker ( Prionochilus xanthopygius ) Photo : Hery Sudarno.

Figure 28. Several Birds in PT. Salamander Energy;(a) Chesnut-winged Babbler (Stachyris erythroptera );

(b) Chestnut-breasted Malkoha ( Rhamphococcyx curvirostris );(c) Greater Goldenback (Chrysocolaptes lucidus );

(d) Brown Barbet (Calorhamphus fuliginosus )Photo : Hery Sudarno, July 19, 2013

3.2.3 Herpetofauna

Surveys were conducted in all habitat types. Habitat types in the survey area isdivided into 4 types, such as: (a) old secondary forest; having relatively tightcanopy closure, (b) young secondary forest; dominated tree saplings at the siteKGPF, (c) open area and forest rubber mixture around Helipad area, and (d) amixture of rubber forests and secondary swamp forests around Wellsite area.

Land cover types in the survey area include logged-over forests, fields, temporalponds, marshes and open areas. Topography at entire site is relatively flat andslightly undulating. There is a river in KGPF location that has a slow stream withmuddy sand substrate. In addition there is puddle in the vicinity of the helipad isformed due to disconnected from the flow of river.




35

Based on a survey conducted during 5 days of observation, found 67 individualherpetofauna recorded with details of 51 individuals amphibians and 16individuals reptiles. The overall findings identified 23 species of herpetofauna, 15species of amphibians of the 4 families (Bufonidae, Ranidae, Dicrogglossidae andRhacophoridae) and 8 species of reptiles from 4 families (Gekkonidae, Agamidae,

Scincidae and Colubridae). Herpetofauna species list as a whole are presented inTable 7. No species of conservation significance were identified during thesurvey.

Table 7. Herpetofauna species list at survey area PT. Salamander Energy No. Family Species Protection Status

IUCN CITES PP N0.7 Th 1999Aamphibians1 Bufonidae Phrynoidis aspera LC - -2 Ranidae Hylarana raniceps LC - -3 Ranidae Hylarana signata LC - -4 Ranidae Hylarana nicobariensis LC - -

5 Ranidae Hylarana baramica LC - -6 Ranidae Hylarana erythraea LC - -7 Ranidae Hylarana glandulosa LC - -8 Dicrogglossidae Fejervarya cancrivora LC - -9 Dicrogglossidae Fejervarya limnocharis LC - -10 Dicrogglossidae Limnonectes paramacrodon NT - -11 Dicrogglossidae Occidozyga leavis LC - -12 Rhacophoridae Polypedates leucomystax LC - -13 Rhacophoridae Polypedates colleti LC - -14 Rhacophoridae Polypedates macrotis LC - -15 Rhacophoridae Rhacophorus appendiculatus LC - -Reptiles16 Gekkonidae Hemydactylus frenatus LC - -

17 Gekkonidae Cyrtodactylus ingeri - - -18 Agamidae Draco quinquefasciatus - - -19 Scincidae Eutropis multifasciata - - -20 Scincidae Eutropis rudis - - -21 Scincidae Apterygodon vittatus - - -22 Colubridae Xenocrhopis trianguligera - - -23 Colubridae Dendrelapis pictus - - -

Note : LC = Least Concern

0

5

10

15

20

25

1 2 3 4 5

Number ofSpecies

Day -

Herpetofauna Species Curve

Amfibi

ReptilHerpetofauna




36

Figure 29. Curves of the number of types of herpetofauna based on theobservation.

Most of the herpetofauna species found have specific distribution. A total of 18species were only found in one survey location. This is because reptiles havelower density so it difficult to find. Most widely spread of reptile is Eutropismultifasciata and Eutropis rudis which were encountered at all locations. Besideshaving a high enough density, Eutropis sp. has a range of habitats and a highenough adaptability so that it can be found in a variety of different habitats.

In the open area around the Helipad, species identified include Hylaranaerythraea, Fejervarya cancrivora, Fejervarya limnocharis and Polypedates leucomystax.Each of these species has a high adaptability to areas that have been disturbed.Meanwhile, Asper Phrynoidis, Hylarana signata , Hylarana raniceps and Hylaranabaramica occupy habitat that have minimal disturbance that is KGPF site,precisely on the banks of the river.

(A) (B)

(C) (D)

Figure 30. A) Fejervarya limnocharis ; B) Phrynoidis aspera ; C) Hylaranaerythraea ; D) Polypedates leucomystax .

Different species are found in marshy habitat types around the Wellsite. For

example, species such as Leavis Occidozyga, Rhacophorus appendiculatus andPolypedates colleti. were identified.




37

B

A C

Figure 31. A) Polypedates colleti ; B) Occidozyga leavis ; C) Rhacophorusappendiculatus

3.2.4 Insect

Insect species identified during the survey are listed at Table 8 below. No speciesof conservation significance were recorded.

Table 8. Insect species list at survey area PT. Salamander Energy

Order Family Species

Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Moduza procris

Orthoptera Mantidae Hierodula sp.

Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Athyma larymna (male)

Orthoptera Grylidae

Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Althyma asura latecicta

Orthoptera Phasmatidae

Wellsite




38

Coleoptera Scarabidae Chacosoma caucasus

Homoptera Cicadidae

Coleoptera Scarabidae Papilia sp.

Orthoptera Grylidae

Odonata Libellilulidae

KGPF

Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Althyma larymna

Hemiptera Reduvididae

Hymenoptera Formicidae

Lepidoptera Lycanidae Jamides bochus

Diptera Syrphidae Syrphu sp.

Diptera Calliphoridae Chrysomya sp.

Odonata Libellilulidae

Lepidoptera Hesperidae

Coleoptera Chrysomelidae

Hymenoptera Ichneumonidae




REFERENCES

Alikodra, H.S. 1990. Pengelolaan Satwaliar. Jilid I. Yayasan Penerbit FakultasKehutanan IPB, Bogor.

Bibby, C; M.Jones; S. Marsden. 2000. Teknik-Teknik Ekspedisi Lapangan :Survey Burung. BirdLife International Indonesia Programme. Bogor.

Darmawan, M. P. 2006. Keanekaragaman Jenis Burung pada Beberapa Tipehabitat di Hutan Lindung Gunung Lumut Kalimantan Timur. Skripsi. Jurusan Konservasi Sumberdaya Hutan Fakultas Kehutanan InstitutPertanian Bogor, Bogor.Tidak Dipublikasikan.

IUCN. 2013. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. www.iucnredlist.org.

MacKinnon, J.; K. Phillips; B. V. Balen. 1993. Seri Panduan Lapang Burung-Burung Di Sumatera, Jawa, Bali Dan Kalimantan. Pusat Panelitian DanPengembangan Biologi LIPI. Bogor.

Payne J, Francis C. M, and Kartikasari S. N. 2000. Panduan Lapangan Mamalia diKalimantan, Sabah, Serawak & Brunei Darussalam. The Sabah Society-World Conservation Society-Indonesian Programe and World Wild Fund-Malaysia.

Rowe N. 1996. The Pictorial Guide to The Living Primates. Poginian Press.Hongkong.

Soerianegara, I. dan A. Indrawan. 1998. Ekologi Hutan Indonesia. Laboratorium`Ekologi Hutan. Fakultas Kehutanan. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor

Sozer, R., Y. Saaroni, P.F. Nurwatha. 1999. Jenis-Jenis Burung Dilindungi YangSering Diperdagangkan. Yayasan Pribumi Alam Lestari. Bandung.

Sukmantoro W., M. Irham, W. Novarino, F. Hasudungan, N. Kemp & M.Muchtar. 2007. Daftar Burung Indonesia (DBI) no. 2. Indonesian

Ornithologists’ Union, Bogor.

Tropenbos Kalimantan [Director General Of The Agency Forestry Research andDevelopment]. 1994. The International Indonesia Ministry of ForestryTropenbos Kalimantan Project. Tropenbos Indonesia. Bogor

Tropenbos Kalimantan [Director General Of The Agency Forestry Research andDevelopment]. Dipterocarpaceae di Pulau Kalimantan. TropenbosIndonesia.Bogor



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 337 of 369



Annex DEco-system Services Questionnaire and Observation Form



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 338 of 369



Ref#

EcosystemService Questions

Key Project Area (Does it occur? Y/N)If yes, providefurther detail

on thefollowing:

DetailsWellsite

Pipeline Roads KGF SupplyBase


1a

Food: wild-caught fish andshellfish

Are fish caughtfor subsistence?

● Main speciescaught ortargeted (local,common andscientific name)

● Catchamounts

● Important fishing locations

1bAre fish caughtfor commercialsale?

2Food:aquaculture

Are fish,shellfish, and/orplants bred andreared in pondsor enclosuresfor harvesting?

● Location ofenclosures

● Species bred(local, commonand scientificname)

3a

Food: wildplants, nuts,mushrooms,fruit, honey

Are wild fruits,nuts, plants,etc. collectedfor personaluse?

● Speciesnames of wild

plants collected(local, common,scientific name)

● Locations

● Commercial

value ● Where and towhom are

plants sold to?

3b

Are wild fruit,nuts, wild

plants, etc.collected forcommercialuse?

4a

Food: wild meat

Are wild animals huntedfor food forpersonal use?

● Speciesnames of wildanimals hunted(local, common,scientific name)

● Importanthuntinglocations

● Commercialvalue of hunting

● Where and towhom are wildanimals sold to?

4b

Are wild animals huntedfor food for

commercialuse?

5a

Food:cultivated crops

Are cropsgrown forpersonal use?

● Speciesnames of cropsgrown (local,common,scientific name)

● Croplocations

● Commercialvalue

● Where and to

whom are cropssold to?

5b

Are cropsgrown forcommercialuse?



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 339 of 369



Ref#



on thefollowing:

DetailsWellsite


6Livestockfarming

Is therelivestockfarming?

● What speciesof livestock are

farmed (local,common,scientific name)

● Is the farmingsedentary ornomadic?

7 Biomass fuel

Is wood, dung

and plantmatter used forfuel

● What type isused? E.g. wood

● Where is thebiomass fuelsourced?

8a

Timber andwood products

Is woodcollected forlocal use?

● Harvestlocations

● Type ofcommercial use

8b

Is woodcollected forcommercial use? e.g. timber,wood pulp,paper

9Non- woodfibres and resins

Are other

materialsharvested? e.g.cane, palm,straw, cotton,twine and rope,natural rubber

● Harvest

locations ● Typesharvested

10 Freshwater

Is freshwaterused forbathing,drinking,irrigation,laundry,household andindustrial use?

● What is freshwater used for?

● Location ofimportant

freshwatersources e.g.wells, streams

11a

Biochemical,naturalmedicines,pharmaceuticals

Is the naturalenvironmentused forsourcing naturalmedicines andother biologicalmaterialfor personal use?

● Harvestlocations

● Materialssourced

● Commercialvalue

11a

Is the naturalenvironmentused forsourcing natural

medicines andother biologicalmaterialfor commercial use?



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 340 of 369



Ref#



on thefollowing:

DetailsWellsite


12Ornamentalresources

Are ornamentalresourcescollected ortraded? E.g.carved ordecorativeanimalproducts, liveanimal trade

● Types ofornamentalresources

collected/traded

● Locations

13Geneticresources

Are genes and

geneticinformationused for animalbreeding, plantimprovement,andbiotechnology?

N/A

Regulating Services

14Regulation ofair quality

The influenceecosystemshave on airquality byextracting

chemicals fromthe atmosphere(i.e., serving asa “sink”) oremittingchemicals tothe atmosphere(i.e., serving asa “source”)

● Sinks (land

basedemissions)

● Sources(removes

emissions fromatmosphere e.g.

forest, lakes)

15Climateregulation:global

Influenceecosystemshave on theglobal climateby emittinggreenhousegases oraerosols to theatmosphere orby absorbinggreenhousegases oraerosols fromtheatmosphere.

● Sources ofgreenhousegases (e.g.livestock, rice

paddies emitmethane)

● Removegreenhousegases (e.g.

forest)

16 Climateregulation: local

Influenceecosystemshave on local or

regionaltemperature,precipitation,and otherclimatic factors.



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 341 of 369



Ref#



on thefollowing:

DetailsWellsite


17Regulation ofwater timingand flows

Influenceecosystemshave on thetiming andmagnitude ofwater runoff,flooding, andaquiferrecharge

● Location andtype ofecosystem (e.g.river

floodplains,wetlands)

18

Waterpurification andwastetreatment

Role played by

vegetation inthe filtrationanddecompositionof organicwastes andpollutants andthe assimilationanddetoxification ofcompounds.

● Location and

type ofvegetation

19Shorelineprotection

Role of naturalhabitats (e.g.wetlands,beaches, reefs)in protectingcrops, buildings,recreation areasfrom waves,wind andflooding fromcoastal storms.

● Location andtype ofecosystem (e.g.river

floodplains,wetlands)

20 Fire regulation

Regulation offire frequencyand intensity(e.g. denseforest can

providefirebreaks)

● Are theynatural fires orcontrolledburns?

● How often

and where dothey occur?

21 Pest regulation

Are there pestsand diseasesthat affectcrops and/orlivestock?

● Types of pestsor diseases(local andscientific name)

● Distribution(common?rare?)

● Where havethey come

from?

22Diseaseregulation

Influence

ecosystemshave on theincidence andabundance ofhuman

● Ecosystems

that affect levelof human pathogens (e.g.mosquitobreeding sites)



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 342 of 369



Ref#



on thefollowing:

DetailsWellsite


pathogens

23Erosionregulation

Role ofvegetation inregulatingerosion onslopes andriparian areas

● Location andtype ofvegetation

● Are there problems witherosion?Where?

24 Pollination

Birds, insectsand some smallmammalspollinate certainflora species,including someagriculturalcrops

● Types of cropsgrown

● Pollinatingspecies knownto occur in area

Cultural Services

25Spiritual orreligious value

Are therenatural spacesor species ofspiritual orreligiousimportance?

● Type of place/species

● Level ofsignificance

● Locations

26Traditionalpractices

Are traditionalpractices suchas hunting,fishing, craftsand use ofnaturalresourcesculturallyimportant?

● Types ofculturallyimportance

practice (.e.g.

fishing)

● Location of practices

27Recreation andtourism

Are naturalspaces and

resources usedfor tourism andrecreation (e.g.swimming,boating,hunting)?

● Types ofactivities (e.g.

swimming) ● Location ofactivities

28 Aesthetic value

Cultural valueplaced on theaesthetic valueprovided bylandscapes,naturallandmarks

● Location ofculturallyimportantlandscapes

29Educational andinspirationalvalues

Informationderived fromecosystemsused forintellectualdevelopment,

● Types ofinformation



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 343 of 369



Ref#



on thefollowing:

DetailsWellsite


culture, art,design, andinnovation.

Supporting Services (1)

Primaryproduction

Formation ofbiologicalmaterial byplants through

photosynthesisand nutrientassimilation.

● Type ofbiologicalmaterial (e.g.algae)

Nutrient cycling

Flow ofnutrients (e.g.,nitrogen,sulphur,phosphorus,carbon) throughecosystems.

● Types ofnutrient flows(e.g. sedimentin rivers)

Water cycling

Flow of waterthroughecosystems inits solid, liquid,or gaseousforms.

● Water flows

HabitatProvision

Natural spacesthat maintainspeciespopulations andprotect thecapacity ofecologicalcommunities torecover fromdisturbances.

● Types andlocations ofnatural spaces(e.g. rivers)



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 344 of 369



Annex EPublic Consultation Attendance Record



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 345 of 369



SALAMANDER PROJECT - COMMUNITY CONSULTATION ATTENDANCE SHEETDATE: ……………………………….. VENUE LOCATION: …………………………………………… SESSION (AM/PM): ………………… FACILITATORS:……………………………………..……………..Name Number of

accompanyingchildren

Contact Details Please tick if you would be interested inparticipating in future consultationactivities with Salamander



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 346 of 369



Annex FGroup Discussion



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 347 of 369



Group Discussion QuestionnaireECONOMY

• How do people in this settlement secure their livelihood?• Fishing, Animal husbandry, Hunting, gathering, Agriculture, Industry, Trade, Salaries paid

from state budget, Material aid provided by family members living outside the village, Socialbenefits (excluding Humanitarian aid), Humanitarian aid, Retirement benefit (pension), Nopermanent source of livelihood

• Please list the industry/commerce/crafts in the village (workshops, restaurants, hairdressersetc)

EDUCATION• For each school in your village provide the following information:•

Name of school, enrolment, student/teacher ratio, number of classes• Where are schools located?• Do children from the settlement go to schools outside the village? If so where?• Are there any educational issues in the community? E.g. Conditions of schools need for

children to travel long distances to school, lack of educational materials

HEALTH• Are there any problems with health services/care in your settlement?• In your opinion, how has the health of the local population changed during the past five years?

If yes, has it worsened or improved and why?• What are the health services in this settlement?• Where is the nearest hospital? Hospital and clinic equipment available. How do people get to

the hospital?• Is there a campaign in immunization of the population?• What are the serious health problems associated with the location, profession or any

environmental impact in the village?

INFRASTRUCTURE• Is electric energy provided to your settlement?• Water supply?• Is there a communal sewerage in the village?• Does garbage collection take place in the village?• What will happen with the landfill?• Are/were there any indices of burning of waste?• Do you have graveyards in this village? If yes, how many? And where located? If no, where

are people buried?• Where are the services and infrastructure in your area?

o Policeo Fire departmento Marketo Shopso Emergency healthcare services (ambulances)

o Child care serviceso Community centreo Banko Local government office



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 348 of 369



o Cultural artefactso

Association• What are the best things about your settlement?



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 349 of 369



Annex GCommunity Perception Questionnaire



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 350 of 369



KERENDAN GAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTCommunity Questionnaire - Project Understanding

Q1. How long have you lived in this area? (..year…months). What is your occupation?

Q2. If you are a migrant- are you working in this area? For how long?

Q3. What is your age? ____________ (leave blank if they prefer not to say)

Q4. Gender (please tick): Male Female

Q5. How would you rate your level of general knowledge of the Kerendan Project (please tick ONEbox only)?

No Knowledge Limited knowledge Some knowledge Extensive knowledge

Q6. What is your main source of information about the Kerendan Project? Please tick ONE boxonly

Salamander Employer Family and Friends Community leaders

Q7. If any other Source (please specify): _________________

Q8. How would you rate the level of consultation by Salamander in your community (please tickONE box only)?

Don’t know Very Poor Poor Good Excellent

Q9. Please rank the following categories in order of importance from 1 to 10 (1 = most important, 10= least important)

Category Ranking

Protecting the environment

Education facilities

Increasing employment opportunities

Improved housing

Medical facilities/health care

Access to drinking water

Community infrastructure (e.g. roads)

Community SafetyAttracting new industries

Recreational facilities



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 351 of 369



Q10. What can be done to improve liveability in your community? _______________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Q11. How concerned are you that the Kerendan Project will affect your way of life?

Unsure Not concerned Slightlyconcerned

Moderatelyconcerned

Highlyconcerned

Extremelyconcerned

Q12. Do you think the Kerendan Project will have a positive impact on you and your community?

Yes No Unsure

Q13. Please read through the list of statements and tick the following statements about Salamander? Please tick ONE box onlySalamander….. Unsure Strongly

Disagree

Disagree Agree Strongly

AgreeCares for the environmentHas helped our community

Is concerned about our community

Is good employerHas a good reputation locallyIs trusted by the local community

Meets community expectationsIs committed to the community for thelong term

Communicates clearly with ourcommunity

Q14. Overall, how do you feel about the Project? Please tick in ONE box only

Negative Neutral Positive



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 352 of 369



Annex HEHS Impact Assessment



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 353 of 369



Table H-1 Environmental Impact Assessment – Kerendan Gas Development Project (A3)

Phase Activity/Aspect Receptor Potential Impacts Impact Evaluation (Pre-Mitigation) Mitigation Residual ImpactMagnitude Sensitivity Significance Magnitude Sensitivity Significance

All Phases Employment Opportunities(including workforce presence)

Vegetation Workers disturbing vegetation fromphysical activity

Small Medium Minor Personnel not allowed togather/remove flora or plant productsfrom site. All workers briefed on thispolicy.

Small Low Negligible


Vegetation Workers disturbing vegetation outsideapproved cleared areas and/or takingforest resources

Small Medium Minor All work to be undertaken in clearedfootprint only


All Phases Employment Opportunities(including workforce presence) Vegetation Workers disturbing vegetation outsideapproved cleared areas and/or takingforest resources

Small Medium Minor Register of protected or endangeredspecies and/or species used by thelocal community for commercial orsubsistence use (biodiversity surveyand social consultation)



Wildlife Workers hunting/trapping fauna Small Medium Minor No hunting policy enforced forworkforce


All Phases Transportation/ Operation ofvehicles (construction,materials/supplies andworkforce)

Air Dust generation from vehiclemovement

Medium Medium Moderate Water spraying required for dustsuppression on access roads

Small Medium Minor


Air Exhaust emissions from operationalvehicles, dust generation from vehiclemovement

Medium Medium Moderate Speed limits (maximum speed limits of15 kph at worksites and nearaccommodation. Maximum 60 kph onopen highway. Maximum 40 kph forheavy machinery operations)

Small Medium Minor

All Phases Transportation/ Operation ofvehicles, plant and equipment

Air Exhaust emissions from operationalvehicles, plant and equipment

Medium Medium Moderate All vehicles, equipment and machineryto undergo a pre-use inspection prior touse and periodic maintenanceinspections.

Small Medium Minor


Vegetation Smothering from dust generation/airquality impacts


Small Medium Minor




Small Medium Minor


Wildlife Wildlife may be impacted throughinteractions with vehicles (resulting ininjury or mortality) or disturbance fromdust generation, noise and vibration.

Small Medium Minor Speed limits (maximum speed limits of15 kph at worksites and nearaccommodation. Maximum 60 kph onopen highway. Maximum 40 kph forheavy machinery operations)




DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 354 of 369





Wildlife Wildlife may be impacted throughinteractions with vehicles (resulting ininjury or mortality) or disturbance fromdust generation, noise and vibration.

Small Medium Minor No night driving under routineconditions


All Phases Wastes/effluents, handling anddisposal

Surface WaterSoil

Surface water or soil contamination,subsequently reducing environmentalquality

Medium Medium Moderate All designated waste storage areas onhard standing with secondaryprotection and closed drainage(bunding)

Small Medium Minor


Surface WaterSoil

Surface water or soil contamination,subsequently reducing environmentalquality

Medium Medium Moderate All refuelling to be conducted over hardstanding with secondary containmentand closed drainage

Small Medium Minor


Wildlife Organic waste may attract fauna tothe area (pest/native), resulting inchanges to natural behaviour and/oroutbreaks of pest species.

Small Medium Minor All organic waste stored in green binsand incinerated daily


Construction Transportation/ Operation ofvehicles (construction,materials/supplies andworkforce)

Noise andVibration

Vehicle noise and vibration reducingenvironmental quality and affectingfauna

Small Medium Minor Construction activities restricted todaylight hours except foruninterruptible activities


Construction Si te preparation Vegetation Clearing of flora species Medium Medium Moderate Vegetation clearing only in designatedareas for the project footprint; andNo disturbance to vegetation outsidemarked areas

Medium Medium Moderate

Construction Site preparation Vegetation Clearing of flora species Medium Medium Moderate Topsoil will be stored separately duringclearing and will be used to fill andlevel the area once grubbing activitieshave been completed, therebymaintaining the seed bank

Small Medium Minor

Construction Site preparation Vegetation Clearing of flora species Medium Medium Moderate Install the pipeline along the roadthereby reducing the land requirementsand associated vegetation clearance

Small Medium Minor

Construction Site preparation Vegetation Clearing of flora species Medium Medium Moderate Re-vegetation of pipeline ROWfollowing installation

Small Medium Minor

Construction Site preparation Vegetation Clearing of threatened flora species Medium Medium Moderate Rehabilitation program for habitatoffsets to gain no net loss inbiodiversity




DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 355 of 369




Construction Site preparation Vegetation Dust generation and smothering offauna

Small Medium Minor Water spraying required for dustsuppression during earthworks


Construction Site preparation Vegetation Clearing of natural flora andintroduction of alien species

Small Low Negligible N/A Small Low Negligible

Construction Site preparation Surface Water Increased sediment andcontamination from runoff

Small Medium Minor Bunding/secondary containment andspill kits in refuelling area andchemical/hazardous material storageareas


Construction Site preparation Wildlife Loss of habitat from vegetationclearing



Construction Site preparation Wildlife Loss of habitat, Interaction withpersonnel and machinery, increasednoise and vibration

Small Medium Minor All work to be undertaken in clearedfootprint only


Construction Site preparation Wildlife Interaction with personnel andmachinery, increased noise andvibration

Small Medium Minor Personnel not allowed to remove faunafrom the work location (dead or alive)or animal products (e.g. eggs, skins)


Construction Site preparation Wildlife Interaction with personnel andmachinery, increased noise andvibration

Small Medium Minor Limit 24 hour construction touninterruptible activities


Construction Pipeline trench excavation,backfilling and surfacerestoration

Air Dust generation from soil stockpiles Small Medium Minor Water spraying required for dustsuppression on access roads

Small Medium Negligible


Soil Site drainage and disturbance of soils(resulting in erosion), potentially withinsteep areas which may be subject toslope instability and erosion.

Medium Medium Moderate Soil to be placed at a minimum 1 mfrom edge of grading to reduceinstability risk (trenching)

Small Medium Minor


Surface Water Increased sediment andcontamination from runoff

Small Medium Minor Dedicated drainage channels must beconstructed to catch and divert run-offaway from surface water



Wildlife Injury/mortality from open trenches,impeded movement between forestedareas while trench is open

Small Low Negligible Trenches will be left open for amaximum of 3 days


Construction Installation and testing offacilities

Surface Water Contaminated hydrotest waterreducing environmental quality andsecondary impacts on aquatic fauna


Construction Construction of groundwater wellat KGPF

Groundwater Disruptions to groundwater resourceavailability

Small Medium Minor Water use study to be conducted toensure no depletion in supply




DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 356 of 369




Construction Construction, installation andtesting of Project facilities

Air Atmospheric emissions, dustgeneration


Small Medium Minor




Small Medium Minor



Medium Medium Moderate All vehicles, equipment and machineryto undergo a pre-use inspection prior touse and periodic maintenanceinspections.

Small Medium Minor




Small Medium Minor


Wildlife Temporary displacement frominteraction with personnel andmachinery, noise and vibration,lighting


All work to be undertaken in clearedfootprint only

Limit 24 hour construction touninterruptible activities



Wildlife Workers disturbing fauna fromphysical activity

Small Medium Minor No hunting policy enforced forworkforce

All work to be undertaken in clearedfootprint only


Construction Installation and testing offacilities

Surface Water Contaminated hydrotest waterreducing environmental quality andsecondary impacts on aquatic fauna


Operation Lighting of Project facilities Wildlife Disturbance to fauna and behaviouralimpacts

Medium Medium Moderate Light impact minimization - to beidentified




Groundwater Disruptions to groundwater resourceavailability

Medium Medium Moderate Water use study to be conducted toensure no depletion in supply




Air Dust generation and exhaustemissions from vehicles, plant andequipment




DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 357 of 369






Noise andVibration

Disturbance to fauna from noise andvibration from operation of facility,vessels, vehicles and equipment

Small Medium Minor Noise dampening for all noise sourceswith emission levels above 85dB

Small Medium Minor



Surface Water Contamination through uncontrolledrunoff/drainage

Small Medium Minor All hazardous materials to be stored onhard standing with bunding and 110%inventory capacity

Small Medium Minor



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 358 of 369



Table I-2 Social Impact Assessment – Kerendan Gas Development Project (A3)


All phases Employment Opportunities(including workforce presence)

CommunicableDisease

Introduction of communicablediseases and reproductive healthissues from bringing workers fromoutside the area

Medium Medium Moderate Personnel will educated onhealth/cultural risks through onsitetraining.

Small Medium Minor



Introduction of workers with differentcultural and religious values, andsocial/cultural interaction issues andtensions

Small Medium Minor All relevant personnel to be trained oncommunity awareness/ interaction and“dos and don’ts”. Personnel willeducated on health/cultural risksthrough onsite training.

Small Medium Minor

All phases Employment Opportunities(including workforce presence) Economy andLivelihood (-/+) Positive impact on the communitythrough generation of newemployment and income generatedfrom Project demand for localbusinesses/economic activity

Positive Communicate Project opportunities inadvance and in an accessible formatto communities

Positive



Positive impact on the communitythrough generation of newemployment and income generatedfrom Project demand for localbusinesses/economic activity

Positive Effective contract document requiringappropriate local hiring.

Positive



Introduction of workers with differentcultural and religious values, andsocial/cultural interaction issues andtensions

Small Medium Minor The management of this potentialimpact will be carried forward toSalamander's HSE ManagementSystem that governs environmental,social and community health riskmanagement throughout the life of theProject.



Security personnel for the Projecthave the potential to impactcommunity safety and security (humanrights considerations)

Small Medium Minor Contract scope for security provider:Socialization of security arrangementfor Salamander site with community.

Small Medium Minor


CommunicableDiseaseVector BorneDisease


Medium Medium Moderate The management of this potentialimpact will be carried forward toSalamander's HSE ManagementSystem that governs environmental,social and community health riskmanagement throughout the life of theProject.



Positive impact on the communitythrough generation of newemployment and income generatedfrom Project demand for localbusinesses/economic activity

Positive The management of this potentialimpact will be carried forward toSalamander's HSE ManagementSystem that governs environmental,social and community health riskmanagement throughout the life of theProject.



Safety risk from workers entering thecommunity (even a perceived risk hasthe potential to disturb the community)

Small Medium Minor The management of this potentialimpact will be carried forward toSalamander's HSE ManagementSystem that governs environmental,social and community health riskmanagement throughout the life of the



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 359 of 369




Project. All phases Employment Opportunities

(including workforce presence)CommunicableDisease


Medium Medium Moderate The management of this potentialimpact will be carried forward toSalamander's HSE ManagementSystem that governs environmental,social and community health riskmanagement throughout the life of theProject.











Security personnel for the Projecthave the potential to impactcommunity safety and security (humanrights considerations)


All phases Maintenance of access roads Economy andLivelihood (-/+)

Improvements to infrastructure andservices may improve accessibilitybetween communities/main populationcentres and subsequently improveaccess to surrounding communityinfrastructure and services, educationand economic opportunities

Positive CSR activities focus on sustainableprojects (enhancing economicopportunities provided throughinfrastructure, access to education,markets etc.)

Positive

All phases Transportation of

materials/supplies and workforce

Economy and

Livelihood (-/+)

Increased traffic and pressure on

existing infrastructure interfering withexisting road/river use

Medium Low Minor Undertake consultation with local

community (including in local schools)to raise awareness of transportationroutes


All phases Wastes/effluents generation,handling and disposal


Domestic waste managementattracting wildlife (e.g. rats, dogs,insects) and increasing spread ofassociated diseases.

Small Medium Minor All domestic waste will be disposed ofappropriately i.e. through incinerationonsite or taken offsite for disposal toan appropriate facility

Negligible Medium Negligible



Impacts on environmental quality thatmay affect ecosystem services andlivelihood (e.g. reduction of waterquality effects on the fishing)

Small Medium Minor All refuelling to be conducted overhard standing with secondarycontainment and closed drainage




Impacts on soil and surface waterquality reducing environmental qualityand subsequently impacting humanhealth

Small Medium Minor All refuelling to be conducted overhard standing with secondarycontainment and closed drainage

Small Medium Minor



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 360 of 369











Small Medium Minor The management of this indirectimpact will be through environmentalmitigation (refer environmentalreceptors)

Small Medium Minor










Small Medium Minor










Small Medium Minor

Construction Construction, installation andtesting of project facilities


Alteration of surfacehydrology/drainage may lead to waterpooling and stagnation which mayresult in an increase in mosquitobreeding and spread of associateddiseases (malaria, dengue)

Small High Moderate Cover all trenches and other possiblepotential vector breeding groundswithin the site area during the rainyseason

Small Medium Minor



Safety risk to the community fromopen excavations

Small Low Negligible Consultation with local community(including in local schools) to raiseawareness of transportation routes


Construction Site preparation EnvironmentalQuality

Impact to livelihood from dust or otherdisturbance associated with theProject (e.g. soil erosion andcontamination of surface waters usedby locals for domestic water use andfishing)

Medium Medium Moderate The management of this indirectimpact will be through environmentalmitigation (refer environmentalreceptors)

Small Medium Minor


Noise and vibration, surface waterimpacts and reduction in air qualitycould potentially impact environmentalquality and subsequently impacthuman health


Negligible Medium Negligible



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 361 of 369





Impact to livelihood from dust or otherdisturbance associated with theProject (e.g. soil erosion andcontamination of surface waters usedby locals for domestic water use andfishing)


Small Medium Minor

Construction Site preparation Economy andLivelihood (-/+)

Impact to livelihoods through loss ofresource use and ability to produce orcollect surplus resources forcommercial purposes

Medium Medium Moderate All work to be undertaken in clearedfootprint only

Small Medium Minor

Construction Site preparationPipeline trench excavation,backfilling and surfacerestoration

CulturalResources

Potential direct impacts to tangible andintangible heritage caused bydisturbance of the ground and/or lossof community access to areas

Small Low Negligible Personnel will educated onhealth/cultural risks through onsitetraining.


Construction Site preparationPipeline trenchexcavation, backfilling andsurface restoration

CulturalResources

Potential direct impacts to tangible andintangible heritage caused bydisturbance of the ground and/or lossof community access to areas

Small Low Negligible The management of this potentialimpact will be carried forward toSalamander's HSE ManagementSystem that governs environmental,social and community health riskmanagement throughout the life of theProject.

Operation Physical presence and operationof infrastructure


Increased noise, vibration and lightemissions and discharges to river mayimpact environmental quality andsubsequently human health

Potential impacts on resources andquality of groundwater and/or surfacewater used by the community (e gwaterways for fishing and drinkingwater) could have subsequent effectson the community health if access toor quality of these resources isnegatively impacted (e g lo ss ofdrinking water source)

Medium Low Minor Maintenance program Medium Low Minor

Operation Physical presence and operation

of infrastructure

Environmental

Quality

Increased noise, vibration and light

emissions and discharges to river mayimpact environmental quality andsubsequently human health


Medium Low Minor The management of this indirect

impact will be through environmentalmitigation (refer environmentalreceptors)

Medium Low Minor



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 362 of 369





Infrastructureand Services(-/+)

Potential for local infrastructure andservices to be improved either throughdirect investment/maintenance ofinfrastructure which may improveaccessibility betweencommunities/main population centres(and surrounding services, educationand economic opportunities)

Positive CSR activities focus on sustainableprojects (enhancing economicopportunities provided throughinfrastructure, access to education,markets etc.)

Positive





Medium Low Minor The management of this indirectimpact will be through environmentalmitigation (refer environmentalreceptors)

Medium Low Minor










Medium Low Minor




Potential impacts on resources andquality of groundwater and/or surfacewater used by the community (e gwaterways for fishing and drinkingwater) could have subsequent effects


Medium Low Minor



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 363 of 369




on the community health if access toor quality of these resources isnegatively impacted (e g lo ss ofdrinking water source)


Luwe Hulu Supply and SupportBase Presence and Activities


Increased noise, vibration and lightemissions and discharges to river mayimpact environmental quality and

subsequently human health

Medium Low Minor The management of this indirectimpact will be through environmentalmitigation (refer environmental

receptors)











Positive impact on local businessesthrough increased economic activityand demand for local goods andservices


Positive









Use of the river for transportation hasthe possibility to interfere with otherriver users (community, commercial)

Medium Low Minor Contract Management of riverservices contractorsComply with River TransportationSystem







Positive



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 364 of 369























Safety risk to Community membersthat access the site due to insufficientcontrols

Medium Medium Moderate Contract scope for security provider:Socialization of security arrangementfor Salamander site with community.

Small Medium Minor



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 365 of 369



Table I-3 Non Routine Impact Assessment – Kerendan Gas Development Project (A3)

Phase Activity/Aspect Receptor Potential Impacts Impact Evaluation (Pre-Mitigation) Mitigation Residual Impact

Magnitude Sensitivity Likelihood Significance Magnitude Sensitivity Likelihood SignificanceNon routine/unplannedevents

Fire/explosion Air Increase in atmosphericemissions andparticulates, GHG

Small Low Unlikely Negligible N/A Small Low Unlikely Negligible


Fire/explosion CommunitySafety andSecurity


Small Medium Unlikely Moderate Only authorised persons allowed toenter site (security to prevent access)

Small Medium Unlikely Minor




Small Medium Unlikely Moderate Community AwarenessProgram/Consultation Small Medium Unlikely Minor




Small Medium Unlikely Moderate Trained emergency response/fire teamDedicated fire response equipment



Fire/explosion Resourceownership/use

Resource use may beimpacted if it results inloss of resources (e.g.forest/farmland) orimpacts quality orabundance resourcesused by the community(e.g. forest products)

Small Medium Unlikely Minor Trained emergency response/fire teamDedicated fire response equipment





Small Medium Unlikely Minor Fire drills and response exercises Small Medium Unlikely Minor


Fire/explosion Vegetation Direct loss ofvegetation/habitat

Small Low Unlikely Negligible No mitigation measures required Small Low Unlikely Negligible


Fire/explosion Wildlife Injury/mortality Small Low Unlikely Negligible No mitigation measures required Small Low Unlikely Negligible


Gas leak fromfacilities/pipeline

Air Increase in atmosphericemissions andparticulates, GHG

Small Low Possible Negligible No mitigation measures required Small Low Possible Negligible


ProcessUpset/emergencyflaring

Air Increase in atmosphericemissions andparticulates, GHG

Medium Low Possible Minor Impact cannot be mitigated further Medium Low Possible Minor



DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 366 of 369





ProcessUpset/emergencyflaring

Wildlife Noise and vibration, lightdisturbance

Medium Low Possible Minor Impact cannot be mitigated further Medium Low Possible Minor




People's livelihoods maybe affected if resourcesare negatively impactedand result in loss ofeconomic value

Medium Medium Possible Moderate All hazardous materials to be stored onhard standing with bunding and 110%inventory capacity


Non routine/

unplannedevents

Spillage of fuel, oil,

chemicals andhazardous materials

Economy and

Livelihood (-/+)

People's livelihoods may

be affected if resourcesare negatively impactedand result in loss ofeconomic value

Medium Medium Possible Moderate Bunding/secondary containment and

spill kits in refuelling area andchemical/hazardous material storageareas





People's livelihoods maybe affected if resourcesare negatively impactedand result in loss ofeconomic value

Medium Medium Possible Moderate MSDS available in areas of chemicalstorage and use. Every activity (e.g.loading and hauling of hazardousmaterial chemicals) shall refer to theMSDS. Chemical to be storedaccording to label type, with secondarycontainment, spill kits, and visiblewarning signs (no smoking, eating,drinking and sleeping)






Medium Medium Possible Minor All hazardous materials to be stored onhard standing with bunding and 110%inventory capacity

Small Low Unlikely Negligible




Impacts on air, soil andsurface water qualityreducing environmentalquality andsubsequently impacting

human health

Medium Medium Possible Minor Bunding/secondary containment andspill kits in refuelling area andchemical/hazardous material storageareas




Groundwater Contamination Small Medium Unlikely Minor All hazardous materials to be stored onhard standing with bunding and 110%inventory capacity




Groundwater Contamination Small Medium Unlikely Minor Bunding/secondary containment andspill kits in refuelling area andchemical/hazardous material storageareas




Groundwater Contamination Small Medium Unlikely Minor Train personnel in spill handling andresponse




DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 367 of 369






Nutrition Impacts onenvironmental qualitymay affect nutrition if theability to source cleandrinking water and otherresources (fish,vegetation) areimpacted

Medium Low Unlikely Minor All hazardous materials to be stored onhard standing with bunding and 110%inventory capacity




Nutrition Impacts onenvironmental qualitymay affect nutrition if theability to source cleandrinking water and otherresources (fish,vegetation) areimpacted

Medium Low Unlikely Minor Bunding/secondary containment andspill kits in refuelling area andchemical/hazardous material storageareas






Small Medium Possible Minor All hazardous materials to be stored onhard standing with bunding and 110%inventory capacity






Small Medium Possible Minor Bunding/secondary containment andspill kits in refuelling area andchemical/hazardous material storageareas




Soil Contamination of soil Medium Medium Possible Moderate All hazardous materials to be stored onhard standing with bunding and 110%inventory capacity

Small Medium Possible Minor



Soil Contamination of soil Medium Medium Possible Moderate Bunding/secondary containment andspill kits in refuelling area andchemical/hazardous material storageareas




Soil Contamination of soil Medium Medium Possible Moderate MSDS available in areas of chemicalstorage and use. Every activity (e.g.loading and hauling of hazardousmaterial chemicals) shall refer to theMSDS. Chemical to be storedaccording to label type, with secondarycontainment, spill kits, and visiblewarning signs (no smoking, eating,drinking and sleeping)





Small Medium Possible Minor All hazardous materials to be stored onhard standing with bunding and 110%inventory capacity




DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 368 of 369







Small Medium Possible Minor Bunding/secondary containment andspill kits in refuelling area andchemical/hazardous material storageareas





Potential loss of life Medium Medium Unlikely Moderate All personnel trained in first aid andrefresher training provided regularly tomaintain skill levels


Non routine/

unplannedevents

Vessel, vehicle,

helicopter accident

Community

Safety andSecurity

Potential loss of life Medium Medium Unlikely Moderate All vehicles, equipment and machinery

to undergo a pre-use inspection priorto use and periodic maintenanceinspections.





Potential loss of life Medium Medium Unlikely Moderate Keep all non-workers away from workarea (authorised personnel only) anderect warning signs/barriers to workareas




DD-BK00-0Q-003

Salamander Energy

Page 369 of 369



Annex ISalamander Energy Indonesia HSE Management System



















































































































































































































































































































































































































Date post:	04-Jun-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	robert-watania
View:	274 times
Download:	5 times

Kerendan ESIA

Documents